Extend the review workflow load gate with pre-review command classification,
boundary violation tracking, and structured helper-result requirements in
final reports. Adds gitea_record_pre_review_command MCP tool.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Replace manual in-process _SESSION_LEASE seeding with an auditable
gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease tool that posts durable adoption proof and
records sanctioned session provenance. Mutation gates now reject bare
record_session_lease calls without provenance from acquire/adopt/heartbeat.
Closes#536
Refuse merge-oriented reviewer-lease acquisition/adoption on an already
merged/closed PR, and add a read-first cleanup path for a lingering moot lease.
- reviewer_pr_lease.assess_acquire_lease: new pr_merged_or_closed flag; fail
closed with a post_merge_moot reason and no lease body when the PR already
merged/closed.
- reviewer_pr_lease.assess_post_merge_moot_lease: pure assessment. Only treats a
lease as moot when the PR is merged/closed; never proposes touching an active
lease on an open PR; provides a terminal phase:released (blocker:
post-merge-moot) body to neutralise the moot lease append-only; idempotent
once the released marker is the newest entry.
- gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease: fetch live PR state, pass the flag, surface
post_merge_moot on refusal (no comment posted).
- gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease: new read-first tool. Reports merged
state, merge_commit_sha, linked-issue closure, lease-moot, cleanup
performed/skipped, and no_merge_or_adoption. apply=True posts the released
marker only when merged/closed with an active lease; refuses on open PRs.
- tests/test_post_merge_moot_lease.py: 10 tests covering acquire refusal on
merged PR (no post), safe/idempotent cleanup, and open-PR foreign-lease
protection.
No relaxation of #407 reviewer-lease or #16 gated-merge gates for open PRs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Move @mcp.tool() from internal _list_open_pulls helper onto
gitea_lock_issue so author sessions can discover and call the
issue lock required by gitea_create_pr.
Add regression tests for MCP registration and create_pr lock flow.
Namespace-scoped workspace resolution prevents GITEA_AUTHOR_WORKTREE from
poisoning reviewer, merger, and reconciler purity checks. Each role uses
its own worktree env var with actionable binding-source errors and safe
reconnect guidance. Preserves #274/#475 author and control-checkout guards.
Read-only gitea_whoami calls no longer clear a valid capability proof when
whoami was already verified clean. Capability is consumed on mutation (one
resolve per mutation), and verify_preflight_purity rejects task mismatches.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Stale worktrees accumulate under branches/ when runs stop early, race a
sibling session, hit a validation failure, or lose cwd state, making later
workflow decisions harder and riskier.
Changes:
- worktree_cleanup_audit.py — ownership metadata, safety-first classifier
(active_open_pr, active_issue_work, dirty_local_worktree,
clean_stale_removable, detached_review_leftover, unsafe_unknown), TTL
expiry, per-worktree removal proof, and success-completion cleanup plan.
Only clean_stale_removable and detached_review_leftover are removable;
dirty/PR/leased/protected/unknown worktrees are never auto-deleted.
- gitea_audit_worktree_cleanup — read-only MCP tool that classifies every
branches/ entry, fetches live open-PR heads (fails closed if unavailable),
and returns counts, removable candidates, and git worktree list proof.
- work-issue.md 22A + review-merge-pr.md 28 — cleanup/TTL workflow rules.
- tests/test_worktree_cleanup_audit.py — 30 cases covering all nine
acceptance scenarios plus inference, metadata, TTL, and report accuracy.
Validation:
/Users/jasonwalker/Development/Gitea-Tools/venv/bin/python \
-m unittest tests.test_worktree_cleanup_audit tests.test_merged_cleanup_reconcile -q
38 passed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Introduce root_checkout_guard helper and enforce it in verify_preflight_purity
so author, reviewer, and merger mutations fail closed when the stable control
checkout is on the wrong branch, detached, dirty, or diverged from prgs/master.
Isolated branches/... worktrees and reconciler paths remain allowed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Normal author work is unchanged: gitea_lock_issue still requires the worktree
to be base-equivalent to master/main/dev, and gitea_create_pr still targets a
normal base branch. A *stacked* PR (based on another unmerged PR's branch) is a
new explicit, proof-backed path — it never bypasses the issue lock.
- stacked_pr_support.py: pure policy. Approve a non-master base only when it is
declared AND owned by a live OPEN PR whose number matches; reject arbitrary,
mismatched, or stale (merged/closed) branches; require the PR body to document
the stack (base branch, stacked-on PR, merge ordering).
- issue_lock_worktree.py: read_worktree_git_state / _find_matching_base_ref gain
an opt-in extra_bases arg so an approved stacked base can anchor
base-equivalence in addition to master/main/dev (empty by default = unchanged).
- gitea_mcp_server.py:
- gitea_lock_issue gains stacked_base_branch + stacked_base_pr. When declared,
it verifies the open PR owns the branch, anchors base-equivalence to it, and
records approved_stacked_base = {branch, pr_number, verified_open} on the lock.
- gitea_create_pr validates a non-master base against the lock's approved
stacked base, re-checks the dependency PR is still open, and enforces the
stacked-PR body fields. Master-based path untouched.
- Docs: llm-workflow-runbooks.md and work-issue.md document when stacked PRs are
allowed and the required PR-body wording.
Tests: test_stacked_pr_support.py (18 policy cases), stacked base-equivalence in
test_issue_lock_worktree.py, approved_stacked_base persistence round-trip in
test_issue_lock_store.py. Existing lock/create_pr regressions still pass.
The #482 -> #479/#478 case motivates this: create_pr previously could not open a
stacked PR because the lock required a master-equivalent worktree.
Closes#484.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Merge prgs/master into feat/issue-389-review-workflow-load-proof and
preserve workflow-load gates while adopting master test harness patterns
(_seed_ready_review_decision, reviewer leases, expected_head_sha).
_list_pr_lease_comments and gitea_list_issue_comments now fail safe to an
empty list when the comments API returns a non-list payload (e.g. an error
object), preventing KeyError: slice on the lease and listing paths.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
PR #416 introduced pr_work_lease reviewer blocks and mandatory full
40-hex expected_head_sha on mark/merge paths. Update audit, review,
permission-report, terminal hard-stop, inventory, and schema tests to
patch lease comment fetches, seed ready review decisions, and use
consistent HEAD_SHA constants so the full suite passes again.
When gitea_lock_issue adopts an existing own branch, the live tool
response now carries explicit, citable adoption-proof fields so #473-style
recovery sessions can quote the lock output directly instead of inferring
adoption from separate offline checks.
- issue_lock_adoption.py: add DECISION_LABELS + decision_label()/
safe_next_action() helpers; extend build_adoption_proof() with
adoption_decision, adopted, adopted_branch, adopted_branch_head,
matcher_summary (boundary-safe reason), competing_branch_check, and
safe_next_action for all outcomes; add build_non_adoption_lock_proof()
for adoption-free NO_MATCH metadata.
- gitea_mcp_server.py: attach adoption-free adoption_check block to normal
(non-adopt) lock responses so they cannot be misread as claiming adoption.
- docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md: document the adoption/adoption_check
response blocks and instruct recovery reports to cite them directly.
- tests: explicit-field proof for ADOPT/BLOCK_COMPETING/NO_MATCH,
substring-collision boundary safety (issue-42 vs issue-420), non-adoption
proof, and MCP-level live-response assertions.
BLOCK_COMPETING lock attempts still fail closed (raise); no raw API
fallback, branch deletion, force-push, or manual lock seeding introduced.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Add merge_approval_gate assessment so gitea_merge_pr fails closed when
visible APPROVED reviews do not pin the live head SHA. Expose
approval_at_current_head and stale_approval_block_reason in review
feedback. Document re-review requirement in canonical merge workflow.
Closes#471.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Rebase onto master (#443 keyed store) and port #438 hardening: per-issue
fcntl.flock around bind_session_lock, assess_lock_freshness with dead-PID
detection, verify_lock_for_mutation before create_pr, and live lock
inventory for claim visibility.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Replace substring issue-marker matching with a numeric word-boundary
regex so issue-42 adoption is not false-blocked by unrelated issue-420
branches. Add regression tests for the #42 vs #420 collision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Merge current prgs/master into feat/issue-399-conflict-fix-leases.
Preserve reviewer PR lease gate (#407) before conflict-fix stale-head
gate (#399); document both as §26B and §26C. Align MCP and validator
tests with mandatory expected_head_sha and stale-head proof fields.
Reconciler profiles perform Gitea metadata mutations (close_pr) and must
not be blocked when the MCP workspace resolves to the stable control
checkout without GITEA_AUTHOR_WORKTREE. Author file mutations remain
guarded. Add regression tests for reconciler close vs author create_issue.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Merge current prgs/master into feat/issue-389-review-workflow-load-proof.
Combine workflow-load session proof (#389) with reviewer PR lease test
fixtures from #407 so reviewer mutation gates remain fully tested.
sysadmin
jcwalker3andClaude Opus 4.8