fix: resolve conflicts for PR #363
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,878 @@
|
||||
"""Composable final-report validator for reviewer and reconciliation handoffs (#327).
|
||||
|
||||
Single entry point ``assess_final_report_validator`` runs task-specific rule
|
||||
modules and returns structured findings suitable for controller handoff
|
||||
``Blocker`` / ``Safe next action`` fields.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import inspect
|
||||
import re
|
||||
from typing import Any, Callable
|
||||
|
||||
from review_proofs import (
|
||||
HANDOFF_HEADING,
|
||||
assess_controller_handoff,
|
||||
assess_email_disclosure,
|
||||
assess_issue_filing_final_report,
|
||||
assess_mutation_ledger_report,
|
||||
assess_review_mutation_final_report,
|
||||
assess_validation_report,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
FINAL_REPORT_TASK_KINDS = frozenset({
|
||||
"review_pr",
|
||||
"reconcile_already_landed",
|
||||
"author_issue",
|
||||
"work_issue",
|
||||
"issue_filing",
|
||||
"issue_selection",
|
||||
"inventory",
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
_TASK_KIND_ALIASES = {
|
||||
"review": "review_pr",
|
||||
"review-merge-pr": "review_pr",
|
||||
"reconcile-landed-pr": "reconcile_already_landed",
|
||||
"reconcile_already_landed": "reconcile_already_landed",
|
||||
"work-issue": "work_issue",
|
||||
"create_issue": "issue_filing",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
_HANDOFF_ROLE_BY_TASK = {
|
||||
"review_pr": "review",
|
||||
"reconcile_already_landed": None,
|
||||
"author_issue": "author",
|
||||
"work_issue": "author",
|
||||
"issue_filing": "issue_filing",
|
||||
"issue_selection": None,
|
||||
"inventory": "inventory",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
_LEGACY_WORKSPACE_MUTATIONS_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"^\s*[-*]?\s*workspace\s+mutations\s*:",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_VAGUE_MUTATIONS_NONE_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"^\s*[-*]?\s*mutations\s*:\s*none\s*$",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_BARE_PYTEST_RE = re.compile(r"\b(?:pytest|python\s+-m\s+pytest)\b", re.IGNORECASE)
|
||||
_VALIDATION_ENV_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?:working directory|cwd|executed (?:in|from)|command\s+path)\s*:|\bin\s+branches/",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_MAIN_CHECKOUT_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?:/Gitea-Tools(?:/|$)(?!branches/)|main checkout|shared checkout|control checkout)",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_SAME_AS_MASTER_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"same as master|same failures as master|matches master baseline",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_BASELINE_WORKTREE_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"baseline worktree",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_APPROVAL_CLAIM_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?:submitted\s+['\"]approve['\"]|review decision\s*:\s*approve|claims?\s+approve)",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_FULL_SUITE_FAIL_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?:full suite failed|full test suite failed|\d+\s+failed(?:,|\s))",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_ALREADY_LANDED_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"already[- ]landed|ancestor proof\s*:\s*passed|eligibility class\s*:\s*already_landed",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_ELIGIBLE_REVIEW_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"eligible for (?:review|merge)|ready for (?:review|merge)|next eligible pr",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_REVIEWED_LANDED_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?:reviewed|approved).{0,40}already[- ]landed|already[- ]landed.{0,40}(?:reviewed|eligible)",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE | re.DOTALL,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_RECONCILE_STALE_FIELDS = (
|
||||
"pr number opened",
|
||||
"pinned reviewed head",
|
||||
"scratch worktree used",
|
||||
"review decision",
|
||||
"merge result",
|
||||
)
|
||||
_RECONCILE_REQUIRED_FIELDS = (
|
||||
"Selected PR",
|
||||
"Eligibility class",
|
||||
"Linked issue live status",
|
||||
"Safe next action",
|
||||
"No review/merge confirmation",
|
||||
)
|
||||
_LINKED_ISSUE_STATUS_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"linked issue(?:\s+live)?\s+status\s*:\s*(.+)$",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_LINKED_ISSUE_NUMBER_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"linked issue\s*:\s*#?(\d+)",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_INVENTORY_COMPLETE_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"inventory\s+(?:complete|completeness\s*:\s*complete)",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_PAGINATION_PROOF_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?:pagination\s+complete|final page|no next page|total\s+(?:open\s+)?pr\s+count|traversed\s+all\s+pages)",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_GIT_FETCH_RE = re.compile(r"\bgit\s+fetch\b", re.IGNORECASE)
|
||||
_READONLY_DIAG_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"read[- ]only diagnostics\s*:\s*(.+)$",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_MUTATION_CATEGORY_FIELDS = (
|
||||
"file edits by reviewer",
|
||||
"worktree/index mutations",
|
||||
"git ref mutations",
|
||||
"mcp/gitea mutations",
|
||||
"reconciliation mutations",
|
||||
"file edits by reconciler",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _normalize_task_kind(task_kind: str | None) -> str:
|
||||
raw = (task_kind or "").strip().lower().replace(" ", "_")
|
||||
return _TASK_KIND_ALIASES.get(raw, raw)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def validator_finding(
|
||||
rule_id: str,
|
||||
severity: str,
|
||||
field: str,
|
||||
reason: str,
|
||||
safe_next_action: str,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, str]:
|
||||
"""Structured finding for controller handoff consumption."""
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"rule_id": rule_id,
|
||||
"severity": severity,
|
||||
"field": field,
|
||||
"reason": reason,
|
||||
"safe_next_action": safe_next_action,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _findings_from_reasons(
|
||||
rule_id: str,
|
||||
reasons: list[str],
|
||||
*,
|
||||
field: str = "",
|
||||
severity: str = "downgrade",
|
||||
safe_next_action: str = "downgrade final report; repair missing proof fields",
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(rule_id, severity, field, reason, safe_next_action)
|
||||
for reason in reasons
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _handoff_fields(report_text: str) -> dict[str, str]:
|
||||
from review_proofs import _handoff_section_lines # local import avoids cycle at load
|
||||
|
||||
section = _handoff_section_lines(report_text) or []
|
||||
fields: dict[str, str] = {}
|
||||
for line in section:
|
||||
stripped = line.strip().lstrip("-*").strip()
|
||||
if ":" not in stripped:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
key, value = stripped.split(":", 1)
|
||||
fields[key.strip().lower()] = value.strip()
|
||||
return fields
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_shared_controller_handoff(
|
||||
report_text: str,
|
||||
task_kind: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
local_edits: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
role = _HANDOFF_ROLE_BY_TASK.get(task_kind)
|
||||
result = assess_controller_handoff(
|
||||
report_text,
|
||||
role=role,
|
||||
local_edits=local_edits,
|
||||
)
|
||||
verdict = result.get("verdict")
|
||||
if verdict == "complete":
|
||||
return []
|
||||
severity = "block" if verdict == "missing" else "downgrade"
|
||||
return _findings_from_reasons(
|
||||
"shared.controller_handoff",
|
||||
result.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
field="Controller Handoff",
|
||||
severity=severity,
|
||||
safe_next_action=(
|
||||
"add a complete Controller Handoff section with task-appropriate fields"
|
||||
if verdict == "missing"
|
||||
else "fill missing controller handoff fields before submission"
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_shared_email_disclosure(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
result = assess_email_disclosure(report_text)
|
||||
if result.get("proven"):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
return _findings_from_reasons(
|
||||
"shared.email_disclosure",
|
||||
result.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
field="Identity",
|
||||
severity="downgrade",
|
||||
safe_next_action="use username / profile identity; remove personal email",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_legacy_workspace_mutations(
|
||||
report_text: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
mutations_observed: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
if not mutations_observed:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if not _LEGACY_WORKSPACE_MUTATIONS_RE.search(report_text or ""):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.legacy_workspace_mutations",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Workspace mutations",
|
||||
"legacy 'Workspace mutations' field used after observed mutations; "
|
||||
"use precise mutation categories instead",
|
||||
"replace Workspace mutations with file/worktree/git/MCP category fields",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none(
|
||||
report_text: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
action_log: list[dict] | None = None,
|
||||
mutations_observed: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
performed = any(
|
||||
e.get("performed") is not False and not e.get("gated_rejected")
|
||||
for e in (action_log or [])
|
||||
)
|
||||
if not (mutations_observed or performed):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if not _VAGUE_MUTATIONS_NONE_RE.search(report_text or ""):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.vague_mutations_none",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Mutations",
|
||||
"report claims 'Mutations: none' while mutations were observed",
|
||||
"list performed mutations under precise category fields",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_mutation_categories(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
if "mutations:" not in lower and "mutation categories" not in lower:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.mutation_categories",
|
||||
"downgrade",
|
||||
"Mutations",
|
||||
"reviewer handoff lacks precise mutation category fields",
|
||||
"report file edits, worktree/index, git ref, MCP/Gitea, and review mutations separately",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
if any(term in lower for term in ("workspace mutations", "mutations: none")):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if any(field in lower for field in _MUTATION_CATEGORY_FIELDS):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
vague_only = "mutations:" in lower and not any(
|
||||
marker in lower
|
||||
for marker in ("file edits", "worktree", "git ref", "mcp/gitea", "review mutation")
|
||||
)
|
||||
if vague_only:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.mutation_categories",
|
||||
"downgrade",
|
||||
"Mutations",
|
||||
"mutation section is vague; precise categories are required",
|
||||
"split mutations into file edits, worktree/index, git ref, MCP/Gitea, review",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_git_fetch_readonly(
|
||||
report_text: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
action_log: list[dict] | None = None,
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
fetch_observed = any(
|
||||
_GIT_FETCH_RE.search(str(e.get("command") or e.get("action") or ""))
|
||||
for e in (action_log or [])
|
||||
) or _GIT_FETCH_RE.search(text)
|
||||
if not fetch_observed:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
readonly_match = _READONLY_DIAG_RE.search(text)
|
||||
readonly_value = (readonly_match.group(1) if readonly_match else "").strip().lower()
|
||||
fields = _handoff_fields(text)
|
||||
git_ref_value = fields.get("git ref mutations", "").strip().lower()
|
||||
git_ref_reported = bool(git_ref_value) and git_ref_value not in {
|
||||
"none",
|
||||
"n/a",
|
||||
"no",
|
||||
}
|
||||
if git_ref_reported:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if readonly_match and _GIT_FETCH_RE.search(readonly_value):
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.git_fetch_readonly",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Git ref mutations",
|
||||
"git fetch occurred but was classified only as read-only diagnostics",
|
||||
"classify git fetch under Git ref mutations, not read-only diagnostics",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
if not git_ref_reported and _GIT_FETCH_RE.search(text):
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.git_fetch_readonly",
|
||||
"downgrade",
|
||||
"Git ref mutations",
|
||||
"git fetch mentioned without Git ref mutation classification",
|
||||
"record git fetch under Git ref mutations",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_validation_command(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
if not _BARE_PYTEST_RE.search(text):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if _VALIDATION_ENV_RE.search(text):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.validation_command_proof",
|
||||
"downgrade",
|
||||
"Validation",
|
||||
"bare pytest command without working-directory or executable path proof",
|
||||
"report exact validation command, cwd, and path proof for bare commands",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_linked_issue(
|
||||
report_text: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
linked_issue_lock: dict | None = None,
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
lock = linked_issue_lock or {}
|
||||
expected_issue = lock.get("issue_number")
|
||||
expected_pr = lock.get("pr_number")
|
||||
if expected_issue is None and expected_pr is None:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
findings: list[dict[str, str]] = []
|
||||
reported_issue = None
|
||||
issue_match = _LINKED_ISSUE_NUMBER_RE.search(text)
|
||||
if issue_match:
|
||||
reported_issue = int(issue_match.group(1))
|
||||
elif expected_issue is not None:
|
||||
if f"#{expected_issue}" not in text and f"issue {expected_issue}" not in text.lower():
|
||||
findings.append(
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.linked_issue_missing",
|
||||
"downgrade",
|
||||
"Linked issue",
|
||||
f"linked issue #{expected_issue} not documented in final report",
|
||||
"document the linked issue number matching the selected PR",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if expected_issue is not None and reported_issue is not None and reported_issue != expected_issue:
|
||||
findings.append(
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.linked_issue_mismatch",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Linked issue",
|
||||
f"reported linked issue #{reported_issue} does not match "
|
||||
f"selected PR linked issue #{expected_issue}",
|
||||
"reconcile linked issue proof with the selected PR before reporting status",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if expected_pr is not None:
|
||||
pr_tokens = (f"pr #{expected_pr}", f"pr{expected_pr}", f"#pr{expected_pr}")
|
||||
if not any(token in text.lower().replace(" ", "") for token in pr_tokens):
|
||||
if f"#{expected_pr}" not in text:
|
||||
findings.append(
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.linked_pr_missing",
|
||||
"downgrade",
|
||||
"Selected PR",
|
||||
f"selected PR #{expected_pr} not consistently referenced",
|
||||
"reference the selected PR number in handoff and diagnostics",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
return findings
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_baseline_on_failure(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
if not (_APPROVAL_CLAIM_RE.search(text) and _FULL_SUITE_FAIL_RE.search(text)):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if _BASELINE_WORKTREE_RE.search(text) and "baseline worktree path" in text.lower():
|
||||
return []
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.baseline_on_full_suite_failure",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Baseline worktree",
|
||||
"approval claimed after full-suite failure without baseline worktree proof",
|
||||
"create a clean branches/ baseline worktree and report path plus results",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_main_checkout_baseline(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
if not _SAME_AS_MASTER_RE.search(text):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if _BASELINE_WORKTREE_RE.search(text):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.main_checkout_baseline",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Baseline worktree",
|
||||
"vague 'same as master' claim without clean baseline worktree proof",
|
||||
"validate against a clean branches/ baseline worktree; do not use main checkout",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_main_checkout_path(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
if "baseline worktree path" not in text.lower():
|
||||
return []
|
||||
fields = _handoff_fields(text)
|
||||
baseline_path = ""
|
||||
for key, value in fields.items():
|
||||
if key.startswith("baseline worktree path"):
|
||||
baseline_path = value
|
||||
break
|
||||
if baseline_path and _MAIN_CHECKOUT_RE.search(baseline_path):
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.main_checkout_path",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Baseline worktree path",
|
||||
"baseline validation used main/shared checkout instead of branches/ worktree",
|
||||
"recreate baseline proof under branches/ and report that path",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_already_landed_eligible(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
if not _ALREADY_LANDED_RE.search(text):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if not _ELIGIBLE_REVIEW_RE.search(text):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.already_landed_eligible_wording",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Eligibility class",
|
||||
"already-landed PR described as eligible for review or merge",
|
||||
"classify as ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED and stop normal review",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reconcile_controller_handoff(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
from review_proofs import _handoff_section_lines
|
||||
|
||||
if _handoff_section_lines(report_text) is None:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reconcile.controller_handoff",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Controller Handoff",
|
||||
f"final report has no section titled exactly '{HANDOFF_HEADING}'",
|
||||
"add a reconciliation Controller Handoff section",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
fields = _handoff_fields(report_text)
|
||||
missing = [
|
||||
name
|
||||
for name in _RECONCILE_REQUIRED_FIELDS
|
||||
if not (fields.get(name.lower()) or "").strip()
|
||||
]
|
||||
if missing:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reconcile.controller_handoff",
|
||||
"downgrade",
|
||||
"Controller Handoff",
|
||||
f"reconciliation handoff missing required field: {field}",
|
||||
"complete the reconciliation handoff schema before submission",
|
||||
)
|
||||
for field in missing
|
||||
]
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reconcile_stale_author_fields(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
text = (report_text or "").lower()
|
||||
findings = []
|
||||
for field in _RECONCILE_STALE_FIELDS:
|
||||
if f"{field}:" in text:
|
||||
findings.append(
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reconcile.stale_author_reviewer_fields",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
field,
|
||||
f"reconciliation handoff includes stale author/reviewer field '{field}'",
|
||||
"use reconciliation schema only; remove author/reviewer review fields",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
return findings
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reconcile_eligible_reviewed(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
if not _ALREADY_LANDED_RE.search(text):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
findings = []
|
||||
if _ELIGIBLE_REVIEW_RE.search(text):
|
||||
findings.append(
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reconcile.eligible_reviewed_wording",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Eligibility class",
|
||||
"already-landed PR described as eligible for review or merge",
|
||||
"report ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED and reconciliation-only next steps",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
if _REVIEWED_LANDED_RE.search(text):
|
||||
findings.append(
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reconcile.reviewed_landed_wording",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Current status",
|
||||
"already-landed PR described as reviewed or approval-eligible",
|
||||
"use reconciliation status wording only",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
return findings
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reconcile_linked_issue_live(
|
||||
report_text: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
linked_issue_lock: dict | None = None,
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
lock = linked_issue_lock or {}
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
status_match = _LINKED_ISSUE_STATUS_RE.search(text)
|
||||
if not status_match:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
status_value = status_match.group(1).strip().lower()
|
||||
if "not verified" in status_value:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
live_proof = lock.get("live_fetched") is True or lock.get("verified_live") is True
|
||||
if live_proof:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
if status_value not in {"", "none", "n/a", "unknown"}:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reconcile.linked_issue_live_status",
|
||||
"downgrade",
|
||||
"Linked issue live status",
|
||||
"linked issue status reported without live verification proof in this session",
|
||||
"fetch linked issue live or report 'not verified in this session'",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reconcile_pagination_proof(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
if not _INVENTORY_COMPLETE_RE.search(text):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if _PAGINATION_PROOF_RE.search(text):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
return [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"reconcile.inventory_pagination_proof",
|
||||
"downgrade",
|
||||
"PR inventory",
|
||||
"inventory completeness claimed without pagination or final-page proof",
|
||||
"include pagination complete, final page, or total open PR count evidence",
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_validation_structured(
|
||||
validation_report: dict | None,
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
if not validation_report:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
result = assess_validation_report(validation_report)
|
||||
if result.get("verdict") == "strong":
|
||||
return []
|
||||
severity = "block" if result.get("verdict") == "invalid" else "downgrade"
|
||||
return _findings_from_reasons(
|
||||
"reviewer.validation_structured",
|
||||
result.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
field="Validation",
|
||||
severity=severity,
|
||||
safe_next_action="provide exact validation command, output read proof, and counts",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_mutation_ledger(
|
||||
report_text: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
action_log: list[dict] | None = None,
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
if not action_log:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
result = assess_mutation_ledger_report(report_text, action_log=action_log)
|
||||
if result.get("proven"):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
return _findings_from_reasons(
|
||||
"reviewer.mutation_ledger",
|
||||
result.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
field="File edits by reviewer",
|
||||
severity="block",
|
||||
safe_next_action="align mutation ledger with observed file edits",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rule_reviewer_review_mutation(
|
||||
report_text: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
review_decision_lock: dict | None = None,
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
if not review_decision_lock:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
result = assess_review_mutation_final_report(report_text, review_decision_lock)
|
||||
if result.get("complete"):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
return _findings_from_reasons(
|
||||
"reviewer.review_mutation_proof",
|
||||
result.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
field="Review mutations",
|
||||
severity="downgrade",
|
||||
safe_next_action="document exactly one live review mutation or authorized correction flow",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
_RULES_BY_TASK: dict[str, list[Callable[..., list[dict[str, str]]]]] = {
|
||||
"review_pr": [
|
||||
_rule_shared_controller_handoff,
|
||||
_rule_shared_email_disclosure,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_legacy_workspace_mutations,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_mutation_categories,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_git_fetch_readonly,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_validation_command,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_validation_structured,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_linked_issue,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_baseline_on_failure,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_main_checkout_baseline,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_main_checkout_path,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_already_landed_eligible,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_mutation_ledger,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_review_mutation,
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reconcile_already_landed": [
|
||||
_rule_reconcile_controller_handoff,
|
||||
_rule_shared_email_disclosure,
|
||||
_rule_reconcile_stale_author_fields,
|
||||
_rule_reconcile_eligible_reviewed,
|
||||
_rule_reconcile_linked_issue_live,
|
||||
_rule_reconcile_pagination_proof,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_git_fetch_readonly,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_legacy_workspace_mutations,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none,
|
||||
],
|
||||
"author_issue": [
|
||||
_rule_shared_controller_handoff,
|
||||
_rule_shared_email_disclosure,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none,
|
||||
],
|
||||
"work_issue": [
|
||||
_rule_shared_controller_handoff,
|
||||
_rule_shared_email_disclosure,
|
||||
_rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none,
|
||||
],
|
||||
"issue_filing": [
|
||||
_rule_shared_controller_handoff,
|
||||
_rule_shared_email_disclosure,
|
||||
],
|
||||
"inventory": [
|
||||
_rule_shared_controller_handoff,
|
||||
_rule_shared_email_disclosure,
|
||||
_rule_reconcile_pagination_proof,
|
||||
],
|
||||
"issue_selection": [
|
||||
_rule_shared_controller_handoff,
|
||||
_rule_shared_email_disclosure,
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _aggregate_grade(findings: list[dict[str, str]]) -> tuple[str, bool, bool]:
|
||||
blocked = any(f["severity"] == "block" for f in findings)
|
||||
downgraded = any(f["severity"] == "downgrade" for f in findings)
|
||||
if blocked:
|
||||
return "blocked", True, downgraded
|
||||
if downgraded:
|
||||
return "downgraded", False, True
|
||||
return "A", False, False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _primary_safe_next_action(findings: list[dict[str, str]]) -> str:
|
||||
for severity in ("block", "downgrade", "warning"):
|
||||
for finding in findings:
|
||||
if finding["severity"] == severity:
|
||||
return finding["safe_next_action"]
|
||||
return "proceed"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _call_rule(
|
||||
rule: Callable[..., list[dict[str, str]]],
|
||||
report_text: str,
|
||||
task_kind: str,
|
||||
rule_kwargs: dict[str, Any],
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
|
||||
if rule is _rule_shared_controller_handoff:
|
||||
return rule(
|
||||
report_text,
|
||||
task_kind,
|
||||
local_edits=bool(rule_kwargs.get("local_edits")),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if rule is _rule_reviewer_validation_structured:
|
||||
return rule(rule_kwargs.get("validation_report"))
|
||||
if rule is _rule_reconcile_controller_handoff:
|
||||
return rule(report_text)
|
||||
|
||||
bound: dict[str, Any] = {}
|
||||
for name, param in inspect.signature(rule).parameters.items():
|
||||
if name == "report_text":
|
||||
bound[name] = report_text
|
||||
elif name in rule_kwargs:
|
||||
bound[name] = rule_kwargs[name]
|
||||
elif param.default is inspect.Parameter.empty and param.kind != inspect.Parameter.VAR_KEYWORD:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
return rule(**bound)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess_final_report_validator(
|
||||
report_text: str,
|
||||
task_kind: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
review_decision_lock: dict | None = None,
|
||||
linked_issue_lock: dict | None = None,
|
||||
validation_report: dict | None = None,
|
||||
action_log: list[dict] | None = None,
|
||||
mutations_observed: bool = False,
|
||||
local_edits: bool = False,
|
||||
issue_filing_lock: dict | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Validate final-report text against task-specific proof rules (#327).
|
||||
|
||||
Returns structured findings plus a composite grade suitable for workflow
|
||||
controllers. Optional *proof_locks* carry live session facts used to fail
|
||||
closed on stale or contradictory report fields.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
normalized_kind = _normalize_task_kind(task_kind)
|
||||
if normalized_kind not in FINAL_REPORT_TASK_KINDS:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"task_kind": normalized_kind,
|
||||
"grade": "blocked",
|
||||
"blocked": True,
|
||||
"downgraded": False,
|
||||
"findings": [
|
||||
validator_finding(
|
||||
"shared.unknown_task_kind",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Task",
|
||||
f"unknown task kind '{task_kind}'",
|
||||
"use a supported task kind from FINAL_REPORT_TASK_KINDS",
|
||||
)
|
||||
],
|
||||
"checks": {},
|
||||
"reasons": [f"unknown task kind '{task_kind}'"],
|
||||
"safe_next_action": "set task_kind to a supported workflow mode",
|
||||
"complete": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
checks: dict[str, Any] = {}
|
||||
findings: list[dict[str, str]] = []
|
||||
|
||||
if normalized_kind == "issue_filing" and issue_filing_lock is not None:
|
||||
checks["issue_filing"] = assess_issue_filing_final_report(
|
||||
report_text,
|
||||
**issue_filing_lock,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if checks["issue_filing"].get("downgraded"):
|
||||
findings.extend(
|
||||
_findings_from_reasons(
|
||||
"issue_filing.composite",
|
||||
checks["issue_filing"].get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
field="Issue filing",
|
||||
severity="downgrade",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
rule_kwargs = {
|
||||
"review_decision_lock": review_decision_lock,
|
||||
"linked_issue_lock": linked_issue_lock,
|
||||
"validation_report": validation_report,
|
||||
"action_log": action_log,
|
||||
"mutations_observed": mutations_observed,
|
||||
"local_edits": local_edits,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for rule in _RULES_BY_TASK.get(normalized_kind, ()):
|
||||
findings.extend(_call_rule(rule, report_text, normalized_kind, rule_kwargs))
|
||||
|
||||
grade, blocked, downgraded = _aggregate_grade(findings)
|
||||
reasons = [f"{f['rule_id']}: {f['reason']}" for f in findings]
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"task_kind": normalized_kind,
|
||||
"grade": grade,
|
||||
"blocked": blocked,
|
||||
"downgraded": downgraded,
|
||||
"findings": findings,
|
||||
"checks": checks,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
"safe_next_action": _primary_safe_next_action(findings),
|
||||
"complete": grade == "A",
|
||||
"handoff_heading": HANDOFF_HEADING,
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1351,6 +1351,7 @@ def build_final_report(checkout_proof, inventory, validation, contamination,
|
||||
report_text=None, review_decision_lock=None,
|
||||
controller_handoff=None, capability_proof=None,
|
||||
sweep_proof=None, worktree_proof=None,
|
||||
queue_ordering=None,
|
||||
baseline_validation=None, project_root=None):
|
||||
"""Required behavior 6 + acceptance criteria: one report, distinct proofs.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1378,6 +1379,22 @@ def build_final_report(checkout_proof, inventory, validation, contamination,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
empty_queue_report = assess_empty_queue_report(report_text)
|
||||
if queue_ordering is None and report_text:
|
||||
queue_ordering_proof = assess_queue_ordering_proof(
|
||||
report_text=report_text,
|
||||
)
|
||||
elif queue_ordering is not None:
|
||||
queue_ordering_proof = assess_queue_ordering_proof(
|
||||
report_text=report_text,
|
||||
queue_ordering=queue_ordering,
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
queue_ordering_proof = {
|
||||
"proven": True,
|
||||
"block": False,
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
"violations": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
queue_status_report = (
|
||||
assess_queue_status_report(report_text)
|
||||
if report_text and _QUEUE_STATUS_REPORT_HINT.search(report_text)
|
||||
@@ -1529,6 +1546,11 @@ def build_final_report(checkout_proof, inventory, validation, contamination,
|
||||
"empty-queue report missing or failed trust-gate proof (#198)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
downgrade_reasons.extend(empty_queue_report.get("reasons", []))
|
||||
if not queue_ordering_proof.get("proven"):
|
||||
downgrade_reasons.append(
|
||||
"queue ordering proof missing or failed (#321)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
downgrade_reasons.extend(queue_ordering_proof.get("reasons", []))
|
||||
if not proof_wording.get("proven"):
|
||||
downgrade_reasons.append(
|
||||
"unsupported proof wording in final report (#330)"
|
||||
@@ -1555,10 +1577,12 @@ def build_final_report(checkout_proof, inventory, validation, contamination,
|
||||
# #179: no merge without a proven final live-state recheck.
|
||||
and live_state_proven
|
||||
and worktree_proven
|
||||
and queue_ordering_proof.get("proven")
|
||||
and baseline_validation.get("proven")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
violations = []
|
||||
violations.extend(queue_ordering_proof.get("violations", []))
|
||||
violations.extend(baseline_validation.get("violations", []))
|
||||
if merge_performed and not merge_allowed:
|
||||
violations.append(
|
||||
@@ -1611,6 +1635,11 @@ def build_final_report(checkout_proof, inventory, validation, contamination,
|
||||
else True
|
||||
),
|
||||
"empty_queue_trust_gate_status": empty_queue_report.get("status"),
|
||||
"queue_ordering_proven": bool(queue_ordering_proof.get("proven")),
|
||||
"queue_ordering_policy": queue_ordering_proof.get("policy"),
|
||||
"queue_ordering_violations": list(
|
||||
queue_ordering_proof.get("violations") or []
|
||||
),
|
||||
"proof_wording_proven": bool(proof_wording.get("proven")),
|
||||
"proof_wording_violations": list(proof_wording.get("violations") or []),
|
||||
"queue_status_report_proven": bool(queue_status_report.get("proven")),
|
||||
@@ -3189,6 +3218,162 @@ def build_review_mutation_proof(run_log: list[dict]) -> dict:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# Reviewer queue ordering proof (#321)
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
_QUEUE_SELECTION_CLAIM_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"\b(?:next|oldest)\s+eligible\s+pr\b",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
_ORDERING_POLICY_LINE_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?:queue\s+ordering\s+policy|selection\s+policy|ordering\s+policy)"
|
||||
r"\s*:\s*(.+)",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
_SKIPPED_PR_LINE_RE = re.compile(
|
||||
r"\bskipped\s+pr\s*#?(\d+)\b",
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_ordering_policy(report_text: str) -> str:
|
||||
for line in (report_text or "").splitlines():
|
||||
match = _ORDERING_POLICY_LINE_RE.search(line)
|
||||
if match:
|
||||
return match.group(1).strip().rstrip(".")
|
||||
return ""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _skipped_pr_numbers(report_text: str) -> set[int]:
|
||||
skipped: set[int] = set()
|
||||
for match in _SKIPPED_PR_LINE_RE.finditer(report_text or ""):
|
||||
try:
|
||||
skipped.add(int(match.group(1)))
|
||||
except ValueError:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
return skipped
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess_queue_ordering_proof(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
report_text: str | None = None,
|
||||
queue_ordering: dict | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""#321: reviewer queue selection must prove ordering before claiming next PR."""
|
||||
text = report_text or ""
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
proof = queue_ordering or {}
|
||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
violations: list[str] = []
|
||||
|
||||
claims_selection = bool(_QUEUE_SELECTION_CLAIM_RE.search(text))
|
||||
selected = proof.get("selected_pr_number")
|
||||
if selected is None and "selected pr #" in lower:
|
||||
for token in lower.split():
|
||||
if token.startswith("#") and token[1:].isdigit():
|
||||
selected = int(token[1:])
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
if not claims_selection and selected is None:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"proven": True,
|
||||
"block": False,
|
||||
"claims_selection": False,
|
||||
"policy": None,
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
"violations": [],
|
||||
"safe_next_action": "proceed",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
policy = (proof.get("policy") or _parse_ordering_policy(text)).strip()
|
||||
if not policy:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"queue selection claimed without stated ordering policy (#321)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
policy_lower = policy.lower()
|
||||
api_numbers: list[int] = []
|
||||
for n in proof.get("api_pr_numbers") or []:
|
||||
if isinstance(n, int):
|
||||
api_numbers.append(n)
|
||||
elif isinstance(n, str) and n.isdigit():
|
||||
api_numbers.append(int(n))
|
||||
skipped_entries = list(proof.get("skipped_earlier") or [])
|
||||
skipped_numbers = {
|
||||
int(entry["pr_number"])
|
||||
for entry in skipped_entries
|
||||
if isinstance(entry, dict) and entry.get("pr_number") is not None
|
||||
}
|
||||
skipped_numbers.update(_skipped_pr_numbers(text))
|
||||
|
||||
if selected is not None and api_numbers:
|
||||
if "oldest" in policy_lower and "number" in policy_lower:
|
||||
earlier_actionable = [
|
||||
n for n in api_numbers
|
||||
if n < int(selected) and n not in skipped_numbers
|
||||
]
|
||||
for pr_number in earlier_actionable:
|
||||
entry = next(
|
||||
(
|
||||
e for e in skipped_entries
|
||||
if isinstance(e, dict)
|
||||
and int(e.get("pr_number", -1)) == pr_number
|
||||
),
|
||||
None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
reason = (entry or {}).get("reason", "").strip()
|
||||
if not reason and f"skipped pr #{pr_number}" not in lower:
|
||||
violations.append(
|
||||
f"earlier actionable PR #{pr_number} skipped without "
|
||||
"proof-backed reason (#321)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"oldest-first policy requires skip reasoning for "
|
||||
f"earlier PR #{pr_number} (#321)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if api_numbers and api_numbers[0] != min(api_numbers):
|
||||
if (
|
||||
"api order" not in lower
|
||||
and "sorted" not in lower
|
||||
and "newest-first" not in lower
|
||||
and not skipped_entries
|
||||
):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"API response order differs from oldest-first "
|
||||
"selection but report does not prove explicit sort "
|
||||
"or skip reasoning (#321)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if "priority" in policy_lower:
|
||||
override = (proof.get("priority_override") or "").strip()
|
||||
if not override and "priority" not in lower:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"priority-label ordering policy requires override "
|
||||
"explanation in report (#321)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
proven = not reasons and not violations
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"proven": proven,
|
||||
"block": bool(violations),
|
||||
"claims_selection": True,
|
||||
"policy": policy or None,
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": selected,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
"violations": violations,
|
||||
"safe_next_action": (
|
||||
"state queue ordering policy and proof-backed skip reasoning "
|
||||
"for every earlier actionable PR"
|
||||
if not proven
|
||||
else "proceed"
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# Reviewer baseline validation (#325)
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -3444,6 +3629,13 @@ def assess_email_disclosure(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess_final_report_validator(report_text, task_kind, **kwargs):
|
||||
"""#327: single entry point for task-specific final-report validation."""
|
||||
from final_report_validator import assess_final_report_validator as _validate
|
||||
|
||||
return _validate(report_text, task_kind, **kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
_QUEUE_STATUS_REPORT_HINT = re.compile(
|
||||
r"queue[- ]status|selected pr:\s*none|no pr selected|"
|
||||
r"queue[- ]status[- ]only",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
|
||||
"""Tests for composable final-report validator (#327)."""
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
from final_report_validator import ( # noqa: E402
|
||||
FINAL_REPORT_TASK_KINDS,
|
||||
assess_final_report_validator,
|
||||
validator_finding,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _review_handoff(**overrides):
|
||||
lines = [
|
||||
"## Controller Handoff",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"- Task: review PR #203",
|
||||
"- Repo: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
"- Role: reviewer",
|
||||
"- Identity: sysadmin / prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
"- Issue/PR: #182 / PR #203",
|
||||
"- Branch/SHA: feat/x @ 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
|
||||
"- Files changed: review_proofs.py",
|
||||
"- Validation: pytest tests/test_review_proofs.py -q in branches/review-203",
|
||||
"- Mutations: review only",
|
||||
"- Workspace mutations: none",
|
||||
"- File edits by reviewer: none",
|
||||
"- Worktree/index mutations: none",
|
||||
"- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master",
|
||||
"- MCP/Gitea mutations: review submitted",
|
||||
"- Current status: PR open",
|
||||
"- Blockers: none",
|
||||
"- Next: await author",
|
||||
"- Safety: no self-review; no self-merge",
|
||||
"- Selected PR: #203",
|
||||
"- Reviewer eligibility: eligible",
|
||||
"- Pinned reviewed head: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
|
||||
"- Worktree path: branches/review-203",
|
||||
"- Worktree dirty: clean",
|
||||
"- Scratch worktree used: yes (branches/review-203)",
|
||||
"- Unrelated local mutations: none",
|
||||
"- Review decision: request_changes",
|
||||
"- Merge result: not attempted",
|
||||
"- Linked issue: #182",
|
||||
"- Linked issue status: open",
|
||||
"- Cleanup status: none",
|
||||
]
|
||||
text = "\n".join(lines)
|
||||
for key, value in overrides.items():
|
||||
text = text.replace(f"- {key}:", f"- {key}: {value}")
|
||||
return text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _reconcile_handoff(**overrides):
|
||||
lines = [
|
||||
"## Controller Handoff",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"- Task: reconcile already-landed PR #99",
|
||||
"- Repo: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
"- Role: reconciler",
|
||||
"- Identity: sysadmin / prgs-author",
|
||||
"- Selected PR: #99",
|
||||
"- Eligibility class: ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED",
|
||||
"- Linked issue: #98",
|
||||
"- Linked issue live status: not verified in this session",
|
||||
"- File edits by reconciler: none",
|
||||
"- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master",
|
||||
"- Reconciliation mutations: PR comment posted",
|
||||
"- Current status: reconciliation complete",
|
||||
"- Safe next action: none",
|
||||
"- No review/merge confirmation: confirmed",
|
||||
]
|
||||
text = "\n".join(lines)
|
||||
for key, value in overrides.items():
|
||||
if f"- {key}:" in text:
|
||||
text = text.replace(f"- {key}:", f"- {key}: {value}")
|
||||
return text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestValidatorFinding(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_finding_shape(self):
|
||||
finding = validator_finding(
|
||||
"reviewer.test",
|
||||
"block",
|
||||
"Validation",
|
||||
"missing proof",
|
||||
"repair validation proof",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(finding["rule_id"], "reviewer.test")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(finding["severity"], "block")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(finding["field"], "Validation")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestReviewPrRules(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_clean_reviewer_report_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(
|
||||
_review_handoff(),
|
||||
"review_pr",
|
||||
linked_issue_lock={"issue_number": 182, "pr_number": 203},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "A")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["blocked"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["findings"], [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_workspace_mutations_blocks(self):
|
||||
report = _review_handoff() + "\n- Workspace mutations: none"
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(
|
||||
report,
|
||||
"review_pr",
|
||||
mutations_observed=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "blocked")
|
||||
rule_ids = [f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]]
|
||||
self.assertIn("reviewer.legacy_workspace_mutations", rule_ids)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_vague_mutations_none_blocks(self):
|
||||
report = _review_handoff().replace(
|
||||
"- Mutations: review only",
|
||||
"- Mutations: none",
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(
|
||||
report,
|
||||
"review_pr",
|
||||
mutations_observed=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any(f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.vague_mutations_none" for f in result["findings"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_bare_pytest_without_cwd_downgrades(self):
|
||||
report = _review_handoff().replace(
|
||||
"- Validation: pytest tests/test_review_proofs.py -q in branches/review-203",
|
||||
"- Validation: pytest passed",
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "downgraded")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any(f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.validation_command_proof" for f in result["findings"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_linked_issue_mismatch_blocks(self):
|
||||
report = _review_handoff().replace("- Linked issue: #182", "- Linked issue: #999")
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(
|
||||
report,
|
||||
"review_pr",
|
||||
linked_issue_lock={"issue_number": 182, "pr_number": 203},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any(f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.linked_issue_mismatch" for f in result["findings"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_approval_after_full_suite_failure_blocks_without_baseline(self):
|
||||
report = (
|
||||
_review_handoff()
|
||||
.replace("- Review decision: request_changes", "- Review decision: approve")
|
||||
+ "\nSubmitted 'approve' after full suite failed with 3 failed tests."
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any(
|
||||
f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.baseline_on_full_suite_failure"
|
||||
for f in result["findings"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_same_as_master_without_baseline_blocks(self):
|
||||
report = _review_handoff() + "\nFailures are same as master baseline."
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any(f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.main_checkout_baseline" for f in result["findings"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_already_landed_eligible_wording_blocks(self):
|
||||
report = (
|
||||
_review_handoff()
|
||||
+ "\nPR is already landed and eligible for review next."
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any(
|
||||
f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.already_landed_eligible_wording"
|
||||
for f in result["findings"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_git_fetch_must_not_be_readonly_only(self):
|
||||
report = (
|
||||
_review_handoff()
|
||||
.replace("- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master", "- Git ref mutations: none")
|
||||
+ "\n- Read-only diagnostics: git fetch prgs master"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(
|
||||
report,
|
||||
"review_pr",
|
||||
action_log=[{"command": "git fetch prgs master", "performed": True}],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any(f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.git_fetch_readonly" for f in result["findings"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestReconciliationRules(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_clean_reconcile_report_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(
|
||||
_reconcile_handoff(),
|
||||
"reconcile_already_landed",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "A")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_author_field_blocks(self):
|
||||
report = _reconcile_handoff() + "\n- PR number opened: #12"
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any(
|
||||
f["rule_id"] == "reconcile.stale_author_reviewer_fields"
|
||||
for f in result["findings"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_eligible_wording_for_landed_pr_blocks(self):
|
||||
report = _reconcile_handoff() + "\nPR already landed and eligible for merge."
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_linked_issue_status_without_live_proof_downgrades(self):
|
||||
report = _reconcile_handoff().replace(
|
||||
"- Linked issue live status: not verified in this session",
|
||||
"- Linked issue live status: closed",
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "downgraded")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any(f["rule_id"] == "reconcile.linked_issue_live_status" for f in result["findings"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_inventory_complete_requires_pagination_proof(self):
|
||||
report = _reconcile_handoff() + "\nInventory complete for open PRs."
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["grade"], "downgraded")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any(f["rule_id"] == "reconcile.inventory_pagination_proof" for f in result["findings"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestEntryPoint(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_unknown_task_kind_blocks(self):
|
||||
result = assess_final_report_validator("report", "unknown_mode")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["findings"][0]["rule_id"], "shared.unknown_task_kind")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
|
||||
from review_proofs import assess_final_report_validator as exported
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
|
||||
result = exported(_review_handoff(), "review_pr")
|
||||
self.assertIn("grade", result)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_supported_task_kinds_include_review_and_reconcile(self):
|
||||
self.assertIn("review_pr", FINAL_REPORT_TASK_KINDS)
|
||||
self.assertIn("reconcile_already_landed", FINAL_REPORT_TASK_KINDS)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -118,6 +118,12 @@ def test_start_issue_template_references_work_issue_workflow():
|
||||
assert "workflows/work-issue.md" in text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_final_report_validator_exported():
|
||||
from review_proofs import assess_final_report_validator
|
||||
|
||||
assert callable(assess_final_report_validator)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_create_issue_final_report_verifier_exported():
|
||||
from review_proofs import assess_create_issue_final_report
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -133,4 +139,4 @@ def test_non_mergeable_skip_verifier_exported():
|
||||
def test_validation_worktree_edit_verifier_exported():
|
||||
from review_proofs import assess_validation_worktree_edit_report
|
||||
|
||||
assert callable(assess_validation_worktree_edit_report)
|
||||
assert callable(assess_validation_worktree_edit_report)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ from review_proofs import ( # noqa: E402
|
||||
ISSUE_SELECTION_CONTINUATION_EXPLICIT,
|
||||
ISSUE_SELECTION_REPRESENTED_BY_OPEN_PR,
|
||||
assess_author_pr_report,
|
||||
assess_queue_ordering_proof,
|
||||
assess_reviewer_baseline_validation_proof,
|
||||
assess_capability_evidence,
|
||||
assess_capability_proof,
|
||||
@@ -2161,6 +2162,111 @@ class TestCreateIssueFinalReport(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["downgraded"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestQueueOrderingProof(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Issue #321: reviewer queue selection must prove ordering."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_next_eligible_claim_without_policy_fails(self):
|
||||
result = assess_queue_ordering_proof(
|
||||
report_text="Selected the next eligible PR: PR #286.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["claims_selection"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_next_eligible_claim_with_policy_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_queue_ordering_proof(
|
||||
report_text=(
|
||||
"Queue ordering policy: oldest PR number first\n"
|
||||
"Selected the next eligible PR: PR #286."
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["policy"], "oldest PR number first")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_newest_first_api_with_oldest_first_selection_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_queue_ordering_proof(
|
||||
report_text=(
|
||||
"Queue ordering policy: oldest PR number first\n"
|
||||
"API order was newest-first (PR #291 before PR #286).\n"
|
||||
"Selected the next eligible PR: PR #286."
|
||||
),
|
||||
queue_ordering={
|
||||
"policy": "oldest PR number first",
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": 286,
|
||||
"api_pr_numbers": [291, 286],
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_earlier_actionable_pr_without_skip_reason_fails(self):
|
||||
result = assess_queue_ordering_proof(
|
||||
report_text=(
|
||||
"Queue ordering policy: oldest PR number first\n"
|
||||
"Selected the next eligible PR: PR #300."
|
||||
),
|
||||
queue_ordering={
|
||||
"policy": "oldest PR number first",
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": 300,
|
||||
"api_pr_numbers": [300, 286],
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_priority_override_requires_explanation(self):
|
||||
result = assess_queue_ordering_proof(
|
||||
report_text="Selected the next eligible PR: PR #300.",
|
||||
queue_ordering={
|
||||
"policy": "priority label",
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": 300,
|
||||
"api_pr_numbers": [286, 300],
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_priority_override_with_explanation_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_queue_ordering_proof(
|
||||
report_text=(
|
||||
"Queue ordering policy: priority label\n"
|
||||
"Priority override: security label on PR #300.\n"
|
||||
"Selected the next eligible PR: PR #300."
|
||||
),
|
||||
queue_ordering={
|
||||
"policy": "priority label",
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": 300,
|
||||
"api_pr_numbers": [286, 300],
|
||||
"priority_override": "security label on PR #300",
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_build_final_report_downgrades_missing_ordering_proof(self):
|
||||
report = build_final_report(
|
||||
checkout_proof=_good_checkout(),
|
||||
inventory=_good_inventory(),
|
||||
validation=_good_validation(),
|
||||
contamination=_good_contamination(),
|
||||
identity_eligible=True,
|
||||
merge_performed=False,
|
||||
issue_status_verified=True,
|
||||
capability_evidence=_good_capability_evidence(),
|
||||
sweep=_good_sweep(),
|
||||
live_state=_good_live_state(),
|
||||
role_boundary=_good_role_boundary(),
|
||||
review_mutation=_good_review_mutation(),
|
||||
controller_handoff=_good_handoff(),
|
||||
capability_proof=_good_capability_proof(),
|
||||
sweep_proof=_good_secret_sweep(),
|
||||
worktree_proof={
|
||||
"worktree_path": "/repo/branches/review-feat-issue-224",
|
||||
"porcelain_status": "",
|
||||
"pr_scope_files": ["docs/wiki/Repositories.md"],
|
||||
"scratch_used": True,
|
||||
},
|
||||
report_text="Selected the next eligible PR: PR #286.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(report["queue_ordering_proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
class TestReviewerBaselineValidationProof(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Issue #325: baseline validation must use branches/ worktrees."""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user