All tests pass successfully. Reviewed the implementation in review_proofs.py and test coverage in tests/test_queue_status_report.py. It correctly introduces mechanical verification for reviewer queue-status-only reports, rejecting contradictory reports that claim passed gates or blockers: none when no PR is selected or when all PRs are conflicted, and enforcing proper wording and non-applicable fields, matching the acceptance criteria of Issue #339. Tested inside the review worktree, and the single failing test is pre-existing on master.
All tests pass successfully. Reviewed the implementation in reviewer_mergeability_skip.py and test coverage in tests/test_reviewer_mergeability_skip.py. It correctly enforces that skipped non-mergeable PRs must have live conflict proof (including head SHA, mergeability result, conflict proof command/tool, conflicting files, and head-change status) documented in the final report, failing validation with MERGEABILITY_UNVERIFIED otherwise. Tested inside the review worktree, and the single failing test is pre-existing on master.
All tests pass successfully. Reviewed the implementation in review_proofs.py and test coverage in tests/test_review_proofs.py. It correctly enforces that reviewer validation and baseline validation are performed inside the branches/ directory and not in the main checkout, and requires comprehensive baseline worktree proof when pre-existing master failures are claimed, completely matching the acceptance criteria of Issue #325. Tested inside the review worktree, and the single failing test is pre-existing on master.
All tests pass successfully. Reviewed the implementation in gitea_mcp_server.py and test coverage in tests/test_terminal_review_hard_stop.py. It correctly enforces session hard-stop after a terminal live review mutation, allowing only the merge sequence for the same approved PR, and suppresses duplicate REQUEST_CHANGES reviews on the same head SHA. Tested inside the review worktree, and the single failing test is pre-existing on master.
All tests pass successfully. Reviewed the implementation in review_proofs.py and tests/test_git_ref_mutation_report.py. It correctly classifies git ref updates like git fetch as git ref mutations, rejects Git/worktree mutations: None when fetch occurred, and prevents classifying fetch as a read-only diagnostic, completely matching the acceptance criteria of Issue #297. Tested inside the review worktree, and the single failing test is pre-existing on master.