feat: add precise validation status vocabulary for reviewer reports (Closes #406)

Introduce validation_status_vocabulary with proof-path binding for baseline-
equivalent, merge-simulation-resolved, and transient-pass labels. Wire the
assessor into final_report_validator and document the taxonomy in the
review-merge workflow.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>

already_landed_reconcile.py

@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+"""Already-landed open PR reconciliation gates (#310).
+
+Reconciler workflows may close an open PR only when the PR head SHA is proven
+an ancestor of a freshly fetched target branch. Arbitrary PR closure is denied.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import subprocess
+from typing import Any
+
+from merged_cleanup_reconcile import extract_linked_issue, is_head_ancestor_of_ref
+
+ELIGIBILITY_ALREADY_LANDED = "ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED"
+ELIGIBILITY_NOT_LANDED = "NOT_ALREADY_LANDED"
+ELIGIBILITY_STALE_TARGET = "TARGET_BRANCH_UNVERIFIED"
+ELIGIBILITY_PR_NOT_OPEN = "PR_NOT_OPEN"
+
+
+def fetch_target_branch(project_root: str, remote: str, branch: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Fetch *branch* from *remote* and return the resolved SHA."""
+    ref = f"{remote}/{branch}"
+    fetch = subprocess.run(
+        ["git", "-C", project_root, "fetch", remote, branch],
+        capture_output=True,
+        text=True,
+        check=False,
+    )
+    if fetch.returncode != 0:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "target_branch": branch,
+            "target_ref": ref,
+            "target_branch_sha": None,
+            "reasons": [
+                f"git fetch {remote} {branch} failed: "
+                f"{(fetch.stderr or fetch.stdout or '').strip()}"
+            ],
+        }
+
+    rev = subprocess.run(
+        ["git", "-C", project_root, "rev-parse", ref],
+        capture_output=True,
+        text=True,
+        check=False,
+    )
+    if rev.returncode != 0:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "target_branch": branch,
+            "target_ref": ref,
+            "target_branch_sha": None,
+            "reasons": [
+                f"git rev-parse {ref} failed: "
+                f"{(rev.stderr or rev.stdout or '').strip()}"
+            ],
+        }
+
+    return {
+        "success": True,
+        "target_branch": branch,
+        "target_ref": ref,
+        "target_branch_sha": (rev.stdout or "").strip(),
+        "reasons": [],
+        "git_fetch_command": f"git fetch {remote} {branch}",
+    }
+
+
+def assess_already_landed_reconciliation(
+    *,
+    pr: dict[str, Any],
+    project_root: str,
+    remote: str,
+    target_branch: str,
+    target_fetch: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Return eligibility and proof for reconciling an open PR."""
+    pr_number = int(pr.get("number") or 0)
+    pr_state = (pr.get("state") or "").strip().lower()
+    head_sha = (pr.get("head") or {}).get("sha") if isinstance(pr.get("head"), dict) else None
+    if not head_sha and isinstance(pr.get("head"), str):
+        head_sha = None
+    head_ref = (pr.get("head") or {}).get("ref") if isinstance(pr.get("head"), dict) else pr.get("head")
+    base_ref = (pr.get("base") or {}).get("ref") if isinstance(pr.get("base"), dict) else pr.get("base")
+    title = pr.get("title") or ""
+    body = pr.get("body") or ""
+
+    fetch_result = target_fetch or fetch_target_branch(project_root, remote, target_branch)
+    linked_issue = extract_linked_issue(title, body)
+
+    result: dict[str, Any] = {
+        "pr_number": pr_number,
+        "pr_state": pr_state,
+        "candidate_head_sha": head_sha,
+        "head_ref": head_ref,
+        "base_ref": base_ref or target_branch,
+        "target_branch": target_branch,
+        "target_branch_sha": fetch_result.get("target_branch_sha"),
+        "linked_issue": linked_issue,
+        "git_ref_mutations": [],
+        "reasons": [],
+    }
+    if fetch_result.get("git_fetch_command"):
+        result["git_ref_mutations"].append(fetch_result["git_fetch_command"])
+
+    if pr_state != "open":
+        result["eligibility_class"] = ELIGIBILITY_PR_NOT_OPEN
+        result["ancestor_proof"] = None
+        result["close_allowed"] = False
+        result["reasons"].append(f"PR #{pr_number} state is {pr_state!r}, not open")
+        return result
+
+    if not fetch_result.get("success"):
+        result["eligibility_class"] = ELIGIBILITY_STALE_TARGET
+        result["ancestor_proof"] = None
+        result["close_allowed"] = False
+        result["reasons"].extend(fetch_result.get("reasons") or [])
+        return result
+
+    target_ref = fetch_result.get("target_ref") or f"{remote}/{target_branch}"
+    ancestor = is_head_ancestor_of_ref(project_root, head_sha, target_ref)
+    result["ancestor_proof"] = ancestor
+
+    if ancestor is None:
+        result["eligibility_class"] = ELIGIBILITY_STALE_TARGET
+        result["close_allowed"] = False
+        result["reasons"].append(
+            f"ancestor check failed for head {head_sha!r} against {target_ref}"
+        )
+        return result
+
+    if ancestor:
+        result["eligibility_class"] = ELIGIBILITY_ALREADY_LANDED
+        result["close_allowed"] = True
+        return result
+
+    result["eligibility_class"] = ELIGIBILITY_NOT_LANDED
+    result["close_allowed"] = False
+    result["reasons"].append(
+        f"PR head {head_sha} is not an ancestor of {target_ref}"
+    )
+    return result

author_mutation_worktree.py

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+"""Branches-only author mutation worktree guard (#274).
+
+Author/coder mutations must run from a session-owned worktree under the
+project's ``branches/`` directory, never from the stable control checkout.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+
+BASE_BRANCHES = frozenset({"master", "main", "dev"})
+
+
+def _normalize_path(path: str) -> str:
+    return (path or "").replace("\\", "/").rstrip("/")
+
+
+def is_path_under_branches(path: str, project_root: str | None = None) -> bool:
+    """True when *path* resolves inside ``<project_root>/branches/``."""
+    normalized = _normalize_path(path)
+    if not normalized:
+        return False
+    if "/branches/" in f"{normalized}/":
+        return True
+    if normalized.endswith("/branches"):
+        return True
+    if project_root:
+        root = _normalize_path(os.path.realpath(project_root))
+        real = _normalize_path(os.path.realpath(path))
+        if real.startswith(f"{root}/"):
+            rel = real[len(root) + 1 :]
+            return rel == "branches" or rel.startswith("branches/")
+    return False
+
+
+def resolve_mutation_workspace(
+    worktree_path: str | None,
+    project_root: str,
+    *,
+    active_worktree_env: str | None = None,
+    author_worktree_env: str | None = None,
+) -> str:
+    """Resolve the workspace path inspected before author mutations."""
+    for candidate in (worktree_path, active_worktree_env, author_worktree_env):
+        text = (candidate or "").strip()
+        if text:
+            return os.path.realpath(os.path.abspath(text))
+    return os.path.realpath(project_root)
+
+
+def assess_author_mutation_worktree(
+    *,
+    workspace_path: str,
+    project_root: str,
+    current_branch: str | None = None,
+    base_branches: frozenset[str] | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Fail closed when author mutations are not rooted under ``branches/``."""
+    bases = base_branches or BASE_BRANCHES
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    root = os.path.realpath(project_root)
+    workspace = os.path.realpath(workspace_path)
+    branch = (current_branch or "").strip()
+
+    under_branches = is_path_under_branches(workspace, root)
+    if not under_branches:
+        if workspace == root:
+            reasons.append(
+                "author mutation blocked: workspace is the stable control checkout; "
+                "create or switch to a session-owned worktree under branches/"
+            )
+        else:
+            reasons.append(
+                f"author mutation blocked: workspace '{workspace}' is not under "
+                f"'{root}/branches/'; create a branches/<task> worktree first"
+            )
+
+    if not under_branches and workspace == root and branch and branch not in bases:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"control checkout drift: branch '{branch}' is not a stable base "
+            f"branch ({'/'.join(sorted(bases))})"
+        )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "project_root": root,
+        "workspace_path": workspace,
+        "under_branches": is_path_under_branches(workspace, root),
+        "current_branch": branch or None,
+    }
+
+
+def format_author_mutation_worktree_error(assessment: dict) -> str:
+    """Single RuntimeError message for MCP preflight gates."""
+    workspace = assessment.get("workspace_path") or "(unknown)"
+    root = assessment.get("project_root") or "(unknown)"
+    reasons = "; ".join(assessment.get("reasons") or ["unknown branches-only violation"])
+    return (
+        f"Branches-only mutation guard (#274): {reasons}. "
+        f"project root: {root}; workspace: {workspace}. "
+        "Create a session-owned worktree under branches/ before mutating."
+    )

capability_stop_terminal.py

@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ REVIEWER_CAPABILITY_TASKS = frozenset({
     "review_pr",
     "merge_pr",
     "blind_pr_queue_review",
+    "pr_queue_cleanup",
+    "pr-queue-cleanup",
     "request_changes_pr",
     "approve_pr",
 })

docs/gitea-dual-namespace-deployment.md

@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ launched with exactly one static execution profile:
 |-----------------------------|----------------|-------------|
 | `gitea-author` | an author profile | implement issues, push branches, open PRs, comment |
 | `gitea-reviewer` | a reviewer profile | review, approve/request changes, merge |
+| `gitea-reconciler` | a reconciler profile | close already-landed open PRs after ancestry proof (#304 profile; #310 close tool) |
 
 Properties:
 

docs/gitea-execution-profiles.md

@@ -226,6 +226,31 @@ explicit operator-directed closure of a contaminated PR). If `close_pr` ever
 resolves as unknown, agents must fail closed rather than fall back to the
 edit path.
 
+## Reconciler profile for already-landed open PRs (#304 / #310)
+
+Normal author and reviewer profiles must not gain broad `gitea.pr.close`
+authority. Already-landed open PRs (head SHA is an ancestor of the target
+branch) need a dedicated reconciler profile such as `prgs-reconciler` with a
+narrow operation set:
+
+- `gitea.read`
+- `gitea.pr.comment`
+- `gitea.issue.comment`
+- `gitea.issue.close`
+- `gitea.pr.close`
+
+Forbidden on reconciler profiles: `gitea.pr.approve`, `gitea.pr.merge`,
+`gitea.pr.review`, `gitea.pr.create`, `gitea.branch.push`, and
+`gitea.repo.commit`.
+
+Launch a static `gitea-reconciler` MCP namespace with
+`GITEA_MCP_PROFILE=prgs-reconciler`. Profile shape is validated by
+`reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile` (#304). Use the
+`gitea_reconcile_already_landed_pr` tool (#310). The resolver task is
+`reconcile_already_landed_pr`. PR close is allowed only after live PR fetch,
+fresh target-branch fetch, recorded target SHA, and ancestor proof. PRs whose
+heads are not already landed cannot be closed through this path.
+
 ## Identity and fail-closed rules
 
 Before **any** mutating action, a workflow must know both:

docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md

@@ -169,6 +169,25 @@ To avoid the bottleneck of relaunching/restarting the MCP server to switch betwe
   * `mcp__gitea-reviewer__*` (for reviewing PRs, approving, requesting changes, merging)
 * **Trust Model:** Separate tokens remain separate in the keychain/environment. Each instance operates under its own `GITEA_MCP_PROFILE` and enforces its own `allowed_operations`. A runtime `whoami` identity check is still performed independently, and self-review/self-merge checks remain strictly mandatory. The dual-server pattern is a operational convenience and never a security bypass.
 * **Reviewer-Identity PR Creation Deadlock:** Reviewer/merge identities must not create PRs or push branches. Doing so makes the reviewer identity the PR author in Gitea, blocking subsequent independent review and causing a review deadlock. Normally, PRs must be created by the author/work identity (`gitea-author`), leaving the reviewer identity (`gitea-reviewer`) clean and available for independent review and merge.
+* **Reconciler namespace (#310):** Register a third static instance for
+  already-landed PR cleanup when review queues block on open PRs whose heads
+  already landed on `master`:
+
+```json
+"gitea-reconciler": {
+  "command": "/path/to/Gitea-Tools/venv/bin/python3",
+  "args": ["/path/to/Gitea-Tools/mcp_server.py"],
+  "env": {
+    "GITEA_MCP_CONFIG": "/path/to/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json",
+    "GITEA_MCP_PROFILE": "prgs-reconciler"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+  The reconciler profile grants `gitea.pr.close` only for
+  `gitea_reconcile_already_landed_pr` after ancestry proof — not for normal
+  review or author workflows.
+
 * **Fallback:** If the dual-profile MCP launcher pattern is not supported or configured in the client, the LLM must relaunch or restart the client/MCP with the correct profile environment variable before claiming or working on any tasks.
 
 ## Setup runbook — interactive menu
@@ -254,7 +273,20 @@ Never create a parallel branch or PR for the same issue unless the old branch
 is proven abandoned and the takeover is recorded.
 
 Gitea-Tools lease gates: `gitea_lock_issue` (fail-closed before author
-mutations), `status:in-progress`, and claim comments. Full portable wording:
+mutations), `status:in-progress`, and claim comments. `gitea_lock_issue`
+records an `author_issue_work` lease in the issue-lock payload with issue
+number, optional PR number, branch, worktree path, claimant identity/profile,
+created timestamp, expiry timestamp, and last heartbeat timestamp. An active
+same-issue/same-operation lease blocks duplicate work. An expired lease still
+blocks takeover until a recovery review records why the prior work is abandoned,
+completed, or unsafe to continue.
+
+Remote branches matching the issue number are also treated as active work unless
+the recovery review proves the branch is abandoned or superseded. Never delete
+or clean up a branch when it has an active lease, dirty worktree, open PR, or is
+the only copy of unmerged work.
+
+Full portable wording:
 [`skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md`](../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md).
 
 ## Global LLM Worktree Rule
@@ -749,3 +781,22 @@ scripts/release-tag v0.4.0 --notes-file /tmp/release-notes.md --push
 - [`credential-isolation.md`](credential-isolation.md) — credential handling.
 - [`release-workflows.md`](release-workflows.md) — release/merge workflow.
 - [`../README.md`](../README.md) — canonical config, thin launchers, the menu.
+
+## PR-only queue cleanup mode (#390)
+
+Use `pr-queue-cleanup` mode when the queue holds many open PRs and the goal
+is to drain reviews deterministically. One run = one PR = one canonical
+review (`skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/pr-queue-cleanup.md`).
+
+* Cleanup runs are reviewer-role only (`pr_queue_cleanup` resolver task);
+  author sessions get `wrong_role_stop`.
+* Forbidden in cleanup mode: issue claiming, branch creation, implementation
+  edits, new issue filing, and any second-PR review after a terminal
+  mutation.
+* Terminal chain: stop after `REQUEST_CHANGES`; after `APPROVED` continue
+  only to same-PR merge with explicit per-PR operator authorization and
+  passing gates; stop after merge or merge blocker.
+* Every run reports the next suggested PR without continuing to it; the next
+  PR requires a fresh run with fresh identity/capability/inventory proof.
+* Use full `review-merge-pr` mode instead when the operator wants a single
+  targeted review, and `work-issue` mode for any authoring.

docs/wiki/Workflow.md

@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
 0. Work Selection Rule — verify a work lease before any mutations (open PRs,
    issue-linked PRs, branches, worktrees, dirty worktrees, active leases/
    handoffs, merged-PR completion). Stop if another session owns the lease.
+   `gitea_lock_issue` records an operation-scoped `author_issue_work` lease
+   with issue, branch, worktree, claimant, created, expiry, and heartbeat
+   fields; active or expired same-operation leases require recovery review
+   before takeover.
 0b. Global LLM Worktree Rule — main checkout on `master`/`main`/`dev` only;
    mutate only from a `branches/` worktree after proving root, cwd, branch,
    stable main-checkout branch, and session worktree path (no exceptions).
@@ -31,4 +35,4 @@
 Wiki publication, credential provisioning, and cross-repo mirror operations are
 operator-confirmed actions — see [Runbooks](Runbooks.md).
 
-Full Gitea-specific runbooks: `docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md` in the repository.
+Full Gitea-specific runbooks: `docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md` in the repository.

final_report_validator.py

@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ from review_proofs import (
     assess_review_mutation_final_report,
     assess_validation_report,
 )
+from validation_status_vocabulary import assess_validation_status_vocabulary
 
 FINAL_REPORT_TASK_KINDS = frozenset({
     "review_pr",
@@ -87,25 +88,72 @@ _ALREADY_LANDED_RE = re.compile(
     r"already[- ]landed|ancestor proof\s*:\s*passed|eligibility class\s*:\s*already_landed",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
+_ALREADY_LANDED_GATE_FIRED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:fired|passed|true|yes|already_landed_reconcile_required)\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
 _ELIGIBLE_REVIEW_RE = re.compile(
-    r"eligible for (?:review|merge)|ready for (?:review|merge)|next eligible pr",
+    r"eligible for (?:review|merge)|ready for (?:review|merge)|"
+    r"(?:next|oldest)\s+eligible\s+pr",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_APPROVED_STATE_RE = re.compile(r"\bapproved?\b", re.IGNORECASE)
+_MERGED_STATE_RE = re.compile(r"\bmerged\b", re.IGNORECASE)
+_READY_TO_MERGE_STATE_RE = re.compile(r"\bready_to_merge\b|\bready to merge\b", re.IGNORECASE)
+_NEGATED_STATE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:not|no|none|n/a|never)\b|request_changes|not attempted",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
 _REVIEWED_LANDED_RE = re.compile(
     r"(?:reviewed|approved).{0,40}already[- ]landed|already[- ]landed.{0,40}(?:reviewed|eligible)",
     re.IGNORECASE | re.DOTALL,
 )
+_TARGET_BRANCH_UP_TO_DATE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\btarget branch (?:is )?up[- ]to[- ]date\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA_RE = re.compile(
+    r"target branch sha\s*:\s*[0-9a-f]{40}",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_FULL_SHA_RE = re.compile(r"\b[0-9a-f]{40}\b", re.IGNORECASE)
 _RECONCILE_STALE_FIELDS = (
     "pr number opened",
     "pinned reviewed head",
     "scratch worktree used",
     "review decision",
     "merge result",
+    "issue lock proof",
+    "claim/comment status",
+    "workspace mutations",
 )
+# Issue #307: reconciliation handoffs must carry the full canonical schema.
 _RECONCILE_REQUIRED_FIELDS = (
+    "Task",
+    "Repo",
+    "Role/profile",
+    "Identity",
     "Selected PR",
-    "Eligibility class",
+    "PR live state",
+    "Candidate head SHA",
+    "Target branch",
+    "Target branch SHA",
+    "Ancestor proof",
+    "Linked issue",
     "Linked issue live status",
+    "Eligibility class",
+    "Capabilities proven",
+    "Missing capabilities",
+    "PR comments posted",
+    "Issue comments posted",
+    "PRs closed",
+    "Issues closed",
+    "Git ref mutations",
+    "Worktree mutations",
+    "MCP/Gitea mutations",
+    "External-state mutations",
+    "Read-only diagnostics",
+    "Blocker",
     "Safe next action",
     "No review/merge confirmation",
 )
@@ -190,6 +238,54 @@ def _handoff_fields(report_text: str) -> dict[str, str]:
     return fields
 
 
+def _already_landed_gate_fired(report_text: str) -> bool:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    fields = _handoff_fields(text)
+
+    gate_value = fields.get("already-landed gate", "")
+    if gate_value and _ALREADY_LANDED_GATE_FIRED_RE.search(gate_value):
+        return True
+
+    ancestor_value = fields.get("ancestor proof", "")
+    if re.search(r"\bpassed\b", ancestor_value, re.IGNORECASE):
+        return True
+
+    eligibility_value = fields.get("eligibility class", "")
+    if "already_landed" in eligibility_value.lower():
+        return True
+
+    if re.search(
+        r"\bpr\b.{0,60}\balready[- ]landed\b|\balready[- ]landed\b.{0,60}\bpr\b",
+        text,
+        re.IGNORECASE | re.DOTALL,
+    ):
+        return True
+
+    return bool(_ALREADY_LANDED_RE.search(text))
+
+
+def _positive_review_state_terms(fields: dict[str, str]) -> list[str]:
+    terms: list[str] = []
+    for key, value in fields.items():
+        lowered_key = key.lower()
+        lowered_value = value.lower()
+        if _NEGATED_STATE_RE.search(value):
+            continue
+        if lowered_key == "review decision" and _APPROVED_STATE_RE.search(value):
+            terms.append("APPROVED")
+        elif lowered_key == "merge result" and _MERGED_STATE_RE.search(value):
+            terms.append("MERGED")
+        elif _READY_TO_MERGE_STATE_RE.search(value):
+            terms.append("READY_TO_MERGE")
+        elif lowered_value in {"approved", "approve"}:
+            terms.append("APPROVED")
+        elif lowered_value == "merged":
+            terms.append("MERGED")
+        elif lowered_value == "ready_to_merge":
+            terms.append("READY_TO_MERGE")
+    return sorted(set(terms))
+
+
 def _rule_shared_controller_handoff(
     report_text: str,
     task_kind: str,
@@ -346,19 +442,55 @@ def _rule_reviewer_git_fetch_readonly(
                 "classify git fetch under Git ref mutations, not read-only diagnostics",
             )
         ]
-    if not git_ref_reported and _GIT_FETCH_RE.search(text):
+    if not git_ref_reported:
+        # Issue #307: an observed git fetch (report text or action log)
+        # must be listed under Git ref mutations.
         return [
             validator_finding(
                 "reviewer.git_fetch_readonly",
                 "downgrade",
                 "Git ref mutations",
-                "git fetch mentioned without Git ref mutation classification",
+                "git fetch occurred without Git ref mutation classification",
                 "record git fetch under Git ref mutations",
             )
         ]
     return []
 
 
+def _rule_reviewer_validation_failure_history(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    validation_session: dict | None = None,
+) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    from reviewer_validation_failure_history import (
+        assess_validation_failure_history_report,
+    )
+
+    session = validation_session or {}
+    observed = session.get("observed_failures") or []
+    if not observed:
+        return []
+
+    result = assess_validation_failure_history_report(
+        report_text,
+        validation_session=session,
+    )
+    if result.get("proven"):
+        return []
+    severity = "block" if result.get("violations") else "downgrade"
+    return [
+        validator_finding(
+            "reviewer.validation_failure_history",
+            severity,
+            "Validation failure history",
+            reason,
+            result.get("safe_next_action")
+            or "document every observed validation failure before claiming pass",
+        )
+        for reason in (result.get("violations") or result.get("reasons") or ["incomplete"])
+    ]
+
+
 def _rule_reviewer_validation_command(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
     text = report_text or ""
     if not _BARE_PYTEST_RE.search(text):
@@ -467,6 +599,34 @@ def _rule_reviewer_main_checkout_baseline(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, st
     ]
 
 
+def _rule_reviewer_validation_status_vocabulary(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    action_log: list[dict] | None = None,
+) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    if not re.search(
+        r"validation status|pr-head validation status|official validation status",
+        text,
+        re.IGNORECASE,
+    ):
+        return []
+    result = assess_validation_status_vocabulary(
+        text,
+        command_log=action_log,
+    )
+    if not result.get("block"):
+        return []
+    return _findings_from_reasons(
+        "reviewer.validation_status_vocabulary",
+        result.get("reasons") or [],
+        field="Validation status",
+        severity="block",
+        safe_next_action=result.get("safe_next_action")
+        or "use a validation status that matches the proof path executed",
+    )
+
+
 def _rule_reviewer_main_checkout_path(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
     text = report_text or ""
     if "baseline worktree path" not in text.lower():
@@ -492,7 +652,7 @@ def _rule_reviewer_main_checkout_path(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
 
 def _rule_reviewer_already_landed_eligible(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
     text = report_text or ""
-    if not _ALREADY_LANDED_RE.search(text):
+    if not _already_landed_gate_fired(text):
         return []
     if not _ELIGIBLE_REVIEW_RE.search(text):
         return []
@@ -507,6 +667,65 @@ def _rule_reviewer_already_landed_eligible(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, s
     ]
 
 
+def _rule_reviewer_already_landed_state(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    if not _already_landed_gate_fired(text):
+        return []
+
+    terms = _positive_review_state_terms(_handoff_fields(text))
+    if not terms:
+        return []
+
+    return [
+        validator_finding(
+            "reviewer.already_landed_review_state",
+            "block",
+            "Review decision",
+            "already-landed gate fired but final report claims "
+            f"{', '.join(terms)} state",
+            "stop normal review/merge; classify as ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED",
+        )
+    ]
+
+
+def _rule_reviewer_target_branch_freshness(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    action_log: list[dict] | None = None,
+) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    if not _TARGET_BRANCH_UP_TO_DATE_RE.search(text):
+        return []
+
+    fields = _handoff_fields(text)
+    fetch_reported = bool(_GIT_FETCH_RE.search(text)) or any(
+        _GIT_FETCH_RE.search(str(e.get("command") or e.get("action") or ""))
+        for e in (action_log or [])
+    )
+    target_sha_reported = bool(_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA_RE.search(text)) or any(
+        "target branch" in key and "sha" in key and _FULL_SHA_RE.search(value)
+        for key, value in fields.items()
+    )
+    if fetch_reported and target_sha_reported:
+        return []
+
+    missing = []
+    if not fetch_reported:
+        missing.append("fresh git fetch")
+    if not target_sha_reported:
+        missing.append("target branch SHA")
+    return [
+        validator_finding(
+            "reviewer.target_branch_freshness_proof",
+            "block",
+            "Target branch SHA",
+            "target branch up-to-date claim lacks " + " and ".join(missing),
+            "fetch the target branch and report the exact target branch SHA before "
+            "claiming it is up to date",
+        )
+    ]
+
+
 def _rule_reconcile_controller_handoff(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
     from review_proofs import _handoff_section_lines
 
@@ -541,10 +760,18 @@ def _rule_reconcile_controller_handoff(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]
     return []
 
 
-def _rule_reconcile_stale_author_fields(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+def _rule_reconcile_stale_author_fields(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    session_pr_opened: bool = False,
+) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
     text = (report_text or "").lower()
     findings = []
     for field in _RECONCILE_STALE_FIELDS:
+        if field == "pr number opened" and session_pr_opened:
+            # Issue #307: allowed only when a PR was actually opened
+            # in this session.
+            continue
         if f"{field}:" in text:
             findings.append(
                 validator_finding(
@@ -700,12 +927,16 @@ _RULES_BY_TASK: dict[str, list[Callable[..., list[dict[str, str]]]]] = {
         _rule_reviewer_mutation_categories,
         _rule_reviewer_git_fetch_readonly,
         _rule_reviewer_validation_command,
+        _rule_reviewer_validation_failure_history,
         _rule_reviewer_validation_structured,
         _rule_reviewer_linked_issue,
         _rule_reviewer_baseline_on_failure,
+        _rule_reviewer_validation_status_vocabulary,
         _rule_reviewer_main_checkout_baseline,
         _rule_reviewer_main_checkout_path,
         _rule_reviewer_already_landed_eligible,
+        _rule_reviewer_already_landed_state,
+        _rule_reviewer_target_branch_freshness,
         _rule_reviewer_mutation_ledger,
         _rule_reviewer_review_mutation,
     ],
@@ -803,6 +1034,8 @@ def assess_final_report_validator(
     mutations_observed: bool = False,
     local_edits: bool = False,
     issue_filing_lock: dict | None = None,
+    session_pr_opened: bool = False,
+    validation_session: dict | None = None,
 ) -> dict[str, Any]:
     """Validate final-report text against task-specific proof rules (#327).
 
@@ -857,6 +1090,8 @@ def assess_final_report_validator(
         "action_log": action_log,
         "mutations_observed": mutations_observed,
         "local_edits": local_edits,
+        "session_pr_opened": session_pr_opened,
+        "validation_session": validation_session,
     }
 
     for rule in _RULES_BY_TASK.get(normalized_kind, ()):
@@ -875,4 +1110,4 @@ def assess_final_report_validator(
         "safe_next_action": _primary_safe_next_action(findings),
         "complete": grade == "A",
         "handoff_heading": HANDOFF_HEADING,
-    }
+    }

issue_claim_heartbeat.py

@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+"""Issue claim heartbeat leases and stale-claim reconciliation (#268).
+
+Structured issue-thread comments prove live ownership beyond the
+``status:in-progress`` label alone. Queue inventory can classify claims as
+active, stale, reclaimable, PR-backed, or phantom.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+from typing import Any
+
+MARKER = "<!-- gitea-issue-claim-heartbeat:v1 -->"
+IN_PROGRESS_LABEL = "status:in-progress"
+
+_KIND_CLAIM = "claim"
+_KIND_PROGRESS = "progress"
+_KIND_CLEANUP = "cleanup"
+
+_FIELD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*-\s*([a-z_]+)\s*:\s*(.+?)\s*$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_ISSUE_REF_RE = re.compile(r"issue-(\d+)", re.IGNORECASE)
+
+
+def _parse_timestamp(value: str | None) -> datetime | None:
+    if not value:
+        return None
+    text = value.strip()
+    if text.endswith("Z"):
+        text = text[:-1] + "+00:00"
+    try:
+        parsed = datetime.fromisoformat(text)
+    except ValueError:
+        return None
+    if parsed.tzinfo is None:
+        return parsed.replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+    return parsed
+
+
+def format_heartbeat_body(
+    *,
+    kind: str,
+    issue_number: int,
+    branch: str,
+    phase: str,
+    profile: str | None = None,
+    pr: str = "none",
+    next_action: str = "none",
+    blocker: str = "none",
+) -> str:
+    """Return a structured, machine-parseable issue comment body."""
+    profile_value = (profile or "unknown").strip() or "unknown"
+    lines = [
+        MARKER,
+        "**Issue claim heartbeat**",
+        f"- kind: {kind}",
+        f"- issue: #{issue_number}",
+        f"- branch: {branch}",
+        f"- phase: {phase}",
+        f"- profile: {profile_value}",
+        f"- pr: {pr}",
+        f"- blocker: {blocker}",
+        f"- next_action: {next_action}",
+    ]
+    return "\n".join(lines)
+
+
+def parse_heartbeat_comment(body: str) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
+    """Parse one structured heartbeat comment, or None when not a heartbeat."""
+    text = body or ""
+    if MARKER not in text:
+        return None
+    fields: dict[str, str] = {}
+    for match in _FIELD_RE.finditer(text):
+        fields[match.group(1).strip().lower()] = match.group(2).strip()
+    if not fields:
+        return None
+    issue_raw = fields.get("issue", "")
+    issue_digits = re.sub(r"[^\d]", "", issue_raw)
+    issue_number = int(issue_digits) if issue_digits.isdigit() else None
+    return {
+        "kind": fields.get("kind"),
+        "issue_number": issue_number,
+        "branch": fields.get("branch"),
+        "phase": fields.get("phase"),
+        "profile": fields.get("profile"),
+        "pr": fields.get("pr"),
+        "blocker": fields.get("blocker"),
+        "next_action": fields.get("next_action"),
+        "raw_fields": fields,
+    }
+
+
+def extract_issue_heartbeats(
+    comments: list[dict],
+    *,
+    issue_number: int | None = None,
+) -> list[dict]:
+    """Return parsed heartbeats newest-last, optionally filtered to *issue_number*."""
+    heartbeats: list[dict] = []
+    for comment in comments or []:
+        parsed = parse_heartbeat_comment(comment.get("body") or "")
+        if not parsed:
+            continue
+        if issue_number is not None and parsed.get("issue_number") != issue_number:
+            continue
+        heartbeats.append(
+            {
+                **parsed,
+                "comment_id": comment.get("id"),
+                "author": (comment.get("user") or {}).get("login")
+                or comment.get("author"),
+                "created_at": comment.get("created_at"),
+                "updated_at": comment.get("updated_at"),
+            }
+        )
+    return heartbeats
+
+
+def issue_has_in_progress_label(issue: dict) -> bool:
+    labels = issue.get("labels") or []
+    for label in labels:
+        name = label if isinstance(label, str) else label.get("name")
+        if name == IN_PROGRESS_LABEL:
+            return True
+    return False
+
+
+def _linked_open_pr(issue_number: int, open_prs: list[dict]) -> dict | None:
+    pattern = f"issue-{issue_number}"
+    closes = f"closes #{issue_number}"
+    fixes = f"fixes #{issue_number}"
+    for pr in open_prs or []:
+        head = (pr.get("head") or {}).get("ref") or ""
+        text = f"{pr.get('title', '')} {pr.get('body', '')}".lower()
+        if pattern in head.lower():
+            return pr
+        if closes in text or fixes in text:
+            return pr
+    return None
+
+
+def _matching_branch_names(issue_number: int, branch_names: list[str]) -> list[str]:
+    pattern = f"issue-{issue_number}"
+    return [name for name in branch_names if pattern in (name or "").lower()]
+
+
+def classify_issue_claim(
+    *,
+    issue: dict,
+    comments: list[dict],
+    open_prs: list[dict] | None = None,
+    branch_names: list[str] | None = None,
+    now: datetime | None = None,
+    heartbeat_lease_minutes: int = 30,
+    reclaim_after_minutes: int = 60,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Classify one issue's claim state from labels, heartbeats, PRs, and branches."""
+    issue_number = int(issue.get("number") or 0)
+    open_prs = open_prs or []
+    branch_names = branch_names or []
+    current = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+
+    has_label = issue_has_in_progress_label(issue)
+    heartbeats = extract_issue_heartbeats(comments, issue_number=issue_number)
+    latest = heartbeats[-1] if heartbeats else None
+    latest_at = _parse_timestamp(
+        (latest or {}).get("updated_at") or (latest or {}).get("created_at")
+    )
+    age_minutes = None
+    if latest_at:
+        age_minutes = int((current - latest_at).total_seconds() // 60)
+
+    linked_pr = _linked_open_pr(issue_number, open_prs)
+    matching_branches = _matching_branch_names(issue_number, branch_names)
+
+    if not has_label:
+        status = "not_claimed"
+        reasons = ["issue lacks status:in-progress label"]
+    elif linked_pr:
+        status = "awaiting_review"
+        reasons = [f"open PR #{linked_pr.get('number')} covers this issue"]
+    elif not heartbeats:
+        status = "phantom"
+        reasons = [
+            "status:in-progress label present without structured claim heartbeat"
+        ]
+    elif latest_at is None:
+        status = "phantom"
+        reasons = ["heartbeat comments present but timestamps could not be parsed"]
+    elif age_minutes is not None and age_minutes <= heartbeat_lease_minutes:
+        status = "active"
+        reasons = [f"heartbeat age {age_minutes}m within {heartbeat_lease_minutes}m lease"]
+    elif matching_branches and age_minutes is not None and age_minutes <= reclaim_after_minutes:
+        status = "active"
+        reasons = [
+            f"matching branch(es) {', '.join(matching_branches)} with heartbeat "
+            f"age {age_minutes}m"
+        ]
+    elif age_minutes is not None and age_minutes > reclaim_after_minutes and not matching_branches:
+        status = "reclaimable"
+        reasons = [
+            f"no heartbeat within {reclaim_after_minutes}m and no matching branch"
+        ]
+    elif age_minutes is not None and age_minutes > heartbeat_lease_minutes:
+        status = "stale"
+        reasons = [
+            f"heartbeat age {age_minutes}m exceeds {heartbeat_lease_minutes}m lease"
+        ]
+    else:
+        status = "active"
+        reasons = ["claim has structured heartbeat proof"]
+
+    return {
+        "issue_number": issue_number,
+        "title": issue.get("title"),
+        "status": status,
+        "has_in_progress_label": has_label,
+        "heartbeat_count": len(heartbeats),
+        "latest_heartbeat": latest,
+        "heartbeat_age_minutes": age_minutes,
+        "linked_open_pr": linked_pr.get("number") if linked_pr else None,
+        "matching_branches": matching_branches,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "reclaimable": status == "reclaimable",
+        "stale": status in {"stale", "phantom", "reclaimable"},
+    }
+
+
+def build_claim_inventory(
+    *,
+    issues: list[dict],
+    comments_by_issue: dict[int, list[dict]],
+    open_prs: list[dict],
+    branch_names: list[str],
+    now: datetime | None = None,
+    heartbeat_lease_minutes: int = 30,
+    reclaim_after_minutes: int = 60,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Build a queue inventory report for in-progress issue claims."""
+    entries: list[dict] = []
+    for issue in issues or []:
+        if not issue_has_in_progress_label(issue):
+            continue
+        number = int(issue["number"])
+        entry = classify_issue_claim(
+            issue=issue,
+            comments=comments_by_issue.get(number, []),
+            open_prs=open_prs,
+            branch_names=branch_names,
+            now=now,
+            heartbeat_lease_minutes=heartbeat_lease_minutes,
+            reclaim_after_minutes=reclaim_after_minutes,
+        )
+        entries.append(entry)
+
+    counts: dict[str, int] = {}
+    for entry in entries:
+        counts[entry["status"]] = counts.get(entry["status"], 0) + 1
+
+    return {
+        "entries": entries,
+        "counts": counts,
+        "heartbeat_lease_minutes": heartbeat_lease_minutes,
+        "reclaim_after_minutes": reclaim_after_minutes,
+        "in_progress_total": len(entries),
+    }
+
+
+def build_cleanup_plan(inventory: dict[str, Any]) -> list[dict]:
+    """Return stale/reclaimable/phantom claims that may be cleaned up."""
+    plan: list[dict] = []
+    for entry in inventory.get("entries") or []:
+        if entry.get("status") in {"reclaimable", "phantom"}:
+            plan.append(
+                {
+                    "issue_number": entry["issue_number"],
+                    "status": entry["status"],
+                    "action": "remove_status_in_progress_and_comment",
+                    "reasons": list(entry.get("reasons") or []),
+                }
+            )
+        elif entry.get("status") == "stale" and not entry.get("linked_open_pr"):
+            plan.append(
+                {
+                    "issue_number": entry["issue_number"],
+                    "status": entry["status"],
+                    "action": "report_only",
+                    "reasons": list(entry.get("reasons") or []),
+                }
+            )
+    return plan

migrate_profiles.py

@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ REVIEWER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN = ["branch", "commit", "push", "open_pr"]
 def infer_role(name, execution_profile):
     """Return the unambiguous role for a legacy profile name, or None."""
     haystack = f"{name} {execution_profile or ''}".lower()
+    if "reconciler" in haystack:
+        return "reconciler"
     has_author = "author" in haystack
     has_reviewer = "reviewer" in haystack
     if has_author == has_reviewer:

native_mcp_preference.py

@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
+"""Native MCP preference gate and shell health circuit breaker (#270).
+
+Gitea mutations must use native MCP tools first. Shell scripts, direct API
+calls, browser helpers, and improvised encoders are blocked when MCP is
+available unless explicit recovery-mode proof is supplied.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+from reviewer_fallback import LOCAL_GITEA_SCRIPT_NAMES
+
+# Tasks that must prefer native MCP over shell/API/helper fallbacks.
+GITEA_MUTATION_TASKS = frozenset({
+    "comment_issue",
+    "mark_issue",
+    "lock_issue",
+    "set_issue_labels",
+    "create_issue",
+    "close_issue",
+    "create_branch",
+    "push_branch",
+    "create_pr",
+    "close_pr",
+    "comment_pr",
+    "review_pr",
+    "merge_pr",
+    "approve_pr",
+    "request_changes_pr",
+    "commit_files",
+    "gitea_commit_files",
+    "delete_branch",
+    "address_pr_change_requests",
+})
+
+ALLOWED_PATH_KINDS = frozenset({
+    "mcp_native",
+    "recovery_fallback",
+})
+
+BLOCKED_PATH_KINDS = frozenset({
+    "shell_script",
+    "direct_api",
+    "webfetch",
+    "playwright",
+    "helper_script",
+    "unsafe_helper",
+    "mcp_server_touch",
+})
+
+SHELL_SPAWN_FAILURE_THRESHOLD = 2
+
+TERMINAL_REPORT_HEADING = (
+    "MCP transport unavailable or shell circuit breaker tripped. "
+    "No unsafe Gitea fallback performed."
+)
+
+_RECOVERY_MODE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:recovery mode|explicit recovery|mcp unavailable|mcp not available|"
+    r"mcp tools unavailable|no mcp path)\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_LOCAL_SCRIPT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:^|[\s\"'`/])(?:python3?|bash|sh)?\s*(?:"
+    + "|".join(re.escape(name) for name in LOCAL_GITEA_SCRIPT_NAMES)
+    + r")",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_WEBFETCH_RE = re.compile(r"\b(?:webfetch|mcp_web_fetch|fetch\s+url)\b", re.IGNORECASE)
+_PLAYWRIGHT_RE = re.compile(r"\b(?:playwright|browser_navigate|browser_click)\b", re.IGNORECASE)
+_HELPER_SCRIPT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:^|[\s\"'`/])(?:_encode_|_emit_|_inline_)[\w-]+\.py",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_MANUAL_BASE64_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:manual\s+base64|llm-generated\s+base64|base64-encode\s+in\s+chat)\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_DIRECT_API_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:api_request|urllib\.request|requests\.(?:post|patch|put)|curl\s+-X\s+POST)\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_MCP_SERVER_TOUCH_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:kill|pkill|restart|reload|touch|edit|modify|write)\b.{0,40}\b(?:mcp_server|mcp-server|gitea_mcp_server)\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_CLI_AUTH_DIVERGENCE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"GITEA_MCP_PROFILE\s*=\s*['\"]?([^\s'\";]+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+_session_shell: dict[str, Any] = {
+    "consecutive_spawn_failures": 0,
+    "shell_unavailable": False,
+    "hard_stopped": False,
+    "last_exit_code": None,
+}
+
+
+def _clean(value: str | None) -> str:
+    return (value or "").strip()
+
+
+def is_spawn_failure(
+    *,
+    exit_code: int | None = None,
+    stdout: str | None = None,
+    stderr: str | None = None,
+    spawn_failure: bool | None = None,
+) -> bool:
+    """True for executor spawn failures (exit_code -1, empty output)."""
+    if spawn_failure is True:
+        return True
+    if spawn_failure is False:
+        return False
+    if exit_code != -1:
+        return False
+    return not (_clean(stdout) or _clean(stderr))
+
+
+def record_shell_spawn_outcome(
+    *,
+    exit_code: int | None = None,
+    stdout: str | None = None,
+    stderr: str | None = None,
+    spawn_failure: bool | None = None,
+    probe_attempted: bool = False,
+    probe_succeeded: bool | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Track shell spawn outcomes and trip the session circuit breaker (#270 AC4)."""
+    global _session_shell
+    failed = is_spawn_failure(
+        exit_code=exit_code,
+        stdout=stdout,
+        stderr=stderr,
+        spawn_failure=spawn_failure,
+    )
+
+    if failed:
+        _session_shell["consecutive_spawn_failures"] = (
+            int(_session_shell.get("consecutive_spawn_failures") or 0) + 1
+        )
+        _session_shell["last_exit_code"] = exit_code
+        if probe_attempted and probe_succeeded is False:
+            _session_shell["shell_unavailable"] = True
+    else:
+        _session_shell["consecutive_spawn_failures"] = 0
+        _session_shell["shell_unavailable"] = False
+        _session_shell["hard_stopped"] = False
+        _session_shell["last_exit_code"] = exit_code
+
+    failures = int(_session_shell["consecutive_spawn_failures"])
+    if failures >= SHELL_SPAWN_FAILURE_THRESHOLD:
+        _session_shell["shell_unavailable"] = True
+        _session_shell["hard_stopped"] = True
+
+    return shell_health_status()
+
+
+def shell_health_status() -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Return the current shell health / circuit-breaker state."""
+    failures = int(_session_shell.get("consecutive_spawn_failures") or 0)
+    hard_stopped = bool(_session_shell.get("hard_stopped"))
+    shell_unavailable = bool(_session_shell.get("shell_unavailable"))
+    return {
+        "consecutive_spawn_failures": failures,
+        "shell_unavailable": shell_unavailable,
+        "hard_stopped": hard_stopped,
+        "threshold": SHELL_SPAWN_FAILURE_THRESHOLD,
+        "shell_use_allowed": not hard_stopped,
+        "last_exit_code": _session_shell.get("last_exit_code"),
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "emit terminal recovery report; prefer native MCP for remaining Gitea mutations"
+            if hard_stopped
+            else (
+                "probe shell once with echo/pwd; if probe fails mark shell unavailable"
+                if failures == 1
+                else "shell healthy"
+            )
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def clear_shell_health_for_tests() -> None:
+    """Reset session shell state (tests only)."""
+    global _session_shell
+    _session_shell = {
+        "consecutive_spawn_failures": 0,
+        "shell_unavailable": False,
+        "hard_stopped": False,
+        "last_exit_code": None,
+    }
+
+
+def classify_command_path(command_or_detail: str | None) -> str:
+    """Classify a proposed command/detail into a path kind."""
+    text = command_or_detail or ""
+    if _MCP_SERVER_TOUCH_RE.search(text):
+        return "mcp_server_touch"
+    if _WEBFETCH_RE.search(text):
+        return "webfetch"
+    if _PLAYWRIGHT_RE.search(text):
+        return "playwright"
+    if _HELPER_SCRIPT_RE.search(text) or _MANUAL_BASE64_RE.search(text):
+        return "unsafe_helper"
+    if _LOCAL_SCRIPT_RE.search(text):
+        return "shell_script"
+    if _DIRECT_API_RE.search(text):
+        return "direct_api"
+    return "mcp_native"
+
+
+def detect_cli_auth_divergence(
+    command_or_detail: str | None,
+    *,
+    active_profile: str | None,
+) -> list[str]:
+    """Flag shell commands that override GITEA_MCP_PROFILE away from the session."""
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    text = command_or_detail or ""
+    active = _clean(active_profile)
+    match = _CLI_AUTH_DIVERGENCE_RE.search(text)
+    if not match or not active:
+        return reasons
+    requested = _clean(match.group(1))
+    if requested and requested != active:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"CLI auth divergence: command sets GITEA_MCP_PROFILE='{requested}' "
+            f"but active session profile is '{active}' (fail closed)"
+        )
+    return reasons
+
+
+def format_mcp_unavailable_terminal_report(
+    *,
+    task: str | None = None,
+    reasons: list[str] | None = None,
+) -> str:
+    """Terminal report when MCP is broken and unsafe recovery is forbidden (#270 AC3)."""
+    lines = [TERMINAL_REPORT_HEADING, ""]
+    if task:
+        lines.append(f"Blocked task: {task}")
+    if reasons:
+        lines.extend(["", "Reasons:"])
+        lines.extend(f"- {reason}" for reason in reasons)
+    lines.extend([
+        "",
+        "Required recovery (no improvised fallback):",
+        "- Restart the MCP session",
+        "- Kill hung background terminals holding the shell executor",
+        "- Retry the native MCP tool once after reconnect",
+        "- If MCP remains unavailable, stop and hand off to the operator",
+        "- Do not run local Gitea scripts, WebFetch, Playwright, or manual base64 encoders",
+    ])
+    return "\n".join(lines)
+
+
+def assess_gitea_operation_path(
+    *,
+    task: str,
+    path_kind: str | None = None,
+    command_or_detail: str | None = None,
+    mcp_available: bool = True,
+    mcp_tool_visible: bool = True,
+    recovery_mode: bool = False,
+    recovery_proof_complete: bool = False,
+    role: str | None = None,
+    active_profile: str | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Fail closed when a Gitea mutation would bypass native MCP (#270)."""
+    task_name = _clean(task)
+    resolved_kind = _clean(path_kind) or classify_command_path(command_or_detail)
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    if task_name and task_name not in GITEA_MUTATION_TASKS:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"unknown or non-mutation Gitea task '{task_name}'; "
+            "native MCP preference gate applies only to Gitea mutations"
+        )
+
+    shell = shell_health_status()
+    if shell["hard_stopped"] and resolved_kind != "mcp_native":
+        reasons.append(
+            "shell circuit breaker is hard-stopped after consecutive spawn failures; "
+            "use native MCP or emit terminal recovery report"
+        )
+
+    recovery_declared = recovery_mode or bool(
+        _RECOVERY_MODE_RE.search(command_or_detail or "")
+    )
+    recovery_allowed = (
+        recovery_declared
+        and recovery_proof_complete
+        and not mcp_available
+        and resolved_kind in BLOCKED_PATH_KINDS - {"mcp_server_touch"}
+    )
+
+    if resolved_kind in BLOCKED_PATH_KINDS and not recovery_allowed:
+        reasons.append(f"path kind '{resolved_kind}' is not an approved Gitea mutation path")
+
+    if resolved_kind == "mcp_server_touch":
+        if _clean(role) == "reviewer" or (
+            active_profile and "reviewer" in active_profile.lower()
+        ):
+            reasons.append(
+                "reviewer workflows must not touch, restart, or kill MCP server files/processes"
+            )
+        else:
+            reasons.append(
+                "MCP server files/processes must not be modified during normal Gitea workflows"
+            )
+
+    reasons.extend(
+        detect_cli_auth_divergence(command_or_detail, active_profile=active_profile)
+    )
+
+    if (
+        mcp_available
+        and mcp_tool_visible
+        and resolved_kind != "mcp_native"
+        and not recovery_allowed
+    ):
+        if not recovery_declared:
+            reasons.append(
+                "native MCP tools are available; shell/API/helper fallback is forbidden"
+            )
+        elif not recovery_proof_complete:
+            reasons.append(
+                "recovery-mode fallback requires complete recovery proof before proceeding"
+            )
+
+    if not mcp_available and resolved_kind != "mcp_native" and not recovery_allowed:
+        if not recovery_declared:
+            reasons.append(
+                "MCP transport unavailable; produce terminal recovery report instead of "
+                "improvising unsafe fallback"
+            )
+
+    block = bool(reasons)
+    terminal_report = None
+    if block and (not mcp_available or shell["hard_stopped"]):
+        terminal_report = format_mcp_unavailable_terminal_report(
+            task=task_name or None,
+            reasons=reasons,
+        )
+
+    return {
+        "task": task_name or None,
+        "path_kind": resolved_kind,
+        "mcp_available": mcp_available,
+        "mcp_tool_visible": mcp_tool_visible,
+        "recovery_mode": recovery_declared,
+        "shell_health": shell,
+        "block": block,
+        "allowed": not block,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "terminal_report": terminal_report,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "use the native MCP tool for this task"
+            if mcp_available and mcp_tool_visible and block
+            else (
+                terminal_report or "proceed with native MCP"
+                if block
+                else "proceed with native MCP"
+            )
+        ),
+    }

pr_queue_cleanup.py

@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+"""PR-only queue cleanup mode gates and report verifier (#390).
+
+Cleanup mode dispatches exactly one canonical review run per PR. It forbids
+author-side mutations (issue claiming, branch creation, implementation edits,
+issue filing) and enforces the terminal-mutation chain: stop after
+``REQUEST_CHANGES``; after ``APPROVED`` continue only to same-PR merge when
+merge is explicitly authorized for that PR and merge gates pass; stop after
+merge or a merge blocker. The next PR always requires a fresh run.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+
+CLEANUP_WORKFLOW_PATH = "workflows/pr-queue-cleanup.md"
+
+# Author-side resolver tasks that must never run inside cleanup mode.
+CLEANUP_FORBIDDEN_TASKS = frozenset({
+    "claim_issue",
+    "mark_issue",
+    "lock_issue",
+    "create_issue",
+    "create_branch",
+    "push_branch",
+    "create_pr",
+    "commit_files",
+    "gitea_commit_files",
+    "address_pr_change_requests",
+})
+
+# Run-state outcomes for one cleanup dispatch.
+STOP_AFTER_REQUEST_CHANGES = "STOP_AFTER_REQUEST_CHANGES"
+STOP_AFTER_DECISION = "STOP_AFTER_DECISION"
+CONTINUE_TO_SAME_PR_MERGE = "CONTINUE_TO_SAME_PR_MERGE"
+STOP_APPROVED_NO_MERGE_AUTH = "STOP_APPROVED_NO_MERGE_AUTH"
+STOP_APPROVED_MERGE_GATES_FAILED = "STOP_APPROVED_MERGE_GATES_FAILED"
+STOP_AFTER_MERGE = "STOP_AFTER_MERGE"
+STOP_AFTER_MERGE_BLOCKER = "STOP_AFTER_MERGE_BLOCKER"
+STOP_GATE_NOT_PROVEN = "STOP_GATE_NOT_PROVEN"
+
+_TERMINAL_DECISIONS = frozenset({"approved", "request_changes", "comment", "skip"})
+
+
+def resolve_cleanup_run_state(
+    decision: str | None,
+    *,
+    merge_authorized_for_pr: bool = False,
+    merge_gates_passed: bool | None = None,
+    merge_completed: bool = False,
+    merge_blocker: bool = False,
+) -> dict:
+    """Resolve what one cleanup run may do after its terminal review decision.
+
+    Fail closed: unknown decisions stop the run with no further mutation.
+    """
+    normalized = (decision or "").strip().lower()
+
+    if normalized not in _TERMINAL_DECISIONS:
+        return {
+            "outcome": STOP_GATE_NOT_PROVEN,
+            "further_mutation_allowed": False,
+            "reasons": [
+                f"unknown terminal decision {decision!r}; cleanup run stops "
+                "(fail closed)"
+            ],
+        }
+
+    if normalized == "request_changes":
+        return {
+            "outcome": STOP_AFTER_REQUEST_CHANGES,
+            "further_mutation_allowed": False,
+            "reasons": ["REQUEST_CHANGES is terminal in cleanup mode"],
+        }
+
+    if normalized in {"comment", "skip"}:
+        return {
+            "outcome": STOP_AFTER_DECISION,
+            "further_mutation_allowed": False,
+            "reasons": [f"{normalized} decision ends the cleanup run"],
+        }
+
+    # normalized == "approved"
+    if merge_completed:
+        return {
+            "outcome": STOP_AFTER_MERGE,
+            "further_mutation_allowed": False,
+            "reasons": ["merge completed; cleanup run stops"],
+        }
+    if merge_blocker:
+        return {
+            "outcome": STOP_AFTER_MERGE_BLOCKER,
+            "further_mutation_allowed": False,
+            "reasons": ["merge blocker recorded; cleanup run stops"],
+        }
+    if not merge_authorized_for_pr:
+        return {
+            "outcome": STOP_APPROVED_NO_MERGE_AUTH,
+            "further_mutation_allowed": False,
+            "reasons": [
+                "APPROVED without explicit per-PR merge authorization; "
+                "cleanup run stops"
+            ],
+        }
+    if merge_gates_passed is not True:
+        return {
+            "outcome": STOP_APPROVED_MERGE_GATES_FAILED,
+            "further_mutation_allowed": False,
+            "reasons": [
+                "merge gates not proven passed; cleanup run stops before merge"
+            ],
+        }
+    return {
+        "outcome": CONTINUE_TO_SAME_PR_MERGE,
+        "further_mutation_allowed": True,
+        "reasons": [],
+        "allowed_mutation": "merge same PR only",
+    }
+
+
+def check_cleanup_task_allowed(task: str) -> tuple[bool, list[str]]:
+    """Fail closed on any author-side mutation task inside cleanup mode."""
+    normalized = (task or "").strip().lower()
+    if normalized in CLEANUP_FORBIDDEN_TASKS:
+        return False, [
+            f"task '{normalized}' is forbidden in PR-only cleanup mode: "
+            "no issue claiming, branch creation, implementation edits, or "
+            "issue filing"
+        ]
+    return True, []
+
+
+_SELECTED_PR_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*selected pr\s*:\s*#?(\d+)", re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE
+)
+_NEXT_SUGGESTED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*next suggested pr\s*:", re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE
+)
+_TERMINAL_MUTATION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*(?:review (?:decision|verdict)|terminal (?:review )?"
+    r"(?:decision|mutation))\s*:\s*"
+    r"(approved|request_changes|request changes|merged|comment)",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_PAGINATION_HINT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"inventory_complete|final page|has_more\s*[=:]\s*false|total[_ ]count",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_MERGE_RESULT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*merge result\s*:\s*(?!none\b|not attempted\b)\S",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_MERGE_AUTHORIZED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*merge authorized(?: for pr)?\s*:\s*true",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_ISSUE_MUTATION_CLAIM_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*issue mutations\s*:\s*(?!none\b)\S",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_BRANCH_MUTATION_CLAIM_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*branch mutations\s*:\s*(?!none\b)\S",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+
+
+def assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(report_text: str) -> dict:
+    """Validate a PR-only cleanup run report (single dispatch, fail closed)."""
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    text = report_text or ""
+
+    if CLEANUP_WORKFLOW_PATH not in text:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"report must cite the canonical cleanup workflow "
+            f"({CLEANUP_WORKFLOW_PATH})"
+        )
+
+    selected = _SELECTED_PR_RE.findall(text)
+    if len(selected) == 0:
+        reasons.append("report must name exactly one Selected PR")
+    elif len(set(selected)) > 1:
+        reasons.append(
+            "cleanup run selected multiple PRs "
+            f"({', '.join(sorted(set(selected)))}); one canonical review per "
+            "PR per run"
+        )
+
+    terminal = _TERMINAL_MUTATION_RE.findall(text)
+    if len(terminal) > 1:
+        reasons.append(
+            "multiple terminal review mutations reported in one cleanup run"
+        )
+
+    if not _PAGINATION_HINT_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "report missing PR inventory pagination proof "
+            "(inventory_complete / final page / total_count)"
+        )
+
+    if not _NEXT_SUGGESTED_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "report must include 'Next suggested PR' (without continuing to it)"
+        )
+
+    if _MERGE_RESULT_RE.search(text) and not _MERGE_AUTHORIZED_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "merge reported without explicit per-PR merge authorization "
+            "('Merge authorized: true')"
+        )
+
+    if _ISSUE_MUTATION_CLAIM_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append("issue mutations are forbidden in PR-only cleanup mode")
+    if _BRANCH_MUTATION_CLAIM_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append("branch mutations are forbidden in PR-only cleanup mode")
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "proceed" if proven else
+            "fix the cleanup report: one PR, one terminal mutation, pagination "
+            "proof, next-suggested-PR field, and no issue/branch mutations"
+        ),
+    }

reconciler_profile.py

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+"""Reconciler profile model for already-landed PR closure (#304).
+
+Defines the narrowly scoped operation set for a dedicated reconciler profile
+such as ``prgs-reconciler``. Close MCP tooling and ancestry gates ship in the
+#310 stack; this module validates profile shape only.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import gitea_config
+
+RECONCILER_REQUIRED_OPERATIONS = (
+    "gitea.read",
+    "gitea.pr.close",
+)
+
+RECONCILER_RECOMMENDED_OPERATIONS = (
+    "gitea.pr.comment",
+    "gitea.issue.comment",
+    "gitea.issue.close",
+)
+
+RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN_OPERATIONS = (
+    "gitea.pr.approve",
+    "gitea.pr.merge",
+    "gitea.pr.review",
+    "gitea.pr.create",
+    "gitea.branch.push",
+    "gitea.repo.commit",
+)
+
+
+def _normalized_allowed(allowed: list[str]) -> set[str]:
+    normalized: set[str] = set()
+    for entry in allowed or []:
+        try:
+            normalized.add(gitea_config.normalize_operation(entry))
+        except gitea_config.ConfigError:
+            continue
+    return normalized
+
+
+def _forbidden_in_allowed(allowed: list[str], ops: tuple[str, ...]) -> list[str]:
+    """Return forbidden ops that are explicitly listed in *allowed*."""
+    allowed_n = _normalized_allowed(allowed)
+    present: list[str] = []
+    for op in ops:
+        try:
+            if gitea_config.normalize_operation(op) in allowed_n:
+                present.append(op)
+        except gitea_config.ConfigError:
+            continue
+    return present
+
+
+def is_reconciler_profile(allowed: list[str], forbidden: list[str]) -> bool:
+    """Return True when *allowed*/*forbidden* describe a reconciler profile."""
+    def can(op: str) -> bool:
+        return gitea_config.check_operation(op, allowed, forbidden)[0]
+
+    if not can("gitea.pr.close"):
+        return False
+    if _forbidden_in_allowed(allowed, RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN_OPERATIONS):
+        return False
+    return True
+
+
+def assess_reconciler_profile(allowed: list[str], forbidden: list[str]) -> dict:
+    """Validate reconciler profile operations (read-only, fail closed)."""
+    allowed = list(allowed or [])
+    forbidden = list(forbidden or [])
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    for op in RECONCILER_REQUIRED_OPERATIONS:
+        ok, _ = gitea_config.check_operation(op, allowed, forbidden)
+        if not ok:
+            reasons.append(f"missing required operation {op}")
+
+    for op in _forbidden_in_allowed(allowed, RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN_OPERATIONS):
+        reasons.append(f"forbidden operation must not be allowed: {op}")
+
+    missing_recommended = [
+        op for op in RECONCILER_RECOMMENDED_OPERATIONS
+        if not gitea_config.check_operation(op, allowed, forbidden)[0]
+    ]
+
+    return {
+        "is_reconciler_profile": is_reconciler_profile(allowed, forbidden),
+        "valid": not reasons and is_reconciler_profile(allowed, forbidden),
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "missing_recommended_operations": missing_recommended,
+        "required_operations": list(RECONCILER_REQUIRED_OPERATIONS),
+        "forbidden_operations": list(RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN_OPERATIONS),
+    }

reconciliation_workflow.py

@@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
+"""Already-landed PR reconciliation workflow helpers (#301).
+
+Read-only assessment and capability planning for reconciling open PRs whose
+heads are already ancestors of the target branch. Does not invoke review or
+merge paths.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import subprocess
+from typing import Any
+
+import gitea_config
+from merged_cleanup_reconcile import extract_linked_issue, is_head_ancestor_of_ref
+
+ELIGIBILITY_ALREADY_LANDED = "ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED"
+ELIGIBILITY_NOT_LANDED = "NOT_ALREADY_LANDED"
+ELIGIBILITY_STALE_TARGET = "TARGET_BRANCH_UNVERIFIED"
+ELIGIBILITY_PR_NOT_OPEN = "PR_NOT_OPEN"
+
+OUTCOME_FULL_RECONCILE = "FULL_RECONCILE_CLOSE_ALLOWED"
+OUTCOME_PARTIAL_COMMENT = "PARTIAL_RECONCILE_COMMENT_THEN_STOP"
+OUTCOME_RECOVERY_HANDOFF = "RECOVERY_HANDOFF_ONLY"
+OUTCOME_NOT_LANDED = "NOT_LANDED_NO_ACTION"
+OUTCOME_GATE_NOT_PROVEN = "GATE_NOT_PROVEN"
+
+RECONCILE_WORKFLOW_MARKERS = (
+    "workflows/reconcile-landed-pr.md",
+    "reconcile-landed-pr.md",
+)
+
+RECONCILE_TASK_MARKERS = (
+    "reconcile-landed-pr",
+    "reconcile already-landed",
+    "reconcile_already_landed",
+)
+
+
+def fetch_target_branch(project_root: str, remote: str, branch: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Fetch *branch* from *remote* and return the resolved SHA."""
+    ref = f"{remote}/{branch}"
+    fetch = subprocess.run(
+        ["git", "-C", project_root, "fetch", remote, branch],
+        capture_output=True,
+        text=True,
+        check=False,
+    )
+    if fetch.returncode != 0:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "target_branch": branch,
+            "target_ref": ref,
+            "target_branch_sha": None,
+            "reasons": [
+                f"git fetch {remote} {branch} failed: "
+                f"{(fetch.stderr or fetch.stdout or '').strip()}"
+            ],
+        }
+
+    rev = subprocess.run(
+        ["git", "-C", project_root, "rev-parse", ref],
+        capture_output=True,
+        text=True,
+        check=False,
+    )
+    if rev.returncode != 0:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "target_branch": branch,
+            "target_ref": ref,
+            "target_branch_sha": None,
+            "reasons": [
+                f"git rev-parse {ref} failed: "
+                f"{(rev.stderr or rev.stdout or '').strip()}"
+            ],
+        }
+
+    return {
+        "success": True,
+        "target_branch": branch,
+        "target_ref": ref,
+        "target_branch_sha": (rev.stdout or "").strip(),
+        "reasons": [],
+        "git_fetch_command": f"git fetch {remote} {branch}",
+    }
+
+
+def profile_reconciliation_capabilities(
+    allowed: list[str] | None,
+    forbidden: list[str] | None,
+) -> dict[str, bool]:
+    """Map active profile operations to reconciliation capabilities."""
+    allowed = allowed or []
+    forbidden = forbidden or []
+
+    def can(op: str) -> bool:
+        return gitea_config.check_operation(op, allowed, forbidden)[0]
+
+    return {
+        "read": can("gitea.read"),
+        "comment_pr": can("gitea.pr.comment"),
+        "comment_issue": can("gitea.issue.comment"),
+        "close_pr": can("gitea.pr.close"),
+        "close_issue": can("gitea.issue.close"),
+        "review_pr": can("gitea.pr.review") or can("gitea.pr.approve"),
+        "merge_pr": can("gitea.pr.merge"),
+    }
+
+
+def assess_open_pr_reconciliation(
+    *,
+    pr: dict[str, Any],
+    project_root: str,
+    remote: str,
+    target_branch: str,
+    target_fetch: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Assess whether an open PR is eligible for already-landed reconciliation."""
+    pr_number = int(pr.get("number") or 0)
+    pr_state = (pr.get("state") or "").strip().lower()
+    head = pr.get("head") or {}
+    head_sha = head.get("sha") if isinstance(head, dict) else None
+    head_ref = head.get("ref") if isinstance(head, dict) else None
+    base = pr.get("base") or {}
+    base_ref = base.get("ref") if isinstance(base, dict) else None
+    title = pr.get("title") or ""
+    body = pr.get("body") or ""
+
+    fetch_result = target_fetch or fetch_target_branch(
+        project_root, remote, target_branch
+    )
+    linked_issue = extract_linked_issue(title, body)
+
+    result: dict[str, Any] = {
+        "pr_number": pr_number,
+        "pr_state": pr_state,
+        "candidate_head_sha": head_sha,
+        "head_ref": head_ref,
+        "base_ref": base_ref or target_branch,
+        "target_branch": target_branch,
+        "target_branch_sha": fetch_result.get("target_branch_sha"),
+        "linked_issue": linked_issue,
+        "git_ref_mutations": [],
+        "reasons": [],
+        "review_merge_allowed": False,
+    }
+    if fetch_result.get("git_fetch_command"):
+        result["git_ref_mutations"].append(fetch_result["git_fetch_command"])
+
+    if pr_state != "open":
+        result["eligibility_class"] = ELIGIBILITY_PR_NOT_OPEN
+        result["ancestor_proof"] = None
+        result["reconciliation_allowed"] = False
+        result["reasons"].append(f"PR #{pr_number} state is {pr_state!r}, not open")
+        return result
+
+    if not fetch_result.get("success"):
+        result["eligibility_class"] = ELIGIBILITY_STALE_TARGET
+        result["ancestor_proof"] = None
+        result["reconciliation_allowed"] = False
+        result["reasons"].extend(fetch_result.get("reasons") or [])
+        return result
+
+    target_ref = fetch_result.get("target_ref") or f"{remote}/{target_branch}"
+    ancestor = is_head_ancestor_of_ref(project_root, head_sha, target_ref)
+    result["ancestor_proof"] = ancestor
+
+    if ancestor is None:
+        result["eligibility_class"] = ELIGIBILITY_STALE_TARGET
+        result["reconciliation_allowed"] = False
+        result["reasons"].append(
+            f"ancestor check failed for head {head_sha!r} against {target_ref}"
+        )
+        return result
+
+    if ancestor:
+        result["eligibility_class"] = ELIGIBILITY_ALREADY_LANDED
+        result["reconciliation_allowed"] = True
+        return result
+
+    result["eligibility_class"] = ELIGIBILITY_NOT_LANDED
+    result["reconciliation_allowed"] = False
+    result["reasons"].append(
+        f"PR head {head_sha} is not an ancestor of {target_ref}"
+    )
+    return result
+
+
+def resolve_reconciliation_plan(
+    *,
+    assessment: dict[str, Any],
+    capabilities: dict[str, bool] | None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Map eligibility + profile capabilities to a reconciliation outcome."""
+    caps = capabilities or {}
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    if not assessment.get("reconciliation_allowed"):
+        outcome = OUTCOME_NOT_LANDED
+        if assessment.get("eligibility_class") in {
+            ELIGIBILITY_STALE_TARGET,
+            ELIGIBILITY_PR_NOT_OPEN,
+        }:
+            outcome = OUTCOME_GATE_NOT_PROVEN
+        reasons.extend(assessment.get("reasons") or [])
+        return {
+            "outcome": outcome,
+            "close_pr_allowed": False,
+            "comment_pr_allowed": False,
+            "close_issue_allowed": False,
+            "comment_issue_allowed": False,
+            "review_merge_allowed": False,
+            "missing_capabilities": _missing_reconciliation_capabilities(caps),
+            "safe_next_action": (
+                "Do not reconcile via review/merge; repair missing proof first."
+            ),
+            "reasons": reasons,
+        }
+
+    close_pr = bool(caps.get("close_pr"))
+    comment_pr = bool(caps.get("comment_pr"))
+    close_issue = bool(caps.get("close_issue"))
+    comment_issue = bool(caps.get("comment_issue"))
+
+    if caps.get("review_pr") or caps.get("merge_pr"):
+        reasons.append(
+            "reconciliation path must not use review/merge capabilities"
+        )
+
+    if close_pr:
+        outcome = OUTCOME_FULL_RECONCILE
+        safe_next_action = (
+            "Run reconciliation close via exact gitea.pr.close after proof; "
+            "do not approve or merge."
+        )
+    elif comment_pr:
+        outcome = OUTCOME_PARTIAL_COMMENT
+        safe_next_action = (
+            "Post one reconciliation comment with ancestor proof, then stop "
+            "for an authorized close profile."
+        )
+    else:
+        outcome = OUTCOME_RECOVERY_HANDOFF
+        safe_next_action = (
+            "Produce a recovery handoff naming missing gitea.pr.close and/or "
+            "gitea.pr.comment; do not loop through review/merge."
+        )
+        reasons.append("gitea.pr.close is not available in the active profile")
+
+    return {
+        "outcome": outcome,
+        "close_pr_allowed": close_pr,
+        "comment_pr_allowed": comment_pr,
+        "close_issue_allowed": close_issue,
+        "comment_issue_allowed": comment_issue,
+        "review_merge_allowed": False,
+        "missing_capabilities": _missing_reconciliation_capabilities(caps),
+        "safe_next_action": safe_next_action,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+    }
+
+
+def _missing_reconciliation_capabilities(caps: dict[str, bool]) -> list[str]:
+    missing = []
+    if not caps.get("read"):
+        missing.append("gitea.read")
+    if not caps.get("close_pr"):
+        missing.append("gitea.pr.close")
+    if not caps.get("comment_pr"):
+        missing.append("gitea.pr.comment")
+    return missing
+
+
+def assess_reconcile_workflow_source(report_text: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Reconciliation reports must cite the canonical workflow file."""
+    lower = (report_text or "").lower()
+    reasons = []
+    if not any(marker in lower for marker in RECONCILE_WORKFLOW_MARKERS):
+        reasons.append(
+            "reconciliation report missing workflow source "
+            "(workflows/reconcile-landed-pr.md)"
+        )
+    if not any(marker in lower for marker in RECONCILE_TASK_MARKERS):
+        reasons.append(
+            "reconciliation report missing task mode declaration "
+            "(reconcile-landed-pr)"
+        )
+    return {
+        "complete": not reasons,
+        "downgraded": bool(reasons),
+        "reasons": reasons,
+    }

review_final_report_schema.py

@@ -0,0 +1,321 @@
+"""Reviewer final-report schema verification before session output (#391).
+
+Composes the composable ``assess_final_report_validator`` (#327) with
+review-specific schema gates required before a reviewer session completes.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+from final_report_validator import (
+    assess_final_report_validator,
+    validator_finding,
+    _handoff_fields,
+)
+
+_LEGACY_STALE_FIELDS = (
+    "pinned reviewed head",
+    "scratch worktree used",
+    "workspace mutations",
+)
+
+_REVIEWED_HEAD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:pinned reviewed head|reviewed head sha)\s*:\s*([0-9a-f]{7,40})",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_VALIDATION_PASS_RE = re.compile(
+    r"validation\s*:\s*(?:pass|passed|strong|ok|green)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_MERGED_CLAIM_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:merged|merge result\s*:\s*merged|pr\s+#\d+\s+merged)\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_MERGE_RESULT_RE = re.compile(r"merge result\s*:", re.IGNORECASE)
+_ANCESTRY_PROOF_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:ancestor proof|target branch sha|merge commit)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_ISSUE_CLOSED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:linked issue(?:\s+live)?\s+status\s*:\s*closed|issue\s+#\d+\s+closed)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_LIVE_ISSUE_PROOF_RE = re.compile(
+    r"gitea_view_issue|(?:issue|linked issue).{0,40}fetched live|live fetch proof",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_FULL_SUITE_PASS_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:full suite passed|full test suite passed|\d+\s+passed,\s*0\s+failed)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_TESTS_IGNORED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:ignored tests|tests?\s+ignored|skipped tests|not run|tests?\s+skipped)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_BLOCKED_HANDOFF_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:blocker\s*:|recovery handoff|infra_stop|capability stop|mutation blocked)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_REPLAY_COMMAND_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:gitea_submit_pr_review|gitea_merge_pr|gitea_review_pr|"
+    r"submitted\s+['\"]approve['\"]|replay approve|replay merge)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_PENDING_RE = re.compile(r"\bPENDING\b", re.IGNORECASE)
+_APPROVED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:review decision\s*:\s*approve|submitted\s+approve|official review submitted)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_DRY_RUN_RE = re.compile(r"dry[- ]run", re.IGNORECASE)
+_FINDING_READY_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:finding ready|ready to submit|not yet submitted)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_NARRATIVE_APPROVE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:^|\n)\s*(?:##\s+)?(?:summary|verdict|recommendation)\b[^\n]*\bapprove\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_HANDOFF_DECISION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"review decision\s*:\s*(\w+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+
+def _rule_legacy_stale_fields(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    fields = _handoff_fields(report_text)
+    findings: list[dict[str, str]] = []
+    for stale in _LEGACY_STALE_FIELDS:
+        if stale in fields and fields[stale].lower() not in {"", "none", "n/a"}:
+            findings.append(
+                validator_finding(
+                    "reviewer.legacy_stale_field",
+                    "block",
+                    stale.title(),
+                    f"legacy or stale handoff field '{stale}' must not appear in "
+                    "canonical reviewer final reports",
+                    "remove stale fields; use Candidate head SHA and precise "
+                    "mutation categories instead",
+                )
+            )
+    return findings
+
+
+def _rule_reviewed_head_without_validation(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    if not _REVIEWED_HEAD_RE.search(text):
+        return []
+    if _VALIDATION_PASS_RE.search(text):
+        return []
+    return [
+        validator_finding(
+            "reviewer.reviewed_head_without_validation",
+            "block",
+            "Pinned reviewed head",
+            "reviewed/pinned head SHA reported without validation pass proof",
+            "document validation command, cwd, and pass result before pinning head SHA",
+        )
+    ]
+
+
+def _rule_merged_without_proof(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    if not _MERGED_CLAIM_RE.search(text):
+        return []
+    if _MERGE_RESULT_RE.search(text) and _ANCESTRY_PROOF_RE.search(text):
+        return []
+    return [
+        validator_finding(
+            "reviewer.merged_without_proof",
+            "block",
+            "Merge result",
+            "merged outcome claimed without merge result and target ancestry proof",
+            "include Merge result, target branch SHA, and ancestor proof before claiming merged",
+        )
+    ]
+
+
+def _rule_issue_closed_without_live_proof(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    if not _ISSUE_CLOSED_RE.search(text):
+        return []
+    fields = _handoff_fields(text)
+    status_value = fields.get("linked issue live status", "")
+    readonly_value = fields.get("read-only diagnostics", "")
+    proof_blob = f"{status_value} {readonly_value}".lower()
+    if _LIVE_ISSUE_PROOF_RE.search(proof_blob):
+        return []
+    return [
+        validator_finding(
+            "reviewer.issue_closed_without_live_proof",
+            "block",
+            "Linked issue",
+            "issue closed claimed without live linked-issue verification proof",
+            "fetch linked issue live (gitea_view_issue) and record Linked issue live status",
+        )
+    ]
+
+
+def _rule_full_suite_pass_ignored_tests(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    if not (_FULL_SUITE_PASS_RE.search(text) and _TESTS_IGNORED_RE.search(text)):
+        return []
+    if re.search(r"explicitly\s+(?:ignored|skipped)", text, re.IGNORECASE):
+        return []
+    return [
+        validator_finding(
+            "reviewer.full_suite_pass_ignored_tests",
+            "block",
+            "Validation",
+            "full suite pass claimed while tests were ignored or skipped without "
+            "explicit disclosure",
+            "state which tests were ignored/skipped or downgrade validation verdict",
+        )
+    ]
+
+
+def _rule_blocked_handoff_replay(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    if not _BLOCKED_HANDOFF_RE.search(text):
+        return []
+    if not _REPLAY_COMMAND_RE.search(text):
+        return []
+    return [
+        validator_finding(
+            "reviewer.blocked_handoff_replay",
+            "block",
+            "Safe next action",
+            "blocked recovery handoff includes direct approve or merge replay commands",
+            "restart the full workflow after the blocker clears; do not replay mutations",
+        )
+    ]
+
+
+def _rule_narrative_handoff_drift(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    narrative_approve = bool(_NARRATIVE_APPROVE_RE.search(text))
+    decision_match = _HANDOFF_DECISION_RE.search(text)
+    if not narrative_approve or not decision_match:
+        return []
+    handoff_decision = decision_match.group(1).strip().lower()
+    if handoff_decision in {"approve", "approved"}:
+        return []
+    return [
+        validator_finding(
+            "reviewer.narrative_handoff_drift",
+            "block",
+            "Review decision",
+            f"narrative approves PR but controller handoff says '{handoff_decision}'",
+            "align narrative summary with controller handoff Review decision field",
+        )
+    ]
+
+
+def _rule_review_state_ambiguous(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    findings: list[dict[str, str]] = []
+    if _PENDING_RE.search(text) and _APPROVED_RE.search(text):
+        findings.append(
+            validator_finding(
+                "reviewer.pending_vs_approved",
+                "block",
+                "Review decision",
+                "report conflates PENDING review state with APPROVED outcome",
+                "distinguish official submitted review from pending or ready-to-submit state",
+            )
+        )
+    if _DRY_RUN_RE.search(text) and _APPROVED_RE.search(text):
+        if "dry-run only" not in text.lower():
+            findings.append(
+                validator_finding(
+                    "reviewer.dry_run_vs_submitted",
+                    "block",
+                    "Review mutations",
+                    "dry-run language mixed with official approve/submitted claims",
+                    "mark dry-run explicitly or document the live review mutation proof",
+                )
+            )
+    if _FINDING_READY_RE.search(text) and _APPROVED_RE.search(text):
+        findings.append(
+            validator_finding(
+                "reviewer.finding_ready_vs_submitted",
+                "downgrade",
+                "Review decision",
+                "finding-ready wording combined with submitted-approve claims",
+                "state whether review was submitted live or only prepared for submission",
+            )
+        )
+    return findings
+
+
+_SCHEMA_RULES = (
+    _rule_legacy_stale_fields,
+    _rule_reviewed_head_without_validation,
+    _rule_merged_without_proof,
+    _rule_issue_closed_without_live_proof,
+    _rule_full_suite_pass_ignored_tests,
+    _rule_blocked_handoff_replay,
+    _rule_narrative_handoff_drift,
+    _rule_review_state_ambiguous,
+)
+
+
+def _merge_validator_results(
+    base: dict[str, Any],
+    extra_findings: list[dict[str, str]],
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    findings = list(base.get("findings") or []) + extra_findings
+    blocked = base.get("blocked") or any(f["severity"] == "block" for f in extra_findings)
+    downgraded = base.get("downgraded") or any(
+        f["severity"] == "downgrade" for f in extra_findings
+    )
+    grade = base.get("grade", "A")
+    if blocked:
+        grade = "blocked"
+    elif downgraded and grade == "A":
+        grade = "downgraded"
+    reasons = [f"{f['rule_id']}: {f['reason']}" for f in findings]
+    safe_next = base.get("safe_next_action") or "none"
+    if extra_findings:
+        safe_next = extra_findings[0].get("safe_next_action", safe_next)
+    return {
+        **base,
+        "grade": grade,
+        "blocked": blocked,
+        "downgraded": downgraded,
+        "findings": findings,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": safe_next,
+        "complete": grade == "A",
+        "schema_rules_applied": len(_SCHEMA_RULES),
+    }
+
+
+def assess_review_final_report_schema(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    review_decision_lock: dict | None = None,
+    linked_issue_lock: dict | None = None,
+    validation_report: dict | None = None,
+    action_log: list[dict] | None = None,
+    mutations_observed: bool = False,
+    local_edits: bool = False,
+    validation_session: dict | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Validate reviewer final report text before session completion (#391)."""
+    base = assess_final_report_validator(
+        report_text,
+        "review_pr",
+        review_decision_lock=review_decision_lock,
+        linked_issue_lock=linked_issue_lock,
+        validation_report=validation_report,
+        action_log=action_log,
+        mutations_observed=mutations_observed,
+        local_edits=local_edits,
+        validation_session=validation_session,
+    )
+    extra: list[dict[str, str]] = []
+    for rule in _SCHEMA_RULES:
+        extra.extend(rule(report_text))
+    return _merge_validator_results(base, extra)

review_merge_state_machine.py

@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+"""Enforced PR review/merge workflow state machine (#290).
+
+Review and merge must advance through explicit states. Any failed upstream
+gate forbids downstream approve/merge mutations until the full workflow is
+restarted after blockers clear.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+REVIEW_MERGE_STATES: tuple[str, ...] = (
+    "PRECHECK",
+    "INVENTORY",
+    "SELECT_PR",
+    "PIN_HEAD_SHA",
+    "CREATE_BRANCHES_WORKTREE",
+    "VALIDATE",
+    "REVIEW_DECISION",
+    "APPROVE_OR_REQUEST_CHANGES",
+    "PRE_MERGE_RECHECK",
+    "MERGE",
+    "POST_MERGE_REPORT",
+)
+
+TERMINAL_BLOCKED_HEADING = (
+    "PR review/merge workflow blocked. Restart the full workflow after blockers clear."
+)
+
+_FORBIDDEN_RECOVERY_REPLAY_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:approve(?:\s+pr)?\s*#?\d+|merge(?:\s+pr)?\s*#?\d+|gitea_merge_pr|"
+    r"gitea_submit_pr_review|submit\s+approve|run\s+merge)\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_RESTART_WORKFLOW_RE = re.compile(
+    r"restart(?:\s+the)?\s+full\s+workflow|rerun\s+the\s+full\s+workflow",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_READY_TO_MERGE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\bready\s+to\s+merge\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_REVIEWED_VALIDATED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:reviewed|validated|approval\s+submitted)\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+_PRE_MERGE_REQUIRED_GATES = (
+    "whoami_verified",
+    "profile_runtime_verified",
+    "merge_capability_verified",
+    "pr_refetched",
+    "reviewed_head_sha_unchanged",
+    "pr_mergeable",
+    "checks_passed",
+    "reviewer_not_author",
+    "worktree_clean",
+)
+
+
+def _clean(value: str | None) -> str:
+    return (value or "").strip()
+
+
+def state_index(state: str) -> int:
+    name = _clean(state).upper()
+    try:
+        return REVIEW_MERGE_STATES.index(name)
+    except ValueError as exc:
+        raise ValueError(f"unknown review/merge state '{state}' (fail closed)") from exc
+
+
+def downstream_states(from_state: str) -> list[str]:
+    idx = state_index(from_state)
+    return list(REVIEW_MERGE_STATES[idx + 1 :])
+
+
+def _completed_through(state_completion: dict[str, bool], state: str) -> bool:
+    return bool(state_completion.get(state))
+
+
+def _first_incomplete_state(state_completion: dict[str, bool]) -> str | None:
+    for state in REVIEW_MERGE_STATES:
+        if not _completed_through(state_completion, state):
+            return state
+    return None
+
+
+def assess_workflow_blockers(
+    *,
+    infra_stop: bool = False,
+    capability_blocked: bool = False,
+    mcp_reconnect_failed: bool = False,
+    stale_capability_state: bool = False,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Return hard blockers that forbid all PR queue work (#290 AC3)."""
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    if infra_stop:
+        reasons.append("infra_stop is active; PR selection/review/merge is forbidden")
+    if capability_blocked:
+        reasons.append("gitea_resolve_task_capability returned blocked/stop_required")
+    if mcp_reconnect_failed:
+        reasons.append("MCP reconnect failed; stale session state cannot be reused")
+    if stale_capability_state:
+        reasons.append("stale MCP capability state detected after reconnect failure")
+    return {
+        "block": bool(reasons),
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "forbidden_states": list(REVIEW_MERGE_STATES) if reasons else [],
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            TERMINAL_BLOCKED_HEADING if reasons else "proceed with PRECHECK"
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def assess_state_advancement(
+    state_completion: dict[str, bool] | None,
+    *,
+    target_state: str,
+    infra_stop: bool = False,
+    capability_blocked: bool = False,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Fail closed when *target_state* is requested before upstream gates pass."""
+    completion = dict(state_completion or {})
+    target = _clean(target_state).upper()
+    blockers = assess_workflow_blockers(
+        infra_stop=infra_stop,
+        capability_blocked=capability_blocked,
+    )
+    reasons = list(blockers["reasons"])
+
+    try:
+        target_idx = state_index(target)
+    except ValueError as exc:
+        return {
+            "target_state": target,
+            "allowed": False,
+            "block": True,
+            "reasons": [str(exc)],
+            "next_allowed_state": None,
+            "safe_next_action": TERMINAL_BLOCKED_HEADING,
+        }
+
+    if blockers["block"]:
+        return {
+            "target_state": target,
+            "allowed": False,
+            "block": True,
+            "reasons": reasons,
+            "next_allowed_state": None,
+            "safe_next_action": blockers["safe_next_action"],
+        }
+
+    next_allowed = _first_incomplete_state(completion)
+    if next_allowed is None:
+        allowed = target_idx == len(REVIEW_MERGE_STATES) - 1
+        if not allowed:
+            reasons.append("workflow already completed through POST_MERGE_REPORT")
+    else:
+        allowed = state_index(next_allowed) >= target_idx
+        if not allowed:
+            reasons.append(
+                f"state '{target}' is forbidden until '{next_allowed}' completes"
+            )
+
+    return {
+        "target_state": target,
+        "allowed": allowed and not reasons,
+        "block": bool(reasons),
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "next_allowed_state": next_allowed,
+        "completed_states": [s for s in REVIEW_MERGE_STATES if completion.get(s)],
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            f"complete state '{next_allowed}' before advancing"
+            if next_allowed and not allowed
+            else (
+                TERMINAL_BLOCKED_HEADING
+                if reasons
+                else f"advance to {target}"
+            )
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def can_approve(state_completion: dict[str, bool] | None, **blocker_kwargs) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Approval requires all states through REVIEW_DECISION (#290 AC)."""
+    required = REVIEW_MERGE_STATES[: REVIEW_MERGE_STATES.index("REVIEW_DECISION") + 1]
+    completion = dict(state_completion or {})
+    advance = assess_state_advancement(
+        completion,
+        target_state="APPROVE_OR_REQUEST_CHANGES",
+        **blocker_kwargs,
+    )
+    missing = [s for s in required if not completion.get(s)]
+    reasons = list(advance["reasons"])
+    if missing:
+        reasons.append(
+            "approval blocked: incomplete states: " + ", ".join(missing)
+        )
+    block = bool(reasons) or advance["block"]
+    return {
+        "allowed": not block,
+        "block": block,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "missing_states": missing,
+        "safe_next_action": advance["safe_next_action"],
+    }
+
+
+def can_merge(
+    state_completion: dict[str, bool] | None,
+    *,
+    pre_merge_gates: dict[str, bool] | None = None,
+    **blocker_kwargs,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Merge requires approve path plus fresh PRE_MERGE_RECHECK gates (#290 AC6)."""
+    completion = dict(state_completion or {})
+    approve = can_approve(completion, **blocker_kwargs)
+    reasons = list(approve["reasons"])
+
+    if not completion.get("APPROVE_OR_REQUEST_CHANGES"):
+        reasons.append("merge blocked: APPROVE_OR_REQUEST_CHANGES not completed")
+
+    gate_map = dict(pre_merge_gates or {})
+    missing_gates = [g for g in _PRE_MERGE_REQUIRED_GATES if not gate_map.get(g)]
+    if missing_gates:
+        reasons.append(
+            "merge blocked: pre-merge gates incomplete: " + ", ".join(missing_gates)
+        )
+
+    advance = assess_state_advancement(
+        completion,
+        target_state="MERGE",
+        **blocker_kwargs,
+    )
+    reasons.extend(advance["reasons"])
+
+    block = bool(reasons)
+    return {
+        "allowed": not block,
+        "block": block,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "missing_pre_merge_gates": missing_gates,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "complete PRE_MERGE_RECHECK with fresh whoami/capability/PR re-fetch "
+            "before merge"
+            if block
+            else "merge allowed"
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def assess_blocked_recovery_handoff(report_text: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Blocked handoffs must not replay approve/merge commands (#290 AC4)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    if _FORBIDDEN_RECOVERY_REPLAY_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "blocked recovery handoff contains direct approve/merge replay command"
+        )
+    if reasons and not _RESTART_WORKFLOW_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "blocked recovery handoff must direct operator to restart full workflow"
+        )
+    return {
+        "block": bool(reasons),
+        "allowed": not reasons,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "remove approve/merge replay commands and say to restart full workflow "
+            "after blockers clear"
+            if reasons
+            else "recovery handoff wording acceptable"
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def assess_final_report_state_claims(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    state_completion: dict[str, bool] | None = None,
+    approve_completed: bool = False,
+    merge_completed: bool = False,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Reports must not claim reviewed/ready-to-merge without gate proof (#290 AC10)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    completion = dict(state_completion or {})
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    if _READY_TO_MERGE_RE.search(text) and not (
+        merge_completed or completion.get("PRE_MERGE_RECHECK")
+    ):
+        reasons.append(
+            "report claims ready-to-merge without PRE_MERGE_RECHECK completion"
+        )
+
+    if _REVIEWED_VALIDATED_RE.search(text):
+        if not (approve_completed or completion.get("VALIDATE")):
+            reasons.append(
+                "report claims reviewed/validated without VALIDATE/APPROVE proof"
+            )
+
+    return {
+        "block": bool(reasons),
+        "allowed": not reasons,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "remove stale reviewed/ready-to-merge claims unless gates passed"
+            if reasons
+            else "final report state claims consistent with workflow"
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def workflow_status(
+    state_completion: dict[str, bool] | None,
+    **blocker_kwargs,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Summarize current state-machine position for MCP/runtime reporting."""
+    completion = dict(state_completion or {})
+    blockers = assess_workflow_blockers(**blocker_kwargs)
+    next_state = _first_incomplete_state(completion)
+    return {
+        "states": list(REVIEW_MERGE_STATES),
+        "completed_states": [s for s in REVIEW_MERGE_STATES if completion.get(s)],
+        "next_required_state": next_state,
+        "workflow_complete": next_state is None,
+        "approve_allowed": can_approve(completion, **blocker_kwargs)["allowed"],
+        "merge_allowed": can_merge(completion, **blocker_kwargs)["allowed"],
+        "blockers": blockers,
+    }

reviewer_already_landed_classification.py

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+"""Already-landed PR classification verifier for reviewer reports (#295)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+ALREADY_LANDED_ELIGIBILITY_CLASS = "ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED"
+
+_LANDED_CONTEXT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"already[- ]landed|ancestor proof\s*:\s*passed|"
+    r"eligibility class\s*:\s*already_landed",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_ELIGIBILITY_CLASS_LINE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"eligibility class\s*:\s*(.+)$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_INELIGIBLE_SELECTION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:next|oldest)\s+eligible\s+pr\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_REVIEW_ELIGIBLE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\beligible for (?:review|merge)\b|\bready for (?:review|merge)\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_PINNED_REVIEWED_HEAD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\bpinned reviewed head\s*:",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_CANDIDATE_HEAD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\bcandidate head sha\s*:",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_REVIEWED_HEAD_NONE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\breviewed head sha\s*:\s*none\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_VALIDATION_PROOF_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:validation passed|pytest.*passed|diff review passed|"
+    r"validated on pinned head)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_QUEUE_BLOCKED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"queue blocked by already[- ]landed|"
+    r"reconciliation(?:-only)?\s+(?:next step|required)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+
+def _landed_context(report_text: str, eligibility_class: str | None) -> bool:
+    if (eligibility_class or "").strip().upper() == ALREADY_LANDED_ELIGIBILITY_CLASS:
+        return True
+    return bool(_LANDED_CONTEXT_RE.search(report_text or ""))
+
+
+def assess_already_landed_classification_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    eligibility_class: str | None = None,
+    selected_pr_already_landed: bool | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """#295: already-landed PRs are reconciliation-only, not review eligible."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    landed = _landed_context(text, eligibility_class)
+    if selected_pr_already_landed is True:
+        landed = True
+    if not landed:
+        return {
+            "proven": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "landed_context": False,
+            "reasons": [],
+            "safe_next_action": "proceed",
+        }
+
+    if _INELIGIBLE_SELECTION_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "already-landed PR must not be described as oldest/next eligible PR; "
+            "use 'Oldest open PR requiring action' and "
+            f"'Eligibility class: {ALREADY_LANDED_ELIGIBILITY_CLASS}'"
+        )
+
+    if _REVIEW_ELIGIBLE_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "already-landed PR must not be described as eligible for review or merge"
+        )
+
+    class_match = _ELIGIBILITY_CLASS_LINE_RE.search(text)
+    if class_match:
+        declared = class_match.group(1).strip().upper()
+        if declared != ALREADY_LANDED_ELIGIBILITY_CLASS:
+            reasons.append(
+                "already-landed PR eligibility class must be "
+                f"{ALREADY_LANDED_ELIGIBILITY_CLASS}"
+            )
+    elif selected_pr_already_landed is True:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"already-landed selected PR must declare Eligibility class: "
+            f"{ALREADY_LANDED_ELIGIBILITY_CLASS}"
+        )
+
+    if _PINNED_REVIEWED_HEAD_RE.search(text):
+        if not _VALIDATION_PROOF_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "already-landed pre-review report must use Candidate head SHA, "
+                "not Pinned reviewed head, unless validation and diff review passed"
+            )
+
+    if selected_pr_already_landed is True and not _CANDIDATE_HEAD_RE.search(text):
+        if _PINNED_REVIEWED_HEAD_RE.search(text) or "head sha" in text.lower():
+            reasons.append(
+                "already-landed ancestry check must report Candidate head SHA"
+            )
+
+    if selected_pr_already_landed is True and not _REVIEWED_HEAD_NONE_RE.search(text):
+        if _PINNED_REVIEWED_HEAD_RE.search(text) and not _VALIDATION_PROOF_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "already-landed report must state 'Reviewed head SHA: none' "
+                "when validation did not run"
+            )
+
+    if selected_pr_already_landed is True and not _QUEUE_BLOCKED_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "already-landed queue blocker must state reconciliation requirement "
+            "or queue blocked wording"
+        )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "landed_context": True,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "classify as ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED, use Candidate head SHA, "
+            "and stop normal review"
+            if not proven
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_already_landed_handoff.py

@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+"""Already-landed controller handoff consistency verifier (#299)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+from review_proofs import git_ref_mutating_commands
+
+ALREADY_LANDED_STATE = "ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED"
+
+_HANDOFF_SECTION_RE = re.compile(r"^##\s*Controller Handoff\s*$", re.I | re.M)
+
+_STALE_HANDOFF_FIELDS = (
+    "pinned reviewed head",
+    "scratch worktree used",
+)
+
+_LEGACY_MUTATIONS_NONE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*mutations\s*:\s*none\s*$",
+    re.I | re.M,
+)
+_LEGACY_WORKSPACE_NONE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*workspace\s+mutations\s*:\s*none\s*$",
+    re.I | re.M,
+)
+
+_FORBIDDEN_REVIEW_STATES_RE = re.compile(
+    r"review decision\s*:\s*approved?\b|"
+    r"merge result\s*:\s*merged\b|"
+    r"\bready[_ ]to[_ ]merge\b",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_NARRATIVE_ELIGIBILITY_RE = re.compile(
+    r"eligibility class\s*:\s*([^\n]+)",
+    re.I,
+)
+_NARRATIVE_REVIEWED_SHA_RE = re.compile(
+    r"reviewed head sha\s*:\s*([^\n]+)",
+    re.I,
+)
+_NARRATIVE_WORKTREE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"review worktree used\s*:\s*([^\n]+)",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+
+def _handoff_field_map(report_text: str) -> dict[str, str]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    match = _HANDOFF_SECTION_RE.search(text)
+    if not match:
+        return {}
+    fields: dict[str, str] = {}
+    for line in text[match.end() :].splitlines():
+        stripped = line.strip().lstrip("-*").strip()
+        if ":" not in stripped:
+            continue
+        key, value = stripped.split(":", 1)
+        fields[key.strip().lower()] = value.strip()
+    return fields
+
+
+def _narrative_before_handoff(report_text: str) -> str:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    match = _HANDOFF_SECTION_RE.search(text)
+    if not match:
+        return text
+    return text[: match.start()]
+
+
+def _is_truthy(value: str) -> bool:
+    lowered = (value or "").strip().lower()
+    return lowered not in {"", "none", "n/a", "not applicable", "false", "no", "—", "-"}
+
+
+def _gate_active(text: str, fields: dict[str, str], session: dict) -> bool:
+    if session.get("gate_fired") or session.get("already_landed_gate_fired"):
+        return True
+    eligibility = (fields.get("eligibility class") or "").upper()
+    if ALREADY_LANDED_STATE in eligibility:
+        return True
+    return ALREADY_LANDED_STATE.lower() in text.lower()
+
+
+def assess_already_landed_handoff_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    handoff_session: dict | None = None,
+    command_log: list | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Reject stale handoff fields and narrative/handoff drift after the gate (#299)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    session = dict(handoff_session or {})
+    fields = _handoff_field_map(text)
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    if not _gate_active(text, fields, session):
+        return {
+            "proven": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "reasons": [],
+            "gate_active": False,
+            "safe_next_action": "proceed",
+        }
+
+    for stale_field in _STALE_HANDOFF_FIELDS:
+        if stale_field in fields:
+            reasons.append(
+                f"already-landed handoff must not include stale field "
+                f"'{stale_field.title()}' (#299)"
+            )
+
+    if _LEGACY_WORKSPACE_NONE_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "already-landed handoff must not include legacy "
+            "'Workspace mutations: None' (#299)"
+        )
+
+    ref_commands = git_ref_mutating_commands(command_log or session.get("command_log"))
+    mutations_observed = bool(
+        ref_commands
+        or session.get("mutations_observed")
+        or session.get("mcp_mutations")
+        or session.get("review_mutations")
+    )
+    if mutations_observed and _LEGACY_MUTATIONS_NONE_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "already-landed handoff must not claim 'Mutations: None' when "
+            "git ref, MCP, review, merge, or cleanup mutations occurred (#299)"
+        )
+
+    git_ref_value = fields.get("git ref mutations", "").strip().lower()
+    if ref_commands and (not git_ref_value or git_ref_value == "none"):
+        reasons.append(
+            "git fetch/ref updates must be reported under Git ref mutations (#299)"
+        )
+
+    reviewed_sha = fields.get("reviewed head sha", "")
+    if reviewed_sha and _is_truthy(reviewed_sha):
+        reasons.append(
+            "already-landed handoff must use 'Reviewed head SHA: none' (#299)"
+        )
+
+    worktree_used = fields.get("review worktree used", "")
+    if worktree_used and _is_truthy(worktree_used):
+        reasons.append(
+            "already-landed handoff must set Review worktree used: false (#299)"
+        )
+
+    candidate_sha = fields.get("candidate head sha", "")
+    if not candidate_sha or candidate_sha.lower() in {"none", "n/a", "unknown"}:
+        reasons.append(
+            "already-landed handoff must include Candidate head SHA (#299)"
+        )
+
+    if _FORBIDDEN_REVIEW_STATES_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "already-landed handoff must not claim approved/merged/ready-to-merge (#299)"
+        )
+
+    narrative = _narrative_before_handoff(text)
+    handoff_eligibility = (fields.get("eligibility class") or "").strip()
+    narrative_eligibility = (
+        _NARRATIVE_ELIGIBILITY_RE.search(narrative).group(1).strip()
+        if _NARRATIVE_ELIGIBILITY_RE.search(narrative)
+        else ""
+    )
+    if handoff_eligibility and narrative_eligibility:
+        if handoff_eligibility.upper() != narrative_eligibility.upper():
+            reasons.append(
+                "narrative Eligibility class disagrees with controller handoff (#299)"
+            )
+
+    narrative_reviewed = (
+        _NARRATIVE_REVIEWED_SHA_RE.search(narrative).group(1).strip()
+        if _NARRATIVE_REVIEWED_SHA_RE.search(narrative)
+        else ""
+    )
+    if narrative_reviewed and reviewed_sha:
+        if narrative_reviewed.lower() != reviewed_sha.lower():
+            reasons.append(
+                "narrative Reviewed head SHA disagrees with controller handoff (#299)"
+            )
+
+    narrative_worktree = (
+        _NARRATIVE_WORKTREE_RE.search(narrative).group(1).strip()
+        if _NARRATIVE_WORKTREE_RE.search(narrative)
+        else ""
+    )
+    if narrative_worktree and worktree_used:
+        if narrative_worktree.lower() != worktree_used.lower():
+            reasons.append(
+                "narrative Review worktree used disagrees with controller handoff (#299)"
+            )
+
+    git_ref_narrative = "git ref mutations" in narrative.lower()
+    if git_ref_narrative and git_ref_value:
+        if "none" in git_ref_value and ref_commands:
+            reasons.append(
+                "narrative and handoff disagree on git ref mutation reporting (#299)"
+            )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": list(dict.fromkeys(reasons)),
+        "gate_active": True,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "emit canonical ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED handoff without "
+            "stale review/merge fields; align narrative and controller handoff"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_infra_stop_handoff.py

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+"""Infra-stop repair handoff verifier for blocked reviewer workflows (#289)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+from capability_stop_terminal import (
+    TERMINAL_REPORT_HEADING,
+    assess_capability_stop_report,
+)
+
+_REPAIR_HANDOFF_RE = re.compile(
+    r"repair handoff|control-checkout repair mode",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_CONTROL_REPAIR_RE = re.compile(r"control-checkout repair mode", re.IGNORECASE)
+_PR_QUEUE_ADVANCE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:selected pr|pr #\d+ (?:to review|selected)|eligible pr|"
+    r"next (?:eligible )?pr(?: to review)?|oldest eligible pr|pinned (?:review )?head)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_REVIEW_MUTATION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:gitea_review_pr|gitea_merge_pr|request_changes|submitted\s+approve|"
+    r"merge result|review decision\s*:\s*approve)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_BACKGROUND_TOOL_RE = re.compile(r"\b(?:schedule|manage_task)\b", re.IGNORECASE)
+_PR_REVIEW_REPORT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:review summary|merge recommendation|validation result\s*:\s*pass|"
+    r"queue status report with selected pr)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+_DIAGNOSTIC_FIELDS = {
+    "mcp process root": re.compile(r"mcp process root\s*:", re.IGNORECASE),
+    "inspected git root": re.compile(r"inspected git root\s*:", re.IGNORECASE),
+    "conflict marker path": re.compile(
+        r"(?:conflict marker path|exact conflict marker path)\s*:",
+        re.IGNORECASE,
+    ),
+    "merge/rebase control path": re.compile(
+        r"(?:merge/rebase control path|exact merge/rebase control path)\s*:",
+        re.IGNORECASE,
+    ),
+    "safe next repair action": re.compile(
+        r"safe next (?:repair )?action\s*:",
+        re.IGNORECASE,
+    ),
+}
+
+
+def assess_infra_stop_handoff_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    stop_session: dict | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Validate repair handoff purity when infra_stop blocks reviewer capability (#289)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    session = dict(stop_session or {})
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    infra_stop = bool(
+        session.get("infra_stop")
+        or session.get("infra_stop_blocked")
+        or session.get("route_result") == "infra_stop"
+    )
+    if not infra_stop:
+        return {
+            "proven": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "reasons": [],
+            "infra_stop": False,
+            "safe_next_action": "proceed",
+        }
+
+    lower = text.lower()
+    repair_handoff = bool(
+        _REPAIR_HANDOFF_RE.search(text)
+        or TERMINAL_REPORT_HEADING.lower() in lower
+    )
+    if not repair_handoff:
+        reasons.append(
+            "infra_stop requires a repair handoff, not a PR review report"
+        )
+
+    if _PR_REVIEW_REPORT_RE.search(text) and not _REPAIR_HANDOFF_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "final output must be a repair handoff instead of stale PR review state"
+        )
+
+    if _PR_QUEUE_ADVANCE_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "infra_stop blocks PR queue advancement; do not select or advance next PR"
+        )
+
+    if _REVIEW_MUTATION_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "review, approval, request-changes, merge, or comment mutations "
+            "forbidden while infra_stop is active"
+        )
+
+    if session.get("pinned_head_sha") or re.search(
+        r"pinned (?:review )?head sha\s*:", text, re.IGNORECASE
+    ):
+        if session.get("capability_cleared") is not True:
+            reasons.append(
+                "cannot pin PR head SHA while review capability never cleared"
+            )
+
+    if session.get("main_checkout_diagnostics") and not _CONTROL_REPAIR_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "main-checkout diagnostics must be labeled CONTROL-CHECKOUT REPAIR MODE"
+        )
+
+    if _BACKGROUND_TOOL_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "background schedule/manage_task tools must not be used during "
+            "blocked infra_stop recovery"
+        )
+
+    assessment = session.get("infra_stop_assessment") or {}
+    if assessment.get("infra_stop") or infra_stop:
+        missing = [
+            label
+            for label, pattern in _DIAGNOSTIC_FIELDS.items()
+            if not pattern.search(text)
+        ]
+        if missing and session.get("require_infra_diagnostics", True):
+            reasons.append(
+                "infra_stop repair handoff missing diagnostic fields: "
+                + ", ".join(missing)
+            )
+        conflict_file = assessment.get("conflict_file")
+        if conflict_file and conflict_file.lower() not in lower:
+            reasons.append(
+                f"infra_stop assessment conflict file {conflict_file!r} "
+                "not reflected in repair handoff"
+            )
+
+    capability = assess_capability_stop_report(
+        text,
+        trust_gate_status=session.get("trust_gate_status"),
+        capability_denied=True,
+    )
+    if not capability.get("pure"):
+        reasons.extend(capability.get("reasons") or [])
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": list(dict.fromkeys(reasons)),
+        "infra_stop": True,
+        "repair_handoff": repair_handoff,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "stop PR queue work; emit CONTROL-CHECKOUT REPAIR MODE handoff "
+            "with infra diagnostics and safe next repair action"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_inventory_worktree.py

@@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
+"""Reviewer inventory completeness and worktree state verifier (#293)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+_PAGINATION_FINALITY_EVIDENCE = re.compile(
+    r"pagination_complete\s*:\s*true|inventory_complete\s*:\s*true|"
+    r"is_final_page\s*:\s*true|pages_fetched|has_more\s*:\s*false|"
+    r"no next page|final[- ]page|pr_inventory_trust_gate\.status|"
+    r"total_count\s*:|pagination.*(?:final|complete)",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_INCOMPLETE_PAGINATION_PROOF = re.compile(
+    r"first page only|partial page|page 1 only|truncated|"
+    r"returned \d+ open prs?(?:\s*$|\s*[,;])",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZE_ASSUMPTION = re.compile(
+    r"(?:less|fewer) than (?:the )?(?:default )?(?:gitea )?page[- ]?(?:size|limit)|"
+    r"default (?:gitea )?page[- ]?size|under (?:the )?50[- ]?(?:item )?limit|"
+    r"(?:complete|exhaustive).*(?:default )?page[- ]?size|"
+    r"page[- ]?size assumption|assumed complete",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_ELIGIBILITY_CLAIM_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:oldest eligible pr|next eligible pr|next pr to review|"
+    r"inventory (?:is )?complete|inventory exhaustive|exhaustive inventory)\b",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_EXACT_PAGE_LIMIT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:returned|listed|fetched)\s+(\d+)\s+open prs?|"
+    r"open pr count\s*:\s*(\d+)|"
+    r"page[- ]?size\s*(?:=|:)\s*(\d+)",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_LEGACY_SCRATCH_FALSE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"scratch worktree used\s*:\s*false",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_BRANCHES_WORKTREE_RE = re.compile(r"\bbranches/", re.I)
+
+_CONTRADICTORY_HEAD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"detached head\s*/\s*branch\s+master|"
+    r"branch\s+master\s*/\s*detached head|"
+    r"detached head.*branch\s+(?:master|main|dev)\b.*detached|"
+    r"checkout\s*:\s*detached head\s*/\s*branch",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_MAIN_CHECKOUT_BRANCH_RE = re.compile(
+    r"main checkout branch\s*:\s*(\S+)",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_REVIEW_HEAD_STATE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"review worktree head state\s*:\s*(\S+)",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_HANDOFF_SECTION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^##\s*Controller Handoff\s*$",
+    re.I | re.M,
+)
+
+
+def _handoff_field_map(report_text: str) -> dict[str, str]:
+    """Parse ``- Field: value`` lines from the Controller Handoff section."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    match = _HANDOFF_SECTION_RE.search(text)
+    if not match:
+        return {}
+    section = text[match.end() :]
+    fields: dict[str, str] = {}
+    for line in section.splitlines():
+        stripped = line.strip().lstrip("-*").strip()
+        if ":" not in stripped:
+            continue
+        key, value = stripped.split(":", 1)
+        fields[key.strip().lower()] = value.strip()
+    return fields
+
+
+def _truthy_field(value: str) -> bool:
+    lowered = (value or "").strip().lower()
+    if not lowered:
+        return False
+    if lowered in {"false", "no", "none", "not applicable", "n/a", "—", "-"}:
+        return False
+    return True
+
+
+def _field_proves_pagination(value: str) -> bool:
+    proof = (value or "").strip()
+    if not proof or proof.lower() in {"none", "n/a", "not applicable", "unknown"}:
+        return False
+    if _DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZE_ASSUMPTION.search(proof):
+        return False
+    if _INCOMPLETE_PAGINATION_PROOF.search(proof):
+        return False
+    return bool(_PAGINATION_FINALITY_EVIDENCE.search(proof))
+
+
+def _pagination_proven(text: str, session: dict, *, pagination_field: str = "") -> bool:
+    if session.get("pagination_complete") or session.get("inventory_complete"):
+        return True
+    session_proof = session.get("inventory_pagination_proof") or ""
+    if _field_proves_pagination(str(session_proof)):
+        return True
+    if _field_proves_pagination(pagination_field):
+        return True
+    if _PAGINATION_FINALITY_EVIDENCE.search(text):
+        return True
+    return False
+
+
+def _exact_page_limit_unproven(
+    text: str, session: dict, *, pagination_proven: bool = False
+) -> bool:
+    """True when a full page was returned without final-page proof."""
+    if pagination_proven:
+        return False
+    requested = session.get("requested_page_size")
+    returned = session.get("returned_page_size")
+    if isinstance(requested, int) and isinstance(returned, int):
+        if returned >= requested > 0:
+            return True
+    for match in _EXACT_PAGE_LIMIT_RE.finditer(text):
+        count = next((g for g in match.groups() if g), None)
+        if not count:
+            continue
+        try:
+            n = int(count)
+        except ValueError:
+            continue
+        if n in {10, 20, 50}:
+            return True
+    return False
+
+
+def assess_inventory_worktree_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    inventory_session: dict | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Validate PR inventory pagination proof and worktree field consistency (#293)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    session = dict(inventory_session or {})
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    fields = _handoff_field_map(text)
+    pagination_proof_field = fields.get("inventory pagination proof", "")
+
+    pagination_proven = _pagination_proven(
+        text, session, pagination_field=pagination_proof_field
+    )
+
+    if _ELIGIBILITY_CLAIM_RE.search(text):
+        if not pagination_proven:
+            reasons.append(
+                "oldest/next eligible PR or inventory-complete claim requires "
+                "final-page/no-next-page/pagination_complete proof"
+            )
+
+    if _DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZE_ASSUMPTION.search(text):
+        if not pagination_proven:
+            reasons.append(
+                "inventory pagination assumed from default page size without "
+                "final-page/no-next-page/total-count/traversal proof"
+            )
+
+    if pagination_proof_field:
+        if _DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZE_ASSUMPTION.search(pagination_proof_field):
+            reasons.append(
+                "Inventory pagination proof field relies on page-size assumption"
+            )
+        elif _INCOMPLETE_PAGINATION_PROOF.search(pagination_proof_field):
+            reasons.append(
+                "Inventory pagination proof field does not prove final page"
+            )
+        elif not _field_proves_pagination(pagination_proof_field):
+            if _ELIGIBILITY_CLAIM_RE.search(text) or _EXACT_PAGE_LIMIT_RE.search(text):
+                reasons.append(
+                    "Inventory pagination proof field missing final-page metadata"
+                )
+
+    if _exact_page_limit_unproven(text, session, pagination_proven=pagination_proven):
+        reasons.append(
+            "exactly-full first page returned without final-page or "
+            "no-next-page proof"
+        )
+
+    review_worktree_used = fields.get("review worktree used", "")
+    review_worktree_path = fields.get("review worktree path", "")
+    scratch_used = fields.get("scratch worktree used", "")
+    inside_branches = fields.get("review worktree inside branches:", "") or fields.get(
+        "review worktree inside branches", ""
+    )
+
+    branches_path_in_text = bool(
+        _BRANCHES_WORKTREE_RE.search(review_worktree_path)
+        or _BRANCHES_WORKTREE_RE.search(text)
+    )
+
+    if branches_path_in_text:
+        if review_worktree_used and not _truthy_field(review_worktree_used):
+            reasons.append(
+                "reports using a branches/ review worktree must set "
+                "Review worktree used: true"
+            )
+        if scratch_used and re.search(r"\bfalse\b", scratch_used, re.I):
+            reasons.append(
+                "Scratch worktree used: false rejected when a branches/ "
+                "review worktree was created or used"
+            )
+        if _LEGACY_SCRATCH_FALSE_RE.search(text) and not _truthy_field(
+            review_worktree_used
+        ):
+            reasons.append(
+                "legacy Scratch worktree used: false contradicts branches/ "
+                "review worktree usage"
+            )
+
+    if review_worktree_path and _truthy_field(review_worktree_used):
+        if "branches/" not in review_worktree_path.replace("\\", "/").lower():
+            reasons.append(
+                "Review worktree path must be under branches/ when "
+                "Review worktree used is true"
+            )
+        if inside_branches and re.search(r"\bfalse\b", inside_branches, re.I):
+            reasons.append(
+                "Review worktree inside branches must be true when path is "
+                "under branches/"
+            )
+
+    main_branch = (
+        fields.get("main checkout branch", "")
+        or _MAIN_CHECKOUT_BRANCH_RE.search(text).group(1)
+        if _MAIN_CHECKOUT_BRANCH_RE.search(text)
+        else ""
+    )
+    head_state = (
+        fields.get("review worktree head state", "")
+        or (
+            _REVIEW_HEAD_STATE_RE.search(text).group(1)
+            if _REVIEW_HEAD_STATE_RE.search(text)
+            else ""
+        )
+    )
+    if main_branch and head_state:
+        main_norm = main_branch.strip().lower()
+        head_norm = head_state.strip().lower()
+        if head_norm in {"branch", "on branch"} and main_norm in {
+            "master",
+            "main",
+            "dev",
+        }:
+            if "detached" in text.lower() and "review worktree" in text.lower():
+                reasons.append(
+                    "review worktree HEAD state must not reuse main checkout "
+                    "branch wording"
+                )
+
+    if _CONTRADICTORY_HEAD_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "contradictory checkout wording such as 'Detached HEAD / Branch master'"
+        )
+
+    if review_worktree_used and _truthy_field(review_worktree_used):
+        if not review_worktree_path or review_worktree_path.lower() in {
+            "none",
+            "n/a",
+            "not applicable",
+        }:
+            reasons.append(
+                "Review worktree used: true requires Review worktree path"
+            )
+        if not head_state or head_state.lower() in {
+            "none",
+            "n/a",
+            "not applicable",
+            "unknown",
+        }:
+            reasons.append(
+                "Review worktree used: true requires Review worktree HEAD state"
+            )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": list(dict.fromkeys(reasons)),
+        "pagination_proven": pagination_proven,
+        "branches_worktree_used": branches_path_in_text,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "prove inventory pagination with final-page metadata; align "
+            "Review worktree used/path/HEAD state with branches/ usage"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_merge_simulation.py

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+"""Merge-simulation worktree mutation verifier for reviewer reports (#317)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+_WORKTREE_INDEX_FIELD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*worktree/index mutations\s*:\s*(.+?)\s*$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_READONLY_DIAG_RE = re.compile(
+    r"read[- ]only diagnostics\s*:\s*(.+)$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_WORKTREE_PATH_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:worktree path|diagnostic worktree|simulation worktree)\s*:",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_PRE_CLEAN_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:pre[- ]simulation|before simulation|clean before).*(?:clean|status)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_MERGE_RESULT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:merge result|simulation result|conflict status|merge conflict)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_ABORT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:merge --abort|abort/reset command|abort command|git merge --abort)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_POST_CLEAN_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:post[- ]abort|after abort|clean after).*(?:clean|status)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+
+def _command_text(entry: Any) -> str:
+    if isinstance(entry, dict):
+        return str(entry.get("command") or "").strip()
+    return str(entry or "").strip()
+
+
+def _git_subcommand_line(command: str) -> str | None:
+    tokens = command.split()
+    if not tokens or tokens[0] != "git":
+        return None
+    return " ".join(tokens[1:])
+
+
+def merge_simulation_commands(command_log: list | None) -> list[str]:
+    """Return logged commands that perform local merge simulation (#317)."""
+    out: list[str] = []
+    for entry in command_log or []:
+        command = _command_text(entry)
+        rest = _git_subcommand_line(command)
+        if rest is None:
+            continue
+        lower = command.lower()
+        if rest.startswith("merge"):
+            if "--no-commit" in lower or (
+                "--no-ff" in lower and "merge" in lower and "--commit" not in lower
+            ):
+                out.append(command)
+            elif "--abort" in lower:
+                out.append(command)
+    return out
+
+
+def assess_merge_simulation_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    command_log: list | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Reject merge simulation classified as read-only; require worktree proof (#317)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    lower = text.lower()
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    simulation_commands = merge_simulation_commands(command_log)
+    has_abort = any("--abort" in c.lower() for c in simulation_commands)
+    has_simulation = any(
+        "--no-commit" in c.lower() or (
+            "--no-ff" in c.lower() and "--abort" not in c.lower()
+        )
+        for c in simulation_commands
+    )
+
+    if not simulation_commands:
+        return {
+            "proven": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "reasons": [],
+            "simulation_commands": [],
+            "safe_next_action": "proceed",
+        }
+
+    field = _WORKTREE_INDEX_FIELD_RE.search(text)
+    value = (field.group(1).strip().lower() if field else "") or ""
+    if not value or value in {"none", "n/a", "no"}:
+        reasons.append(
+            "merge simulation commands ran but report lacks "
+            "'Worktree/index mutations' entry"
+        )
+    elif "merge" not in value and "simulation" not in value:
+        if not any(cmd.lower() in lower for cmd in simulation_commands):
+            reasons.append(
+                "Worktree/index mutations must document merge simulation commands"
+            )
+
+    readonly = _READONLY_DIAG_RE.search(text)
+    if readonly:
+        readonly_value = readonly.group(1)
+        for command in simulation_commands:
+            if command.lower() in readonly_value.lower():
+                reasons.append(
+                    "merge simulation may not be listed under read-only diagnostics"
+                )
+        if has_simulation and "merge simulation" in readonly_value.lower():
+            reasons.append(
+                "merge simulation may not be classified as read-only diagnostics"
+            )
+
+    if has_simulation:
+        if not _WORKTREE_PATH_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append("merge simulation report missing worktree path")
+        if not _PRE_CLEAN_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append("merge simulation report missing pre-simulation clean status")
+        if not _MERGE_RESULT_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append("merge simulation report missing merge result/conflict status")
+    if has_abort or has_simulation:
+        if has_abort and not _ABORT_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append("merge simulation report missing abort/reset command proof")
+        if has_abort and not _POST_CLEAN_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append("merge simulation report missing post-abort clean status")
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "simulation_commands": simulation_commands,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "classify merge simulation under Worktree/index mutations with full "
+            "pre/merge/abort/post-clean proof; never list as read-only diagnostics"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_mutation_categories.py

@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+"""Precise mutation category verifier for reviewer controller handoffs (#319)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+_CONTROLLER_HANDOFF_RE = re.compile(r"controller handoff", re.IGNORECASE)
+_WORKSPACE_MUTATIONS_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*workspace\s+mutations\s*:",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_VAGUE_MUTATIONS_NONE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*mutations\s*:\s*none\s*$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+
+_REQUIRED_CATEGORIES = (
+    "file edits by reviewer",
+    "worktree/index mutations",
+    "git ref mutations",
+)
+_WORKTREE_FIELD_ALIASES = (
+    "worktree/index mutations",
+    "worktree mutations",
+)
+
+
+def _has_category(text: str, category: str) -> bool:
+    pattern = re.compile(
+        rf"^\s*[-*]?\s*{re.escape(category)}\s*:",
+        re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+    )
+    return bool(pattern.search(text))
+
+
+def _has_worktree_category(text: str) -> bool:
+    return any(_has_category(text, alias) for alias in _WORKTREE_FIELD_ALIASES)
+
+
+def _normalize_for_consistency_check(text: str) -> str:
+    """Map #319 precise labels to #313 field names for consistency delegation."""
+    normalized = text
+    if _has_category(text, "worktree/index mutations") and not _has_category(
+        text, "worktree mutations"
+    ):
+        normalized = re.sub(
+            r"(worktree/index mutations\s*:)",
+            "Worktree mutations:",
+            normalized,
+            flags=re.IGNORECASE,
+        )
+    return normalized
+
+
+def assess_mutation_categories_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    handoff_session: dict | None = None,
+    observed_commands: list | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Require precise mutation categories in reviewer controller handoffs (#319)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    session = dict(handoff_session or {})
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    lower = text.lower()
+
+    is_controller = bool(
+        session.get("controller_handoff")
+        or _CONTROLLER_HANDOFF_RE.search(text)
+    )
+    if not is_controller and not session.get("require_categories"):
+        return {
+            "proven": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "reasons": [],
+            "controller_handoff": False,
+            "safe_next_action": "proceed",
+        }
+
+    if _WORKSPACE_MUTATIONS_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "controller handoffs must not use legacy 'Workspace mutations'; "
+            "use precise mutation category fields"
+        )
+
+    if _VAGUE_MUTATIONS_NONE_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "controller handoffs must not use vague 'Mutations: none'; "
+            "report each precise category separately"
+        )
+
+    missing = [
+        category
+        for category in _REQUIRED_CATEGORIES
+        if category != "worktree/index mutations" and not _has_category(text, category)
+    ]
+    if not _has_worktree_category(text):
+        missing.append("worktree/index mutations")
+
+    if missing:
+        reasons.append(
+            "controller handoff missing precise mutation categories: "
+            + ", ".join(missing)
+        )
+
+    commands = observed_commands or session.get("observed_commands")
+    if commands:
+        from review_proofs import assess_workspace_mutation_consistency
+
+        consistency = assess_workspace_mutation_consistency(
+            _normalize_for_consistency_check(text),
+            commands,
+        )
+        if not consistency.get("complete"):
+            reasons.extend(consistency.get("reasons") or [])
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "controller_handoff": True,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "replace Workspace mutations with file edits, worktree/index, git ref, "
+            "and other precise mutation category fields"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_proof_backed_handoff.py

@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+"""Proof-backed reviewer handoff claim verifier (#395)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+_PAGINATION_FINALITY = re.compile(
+    r"has_more\s*:\s*false|is_final_page\s*:\s*true|"
+    r"inventory_complete\s*:\s*true|pages_fetched|total_count\s*:",
+    re.I,
+)
+_PAGE_SIZE_ONLY = re.compile(
+    r"(?:less|fewer) than (?:the )?(?:default )?page[- ]?size|"
+    r"under (?:the )?50[- ]?(?:item )?limit|"
+    r"returned \d+ (?:open )?prs?.*less than 50",
+    re.I,
+)
+_INVENTORY_COMPLETE_CLAIM = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:inventory (?:is )?complete|inventory exhaustive|"
+    r"complete (?:pr )?inventory)\b",
+    re.I,
+)
+_SKIP_CLAIM = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:earlier prs? skipped|skipped (?:earlier )?pr|"
+    r"skip(?:ped)? pr #?\d+|non-mergeable|prior request.changes)\b",
+    re.I,
+)
+_CONFLICT_PROOF = re.compile(
+    r"merge simulation|git merge --no-commit|conflicting files|"
+    r"conflict proof|merge_exit|non-mergeable",
+    re.I,
+)
+_BASELINE_CLAIM = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:baseline (?:validation|worktree|comparison)|"
+    r"same as master|pre-existing (?:on )?master|"
+    r"failure signatures match)\b",
+    re.I,
+)
+_BASELINE_PATH = re.compile(r"baseline worktree path\s*:\s*(\S+)", re.I)
+_BASELINE_SHA = re.compile(r"baseline (?:target )?sha\s*:\s*([0-9a-f]{7,40})", re.I)
+_BASELINE_DIRTY_BEFORE = re.compile(
+    r"baseline.*dirty before|dirty before.*baseline", re.I
+)
+_BASELINE_DIRTY_AFTER = re.compile(
+    r"baseline.*dirty after|dirty after.*baseline", re.I
+)
+_BASELINE_COMMAND = re.compile(
+    r"baseline.*(?:validation )?command|pytest.*baseline", re.I
+)
+_BASELINE_RESULT = re.compile(
+    r"baseline.*(?:validation )?result|baseline_exit|baseline failures", re.I
+)
+_MASTER_INTEGRATION = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:merged master into|merge(?:d)? (?:remote[- ]tracking )?branch.*master|"
+    r"master integration|integrated master|rebase.*master)\b",
+    re.I,
+)
+_CLEANUP_CLAIM = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:worktree(?:s)? (?:were )?cleaned|cleanup (?:result|mutations)|"
+    r"removed (?:session[- ]owned )?worktree|git worktree remove)\b",
+    re.I,
+)
+_WORKTREE_LIST = re.compile(r"git worktree list|worktree list proof", re.I)
+_PROOF_SOURCE = re.compile(
+    r"proof source\s*:\s*(command|mcp metadata|prior blocker|not checked)",
+    re.I,
+)
+_HANDOFF_SECTION = re.compile(r"^##\s*Controller Handoff\s*$", re.I | re.M)
+
+
+def _handoff_fields(report_text: str) -> dict[str, str]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    match = _HANDOFF_SECTION.search(text)
+    if not match:
+        return {}
+    fields: dict[str, str] = {}
+    for line in text[match.end() :].splitlines():
+        stripped = line.strip().lstrip("-*").strip()
+        if ":" not in stripped:
+            continue
+        key, value = stripped.split(":", 1)
+        fields[key.strip().lower()] = value.strip()
+    return fields
+
+
+def _command_text(entry: Any) -> str:
+    if isinstance(entry, dict):
+        return str(entry.get("command") or entry.get("tool") or "").strip()
+    return str(entry or "").strip()
+
+
+def _action_log_has(action_log: list | None, pattern: re.Pattern[str]) -> bool:
+    for entry in action_log or []:
+        blob = " ".join(
+            filter(
+                None,
+                [
+                    _command_text(entry),
+                    str(entry.get("result") or "") if isinstance(entry, dict) else "",
+                    str(entry.get("reason") or "") if isinstance(entry, dict) else "",
+                ],
+            )
+        )
+        if pattern.search(blob):
+            return True
+    return False
+
+
+def assess_proof_backed_handoff_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    action_log: list | None = None,
+    inventory_session: dict | None = None,
+    baseline_session: dict | None = None,
+    skip_session: list[dict] | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Require explicit command/tool evidence for proof-sensitive review claims (#395)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    fields = _handoff_fields(text)
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    inventory = dict(inventory_session or {})
+    baseline = dict(baseline_session or {})
+    skips = list(skip_session or [])
+
+    pagination_field = fields.get("inventory pagination proof", "")
+    if _INVENTORY_COMPLETE_CLAIM.search(text) or _PAGE_SIZE_ONLY.search(text):
+        has_meta = bool(
+            inventory.get("inventory_complete")
+            or inventory.get("pagination_complete")
+            or _PAGINATION_FINALITY.search(pagination_field)
+            or _PAGINATION_FINALITY.search(text)
+            or _action_log_has(action_log, re.compile(r"gitea_list_prs", re.I))
+        )
+        if _PAGE_SIZE_ONLY.search(text) and not has_meta:
+            reasons.append(
+                "inventory completeness claimed from page-size assumption only; "
+                "require has_more=false, is_final_page=true, or inventory_complete=true"
+            )
+        elif _INVENTORY_COMPLETE_CLAIM.search(text) and not has_meta:
+            reasons.append(
+                "inventory complete claim lacks explicit pagination metadata proof"
+            )
+
+    if _SKIP_CLAIM.search(text) or fields.get("earlier prs skipped", "").lower() not in {
+        "",
+        "none",
+        "n/a",
+    }:
+        skip_proof = bool(
+            skips
+            or _CONFLICT_PROOF.search(text)
+            or _action_log_has(
+                action_log, re.compile(r"git merge --no-commit|gitea_get_pr_review_feedback", re.I)
+            )
+        )
+        if not skip_proof:
+            reasons.append(
+                "earlier PR skip claim lacks command/tool conflict or blocker proof"
+            )
+
+    if _BASELINE_CLAIM.search(text) or fields.get("baseline worktree used", "").lower() == "true":
+        baseline_ok = bool(
+            baseline.get("complete")
+            or (
+                _BASELINE_PATH.search(text)
+                and _BASELINE_SHA.search(text)
+                and (_BASELINE_DIRTY_BEFORE.search(text) or baseline.get("clean_before"))
+                and (_BASELINE_COMMAND.search(text) or baseline.get("command"))
+                and (_BASELINE_RESULT.search(text) or baseline.get("result"))
+                and (_BASELINE_DIRTY_AFTER.search(text) or baseline.get("clean_after"))
+            )
+        )
+        if not baseline_ok:
+            reasons.append(
+                "baseline validation claim missing worktree path, target SHA, "
+                "dirty-before/after status, command, or result proof"
+            )
+
+    if _MASTER_INTEGRATION.search(text):
+        if not _action_log_has(
+            action_log,
+            re.compile(r"git merge.*master|git rebase.*master", re.I),
+        ) and not re.search(r"merge_exit\s*=\s*\d+|merge simulation", text, re.I):
+            reasons.append(
+                "master integration claim lacks exact merge/rebase command and result"
+            )
+
+    if _CLEANUP_CLAIM.search(text) or fields.get("cleanup mutations", "").lower() not in {
+        "",
+        "none",
+        "n/a",
+    }:
+        if not (_WORKTREE_LIST.search(text) or _action_log_has(action_log, _WORKTREE_LIST)):
+            reasons.append(
+                "cleanup claim lacks final git worktree list or equivalent proof"
+            )
+
+    if re.search(r"\blive proof\b", text, re.I) and not _PROOF_SOURCE.search(text):
+        if not action_log:
+            reasons.append(
+                "live proof wording requires proof source classification "
+                "(command, MCP metadata, prior blocker, or not checked)"
+            )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "cite explicit command/tool evidence or structured MCP pagination metadata "
+            "for each proof-sensitive claim"
+            if not proven
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_reconcile_inventory.py

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+"""Reconciliation PR inventory pagination proof verifier (#308)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+_COMPLETE_SCAN_CLAIM_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:all already[- ]landed(?:\s+prs?)?(?:\s+were)?\s+found|"
+    r"complete queue scan|all open prs? (?:were )?(?:found|checked|inventoried|listed)|"
+    r"inventory (?:is )?complete|exhaustive (?:pr )?inventory|"
+    r"no additional already[- ]landed|scanned (?:the )?(?:full )?open pr queue)\b",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_FINALITY_RE = re.compile(
+    r"is_final_page\s*:\s*true|has_more\s*:\s*false|no next page|final[- ]page|"
+    r"pagination_complete\s*:\s*true|inventory pagination proof\s*:\s*(?!assumed|none\b).+",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_REQUESTED_PAGE_SIZE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"requested page size\s*:\s*(\d+)|page[- ]?size\s*(?:=|:)\s*(\d+)",
+    re.I,
+)
+_PAGES_FETCHED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"pages? fetched\s*:\s*(\d+)|page count\s*:\s*(\d+)",
+    re.I,
+)
+_RETURNED_PER_PAGE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"returned pr count(?: per page)?\s*:|open pr count per page|"
+    r"returned \d+ open prs? per page|per[- ]page counts?\s*:",
+    re.I,
+)
+_EXACT_LIMIT_RETURN_RE = re.compile(
+    r"returned\s+(\d+)\s+open prs?|listed\s+(\d+)\s+open prs?",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZE_ASSUMPTION = re.compile(
+    r"(?:less|fewer) than (?:the )?(?:default )?(?:gitea )?page[- ]?(?:size|limit)|"
+    r"default (?:gitea )?page[- ]?size|assumed complete",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+
+def _int_from_groups(match: re.Match[str] | None) -> int | None:
+    if not match:
+        return None
+    for group in match.groups():
+        if group:
+            return int(group)
+    return None
+
+
+def _pagination_proven(text: str, session: dict) -> bool:
+    if session.get("pagination_complete") or session.get("inventory_complete"):
+        return True
+    if _FINALITY_RE.search(text):
+        return True
+    pages = session.get("pages_fetched")
+    if isinstance(pages, int) and pages >= 1 and session.get("is_final_page"):
+        return True
+    return False
+
+
+def _metadata_present(text: str, session: dict) -> list[str]:
+    missing: list[str] = []
+    has_page_size = bool(
+        _REQUESTED_PAGE_SIZE_RE.search(text)
+        or session.get("requested_page_size")
+    )
+    has_pages_fetched = bool(
+        _PAGES_FETCHED_RE.search(text) or session.get("pages_fetched")
+    )
+    has_returned_counts = bool(
+        _RETURNED_PER_PAGE_RE.search(text) or session.get("returned_per_page")
+    )
+    if not has_page_size:
+        missing.append("requested page size")
+    if not has_pages_fetched:
+        missing.append("page count fetched")
+    if not has_returned_counts:
+        missing.append("returned PR count per page")
+    if not _pagination_proven(text, session):
+        missing.append("final-page/no-next-page proof")
+    return missing
+
+
+def assess_reconcile_inventory_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    inventory_session: dict | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Validate PR inventory pagination proof in reconciliation reports (#308)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    session = dict(inventory_session or {})
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    claims_scan = bool(_COMPLETE_SCAN_CLAIM_RE.search(text))
+    lists_open_prs = bool(
+        re.search(r"open prs? listed|listed open prs?|pr inventory", text, re.I)
+    )
+
+    if not claims_scan and not lists_open_prs and not session.get("inventory_required"):
+        return {
+            "proven": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "reasons": [],
+            "inventory_claimed": False,
+            "safe_next_action": "proceed",
+        }
+
+    if _DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZE_ASSUMPTION.search(text) and not _pagination_proven(text, session):
+        reasons.append(
+            "reconciliation inventory assumed complete from page-size guess "
+            "without final-page proof (#308)"
+        )
+
+    if claims_scan and not _pagination_proven(text, session):
+        reasons.append(
+            "complete queue scan or all already-landed claim requires "
+            "pagination finality proof (#308)"
+        )
+
+    missing = _metadata_present(text, session)
+    if (claims_scan or lists_open_prs) and missing:
+        reasons.append(
+            "reconciliation inventory missing pagination metadata: "
+            + ", ".join(missing)
+        )
+
+    requested = session.get("requested_page_size")
+    returned = session.get("returned_page_size")
+    if isinstance(requested, int) and isinstance(returned, int):
+        if returned >= requested > 0 and not _pagination_proven(text, session):
+            reasons.append(
+                "exactly-full first reconciliation page without final-page proof (#308)"
+            )
+    else:
+        for match in _EXACT_LIMIT_RETURN_RE.finditer(text):
+            count = _int_from_groups(match)
+            if count in {10, 20, 50} and not _pagination_proven(text, session):
+                reasons.append(
+                    "exactly-full first reconciliation page without final-page proof (#308)"
+                )
+                break
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": list(dict.fromkeys(reasons)),
+        "inventory_claimed": claims_scan or lists_open_prs,
+        "pagination_proven": _pagination_proven(text, session),
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "include requested page size, pages fetched, per-page counts, and "
+            "final-page/no-next-page proof before claiming complete scan"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_reconcile_linked_issue.py

@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+"""Reconciliation linked-issue live proof verifier (#300)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+_HANDOFF_SECTION_RE = re.compile(r"^##\s*Controller Handoff\s*$", re.I | re.M)
+
+_LINKED_ISSUE_FIELD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"linked issue\s*:\s*(.+)$",
+    re.I | re.M,
+)
+_LINKED_ISSUE_STATUS_RE = re.compile(
+    r"linked issue(?:\s+live)?\s+status\s*:\s*(.+)$",
+    re.I | re.M,
+)
+
+_STATUS_CLAIM_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(?:issue\s+#?\d+\s*\()?(open|closed|resolved)\b|"
+    r"issue\s+(?:is\s+)?(open|closed|resolved)\b|"
+    r"linked issue.*\b(open|closed|resolved)\b",
+    re.I,
+)
+_NOT_VERIFIED_RE = re.compile(r"not verified in this session", re.I)
+
+_LIVE_FETCH_PROOF_RE = re.compile(
+    r"gitea_view_issue|issue fetched live|live issue fetch|"
+    r"fetched linked issue.*(?:current|this) session|"
+    r"linked issue (?:fetch|proof).*(?:current|this) session|"
+    r"live linked issue proof",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_ISSUE_ACTION_RECOMMEND_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:recommend(?:ed)?|should|must)\s+(?:close|reopen|comment on)\s+"
+    r"(?:the\s+)?(?:linked\s+)?issue|"
+    r"(?:close|reopen|comment on)\s+linked issue\s+#?\d+",
+    re.I,
+)
+_CAPABILITY_PROOF_RE = re.compile(
+    r"capability proof|exact capability|gitea_close_issue|"
+    r"gitea_mark_issue|gitea_create_issue_comment|gitea_edit_issue",
+    re.I,
+)
+
+_NO_LINKED_ISSUE_VALUES = frozenset({
+    "",
+    "none",
+    "n/a",
+    "not applicable",
+    "no linked issue",
+    "unknown",
+})
+
+
+def _handoff_field_map(report_text: str) -> dict[str, str]:
+    text = report_text or ""
+    match = _HANDOFF_SECTION_RE.search(text)
+    if not match:
+        return {}
+    fields: dict[str, str] = {}
+    for line in text[match.end() :].splitlines():
+        stripped = line.strip().lstrip("-*").strip()
+        if ":" not in stripped:
+            continue
+        key, value = stripped.split(":", 1)
+        fields[key.strip().lower()] = value.strip()
+    return fields
+
+
+def _extract_linked_issue_number(text: str, fields: dict[str, str]) -> int | None:
+    linked = fields.get("linked issue", "")
+    if linked.lower() in _NO_LINKED_ISSUE_VALUES:
+        return None
+    match = re.search(r"#?(\d+)", linked)
+    if match:
+        return int(match.group(1))
+    field_match = _LINKED_ISSUE_FIELD_RE.search(text)
+    if field_match:
+        num = re.search(r"#?(\d+)", field_match.group(1))
+        if num:
+            return int(num.group(1))
+    return None
+
+
+def _status_value(text: str, fields: dict[str, str]) -> str:
+    for key in ("linked issue live status", "linked issue status"):
+        if fields.get(key):
+            return fields[key]
+    match = _LINKED_ISSUE_STATUS_RE.search(text)
+    return match.group(1).strip() if match else ""
+
+
+def _live_proof_present(text: str, session: dict, issue_number: int | None) -> bool:
+    if session.get("live_fetched") or session.get("verified_live"):
+        return True
+    if session.get("issue_fetch_proof"):
+        return True
+    if _LIVE_FETCH_PROOF_RE.search(text):
+        return True
+    if issue_number is not None:
+        pattern = re.compile(
+            rf"gitea_view_issue.*#?{issue_number}|"
+            rf"issue\s+#?{issue_number}.*(?:fetched|viewed).*(?:current|this) session",
+            re.I,
+        )
+        if pattern.search(text):
+            return True
+    return False
+
+
+def assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    reconcile_session: dict | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Validate linked issue status claims in reconciliation handoffs (#300)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    session = dict(reconcile_session or {})
+    fields = _handoff_field_map(text)
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    issue_number = session.get("linked_issue_number")
+    if issue_number is None:
+        issue_number = _extract_linked_issue_number(text, fields)
+
+    if issue_number is None:
+        status = _status_value(text, fields)
+        if status and status.lower() not in _NO_LINKED_ISSUE_VALUES:
+            if _STATUS_CLAIM_RE.search(status):
+                reasons.append(
+                    "linked issue status reported without identifying the linked issue (#300)"
+                )
+        if not reasons:
+            return {
+                "proven": True,
+                "block": False,
+                "reasons": [],
+                "linked_issue_number": None,
+                "safe_next_action": "proceed",
+            }
+
+    status = _status_value(text, fields)
+    status_lower = status.lower()
+
+    if session.get("issue_missing"):
+        if status_lower and "not verified" not in status_lower:
+            reasons.append(
+                "missing linked issue must be reported as "
+                "'not verified in this session' (#300)"
+            )
+    elif status:
+        if _NOT_VERIFIED_RE.search(status):
+            pass
+        elif _STATUS_CLAIM_RE.search(status):
+            if not _live_proof_present(text, session, issue_number):
+                reasons.append(
+                    "linked issue open/closed/resolved status requires live "
+                    "gitea_view_issue proof in the current session (#300)"
+                )
+        elif status_lower not in _NO_LINKED_ISSUE_VALUES:
+            if not _live_proof_present(text, session, issue_number):
+                reasons.append(
+                    "linked issue status claim requires live fetch proof or "
+                    "'not verified in this session' (#300)"
+                )
+
+    if _ISSUE_ACTION_RECOMMEND_RE.search(text):
+        if not _CAPABILITY_PROOF_RE.search(text) and not session.get(
+            "issue_action_capability_proven"
+        ):
+            reasons.append(
+                "recommended linked issue close/reopen/comment requires "
+                "exact capability proof (#300)"
+            )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": list(dict.fromkeys(reasons)),
+        "linked_issue_number": issue_number,
+        "live_proof_present": _live_proof_present(text, session, issue_number),
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "fetch linked issue with gitea_view_issue in this session or "
+            "report 'Linked issue status: not verified in this session'"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_validation_failure_history.py

@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+"""Transient validation failure history verifier (#396).
+
+Reviewer sessions may observe validation failures that later pass on rerun.
+Final reports must document every failure observed during the session, not
+only the last passing result.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+_SECTION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"validation failure history",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_FAILURE_ENTRY_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:failure\s*(?:#|entry)?\s*\d+|validation failure)\s*:",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_COMMAND_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:command|validation command)\s*:\s*(.+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_FAILING_TEST_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:failing test|failure|error)\s*:\s*(.+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_CAUSE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:suspected cause|cause)\s*:\s*(.+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_REPRODUCED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:reproduced|reproduces)\s*:\s*(yes|no|unknown)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_BASELINE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:on baseline master|baseline master|exists on baseline)\s*:\s*(yes|no|unknown|not checked)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_PR_CAUSED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:pr[- ]caused|pr caused)\s*:\s*(yes|no|unknown|not proven)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_TRANSIENT_STATUS_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:passed after transient failure investigation|transient failure investigation)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_PLAIN_PASS_RE = re.compile(
+    r"validation\s*:\s*(?:pass|passed|strong|ok|green)\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_ENV_CLEANUP_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:environmental cleanup|state cleaned|what changed between runs)\s*:",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_UNKNOWN_CAUSE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:suspected cause|cause)\s*:\s*(?:unknown|unexplained|not determined)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+
+def _failure_documented_in_text(text: str, failure: dict[str, Any]) -> bool:
+    """Return True when *failure* appears documented in free-form report text."""
+    command = (failure.get("command") or "").strip()
+    failing = (failure.get("failing_test") or failure.get("error") or "").strip()
+    if command and command not in text:
+        return False
+    if failing and failing not in text:
+        return False
+    return bool(command or failing)
+
+
+def _section_has_structured_fields(text: str) -> bool:
+    if not _SECTION_RE.search(text):
+        return False
+    section_start = _SECTION_RE.search(text).start()
+    section = text[section_start:]
+    has_command = bool(_COMMAND_RE.search(section))
+    has_failure = bool(_FAILING_TEST_RE.search(section))
+    return has_command and has_failure
+
+
+def assess_validation_failure_history_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    validation_session: dict | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Require final reports to account for transient validation failures (#396)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    session = dict(validation_session or {})
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    violations: list[str] = []
+
+    observed = list(session.get("observed_failures") or [])
+    final_status = (session.get("final_validation_status") or "").strip().lower()
+    cause_unknown = any(
+        (f.get("suspected_cause") or "").strip().lower() in {
+            "unknown", "unexplained", "not determined", ""
+        }
+        and not (f.get("pr_caused") or "").strip().lower() in {"yes", "no"}
+        for f in observed
+    ) or bool(session.get("cause_unknown"))
+
+    if not observed:
+        return {
+            "proven": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "reasons": [],
+            "violations": [],
+            "observed_failure_count": 0,
+            "safe_next_action": "proceed",
+        }
+
+    documented = _section_has_structured_fields(text)
+    if not documented:
+        for failure in observed:
+            if _failure_documented_in_text(text, failure):
+                documented = True
+                break
+
+    if not documented:
+        violations.append(
+            "session observed validation failure(s) but final report omits "
+            "Validation failure history"
+        )
+        reasons.append(
+            "every validation failure observed during the session must appear "
+            "in a Validation failure history section"
+        )
+
+    if documented and not _SECTION_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "failure details must appear under an explicit "
+            "'Validation failure history' heading"
+        )
+
+    for idx, failure in enumerate(observed, start=1):
+        prefix = f"failure #{idx}"
+        if not _failure_documented_in_text(text, failure) and documented:
+            reasons.append(
+                f"{prefix}: command and failing test/error not documented in report"
+            )
+        command = (failure.get("command") or "").strip()
+        failing = (failure.get("failing_test") or failure.get("error") or "").strip()
+        if not command:
+            reasons.append(f"{prefix}: missing command in session failure record")
+        if not failing:
+            reasons.append(
+                f"{prefix}: missing failing test or error in session failure record"
+            )
+
+    plain_pass = bool(_PLAIN_PASS_RE.search(text))
+    transient_wording = bool(_TRANSIENT_STATUS_RE.search(text))
+    final_passed = final_status in {
+        "passed",
+        "pass",
+        "passed_after_transient_failure_investigation",
+    }
+
+    if (final_passed or plain_pass) and observed:
+        if cause_unknown and not transient_wording:
+            violations.append(
+                "unknown transient failure cause cannot be erased as plain 'passed'"
+            )
+            reasons.append(
+                "when cause is unknown, use status "
+                "'passed after transient failure investigation'"
+            )
+        elif not transient_wording and final_status != "passed_after_transient_failure_investigation":
+            if not _ENV_CLEANUP_RE.search(text):
+                reasons.append(
+                    "later passing rerun must document what changed between runs "
+                    "or environmental cleanup performed"
+                )
+
+    if session.get("environmental_contamination") and not _ENV_CLEANUP_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "environmental /tmp state contamination must document cleanup or "
+            "what changed before the passing rerun"
+        )
+
+    proven = not reasons and not violations
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": bool(violations) or not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "violations": violations,
+        "observed_failure_count": len(observed),
+        "documented": documented,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "add Validation failure history with command, failing test, cause, "
+            "reproduction, baseline comparison, and PR-caused evidence; use "
+            "'passed after transient failure investigation' when appropriate"
+            if not proven
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_validation_integrity.py

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+"""PR-head vs diagnostic validation integrity verifier (#316)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+_DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL_RE = re.compile(
+    r"diagnostic local experiment|not pr-head validation|diagnostic-only validation",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_OFFICIAL_VALIDATION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:official validation|pr-head validation|validation integrity)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_OFFICIAL_COMMAND_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:official validation command|pr-head validation command|validation command)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_OFFICIAL_RESULT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:official validation result|pr-head validation result|validation result|validation integrity status)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_DIRTY_AFTER_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:worktree dirty after (?:official )?validation|dirty (?:state )?after (?:official )?validation|"
+    r"validation worktree dirty after)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_DIAGNOSTIC_EDIT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:diagnostic edit(?:ed)? path|file edits by reviewer|diagnostic local edit)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_DIAGNOSTIC_COMMAND_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:diagnostic (?:validation )?command|diagnostic test run|diagnostic result)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_SUGGESTED_FIX_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:diagnostic results? (?:were )?used only for suggested fix|suggested fix only|"
+    r"not used as official validation)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_INTEGRITY_STATUS_RE = re.compile(
+    r"validation integrity status\s*:\s*(passed|failed|not run|contaminated)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_POST_EDIT_AS_OFFICIAL_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:official validation(?:\s+result)?\s*:\s*pass|validation passed after (?:local )?edit|"
+    r"full suite passed after diagnostic edit)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+
+def _performed_edits(action_log: list[dict] | None) -> list[str]:
+    paths: list[str] = []
+    for entry in action_log or []:
+        if entry.get("gated_rejected") or entry.get("performed") is False:
+            continue
+        path = entry.get("path")
+        if path and entry.get("kind", "file_edit") in {"file_edit", "edit", "write"}:
+            paths.append(str(path))
+    return paths
+
+
+def assess_validation_integrity_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    validation_session: dict | None = None,
+    action_log: list[dict] | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Separate official PR-head validation from diagnostic edited-worktree tests (#316)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    session = dict(validation_session or {})
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    diagnostic_edits = list(session.get("diagnostic_edits") or [])
+    if not diagnostic_edits:
+        diagnostic_edits = _performed_edits(action_log)
+    diagnostic_ran = bool(
+        session.get("diagnostic_validation_ran")
+        or session.get("diagnostic_runs")
+    )
+    official_ran = bool(session.get("official_validation_ran", True))
+    official_result = (session.get("official_result") or "").strip().lower()
+    diagnostic_result = (session.get("diagnostic_result") or "").strip().lower()
+    dirty_after = session.get("worktree_dirty_after_official")
+    contaminated = bool(session.get("contaminated"))
+
+    if official_ran:
+        if not _OFFICIAL_VALIDATION_RE.search(text) and not _OFFICIAL_COMMAND_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append("report missing official PR-head validation section")
+        if not _OFFICIAL_COMMAND_RE.search(text) and "validation:" not in text.lower():
+            reasons.append("report missing official validation command")
+        if not _OFFICIAL_RESULT_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append("report missing official validation result or integrity status")
+        if dirty_after is not None and not _DIRTY_AFTER_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "report missing worktree dirty state after official validation"
+            )
+        elif dirty_after is None and official_ran and not _DIRTY_AFTER_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "report missing worktree dirty state after official validation"
+            )
+
+    if diagnostic_edits or diagnostic_ran:
+        if not _DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "post-edit diagnostic runs must be labeled "
+                "'Diagnostic local experiment — not PR-head validation'"
+            )
+        if diagnostic_edits and not _DIAGNOSTIC_EDIT_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append("report missing diagnostic edit path")
+        if diagnostic_ran and not _DIAGNOSTIC_COMMAND_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append("report missing diagnostic command/result")
+        if not _SUGGESTED_FIX_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "report must state diagnostic results were used only for suggested fix"
+            )
+        if _POST_EDIT_AS_OFFICIAL_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "post-edit diagnostic results cannot be reported as official PR-head validation"
+            )
+        if diagnostic_result == "pass" and official_result == "fail":
+            if "request_changes" not in text.lower() and "failed" not in text.lower():
+                reasons.append(
+                    "request-changes must cite unmodified PR-head failure, not diagnostic pass"
+                )
+
+    if contaminated:
+        status = _INTEGRITY_STATUS_RE.search(text)
+        if not status or "contaminated" not in status.group(1).lower():
+            reasons.append(
+                "contaminated validation must report integrity status "
+                "'contaminated — recovery required'"
+            )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "diagnostic_edits": diagnostic_edits,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "separate official PR-head validation from diagnostic experiments; "
+            "report dirty-after-validation state"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_validation_worktree_edits.py

@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+"""PR validation worktree read-only edit verifier (#315)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+_VALIDATION_WORKTREE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"branches/(?:review-pr\d+[\w/-]*|review-[\w-]+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_DIAGNOSTIC_WORKTREE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"branches/(?:diagnostic[\w/-]*|scratch[\w/-]*)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_FILE_EDITS_NONE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"file edits by reviewer\s*:\s*none\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_FILE_EDITS_FIELD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"file edits by reviewer\s*:\s*(.+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_VALIDATION_WORKTREE_PATH_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:validation worktree path|review worktree path)\s*:\s*(\S+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_DIAGNOSTIC_WORKTREE_PATH_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:diagnostic (?:scratch )?worktree path|diagnostic worktree)\s*:\s*(\S+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL_RE = re.compile(
+    r"diagnostic local experiment|not pr-head validation|diagnostic-only",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_OFFICIAL_VALIDATION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:official (?:pr-head )?validation|pr-head validation result)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_POST_EDIT_OFFICIAL_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:official validation(?:\s+result)?\s*:\s*pass|validation passed after (?:local )?edit)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+_PERFORMED_EDIT_KINDS = frozenset({"file_edit", "edit", "write", "edited", "created", "wrote"})
+
+
+def _normalize_path(path: str) -> str:
+    return (path or "").replace("\\", "/").strip()
+
+
+def _is_validation_worktree(path: str) -> bool:
+    return bool(_VALIDATION_WORKTREE_RE.search(_normalize_path(path)))
+
+
+def _is_diagnostic_worktree(path: str) -> bool:
+    normalized = _normalize_path(path)
+    return bool(
+        _DIAGNOSTIC_WORKTREE_RE.search(normalized)
+        or "diagnostic" in normalized.lower()
+    )
+
+
+def _performed_edits(action_log: list[dict] | None) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    edits: list[dict[str, str]] = []
+    for entry in action_log or []:
+        if entry.get("gated_rejected") or entry.get("performed") is False:
+            continue
+        kind = (entry.get("kind") or entry.get("action") or "file_edit").strip().lower()
+        if kind not in _PERFORMED_EDIT_KINDS:
+            continue
+        path = (entry.get("path") or "").strip()
+        if not path:
+            continue
+        worktree = _normalize_path(str(entry.get("worktree_path") or entry.get("cwd") or ""))
+        edits.append({"path": path, "worktree_path": worktree})
+    return edits
+
+
+def _extract_validation_path(text: str, session: dict) -> str:
+    path = _normalize_path(str(session.get("validation_worktree_path") or ""))
+    if path:
+        return path
+    match = _VALIDATION_WORKTREE_PATH_RE.search(text or "")
+    return _normalize_path(match.group(1)) if match else ""
+
+
+def _extract_diagnostic_path(text: str, session: dict) -> str:
+    path = _normalize_path(str(session.get("diagnostic_worktree_path") or ""))
+    if path:
+        return path
+    match = _DIAGNOSTIC_WORKTREE_PATH_RE.search(text or "")
+    return _normalize_path(match.group(1)) if match else ""
+
+
+def assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    validation_session: dict | None = None,
+    action_log: list[dict] | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Block edits in PR validation worktrees; require diagnostic separation (#315)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    session = dict(validation_session or {})
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    validation_path = _extract_validation_path(text, session)
+    diagnostic_path = _extract_diagnostic_path(text, session)
+    validation_edits = list(session.get("validation_worktree_edits") or [])
+    diagnostic_edits = list(session.get("diagnostic_edits") or [])
+    edits = _performed_edits(action_log)
+
+    if not validation_edits:
+        for entry in edits:
+            wt = entry.get("worktree_path") or validation_path
+            if wt and _is_validation_worktree(wt) and not _is_diagnostic_worktree(wt):
+                validation_edits.append(entry["path"])
+
+    if not diagnostic_edits:
+        for entry in edits:
+            wt = entry.get("worktree_path") or ""
+            if wt and _is_diagnostic_worktree(wt):
+                diagnostic_edits.append(entry["path"])
+            elif entry["path"] and diagnostic_path and not validation_edits:
+                if _is_diagnostic_worktree(diagnostic_path):
+                    diagnostic_edits.append(entry["path"])
+
+    claimed_none = bool(_FILE_EDITS_NONE_RE.search(text))
+    any_edits = bool(validation_edits or diagnostic_edits or edits)
+
+    if validation_edits:
+        reasons.append(
+            "reviewer must not edit files in the PR validation worktree; "
+            f"observed edits: {', '.join(validation_edits)}"
+        )
+
+    if diagnostic_edits or session.get("diagnostic_experiment"):
+        if not diagnostic_path and not _DIAGNOSTIC_WORKTREE_PATH_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "diagnostic experiments require a separate diagnostic scratch worktree path"
+            )
+        if not _DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "diagnostic experiments must be labeled "
+                "'Diagnostic local experiment — not PR-head validation'"
+            )
+        if not _FILE_EDITS_FIELD_RE.search(text) or claimed_none:
+            reasons.append(
+                "diagnostic edits must be reported under 'File edits by reviewer'"
+            )
+
+    if any_edits and claimed_none:
+        reasons.append(
+            "report claims 'File edits by reviewer: none' but reviewer file edits occurred"
+        )
+
+    if session.get("official_validation_after_edit") or _POST_EDIT_OFFICIAL_RE.search(text):
+        if validation_edits or (validation_path and diagnostic_edits):
+            reasons.append(
+                "post-edit test results cannot be reported as official PR-head validation"
+            )
+
+    if validation_edits and _OFFICIAL_VALIDATION_RE.search(text):
+        if not _DIAGNOSTIC_LABEL_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "validation worktree was edited; official PR-head validation is no longer valid"
+            )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "validation_worktree_path": validation_path or None,
+        "diagnostic_worktree_path": diagnostic_path or None,
+        "validation_worktree_edits": validation_edits,
+        "diagnostic_edits": diagnostic_edits,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "keep PR validation worktrees read-only; use a separate diagnostic "
+            "scratch worktree and report all reviewer file edits"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_worktree_ownership.py

@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+"""Reviewer worktree ownership and safe-reuse proof verifier (#312)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+_SESSION_OWNED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"branches/(?:review-pr\d+[\w/-]*|review-[\w-]+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_WORKTREE_PATH_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:review worktree path|worktree path|session-owned worktree)\s*:\s*(\S+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_BRANCHES_PATH_RE = re.compile(r"/branches/|\bbranches/", re.IGNORECASE)
+_MAIN_CHECKOUT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"main checkout|not (?:the )?main checkout|outside branches/",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_SAFE_REUSE_RE = re.compile(r"safe[- ]reuse proof", re.IGNORECASE)
+_REUSE_POLICY_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:project policy|policy) (?:allows|allowing) (?:reuse|reset)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_CLEAN_TRACKED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:clean tracked state|tracked state\s*:\s*clean|no uncommitted tracked)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_CLEAN_UNTRACKED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:clean untracked state|untracked state\s*:\s*clean|no untracked files)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_NOT_OTHER_SESSION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"not owned by (?:another|other) (?:active )?(?:task|session)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_BRANCH_BEFORE_RESET_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:branch/head before reset|head before reset|branch before reset)\s*:\s*(\S+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_RESET_TARGET_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:reset target sha|reset target)\s*:\s*([0-9a-f]{7,40})",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_DESTRUCTIVE_CMD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\bgit\b(?:\s+(?:-C\s+\S+\s+)?)?"
+    r"(?:reset\s+--hard|clean(?:\s+-[A-Za-z]+)*|checkout\s+(?!HEAD\s+--)|switch\s+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_WORKSPACE_NONE_RE = re.compile(r"workspace mutations\s*:\s*none", re.IGNORECASE)
+_WORKTREE_MUTATION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:worktree(?:/index)? mutations|destructive reset)\s*:\s*(?!none\b).+",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_RESET_IN_REPORT_RE = re.compile(r"reset\s+--hard", re.IGNORECASE)
+
+
+def _command_text(entry) -> str:
+    if isinstance(entry, dict):
+        return str(entry.get("command") or "").strip()
+    return str(entry or "").strip()
+
+
+def _destructive_commands(command_log: list | None) -> list[str]:
+    return [
+        cmd
+        for cmd in (_command_text(entry) for entry in (command_log or []))
+        if cmd and _DESTRUCTIVE_CMD_RE.search(cmd)
+    ]
+
+
+def _extract_worktree_path(text: str, session: dict) -> str:
+    path = (session.get("worktree_path") or "").strip()
+    if path:
+        return path
+    match = _WORKTREE_PATH_RE.search(text or "")
+    return match.group(1).strip() if match else ""
+
+
+def _is_session_owned_path(path: str) -> bool:
+    normalized = (path or "").replace("\\", "/")
+    return bool(_SESSION_OWNED_RE.search(normalized))
+
+
+def _safe_reuse_fields_present(text: str) -> list[str]:
+    missing: list[str] = []
+    if not _WORKTREE_PATH_RE.search(text):
+        missing.append("exact worktree path")
+    if not _BRANCHES_PATH_RE.search(text):
+        missing.append("worktree inside branches/")
+    if not _MAIN_CHECKOUT_RE.search(text):
+        missing.append("worktree is not the main checkout")
+    if not _NOT_OTHER_SESSION_RE.search(text):
+        missing.append("worktree not owned by another active session")
+    if not _CLEAN_TRACKED_RE.search(text):
+        missing.append("clean tracked state")
+    if not _CLEAN_UNTRACKED_RE.search(text):
+        missing.append("clean untracked state")
+    if not _BRANCH_BEFORE_RESET_RE.search(text):
+        missing.append("branch/head before reset")
+    if not _RESET_TARGET_RE.search(text):
+        missing.append("reset target SHA")
+    if not _REUSE_POLICY_RE.search(text):
+        missing.append("explicit project policy allowing reuse/reset")
+    return missing
+
+
+def assess_worktree_ownership_report(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    ownership_session: dict | None = None,
+    command_log: list | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Prove reviewer worktree ownership before reset or validation (#312)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    session = dict(ownership_session or {})
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    worktree_path = _extract_worktree_path(text, session)
+    destructive = _destructive_commands(command_log or session.get("command_log"))
+    if not destructive and session.get("destructive_reset"):
+        destructive = ["git reset --hard (session)"]
+
+    session_owned = bool(
+        session.get("session_owned")
+        or (worktree_path and _is_session_owned_path(worktree_path))
+    )
+    safe_reuse = bool(session.get("safe_reuse") or _SAFE_REUSE_RE.search(text))
+    main_checkout = bool(session.get("main_checkout"))
+    dirty_tracked = session.get("dirty_tracked")
+    dirty_untracked = session.get("dirty_untracked")
+    other_session_owned = bool(session.get("other_session_owned"))
+
+    if worktree_path or destructive or session.get("validation_ran"):
+        if not worktree_path:
+            reasons.append("report missing exact review worktree path")
+        elif main_checkout or "branches/" not in worktree_path.replace("\\", "/"):
+            reasons.append("review worktree must be inside branches/, not the main checkout")
+        elif not _BRANCHES_PATH_RE.search(worktree_path.replace("\\", "/")):
+            reasons.append("review worktree path must be under branches/")
+
+    if other_session_owned and not safe_reuse:
+        reasons.append(
+            "reused worktree appears owned by another active task/session; "
+            "safe-reuse proof required"
+        )
+
+    if dirty_tracked:
+        reasons.append(
+            "worktree has uncommitted tracked changes before reset or validation"
+        )
+    if dirty_untracked and safe_reuse:
+        reasons.append("safe-reuse proof requires clean untracked state")
+
+    if safe_reuse and not session_owned:
+        reasons.extend(
+            f"safe-reuse proof missing {field}"
+            for field in _safe_reuse_fields_present(text)
+        )
+
+    if destructive:
+        if not session_owned and not safe_reuse:
+            reasons.append(
+                "destructive worktree commands forbidden without session-owned "
+                "worktree or safe-reuse proof"
+            )
+        if _WORKSPACE_NONE_RE.search(text) and (
+            _RESET_IN_REPORT_RE.search(text) or any("reset" in c.lower() for c in destructive)
+        ):
+            reasons.append(
+                "final report must not claim 'Workspace mutations: none' when "
+                "git reset --hard occurred"
+            )
+        if not _WORKTREE_MUTATION_RE.search(text) and not _RESET_IN_REPORT_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "destructive reset must be reported under Worktree/index mutations "
+                "or destructive reset operations"
+            )
+
+    if (
+        worktree_path
+        and not session_owned
+        and not safe_reuse
+        and (destructive or session.get("validation_ran"))
+        and not _is_session_owned_path(worktree_path)
+    ):
+        reasons.append(
+            "reused branch-named worktree requires safe-reuse proof before reset or validation"
+        )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "worktree_path": worktree_path or None,
+        "session_owned": session_owned,
+        "safe_reuse": safe_reuse,
+        "destructive_commands": destructive,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "use a fresh session-owned review worktree under branches/review-pr<N>-* "
+            "or document full safe-reuse proof before destructive reset"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }

role_session_router.py

@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ REVIEWER_TASKS = frozenset({
     "review_pr",
     "merge_pr",
     "blind_pr_queue_review",
+    "pr_queue_cleanup",
+    "pr-queue-cleanup",
     "request_changes_pr",
     "approve_pr",
 })
@@ -72,6 +74,15 @@ AUTHOR_TASKS = frozenset({
     "comment_pr",
     "address_pr_change_requests",
     "delete_branch",
+    "work_issue",
+    "work-issue",
+    "reconcile_landed_pr",
+})
+
+RECONCILER_TASKS = frozenset({
+    "reconcile_already_landed_pr",
+    "reconcile_already_landed",
+    "reconcile-landed-pr",
 })
 
 TASK_REQUIRED_ROLE = {
@@ -88,14 +99,30 @@ TASK_REQUIRED_ROLE = {
     "review_pr": "reviewer",
     "merge_pr": "reviewer",
     "blind_pr_queue_review": "reviewer",
+    "pr_queue_cleanup": "reviewer",
+    "pr-queue-cleanup": "reviewer",
     "request_changes_pr": "reviewer",
     "approve_pr": "reviewer",
+    "work_issue": "author",
+    "work-issue": "author",
+    "reconcile_landed_pr": "author",
+    "reconcile_already_landed_pr": "reconciler",
+    "reconcile_already_landed": "reconciler",
+    "reconcile-landed-pr": "reconciler",
+    # #309: reconciler tasks close already-landed PRs/issues only.
+    "reconcile_close_landed_pr": "reconciler",
+    "reconcile_close_landed_issue": "reconciler",
 }
 
 WRONG_ROLE_REVIEWER_MSG = (
     "Wrong role/session for reviewer task. Launch reviewer MCP namespace."
 )
 
+WRONG_ROLE_RECONCILER_MSG = (
+    "Wrong role/session for reconciler task. Launch a reconciler-capable "
+    "MCP namespace/profile with exact close capability."
+)
+
 _session_last_route: dict | None = None
 
 
@@ -191,6 +218,26 @@ def route_task_session(
         _record_route(result)
         return result
 
+    if required_role == "reconciler":
+        result = {
+            "task_type": task_type,
+            "required_role": required_role,
+            "active_role": active_role_kind,
+            "active_profile": active_profile,
+            "route_result": ROUTE_WRONG_ROLE,
+            "downstream_allowed": False,
+            "reasons": [
+                WRONG_ROLE_RECONCILER_MSG,
+                "Reconciler tasks cannot run in author or reviewer "
+                "sessions without exact close capability.",
+            ],
+            "message": WRONG_ROLE_RECONCILER_MSG,
+            "runtime_switching_supported": runtime_switching_supported,
+            "profile_switch_blocked": not runtime_switching_supported,
+        }
+        _record_route(result)
+        return result
+
     if required_role == "author":
         route = ROUTE_TO_AUTHOR
         message = (

skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md

@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ workflow file.
 | Reconcile already-landed open PRs | [`workflows/reconcile-landed-pr.md`](workflows/reconcile-landed-pr.md) | [`schemas/reconcile-landed-final-report.md`](schemas/reconcile-landed-final-report.md) |
 | Create or update Gitea issues | [`workflows/create-issue.md`](workflows/create-issue.md) | [`schemas/create-issue-final-report.md`](schemas/create-issue-final-report.md) |
 | Work on an assigned issue / author code | [`workflows/work-issue.md`](workflows/work-issue.md) | [`schemas/work-issue-final-report.md`](schemas/work-issue-final-report.md) |
+| PR-only queue cleanup (one canonical review per PR) | [`workflows/pr-queue-cleanup.md`](workflows/pr-queue-cleanup.md) | [`schemas/pr-queue-cleanup-final-report.md`](schemas/pr-queue-cleanup-final-report.md) |
 
 ## Universal rules
 
@@ -50,6 +51,10 @@ changes, merge, implement fixes, create branches, commit, push, or create PRs.
 A run that starts in `work-issue` mode may not review, approve, request changes,
 merge, close PRs, or act as reviewer.
 
+A run that starts in `pr-queue-cleanup` mode may not claim issues, create
+branches, edit implementation files, file new issues, or review a second PR
+after any terminal review mutation.
+
 If the task requires a different mode, stop and produce a handoff for the
 correct workflow.
 
@@ -156,6 +161,7 @@ Ready-to-copy task prompts live in [`templates/`](templates/):
 
 - [`start-issue.md`](templates/start-issue.md) — author work (loads `work-issue.md`)
 - [`review-pr.md`](templates/review-pr.md) — review (loads `review-merge-pr.md`)
+- [`pr-queue-cleanup.md`](templates/pr-queue-cleanup.md) — one PR per cleanup run
 - [`merge-pr.md`](templates/merge-pr.md) — merge (loads `review-merge-pr.md`)
 - [`recover-bad-state.md`](templates/recover-bad-state.md)
 - [`reconcile-closed-not-merged-pr.md`](templates/reconcile-closed-not-merged-pr.md)

skills/llm-project-workflow/schemas/pr-queue-cleanup-final-report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# PR-queue-cleanup final report schema
+
+One report per cleanup run (one run = one PR). Fields must all be present;
+use `none` where nothing occurred. Validated by
+`pr_queue_cleanup.assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report` (fail closed).
+
+* Task: pr-queue-cleanup
+* Workflow source: workflows/pr-queue-cleanup.md (+ version/commit/hash)
+* Repo:
+* Role/profile:
+* Identity:
+* PR inventory pagination proof: (inventory_complete / final page / total_count)
+* Queue ordering proof:
+* Earlier PRs skipped: (with live per-PR proof)
+* Selected PR: (exactly one)
+* Pinned head SHA:
+* Review decision: (single terminal decision)
+* Merge authorized for PR: true/false (explicit per-PR operator authorization)
+* Merge gates result:
+* Merge result: (none / not attempted / merged SHA / blocker)
+* Run stop point: (which §4 chain rule ended the run)
+* Next suggested PR: (named, not continued to)
+* File edits by reviewer:
+* Worktree/index mutations:
+* Git ref mutations:
+* MCP/Gitea mutations:
+* Issue mutations: none (required — forbidden in cleanup mode)
+* Branch mutations: none (required — forbidden in cleanup mode)
+* Read-only diagnostics:
+* Blockers:
+* Safe next action: (fresh run for the next PR)

skills/llm-project-workflow/schemas/review-merge-final-report.md

@@ -91,4 +91,23 @@ Verifier: `review_proofs.assess_queue_status_report()`.
 
 Narrative final report and controller handoff must agree on eligibility class,
 candidate/reviewed head SHA, mutation state, worktree usage, review decision,
-terminal review mutation, merge result, and linked issue status.
+terminal review mutation, merge result, and linked issue status.
+
+### Proof-backed claims (#395)
+
+Proof-sensitive claims must cite explicit command/tool evidence in the report
+or structured MCP metadata — not narrative alone:
+
+- **Inventory complete:** `has_more=false`, `is_final_page=true`,
+  `inventory_complete=true`, and/or `total_count` from `gitea_list_prs`.
+- **Skipped earlier PRs:** merge-simulation command output, conflict file list,
+  or live `gitea_get_pr_review_feedback` / mergeability fields.
+- **Baseline validation:** baseline worktree path, baseline target SHA,
+  dirty-before/after, exact command, exact result.
+- **Master integration:** exact `git merge` / `git rebase` command and exit status.
+- **Cleanup:** final `git worktree list` (or remove commands) proving session
+  worktrees were removed.
+
+When a claim relies on prior-session blocker state or MCP metadata only, label
+the proof source explicitly (`command`, `MCP metadata`, `prior blocker`,
+`not checked`). Do not use `live proof` without that classification.

skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/pr-queue-cleanup.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Template: PR-only queue cleanup (one PR per run)
+
+Copy, fill the `<...>` fields, and paste as the task prompt.
+
+```text
+Task: PR-only queue cleanup for <repo>.
+
+Load workflows/pr-queue-cleanup.md and workflows/review-merge-pr.md before any
+mutation. Route pr_queue_cleanup through gitea_route_task_session (reviewer
+profile required).
+
+Rules:
+- One run = exactly one selected PR = one terminal review decision.
+- Build full open-PR inventory with pagination proof before selection.
+- Forbidden: issue claiming, branch creation, implementation edits, issue filing,
+  reviewing a second PR after a terminal mutation in this run.
+- After REQUEST_CHANGES: stop. After APPROVED: merge only this PR and only if
+  operator explicitly authorized merge for this PR in this run.
+- Report Next suggested PR without continuing to it.
+
+Operator PR list (optional): <pr numbers or "oldest eligible from inventory">
+Merge authorized for selected PR in this run: <true|false>
+
+End with the pr-queue-cleanup final report schema.
+```

skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/pr-queue-cleanup.md

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+---
+task_mode: pr-queue-cleanup
+canonical: true
+final_report_schema: ../schemas/pr-queue-cleanup-final-report.md
+---
+
+# PR-only queue cleanup workflow (canonical)
+
+**Task mode:** `pr-queue-cleanup`
+
+Reviewer-role mode for cleanup periods when the queue holds many open PRs.
+Each run dispatches **exactly one** canonical review for **exactly one** PR,
+then stops after any terminal review mutation. The next PR always requires a
+new run with fresh identity, capability, and inventory proof.
+
+This mode composes with the canonical review workflow: for the selected PR,
+load and follow [`workflows/review-merge-pr.md`](review-merge-pr.md) in full.
+This file adds the cleanup-mode boundaries around that per-PR run; it does
+not replace the review workflow.
+
+## 0. Load the canonical workflow first
+
+Load this file and `workflows/review-merge-pr.md` before any mutation and
+report source, version/commit/hash, and any conflict with the operator
+prompt. If either cannot be loaded, stop and produce a recovery handoff.
+
+## 1. Mode isolation — forbidden actions
+
+PR-only cleanup mode forbids, with no exceptions:
+
+* issue claiming (`claim_issue`, `mark_issue`, `lock_issue`)
+* branch creation or push (`create_branch`, `push_branch`)
+* implementation edits of any kind
+* new issue filing (`create_issue`)
+* PR creation (`create_pr`) and commit tools (`commit_files`)
+* reviewing a second PR after any terminal review mutation
+
+`pr_queue_cleanup.check_cleanup_task_allowed` fails closed on these tasks.
+If author-side work is needed, stop and hand off to `work-issue` mode in a
+separate session.
+
+## 2. Identity, capability, and routing
+
+Route `pr_queue_cleanup` through `gitea_route_task_session` — reviewer role
+required; author sessions receive `wrong_role_stop`. Prove `gitea.pr.review`
+capability before selection. Merge additionally requires `gitea.pr.merge`
+plus the explicit per-PR authorization in §4.
+
+## 3. Inventory and selection
+
+Build the complete open-PR inventory with pagination proof
+(`inventory_complete`, final page, `total_count`) before any selection
+claim. Select exactly one PR according to project queue ordering rules
+(oldest-first unless the operator queue says otherwise), skipping earlier
+PRs only with live per-PR proof. No multi-PR validation and no batch report
+may substitute for per-PR proof.
+
+## 4. Terminal mutation chain
+
+`pr_queue_cleanup.resolve_cleanup_run_state` is the authority:
+
+* After `REQUEST_CHANGES` → the run stops.
+* After `COMMENT` or a proof-backed skip → the run stops.
+* After `APPROVED` → the run may continue **only** to same-PR merge, and only
+  when the operator explicitly authorized merge for that specific PR in this
+  run (`Merge authorized: true`) and every merge gate passes.
+* After merge, or on any merge blocker → the run stops.
+* Any terminal mutation targeting a PR other than the selected PR is a hard
+  stop and must be reported as a violation.
+
+## 5. Fresh run per PR
+
+The next PR requires a new run with fresh identity, capability, inventory,
+and ordering proof. Do not carry pinned SHAs, eligibility classes, or
+validation results across runs.
+
+## 6. Final report
+
+Use the schema in
+[`schemas/pr-queue-cleanup-final-report.md`](../schemas/pr-queue-cleanup-final-report.md).
+The report must include the **Next suggested PR** (from the proven ordering)
+without continuing to it, exactly one **Selected PR**, the single terminal
+decision, pagination proof, and `Issue mutations: none` / `Branch mutations:
+none`. `pr_queue_cleanup.assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report` validates these
+fields and fails closed on batch reviews, missing pagination proof, missing
+next-suggested-PR, unauthorized merges, or any issue/branch mutation.

skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/reconcile-landed-pr.md

@@ -248,6 +248,28 @@ Post a reconciliation comment only if:
 If comment capability is missing, record the intended comment in the final
 handoff only.
 
+## 12A. Partial reconciliation policy (#302)
+
+The durable policy when `close_pr` capability is missing is
+**comment-then-stop** (`resolve_partial_reconciliation_plan` in
+`review_proofs.py` enforces it):
+
+* `close_pr` proven → full reconciliation: close the PR and report the
+  close result (`FULL_RECONCILE_CLOSE_ALLOWED`).
+* `close_pr` missing, `comment_pr` proven → post exactly one
+  reconciliation comment carrying PR head SHA, target branch SHA,
+  ancestor proof, linked issue status, and the required missing
+  capability, then stop for a human or authorized close
+  (`PARTIAL_RECONCILE_COMMENT_THEN_STOP`).
+* `comment_pr` also missing → no Gitea mutation; produce a recovery
+  handoff recording the intended comment and required capabilities
+  (`RECOVERY_HANDOFF_ONLY`).
+* Ancestry not proven → no mutation regardless of capability
+  (`GATE_NOT_PROVEN`).
+
+Final reports must explain why the comment was or was not posted and
+name the missing capability (`assess_partial_reconciliation_report`).
+
 ## 13. PR close rules
 
 Close a PR only if:

skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/review-merge-pr.md

@@ -538,6 +538,58 @@ Official validation integrity status must be one of:
 
 Do not invent a softer status.
 
+## 21A. Validation failure history rule
+
+Every validation failure observed during the review session must appear in the
+final report, even if a later rerun passes.
+
+Before claiming `Validation: passed`, list every failed validation command from
+the session under `Validation failure history`.
+
+For each failure, report:
+
+* command
+* failing test or error
+* suspected cause
+* whether it reproduced
+* whether it exists on baseline master
+* evidence for whether it is or is not PR-caused
+
+If a later rerun passes, also report:
+
+* what changed between runs
+* whether environmental state was cleaned (for example `/tmp` lock files)
+* why the pass is trustworthy
+
+If the cause is unknown, do not erase the earlier failure with plain
+`Validation: passed`. Use a status such as
+`passed after transient failure investigation`.
+
+`gitea_validate_review_final_report` rejects reports that omit known earlier
+validation failures when `validation_session.observed_failures` is supplied.
+
+## 21B. Validation status taxonomy (#406)
+
+When the final report summarizes how validation concluded, use one of these
+**validation status** labels (distinct from per-command pass/fail entries):
+
+* `passed` — raw PR-head validation passed on the unmodified head.
+* `failed` — raw PR-head validation failed and no allowed resolution path
+  was proven.
+* `baseline-equivalent failure accepted` — only when a clean baseline
+  worktree under `branches/` proves matching failure signatures on the target
+  branch (baseline path, target SHA, exact commands, failure lists, and
+  `failure signatures match: true`).
+* `raw-head failure resolved by merge simulation` — raw PR-head validation
+  failed, but merge simulation into the current target passed cleanly; report
+  merge simulation under `Worktree/index mutations` with full #317 proof.
+* `passed after transient failure investigation` — a later run passed after an
+  earlier failure in the same session; document the failure history (#396).
+
+Do not use `baseline-equivalent failure accepted` when only merge simulation
+resolved the failure. Do not use bare `passed` when raw PR-head validation
+failed unless one of the resolution statuses above applies.
+
 ## 22. Baseline validation rule
 
 Do not run tests in the main checkout.
@@ -1096,6 +1148,7 @@ Controller Handoff:
 * Baseline worktree path:
 * Files reviewed:
 * Validation:
+* Validation failure history:
 * Official validation integrity status:
 * Terminal review mutation:
 * Review decision:

skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/work-issue.md

@@ -83,6 +83,20 @@ Examples:
 
 If capability cannot be proven, stop and produce a recovery handoff only.
 
+### 2A. Pre-task role routing (#139)
+
+Before issue selection or any mutation, resolve the composite author task:
+
+* `gitea_route_task_session(task_type="work-issue", remote=…)` — must return
+  `route_result: allowed_current_session` and `downstream_allowed: true`
+* `gitea_resolve_task_capability(task="work_issue", remote=…)` — must show
+  `required_role_kind: author` and `allowed_in_current_session: true`
+
+Hyphen (`work-issue`) and underscore (`work_issue`) aliases are equivalent.
+If routing returns `ambiguous_task_stop`, `wrong_role_stop`, or
+`route_to_author_session`, stop and produce a recovery handoff only — do not
+fall back to reviewer tools or guess a different profile.
+
 ## 3. Stop immediately on blocked infrastructure
 
 If any of the following appears, stop immediately:

task_capability_map.py

@@ -72,6 +72,14 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
         "role": "reviewer",
     },
+    "pr_queue_cleanup": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
+        "role": "reviewer",
+    },
+    "pr-queue-cleanup": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
+        "role": "reviewer",
+    },
     "request_changes_pr": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.request_changes",
         "role": "reviewer",
@@ -96,6 +104,48 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
         "permission": "gitea.read",
         "role": "author",
     },
+    "work_issue": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.create",
+        "role": "author",
+    },
+    "work-issue": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.create",
+        "role": "author",
+    },
+    "reconcile_landed_pr": {
+        "permission": "gitea.read",
+        "role": "author",
+    },
+    "reconcile-landed-pr": {
+        "permission": "gitea.read",
+        "role": "author",
+    },
+    "reconcile_already_landed_pr": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.close",
+        "role": "reconciler",
+    },
+    # #309: dedicated reconciler path for already-landed open PRs. Exact
+    # close capabilities only — never review/approve/request_changes/merge.
+    "reconcile_close_landed_pr": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.close",
+        "role": "reconciler",
+    },
+    "reconcile_close_landed_issue": {
+        "permission": "gitea.issue.close",
+        "role": "reconciler",
+    },
+    "post_heartbeat": {
+        "permission": "gitea.issue.comment",
+        "role": "author",
+    },
+    "reconcile_issue_claims": {
+        "permission": "gitea.read",
+        "role": "author",
+    },
+    "cleanup_stale_claims": {
+        "permission": "gitea.issue.comment",
+        "role": "author",
+    },
 }
 
 # Issue-mutating MCP tools and their resolver task keys.

tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py

@@ -62,7 +62,24 @@ class TestPreflightWarnings(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertIn("_encode_commit_payload.py", status["preflight_warnings"][0])
 
 
+# Issue-write tools are profile-gated (#69); gitea_lock_issue requires
+# gitea.issue.comment (see task_capability_map), so the gate must be
+# seeded exactly like tests/test_mcp_server.py::TestIssueLocking (#359).
+ISSUE_WRITE_ENV = {
+    "GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": (
+        "gitea.issue.create,gitea.issue.close,gitea.issue.comment"
+    ),
+}
+
+
 class TestIssueLockArtifactWarning(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        self._env_patcher = patch.dict(os.environ, ISSUE_WRITE_ENV, clear=True)
+        self._env_patcher.start()
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        self._env_patcher.stop()
+
     @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[])
     @patch("mcp_server._auth", return_value="token x")
     @patch("mcp_server._resolve", return_value=("h", "o", "r"))
@@ -72,6 +89,9 @@ class TestIssueLockArtifactWarning(unittest.TestCase):
         mock_state.return_value = {
             "current_branch": "master",
             "porcelain_status": "?? _emit_payload.py\n",
+            "base_equivalent": True,
+            "inspected_git_root": "/scratch/wt",
+            "base_branch": "origin/master",
         }
         result = mcp_server.gitea_lock_issue(
             issue_number=261,

tests/test_already_landed_reconcile.py

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+"""Tests for already-landed PR reconciliation gates (#310)."""
+import os
+import sys
+import unittest
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import already_landed_reconcile
+
+
+class TestAssessAlreadyLandedReconciliation(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_open_pr_already_landed_allows_close(self):
+        with patch(
+            "already_landed_reconcile.is_head_ancestor_of_ref",
+            return_value=True,
+        ):
+            assessment = already_landed_reconcile.assess_already_landed_reconciliation(
+                pr={
+                    "number": 278,
+                    "state": "open",
+                    "title": "Fix thing (Closes #263)",
+                    "body": "",
+                    "head": {"ref": "feat/x", "sha": "abc123"},
+                    "base": {"ref": "master"},
+                },
+                project_root="/tmp/repo",
+                remote="prgs",
+                target_branch="master",
+                target_fetch={
+                    "success": True,
+                    "target_branch": "master",
+                    "target_ref": "prgs/master",
+                    "target_branch_sha": "deadbeef",
+                    "git_fetch_command": "git fetch prgs master",
+                },
+            )
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["close_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            assessment["eligibility_class"],
+            already_landed_reconcile.ELIGIBILITY_ALREADY_LANDED,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(assessment["linked_issue"], 263)
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["ancestor_proof"])
+
+    def test_not_landed_pr_denies_close(self):
+        with patch(
+            "already_landed_reconcile.is_head_ancestor_of_ref",
+            return_value=False,
+        ):
+            assessment = already_landed_reconcile.assess_already_landed_reconciliation(
+                pr={
+                    "number": 99,
+                    "state": "open",
+                    "title": "WIP",
+                    "body": "",
+                    "head": {"ref": "feat/y", "sha": "fff111"},
+                    "base": {"ref": "master"},
+                },
+                project_root="/tmp/repo",
+                remote="prgs",
+                target_branch="master",
+                target_fetch={
+                    "success": True,
+                    "target_branch": "master",
+                    "target_ref": "prgs/master",
+                    "target_branch_sha": "deadbeef",
+                },
+            )
+        self.assertFalse(assessment["close_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            assessment["eligibility_class"],
+            already_landed_reconcile.ELIGIBILITY_NOT_LANDED,
+        )
+
+    def test_stale_target_branch_denies_close(self):
+        assessment = already_landed_reconcile.assess_already_landed_reconciliation(
+            pr={
+                "number": 99,
+                "state": "open",
+                "title": "WIP",
+                "body": "",
+                "head": {"ref": "feat/y", "sha": "fff111"},
+                "base": {"ref": "master"},
+            },
+            project_root="/tmp/repo",
+            remote="prgs",
+            target_branch="master",
+            target_fetch={
+                "success": False,
+                "target_branch": "master",
+                "target_ref": "prgs/master",
+                "target_branch_sha": None,
+                "reasons": ["git fetch failed"],
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(assessment["close_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            assessment["eligibility_class"],
+            already_landed_reconcile.ELIGIBILITY_STALE_TARGET,
+        )
+
+    def test_closed_pr_denies_close(self):
+        assessment = already_landed_reconcile.assess_already_landed_reconciliation(
+            pr={
+                "number": 50,
+                "state": "closed",
+                "title": "Done",
+                "body": "",
+                "head": {"ref": "feat/z", "sha": "aaa"},
+                "base": {"ref": "master"},
+            },
+            project_root="/tmp/repo",
+            remote="prgs",
+            target_branch="master",
+            target_fetch={
+                "success": True,
+                "target_branch": "master",
+                "target_ref": "prgs/master",
+                "target_branch_sha": "deadbeef",
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(assessment["close_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            assessment["eligibility_class"],
+            already_landed_reconcile.ELIGIBILITY_PR_NOT_OPEN,
+        )
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_already_landed_report_wording.py

@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+"""Tests for already-landed final-report wording validator (#298).
+
+An already-landed PR is reconciliation-only, never review/merge
+eligible, and a head SHA may not be called reviewed unless validation
+and diff review actually passed. Final reports and controller handoffs
+must use the reconciliation wording, not the legacy eligible/reviewed
+fields.
+"""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from review_proofs import assess_already_landed_report_wording  # noqa: E402
+
+
+GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED = (
+    "Controller Handoff\n"
+    "- Oldest open PR requiring action: PR #278\n"
+    "- Eligibility class: ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED\n"
+    "- Candidate head SHA: 2a544b7\n"
+    "- Reviewed head SHA: none\n"
+    "- Review worktree used: false\n"
+)
+
+
+class TestAlreadyLandedWording(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_correct_reconciliation_wording_passes(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
+            GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED, already_landed=True
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["downgraded"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["reasons"], [])
+
+    def test_oldest_eligible_wording_fails(self):
+        report = GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED + "- oldest eligible PR: PR #278\n"
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
+            report, already_landed=True
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("oldest eligible pr" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_next_eligible_wording_fails(self):
+        report = GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED + "- next eligible PR: PR #278\n"
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
+            report, already_landed=True
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_pinned_reviewed_head_fails(self):
+        report = GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED + "- Pinned reviewed head: 2a544b7\n"
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
+            report, already_landed=True
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("pinned reviewed head" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_scratch_worktree_field_fails(self):
+        report = GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED + "- Scratch worktree used: False\n"
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
+            report, already_landed=True
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_missing_eligibility_class_fails(self):
+        report = (
+            "Controller Handoff\n"
+            "- Oldest open PR requiring action: PR #278\n"
+            "- Candidate head SHA: 2a544b7\n"
+            "- Reviewed head SHA: none\n"
+            "- Review worktree used: false\n"
+        )
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
+            report, already_landed=True
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("eligibility class" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_populated_reviewed_head_sha_fails(self):
+        report = GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED.replace(
+            "- Reviewed head SHA: none\n",
+            "- Reviewed head SHA: 2a544b7\n",
+        )
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
+            report, already_landed=True
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("reviewed head" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+
+class TestNonAlreadyLandedReports(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_normal_reviewed_report_passes(self):
+        report = (
+            "- Selected PR: 281\n"
+            "- Pinned reviewed head: abc1234\n"
+            "- Review decision: approve\n"
+        )
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
+            report, already_landed=False, review_validated=True
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_blocked_infra_report_with_pinned_head_fails(self):
+        report = (
+            "- Selected PR: 281\n"
+            "- Pinned reviewed head: abc1234\n"
+            "- Current status: blocked on infra_stop\n"
+        )
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
+            report, already_landed=False, review_validated=False
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("before validation" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_validation_failed_report_with_reviewed_sha_fails(self):
+        report = (
+            "- Selected PR: 281\n"
+            "- Reviewed head SHA: abc1234\n"
+            "- Validation: full suite failed\n"
+        )
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
+            report, already_landed=False, review_validated=False
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_validation_failed_report_with_reviewed_none_passes(self):
+        report = (
+            "- Selected PR: 281\n"
+            "- Reviewed head SHA: none\n"
+            "- Validation: full suite failed\n"
+        )
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
+            report, already_landed=False, review_validated=False
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_author_mutation_worktree.py

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+"""Tests for branches-only author mutation worktree guard (#274)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+from unittest import mock
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import author_mutation_worktree as amw  # noqa: E402
+
+
+class TestPathUnderBranches(unittest.TestCase):
+    ROOT = "/repo/Gitea-Tools"
+
+    def test_branches_subdirectory_passes(self):
+        self.assertTrue(
+            amw.is_path_under_branches(f"{self.ROOT}/branches/issue-274", self.ROOT)
+        )
+
+    def test_control_checkout_fails(self):
+        self.assertFalse(amw.is_path_under_branches(self.ROOT, self.ROOT))
+
+    def test_sibling_directory_fails(self):
+        self.assertFalse(
+            amw.is_path_under_branches("/repo/other-checkout", self.ROOT)
+        )
+
+
+class TestAssessAuthorMutationWorktree(unittest.TestCase):
+    ROOT = "/repo/Gitea-Tools"
+
+    def test_branches_worktree_passes(self):
+        result = amw.assess_author_mutation_worktree(
+            workspace_path=f"{self.ROOT}/branches/issue-274",
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+            current_branch="feat/issue-274-branches-only-worktrees",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_control_checkout_blocks(self):
+        result = amw.assess_author_mutation_worktree(
+            workspace_path=self.ROOT,
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+            current_branch="master",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertIn("control checkout", result["reasons"][0])
+
+    def test_drifted_control_branch_blocks(self):
+        result = amw.assess_author_mutation_worktree(
+            workspace_path=self.ROOT,
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+            current_branch="feat/some-task",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("drift" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_branches_worktree_as_project_root_passes(self):
+        """MCP launched from a branches/ worktree uses that path as PROJECT_ROOT."""
+        worktree_root = f"{self.ROOT}/branches/issue-274"
+        result = amw.assess_author_mutation_worktree(
+            workspace_path=worktree_root,
+            project_root=worktree_root,
+            current_branch="feat/issue-274-branches-only-worktrees",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestPreflightIntegration(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_verify_preflight_blocks_control_checkout_with_test_porcelain(self):
+        import mcp_server
+
+        mcp_server._preflight_whoami_called = True
+        mcp_server._preflight_capability_called = True
+        mcp_server._preflight_resolved_role = "author"
+        control_root = "/repo/Gitea-Tools"
+        with mock.patch.object(mcp_server, "PROJECT_ROOT", control_root):
+            with mock.patch.dict(
+                "os.environ",
+                {"GITEA_TEST_PORCELAIN": ""},
+                clear=False,
+            ):
+                with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+                    mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity()
+        self.assertIn("Branches-only mutation guard", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_verify_preflight_allows_branches_worktree(self):
+        import mcp_server
+
+        mcp_server._preflight_whoami_called = True
+        mcp_server._preflight_capability_called = True
+        mcp_server._preflight_resolved_role = "author"
+        worktree = "/repo/Gitea-Tools/branches/issue-274"
+        with mock.patch.dict(
+            "os.environ",
+            {"GITEA_TEST_PORCELAIN": ""},
+            clear=False,
+        ):
+            mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity(worktree_path=worktree)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_commit_payloads.py

@@ -55,7 +55,15 @@ class TestCommitPayloads(unittest.TestCase):
         with open(self.config_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
             fh.write(json.dumps(CONFIG))
 
-        self.locked_worktree_dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
+        repo_root = os.path.realpath(
+            os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), os.pardir)
+        )
+        branches_root = os.path.join(repo_root, "branches")
+        os.makedirs(branches_root, exist_ok=True)
+        self.locked_worktree_dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(
+            dir=branches_root,
+            prefix="test-commit-payloads-",
+        )
         self.locked_worktree_path = os.path.realpath(self.locked_worktree_dir.name)
 
         self.lock_file_path = "/tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json"
@@ -94,6 +102,7 @@ class TestCommitPayloads(unittest.TestCase):
             "GITEA_MCP_PROFILE": profile,
             "GITEA_TOKEN_AUTHOR": "author-pass",
             "GITEA_TEST_PORCELAIN": "",
+            "GITEA_AUTHOR_WORKTREE": self.locked_worktree_path,
         }
 
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request")

tests/test_delete_branch_capability.py

@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+"""Tests for gitea_delete_branch capability gate (Issue #408).
+
+``gitea_delete_branch`` requires the exact ``gitea.branch.delete`` operation:
+without it the delete fails closed (no preflight, no auth lookup, no API call,
+structured permission report). With it, deletion proceeds through existing
+preflight and audit unchanged.
+"""
+import json
+import os
+import sys
+import tempfile
+import unittest
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import mcp_server
+from mcp_server import gitea_delete_branch
+
+FAKE_AUTH = "token fake"
+
+AUTHOR_NO_DELETE = {
+    "profile_name": "prgs-author",
+    "allowed_operations": [
+        "gitea.read", "gitea.pr.create", "gitea.pr.comment",
+        "gitea.branch.push", "gitea.issue.comment",
+    ],
+    "forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge"],
+    "audit_label": "prgs-author",
+}
+
+AUTHOR_WITH_DELETE = {
+    "profile_name": "prgs-author-deleter",
+    "allowed_operations": AUTHOR_NO_DELETE["allowed_operations"] + [
+        "gitea.branch.delete",
+    ],
+    "forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge"],
+    "audit_label": "prgs-author-deleter",
+}
+
+CONFIG = {
+    "version": 2,
+    "contexts": {
+        "ctx": {
+            "enabled": True,
+            "gitea": {"enabled": True, "base_url": "https://gitea.example.com"},
+        }
+    },
+    "profiles": {
+        "author-no-delete": {
+            "enabled": True,
+            "context": "ctx",
+            "role": "author",
+            "username": "author-user",
+            "auth": {"type": "env", "name": "GITEA_TOKEN_AUTHOR"},
+            "allowed_operations": AUTHOR_NO_DELETE["allowed_operations"],
+            "forbidden_operations": [],
+            "execution_profile": "author-no-delete",
+        },
+        "author-with-delete": {
+            "enabled": True,
+            "context": "ctx",
+            "role": "author",
+            "username": "deleter-user",
+            "auth": {"type": "env", "name": "GITEA_TOKEN_AUTHOR"},
+            "allowed_operations": AUTHOR_WITH_DELETE["allowed_operations"],
+            "forbidden_operations": [],
+            "execution_profile": "author-with-delete",
+        },
+        "reviewer-profile": {
+            "enabled": True,
+            "context": "ctx",
+            "role": "reviewer",
+            "username": "reviewer-user",
+            "auth": {"type": "env", "name": "GITEA_TOKEN_REVIEWER"},
+            "allowed_operations": [
+                "gitea.read", "gitea.pr.review", "gitea.pr.merge",
+            ],
+            "forbidden_operations": [
+                "gitea.branch.delete", "gitea.branch.push", "gitea.pr.create",
+            ],
+            "execution_profile": "reviewer-profile",
+        },
+    },
+    "rules": {"allow_runtime_switching": False},
+}
+
+
+class TestDeleteBranchToolGate(unittest.TestCase):
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        self._preflight_snapshot = (
+            mcp_server._preflight_whoami_called,
+            mcp_server._preflight_capability_called,
+        )
+        mcp_server._preflight_whoami_called = False
+        mcp_server._preflight_capability_called = False
+        self._remotes = patch.dict(mcp_server.REMOTES, {
+            "prgs": {"host": "gitea.example.com", "org": "Example-Org",
+                     "repo": "Example-Repo"},
+        })
+        self._remotes.start()
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+        patch("gitea_config.load_config", return_value={}).start()
+        patch(
+            "gitea_config.is_runtime_switching_enabled", return_value=False
+        ).start()
+        patch("gitea_audit.audit_enabled", return_value=False).start()
+        self.mock_api = patch("mcp_server.api_request").start()
+        self.mock_auth = patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH
+        ).start()
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        patch.stopall()
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+        mcp_server._preflight_whoami_called, mcp_server._preflight_capability_called = (
+            self._preflight_snapshot
+        )
+
+    def _set_profile(self, profile):
+        patch("mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=profile).start()
+
+    def test_blocked_without_delete_capability(self):
+        self._set_profile(AUTHOR_NO_DELETE)
+        res = gitea_delete_branch(branch="feat/branch", remote="prgs")
+        self.assertFalse(res["success"])
+        self.assertFalse(res["performed"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_permission"], "gitea.branch.delete")
+        self.assertTrue(res["reasons"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            res["permission_report"]["missing_permission"],
+            "gitea.branch.delete",
+        )
+        self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
+        self.mock_auth.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_allowed_delete_proceeds(self):
+        self._set_profile(AUTHOR_WITH_DELETE)
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("whoami")
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("capability", resolved_role="author")
+        res = gitea_delete_branch(branch="feat/branch", remote="prgs")
+        self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+        self.assertIn("deleted", res["message"])
+        delete_calls = [
+            c for c in self.mock_api.call_args_list if c.args[0] == "DELETE"
+        ]
+        self.assertTrue(delete_calls)
+
+    def test_allowed_delete_audited_with_capability_proof(self):
+        self._set_profile(AUTHOR_WITH_DELETE)
+        patch("gitea_audit.audit_enabled", return_value=True).start()
+        mock_write = patch("gitea_audit.write_event").start()
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("whoami")
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("capability", resolved_role="author")
+        self.mock_api.return_value = {}
+        gitea_delete_branch(branch="feat/branch", remote="prgs")
+        mock_write.assert_called()
+        event = mock_write.call_args[0][0]
+        self.assertEqual(event["action"], "delete_branch")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            event["request_metadata"]["required_permission"],
+            "gitea.branch.delete",
+        )
+
+
+class TestDeleteBranchResolverParity(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        self._remotes = patch.dict(mcp_server.REMOTES, {
+            "prgs": {"host": "gitea.example.com", "org": "Example-Org",
+                     "repo": "Example-Repo"},
+        })
+        self._remotes.start()
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+        self._dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
+        self.config_path = os.path.join(self._dir.name, "profiles.json")
+        with open(self.config_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
+            fh.write(json.dumps(CONFIG))
+        patch(
+            "gitea_config.is_runtime_switching_enabled", return_value=False
+        ).start()
+        patch("gitea_audit.audit_enabled", return_value=False).start()
+        self.mock_api = patch("mcp_server.api_request").start()
+        patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH).start()
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        patch.stopall()
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+        self._dir.cleanup()
+
+    def _env(self, profile: str) -> dict:
+        return {
+            "GITEA_MCP_CONFIG": self.config_path,
+            "GITEA_MCP_PROFILE": profile,
+            "GITEA_TOKEN_AUTHOR": "author-pass",
+            "GITEA_TOKEN_REVIEWER": "reviewer-pass",
+        }
+
+    def test_reviewer_resolver_denial_blocks_raw_tool(self):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("reviewer-profile"), clear=True):
+            resolve = mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(
+                task="delete_branch", remote="prgs")
+            self.assertFalse(resolve["allowed_in_current_session"])
+            res = gitea_delete_branch(branch="feat/branch", remote="prgs")
+        self.assertFalse(res["success"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            res["permission_report"]["missing_permission"],
+            resolve["required_operation_permission"],
+        )
+        delete_calls = [
+            c for c in self.mock_api.call_args_list if c.args[0] == "DELETE"
+        ]
+        self.assertFalse(delete_calls)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_final_report_validator.py

@@ -25,11 +25,15 @@ def _review_handoff(**overrides):
         "- Files changed: review_proofs.py",
         "- Validation: pytest tests/test_review_proofs.py -q in branches/review-203",
         "- Mutations: review only",
-        "- Workspace mutations: none",
         "- File edits by reviewer: none",
         "- Worktree/index mutations: none",
         "- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master",
         "- MCP/Gitea mutations: review submitted",
+        "- Review mutations: submitted request_changes review",
+        "- Merge mutations: none",
+        "- Cleanup mutations: none",
+        "- External-state mutations: none",
+        "- Read-only diagnostics: issue and PR metadata inspected",
         "- Current status: PR open",
         "- Blockers: none",
         "- Next: await author",
@@ -53,26 +57,47 @@ def _review_handoff(**overrides):
     return text
 
 
-def _reconcile_handoff(**overrides):
+def _reconcile_handoff(drop=(), **overrides):
     lines = [
         "## Controller Handoff",
         "",
         "- Task: reconcile already-landed PR #99",
         "- Repo: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
-        "- Role: reconciler",
-        "- Identity: sysadmin / prgs-author",
+        "- Role/profile: reconciler / prgs-reconciler",
+        "- Identity: sysadmin",
         "- Selected PR: #99",
-        "- Eligibility class: ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED",
+        "- PR live state: open",
+        "- Candidate head SHA: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
+        "- Target branch: master",
+        "- Target branch SHA: 5e023dc71b0e2b813a0b1eee6b0f42630c47a95c",
+        "- Ancestor proof: candidate head is ancestor of target branch SHA",
         "- Linked issue: #98",
         "- Linked issue live status: not verified in this session",
+        "- Eligibility class: ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED",
+        "- Capabilities proven: gitea.read, gitea.pr.comment",
+        "- Missing capabilities: gitea.pr.close",
+        "- PR comments posted: 1 reconciliation comment on PR #99",
+        "- Issue comments posted: none",
+        "- PRs closed: none",
+        "- Issues closed: none",
         "- File edits by reconciler: none",
         "- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master",
+        "- Worktree mutations: none",
+        "- MCP/Gitea mutations: PR comment posted",
+        "- External-state mutations: none",
+        "- Read-only diagnostics: gitea_view_pr, gitea_view_issue",
         "- Reconciliation mutations: PR comment posted",
         "- Current status: reconciliation complete",
-        "- Safe next action: none",
+        "- Blocker: missing gitea.pr.close capability",
+        "- Safe next action: hand off to a profile with gitea.pr.close",
         "- No review/merge confirmation: confirmed",
     ]
-    text = "\n".join(lines)
+    kept = [
+        line
+        for line in lines
+        if not any(line.startswith(f"- {name}:") for name in drop)
+    ]
+    text = "\n".join(kept)
     for key, value in overrides.items():
         if f"- {key}:" in text:
             text = text.replace(f"- {key}:", f"- {key}: {value}")
@@ -190,11 +215,76 @@ class TestReviewPrRules(unittest.TestCase):
             )
         )
 
+    def test_already_landed_oldest_eligible_pr_blocks(self):
+        report = (
+            _review_handoff()
+            + "\nAlready landed.\nOldest eligible PR: PR #278."
+        )
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
+        self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any(
+                f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.already_landed_eligible_wording"
+                for f in result["findings"]
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_already_landed_gate_blocks_review_terminal_states(self):
+        cases = {
+            "APPROVED": ("- Review decision: request_changes", "- Review decision: APPROVED"),
+            "MERGED": ("- Merge result: not attempted", "- Merge result: MERGED"),
+            "READY_TO_MERGE": ("- Current status: PR open", "- Current status: READY_TO_MERGE"),
+        }
+        for state, (old, new) in cases.items():
+            with self.subTest(state=state):
+                report = (
+                    _review_handoff()
+                    .replace("- Reviewer eligibility: eligible", "- Reviewer eligibility: blocked")
+                    .replace(old, new)
+                    + "\n- Already-landed gate: fired"
+                    + "\n- Ancestor proof: passed"
+                    + "\n- Eligibility class: ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED"
+                )
+                result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
+                self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
+                self.assertTrue(
+                    any(
+                        f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.already_landed_review_state"
+                        for f in result["findings"]
+                    )
+                )
+
+    def test_target_branch_up_to_date_requires_fetch_and_sha(self):
+        report = (
+            _review_handoff()
+            .replace("- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master", "- Git ref mutations: none")
+            + "\nTarget branch up to date."
+        )
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
+        self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any(
+                f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.target_branch_freshness_proof"
+                for f in result["findings"]
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_target_branch_up_to_date_with_fetch_and_sha_passes(self):
+        report = (
+            _review_handoff()
+            + "\n- Target branch SHA: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9"
+            + "\nTarget branch up to date."
+        )
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
+        self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "A")
     def test_git_fetch_must_not_be_readonly_only(self):
         report = (
             _review_handoff()
             .replace("- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master", "- Git ref mutations: none")
-            + "\n- Read-only diagnostics: git fetch prgs master"
+            .replace(
+                "- Read-only diagnostics: issue and PR metadata inspected",
+                "- Read-only diagnostics: git fetch prgs master",
+            )
         )
         result = assess_final_report_validator(
             report,
@@ -251,6 +341,159 @@ class TestReconciliationRules(unittest.TestCase):
         )
 
 
+class TestCanonicalReconcileSchema(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Issue #307: reconciliation workflows emit only the canonical schema."""
+
+    def test_comment_only_reconciliation_passes(self):
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(
+            _reconcile_handoff(),
+            "reconcile_already_landed",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "A")
+        self.assertEqual(result["findings"], [])
+
+    def test_successful_close_reconciliation_passes(self):
+        report = _reconcile_handoff().replace(
+            "- Capabilities proven: gitea.read, gitea.pr.comment",
+            "- Capabilities proven: gitea.read, gitea.pr.comment, gitea.pr.close",
+        ).replace(
+            "- Missing capabilities: gitea.pr.close",
+            "- Missing capabilities: none",
+        ).replace(
+            "- PRs closed: none",
+            "- PRs closed: #99",
+        ).replace(
+            "- Blocker: missing gitea.pr.close capability",
+            "- Blocker: none",
+        )
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
+        self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "A")
+
+    def test_blocked_reconciliation_passes(self):
+        report = _reconcile_handoff().replace(
+            "- Capabilities proven: gitea.read, gitea.pr.comment",
+            "- Capabilities proven: gitea.read",
+        ).replace(
+            "- Missing capabilities: gitea.pr.close",
+            "- Missing capabilities: gitea.pr.close, gitea.pr.comment",
+        ).replace(
+            "- PR comments posted: 1 reconciliation comment on PR #99",
+            "- PR comments posted: none",
+        ).replace(
+            "- MCP/Gitea mutations: PR comment posted",
+            "- MCP/Gitea mutations: none",
+        ).replace(
+            "- Reconciliation mutations: PR comment posted",
+            "- Reconciliation mutations: none",
+        )
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
+        self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "A")
+
+    def test_missing_capabilities_field_required(self):
+        report = _reconcile_handoff(drop=("Missing capabilities",))
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
+        self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "downgraded")
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any(
+                f["rule_id"] == "reconcile.controller_handoff"
+                and "Missing capabilities" in f["reason"]
+                for f in result["findings"]
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_missing_ancestor_proof_and_candidate_sha_downgrade(self):
+        report = _reconcile_handoff(drop=("Ancestor proof", "Candidate head SHA"))
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
+        self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "downgraded")
+        reasons = " ".join(f["reason"] for f in result["findings"])
+        self.assertIn("Ancestor proof", reasons)
+        self.assertIn("Candidate head SHA", reasons)
+
+    def test_stale_issue_lock_proof_blocks(self):
+        report = _reconcile_handoff() + "\n- Issue lock proof: locked before diff"
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
+        self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any(
+                f["rule_id"] == "reconcile.stale_author_reviewer_fields"
+                and f["field"] == "issue lock proof"
+                for f in result["findings"]
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_stale_claim_comment_status_blocks(self):
+        report = _reconcile_handoff() + "\n- Claim/comment status: claimed"
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
+        self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any(
+                f["rule_id"] == "reconcile.stale_author_reviewer_fields"
+                and f["field"] == "claim/comment status"
+                for f in result["findings"]
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_stale_workspace_mutations_blocks_without_observed_mutations(self):
+        report = _reconcile_handoff() + "\n- Workspace mutations: None"
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
+        self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any(
+                f["rule_id"] == "reconcile.stale_author_reviewer_fields"
+                and f["field"] == "workspace mutations"
+                for f in result["findings"]
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_pr_number_opened_allowed_when_session_opened_pr(self):
+        report = _reconcile_handoff() + "\n- PR number opened: #12"
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(
+            report,
+            "reconcile_already_landed",
+            session_pr_opened=True,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(
+            any(
+                f["rule_id"] == "reconcile.stale_author_reviewer_fields"
+                and f["field"] == "pr number opened"
+                for f in result["findings"]
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_pr_number_opened_still_blocked_without_session_proof(self):
+        report = _reconcile_handoff() + "\n- PR number opened: #12"
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(
+            report,
+            "reconcile_already_landed",
+            session_pr_opened=False,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any(
+                f["rule_id"] == "reconcile.stale_author_reviewer_fields"
+                and f["field"] == "pr number opened"
+                for f in result["findings"]
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_action_log_fetch_requires_git_ref_mutation_entry(self):
+        report = _reconcile_handoff().replace(
+            "- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master",
+            "- Git ref mutations: none",
+        )
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(
+            report,
+            "reconcile_already_landed",
+            action_log=[{"command": "git fetch prgs master", "performed": True}],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any(
+                f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.git_fetch_readonly"
+                for f in result["findings"]
+            )
+        )
+
+
 class TestEntryPoint(unittest.TestCase):
     def test_unknown_task_kind_blocks(self):
         result = assess_final_report_validator("report", "unknown_mode")
@@ -270,4 +513,4 @@ class TestEntryPoint(unittest.TestCase):
 
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
-    unittest.main()
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_issue_claim_heartbeat.py

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+"""Tests for issue claim heartbeat leases (#268)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import sys
+import unittest
+from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import issue_claim_heartbeat as ich  # noqa: E402
+
+
+class TestHeartbeatFormatting(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_format_and_parse_roundtrip(self):
+        body = ich.format_heartbeat_body(
+            kind="claim",
+            issue_number=268,
+            branch="feat/issue-268-heartbeat-leases",
+            phase="claimed",
+            profile="prgs-author",
+            next_action="implement module",
+        )
+        parsed = ich.parse_heartbeat_comment(body)
+        self.assertIsNotNone(parsed)
+        assert parsed is not None
+        self.assertEqual(parsed["issue_number"], 268)
+        self.assertEqual(parsed["branch"], "feat/issue-268-heartbeat-leases")
+        self.assertEqual(parsed["phase"], "claimed")
+
+
+class TestClaimClassification(unittest.TestCase):
+    NOW = datetime(2026, 7, 7, 12, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+
+    def _comment(self, *, minutes_ago: int, kind: str = "progress") -> dict:
+        ts = (self.NOW - timedelta(minutes=minutes_ago)).isoformat()
+        body = ich.format_heartbeat_body(
+            kind=kind,
+            issue_number=268,
+            branch="feat/issue-268-heartbeat-leases",
+            phase="implementation",
+            profile="prgs-author",
+        )
+        return {"id": 1, "body": body, "created_at": ts, "updated_at": ts}
+
+    def test_active_claim_within_lease(self):
+        issue = {"number": 268, "title": "t", "labels": [{"name": "status:in-progress"}]}
+        result = ich.classify_issue_claim(
+            issue=issue,
+            comments=[self._comment(minutes_ago=5)],
+            now=self.NOW,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "active")
+
+    def test_stale_claim_without_branch(self):
+        issue = {"number": 268, "title": "t", "labels": [{"name": "status:in-progress"}]}
+        result = ich.classify_issue_claim(
+            issue=issue,
+            comments=[self._comment(minutes_ago=45)],
+            now=self.NOW,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "stale")
+
+    def test_reclaimable_after_sixty_minutes_without_branch(self):
+        issue = {"number": 268, "title": "t", "labels": [{"name": "status:in-progress"}]}
+        result = ich.classify_issue_claim(
+            issue=issue,
+            comments=[self._comment(minutes_ago=90)],
+            now=self.NOW,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "reclaimable")
+
+    def test_awaiting_review_when_open_pr_exists(self):
+        issue = {"number": 268, "title": "t", "labels": [{"name": "status:in-progress"}]}
+        open_prs = [
+            {
+                "number": 400,
+                "title": "feat",
+                "body": "Closes #268",
+                "head": {"ref": "feat/issue-268-heartbeat-leases"},
+            }
+        ]
+        result = ich.classify_issue_claim(
+            issue=issue,
+            comments=[self._comment(minutes_ago=120)],
+            open_prs=open_prs,
+            now=self.NOW,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "awaiting_review")
+
+    def test_phantom_claim_without_heartbeat(self):
+        issue = {"number": 268, "title": "t", "labels": [{"name": "status:in-progress"}]}
+        result = ich.classify_issue_claim(
+            issue=issue,
+            comments=[{"id": 1, "body": "working on it"}],
+            now=self.NOW,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "phantom")
+
+
+class TestInventory(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_build_cleanup_plan_flags_phantom(self):
+        inventory = {
+            "entries": [
+                {"issue_number": 1, "status": "phantom", "reasons": ["no heartbeat"]},
+                {"issue_number": 2, "status": "active", "reasons": []},
+            ]
+        }
+        plan = ich.build_cleanup_plan(inventory)
+        self.assertEqual(len(plan), 1)
+        self.assertEqual(plan[0]["issue_number"], 1)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_issue_write_tool_gates.py

@@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ class TestAllowedIssueWritesProceed(IssueWriteGateBase):
                 return [{"id": 10, "name": "status:in-progress"}]
             if method == "POST" and "/issues/9/labels" in url:
                 return [{"name": "status:in-progress"}]
+            if method == "POST" and "/issues/9/comments" in url:
+                return {"id": 501}
             if method == "GET" and url.endswith("/user"):
                 return {"login": "author-user"}
             return {}

tests/test_llm_workflow_split.py

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ def test_all_workflow_files_exist():
         "reconcile-landed-pr.md",
         "create-issue.md",
         "work-issue.md",
+        "pr-queue-cleanup.md",
     ):
         assert (SKILL_DIR / "workflows" / name).is_file(), name
 
@@ -26,6 +27,7 @@ def test_skill_references_all_workflow_files():
         "workflows/reconcile-landed-pr.md",
         "workflows/create-issue.md",
         "workflows/work-issue.md",
+        "workflows/pr-queue-cleanup.md",
     ):
         assert name in SKILL
 
@@ -36,6 +38,7 @@ def test_skill_contains_mode_isolation_language():
     assert "reconcile-landed-pr" in SKILL
     assert "create-issue" in SKILL
     assert "work-issue" in SKILL
+    assert "pr-queue-cleanup" in SKILL
     assert "Do not mix modes" in SKILL or "do not mix modes" in SKILL.lower()
 
 
@@ -78,6 +81,12 @@ def test_reconcile_landed_workflow_contract():
     assert "canonical: true" in text
     assert "Do not review or merge normal PRs" in text
     assert "Already-landed proof" in text
+    # Issue #302: partial reconciliation policy must stay documented.
+    assert "## 12A. Partial reconciliation policy (#302)" in text
+    assert "comment-then-stop" in text
+    assert "PARTIAL_RECONCILE_COMMENT_THEN_STOP" in text
+    assert "RECOVERY_HANDOFF_ONLY" in text
+    assert "resolve_partial_reconciliation_plan" in text
 
 
 def test_create_issue_workflow_contract():
@@ -91,6 +100,19 @@ def test_work_issue_workflow_contract():
     assert "canonical: true" in text
     assert "Do not merge your own PR" in text
     assert "## 21. PR creation rules" in text
+    assert "gitea_route_task_session" in text
+    assert "work-issue" in text
+
+
+def test_pr_queue_cleanup_workflow_contract():
+    text = (SKILL_DIR / "workflows" / "pr-queue-cleanup.md").read_text(
+        encoding="utf-8"
+    )
+    assert "canonical: true" in text
+    assert "exactly one" in text
+    assert "check_cleanup_task_allowed" in text
+    assert "resolve_cleanup_run_state" in text
+    assert "Next suggested PR" in text
 
 
 def test_final_report_schemas_exist():
@@ -99,6 +121,7 @@ def test_final_report_schemas_exist():
         "reconcile-landed-final-report.md",
         "create-issue-final-report.md",
         "work-issue-final-report.md",
+        "pr-queue-cleanup-final-report.md",
     ):
         assert (SKILL_DIR / "schemas" / name).is_file(), name
 
@@ -118,6 +141,30 @@ def test_start_issue_template_references_work_issue_workflow():
     assert "workflows/work-issue.md" in text
 
 
+def test_reconcile_skill_registered_in_mcp_server():
+    from mcp_server import _PROJECT_SKILLS
+
+    assert "gitea-reconcile-landed-pr" in _PROJECT_SKILLS
+    steps = _PROJECT_SKILLS["gitea-reconcile-landed-pr"]["steps"]
+    joined = " ".join(steps).lower()
+    assert "gitea_scan_already_landed_open_prs" in joined
+    assert "gitea_assess_already_landed_reconciliation" in joined
+
+
+def test_pr_queue_cleanup_template_references_workflow():
+    text = (SKILL_DIR / "templates" / "pr-queue-cleanup.md").read_text(
+        encoding="utf-8"
+    )
+    assert "workflows/pr-queue-cleanup.md" in text
+    assert "pr_queue_cleanup" in text
+
+
+def test_pr_queue_cleanup_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report)
+
+
 def test_reviewer_fallback_verifier_exported():
     from review_proofs import assess_reviewer_fallback_report
 
@@ -130,12 +177,42 @@ def test_final_report_validator_exported():
     assert callable(assess_final_report_validator)
 
 
+def test_review_final_report_schema_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_review_final_report_schema
+
+    assert callable(assess_review_final_report_schema)
+
+
 def test_create_issue_final_report_verifier_exported():
     from review_proofs import assess_create_issue_final_report
 
     assert callable(assess_create_issue_final_report)
 
 
+def test_work_issue_final_report_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_work_issue_final_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_work_issue_final_report)
+
+
+def test_merge_simulation_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_merge_simulation_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_merge_simulation_report)
+
+
+def test_validation_integrity_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_validation_integrity_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_validation_integrity_report)
+
+
+def test_validation_failure_history_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_validation_failure_history_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_validation_failure_history_report)
+
+
 def test_prior_blocker_skip_verifier_exported():
     from review_proofs import assess_prior_blocker_skip_proof
 
@@ -146,3 +223,82 @@ def test_non_mergeable_skip_verifier_exported():
     from review_proofs import assess_non_mergeable_skip_proof
 
     assert callable(assess_non_mergeable_skip_proof)
+
+
+def test_validation_worktree_edit_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_validation_worktree_edit_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_validation_worktree_edit_report)
+
+
+def test_reconcile_inventory_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_reconcile_inventory_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_reconcile_inventory_report)
+
+
+def test_reconcile_linked_issue_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report)
+
+
+def test_already_landed_handoff_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_already_landed_handoff_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_already_landed_handoff_report)
+
+
+def test_inventory_worktree_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_inventory_worktree_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_inventory_worktree_report)
+
+
+def test_proof_backed_handoff_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_proof_backed_handoff_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_proof_backed_handoff_report)
+
+
+def test_infra_stop_handoff_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_infra_stop_handoff_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_infra_stop_handoff_report)
+
+
+def test_mutation_categories_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_mutation_categories_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_mutation_categories_report)
+
+
+def test_worktree_ownership_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_worktree_ownership_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_worktree_ownership_report)
+
+
+def test_already_landed_classification_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_already_landed_classification_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_already_landed_classification_report)
+
+
+def test_pr_queue_cleanup_verifier_exported():
+    from review_proofs import assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report
+
+    assert callable(assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report)
+
+
+def test_pr_queue_cleanup_workflow_contract():
+    text = (SKILL_DIR / "workflows" / "pr-queue-cleanup.md").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+    assert "canonical: true" in text
+    assert "task_mode: pr-queue-cleanup" in text
+    assert "## 1. Mode isolation" in text
+    assert "## 4. Terminal mutation chain" in text
+    assert "## 5. Fresh run per PR" in text
+    assert "exactly one" in text.lower()
+    assert "review-merge-pr.md" in text
+    assert "Next suggested PR" in text
+    assert "schemas/pr-queue-cleanup-final-report.md" in text

tests/test_mcp_server.py

@@ -321,15 +321,17 @@ class TestMarkIssue(unittest.TestCase):
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
     def test_start_adds_label(self, _auth, mock_api):
-        # First call: get labels; second call: add label
+        # labels, add label, post claim heartbeat comment
         mock_api.side_effect = [
             [{"id": 10, "name": "status:in-progress"}],
             [{"name": "status:in-progress"}],
+            {"id": 99},
         ]
         with patch.dict(os.environ, ISSUE_WRITE_ENV, clear=True):
             result = gitea_mark_issue(issue_number=5, action="start")
         self.assertTrue(result["success"])
         self.assertIn("claimed", result["message"])
+        self.assertTrue(result.get("heartbeat_posted"))
 
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
@@ -1003,9 +1005,19 @@ class TestReviewPR(unittest.TestCase):
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 class TestDeleteBranch(unittest.TestCase):
 
+    DELETE_PROFILE = {
+        "profile_name": "test-deleter",
+        "allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
+        "forbidden_operations": [],
+        "audit_label": "test-deleter",
+    }
+
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=DELETE_PROFILE)
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
-    def test_delete_branch(self, _auth, mock_api):
+    def test_delete_branch(self, _auth, mock_api, _profile):
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("whoami")
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("capability", resolved_role="author")
         mock_api.return_value = {}
         result = gitea_delete_branch(branch="feat/branch")
         self.assertTrue(result["success"])
@@ -3048,10 +3060,18 @@ class TestIssueLocking(unittest.TestCase):
         mock_api.return_value = [] # no open PRs
         res = gitea_lock_issue(issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs")
         self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["work_lease"]["operation_type"], "author_issue_work")
+        self.assertEqual(res["work_lease"]["issue_number"], 196)
+        self.assertEqual(res["work_lease"]["branch"], "feat/issue-196-mutations")
+        self.assertIn("created_at", res["work_lease"])
+        self.assertIn("expires_at", res["work_lease"])
+        self.assertIn("last_heartbeat_at", res["work_lease"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["work_lease"]["claimant"]["profile"], "gitea-default")
         self.assertTrue(os.path.exists(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE))
         with open(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE, encoding="utf-8") as f:
             lock = json.load(f)
         self.assertIn("worktree_path", lock)
+        self.assertIn("work_lease", lock)
 
     def test_lock_issue_mismatch_branch_fails(self):
         with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
@@ -3092,6 +3112,51 @@ class TestIssueLocking(unittest.TestCase):
             gitea_lock_issue(issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs")
         self.assertIn("already tied to an open PR", str(ctx.exception))
 
+    @patch(
+        "mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+        return_value=_clean_master_git_state_for_lock(),
+    )
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all")
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    def test_lock_issue_reused_by_remote_branch(self, _auth, mock_api, _git_state):
+        mock_api.side_effect = [
+            [],
+            [{"name": "feat/issue-196-existing-work"}],
+        ]
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
+            gitea_lock_issue(issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs")
+        self.assertIn("already has matching branch", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_lock_issue_blocks_active_same_operation_lease(self):
+        with open(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
+            json.dump({
+                "issue_number": 196,
+                "branch_name": "feat/issue-196-other-work",
+                "worktree_path": "/tmp/other-worktree",
+                "work_lease": {
+                    "operation_type": "author_issue_work",
+                    "expires_at": "2999-01-01T00:00:00Z",
+                },
+            }, f)
+        with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+            gitea_lock_issue(issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs")
+        self.assertIn("already has an active author_issue_work lease", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_lock_issue_blocks_expired_same_operation_lease_for_recovery(self):
+        with open(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
+            json.dump({
+                "issue_number": 196,
+                "branch_name": "feat/issue-196-other-work",
+                "worktree_path": "/tmp/other-worktree",
+                "work_lease": {
+                    "operation_type": "author_issue_work",
+                    "expires_at": "2000-01-01T00:00:00Z",
+                },
+            }, f)
+        with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+            gitea_lock_issue(issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs")
+        self.assertIn("Recovery review is required before takeover", str(ctx.exception))
+
     @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[])
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
     def test_lock_from_clean_scratch_worktree(self, _auth, _api):

tests/test_native_mcp_preference.py

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+"""Tests for native MCP preference gate and shell circuit breaker (#270)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import native_mcp_preference as nmp  # noqa: E402
+
+
+class TestShellHealthCircuitBreaker(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        nmp.clear_shell_health_for_tests()
+
+    def test_two_spawn_failures_hard_stop(self):
+        nmp.record_shell_spawn_outcome(exit_code=-1, stdout="", stderr="")
+        status = nmp.record_shell_spawn_outcome(exit_code=-1, stdout="", stderr="")
+        self.assertTrue(status["hard_stopped"])
+        self.assertFalse(status["shell_use_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(status["consecutive_spawn_failures"], 2)
+
+    def test_success_resets_breaker(self):
+        nmp.record_shell_spawn_outcome(exit_code=-1, stdout="", stderr="")
+        status = nmp.record_shell_spawn_outcome(exit_code=0, stdout="ok", stderr="")
+        self.assertFalse(status["hard_stopped"])
+        self.assertEqual(status["consecutive_spawn_failures"], 0)
+
+
+class TestNativeMcpPreferenceGate(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        nmp.clear_shell_health_for_tests()
+
+    def test_mcp_available_blocks_local_script(self):
+        result = nmp.assess_gitea_operation_path(
+            task="create_pr",
+            command_or_detail="python create_pr.py --remote prgs --title T --head h",
+            mcp_available=True,
+            mcp_tool_visible=True,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["path_kind"], "shell_script")
+
+    def test_mcp_native_path_allowed(self):
+        result = nmp.assess_gitea_operation_path(
+            task="comment_issue",
+            path_kind="mcp_native",
+            mcp_available=True,
+            mcp_tool_visible=True,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["allowed"])
+
+    def test_mcp_unavailable_requires_terminal_report(self):
+        result = nmp.assess_gitea_operation_path(
+            task="merge_pr",
+            path_kind="shell_script",
+            mcp_available=False,
+            mcp_tool_visible=False,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("terminal recovery report" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+        self.assertIn(nmp.TERMINAL_REPORT_HEADING, result["terminal_report"])
+
+    def test_recovery_fallback_allowed_with_proof(self):
+        result = nmp.assess_gitea_operation_path(
+            task="merge_pr",
+            path_kind="shell_script",
+            command_or_detail="Recovery mode: MCP tools unavailable in this session.",
+            mcp_available=False,
+            recovery_mode=True,
+            recovery_proof_complete=True,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_cli_auth_divergence_blocked(self):
+        result = nmp.assess_gitea_operation_path(
+            task="create_pr",
+            command_or_detail="GITEA_MCP_PROFILE=prgs-reviewer python create_pr.py",
+            mcp_available=True,
+            active_profile="prgs-author",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("CLI auth divergence" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_unsafe_helper_fallback_denied(self):
+        result = nmp.assess_gitea_operation_path(
+            task="commit_files",
+            command_or_detail="python _encode_payload.py",
+            mcp_available=True,
+            mcp_tool_visible=True,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["path_kind"], "unsafe_helper")
+
+    def test_reviewer_mcp_server_touch_blocked(self):
+        result = nmp.assess_gitea_operation_path(
+            task="review_pr",
+            command_or_detail="pkill -f gitea_mcp_server.py",
+            mcp_available=True,
+            role="reviewer",
+            active_profile="prgs-reviewer",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["path_kind"], "mcp_server_touch")
+
+    def test_hard_stopped_shell_blocks_non_mcp_path(self):
+        nmp.record_shell_spawn_outcome(exit_code=-1, stdout="", stderr="")
+        nmp.record_shell_spawn_outcome(exit_code=-1, stdout="", stderr="")
+        result = nmp.assess_gitea_operation_path(
+            task="lock_issue",
+            path_kind="shell_script",
+            mcp_available=True,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("circuit breaker" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_pr_queue_cleanup.py

@@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
+"""Tests for PR-only queue cleanup mode (#390)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from pr_queue_cleanup import (
+    CLEANUP_FORBIDDEN_TASKS,
+    CLEANUP_WORKFLOW_PATH,
+    CONTINUE_TO_SAME_PR_MERGE,
+    STOP_AFTER_DECISION,
+    STOP_AFTER_MERGE,
+    STOP_AFTER_MERGE_BLOCKER,
+    STOP_AFTER_REQUEST_CHANGES,
+    STOP_APPROVED_MERGE_GATES_FAILED,
+    STOP_APPROVED_NO_MERGE_AUTH,
+    STOP_GATE_NOT_PROVEN,
+    assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report,
+    check_cleanup_task_allowed,
+    resolve_cleanup_run_state,
+)
+from review_proofs import assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report as proofs_assess
+from role_session_router import REVIEWER_TASKS, route_task_session
+from task_capability_map import required_permission, required_role
+
+
+class TestCleanupCapabilityMapping(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_cleanup_task_is_reviewer_role(self):
+        for key in ("pr_queue_cleanup", "pr-queue-cleanup"):
+            self.assertEqual(required_permission(key), "gitea.pr.review")
+            self.assertEqual(required_role(key), "reviewer")
+
+    def test_cleanup_task_registered_as_reviewer_route(self):
+        self.assertIn("pr_queue_cleanup", REVIEWER_TASKS)
+
+    def test_author_session_gets_wrong_role_stop(self):
+        result = route_task_session(
+            "pr_queue_cleanup",
+            active_profile="prgs-author",
+            active_role_kind="author",
+            allowed_in_current_session=False,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["route_result"], "wrong_role_stop")
+        self.assertFalse(result["downstream_allowed"])
+
+    def test_reviewer_session_allowed(self):
+        result = route_task_session(
+            "pr_queue_cleanup",
+            active_profile="prgs-reviewer",
+            active_role_kind="reviewer",
+            allowed_in_current_session=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["route_result"], "allowed_current_session")
+        self.assertTrue(result["downstream_allowed"])
+
+
+class TestCleanupTaskGate(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_author_tasks_blocked(self):
+        for task in (
+            "claim_issue",
+            "mark_issue",
+            "lock_issue",
+            "create_issue",
+            "create_branch",
+            "push_branch",
+            "create_pr",
+            "commit_files",
+        ):
+            allowed, reasons = check_cleanup_task_allowed(task)
+            self.assertFalse(allowed, task)
+            self.assertTrue(reasons, task)
+
+    def test_review_task_allowed(self):
+        allowed, reasons = check_cleanup_task_allowed("review_pr")
+        self.assertTrue(allowed)
+        self.assertEqual(reasons, [])
+
+    def test_forbidden_set_covers_issue_filing_and_impl(self):
+        self.assertIn("create_issue", CLEANUP_FORBIDDEN_TASKS)
+        self.assertIn("create_branch", CLEANUP_FORBIDDEN_TASKS)
+        self.assertIn("commit_files", CLEANUP_FORBIDDEN_TASKS)
+
+
+class TestCleanupRunState(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_request_changes_stops_run(self):
+        state = resolve_cleanup_run_state("request_changes")
+        self.assertEqual(state["outcome"], STOP_AFTER_REQUEST_CHANGES)
+        self.assertFalse(state["further_mutation_allowed"])
+
+    def test_comment_and_skip_stop_run(self):
+        for decision in ("comment", "skip"):
+            state = resolve_cleanup_run_state(decision)
+            self.assertEqual(state["outcome"], STOP_AFTER_DECISION)
+            self.assertFalse(state["further_mutation_allowed"])
+
+    def test_approved_without_merge_auth_stops(self):
+        state = resolve_cleanup_run_state("approved", merge_gates_passed=True)
+        self.assertEqual(state["outcome"], STOP_APPROVED_NO_MERGE_AUTH)
+        self.assertFalse(state["further_mutation_allowed"])
+
+    def test_approved_with_merge_auth_continues_to_merge(self):
+        state = resolve_cleanup_run_state(
+            "approved",
+            merge_authorized_for_pr=True,
+            merge_gates_passed=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(state["outcome"], CONTINUE_TO_SAME_PR_MERGE)
+        self.assertTrue(state["further_mutation_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(state["allowed_mutation"], "merge same PR only")
+
+    def test_approved_with_auth_but_failed_gates_stops(self):
+        state = resolve_cleanup_run_state(
+            "approved",
+            merge_authorized_for_pr=True,
+            merge_gates_passed=False,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(state["outcome"], STOP_APPROVED_MERGE_GATES_FAILED)
+        self.assertFalse(state["further_mutation_allowed"])
+
+    def test_merge_completed_stops(self):
+        state = resolve_cleanup_run_state(
+            "approved",
+            merge_authorized_for_pr=True,
+            merge_gates_passed=True,
+            merge_completed=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(state["outcome"], STOP_AFTER_MERGE)
+        self.assertFalse(state["further_mutation_allowed"])
+
+    def test_merge_blocker_stops(self):
+        state = resolve_cleanup_run_state(
+            "approved",
+            merge_authorized_for_pr=True,
+            merge_gates_passed=True,
+            merge_blocker=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(state["outcome"], STOP_AFTER_MERGE_BLOCKER)
+        self.assertFalse(state["further_mutation_allowed"])
+
+    def test_unknown_decision_fails_closed(self):
+        state = resolve_cleanup_run_state("ship_it")
+        self.assertEqual(state["outcome"], STOP_GATE_NOT_PROVEN)
+        self.assertFalse(state["further_mutation_allowed"])
+
+
+def _clean_report(**overrides):
+    lines = {
+        "task": "Task: pr-queue-cleanup",
+        "workflow": f"Workflow source: {CLEANUP_WORKFLOW_PATH} (hash abc123def456)",
+        "pagination": (
+            "PR inventory pagination proof: inventory_complete=true, final "
+            "page, total_count 15"
+        ),
+        "selected": "Selected PR: #371",
+        "decision": "Review decision: approved",
+        "merge_auth": "Merge authorized for PR: false",
+        "merge_result": "Merge result: not attempted",
+        "next": "Next suggested PR: #372",
+        "issue_mut": "Issue mutations: none",
+        "branch_mut": "Branch mutations: none",
+    }
+    lines.update(overrides)
+    return "\n".join(v for v in lines.values() if v)
+
+
+class TestCleanupReportVerifier(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_clean_single_pr_report_passes(self):
+        result = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(_clean_report())
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_approved_and_merged_with_authorization_passes(self):
+        report = _clean_report(
+            merge_auth="Merge authorized for PR: true",
+            merge_result="Merge result: merged 0123456789ab",
+        )
+        result = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_request_changes_then_stop_passes(self):
+        report = _clean_report(decision="Review decision: request_changes")
+        result = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_multi_pr_selection_blocked(self):
+        report = _clean_report() + "\nSelected PR: #403\n"
+        result = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("multiple prs" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_two_terminal_mutations_blocked(self):
+        report = _clean_report() + "\nReview decision: request_changes"
+        result = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("terminal review mutations" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_missing_pagination_proof_blocked(self):
+        report = _clean_report(
+            pagination="PR inventory pagination proof: inventory listed"
+        )
+        result = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("pagination" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_missing_next_suggested_pr_blocked(self):
+        report = _clean_report(next="")
+        result = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("Next suggested PR" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_merge_without_authorization_blocked(self):
+        report = _clean_report(
+            merge_result="Merge result: merged abc123abc123",
+        )
+        result = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("authorization" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_issue_mutations_forbidden(self):
+        report = _clean_report(issue_mut="Issue mutations: gitea_mark_issue")
+        result = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("issue mutations" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_branch_mutations_forbidden(self):
+        report = _clean_report(branch_mut="Branch mutations: created feat/x")
+        result = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("branch mutations" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_missing_workflow_citation_blocked(self):
+        report = _clean_report(workflow="Workflow source: none")
+        result = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("pr-queue-cleanup.md" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_review_proofs_wrapper_matches_module(self):
+        direct = assess_pr_queue_cleanup_report(_clean_report())
+        wrapped = proofs_assess(_clean_report())
+        self.assertEqual(direct["proven"], wrapped["proven"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reconcile_already_landed_pr_tool.py

@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+"""Tests for gitea_reconcile_already_landed_pr MCP tool (#310)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import mcp_server
+from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_already_landed_pr
+
+RECONCILER_PROFILE = {
+    "profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
+    "allowed_operations": [
+        "gitea.read",
+        "gitea.pr.comment",
+        "gitea.issue.comment",
+        "gitea.issue.close",
+        "gitea.pr.close",
+    ],
+    "forbidden_operations": [
+        "gitea.pr.approve",
+        "gitea.pr.merge",
+        "gitea.pr.create",
+        "gitea.branch.push",
+    ],
+    "audit_label": "prgs-reconciler",
+}
+
+AUTHOR_PROFILE = {
+    "profile_name": "prgs-author",
+    "allowed_operations": [
+        "gitea.read",
+        "gitea.pr.create",
+        "gitea.issue.comment",
+    ],
+    "forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.close", "gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge"],
+    "audit_label": "prgs-author",
+}
+
+OPEN_LANDED_PR = {
+    "number": 278,
+    "title": "Already landed (Closes #263)",
+    "body": "",
+    "state": "open",
+    "head": {"ref": "feat/issue-263", "sha": "2a544b78d1371925761d16f1c451bb3b2984470e"},
+    "base": {"ref": "master"},
+}
+
+
+class TestReconcileAlreadyLandedPrTool(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        self.mock_api = patch("mcp_server.api_request").start()
+        self.mock_auth = patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token test"
+        ).start()
+        patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity").start()
+        patch("gitea_audit.audit_enabled", return_value=False).start()
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        patch.stopall()
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+
+    def _set_profile(self, profile):
+        patch("mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=profile).start()
+
+    def test_close_blocked_without_pr_close_capability(self):
+        self._set_profile(AUTHOR_PROFILE)
+        res = gitea_reconcile_already_landed_pr(
+            pr_number=278,
+            close_pr=True,
+            remote="prgs",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(res["success"])
+        self.assertFalse(res["performed"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_permission"], "gitea.pr.close")
+        self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_not_landed_pr_close_denied_after_live_fetch(self):
+        self._set_profile(RECONCILER_PROFILE)
+        self.mock_api.return_value = OPEN_LANDED_PR
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server.already_landed_reconcile.assess_already_landed_reconciliation",
+            return_value={
+                "pr_state": "open",
+                "candidate_head_sha": OPEN_LANDED_PR["head"]["sha"],
+                "target_branch": "master",
+                "target_branch_sha": "deadbeef",
+                "ancestor_proof": False,
+                "eligibility_class": "NOT_ALREADY_LANDED",
+                "linked_issue": 263,
+                "close_allowed": False,
+                "git_ref_mutations": ["git fetch prgs master"],
+                "reasons": ["not ancestor"],
+            },
+        ):
+            res = gitea_reconcile_already_landed_pr(
+                pr_number=278,
+                close_pr=True,
+                remote="prgs",
+            )
+        self.assertFalse(res["success"])
+        self.assertFalse(res.get("pr_closed"))
+        patch_calls = [
+            c for c in self.mock_api.call_args_list if c.args[0] == "PATCH"
+        ]
+        self.assertEqual(patch_calls, [])
+
+    def test_already_landed_close_allowed_with_capability(self):
+        self._set_profile(RECONCILER_PROFILE)
+
+        def api_side_effect(method, url, auth, payload=None):
+            if method == "GET" and "/pulls/278" in url:
+                return dict(OPEN_LANDED_PR)
+            if method == "PATCH" and "/pulls/278" in url:
+                closed = dict(OPEN_LANDED_PR)
+                closed["state"] = "closed"
+                return closed
+            return {}
+
+        self.mock_api.side_effect = api_side_effect
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server.already_landed_reconcile.assess_already_landed_reconciliation",
+            return_value={
+                "pr_state": "open",
+                "candidate_head_sha": OPEN_LANDED_PR["head"]["sha"],
+                "target_branch": "master",
+                "target_branch_sha": "e017d80256217f17b0f421cd051cfa5cbcf5ae0f",
+                "ancestor_proof": True,
+                "eligibility_class": "ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED",
+                "linked_issue": 263,
+                "close_allowed": True,
+                "git_ref_mutations": ["git fetch prgs master"],
+                "reasons": [],
+            },
+        ):
+            res = gitea_reconcile_already_landed_pr(
+                pr_number=278,
+                close_pr=True,
+                remote="prgs",
+            )
+        self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(res["performed"])
+        self.assertTrue(res["pr_closed"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["eligibility_class"], "ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED")
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reconciler_close_gate.py

@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
+"""Issue #309: dedicated reconciler capability to close already-landed PRs.
+
+The reconciler path must prove exact ``gitea.pr.close`` capability, must
+never imply review/approve/request-changes/merge capability, and may close
+a PR only after full already-landed proof.
+"""
+
+import sys
+import unittest
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import role_session_router  # noqa: E402
+import task_capability_map  # noqa: E402
+from review_proofs import assess_reconciler_close_gate  # noqa: E402
+
+PINNED = "0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9"
+OTHER = "a4060c5de00f2b1c9e88f4f6f0f3f9a7b2c1d0e9"
+
+
+class TestReconcilerCapabilityMap(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_reconcile_close_pr_task_maps_to_pr_close(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            task_capability_map.required_permission(
+                "reconcile_close_landed_pr"),
+            "gitea.pr.close",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            task_capability_map.required_role("reconcile_close_landed_pr"),
+            "reconciler",
+        )
+
+    def test_reconcile_close_issue_task_maps_to_issue_close(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            task_capability_map.required_permission(
+                "reconcile_close_landed_issue"),
+            "gitea.issue.close",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            task_capability_map.required_role(
+                "reconcile_close_landed_issue"),
+            "reconciler",
+        )
+
+    def test_reconciler_tasks_do_not_grant_review_permissions(self):
+        for task in ("reconcile_close_landed_pr",
+                     "reconcile_close_landed_issue"):
+            permission = task_capability_map.required_permission(task)
+            self.assertNotIn("review", permission)
+            self.assertNotIn("approve", permission)
+            self.assertNotIn("merge", permission)
+            self.assertNotIn("request_changes", permission)
+
+
+class TestReconcilerRouting(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_reconciler_task_requires_reconciler_role(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            role_session_router.required_role_for_task(
+                "reconcile_close_landed_pr"),
+            "reconciler",
+        )
+
+    def test_reconciler_task_blocked_in_author_session(self):
+        result = role_session_router.route_task_session(
+            "reconcile_close_landed_pr",
+            active_profile="prgs-author",
+            active_role_kind="author",
+            allowed_in_current_session=False,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["route_result"], "wrong_role_stop")
+        self.assertFalse(result["downstream_allowed"])
+
+    def test_reconciler_task_allowed_in_matching_session(self):
+        result = role_session_router.route_task_session(
+            "reconcile_close_landed_pr",
+            active_profile="prgs-reconciler",
+            active_role_kind="reconciler",
+            allowed_in_current_session=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["route_result"], "allowed_current_session")
+        self.assertTrue(result["downstream_allowed"])
+
+
+class TestReconcilerCloseGate(unittest.TestCase):
+    def _gate(self, **overrides):
+        kwargs = {
+            "pr_number": 278,
+            "pr_state": "open",
+            "candidate_head_sha": PINNED,
+            "live_head_sha": PINNED,
+            "target_branch": "master",
+            "target_branch_sha": OTHER,
+            "head_is_ancestor_of_target": True,
+            "close_pr_capability": True,
+            "close_issue_capability": False,
+            "linked_issue_state": "closed",
+        }
+        kwargs.update(overrides)
+        return assess_reconciler_close_gate(**kwargs)
+
+    def test_already_landed_open_pr_close_allowed(self):
+        result = self._gate()
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "CLOSE_ALLOWED")
+        self.assertTrue(result["pr_close_allowed"])
+
+    def test_not_landed_pr_cannot_be_closed(self):
+        result = self._gate(head_is_ancestor_of_target=False)
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "NOT_LANDED_CLOSE_BLOCKED")
+        self.assertFalse(result["pr_close_allowed"])
+
+    def test_unchecked_ancestry_blocks_close(self):
+        result = self._gate(head_is_ancestor_of_target=None)
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "GATE_NOT_PROVEN")
+        self.assertFalse(result["pr_close_allowed"])
+
+    def test_stale_target_branch_sha_blocks_close(self):
+        result = self._gate(target_branch_sha=None)
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "GATE_NOT_PROVEN")
+        self.assertFalse(result["pr_close_allowed"])
+
+    def test_closed_pr_state_blocks_close(self):
+        result = self._gate(pr_state="closed")
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "GATE_NOT_PROVEN")
+        self.assertFalse(result["pr_close_allowed"])
+
+    def test_changed_head_blocks_close(self):
+        result = self._gate(live_head_sha=OTHER)
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "GATE_NOT_PROVEN")
+        self.assertFalse(result["pr_close_allowed"])
+
+    def test_missing_close_capability_produces_recovery_handoff(self):
+        result = self._gate(close_pr_capability=False)
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "RECOVERY_HANDOFF_REQUIRED")
+        self.assertFalse(result["pr_close_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any(
+            "gitea.pr.close" in reason for reason in result["reasons"]
+        ))
+
+    def test_linked_issue_already_closed_skips_issue_close(self):
+        result = self._gate(linked_issue_state="closed",
+                            close_issue_capability=True)
+        self.assertFalse(result["issue_close_allowed"])
+
+    def test_linked_open_issue_close_requires_capability(self):
+        allowed = self._gate(
+            linked_issue_state="open",
+            issue_resolved_by_landing=True,
+            close_issue_capability=True,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(allowed["issue_close_allowed"])
+
+        blocked = self._gate(
+            linked_issue_state="open",
+            issue_resolved_by_landing=True,
+            close_issue_capability=False,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(blocked["issue_close_allowed"])
+
+    def test_gate_never_allows_review_mutations(self):
+        for result in (
+            self._gate(),
+            self._gate(head_is_ancestor_of_target=False),
+            self._gate(close_pr_capability=False),
+        ):
+            self.assertFalse(result["review_allowed"])
+            self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+            self.assertFalse(result["request_changes_allowed"])
+            self.assertFalse(result["merge_allowed"])
+
+    def test_report_fields_listed_for_close(self):
+        result = self._gate()
+        for field in (
+            "identity/profile",
+            "close capability proof",
+            "PR live state",
+            "candidate head SHA",
+            "target branch SHA",
+            "ancestor proof",
+            "linked issue status",
+            "PR close result",
+            "issue close result",
+            "no review/merge confirmation",
+        ):
+            self.assertIn(field, result["required_report_fields"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reconciler_profile.py

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+"""Tests for reconciler profile model (#304)."""
+
+import os
+import sys
+import unittest
+
+sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
+
+import gitea_mcp_server as mcp_server
+import migrate_profiles
+import reconciler_profile
+
+
+PRGS_RECONCILER_ALLOWED = [
+    "gitea.read",
+    "gitea.pr.comment",
+    "gitea.issue.comment",
+    "gitea.issue.close",
+    "gitea.pr.close",
+]
+PRGS_RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN = [
+    "gitea.pr.approve",
+    "gitea.pr.merge",
+    "gitea.pr.create",
+    "gitea.branch.push",
+]
+
+
+class TestReconcilerProfileModel(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_prgs_reconciler_shape_valid(self):
+        result = reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(
+            PRGS_RECONCILER_ALLOWED,
+            PRGS_RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["is_reconciler_profile"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["valid"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["reasons"], [])
+
+    def test_author_profile_not_reconciler(self):
+        allowed = [
+            "gitea.read",
+            "gitea.pr.create",
+            "gitea.branch.push",
+            "gitea.issue.comment",
+        ]
+        forbidden = ["gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge"]
+        self.assertFalse(
+            reconciler_profile.is_reconciler_profile(allowed, forbidden)
+        )
+
+    def test_reviewer_profile_not_reconciler(self):
+        allowed = [
+            "gitea.read",
+            "gitea.pr.review",
+            "gitea.pr.approve",
+            "gitea.pr.merge",
+        ]
+        forbidden = ["gitea.pr.create", "gitea.branch.push"]
+        self.assertFalse(
+            reconciler_profile.is_reconciler_profile(allowed, forbidden)
+        )
+
+    def test_broad_close_on_author_invalid(self):
+        allowed = PRGS_RECONCILER_ALLOWED + ["gitea.pr.create"]
+        result = reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(
+            allowed,
+            PRGS_RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["valid"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["is_reconciler_profile"])
+
+    def test_role_kind_detects_reconciler(self):
+        role = mcp_server._role_kind(
+            PRGS_RECONCILER_ALLOWED,
+            PRGS_RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(role, "reconciler")
+
+    def test_migrate_infer_role_reconciler(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            migrate_profiles.infer_role("prgs-reconciler", "prgs-reconciler"),
+            "reconciler",
+        )
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reconciliation_handoff.py

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+"""Tests for the dedicated reconciliation controller-handoff schema (#303).
+
+Already-landed PR reconciliation runs must emit the reconciliation
+schema, not stale author/reviewer handoff fields; observed git ref
+mutations (fetch) must be reported, and legacy fields fail validation.
+"""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from review_proofs import assess_reconciliation_handoff  # noqa: E402
+
+
+def _good_handoff(**overrides):
+    fields = {
+        "Task": "Reconcile already-landed open PRs",
+        "Repo": "prgs/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
+        "Role/profile": "prgs-reconciler",
+        "Identity": "jcwalker3",
+        "Selected PR": "278",
+        "PR live state": "open",
+        "Candidate head SHA": "2a544b7",
+        "Target branch": "master",
+        "Target branch SHA": "fa0cb12",
+        "Ancestor proof": "candidate head is ancestor of target branch SHA",
+        "Linked issue": "263",
+        "Linked issue live status": "open (fetched live this session)",
+        "Eligibility class": "ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED",
+        "Capabilities proven": "gitea.pr.comment",
+        "Missing capabilities": "gitea.pr.close",
+        "PR comments posted": "1 (PR #278 reconciliation notice)",
+        "Issue comments posted": "none",
+        "PRs closed": "none",
+        "Issues closed": "none",
+        "Git ref mutations": "git fetch prgs master",
+        "Worktree mutations": "none",
+        "MCP/Gitea mutations": "PR comment on #278",
+        "External-state mutations": "none",
+        "Read-only diagnostics": "gitea_view_pr 278, gitea_view_issue 263",
+        "Blocker": "PR close capability missing",
+        "Safe next action": "operator closes PR #278 or grants close capability",
+        "No review/merge confirmation": "no review or merge mutations performed",
+    }
+    fields.update(overrides)
+    lines = ["Controller Handoff"]
+    lines += [f"- {k}: {v}" for k, v in fields.items() if v is not None]
+    return "\n".join(lines) + "\n"
+
+
+class TestReconciliationSchemaPasses(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_blocked_reconciliation_passes(self):
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(
+            _good_handoff(),
+            observed_commands=["git fetch prgs master"],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["reasons"], [])
+
+    def test_successful_pr_close_passes(self):
+        report = _good_handoff(**{
+            "Missing capabilities": "none",
+            "PRs closed": "PR #278",
+            "Blocker": "none",
+            "Safe next action": "none; reconciliation complete",
+        })
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(
+            report, observed_commands=["git fetch prgs master"]
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_comment_only_reconciliation_passes(self):
+        report = _good_handoff(**{
+            "Git ref mutations": "none",
+        })
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(report, observed_commands=[])
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_noop_already_closed_passes(self):
+        report = _good_handoff(**{
+            "PR live state": "closed",
+            "PR comments posted": "none",
+            "MCP/Gitea mutations": "none",
+            "Git ref mutations": "none",
+            "Blocker": "none",
+            "Safe next action": "none; PR already closed",
+        })
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(report, observed_commands=[])
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+
+
+class TestSchemaViolationsFail(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_missing_linked_issue_proof_fails(self):
+        report = _good_handoff(**{"Linked issue live status": None})
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(report, observed_commands=[])
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("linked issue live status" in r.lower()
+                for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_wrong_eligibility_class_fails(self):
+        report = _good_handoff(**{"Eligibility class": "REVIEW_ELIGIBLE"})
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(report, observed_commands=[])
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_missing_handoff_section_fails(self):
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(
+            "no handoff here", observed_commands=[]
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+
+
+class TestStaleFieldsFail(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_pr_number_opened_fails(self):
+        report = _good_handoff() + "- PR number opened: 278\n"
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(report, observed_commands=[])
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("pr number opened" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_pinned_reviewed_head_fails(self):
+        report = _good_handoff() + "- Pinned reviewed head: 2a544b7\n"
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(report, observed_commands=[])
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_scratch_worktree_used_fails(self):
+        report = _good_handoff() + "- Scratch worktree used: False\n"
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(report, observed_commands=[])
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_workspace_mutations_fails(self):
+        report = _good_handoff() + "- Workspace mutations: None\n"
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(report, observed_commands=[])
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_author_lock_fields_fail(self):
+        report = (
+            _good_handoff()
+            + "- Issue lock proof: locked before diff\n"
+            + "- Claim/comment status: claimed\n"
+        )
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(report, observed_commands=[])
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+
+
+class TestObservedFetchMustBeReported(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_fetch_with_ref_mutations_none_fails(self):
+        report = _good_handoff(**{"Git ref mutations": "none"})
+        result = assess_reconciliation_handoff(
+            report, observed_commands=["git fetch prgs master"]
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("git ref mutation" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reconciliation_inventory_proof.py

@@ -1,150 +0,0 @@
-"""Tests for reconciliation PR-inventory pagination proof (#308).
-
-Already-landed reconciliation reports may not claim a complete queue
-scan (or that all already-landed PRs were found) unless the report
-carries pagination proof fields and the per-page evidence proves the
-final page was reached or the page limit was not hit.
-"""
-import sys
-import unittest
-from pathlib import Path
-
-sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
-
-from review_proofs import assess_reconciliation_inventory_proof  # noqa: E402
-
-
-def _report(claim=True, fields=True, pages="1", counts="12",
-            final_proof="is_final_page=true, has_more=false"):
-    lines = []
-    if claim:
-        lines.append(
-            "Inventory scope: complete queue scan; all already-landed "
-            "PRs were found."
-        )
-    if fields:
-        lines += [
-            "- Requested page size: 50",
-            f"- Pages fetched: {pages}",
-            f"- Returned PR count per page: {counts}",
-            f"- Final page proof: {final_proof}",
-        ]
-    return "\n".join(lines) + "\n"
-
-
-def _page(page, returned, per_page=50, has_more=False, final=True,
-          inventory_complete=None):
-    d = {
-        "page": page,
-        "per_page": per_page,
-        "returned_count": returned,
-        "has_more": has_more,
-        "is_final_page": final,
-    }
-    if inventory_complete is not None:
-        d["inventory_complete"] = inventory_complete
-    return d
-
-
-class TestCompleteScanProven(unittest.TestCase):
-    def test_first_page_below_limit_passes(self):
-        result = assess_reconciliation_inventory_proof(
-            _report(),
-            pagination_evidence=[_page(1, 12)],
-        )
-        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["reasons"], [])
-
-    def test_multiple_pages_to_final_passes(self):
-        report = _report(
-            pages="3", counts="50, 50, 12",
-            final_proof="has_more=false on page 3",
-        )
-        evidence = [
-            _page(1, 50, has_more=True, final=False),
-            _page(2, 50, has_more=True, final=False),
-            _page(3, 12),
-        ]
-        result = assess_reconciliation_inventory_proof(
-            report, pagination_evidence=evidence
-        )
-        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
-
-    def test_no_completeness_claim_needs_no_proof(self):
-        result = assess_reconciliation_inventory_proof(
-            _report(claim=False, fields=False),
-            pagination_evidence=None,
-        )
-        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
-
-
-class TestUnprovenScanFails(unittest.TestCase):
-    def test_first_page_exactly_at_limit_fails(self):
-        # 50 returned with per_page 50 and no final-page signal: the page
-        # limit was hit, so completeness is unproven.
-        evidence = [_page(1, 50, has_more=True, final=False)]
-        result = assess_reconciliation_inventory_proof(
-            _report(counts="50", final_proof="none"),
-            pagination_evidence=evidence,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("final page" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
-        )
-
-    def test_missing_pagination_evidence_fails(self):
-        result = assess_reconciliation_inventory_proof(
-            _report(), pagination_evidence=None
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("pagination" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
-        )
-
-    def test_missing_report_fields_fails(self):
-        result = assess_reconciliation_inventory_proof(
-            _report(fields=False),
-            pagination_evidence=[_page(1, 12)],
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("requested page size" in r.lower()
-                for r in result["reasons"])
-        )
-
-    def test_page_count_mismatch_fails(self):
-        # Report claims 1 page; evidence shows 2 were fetched.
-        evidence = [
-            _page(1, 50, has_more=True, final=False),
-            _page(2, 3),
-        ]
-        result = assess_reconciliation_inventory_proof(
-            _report(pages="1", counts="50"),
-            pagination_evidence=evidence,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("pages fetched" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
-        )
-
-    def test_per_page_count_mismatch_fails(self):
-        evidence = [_page(1, 12)]
-        result = assess_reconciliation_inventory_proof(
-            _report(counts="11"),
-            pagination_evidence=evidence,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("count per page" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
-        )
-
-    def test_evidence_page_missing_metadata_fails(self):
-        result = assess_reconciliation_inventory_proof(
-            _report(),
-            pagination_evidence=[{"page": 1}],
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
-
-
-if __name__ == "__main__":
-    unittest.main()

tests/test_reconciliation_mcp_tools.py

@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+"""Tests for reconciliation MCP assessment tools (#301)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import mcp_server
+from mcp_server import (
+    gitea_assess_already_landed_reconciliation,
+    gitea_scan_already_landed_open_prs,
+)
+
+AUTHOR_PROFILE = {
+    "profile_name": "prgs-author",
+    "allowed_operations": [
+        "gitea.read",
+        "gitea.pr.comment",
+        "gitea.issue.comment",
+        "gitea.issue.close",
+    ],
+    "forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.close"],
+    "audit_label": "prgs-author",
+}
+
+OPEN_PR = {
+    "number": 278,
+    "title": "Landed (Closes #263)",
+    "body": "",
+    "state": "open",
+    "head": {"ref": "feat/x", "sha": "a" * 40},
+    "base": {"ref": "master"},
+}
+
+
+class TestReconciliationMcpTools(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        self.mock_api = patch("mcp_server.api_request").start()
+        self.mock_auth = patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token test"
+        ).start()
+        patch("mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=AUTHOR_PROFILE).start()
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        patch.stopall()
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+
+    def test_assess_returns_plan_without_mutations(self):
+        self.mock_api.return_value = OPEN_PR
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server.reconciliation_workflow.assess_open_pr_reconciliation",
+            return_value={
+                "reconciliation_allowed": True,
+                "eligibility_class": "ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED",
+                "candidate_head_sha": OPEN_PR["head"]["sha"],
+                "target_branch_sha": "deadbeef",
+                "linked_issue": 263,
+                "review_merge_allowed": False,
+            },
+        ):
+            res = gitea_assess_already_landed_reconciliation(
+                pr_number=278, remote="prgs"
+            )
+        self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+        self.assertFalse(res["performed"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["plan"]["outcome"], "PARTIAL_RECONCILE_COMMENT_THEN_STOP")
+        self.assertFalse(res["review_merge_allowed"])
+        patch_calls = [
+            c for c in self.mock_api.call_args_list if c.args[0] == "PATCH"
+        ]
+        self.assertEqual(patch_calls, [])
+
+    def test_scan_returns_candidates_with_pagination(self):
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server.api_fetch_page",
+            return_value=([OPEN_PR], {
+                "page": 1,
+                "per_page": 50,
+                "is_final_page": True,
+                "has_more": False,
+                "next_page": None,
+            }),
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server.reconciliation_workflow.fetch_target_branch",
+            return_value={
+                "success": True,
+                "target_branch_sha": "deadbeef",
+                "git_fetch_command": "git fetch prgs master",
+            },
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server.reconciliation_workflow.assess_open_pr_reconciliation",
+            return_value={
+                "pr_number": 278,
+                "eligibility_class": "ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED",
+                "reconciliation_allowed": True,
+            },
+        ):
+            res = gitea_scan_already_landed_open_prs(remote="prgs", limit=50)
+        self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["candidate_count"], 1)
+        self.assertTrue(res["pagination"]["inventory_complete"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reconciliation_workflow.py

@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+"""Tests for already-landed reconciliation workflow helpers (#301)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import reconciliation_workflow
+from review_proofs import assess_reconcile_workflow_source
+
+
+class TestReconciliationAssessment(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_already_landed_open_pr(self):
+        with patch(
+            "reconciliation_workflow.is_head_ancestor_of_ref",
+            return_value=True,
+        ):
+            assessment = reconciliation_workflow.assess_open_pr_reconciliation(
+                pr={
+                    "number": 278,
+                    "state": "open",
+                    "title": "Fix (Closes #263)",
+                    "body": "",
+                    "head": {"ref": "feat/x", "sha": "abc" * 13 + "a"},
+                    "base": {"ref": "master"},
+                },
+                project_root="/tmp/repo",
+                remote="prgs",
+                target_branch="master",
+                target_fetch={
+                    "success": True,
+                    "target_ref": "prgs/master",
+                    "target_branch_sha": "deadbeef",
+                    "git_fetch_command": "git fetch prgs master",
+                },
+            )
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["reconciliation_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            assessment["eligibility_class"],
+            reconciliation_workflow.ELIGIBILITY_ALREADY_LANDED,
+        )
+
+    def test_not_landed_pr(self):
+        with patch(
+            "reconciliation_workflow.is_head_ancestor_of_ref",
+            return_value=False,
+        ):
+            assessment = reconciliation_workflow.assess_open_pr_reconciliation(
+                pr={
+                    "number": 1,
+                    "state": "open",
+                    "title": "WIP",
+                    "body": "",
+                    "head": {"ref": "feat/y", "sha": "fff" * 13 + "f"},
+                    "base": {"ref": "master"},
+                },
+                project_root="/tmp/repo",
+                remote="prgs",
+                target_branch="master",
+                target_fetch={
+                    "success": True,
+                    "target_ref": "prgs/master",
+                    "target_branch_sha": "deadbeef",
+                },
+            )
+        self.assertFalse(assessment["reconciliation_allowed"])
+
+
+class TestReconciliationPlan(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_full_close_when_close_pr_allowed(self):
+        plan = reconciliation_workflow.resolve_reconciliation_plan(
+            assessment={
+                "reconciliation_allowed": True,
+                "eligibility_class": reconciliation_workflow.ELIGIBILITY_ALREADY_LANDED,
+            },
+            capabilities={
+                "close_pr": True,
+                "comment_pr": True,
+                "close_issue": True,
+                "comment_issue": True,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            plan["outcome"],
+            reconciliation_workflow.OUTCOME_FULL_RECONCILE,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(plan["close_pr_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(plan["review_merge_allowed"])
+
+    def test_comment_then_stop_without_close(self):
+        plan = reconciliation_workflow.resolve_reconciliation_plan(
+            assessment={
+                "reconciliation_allowed": True,
+                "eligibility_class": reconciliation_workflow.ELIGIBILITY_ALREADY_LANDED,
+            },
+            capabilities={
+                "close_pr": False,
+                "comment_pr": True,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            plan["outcome"],
+            reconciliation_workflow.OUTCOME_PARTIAL_COMMENT,
+        )
+
+    def test_recovery_handoff_without_comment_or_close(self):
+        plan = reconciliation_workflow.resolve_reconciliation_plan(
+            assessment={
+                "reconciliation_allowed": True,
+                "eligibility_class": reconciliation_workflow.ELIGIBILITY_ALREADY_LANDED,
+            },
+            capabilities={"close_pr": False, "comment_pr": False},
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            plan["outcome"],
+            reconciliation_workflow.OUTCOME_RECOVERY_HANDOFF,
+        )
+
+    def test_not_landed_no_action(self):
+        plan = reconciliation_workflow.resolve_reconciliation_plan(
+            assessment={
+                "reconciliation_allowed": False,
+                "eligibility_class": reconciliation_workflow.ELIGIBILITY_NOT_LANDED,
+                "reasons": ["not ancestor"],
+            },
+            capabilities={"close_pr": True},
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            plan["outcome"],
+            reconciliation_workflow.OUTCOME_NOT_LANDED,
+        )
+
+
+class TestReconcileWorkflowSource(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_valid_report_passes(self):
+        report = (
+            "Task mode: reconcile-landed-pr\n"
+            "Workflow source: workflows/reconcile-landed-pr.md\n"
+        )
+        result = assess_reconcile_workflow_source(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_missing_workflow_fails(self):
+        result = assess_reconcile_workflow_source("Task mode: reconcile-landed-pr")
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_resolve_task_capability.py

@@ -121,6 +121,32 @@ class TestResolveTaskCapability(unittest.TestCase):
             self.assertTrue(res["allowed_in_current_session"])
             self.assertFalse(res["different_mcp_namespace_required"])
 
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "author-user"})
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token author-pass")
+    def test_resolve_work_issue_author_profile_allowed(self, _auth, _api):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("author-profile")):
+            for task in ("work_issue", "work-issue"):
+                res = mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(
+                    task=task, remote="prgs"
+                )
+                self.assertEqual(res["requested_task"], task)
+                self.assertEqual(
+                    res["required_operation_permission"], "gitea.pr.create"
+                )
+                self.assertEqual(res["required_role_kind"], "author")
+                self.assertTrue(res["allowed_in_current_session"])
+
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "author-user"})
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token author-pass")
+    def test_resolve_work_issue_reviewer_profile_blocked(self, _auth, _api):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("reviewer-profile")):
+            res = mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(
+                task="work_issue", remote="prgs"
+            )
+            self.assertFalse(res["allowed_in_current_session"])
+            self.assertEqual(res["required_role_kind"], "author")
+            self.assertTrue(res["different_mcp_namespace_required"])
+
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "author-user"})
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token author-pass")
     def test_resolve_issue_comment_task(self, _auth, _api):
@@ -275,6 +301,40 @@ class TestResolveTaskCapability(unittest.TestCase):
             self.assertEqual(res["required_role_kind"], "author")
             self.assertIn("author", res["exact_safe_next_action"].lower())
 
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "author-user"})
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token author-pass")
+    def test_resolve_reconcile_already_landed_pr_requires_close(self, _auth, _api):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("author-profile")):
+            res = mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(
+                task="reconcile_already_landed_pr", remote="prgs"
+            )
+            self.assertEqual(res["requested_task"], "reconcile_already_landed_pr")
+            self.assertEqual(res["required_operation_permission"], "gitea.pr.close")
+            self.assertEqual(res["required_role_kind"], "reconciler")
+            self.assertFalse(res["allowed_in_current_session"])
+
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "author-user"})
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token author-pass")
+    def test_resolve_pr_queue_cleanup_author_profile_blocked(self, _auth, _api):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("author-profile")):
+            res = mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(
+                task="pr_queue_cleanup", remote="prgs"
+            )
+            self.assertEqual(res["required_role_kind"], "reviewer")
+            self.assertFalse(res["allowed_in_current_session"])
+            self.assertTrue(res["stop_required"])
+
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "reviewer-user"})
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token reviewer-pass")
+    def test_resolve_pr_queue_cleanup_reviewer_profile_allowed(self, _auth, _api):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("reviewer-profile")):
+            res = mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(
+                task="pr_queue_cleanup", remote="prgs"
+            )
+            self.assertEqual(res["required_operation_permission"], "gitea.pr.review")
+            self.assertTrue(res["allowed_in_current_session"])
+            self.assertFalse(res["stop_required"])
+
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "author-user"})
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token author-pass")
     def test_close_pr_known_and_lookalike_tasks_still_fail_closed(self, _auth, _api):

tests/test_review_final_report_schema.py

@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+"""Tests for reviewer final-report schema verification (#391)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from review_final_report_schema import assess_review_final_report_schema  # noqa: E402
+
+
+def _minimal_review_report(**overrides):
+    lines = [
+        "## Controller Handoff",
+        "",
+        "- Task: review PR #203",
+        "- Repo: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
+        "- Role: reviewer",
+        "- Identity: sysadmin / prgs-reviewer",
+        "- Issue/PR: #182 / PR #203",
+        "- Branch/SHA: feat/x @ 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
+        "- Files changed: review_proofs.py",
+        "- Validation: pytest tests/test_review_proofs.py -q in branches/review-203",
+        "- Mutations: review only",
+        "- File edits by reviewer: none",
+        "- Worktree/index mutations: none",
+        "- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master",
+        "- MCP/Gitea mutations: review submitted",
+        "- Review mutations: request_changes submitted",
+        "- Merge mutations: none",
+        "- Cleanup mutations: none",
+        "- External-state mutations: none",
+        "- Read-only diagnostics: gitea_view_pr, gitea_view_issue",
+        "- Current status: PR open",
+        "- Blockers: none",
+        "- Next: await author",
+        "- Safety: no self-review; no self-merge",
+        "- Selected PR: #203",
+        "- Reviewer eligibility: eligible",
+        "- Candidate head SHA: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
+        "- Worktree path: branches/review-203",
+        "- Worktree dirty: clean",
+        "- Unrelated local mutations: none",
+        "- Review decision: request_changes",
+        "- Merge result: not attempted",
+        "- Linked issue: #182",
+        "- Linked issue live status: open (gitea_view_issue)",
+        "- Cleanup status: none",
+    ]
+    text = "\n".join(lines)
+    for key, value in overrides.items():
+        prefix = f"- {key}:"
+        replaced = False
+        new_lines = []
+        for line in text.splitlines():
+            if line.strip().startswith(prefix):
+                new_lines.append(f"{prefix} {value}")
+                replaced = True
+            else:
+                new_lines.append(line)
+        text = "\n".join(new_lines)
+        if not replaced:
+            text += f"\n{prefix} {value}"
+    return text
+
+
+class TestReviewFinalReportSchema(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_clean_report_passes(self):
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(
+            _minimal_review_report(),
+            linked_issue_lock={"issue_number": 182, "pr_number": 203},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["blocked"])
+        self.assertIn(result["grade"], ("A", "downgraded"))
+
+    def test_legacy_pinned_reviewed_head_blocks(self):
+        report = _minimal_review_report(**{"Pinned reviewed head": "abc123"})
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(report)
+        rule_ids = [f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]]
+        self.assertIn("reviewer.legacy_stale_field", rule_ids)
+
+    def test_reviewed_head_without_validation_blocks(self):
+        report = _minimal_review_report().replace(
+            "- Validation: pytest tests/test_review_proofs.py -q in branches/review-203",
+            "- Validation: not run",
+        )
+        report += "\n- Pinned reviewed head: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9"
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(report)
+        rule_ids = [f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]]
+        self.assertIn("reviewer.reviewed_head_without_validation", rule_ids)
+
+    def test_merged_without_proof_blocks(self):
+        report = _minimal_review_report() + "\n\nPR #203 merged successfully."
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(report)
+        rule_ids = [f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]]
+        self.assertIn("reviewer.merged_without_proof", rule_ids)
+
+    def test_issue_closed_without_live_proof_blocks(self):
+        report = _minimal_review_report(
+            **{
+                "Linked issue live status": "closed",
+                "Read-only diagnostics": "gitea_view_pr only",
+            }
+        )
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(report)
+        rule_ids = [f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]]
+        self.assertIn("reviewer.issue_closed_without_live_proof", rule_ids)
+
+    def test_full_suite_pass_with_ignored_tests_blocks(self):
+        report = (
+            _minimal_review_report()
+            + "\nFull test suite passed with 0 failed; some tests ignored."
+        )
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(report)
+        rule_ids = [f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]]
+        self.assertIn("reviewer.full_suite_pass_ignored_tests", rule_ids)
+
+    def test_blocked_handoff_replay_blocks(self):
+        report = (
+            _minimal_review_report(**{"Blockers": "capability stop"})
+            + "\nSafe next action: run gitea_merge_pr to finish."
+        )
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(report)
+        rule_ids = [f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]]
+        self.assertIn("reviewer.blocked_handoff_replay", rule_ids)
+
+    def test_narrative_handoff_drift_blocks(self):
+        report = (
+            _minimal_review_report()
+            + "\n## Summary\nVerdict: APPROVE this PR."
+        )
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(report)
+        rule_ids = [f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]]
+        self.assertIn("reviewer.narrative_handoff_drift", rule_ids)
+
+    def test_pending_vs_approved_blocks(self):
+        report = _minimal_review_report(
+            **{"Review decision": "PENDING official review submitted approve"}
+        )
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(report)
+        rule_ids = [f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]]
+        self.assertIn("reviewer.pending_vs_approved", rule_ids)
+
+    def test_exported_from_review_proofs(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_review_final_report_schema as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+class TestMcpValidateReviewFinalReport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_mcp_tool_callable(self):
+        import gitea_mcp_server
+
+        result = gitea_mcp_server.gitea_validate_review_final_report(
+            _minimal_review_report()
+        )
+        self.assertIn("grade", result)
+        self.assertIn("findings", result)
+        self.assertFalse(result["blocked"])

tests/test_review_merge_state_machine.py

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+"""Tests for enforced PR review/merge state machine (#290)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import review_merge_state_machine as rmsm  # noqa: E402
+
+FULL_REVIEW_COMPLETION = {state: True for state in rmsm.REVIEW_MERGE_STATES}
+
+
+def _completion_through(state_name: str) -> dict[str, bool]:
+    idx = rmsm.state_index(state_name)
+    return {state: i <= idx for i, state in enumerate(rmsm.REVIEW_MERGE_STATES)}
+
+
+class TestWorkflowBlockers(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_infra_stop_blocks_all_states(self):
+        result = rmsm.assess_workflow_blockers(infra_stop=True)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["forbidden_states"], list(rmsm.REVIEW_MERGE_STATES))
+
+    def test_infra_stop_forbids_advancement(self):
+        result = rmsm.assess_state_advancement(
+            {},
+            target_state="INVENTORY",
+            infra_stop=True,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["allowed"])
+
+
+class TestStateAdvancement(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_cannot_skip_inventory(self):
+        result = rmsm.assess_state_advancement(
+            {"PRECHECK": True},
+            target_state="SELECT_PR",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["next_allowed_state"], "INVENTORY")
+
+    def test_sequential_advance_allowed(self):
+        completion = _completion_through("INVENTORY")
+        result = rmsm.assess_state_advancement(
+            completion,
+            target_state="SELECT_PR",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["allowed"])
+
+
+class TestApproveAndMergeGates(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_approve_blocked_without_validate(self):
+        completion = _completion_through("PIN_HEAD_SHA")
+        result = rmsm.can_approve(completion)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertIn("VALIDATE", ",".join(result["missing_states"]))
+
+    def test_approve_allowed_when_review_path_complete(self):
+        completion = _completion_through("REVIEW_DECISION")
+        result = rmsm.can_approve(completion)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["allowed"])
+
+    def test_merge_blocked_without_pre_merge_gates(self):
+        completion = _completion_through("APPROVE_OR_REQUEST_CHANGES")
+        result = rmsm.can_merge(completion)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["missing_pre_merge_gates"])
+
+    def test_merge_allowed_with_pre_merge_gates(self):
+        completion = _completion_through("PRE_MERGE_RECHECK")
+        gates = {gate: True for gate in rmsm._PRE_MERGE_REQUIRED_GATES}
+        result = rmsm.can_merge(completion, pre_merge_gates=gates)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["allowed"])
+
+    def test_merge_blocked_when_head_sha_gate_fails(self):
+        completion = _completion_through("PRE_MERGE_RECHECK")
+        gates = {gate: True for gate in rmsm._PRE_MERGE_REQUIRED_GATES}
+        gates["reviewed_head_sha_unchanged"] = False
+        result = rmsm.can_merge(completion, pre_merge_gates=gates)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertIn("reviewed_head_sha_unchanged", result["missing_pre_merge_gates"])
+
+
+class TestRecoveryHandoff(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_blocked_handoff_without_replay_passes(self):
+        report = (
+            "Blocked recovery handoff.\n"
+            "Restart the full workflow after infra_stop clears.\n"
+            "No approve/merge performed."
+        )
+        result = rmsm.assess_blocked_recovery_handoff(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_blocked_handoff_with_merge_replay_fails(self):
+        report = "Please merge PR #12 now using gitea_merge_pr."
+        result = rmsm.assess_blocked_recovery_handoff(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestFinalReportClaims(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_ready_to_merge_claim_without_gates_fails(self):
+        result = rmsm.assess_final_report_state_claims(
+            "PR is ready to merge after validation.",
+            state_completion=_completion_through("VALIDATE"),
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_reviewed_claim_without_validate_fails(self):
+        result = rmsm.assess_final_report_state_claims(
+            "PR reviewed and looks good.",
+            state_completion={"PRECHECK": True},
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_review_proofs.py

@@ -23,7 +23,13 @@ sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.par
 from review_proofs import (  # noqa: E402
     ISSUE_SELECTION_CONTINUATION_EXPLICIT,
     ISSUE_SELECTION_REPRESENTED_BY_OPEN_PR,
+    assess_already_landed_report_state,
+    assess_already_landed_review_gate,
     assess_author_pr_report,
+    assess_partial_reconciliation_report,
+    resolve_partial_reconciliation_plan,
+    assess_validation_environment_proof,
+    assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate,
     assess_queue_ordering_proof,
     assess_reviewer_baseline_validation_proof,
     assess_capability_evidence,
@@ -34,6 +40,9 @@ from review_proofs import (  # noqa: E402
     assess_create_issue_final_report,
     assess_create_issue_mode_isolation,
     assess_create_issue_workflow_source,
+    assess_work_issue_final_report,
+    assess_work_issue_mode_isolation,
+    assess_work_issue_workflow_source,
     assess_edited_pr_inventory_coverage,
     assess_empty_queue_report,
     assess_fresh_issue_selection,
@@ -2314,10 +2323,154 @@ class TestCreateIssueFinalReport(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertTrue(result["downgraded"])
 
 
-class TestQueueOrderingProof(unittest.TestCase):
-    """Issue #321: reviewer queue selection must prove ordering."""
+class TestWorkIssueFinalReport(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#139: work-issue final-report verifier coverage."""
+
+    def _good_report(self):
+        return "\n".join([
+            "Task mode: work-issue",
+            "Workflow source: skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/work-issue.md",
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Task: work-issue",
+            "- Repo: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
+            "- Role: author",
+            "- Identity: jcwalker3 / prgs-author",
+            "- Active profile: prgs-author",
+            "- Runtime context: prgs-author on prgs",
+            "- Selected issue: #139",
+            "- Branch name: feat/issue-139-role-aware-work-issue-routing",
+            "- PR number: not created in this session",
+            "- File edits by author: role_session_router.py",
+            "- Blockers: none",
+            "- Current status: implementing routing",
+            "- Safe next action: open PR",
+            "- Next: open PR",
+            "- Safety statement: no review/merge",
+        ])
+
+    def test_complete_work_issue_report_earns_a(self):
+        result = assess_work_issue_final_report(self._good_report())
+        self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "A")
+        self.assertFalse(result["downgraded"])
+
+    def test_missing_workflow_source_downgrades(self):
+        report = self._good_report().replace(
+            "workflows/work-issue.md", "SKILL.md only"
+        )
+        result = assess_work_issue_workflow_source(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["downgraded"])
+
+    def test_review_field_in_handoff_downgrades(self):
+        report = self._good_report().replace(
+            "- Safety statement:",
+            "- Review decision: APPROVE\n- Safety statement:",
+        )
+        result = assess_work_issue_mode_isolation(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["downgraded"])
+
+
+class TestValidationEnvironmentProof(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Issue #311: exact validation command and execution environment."""
+
+    ROOT = "/repo/Gitea-Tools/branches/review-pr-280"
+
+    def test_venv_pytest_with_full_report_passes(self):
+        result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
+            report_text=(
+                "Validation command: venv/bin/pytest tests/ --ignore=branches\n"
+                f"Working directory: {self.ROOT}\n"
+                "Result: 1014 passed, 6 skipped"
+            ),
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_bare_pytest_without_path_proof_fails(self):
+        result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
+            report_text=(
+                "Validation command: pytest\n"
+                f"Working directory: {self.ROOT}\n"
+                "1014 passed, 6 skipped"
+            ),
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_bare_pytest_with_path_and_version_proof_passes(self):
+        result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
+            report_text=(
+                "Validation command: pytest tests/\n"
+                f"Working directory: {self.ROOT}\n"
+                "which pytest: /repo/Gitea-Tools/venv/bin/pytest\n"
+                "pytest --version: pytest 8.3.4\n"
+                "Resolves to the project venv: yes\n"
+                "1014 passed, 6 skipped"
+            ),
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_vague_pytest_summary_without_command_fails(self):
+        result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
+            report_text=(
+                f"Working directory: {self.ROOT}\n"
+                "pytest executed inside the worktree: 1014 passed, 6 skipped"
+            ),
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_structured_environment_proof_passes(self):
+        result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
+            validation_environment={
+                "command": "pytest tests/",
+                "working_directory": self.ROOT,
+                "which_pytest": "/repo/Gitea-Tools/venv/bin/pytest",
+                "pytest_version": "pytest 8.3.4",
+                "venv_resolved": True,
+                "passed": 1014,
+                "skipped": 6,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_missing_working_directory_fails(self):
+        result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
+            report_text=(
+                "Validation command: venv/bin/pytest tests/\n"
+                "1014 passed, 6 skipped"
+            ),
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_build_final_report_downgrades_missing_environment_proof(self):
+        report = build_final_report(
+            checkout_proof=_good_checkout(),
+            inventory=_good_inventory(),
+            validation=_good_validation(),
+            contamination=_good_contamination(),
+            identity_eligible=True,
+            merge_performed=False,
+            issue_status_verified=True,
+            capability_evidence=_good_capability_evidence(),
+            sweep=_good_sweep(),
+            live_state=_good_live_state(),
+            role_boundary=_good_role_boundary(),
+            review_mutation=_good_review_mutation(),
+            controller_handoff=_good_handoff(),
+            capability_proof=_good_capability_proof(),
+            sweep_proof=_good_secret_sweep(),
+            worktree_proof={
+                "worktree_path": "/repo/branches/review-feat-issue-224",
+                "porcelain_status": "",
+                "pr_scope_files": ["docs/wiki/Repositories.md"],
+                "scratch_used": True,
+            },
+            report_text=(
+                f"Working directory: {self.ROOT}\n"
+                "pytest executed: 1014 passed, 6 skipped"
+            ),
+        )
+        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
+        self.assertFalse(report["validation_environment_proven"])
+
 
-    def test_next_eligible_claim_without_policy_fails(self):
         result = assess_queue_ordering_proof(
             report_text="Selected the next eligible PR: PR #286.",
         )
@@ -2539,5 +2692,433 @@ class TestReviewerBaselineValidationProof(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertFalse(report["baseline_validation_proven"])
 
 
+class TestPartialReconciliationPlan(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Issue #302: policy when PR-close capability is missing (Option B)."""
+
+    def _plan(self, **overrides):
+        kwargs = {
+            "ancestor_proven": True,
+            "capabilities": {
+                "close_pr": False,
+                "comment_pr": True,
+                "close_issue": True,
+                "comment_issue": True,
+            },
+        }
+        kwargs.update(overrides)
+        return resolve_partial_reconciliation_plan(**kwargs)
+
+    def test_close_capability_present_allows_full_reconcile(self):
+        plan = self._plan(capabilities={
+            "close_pr": True, "comment_pr": True,
+            "close_issue": True, "comment_issue": True,
+        })
+        self.assertEqual(plan["outcome"], "FULL_RECONCILE_CLOSE_ALLOWED")
+        self.assertIn("close_pr", plan["allowed_mutations"])
+
+    def test_close_missing_with_comment_posts_comment_then_stops(self):
+        plan = self._plan()
+        self.assertEqual(
+            plan["outcome"], "PARTIAL_RECONCILE_COMMENT_THEN_STOP")
+        self.assertEqual(plan["allowed_mutations"], ("comment_pr",))
+        for field in (
+            "PR head SHA",
+            "target branch SHA",
+            "ancestor proof",
+            "linked issue status",
+            "required missing capability",
+        ):
+            self.assertIn(field, plan["required_comment_fields"])
+
+    def test_comment_capability_missing_produces_handoff_only(self):
+        plan = self._plan(capabilities={
+            "close_pr": False, "comment_pr": False,
+            "close_issue": True, "comment_issue": True,
+        })
+        self.assertEqual(plan["outcome"], "RECOVERY_HANDOFF_ONLY")
+        self.assertEqual(plan["allowed_mutations"], ())
+
+    def test_all_capabilities_missing_produces_handoff_only(self):
+        plan = self._plan(capabilities={
+            "close_pr": False, "comment_pr": False,
+            "close_issue": False, "comment_issue": False,
+        })
+        self.assertEqual(plan["outcome"], "RECOVERY_HANDOFF_ONLY")
+        self.assertEqual(plan["allowed_mutations"], ())
+
+    def test_unproven_ancestry_blocks_all_mutations(self):
+        plan = self._plan(ancestor_proven=False, capabilities={
+            "close_pr": True, "comment_pr": True,
+            "close_issue": True, "comment_issue": True,
+        })
+        self.assertEqual(plan["outcome"], "GATE_NOT_PROVEN")
+        self.assertEqual(plan["allowed_mutations"], ())
+
+    def test_missing_capability_dict_fails_closed(self):
+        plan = self._plan(capabilities=None)
+        self.assertEqual(plan["outcome"], "RECOVERY_HANDOFF_ONLY")
+        self.assertEqual(plan["allowed_mutations"], ())
+
+
+class TestPartialReconciliationReport(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Issue #302: reports must explain why comments were or were not posted."""
+
+    def _plan(self, outcome):
+        capabilities = {
+            "FULL_RECONCILE_CLOSE_ALLOWED": {
+                "close_pr": True, "comment_pr": True,
+                "close_issue": True, "comment_issue": True,
+            },
+            "PARTIAL_RECONCILE_COMMENT_THEN_STOP": {
+                "close_pr": False, "comment_pr": True,
+                "close_issue": True, "comment_issue": True,
+            },
+            "RECOVERY_HANDOFF_ONLY": {
+                "close_pr": False, "comment_pr": False,
+                "close_issue": False, "comment_issue": False,
+            },
+        }[outcome]
+        return resolve_partial_reconciliation_plan(
+            ancestor_proven=True, capabilities=capabilities)
+
+    def test_partial_report_requires_comment_and_missing_capability(self):
+        plan = self._plan("PARTIAL_RECONCILE_COMMENT_THEN_STOP")
+        good = (
+            "Reconciliation comment posted on PR #278 with ancestor proof. "
+            "PR close skipped: close capability gitea.pr.close missing; "
+            "stopped for authorized close."
+        )
+        result = assess_partial_reconciliation_report(good, plan=plan)
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+
+        bad = "Stopped. Nothing done."
+        result = assess_partial_reconciliation_report(bad, plan=plan)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_handoff_only_report_requires_no_comment_explanation(self):
+        plan = self._plan("RECOVERY_HANDOFF_ONLY")
+        good = (
+            "No reconciliation comment posted: comment capability missing. "
+            "No Gitea mutation performed; recovery handoff produced."
+        )
+        result = assess_partial_reconciliation_report(good, plan=plan)
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+
+        bad = "Recovery handoff produced."
+        result = assess_partial_reconciliation_report(bad, plan=plan)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_full_reconcile_report_requires_close_result(self):
+        plan = self._plan("FULL_RECONCILE_CLOSE_ALLOWED")
+        good = "PR close result: closed PR #278 after ancestor proof."
+        result = assess_partial_reconciliation_report(good, plan=plan)
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+
+        bad = "Reconciliation done."
+        result = assess_partial_reconciliation_report(bad, plan=plan)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestAlreadyLandedReviewGate(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Issue #292: PR head already on target blocks approval and merge."""
+
+    def _gate(self, **overrides):
+        kwargs = {
+            "pr_number": 278,
+            "candidate_head_sha": PINNED,
+            "target_branch": "master",
+            "target_branch_sha": OTHER,
+            "head_is_ancestor_of_target": True,
+            "live_head_sha": PINNED,
+        }
+        kwargs.update(overrides)
+        return assess_already_landed_review_gate(**kwargs)
+
+    def test_already_landed_blocks_approval_and_merge(self):
+        result = self._gate()
+        self.assertEqual(result["state"], "ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED")
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["merge_api_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["request_changes_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["reconciliation_handoff_required"])
+
+    def test_already_landed_with_real_blocker_allows_request_changes(self):
+        result = self._gate(real_blocker=True)
+        self.assertEqual(result["state"], "ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED")
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["merge_api_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["request_changes_allowed"])
+
+    def test_normal_candidate_passes_gate(self):
+        result = self._gate(head_is_ancestor_of_target=False)
+        self.assertEqual(result["state"], "NORMAL_REVIEW_CANDIDATE")
+        self.assertTrue(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["merge_api_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["reconciliation_handoff_required"])
+
+    def test_non_mergeable_normal_pr_still_passes_this_gate(self):
+        # Mergeability/conflicts are separate gates; ancestry gate only
+        # decides already-landed vs normal candidate.
+        result = self._gate(
+            head_is_ancestor_of_target=False, mergeable=False)
+        self.assertEqual(result["state"], "NORMAL_REVIEW_CANDIDATE")
+        self.assertTrue(result["request_changes_allowed"])
+
+    def test_unchecked_ancestry_blocks_review_mutations(self):
+        result = self._gate(head_is_ancestor_of_target=None)
+        self.assertEqual(result["state"], "GATE_NOT_PROVEN")
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["merge_api_allowed"])
+
+    def test_changed_head_since_pin_blocks_until_recheck(self):
+        result = self._gate(
+            head_is_ancestor_of_target=False, live_head_sha=OTHER)
+        self.assertEqual(result["state"], "GATE_NOT_PROVEN")
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any(
+            "head" in reason.lower() for reason in result["reasons"]
+        ))
+
+    def test_invalid_shas_block_gate(self):
+        result = self._gate(candidate_head_sha="deadbeef")
+        self.assertEqual(result["state"], "GATE_NOT_PROVEN")
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+
+        result = self._gate(target_branch_sha=None)
+        self.assertEqual(result["state"], "GATE_NOT_PROVEN")
+
+    def test_already_landed_handoff_lists_required_fields(self):
+        result = self._gate()
+        for field in (
+            "PR number/title",
+            "candidate head SHA",
+            "target branch",
+            "target branch SHA",
+            "ancestor proof",
+            "linked issue status",
+            "recommended reconciliation action",
+            "capability proof for close/comment mutations",
+        ):
+            self.assertIn(field, result["required_handoff_fields"])
+
+
+class TestAlreadyLandedReportState(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Issue #292: reports cannot say APPROVED after the gate fired."""
+
+    GOOD_REPORT = (
+        "Eligibility class: ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED\n"
+        "Candidate head SHA: " + PINNED + "\n"
+        "Review decision: none\n"
+        "Merge result: none\n"
+    )
+
+    def test_gate_fired_with_reconcile_state_passes(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_state(
+            self.GOOD_REPORT, gate_fired=True)
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_gate_fired_with_approved_state_blocks(self):
+        report = self.GOOD_REPORT.replace(
+            "Review decision: none", "Review decision: APPROVED")
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_state(report, gate_fired=True)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_gate_fired_with_merged_state_blocks(self):
+        report = self.GOOD_REPORT.replace(
+            "Merge result: none", "Merge result: MERGED")
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_state(report, gate_fired=True)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_gate_fired_with_ready_to_merge_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_state(
+            self.GOOD_REPORT + "Current status: READY_TO_MERGE\n",
+            gate_fired=True)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_gate_fired_without_reconcile_state_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_state(
+            "Current status: review complete.\n", gate_fired=True)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(any(
+            "already_landed_reconcile_required" in reason.lower()
+            for reason in result["reasons"]
+        ))
+
+    def test_gate_not_fired_reports_pass_untouched(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_report_state(
+            "Review decision: APPROVED\nMerge result: MERGED\n",
+            gate_fired=False)
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+
+
+class TestFullSuiteFailureApprovalGate(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Issue #323: full-suite failure blocks approval without baseline proof."""
+
+    ROOT = "/repo/Gitea-Tools"
+
+    def _good_proof(self, **overrides):
+        proof = {
+            "worktree_path": f"{self.ROOT}/branches/baseline-master-pr280",
+            "baseline_target_sha": PINNED,
+            "pr_head_sha": OTHER,
+            "baseline_failures": ["tests/test_foo.py::test_bar"],
+            "pr_failures": ["tests/test_foo.py::test_bar"],
+            "failure_signatures_match": True,
+            "clean_before": True,
+            "clean_after": True,
+            "pr_suite_command": "venv/bin/pytest tests/",
+            "baseline_suite_command": "venv/bin/pytest tests/",
+            "new_tests_passed": True,
+            "unrelated_explanation": (
+                "failures touch agent_temp_artifacts only; PR changes "
+                "review_proofs handoff fields"
+            ),
+        }
+        proof.update(overrides)
+        return proof
+
+    def _good_report(self):
+        return (
+            "Full suite failed on PR worktree and on baseline.\n"
+            "- Validation command: venv/bin/pytest tests/\n"
+            f"- Working directory: {self.ROOT}/branches/review-pr-280\n"
+            "Failures are pre-existing on master.\n"
+        )
+
+    def test_full_suite_pass_allows_approval_without_baseline(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="approve",
+            full_suite_passed=True,
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["default_action"], "proceed")
+
+    def test_full_suite_failure_defaults_to_request_changes(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="request_changes",
+            full_suite_passed=False,
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["default_action"], "request_changes")
+
+    def test_approval_with_failure_and_no_proof_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="approve",
+            full_suite_passed=False,
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["default_action"], "request_changes")
+
+    def test_approval_with_matching_baseline_proof_allowed(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="approve",
+            full_suite_passed=False,
+            baseline_proof=self._good_proof(),
+            report_text=self._good_report(),
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_mismatched_failure_signatures_block_approval(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="approve",
+            full_suite_passed=False,
+            baseline_proof=self._good_proof(
+                failure_signatures_match=False,
+                pr_failures=["tests/test_other.py::test_other"],
+            ),
+            report_text=self._good_report(),
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_main_checkout_baseline_blocks_approval(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="approve",
+            full_suite_passed=False,
+            baseline_proof=self._good_proof(worktree_path=self.ROOT),
+            report_text=self._good_report(),
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_missing_new_tests_proof_blocks_approval(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="approve",
+            full_suite_passed=False,
+            baseline_proof=self._good_proof(new_tests_passed=None),
+            report_text=self._good_report(),
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any(
+            "new" in reason.lower() and "test" in reason.lower()
+            for reason in result["reasons"]
+        ))
+
+    def test_missing_unrelated_explanation_blocks_approval(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="approve",
+            full_suite_passed=False,
+            baseline_proof=self._good_proof(unrelated_explanation=""),
+            report_text=self._good_report(),
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+
+    def test_missing_suite_commands_block_approval(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="approve",
+            full_suite_passed=False,
+            baseline_proof=self._good_proof(
+                pr_suite_command="", baseline_suite_command=""),
+            report_text=self._good_report(),
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any(
+            "command" in reason.lower() for reason in result["reasons"]
+        ))
+
+    def test_unknown_suite_result_blocks_approval(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="approve",
+            full_suite_passed=None,
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_vague_same_as_master_claim_without_proof_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="approve",
+            full_suite_passed=False,
+            report_text="Validation: failures same as master; approving.",
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["approve_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_non_approve_decision_never_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate(
+            review_decision="comment",
+            full_suite_passed=None,
+            project_root=self.ROOT,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()
+
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     unittest.main()

tests/test_review_workflow_source.py

@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+"""Tests for canonical review-workflow citation and version proof (#296).
+
+PR review/merge reports must prove they loaded the canonical workflow
+(workflows/review-merge-pr.md) and cite the workflow version/hash used;
+a stale or missing hash fails so prompt drift is caught.
+"""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from review_proofs import (  # noqa: E402
+    assess_review_workflow_source,
+    compute_workflow_hash,
+)
+
+
+CANONICAL_TEXT = "# review-merge-pr workflow v1\nstep one\n"
+CANONICAL_HASH = compute_workflow_hash(CANONICAL_TEXT)
+
+
+def _report(citation=True, version=CANONICAL_HASH):
+    lines = ["Task: review next eligible PR"]
+    if citation:
+        lines.append(
+            "Workflow source: skills/llm-project-workflow/"
+            "workflows/review-merge-pr.md (loaded via mcp_get_skill_guide)"
+        )
+    if version is not None:
+        lines.append(f"- Workflow version: {version}")
+    return "\n".join(lines) + "\n"
+
+
+class TestComputeWorkflowHash(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_deterministic(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            compute_workflow_hash(CANONICAL_TEXT),
+            compute_workflow_hash(CANONICAL_TEXT),
+        )
+
+    def test_changes_with_content(self):
+        self.assertNotEqual(
+            compute_workflow_hash(CANONICAL_TEXT),
+            compute_workflow_hash(CANONICAL_TEXT + "extra rule\n"),
+        )
+
+    def test_short_hex(self):
+        h = compute_workflow_hash(CANONICAL_TEXT)
+        self.assertEqual(len(h), 12)
+        int(h, 16)  # raises if not hex
+
+
+class TestReviewWorkflowSource(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_citation_and_matching_hash_passes(self):
+        result = assess_review_workflow_source(
+            _report(), canonical_hash=CANONICAL_HASH
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["reasons"], [])
+
+    def test_missing_citation_fails(self):
+        result = assess_review_workflow_source(
+            _report(citation=False), canonical_hash=CANONICAL_HASH
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("review-merge-pr" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_missing_version_field_fails(self):
+        result = assess_review_workflow_source(
+            _report(version=None), canonical_hash=CANONICAL_HASH
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("workflow version" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_stale_hash_fails(self):
+        result = assess_review_workflow_source(
+            _report(version="deadbeef0000"), canonical_hash=CANONICAL_HASH
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("stale" in r.lower() or "does not match" in r.lower()
+                for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_version_none_fails(self):
+        result = assess_review_workflow_source(
+            _report(version="none"), canonical_hash=CANONICAL_HASH
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
+
+    def test_without_canonical_hash_field_still_required(self):
+        # No canonical hash supplied (e.g. offline validation): citation
+        # and a populated version field are still required.
+        self.assertTrue(
+            assess_review_workflow_source(_report())["complete"]
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(
+            assess_review_workflow_source(_report(version=None))["complete"]
+        )
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_already_landed_classification.py

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+import unittest
+
+from reviewer_already_landed_classification import (  # noqa: E402
+    ALREADY_LANDED_ELIGIBILITY_CLASS,
+    assess_already_landed_classification_report,
+)
+
+
+class TestAlreadyLandedClassification(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_non_landed_report_passes(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_classification_report(
+            "Selected the next eligible PR: PR #286."
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["landed_context"])
+
+    def test_oldest_eligible_pr_on_landed_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_classification_report(
+            "PR is already landed.\n"
+            "Oldest eligible PR: PR #278."
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_next_eligible_pr_on_landed_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_classification_report(
+            "Ancestor proof: passed\n"
+            "Selected the next eligible PR: PR #278."
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_eligible_for_review_on_landed_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_classification_report(
+            "Already landed on master and eligible for review next."
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_proper_landed_wording_passes(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_classification_report(
+            "Oldest open PR requiring action: PR #278\n"
+            f"Eligibility class: {ALREADY_LANDED_ELIGIBILITY_CLASS}\n"
+            "Candidate head SHA: abc123\n"
+            "Reviewed head SHA: none\n"
+            "Queue blocked by already-landed PR requiring reconciliation",
+            selected_pr_already_landed=True,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_pinned_reviewed_head_without_validation_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_classification_report(
+            "Already landed.\n"
+            "Pinned reviewed head: abc123def456",
+            selected_pr_already_landed=True,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_wrong_eligibility_class_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_classification_report(
+            "Already landed.\n"
+            "Eligibility class: REVIEW_ELIGIBLE",
+            selected_pr_already_landed=True,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_missing_queue_blocker_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_classification_report(
+            f"Eligibility class: {ALREADY_LANDED_ELIGIBILITY_CLASS}\n"
+            "Candidate head SHA: abc123\n"
+            "Reviewed head SHA: none",
+            selected_pr_already_landed=True,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_exported_from_review_proofs(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_already_landed_classification_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_already_landed_handoff.py

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+"""Tests for already-landed handoff verifier (#299)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from reviewer_already_landed_handoff import (  # noqa: E402
+    ALREADY_LANDED_STATE,
+    assess_already_landed_handoff_report,
+)
+
+
+def _good_report() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "## PR reconciliation summary",
+        f"Eligibility class: {ALREADY_LANDED_STATE}",
+        "Candidate head SHA: 2a544f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
+        "Reviewed head SHA: none",
+        "Review worktree used: false",
+        "Ancestor proof: PR head is ancestor of prgs/master",
+        "",
+        "## Controller Handoff",
+        "- Selected PR: #278",
+        f"- Eligibility class: {ALREADY_LANDED_STATE}",
+        "- Candidate head SHA: 2a544f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
+        "- Reviewed head SHA: none",
+        "- Target branch: master",
+        "- Target branch SHA: abc123def4567890abcdef1234567890abcdef12",
+        "- Review worktree used: false",
+        "- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master",
+        "- Review decision: none",
+        "- Merge result: none",
+        "- Linked issue status: open",
+        "- Safe next action: reconcile open PR and linked issue",
+    ])
+
+
+class TestAlreadyLandedHandoff(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_clean_handoff_passes(self):
+        result = assess_already_landed_handoff_report(_good_report())
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["gate_active"])
+
+    def test_inactive_gate_skips_checks(self):
+        report = "## Controller Handoff\n- Selected PR: #12\n- Review decision: approve"
+        result = assess_already_landed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["gate_active"])
+
+    def test_rejects_stale_pinned_reviewed_head(self):
+        report = _good_report().replace(
+            "- Candidate head SHA:",
+            "- Pinned reviewed head: 2a544f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9\n"
+            "- Candidate head SHA:",
+        )
+        result = assess_already_landed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("pinned reviewed head" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_rejects_scratch_worktree_used(self):
+        report = _good_report() + "\n- Scratch worktree used: false"
+        result = assess_already_landed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("scratch worktree" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_rejects_mutations_none_with_git_fetch(self):
+        report = _good_report().replace(
+            "- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master",
+            "- Git ref mutations: none\n- Mutations: None",
+        )
+        result = assess_already_landed_handoff_report(
+            report,
+            command_log=[{"command": "git fetch prgs master", "performed": True}],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        joined = " ".join(result["reasons"]).lower()
+        self.assertIn("mutations", joined)
+        self.assertIn("git ref", joined)
+
+    def test_rejects_workspace_mutations_none(self):
+        report = _good_report() + "\n- Workspace mutations: None"
+        result = assess_already_landed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("workspace mutations" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_rejects_reviewed_head_sha_when_gate_fired(self):
+        report = _good_report().replace("- Reviewed head SHA: none", "- Reviewed head SHA: abc123")
+        result = assess_already_landed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("reviewed head sha" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_rejects_narrative_handoff_eligibility_mismatch(self):
+        report = _good_report().replace(
+            f"Eligibility class: {ALREADY_LANDED_STATE}",
+            "Eligibility class: NORMAL_REVIEW_CANDIDATE",
+            1,
+        )
+        result = assess_already_landed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("eligibility class" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_session_gate_fired_without_text_marker(self):
+        report = "## Controller Handoff\n- Selected PR: #1\n- Pinned reviewed head: abc"
+        result = assess_already_landed_handoff_report(
+            report,
+            handoff_session={"gate_fired": True},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["gate_active"])
+
+    def test_infra_stop_style_normal_handoff_not_blocked(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Selected PR: #12",
+            "- Review decision: request_changes",
+            "- Pinned reviewed head: abc123def4567890abcdef1234567890abcdef12",
+        ])
+        result = assess_already_landed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+
+class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_already_landed_handoff_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_infra_stop_handoff.py

@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+"""Tests for infra-stop repair handoff verifier (#289)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from capability_stop_terminal import TERMINAL_REPORT_HEADING
+from reviewer_infra_stop_handoff import assess_infra_stop_handoff_report  # noqa: E402
+
+
+def _repair_handoff() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        TERMINAL_REPORT_HEADING,
+        "Repair handoff for infra_stop blocked reviewer workflow.",
+        "CONTROL-CHECKOUT REPAIR MODE",
+        "MCP process root: /Users/dev/Gitea-Tools",
+        "Inspected git root: /Users/dev/Gitea-Tools",
+        "Conflict marker path: gitea_mcp_server.py",
+        "Merge/rebase control path: none",
+        "Safe next repair action: resolve conflict markers and restart MCP",
+        "infra_stop: true",
+    ])
+
+
+class TestInfraStopHandoff(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_repair_handoff_passes(self):
+        result = assess_infra_stop_handoff_report(
+            _repair_handoff(),
+            stop_session={
+                "infra_stop": True,
+                "infra_stop_assessment": {
+                    "infra_stop": True,
+                    "conflict_file": "gitea_mcp_server.py",
+                },
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_next_pr_selection_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            TERMINAL_REPORT_HEADING,
+            "Next eligible PR to review: PR #276",
+            "Pinned review head SHA: abc123",
+        ])
+        result = assess_infra_stop_handoff_report(
+            report,
+            stop_session={"infra_stop": True, "require_infra_diagnostics": False},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("queue" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_missing_repair_handoff_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_infra_stop_handoff_report(
+            "Validation result: pass\nReview summary for PR #276",
+            stop_session={"infra_stop": True},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_main_checkout_diagnostics_without_label_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            TERMINAL_REPORT_HEADING,
+            "Repair handoff",
+            "Ran git status in main checkout for MCP diagnostics.",
+        ])
+        result = assess_infra_stop_handoff_report(
+            report,
+            stop_session={
+                "infra_stop": True,
+                "main_checkout_diagnostics": True,
+                "require_infra_diagnostics": False,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("control-checkout" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_background_scheduling_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            TERMINAL_REPORT_HEADING,
+            "Repair handoff",
+            "Used schedule/manage_task while waiting for MCP recovery.",
+        ])
+        result = assess_infra_stop_handoff_report(
+            report,
+            stop_session={"infra_stop": True, "require_infra_diagnostics": False},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("schedule" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_non_infra_stop_skips(self):
+        result = assess_infra_stop_handoff_report(
+            "Selected PR #1 for review",
+            stop_session={"infra_stop": False},
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+
+class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_infra_stop_handoff_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_inventory_worktree.py

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+"""Tests for reviewer inventory/worktree verifier (#293)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from reviewer_inventory_worktree import assess_inventory_worktree_report  # noqa: E402
+
+
+def _good_handoff() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "## Controller Handoff",
+        "- Selected PR: 280",
+        "- Inventory pagination proof: is_final_page: true, has_more: false, total_count: 6",
+        "- Review worktree used: true",
+        "- Review worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
+        "- Review worktree inside branches: true",
+        "- Review worktree HEAD state: detached",
+        "- Main checkout branch: master",
+        "- Current status: reviewed PR #280",
+    ])
+
+
+class TestInventoryPaginationProof(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_no_next_page_proof_passes(self):
+        result = assess_inventory_worktree_report(_good_handoff())
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["pagination_proven"])
+
+    def test_rejects_partial_first_page_eligibility_claim(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Oldest eligible PR is #280.",
+            "gitea_list_prs returned 10 open PRs on the first page.",
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Inventory pagination proof: first page only",
+        ])
+        result = assess_inventory_worktree_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("eligible" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_rejects_default_page_size_assumption(self):
+        report = (
+            "Inventory exhaustive because fewer than the default Gitea page size "
+            "were returned."
+        )
+        result = assess_inventory_worktree_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("page size" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_rejects_exactly_full_first_page_without_finality(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Next eligible PR: #290 based on complete inventory.",
+            "gitea_list_prs returned 50 open PRs.",
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Inventory pagination proof: returned 50 open PRs",
+        ])
+        result = assess_inventory_worktree_report(
+            report,
+            inventory_session={"requested_page_size": 50, "returned_page_size": 50},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("full first page" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_allows_exact_page_with_session_pagination_complete(self):
+        report = "Oldest eligible PR: #12 after queue inventory."
+        result = assess_inventory_worktree_report(
+            report,
+            inventory_session={"pagination_complete": True},
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+
+class TestWorktreeConsistency(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_branches_worktree_requires_review_worktree_used_true(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Inventory pagination proof: is_final_page: true",
+            "- Review worktree used: false",
+            "- Review worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat",
+            "- Scratch worktree used: false",
+        ])
+        result = assess_inventory_worktree_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        joined = " ".join(result["reasons"]).lower()
+        self.assertIn("review worktree used", joined)
+        self.assertIn("scratch worktree", joined)
+
+    def test_rejects_contradictory_detached_and_branch_wording(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Checkout: Detached HEAD / Branch master",
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Inventory pagination proof: is_final_page: true",
+            "- Review worktree used: true",
+            "- Review worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat",
+            "- Review worktree HEAD state: detached",
+            "- Main checkout branch: master",
+        ])
+        result = assess_inventory_worktree_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("contradictory" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_requires_head_state_when_review_worktree_used(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Inventory pagination proof: pagination_complete: true",
+            "- Review worktree used: true",
+            "- Review worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat",
+        ])
+        result = assess_inventory_worktree_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("head state" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+
+class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_inventory_worktree_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_merge_simulation.py

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+"""Tests for merge-simulation worktree mutation verifier (#317)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from reviewer_merge_simulation import (  # noqa: E402
+    assess_merge_simulation_report,
+    merge_simulation_commands,
+)
+
+
+def _good_simulation_report(**overrides) -> str:
+    lines = [
+        "Worktree/index mutations: merge simulation in branches/review-pr281",
+        "Worktree path: branches/review-pr281",
+        "Pre-simulation clean status: clean (git status --porcelain empty)",
+        "Merge result: conflicts in review_proofs.py",
+        "Abort command: git merge --abort",
+        "Post-abort clean status: clean after abort (git status --porcelain empty)",
+    ]
+    text = "\n".join(lines)
+    for key, value in overrides.items():
+        text = text.replace(f"{key}:", f"{key}: {value}")
+    return text
+
+
+class TestMergeSimulationDetection(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_detects_no_commit_merge(self):
+        commands = merge_simulation_commands([
+            "git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff",
+            "git status",
+        ])
+        self.assertEqual(commands, ["git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff"])
+
+    def test_detects_merge_abort(self):
+        commands = merge_simulation_commands([
+            "git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff",
+            "git merge --abort",
+        ])
+        self.assertIn("git merge --abort", commands)
+
+
+class TestMergeSimulationReport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_no_simulation_passes(self):
+        result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
+            "Review complete. Worktree/index mutations: none",
+            command_log=["git status --porcelain", "git diff prgs/master...HEAD"],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_documented_simulation_passes(self):
+        report = _good_simulation_report()
+        result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
+            report,
+            command_log=[
+                "git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff",
+                "git merge --abort",
+            ],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_readonly_classification_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Read-only diagnostics: git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff, git status",
+            "Worktree/index mutations: none",
+        ])
+        result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
+            report,
+            command_log=["git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff"],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("read-only" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_missing_worktree_field_blocks(self):
+        report = "Merge simulation ran but only noted in prose."
+        result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
+            report,
+            command_log=["git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff"],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("worktree/index mutations" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_conflict_simulation_requires_merge_result(self):
+        report = _good_simulation_report().replace(
+            "Merge result: conflicts in review_proofs.py",
+            "",
+        )
+        result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
+            report,
+            command_log=["git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff"],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("merge result" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_aborted_simulation_requires_post_clean_proof(self):
+        report = _good_simulation_report().replace(
+            "Post-abort clean status: clean after abort (git status --porcelain empty)",
+            "",
+        )
+        result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
+            report,
+            command_log=[
+                "git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff",
+                "git merge --abort",
+            ],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("post-abort" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_successful_simulation_without_abort_omits_abort_fields(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Worktree/index mutations: merge simulation completed cleanly",
+            "Worktree path: branches/review-pr281",
+            "Pre-simulation clean status: clean before simulation",
+            "Merge result: clean fast-forward simulation",
+        ])
+        result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
+            report,
+            command_log=["git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff"],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+
+class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_merge_simulation_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_mutation_categories.py

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+"""Tests for precise mutation category verifier (#319)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from reviewer_mutation_categories import assess_mutation_categories_report  # noqa: E402
+
+
+def _precise_handoff() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "Controller Handoff",
+        "File edits by reviewer: none",
+        "Worktree/index mutations: git worktree add branches/review-pr1",
+        "Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master",
+        "MCP/Gitea mutations: gitea_view_pr",
+        "Review mutations: gitea_review_pr request_changes",
+        "Read-only diagnostics: git status, git diff",
+    ])
+
+
+class TestMutationCategories(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_precise_categories_pass(self):
+        result = assess_mutation_categories_report(_precise_handoff())
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_legacy_workspace_mutations_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Controller Handoff",
+            "Workspace mutations: none (no local file changes)",
+            "File edits by reviewer: none",
+            "Worktree/index mutations: none",
+            "Git ref mutations: none",
+        ])
+        result = assess_mutation_categories_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("workspace mutations" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_workspace_none_with_worktree_command_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Controller Handoff",
+            "Workspace mutations: none (no local file changes)",
+            "File edits by reviewer: none",
+            "Worktree/index mutations: none",
+            "Git ref mutations: none",
+        ])
+        result = assess_mutation_categories_report(
+            report,
+            observed_commands=["git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD"],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_file_edits_none_with_worktree_mutation_passes(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Controller Handoff",
+            "File edits by reviewer: none",
+            "Worktree/index mutations: git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD",
+            "Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs",
+        ])
+        result = assess_mutation_categories_report(
+            report,
+            observed_commands=["git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD", "git fetch prgs"],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_missing_required_categories_blocks(self):
+        report = "Controller Handoff\nFile edits by reviewer: none\n"
+        result = assess_mutation_categories_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("missing" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_non_controller_handoff_skips(self):
+        result = assess_mutation_categories_report(
+            "Workspace mutations: none\n",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+
+class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_mutation_categories_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_proof_backed_handoff.py

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+"""Tests for proof-backed reviewer handoff verifier (#395)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from reviewer_proof_backed_handoff import (  # noqa: E402
+    assess_proof_backed_handoff_report,
+)
+
+
+def _good_report() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "Inventory pagination proof: is_final_page: true, has_more: false, total_count: 11",
+        "Earlier PRs skipped: #372 non-mergeable — merge simulation conflicts in review_proofs.py",
+        "Baseline worktree path: branches/baseline-master-pr383",
+        "Baseline target SHA: 4243b60ca32d79f1ee5e6b0f10d7570e9dea2937",
+        "Baseline dirty before validation: false",
+        "Baseline validation command: venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -q",
+        "Baseline validation result: 1 failed (test_clean_reviewer_report_passes)",
+        "Baseline dirty after validation: false",
+        "Cleanup mutations: git worktree list showed session worktrees removed",
+        "## Controller Handoff",
+        "- Inventory pagination proof: inventory_complete: true, total_count: 11",
+        "- Earlier PRs skipped: #372 conflict proof via merge simulation",
+        "- Baseline worktree used: true",
+        "- Baseline worktree path: branches/baseline-master-pr383",
+        "- Cleanup mutations: git worktree remove branches/review-pr383",
+    ])
+
+
+class TestProofBackedHandoff(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_fully_proof_backed_report_passes(self):
+        result = assess_proof_backed_handoff_report(
+            _good_report(),
+            action_log=[{"command": "gitea_list_prs", "result": "inventory_complete=true"}],
+            baseline_session={
+                "complete": True,
+                "clean_before": True,
+                "clean_after": True,
+                "command": "pytest",
+                "result": "passed",
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_inventory_page_size_assumption_blocks(self):
+        report = (
+            "Inventory is complete because 13 results are less than page size 50."
+        )
+        result = assess_proof_backed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("page-size" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_skip_without_conflict_proof_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Earlier PRs skipped: #372, #374",
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Earlier PRs skipped: #372, #374",
+        ])
+        result = assess_proof_backed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("skip" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_baseline_without_command_blocks(self):
+        report = "Baseline validation passed; same as master failures."
+        result = assess_proof_backed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("baseline" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_cleanup_without_worktree_list_blocks(self):
+        report = "Worktrees were cleaned after merge."
+        result = assess_proof_backed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("cleanup" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_cleanup_with_worktree_list_passes(self):
+        report = "Cleanup: git worktree list confirmed removal."
+        result = assess_proof_backed_handoff_report(
+            report,
+            action_log=[{"command": "git worktree list"}],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_master_integration_requires_command(self):
+        report = "Merged master into the review worktree before validation."
+        result = assess_proof_backed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("master integration" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_master_integration_with_action_log_passes(self):
+        report = "Merged master into review worktree; merge_exit=0"
+        result = assess_proof_backed_handoff_report(
+            report,
+            action_log=[{"command": "git merge --no-commit prgs/master"}],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_live_proof_requires_source_classification(self):
+        report = "Live proof shows inventory complete."
+        result = assess_proof_backed_handoff_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("proof source" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+
+class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_proof_backed_handoff_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+        result = exported(_good_report(), inventory_session={"inventory_complete": True})
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_reconcile_inventory.py

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+"""Tests for reconciliation inventory pagination verifier (#308)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from reviewer_reconcile_inventory import assess_reconcile_inventory_report  # noqa: E402
+
+
+def _good_report() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "## Already-landed reconciliation",
+        "Open PR inventory:",
+        "- Requested page size: 50",
+        "- Pages fetched: 2",
+        "- Returned PR count per page: page1=50, page2=6",
+        "- Inventory pagination proof: is_final_page: true, has_more: false",
+        "All already-landed PRs in the scanned open queue were found.",
+        "",
+        "## Controller Handoff",
+        "- Selected PR: #278",
+        "- Eligibility class: ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED",
+    ])
+
+
+class TestReconcileInventoryPagination(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_complete_metadata_passes(self):
+        result = assess_reconcile_inventory_report(_good_report())
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["pagination_proven"])
+
+    def test_no_inventory_claim_skips_checks(self):
+        report = "## Controller Handoff\n- Selected PR: #278"
+        result = assess_reconcile_inventory_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["inventory_claimed"])
+
+    def test_first_page_below_limit_with_finality_passes(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Open PRs listed for reconciliation.",
+            "- Requested page size: 50",
+            "- Pages fetched: 1",
+            "- Returned PR count per page: page1=6",
+            "- Inventory pagination proof: is_final_page: true",
+        ])
+        result = assess_reconcile_inventory_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_exactly_full_first_page_without_finality_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Complete queue scan of open PRs.",
+            "- Requested page size: 50",
+            "- Pages fetched: 1",
+            "- Returned PR count per page: page1=50",
+            "Listed 50 open PRs on the first page.",
+        ])
+        result = assess_reconcile_inventory_report(
+            report,
+            inventory_session={"requested_page_size": 50, "returned_page_size": 50},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("full first" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_missing_pagination_metadata_blocks(self):
+        report = "All open PRs were inventoried. Inventory is complete."
+        result = assess_reconcile_inventory_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("metadata" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_default_page_size_assumption_blocks(self):
+        report = (
+            "Exhaustive PR inventory: fewer than the default Gitea page size returned."
+        )
+        result = assess_reconcile_inventory_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("page-size" in r.lower() or "page size" in r.lower()
+                            for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_session_pagination_complete_passes(self):
+        report = "All already-landed PRs were found after scanning open PRs."
+        result = assess_reconcile_inventory_report(
+            report,
+            inventory_session={
+                "pagination_complete": True,
+                "requested_page_size": 50,
+                "pages_fetched": 2,
+                "returned_per_page": [50, 3],
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+
+class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_reconcile_inventory_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_reconcile_linked_issue.py

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+"""Tests for reconciliation linked-issue live proof verifier (#300)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from reviewer_reconcile_linked_issue import assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report  # noqa: E402
+
+
+def _good_handoff() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "## PR reconciliation summary",
+        "Fetched linked issue #263 live with gitea_view_issue in this session.",
+        "",
+        "## Controller Handoff",
+        "- Selected PR: #278",
+        "- Eligibility class: ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED",
+        "- Linked issue: #263",
+        "- Linked issue live status: Issue #263 (open)",
+        "- Safe next action: reconcile open PR",
+    ])
+
+
+class TestReconcileLinkedIssueLiveProof(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_live_fetch_with_open_status_passes(self):
+        result = assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report(
+            _good_handoff(),
+            reconcile_session={"live_fetched": True, "linked_issue_number": 263},
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["linked_issue_number"], 263)
+
+    def test_no_linked_issue_passes(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Selected PR: #99",
+            "- Linked issue: none",
+            "- Linked issue live status: not applicable",
+        ])
+        result = assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+        self.assertIsNone(result["linked_issue_number"])
+
+    def test_closed_status_without_live_proof_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Linked issue: #263",
+            "- Linked issue live status: Issue #263 (closed)",
+        ])
+        result = assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("live" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_not_verified_wording_passes_without_live_proof(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Linked issue: #263",
+            "- Linked issue live status: not verified in this session",
+        ])
+        result = assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_missing_issue_requires_not_verified(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Linked issue: #999",
+            "- Linked issue live status: Issue #999 (open)",
+        ])
+        result = assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report(
+            report,
+            reconcile_session={"issue_missing": True, "linked_issue_number": 999},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("not verified" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_text_live_proof_without_session_lock_passes(self):
+        report = _good_handoff()
+        result = assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["live_proof_present"])
+
+    def test_issue_action_recommendation_requires_capability_proof(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            _good_handoff(),
+            "Recommended: close linked issue #263 after PR reconciliation.",
+        ])
+        result = assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report(
+            report,
+            reconcile_session={"live_fetched": True},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("capability" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_issue_action_with_capability_proof_passes(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            _good_handoff(),
+            "Recommended: close linked issue #263.",
+            "Capability proof: gitea_close_issue allowed for prgs-author.",
+        ])
+        result = assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report(
+            report,
+            reconcile_session={"live_fetched": True},
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+
+class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_reconcile_linked_issue_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_validation_failure_history.py

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+"""Tests for transient validation failure history verifier (#396)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from final_report_validator import assess_final_report_validator  # noqa: E402
+from reviewer_validation_failure_history import (  # noqa: E402
+    assess_validation_failure_history_report,
+)
+
+
+def _full_history_report() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "Validation failure history",
+        "Failure #1:",
+        "Command: venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/test_worktrees.py -q",
+        "Failing test: tests/test_worktrees.py::TestWorktreeStart::test_rejects_untraceable_branches",
+        "Suspected cause: stale /tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json from prior session",
+        "Reproduced: no",
+        "On baseline master: no",
+        "PR-caused: no",
+        "What changed between runs: removed /tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json",
+        "Environmental cleanup: lock file removed before rerun",
+        "Validation: passed after transient failure investigation",
+        "Final validation command: venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -q",
+        "Final result: 1497 passed, 6 skipped",
+    ])
+
+
+class TestValidationFailureHistory(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_no_failures_observed_passes(self):
+        result = assess_validation_failure_history_report(
+            "Validation: passed",
+            validation_session={"observed_failures": []},
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_omitted_failure_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_validation_failure_history_report(
+            "Validation: passed\n1497 passed, 6 skipped",
+            validation_session={
+                "observed_failures": [{
+                    "command": "pytest tests/test_worktrees.py -q",
+                    "failing_test": (
+                        "tests/test_worktrees.py::TestWorktreeStart::"
+                        "test_rejects_untraceable_branches"
+                    ),
+                }],
+                "final_validation_status": "passed",
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_full_history_with_transient_investigation_passes(self):
+        result = assess_validation_failure_history_report(
+            _full_history_report(),
+            validation_session={
+                "observed_failures": [{
+                    "command": (
+                        "venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/test_worktrees.py -q"
+                    ),
+                    "failing_test": (
+                        "tests/test_worktrees.py::TestWorktreeStart::"
+                        "test_rejects_untraceable_branches"
+                    ),
+                    "suspected_cause": "stale /tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json",
+                    "reproduced": "no",
+                    "on_baseline_master": "no",
+                    "pr_caused": "no",
+                }],
+                "final_validation_status": "passed_after_transient_failure_investigation",
+                "environmental_contamination": True,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_baseline_equivalent_failure_documented(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Validation failure history",
+            "Command: pytest tests/test_example.py -q",
+            "Failing test: tests/test_example.py::test_flaky",
+            "Suspected cause: pre-existing master failure",
+            "On baseline master: yes",
+            "PR-caused: no",
+            "What changed between runs: none; failure matches baseline",
+            "Validation: passed after transient failure investigation",
+        ])
+        result = assess_validation_failure_history_report(
+            report,
+            validation_session={
+                "observed_failures": [{
+                    "command": "pytest tests/test_example.py -q",
+                    "failing_test": "tests/test_example.py::test_flaky",
+                    "on_baseline_master": "yes",
+                    "pr_caused": "no",
+                }],
+                "final_validation_status": "passed_after_transient_failure_investigation",
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_unknown_cause_plain_pass_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_validation_failure_history_report(
+            "Validation: passed",
+            validation_session={
+                "observed_failures": [{
+                    "command": "pytest tests/ -q",
+                    "failing_test": "tests/test_foo.py::test_bar",
+                    "suspected_cause": "unknown",
+                }],
+                "final_validation_status": "passed",
+                "cause_unknown": True,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("transient" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_final_report_validator_rejects_omitted_failure(self):
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(
+            "Validation: passed",
+            "review_pr",
+            validation_session={
+                "observed_failures": [{
+                    "command": "pytest tests/ -q",
+                    "failing_test": "tests/test_foo.py::test_bar",
+                }],
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["blocked"] or result["downgraded"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any(
+                f.get("rule_id") == "reviewer.validation_failure_history"
+                for f in result.get("findings") or []
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_exported_from_review_proofs(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_validation_failure_history_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_validation_integrity.py

@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+"""Tests for PR-head vs diagnostic validation integrity verifier (#316)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from reviewer_validation_integrity import assess_validation_integrity_report  # noqa: E402
+
+
+def _official_only_report() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "Official PR-head validation on unmodified worktree.",
+        "Official validation command: pytest tests/ -q",
+        "Official validation result: failed (3 failed)",
+        "Validation integrity status: failed",
+        "Worktree dirty after official validation: clean",
+        "Review decision: request_changes",
+    ])
+
+
+def _diagnostic_report() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        _official_only_report(),
+        "Diagnostic local experiment — not PR-head validation",
+        "Diagnostic edit path: tests/test_example.py",
+        "File edits by reviewer: tests/test_example.py",
+        "Diagnostic command: pytest tests/test_example.py -q",
+        "Diagnostic result: passed after local fix",
+        "Diagnostic results used only for suggested fix; blocker remains PR-head failure.",
+    ])
+
+
+class TestValidationIntegrity(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_official_only_passes(self):
+        result = assess_validation_integrity_report(
+            _official_only_report(),
+            validation_session={
+                "official_validation_ran": True,
+                "official_result": "fail",
+                "worktree_dirty_after_official": False,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_failing_pr_head_with_diagnostic_pass_passes(self):
+        result = assess_validation_integrity_report(
+            _diagnostic_report(),
+            validation_session={
+                "official_validation_ran": True,
+                "official_result": "fail",
+                "diagnostic_validation_ran": True,
+                "diagnostic_result": "pass",
+                "diagnostic_edits": ["tests/test_example.py"],
+                "worktree_dirty_after_official": False,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_post_edit_tests_as_official_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Official validation result: passed after diagnostic edit",
+            "pytest passed after local fix in validation worktree",
+        ])
+        result = assess_validation_integrity_report(
+            report,
+            validation_session={
+                "official_validation_ran": True,
+                "diagnostic_edits": ["tests/test_example.py"],
+                "diagnostic_validation_ran": True,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_missing_dirty_after_validation_blocks(self):
+        report = _official_only_report().replace(
+            "Worktree dirty after official validation: clean",
+            "",
+        )
+        result = assess_validation_integrity_report(
+            report,
+            validation_session={"official_validation_ran": True, "official_result": "fail"},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("dirty" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_diagnostic_without_label_blocks(self):
+        report = _diagnostic_report().replace(
+            "Diagnostic local experiment — not PR-head validation",
+            "",
+        )
+        result = assess_validation_integrity_report(
+            report,
+            validation_session={
+                "official_validation_ran": True,
+                "diagnostic_edits": ["tests/test_example.py"],
+                "diagnostic_validation_ran": True,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("diagnostic" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_contaminated_requires_integrity_status(self):
+        report = "Validation worktree was edited before official validation completed."
+        result = assess_validation_integrity_report(
+            report,
+            validation_session={"contaminated": True, "official_validation_ran": True},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("contaminated" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_action_log_edits_trigger_diagnostic_rules(self):
+        result = assess_validation_integrity_report(
+            _official_only_report(),
+            validation_session={"official_validation_ran": True, "official_result": "fail"},
+            action_log=[{"path": "tests/test_example.py", "kind": "file_edit", "performed": True}],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+
+class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_validation_integrity_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_validation_worktree_edits.py

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+"""Tests for PR validation worktree no-edit verifier (#315)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from reviewer_validation_worktree_edits import (  # noqa: E402
+    assess_validation_worktree_edit_report,
+)
+
+
+def _read_only_report() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "Validation worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
+        "Official PR-head validation on unmodified worktree.",
+        "Official validation result: failed (1 failed)",
+        "File edits by reviewer: none",
+        "Review decision: request_changes",
+    ])
+
+
+def _diagnostic_report() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "Validation worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
+        "Official PR-head validation on unmodified worktree.",
+        "Official validation result: failed (1 failed)",
+        "Review decision: request_changes",
+        "Diagnostic local experiment — not PR-head validation",
+        "Diagnostic scratch worktree path: branches/diagnostic-pr280-fix-test",
+        "File edits by reviewer: tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py (diagnostic only)",
+        "Diagnostic result: passed after local fix",
+    ])
+
+
+class TestValidationWorktreeEdits(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_read_only_review_passes(self):
+        result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
+            _read_only_report(),
+            validation_session={
+                "validation_worktree_path": (
+                    "branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim"
+                ),
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_validation_worktree_edit_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
+            _read_only_report(),
+            validation_session={
+                "validation_worktree_path": (
+                    "branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim"
+                ),
+                "validation_worktree_edits": ["tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py"],
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("validation worktree" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_file_edits_none_contradiction_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
+            _read_only_report(),
+            validation_session={
+                "validation_worktree_path": (
+                    "branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim"
+                ),
+            },
+            action_log=[
+                {
+                    "path": "tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py",
+                    "kind": "file_edit",
+                    "performed": True,
+                    "worktree_path": "branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
+                }
+            ],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("file edits" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_diagnostic_scratch_with_reporting_passes(self):
+        result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
+            _diagnostic_report(),
+            validation_session={
+                "validation_worktree_path": (
+                    "branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim"
+                ),
+                "diagnostic_worktree_path": "branches/diagnostic-pr280-fix-test",
+                "diagnostic_edits": ["tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py"],
+                "diagnostic_experiment": True,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_diagnostic_without_scratch_worktree_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
+            "File edits by reviewer: tests/test_example.py",
+            validation_session={
+                "diagnostic_edits": ["tests/test_example.py"],
+                "diagnostic_experiment": True,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("diagnostic" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_post_edit_official_validation_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Validation worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
+            "Official validation result: passed after local edit",
+            "File edits by reviewer: tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py",
+        ])
+        result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
+            report,
+            validation_session={
+                "validation_worktree_path": (
+                    "branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim"
+                ),
+                "validation_worktree_edits": ["tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py"],
+                "official_validation_after_edit": True,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+
+class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_validation_worktree_edit_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_worktree_ownership.py

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+"""Tests for reviewer worktree ownership verifier (#312)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from reviewer_worktree_ownership import assess_worktree_ownership_report  # noqa: E402
+
+
+def _fresh_review_report() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "Review worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
+        "Worktree is inside branches/ and not the main checkout.",
+        "Tracked state: clean; untracked state: clean.",
+        "Official PR-head validation on session-owned worktree.",
+        "Worktree mutations: none",
+    ])
+
+
+def _safe_reuse_report() -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "Safe-reuse proof for existing review worktree.",
+        "Review worktree path: branches/docs-issue-260-forbid-commit-fallbacks",
+        "Worktree inside branches/; not the main checkout.",
+        "Not owned by another active task/session.",
+        "Clean tracked state; clean untracked state.",
+        "Branch/head before reset: feat/issue-260-example",
+        "Reset target SHA: abc123def4567890abcdef1234567890abcdef12",
+        "Project policy allows reuse/reset for this clean review worktree.",
+        "Worktree mutations: git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD",
+        "Destructive reset operations: git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD",
+    ])
+
+
+class TestWorktreeOwnership(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_fresh_session_owned_passes(self):
+        result = assess_worktree_ownership_report(
+            _fresh_review_report(),
+            ownership_session={
+                "validation_ran": True,
+                "worktree_path": "branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["session_owned"])
+
+    def test_safe_reuse_with_reset_passes(self):
+        result = assess_worktree_ownership_report(
+            _safe_reuse_report(),
+            ownership_session={
+                "safe_reuse": True,
+                "worktree_path": "branches/docs-issue-260-forbid-commit-fallbacks",
+            },
+            command_log=["git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD"],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_destructive_reset_without_proof_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Review worktree path: branches/docs-issue-260-forbid-commit-fallbacks",
+            "Worktree mutations: git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD",
+        ])
+        result = assess_worktree_ownership_report(
+            report,
+            ownership_session={
+                "validation_ran": True,
+                "worktree_path": "branches/docs-issue-260-forbid-commit-fallbacks",
+            },
+            command_log=["git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD"],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_reused_dirty_tracked_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_worktree_ownership_report(
+            _fresh_review_report(),
+            ownership_session={
+                "validation_ran": True,
+                "worktree_path": "branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
+                "dirty_tracked": True,
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("tracked" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_safe_reuse_dirty_untracked_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_worktree_ownership_report(
+            _safe_reuse_report(),
+            ownership_session={
+                "safe_reuse": True,
+                "dirty_untracked": True,
+                "worktree_path": "branches/docs-issue-260-forbid-commit-fallbacks",
+            },
+            command_log=["git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD"],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("untracked" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_workspace_none_with_reset_blocks(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Review worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
+            "Workspace mutations: none",
+            "Worktree mutations: git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD",
+        ])
+        result = assess_worktree_ownership_report(
+            report,
+            ownership_session={
+                "session_owned": True,
+                "worktree_path": "branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
+            },
+            command_log=["git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD"],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("workspace mutations" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_main_checkout_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_worktree_ownership_report(
+            "Review worktree path: /Users/dev/Gitea-Tools",
+            ownership_session={
+                "validation_ran": True,
+                "main_checkout": True,
+                "worktree_path": "/Users/dev/Gitea-Tools",
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+
+class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
+        from review_proofs import assess_worktree_ownership_report as exported
+
+        self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_role_session_router.py

@@ -52,6 +52,22 @@ CONFIG = {
             ],
             "execution_profile": "prgs-reviewer",
         },
+        "prgs-reconciler": {
+            "enabled": True,
+            "context": "ctx",
+            "role": "reconciler",
+            "username": "sysadmin",
+            "auth": {"type": "env", "name": "GITEA_TOKEN_RECONCILER"},
+            "allowed_operations": [
+                "gitea.read", "gitea.pr.comment", "gitea.issue.comment",
+                "gitea.issue.close", "gitea.pr.close",
+            ],
+            "forbidden_operations": [
+                "gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge", "gitea.pr.create",
+                "gitea.branch.push",
+            ],
+            "execution_profile": "prgs-reconciler",
+        },
     },
     "rules": {"allow_runtime_switching": False},
 }
@@ -88,6 +104,7 @@ class TestRoleSessionRouter(unittest.TestCase):
             "GITEA_MCP_PROFILE": profile,
             "GITEA_TOKEN_AUTHOR": "author-pass",
             "GITEA_TOKEN_REVIEWER": "reviewer-pass",
+            "GITEA_TOKEN_RECONCILER": "reconciler-pass",
         }
 
     def test_reviewer_task_under_author_profile_wrong_role_stop(self):
@@ -99,6 +116,24 @@ class TestRoleSessionRouter(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertFalse(route["downstream_allowed"])
         self.assertIn("Wrong role/session for reviewer task", route["message"])
 
+    def test_pr_queue_cleanup_under_author_profile_wrong_role_stop(self):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("prgs-author")):
+            route = mcp_server.gitea_route_task_session(
+                task_type="pr_queue_cleanup", remote="prgs"
+            )
+        self.assertEqual(route["route_result"], role_session_router.ROUTE_WRONG_ROLE)
+        self.assertFalse(route["downstream_allowed"])
+
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "sysadmin"})
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token reviewer-pass")
+    def test_pr_queue_cleanup_under_reviewer_profile_allowed(self, _auth, _api):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("prgs-reviewer")):
+            route = mcp_server.gitea_route_task_session(
+                task_type="pr_queue_cleanup", remote="prgs"
+            )
+        self.assertEqual(route["route_result"], role_session_router.ROUTE_ALLOWED)
+        self.assertTrue(route["downstream_allowed"])
+
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token author-pass")
     def test_issue_creation_blocked_after_reviewer_wrong_role_stop(
@@ -157,6 +192,31 @@ class TestRoleSessionRouter(unittest.TestCase):
             )
         self.assertEqual(result.get("number"), 999)
 
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "jcwalker3"})
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token author-pass")
+    def test_work_issue_task_under_author_profile_allowed(self, _auth, _api):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("prgs-author")):
+            for task_type in ("work_issue", "work-issue"):
+                route = mcp_server.gitea_route_task_session(
+                    task_type=task_type, remote="prgs"
+                )
+                self.assertEqual(
+                    route["route_result"], role_session_router.ROUTE_ALLOWED
+                )
+                self.assertTrue(route["downstream_allowed"])
+
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "sysadmin"})
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token reviewer-pass")
+    def test_work_issue_task_under_reviewer_profile_routes_to_author(self, _auth, _api):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("prgs-reviewer")):
+            route = mcp_server.gitea_route_task_session(
+                task_type="work-issue", remote="prgs"
+            )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            route["route_result"], role_session_router.ROUTE_TO_AUTHOR
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(route["downstream_allowed"])
+
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "sysadmin"})
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token reviewer-pass")
     def test_reviewer_task_under_reviewer_profile_allowed(self, _auth, _api):
@@ -179,6 +239,24 @@ class TestRoleSessionRouter(unittest.TestCase):
         )
         self.assertFalse(route["downstream_allowed"])
 
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "sysadmin"})
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token reconciler-pass")
+    def test_reconciler_task_under_reconciler_profile_allowed(self, _auth, _api):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("prgs-reconciler")):
+            route = mcp_server.gitea_route_task_session(
+                task_type="reconcile_already_landed_pr", remote="prgs"
+            )
+        self.assertEqual(route["route_result"], role_session_router.ROUTE_ALLOWED)
+        self.assertTrue(route["downstream_allowed"])
+
+    def test_reconciler_task_under_author_profile_wrong_role_stop(self):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("prgs-author")):
+            route = mcp_server.gitea_route_task_session(
+                task_type="reconcile_already_landed_pr", remote="prgs"
+            )
+        self.assertEqual(route["route_result"], role_session_router.ROUTE_WRONG_ROLE)
+        self.assertFalse(route["downstream_allowed"])
+
     def test_activate_profile_blocked_in_static_mode(self):
         with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("prgs-author")):
             result = mcp_server.gitea_activate_profile(

tests/test_validation_status_vocabulary.py

@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+"""Tests for validation status vocabulary (#406)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from final_report_validator import assess_final_report_validator  # noqa: E402
+from validation_status_vocabulary import (  # noqa: E402
+    STATUS_BASELINE_EQUIVALENT,
+    STATUS_FAILED,
+    STATUS_MERGE_SIM_RESOLVED,
+    STATUS_PASSED,
+    STATUS_TRANSIENT_PASS,
+    assess_validation_status_vocabulary,
+)
+
+
+def _handoff(**extra):
+    fields = {
+        "Task": "review PR #386",
+        "Validation status": STATUS_PASSED,
+        "Raw PR-head validation result": "passed",
+        "Merge simulation result": "not run",
+        "Baseline worktree used": "none",
+    }
+    fields.update(extra)
+    lines = ["## Controller Handoff", ""]
+    lines.extend(f"- {key}: {value}" for key, value in fields.items())
+    return "\n".join(lines)
+
+
+class TestValidationStatusVocabulary(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_raw_head_pass_status(self):
+        report = _handoff()
+        result = assess_validation_status_vocabulary(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["status_claimed"], STATUS_PASSED)
+
+    def test_raw_head_failure_with_baseline_match(self):
+        report = _handoff(
+            **{
+                "Validation status": STATUS_BASELINE_EQUIVALENT,
+                "Raw PR-head validation result": "failed",
+                "Baseline worktree used": "branches/baseline-master-pr386",
+                "Baseline target SHA": "a" * 40,
+                "Baseline failures": "test_foo failed",
+                "PR failures": "test_foo failed",
+                "Failure signatures match": "true",
+            }
+        )
+        result = assess_validation_status_vocabulary(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["baseline_proof_complete"])
+
+    def test_baseline_equivalent_without_baseline_proof_blocked(self):
+        report = _handoff(
+            **{
+                "Validation status": STATUS_BASELINE_EQUIVALENT,
+                "Raw PR-head validation result": "failed",
+            }
+        )
+        result = assess_validation_status_vocabulary(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertIn("baseline-equivalent", result["reasons"][0])
+
+    def test_merge_simulation_resolution_passes(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            _handoff(
+                **{
+                    "Validation status": STATUS_MERGE_SIM_RESOLVED,
+                    "Raw PR-head validation result": "failed",
+                    "Merge simulation result": "passed",
+                }
+            ),
+            "Worktree/index mutations: merge simulation in branches/review-pr386",
+            "Worktree path: branches/review-pr386",
+            "Pre-simulation clean status: clean",
+            "Merge result: clean merge",
+            "Abort command: git merge --abort",
+            "Post-abort clean status: clean",
+        ])
+        command_log = [
+            {"command": "git merge --no-commit prgs/master"},
+            {"command": "git merge --abort"},
+        ]
+        result = assess_validation_status_vocabulary(
+            report, command_log=command_log
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["merge_simulation_passed"])
+
+    def test_merge_simulation_failure_stays_failed(self):
+        report = _handoff(
+            **{
+                "Validation status": STATUS_FAILED,
+                "Raw PR-head validation result": "failed",
+                "Merge simulation result": "failed",
+            }
+        )
+        result = assess_validation_status_vocabulary(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_failed_status_with_passing_merge_sim_blocked(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            _handoff(
+                **{
+                    "Validation status": STATUS_FAILED,
+                    "Raw PR-head validation result": "failed",
+                    "Merge simulation result": "passed",
+                }
+            ),
+            "Worktree/index mutations: merge simulation",
+            "Worktree path: branches/review-pr386",
+            "Pre-simulation clean status: clean",
+            "Merge result: clean",
+            "Abort command: git merge --abort",
+            "Post-abort clean status: clean",
+        ])
+        result = assess_validation_status_vocabulary(
+            report,
+            command_log=[{"command": "git merge --no-commit prgs/master"}],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_transient_failure_then_pass(self):
+        report = _handoff(
+            **{
+                "Validation status": STATUS_TRANSIENT_PASS,
+                "Raw PR-head validation result": "passed",
+                "Transient validation failure history": (
+                    "first run failed with infra flake; rerun passed"
+                ),
+            }
+        )
+        result = assess_validation_status_vocabulary(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_transient_pass_without_history_blocked(self):
+        report = _handoff(
+            **{
+                "Validation status": STATUS_TRANSIENT_PASS,
+                "Raw PR-head validation result": "passed",
+            }
+        )
+        result = assess_validation_status_vocabulary(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_bare_passed_after_raw_failure_blocked(self):
+        report = _handoff(
+            **{
+                "Validation status": STATUS_PASSED,
+                "Raw PR-head validation result": "failed",
+            }
+        )
+        result = assess_validation_status_vocabulary(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_wrong_baseline_label_when_merge_sim_used_blocked(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            _handoff(
+                **{
+                    "Validation status": STATUS_BASELINE_EQUIVALENT,
+                    "Raw PR-head validation result": "failed",
+                    "Merge simulation result": "passed",
+                }
+            ),
+            "Worktree/index mutations: merge simulation",
+            "Worktree path: branches/review-pr386",
+            "Pre-simulation clean status: clean",
+            "Merge result: clean",
+            "Abort command: git merge --abort",
+            "Post-abort clean status: clean",
+        ])
+        result = assess_validation_status_vocabulary(
+            report,
+            command_log=[{"command": "git merge --no-commit prgs/master"}],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        joined = " ".join(result["reasons"]).lower()
+        self.assertTrue(
+            "misleading" in joined or "baseline-equivalent" in joined
+        )
+
+    def test_final_report_validator_integration_blocks_misleading_label(self):
+        report = _handoff(
+            **{
+                "Validation status": STATUS_BASELINE_EQUIVALENT,
+                "Raw PR-head validation result": "failed",
+            }
+        )
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
+        blocked_ids = {f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]}
+        self.assertIn("reviewer.validation_status_vocabulary", blocked_ids)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

validation_status_vocabulary.py

@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+"""Precise validation-status vocabulary for reviewer final reports (#406)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+from reviewer_merge_simulation import assess_merge_simulation_report
+
+STATUS_PASSED = "passed"
+STATUS_FAILED = "failed"
+STATUS_BASELINE_EQUIVALENT = "baseline-equivalent failure accepted"
+STATUS_MERGE_SIM_RESOLVED = "raw-head failure resolved by merge simulation"
+STATUS_TRANSIENT_PASS = "passed after transient failure investigation"
+
+ALLOWED_VALIDATION_STATUSES = frozenset({
+    STATUS_PASSED,
+    STATUS_FAILED,
+    STATUS_BASELINE_EQUIVALENT,
+    STATUS_MERGE_SIM_RESOLVED,
+    STATUS_TRANSIENT_PASS,
+})
+
+_STATUS_FIELD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*(?:validation status|pr-head validation status|"
+    r"official validation status)\s*:\s*(.+?)\s*$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_RAW_HEAD_RESULT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*raw pr-head validation result\s*:\s*(.+?)\s*$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_MERGE_SIM_RESULT_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*merge simulation result\s*:\s*(.+?)\s*$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_BASELINE_WORKTREE_USED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*baseline (?:validation )?worktree(?: used)?\s*:\s*(.+?)\s*$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_BASELINE_TARGET_SHA_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*baseline target sha\s*:\s*([0-9a-f]{7,40})\s*$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_FAILURE_SIGNATURE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"failure signatures match\s*:\s*(true|yes)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_BASELINE_FAILURES_RE = re.compile(
+    r"baseline failures\s*:",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_TRANSIENT_HISTORY_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:transient validation failure|earlier validation failure|"
+    r"prior failure|failure history|failed then passed)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_FULL_SHA = re.compile(r"^[0-9a-f]{40}$", re.IGNORECASE)
+
+
+def _first_match(pattern: re.Pattern[str], text: str) -> str:
+    match = pattern.search(text or "")
+    return (match.group(1).strip() if match else "")
+
+
+def _normalize_status_label(raw: str) -> str:
+    text = (raw or "").strip().lower()
+    for status in ALLOWED_VALIDATION_STATUSES:
+        if text == status.lower():
+            return status
+    return raw.strip()
+
+
+def _baseline_proof_complete(text: str, baseline_proof: dict | None) -> bool:
+    proof = baseline_proof or {}
+    worktree = (
+        (proof.get("worktree_path") or "").strip()
+        or _first_match(_BASELINE_WORKTREE_USED_RE, text)
+    ).lower()
+    if not worktree or worktree in {"none", "n/a", "not used", "not applicable"}:
+        return False
+    if "branches/" not in worktree and not worktree.startswith("branches/"):
+        return False
+    target_sha = (proof.get("baseline_target_sha") or "").strip()
+    if not target_sha:
+        target_sha = _first_match(_BASELINE_TARGET_SHA_RE, text)
+    if not _FULL_SHA.match(target_sha or ""):
+        return False
+    if proof.get("failure_signatures_match") is True:
+        return True
+    if _FAILURE_SIGNATURE_RE.search(text) and _BASELINE_FAILURES_RE.search(text):
+        return True
+    return False
+
+
+def _merge_simulation_passed(text: str, command_log: list | None) -> bool:
+    merge_result = _first_match(_MERGE_SIM_RESULT_RE, text).lower()
+    if merge_result in {"passed", "pass", "clean", "succeeded", "success"}:
+        sim = assess_merge_simulation_report(text, command_log=command_log)
+        return sim.get("proven") and not sim.get("block")
+    if "pass" in merge_result and "fail" not in merge_result:
+        sim = assess_merge_simulation_report(text, command_log=command_log)
+        return sim.get("proven") and not sim.get("block")
+    return False
+
+
+def _raw_head_failed(text: str) -> bool:
+    raw = _first_match(_RAW_HEAD_RESULT_RE, text).lower()
+    if raw in {"failed", "fail", "failure"}:
+        return True
+    if "fail" in raw and "pass" not in raw:
+        return True
+    return bool(re.search(r"\bfailed\b.*pr-head validation", text, re.IGNORECASE))
+
+
+def _raw_head_passed(text: str) -> bool:
+    raw = _first_match(_RAW_HEAD_RESULT_RE, text).lower()
+    return raw in {"passed", "pass", "success"}
+
+
+def assess_validation_status_vocabulary(
+    report_text: str,
+    *,
+    command_log: list | None = None,
+    baseline_proof: dict | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Bind validation-status labels to the proof path that actually ran (#406)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    status_raw = _first_match(_STATUS_FIELD_RE, text)
+    status = _normalize_status_label(status_raw) if status_raw else ""
+
+    if status_raw and status not in ALLOWED_VALIDATION_STATUSES:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"unknown validation status {status_raw!r}; use one of "
+            f"{sorted(ALLOWED_VALIDATION_STATUSES)}"
+        )
+
+    if status == STATUS_BASELINE_EQUIVALENT:
+        if not _baseline_proof_complete(text, baseline_proof):
+            reasons.append(
+                "baseline-equivalent failure accepted requires baseline "
+                "worktree path, baseline target SHA, and matching failure "
+                "signatures (#406)"
+            )
+
+    if status == STATUS_MERGE_SIM_RESOLVED:
+        if not _raw_head_failed(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "raw-head failure resolved by merge simulation requires "
+                "raw PR-head validation result: failed (#406)"
+            )
+        if not _merge_simulation_passed(text, command_log):
+            reasons.append(
+                "raw-head failure resolved by merge simulation requires "
+                "passing merge simulation with worktree/index mutation proof "
+                "(#317/#406)"
+            )
+
+    if status == STATUS_TRANSIENT_PASS:
+        if not _TRANSIENT_HISTORY_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "passed after transient failure investigation requires "
+                "documented earlier validation failure history (#396/#406)"
+            )
+
+    if status == STATUS_PASSED and _raw_head_failed(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "validation status passed contradicts raw PR-head validation "
+            "failure; use a precise status (#406)"
+        )
+
+    if status == STATUS_BASELINE_EQUIVALENT and _merge_simulation_passed(
+        text, command_log
+    ) and not _baseline_proof_complete(text, baseline_proof):
+        reasons.append(
+            "baseline-equivalent failure accepted is misleading when only "
+            "merge simulation resolved the failure; use "
+            "'raw-head failure resolved by merge simulation' (#406)"
+        )
+
+    if status == STATUS_FAILED and _merge_simulation_passed(text, command_log):
+        reasons.append(
+            "validation status failed contradicts passing merge simulation; "
+            "report the precise resolution status (#406)"
+        )
+
+    block = bool(reasons)
+    return {
+        "block": block,
+        "proven": not block,
+        "status_claimed": status or None,
+        "raw_status_label": status_raw or None,
+        "raw_head_failed": _raw_head_failed(text),
+        "raw_head_passed": _raw_head_passed(text),
+        "merge_simulation_passed": _merge_simulation_passed(text, command_log),
+        "baseline_proof_complete": _baseline_proof_complete(text, baseline_proof),
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "use a validation status that matches the proof path executed "
+            "(baseline worktree, merge simulation, or transient history)"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }