Compare commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
  jcwalker3andClaude Opus 4.8
|
479e434f92 | ||
 sysadmin
|
9eb0f29cef | ||
|
sysadmin
|
0b29404031 | ||
|
jcwalker3andClaude Opus 4.8
|
5463f58933 | ||
|
sysadmin
|
5032965e3a | ||
 jcwalker3andGrok 4.5
|
57a52b1a99 | ||
|
jcwalker3andClaude Opus 4.8
|
e33b8d3712 | ||
|
jcwalker3
|
344dc41ce2 | ||
|
sysadmin
|
620ed6e9a9 | ||
|
sysadminandClaude Opus 4.8
|
a30a3ce4c3 | ||
|
sysadminandClaude Opus 4.8
|
1a97ced133 | ||
|
sysadmin
|
3d0c13fa5a | ||
|
jcwalker3
|
0f19773076 | ||
|
sysadminandClaude Opus 4.8
|
324b4b3e93 |
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
|
||||
# ADR: MCP Control Plane Web Console architecture and information architecture
|
||||
|
||||
- **Status:** Proposed (documentation only; blocks no code, gates every #631 child)
|
||||
- **Date:** 2026-07-22
|
||||
- **Tracking issue:** [#632](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/632) — architecture and information architecture (Phase 1)
|
||||
- **Parent epic:** [#631](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/631) — MCP Control Plane Web Console
|
||||
- **Foundation (closed, extend — do not recreate):** #425 tracker and children #426 skeleton, #427 projects, #428 prompts, #429 queue, #430 runtime, #431 audit paste, #432 worktrees, #433 leases, #434 gated actions, #435 auth/deployment boundary, #436 tests/CI
|
||||
- **Related:** `mcp-allocator-control-plane-observability-adr.md`, `mcp-stable-control-runtime-policy-adr.md`, `control-plane-db-substrate.md`, `../safety-model.md`, `../tool-boundaries.md`, `../credential-isolation.md`, `../webui-local-dev.md`, `../webui-deployment.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Context
|
||||
|
||||
The MVP web UI shipped under `webui/` as a read-only Starlette application with ten operator routes and a JSON export beside most of them. It is a working foundation, not the console product described by epic #631, and it carries no durable architecture record: no layer contract, no authority boundary, no API versioning rule, no page map, and no statement of which phase may open a write path.
|
||||
|
||||
Twenty children (#632–#651) hang off #631. Without one architecture document each implementer re-derives boundaries, and the most likely failure is not a bad view — it is a privileged action wired into the browser before the authorization and audit model of #633 exists.
|
||||
|
||||
This ADR is the single retrievable design source for the console. It decides structure only. It implements no UI, no API, and no change to deployment topology.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Decision summary (core)
|
||||
|
||||
| Layer | Owns | Must not |
|
||||
|-------|------|----------|
|
||||
| **Browser UI** | Rendering, navigation, operator affordances | Hold tokens, call Gitea/providers directly, or execute an action the server did not gate |
|
||||
| **HTTP route layer** (`webui/app.py`) | Versioned routing, authentication, authorization, redaction boundary, audit emission | Contain domain logic or reach past a loader to a raw credential |
|
||||
| **Domain loaders** (`webui/*_loader.py`, `*_scanner.py`, `runtime_health.py`, `project_registry.py`) | Assembling read models from authoritative sources | Mutate anything, or emit unredacted secrets across the boundary |
|
||||
| **Gitea** | Durable work record: issues, PRs, comments, reviews, labels, merges | Be the concurrency lock under multi-session load |
|
||||
| **Control-plane DB** | Sessions, assignment, leases, heartbeats, events | Replace Gitea history |
|
||||
| **MCP tools / capability gates** | Mutation authorization | Be re-implemented, mirrored, or bypassed by console code |
|
||||
| **External providers** (Sentry/GlitchTip, AI providers) | Incident and usage data | Assign work or mutate Gitea outside the #612 bridge |
|
||||
|
||||
**One-liner:** **Gitea records. The DB coordinates. MCP tools authorize. The console projects state and executes only capability-checked, audited actions. Providers observe.**
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Console surface today versus target
|
||||
|
||||
`webui/app.py` currently registers these routes (see `../webui-local-dev.md` for the operator-facing table): `/`, `/health`, `/queue`, `/projects`, `/projects/{id}`, `/prompts`, `/runtime`, `/audit`, `/worktrees`, `/leases`, `/actions`, and the unversioned exports `/api/queue`, `/api/projects`, `/api/prompts`, `/api/runtime`, `/api/audit`, `/api/worktrees`, `/api/leases`, `/api/actions`, `/api/actions/{id}/preview`, `/api/actions/{id}/attempt`.
|
||||
|
||||
Every one of these is **retained and evolved**. No child issue may recreate a route from scratch; each states in its PR which MVP surface it extends and what it changes.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Authority boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.1 Gitea (durable record)
|
||||
|
||||
Authoritative for issue and PR identity and state, comments, reviews and verdicts, labels, merges, and branch refs. When the console and Gitea disagree about durable state, Gitea wins and the console view is refreshed — never the reverse.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.2 Control-plane DB (coordination)
|
||||
|
||||
Authoritative for live coordination: which session holds which assignment or lease, heartbeat freshness, expiry, and the allocation event log. The console reads it; only allocator and lease tools write it.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.3 MCP capability gates (authorization)
|
||||
|
||||
`task_capability_map.py` and `gitea_resolve_task_capability` remain the only authority that decides whether a mutation may run. The console asks; it never answers. A console action that cannot name the MCP tool it delegates to is not an action — it is a defect.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.4 Filesystem and git (local state)
|
||||
|
||||
Issue lock files, `branches/` worktrees, and registered git worktrees are read through existing scanners. The console never deletes, rebinds, or force-clears local state outside a Phase 2 gated action.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.5 Providers (observe only)
|
||||
|
||||
Sentry/GlitchTip and AI providers are read surfaces. The #612 incident bridge is the only path that turns an observation into Gitea work.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Request flow and the redaction boundary
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
browser ──HTTP──> route layer ──> domain loader ──> Gitea REST
|
||||
│ ├──> control-plane DB
|
||||
│ ├──> filesystem / git
|
||||
│ └──> providers
|
||||
│
|
||||
[redaction boundary]
|
||||
│
|
||||
audit event
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
| Stage | May hold credentials | Emits |
|
||||
|-------|----------------------|-------|
|
||||
| Loader → route layer | yes (server-side, via `gitea_auth`) | domain objects |
|
||||
| Route layer → browser | **no** | redacted DTOs, HTML |
|
||||
|
||||
Two invariants govern the boundary and are non-negotiable for every child:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **No secrets to the browser.** Tokens, keychain identifiers, Authorization headers, raw provider endpoints, and credential-bearing URLs are redacted by default, consistent with `../safety-model.md` §3 and `../credential-isolation.md`. Serializers redact; templates do not sanitize after the fact.
|
||||
2. **No ungated mutations.** A write reaches an authoritative system only by delegating to an MCP tool that passed its own capability gate. HTML forms and JSON endpoints are transport, never authority.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. API naming and versioning
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision:** all console APIs added from Phase 1 onward are served under `/api/v1/...`.
|
||||
|
||||
- Nouns are plural and hierarchical: `/api/v1/inventory/leases`, `/api/v1/system/health`.
|
||||
- Read endpoints are `GET` and side-effect free.
|
||||
- Phase 2 action endpoints are `POST /api/v1/actions/{action_id}/preview` and `POST /api/v1/actions/{action_id}/execute`; `preview` stays side-effect free and returns a mutation ledger.
|
||||
- The existing unversioned MVP exports remain as **compatibility aliases** for the whole of Phase 1 so the current operator flow never breaks. They may be retired no earlier than Phase 2, and only after the replacing `v1` route ships and `../webui-local-dev.md` records the swap.
|
||||
- A breaking change to a `v1` payload requires `/api/v2/...`, not an in-place edit.
|
||||
- Every JSON payload carries enough provenance for an auditor to tell where the data came from — at minimum the source system and whether the inventory was complete, matching the pagination-proof habit the MVP queue export already established.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Page map
|
||||
|
||||
| Page | Purpose | Owning child | Evolves |
|
||||
|------|---------|--------------|---------|
|
||||
| `/` | Console shell, navigation, next-safe-action summary | #638 | MVP `/` (#426) |
|
||||
| `/system` | System-health dashboard | #639 | new, backed by #634 |
|
||||
| `/traffic` | Workflow traffic control, queues, blockers | #640 | MVP `/queue` (#429) |
|
||||
| `/runtime` | Runtime and session view | #641 | MVP `/runtime` (#430) |
|
||||
| `/projects`, `/projects/{id}` | Project registry and onboarding | #635 | MVP `/projects` (#427) |
|
||||
| `/inventory` | Sessions, leases, locks, worktrees in one surface | #636 | MVP `/leases` (#433) + `/worktrees` (#432) |
|
||||
| `/timeline` | Workflow events and conversation timeline | #637 | new |
|
||||
| `/actions` | Gated action registry, preview, execution | #642, #643, #644 | MVP `/actions` (#434) |
|
||||
| `/gitea` | Issue and PR linkage console | #645 | new |
|
||||
| `/policy` | Guardrail visibility, then versioned editing | #646, #647 | new |
|
||||
| `/notifications` | Human-attention routing | #648 | new |
|
||||
| `/observability` | Sentry/GlitchTip correlation and durable issue creation | #649 | new |
|
||||
| `/providers` | AI-provider connections and insights | #650 | new |
|
||||
| `/analytics` | Usage, token cost, latency, workflow performance | #651 | new |
|
||||
| `/audit` | Final-report validator preview and audit log | #431 foundation, extended by #633 | MVP `/audit` (#431) |
|
||||
| `/prompts`, `/prompts/{id}` | Canonical prompt library | #638 | MVP `/prompts` (#428) |
|
||||
| `/health` | Liveness and deployment metadata | #634 | MVP `/health` (#435) |
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Component ownership for every epic child
|
||||
|
||||
Each #631 child maps to at least one architectural component defined above.
|
||||
|
||||
| Child | Capability area | Primary component | Phase |
|
||||
|-------|-----------------|-------------------|-------|
|
||||
| #632 | Architecture and information architecture | this ADR | 1 |
|
||||
| #633 | Authorization, RBAC, secret redaction, audit and retention | route layer + redaction boundary (§5) | 1 |
|
||||
| #634 | Read-only system-health API | `/api/v1/system/health` + health loader | 1 |
|
||||
| #635 | Project registry API evolution | `/api/v1/projects` + `project_registry.py` | 1 |
|
||||
| #636 | Session, lease, lock, worktree inventory API | `/api/v1/inventory/*` + `lease_loader.py`, `worktree_scanner.py` | 1 |
|
||||
| #637 | Workflow-event and conversation timeline model | `/api/v1/events` + control-plane DB event log | 1 |
|
||||
| #638 | Application shell evolution | browser UI layer + `layout.py` | 1 |
|
||||
| #639 | System-health dashboard | `/system` page over #634 | 1 |
|
||||
| #640 | Workflow traffic-control view | `/traffic` page over the queue loader | 1 |
|
||||
| #641 | Runtime and session view | `/runtime` page over `runtime_health.py` | 1 |
|
||||
| #642 | Sanctioned restart and graceful reload controls | gated action framework, restart class | 2 |
|
||||
| #643 | Requests, intent preview, authorization, workflow initiation | `/api/v1/actions/*` execute path | 2 |
|
||||
| #644 | Stale-runtime recovery, worktree rebinding, reconciliation controls | gated actions over filesystem/git authority | 2 |
|
||||
| #645 | Gitea issue and PR linkage console | `/gitea` page over Gitea authority | 3 |
|
||||
| #646 | Workflow policy and guardrail visibility | `/policy` read view over the capability map | 3 |
|
||||
| #647 | Versioned policy editing, validation, simulation, approval, rollback | `/policy` write path, gated | 3 |
|
||||
| #648 | Notifications and human-attention routing | notification component over the event model | 3 |
|
||||
| #649 | Sentry/GlitchTip connections, correlation, durable issue creation | provider layer + #612 incident bridge | 4 |
|
||||
| #650 | AI-provider connections and operational insights | provider layer | 4 |
|
||||
| #651 | Model usage, token cost, latency, workflow analytics | analytics component over the event model | 4 |
|
||||
|
||||
Related but **outside** this epic: #667 (restart status, impact preview, and approval controls) belongs to the #655 restart-governance umbrella and must reuse the #642 action class rather than adding a second restart surface.
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Phase gates
|
||||
|
||||
| Phase | May ship | Entry condition |
|
||||
|-------|----------|-----------------|
|
||||
| **1 — read-only visibility** | `GET` pages and `GET /api/v1/...` | this ADR accepted |
|
||||
| **2 — controlled actions** | gated `POST` action execution | #633 authorization, RBAC, and audit model landed |
|
||||
| **3 — orchestration and policy** | linkage, policy visibility, versioned policy editing | Phase 1 inventory plus the Phase 2 action framework |
|
||||
| **4 — insights** | provider correlation, analytics | evidence-backed sources from Phases 1–3 |
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 1 must not open a mutation endpoint, and the read-only guard that returns `405 read-only-mvp` stays in force until the Phase 2 entry condition is met. A phase is not entered by exception; if a control is urgent, the entry condition is what gets prioritized.
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Security and workflow safety
|
||||
|
||||
- **Fail closed** on unknown authentication, missing RBAC mapping, or ambiguous lease ownership. An unknown state renders as blocked, never as permitted.
|
||||
- **Redact by default**, per §5.
|
||||
- **Every privileged action** requires a resolved capability, an explicit operator confirmation, and a durable audit event naming actor, action, target, and outcome.
|
||||
- **Contamination surfaces.** Session contamination — including a manually killed MCP daemon (#630) — must be shown and must block clean claims rather than being silently repaired.
|
||||
- **Deployment boundary unchanged.** Loopback by default, with the existing refusal of public binds (#435). This ADR documents that target; it does not widen it.
|
||||
|
||||
## 11. Forbidden paths
|
||||
|
||||
These are rejected designs, not preferences:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Raw provider incidents as work.** The allocator never receives an unclassified Sentry/GlitchTip incident; only the #612 bridge turns an observation into a Gitea issue.
|
||||
2. **Browser-held tokens.** No credential, keychain identifier, or Authorization header is ever sent to the browser or embedded in a client bundle.
|
||||
3. **Process-kill recovery.** The console must not expose `pkill`, process-identifier termination, or any host process kill as a recovery affordance (#630). Restart is the sanctioned, operator-owned path of #642 and the #655 umbrella.
|
||||
4. **Ungated browser mutations.** No review, approval, merge, close, or comment may originate from the browser without passing an MCP capability gate.
|
||||
5. **Policy invented in the console.** The console projects policy from the capability map and canonical workflows; it never encodes a second copy.
|
||||
6. **Recreating MVP scope.** Re-implementing a #426–#436 surface without an explicit evolve-or-extend statement is out of bounds.
|
||||
|
||||
## 12. Approval checklist (readable without chat history)
|
||||
|
||||
A controller can accept or reject this ADR against these six points alone:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Layers and their owners are defined (§2) and each authority is named (§4).
|
||||
2. The redaction boundary and the two invariants are stated (§5).
|
||||
3. API versioning is decided, including what happens to the existing unversioned routes (§6).
|
||||
4. A page map exists and names an owning child for every page (§7).
|
||||
5. Every #631 child maps to at least one component and one phase (§8).
|
||||
6. Phase gates and forbidden paths are explicit (§9, §11).
|
||||
|
||||
## 13. Open questions and follow-ups
|
||||
|
||||
Unresolved choices are recorded here rather than settled by implication. Each needs its own durable issue before the phase that depends on it:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Authentication mechanism.** Whether the console authenticates via an access proxy (Cloudflare Access or equivalent) or an application-level session is deferred to #633. This ADR requires only that it fail closed.
|
||||
- **Event model substrate.** Whether the #637 timeline reads the control-plane event log directly or through a projection is deferred to #637.
|
||||
- **CI path filter coverage.** `webui/ci_paths.py` triggers the web UI suite on `webui/`, `tests/test_webui_*`, and `docs/webui*`. This ADR lives under `docs/architecture/`, so editing it alone does not trigger that gate; the accompanying `tests/test_webui_architecture_docs.py` does run in the full suite. Widening the filter is a small follow-up, deliberately not bundled into a documentation-only change.
|
||||
- **Retention.** Audit-event retention duration is owned by #633.
|
||||
|
||||
## 14. Acceptance
|
||||
|
||||
Accepting this ADR means:
|
||||
|
||||
- Phase 1 children may proceed against the layers, page map, and API rules above.
|
||||
- Phase 2 children may not open a write path until #633 lands.
|
||||
- Any deviation is recorded as an amendment to this file with its own issue reference, not as an undocumented divergence in code.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
|
||||
# Web console authorization, RBAC, redaction, and audit model (#633)
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 1. Read-only. This document defines the model that future console
|
||||
writes must pass through; it enables none of them.**
|
||||
|
||||
The MVP deployment boundary ([`webui-deployment.md`](webui-deployment.md), #435)
|
||||
documents internal-only serving and states plainly that MVP authentication is
|
||||
*none* — protection comes from network placement. That is adequate while every
|
||||
route is a GET, and inadequate the moment a gated write ships. This document
|
||||
and the three modules it describes land **before** any write exists, so no
|
||||
Phase 2 action can be added without an authority to check it against.
|
||||
|
||||
| Concern | Module |
|
||||
|---------|--------|
|
||||
| Identity, roles, authorization decision | `webui/console_authz.py` |
|
||||
| Secret redaction for every surface | `webui/console_redaction.py` |
|
||||
| Audit event schema, retention, sink | `webui/console_audit.py` |
|
||||
| Machine-readable publication | `GET /api/console/security-model` |
|
||||
|
||||
Two invariants hold everywhere and are non-negotiable for every child of #631:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **No secrets reach the browser.** Credentials are resolved server-side and
|
||||
redacted before any payload, page, log line, or audit record leaves.
|
||||
2. **No ungated mutations.** Authorization is necessary but never sufficient;
|
||||
execution stays disabled until the Phase 2 framework ships.
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity sources
|
||||
|
||||
The console performs *authorization*. Authentication is delegated, because a
|
||||
console that mints its own sessions is a credential store, and this one must
|
||||
not be.
|
||||
|
||||
| Source | Mode value | Authenticated | Shared host | Phase |
|
||||
|--------|-----------|---------------|-------------|-------|
|
||||
| None | `none` (default) | No — anonymous, capped at `viewer` | No | 1 |
|
||||
| Local dev | `local-dev` / `local_dev` | Yes, **asserted not verified** | No | 1 |
|
||||
| Access proxy | `access-proxy` / `access_proxy` | Yes, asserted by trusted proxy | Yes | 2 |
|
||||
|
||||
Selected by `WEBUI_AUTH_MODE`. An unrecognised value falls back to `none`
|
||||
rather than erroring open.
|
||||
|
||||
**Access-proxy mode** reads the subject from the
|
||||
`Cf-Access-Authenticated-User-Email` header, set by Cloudflare Access, WARP, or
|
||||
an equivalent org portal that terminates authentication in front of the
|
||||
console. If the header is absent the request did not traverse the proxy, so the
|
||||
principal degrades to anonymous — it is never trusted by default.
|
||||
|
||||
The **role is always server-side configuration**, never a client assertion. It
|
||||
comes from `WEBUI_ROLE_MAP`, a JSON object of subject → role:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{"[email protected]": "operator", "[email protected]": "controller"}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
An unmapped subject gets `viewer`. Malformed JSON yields an empty map, so
|
||||
everyone gets `viewer` — a parse failure loses authority rather than granting
|
||||
it.
|
||||
|
||||
Full SSO is explicitly a non-goal of this issue.
|
||||
|
||||
## Role matrix
|
||||
|
||||
Four roles, ordered least to most authority. Each role inherits every lower
|
||||
role's actions; the table states the *minimum* rank required.
|
||||
|
||||
| Role | Authority |
|
||||
|------|-----------|
|
||||
| `viewer` | Read every console view. No write, ever, in any phase. |
|
||||
| `operator` | Viewer, plus author-class work: claim, comment, open a PR. |
|
||||
| `controller` | Operator, plus reviewer/merger-class decisions on a PR. |
|
||||
| `admin` | Controller, plus destructive and policy-editing actions. |
|
||||
|
||||
`viewer` holds the empty write set by construction, and a test asserts it stays
|
||||
empty.
|
||||
|
||||
## Privileged actions
|
||||
|
||||
Every console action maps to a `task_key` in `task_capability_map.py`, the same
|
||||
single source of truth `gitea_resolve_task_capability` and the MCP tool gates
|
||||
use. The console therefore cannot invent an authority the MCP layer does not
|
||||
already define, and a regression test asserts each mapping matches.
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Minimum role | Class | MCP permission | Confirm | Dual control | Break-glass | Phase |
|
||||
|--------|--------------|-------|----------------|---------|--------------|-------------|-------|
|
||||
| `claim_issue` | operator | gated_write | `gitea.issue.comment` | Yes | No | No | 2 |
|
||||
| `comment_issue` | operator | gated_write | `gitea.issue.comment` | Yes | No | No | 2 |
|
||||
| `create_issue` | operator | gated_write | `gitea.issue.create` | Yes | No | No | 2 |
|
||||
| `comment_pr` | operator | gated_write | `gitea.pr.comment` | Yes | No | No | 2 |
|
||||
| `create_pr` | operator | gated_write | `gitea.pr.create` | Yes | No | No | 2 |
|
||||
| `review_pr` | controller | privileged | `gitea.pr.review` | Yes | No | No | 3 |
|
||||
| `close_pr` | controller | privileged | `gitea.pr.close` | Yes | No | No | 3 |
|
||||
| `merge_pr` | controller | privileged | `gitea.pr.merge` | Yes | **Yes** | **Yes** | 3 |
|
||||
| `delete_branch` | admin | destructive | `gitea.branch.delete` | Yes | **Yes** | **Yes** | 3 |
|
||||
|
||||
**Dual control** means the acting principal may not be the sole authority: a
|
||||
second distinct principal must confirm. **Break-glass** means the action is
|
||||
expected to be unavailable in normal operation and its use is retained for two
|
||||
years. Both are declared here and enforced by the Phase 2 framework; Phase 1
|
||||
records the requirement on every decision so the framework cannot ship without
|
||||
honouring it.
|
||||
|
||||
`delete_branch` is admin-only rather than controller because it is the one
|
||||
irreversible action in the set.
|
||||
|
||||
### Authorization decision
|
||||
|
||||
`authorize(action_id, principal, for_execution=False)` returns a decision
|
||||
record and **denies by default**. The deny reasons are closed and enumerated:
|
||||
|
||||
| Reason code | Meaning |
|
||||
|-------------|---------|
|
||||
| `unknown_action` | No such console action is registered. |
|
||||
| `unauthenticated` | The principal is anonymous. |
|
||||
| `unknown_role` | The role is not in the matrix. |
|
||||
| `insufficient_role` | The role ranks below the action's minimum. |
|
||||
| `phase_not_active` | Execution requested for an action whose phase is not open. |
|
||||
| `allowed_preview_only` | Authorized — preview only, execution still disabled. |
|
||||
|
||||
There is no implicit allow branch. Even the allow result reports
|
||||
`execution_enabled: false` while the console is in Phase 1, so no caller can
|
||||
read an allow as permission to mutate.
|
||||
|
||||
## Secret redaction
|
||||
|
||||
One pass applies to **API payloads, rendered HTML, server logs, and audit
|
||||
records** — the four surfaces where a credential could escape.
|
||||
|
||||
Redaction reuses `gitea_audit.redact` rather than forking it: that remains the
|
||||
authority for secret-looking dict keys, `Authorization` material, and raw URLs.
|
||||
The console layer then applies its own patterns:
|
||||
|
||||
Each rule below matches an *assignment form*: the named key, followed by `=` or
|
||||
`:`, followed by the value. The keys are listed bare rather than spelled out as
|
||||
complete assignments, because this document is itself scanned by
|
||||
`scan_for_secrets` — writing the examples in full assignment form would make the
|
||||
documentation trip the very detectors it documents.
|
||||
|
||||
| Rule | Catches (as an assignment) |
|
||||
|------|----------------------------|
|
||||
| `credential_assignment` | `token`, `password`, `passwd`, `secret`, `api_key`, `access_key`, `client_secret`, `private_key` |
|
||||
| `credential_env_assignment` | `GITEA_TOKEN`, `GITEA_PASS`, `GITEA_PASSWORD` and suffixed variants |
|
||||
| `keychain_reference` | `keychain:` entry references |
|
||||
| `keychain_command` | macOS `security` keychain lookups (`find-generic-password`, `find-internet-password`) |
|
||||
| `private_key_block` | PEM `BEGIN ... PRIVATE KEY` blocks |
|
||||
| `json_web_token` | Three-segment `eyJ...` JWTs |
|
||||
| `bearer_credential` | `Bearer` / `Basic` credentials |
|
||||
|
||||
Assignments keep the key and replace only the value, so an operator can still
|
||||
see *what* was removed. Two behaviours are deliberate:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Fail closed.** A value that cannot be redacted becomes `[REDACTED]`
|
||||
outright rather than being emitted raw. Redaction never raises.
|
||||
- **Redact before persist.** `console_audit.build_event` redacts before
|
||||
serialization, and `write_event` re-scans and **drops** any record that still
|
||||
trips a detector. An unredacted record is never durable.
|
||||
|
||||
`scan_for_secrets` is the assertion helper: it returns the detector names still
|
||||
matching a payload, and already-redacted hits are not findings. Tests use it to
|
||||
prove the published policy, the security-model endpoint, and this document
|
||||
itself carry no secret material.
|
||||
|
||||
## Audit event schema
|
||||
|
||||
`gitea_audit` records MCP-side *mutations* — which profile and Gitea user
|
||||
performed which tool call. It has no console actor, no identity source, no
|
||||
correlation identifier, and no retention class, and an authorization **denial**
|
||||
is not a mutation, so it would never appear there at all. The console record is
|
||||
additive, not a replacement: a Phase 2 action emits both, joined on
|
||||
`correlation.request_id`.
|
||||
|
||||
Required fields, all asserted by tests so an edit cannot quietly drop one:
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Content |
|
||||
|-------|---------|
|
||||
| `schema_version` | Currently `1`. |
|
||||
| `event_id` | Unique per record. |
|
||||
| `timestamp` | Timezone-aware ISO-8601, UTC. |
|
||||
| `actor` | `subject`, `role`, `identity_source`, `authenticated`. |
|
||||
| `action` | Console action id. |
|
||||
| `action_class` | `gated_write`, `privileged`, `destructive`, or `unknown`. |
|
||||
| `target` | `{kind, ref}`, e.g. `{"kind": "pr", "ref": "#123"}`. |
|
||||
| `result` | `allowed`, `denied`, `previewed`, `failed`, `succeeded`. |
|
||||
| `reason_code` | The authorization reason code above. |
|
||||
| `correlation` | `request_id`, `session_id`, `mcp_task`, `mcp_permission`. |
|
||||
| `retention` | `class`, `days`, `expires_at`. |
|
||||
| `redacted` | Always `true`; records are redacted at build time. |
|
||||
|
||||
An unrecognised `result` degrades to `failed` rather than being stored
|
||||
verbatim.
|
||||
|
||||
The sink is an append-only JSON Lines file named by
|
||||
`WEBUI_CONSOLE_AUDIT_LOG`. It is **off by default**: with the variable unset,
|
||||
events are still built — so callers and tests exercise the schema — but nothing
|
||||
is written. Auditing never raises; a failed write returns `False` rather than
|
||||
breaking the request it describes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Retention
|
||||
|
||||
| Class | Applies to | Default |
|
||||
|-------|-----------|---------|
|
||||
| `standard` | Routine gated writes | 90 days |
|
||||
| `privileged` | `review_pr`, `close_pr`, and any unclassifiable action | 365 days |
|
||||
| `break_glass` | `merge_pr`, `delete_branch` | 730 days |
|
||||
|
||||
Each record carries its own class, day count, and computed `expires_at`, so
|
||||
retention is auditable per record rather than inferred from file age. An
|
||||
**unknown action is retained as privileged, not standard** — for a safety
|
||||
control the conservative direction is to keep the record longer.
|
||||
|
||||
Nothing in this module updates or deletes. Expiry is enforced by an
|
||||
operator-run policy against `expires_at`, never by the console silently
|
||||
rewriting its own history.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2 integration
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 2 opens gated writes. It must reuse this model rather than introduce a
|
||||
second one. The integration points are already wired and observable:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`GET /api/actions/{action_id}/preview`** attaches an `authorization` block
|
||||
to the existing preview payload and records a `previewed` audit event.
|
||||
- **`POST /api/actions/{action_id}/attempt`** attaches the same block and
|
||||
records a `denied` event. The terminal outcome is unchanged — the MVP
|
||||
registry in `webui/gated_actions.py` still fails closed for every action — so
|
||||
Phase 1 cannot loosen anything. Phase 2 enforces on this same decision
|
||||
instead of adding a parallel check.
|
||||
- **`GET /api/console/security-model`** publishes the RBAC matrix, redaction
|
||||
policy, and audit policy as JSON for operators and tests.
|
||||
|
||||
To open Phase 2, a child issue must: raise `ACTIVE_PHASE`, implement the
|
||||
confirmation and dual-control flow the matrix already declares, emit a
|
||||
`succeeded` or `failed` record alongside the `gitea_audit` mutation record, and
|
||||
keep `viewer` unable to reach any of it. Turning on execution without the
|
||||
confirmation flow contradicts a declared requirement and is a review failure,
|
||||
not a shortcut.
|
||||
|
||||
## Local-dev mode
|
||||
|
||||
`WEBUI_AUTH_MODE=local-dev` reads the principal straight from the environment:
|
||||
|
||||
| Variable | Purpose |
|
||||
|----------|---------|
|
||||
| `WEBUI_DEV_SUBJECT` | Subject string; absent ⇒ anonymous |
|
||||
| `WEBUI_DEV_ROLE` | One of `viewer`, `operator`, `controller`, `admin`; unrecognised ⇒ `viewer` |
|
||||
|
||||
**INSECURE — this mode is for loopback development only.** The subject and role
|
||||
are *asserted by the developer running the process and verified by nothing*.
|
||||
Anyone able to set an environment variable on the host is an `admin`, and
|
||||
anyone able to reach the port inherits that principal. It provides no
|
||||
authentication whatsoever; it exists so Phase 2 authorization paths can be
|
||||
exercised without standing up a proxy.
|
||||
|
||||
Never enable local-dev mode on a non-loopback bind. Combining it with
|
||||
`WEBUI_ALLOW_PUBLIC_BIND=1` or `WEBUI_ALLOW_REMOTE_BIND=1` publishes an
|
||||
unauthenticated admin console.
|
||||
|
||||
For anything beyond a laptop use `access-proxy` mode behind Cloudflare Access,
|
||||
WARP, or a VPN, as [`webui-deployment.md`](webui-deployment.md) requires.
|
||||
|
||||
### Probe authentication
|
||||
|
||||
`WEBUI_REQUIRE_PROBE_AUTH=1` declares that non-public probes should require an
|
||||
authenticated principal. It is **opt-in**: the default is off so the MVP
|
||||
`/health` contract is unchanged.
|
||||
|
||||
**This flag is declarative in Phase 1 and enforces nothing today.**
|
||||
`console_authz.probe_auth_required()` reports the operator's intent, and no
|
||||
route consults it — setting the variable does not currently change the
|
||||
behaviour of `/health` or any other endpoint. It is published here so the Phase
|
||||
2 action framework has a declared policy to honour rather than inventing a
|
||||
second one, exactly as `ACTIVE_PHASE` gates execution while the matrix is
|
||||
already declared. A regression test pins this "declared, not enforced" status,
|
||||
so wiring it later is a deliberate change rather than a silent one.
|
||||
|
||||
Until Phase 2 wires it, probe protection rests on network placement alone, as
|
||||
[`webui-deployment.md`](webui-deployment.md) (#435) states.
|
||||
|
||||
## Environment variables
|
||||
|
||||
| Variable | Default | Purpose |
|
||||
|----------|---------|---------|
|
||||
| `WEBUI_AUTH_MODE` | `none` | Identity source selection |
|
||||
| `WEBUI_DEV_SUBJECT` | unset | Local-dev subject (insecure) |
|
||||
| `WEBUI_DEV_ROLE` | `viewer` | Local-dev role (insecure) |
|
||||
| `WEBUI_ROLE_MAP` | unset | JSON subject → role map |
|
||||
| `WEBUI_REQUIRE_PROBE_AUTH` | unset | Require auth for non-public probes |
|
||||
| `WEBUI_CONSOLE_AUDIT_LOG` | unset | Append-only audit sink path |
|
||||
|
||||
All are read server-side only. None is ever rendered into a page or returned by
|
||||
an API.
|
||||
|
||||
## Non-goals
|
||||
|
||||
- No full SSO product; authentication stays delegated to the proxy.
|
||||
- No browser-initiated merges or approvals in any phase covered here.
|
||||
- No tokens in the frontend, in browser storage, or in committed config.
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,10 @@ only.
|
||||
## MVP deployment model
|
||||
|
||||
- **Default bind:** `127.0.0.1:8765` (`WEBUI_HOST` / `WEBUI_PORT`)
|
||||
- **Authentication:** none in MVP — protection comes from network placement
|
||||
- **Authentication:** none in MVP — protection comes from network placement.
|
||||
The authorization, RBAC, redaction, and audit model that future gated writes
|
||||
must pass through is defined in
|
||||
[`webui-authz-audit.md`](webui-authz-audit.md) (#633).
|
||||
- **Mutations:** read-only routes; gated write actions remain disabled (#434)
|
||||
- **Secrets:** resolved server-side via `gitea_auth` / `GITEA_MCP_CONFIG`; never
|
||||
embedded in HTML, JavaScript, or browser storage
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ Optional environment variables:
|
||||
See [webui-deployment.md](webui-deployment.md) for internal-only serving,
|
||||
Cloudflare Access/WARP/VPN guidance, and unsafe bind overrides (#435).
|
||||
|
||||
See
|
||||
[architecture/webui-control-plane-console-architecture-adr.md](architecture/webui-control-plane-console-architecture-adr.md)
|
||||
for the console architecture: layer and authority boundaries, the redaction
|
||||
boundary, `/api/v1/...` versioning, the target page map, and the phase gates
|
||||
that govern when a write path may open (#632, epic #631).
|
||||
|
||||
## Routes (MVP)
|
||||
|
||||
| Path | Description |
|
||||
|
||||
+247
-22
@@ -2017,6 +2017,7 @@ import issue_lock_provenance # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_store # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_adoption # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_recovery # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_renewal # noqa: E402
|
||||
import stacked_pr_support # noqa: E402
|
||||
import merge_approval_gate # noqa: E402
|
||||
import review_quarantine # noqa: E402 # #695 contaminated formal-review quarantine
|
||||
@@ -2316,7 +2317,12 @@ def _resolve_issue_lock_for_pr(
|
||||
return lock_data
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _save_issue_lock(data: dict, *, expected_generation: int | None = None) -> str:
|
||||
def _save_issue_lock(
|
||||
data: dict,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
expected_generation: int | None = None,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> str:
|
||||
existing = issue_lock_store.load_issue_lock(
|
||||
remote=str(data.get("remote") or ""),
|
||||
org=str(data.get("org") or ""),
|
||||
@@ -2328,7 +2334,9 @@ def _save_issue_lock(data: dict, *, expected_generation: int | None = None) -> s
|
||||
raise RuntimeError(overwrite_block)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
return issue_lock_store.bind_session_lock(
|
||||
data, expected_generation=expected_generation
|
||||
data,
|
||||
expected_generation=expected_generation,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=renewal_sanctioned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
raise RuntimeError(f"Could not write issue lock file: {e}") from e
|
||||
@@ -2448,6 +2456,79 @@ def _evaluate_issue_lock_recovery(
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _evaluate_issue_lock_renewal(
|
||||
existing_lock: dict,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
issue_number: int,
|
||||
branch_name: str,
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
remote: str,
|
||||
h: str | None,
|
||||
o: str,
|
||||
r: str,
|
||||
git_state: dict,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Gather evidence and decide exact-owner renewal of an expired lease (#760).
|
||||
|
||||
Mirrors ``_evaluate_issue_lock_recovery``: every input is durable lock state
|
||||
or a live server-side observation (Gitea branch/PR inventory, git in the
|
||||
declared worktree, the local lock store). Nothing is reachable from an MCP
|
||||
caller's parameters, so no caller can assert its way into a renewal
|
||||
(#760 AC14).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
renewal_auth = _auth(h)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
renewal_branches = api_get_all(
|
||||
f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/branches", renewal_auth
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as exc:
|
||||
raise RuntimeError(
|
||||
f"Could not list branches to verify exact-owner lease renewal: {exc}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
remote_head: str | None = None
|
||||
candidates: list[str] = []
|
||||
for entry in renewal_branches:
|
||||
entry_name = _branch_entry_name(entry)
|
||||
if entry_name == branch_name:
|
||||
remote_head = _branch_entry_commit_sha(entry)
|
||||
if issue_lock_adoption.branch_carries_issue_marker(entry_name, issue_number):
|
||||
candidates.append(entry_name)
|
||||
|
||||
pr_head: str | None = None
|
||||
pr_number: int | None = None
|
||||
for pull in _list_open_pulls(h, o, r, renewal_auth):
|
||||
pull_head = pull.get("head") or {}
|
||||
if str(pull_head.get("ref") or "") == branch_name:
|
||||
pr_head = pull_head.get("sha")
|
||||
pr_number = pull.get("number")
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
claimant = _work_lease_claimant(h)
|
||||
return issue_lock_renewal.assess_exact_owner_lease_renewal(
|
||||
existing_lock,
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=branch_name,
|
||||
worktree_path=worktree_path,
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
identity=claimant.get("username"),
|
||||
profile=claimant.get("profile"),
|
||||
operation_type=AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
current_branch=git_state.get("current_branch"),
|
||||
porcelain_status=git_state.get("porcelain_status") or "",
|
||||
worktree_exists=os.path.isdir(os.path.realpath(worktree_path)),
|
||||
head_sha=git_state.get("head_sha"),
|
||||
remote_head_sha=remote_head,
|
||||
pr_head_sha=pr_head,
|
||||
pr_number=pr_number,
|
||||
competing_live_locks=issue_lock_store.list_live_locks(),
|
||||
candidate_branches=candidates,
|
||||
current_pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _work_lease_claimant(host: str | None) -> dict:
|
||||
profile = get_profile()
|
||||
username = _IDENTITY_CACHE.get(host) if host else None
|
||||
@@ -3893,15 +3974,12 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
|
||||
existing_issue_lock = _load_existing_issue_lock(
|
||||
remote=remote, org=o, repo=r, issue_number=issue_number
|
||||
)
|
||||
active_lease_block = issue_lock_store.assess_same_issue_lease_conflict(
|
||||
existing_issue_lock,
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=branch_name,
|
||||
worktree_path=resolved_worktree,
|
||||
operation_type=AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if active_lease_block:
|
||||
raise RuntimeError(active_lease_block)
|
||||
# #760: the competing-lease disposition is decided below, once the worktree
|
||||
# and Gitea evidence an exact-owner renewal depends on has actually been
|
||||
# observed. Deciding it here — before any of that exists — is what made the
|
||||
# same-owner allowance unreachable for an expired lease. The authoritative
|
||||
# check still runs inside bind_session_lock under the per-issue flock, so
|
||||
# moving this one later cannot widen the window for a competing writer.
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Stacked-PR base declaration (opt-in, #484) ──
|
||||
# Normal work leaves stacked_base_branch None → master-equivalent path.
|
||||
@@ -3967,6 +4045,53 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
|
||||
recovery_sanctioned = bool(
|
||||
recovery_assessment and recovery_assessment.get("recovery_sanctioned")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Exact-owner renewal of an expired lease (#760) ──
|
||||
# The opposite trigger from #753 above: there the lease is unexpired and the
|
||||
# PID is dead; here the lease has expired while the recording daemon — which
|
||||
# is the long-lived MCP server, not the authoring task — may well still be
|
||||
# up. Only an expired lease is assessed, so a live foreign lease is never a
|
||||
# candidate (AC12) and dead-PID takeover keeps its existing conditions
|
||||
# (AC11). A refusal never raises: it withholds the waiver and leaves the
|
||||
# conflict check below to fail closed exactly as before.
|
||||
renewal_assessment: dict | None = None
|
||||
if (
|
||||
existing_issue_lock
|
||||
and existing_issue_lock.get("issue_number") == issue_number
|
||||
and issue_lock_store.is_lease_expired(existing_issue_lock)
|
||||
):
|
||||
renewal_assessment = _evaluate_issue_lock_renewal(
|
||||
existing_issue_lock,
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=branch_name,
|
||||
worktree_path=resolved_worktree,
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
h=h,
|
||||
o=o,
|
||||
r=r,
|
||||
git_state=git_state,
|
||||
)
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned = bool(
|
||||
renewal_assessment and renewal_assessment.get("renewal_sanctioned")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
active_lease_block = issue_lock_store.assess_same_issue_lease_conflict(
|
||||
existing_issue_lock,
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=branch_name,
|
||||
worktree_path=resolved_worktree,
|
||||
operation_type=AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=renewal_sanctioned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if active_lease_block:
|
||||
reasons = [active_lease_block]
|
||||
# Name the exact missing evidence when this looked like a renewal, so a
|
||||
# blocked owner sees why rather than only the generic takeover text.
|
||||
if renewal_assessment and renewal_assessment.get("is_candidate"):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
issue_lock_renewal.format_renewal_refusal(renewal_assessment)
|
||||
)
|
||||
raise RuntimeError("; ".join(reasons))
|
||||
# #755: a sanctioned dead-session recovery always has an owning open PR —
|
||||
# that is what makes it a recovery rather than a fresh claim. Carry the
|
||||
# server-derived owning-PR evidence into the duplicate-work gate below so
|
||||
@@ -3978,6 +4103,14 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
|
||||
if recovery_sanctioned
|
||||
else None
|
||||
)
|
||||
# #760: a sanctioned renewal owns its open PR for the same reason, so it
|
||||
# needs the same exemption. Without it the duplicate-work gate rejects every
|
||||
# renewal with "open PR already covers issue", which is the PR the lock
|
||||
# being renewed already owns. Withheld unless renewal was granted.
|
||||
if recovered_owning_pr is None and renewal_sanctioned:
|
||||
recovered_owning_pr = issue_lock_renewal.owning_pr_renewal_evidence(
|
||||
renewal_assessment
|
||||
)
|
||||
lock_assessment = issue_lock_worktree.assess_issue_lock_worktree(
|
||||
worktree_path=resolved_worktree,
|
||||
current_branch=git_state.get("current_branch"),
|
||||
@@ -3986,6 +4119,10 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
|
||||
inspected_git_root=git_state.get("inspected_git_root"),
|
||||
base_branch=git_state.get("base_branch"),
|
||||
recovery_sanctioned=recovery_sanctioned,
|
||||
# #760: without this the renewal waiver was computed and then discarded
|
||||
# here — the exact-owner branch always carries commits, so it can never
|
||||
# be base-equivalent, and every real renewal failed at this gate.
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=renewal_sanctioned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if lock_assessment["block"]:
|
||||
reasons = list(lock_assessment.get("reasons") or [])
|
||||
@@ -3995,6 +4132,12 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
issue_lock_recovery.format_recovery_refusal(recovery_assessment)
|
||||
)
|
||||
# #760: same courtesy for a refused renewal, so an exact owner blocked
|
||||
# at this gate sees which piece of ownership evidence was missing.
|
||||
if renewal_assessment and renewal_assessment.get("is_candidate"):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
issue_lock_renewal.format_renewal_refusal(renewal_assessment)
|
||||
)
|
||||
raise RuntimeError(
|
||||
issue_lock_worktree.format_issue_lock_worktree_error(
|
||||
{**lock_assessment, "reasons": reasons}
|
||||
@@ -4070,18 +4213,35 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
|
||||
recovery_assessment,
|
||||
recovered_at=_work_lease_timestamp(_work_lease_now()),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if renewal_sanctioned and renewal_assessment:
|
||||
# #760 AC9: record both sides of the transition — prior PID and expiry,
|
||||
# replacement PID and new expiry — so a renewed lock is auditable and
|
||||
# never reads as an original claim.
|
||||
data["lease_renewal"] = issue_lock_renewal.build_renewal_record(
|
||||
renewal_assessment,
|
||||
renewed_at=_work_lease_timestamp(_work_lease_now()),
|
||||
new_expires_at=str(work_lease.get("expires_at") or ""),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# #772 AC5: a recovery replaces a claim another session already owned, so
|
||||
# its write is a compare-and-swap against the generation the assessment was
|
||||
# made on. Two replacement sessions that both observed the same dead owner
|
||||
# cannot both succeed — the second finds a moved generation and fails
|
||||
# closed. Ordinary first-time claims keep the unconditional write.
|
||||
# #760 uses the same compare-and-swap: a renewal also replaces a claim that
|
||||
# already existed on disk, so two sessions that both observed the same
|
||||
# expired lease cannot both win — the second finds a moved generation and
|
||||
# fails closed.
|
||||
expected_generation = (
|
||||
issue_lock_store.lock_generation(existing_issue_lock)
|
||||
if recovery_sanctioned
|
||||
if (recovery_sanctioned or renewal_sanctioned)
|
||||
else None
|
||||
)
|
||||
lock_file_path = _save_issue_lock(data, expected_generation=expected_generation)
|
||||
lock_file_path = _save_issue_lock(
|
||||
data,
|
||||
expected_generation=expected_generation,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=renewal_sanctioned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
lock_record = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(lock_file_path) or data
|
||||
freshness = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(lock_record)
|
||||
competing = [
|
||||
@@ -4150,6 +4310,16 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=branch_name,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if renewal_sanctioned:
|
||||
# #760 AC13: the renewal is visible in the native tool result, so an
|
||||
# owner never has to inspect the lock file to confirm what happened.
|
||||
result["lease_renewal"] = lock_record.get("lease_renewal")
|
||||
result["message"] = (
|
||||
f"Renewed the expired {AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE} lease on issue "
|
||||
f"#{issue_number} for its exact recorded owner, on branch "
|
||||
f"'{branch_name}' from worktree '{resolved_worktree}' "
|
||||
"(fail-closed check complete)."
|
||||
)
|
||||
if agent_artifacts:
|
||||
result["warnings"] = [
|
||||
"Agent temp artifacts at repo root (delete before implementation): "
|
||||
@@ -12366,10 +12536,39 @@ def _try_auto_switch_for_operation(op: str, host: str | None = None) -> bool:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _git_default_remote_name(root: str) -> str:
|
||||
"""First configured git remote name for *root*, defaulting to 'origin'.
|
||||
|
||||
Used to resolve the live remote master target for parity (#610). Best
|
||||
effort: any failure falls back to 'origin' so callers never raise.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
res = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", root, "remote"],
|
||||
capture_output=True, text=True, check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
return "origin"
|
||||
if res.returncode != 0:
|
||||
return "origin"
|
||||
names = [n.strip() for n in (res.stdout or "").splitlines() if n.strip()]
|
||||
return names[0] if names else "origin"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _current_master_parity() -> dict:
|
||||
"""Assess this process's code against the on-disk master HEAD (#420)."""
|
||||
"""Assess this process's code against local and live remote master (#420/#610).
|
||||
|
||||
Compares the daemon's startup commit, the on-disk checkout HEAD, and the
|
||||
live remote master target. A stale daemon relative to live master fails
|
||||
closed for mutations even when the local checkout HEAD still matches the
|
||||
startup commit. The live-remote read is best effort: an unresolved live
|
||||
head leaves read-only diagnostics unblocked but is never mutation-safe.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
current_head = master_parity_gate.read_git_head(PROJECT_ROOT)
|
||||
return master_parity_gate.assess_master_parity(_STARTUP_PARITY, current_head)
|
||||
live_head = master_parity_gate.read_remote_master_head(
|
||||
PROJECT_ROOT, remote=_git_default_remote_name(PROJECT_ROOT))
|
||||
return master_parity_gate.assess_master_parity(
|
||||
_STARTUP_PARITY, current_head, live_remote_head=live_head)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _current_runtime_mode_report(refresh: bool = False) -> dict:
|
||||
@@ -16310,15 +16509,34 @@ def gitea_get_runtime_context(
|
||||
"restart_required": parity["restart_required"],
|
||||
"startup_head": parity["startup_head"],
|
||||
"current_head": parity["current_head"],
|
||||
# #610 distinguished mutation-safety signals:
|
||||
"daemon_start_head": parity["daemon_start_head"],
|
||||
"local_head": parity["local_head"],
|
||||
"live_remote_head": parity["live_remote_head"],
|
||||
"live_known": parity["live_known"],
|
||||
"live_stale": parity["live_stale"],
|
||||
"mutation_safe": parity["mutation_safe"],
|
||||
"summary": master_parity_gate.format_parity(parity),
|
||||
"mutation_gate_enforced": not master_parity_gate.gate_disabled(),
|
||||
# #610: the capability resolver is authoritative for mutation safety;
|
||||
# local parity alone must never authorize a mutation.
|
||||
"resolver_authoritative_for_mutation_safety": True,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if parity["stale"] and not master_parity_gate.gate_disabled():
|
||||
safe_next_action = (
|
||||
"Server code is stale relative to master; restart the Gitea MCP "
|
||||
"server to load current capability gates before mutating. "
|
||||
f"({master_parity_gate.format_parity(parity)})"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if parity["restart_required"] and not master_parity_gate.gate_disabled():
|
||||
if parity["live_stale"]:
|
||||
safe_next_action = (
|
||||
"Daemon is stale relative to LIVE remote master "
|
||||
f"(started {parity['startup_head'][:12] if parity['startup_head'] else 'unknown'}, "
|
||||
f"live master {parity['live_remote_head'][:12] if parity['live_remote_head'] else 'unknown'}); "
|
||||
"restart/reconnect the Gitea MCP server before mutating. The "
|
||||
"capability resolver is authoritative for mutation safety."
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
safe_next_action = (
|
||||
"Server code is stale relative to master; restart the Gitea MCP "
|
||||
"server to load current capability gates before mutating. "
|
||||
f"({master_parity_gate.format_parity(parity)})"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result["safe_next_action"] = safe_next_action
|
||||
|
||||
if reveal and h:
|
||||
@@ -16367,6 +16585,13 @@ def gitea_assess_master_parity(
|
||||
"determinable": parity["determinable"],
|
||||
"startup_head": parity["startup_head"],
|
||||
"current_head": parity["current_head"],
|
||||
# #610 distinguished mutation-safety signals:
|
||||
"daemon_start_head": parity["daemon_start_head"],
|
||||
"local_head": parity["local_head"],
|
||||
"live_remote_head": parity["live_remote_head"],
|
||||
"live_known": parity["live_known"],
|
||||
"live_stale": parity["live_stale"],
|
||||
"mutation_safe": parity["mutation_safe"],
|
||||
"mutation_gate_enforced": enforced,
|
||||
"summary": master_parity_gate.format_parity(parity),
|
||||
"reasons": parity["reasons"],
|
||||
@@ -16383,7 +16608,7 @@ def gitea_assess_master_parity(
|
||||
source=canonical_source,
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
if parity["stale"] and enforced:
|
||||
if parity["restart_required"] and enforced:
|
||||
out["report"] = master_parity_gate.parity_report(parity)
|
||||
return out
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,481 @@
|
||||
"""Exact-owner renewal of an expired author issue lease (#760).
|
||||
|
||||
An author issue lease carries an absolute wall-clock expiry stamped once at
|
||||
lock time. The PID recorded alongside it is the long-lived MCP daemon, not the
|
||||
authoring task, so a lease that expires while its daemon is still up is the
|
||||
ordinary case for any author task that outlives the TTL — not an anomaly.
|
||||
|
||||
Before this module, that case was unreachable.
|
||||
``issue_lock_store.assess_same_issue_lease_conflict`` computed same-owner
|
||||
evidence and then returned on the expired branch before consulting it, and
|
||||
``assess_expired_lock_reclaim`` only permits takeover on a dead PID or a
|
||||
missing worktree. An exact owner whose daemon is alive and whose worktree is
|
||||
present satisfied neither, so its own lock became permanently unmodifiable
|
||||
through sanctioned tools.
|
||||
|
||||
This module is the pure evidence assessor for that one narrow case. It answers
|
||||
a single question: may *this* session renew a lease it can prove it already
|
||||
owns? It performs no mutation and no network I/O, and it never trusts a caller
|
||||
assertion — every field is compared against durable lock state or a live
|
||||
observation supplied by the caller and gathered server-side.
|
||||
|
||||
Deliberate boundaries:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Renewal is not takeover.** A refusal here never widens what
|
||||
``assess_expired_lock_reclaim`` already allows; foreign expired locks keep
|
||||
requiring a dead PID or missing worktree (#760 AC11), and a *live* foreign
|
||||
lease stays non-recoverable by construction because only an expired lease is
|
||||
ever a candidate (AC12).
|
||||
* **PID liveness is never authorization.** A live recorded PID proves the
|
||||
daemon is up, nothing more. It is recorded as evidence and is neither
|
||||
necessary nor sufficient for renewal (AC16).
|
||||
* **Absolute expiry is preserved.** Renewal issues a new absolute expiry from
|
||||
the moment of the write. It does not introduce sliding heartbeat renewal,
|
||||
lease generations as fencing tokens, or a shared cross-role lifecycle — that
|
||||
is #790's scope and is deliberately not implemented here.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
from typing import Any, Iterable, Mapping, Sequence
|
||||
|
||||
from issue_lock_store import AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE, is_lease_expired, is_process_alive
|
||||
from reviewer_worktree import parse_dirty_tracked_files
|
||||
|
||||
# Outcome values.
|
||||
RENEWAL_SANCTIONED = "RENEWAL_SANCTIONED"
|
||||
NO_CANDIDATE = "NO_CANDIDATE"
|
||||
REFUSED = "REFUSED"
|
||||
|
||||
# Durable fields a lock must carry before it can be considered at all.
|
||||
REQUIRED_LOCK_FIELDS = ("issue_number", "branch_name", "worktree_path")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _text(value: Any) -> str:
|
||||
return str(value or "").strip()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _same_realpath(left: str | None, right: str | None) -> bool:
|
||||
if not left or not right:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
try:
|
||||
return os.path.realpath(left) == os.path.realpath(right)
|
||||
except OSError:
|
||||
return left == right
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _lock_claimant(lock: Mapping[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
claimant = lock.get("claimant")
|
||||
if not isinstance(claimant, Mapping):
|
||||
lease = lock.get("work_lease")
|
||||
claimant = lease.get("claimant") if isinstance(lease, Mapping) else None
|
||||
return dict(claimant) if isinstance(claimant, Mapping) else {}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _lock_lease(lock: Mapping[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
lease = lock.get("work_lease")
|
||||
return dict(lease) if isinstance(lease, Mapping) else {}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _lock_operation_type(lock: Mapping[str, Any]) -> str:
|
||||
lease = _lock_lease(lock)
|
||||
return _text(lease.get("operation_type")) or AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _recorded_pid(lock: Mapping[str, Any]) -> Any:
|
||||
pid = lock.get("session_pid")
|
||||
if pid is None:
|
||||
pid = lock.get("pid")
|
||||
return pid
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _malformed_reasons(lock: Mapping[str, Any]) -> list[str]:
|
||||
"""Names of durable fields that are missing or unusable."""
|
||||
missing: list[str] = []
|
||||
for field in REQUIRED_LOCK_FIELDS:
|
||||
if not _text(lock.get(field)):
|
||||
missing.append(field)
|
||||
pid = _recorded_pid(lock)
|
||||
if pid is None or _text(pid) == "":
|
||||
missing.append("session_pid/pid")
|
||||
else:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
if int(pid) <= 0:
|
||||
missing.append("session_pid/pid")
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
missing.append("session_pid/pid")
|
||||
return missing
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _competing_lock_reasons(
|
||||
competing_live_locks: Iterable[Mapping[str, Any]] | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
issue_number: int,
|
||||
branch_name: str,
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
) -> list[str]:
|
||||
"""Live locks that would contend with this renewal (#760 AC7).
|
||||
|
||||
A live lock on the *same* issue cannot coexist with this expired lease, so
|
||||
any live entry naming this issue, branch, or worktree belongs to somebody
|
||||
else and refuses the renewal.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
for entry in competing_live_locks or ():
|
||||
if not isinstance(entry, Mapping):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
entry_issue = entry.get("issue_number")
|
||||
entry_branch = _text(entry.get("branch_name"))
|
||||
entry_worktree = _text(entry.get("worktree_path"))
|
||||
if entry_issue == issue_number:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"a live lock already exists for issue #{issue_number} "
|
||||
f"(pid {entry.get('pid')}); renewal would contend with it"
|
||||
)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
if entry_branch and entry_branch == _text(branch_name):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"live lock for issue #{entry_issue} already holds branch "
|
||||
f"'{branch_name}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if entry_worktree and _same_realpath(entry_worktree, worktree_path):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"live lock for issue #{entry_issue} already holds worktree "
|
||||
f"'{worktree_path}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return reasons
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess_exact_owner_lease_renewal(
|
||||
existing_lock: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
issue_number: int,
|
||||
branch_name: str,
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
remote: str,
|
||||
org: str,
|
||||
repo: str,
|
||||
identity: str | None,
|
||||
profile: str | None,
|
||||
operation_type: str = AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
current_branch: str | None = None,
|
||||
porcelain_status: str = "",
|
||||
worktree_exists: bool = False,
|
||||
head_sha: str | None = None,
|
||||
remote_head_sha: str | None = None,
|
||||
pr_head_sha: str | None = None,
|
||||
pr_number: int | None = None,
|
||||
competing_live_locks: Sequence[Mapping[str, Any]] | None = None,
|
||||
candidate_branches: Sequence[str] | None = None,
|
||||
current_pid: int | None = None,
|
||||
now: Any = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Decide whether an expired lease may be renewed by its exact owner.
|
||||
|
||||
Returns a disposition dict; it never raises and never mutates. A refusal
|
||||
withholds permission, leaving every pre-existing guard to fail closed
|
||||
exactly as before — this assessment can only ever *add* permission.
|
||||
|
||||
``NO_CANDIDATE`` means the situation is not an exact-owner renewal at all
|
||||
(no lock, different issue, different operation, or an unexpired lease) and
|
||||
the caller should carry on with its normal path. ``REFUSED`` means it looked
|
||||
like one but the evidence did not hold, and ``reasons`` names exactly what
|
||||
was missing.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
evidence: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"issue_number": issue_number,
|
||||
"branch_name": branch_name,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"org": org,
|
||||
"repo": repo,
|
||||
"operation_type": operation_type,
|
||||
"identity": identity,
|
||||
"profile": profile,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def _result(outcome: str, reasons: list[str], **extra: Any) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"outcome": outcome,
|
||||
"renewal_sanctioned": outcome == RENEWAL_SANCTIONED,
|
||||
"is_candidate": outcome in (RENEWAL_SANCTIONED, REFUSED),
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
"evidence": {**evidence, **extra},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if not isinstance(existing_lock, Mapping) or not existing_lock:
|
||||
return _result(NO_CANDIDATE, ["no existing lock to renew"])
|
||||
|
||||
if existing_lock.get("issue_number") != issue_number:
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
NO_CANDIDATE,
|
||||
[
|
||||
f"existing lock is for issue #{existing_lock.get('issue_number')}, "
|
||||
f"not #{issue_number}"
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
existing_operation = _lock_operation_type(existing_lock)
|
||||
if existing_operation != operation_type:
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
NO_CANDIDATE,
|
||||
[
|
||||
f"existing lease operation '{existing_operation}' is not "
|
||||
f"'{operation_type}'"
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Only an *expired* lease is ever a renewal candidate. An unexpired lease —
|
||||
# live, or stale by dead PID — is somebody else's problem: the first needs no
|
||||
# renewal, and the second is #753's dead-session recovery. This is also what
|
||||
# makes a live foreign lease non-recoverable here (#760 AC12).
|
||||
if not is_lease_expired(existing_lock, now=now):
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
NO_CANDIDATE,
|
||||
["lease has not expired; renewal does not apply"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
malformed = _malformed_reasons(existing_lock)
|
||||
if malformed:
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
REFUSED,
|
||||
["durable lock is missing or has unusable fields: " + ", ".join(malformed)],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
lease = _lock_lease(existing_lock)
|
||||
claimant = _lock_claimant(existing_lock)
|
||||
recorded_pid = _recorded_pid(existing_lock)
|
||||
prior_expires_at = _text(lease.get("expires_at"))
|
||||
|
||||
# #760 AC16: recorded purely as evidence. A live daemon PID is neither
|
||||
# necessary nor sufficient for renewal, and nothing below branches on it.
|
||||
recorded_pid_alive = is_process_alive(recorded_pid)
|
||||
|
||||
extra: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"prior_pid": recorded_pid,
|
||||
"prior_pid_alive": recorded_pid_alive,
|
||||
"prior_expires_at": prior_expires_at,
|
||||
"replacement_pid": current_pid,
|
||||
"recorded_claimant": claimant,
|
||||
"head_sha": head_sha,
|
||||
"remote_head_sha": remote_head_sha,
|
||||
"pr_head_sha": pr_head_sha,
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
|
||||
# ── AC3: exact ownership identity ──
|
||||
if _text(existing_lock.get("remote")) != _text(remote):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"recorded remote '{existing_lock.get('remote')}' does not match "
|
||||
f"'{remote}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if _text(existing_lock.get("org")) != _text(org):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"recorded org '{existing_lock.get('org')}' does not match '{org}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if _text(existing_lock.get("repo")) != _text(repo):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"recorded repo '{existing_lock.get('repo')}' does not match '{repo}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if _text(existing_lock.get("branch_name")) != _text(branch_name):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"recorded branch '{existing_lock.get('branch_name')}' does not match "
|
||||
f"'{branch_name}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if not _same_realpath(_text(existing_lock.get("worktree_path")), worktree_path):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"recorded worktree '{existing_lock.get('worktree_path')}' does not "
|
||||
f"match '{worktree_path}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
recorded_identity = _text(claimant.get("username"))
|
||||
recorded_profile = _text(claimant.get("profile"))
|
||||
if not recorded_identity or not recorded_profile:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"durable lock does not record both a claimant username and profile"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if recorded_identity and recorded_identity != _text(identity):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"recorded claimant '{recorded_identity}' does not match active "
|
||||
f"identity '{_text(identity) or 'unknown'}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if recorded_profile and recorded_profile != _text(profile):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"recorded profile '{recorded_profile}' does not match active profile "
|
||||
f"'{_text(profile) or 'unknown'}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ── AC4: the registered worktree still exists, is on the branch, and is clean ──
|
||||
if not worktree_exists:
|
||||
reasons.append(f"declared worktree '{worktree_path}' does not exist")
|
||||
if _text(current_branch) != _text(branch_name):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"worktree is on branch '{_text(current_branch) or 'unknown'}', not "
|
||||
f"'{branch_name}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
dirty = parse_dirty_tracked_files(porcelain_status or "")
|
||||
if dirty:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"worktree has uncommitted tracked changes: " + ", ".join(sorted(dirty))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ── AC5/AC6: published heads must agree ──
|
||||
if not _text(head_sha):
|
||||
reasons.append("local head could not be observed")
|
||||
if not _text(remote_head_sha):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"remote branch head could not be observed; an unpublished branch "
|
||||
"cannot prove exact-owner renewal"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if _text(head_sha) and _text(remote_head_sha) and head_sha != remote_head_sha:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"local head {head_sha} does not equal remote head {remote_head_sha}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if pr_number is not None:
|
||||
if not _text(pr_head_sha):
|
||||
reasons.append(f"owning PR #{pr_number} head could not be observed")
|
||||
elif _text(head_sha) and pr_head_sha != head_sha:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"owning PR #{pr_number} head {pr_head_sha} does not equal local "
|
||||
f"head {head_sha}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ── AC7: nothing else claims this work ──
|
||||
reasons.extend(
|
||||
_competing_lock_reasons(
|
||||
competing_live_locks,
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=branch_name,
|
||||
worktree_path=worktree_path,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
other_branches = [
|
||||
name
|
||||
for name in (candidate_branches or ())
|
||||
if _text(name) and _text(name) != _text(branch_name)
|
||||
]
|
||||
if other_branches:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"other branches already carry this issue marker: "
|
||||
+ ", ".join(sorted(other_branches))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if reasons:
|
||||
return _result(REFUSED, reasons, **extra)
|
||||
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
RENEWAL_SANCTIONED,
|
||||
[
|
||||
f"exact owner '{recorded_identity}' ({recorded_profile}) proved "
|
||||
f"ownership of issue #{issue_number} on branch '{branch_name}' from "
|
||||
f"worktree '{worktree_path}'; local, remote"
|
||||
+ (f", and PR #{pr_number}" if pr_number is not None else "")
|
||||
+ f" heads all equal {head_sha}; lease expired at "
|
||||
f"{prior_expires_at or 'unknown'}"
|
||||
],
|
||||
**extra,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def owning_pr_renewal_evidence(
|
||||
assessment: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
|
||||
"""Server-derived proof of the open PR a sanctioned renewal already owns.
|
||||
|
||||
The mirror of ``issue_lock_recovery.owning_pr_recovery_evidence`` (#755) for
|
||||
the renewal disposition. An exact-owner renewal of a published branch is, by
|
||||
construction, renewal of work that already has an open PR — so the
|
||||
duplicate-work gate's linked-open-PR blocker would otherwise discard every
|
||||
sanctioned renewal, exactly as it once discarded every sanctioned recovery.
|
||||
|
||||
Returns ``None`` unless renewal was actually granted and the evidence names
|
||||
one owning PR whose head agrees with both the local and remote heads the
|
||||
assessor accepted. Nothing is caller-supplied: every field is copied from
|
||||
evidence built out of durable lock state plus live git/Gitea observation.
|
||||
|
||||
Renewal has no descendant case — it requires the local, remote, and PR heads
|
||||
to be equal — so there is only one head to report.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not isinstance(assessment, Mapping):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if assessment.get("outcome") != RENEWAL_SANCTIONED:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if not assessment.get("renewal_sanctioned"):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
evidence = assessment.get("evidence") or {}
|
||||
branch_name = _text(evidence.get("branch_name"))
|
||||
pr_head = _text(evidence.get("pr_head_sha"))
|
||||
local_head = _text(evidence.get("head_sha"))
|
||||
remote_head = _text(evidence.get("remote_head_sha"))
|
||||
raw_pr_number = evidence.get("pr_number")
|
||||
|
||||
if raw_pr_number is None or not branch_name or not pr_head:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
# The assessor already required these to agree. Re-check, so a truncated or
|
||||
# hand-built evidence map can never authorize an exemption.
|
||||
if pr_head != local_head or pr_head != remote_head:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
pr_number = int(raw_pr_number)
|
||||
issue_number = int(evidence.get("issue_number"))
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"issue_number": issue_number,
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"branch_name": branch_name,
|
||||
"head_sha": pr_head,
|
||||
"recorded_head": pr_head,
|
||||
"accepted_head": pr_head,
|
||||
"head_relation": "equal",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def build_renewal_record(
|
||||
assessment: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
renewed_at: str,
|
||||
new_expires_at: str,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Durable audit record for a sanctioned renewal (#760 AC9).
|
||||
|
||||
Records both sides of the transition — prior PID and expiry, replacement PID
|
||||
and new expiry — so a renewed lock is never mistakable for an original
|
||||
claim, and so the evidence the waiver was granted on stays inspectable.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
data = dict(assessment or {})
|
||||
evidence = dict(data.get("evidence") or {})
|
||||
recorded_claimant = dict(evidence.get("recorded_claimant") or {})
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"renewed": bool(data.get("renewal_sanctioned")),
|
||||
"renewed_at": renewed_at,
|
||||
"prior_pid": evidence.get("prior_pid"),
|
||||
"prior_pid_alive": evidence.get("prior_pid_alive"),
|
||||
"prior_expires_at": evidence.get("prior_expires_at"),
|
||||
"replacement_pid": evidence.get("replacement_pid"),
|
||||
"new_expires_at": new_expires_at,
|
||||
"identity": recorded_claimant.get("username"),
|
||||
"profile": recorded_claimant.get("profile"),
|
||||
"branch_name": evidence.get("branch_name"),
|
||||
"worktree_path": evidence.get("worktree_path"),
|
||||
"head_sha": evidence.get("head_sha"),
|
||||
"remote_head_sha": evidence.get("remote_head_sha"),
|
||||
"pr_head_sha": evidence.get("pr_head_sha"),
|
||||
"pr_number": evidence.get("pr_number"),
|
||||
"reason": "expired lease renewed by its exact recorded owner",
|
||||
"proof": list(data.get("reasons") or []),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def format_renewal_refusal(assessment: Mapping[str, Any] | None) -> str:
|
||||
"""One-line refusal summary for a blocked caller."""
|
||||
data = dict(assessment or {})
|
||||
reasons = list(data.get("reasons") or [])
|
||||
if not reasons:
|
||||
return "exact-owner lease renewal was not available (no evidence recorded)"
|
||||
return "exact-owner lease renewal refused: " + "; ".join(reasons)
|
||||
+23
-1
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ def bind_session_lock(
|
||||
lock_dir: str | None = None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
expected_generation: int | None = None,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> str:
|
||||
"""Persist a keyed lock and bind it to the current process session.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -220,6 +221,7 @@ def bind_session_lock(
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=str(record.get("branch_name") or ""),
|
||||
worktree_path=str(record.get("worktree_path") or ""),
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=renewal_sanctioned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if lease_block:
|
||||
raise RuntimeError(lease_block)
|
||||
@@ -483,9 +485,19 @@ def assess_same_issue_lease_conflict(
|
||||
branch_name: str,
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
operation_type: str = AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned: bool = False,
|
||||
now: datetime | None = None,
|
||||
) -> str | None:
|
||||
"""Return a fail-closed error when a competing live lease blocks acquisition."""
|
||||
"""Return a fail-closed error when a competing live lease blocks acquisition.
|
||||
|
||||
``renewal_sanctioned`` is set only when
|
||||
``issue_lock_renewal.assess_exact_owner_lease_renewal`` has already proven,
|
||||
from the durable lock plus live server-side observation, that this session
|
||||
is the exact recorded owner of an *expired* lease (#760). It is never a
|
||||
caller-supplied parameter of any MCP tool (#760 AC14): the server computes
|
||||
it and passes it down. Left False, every pre-existing disposition is
|
||||
unchanged.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not existing_lock:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -506,6 +518,16 @@ def assess_same_issue_lease_conflict(
|
||||
and _same_realpath(str(existing_worktree or ""), worktree_path)
|
||||
)
|
||||
if is_lease_expired(existing_lock, now=now):
|
||||
# #760 AC1/AC2: exact-owner renewal is a different disposition from
|
||||
# foreign takeover and is evaluated first. Before this, both branches
|
||||
# below returned unconditionally, so the same_owner allowance further
|
||||
# down was unreachable for every expired lease — an owner could never
|
||||
# renew its own lock once the wall clock passed, no matter how complete
|
||||
# its ownership evidence. Requires BOTH the locally recomputed
|
||||
# same_owner match and the server-proven renewal waiver; either alone is
|
||||
# insufficient.
|
||||
if same_owner and renewal_sanctioned:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
reclaim = assess_expired_lock_reclaim(existing_lock, now=now)
|
||||
if reclaim.get("reclaim_allowed"):
|
||||
# #601: expired + dead pid / missing worktree may be reclaimed
|
||||
|
||||
+25
-3
@@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ def assess_issue_lock_worktree(
|
||||
base_branch: str | None = None,
|
||||
base_branches: frozenset[str] | None = None,
|
||||
recovery_sanctioned: bool = False,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Fail closed when lock preconditions are not met on the declared worktree.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -296,6 +297,19 @@ def assess_issue_lock_worktree(
|
||||
by construction and could never satisfy it. Every other precondition —
|
||||
notably worktree cleanliness — still applies unchanged, and brand-new issue
|
||||
claims keep the full base-equivalence requirement.
|
||||
|
||||
``renewal_sanctioned`` waives base-equivalence on exactly the same grounds
|
||||
for the other proven-ownership case (#760): ``issue_lock_renewal`` has shown
|
||||
that an *expired* lease is being renewed by its exact recorded owner — same
|
||||
remote, org, repo, issue, operation, branch, realpath-normalized worktree,
|
||||
claimant username and profile — with the local head matching the remote head
|
||||
and any owning PR head. Such a branch carries committed work for the same
|
||||
reason a recovered one does, so it can never be base-equivalent either.
|
||||
|
||||
Both waivers relax this one requirement and nothing else. Neither is
|
||||
caller-supplied: each is computed server-side from durable lock state plus
|
||||
live observation. With both False every precondition applies exactly as
|
||||
before.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
bases = base_branches or BASE_BRANCHES
|
||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
@@ -314,9 +328,12 @@ def assess_issue_lock_worktree(
|
||||
f"(dirty files: {', '.join(dirty_files)})"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if recovery_sanctioned:
|
||||
if recovery_sanctioned or renewal_sanctioned:
|
||||
# Base-equivalence intentionally not evaluated: ownership was proven
|
||||
# against the durable lock record instead (#753).
|
||||
# against the durable lock record instead — by dead-session recovery
|
||||
# (#753) or by exact-owner renewal of an expired lease (#760). Every
|
||||
# other precondition above and below still applies; cleanliness in
|
||||
# particular is checked before this branch and is never waived.
|
||||
pass
|
||||
elif base_equivalent is False:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
@@ -347,6 +364,7 @@ def assess_issue_lock_worktree(
|
||||
base_branch=base_branch,
|
||||
base_equivalent=base_equivalent,
|
||||
recovery_sanctioned=recovery_sanctioned,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=renewal_sanctioned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -406,6 +424,7 @@ def _assessment(
|
||||
base_branch: str | None = None,
|
||||
base_equivalent: bool | None = None,
|
||||
recovery_sanctioned: bool = False,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"proven": proven,
|
||||
@@ -418,7 +437,10 @@ def _assessment(
|
||||
"base_branch": base_branch,
|
||||
"base_equivalent": base_equivalent,
|
||||
"recovery_sanctioned": recovery_sanctioned,
|
||||
"base_equivalence_waived": bool(recovery_sanctioned),
|
||||
"renewal_sanctioned": renewal_sanctioned,
|
||||
# Either proven-ownership waiver relaxes base-equivalence; the two are
|
||||
# reported separately so an audit can tell which one applied.
|
||||
"base_equivalence_waived": bool(recovery_sanctioned or renewal_sanctioned),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+213
-17
@@ -24,12 +24,50 @@ from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
import time
|
||||
|
||||
# Live-remote head cache: the parity gate runs on every mutation and every
|
||||
# runtime-context read, so the ``git ls-remote`` result is cached briefly to
|
||||
# avoid a network round-trip per call (#610). Keyed by (root, remote, branch).
|
||||
_REMOTE_HEAD_CACHE: dict[tuple[str, str, str], tuple[float, str | None]] = {}
|
||||
_REMOTE_HEAD_TTL = 60.0
|
||||
|
||||
# When True, ``read_remote_master_head`` never performs ``git ls-remote`` unless
|
||||
# ``GITEA_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD`` is set. Conftest enables this suite-wide so
|
||||
# feature worktrees (whose HEAD differs from live master) cannot flip legacy
|
||||
# runtime-context assertions to live_stale, and so unit tests never depend on
|
||||
# a live network (PR #788 F1/F2 / issue #610). Module-level (not env-only) so
|
||||
# ``patch.dict(os.environ, …, clear=True)`` cannot re-enable the probe.
|
||||
_HERMETIC_TEST_MODE: bool = False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _clear_remote_head_cache() -> None:
|
||||
"""Reset the live-remote head cache (test isolation / forced refresh)."""
|
||||
_REMOTE_HEAD_CACHE.clear()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def set_hermetic_test_mode(enabled: bool) -> None:
|
||||
"""Enable or disable suite-wide hermetic live-remote reads (tests only)."""
|
||||
global _HERMETIC_TEST_MODE
|
||||
_HERMETIC_TEST_MODE = bool(enabled)
|
||||
_clear_remote_head_cache()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def hermetic_test_mode() -> bool:
|
||||
"""Return whether hermetic live-remote reads are active."""
|
||||
return bool(_HERMETIC_TEST_MODE)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Environment escape hatches (ops + tests):
|
||||
# GITEA_MCP_DISABLE_PARITY_GATE -> disable enforcement entirely (fail open).
|
||||
# GITEA_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD -> force the "current" HEAD read, for tests.
|
||||
ENV_DISABLE = "GITEA_MCP_DISABLE_PARITY_GATE"
|
||||
ENV_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD = "GITEA_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD"
|
||||
# GITEA_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD -> force the live remote master read, for tests.
|
||||
ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD = "GITEA_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD"
|
||||
# GITEA_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE -> opt a single test into a real ls-remote
|
||||
# even when hermetic mode is on (rare; prefer ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD).
|
||||
ENV_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE = "GITEA_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def read_git_head(root: str) -> str | None:
|
||||
@@ -58,6 +96,75 @@ def read_git_head(root: str) -> str | None:
|
||||
return (res.stdout or "").strip() or None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def read_remote_master_head(
|
||||
root: str,
|
||||
remote: str = "origin",
|
||||
branch: str = "master",
|
||||
ttl: float = _REMOTE_HEAD_TTL,
|
||||
) -> str | None:
|
||||
"""Return the live remote ``branch`` commit SHA, or ``None`` (#610).
|
||||
|
||||
Resolves the *live* target commit via ``git ls-remote`` so parity can tell
|
||||
a daemon that is behind the live remote master apart from one whose local
|
||||
checkout simply hasn't been pulled. ``None`` means the live head could not
|
||||
be resolved (offline, no such remote, git unavailable, error) -- callers
|
||||
must treat unknown live state as *not mutation-safe* while never blocking
|
||||
read-only diagnostics. A ``GITEA_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD`` override takes
|
||||
precedence so the wiring can be exercised deterministically and offline.
|
||||
|
||||
The result is cached for *ttl* seconds per (root, remote, branch) so the
|
||||
gate does not run a network probe on every mutation/read (``ttl=0`` forces
|
||||
a live probe). Both hits and ``None`` misses are cached to bound offline
|
||||
latency; the env override bypasses the cache and the subprocess entirely.
|
||||
|
||||
Under suite hermetic mode (``set_hermetic_test_mode(True)``, set by
|
||||
conftest) a missing override returns ``None`` without network I/O so
|
||||
feature-worktree test runs cannot observe live_stale against real master
|
||||
(PR #788 F1) and unit tests stay offline (F2). Opt out with an explicit
|
||||
``GITEA_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD`` pin or ``GITEA_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE``.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
forced = os.environ.get(ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD)
|
||||
if forced is not None:
|
||||
return forced.strip() or None
|
||||
if _HERMETIC_TEST_MODE and not (
|
||||
os.environ.get(ENV_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE) or ""
|
||||
).strip():
|
||||
# Hermetic default: live head unknown. live_stale stays False;
|
||||
# mutation_safe is False when live is unknown (documented #610 note).
|
||||
return None
|
||||
# Defense in depth: even without the module flag, never probe while pytest
|
||||
# is running unless the test opted into a real probe or set an override.
|
||||
if (os.environ.get("PYTEST_CURRENT_TEST") or "").strip() and not (
|
||||
os.environ.get(ENV_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE) or ""
|
||||
).strip():
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if not root:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
key = (root, remote, branch)
|
||||
now = time.monotonic()
|
||||
if ttl > 0:
|
||||
cached = _REMOTE_HEAD_CACHE.get(key)
|
||||
if cached is not None and (now - cached[0]) < ttl:
|
||||
return cached[1]
|
||||
sha: str | None = None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
res = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", root, "ls-remote", remote, f"refs/heads/{branch}"],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
check=False,
|
||||
timeout=5,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if res.returncode == 0:
|
||||
lines = (res.stdout or "").strip().splitlines()
|
||||
if lines:
|
||||
sha = lines[0].split("\t", 1)[0].split()[0].strip() or None
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
sha = None
|
||||
_REMOTE_HEAD_CACHE[key] = (now, sha)
|
||||
return sha
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def capture_startup_parity(root: str, head: str | None = None) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Capture the process source-tree baseline once at server startup.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -72,18 +179,38 @@ def _short(sha: str | None) -> str:
|
||||
return sha[:12] if sha else "unknown"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess_master_parity(startup: dict | None, current_head: str | None) -> dict:
|
||||
def assess_master_parity(
|
||||
startup: dict | None,
|
||||
current_head: str | None,
|
||||
live_remote_head: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Compare the startup baseline against the current on-disk ``HEAD``.
|
||||
|
||||
Pure: both HEADs are supplied by the caller. Returns a structured result:
|
||||
Pure: all HEADs are supplied by the caller. Returns a structured result:
|
||||
|
||||
- ``in_parity`` -- server code matches the on-disk master (or parity
|
||||
could not be determined, which is not treated as stale).
|
||||
- ``stale`` -- the on-disk master has definitively advanced past the
|
||||
running process.
|
||||
- ``restart_required`` -- alias of ``stale``; the recovery action.
|
||||
- ``determinable`` -- whether both HEADs were known well enough to compare.
|
||||
- ``restart_required`` -- ``stale`` or ``live_stale``; the recovery action.
|
||||
- ``determinable`` -- whether both local HEADs were known well enough to
|
||||
compare.
|
||||
- ``startup_head`` / ``current_head`` / ``reasons``.
|
||||
|
||||
#610 adds live-remote awareness so a daemon that is stale relative to the
|
||||
*live* remote master cannot report a mutation-safe result even when the
|
||||
local checkout HEAD still matches the daemon's startup commit:
|
||||
|
||||
- ``daemon_start_head`` -- the commit the running process started at
|
||||
(alias of ``startup_head``, named for clarity in reports).
|
||||
- ``local_head`` -- the on-disk checkout HEAD (alias of ``current_head``).
|
||||
- ``live_remote_head`` -- the live remote target commit, or ``None`` when it
|
||||
could not be fetched.
|
||||
- ``live_known`` -- whether the live remote target was resolved.
|
||||
- ``live_stale`` -- the live remote master has advanced past the running
|
||||
process (daemon is behind live master) even if local parity is green.
|
||||
- ``mutation_safe`` -- the daemon code, local checkout, and live remote
|
||||
target all agree; the only state in which a mutation may rely on parity.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
startup_head = (startup or {}).get("startup_head")
|
||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
@@ -91,32 +218,56 @@ def assess_master_parity(startup: dict | None, current_head: str | None) -> dict
|
||||
if startup_head is None:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"startup commit was not captured; code parity cannot be enforced")
|
||||
return _result(True, False, False, startup_head, current_head, reasons)
|
||||
return _result(True, False, False, startup_head, current_head,
|
||||
live_remote_head, False, reasons)
|
||||
|
||||
if current_head is None:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"current workspace HEAD could not be read; code parity cannot be "
|
||||
"enforced")
|
||||
return _result(True, False, False, startup_head, current_head, reasons)
|
||||
return _result(True, False, False, startup_head, current_head,
|
||||
live_remote_head, False, reasons)
|
||||
|
||||
if startup_head == current_head:
|
||||
return _result(True, False, True, startup_head, current_head, reasons)
|
||||
local_in_parity = startup_head == current_head
|
||||
local_stale = not local_in_parity
|
||||
if local_stale:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"MCP server started at commit {_short(startup_head)} but the "
|
||||
f"workspace master is now {_short(current_head)}; restart the "
|
||||
f"server to load the current capability gates")
|
||||
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"MCP server started at commit {_short(startup_head)} but the workspace "
|
||||
f"master is now {_short(current_head)}; restart the server to load the "
|
||||
f"current capability gates")
|
||||
return _result(False, True, True, startup_head, current_head, reasons)
|
||||
live_known = live_remote_head is not None
|
||||
live_stale = live_known and live_remote_head != startup_head
|
||||
if live_stale:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"live remote master is {_short(live_remote_head)} but the MCP "
|
||||
f"server started at {_short(startup_head)}; the daemon is stale "
|
||||
f"relative to live master -- restart/reconnect before mutating")
|
||||
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
local_in_parity, local_stale, True, startup_head, current_head,
|
||||
live_remote_head, live_stale, reasons)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _result(in_parity, stale, determinable, startup_head, current_head, reasons):
|
||||
def _result(in_parity, stale, determinable, startup_head, current_head,
|
||||
live_remote_head, live_stale, reasons):
|
||||
live_known = live_remote_head is not None
|
||||
mutation_safe = (
|
||||
determinable and in_parity and live_known and not live_stale)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"in_parity": in_parity,
|
||||
"stale": stale,
|
||||
"restart_required": stale,
|
||||
"restart_required": stale or live_stale,
|
||||
"determinable": determinable,
|
||||
"startup_head": startup_head,
|
||||
"current_head": current_head,
|
||||
# #610 distinguished signals:
|
||||
"daemon_start_head": startup_head,
|
||||
"local_head": current_head,
|
||||
"live_remote_head": live_remote_head,
|
||||
"live_known": live_known,
|
||||
"live_stale": live_stale,
|
||||
"mutation_safe": mutation_safe,
|
||||
"reasons": list(reasons),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -130,11 +281,13 @@ def parity_block_reasons(assessment: dict) -> list[str]:
|
||||
"""Block reasons for a mutation gate (empty when the mutation may proceed).
|
||||
|
||||
A disabled gate or an in-parity / non-determinable assessment yields no
|
||||
reasons; only a definitively stale server blocks.
|
||||
reasons. A definitively stale server blocks, and (#610) a daemon that is
|
||||
stale relative to the *live* remote master blocks even when the local
|
||||
checkout HEAD still matches the daemon's startup commit.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if gate_disabled():
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if assessment.get("stale"):
|
||||
if assessment.get("stale") or assessment.get("live_stale"):
|
||||
return list(assessment.get("reasons") or
|
||||
["server code is stale relative to master (fail closed)"])
|
||||
return []
|
||||
@@ -147,6 +300,10 @@ def parity_report(assessment: dict) -> dict:
|
||||
"restart_required": True,
|
||||
"startup_head": assessment.get("startup_head"),
|
||||
"current_head": assessment.get("current_head"),
|
||||
# #610: name the live remote target so the report distinguishes a
|
||||
# local-code stale from a daemon-behind-live-master stale.
|
||||
"live_remote_head": assessment.get("live_remote_head"),
|
||||
"live_stale": bool(assessment.get("live_stale")),
|
||||
"reasons": list(assessment.get("reasons") or []),
|
||||
"recovery": [
|
||||
"The running MCP server is executing code older than the current "
|
||||
@@ -157,6 +314,45 @@ def parity_report(assessment: dict) -> dict:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def parity_resolver_disagreement(
|
||||
assessment: dict,
|
||||
resolver_restart_required: bool,
|
||||
) -> dict | None:
|
||||
"""Typed blocker when the resolver requires restart but parity looks green.
|
||||
|
||||
The capability resolver (``gitea_resolve_task_capability``) detects stale
|
||||
runtime authoritatively for mutation safety (#610). When it requires a
|
||||
restart, local-only parity must never override it: this returns a typed,
|
||||
fail-closed blocker that names the resolver as authoritative. Returns
|
||||
``None`` when the resolver does not require a restart.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not resolver_restart_required:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
parity_optimistic = bool(assessment.get("in_parity")) and not (
|
||||
assessment.get("stale") or assessment.get("live_stale"))
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"kind": "parity_resolver_disagreement",
|
||||
"restart_required": True,
|
||||
"resolver_authoritative": True,
|
||||
"parity_optimistic": parity_optimistic,
|
||||
"daemon_start_head": assessment.get("daemon_start_head"),
|
||||
"local_head": assessment.get("local_head"),
|
||||
"live_remote_head": assessment.get("live_remote_head"),
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"The capability resolver requires a restart/reconnect (stale "
|
||||
"runtime) but master-parity reported local code as in-parity. "
|
||||
"The resolver is authoritative for mutation safety; do not mutate "
|
||||
"on local parity alone. Restart/reconnect the Gitea MCP server "
|
||||
"and re-verify before mutating.",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"recovery": [
|
||||
"Trust the resolver: treat this session as stale.",
|
||||
"Restart or /mcp reconnect the Gitea MCP namespace so it reloads "
|
||||
"current master and live target state, then re-run preflight.",
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def format_parity(assessment: dict) -> str:
|
||||
"""One-line human summary for logs / runtime context."""
|
||||
if assessment.get("stale"):
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -167,6 +167,35 @@ def _reset_mutation_authority(monkeypatch):
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
|
||||
def _hermetic_live_remote_master_head():
|
||||
"""#610 / PR #788 F1/F2: keep live-remote parity reads offline in tests.
|
||||
|
||||
``read_remote_master_head`` would otherwise ``git ls-remote`` whenever
|
||||
``GITEA_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD`` is unset. Feature worktrees under
|
||||
``branches/`` always differ from live master, so legacy suites that assert
|
||||
runtime-context ``safe_next_action`` flip to live_stale. Module-level
|
||||
hermetic mode survives ``patch.dict(os.environ, …, clear=True)``.
|
||||
Tests that exercise the real probe path call
|
||||
``master_parity_gate.set_hermetic_test_mode(False)`` and/or set
|
||||
``GITEA_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE``.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
import master_parity_gate as _mpg
|
||||
|
||||
_mpg.set_hermetic_test_mode(True)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
_mpg = None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
yield
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
if _mpg is not None:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
_mpg.set_hermetic_test_mode(False)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
|
||||
def _deterministic_workspace_remotes():
|
||||
try:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,447 @@
|
||||
"""Exact-owner renewal of an expired author issue lease (#760).
|
||||
|
||||
Covers the renewal disposition that lets the exact recorded owner re-acquire
|
||||
its own lock after the wall-clock lease expires — including while the recording
|
||||
MCP daemon PID is still alive — plus every rejection condition that must keep
|
||||
failing closed, and the pre-existing dead-PID and live-foreign dispositions
|
||||
that must remain untouched.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
import inspect
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
import issue_lock_renewal # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_store # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
ISSUE = 5150
|
||||
BRANCH = f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-demo"
|
||||
WORKTREE = "/scratch/wt-5150"
|
||||
HEAD = "c" * 40
|
||||
OTHER_SHA = "d" * 40
|
||||
IDENTITY = "example-user"
|
||||
PROFILE = "example-author"
|
||||
REMOTE = "prgs"
|
||||
ORG = "ExampleOrg"
|
||||
REPO = "ExampleRepo"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def dead_pid() -> int:
|
||||
"""A PID that has certainly exited (spawned, then reaped)."""
|
||||
proc = subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, "-c", "pass"])
|
||||
proc.wait()
|
||||
return proc.pid
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def past_ts(hours: int = 1) -> str:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
(datetime.now(timezone.utc) - timedelta(hours=hours))
|
||||
.isoformat()
|
||||
.replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def future_ts(hours: int = 4) -> str:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
(datetime.now(timezone.utc) + timedelta(hours=hours))
|
||||
.isoformat()
|
||||
.replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def make_lock(*, expires_at: str | None = None, pid: int | None = None, **overrides):
|
||||
"""An expired lock owned by a still-alive daemon PID — the #760 condition."""
|
||||
lock = {
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": WORKTREE,
|
||||
"remote": REMOTE,
|
||||
"org": ORG,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
# os.getpid() is unambiguously alive: the whole point of #760 is that
|
||||
# daemon liveness is not evidence of an active author task.
|
||||
"session_pid": os.getpid() if pid is None else pid,
|
||||
"lock_generation": 3,
|
||||
"work_lease": {
|
||||
"operation_type": issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": WORKTREE,
|
||||
"claimant": {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
|
||||
"created_at": past_ts(5),
|
||||
"expires_at": expires_at or past_ts(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
lease_overrides = overrides.pop("work_lease", None)
|
||||
if lease_overrides:
|
||||
lock["work_lease"].update(lease_overrides)
|
||||
lock.update(overrides)
|
||||
return lock
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess(lock=None, **overrides):
|
||||
"""Run the assessor with all-passing evidence unless overridden."""
|
||||
kwargs = {
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": WORKTREE,
|
||||
"remote": REMOTE,
|
||||
"org": ORG,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"identity": IDENTITY,
|
||||
"profile": PROFILE,
|
||||
"current_branch": BRANCH,
|
||||
"porcelain_status": "",
|
||||
"worktree_exists": True,
|
||||
"head_sha": HEAD,
|
||||
"remote_head_sha": HEAD,
|
||||
"pr_head_sha": None,
|
||||
"pr_number": None,
|
||||
"competing_live_locks": [],
|
||||
"candidate_branches": [BRANCH],
|
||||
"current_pid": 4242,
|
||||
}
|
||||
kwargs.update(overrides)
|
||||
return issue_lock_renewal.assess_exact_owner_lease_renewal(
|
||||
make_lock() if lock is None else lock, **kwargs
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ExactOwnerRenewalGranted(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC1/AC3-AC7: the positive path."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_lease_alive_pid_exact_owner_is_renewable(self):
|
||||
result = assess()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], issue_lock_renewal.RENEWAL_SANCTIONED)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["renewal_sanctioned"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["is_candidate"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_renewal_holds_when_owning_pr_head_matches(self):
|
||||
result = assess(pr_number=999, pr_head_sha=HEAD)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["renewal_sanctioned"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_evidence_records_both_sides_of_the_transition(self):
|
||||
result = assess()
|
||||
evidence = result["evidence"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(evidence["prior_pid"], os.getpid())
|
||||
self.assertTrue(evidence["prior_pid_alive"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(evidence["replacement_pid"], 4242)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(evidence["prior_expires_at"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ExactOwnerRenewalRefused(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC3-AC8: every near-match must fail closed, one reason at a time."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _refused(self, **overrides):
|
||||
result = assess(**overrides)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], issue_lock_renewal.REFUSED)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["renewal_sanctioned"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["reasons"])
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
def test_different_branch_refused(self):
|
||||
result = self._refused(branch_name=f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-other")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("branch" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_different_worktree_refused(self):
|
||||
result = self._refused(worktree_path="/scratch/somewhere-else")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("worktree" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_different_claimant_refused(self):
|
||||
result = self._refused(identity="someone-else")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("claimant" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_different_profile_refused(self):
|
||||
result = self._refused(profile="other-author")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("profile" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_different_remote_org_or_repo_refused(self):
|
||||
self._refused(remote="dadeschools")
|
||||
self._refused(org="OtherOrg")
|
||||
self._refused(repo="OtherRepo")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dirty_worktree_refused(self):
|
||||
result = self._refused(porcelain_status=" M gitea_mcp_server.py\n")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("uncommitted" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_worktree_refused(self):
|
||||
result = self._refused(worktree_exists=False)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("does not exist" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_worktree_on_wrong_branch_refused(self):
|
||||
self._refused(current_branch="master")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_local_and_remote_head_mismatch_refused(self):
|
||||
result = self._refused(remote_head_sha=OTHER_SHA)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("does not equal remote head" in r for r in result["reasons"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unpublished_branch_refused(self):
|
||||
result = self._refused(remote_head_sha=None)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("remote branch head" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr_head_mismatch_refused(self):
|
||||
result = self._refused(pr_number=999, pr_head_sha=OTHER_SHA)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("does not equal local" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unobservable_pr_head_refused(self):
|
||||
self._refused(pr_number=999, pr_head_sha=None)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_competing_live_lock_on_same_issue_refused(self):
|
||||
result = self._refused(
|
||||
competing_live_locks=[
|
||||
{"issue_number": ISSUE, "branch_name": BRANCH, "pid": 777}
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("live lock" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_competing_live_lock_holding_the_branch_refused(self):
|
||||
self._refused(
|
||||
competing_live_locks=[
|
||||
{"issue_number": 111, "branch_name": BRANCH, "worktree_path": ""}
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_competing_branch_claim_refused(self):
|
||||
result = self._refused(candidate_branches=[BRANCH, f"feat/issue-{ISSUE}-rival"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("issue marker" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_malformed_durable_lock_refused(self):
|
||||
lock = make_lock()
|
||||
lock["worktree_path"] = ""
|
||||
result = assess(lock)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], issue_lock_renewal.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_lock_without_recorded_claimant_refused(self):
|
||||
lock = make_lock()
|
||||
lock["work_lease"]["claimant"] = {}
|
||||
result = assess(lock)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], issue_lock_renewal.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class NotARenewalCandidate(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC12 and scope: situations renewal must decline to judge at all."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_foreign_lease_is_never_a_candidate(self):
|
||||
lock = make_lock(expires_at=future_ts())
|
||||
result = assess(lock, identity="someone-else")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], issue_lock_renewal.NO_CANDIDATE)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["renewal_sanctioned"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unexpired_lease_is_never_a_candidate(self):
|
||||
lock = make_lock(expires_at=future_ts())
|
||||
result = assess(lock)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], issue_lock_renewal.NO_CANDIDATE)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dead_pid_under_unexpired_lease_stays_with_753(self):
|
||||
"""The opposite trigger; #760 must not re-own it."""
|
||||
lock = make_lock(expires_at=future_ts(), pid=dead_pid())
|
||||
result = assess(lock)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], issue_lock_renewal.NO_CANDIDATE)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_absent_lock_is_not_a_candidate(self):
|
||||
result = assess({})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], issue_lock_renewal.NO_CANDIDATE)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_different_issue_is_not_a_candidate(self):
|
||||
lock = make_lock()
|
||||
lock["issue_number"] = ISSUE + 1
|
||||
result = assess(lock)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], issue_lock_renewal.NO_CANDIDATE)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_different_operation_type_is_not_a_candidate(self):
|
||||
lock = make_lock()
|
||||
lock["work_lease"]["operation_type"] = "review_pr_work"
|
||||
result = assess(lock)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], issue_lock_renewal.NO_CANDIDATE)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class DaemonPidIsNotTaskLiveness(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC16: a live recorded PID is never, by itself, authorization."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_alive_pid_alone_does_not_authorize_renewal(self):
|
||||
# Every ownership fact except the live PID is wrong.
|
||||
result = assess(identity="someone-else", branch_name="fix/issue-1-nope")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], issue_lock_renewal.REFUSED)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["evidence"]["prior_pid_alive"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_renewal_does_not_require_a_dead_pid(self):
|
||||
result = assess()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["evidence"]["prior_pid_alive"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["renewal_sanctioned"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dead_pid_does_not_block_an_otherwise_exact_owner(self):
|
||||
lock = make_lock(pid=dead_pid())
|
||||
result = assess(lock)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["renewal_sanctioned"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ConflictGateOrdering(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC2: the same-owner allowance is reachable on an expired lease.
|
||||
|
||||
These cases need a worktree that genuinely exists on disk. The #601 reclaim
|
||||
affordance already permits takeover when the recorded worktree is missing,
|
||||
so a fictional path would satisfy the gate for the wrong reason and never
|
||||
exercise the ordering defect this issue is about.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
@classmethod
|
||||
def setUpClass(cls):
|
||||
cls._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
cls.worktree = cls._tmp.name
|
||||
|
||||
@classmethod
|
||||
def tearDownClass(cls):
|
||||
cls._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def present_lock(self, **overrides):
|
||||
return make_lock(worktree_path=self.worktree, **overrides)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_same_owner_is_allowed_when_renewal_is_sanctioned(self):
|
||||
block = issue_lock_store.assess_same_issue_lease_conflict(
|
||||
self.present_lock(),
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.worktree,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(block)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_same_owner_still_blocks_without_the_waiver(self):
|
||||
"""Regression for the ordering defect: no waiver, no change in behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
Live PID and a present worktree, so the #601 reclaim affordance refuses;
|
||||
before #760 this was the permanent dead end for an exact owner.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
lock = self.present_lock()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
issue_lock_store.assess_expired_lock_reclaim(lock)["reclaim_allowed"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
block = issue_lock_store.assess_same_issue_lease_conflict(
|
||||
lock,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.worktree,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(block)
|
||||
self.assertIn("Recovery review is required", block)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_waiver_does_not_unlock_a_different_owner(self):
|
||||
"""AC11: the waiver is scoped by same_owner, not merely by its own flag."""
|
||||
block = issue_lock_store.assess_same_issue_lease_conflict(
|
||||
self.present_lock(),
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-someone-else",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.worktree,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(block)
|
||||
self.assertIn("Recovery review is required", block)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_lease_disposition_is_unchanged(self):
|
||||
"""AC12: a live foreign lease still blocks, waiver or not."""
|
||||
block = issue_lock_store.assess_same_issue_lease_conflict(
|
||||
self.present_lock(expires_at=future_ts()),
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-someone-else",
|
||||
worktree_path="/scratch/other",
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(block)
|
||||
self.assertIn("already has an active", block)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dead_pid_reclaim_path_is_unchanged(self):
|
||||
"""AC11: expired + dead PID still reclaims through the #601 affordance."""
|
||||
lock = self.present_lock(pid=dead_pid())
|
||||
reclaim = issue_lock_store.assess_expired_lock_reclaim(lock)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(reclaim["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
block = issue_lock_store.assess_same_issue_lease_conflict(
|
||||
lock,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.worktree,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(block)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class RenewalRecordAndDownstream(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC9/AC10: durable audit trail, and a renewed lock that actually works."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_record_captures_prior_and_replacement_state(self):
|
||||
assessment = assess()
|
||||
record = issue_lock_renewal.build_renewal_record(
|
||||
assessment,
|
||||
renewed_at="2026-01-01T00:00:00Z",
|
||||
new_expires_at="2026-01-01T04:00:00Z",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(record["renewed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["prior_pid"], os.getpid())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["new_expires_at"], "2026-01-01T04:00:00Z")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["renewed_at"], "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["identity"], IDENTITY)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["profile"], PROFILE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(record["prior_expires_at"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(record["proof"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_renewed_lock_satisfies_verify_lock_for_mutation(self):
|
||||
renewed = make_lock(expires_at=future_ts())
|
||||
renewed["session_pid"] = os.getpid()
|
||||
renewed["lease_renewal"] = {"renewed": True}
|
||||
verdict = issue_lock_store.verify_lock_for_mutation(
|
||||
renewed,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(verdict["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(verdict["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_refusal_message_names_the_missing_evidence(self):
|
||||
assessment = assess(porcelain_status=" M gitea_mcp_server.py\n")
|
||||
message = issue_lock_renewal.format_renewal_refusal(assessment)
|
||||
self.assertIn("refused", message)
|
||||
self.assertIn("uncommitted", message)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class NoCallerControlledRenewalFlag(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC14: renewal eligibility is never declarable by a caller."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_lock_issue_tool_exposes_no_renewal_parameter(self):
|
||||
import gitea_mcp_server
|
||||
|
||||
target = gitea_mcp_server.gitea_lock_issue
|
||||
target = getattr(target, "fn", getattr(target, "__wrapped__", target))
|
||||
params = set(inspect.signature(target).parameters)
|
||||
for forbidden in ("renewal_sanctioned", "renew", "allow_renewal", "is_owner"):
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(forbidden, params)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_store_defaults_to_no_waiver(self):
|
||||
params = inspect.signature(
|
||||
issue_lock_store.assess_same_issue_lease_conflict
|
||||
).parameters
|
||||
self.assertIs(params["renewal_sanctioned"].default, False)
|
||||
bind_params = inspect.signature(issue_lock_store.bind_session_lock).parameters
|
||||
self.assertIs(bind_params["renewal_sanctioned"].default, False)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class NoIssueNumberSpecialCasing(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC17: no repository issue or PR number is special-cased."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_module_contains_no_hardcoded_issue_special_cases(self):
|
||||
source = inspect.getsource(issue_lock_renewal)
|
||||
code = "\n".join(
|
||||
line for line in source.splitlines() if not line.strip().startswith("#")
|
||||
)
|
||||
for literal in ("757", "759", "760"):
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(f"== {literal}", code)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(f"issue_number == {literal}", code)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,342 @@
|
||||
"""MCP-level exact-owner lease renewal through ``gitea_lock_issue`` (#760).
|
||||
|
||||
The unit suite in ``test_issue_760_exact_owner_lease_renewal`` proves the
|
||||
renewal *disposition*. It cannot prove the disposition survives the rest of the
|
||||
tool, and it did not: the waiver was computed and then discarded before
|
||||
``assess_issue_lock_worktree``, so every real renewal still failed on
|
||||
base-equivalence. A branch being renewed always carries committed work, so it is
|
||||
never base-equivalent by construction — exactly the argument #753 already makes
|
||||
for recovery.
|
||||
|
||||
These tests drive the public tool end to end against a real git repository and a
|
||||
real durable lock file, composing every gate in the production order.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))
|
||||
|
||||
from mutation_profile_fixture import shared_mutation_env # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
import issue_lock_provenance # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_store # noqa: E402
|
||||
import mcp_server # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
ISSUE = 9760
|
||||
BRANCH = f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-renewal-mcp"
|
||||
IDENTITY = "example-user"
|
||||
PROFILE = "test-author-prgs"
|
||||
ORG = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting"
|
||||
REPO = "Gitea-Tools"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _past_ts(hours: int = 1) -> str:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
(datetime.now(timezone.utc) - timedelta(hours=hours))
|
||||
.isoformat()
|
||||
.replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _RenewalMcpBase(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Real git repo + durable expired lock owned by a live PID.
|
||||
|
||||
The recorded PID is ``os.getpid()`` — unambiguously alive. That is the whole
|
||||
point of #760: the PID belongs to the long-lived MCP daemon, so its liveness
|
||||
says nothing about whether the authoring task still holds the work.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.lock_dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self.lock_dir.cleanup)
|
||||
self.repo = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="issue760-mcp-")
|
||||
self.addCleanup(lambda: subprocess.run(["rm", "-rf", self.repo], check=False))
|
||||
self._init_worktree()
|
||||
self.remotes = patch.dict(
|
||||
mcp_server.REMOTES,
|
||||
{"prgs": {"host": "gitea.prgs.cc", "org": ORG, "repo": REPO}},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.remotes.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(patch.stopall)
|
||||
mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
|
||||
|
||||
def _git(self, *args):
|
||||
return subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", self.repo, *args],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
check=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _init_worktree(self):
|
||||
self._git("init", "-q", "-b", "master")
|
||||
self._git("config", "user.email", "[email protected]")
|
||||
self._git("config", "user.name", "Test")
|
||||
with open(os.path.join(self.repo, "seed.txt"), "w") as fh:
|
||||
fh.write("seed\n")
|
||||
self._git("add", "seed.txt")
|
||||
self._git("commit", "-q", "-m", "seed")
|
||||
self.base_sha = self._git("rev-parse", "HEAD").stdout.strip()
|
||||
# The branch carries committed work, so it is NOT base-equivalent.
|
||||
self._git("checkout", "-q", "-b", BRANCH)
|
||||
with open(os.path.join(self.repo, "work.txt"), "w") as fh:
|
||||
fh.write("author work\n")
|
||||
self._git("add", "work.txt")
|
||||
self._git("commit", "-q", "-m", "author work")
|
||||
self.head_sha = self._git("rev-parse", "HEAD").stdout.strip()
|
||||
self.worktree = os.path.realpath(self.repo)
|
||||
|
||||
def write_expired_lock(self, **overrides):
|
||||
path = issue_lock_store.lock_file_path(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org=ORG,
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
lock_dir=self.lock_dir.name,
|
||||
)
|
||||
claimant = {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE}
|
||||
pid = overrides.pop("session_pid", os.getpid())
|
||||
overrides.pop("pid", None)
|
||||
lease_overrides = overrides.pop("work_lease", {})
|
||||
data = {
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"remote": "prgs",
|
||||
"org": ORG,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"worktree_path": self.worktree,
|
||||
"session_pid": pid,
|
||||
"pid": pid,
|
||||
"lock_generation": 3,
|
||||
"work_lease": {
|
||||
"operation_type": issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"pr_number": None,
|
||||
"branch": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": self.worktree,
|
||||
"claimant": claimant,
|
||||
"created_at": _past_ts(5),
|
||||
"last_heartbeat_at": _past_ts(5),
|
||||
"expires_at": _past_ts(), # already expired
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lock_provenance": issue_lock_provenance.build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
|
||||
tool="gitea_lock_issue",
|
||||
claimant=claimant,
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
data["work_lease"].update(lease_overrides)
|
||||
data.update(overrides)
|
||||
data["session_pid"] = pid
|
||||
data["pid"] = pid
|
||||
data["lock_file_path"] = path
|
||||
issue_lock_store.save_lock_file(path, data)
|
||||
return path
|
||||
|
||||
def _tool_env(self):
|
||||
env = shared_mutation_env(
|
||||
PROFILE,
|
||||
include_example_repo=True,
|
||||
GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR=self.lock_dir.name,
|
||||
)
|
||||
env["GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"] = self.lock_dir.name
|
||||
return env
|
||||
|
||||
def _git_state(self, *, porcelain="", branch=BRANCH, head=None):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"current_branch": branch,
|
||||
"porcelain_status": porcelain,
|
||||
# The decisive fact: a branch carrying work is never base-equivalent.
|
||||
"base_equivalent": False,
|
||||
"head_sha": head or self.head_sha,
|
||||
"inspected_git_root": self.worktree,
|
||||
"base_branch": "master",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def run_lock_issue(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
branch_entries=None,
|
||||
open_prs=None,
|
||||
git_state=None,
|
||||
identity=IDENTITY,
|
||||
profile=PROFILE,
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""Drive the public tool for the published exact-owner renewal shape."""
|
||||
if branch_entries is None:
|
||||
branch_entries = [{"name": BRANCH, "commit": {"id": self.head_sha}}]
|
||||
if open_prs is None:
|
||||
open_prs = [{"number": 4242, "head": {"ref": BRANCH, "sha": self.head_sha}}]
|
||||
if git_state is None:
|
||||
git_state = self._git_state()
|
||||
env = self._tool_env()
|
||||
with patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=list(branch_entries)
|
||||
), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._list_open_pulls", return_value=list(open_prs)
|
||||
), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token x"
|
||||
), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._work_lease_claimant",
|
||||
return_value={"username": identity, "profile": profile},
|
||||
), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
|
||||
return_value=git_state,
|
||||
), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.issue_duplicate_context_fetcher",
|
||||
side_effect=lambda h, o, r, auth, issue_number: (
|
||||
list(open_prs),
|
||||
[b.get("name") for b in branch_entries if isinstance(b, dict)],
|
||||
{"status": "not_claimed"},
|
||||
),
|
||||
), patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
os.environ["GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"] = self.lock_dir.name
|
||||
return mcp_server.gitea_lock_issue(
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.worktree,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRenewalReachableThroughTool(_RenewalMcpBase):
|
||||
"""F1: the sanctioned renewal must survive every downstream gate."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_lease_live_pid_exact_owner_renews_through_the_tool(self):
|
||||
prior = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(self.write_expired_lock())
|
||||
self.assertTrue(issue_lock_store.is_lease_expired(prior))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(issue_lock_store.is_process_alive(prior["session_pid"]))
|
||||
|
||||
result = self.run_lock_issue()
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["success"], result)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["issue_number"], ISSUE)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["branch_name"], BRANCH)
|
||||
# The renewal is reported natively, so no lock-file inspection is needed.
|
||||
self.assertIn("lease_renewal", result)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["lease_renewal"]["renewed"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("Renewed the expired", result["message"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_renewed_lock_records_prior_and_replacement_evidence(self):
|
||||
prior = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(self.write_expired_lock())
|
||||
prior_expiry = prior["work_lease"]["expires_at"]
|
||||
prior_generation = issue_lock_store.lock_generation(prior)
|
||||
|
||||
result = self.run_lock_issue()
|
||||
written = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(result["lock_file_path"])
|
||||
|
||||
renewal = written["lease_renewal"]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(renewal["renewed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(renewal["prior_pid"], prior["session_pid"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(renewal["prior_pid_alive"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(renewal["prior_expires_at"], prior_expiry)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(renewal["identity"], IDENTITY)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(renewal["profile"], PROFILE)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(renewal["head_sha"], self.head_sha)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(renewal["proof"])
|
||||
# New expiry is a fresh absolute stamp, later than the one it replaced.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(renewal["new_expires_at"], written["work_lease"]["expires_at"])
|
||||
self.assertGreater(renewal["new_expires_at"], prior_expiry)
|
||||
# Compare-and-swap advanced the generation exactly once.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
issue_lock_store.lock_generation(written), prior_generation + 1
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_renewed_lock_is_live_and_satisfies_mutation_ownership(self):
|
||||
self.write_expired_lock()
|
||||
result = self.run_lock_issue()
|
||||
written = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(result["lock_file_path"])
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(written)["live"])
|
||||
verdict = issue_lock_store.verify_lock_for_mutation(
|
||||
written,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.worktree,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(verdict["proven"], verdict)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(verdict["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_recovery_record_is_not_written_for_a_live_owner_renewal(self):
|
||||
"""#753 recovery must not be claimed when the recorded PID is alive."""
|
||||
self.write_expired_lock()
|
||||
result = self.run_lock_issue()
|
||||
written = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(result["lock_file_path"])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("dead_session_recovery", written)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRenewalWaiverIsNarrow(_RenewalMcpBase):
|
||||
"""The waiver relaxes base-equivalence and nothing else."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dirty_worktree_still_blocks_a_would_be_renewal(self):
|
||||
"""Cleanliness is never waived; the renewal assessor refuses first.
|
||||
|
||||
A dirty worktree makes the renewal refuse, so no waiver is issued and
|
||||
the lease-conflict gate fails closed ahead of the worktree gate. The
|
||||
refusal names the uncommitted files, so the owner still learns why.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
self.write_expired_lock()
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(Exception) as ctx:
|
||||
self.run_lock_issue(
|
||||
git_state=self._git_state(porcelain=" M gitea_mcp_server.py\n")
|
||||
)
|
||||
message = str(ctx.exception)
|
||||
self.assertIn("Recovery review is required before takeover", message)
|
||||
self.assertIn("worktree has uncommitted tracked changes", message)
|
||||
self.assertIn("gitea_mcp_server.py", message)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_foreign_claimant_cannot_use_the_waiver(self):
|
||||
"""A near-match owner gets no renewal and no base-equivalence waiver."""
|
||||
self.write_expired_lock()
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(Exception) as ctx:
|
||||
self.run_lock_issue(identity="someone-else")
|
||||
message = str(ctx.exception)
|
||||
self.assertIn("Recovery review is required before takeover", message)
|
||||
# The refusal names the missing ownership evidence (#760 diagnostics).
|
||||
self.assertIn("does not match active identity", message)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_foreign_profile_cannot_use_the_waiver(self):
|
||||
self.write_expired_lock()
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(Exception) as ctx:
|
||||
self.run_lock_issue(profile="other-author")
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"Recovery review is required before takeover", str(ctx.exception)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unpublished_branch_cannot_use_the_waiver(self):
|
||||
"""No remote head to agree with, so exact-owner renewal is refused."""
|
||||
self.write_expired_lock()
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(Exception) as ctx:
|
||||
self.run_lock_issue(branch_entries=[], open_prs=[])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"Recovery review is required before takeover", str(ctx.exception)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr_head_mismatch_cannot_use_the_waiver(self):
|
||||
self.write_expired_lock()
|
||||
other = "9" * 40
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(Exception) as ctx:
|
||||
self.run_lock_issue(
|
||||
open_prs=[{"number": 4242, "head": {"ref": BRANCH, "sha": other}}]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"Recovery review is required before takeover", str(ctx.exception)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_base_equivalent_branch_still_blocks_without_any_waiver(self):
|
||||
"""No durable lock at all: the ordinary base-equivalence rule applies."""
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(Exception) as ctx:
|
||||
self.run_lock_issue()
|
||||
self.assertIn("must be base-equivalent", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -871,9 +871,13 @@ class TestAc6McpUnpublishedClaimRecovery(_UnpublishedMcpBase):
|
||||
save_calls: list[dict] = []
|
||||
real_save = mcp_server._save_issue_lock
|
||||
|
||||
def tracking_save(data, *, expected_generation=None):
|
||||
def tracking_save(data, *, expected_generation=None, renewal_sanctioned=False):
|
||||
save_calls.append({"expected_generation": expected_generation, "data": dict(data)})
|
||||
return real_save(data, expected_generation=expected_generation)
|
||||
return real_save(
|
||||
data,
|
||||
expected_generation=expected_generation,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=renewal_sanctioned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server._save_issue_lock", side_effect=tracking_save):
|
||||
result = self.run_lock_issue()
|
||||
@@ -926,18 +930,33 @@ class TestAc6McpUnpublishedClaimRecovery(_UnpublishedMcpBase):
|
||||
real_bind = issue_lock_store.bind_session_lock
|
||||
bind_calls: list[int | None] = []
|
||||
|
||||
def racing_bind(data, lock_dir=None, expected_generation=None):
|
||||
# #760 added the renewal waiver keyword; the double forwards it verbatim
|
||||
# so this race still exercises the real compare-and-swap.
|
||||
def racing_bind(
|
||||
data, lock_dir=None, expected_generation=None, renewal_sanctioned=False
|
||||
):
|
||||
bind_calls.append(expected_generation)
|
||||
if expected_generation is None:
|
||||
return real_bind(data, lock_dir=lock_dir, expected_generation=None)
|
||||
return real_bind(
|
||||
data,
|
||||
lock_dir=lock_dir,
|
||||
expected_generation=None,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=renewal_sanctioned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# First concurrent writer wins.
|
||||
if len([c for c in bind_calls if c is not None]) == 1:
|
||||
return real_bind(
|
||||
data, lock_dir=lock_dir, expected_generation=expected_generation
|
||||
data,
|
||||
lock_dir=lock_dir,
|
||||
expected_generation=expected_generation,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=renewal_sanctioned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Second concurrent writer still holds the pre-race generation.
|
||||
return real_bind(
|
||||
data, lock_dir=lock_dir, expected_generation=expected_generation
|
||||
data,
|
||||
lock_dir=lock_dir,
|
||||
expected_generation=expected_generation,
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=renewal_sanctioned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# First recovery succeeds and advances generation.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -78,6 +78,95 @@ class TestBlockReasonsAndReport(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(report["recovery"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestLiveRemoteParity(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""#610: parity must account for the live remote master, not just local.
|
||||
|
||||
The daemon can be stale relative to the live remote target while the local
|
||||
checkout HEAD still matches the daemon's startup commit, so local parity
|
||||
reports green even though a mutation would run against outdated code.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
SHA_C = "c" * 40
|
||||
|
||||
def test_distinguishes_three_shas(self):
|
||||
res = mp.assess_master_parity(
|
||||
{"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_B)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["daemon_start_head"], SHA_A)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["local_head"], SHA_A)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["live_remote_head"], SHA_B)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mutation_safe_only_when_all_three_match(self):
|
||||
res = mp.assess_master_parity(
|
||||
{"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_A)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["mutation_safe"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["live_known"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["live_stale"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_stale_when_remote_advanced_past_daemon(self):
|
||||
# Local checkout still matches the daemon start (local parity green),
|
||||
# but the live remote master has advanced -> daemon is live-stale.
|
||||
res = mp.assess_master_parity(
|
||||
{"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_B)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["in_parity"]) # local parity still green
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["live_stale"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["mutation_safe"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("live" in r.lower() for r in res["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_unknown_is_not_mutation_safe_but_not_stale(self):
|
||||
# Non-goal: unfetchable live remote must not be treated as stale for
|
||||
# read-only, but a mutation-safe claim fails closed.
|
||||
res = mp.assess_master_parity(
|
||||
{"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=None)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["live_known"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["mutation_safe"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["live_stale"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["in_parity"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_default_live_remote_preserves_legacy_shape(self):
|
||||
# Callers that do not supply a live head keep the pre-#610 behavior:
|
||||
# in-parity, not live-stale, no live-derived block.
|
||||
res = mp.assess_master_parity({"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["live_stale"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(mp.parity_block_reasons(res), [])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestLiveStaleBlockAndReport(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""#610: live-staleness must block mutations and surface a typed blocker."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_stale_produces_block_reasons(self):
|
||||
res = mp.assess_master_parity(
|
||||
{"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_B)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(mp.parity_block_reasons(res))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_disable_env_suppresses_live_stale_block(self):
|
||||
res = mp.assess_master_parity(
|
||||
{"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_B)
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_DISABLE: "1"}):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(mp.parity_block_reasons(res), [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_resolver_disagreement_returns_typed_blocker(self):
|
||||
# Parity says local-green, resolver says restart required -> disagreement
|
||||
# is a typed, fail-closed blocker naming the resolver as authoritative.
|
||||
res = mp.assess_master_parity({"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A)
|
||||
blocker = mp.parity_resolver_disagreement(res, resolver_restart_required=True)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(blocker)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(blocker["kind"], "parity_resolver_disagreement")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(blocker["restart_required"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(blocker["resolver_authoritative"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_disagreement_when_resolver_agrees(self):
|
||||
res = mp.assess_master_parity({"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(
|
||||
mp.parity_resolver_disagreement(res, resolver_restart_required=False))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_stale_report_names_live_remote(self):
|
||||
res = mp.assess_master_parity(
|
||||
{"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_B)
|
||||
report = mp.parity_report(res)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(report["live_remote_head"], SHA_B)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(report["restart_required"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestReadGitHead(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_test_override_takes_precedence(self):
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD: SHA_B}):
|
||||
@@ -95,6 +184,149 @@ class TestReadGitHead(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(mp.read_git_head(""))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestReadRemoteMasterHead(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""#610: live remote master head reader (env-overridable, fails to None)."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_test_override_takes_precedence(self):
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_B}):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(mp.read_remote_master_head("/nonexistent"), SHA_B)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_blank_override_is_none(self):
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: " "}):
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(mp.read_remote_master_head("/nonexistent"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unfetchable_remote_is_none(self):
|
||||
# No override; a bogus root/remote must fail closed to None, never raise.
|
||||
env = {k: v for k, v in os.environ.items()
|
||||
if k != mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(
|
||||
mp.read_remote_master_head("/nonexistent", remote="nope"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRemoteHeadCache(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""#610: live remote reads are cached with a TTL to stay off the network.
|
||||
|
||||
The parity gate runs on every mutation and every runtime-context read, so an
|
||||
unbounded ``git ls-remote`` per call would be a latency/flakiness regression.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
# These cases intentionally exercise the subprocess/cache path, so they
|
||||
# opt out of suite-wide hermetic mode (PR #788 F1).
|
||||
self._saved_hermetic = mp.hermetic_test_mode()
|
||||
mp.set_hermetic_test_mode(False)
|
||||
mp._clear_remote_head_cache()
|
||||
env = {
|
||||
k: v for k, v in os.environ.items()
|
||||
if k not in (mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD,
|
||||
mp.ENV_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE,
|
||||
"PYTEST_CURRENT_TEST")
|
||||
}
|
||||
# Allow the probe path under hermetic defenses while still mocking
|
||||
# subprocess so no real network call runs.
|
||||
env[mp.ENV_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE] = "1"
|
||||
self._env = patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True)
|
||||
self._env.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._env.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(mp._clear_remote_head_cache)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(
|
||||
lambda: mp.set_hermetic_test_mode(self._saved_hermetic)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _fake_run(self, sha):
|
||||
class _R:
|
||||
returncode = 0
|
||||
stdout = f"{sha}\trefs/heads/master\n"
|
||||
calls = {"n": 0}
|
||||
|
||||
def run(*args, **kwargs):
|
||||
calls["n"] += 1
|
||||
return _R()
|
||||
return run, calls
|
||||
|
||||
def test_second_call_within_ttl_uses_cache(self):
|
||||
run, calls = self._fake_run(SHA_B)
|
||||
with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", run):
|
||||
a = mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs", ttl=100)
|
||||
b = mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs", ttl=100)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(a, SHA_B)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(b, SHA_B)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(calls["n"], 1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_zero_ttl_bypasses_cache(self):
|
||||
run, calls = self._fake_run(SHA_B)
|
||||
with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", run):
|
||||
mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs", ttl=0)
|
||||
mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs", ttl=0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(calls["n"], 2)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_env_override_never_touches_subprocess(self):
|
||||
run, calls = self._fake_run(SHA_B)
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_A}):
|
||||
with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", run):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs"), SHA_A)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(calls["n"], 0)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestHermeticLiveRemoteReads(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""#610 / PR #788 F1/F2: suite hermetic mode never hits the network."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._saved = mp.hermetic_test_mode()
|
||||
mp.set_hermetic_test_mode(True)
|
||||
mp._clear_remote_head_cache()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(lambda: mp.set_hermetic_test_mode(self._saved))
|
||||
self.addCleanup(mp._clear_remote_head_cache)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_hermetic_mode_returns_none_without_subprocess(self):
|
||||
run_calls = {"n": 0}
|
||||
|
||||
def boom(*args, **kwargs):
|
||||
run_calls["n"] += 1
|
||||
raise AssertionError("ls-remote must not run under hermetic mode")
|
||||
|
||||
env = {
|
||||
k: v for k, v in os.environ.items()
|
||||
if k not in (mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD,
|
||||
mp.ENV_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE)
|
||||
}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", boom):
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(
|
||||
mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs")
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(run_calls["n"], 0)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_hermetic_mode_survives_clear_true_env(self):
|
||||
"""Module flag, not env pin: clear=True cannot re-enable the probe."""
|
||||
run_calls = {"n": 0}
|
||||
|
||||
def boom(*args, **kwargs):
|
||||
run_calls["n"] += 1
|
||||
raise AssertionError("ls-remote must not run after clear=True")
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=True):
|
||||
with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", boom):
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(run_calls["n"], 0)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_explicit_override_still_wins_under_hermetic(self):
|
||||
run_calls = {"n": 0}
|
||||
|
||||
def boom(*args, **kwargs):
|
||||
run_calls["n"] += 1
|
||||
raise AssertionError("override must bypass subprocess")
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_B}):
|
||||
with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", boom):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo"), SHA_B
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(run_calls["n"], 0)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestServerWiring(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Integration with the gate choke point in the server namespace."""
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -105,6 +337,13 @@ class TestServerWiring(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self._saved = self.srv._STARTUP_PARITY
|
||||
self.srv._STARTUP_PARITY = {"root": self.srv.PROJECT_ROOT,
|
||||
"startup_head": SHA_A}
|
||||
# Keep the live-remote read hermetic (no real ls-remote network call):
|
||||
# default the live master to the daemon start so parity is fully green
|
||||
# unless a test overrides the live head explicitly (#610).
|
||||
self._live_patch = patch.dict(
|
||||
os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_A})
|
||||
self._live_patch.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._live_patch.stop)
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
self.srv._STARTUP_PARITY = self._saved
|
||||
@@ -147,6 +386,36 @@ class TestServerWiring(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(out["in_parity"])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("report", out)
|
||||
|
||||
# --- #610: live-remote wiring -------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_stale_blocks_mutation_though_local_green(self):
|
||||
# Local checkout matches the daemon start (local parity green) but the
|
||||
# live remote master has advanced -> mutations must fail closed.
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD: SHA_A,
|
||||
mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_B}):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.srv._master_parity_block("gitea.read"), [])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
self.srv._master_parity_block("gitea.pr.create"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_assess_tool_exposes_three_distinct_shas(self):
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD: SHA_A,
|
||||
mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_B}):
|
||||
out = self.srv.gitea_assess_master_parity(remote="prgs")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["daemon_start_head"], SHA_A)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["local_head"], SHA_A)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["live_remote_head"], SHA_B)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(out["live_stale"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["mutation_safe"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("report", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_assess_tool_mutation_safe_when_all_three_match(self):
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD: SHA_A,
|
||||
mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_A}):
|
||||
out = self.srv.gitea_assess_master_parity(remote="prgs")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(out["mutation_safe"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["live_stale"])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("report", out)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
|
||||
"""Documentation acceptance for the web console architecture ADR (#632 / epic #631).
|
||||
|
||||
Enforces the acceptance criteria of issue #632:
|
||||
|
||||
* AC1 — the ADR exists and covers layers, authority, phases, API versioning,
|
||||
and a page map.
|
||||
* AC2 — every #631 child (#632–#651) maps to at least one architectural
|
||||
component.
|
||||
* AC3 — the closed MVP (#425–#436) is stated as foundation, not recreated.
|
||||
* AC4 — forbidden paths are explicit: raw provider incidents as work,
|
||||
browser-held tokens, process-kill recovery.
|
||||
* AC5 — a controller can approve the document without reading chat history.
|
||||
|
||||
Plus the linkage requirement: ``docs/webui-local-dev.md`` cross-links the ADR.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
|
||||
ADR = (
|
||||
REPO_ROOT
|
||||
/ "docs"
|
||||
/ "architecture"
|
||||
/ "webui-control-plane-console-architecture-adr.md"
|
||||
)
|
||||
ADR_BASENAME = "webui-control-plane-console-architecture-adr.md"
|
||||
LOCAL_DEV = REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "webui-local-dev.md"
|
||||
|
||||
# Epic #631 children, phases 1-4 (twenty capability areas).
|
||||
EPIC_CHILDREN = tuple(f"#{number}" for number in range(632, 652))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _read(path: Path) -> str:
|
||||
assert path.is_file(), f"missing {path.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)}"
|
||||
return path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac1_adr_exists_with_required_sections():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert text.lstrip().startswith("#"), "ADR lacks a title"
|
||||
assert "#631" in text and "#632" in text
|
||||
for heading in (
|
||||
"## 2. Decision summary",
|
||||
"## 4. Authority boundaries",
|
||||
"## 5. Request flow and the redaction boundary",
|
||||
"## 6. API naming and versioning",
|
||||
"## 7. Page map",
|
||||
"## 8. Component ownership",
|
||||
"## 9. Phase gates",
|
||||
"## 11. Forbidden paths",
|
||||
):
|
||||
assert heading in text, f"ADR must contain section {heading!r}"
|
||||
assert "browser ui" in lower and "domain loader" in lower
|
||||
assert "control-plane db" in lower and "capability gate" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac1_api_versioning_is_decided_including_legacy_routes():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
assert "/api/v1/" in text, "ADR must decide the versioned API prefix"
|
||||
assert "/api/v2/" in text, "ADR must state how breaking changes are handled"
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "compatibility alias" in lower, (
|
||||
"ADR must say what happens to the existing unversioned MVP exports"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac1_page_map_covers_mvp_routes():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
for route in ("`/`", "`/health`", "`/projects`", "`/prompts`", "`/runtime`",
|
||||
"`/audit`", "`/actions`"):
|
||||
assert route in text, f"page map must account for MVP route {route}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac2_every_epic_child_maps_to_a_component():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
ownership = text.split("## 8. Component ownership", 1)[-1].split("## 9.", 1)[0]
|
||||
missing = [child for child in EPIC_CHILDREN if child not in ownership]
|
||||
assert not missing, (
|
||||
f"epic #631 children without an architectural component: {missing}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac2_every_child_row_declares_a_phase():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
ownership = text.split("## 8. Component ownership", 1)[-1].split("## 9.", 1)[0]
|
||||
for child in EPIC_CHILDREN:
|
||||
row = next(
|
||||
(line for line in ownership.splitlines() if line.startswith(f"| {child} ")),
|
||||
None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert row is not None, f"no ownership row for {child}"
|
||||
assert row.rstrip().endswith(("| 1 |", "| 2 |", "| 3 |", "| 4 |")), (
|
||||
f"ownership row for {child} must end with its phase: {row!r}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac3_mvp_is_foundation_not_recreated():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
assert "#425" in text and "#436" in text
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "do not recreate" in lower or "recreating mvp scope" in lower
|
||||
assert "retained and evolved" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac4_forbidden_paths_are_explicit():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
forbidden = text.split("## 11. Forbidden paths", 1)[-1].split("## 12.", 1)[0]
|
||||
lower = forbidden.lower()
|
||||
assert "raw provider incidents" in lower and "#612" in forbidden
|
||||
assert "browser-held tokens" in lower
|
||||
assert "process-kill recovery" in lower and "#630" in forbidden
|
||||
assert "ungated browser mutations" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac5_approval_checklist_is_self_contained():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
assert "## 12. Approval checklist" in text
|
||||
checklist = text.split("## 12. Approval checklist", 1)[-1].split("## 13.", 1)[0]
|
||||
for marker in ("1.", "2.", "3.", "4.", "5.", "6."):
|
||||
assert marker in checklist, f"approval checklist missing item {marker}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_adr_states_the_two_boundary_invariants():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "no secrets to the browser" in lower
|
||||
assert "no ungated mutations" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_open_questions_are_recorded_not_implied():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
assert "## 13. Open questions and follow-ups" in text
|
||||
section = text.split("## 13. Open questions and follow-ups", 1)[-1]
|
||||
assert "#633" in section, "deferred authorization work must name its issue"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_local_dev_doc_cross_links_the_adr():
|
||||
text = _read(LOCAL_DEV)
|
||||
assert ADR_BASENAME in text, (
|
||||
"docs/webui-local-dev.md must cross-link the console architecture ADR "
|
||||
"(issue #632 scope)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_docs_do_not_embed_secrets():
|
||||
for path in (ADR, LOCAL_DEV):
|
||||
text = _read(path)
|
||||
for marker in ("ghp_", "BEGIN PRIVATE KEY", "Authorization: Bearer"):
|
||||
assert marker not in text, f"{path.name} contains {marker!r}"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,703 @@
|
||||
"""Console authorization, redaction, and audit model tests (#633).
|
||||
|
||||
Covers each acceptance criterion and each required test named in the issue:
|
||||
|
||||
* AC1 — RBAC matrix and privileged-action list.
|
||||
* AC2 — redaction rules, unit-tested against sample payloads.
|
||||
* AC3 — audit event schema with required fields and retention defaults.
|
||||
* AC4 — Phase 2 integration points.
|
||||
* AC5 — local-dev mode with explicit insecurity warnings.
|
||||
|
||||
Required tests: redaction units (token, keychain, password patterns),
|
||||
default-deny for unauthenticated write stubs, and audit record creation for a
|
||||
simulated privileged preview.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import datetime
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import pathlib
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
|
||||
from starlette.testclient import TestClient
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]))
|
||||
|
||||
from task_capability_map import TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP # noqa: E402
|
||||
from webui import console_audit, console_authz # noqa: E402
|
||||
from webui.app import create_app # noqa: E402
|
||||
from webui.console_redaction import ( # noqa: E402
|
||||
REDACTED,
|
||||
redact_payload,
|
||||
redact_text,
|
||||
redaction_policy,
|
||||
scan_for_secrets,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
DOCS = pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "docs"
|
||||
AUTHZ_DOC = DOCS / "webui-authz-audit.md"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _principal(role: str) -> console_authz.Principal:
|
||||
return console_authz.Principal(
|
||||
subject=f"{role}@example.com",
|
||||
role=role,
|
||||
identity_source=console_authz.IDENTITY_ACCESS_PROXY,
|
||||
authenticated=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRoleMatrix(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC1 — the written RBAC matrix and privileged-action list."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_roles_are_ordered_least_to_most_authority(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_authz.ROLE_ORDER,
|
||||
("viewer", "operator", "controller", "admin"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_every_role_has_a_description(self):
|
||||
for role in console_authz.ROLE_ORDER:
|
||||
with self.subTest(role=role):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(console_authz.ROLE_DESCRIPTIONS[role].strip())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_higher_roles_inherit_lower_role_actions(self):
|
||||
matrix = {
|
||||
entry["role"]: set(entry["permitted_actions"])
|
||||
for entry in console_authz.rbac_matrix()["roles"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
for lower, higher in zip(
|
||||
console_authz.ROLE_ORDER, console_authz.ROLE_ORDER[1:]
|
||||
):
|
||||
with self.subTest(lower=lower, higher=higher):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(matrix[lower].issubset(matrix[higher]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_viewer_holds_no_write_action(self):
|
||||
matrix = {
|
||||
entry["role"]: set(entry["permitted_actions"])
|
||||
for entry in console_authz.rbac_matrix()["roles"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(matrix["viewer"], set())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_privileged_action_list_is_non_empty_and_classified(self):
|
||||
privileged = console_authz.privileged_actions()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(privileged)
|
||||
ids = {action.action_id for action in privileged}
|
||||
# Merge and branch deletion are the canonical privileged pair.
|
||||
self.assertIn("merge_pr", ids)
|
||||
self.assertIn("delete_branch", ids)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merge_and_delete_require_dual_control_and_break_glass(self):
|
||||
for action_id in ("merge_pr", "delete_branch"):
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action_id):
|
||||
action = console_authz.get_action(action_id)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(action.dual_control)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(action.break_glass)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(action.requires_confirmation)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_every_write_action_requires_confirmation(self):
|
||||
for action in console_authz.ACTIONS.values():
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action.action_id):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(action.requires_confirmation)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_delete_branch_is_admin_only(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_authz.get_action("delete_branch").minimum_role,
|
||||
console_authz.ADMIN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_actions_map_to_real_mcp_capability_vocabulary(self):
|
||||
"""The console must not invent an authority the MCP layer lacks."""
|
||||
for action in console_authz.ACTIONS.values():
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action.action_id):
|
||||
self.assertIn(action.task_key, TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
action.mcp_permission,
|
||||
TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP[action.task_key]["permission"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
action.mcp_role,
|
||||
TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP[action.task_key]["role"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_matrix_declares_deny_by_default_and_execution_disabled(self):
|
||||
matrix = console_authz.rbac_matrix()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(matrix["default_decision"], "deny")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(matrix["execution_enabled"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAuthorizeDefaultDeny(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Fail-closed behaviour of the authorization decision."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_anonymous_is_denied_every_action(self):
|
||||
for action_id in console_authz.ACTIONS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action_id):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize(action_id)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_UNAUTHENTICATED
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_action_is_denied(self):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize(
|
||||
"not_a_real_action", _principal("admin")
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_UNKNOWN_ACTION)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_role_is_denied(self):
|
||||
rogue = console_authz.Principal(
|
||||
subject="[email protected]",
|
||||
role="superuser",
|
||||
identity_source=console_authz.IDENTITY_ACCESS_PROXY,
|
||||
authenticated=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize("comment_issue", rogue)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_UNKNOWN_ROLE)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_insufficient_role_is_denied(self):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize("merge_pr", _principal("operator"))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_INSUFFICIENT_ROLE
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sufficient_role_allows_preview_only(self):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize("merge_pr", _principal("controller"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.execution_enabled)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_execution_is_refused_while_phase_is_not_active(self):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize(
|
||||
"merge_pr", _principal("controller"), for_execution=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_PHASE_NOT_ACTIVE
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_allowed_decision_never_reports_execution_enabled(self):
|
||||
for action_id in console_authz.ACTIONS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action_id):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize(
|
||||
action_id, _principal("admin")
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.execution_enabled)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestIdentityResolution(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC5 — identity sources, including the insecure local-dev mode."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_auth_mode_yields_anonymous_viewer(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(env={})
|
||||
self.assertFalse(principal.authenticated)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.identity_source, console_authz.IDENTITY_NONE)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_local_dev_mode_warns_that_identity_is_unverified(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
env={
|
||||
console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "local-dev",
|
||||
console_authz.DEV_SUBJECT_ENV: "[email protected]",
|
||||
console_authz.DEV_ROLE_ENV: "admin",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(principal.authenticated)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, "admin")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(principal.warnings)
|
||||
self.assertIn("asserted", " ".join(principal.warnings).lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_local_dev_without_subject_falls_back_to_anonymous(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
env={console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "local-dev"}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(principal.authenticated)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_local_dev_unknown_role_degrades_to_viewer(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
env={
|
||||
console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "local_dev",
|
||||
console_authz.DEV_SUBJECT_ENV: "[email protected]",
|
||||
console_authz.DEV_ROLE_ENV: "root",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_access_proxy_without_header_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""A proxy-mode request that did not traverse the proxy is anonymous."""
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
headers={},
|
||||
env={console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(principal.authenticated)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_access_proxy_role_comes_from_server_config_not_client(self):
|
||||
env = {
|
||||
console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy",
|
||||
console_authz.ROLE_MAP_ENV: json.dumps(
|
||||
{"[email protected]": "controller"}
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
headers={
|
||||
console_authz.ACCESS_SUBJECT_HEADER: "[email protected]",
|
||||
"x-role": "admin", # client-supplied role must be ignored
|
||||
},
|
||||
env=env,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, "controller")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_access_proxy_unmapped_subject_defaults_to_viewer(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
headers={
|
||||
console_authz.ACCESS_SUBJECT_HEADER: "[email protected]"
|
||||
},
|
||||
env={console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_malformed_role_map_does_not_raise_and_denies(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
headers={console_authz.ACCESS_SUBJECT_HEADER: "[email protected]"},
|
||||
env={
|
||||
console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy",
|
||||
console_authz.ROLE_MAP_ENV: "{not json",
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_probe_auth_is_opt_in(self):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(console_authz.probe_auth_required(env={}))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
console_authz.probe_auth_required(
|
||||
env={console_authz.REQUIRE_PROBE_AUTH_ENV: "1"}
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_probe_auth_is_declared_but_not_yet_enforced(self):
|
||||
"""Phase 1 declares the probe-auth policy; no route enforces it yet.
|
||||
|
||||
The flag exists so the Phase 2 action framework has a declared policy
|
||||
to honour instead of inventing a second one. Pinning the current
|
||||
not-enforced status here means wiring it later is a deliberate change
|
||||
that updates this test and the documentation together, rather than a
|
||||
silent behaviour shift. The documentation must say so plainly, because
|
||||
an operator who sets the variable believing it protects a probe is
|
||||
worse off than one who knows it does not.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
import inspect
|
||||
|
||||
from webui import app as webui_app
|
||||
|
||||
source = inspect.getsource(webui_app)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(
|
||||
"probe_auth_required",
|
||||
source,
|
||||
msg=(
|
||||
"webui.app now consults probe_auth_required, so probe auth is "
|
||||
"no longer merely declared. Update the 'Probe authentication' "
|
||||
"section of docs/webui-authz-audit.md, which states it "
|
||||
"enforces nothing, and replace this test with real "
|
||||
"enforcement coverage."
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"enforces nothing today",
|
||||
AUTHZ_DOC.read_text(encoding="utf-8"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRedaction(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC2 — required redaction units: token, keychain, password patterns."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_token_assignment_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text("GITEA_TOKEN=abcd1234efgh5678ijkl")
|
||||
self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("abcd1234efgh5678ijkl", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_password_assignment_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text("password: hunter2supersecret")
|
||||
self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("hunter2supersecret", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_keychain_reference_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text("keychain:gitea-prgs-token")
|
||||
self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("gitea-prgs-token", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_keychain_command_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text("security find-generic-password -s gitea -w")
|
||||
self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("find-generic-password -s gitea", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_bearer_credential_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text("Authorization: Bearer abcdef1234567890abcdef")
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("abcdef1234567890abcdef", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_jwt_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
token = "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxIn0.abcdefghijklmnop"
|
||||
out = redact_text(f"session={token}")
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(token, out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_private_key_block_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
pem = (
|
||||
"-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----\n"
|
||||
"MIIEowIBAAKCAQEAsecretmaterial\n"
|
||||
"-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----"
|
||||
)
|
||||
out = redact_text(pem)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("MIIEowIBAAKCAQEAsecretmaterial", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_api_key_assignment_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text('api_key = "sk-live-9f8e7d6c5b4a3210"')
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("sk-live-9f8e7d6c5b4a3210", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_nested_payload_is_redacted_recursively(self):
|
||||
payload = {
|
||||
"token": "abc123456789",
|
||||
"nested": {"note": "password=letmein12345"},
|
||||
"list": ["keychain:some-entry"],
|
||||
"safe": "plain text",
|
||||
}
|
||||
out = redact_payload(payload)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["token"], REDACTED)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("letmein12345", json.dumps(out))
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("some-entry", json.dumps(out))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["safe"], "plain text")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_scan_reports_findings_before_and_none_after(self):
|
||||
dirty = "password: hunter2supersecret"
|
||||
self.assertTrue(scan_for_secrets(dirty))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(redact_text(dirty)), [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_strings_pass_through_untouched(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(redact_text(42), 42)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
redact_payload({"n": 1, "b": True}), {"n": 1, "b": True}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_policy_is_documented_and_declares_redact_before_persist(self):
|
||||
policy = redaction_policy()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy["redact_before_persist"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("audit_records", policy["applies_to"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy["console_rules"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_policy_statement_contains_no_secret_material(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(redaction_policy()), [])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAuditSchema(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC3 — audit event schema, required fields, and retention defaults."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _event(self, action_id="merge_pr", **kwargs):
|
||||
return console_audit.build_event(
|
||||
action_id=action_id,
|
||||
result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED,
|
||||
decision=console_authz.authorize(action_id, _principal("operator")),
|
||||
target={"kind": "pr", "ref": "#123"},
|
||||
request_id="req-test",
|
||||
**kwargs,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_every_required_field_is_present(self):
|
||||
event = self._event()
|
||||
for field in console_audit.REQUIRED_FIELDS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(field=field):
|
||||
self.assertIn(field, event)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_actor_carries_who_and_how_they_were_identified(self):
|
||||
event = self._event()
|
||||
for field in console_audit.REQUIRED_ACTOR_FIELDS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(field=field):
|
||||
self.assertIn(field, event["actor"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_correlation_ids_are_present(self):
|
||||
event = self._event()
|
||||
for field in console_audit.REQUIRED_CORRELATION_FIELDS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(field=field):
|
||||
self.assertIn(field, event["correlation"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(event["correlation"]["request_id"], "req-test")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(event["correlation"]["mcp_task"], "merge_pr")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_timestamp_is_timezone_aware_utc_iso8601(self):
|
||||
now = datetime.datetime(
|
||||
2026, 7, 22, 10, 16, 42, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc
|
||||
)
|
||||
event = self._event(now=now)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(event["timestamp"], "2026-07-22T10:16:42+00:00")
|
||||
parsed = datetime.datetime.fromisoformat(event["timestamp"])
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(parsed.tzinfo)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_retention_defaults_by_class(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS[console_audit.RETENTION_STANDARD], 90
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS[console_audit.RETENTION_PRIVILEGED],
|
||||
365,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS[console_audit.RETENTION_BREAK_GLASS],
|
||||
730,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_break_glass_action_retains_longest(self):
|
||||
event = self._event("merge_pr")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
event["retention"]["class"], console_audit.RETENTION_BREAK_GLASS
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_routine_write_uses_standard_retention(self):
|
||||
event = self._event("comment_issue")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
event["retention"]["class"], console_audit.RETENTION_STANDARD
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_action_retains_as_privileged_not_standard(self):
|
||||
"""Conservative direction: keep an unclassifiable record longer."""
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_audit.retention_class_for(None),
|
||||
console_audit.RETENTION_PRIVILEGED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_retention_expiry_matches_declared_days(self):
|
||||
now = datetime.datetime(2026, 7, 22, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc)
|
||||
event = self._event("comment_issue", now=now)
|
||||
expires = datetime.datetime.fromisoformat(
|
||||
event["retention"]["expires_at"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual((expires - now).days, 90)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_invalid_result_degrades_to_failed(self):
|
||||
event = console_audit.build_event(action_id="merge_pr", result="banana")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(event["result"], console_audit.RESULT_FAILED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_denied_result_is_representable(self):
|
||||
"""An authorization denial has no MCP-side mutation record."""
|
||||
self.assertIn(console_audit.RESULT_DENIED, console_audit.RESULTS)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_event_is_redacted_before_it_is_returned(self):
|
||||
event = console_audit.build_event(
|
||||
action_id="merge_pr",
|
||||
result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED,
|
||||
detail="failed with token=abcdef1234567890",
|
||||
metadata={"password": "hunter2supersecret"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
serialized = json.dumps(event)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("abcdef1234567890", serialized)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("hunter2supersecret", serialized)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(event["redacted"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_audit_policy_reports_schema_and_retention(self):
|
||||
policy = console_audit.audit_policy()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy["append_only"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy["redact_before_persist"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
policy["retention_defaults_days"], console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAuditSink(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Append-only persistence behaviour."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_write_is_a_noop_when_sink_is_unconfigured(self):
|
||||
saved = os.environ.pop(console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV, None)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
self.assertFalse(console_audit.audit_enabled())
|
||||
self.assertFalse(console_audit.write_event({"schema_version": 1}))
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
if saved is not None:
|
||||
os.environ[console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV] = saved
|
||||
|
||||
def test_records_append_one_json_line_each(self):
|
||||
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
|
||||
sink = os.path.join(tmp, "console-audit.jsonl")
|
||||
for _ in range(3):
|
||||
event = console_audit.build_event(
|
||||
action_id="merge_pr", result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(console_audit.write_event(event, path=sink))
|
||||
with open(sink, encoding="utf-8") as handle:
|
||||
lines = [json.loads(line) for line in handle if line.strip()]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(lines), 3)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len({line["event_id"] for line in lines}), 3)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_record_that_still_carries_a_secret_is_not_persisted(self):
|
||||
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
|
||||
sink = os.path.join(tmp, "console-audit.jsonl")
|
||||
leaky = {
|
||||
"schema_version": 1,
|
||||
"detail": "password: hunter2supersecret",
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.assertFalse(console_audit.write_event(leaky, path=sink))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(os.path.exists(sink))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_write_never_raises_on_a_bad_path(self):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
console_audit.write_event(
|
||||
{"schema_version": 1}, path="/nonexistent-dir/audit.jsonl"
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_simulated_privileged_preview_creates_an_audit_record(self):
|
||||
"""Required test: audit record creation for a privileged preview."""
|
||||
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
|
||||
sink = os.path.join(tmp, "console-audit.jsonl")
|
||||
os.environ[console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV] = sink
|
||||
try:
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize(
|
||||
"merge_pr", _principal("controller")
|
||||
)
|
||||
outcome = console_audit.record_event(
|
||||
action_id="merge_pr",
|
||||
result=console_audit.RESULT_PREVIEWED,
|
||||
decision=decision,
|
||||
target={"kind": "pr", "ref": "#123"},
|
||||
request_id="req-preview",
|
||||
)
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
os.environ.pop(console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV, None)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(outcome["written"])
|
||||
with open(sink, encoding="utf-8") as handle:
|
||||
record = json.loads(handle.read().strip())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["action"], "merge_pr")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["result"], console_audit.RESULT_PREVIEWED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["action_class"], "privileged")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(record["decision"]["allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(record["decision"]["execution_enabled"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["actor"]["role"], "controller")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_decision_block_survives_redaction(self):
|
||||
"""Regression: naming it 'authorization' collided with a secret hint.
|
||||
|
||||
``gitea_audit._SECRET_KEY_HINTS`` contains "authorization" (for the
|
||||
HTTP header), so a block under that key was replaced wholesale by the
|
||||
placeholder and the record lost its decision entirely.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
event = console_audit.build_event(
|
||||
action_id="merge_pr",
|
||||
result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED,
|
||||
decision=console_authz.authorize("merge_pr", _principal("admin")),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsInstance(event["decision"], dict)
|
||||
self.assertIn("allowed", event["decision"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestConsoleRoutes(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC4 — the wired Phase 2 integration points, still fail-closed."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.client = TestClient(create_app(bind_host="127.0.0.1"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unauthenticated_write_stub_is_denied(self):
|
||||
"""Required test: default-deny for unauthenticated write stubs."""
|
||||
response = self.client.post(
|
||||
"/api/actions/merge_pr/attempt", json={"pr_number": 99}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 403)
|
||||
body = response.json()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(body["success"])
|
||||
authorization = body["authorization"]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(authorization["allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
authorization["reason_code"], console_authz.DENY_UNAUTHENTICATED
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(authorization["execution_enabled"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_preview_reports_an_authorization_decision(self):
|
||||
response = self.client.get("/api/actions/merge_pr/preview?pr_number=7")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
|
||||
authorization = response.json()["authorization"]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(authorization["allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(authorization["dual_control"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(authorization["required_role"], "controller")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_action_preview_still_404s(self):
|
||||
response = self.client.get("/api/actions/no_such_action/preview")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 404)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_security_model_endpoint_publishes_all_three_policies(self):
|
||||
response = self.client.get("/api/console/security-model")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
|
||||
body = response.json()
|
||||
self.assertIn("rbac", body)
|
||||
self.assertIn("redaction", body)
|
||||
self.assertIn("audit", body)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(body["rbac"]["default_decision"], "deny")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_security_model_endpoint_leaks_no_secrets(self):
|
||||
response = self.client.get("/api/console/security-model")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(response.json()), [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_security_model_rejects_writes(self):
|
||||
response = self.client.post("/api/console/security-model", json={})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 405)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_existing_read_routes_are_unaffected(self):
|
||||
for path in ("/", "/health", "/actions", "/api/actions"):
|
||||
with self.subTest(path=path):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.client.get(path).status_code, 200)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAuthzAuditDoc(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""The model must be written down, not only coded."""
|
||||
|
||||
@classmethod
|
||||
def setUpClass(cls):
|
||||
cls.text = (
|
||||
AUTHZ_DOC.read_text(encoding="utf-8") if AUTHZ_DOC.exists() else ""
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_exists(self):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(AUTHZ_DOC.exists(), f"missing {AUTHZ_DOC}")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_covers_each_required_section(self):
|
||||
for heading in (
|
||||
"Identity sources",
|
||||
"Role matrix",
|
||||
"Privileged actions",
|
||||
"Secret redaction",
|
||||
"Audit event schema",
|
||||
"Retention",
|
||||
"Phase 2 integration",
|
||||
"Local-dev mode",
|
||||
):
|
||||
with self.subTest(heading=heading):
|
||||
self.assertIn(heading, self.text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_names_every_role(self):
|
||||
for role in console_authz.ROLE_ORDER:
|
||||
with self.subTest(role=role):
|
||||
self.assertIn(role, self.text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_names_every_console_action(self):
|
||||
for action_id in console_authz.ACTIONS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action_id):
|
||||
self.assertIn(action_id, self.text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_states_retention_defaults(self):
|
||||
for days in console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS.values():
|
||||
with self.subTest(days=days):
|
||||
self.assertIn(str(days), self.text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_warns_local_dev_is_insecure(self):
|
||||
self.assertIn("INSECURE", self.text.upper())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_states_default_deny(self):
|
||||
self.assertIn("deny", self.text.lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_contains_no_secret_material(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(self.text), [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_deployment_doc_links_to_the_model(self):
|
||||
deployment = (DOCS / "webui-deployment.md").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
||||
self.assertIn("webui-authz-audit", deployment)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__": # pragma: no cover
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,458 @@
|
||||
"""Tests for the worker registry and configuration schema (#798, epic #797)."""
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
from webui.worker_registry import (
|
||||
ALLOWED_ROLES,
|
||||
SCHEMA_VERSION,
|
||||
RegistryValidationError,
|
||||
WorkerRegistry,
|
||||
default_registry_path,
|
||||
find_provider,
|
||||
find_worker,
|
||||
history_dir,
|
||||
list_revisions,
|
||||
load_registry,
|
||||
registry_to_dict,
|
||||
registry_to_document,
|
||||
rollback_to_revision,
|
||||
save_registry,
|
||||
validate_payload,
|
||||
worker_to_dict,
|
||||
workers_for_provider,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
_EXPECTED_PROVIDER_IDS = ("claude", "grok", "codex", "agy", "kimi-k")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _provider(provider_id: str = "claude", **overrides) -> dict:
|
||||
payload = {
|
||||
"id": provider_id,
|
||||
"display_name": "Claude",
|
||||
"vendor": "Anthropic",
|
||||
"executable": "claude",
|
||||
"available": True,
|
||||
"models": ["claude-opus-4-8"],
|
||||
"notes": "",
|
||||
}
|
||||
payload.update(overrides)
|
||||
return payload
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _worker(worker_id: str = "claude-author", **overrides) -> dict:
|
||||
payload = {
|
||||
"id": worker_id,
|
||||
"display_name": "Claude author",
|
||||
"provider": "claude",
|
||||
"model": "claude-opus-4-8",
|
||||
"project": "gitea-tools",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
"namespace": "gitea-author",
|
||||
"profile": "prgs-author",
|
||||
"workflow": "skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/work-issue.md",
|
||||
"schedule": {"kind": "cron", "expression": "0 * * * *"},
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 3600,
|
||||
"enabled": True,
|
||||
"scheduler": {"kind": "launchd", "label": "cc.prgs.claude.author"},
|
||||
"notes": "",
|
||||
}
|
||||
payload.update(overrides)
|
||||
return payload
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _document(providers=None, workers=None, **overrides) -> dict:
|
||||
payload = {
|
||||
"version": SCHEMA_VERSION,
|
||||
"revision": 1,
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-07-22T00:00:00Z",
|
||||
"providers": providers if providers is not None else [_provider()],
|
||||
"workers": workers if workers is not None else [_worker()],
|
||||
}
|
||||
payload.update(overrides)
|
||||
return payload
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _TempRegistryCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Base case giving each test an isolated registry file."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._tmp.cleanup)
|
||||
self.path = Path(self._tmp.name) / "workers.registry.json"
|
||||
|
||||
def write(self, document: dict) -> Path:
|
||||
self.path.write_text(json.dumps(document, indent=2) + "\n", encoding="utf-8")
|
||||
return self.path
|
||||
|
||||
def parse(self, document: dict) -> WorkerRegistry:
|
||||
return validate_payload(document, source_path=self.path)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestPackagedRegistry(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC: the declarative registry is the source of truth and ships with the app."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_default_path_points_at_packaged_data(self):
|
||||
path = default_registry_path()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(path.name, "workers.registry.json")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(path.parent.name, "data")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_packaged_registry_loads_and_validates(self):
|
||||
registry = load_registry()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(registry.version, SCHEMA_VERSION)
|
||||
self.assertGreaterEqual(registry.revision, 1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_packaged_registry_declares_all_five_providers(self):
|
||||
registry = load_registry()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
tuple(provider.id for provider in registry.providers),
|
||||
_EXPECTED_PROVIDER_IDS,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_packaged_registry_carries_no_credentials(self):
|
||||
raw = default_registry_path().read_text(encoding="utf-8").lower()
|
||||
for marker in ("token", "password", "secret", "api_key", "credential"):
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(marker, raw)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestSeparateEntities(_TempRegistryCase):
|
||||
"""AC: providers and configured workers are separate entities."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_provider_may_exist_with_no_workers(self):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(
|
||||
_document(providers=[_provider("grok", display_name="Grok")], workers=[])
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(registry.providers), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(registry.workers, ())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(workers_for_provider(registry, "grok"), ())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_many_workers_may_share_one_provider(self):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(
|
||||
_document(
|
||||
workers=[
|
||||
_worker("claude-author"),
|
||||
_worker(
|
||||
"claude-reviewer",
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
namespace="gitea-reviewer",
|
||||
profile="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
scheduler={"kind": "launchd", "label": "cc.prgs.claude.reviewer"},
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(workers_for_provider(registry, "claude")), 2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(registry.providers), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_worker_referencing_unknown_provider_is_refused(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(provider="mystery")]))
|
||||
self.assertIn("unknown provider", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_lookup_helpers(self):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(_document())
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(find_worker(registry, "claude-author"))
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(find_worker(registry, "absent"))
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(find_provider(registry, "claude"))
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(find_provider(registry, "absent"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRecordedFields(_TempRegistryCase):
|
||||
"""AC: records provider, model, project, role, namespace/profile, workflow,
|
||||
schedule, timeout, enabled state, and scheduler metadata."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_every_required_field_is_recorded(self):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(_document())
|
||||
worker = registry.workers[0]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.provider, "claude")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.model, "claude-opus-4-8")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.project, "gitea-tools")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.role, "author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.namespace, "gitea-author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.profile, "prgs-author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.workflow, "skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/work-issue.md")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.schedule.kind, "cron")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.schedule.expression, "0 * * * *")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.timeout_seconds, 3600)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(worker.enabled)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.scheduler.kind, "launchd")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(worker.scheduler.label, "cc.prgs.claude.author")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_each_required_field_is_individually_required(self):
|
||||
for field in (
|
||||
"provider", "model", "project", "role", "namespace",
|
||||
"profile", "workflow", "schedule", "timeout_seconds",
|
||||
"enabled", "scheduler", "id", "display_name",
|
||||
):
|
||||
with self.subTest(field=field):
|
||||
worker = _worker()
|
||||
worker.pop(field)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[worker]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_all_sanctioned_roles_are_accepted(self):
|
||||
for role in ALLOWED_ROLES:
|
||||
with self.subTest(role=role):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(role=role)]))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(registry.workers[0].role, role)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unsanctioned_role_is_refused(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(role="admin")]))
|
||||
self.assertIn("role must be one of", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_worker_dict_round_trips_every_field(self):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(_document())
|
||||
encoded = worker_to_dict(registry.workers[0])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(encoded, _worker())
|
||||
json.dumps(encoded) # must stay JSON-safe for the #799 API
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestSchemaValidation(_TempRegistryCase):
|
||||
"""AC: supports schema validation — and fails closed."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unsupported_version_is_refused(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
self.parse(_document(version=2))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_root_must_be_an_object(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
validate_payload([], source_path=self.path)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_providers_must_be_non_empty(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
self.parse(_document(providers=[]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_top_level_field_is_refused(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.parse(_document(fleet=[]))
|
||||
self.assertIn("unknown fields", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_worker_field_is_refused_not_ignored(self):
|
||||
# A typo'd field must not be silently dropped: "timeout_second" would
|
||||
# otherwise read as "no timeout declared".
|
||||
worker = _worker()
|
||||
worker["timeout_second"] = 30
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[worker]))
|
||||
self.assertIn("timeout_second", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_credentials_are_refused_anywhere_in_the_document(self):
|
||||
for label, mutate in (
|
||||
("provider.api_token", lambda doc: doc["providers"][0].__setitem__("api_token", "x")),
|
||||
("worker.password", lambda doc: doc["workers"][0].__setitem__("password", "x")),
|
||||
("root.secret", lambda doc: doc.__setitem__("secret", "x")),
|
||||
):
|
||||
with self.subTest(field=label):
|
||||
document = _document()
|
||||
mutate(document)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.parse(document)
|
||||
self.assertIn("credential", str(ctx.exception).lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_duplicate_worker_id_is_refused(self):
|
||||
workers = [_worker("dup"), _worker("dup", scheduler={"kind": "manual"})]
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=workers))
|
||||
self.assertIn("duplicate worker id", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_duplicate_provider_id_is_refused(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.parse(_document(providers=[_provider("claude"), _provider("claude")], workers=[]))
|
||||
self.assertIn("duplicate provider id", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_duplicate_launchagent_label_is_refused(self):
|
||||
# Two workers sharing a label would silently overwrite each other's agent.
|
||||
workers = [
|
||||
_worker("a", scheduler={"kind": "launchd", "label": "cc.prgs.same"}),
|
||||
_worker("b", scheduler={"kind": "launchd", "label": "cc.prgs.same"}),
|
||||
]
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=workers))
|
||||
self.assertIn("duplicate scheduler label", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_manual_scheduler_needs_no_label_and_many_may_coexist(self):
|
||||
workers = [
|
||||
_worker("a", scheduler={"kind": "manual"}),
|
||||
_worker("b", scheduler={"kind": "manual"}),
|
||||
]
|
||||
registry = self.parse(_document(workers=workers))
|
||||
self.assertEqual([w.scheduler.label for w in registry.workers], [None, None])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_launchd_scheduler_requires_a_label(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(scheduler={"kind": "launchd"})]))
|
||||
self.assertIn("label is required", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_scheduler_kind_is_refused(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(scheduler={"kind": "systemd", "label": "x"})]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_timeout_must_be_a_positive_bounded_integer(self):
|
||||
for bad in (0, -1, "3600", 1.5, True, 86_401):
|
||||
with self.subTest(timeout=bad):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(timeout_seconds=bad)]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_enabled_must_be_a_real_boolean(self):
|
||||
for bad in ("true", 1, None):
|
||||
with self.subTest(enabled=bad):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(enabled=bad)]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_identifier_shape_is_enforced(self):
|
||||
for bad in ("Claude Author", "-leading", "UPPER", ""):
|
||||
with self.subTest(worker_id=bad):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(bad)]))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestScheduleValidation(_TempRegistryCase):
|
||||
"""Schedules are declarations; next-run computation belongs to #803."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_interval_schedule_requires_positive_seconds(self):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(
|
||||
_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "interval", "seconds": 900})])
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(registry.workers[0].schedule.seconds, 900)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "interval"})]))
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "interval", "seconds": 0})]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_cron_schedule_requires_five_fields(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "cron", "expression": "0 *"})]))
|
||||
self.assertIn("five crontab fields", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_manual_schedule_needs_no_timing(self):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "manual"})]))
|
||||
schedule = registry.workers[0].schedule
|
||||
self.assertEqual(schedule.kind, "manual")
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(schedule.seconds)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(schedule.expression)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_fields_from_the_wrong_kind_are_refused(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "manual", "seconds": 60})]))
|
||||
self.assertIn("not valid for kind", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_schedule_kind_is_refused(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "hourly"})]))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAtomicPersistence(_TempRegistryCase):
|
||||
"""AC: atomic persistence."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_save_then_load_round_trips(self):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(_document())
|
||||
save_registry(registry, self.path)
|
||||
reloaded = load_registry(self.path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
[worker_to_dict(w) for w in reloaded.workers],
|
||||
[worker_to_dict(w) for w in registry.workers],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_save_leaves_no_temp_files_behind(self):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(_document())
|
||||
save_registry(registry, self.path)
|
||||
save_registry(registry, self.path)
|
||||
leftovers = [p.name for p in self.path.parent.iterdir() if p.name.startswith(".")]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(leftovers, [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_save_refuses_to_persist_an_invalid_document(self):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(_document())
|
||||
broken = WorkerRegistry(
|
||||
version=registry.version,
|
||||
revision=registry.revision,
|
||||
updated_at=registry.updated_at,
|
||||
providers=registry.providers,
|
||||
# A worker whose provider is not declared in the registry.
|
||||
workers=tuple(
|
||||
type(worker)(**{**worker.__dict__, "provider": "vanished"})
|
||||
for worker in registry.workers
|
||||
),
|
||||
source_path=self.path,
|
||||
)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
save_registry(broken, self.path)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self.path.exists(), "invalid save must not create the file")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_document_shape_excludes_local_paths_but_api_shape_includes_it(self):
|
||||
registry = self.parse(_document())
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("source_path", registry_to_document(registry))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(registry_to_dict(registry)["source_path"], str(self.path))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestVersioningAndRollback(_TempRegistryCase):
|
||||
"""AC: versioning and rollback."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _seed(self) -> WorkerRegistry:
|
||||
self.write(_document())
|
||||
return load_registry(self.path)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_revision_increments_on_each_save(self):
|
||||
registry = self._seed()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(registry.revision, 1)
|
||||
second = save_registry(registry, self.path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(second.revision, 2)
|
||||
third = save_registry(second, self.path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(third.revision, 3)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_updated_at_is_refreshed_and_utc(self):
|
||||
registry = self._seed()
|
||||
saved = save_registry(registry, self.path)
|
||||
self.assertRegex(saved.updated_at, r"^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}Z$")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_superseded_revisions_are_retained(self):
|
||||
registry = self._seed()
|
||||
second = save_registry(registry, self.path)
|
||||
save_registry(second, self.path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(list_revisions(self.path), (1, 2))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(history_dir(self.path).is_dir())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rollback_restores_prior_content_as_a_new_revision(self):
|
||||
self.write(_document(workers=[_worker("original")]))
|
||||
registry = load_registry(self.path)
|
||||
|
||||
changed = WorkerRegistry(
|
||||
version=registry.version,
|
||||
revision=registry.revision,
|
||||
updated_at=registry.updated_at,
|
||||
providers=registry.providers,
|
||||
workers=(), # operator deletes every worker
|
||||
source_path=self.path,
|
||||
)
|
||||
save_registry(changed, self.path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(load_registry(self.path).workers, ())
|
||||
|
||||
restored = rollback_to_revision(1, self.path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual([w.id for w in restored.workers], ["original"])
|
||||
# Append-only: the rollback publishes a new head rather than rewinding.
|
||||
self.assertGreater(restored.revision, 2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual([w.id for w in load_registry(self.path).workers], ["original"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rollback_to_unknown_revision_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
self._seed()
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
rollback_to_revision(99, self.path)
|
||||
self.assertIn("not retained", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_revision_must_be_a_positive_integer(self):
|
||||
for bad in (0, -1, "1", None):
|
||||
with self.subTest(revision=bad):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
|
||||
self.parse(_document(revision=bad))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_history_is_empty_before_any_save(self):
|
||||
self.write(_document())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(list_revisions(self.path), ())
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import uuid
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timezone
|
||||
|
||||
from starlette.applications import Starlette
|
||||
@@ -19,6 +20,9 @@ from final_report_validator import FINAL_REPORT_TASK_KINDS
|
||||
|
||||
from webui.gated_actions import attempt_action, load_action_registry, preview_action
|
||||
from webui.gated_action_views import render_actions_page
|
||||
from webui import console_audit
|
||||
from webui.console_authz import authorize, rbac_matrix, resolve_principal
|
||||
from webui.console_redaction import redaction_policy
|
||||
from webui.audit_validator import audit_report, audit_to_dict
|
||||
from webui.audit_views import render_audit_page
|
||||
from webui.lease_loader import load_lease_snapshot, snapshot_to_dict as lease_snapshot_to_dict
|
||||
@@ -215,6 +219,49 @@ async def api_actions(_request: Request) -> JSONResponse:
|
||||
return JSONResponse(load_action_registry().to_dict())
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _request_id() -> str:
|
||||
return f"req-{uuid.uuid4().hex}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _audit_target(action_id: str, params: dict[str, object]) -> dict[str, object]:
|
||||
"""Describe the action target for the audit record (never secrets)."""
|
||||
if "pr_number" in params:
|
||||
return {"kind": "pr", "ref": f"#{params['pr_number']}"}
|
||||
if "issue_number" in params:
|
||||
return {"kind": "issue", "ref": f"#{params['issue_number']}"}
|
||||
if "branch_name" in params:
|
||||
return {"kind": "branch", "ref": str(params["branch_name"])}
|
||||
return {"kind": "unspecified", "ref": action_id}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _authorize_request(
|
||||
request: Request,
|
||||
action_id: str,
|
||||
params: dict[str, object],
|
||||
*,
|
||||
for_execution: bool,
|
||||
result: str,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, object]:
|
||||
"""Resolve principal, decide, and audit. Returns the decision payload.
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 1 records the decision rather than enforcing it as the terminal
|
||||
outcome: ``webui.gated_actions`` already fails closed for every action, so
|
||||
this layer cannot loosen anything. Phase 2 enforces on this same decision.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
principal = resolve_principal(headers=dict(request.headers))
|
||||
decision = authorize(action_id, principal, for_execution=for_execution)
|
||||
console_audit.record_event(
|
||||
action_id=action_id,
|
||||
result=result,
|
||||
decision=decision,
|
||||
principal=principal,
|
||||
target=_audit_target(action_id, params),
|
||||
request_id=_request_id(),
|
||||
detail=decision.detail,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return decision.to_dict()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
async def api_action_preview(request: Request) -> JSONResponse:
|
||||
action_id = request.path_params["action_id"]
|
||||
params = dict(request.query_params)
|
||||
@@ -224,6 +271,13 @@ async def api_action_preview(request: Request) -> JSONResponse:
|
||||
result = preview_action(action_id, **params)
|
||||
if "error" in result:
|
||||
return JSONResponse(result, status_code=404)
|
||||
result["authorization"] = _authorize_request(
|
||||
request,
|
||||
action_id,
|
||||
params,
|
||||
for_execution=False,
|
||||
result=console_audit.RESULT_PREVIEWED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return JSONResponse(result)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -237,10 +291,31 @@ async def api_action_attempt(request: Request) -> JSONResponse:
|
||||
if not isinstance(body, dict):
|
||||
body = {}
|
||||
result = attempt_action(action_id, **body)
|
||||
authorization = _authorize_request(
|
||||
request,
|
||||
action_id,
|
||||
body,
|
||||
for_execution=True,
|
||||
result=(
|
||||
console_audit.RESULT_DENIED
|
||||
if not result.get("success")
|
||||
else console_audit.RESULT_ALLOWED
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
result["authorization"] = authorization
|
||||
status = 403 if not result.get("success") else 200
|
||||
return JSONResponse(result, status_code=status)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
async def api_console_security_model(_request: Request) -> JSONResponse:
|
||||
"""Read-only publication of the #633 authorization/redaction/audit model."""
|
||||
return JSONResponse({
|
||||
"rbac": rbac_matrix(),
|
||||
"redaction": redaction_policy(),
|
||||
"audit": console_audit.audit_policy(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
async def method_not_allowed(request: Request, _exc: Exception) -> Response:
|
||||
path = request.url.path
|
||||
if path in _AUDIT_MUTATION_PATHS and request.method == "POST":
|
||||
@@ -291,6 +366,11 @@ def create_app(*, bind_host: str | None = None) -> Starlette:
|
||||
methods=["POST"],
|
||||
),
|
||||
Route("/api/leases", api_leases, methods=["GET"]),
|
||||
Route(
|
||||
"/api/console/security-model",
|
||||
api_console_security_model,
|
||||
methods=["GET"],
|
||||
),
|
||||
],
|
||||
exception_handlers={405: method_not_allowed},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
|
||||
"""Console audit event schema, retention, and append-only sink (#633).
|
||||
|
||||
``gitea_audit`` records MCP-side *mutations*: which profile and Gitea user
|
||||
performed which tool call. It carries no console actor, no identity source, no
|
||||
correlation identifier, and no retention class, so it cannot answer the
|
||||
question #633 exists to answer — *who sat at the console, what did they
|
||||
attempt, and was it authorized?* An authorization denial is not a mutation and
|
||||
would never appear there at all.
|
||||
|
||||
This module adds the console-side record. It does not replace ``gitea_audit``:
|
||||
when a Phase 2 action eventually reaches MCP, both fire, correlated by
|
||||
``correlation.request_id``.
|
||||
|
||||
Design constraints:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Redact before persist.** Every record passes through
|
||||
``webui.console_redaction.redact_payload`` before serialization, so an
|
||||
unredacted field is never durable.
|
||||
- **Append-only.** Records are appended as JSON lines. Nothing here updates or
|
||||
deletes; retention is metadata on each record, enforced by an operator-run
|
||||
policy, never by silent rewriting.
|
||||
- **Never raises.** Auditing must not break the request it describes. A failed
|
||||
write returns ``False``.
|
||||
- **Off by default.** With ``WEBUI_CONSOLE_AUDIT_LOG`` unset, events are still
|
||||
*built* (so callers and tests see the schema) but nothing is written.
|
||||
|
||||
A record looks like this (synthetic values):
|
||||
|
||||
{"schema_version": 1, "event_id": "evt-0001",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T10:16:42+00:00",
|
||||
"actor": {"subject": "[email protected]", "role": "operator",
|
||||
"identity_source": "access_proxy", "authenticated": true},
|
||||
"action": "merge_pr", "action_class": "privileged",
|
||||
"target": {"kind": "pr", "ref": "#123"},
|
||||
"result": "denied", "reason_code": "insufficient_role",
|
||||
"correlation": {"request_id": "req-abc", "session_id": null,
|
||||
"mcp_task": "merge_pr", "mcp_permission": "gitea.pr.merge"},
|
||||
"retention": {"class": "privileged", "days": 365,
|
||||
"expires_at": "2027-07-22T10:16:42+00:00"},
|
||||
"redacted": true}
|
||||
|
||||
Timestamps are timezone-aware ISO-8601 in UTC.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import datetime
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import uuid
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
from webui import console_authz
|
||||
from webui.console_redaction import redact_payload, scan_for_secrets
|
||||
|
||||
SCHEMA_VERSION = 1
|
||||
|
||||
AUDIT_LOG_ENV = "WEBUI_CONSOLE_AUDIT_LOG"
|
||||
|
||||
# Result vocabulary. ``denied`` is the one ``gitea_audit`` has no equivalent
|
||||
# for: an authorization refusal never reaches the MCP layer.
|
||||
RESULT_ALLOWED = "allowed"
|
||||
RESULT_DENIED = "denied"
|
||||
RESULT_PREVIEWED = "previewed"
|
||||
RESULT_FAILED = "failed"
|
||||
RESULT_SUCCEEDED = "succeeded"
|
||||
|
||||
RESULTS = frozenset(
|
||||
{
|
||||
RESULT_ALLOWED,
|
||||
RESULT_DENIED,
|
||||
RESULT_PREVIEWED,
|
||||
RESULT_FAILED,
|
||||
RESULT_SUCCEEDED,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Retention classes and default lifetimes in days. Privileged and break-glass
|
||||
# records outlive routine ones because they are what an incident review needs.
|
||||
RETENTION_STANDARD = "standard"
|
||||
RETENTION_PRIVILEGED = "privileged"
|
||||
RETENTION_BREAK_GLASS = "break_glass"
|
||||
|
||||
RETENTION_DAYS: dict[str, int] = {
|
||||
RETENTION_STANDARD: 90,
|
||||
RETENTION_PRIVILEGED: 365,
|
||||
RETENTION_BREAK_GLASS: 730,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Fields every record must carry. Asserted by the test suite so a future edit
|
||||
# cannot quietly drop one.
|
||||
REQUIRED_FIELDS: tuple[str, ...] = (
|
||||
"schema_version",
|
||||
"event_id",
|
||||
"timestamp",
|
||||
"actor",
|
||||
"action",
|
||||
"action_class",
|
||||
"target",
|
||||
"result",
|
||||
"reason_code",
|
||||
"correlation",
|
||||
"retention",
|
||||
"redacted",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRED_ACTOR_FIELDS: tuple[str, ...] = (
|
||||
"subject",
|
||||
"role",
|
||||
"identity_source",
|
||||
"authenticated",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRED_CORRELATION_FIELDS: tuple[str, ...] = (
|
||||
"request_id",
|
||||
"session_id",
|
||||
"mcp_task",
|
||||
"mcp_permission",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def audit_log_path() -> str | None:
|
||||
"""Configured sink path, or ``None`` when console auditing is off."""
|
||||
return (os.environ.get(AUDIT_LOG_ENV) or "").strip() or None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def audit_enabled() -> bool:
|
||||
return audit_log_path() is not None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def retention_class_for(action: console_authz.ConsoleAction | None) -> str:
|
||||
"""Classify retention from the action, defaulting to the longest-lived.
|
||||
|
||||
An unknown action is treated as privileged rather than standard: for a
|
||||
safety control the conservative direction is to keep the record longer.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if action is None:
|
||||
return RETENTION_PRIVILEGED
|
||||
if action.break_glass:
|
||||
return RETENTION_BREAK_GLASS
|
||||
if action.privileged:
|
||||
return RETENTION_PRIVILEGED
|
||||
return RETENTION_STANDARD
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _retention_block(
|
||||
retention_class: str, now: datetime.datetime
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
days = RETENTION_DAYS.get(
|
||||
retention_class, RETENTION_DAYS[RETENTION_PRIVILEGED]
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"class": retention_class,
|
||||
"days": days,
|
||||
"expires_at": (now + datetime.timedelta(days=days)).isoformat(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def build_event(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
action_id: str,
|
||||
result: str,
|
||||
decision: console_authz.AuthorizationDecision | None = None,
|
||||
principal: console_authz.Principal | None = None,
|
||||
target: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
|
||||
reason_code: str | None = None,
|
||||
request_id: str | None = None,
|
||||
session_id: str | None = None,
|
||||
detail: str | None = None,
|
||||
metadata: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
|
||||
now: datetime.datetime | None = None,
|
||||
event_id: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Build one redacted, JSON-able console audit record.
|
||||
|
||||
Redaction runs here rather than at write time so an in-memory record handed
|
||||
to a template or an API response is already clean.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
ts = now or datetime.datetime.now(datetime.timezone.utc)
|
||||
action = console_authz.get_action(action_id)
|
||||
who = principal or (
|
||||
decision.principal if decision else console_authz.ANONYMOUS
|
||||
)
|
||||
resolved_result = result if result in RESULTS else RESULT_FAILED
|
||||
resolved_reason = reason_code or (
|
||||
decision.reason_code if decision else "unspecified"
|
||||
)
|
||||
retention_class = retention_class_for(action)
|
||||
|
||||
event: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"schema_version": SCHEMA_VERSION,
|
||||
"event_id": event_id or f"evt-{uuid.uuid4().hex}",
|
||||
"timestamp": ts.isoformat(),
|
||||
"actor": who.to_dict(),
|
||||
"action": action_id,
|
||||
"action_class": action.action_class if action else "unknown",
|
||||
"target": dict(target or {}),
|
||||
"result": resolved_result,
|
||||
"reason_code": resolved_reason,
|
||||
"correlation": {
|
||||
"request_id": request_id,
|
||||
"session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"mcp_task": action.task_key if action else None,
|
||||
"mcp_permission": action.mcp_permission if action else None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
"retention": _retention_block(retention_class, ts),
|
||||
"redacted": True,
|
||||
"detail": detail,
|
||||
"metadata": dict(metadata or {}),
|
||||
}
|
||||
if decision is not None:
|
||||
# Deliberately *not* named "authorization": ``gitea_audit`` treats that
|
||||
# substring as a secret key hint (it matches the HTTP Authorization
|
||||
# header) and would replace this whole block with the placeholder.
|
||||
event["decision"] = {
|
||||
"allowed": decision.allowed,
|
||||
"required_role": decision.required_role,
|
||||
"requires_confirmation": decision.requires_confirmation,
|
||||
"dual_control": decision.dual_control,
|
||||
"break_glass": decision.break_glass,
|
||||
"execution_enabled": decision.execution_enabled,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
redacted = redact_payload(event)
|
||||
if not isinstance(redacted, dict): # pragma: no cover - defensive
|
||||
return {"schema_version": SCHEMA_VERSION, "redacted": True}
|
||||
return redacted
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def write_event(event: dict[str, Any], path: str | None = None) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Append *event* as one JSON line. Never raises.
|
||||
|
||||
Returns ``True`` when a line was written, ``False`` when auditing is off or
|
||||
the write failed. A record that still trips a secret detector is dropped
|
||||
rather than persisted.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
sink = path or audit_log_path()
|
||||
if not sink:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
try:
|
||||
if scan_for_secrets(event):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
line = json.dumps(event, default=str, sort_keys=True)
|
||||
with open(sink, "a", encoding="utf-8") as handle:
|
||||
handle.write(line + "\n")
|
||||
return True
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def record_event(**kwargs: Any) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Build and persist one record; return the record either way.
|
||||
|
||||
Callers get the record back so it can be surfaced in a response or a test
|
||||
regardless of whether a sink is configured.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
event = build_event(**kwargs)
|
||||
written = write_event(event)
|
||||
return {"event": event, "written": written}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def audit_policy() -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Machine-readable audit schema and retention defaults (never secrets)."""
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"schema_version": SCHEMA_VERSION,
|
||||
"required_fields": list(REQUIRED_FIELDS),
|
||||
"required_actor_fields": list(REQUIRED_ACTOR_FIELDS),
|
||||
"required_correlation_fields": list(REQUIRED_CORRELATION_FIELDS),
|
||||
"results": sorted(RESULTS),
|
||||
"retention_defaults_days": dict(RETENTION_DAYS),
|
||||
"sink_env": AUDIT_LOG_ENV,
|
||||
"enabled": audit_enabled(),
|
||||
"append_only": True,
|
||||
"redact_before_persist": True,
|
||||
"timestamp_format": "ISO-8601, timezone-aware, UTC",
|
||||
"relationship_to_mcp_audit": (
|
||||
"webui.console_audit records console intent and authorization "
|
||||
"outcomes; gitea_audit records MCP mutations. A Phase 2 action "
|
||||
"emits both, correlated by correlation.request_id."
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,537 @@
|
||||
"""Console authorization and RBAC model (#633, Phase 1).
|
||||
|
||||
The read-only MVP (#426–#436) ships with no authentication: protection comes
|
||||
from network placement alone (#435). That is adequate while every route is a
|
||||
GET, and inadequate the moment Phase 2 wires a gated write. This module is the
|
||||
authorization model those writes must go through, landed *before* any of them
|
||||
exists so no write can be added without an authority to check against.
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 1 scope is the model itself: identity resolution, the role matrix, the
|
||||
privileged-action list, and a fail-closed :func:`authorize`. It deliberately
|
||||
does **not** enable any write. ``webui.gated_actions`` stays globally disabled,
|
||||
so an allow decision here is necessary but never sufficient.
|
||||
|
||||
Two invariants hold for every caller:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Default deny.** An unrecognised action, an unknown role, or an absent
|
||||
principal denies. There is no implicit allow branch and no "unless" clause.
|
||||
- **Authorization is not execution.** :func:`authorize` returns a decision
|
||||
record. It never calls MCP, never mutates, and never consults credentials.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
from dataclasses import asdict, dataclass, field
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
from task_capability_map import required_permission, required_role
|
||||
|
||||
# --- Roles ------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# Ordered least to most authority. Higher ranks inherit every lower rank's
|
||||
# permitted actions; the matrix below is expressed as a minimum required rank.
|
||||
VIEWER = "viewer"
|
||||
OPERATOR = "operator"
|
||||
CONTROLLER = "controller"
|
||||
ADMIN = "admin"
|
||||
|
||||
ROLE_ORDER: tuple[str, ...] = (VIEWER, OPERATOR, CONTROLLER, ADMIN)
|
||||
_ROLE_RANK: dict[str, int] = {role: idx for idx, role in enumerate(ROLE_ORDER)}
|
||||
|
||||
ROLE_DESCRIPTIONS: dict[str, str] = {
|
||||
VIEWER: "Read every console view. No write, ever, in any phase.",
|
||||
OPERATOR: "Viewer, plus author-class work: claim, comment, open a PR.",
|
||||
CONTROLLER: "Operator, plus reviewer/merger-class decisions on a PR.",
|
||||
ADMIN: "Controller, plus destructive and policy-editing actions.",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# --- Identity sources -------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
IDENTITY_NONE = "none"
|
||||
IDENTITY_LOCAL_DEV = "local_dev"
|
||||
IDENTITY_ACCESS_PROXY = "access_proxy"
|
||||
|
||||
IDENTITY_SOURCES: dict[str, dict[str, Any]] = {
|
||||
IDENTITY_NONE: {
|
||||
"description": (
|
||||
"No authentication configured. Every request is anonymous and "
|
||||
"capped at viewer. This is the MVP default and the only mode "
|
||||
"whose safety rests entirely on network placement (#435)."
|
||||
),
|
||||
"authenticated": False,
|
||||
"safe_for_shared_host": False,
|
||||
"phase_available": 1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
IDENTITY_LOCAL_DEV: {
|
||||
"description": (
|
||||
"Developer-supplied principal read from the environment. INSECURE: "
|
||||
"the subject and role are asserted, never verified. Loopback only."
|
||||
),
|
||||
"authenticated": True,
|
||||
"safe_for_shared_host": False,
|
||||
"phase_available": 1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
IDENTITY_ACCESS_PROXY: {
|
||||
"description": (
|
||||
"Subject asserted by a trusted access proxy (Cloudflare Access, "
|
||||
"WARP, or an org VPN portal) via a verified request header. The "
|
||||
"proxy performs authentication; the console performs authorization."
|
||||
),
|
||||
"authenticated": True,
|
||||
"safe_for_shared_host": True,
|
||||
"phase_available": 2,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Environment configuration. All are read server-side and never rendered.
|
||||
AUTH_MODE_ENV = "WEBUI_AUTH_MODE"
|
||||
DEV_SUBJECT_ENV = "WEBUI_DEV_SUBJECT"
|
||||
DEV_ROLE_ENV = "WEBUI_DEV_ROLE"
|
||||
ROLE_MAP_ENV = "WEBUI_ROLE_MAP"
|
||||
REQUIRE_PROBE_AUTH_ENV = "WEBUI_REQUIRE_PROBE_AUTH"
|
||||
ACCESS_SUBJECT_HEADER = "cf-access-authenticated-user-email"
|
||||
|
||||
# --- Action classes ---------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
CLASS_READ = "read"
|
||||
CLASS_WRITE = "gated_write"
|
||||
CLASS_PRIVILEGED = "privileged"
|
||||
CLASS_DESTRUCTIVE = "destructive"
|
||||
|
||||
# --- Privileged action list -------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# ``task_key`` ties each console action back to ``task_capability_map``, so the
|
||||
# console cannot invent an authority the MCP layer does not already define.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class ConsoleAction:
|
||||
"""One console action and the authority required to invoke it."""
|
||||
|
||||
action_id: str
|
||||
task_key: str
|
||||
action_class: str
|
||||
minimum_role: str
|
||||
requires_confirmation: bool
|
||||
dual_control: bool
|
||||
break_glass: bool
|
||||
phase: int
|
||||
summary: str
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def mcp_permission(self) -> str:
|
||||
return required_permission(self.task_key)
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def mcp_role(self) -> str:
|
||||
return required_role(self.task_key)
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def privileged(self) -> bool:
|
||||
return self.action_class in {CLASS_PRIVILEGED, CLASS_DESTRUCTIVE}
|
||||
|
||||
def to_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
data = asdict(self)
|
||||
data["mcp_permission"] = self.mcp_permission
|
||||
data["mcp_role"] = self.mcp_role
|
||||
data["privileged"] = self.privileged
|
||||
return data
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
_ACTION_SPECS: tuple[ConsoleAction, ...] = (
|
||||
ConsoleAction(
|
||||
action_id="claim_issue",
|
||||
task_key="claim_issue",
|
||||
action_class=CLASS_WRITE,
|
||||
minimum_role=OPERATOR,
|
||||
requires_confirmation=True,
|
||||
dual_control=False,
|
||||
break_glass=False,
|
||||
phase=2,
|
||||
summary="Apply status:in-progress to an issue.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
ConsoleAction(
|
||||
action_id="comment_issue",
|
||||
task_key="comment_issue",
|
||||
action_class=CLASS_WRITE,
|
||||
minimum_role=OPERATOR,
|
||||
requires_confirmation=True,
|
||||
dual_control=False,
|
||||
break_glass=False,
|
||||
phase=2,
|
||||
summary="Post an issue comment.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
ConsoleAction(
|
||||
action_id="create_issue",
|
||||
task_key="create_issue",
|
||||
action_class=CLASS_WRITE,
|
||||
minimum_role=OPERATOR,
|
||||
requires_confirmation=True,
|
||||
dual_control=False,
|
||||
break_glass=False,
|
||||
phase=2,
|
||||
summary="Open a new tracking issue.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
ConsoleAction(
|
||||
action_id="comment_pr",
|
||||
task_key="comment_pr",
|
||||
action_class=CLASS_WRITE,
|
||||
minimum_role=OPERATOR,
|
||||
requires_confirmation=True,
|
||||
dual_control=False,
|
||||
break_glass=False,
|
||||
phase=2,
|
||||
summary="Post a PR thread comment.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
ConsoleAction(
|
||||
action_id="create_pr",
|
||||
task_key="create_pr",
|
||||
action_class=CLASS_WRITE,
|
||||
minimum_role=OPERATOR,
|
||||
requires_confirmation=True,
|
||||
dual_control=False,
|
||||
break_glass=False,
|
||||
phase=2,
|
||||
summary="Open a PR from a locked feature branch.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
ConsoleAction(
|
||||
action_id="review_pr",
|
||||
task_key="review_pr",
|
||||
action_class=CLASS_PRIVILEGED,
|
||||
minimum_role=CONTROLLER,
|
||||
requires_confirmation=True,
|
||||
dual_control=False,
|
||||
break_glass=False,
|
||||
phase=3,
|
||||
summary="Submit an approve / request-changes verdict.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
ConsoleAction(
|
||||
action_id="close_pr",
|
||||
task_key="close_pr",
|
||||
action_class=CLASS_PRIVILEGED,
|
||||
minimum_role=CONTROLLER,
|
||||
requires_confirmation=True,
|
||||
dual_control=False,
|
||||
break_glass=False,
|
||||
phase=3,
|
||||
summary="Close a pull request without merging.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
ConsoleAction(
|
||||
action_id="merge_pr",
|
||||
task_key="merge_pr",
|
||||
action_class=CLASS_PRIVILEGED,
|
||||
minimum_role=CONTROLLER,
|
||||
requires_confirmation=True,
|
||||
dual_control=True,
|
||||
break_glass=True,
|
||||
phase=3,
|
||||
summary="Merge an approved pull request.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
ConsoleAction(
|
||||
action_id="delete_branch",
|
||||
task_key="delete_branch",
|
||||
action_class=CLASS_DESTRUCTIVE,
|
||||
minimum_role=ADMIN,
|
||||
requires_confirmation=True,
|
||||
dual_control=True,
|
||||
break_glass=True,
|
||||
phase=3,
|
||||
summary="Remove a remote feature branch.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIONS: dict[str, ConsoleAction] = {a.action_id: a for a in _ACTION_SPECS}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def privileged_actions() -> tuple[ConsoleAction, ...]:
|
||||
"""Actions requiring dual control, break-glass, or controller+ authority."""
|
||||
return tuple(a for a in _ACTION_SPECS if a.privileged)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def get_action(action_id: str) -> ConsoleAction | None:
|
||||
return ACTIONS.get(action_id)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# --- Principals -------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class Principal:
|
||||
"""Who is making a request, and how strongly that is known."""
|
||||
|
||||
subject: str
|
||||
role: str
|
||||
identity_source: str
|
||||
authenticated: bool
|
||||
warnings: tuple[str, ...] = field(default_factory=tuple)
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def rank(self) -> int:
|
||||
return _ROLE_RANK.get(self.role, -1)
|
||||
|
||||
def to_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"subject": self.subject,
|
||||
"role": self.role,
|
||||
"identity_source": self.identity_source,
|
||||
"authenticated": self.authenticated,
|
||||
"warnings": list(self.warnings),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
ANONYMOUS = Principal(
|
||||
subject="anonymous",
|
||||
role=VIEWER,
|
||||
identity_source=IDENTITY_NONE,
|
||||
authenticated=False,
|
||||
warnings=("No authentication configured; capped at viewer.",),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def auth_mode(env: dict[str, str] | None = None) -> str:
|
||||
"""Resolve the configured identity source, defaulting to ``none``."""
|
||||
source = env if env is not None else os.environ
|
||||
raw = (source.get(AUTH_MODE_ENV) or "").strip().lower().replace("-", "_")
|
||||
if raw in IDENTITY_SOURCES:
|
||||
return raw
|
||||
return IDENTITY_NONE
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _role_map(env: dict[str, str]) -> dict[str, str]:
|
||||
"""Parse ``WEBUI_ROLE_MAP`` (JSON subject→role). Invalid config yields {}."""
|
||||
raw = (env.get(ROLE_MAP_ENV) or "").strip()
|
||||
if not raw:
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
try:
|
||||
parsed = json.loads(raw)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
if not isinstance(parsed, dict):
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
return {
|
||||
str(k): str(v).strip().lower()
|
||||
for k, v in parsed.items()
|
||||
if str(v).strip().lower() in _ROLE_RANK
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def resolve_principal(
|
||||
headers: dict[str, str] | None = None,
|
||||
env: dict[str, str] | None = None,
|
||||
) -> Principal:
|
||||
"""Resolve the requesting principal. Unknown or unconfigured → anonymous.
|
||||
|
||||
Never raises and never trusts a client-supplied role: the role always comes
|
||||
from server-side configuration keyed by the resolved subject.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
source_env = dict(env) if env is not None else dict(os.environ)
|
||||
lowered = {str(k).lower(): str(v) for k, v in (headers or {}).items()}
|
||||
mode = auth_mode(source_env)
|
||||
|
||||
if mode == IDENTITY_LOCAL_DEV:
|
||||
subject = (source_env.get(DEV_SUBJECT_ENV) or "").strip()
|
||||
if not subject:
|
||||
return ANONYMOUS
|
||||
role = (source_env.get(DEV_ROLE_ENV) or VIEWER).strip().lower()
|
||||
if role not in _ROLE_RANK:
|
||||
role = VIEWER
|
||||
return Principal(
|
||||
subject=subject,
|
||||
role=role,
|
||||
identity_source=IDENTITY_LOCAL_DEV,
|
||||
authenticated=True,
|
||||
warnings=(
|
||||
"local-dev identity is asserted, not verified; never use "
|
||||
"outside loopback.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if mode == IDENTITY_ACCESS_PROXY:
|
||||
subject = (lowered.get(ACCESS_SUBJECT_HEADER) or "").strip()
|
||||
if not subject:
|
||||
# Proxy mode with no proxy header means the request did not
|
||||
# traverse the proxy. Fail closed rather than trust it.
|
||||
return ANONYMOUS
|
||||
role = _role_map(source_env).get(subject, VIEWER)
|
||||
return Principal(
|
||||
subject=subject,
|
||||
role=role,
|
||||
identity_source=IDENTITY_ACCESS_PROXY,
|
||||
authenticated=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return ANONYMOUS
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def probe_auth_required(env: dict[str, str] | None = None) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Whether non-public probes must be authenticated. Default False.
|
||||
|
||||
#633 requires the console to *fail closed on missing auth for non-public
|
||||
health probes if configured*. The default stays off so the MVP ``/health``
|
||||
contract is unchanged; an operator opts in explicitly.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
source = env if env is not None else os.environ
|
||||
return (source.get(REQUIRE_PROBE_AUTH_ENV) or "").strip().lower() in {
|
||||
"1",
|
||||
"true",
|
||||
"yes",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# --- Authorization ----------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
DENY_UNKNOWN_ACTION = "unknown_action"
|
||||
DENY_UNAUTHENTICATED = "unauthenticated"
|
||||
DENY_INSUFFICIENT_ROLE = "insufficient_role"
|
||||
DENY_UNKNOWN_ROLE = "unknown_role"
|
||||
DENY_PHASE_NOT_ACTIVE = "phase_not_active"
|
||||
ALLOW_PREVIEW = "allowed_preview_only"
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 1 is the only active console phase. Phase 2 opens gated writes and is
|
||||
# gated on this model landing; nothing here enables it.
|
||||
ACTIVE_PHASE = 1
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class AuthorizationDecision:
|
||||
"""Result of an authorization check. Never an execution grant."""
|
||||
|
||||
allowed: bool
|
||||
reason_code: str
|
||||
detail: str
|
||||
action_id: str
|
||||
principal: Principal
|
||||
required_role: str | None = None
|
||||
action_class: str | None = None
|
||||
requires_confirmation: bool = False
|
||||
dual_control: bool = False
|
||||
break_glass: bool = False
|
||||
execution_enabled: bool = False
|
||||
|
||||
def to_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"allowed": self.allowed,
|
||||
"reason_code": self.reason_code,
|
||||
"detail": self.detail,
|
||||
"action_id": self.action_id,
|
||||
"principal": self.principal.to_dict(),
|
||||
"required_role": self.required_role,
|
||||
"action_class": self.action_class,
|
||||
"requires_confirmation": self.requires_confirmation,
|
||||
"dual_control": self.dual_control,
|
||||
"break_glass": self.break_glass,
|
||||
"execution_enabled": self.execution_enabled,
|
||||
"active_phase": ACTIVE_PHASE,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def authorize(
|
||||
action_id: str,
|
||||
principal: Principal | None = None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
for_execution: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> AuthorizationDecision:
|
||||
"""Decide whether *principal* may invoke *action_id*. Deny by default.
|
||||
|
||||
``for_execution`` distinguishes a read-only preview from a real invocation.
|
||||
Even an allowed decision reports ``execution_enabled=False`` while the
|
||||
console is in Phase 1, so no caller can read an allow as permission to
|
||||
mutate.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
who = principal if principal is not None else ANONYMOUS
|
||||
action = get_action(action_id)
|
||||
|
||||
if action is None:
|
||||
return AuthorizationDecision(
|
||||
allowed=False,
|
||||
reason_code=DENY_UNKNOWN_ACTION,
|
||||
detail=f"No console action registered as {action_id!r}.",
|
||||
action_id=action_id,
|
||||
principal=who,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
base: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"action_id": action_id,
|
||||
"principal": who,
|
||||
"required_role": action.minimum_role,
|
||||
"action_class": action.action_class,
|
||||
"requires_confirmation": action.requires_confirmation,
|
||||
"dual_control": action.dual_control,
|
||||
"break_glass": action.break_glass,
|
||||
"execution_enabled": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if not who.authenticated:
|
||||
return AuthorizationDecision(
|
||||
allowed=False,
|
||||
reason_code=DENY_UNAUTHENTICATED,
|
||||
detail=(
|
||||
"Write actions require an authenticated principal; this "
|
||||
"request is anonymous."
|
||||
),
|
||||
**base,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if who.rank < 0:
|
||||
return AuthorizationDecision(
|
||||
allowed=False,
|
||||
reason_code=DENY_UNKNOWN_ROLE,
|
||||
detail=f"Role {who.role!r} is not in the console role matrix.",
|
||||
**base,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if who.rank < _ROLE_RANK[action.minimum_role]:
|
||||
return AuthorizationDecision(
|
||||
allowed=False,
|
||||
reason_code=DENY_INSUFFICIENT_ROLE,
|
||||
detail=(
|
||||
f"Action {action_id!r} requires {action.minimum_role!r}; "
|
||||
f"principal holds {who.role!r}."
|
||||
),
|
||||
**base,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if for_execution and action.phase > ACTIVE_PHASE:
|
||||
return AuthorizationDecision(
|
||||
allowed=False,
|
||||
reason_code=DENY_PHASE_NOT_ACTIVE,
|
||||
detail=(
|
||||
f"Action {action_id!r} belongs to phase {action.phase}; the "
|
||||
f"console is in phase {ACTIVE_PHASE}. Execution is not wired."
|
||||
),
|
||||
**base,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return AuthorizationDecision(
|
||||
allowed=True,
|
||||
reason_code=ALLOW_PREVIEW,
|
||||
detail=(
|
||||
"Principal holds the required role. Preview only — execution "
|
||||
"remains disabled until the Phase 2 action framework ships."
|
||||
),
|
||||
**base,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def rbac_matrix() -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Machine-readable RBAC matrix and privileged-action list."""
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"model_version": 1,
|
||||
"active_phase": ACTIVE_PHASE,
|
||||
"roles": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"role": role,
|
||||
"rank": _ROLE_RANK[role],
|
||||
"description": ROLE_DESCRIPTIONS[role],
|
||||
"permitted_actions": sorted(
|
||||
a.action_id
|
||||
for a in _ACTION_SPECS
|
||||
if _ROLE_RANK[role] >= _ROLE_RANK[a.minimum_role]
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
for role in ROLE_ORDER
|
||||
],
|
||||
"identity_sources": IDENTITY_SOURCES,
|
||||
"actions": [a.to_dict() for a in _ACTION_SPECS],
|
||||
"privileged_actions": [a.action_id for a in privileged_actions()],
|
||||
"default_decision": "deny",
|
||||
"execution_enabled": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
|
||||
"""Secret redaction policy for every console surface (#633).
|
||||
|
||||
The MVP already redacts MCP-side mutation records through ``gitea_audit``.
|
||||
This module is the console-facing policy: one redaction pass applied to API
|
||||
payloads, rendered HTML, log lines, and audit records *before* they leave the
|
||||
server or reach persistent storage.
|
||||
|
||||
Design constraints:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Reuse, never fork.** ``gitea_audit.redact`` remains the authority for
|
||||
secret-looking dict keys, ``Authorization`` material, and raw URLs. This
|
||||
module runs that pass first and then applies console-specific patterns for
|
||||
keychain references, key/value assignments, private-key blocks, and JWTs.
|
||||
- **Never raises.** Redaction is a safety control; a malformed payload must
|
||||
degrade to a redacted placeholder rather than propagate an exception.
|
||||
- **Redact before persist.** ``webui.console_audit`` calls this module before
|
||||
writing, so an unredacted record is never durable.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import re
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
import gitea_audit
|
||||
|
||||
REDACTED = gitea_audit.REDACTED
|
||||
|
||||
# Console-specific patterns applied after the shared ``gitea_audit`` pass.
|
||||
# Each keeps the identifying key so an operator can still tell *what* was
|
||||
# removed, and replaces only the secret run itself.
|
||||
_KEYCHAIN_REF = re.compile(r"(?i)\bkeychain:[\w.\-/@]+")
|
||||
_KEYCHAIN_CMD = re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?i)\bsecurity\s+find-(?:generic|internet)-password\b[^\n]*"
|
||||
)
|
||||
_ASSIGNMENT = re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?i)\b(token|password|passwd|secret|api[_-]?key|access[_-]?key|"
|
||||
r"client[_-]?secret|private[_-]?key)\b(\s*[:=]\s*)"
|
||||
r"(\"[^\"]*\"|'[^']*'|\S+)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
_ENV_ASSIGNMENT = re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?i)\b(GITEA_(?:TOKEN|PASS|PASSWORD)[A-Z0-9_]*)(\s*=\s*)"
|
||||
r"(\"[^\"]*\"|'[^']*'|\S+)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
_PRIVATE_KEY_BLOCK = re.compile(
|
||||
r"-----BEGIN [A-Z ]*PRIVATE KEY-----.*?-----END [A-Z ]*PRIVATE KEY-----",
|
||||
re.S,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_JWT = re.compile(
|
||||
r"\beyJ[A-Za-z0-9_\-]{8,}\.[A-Za-z0-9_\-]{8,}\.[A-Za-z0-9_\-]{8,}\b"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Shapes that mean a payload still carries a secret. ``scan_for_secrets`` uses
|
||||
# these to assert a surface is clean.
|
||||
_DETECTORS: tuple[tuple[str, re.Pattern[str]], ...] = (
|
||||
("keychain_reference", _KEYCHAIN_REF),
|
||||
("keychain_command", _KEYCHAIN_CMD),
|
||||
("credential_assignment", _ASSIGNMENT),
|
||||
("credential_env_assignment", _ENV_ASSIGNMENT),
|
||||
("private_key_block", _PRIVATE_KEY_BLOCK),
|
||||
("json_web_token", _JWT),
|
||||
("bearer_credential", re.compile(r"(?i)\b(?:bearer|basic)\s+\S{8,}")),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _mask_assignment(match: re.Match[str]) -> str:
|
||||
"""Keep the key and separator, replace the value."""
|
||||
return f"{match.group(1)}{match.group(2)}{REDACTED}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def redact_text(text: Any) -> Any:
|
||||
"""Redact secret material from a single string.
|
||||
|
||||
Non-strings are returned unchanged so this is safe to map over mixed
|
||||
payloads. Runs the shared ``gitea_audit`` pass first, then the
|
||||
console-specific patterns.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not isinstance(text, str) or not text:
|
||||
return text
|
||||
try:
|
||||
out = gitea_audit.redact(text)
|
||||
if not isinstance(out, str): # defensive; redact() returns str for str
|
||||
return REDACTED
|
||||
out = _PRIVATE_KEY_BLOCK.sub(f"{REDACTED}_PRIVATE_KEY", out)
|
||||
out = _ENV_ASSIGNMENT.sub(_mask_assignment, out)
|
||||
out = _ASSIGNMENT.sub(_mask_assignment, out)
|
||||
out = _KEYCHAIN_CMD.sub(f"{REDACTED}_KEYCHAIN_COMMAND", out)
|
||||
out = _KEYCHAIN_REF.sub(f"{REDACTED}_KEYCHAIN_REF", out)
|
||||
out = _JWT.sub(f"{REDACTED}_JWT", out)
|
||||
return out
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
# Fail closed: an unredactable string is dropped rather than emitted raw.
|
||||
return REDACTED
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def redact_payload(value: Any) -> Any:
|
||||
"""Recursively redact a JSON-able payload for any console surface.
|
||||
|
||||
Secret-looking dict keys are replaced wholesale by the shared
|
||||
``gitea_audit`` policy; every remaining string is run through
|
||||
:func:`redact_text`.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
shared = gitea_audit.redact(value)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
return REDACTED
|
||||
return _walk(shared)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _walk(value: Any) -> Any:
|
||||
if isinstance(value, dict):
|
||||
return {k: _walk(v) for k, v in value.items()}
|
||||
if isinstance(value, (list, tuple)):
|
||||
return [_walk(v) for v in value]
|
||||
if isinstance(value, str):
|
||||
return redact_text(value)
|
||||
return value
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def scan_for_secrets(value: Any) -> list[str]:
|
||||
"""Return detector names that still match *value* after serialization.
|
||||
|
||||
Used to assert an outbound payload or rendered page is clean. An empty
|
||||
list means no known secret shape was found. Already-redacted hits are not
|
||||
findings.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if isinstance(value, str):
|
||||
text = value
|
||||
else:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
text = json.dumps(value, default=str)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
text = str(value)
|
||||
findings: list[str] = []
|
||||
for name, pattern in _DETECTORS:
|
||||
for match in pattern.finditer(text):
|
||||
if REDACTED in match.group(0):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
findings.append(name)
|
||||
break
|
||||
return findings
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def redaction_policy() -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Machine-readable statement of the redaction rules (never secrets)."""
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"policy_version": 1,
|
||||
"applies_to": [
|
||||
"json_api_responses",
|
||||
"rendered_html",
|
||||
"server_logs",
|
||||
"audit_records",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"ordering": "shared gitea_audit pass, then console patterns",
|
||||
"redact_before_persist": True,
|
||||
"shared_rules": {
|
||||
"source": "gitea_audit.redact",
|
||||
"secret_key_hints": list(gitea_audit._SECRET_KEY_HINTS),
|
||||
"secret_value_prefixes": list(gitea_audit._SECRET_VALUE_PREFIXES),
|
||||
"urls": "credentials, secret query parameters, and real hosts redacted",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"console_rules": [
|
||||
{"name": name, "pattern": pattern.pattern}
|
||||
for name, pattern in _DETECTORS
|
||||
],
|
||||
"placeholder": REDACTED,
|
||||
"failure_mode": "fail closed — unredactable values become the placeholder",
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"revision": 1,
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-07-22T00:00:00Z",
|
||||
"providers": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "claude",
|
||||
"display_name": "Claude",
|
||||
"vendor": "Anthropic",
|
||||
"executable": "claude",
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"models": [
|
||||
"claude-opus-4-8",
|
||||
"claude-sonnet-5",
|
||||
"claude-haiku-4-5-20251001"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"notes": "Model list is a declaration. Live enumeration and version inspection belong to the provider adapter framework (#800)."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "grok",
|
||||
"display_name": "Grok",
|
||||
"vendor": "xAI",
|
||||
"executable": "grok",
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"models": [],
|
||||
"notes": "Models enumerated by the provider adapter (#800); not declared here."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "codex",
|
||||
"display_name": "Codex",
|
||||
"vendor": "OpenAI",
|
||||
"executable": "codex",
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"models": [],
|
||||
"notes": "Models enumerated by the provider adapter (#800); not declared here."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "agy",
|
||||
"display_name": "AGY",
|
||||
"vendor": "Antigravity",
|
||||
"executable": "agy",
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"models": [],
|
||||
"notes": "MCP allowlist gating applies to this provider; confirm server-side allowlist before configuring a worker."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "kimi-k",
|
||||
"display_name": "Kimi K",
|
||||
"vendor": "Moonshot AI",
|
||||
"executable": "kimi",
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"models": [],
|
||||
"notes": "Provider id is kimi-k; the executable on PATH is kimi. Models enumerated by the provider adapter (#800)."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"workers": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -8,27 +8,7 @@ from dataclasses import dataclass
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
_FORBIDDEN_EXACT_KEYS = frozenset({
|
||||
"token",
|
||||
"password",
|
||||
"secret",
|
||||
"credential",
|
||||
"auth",
|
||||
"api_key",
|
||||
"api-key",
|
||||
})
|
||||
_FORBIDDEN_KEY_PREFIXES = ("auth_", "api_key_", "api-key_")
|
||||
_FORBIDDEN_KEY_SUFFIXES = ("_token", "_secret", "_password", "_credential", "_auth")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _is_forbidden_key(key: str) -> bool:
|
||||
lowered = key.lower()
|
||||
if lowered in _FORBIDDEN_EXACT_KEYS:
|
||||
return True
|
||||
return (
|
||||
lowered.startswith(_FORBIDDEN_KEY_PREFIXES)
|
||||
or lowered.endswith(_FORBIDDEN_KEY_SUFFIXES)
|
||||
)
|
||||
from webui.registry_safety import reject_credential_keys as _reject_credential_keys
|
||||
|
||||
_REQUIRED_PROJECT_FIELDS = (
|
||||
"id",
|
||||
@@ -79,18 +59,6 @@ def default_registry_path() -> Path:
|
||||
return (Path(__file__).resolve().parent / "data" / "projects.registry.json").resolve()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _reject_credential_keys(obj: Any, *, path: str = "") -> None:
|
||||
if isinstance(obj, dict):
|
||||
for key, value in obj.items():
|
||||
key_path = f"{path}.{key}" if path else key
|
||||
if _is_forbidden_key(key):
|
||||
raise ValueError(f"registry must not store credentials ({key_path})")
|
||||
_reject_credential_keys(value, path=key_path)
|
||||
elif isinstance(obj, list):
|
||||
for index, item in enumerate(obj):
|
||||
_reject_credential_keys(item, path=f"{path}[{index}]")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_onboarding(raw: list[dict[str, Any]] | None) -> tuple[OnboardingStep, ...]:
|
||||
if not raw:
|
||||
return ()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
||||
"""Shared credential-rejection guard for web UI registries (#427, #798).
|
||||
|
||||
Registries are operator-editable declarative files that the web UI loads and,
|
||||
for the worker registry, writes back. None of them may ever carry a secret:
|
||||
credentials belong in the keychain and reach worker processes through
|
||||
environment injection, never through a file the browser layer can read.
|
||||
|
||||
The check is structural rather than value-based on purpose. A value scanner has
|
||||
to guess what a secret looks like; a key scanner refuses the *shape* of a
|
||||
credential field, so an operator cannot introduce one by accident and a later
|
||||
loader cannot silently pass one through.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
_FORBIDDEN_EXACT_KEYS = frozenset({
|
||||
"token",
|
||||
"password",
|
||||
"secret",
|
||||
"credential",
|
||||
"auth",
|
||||
"api_key",
|
||||
"api-key",
|
||||
})
|
||||
_FORBIDDEN_KEY_PREFIXES = ("auth_", "api_key_", "api-key_")
|
||||
_FORBIDDEN_KEY_SUFFIXES = ("_token", "_secret", "_password", "_credential", "_auth")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def is_forbidden_key(key: str) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Return True when *key* names a credential field."""
|
||||
lowered = key.lower()
|
||||
if lowered in _FORBIDDEN_EXACT_KEYS:
|
||||
return True
|
||||
return (
|
||||
lowered.startswith(_FORBIDDEN_KEY_PREFIXES)
|
||||
or lowered.endswith(_FORBIDDEN_KEY_SUFFIXES)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def reject_credential_keys(obj: Any, *, path: str = "", subject: str = "registry") -> None:
|
||||
"""Raise ValueError when *obj* carries a credential-shaped key at any depth."""
|
||||
if isinstance(obj, dict):
|
||||
for key, value in obj.items():
|
||||
key_path = f"{path}.{key}" if path else key
|
||||
if is_forbidden_key(key):
|
||||
raise ValueError(f"{subject} must not store credentials ({key_path})")
|
||||
reject_credential_keys(value, path=key_path, subject=subject)
|
||||
elif isinstance(obj, list):
|
||||
for index, item in enumerate(obj):
|
||||
reject_credential_keys(item, path=f"{path}[{index}]", subject=subject)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,647 @@
|
||||
"""Declarative worker registry and configuration schema (#798, epic #797).
|
||||
|
||||
The registry is the single source of truth for the scheduled multi-LLM worker
|
||||
fleet. It is a versioned JSON document holding two *separate* entity kinds:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Providers** — the LLM runtimes a worker can be built on (Claude, Grok,
|
||||
Codex, AGY, Kimi K). A provider describes the runtime itself: vendor,
|
||||
executable name, models it can serve, and whether it is available on this
|
||||
machine. Providers exist whether or not any worker uses them.
|
||||
* **Workers** — a configured *instance*: one provider, one model, one project,
|
||||
one role, one MCP namespace/profile, one workflow, one schedule. Several
|
||||
workers may share a provider; a worker naming an undeclared provider is
|
||||
refused.
|
||||
|
||||
Keeping them separate is what lets #799 list all five providers even when a
|
||||
provider currently has no configured worker, and it stops provider facts from
|
||||
being copied into (and drifting across) every worker record.
|
||||
|
||||
Scope boundary. This module owns the data model, its validation, and its
|
||||
persistence. It does **not** schedule anything, launch anything, probe provider
|
||||
executables, or serve HTTP. Loading a registry never touches a process; the
|
||||
live fields a dashboard wants (PID, elapsed time, next run) are derived
|
||||
elsewhere (#799, #801, #803, #804) from these declarations.
|
||||
|
||||
Safety invariants:
|
||||
|
||||
* No credential may be stored (:mod:`webui.registry_safety`), so the registry
|
||||
stays safe to render and to hand to a browser layer.
|
||||
* Validation fails closed. Unknown fields are refused rather than ignored, so a
|
||||
typo cannot silently disable a timeout or a role binding.
|
||||
* Writes are atomic and every superseded document is retained as a numbered
|
||||
revision, so a bad edit is recoverable by rollback rather than hand-repair.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import re
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timezone
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
from webui.registry_safety import reject_credential_keys
|
||||
|
||||
SCHEMA_VERSION = 1
|
||||
|
||||
#: Roles a worker may hold. These mirror the sanctioned MCP role kinds; a
|
||||
#: worker may not invent one, because the role selects the namespace/profile
|
||||
#: whose capability gates constrain it.
|
||||
ALLOWED_ROLES = ("author", "reviewer", "merger", "reconciler", "cleanup")
|
||||
|
||||
#: Scheduler backends the registry can describe. ``manual`` means the worker is
|
||||
#: only ever started on request and has no recurring trigger.
|
||||
ALLOWED_SCHEDULER_KINDS = ("launchd", "manual")
|
||||
|
||||
#: Schedule kinds. Next-run computation belongs to #803; this module only
|
||||
#: guarantees the declaration is well formed.
|
||||
ALLOWED_SCHEDULE_KINDS = ("interval", "cron", "manual")
|
||||
|
||||
_REQUIRED_PROVIDER_FIELDS = ("id", "display_name", "vendor", "executable", "available")
|
||||
_OPTIONAL_PROVIDER_FIELDS = ("models", "notes")
|
||||
|
||||
_REQUIRED_WORKER_FIELDS = (
|
||||
"id",
|
||||
"display_name",
|
||||
"provider",
|
||||
"model",
|
||||
"project",
|
||||
"role",
|
||||
"namespace",
|
||||
"profile",
|
||||
"workflow",
|
||||
"schedule",
|
||||
"timeout_seconds",
|
||||
"enabled",
|
||||
"scheduler",
|
||||
)
|
||||
_OPTIONAL_WORKER_FIELDS = ("notes",)
|
||||
|
||||
_ID_RE = re.compile(r"^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9._-]*$")
|
||||
|
||||
#: Guards against an operator writing a timeout that would let a worker hold a
|
||||
#: lease effectively forever. 24h is far above any sanctioned cycle.
|
||||
_MAX_TIMEOUT_SECONDS = 86_400
|
||||
|
||||
#: How many superseded revisions to retain beside the live file.
|
||||
_HISTORY_LIMIT = 20
|
||||
|
||||
_TOP_LEVEL_FIELDS = frozenset({"version", "revision", "updated_at", "providers", "workers"})
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class RegistryValidationError(ValueError):
|
||||
"""Raised when a registry document violates the schema."""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class ProviderRecord:
|
||||
id: str
|
||||
display_name: str
|
||||
vendor: str
|
||||
executable: str
|
||||
available: bool
|
||||
models: tuple[str, ...]
|
||||
notes: str
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class ScheduleSpec:
|
||||
kind: str
|
||||
#: Set for ``interval`` schedules.
|
||||
seconds: int | None
|
||||
#: Set for ``cron`` schedules — a five-field crontab expression.
|
||||
expression: str | None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class SchedulerSpec:
|
||||
kind: str
|
||||
#: LaunchAgent label; required for ``launchd``, absent for ``manual``.
|
||||
label: str | None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class WorkerRecord:
|
||||
id: str
|
||||
display_name: str
|
||||
provider: str
|
||||
model: str
|
||||
project: str
|
||||
role: str
|
||||
namespace: str
|
||||
profile: str
|
||||
workflow: str
|
||||
schedule: ScheduleSpec
|
||||
timeout_seconds: int
|
||||
enabled: bool
|
||||
scheduler: SchedulerSpec
|
||||
notes: str
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class WorkerRegistry:
|
||||
version: int
|
||||
revision: int
|
||||
updated_at: str
|
||||
providers: tuple[ProviderRecord, ...]
|
||||
workers: tuple[WorkerRecord, ...]
|
||||
source_path: Path
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── paths ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def default_registry_path() -> Path:
|
||||
"""Location of the packaged worker registry, overridable for tests/deploys."""
|
||||
override = os.environ.get("WEBUI_WORKER_REGISTRY", "").strip()
|
||||
if override:
|
||||
return Path(override).expanduser().resolve()
|
||||
return (Path(__file__).resolve().parent / "data" / "workers.registry.json").resolve()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def history_dir(path: Path | None = None) -> Path:
|
||||
"""Directory holding superseded revisions of *path*."""
|
||||
source = (path or default_registry_path()).resolve()
|
||||
return source.parent / f"{source.name}.history"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── field helpers ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _require_exact_fields(
|
||||
raw: Any,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
required: tuple[str, ...],
|
||||
optional: tuple[str, ...],
|
||||
subject: str,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
if not isinstance(raw, dict):
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject} must be an object")
|
||||
missing = [field for field in required if field not in raw]
|
||||
if missing:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(
|
||||
f"{subject} missing required fields: {', '.join(sorted(missing))}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
unknown = sorted(set(raw) - set(required) - set(optional))
|
||||
if unknown:
|
||||
# Fail closed: silently dropping an unrecognized key is how a typo'd
|
||||
# "timeout_second" ends up meaning "no timeout".
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject} has unknown fields: {', '.join(unknown)}")
|
||||
return raw
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _require_identifier(value: Any, *, subject: str) -> str:
|
||||
text = str(value).strip()
|
||||
if not _ID_RE.match(text):
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(
|
||||
f"{subject} must be lowercase alphanumeric with '.', '_', or '-' (got {value!r})"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _require_text(value: Any, *, subject: str) -> str:
|
||||
if not isinstance(value, str):
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject} must be a string (got {value!r})")
|
||||
text = value.strip()
|
||||
if not text:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject} must be a non-empty string")
|
||||
return text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _require_bool(value: Any, *, subject: str) -> bool:
|
||||
if not isinstance(value, bool):
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject} must be a boolean (got {value!r})")
|
||||
return value
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _require_positive_int(value: Any, *, subject: str, maximum: int | None = None) -> int:
|
||||
if isinstance(value, bool) or not isinstance(value, int):
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject} must be an integer (got {value!r})")
|
||||
if value <= 0:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject} must be greater than zero (got {value})")
|
||||
if maximum is not None and value > maximum:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject} must not exceed {maximum} (got {value})")
|
||||
return value
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── parsing ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_provider(raw: Any) -> ProviderRecord:
|
||||
data = _require_exact_fields(
|
||||
raw,
|
||||
required=_REQUIRED_PROVIDER_FIELDS,
|
||||
optional=_OPTIONAL_PROVIDER_FIELDS,
|
||||
subject="provider",
|
||||
)
|
||||
provider_id = _require_identifier(data["id"], subject="provider.id")
|
||||
|
||||
models_raw = data.get("models") or []
|
||||
if not isinstance(models_raw, list):
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"provider[{provider_id}].models must be an array")
|
||||
models = tuple(
|
||||
_require_text(item, subject=f"provider[{provider_id}].models[]") for item in models_raw
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return ProviderRecord(
|
||||
id=provider_id,
|
||||
display_name=_require_text(
|
||||
data["display_name"], subject=f"provider[{provider_id}].display_name"
|
||||
),
|
||||
vendor=_require_text(data["vendor"], subject=f"provider[{provider_id}].vendor"),
|
||||
executable=_require_text(data["executable"], subject=f"provider[{provider_id}].executable"),
|
||||
available=_require_bool(data["available"], subject=f"provider[{provider_id}].available"),
|
||||
models=models,
|
||||
notes=str(data.get("notes") or "").strip(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_schedule(raw: Any, *, subject: str) -> ScheduleSpec:
|
||||
if not isinstance(raw, dict):
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject} must be an object")
|
||||
kind = _require_text(raw.get("kind"), subject=f"{subject}.kind")
|
||||
if kind not in ALLOWED_SCHEDULE_KINDS:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(
|
||||
f"{subject}.kind must be one of {', '.join(ALLOWED_SCHEDULE_KINDS)} (got {kind!r})"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
seconds: int | None = None
|
||||
expression: str | None = None
|
||||
|
||||
if kind == "interval":
|
||||
if "seconds" not in raw:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject}.seconds is required for interval schedules")
|
||||
seconds = _require_positive_int(raw["seconds"], subject=f"{subject}.seconds")
|
||||
elif kind == "cron":
|
||||
if "expression" not in raw:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject}.expression is required for cron schedules")
|
||||
expression = _require_text(raw["expression"], subject=f"{subject}.expression")
|
||||
if len(expression.split()) != 5:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(
|
||||
f"{subject}.expression must have five crontab fields (got {expression!r})"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
allowed = {"kind"}
|
||||
if kind == "interval":
|
||||
allowed.add("seconds")
|
||||
elif kind == "cron":
|
||||
allowed.add("expression")
|
||||
unknown = sorted(set(raw) - allowed)
|
||||
if unknown:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(
|
||||
f"{subject} has fields not valid for kind {kind!r}: {', '.join(unknown)}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return ScheduleSpec(kind=kind, seconds=seconds, expression=expression)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_scheduler(raw: Any, *, subject: str) -> SchedulerSpec:
|
||||
if not isinstance(raw, dict):
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject} must be an object")
|
||||
kind = _require_text(raw.get("kind"), subject=f"{subject}.kind")
|
||||
if kind not in ALLOWED_SCHEDULER_KINDS:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(
|
||||
f"{subject}.kind must be one of {', '.join(ALLOWED_SCHEDULER_KINDS)} (got {kind!r})"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
label: str | None = None
|
||||
if kind == "launchd":
|
||||
if "label" not in raw:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"{subject}.label is required for launchd schedulers")
|
||||
label = _require_text(raw["label"], subject=f"{subject}.label")
|
||||
|
||||
allowed = {"kind"}
|
||||
if kind == "launchd":
|
||||
allowed.add("label")
|
||||
unknown = sorted(set(raw) - allowed)
|
||||
if unknown:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(
|
||||
f"{subject} has fields not valid for kind {kind!r}: {', '.join(unknown)}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return SchedulerSpec(kind=kind, label=label)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_worker(raw: Any) -> WorkerRecord:
|
||||
data = _require_exact_fields(
|
||||
raw,
|
||||
required=_REQUIRED_WORKER_FIELDS,
|
||||
optional=_OPTIONAL_WORKER_FIELDS,
|
||||
subject="worker",
|
||||
)
|
||||
worker_id = _require_identifier(data["id"], subject="worker.id")
|
||||
|
||||
role = _require_text(data["role"], subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].role")
|
||||
if role not in ALLOWED_ROLES:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(
|
||||
f"worker[{worker_id}].role must be one of {', '.join(ALLOWED_ROLES)} (got {role!r})"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return WorkerRecord(
|
||||
id=worker_id,
|
||||
display_name=_require_text(
|
||||
data["display_name"], subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].display_name"
|
||||
),
|
||||
provider=_require_identifier(data["provider"], subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].provider"),
|
||||
model=_require_text(data["model"], subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].model"),
|
||||
project=_require_text(data["project"], subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].project"),
|
||||
role=role,
|
||||
namespace=_require_text(data["namespace"], subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].namespace"),
|
||||
profile=_require_text(data["profile"], subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].profile"),
|
||||
workflow=_require_text(data["workflow"], subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].workflow"),
|
||||
schedule=_parse_schedule(data["schedule"], subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].schedule"),
|
||||
timeout_seconds=_require_positive_int(
|
||||
data["timeout_seconds"],
|
||||
subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].timeout_seconds",
|
||||
maximum=_MAX_TIMEOUT_SECONDS,
|
||||
),
|
||||
enabled=_require_bool(data["enabled"], subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].enabled"),
|
||||
scheduler=_parse_scheduler(data["scheduler"], subject=f"worker[{worker_id}].scheduler"),
|
||||
notes=str(data.get("notes") or "").strip(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _require_unique(values: list[str], *, subject: str) -> None:
|
||||
seen: set[str] = set()
|
||||
for value in values:
|
||||
if value in seen:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"duplicate {subject}: {value}")
|
||||
seen.add(value)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def validate_payload(payload: Any, *, source_path: Path) -> WorkerRegistry:
|
||||
"""Validate a decoded registry document and return the typed registry.
|
||||
|
||||
Raises :class:`RegistryValidationError` on any violation; never partially
|
||||
accepts a document.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not isinstance(payload, dict):
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError("registry root must be an object")
|
||||
|
||||
version = payload.get("version")
|
||||
if version != SCHEMA_VERSION:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"unsupported registry version: {version!r}")
|
||||
|
||||
reject_credential_keys(payload, subject="worker registry")
|
||||
|
||||
unknown = sorted(set(payload) - _TOP_LEVEL_FIELDS)
|
||||
if unknown:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(f"registry has unknown fields: {', '.join(unknown)}")
|
||||
|
||||
revision = _require_positive_int(payload.get("revision"), subject="revision")
|
||||
updated_at = _require_text(payload.get("updated_at"), subject="updated_at")
|
||||
|
||||
providers_raw = payload.get("providers")
|
||||
if not isinstance(providers_raw, list) or not providers_raw:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError("providers must be a non-empty array")
|
||||
providers = tuple(_parse_provider(item) for item in providers_raw)
|
||||
_require_unique([provider.id for provider in providers], subject="provider id")
|
||||
|
||||
workers_raw = payload.get("workers")
|
||||
if not isinstance(workers_raw, list):
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError("workers must be an array")
|
||||
workers = tuple(_parse_worker(item) for item in workers_raw)
|
||||
_require_unique([worker.id for worker in workers], subject="worker id")
|
||||
|
||||
# Referential integrity: a worker naming an undeclared provider would look
|
||||
# configured while being unrunnable, which is exactly the ambiguous
|
||||
# ownership the epic requires to fail closed.
|
||||
known_providers = {provider.id for provider in providers}
|
||||
for worker in workers:
|
||||
if worker.provider not in known_providers:
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(
|
||||
f"worker[{worker.id}].provider references unknown provider {worker.provider!r}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A LaunchAgent label identifies a job to launchd; two workers sharing one
|
||||
# would silently overwrite each other's agent.
|
||||
_require_unique(
|
||||
[worker.scheduler.label for worker in workers if worker.scheduler.label],
|
||||
subject="scheduler label",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return WorkerRegistry(
|
||||
version=version,
|
||||
revision=revision,
|
||||
updated_at=updated_at,
|
||||
providers=providers,
|
||||
workers=workers,
|
||||
source_path=source_path,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def load_registry(path: Path | None = None) -> WorkerRegistry:
|
||||
"""Load and validate the worker registry from disk."""
|
||||
source = (path or default_registry_path()).resolve()
|
||||
payload = json.loads(source.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
||||
return validate_payload(payload, source_path=source)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── serialization ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def provider_to_dict(provider: ProviderRecord) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"id": provider.id,
|
||||
"display_name": provider.display_name,
|
||||
"vendor": provider.vendor,
|
||||
"executable": provider.executable,
|
||||
"available": provider.available,
|
||||
"models": list(provider.models),
|
||||
"notes": provider.notes,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _schedule_to_dict(schedule: ScheduleSpec) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
payload: dict[str, Any] = {"kind": schedule.kind}
|
||||
if schedule.kind == "interval":
|
||||
payload["seconds"] = schedule.seconds
|
||||
elif schedule.kind == "cron":
|
||||
payload["expression"] = schedule.expression
|
||||
return payload
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _scheduler_to_dict(scheduler: SchedulerSpec) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
payload: dict[str, Any] = {"kind": scheduler.kind}
|
||||
if scheduler.kind == "launchd":
|
||||
payload["label"] = scheduler.label
|
||||
return payload
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def worker_to_dict(worker: WorkerRecord) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"id": worker.id,
|
||||
"display_name": worker.display_name,
|
||||
"provider": worker.provider,
|
||||
"model": worker.model,
|
||||
"project": worker.project,
|
||||
"role": worker.role,
|
||||
"namespace": worker.namespace,
|
||||
"profile": worker.profile,
|
||||
"workflow": worker.workflow,
|
||||
"schedule": _schedule_to_dict(worker.schedule),
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": worker.timeout_seconds,
|
||||
"enabled": worker.enabled,
|
||||
"scheduler": _scheduler_to_dict(worker.scheduler),
|
||||
"notes": worker.notes,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def registry_to_document(registry: WorkerRegistry) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Serialize to the on-disk document shape (no local paths embedded)."""
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"version": registry.version,
|
||||
"revision": registry.revision,
|
||||
"updated_at": registry.updated_at,
|
||||
"providers": [provider_to_dict(provider) for provider in registry.providers],
|
||||
"workers": [worker_to_dict(worker) for worker in registry.workers],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def registry_to_dict(registry: WorkerRegistry) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Serialize for JSON API responses (adds the resolved source path)."""
|
||||
document = registry_to_document(registry)
|
||||
document["source_path"] = str(registry.source_path)
|
||||
return document
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def find_worker(registry: WorkerRegistry, worker_id: str) -> WorkerRecord | None:
|
||||
for worker in registry.workers:
|
||||
if worker.id == worker_id:
|
||||
return worker
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def find_provider(registry: WorkerRegistry, provider_id: str) -> ProviderRecord | None:
|
||||
for provider in registry.providers:
|
||||
if provider.id == provider_id:
|
||||
return provider
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def workers_for_provider(registry: WorkerRegistry, provider_id: str) -> tuple[WorkerRecord, ...]:
|
||||
return tuple(worker for worker in registry.workers if worker.provider == provider_id)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── persistence ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _utc_now() -> str:
|
||||
return datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _atomic_write(path: Path, payload: str) -> None:
|
||||
"""Write *payload* to *path* atomically: temp file in the same dir, fsync, replace."""
|
||||
parent = path.parent
|
||||
parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
|
||||
fd, temp_path = tempfile.mkstemp(prefix=f".{path.name}-", suffix=".tmp", dir=parent)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
with os.fdopen(fd, "w", encoding="utf-8") as handle:
|
||||
handle.write(payload)
|
||||
handle.flush()
|
||||
os.fsync(handle.fileno())
|
||||
os.replace(temp_path, path)
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
if os.path.exists(temp_path):
|
||||
try:
|
||||
os.remove(temp_path)
|
||||
except OSError:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _revision_path(directory: Path, revision: int) -> Path:
|
||||
return directory / f"rev-{revision:06d}.json"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _prune_history(path: Path) -> None:
|
||||
directory = history_dir(path)
|
||||
revisions = list_revisions(path)
|
||||
excess = len(revisions) - _HISTORY_LIMIT
|
||||
for revision in revisions[: max(0, excess)]:
|
||||
_revision_path(directory, revision).unlink(missing_ok=True)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _archive_current(path: Path) -> int | None:
|
||||
"""Copy the live document into the history dir under its own revision number."""
|
||||
if not path.exists():
|
||||
return None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
existing = json.loads(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
||||
revision = int(existing.get("revision", 0))
|
||||
except (json.JSONDecodeError, TypeError, ValueError, AttributeError):
|
||||
# An unreadable live file has no trustworthy revision number to file it
|
||||
# under, so it cannot join the history chain.
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if revision <= 0:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
_atomic_write(
|
||||
_revision_path(history_dir(path), revision),
|
||||
json.dumps(existing, indent=2, sort_keys=True) + "\n",
|
||||
)
|
||||
_prune_history(path)
|
||||
return revision
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def list_revisions(path: Path | None = None) -> tuple[int, ...]:
|
||||
"""Revision numbers retained in history for *path*, oldest first."""
|
||||
directory = history_dir(path)
|
||||
if not directory.is_dir():
|
||||
return ()
|
||||
revisions: list[int] = []
|
||||
for entry in directory.glob("rev-*.json"):
|
||||
try:
|
||||
revisions.append(int(entry.stem.split("-", 1)[1]))
|
||||
except (IndexError, ValueError):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
return tuple(sorted(revisions))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def save_registry(
|
||||
registry: WorkerRegistry,
|
||||
path: Path | None = None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
updated_at: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> WorkerRegistry:
|
||||
"""Validate, archive the superseded revision, then atomically persist a new one.
|
||||
|
||||
The stored revision is always the previous revision plus one, so a reader
|
||||
can tell two documents apart even when their content is otherwise equal.
|
||||
Returns the registry exactly as persisted.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
target = (path or registry.source_path or default_registry_path()).resolve()
|
||||
|
||||
document = registry_to_document(registry)
|
||||
# Re-validate before writing: a registry assembled in memory has not
|
||||
# necessarily been through the loader.
|
||||
validate_payload(document, source_path=target)
|
||||
|
||||
archived = _archive_current(target)
|
||||
document["revision"] = (archived + 1) if archived is not None else registry.revision
|
||||
document["updated_at"] = updated_at or _utc_now()
|
||||
|
||||
persisted = validate_payload(document, source_path=target)
|
||||
_atomic_write(target, json.dumps(document, indent=2, sort_keys=True) + "\n")
|
||||
return persisted
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def rollback_to_revision(revision: int, path: Path | None = None) -> WorkerRegistry:
|
||||
"""Restore a retained *revision* as a new head revision.
|
||||
|
||||
History is append-only: rolling back does not delete the revisions in
|
||||
between, it republishes the chosen one under the next revision number, so a
|
||||
rollback is itself reversible.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
target = (path or default_registry_path()).resolve()
|
||||
snapshot_path = _revision_path(history_dir(target), revision)
|
||||
if not snapshot_path.exists():
|
||||
available = ", ".join(str(item) for item in list_revisions(target)) or "(none)"
|
||||
raise RegistryValidationError(
|
||||
f"revision {revision} is not retained for {target.name}; available: {available}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
payload = json.loads(snapshot_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
||||
restored = validate_payload(payload, source_path=target)
|
||||
return save_registry(restored, target)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user