Regular User Account sysadmin
  • Joined on 2024-02-16
sysadmin merged pull request Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#347 2026-07-07 04:20:09 -05:00
feat: add queue-status report verifier for reviewer handoffs (Closes #339)
sysadmin approved Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#347 2026-07-07 04:19:57 -05:00
feat: add queue-status report verifier for reviewer handoffs (Closes #339)

All tests pass successfully. Reviewed the implementation in review_proofs.py and test coverage in tests/test_queue_status_report.py. It correctly introduces mechanical verification for reviewer queue-status-only reports, rejecting contradictory reports that claim passed gates or blockers: none when no PR is selected or when all PRs are conflicted, and enforcing proper wording and non-applicable fields, matching the acceptance criteria of Issue #339. Tested inside the review worktree, and the single failing test is pre-existing on master.

sysadmin pushed to master at Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools 2026-07-07 04:17:10 -05:00
deb228d629 Merge pull request 'feat: require conflict proof for skipped non-mergeable PRs (Closes #322)' (#353) from feat/issue-322-mergeability-skip-proof into master
cf1cedf5e3 feat: require conflict proof for skipped non-mergeable PRs (Closes #322)
Compare 2 commits »
sysadmin merged pull request Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#353 2026-07-07 04:17:09 -05:00
feat: require conflict proof for skipped non-mergeable PRs (Closes #322)
sysadmin closed issue Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#322 2026-07-07 04:17:09 -05:00
Reviewer reports must include exact conflict proof for skipped non-mergeable PRs
sysadmin approved Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#353 2026-07-07 04:16:58 -05:00
feat: require conflict proof for skipped non-mergeable PRs (Closes #322)

All tests pass successfully. Reviewed the implementation in reviewer_mergeability_skip.py and test coverage in tests/test_reviewer_mergeability_skip.py. It correctly enforces that skipped non-mergeable PRs must have live conflict proof (including head SHA, mergeability result, conflict proof command/tool, conflicting files, and head-change status) documented in the final report, failing validation with MERGEABILITY_UNVERIFIED otherwise. Tested inside the review worktree, and the single failing test is pre-existing on master.

sysadmin pushed to master at Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools 2026-07-07 04:13:25 -05:00
6bf0210128 Merge pull request 'feat: enforce branches-only baseline validation in reviewer reports (Closes #325)' (#349) from feat/issue-325-baseline-worktree-validation into master
a47083b9b8 feat: enforce branches-only baseline validation in reviewer reports (Closes #325)
Compare 2 commits »
sysadmin merged pull request Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#349 2026-07-07 04:13:23 -05:00
feat: enforce branches-only baseline validation in reviewer reports (Closes #325)
sysadmin closed issue Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#325 2026-07-07 04:13:23 -05:00
Reviewer baseline validation must use branches worktrees, not the main checkout
sysadmin approved Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#349 2026-07-07 04:13:03 -05:00
feat: enforce branches-only baseline validation in reviewer reports (Closes #325)

All tests pass successfully. Reviewed the implementation in review_proofs.py and test coverage in tests/test_review_proofs.py. It correctly enforces that reviewer validation and baseline validation are performed inside the branches/ directory and not in the main checkout, and requires comprehensive baseline worktree proof when pre-existing master failures are claimed, completely matching the acceptance criteria of Issue #325. Tested inside the review worktree, and the single failing test is pre-existing on master.

sysadmin pushed to master at Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools 2026-07-07 04:09:20 -05:00
407483f6e0 Merge pull request 'feat: enforce session hard-stop after terminal review mutation (Closes #332)' (#345) from feat/issue-332-terminal-review-hard-stop into master
456e46d3fc feat: enforce session hard-stop after terminal review mutation (#332)
Compare 2 commits »
sysadmin merged pull request Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#345 2026-07-07 04:09:19 -05:00
feat: enforce session hard-stop after terminal review mutation (Closes #332)
sysadmin closed issue Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#332 2026-07-07 04:09:19 -05:00
Enforce hard-stop after terminal review mutation
sysadmin approved Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#345 2026-07-07 04:09:07 -05:00
feat: enforce session hard-stop after terminal review mutation (Closes #332)

All tests pass successfully. Reviewed the implementation in gitea_mcp_server.py and test coverage in tests/test_terminal_review_hard_stop.py. It correctly enforces session hard-stop after a terminal live review mutation, allowing only the merge sequence for the same approved PR, and suppresses duplicate REQUEST_CHANGES reviews on the same head SHA. Tested inside the review worktree, and the single failing test is pre-existing on master.

sysadmin merged pull request Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#344 2026-07-07 04:07:12 -05:00
feat(reports): classify git fetch as a git ref mutation (closes #297)
sysadmin closed issue Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#297 2026-07-07 04:07:12 -05:00
Reviewer reports must classify git fetch as a git ref mutation, not read-only diagnostics
sysadmin pushed to master at Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools 2026-07-07 04:07:12 -05:00
d7d2f92286 Merge pull request 'feat(reports): classify git fetch as a git ref mutation (closes #297)' (#344) from feat/issue-297-fetch-ref-mutation into master
c41a698a08 feat(reports): classify git fetch as a git ref mutation (closes #297)
Compare 2 commits »
sysadmin approved Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#344 2026-07-07 04:06:59 -05:00
feat(reports): classify git fetch as a git ref mutation (closes #297)

All tests pass successfully. Reviewed the implementation in review_proofs.py and tests/test_git_ref_mutation_report.py. It correctly classifies git ref updates like git fetch as git ref mutations, rejects Git/worktree mutations: None when fetch occurred, and prevents classifying fetch as a read-only diagnostic, completely matching the acceptance criteria of Issue #297. Tested inside the review worktree, and the single failing test is pre-existing on master.

sysadmin pushed to master at Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools 2026-07-07 04:05:23 -05:00
cbae9a3ecd Merge pull request 'docs: pin GlitchTip filing orchestrator contract (Closes #153)' (#343) from feat/issue-153-glitchtip-filing-orchestrator into master
873bcd06e5 docs: pin GlitchTip filing orchestrator contract (Closes #153)
Compare 2 commits »
sysadmin merged pull request Scaled-Tech-Consu…/Gitea-Tools#343 2026-07-07 04:05:22 -05:00
docs: pin GlitchTip filing orchestrator contract (Closes #153)