Compare commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
4a63578003 | ||
|
|
c7a444eb4b | ||
|
|
8cac50b2e7 |
@@ -7,6 +7,19 @@ from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
PROTECTED_BRANCHES = frozenset({"master", "main", "dev"})
|
||||
|
||||
# Evidence / preservation branches must never be removed by cleanup tools
|
||||
# (e.g. chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip).
|
||||
_PRESERVATION_MARKERS = ("preserve", "preservation", "evidence")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def is_preservation_or_evidence_branch(branch: str | None) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Return True when *branch* is a preservation/evidence ref that must stay."""
|
||||
if not branch:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
name = str(branch).lower()
|
||||
return any(marker in name for marker in _PRESERVATION_MARKERS)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
_RAW_BRANCH_DELETE_PATTERNS = (
|
||||
re.compile(r"\bgit(?:\s+-C\s+\S+)?\s+branch\s+-[dD]\b[^\n\r]*", re.I),
|
||||
re.compile(r"\bgit(?:\s+-C\s+\S+)?\s+push\b[^\n\r]*\s--delete\b[^\n\r]*", re.I),
|
||||
@@ -72,6 +85,11 @@ def assess_merged_pr_branch_cleanup(
|
||||
reasons.append("PR head branch is missing")
|
||||
if head_branch in protected:
|
||||
reasons.append(f"branch '{head_branch}' is protected")
|
||||
if is_preservation_or_evidence_branch(head_branch):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"branch '{head_branch}' is a preservation/evidence branch and "
|
||||
"cannot be deleted through merged-PR cleanup"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if head_branch in open_pr_heads:
|
||||
reasons.append("an open PR still references this head branch")
|
||||
if head_on_target is False:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -238,11 +238,43 @@ narrow operation set:
|
||||
- `gitea.issue.comment`
|
||||
- `gitea.issue.close`
|
||||
- `gitea.pr.close`
|
||||
- `gitea.branch.delete` (merged-branch cleanup only — see below)
|
||||
|
||||
Forbidden on reconciler profiles: `gitea.pr.approve`, `gitea.pr.merge`,
|
||||
`gitea.pr.review`, `gitea.pr.create`, `gitea.branch.push`, and
|
||||
`gitea.repo.commit`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Merged-branch cleanup ownership (`gitea.branch.delete`)
|
||||
|
||||
The reconciler is the repository-supported owner of merged-PR source-branch
|
||||
cleanup: `task_capability_map` maps `cleanup_merged_pr_branch` (and
|
||||
`reconciliation_cleanup`) to role `reconciler` with permission
|
||||
`gitea.branch.delete`. Post-merge branch lifecycle is reconciliation work —
|
||||
it happens after the author, reviewer, and merger roles have completed, and
|
||||
it must not be reachable from those roles.
|
||||
|
||||
Least-privilege constraints:
|
||||
|
||||
- `gitea.branch.delete` is granted **only** to reconciler profiles. Author,
|
||||
reviewer, and merger profiles must never hold it; `gitea_delete_branch`
|
||||
and `gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch` fail closed on any profile without
|
||||
the permission.
|
||||
- Even with the permission, reconciler deletion is only supported through the
|
||||
guarded `gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch` path (#514 / #687): the PR must be
|
||||
merged, the head an ancestor of the target, the branch not protected
|
||||
(`master`/`main`/`dev`), the branch not a preservation/evidence ref (e.g.
|
||||
`chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip`), no open PR may still use the
|
||||
head, and an explicit `CLEANUP MERGED PR <n> BRANCH <branch>` confirmation is
|
||||
required. Raw `gitea_delete_branch` is **denied** to reconciler even when
|
||||
`gitea.branch.delete` is present.
|
||||
- Raw `git branch -d` / `git push --delete` cleanup remains blocked by
|
||||
`branch_cleanup_guard` and the final-report validator regardless of
|
||||
profile permissions.
|
||||
- `gitea.branch.delete` has no short alias in `GITEA_OPERATION_ALIASES`;
|
||||
write it fully qualified in `allowed_operations`. Migration must emit
|
||||
canonical names such as `gitea.pr.close` (never bare `pr.close` /
|
||||
`issue.close`, which the production normalizer rejects or drops).
|
||||
|
||||
Launch a static `gitea-reconciler` MCP namespace with
|
||||
`GITEA_MCP_PROFILE=prgs-reconciler`. Profile shape is validated by
|
||||
`reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile` (#304). Use the
|
||||
@@ -251,6 +283,159 @@ Launch a static `gitea-reconciler` MCP namespace with
|
||||
fresh target-branch fetch, recorded target SHA, and ancestor proof. PRs whose
|
||||
heads are not already landed cannot be closed through this path.
|
||||
|
||||
### Operational runbook: grant reconciler `gitea.branch.delete` (#687)
|
||||
|
||||
Merging a code PR that updates `migrate_profiles.py` / `reconciler_profile.py`
|
||||
**does not** change the live operator profile on disk. Apply the profile
|
||||
change deliberately, then reconnect the client-managed namespace.
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Approved migration / profile-update command** (from the repo root, using
|
||||
the project venv if present):
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Dry-run first (default): validates v2 output, writes nothing
|
||||
python3 migrate_profiles.py -i ~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Apply: creates backup then writes migrated v2 config
|
||||
python3 migrate_profiles.py -i ~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json -w
|
||||
# Optional explicit paths:
|
||||
# python3 migrate_profiles.py -i ~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json \
|
||||
# -o ~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json \
|
||||
# --backup ~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json.bak -w
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If the live file is already v2, edit the reconciler identity’s
|
||||
`allowed_operations` / `forbidden_operations` under
|
||||
`environments.<env>.services.gitea.identities.reconciler` (or the
|
||||
`prgs-reconciler` alias target) so allowed includes the canonical set
|
||||
below — then re-validate with a load of the config (see step 3).
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Inspect the generated (or edited) profile** — confirm the reconciler
|
||||
identity, for example:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python3 - <<'PY'
|
||||
import json
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
cfg = json.loads(Path.home().joinpath(".config/gitea-tools/profiles.json").read_text())
|
||||
# v2 environments shape:
|
||||
ident = cfg["environments"]["prgs"]["services"]["gitea"]["identities"]["reconciler"]
|
||||
print("role:", ident.get("role"))
|
||||
print("allowed:", ident.get("allowed_operations"))
|
||||
print("forbidden:", ident.get("forbidden_operations"))
|
||||
PY
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Validate canonical operation names and least privilege**
|
||||
|
||||
Expected canonical **allowed** (defaults after migration):
|
||||
|
||||
- `gitea.read`
|
||||
- `gitea.pr.close` (required)
|
||||
- `gitea.pr.comment`
|
||||
- `gitea.issue.comment`
|
||||
- `gitea.issue.close`
|
||||
- `gitea.branch.delete` (recommended; cleanup only)
|
||||
|
||||
Expected **forbidden** includes at least: `gitea.pr.approve`,
|
||||
`gitea.pr.merge`, `gitea.pr.review`, `gitea.pr.create`,
|
||||
`gitea.branch.push`, `gitea.repo.commit`.
|
||||
|
||||
No shorthand (`pr.close`, `issue.close`, `pr.comment`) may remain.
|
||||
Validate with the production loader:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python3 - <<'PY'
|
||||
import gitea_config, reconciler_profile
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
path = str(Path.home() / ".config/gitea-tools/profiles.json")
|
||||
gitea_config.load_config(path) # fails closed on invalid config
|
||||
# Or assess the reconciler lists directly after extracting them:
|
||||
# print(reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(allowed, forbidden))
|
||||
PY
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Merging PR #688 (or any code PR) does not update the live profile.**
|
||||
Code changes only the migration helper, schema, docs, and tests. The
|
||||
operator must still run `migrate_profiles.py -w` or an equivalent
|
||||
authorized edit of `~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json`.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Supported apply method:** `python3 migrate_profiles.py … -w` (backup
|
||||
created automatically) **or** operator-authorized edit of the live
|
||||
profiles file after backup. Unsupported: silent mtime tricks, manual
|
||||
process kill to “reload”, or undocumented env overrides.
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Backup and validation:** `-w` copies the input to
|
||||
`<input_path>.bak` (or `--backup PATH`) before writing. Re-run
|
||||
`load_config` / `assess_reconciler_profile` after write. Keep the
|
||||
`.bak` until live whoami/capability checks pass.
|
||||
|
||||
7. **Client-managed namespace reconnect/reload:** reconnect or reload the
|
||||
IDE MCP client so `gitea-reconciler` restarts from current `master` and
|
||||
the updated `GITEA_MCP_PROFILE=prgs-reconciler` config. Do not hand-launch
|
||||
`mcp_server.py` / `gitea_mcp_server.py` with ad hoc `GITEA_*` env
|
||||
(see #686 / #630).
|
||||
|
||||
8. **Live reverification** (through the client-managed `gitea-reconciler`
|
||||
namespace only):
|
||||
|
||||
- `gitea_whoami` → identity + profile `prgs-reconciler`
|
||||
- `gitea_assess_master_parity` → `stale=false`, `restart_required=false`
|
||||
- `gitea_resolve_task_capability(task="cleanup_merged_pr_branch")` →
|
||||
`allowed_in_current_session=true` only when permission and role match
|
||||
- `gitea_resolve_task_capability(task="delete_branch")` →
|
||||
**not** allowed for reconciler (role denial must be enforced)
|
||||
|
||||
9. **Guarded cleanup usage** (example for a merged PR whose source branch
|
||||
remains on the remote):
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
|
||||
pr_number=<N>,
|
||||
branch=<exact PR head branch>,
|
||||
confirmation="CLEANUP MERGED PR <N> BRANCH <exact PR head branch>",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
worktree_path="<path under branches/>",
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The tool refuses unmerged PRs, protected branches, preservation/evidence
|
||||
branches, open-PR heads, mismatched branch names, and wrong confirmation.
|
||||
|
||||
10. **Prohibitions**
|
||||
|
||||
- No raw `git push --delete`, `git branch -d` / `-D`, or delete refspecs
|
||||
- No arbitrary `gitea_delete_branch` from reconciler
|
||||
- No unsupported profile switching mid-run without full re-preflight
|
||||
- No ad hoc hand-edits of live profiles **unless** operator-authorized,
|
||||
backed up, and revalidated as above
|
||||
|
||||
Canonical migrated reconciler example:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"role": "reconciler",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.close",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.issue.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.issue.close",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.pr.approve",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.merge",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.review",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
"gitea.repo.commit"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity and fail-closed rules
|
||||
|
||||
Before **any** mutating action, a workflow must know both:
|
||||
|
||||
+79
-481
@@ -195,12 +195,6 @@ RECONCILER_WORKTREE_ENV = "GITEA_RECONCILER_WORKTREE"
|
||||
|
||||
import namespace_workspace_binding as nwb # noqa: E402
|
||||
import mcp_namespace_health # noqa: E402
|
||||
import stale_binding_recovery # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
# Worktree env bindings inherited from the parent environment at daemon boot
|
||||
# (#702). A value that still equals its boot snapshot was never established by
|
||||
# a sanctioned tool in this daemon's lifetime.
|
||||
_BOOT_ENV_WORKTREE_BINDINGS = stale_binding_recovery.snapshot_boot_bindings()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _preflight_in_test_mode() -> bool:
|
||||
@@ -266,124 +260,8 @@ def _actual_profile_role() -> str:
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _assess_stale_active_binding(auto_recover: bool = False) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Classify the GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE binding; recover when provably stale (#702).
|
||||
|
||||
Runs during ``gitea_resolve_task_capability`` / runtime context. Clearing
|
||||
is the sanctioned in-daemon mechanism and happens only for the two
|
||||
provably-stale classes (missing path, superseded by a sanctioned session
|
||||
lease); an uncorroborated boot-inherited binding is surfaced with the
|
||||
managed-reconnect next action, never cleared silently.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
active_value = (os.environ.get(ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV) or "").strip() or None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
role = _actual_profile_role()
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
role = "author"
|
||||
role_env_key = nwb.ROLE_WORKTREE_ENVS.get(role, AUTHOR_WORKTREE_ENV)
|
||||
boot_value = (
|
||||
(_BOOT_ENV_WORKTREE_BINDINGS.get("active_worktree") or "").strip() or None
|
||||
)
|
||||
classification = stale_binding_recovery.classify_active_worktree_binding(
|
||||
active_value=active_value,
|
||||
role_env_value=(os.environ.get(role_env_key) or "").strip() or None,
|
||||
session_lease_worktree=_reviewer_session_worktree(),
|
||||
boot_inherited=bool(active_value and boot_value == active_value),
|
||||
path_exists=os.path.isdir(active_value) if active_value else None,
|
||||
role_kind=role,
|
||||
)
|
||||
plan = stale_binding_recovery.plan_recovery(classification)
|
||||
applied: dict = {"performed": False}
|
||||
recovery_enabled = (
|
||||
not _preflight_in_test_mode()
|
||||
or os.environ.get("GITEA_FORCE_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY") == "1"
|
||||
)
|
||||
audit_persisted: bool | None = None
|
||||
if auto_recover and plan.get("clear_allowed") and recovery_enabled:
|
||||
# #702 F6: the durable audit record must exist BEFORE the environment
|
||||
# is cleared. If audit persistence fails the recovery does not run —
|
||||
# an env clear without durable proof is an unauditable mutation.
|
||||
pending_value = (os.environ.get(ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV) or "").strip() or None
|
||||
audit_error: str | None = None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
import mcp_session_state as mss
|
||||
|
||||
mss.save_state(
|
||||
kind=mss.KIND_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY,
|
||||
payload={
|
||||
"cleared_env": ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV,
|
||||
"cleared_value": pending_value,
|
||||
"classification": plan.get("classification"),
|
||||
"reasons": list(plan.get("reasons") or []),
|
||||
"recovery_status": "pending",
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
audit_persisted = True
|
||||
except Exception as exc:
|
||||
audit_persisted = False
|
||||
audit_error = f"{type(exc).__name__}: {exc}"
|
||||
if audit_persisted:
|
||||
applied = stale_binding_recovery.apply_recovery(plan)
|
||||
if applied.get("performed"):
|
||||
try:
|
||||
import mcp_session_state as mss
|
||||
|
||||
mss.save_state(
|
||||
kind=mss.KIND_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY,
|
||||
payload={
|
||||
"cleared_env": applied.get("cleared_env"),
|
||||
"cleared_value": applied.get("cleared_value"),
|
||||
"classification": applied.get("classification"),
|
||||
"reasons": applied.get("reasons"),
|
||||
"recovery_status": "performed",
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
# The pre-clear "pending" record is already durable; the
|
||||
# status refresh is best-effort and never rolls back.
|
||||
pass
|
||||
else:
|
||||
applied = {
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"action": stale_binding_recovery.RECOVERY_ACTION_NONE,
|
||||
"audit_write_failed": True,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"audit persistence failed; stale binding NOT cleared "
|
||||
"(fail closed, #702 F6)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
+ ([audit_error] if audit_error else []),
|
||||
}
|
||||
report = {
|
||||
"classification": classification.get("classification"),
|
||||
"active_worktree": classification.get("active_worktree"),
|
||||
"boot_inherited": classification.get("boot_inherited", False),
|
||||
"clear_eligible": bool(classification.get("clear_eligible")),
|
||||
"recovery_action": plan.get("action"),
|
||||
"recovery_performed": bool(applied.get("performed")),
|
||||
"reasons": classification.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
if audit_persisted is not None:
|
||||
report["audit_persisted"] = audit_persisted
|
||||
if applied.get("audit_write_failed"):
|
||||
report["audit_write_failed"] = True
|
||||
report["reasons"] = list(report["reasons"]) + list(
|
||||
applied.get("reasons") or []
|
||||
)
|
||||
if applied.get("performed"):
|
||||
report["cleared_value"] = applied.get("cleared_value")
|
||||
if plan.get("exact_next_action"):
|
||||
report["exact_next_action"] = plan.get("exact_next_action")
|
||||
return report
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _resolve_preflight_workspace_path(worktree_path: str | None = None) -> str:
|
||||
"""Resolve the namespace-scoped workspace root inspected by pre-flight guards.
|
||||
|
||||
#702 F2: preflight resolves with the same existence verification as the
|
||||
canonical mutation context (verify_paths). A dead env binding must demote
|
||||
here exactly as it does in :func:`_resolve_namespace_mutation_context`,
|
||||
or preflight would inspect a path the mutation guard never uses.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
"""Resolve the namespace-scoped workspace root inspected by pre-flight guards."""
|
||||
role = _effective_workspace_role()
|
||||
workspace, _source = nwb.resolve_namespace_workspace(
|
||||
role_kind=role,
|
||||
@@ -393,7 +271,6 @@ def _resolve_preflight_workspace_path(worktree_path: str | None = None) -> str:
|
||||
_reviewer_session_worktree() if role in {"reviewer", "merger"} else None
|
||||
),
|
||||
profile_name=get_profile().get("profile_name"),
|
||||
verify_paths=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return workspace
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -440,15 +317,6 @@ def _get_git_root(path: str) -> str | None:
|
||||
return (res.stdout or "").strip() or None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# #702 F2: synthetic tracked-dirty porcelain returned when the preflight
|
||||
# workspace cannot be inspected (missing path, git failure). Shaped as a
|
||||
# modified tracked entry so every consumer treats "workspace unavailable"
|
||||
# as dirty — an uninspectable workspace must never read as clean.
|
||||
PREFLIGHT_WORKSPACE_UNAVAILABLE_PORCELAIN = (
|
||||
" M __gitea_preflight_workspace_unavailable__\n"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _get_workspace_porcelain(worktree_path: str | None = None) -> str:
|
||||
"""Return tracked-workspace porcelain for pre-flight attribution."""
|
||||
if os.environ.get("GITEA_TEST_FORCE_DIRTY"):
|
||||
@@ -457,8 +325,6 @@ def _get_workspace_porcelain(worktree_path: str | None = None) -> str:
|
||||
if override is not None:
|
||||
return override
|
||||
workspace = _resolve_preflight_workspace_path(worktree_path)
|
||||
if not os.path.isdir(workspace):
|
||||
return PREFLIGHT_WORKSPACE_UNAVAILABLE_PORCELAIN
|
||||
try:
|
||||
res = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "status", "--porcelain"],
|
||||
@@ -466,11 +332,9 @@ def _get_workspace_porcelain(worktree_path: str | None = None) -> str:
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
cwd=workspace,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return res.stdout or ""
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
return PREFLIGHT_WORKSPACE_UNAVAILABLE_PORCELAIN
|
||||
if res.returncode != 0:
|
||||
return PREFLIGHT_WORKSPACE_UNAVAILABLE_PORCELAIN
|
||||
return res.stdout or ""
|
||||
return ""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_porcelain_entries(porcelain: str) -> dict[str, str]:
|
||||
@@ -6061,6 +5925,65 @@ def gitea_delete_branch(
|
||||
"permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.branch.delete"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Possessing gitea.branch.delete alone is not enough for arbitrary deletion.
|
||||
# task_capability_map maps delete_branch → author; reconciler must use the
|
||||
# guarded cleanup_merged_pr_branch path only (#687 / #514).
|
||||
profile = get_profile()
|
||||
active_role = _profile_role_kind(profile)
|
||||
required_role = task_capability_map.required_role("delete_branch")
|
||||
if active_role == "reconciler":
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"required_permission": "gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
"required_role_kind": required_role,
|
||||
"active_role_kind": active_role,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"reconciler profile cannot use raw gitea_delete_branch; "
|
||||
"use gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch for a fully merged PR "
|
||||
"source branch only (fail closed)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"exact_next_action": (
|
||||
"Call gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch with pr_number, the "
|
||||
"exact PR head branch, and confirmation "
|
||||
"'CLEANUP MERGED PR <n> BRANCH <branch>' after capability "
|
||||
"resolve for cleanup_merged_pr_branch."
|
||||
),
|
||||
"permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.branch.delete"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
if active_role != required_role:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"required_permission": "gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
"required_role_kind": required_role,
|
||||
"active_role_kind": active_role,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"Active profile role '{active_role}' cannot perform "
|
||||
f"{required_role} task 'delete_branch' even when "
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete is present (fail closed)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.branch.delete"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if branch_cleanup_guard.is_preservation_or_evidence_branch(branch):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"required_permission": "gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"branch '{branch}' is a preservation/evidence branch and "
|
||||
"cannot be deleted (fail closed)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
if branch in branch_cleanup_guard.PROTECTED_BRANCHES:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"required_permission": "gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
"reasons": [f"branch '{branch}' is protected (fail closed)"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
audit_allowed, audit_reasons = (
|
||||
audit_reconciliation_mode.check_audit_mutation_allowed("delete_branch")
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -6112,18 +6035,20 @@ def gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
profile = get_profile()
|
||||
active_role = _role_kind(
|
||||
profile.get("allowed_operations", []),
|
||||
profile.get("forbidden_operations", []),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if active_role == "reviewer":
|
||||
active_role = _profile_role_kind(profile)
|
||||
# cleanup_merged_pr_branch is reconciler-owned (task_capability_map).
|
||||
# Author/reviewer/merger must not reach this path even if they somehow
|
||||
# hold gitea.branch.delete.
|
||||
if active_role != "reconciler":
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"required_permission": "gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
"required_role_kind": "reconciler",
|
||||
"active_role_kind": active_role,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"reviewer profile is not authorized for merged branch cleanup "
|
||||
"(fail closed)"
|
||||
f"profile role '{active_role}' is not authorized for merged "
|
||||
"branch cleanup; required role is reconciler (fail closed)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.branch.delete"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -8100,12 +8025,11 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Read-only: diagnose open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit next action (#599, #691).
|
||||
"""Read-only: diagnose open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit next action (#599).
|
||||
|
||||
Classifies no-lease / own / foreign / superseded-head / expired / orphan /
|
||||
instructed-lease-missing-with-replacement and worktree binding mismatch.
|
||||
Returns a canonical ``next_action`` (including guarded obsolete-lease cleanup)
|
||||
without mutating Gitea state. Never steals foreign leases.
|
||||
Classifies no-lease / own / foreign / instructed-lease-missing-with-replacement
|
||||
and worktree binding mismatch. Returns a canonical ``next_action`` without
|
||||
mutating Gitea state. Never steals foreign leases.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
|
||||
if read_block:
|
||||
@@ -8116,7 +8040,7 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
|
||||
}
|
||||
comments = _fetch_pr_comments(
|
||||
pr_number, remote=remote, host=host, org=org, repo=repo)
|
||||
h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
|
||||
h, _o, _r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
username = _authenticated_username(h)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
@@ -8130,74 +8054,6 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
|
||||
# Prefer in-session lease id when present; otherwise diagnose as a fresh
|
||||
# caller without inventing ownership of an on-thread lease.
|
||||
session_id = (session_lease.get("session_id") or "").strip() or None
|
||||
|
||||
# Live PR head + formal reviews for #691 superseded/completed classification.
|
||||
current_head_sha = None
|
||||
formal_reviews: list[dict] = []
|
||||
try:
|
||||
auth = _auth(h)
|
||||
pr_live = api_request(
|
||||
"GET", f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}", auth
|
||||
) or {}
|
||||
head = pr_live.get("head") or {}
|
||||
current_head_sha = head.get("sha") or pr_live.get("head_commit_sha")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
reviews = api_request(
|
||||
"GET",
|
||||
f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews",
|
||||
auth,
|
||||
) or []
|
||||
for rev in reviews if isinstance(reviews, list) else []:
|
||||
formal_reviews.append({
|
||||
"verdict": rev.get("state") or rev.get("verdict"),
|
||||
"reviewed_head_sha": rev.get("commit_id") or rev.get(
|
||||
"reviewed_head_sha"
|
||||
),
|
||||
"dismissed": bool(rev.get("dismissed")),
|
||||
"reviewer": ((rev.get("user") or {}).get("login")),
|
||||
"submitted_at": rev.get("submitted_at"),
|
||||
})
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
formal_reviews = []
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
current_head_sha = None
|
||||
|
||||
lease_wt = None
|
||||
active = reviewer_pr_lease.find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
|
||||
comments, pr_number=pr_number, include_expired=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
if active:
|
||||
lease_wt = (active.get("worktree") or "").strip() or None
|
||||
worktree_exists = None
|
||||
worktree_clean = None
|
||||
if lease_wt:
|
||||
worktree_exists = os.path.isdir(lease_wt)
|
||||
if worktree_exists:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
|
||||
st = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", lease_wt, "status", "--porcelain"],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
timeout=30,
|
||||
check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if st.returncode == 0:
|
||||
worktree_clean = not bool((st.stdout or "").strip())
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
worktree_clean = None
|
||||
|
||||
# #702: derive owner-process evidence from the durable session-lease
|
||||
# shadow left behind by a crashed daemon. Only a provably dead recorded
|
||||
# owner pid yields False; PID liveness alone never proves ownership.
|
||||
orphan_evidence = reviewer_pr_lease.assess_crashed_session_lease_orphan(
|
||||
reviewer_pr_lease.load_session_lease_shadow(
|
||||
session_id=(active or {}).get("session_id")
|
||||
),
|
||||
lease=active,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
diagnosis = reviewer_pr_lease.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
|
||||
comments,
|
||||
pr_number=pr_number,
|
||||
@@ -8207,13 +8063,7 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
|
||||
env_bound_worktree=env_wt,
|
||||
instructed_session_id=instructed_session_id,
|
||||
instructed_comment_id=instructed_comment_id,
|
||||
current_head_sha=current_head_sha,
|
||||
formal_reviews=formal_reviews,
|
||||
worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
|
||||
worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=orphan_evidence.get("owner_process_alive"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
diagnosis["crashed_session_lease_evidence"] = orphan_evidence
|
||||
diagnosis["success"] = True
|
||||
diagnosis["remote"] = remote
|
||||
diagnosis["authenticated_user"] = username
|
||||
@@ -8340,221 +8190,6 @@ def gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease(
|
||||
return report
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@mcp.tool()
|
||||
def gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease(
|
||||
pr_number: int,
|
||||
confirmation: str = "",
|
||||
apply: bool = False,
|
||||
controller_recovery_authorized: bool = False,
|
||||
expected_lease_comment_id: int | None = None,
|
||||
expected_session_id: str | None = None,
|
||||
expected_leased_head: str | None = None,
|
||||
owner_process_alive: bool | None = None,
|
||||
current_head_review_in_progress: bool = False,
|
||||
remote: str = "dadeschools",
|
||||
host: str | None = None,
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Guarded cleanup for obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases on open PRs (#691).
|
||||
|
||||
Neutralises an expired and/or superseded-head foreign lease by posting a
|
||||
terminal ``phase: released`` lease marker (append-only audit). Never deletes
|
||||
comments, never repoints the lease to the new head, never transfers
|
||||
validation/decision/workflow state, never uses PID equality as ownership,
|
||||
and never steals a genuinely active foreign lease on the current head.
|
||||
|
||||
Read-first when ``apply`` is false. Apply requires:
|
||||
|
||||
- ``controller_recovery_authorized=True`` (explicit operator/controller
|
||||
recovery capability — not implied by profile alone)
|
||||
- ``confirmation`` exactly ``CLEANUP OBSOLETE REVIEWER LEASE <pr_number>``
|
||||
- full eligibility evidence from
|
||||
``reviewer_pr_lease.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup``
|
||||
|
||||
Comment-backed leases need no control-plane DB ``lease_id``.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
|
||||
if read_block:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"cleanup_performed": False,
|
||||
"no_steal_or_adoption": True,
|
||||
"reasons": read_block,
|
||||
"permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
|
||||
auth = _auth(h)
|
||||
expected_repo = f"{o}/{r}"
|
||||
comments = _fetch_pr_comments(
|
||||
pr_number, remote=remote, host=host, org=org, repo=repo
|
||||
)
|
||||
pr_live = api_request(
|
||||
"GET", f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}", auth
|
||||
) or {}
|
||||
head = pr_live.get("head") or {}
|
||||
current_head_sha = head.get("sha") or pr_live.get("head_commit_sha")
|
||||
|
||||
formal_reviews: list[dict] = []
|
||||
try:
|
||||
reviews = api_request(
|
||||
"GET",
|
||||
f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews",
|
||||
auth,
|
||||
) or []
|
||||
for rev in reviews if isinstance(reviews, list) else []:
|
||||
formal_reviews.append({
|
||||
"verdict": rev.get("state") or rev.get("verdict"),
|
||||
"reviewed_head_sha": rev.get("commit_id")
|
||||
or rev.get("reviewed_head_sha"),
|
||||
"dismissed": bool(rev.get("dismissed")),
|
||||
"reviewer": ((rev.get("user") or {}).get("login")),
|
||||
"submitted_at": rev.get("submitted_at"),
|
||||
})
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
formal_reviews = []
|
||||
|
||||
lease = reviewer_pr_lease.find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
|
||||
comments, pr_number=pr_number, include_expired=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
lease_wt = ((lease or {}).get("worktree") or "").strip() or None
|
||||
worktree_exists = None
|
||||
worktree_clean = None
|
||||
worktree_has_unpreserved_work = None
|
||||
if lease_wt:
|
||||
worktree_exists = os.path.isdir(lease_wt)
|
||||
if worktree_exists:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
|
||||
st = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", lease_wt, "status", "--porcelain"],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
timeout=30,
|
||||
check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if st.returncode == 0:
|
||||
dirty = bool((st.stdout or "").strip())
|
||||
worktree_clean = not dirty
|
||||
worktree_has_unpreserved_work = dirty
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
worktree_clean = None
|
||||
|
||||
session = reviewer_pr_lease.get_session_lease() or {}
|
||||
# #702: when the caller supplies no owner evidence, consult the durable
|
||||
# session-lease shadow; an explicitly passed value always wins.
|
||||
if owner_process_alive is None:
|
||||
owner_process_alive = reviewer_pr_lease.assess_crashed_session_lease_orphan(
|
||||
reviewer_pr_lease.load_session_lease_shadow(
|
||||
session_id=(lease or {}).get("session_id")
|
||||
),
|
||||
lease=lease,
|
||||
).get("owner_process_alive")
|
||||
assessment = reviewer_pr_lease.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
|
||||
comments,
|
||||
pr_number=pr_number,
|
||||
current_head_sha=current_head_sha,
|
||||
formal_reviews=formal_reviews,
|
||||
repo=expected_repo,
|
||||
expected_repo=expected_repo,
|
||||
requesting_session_id=(session.get("session_id") or "").strip() or None,
|
||||
controller_recovery_authorized=controller_recovery_authorized,
|
||||
worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
|
||||
worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
|
||||
worktree_has_unpreserved_work=worktree_has_unpreserved_work,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=owner_process_alive,
|
||||
owner_pid_observed=None,
|
||||
requesting_pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
current_head_review_in_progress=current_head_review_in_progress,
|
||||
expected_lease_comment_id=expected_lease_comment_id,
|
||||
expected_session_id=expected_session_id,
|
||||
expected_leased_head=expected_leased_head,
|
||||
confirmation=confirmation,
|
||||
apply=apply,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
report = {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"pr_state": pr_live.get("state"),
|
||||
"cleanup_allowed": assessment.get("cleanup_allowed"),
|
||||
"cleanup_performed": False,
|
||||
"classification": assessment.get("classification"),
|
||||
"blocker_kind": assessment.get("blocker_kind"),
|
||||
"exact_next_action": assessment.get("exact_next_action"),
|
||||
"mutation_eligibility": assessment.get("mutation_eligibility"),
|
||||
"leased_head": assessment.get("leased_head"),
|
||||
"current_head": assessment.get("current_head"),
|
||||
"expires_at": assessment.get("expires_at"),
|
||||
"terminal_review": assessment.get("terminal_review"),
|
||||
"worktree_state": assessment.get("worktree_state"),
|
||||
"owner_session_evidence": assessment.get("owner_session_evidence"),
|
||||
"cleanup_tool": assessment.get("cleanup_tool"),
|
||||
"required_confirmation": assessment.get("required_confirmation"),
|
||||
"active_lease": assessment.get("active_lease"),
|
||||
"no_steal_or_adoption": True,
|
||||
"no_repoint": True,
|
||||
"no_validation_transfer": True,
|
||||
"mode": "apply" if apply else "read_only",
|
||||
"reasons": assessment.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
"forbidden": assessment.get("forbidden") or [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if not apply:
|
||||
return report
|
||||
if not assessment.get("cleanup_allowed"):
|
||||
report["success"] = False
|
||||
report["cleanup_skipped_reason"] = (
|
||||
assessment.get("fail_closed_reasons")
|
||||
or assessment.get("reasons")
|
||||
or ["cleanup not allowed"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
return report
|
||||
|
||||
comment_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.pr.comment")
|
||||
if comment_block:
|
||||
report["success"] = False
|
||||
report["reasons"] = comment_block
|
||||
report["permission_report"] = _permission_block_report("gitea.pr.comment")
|
||||
return report
|
||||
|
||||
verify_preflight_purity(remote)
|
||||
# Terminal lease marker (preserves history; does not delete comment 10749-style
|
||||
# entries — newest released marker neutralises the ledger).
|
||||
release_body = assessment.get("release_body") or ""
|
||||
audit_body = assessment.get("audit_comment_body") or ""
|
||||
comment_url = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/issues/{pr_number}/comments"
|
||||
with _audited(
|
||||
"comment_pr",
|
||||
host=h,
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
pr_number=pr_number,
|
||||
request_metadata={
|
||||
"source": "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease",
|
||||
"classification": assessment.get("classification"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
):
|
||||
posted_release = api_request(
|
||||
"POST", comment_url, auth, {"body": release_body}
|
||||
)
|
||||
posted_audit = None
|
||||
if audit_body.strip():
|
||||
posted_audit = api_request(
|
||||
"POST", comment_url, auth, {"body": audit_body}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Never seed session lease from cleaned foreign lease.
|
||||
report["cleanup_performed"] = True
|
||||
report["released_comment_id"] = (posted_release or {}).get("id")
|
||||
report["audit_comment_id"] = (posted_audit or {}).get("id")
|
||||
report["session_lease_seeded"] = False
|
||||
return report
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@mcp.tool()
|
||||
def gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease(
|
||||
pr_number: int,
|
||||
@@ -10301,17 +9936,6 @@ def gitea_get_runtime_context(
|
||||
PROJECT_ROOT),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# #702: read-only visibility into the inherited GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE
|
||||
# binding; recovery itself runs during capability resolution.
|
||||
try:
|
||||
stale_binding = _assess_stale_active_binding(auto_recover=False)
|
||||
if stale_binding.get("classification") != (
|
||||
stale_binding_recovery.CLASSIFICATION_UNBOUND
|
||||
):
|
||||
result["stale_binding_recovery"] = stale_binding
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
parity = _current_master_parity()
|
||||
result["master_parity"] = {
|
||||
"in_parity": parity["in_parity"],
|
||||
@@ -11706,6 +11330,8 @@ def gitea_resolve_task_capability(
|
||||
"gitea_commit_files",
|
||||
"address_pr_change_requests",
|
||||
"delete_branch",
|
||||
"cleanup_merged_pr_branch",
|
||||
"reconciliation_cleanup",
|
||||
"work_issue",
|
||||
"work-issue",
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -11745,18 +11371,6 @@ def gitea_resolve_task_capability(
|
||||
"exact_safe_next_action": next_safe_action,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# #702 F1: validate (and, when provably stale, recover) the inherited
|
||||
# GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE binding BEFORE the terminal launcher probe. The
|
||||
# probe uses that binding as its cwd; a worktree removed mid-session
|
||||
# would otherwise wedge every mutation-task resolution on 'missing cwd'
|
||||
# before the sanctioned recovery could ever run. Recovery stays
|
||||
# fail-closed: only the provably-stale classes clear, with the durable
|
||||
# audit record persisted first (F6).
|
||||
try:
|
||||
stale_binding = _assess_stale_active_binding(auto_recover=True)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
stale_binding = None
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Terminal Launcher Preflight Check (#556) ──
|
||||
if task in native_mcp_preference.GITEA_MUTATION_TASKS:
|
||||
in_test = _preflight_in_test_mode()
|
||||
@@ -11780,7 +11394,7 @@ def gitea_resolve_task_capability(
|
||||
"Do not attempt git/pytest finalization or unsafe fallbacks. "
|
||||
"Run gitea_diagnose_terminal, emit blocked-diagnose-report, and stop."
|
||||
)
|
||||
blocked_result = {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"requested_task": task,
|
||||
"required_operation_permission": required_permission,
|
||||
"required_role_kind": required_role,
|
||||
@@ -11800,11 +11414,6 @@ def gitea_resolve_task_capability(
|
||||
"different_mcp_namespace_required": False,
|
||||
"exact_safe_next_action": next_safe_action,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if stale_binding is not None and stale_binding.get(
|
||||
"classification"
|
||||
) != stale_binding_recovery.CLASSIFICATION_UNBOUND:
|
||||
blocked_result["stale_binding_recovery"] = stale_binding
|
||||
return blocked_result
|
||||
|
||||
record_preflight_check("capability", required_role, resolved_task=task)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -11994,10 +11603,6 @@ def gitea_resolve_task_capability(
|
||||
"different_mcp_namespace_required": different_namespace_required,
|
||||
"exact_safe_next_action": next_safe_action,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if stale_binding is not None and stale_binding.get("classification") != (
|
||||
stale_binding_recovery.CLASSIFICATION_UNBOUND
|
||||
):
|
||||
result["stale_binding_recovery"] = stale_binding
|
||||
if reason_msg:
|
||||
result["reason"] = reason_msg
|
||||
if task in ("review_pr", "merge_pr"):
|
||||
@@ -12873,11 +12478,4 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
# processes (e.g. review_pr.py) can detect and refuse profile
|
||||
# side-channel overrides (#199).
|
||||
_export_session_profile_lock()
|
||||
# #702: an auto-reconnected daemon inherits GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE from its
|
||||
# parent environment. Validate it at boot and clear it only when provably
|
||||
# stale (missing path); anything less certain is surfaced, not cleared.
|
||||
try:
|
||||
_assess_stale_active_binding(auto_recover=True)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
mcp.run(transport="stdio")
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP_TOOLS = frozenset({
|
||||
"gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease",
|
||||
"gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease",
|
||||
"gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups",
|
||||
"gitea_delete_branch",
|
||||
"gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch",
|
||||
|
||||
+10
-96
@@ -36,25 +36,6 @@ KIND_REVIEW_DRAFT = "review_draft"
|
||||
# other session proofs; a contaminated session fails closed on gated mutations
|
||||
# until a reconciler audits and clears it.
|
||||
KIND_STABLE_BRANCH_CONTAMINATION = "stable_branch_contamination"
|
||||
# Durable shadow of the in-memory reviewer session lease (#702). Written on
|
||||
# every sanctioned record/heartbeat and removed on sanctioned clear, so a
|
||||
# daemon that dies without teardown leaves provable orphan evidence (owner
|
||||
# pid + session id) for the guarded lease-cleanup path. Never a substitute
|
||||
# for the in-session lease: mutation gates ignore it.
|
||||
KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE = "reviewer_session_lease"
|
||||
# Durable audit record written whenever the daemon's sanctioned stale-binding
|
||||
# recovery clears an inherited GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE binding (#702).
|
||||
KIND_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY = "stale_binding_recovery"
|
||||
|
||||
# Kinds that carry recovery-critical crash-orphan evidence (#702). They are
|
||||
# exempt from TTL expiry: a crashed daemon can never refresh its own record,
|
||||
# so a wall-clock TTL would silently destroy the only owner-exit proof the
|
||||
# guarded cleanup path accepts. These records live until a sanctioned clear
|
||||
# terminally reconciles them (durable lifecycle), never until a timer fires.
|
||||
RECOVERY_CRITICAL_KINDS = frozenset({
|
||||
KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE,
|
||||
KIND_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -105,7 +86,6 @@ def state_key(
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
profile_identity: str | None = None,
|
||||
instance_id: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> str:
|
||||
"""Build durable filename key.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -113,20 +93,17 @@ def state_key(
|
||||
so the primary key is kind + profile identity. Remote/org/repo are stored
|
||||
inside the payload and validated on load (#559), which lets a later daemon
|
||||
process recover state without already knowing the remote argument.
|
||||
|
||||
*instance_id* extends the key for kinds where one-per-profile collides —
|
||||
concurrent same-profile sessions each own their reviewer-lease shadow
|
||||
(#702 F5), keyed by their lease session id so a later heartbeat can never
|
||||
overwrite or misattribute another session's crash evidence.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# Keep remote/org/repo parameters for API stability / future kinds; they are
|
||||
# intentionally not part of the filename for session-scoped proofs.
|
||||
_ = (remote, org, repo)
|
||||
parts = [kind, profile_identity or "unknown-profile"]
|
||||
instance = (instance_id or "").strip()
|
||||
if instance:
|
||||
parts.append(instance)
|
||||
return "-".join(_sanitize_segment(part) for part in parts)
|
||||
return "-".join(
|
||||
_sanitize_segment(part)
|
||||
for part in (
|
||||
kind,
|
||||
profile_identity or "unknown-profile",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def state_file_path(
|
||||
@@ -137,7 +114,6 @@ def state_file_path(
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
profile_identity: str | None = None,
|
||||
state_dir: str | None = None,
|
||||
instance_id: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> str:
|
||||
root = (state_dir or default_state_dir()).strip()
|
||||
name = state_key(
|
||||
@@ -146,7 +122,6 @@ def state_file_path(
|
||||
org=org,
|
||||
repo=repo,
|
||||
profile_identity=profile_identity,
|
||||
instance_id=instance_id,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return os.path.join(root, f"{name}.json")
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -267,12 +242,10 @@ def identity_match_reasons(
|
||||
reasons.append("session state missing recorded_at timestamp (fail closed)")
|
||||
else:
|
||||
age = _now_utc() - recorded_at
|
||||
record_kind = (str(record.get("kind") or "")).strip()
|
||||
if age > timedelta(hours=ttl_hours()):
|
||||
if record_kind not in RECOVERY_CRITICAL_KINDS:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"session state expired after {ttl_hours():g}h (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"session state expired after {ttl_hours():g}h (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if age < timedelta(0):
|
||||
reasons.append("session state recorded_at is in the future (fail closed)")
|
||||
return reasons
|
||||
@@ -286,7 +259,6 @@ def load_state(
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
profile_identity: str | None = None,
|
||||
state_dir: str | None = None,
|
||||
instance_id: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
|
||||
"""Load durable state payload when identity checks pass."""
|
||||
profile = current_profile_identity(profile_identity=profile_identity)
|
||||
@@ -297,7 +269,6 @@ def load_state(
|
||||
repo=repo,
|
||||
profile_identity=profile,
|
||||
state_dir=state_dir,
|
||||
instance_id=instance_id,
|
||||
)
|
||||
lock_path = f"{path}.lock"
|
||||
with _exclusive_file_lock(lock_path):
|
||||
@@ -343,7 +314,6 @@ def save_state(
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
profile_identity: str | None = None,
|
||||
state_dir: str | None = None,
|
||||
instance_id: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
|
||||
"""Persist or clear durable state for the given session identity key."""
|
||||
profile = current_profile_identity(
|
||||
@@ -365,7 +335,6 @@ def save_state(
|
||||
repo=key_repo,
|
||||
profile_identity=profile,
|
||||
state_dir=root,
|
||||
instance_id=instance_id,
|
||||
)
|
||||
lock_path = f"{path}.lock"
|
||||
with _exclusive_file_lock(lock_path):
|
||||
@@ -387,8 +356,6 @@ def save_state(
|
||||
body["session_profile_lock"] = profile
|
||||
body["recorded_at"] = body.get("recorded_at") or now
|
||||
body["updated_at"] = now
|
||||
if (instance_id or "").strip():
|
||||
body["instance_id"] = instance_id.strip()
|
||||
if key_remote is not None:
|
||||
body["remote"] = key_remote
|
||||
if key_org is not None:
|
||||
@@ -420,7 +387,6 @@ def clear_state(
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
profile_identity: str | None = None,
|
||||
state_dir: str | None = None,
|
||||
instance_id: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
save_state(
|
||||
kind=kind,
|
||||
@@ -430,56 +396,4 @@ def clear_state(
|
||||
repo=repo,
|
||||
profile_identity=profile_identity,
|
||||
state_dir=state_dir,
|
||||
instance_id=instance_id,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def list_states(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
kind: str,
|
||||
profile_identity: str | None = None,
|
||||
state_dir: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
|
||||
"""Enumerate durable records of *kind* across all instance keys.
|
||||
|
||||
Crash recovery cannot know which session id left a shadow behind, so it
|
||||
must be able to enumerate every record of a kind (#702 F5). Identity
|
||||
checks (profile / TTL policy) apply per record exactly as in
|
||||
:func:`load_state`; records that fail closed are omitted.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
root = (state_dir or default_state_dir()).strip()
|
||||
if not root or not os.path.isdir(root):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
profile = current_profile_identity(profile_identity=profile_identity)
|
||||
results: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
|
||||
try:
|
||||
names = sorted(os.listdir(root))
|
||||
except OSError:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
for name in names:
|
||||
if not name.endswith(".json") or name.startswith("."):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
envelope = _read_json(os.path.join(root, name))
|
||||
if not envelope or envelope.get("kind") != kind:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
payload = envelope.get("payload")
|
||||
if not isinstance(payload, dict):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
merged = dict(payload)
|
||||
for key in (
|
||||
"kind",
|
||||
"remote",
|
||||
"org",
|
||||
"repo",
|
||||
"profile_identity",
|
||||
"session_profile_lock",
|
||||
"recorded_at",
|
||||
"updated_at",
|
||||
"writer_pid",
|
||||
):
|
||||
if key in envelope and key not in merged:
|
||||
merged[key] = envelope[key]
|
||||
if identity_match_reasons(merged, profile_identity=profile):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
results.append(merged)
|
||||
return results
|
||||
|
||||
+127
-8
@@ -20,12 +20,114 @@ if PROJECT_ROOT not in sys.path:
|
||||
import gitea_config
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
AUTHOR_DEFAULT_ALLOWED = ["read", "branch", "commit", "push", "open_pr", "comment"]
|
||||
AUTHOR_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN = ["approve", "request_changes", "merge"]
|
||||
REVIEWER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED = [
|
||||
"read", "review", "comment", "approve", "request_changes", "merge"
|
||||
# Defaults emit *canonical* operation names only. Shorthand that is not in
|
||||
# gitea_config.GITEA_OPERATION_ALIASES (e.g. ``pr.close``, ``issue.close``)
|
||||
# is silently dropped by the production loader and must never appear here.
|
||||
AUTHOR_DEFAULT_ALLOWED = [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.create",
|
||||
"gitea.repo.commit",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.comment",
|
||||
]
|
||||
REVIEWER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN = ["branch", "commit", "push", "open_pr"]
|
||||
AUTHOR_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN = [
|
||||
"gitea.pr.approve",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.request_changes",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.merge",
|
||||
]
|
||||
REVIEWER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED = [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.review",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.approve",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.request_changes",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.merge",
|
||||
]
|
||||
REVIEWER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN = [
|
||||
"gitea.branch.create",
|
||||
"gitea.repo.commit",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
]
|
||||
# Required reconciler ops (read + pr.close) plus recommended comment/close and
|
||||
# branch.delete for guarded merged-PR cleanup. All names must normalize via
|
||||
# gitea_config.normalize_operation without being dropped.
|
||||
RECONCILER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED = [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.close",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.issue.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.issue.close",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
]
|
||||
RECONCILER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN = [
|
||||
"gitea.pr.approve",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.merge",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.review",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
"gitea.repo.commit",
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# Migration-only expansions for common shorthands that are *not* in
|
||||
# GITEA_OPERATION_ALIASES. Emitted output is always the canonical form so a
|
||||
# second canonicalize pass is a no-op (idempotent).
|
||||
_MIGRATION_ONLY_ALIASES = {
|
||||
"pr.close": "gitea.pr.close",
|
||||
"pr.comment": "gitea.pr.comment",
|
||||
"issue.close": "gitea.issue.close",
|
||||
"branch.delete": "gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Reconciler required ops that must survive migration (from reconciler_profile).
|
||||
RECONCILER_REQUIRED_CANONICAL = ("gitea.read", "gitea.pr.close")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def canonicalize_operation(op: str) -> str:
|
||||
"""Return a canonical operation name accepted by the production loader.
|
||||
|
||||
Fail closed on unknown/ambiguous spellings so required permissions cannot
|
||||
be silently dropped by ``check_operation`` later.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not isinstance(op, str) or not op.strip():
|
||||
raise ValueError("operation must be a non-empty string (fail closed)")
|
||||
op = op.strip()
|
||||
try:
|
||||
return gitea_config.normalize_operation(op)
|
||||
except gitea_config.ConfigError:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
if op in _MIGRATION_ONLY_ALIASES:
|
||||
return _MIGRATION_ONLY_ALIASES[op]
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
f"operation {op!r} cannot be canonicalized for migration "
|
||||
"(unknown/ambiguous; fail closed — production loader would drop it)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def canonicalize_operations(ops, *, context: str = "operations") -> list[str]:
|
||||
"""Canonicalize a list of operations; preserve order, drop duplicates."""
|
||||
if not isinstance(ops, list):
|
||||
raise ValueError(f"{context} must be a list (fail closed)")
|
||||
out: list[str] = []
|
||||
seen: set[str] = set()
|
||||
for entry in ops:
|
||||
canon = canonicalize_operation(entry)
|
||||
if canon not in seen:
|
||||
seen.add(canon)
|
||||
out.append(canon)
|
||||
return out
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _assert_reconciler_required_survive(allowed: list[str], profile_name: str) -> None:
|
||||
"""Fail visibly when migration would leave a reconciler without required ops."""
|
||||
missing = [op for op in RECONCILER_REQUIRED_CANONICAL if op not in set(allowed)]
|
||||
if missing:
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
f"Profile '{profile_name}' (reconciler) is missing required "
|
||||
f"operation(s) after migration: {missing}. Refusing to emit a "
|
||||
"profile that would silently fail pr.close / read (fail closed)."
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def infer_role(name, execution_profile):
|
||||
@@ -90,9 +192,11 @@ def migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data):
|
||||
ident_name = "reviewer"
|
||||
elif role == "author":
|
||||
ident_name = "author"
|
||||
elif role == "reconciler":
|
||||
ident_name = "reconciler"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
role = prof.get("role")
|
||||
if role not in (None, "author", "reviewer"):
|
||||
if role not in (None, "author", "reviewer", "reconciler"):
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
f"Profile '{name}' has unsupported role {role!r}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -124,20 +228,35 @@ def migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data):
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
f"Profile '{name}' operation fields must be lists"
|
||||
)
|
||||
identity_data["allowed_operations"] = list(allowed)
|
||||
identity_data["forbidden_operations"] = list(forbidden)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
identity_data["allowed_operations"] = canonicalize_operations(
|
||||
allowed, context=f"profile '{name}' allowed_operations"
|
||||
)
|
||||
identity_data["forbidden_operations"] = canonicalize_operations(
|
||||
forbidden, context=f"profile '{name}' forbidden_operations"
|
||||
)
|
||||
except ValueError as exc:
|
||||
raise ValueError(f"Profile '{name}': {exc}") from exc
|
||||
elif role == "author":
|
||||
identity_data["allowed_operations"] = list(AUTHOR_DEFAULT_ALLOWED)
|
||||
identity_data["forbidden_operations"] = list(AUTHOR_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN)
|
||||
elif role == "reviewer":
|
||||
identity_data["allowed_operations"] = list(REVIEWER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED)
|
||||
identity_data["forbidden_operations"] = list(REVIEWER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN)
|
||||
elif role == "reconciler":
|
||||
identity_data["allowed_operations"] = list(RECONCILER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED)
|
||||
identity_data["forbidden_operations"] = list(RECONCILER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
f"Profile '{name}' has no explicit operation lists and no "
|
||||
"unambiguous author/reviewer role marker (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if role == "reconciler":
|
||||
_assert_reconciler_required_survive(
|
||||
identity_data["allowed_operations"], name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Nest inside environments/services structure
|
||||
env = environments.setdefault(env_name, {})
|
||||
services = env.setdefault("services", {})
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,46 +56,23 @@ def resolve_namespace_workspace(
|
||||
env: dict[str, str] | os._Environ | None = None,
|
||||
session_lease_worktree: str | None = None,
|
||||
profile_name: str | None = None,
|
||||
demotions: list[str] | None = None,
|
||||
verify_paths: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> tuple[str, str]:
|
||||
"""Return ``(resolved_path, binding_source)`` for *role_kind*.
|
||||
|
||||
With *verify_paths*, env-sourced candidates whose path no longer exists
|
||||
are demoted (#702): a binding to a deleted worktree can never name a
|
||||
valid task workspace, so resolution falls through to the next candidate.
|
||||
Explicit arguments are never demoted — a caller-declared path must fail
|
||||
loudly downstream rather than silently rebind. Demotion notes are
|
||||
appended to *demotions* when provided. Runtime-context and mutation
|
||||
guards resolve through :func:`resolve_namespace_mutation_context`, which
|
||||
always verifies.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
"""Return ``(resolved_path, binding_source)`` for *role_kind*."""
|
||||
env_map = env if env is not None else os.environ
|
||||
role = normalize_role_kind(role_kind, profile_name=profile_name)
|
||||
role_env_key = ROLE_WORKTREE_ENVS[role]
|
||||
|
||||
for candidate, source, env_sourced in (
|
||||
(worktree_path, "worktree_path argument", False),
|
||||
(worktree, "worktree argument", False),
|
||||
(_env_value(env_map, ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV),
|
||||
f"{ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV} environment variable", True),
|
||||
(_env_value(env_map, role_env_key),
|
||||
f"{role_env_key} environment variable", True),
|
||||
for candidate, source in (
|
||||
(worktree_path, "worktree_path argument"),
|
||||
(worktree, "worktree argument"),
|
||||
(_env_value(env_map, ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV), f"{ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV} environment variable"),
|
||||
(_env_value(env_map, role_env_key), f"{role_env_key} environment variable"),
|
||||
(session_lease_worktree if role in {"reviewer", "merger"} else None,
|
||||
"reviewer PR lease worktree", False),
|
||||
"reviewer PR lease worktree"),
|
||||
):
|
||||
text = (candidate or "").strip()
|
||||
if not text:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
real = os.path.realpath(os.path.abspath(text))
|
||||
if verify_paths and env_sourced and not os.path.isdir(real):
|
||||
if demotions is not None:
|
||||
demotions.append(
|
||||
f"{source} '{real}' demoted: path no longer exists "
|
||||
"(stale binding, #702)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
return real, source
|
||||
if text:
|
||||
return os.path.realpath(os.path.abspath(text)), source
|
||||
|
||||
return os.path.realpath(process_project_root), "MCP server process root (default)"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -111,7 +88,6 @@ def resolve_namespace_mutation_context(
|
||||
profile_name: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Shared workspace resolution for runtime_context and mutation guards."""
|
||||
demotions: list[str] = []
|
||||
workspace, binding_source = resolve_namespace_workspace(
|
||||
role_kind=role_kind,
|
||||
worktree_path=worktree_path,
|
||||
@@ -120,8 +96,6 @@ def resolve_namespace_mutation_context(
|
||||
env=env,
|
||||
session_lease_worktree=session_lease_worktree,
|
||||
profile_name=profile_name,
|
||||
demotions=demotions,
|
||||
verify_paths=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
process_root = os.path.realpath(process_project_root)
|
||||
role = normalize_role_kind(role_kind, profile_name=profile_name)
|
||||
@@ -137,7 +111,7 @@ def resolve_namespace_mutation_context(
|
||||
"workspace_path": workspace,
|
||||
"workspace_binding_source": binding_source,
|
||||
"workspace_role_kind": role,
|
||||
"ignored_bindings": demotions + (pollution.get("ignored_bindings") or []),
|
||||
"ignored_bindings": pollution.get("ignored_bindings") or [],
|
||||
"process_project_root": process_root,
|
||||
"canonical_repo_root": canonical_root,
|
||||
"roots_aligned": canonical_root == process_root,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ RECONCILER_RECOMMENDED_OPERATIONS = (
|
||||
"gitea.pr.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.issue.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.issue.close",
|
||||
# Merged-branch cleanup is reconciler-owned (task_capability_map maps
|
||||
# cleanup_merged_pr_branch -> reconciler). The permission is only
|
||||
# exercisable through the guarded gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch path
|
||||
# (#514): merged proof, protected-branch refusal, explicit confirmation.
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN_OPERATIONS = (
|
||||
|
||||
+43
-892
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1,257 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Sanctioned recovery for stale env-bound task workspace bindings (#702).
|
||||
|
||||
When the MCP daemon dies from an unhandled exception it never runs teardown,
|
||||
and the auto-reconnected daemon inherits ``GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE`` from its
|
||||
parent environment. That inherited value can permanently bind the fresh
|
||||
session to a prior task's worktree (the PR #701 / ``review-pr-654`` incident).
|
||||
|
||||
This module classifies the active env binding against live session evidence
|
||||
and produces a fail-closed recovery plan. Only two situations permit the
|
||||
daemon to clear the binding on its own:
|
||||
|
||||
- the bound path no longer exists on disk (``provably_stale_missing_path``)
|
||||
- the binding was inherited at daemon boot and a *sanctioned* in-session
|
||||
reviewer/merger lease later bound a different worktree
|
||||
(``superseded_by_session_lease``)
|
||||
|
||||
Everything else is surfaced (``unverified_inherited``) and left for the
|
||||
managed reconnect path — never cleared silently, never rebound to a guessed
|
||||
worktree.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV = "GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE"
|
||||
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_UNBOUND = "unbound"
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_CORROBORATED = "corroborated"
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_UNVERIFIED_INHERITED = "unverified_inherited"
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_PROVABLY_STALE_MISSING_PATH = "provably_stale_missing_path"
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_SUPERSEDED_BY_SESSION_LEASE = "superseded_by_session_lease"
|
||||
|
||||
CLASSIFICATIONS = frozenset({
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_UNBOUND,
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_CORROBORATED,
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_UNVERIFIED_INHERITED,
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_PROVABLY_STALE_MISSING_PATH,
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_SUPERSEDED_BY_SESSION_LEASE,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
# Roles whose task workspace is owned by a lease lifecycle, so an inherited
|
||||
# generic binding without a corroborating lease is suspect.
|
||||
LEASE_BOUND_ROLES = frozenset({"reviewer", "merger"})
|
||||
|
||||
RECOVERY_ACTION_NONE = "none"
|
||||
RECOVERY_ACTION_CLEAR_ENV = "clear_env"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _norm(path: str | None) -> str:
|
||||
text = (path or "").strip()
|
||||
if not text:
|
||||
return ""
|
||||
return os.path.realpath(os.path.abspath(text))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def snapshot_boot_bindings(
|
||||
env: dict[str, str] | os._Environ | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Capture worktree env bindings present when the daemon booted.
|
||||
|
||||
A value present in this snapshot was inherited from the parent
|
||||
environment, not established by any sanctioned tool in this daemon's
|
||||
lifetime.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
env_map = env if env is not None else os.environ
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"active_worktree": (env_map.get(ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV) or "").strip() or None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def classify_active_worktree_binding(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
active_value: str | None,
|
||||
role_env_value: str | None = None,
|
||||
session_lease_worktree: str | None = None,
|
||||
boot_inherited: bool,
|
||||
path_exists: bool | None,
|
||||
role_kind: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Classify the GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE binding against live evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
Fail closed: unknown evidence never yields a clear-eligible class.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
active = _norm(active_value)
|
||||
if not active:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"classification": CLASSIFICATION_UNBOUND,
|
||||
"clear_eligible": False,
|
||||
"active_worktree": None,
|
||||
"reasons": ["no GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE binding present"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
role = (role_kind or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
role_env = _norm(role_env_value)
|
||||
lease_wt = _norm(session_lease_worktree)
|
||||
|
||||
result: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"active_worktree": active,
|
||||
"boot_inherited": bool(boot_inherited),
|
||||
"role_kind": role or None,
|
||||
"session_lease_worktree": lease_wt or None,
|
||||
"role_env_worktree": role_env or None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if path_exists is False:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"bound worktree '{active}' no longer exists on disk; the binding "
|
||||
"cannot name a valid task workspace"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result.update({
|
||||
"classification": CLASSIFICATION_PROVABLY_STALE_MISSING_PATH,
|
||||
"clear_eligible": True,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
})
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
if lease_wt and lease_wt == active:
|
||||
reasons.append("binding matches the sanctioned in-session lease worktree")
|
||||
result.update({
|
||||
"classification": CLASSIFICATION_CORROBORATED,
|
||||
"clear_eligible": False,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
})
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
if lease_wt and lease_wt != active and boot_inherited:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"boot-inherited binding disagrees with the sanctioned in-session "
|
||||
f"lease worktree '{lease_wt}'; the lease is live authority"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result.update({
|
||||
"classification": CLASSIFICATION_SUPERSEDED_BY_SESSION_LEASE,
|
||||
"clear_eligible": True,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
})
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
if lease_wt and lease_wt != active and not boot_inherited:
|
||||
# Set after boot by tooling; disagreement is surfaced, never auto-cleared.
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"post-boot binding disagrees with the in-session lease worktree; "
|
||||
"surfacing only (fail closed, no automatic clear)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result.update({
|
||||
"classification": CLASSIFICATION_UNVERIFIED_INHERITED,
|
||||
"clear_eligible": False,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
})
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
if role_env and role_env == active:
|
||||
reasons.append("binding matches the role-specific worktree env binding")
|
||||
result.update({
|
||||
"classification": CLASSIFICATION_CORROBORATED,
|
||||
"clear_eligible": False,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
})
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
if boot_inherited and role in LEASE_BOUND_ROLES and not lease_wt:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"binding was inherited at daemon boot, no sanctioned in-session "
|
||||
f"lease corroborates it, and the {role} role binds workspaces "
|
||||
"through the lease lifecycle; treat as unverified until a fresh "
|
||||
"lease or managed reconnect re-establishes the workspace"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result.update({
|
||||
"classification": CLASSIFICATION_UNVERIFIED_INHERITED,
|
||||
"clear_eligible": False,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
})
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
reasons.append("no contradicting evidence; binding treated as corroborated")
|
||||
result.update({
|
||||
"classification": CLASSIFICATION_CORROBORATED,
|
||||
"clear_eligible": False,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
})
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def plan_recovery(classification_result: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Turn a classification into an explicit, fail-closed recovery plan."""
|
||||
classification = classification_result.get("classification")
|
||||
clear_eligible = bool(classification_result.get("clear_eligible"))
|
||||
reasons = list(classification_result.get("reasons") or [])
|
||||
|
||||
if classification not in CLASSIFICATIONS:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"action": RECOVERY_ACTION_NONE,
|
||||
"clear_allowed": False,
|
||||
"classification": classification,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons + ["unknown classification (fail closed)"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if clear_eligible and classification in {
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_PROVABLY_STALE_MISSING_PATH,
|
||||
CLASSIFICATION_SUPERSEDED_BY_SESSION_LEASE,
|
||||
}:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"action": RECOVERY_ACTION_CLEAR_ENV,
|
||||
"clear_allowed": True,
|
||||
"classification": classification,
|
||||
"active_worktree": classification_result.get("active_worktree"),
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
exact_next_action = None
|
||||
if classification == CLASSIFICATION_UNVERIFIED_INHERITED:
|
||||
exact_next_action = (
|
||||
"managed recovery required: reconnect the MCP namespace through "
|
||||
"the managed client configuration (or start a fresh session) so "
|
||||
"the daemon boots without the inherited GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE, or "
|
||||
"corroborate the binding by acquiring a lease for that worktree; "
|
||||
"do not clear or rewrite the environment manually"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"action": RECOVERY_ACTION_NONE,
|
||||
"clear_allowed": False,
|
||||
"classification": classification,
|
||||
"active_worktree": classification_result.get("active_worktree"),
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
**({"exact_next_action": exact_next_action} if exact_next_action else {}),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def apply_recovery(
|
||||
plan: dict[str, Any],
|
||||
env: dict[str, str] | os._Environ | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Apply a clear-eligible plan by removing the stale env binding.
|
||||
|
||||
This is the sanctioned in-daemon mechanism (#702 AC2); callers must
|
||||
persist the returned record for audit. Refuses anything but an explicit
|
||||
``clear_env`` plan.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
env_map = env if env is not None else os.environ
|
||||
if not plan.get("clear_allowed") or plan.get("action") != RECOVERY_ACTION_CLEAR_ENV:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"action": RECOVERY_ACTION_NONE,
|
||||
"reasons": ["recovery plan does not authorize clearing (fail closed)"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
cleared_value = (env_map.get(ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV) or "").strip() or None
|
||||
env_map.pop(ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV, None)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"action": RECOVERY_ACTION_CLEAR_ENV,
|
||||
"cleared_env": ACTIVE_WORKTREE_ENV,
|
||||
"cleared_value": cleared_value,
|
||||
"classification": plan.get("classification"),
|
||||
"reasons": list(plan.get("reasons") or []),
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -76,16 +76,6 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
|
||||
"role": "reviewer",
|
||||
},
|
||||
# #691: guarded non-owner cleanup of obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases.
|
||||
# Apply path posts lease release + audit comments (gitea.pr.comment).
|
||||
"cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
|
||||
"role": "reviewer",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
|
||||
"role": "reviewer",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"blind_pr_queue_review": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.pr.review",
|
||||
"role": "reviewer",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -27,7 +27,13 @@ from task_capability_map import required_permission, required_role
|
||||
|
||||
DELETE_PROFILE = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-author-delete",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
"audit_label": "prgs-author-delete",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,10 +8,33 @@ import branch_cleanup_guard as guard # noqa: E402
|
||||
import mcp_server # noqa: E402
|
||||
import task_capability_map # noqa: E402
|
||||
from final_report_validator import assess_final_report_validator # noqa: E402
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch # noqa: E402
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch, gitea_delete_branch # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
FAKE_AUTH = "token fake"
|
||||
|
||||
# Reconciler-shaped profile that holds branch.delete (recommended) plus
|
||||
# required pr.close/read so _role_kind classifies as reconciler.
|
||||
RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
|
||||
"role": "reconciler",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.close",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.issue.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.issue.close",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.pr.approve",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.merge",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.review",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
"gitea.repo.commit",
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRawBranchDeleteGuard(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_detects_local_and_remote_raw_git_delete_commands(self):
|
||||
@@ -93,14 +116,48 @@ class TestMergedPrBranchCleanupTool(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_permission"], "gitea.branch.delete")
|
||||
self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_and_merger_without_delete_authority_fail_closed(self):
|
||||
role_profiles = {
|
||||
"author": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
"gitea.repo.commit",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"merger": ["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.merge"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
for name, allowed in role_profiles.items():
|
||||
with self.subTest(role=name):
|
||||
profile_patch = patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": name,
|
||||
"allowed_operations": allowed,
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
profile_patch.start()
|
||||
try:
|
||||
res = gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
|
||||
pr_number=487,
|
||||
confirmation="CLEANUP MERGED PR 487 BRANCH feat/branch",
|
||||
branch="feat/branch",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
worktree_path="/tmp/repo/branches/cleanup",
|
||||
)
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
profile_patch.stop()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
res["required_permission"], "gitea.branch.delete"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_root_checkout_cleanup_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": "branch-cleanup",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
},
|
||||
return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
res = gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
|
||||
pr_number=487,
|
||||
@@ -117,11 +174,7 @@ class TestMergedPrBranchCleanupTool(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
branch = "feat/issue-485-lease-comments-non-list-guard"
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": "branch-cleanup",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
},
|
||||
return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = [
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -152,11 +205,7 @@ class TestMergedPrBranchCleanupTool(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
branch = "feat/issue-485-lease-comments-non-list-guard"
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": "branch-cleanup",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
},
|
||||
return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = [
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -182,6 +231,168 @@ class TestMergedPrBranchCleanupTool(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(delete_calls)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reconciler_with_branch_delete_cannot_raw_delete(self):
|
||||
"""#687: reconciler + gitea.branch.delete still cannot call raw delete."""
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
res = gitea_delete_branch(
|
||||
branch="fix/issue-683-workflow-guard-hardening",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("success", True))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("performed", True))
|
||||
reasons = " ".join(res.get("reasons") or [])
|
||||
self.assertIn("raw gitea_delete_branch", reasons)
|
||||
self.assertIn("cleanup_merged_pr_branch", reasons)
|
||||
self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reconciler_raw_delete_denies_preservation_branch(self):
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
res = gitea_delete_branch(
|
||||
branch="chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("performed", True))
|
||||
self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_with_branch_delete_role_ok_but_preserve_blocked(self):
|
||||
"""Author role may use raw delete path when permitted; preserve fails closed."""
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-author",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
res = gitea_delete_branch(
|
||||
branch="chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("performed", True))
|
||||
self.assertIn("preservation", " ".join(res.get("reasons") or []))
|
||||
self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unmerged_branch_cleanup_rejected(self):
|
||||
branch = "feat/unmerged-work"
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"number": 999,
|
||||
"merged": False,
|
||||
"merged_at": None,
|
||||
"head": {"ref": branch, "sha": "b" * 40},
|
||||
"base": {"ref": "master"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{},
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
|
||||
pr_number=999,
|
||||
confirmation=f"CLEANUP MERGED PR 999 BRANCH {branch}",
|
||||
branch=branch,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
worktree_path="/tmp/repo/branches/cleanup",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("not merged" in r for r in (res.get("reasons") or []))
|
||||
)
|
||||
delete_calls = [
|
||||
call for call in self.mock_api.call_args_list if call.args[0] == "DELETE"
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(delete_calls)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_preservation_branch_cleanup_rejected(self):
|
||||
branch = "chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip"
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"number": 681,
|
||||
"merged": True,
|
||||
"merged_at": "2026-07-08T01:00:00Z",
|
||||
"head": {"ref": branch, "sha": "c" * 40},
|
||||
"base": {"ref": "master"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{},
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
|
||||
pr_number=681,
|
||||
confirmation=f"CLEANUP MERGED PR 681 BRANCH {branch}",
|
||||
branch=branch,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
worktree_path="/tmp/repo/branches/cleanup",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("preservation" in r for r in (res.get("reasons") or []))
|
||||
)
|
||||
delete_calls = [
|
||||
call for call in self.mock_api.call_args_list if call.args[0] == "DELETE"
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(delete_calls)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_reconciler_with_delete_denied_cleanup(self):
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-author",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
res = gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
|
||||
pr_number=487,
|
||||
confirmation="CLEANUP MERGED PR 487 BRANCH feat/branch",
|
||||
branch="feat/branch",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
worktree_path="/tmp/repo/branches/cleanup",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("required_role_kind"), "reconciler")
|
||||
self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_assess_guard_rejects_preservation_branch(self):
|
||||
assessment = guard.assess_merged_pr_branch_cleanup(
|
||||
pr_number=681,
|
||||
head_branch="chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip",
|
||||
merged=True,
|
||||
remote_branch_exists=True,
|
||||
open_pr_heads=set(),
|
||||
head_on_target=True,
|
||||
delete_capability_allowed=True,
|
||||
confirmation=(
|
||||
"CLEANUP MERGED PR 681 BRANCH "
|
||||
"chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip"
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(assessment["safe_to_delete"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("preservation" in r for r in assessment["block_reasons"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,616 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Guarded cleanup for obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases (#691).
|
||||
|
||||
Reproduces PR #688 lease comment 10749 class of defect: completed
|
||||
REQUEST_CHANGES on head A, author pushes head B, foreign lease remains
|
||||
pinned to A (and after expiry still has no non-owner cleanup path that
|
||||
diagnosis can prescribe beyond indefinite wait).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
import merger_lease_adoption as mla # noqa: E402
|
||||
import reviewer_pr_lease as leases # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
# PR #688 / comment 10749 reproduction fixtures
|
||||
HEAD_A = "c7a444eb4b41cf916fdbd20a4999ffd78af496d0"
|
||||
HEAD_B = "4a6357800364718a27a36ebc73578d4b929ff4aa"
|
||||
SESSION_FOREIGN = "25883-7d4c6e6ebd53"
|
||||
COMMENT_10749 = 10749
|
||||
REPO = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"
|
||||
PR = 688
|
||||
ISSUE = 687
|
||||
EXPIRES_10749 = "2026-07-13T04:23:00Z"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _utc(dt: datetime) -> datetime:
|
||||
return dt if dt.tzinfo else dt.replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _lease_comment(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
pr_number: int = PR,
|
||||
session_id: str = SESSION_FOREIGN,
|
||||
phase: str = "claimed",
|
||||
candidate_head: str = HEAD_A,
|
||||
comment_id: int = COMMENT_10749,
|
||||
last_activity: datetime | None = None,
|
||||
expires_at: datetime | None = None,
|
||||
worktree: str = "branches/review-pr688-feat-issue-687-reconciler-branch-delete",
|
||||
repo: str = REPO,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
now = last_activity or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
|
||||
body = leases.format_lease_body(
|
||||
repo=repo,
|
||||
pr_number=pr_number,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
|
||||
profile="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
session_id=session_id,
|
||||
worktree=worktree,
|
||||
phase=phase,
|
||||
candidate_head=candidate_head,
|
||||
target_branch="master",
|
||||
target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
|
||||
last_activity=now,
|
||||
expires_at=expires_at,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"id": comment_id,
|
||||
"body": body,
|
||||
"user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
|
||||
"author": "sysadmin",
|
||||
"created_at": now.isoformat(),
|
||||
"updated_at": now.isoformat(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _reviews_for_head(head: str, verdict: str = "REQUEST_CHANGES") -> list[dict]:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"verdict": verdict,
|
||||
"reviewed_head_sha": head,
|
||||
"dismissed": False,
|
||||
"reviewer": "sysadmin",
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _assess(
|
||||
comments,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
current_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
formal_reviews=None,
|
||||
controller=True,
|
||||
worktree_exists=True,
|
||||
worktree_clean=True,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=False,
|
||||
requesting_session="fresh-controller",
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
confirmation=None,
|
||||
**kwargs,
|
||||
):
|
||||
return leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
|
||||
comments,
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
current_head_sha=current_head,
|
||||
formal_reviews=formal_reviews if formal_reviews is not None else _reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
expected_repo=REPO,
|
||||
requesting_session_id=requesting_session,
|
||||
controller_recovery_authorized=controller,
|
||||
worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
|
||||
worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
|
||||
worktree_has_unpreserved_work=not worktree_clean if worktree_exists else False,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=owner_process_alive,
|
||||
owner_pid_observed=kwargs.get("owner_pid_observed"),
|
||||
requesting_pid=kwargs.get("requesting_pid", 99999),
|
||||
current_head_review_in_progress=kwargs.get(
|
||||
"current_head_review_in_progress", False
|
||||
),
|
||||
expected_lease_comment_id=kwargs.get("expected_lease_comment_id"),
|
||||
expected_session_id=kwargs.get("expected_session_id"),
|
||||
expected_leased_head=kwargs.get("expected_leased_head"),
|
||||
confirmation=confirmation
|
||||
if confirmation is not None
|
||||
else (leases.cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(PR) if apply else ""),
|
||||
apply=apply,
|
||||
now=kwargs.get("now"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestIssue691SupersededHeadCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
leases.clear_session_lease()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_1_request_changes_then_push_expired_cleanup_succeeds(self):
|
||||
"""Completed REQUEST_CHANGES on A, push B, lease A expires → cleanup OK."""
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(
|
||||
last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=2),
|
||||
expires_at=expires,
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_expired_superseded_head")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
result["exact_next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("phase: released", result["release_body"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("obsolete-superseded-or-expired-lease", result["release_body"])
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(result["audit_comment_body"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["cleanup_tool"], leases.CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_2_approve_then_push_cleanup_policy(self):
|
||||
"""Completed APPROVE on A, push B → cleanup eligible (completed superseded)."""
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 1, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc) # not yet expired
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(
|
||||
last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=10),
|
||||
expires_at=expires,
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "APPROVED"),
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_completed_superseded_head")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_3_active_current_head_cleanup_denied(self):
|
||||
now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(
|
||||
candidate_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=5),
|
||||
expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
current_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_B, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_active_current_head")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_4_foreign_owner_recent_progress_denied(self):
|
||||
now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(
|
||||
candidate_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=2),
|
||||
expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
current_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
formal_reviews=[],
|
||||
owner_process_alive=True,
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("recent authenticated progress" in r for r in result["reasons"])
|
||||
or any("current PR head" in r for r in result["reasons"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_5_owner_absent_worktree_dirty_denied(self):
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(
|
||||
candidate_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
|
||||
expires_at=expires,
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
current_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
formal_reviews=[],
|
||||
worktree_clean=False,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=False,
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("dirty" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_6_owner_absent_worktree_clean_orphan_ok(self):
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(
|
||||
candidate_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
|
||||
expires_at=expires,
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
current_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
formal_reviews=[],
|
||||
worktree_clean=True,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=False,
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "orphaned_owner_missing")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_7_pid_reuse_not_ownership(self):
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
|
||||
result = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
owner_pid_observed=4242,
|
||||
requesting_pid=4242,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("PID equality" in r or "NOT ownership" in r for r in result["reasons"])
|
||||
or result["owner_session_evidence"]["pid_is_not_ownership_proof"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Still eligible via superseded+terminal+expired despite matching PID.
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_8_comment_backed_no_db_lease_id(self):
|
||||
"""Cleanup uses comment ledger only — no control-plane lease_id required."""
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
|
||||
# Explicitly no lease_id field anywhere.
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("lease_id", claim)
|
||||
result = _assess([claim], now=now)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["active_lease"]["comment_id"], COMMENT_10749)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(result["active_lease"].get("lease_id"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_9_cleanup_posts_durable_audit_bodies(self):
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
|
||||
result = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("#691", result["audit_comment_body"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(str(COMMENT_10749), result["audit_comment_body"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(HEAD_A, result["audit_comment_body"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(HEAD_B, result["audit_comment_body"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_10_fresh_acquire_after_cleanup_marker(self):
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(
|
||||
expires_at=expires,
|
||||
last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
|
||||
comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assessed = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(assessed["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
release = {
|
||||
"id": 99999,
|
||||
"body": assessed["release_body"],
|
||||
"user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
|
||||
}
|
||||
# Newest terminal marker ends active lease.
|
||||
active = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease(
|
||||
[claim, release], pr_number=PR, now=now
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(active)
|
||||
acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
|
||||
[claim, release],
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
|
||||
profile="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
session_id="fresh-reviewer-1",
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
worktree="branches/review-pr-688-fresh",
|
||||
candidate_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
target_branch="master",
|
||||
target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(acq["acquire_allowed"], acq["reasons"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_11_no_validation_state_transfer(self):
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
|
||||
result = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
# Release body keeps old candidate_head (no repoint).
|
||||
self.assertIn(f"candidate_head: {HEAD_A}", result["release_body"])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(HEAD_B, result["release_body"].split("candidate_head:")[1].split("\n")[0])
|
||||
self.assertIn("did not transfer validation", result["audit_comment_body"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("did not repoint", result["audit_comment_body"])
|
||||
# Session lease must remain unset by assessment (tool never seeds).
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(leases.get_session_lease())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_12_repeated_cleanup_idempotent(self):
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
|
||||
first = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(first["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
release = {"id": 100001, "body": first["release_body"], "user": {"login": "x"}}
|
||||
second = _assess([claim, release], now=now, apply=True)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(second["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(second["classification"], "no_lease")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_13_malformed_expiry_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment()
|
||||
# Corrupt expires_at in the body.
|
||||
claim["body"] = claim["body"].replace(
|
||||
claim["body"].split("expires_at:")[1].split("\n")[0].strip(),
|
||||
"not-a-timestamp",
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = _assess([claim], formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["expires_parseable"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("expires_at" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_14_wrong_identity_evidence_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
|
||||
bad_repo = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
# force repo mismatch via expected_repo
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Patch via direct call with wrong expected_repo
|
||||
bad = leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
|
||||
formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
|
||||
expected_repo="Other-Org/Other-Repo",
|
||||
requesting_session_id="fresh",
|
||||
controller_recovery_authorized=True,
|
||||
worktree_exists=True,
|
||||
worktree_clean=True,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=False,
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(bad["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("repository identity" in r for r in bad["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
bad_pr = leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
pr_number=999,
|
||||
current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
|
||||
formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
|
||||
expected_repo=REPO,
|
||||
requesting_session_id="fresh",
|
||||
controller_recovery_authorized=True,
|
||||
worktree_exists=True,
|
||||
worktree_clean=True,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=False,
|
||||
expected_lease_comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(bad_pr["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
bad_head = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
expected_leased_head="0" * 40,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(bad_head["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
bad_session = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
expected_session_id="wrong-session",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(bad_session["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_15_current_head_active_cannot_be_displaced(self):
|
||||
now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(
|
||||
candidate_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=1),
|
||||
expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
current_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_B),
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
current_head_review_in_progress=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
# Acquire also blocked by foreign active lease.
|
||||
acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
reviewer_identity="other",
|
||||
profile="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
session_id="thief",
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
worktree="branches/steal",
|
||||
candidate_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
target_branch="master",
|
||||
target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(acq["acquire_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_regression_pr688_comment_10749_after_expiry(self):
|
||||
"""Exact 10749 reproduction after recorded expires_at 2026-07-13T04:23:00Z."""
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 30, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime.fromisoformat(EXPIRES_10749.replace("Z", "+00:00"))
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(
|
||||
session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
|
||||
candidate_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
|
||||
last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=2),
|
||||
expires_at=expires,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Diagnosis must not prescribe indefinite wait-only for this case.
|
||||
diag = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
current_session_id="fresh-reviewer",
|
||||
current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
|
||||
current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
|
||||
formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
|
||||
worktree_exists=True,
|
||||
worktree_clean=True,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=False,
|
||||
instructed_session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
|
||||
instructed_comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(diag["classification"], "foreign_expired_superseded_head")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
diag["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(diag["cleanup_tool"], leases.CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL)
|
||||
self.assertIn("CLEANUP OBSOLETE REVIEWER LEASE 688", diag["required_confirmation"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(diag["mutation_eligibility"], "cleanup_only")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(diag["mutation_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
# Assessment still returns the lease as active/stale class of block for acquire
|
||||
# when unexpired path... here it's expired so find_active is None; acquire free
|
||||
# only after cleanup if somehow still active. With expired, find_active is None:
|
||||
active = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease([claim], pr_number=PR, now=now)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(active)
|
||||
|
||||
# But superseded unexpired still blocks acquire and diagnosis points to cleanup:
|
||||
unexpired_now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 1, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim2 = _lease_comment(
|
||||
session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
|
||||
candidate_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
|
||||
last_activity=unexpired_now - timedelta(minutes=45),
|
||||
expires_at=expires,
|
||||
)
|
||||
active2 = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease(
|
||||
[claim2], pr_number=PR, now=unexpired_now
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(active2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(active2["freshness"], "stale_warning")
|
||||
diag2 = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
|
||||
[claim2],
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
current_session_id="fresh-reviewer",
|
||||
current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
|
||||
current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
|
||||
formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
|
||||
worktree_exists=True,
|
||||
worktree_clean=True,
|
||||
now=unexpired_now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(diag2["classification"], "foreign_completed_superseded_head")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
diag2["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
|
||||
)
|
||||
acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
|
||||
[claim2],
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
|
||||
profile="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
session_id="fresh-reviewer",
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
worktree="branches/review-pr-688-new",
|
||||
candidate_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
target_branch="master",
|
||||
target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
|
||||
now=unexpired_now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(acq["acquire_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_controller_auth_denied(self):
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
|
||||
result = _assess([claim], controller=False, now=now)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_confirmation_denied_on_apply(self):
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
|
||||
result = _assess(
|
||||
[claim], now=now, apply=True, confirmation="MERGE PR 688"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("confirmation" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_owner_session_must_use_owner_release(self):
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
|
||||
result = _assess(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
requesting_session=SESSION_FOREIGN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("owns the lease" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_superseded_without_terminal_review_denied(self):
|
||||
# Pre-expiry the missing terminal review is ambiguous (fail closed);
|
||||
# post-expiry with unknown owner evidence it is a crash-orphan (#702)
|
||||
# that still fails closed until owner-process exit is proven.
|
||||
now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
|
||||
result = _assess(
|
||||
[claim], formal_reviews=[], now=now, owner_process_alive=None
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
result["classification"], "orphaned_expired_superseded_head"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
fresh_expires = now + timedelta(minutes=60)
|
||||
fresh = _lease_comment(
|
||||
expires_at=fresh_expires, last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=5)
|
||||
)
|
||||
pre_expiry = _assess([fresh], formal_reviews=[], now=now)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(pre_expiry["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
pre_expiry["classification"], "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestIssue691DiagnoseClassifications(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
leases.clear_session_lease()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_foreign_active_current_head_still_wait(self):
|
||||
now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
|
||||
claim = _lease_comment(
|
||||
candidate_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=5),
|
||||
expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=1),
|
||||
)
|
||||
claim["id"] = 1
|
||||
result = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
|
||||
[claim],
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
current_session_id="other",
|
||||
current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
|
||||
current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
|
||||
formal_reviews=[],
|
||||
now=now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_active_current_head")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_WAIT)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["mutation_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1,693 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Regression tests for the PR #703 REQUEST_CHANGES findings F1–F6 (#702).
|
||||
|
||||
Formal review at head 889931d independently reproduced six defects:
|
||||
|
||||
F1 — stale-binding recovery ran only AFTER the terminal launcher probe in
|
||||
``gitea_resolve_task_capability``; a worktree removed mid-session wedged
|
||||
every mutation-task resolution on 'missing cwd' before recovery.
|
||||
F2 — ``_resolve_preflight_workspace_path`` skipped the existence checks the
|
||||
canonical mutation context applies; a dead binding could produce empty
|
||||
porcelain and read as a clean workspace.
|
||||
F3 — ``orphaned_expired_superseded_head`` cleanup accepted unknown
|
||||
``worktree_exists``/``worktree_clean`` evidence.
|
||||
F4 — the 4-hour session-state TTL silently discarded recovery-critical
|
||||
crash-orphan shadow evidence.
|
||||
F5 — the single same-profile shadow slot let concurrent sessions overwrite
|
||||
each other's crash evidence.
|
||||
F6 — the environment was cleared BEFORE the audit record was persisted, and
|
||||
audit-write failure was swallowed.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import shutil
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
import mcp_session_state as mss # noqa: E402
|
||||
import namespace_workspace_binding as nwb # noqa: E402
|
||||
import reviewer_pr_lease as leases # noqa: E402
|
||||
import stale_binding_recovery as sbr # noqa: E402
|
||||
import mcp_server # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
REPO = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"
|
||||
OLD_HEAD = "b" * 40
|
||||
NEW_HEAD = "6" * 40
|
||||
|
||||
CONFIG = {
|
||||
"version": 2,
|
||||
"contexts": {
|
||||
"ctx": {
|
||||
"enabled": True,
|
||||
"gitea": {"enabled": True, "base_url": "https://gitea.example.com"},
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"profiles": {
|
||||
"prgs-author": {
|
||||
"enabled": True,
|
||||
"context": "ctx",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
"username": "jcwalker3",
|
||||
"auth": {"type": "env", "name": "GITEA_TOKEN_AUTHOR"},
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read", "gitea.issue.create", "gitea.issue.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create", "gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge", "gitea.pr.review",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"execution_profile": "prgs-author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"rules": {"allow_runtime_switching": False},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _now() -> datetime:
|
||||
return datetime.now(timezone.utc)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _CapabilityHarness(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Shared config/env plumbing for resolve-capability integration tests."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._remotes = patch.dict(mcp_server.REMOTES, {
|
||||
"prgs": {
|
||||
"host": "gitea.example.com",
|
||||
"org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
"repo": "Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
self._remotes.start()
|
||||
mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
|
||||
self._dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.config_path = os.path.join(self._dir.name, "profiles.json")
|
||||
with open(self.config_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
|
||||
fh.write(json.dumps(CONFIG))
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
self._remotes.stop()
|
||||
mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
|
||||
self._dir.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def _env(self, **extra):
|
||||
env = {
|
||||
"GITEA_MCP_CONFIG": self.config_path,
|
||||
"GITEA_MCP_PROFILE": "prgs-author",
|
||||
"GITEA_TOKEN_AUTHOR": "author-pass",
|
||||
}
|
||||
env.update(extra)
|
||||
return env
|
||||
|
||||
def _deleted_worktree(self) -> str:
|
||||
path = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="gitea-removed-worktree-")
|
||||
shutil.rmtree(path)
|
||||
return path
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestF1RecoveryBeforeTerminalProbe(_CapabilityHarness):
|
||||
"""F1: recovery must run before the terminal cwd probe can wedge."""
|
||||
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "jcwalker3"})
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token author-pass")
|
||||
def test_removed_worktree_recovers_before_probe(self, _auth, _api):
|
||||
missing = self._deleted_worktree()
|
||||
env = self._env(
|
||||
GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE=missing,
|
||||
GITEA_FORCE_TERMINAL_PROBE="1",
|
||||
GITEA_FORCE_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY="1",
|
||||
)
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env):
|
||||
res = mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(
|
||||
task="create_pr", remote="prgs"
|
||||
)
|
||||
# The provably-stale binding was cleared before the probe ran.
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE", os.environ)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("terminal_launcher_unhealthy"))
|
||||
report = res.get("stale_binding_recovery") or {}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
report.get("classification"),
|
||||
sbr.CLASSIFICATION_PROVABLY_STALE_MISSING_PATH,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(report.get("recovery_performed"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("allowed_in_current_session"))
|
||||
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "jcwalker3"})
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token author-pass")
|
||||
def test_probe_block_still_carries_recovery_report(self, _auth, _api):
|
||||
# Recovery disabled (test mode without the force flag) preserves the
|
||||
# fail-closed probe block, but the block must now carry the
|
||||
# classification evidence instead of hiding it.
|
||||
missing = self._deleted_worktree()
|
||||
env = self._env(
|
||||
GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE=missing,
|
||||
GITEA_FORCE_TERMINAL_PROBE="1",
|
||||
)
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env):
|
||||
res = mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(
|
||||
task="create_pr", remote="prgs"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE", os.environ)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("terminal_launcher_unhealthy"))
|
||||
report = res.get("stale_binding_recovery") or {}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
report.get("classification"),
|
||||
sbr.CLASSIFICATION_PROVABLY_STALE_MISSING_PATH,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(report.get("recovery_performed"))
|
||||
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"login": "jcwalker3"})
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token author-pass")
|
||||
def test_unverified_binding_is_never_cleared_by_reordering(self, _auth, _api):
|
||||
# F1 must not weaken authorization: an existing, uncorroborated
|
||||
# binding survives resolution untouched even with recovery forced.
|
||||
existing = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="gitea-existing-worktree-")
|
||||
self.addCleanup(shutil.rmtree, existing, ignore_errors=True)
|
||||
env = self._env(
|
||||
GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE=existing,
|
||||
GITEA_FORCE_TERMINAL_PROBE="1",
|
||||
GITEA_FORCE_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY="1",
|
||||
)
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env):
|
||||
res = mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(
|
||||
task="create_pr", remote="prgs"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(os.environ.get("GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE"), existing)
|
||||
report = res.get("stale_binding_recovery") or {}
|
||||
self.assertFalse(report.get("recovery_performed"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestF2PreflightPathVerification(_CapabilityHarness):
|
||||
"""F2: preflight and mutation contexts verify resolved paths alike."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_preflight_and_mutation_context_agree_on_dead_binding(self):
|
||||
missing = self._deleted_worktree()
|
||||
env = self._env(GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE=missing)
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env):
|
||||
preflight = mcp_server._resolve_preflight_workspace_path(None)
|
||||
mutation = mcp_server._resolve_namespace_mutation_context(None)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(preflight, mutation["workspace_path"])
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(preflight, os.path.realpath(missing))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_explicit_worktree_never_reads_clean(self):
|
||||
missing = self._deleted_worktree()
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env()):
|
||||
porcelain = mcp_server._get_workspace_porcelain(worktree_path=missing)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
porcelain, mcp_server.PREFLIGHT_WORKSPACE_UNAVAILABLE_PORCELAIN
|
||||
)
|
||||
# The sentinel parses as a tracked dirty entry — never clean.
|
||||
self.assertTrue(mcp_server._parse_porcelain_entries(porcelain))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_workspace_deleted_during_evaluation_never_reads_clean(self):
|
||||
# TOCTOU: resolution succeeded, then the path vanished before git ran.
|
||||
missing = self._deleted_worktree()
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env()):
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server,
|
||||
"_resolve_preflight_workspace_path",
|
||||
return_value=missing,
|
||||
):
|
||||
porcelain = mcp_server._get_workspace_porcelain()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
porcelain, mcp_server.PREFLIGHT_WORKSPACE_UNAVAILABLE_PORCELAIN
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_git_failure_never_reads_clean(self):
|
||||
class _Failed:
|
||||
returncode = 128
|
||||
stdout = ""
|
||||
stderr = "fatal: not a git repository"
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env()):
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server.subprocess, "run", return_value=_Failed()
|
||||
):
|
||||
porcelain = mcp_server._get_workspace_porcelain()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
porcelain, mcp_server.PREFLIGHT_WORKSPACE_UNAVAILABLE_PORCELAIN
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_symlinked_binding_to_deleted_target_is_demoted(self):
|
||||
target = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="gitea-symlink-target-")
|
||||
holder = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="gitea-symlink-holder-")
|
||||
self.addCleanup(shutil.rmtree, holder, ignore_errors=True)
|
||||
link = os.path.join(holder, "worktree-link")
|
||||
os.symlink(target, link)
|
||||
shutil.rmtree(target)
|
||||
demotions: list[str] = []
|
||||
_path, source = nwb.resolve_namespace_workspace(
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
process_project_root=os.getcwd(),
|
||||
env={"GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE": link},
|
||||
demotions=demotions,
|
||||
verify_paths=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(source, "MCP server process root (default)")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(demotions), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dead_binding_falls_through_to_live_role_binding(self):
|
||||
# Path changes during evaluation: the dead candidate demotes at
|
||||
# verification time and never resurrects over the live fallback.
|
||||
alive = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="gitea-alive-worktree-")
|
||||
self.addCleanup(shutil.rmtree, alive, ignore_errors=True)
|
||||
missing = self._deleted_worktree()
|
||||
path, source = nwb.resolve_namespace_workspace(
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
process_project_root=os.getcwd(),
|
||||
env={
|
||||
"GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE": missing,
|
||||
"GITEA_REVIEWER_WORKTREE": alive,
|
||||
},
|
||||
verify_paths=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(path, os.path.realpath(alive))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
source, "GITEA_REVIEWER_WORKTREE environment variable"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestF3AffirmativeWorktreeEvidence(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""F3: unknown worktree evidence must fail closed for crash orphans."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _comments(self) -> list[dict]:
|
||||
stale = _now() - timedelta(hours=3)
|
||||
body = leases.format_lease_body(
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
pr_number=701,
|
||||
issue_number=699,
|
||||
reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
|
||||
profile="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
session_id="65664-4f248d213d60",
|
||||
worktree="branches/review-pr-654",
|
||||
phase="validation-start",
|
||||
candidate_head=OLD_HEAD,
|
||||
target_branch="master",
|
||||
target_branch_sha="2" * 40,
|
||||
last_activity=stale,
|
||||
expires_at=stale + timedelta(minutes=120),
|
||||
)
|
||||
return [{
|
||||
"id": 11131,
|
||||
"body": body,
|
||||
"user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
|
||||
"author": "sysadmin",
|
||||
"created_at": stale.isoformat(),
|
||||
"updated_at": stale.isoformat(),
|
||||
}]
|
||||
|
||||
def _assess(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
defaults = dict(
|
||||
pr_number=701,
|
||||
current_head_sha=NEW_HEAD,
|
||||
formal_reviews=[],
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
expected_repo=REPO,
|
||||
requesting_session_id="fresh-controller",
|
||||
controller_recovery_authorized=True,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
defaults.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
|
||||
self._comments(), **defaults
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_worktree_evidence_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
result = self._assess(worktree_exists=None, worktree_clean=None)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
result["classification"], "orphaned_expired_superseded_head"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"affirmative safe evidence",
|
||||
" ".join(result["fail_closed_reasons"]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_cleanliness_with_existing_worktree_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
result = self._assess(worktree_exists=True, worktree_clean=None)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_affirmative_clean_worktree_is_eligible(self):
|
||||
result = self._assess(worktree_exists=True, worktree_clean=True)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
result["classification"], "orphaned_expired_superseded_head"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_affirmative_absent_worktree_is_eligible(self):
|
||||
result = self._assess(worktree_exists=False, worktree_clean=None)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_matrix_matches_diagnosis_gate(self):
|
||||
# The cleanup matrix and the diagnosis path must agree: unknown
|
||||
# evidence yields acquire-only, affirmative evidence yields cleanup.
|
||||
diagnosis_unknown = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
|
||||
self._comments(),
|
||||
pr_number=701,
|
||||
current_session_id=None,
|
||||
current_reviewer_identity="fresh-reviewer",
|
||||
current_head_sha=NEW_HEAD,
|
||||
formal_reviews=[],
|
||||
owner_process_alive=False,
|
||||
worktree_exists=None,
|
||||
worktree_clean=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assess_unknown = self._assess(worktree_exists=None, worktree_clean=None)
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(
|
||||
diagnosis_unknown["next_action"],
|
||||
"cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(assess_unknown["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestF4CrashShadowDurability(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""F4: crash-orphan evidence survives the former 4h TTL boundary."""
|
||||
|
||||
SID = "82984-abcabcabcabc"
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self._env = patch.dict(
|
||||
os.environ, {"GITEA_MCP_SESSION_STATE_DIR": self._dir.name}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._env.start()
|
||||
leases._SESSION_LEASE = None
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
self._env.stop()
|
||||
self._dir.cleanup()
|
||||
leases._SESSION_LEASE = None
|
||||
|
||||
def _age_record(self, kind: str, hours: float, instance_id: str | None = None):
|
||||
path = mss.state_file_path(kind=kind, instance_id=instance_id)
|
||||
with open(path, encoding="utf-8") as fh:
|
||||
envelope = json.load(fh)
|
||||
stamp = (
|
||||
(_now() - timedelta(hours=hours)).isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
)
|
||||
envelope["recorded_at"] = stamp
|
||||
envelope["updated_at"] = stamp
|
||||
envelope["payload"]["recorded_at"] = stamp
|
||||
envelope["payload"]["updated_at"] = stamp
|
||||
with open(path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
|
||||
json.dump(envelope, fh)
|
||||
|
||||
def _save_shadow(self) -> None:
|
||||
mss.save_state(
|
||||
kind=mss.KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE,
|
||||
instance_id=self.SID,
|
||||
payload={"session_id": self.SID, "owner_pid": os.getpid()},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _load_shadow(self):
|
||||
return mss.load_state(
|
||||
kind=mss.KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE, instance_id=self.SID
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_shadow_loads_before_former_ttl_boundary(self):
|
||||
self._save_shadow()
|
||||
self._age_record(
|
||||
mss.KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE, hours=3.9, instance_id=self.SID
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(self._load_shadow())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_shadow_loads_at_former_ttl_boundary(self):
|
||||
self._save_shadow()
|
||||
self._age_record(
|
||||
mss.KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE, hours=4.0, instance_id=self.SID
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(self._load_shadow())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_shadow_loads_long_after_former_ttl_boundary(self):
|
||||
self._save_shadow()
|
||||
self._age_record(
|
||||
mss.KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE, hours=27.0, instance_id=self.SID
|
||||
)
|
||||
record = self._load_shadow()
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(record)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record.get("session_id"), self.SID)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_binding_audit_record_is_also_durable(self):
|
||||
mss.save_state(
|
||||
kind=mss.KIND_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY,
|
||||
payload={"cleared_env": "GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._age_record(mss.KIND_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY, hours=27.0)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(
|
||||
mss.load_state(kind=mss.KIND_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_recovery_kinds_keep_ttl(self):
|
||||
mss.save_state(
|
||||
kind=mss.KIND_WORKFLOW_LOAD, payload={"workflow_hash": "abc"}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._age_record(mss.KIND_WORKFLOW_LOAD, hours=5.0)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(mss.load_state(kind=mss.KIND_WORKFLOW_LOAD))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sanctioned_clear_is_the_terminal_reconciliation(self):
|
||||
self._save_shadow()
|
||||
self._age_record(
|
||||
mss.KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE, hours=27.0, instance_id=self.SID
|
||||
)
|
||||
mss.clear_state(
|
||||
kind=mss.KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE, instance_id=self.SID
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(self._load_shadow())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
mss.list_states(kind=mss.KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE), []
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_crash_orphan_recovery_works_after_former_ttl(self):
|
||||
# End to end: a crashed session's shadow still proves owner exit a
|
||||
# day later.
|
||||
leases.record_session_lease(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": 701,
|
||||
"session_id": self.SID,
|
||||
"worktree": "branches/review-pr-654",
|
||||
"candidate_head": OLD_HEAD,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"comment_id": 11131,
|
||||
"profile": "prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
"reviewer_identity": "sysadmin",
|
||||
"phase": "claimed",
|
||||
},
|
||||
lease_provenance={"source": "acquire", "comment_id": 11131},
|
||||
)
|
||||
leases._SESSION_LEASE = None # simulated crash: no sanctioned clear
|
||||
self._age_record(
|
||||
mss.KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE, hours=27.0, instance_id=self.SID
|
||||
)
|
||||
shadow = leases.load_session_lease_shadow(session_id=self.SID)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(shadow)
|
||||
verdict = leases.assess_crashed_session_lease_orphan(
|
||||
shadow,
|
||||
lease={"session_id": self.SID},
|
||||
current_pid=os.getpid() + 1,
|
||||
pid_alive=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(verdict["orphan_evidence"])
|
||||
self.assertIs(verdict["owner_process_alive"], False)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestF5ConcurrentSessionShadows(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""F5: concurrent same-profile sessions keep distinct shadow records."""
|
||||
|
||||
SID_A = "11111-aaaaaaaaaaaa"
|
||||
SID_B = "22222-bbbbbbbbbbbb"
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self._env = patch.dict(
|
||||
os.environ, {"GITEA_MCP_SESSION_STATE_DIR": self._dir.name}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._env.start()
|
||||
leases._SESSION_LEASE = None
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
self._env.stop()
|
||||
self._dir.cleanup()
|
||||
leases._SESSION_LEASE = None
|
||||
|
||||
def _lease(self, session_id: str, pr_number: int, head: str) -> dict:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"worktree": f"branches/review-pr-{pr_number}-{session_id[:5]}",
|
||||
"candidate_head": head,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"comment_id": 11221,
|
||||
"profile": "prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
"reviewer_identity": "sysadmin",
|
||||
"phase": "claimed",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def _record(self, lease: dict) -> None:
|
||||
leases.record_session_lease(
|
||||
lease,
|
||||
lease_provenance={"source": "acquire", "comment_id": 11221},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_interleaved_sessions_do_not_overwrite_each_other(self):
|
||||
self._record(self._lease(self.SID_A, 703, OLD_HEAD))
|
||||
self._record(self._lease(self.SID_B, 701, NEW_HEAD))
|
||||
# Session A heartbeats again after B wrote.
|
||||
updated_a = self._lease(self.SID_A, 703, OLD_HEAD)
|
||||
updated_a["phase"] = "validation-start"
|
||||
self._record(updated_a)
|
||||
|
||||
shadow_a = leases.load_session_lease_shadow(session_id=self.SID_A)
|
||||
shadow_b = leases.load_session_lease_shadow(session_id=self.SID_B)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(shadow_a.get("session_id"), self.SID_A)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(shadow_a.get("pr_number"), 703)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(shadow_a.get("phase"), "validation-start")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(shadow_b.get("session_id"), self.SID_B)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(shadow_b.get("pr_number"), 701)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(shadow_b.get("candidate_head"), NEW_HEAD)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_shadow_lookup_never_misattributes(self):
|
||||
self._record(self._lease(self.SID_A, 703, OLD_HEAD))
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(
|
||||
leases.load_session_lease_shadow(session_id=self.SID_B)
|
||||
)
|
||||
verdict = leases.assess_crashed_session_lease_orphan(
|
||||
leases.load_session_lease_shadow(session_id=self.SID_A),
|
||||
lease={"session_id": self.SID_B},
|
||||
pid_alive=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(verdict["orphan_evidence"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_clearing_one_session_preserves_the_other(self):
|
||||
self._record(self._lease(self.SID_A, 703, OLD_HEAD))
|
||||
self._record(self._lease(self.SID_B, 701, NEW_HEAD))
|
||||
# Sanctioned clear of B (the currently recorded in-memory lease).
|
||||
leases.clear_session_lease()
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(
|
||||
leases.load_session_lease_shadow(session_id=self.SID_B)
|
||||
)
|
||||
shadow_a = leases.load_session_lease_shadow(session_id=self.SID_A)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(shadow_a)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(shadow_a.get("session_id"), self.SID_A)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reconnected_process_recovers_by_session_id(self):
|
||||
self._record(self._lease(self.SID_A, 703, OLD_HEAD))
|
||||
self._record(self._lease(self.SID_B, 701, NEW_HEAD))
|
||||
# Simulated crash + reconnect: in-memory state is gone, durable
|
||||
# records remain enumerable and individually attributable.
|
||||
leases._SESSION_LEASE = None
|
||||
records = mss.list_states(kind=mss.KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
sorted(r.get("session_id") for r in records),
|
||||
sorted([self.SID_A, self.SID_B]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
shadow = leases.load_session_lease_shadow(session_id=self.SID_B)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(shadow.get("pr_number"), 701)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_single_slot_record_still_resolves_by_session_id(self):
|
||||
# Upgrade path: a record written by pre-F5 code (no instance key)
|
||||
# remains usable when its payload names the requested session.
|
||||
mss.save_state(
|
||||
kind=mss.KIND_REVIEWER_SESSION_LEASE,
|
||||
payload={"session_id": self.SID_A, "owner_pid": os.getpid()},
|
||||
)
|
||||
shadow = leases.load_session_lease_shadow(session_id=self.SID_A)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(shadow)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(
|
||||
leases.load_session_lease_shadow(session_id=self.SID_B)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestF6AuditBeforeClear(_CapabilityHarness):
|
||||
"""F6: the durable audit record is persisted before the env clears."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _recovery_env(self, missing: str) -> dict:
|
||||
return self._env(
|
||||
GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE=missing,
|
||||
GITEA_FORCE_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY="1",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_audit_write_failure_blocks_the_clear(self):
|
||||
missing = self._deleted_worktree()
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, self._recovery_env(missing)):
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
mss, "save_state", side_effect=OSError("disk full")
|
||||
):
|
||||
report = mcp_server._assess_stale_active_binding(
|
||||
auto_recover=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(os.environ.get("GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE"), missing)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(report["recovery_performed"])
|
||||
self.assertIs(report.get("audit_persisted"), False)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(report.get("audit_write_failed"))
|
||||
self.assertIn("NOT cleared", " ".join(report.get("reasons") or []))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_retry_after_audit_failure_recovers(self):
|
||||
missing = self._deleted_worktree()
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, self._recovery_env(missing)):
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
mss, "save_state", side_effect=OSError("disk full")
|
||||
):
|
||||
first = mcp_server._assess_stale_active_binding(
|
||||
auto_recover=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(first["recovery_performed"])
|
||||
# Persistence recovered; the retry clears with a durable audit.
|
||||
second = mcp_server._assess_stale_active_binding(auto_recover=True)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(second["recovery_performed"])
|
||||
self.assertIs(second.get("audit_persisted"), True)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE", os.environ)
|
||||
audit = mss.load_state(kind=mss.KIND_STALE_BINDING_RECOVERY)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(audit)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(audit.get("recovery_status"), "performed")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(audit.get("cleared_value"), missing)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_audit_record_exists_before_env_clear(self):
|
||||
missing = self._deleted_worktree()
|
||||
observed: list[tuple[str | None, str | None]] = []
|
||||
real_save = mss.save_state
|
||||
|
||||
def _spy(**kwargs):
|
||||
observed.append(
|
||||
(
|
||||
(kwargs.get("payload") or {}).get("recovery_status"),
|
||||
os.environ.get("GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
return real_save(**kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, self._recovery_env(missing)):
|
||||
with patch.object(mss, "save_state", side_effect=_spy):
|
||||
report = mcp_server._assess_stale_active_binding(
|
||||
auto_recover=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(report["recovery_performed"])
|
||||
self.assertGreaterEqual(len(observed), 2)
|
||||
pending_status, env_at_pending = observed[0]
|
||||
performed_status, env_at_performed = observed[-1]
|
||||
# Ordering proof: the binding was still present while the pending
|
||||
# audit persisted, and gone by the time the performed status wrote.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(pending_status, "pending")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(env_at_pending, missing)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(performed_status, "performed")
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(env_at_performed)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_recovery_is_idempotent_after_success(self):
|
||||
missing = self._deleted_worktree()
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, self._recovery_env(missing)):
|
||||
first = mcp_server._assess_stale_active_binding(auto_recover=True)
|
||||
second = mcp_server._assess_stale_active_binding(auto_recover=True)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(first["recovery_performed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(second["classification"], sbr.CLASSIFICATION_UNBOUND)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(second["recovery_performed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1,517 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Regression tests for #702: stale runtime binding + orphaned durable lease.
|
||||
|
||||
Reproduces the PR #701 incident (lease 65664-4f248d213d60, comments
|
||||
11129/11131): the MCP daemon crashed without teardown, destroying the
|
||||
in-memory session lease while the durable comment lease survived, and the
|
||||
auto-reconnected daemon inherited a stale ``GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE`` binding
|
||||
(``branches/review-pr-654``) from its parent environment.
|
||||
|
||||
Covers the five mandated scenarios:
|
||||
|
||||
1. lost in-session leases — durable shadow survives a crash and yields
|
||||
provable owner-process evidence
|
||||
2. old-head leases — expired superseded-head lease with no terminal
|
||||
review becomes recoverable only with orphan evidence + controller authority
|
||||
3. runtime/worktree mismatch — env bindings to deleted worktrees are demoted,
|
||||
never silently bound
|
||||
4. managed reconnect — boot-inherited uncorroborated bindings are
|
||||
surfaced for managed recovery; provably stale ones are clear-eligible
|
||||
5. safe expiry — pre-expiry stays fail-closed wait (no steal);
|
||||
canonical expiry unlocks acquisition and guarded cleanup
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
import namespace_workspace_binding as nwb # noqa: E402
|
||||
import reviewer_pr_lease as leases # noqa: E402
|
||||
import stale_binding_recovery as sbr # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
# PR #701 incident fixtures.
|
||||
OLD_HEAD = "b4d0cb22e452a07c8e816745c704ddb0f43edf0b"
|
||||
NEW_HEAD = "6b675f5c834b41f9d74e8a54294ff44dddf28ae4"
|
||||
CRASHED_SESSION = "65664-4f248d213d60"
|
||||
LEASE_COMMENT = 11131
|
||||
REPO = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"
|
||||
PR = 701
|
||||
ISSUE = 699
|
||||
LEASE_WORKTREE = "branches/review-fix-issue-699-structured-auth-mcp-errors"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _now() -> datetime:
|
||||
return datetime.now(timezone.utc)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _lease_comment(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
phase: str = "validation-start",
|
||||
candidate_head: str = OLD_HEAD,
|
||||
session_id: str = CRASHED_SESSION,
|
||||
comment_id: int = LEASE_COMMENT,
|
||||
last_activity: datetime | None = None,
|
||||
expires_at: datetime | None = None,
|
||||
worktree: str = LEASE_WORKTREE,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
stamp = last_activity or _now()
|
||||
body = leases.format_lease_body(
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
|
||||
profile="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
session_id=session_id,
|
||||
worktree=worktree,
|
||||
phase=phase,
|
||||
candidate_head=candidate_head,
|
||||
target_branch="master",
|
||||
target_branch_sha="2" * 40,
|
||||
last_activity=stamp,
|
||||
expires_at=expires_at,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"id": comment_id,
|
||||
"body": body,
|
||||
"user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
|
||||
"author": "sysadmin",
|
||||
"created_at": stamp.isoformat(),
|
||||
"updated_at": stamp.isoformat(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _expired_superseded_comments() -> list[dict]:
|
||||
stale = _now() - timedelta(hours=3)
|
||||
return [_lease_comment(
|
||||
last_activity=stale,
|
||||
expires_at=stale + timedelta(minutes=120),
|
||||
)]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _fresh_superseded_comments() -> list[dict]:
|
||||
recent = _now() - timedelta(minutes=10)
|
||||
return [_lease_comment(
|
||||
last_activity=recent,
|
||||
expires_at=recent + timedelta(minutes=120),
|
||||
)]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestLostInSessionLeaseShadow(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Scenario 1: the durable shadow survives a daemon crash (#702 AC3)."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
leases._SESSION_LEASE = None
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
leases._SESSION_LEASE = None
|
||||
|
||||
def _record(self) -> dict:
|
||||
return leases.record_session_lease(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": PR,
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"session_id": CRASHED_SESSION,
|
||||
"reviewer_identity": "sysadmin",
|
||||
"profile": "prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
"worktree": LEASE_WORKTREE,
|
||||
"phase": "claimed",
|
||||
"candidate_head": OLD_HEAD,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"comment_id": LEASE_COMMENT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
lease_provenance={"source": "acquire", "comment_id": LEASE_COMMENT},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_shadow_written_on_record_and_survives_simulated_crash(self):
|
||||
self._record()
|
||||
# Simulated unhandled crash: the in-memory dict dies with the process
|
||||
# but the sanctioned clear path never runs.
|
||||
leases._SESSION_LEASE = None
|
||||
shadow = leases.load_session_lease_shadow()
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(shadow)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(shadow.get("session_id"), CRASHED_SESSION)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(shadow.get("pr_number"), PR)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(int(shadow.get("owner_pid")), os.getpid())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sanctioned_clear_removes_shadow(self):
|
||||
self._record()
|
||||
leases.clear_session_lease()
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(leases.load_session_lease_shadow())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_orphan_assessment_dead_owner_pid_proves_exit(self):
|
||||
self._record()
|
||||
leases._SESSION_LEASE = None
|
||||
shadow = leases.load_session_lease_shadow()
|
||||
lease = {"session_id": CRASHED_SESSION}
|
||||
verdict = leases.assess_crashed_session_lease_orphan(
|
||||
shadow, lease=lease, current_pid=os.getpid() + 1, pid_alive=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(verdict["orphan_evidence"])
|
||||
self.assertIs(verdict["owner_process_alive"], False)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_orphan_assessment_alive_pid_is_not_ownership_proof(self):
|
||||
self._record()
|
||||
shadow = leases.load_session_lease_shadow()
|
||||
verdict = leases.assess_crashed_session_lease_orphan(
|
||||
shadow,
|
||||
lease={"session_id": CRASHED_SESSION},
|
||||
current_pid=os.getpid() + 1,
|
||||
pid_alive=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(verdict["orphan_evidence"])
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(verdict["owner_process_alive"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_orphan_assessment_session_mismatch_proves_nothing(self):
|
||||
self._record()
|
||||
shadow = leases.load_session_lease_shadow()
|
||||
verdict = leases.assess_crashed_session_lease_orphan(
|
||||
shadow, lease={"session_id": "other-999"}, pid_alive=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(verdict["orphan_evidence"])
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(verdict["owner_process_alive"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_orphan_assessment_without_shadow_is_unknown(self):
|
||||
verdict = leases.assess_crashed_session_lease_orphan(
|
||||
None, lease={"session_id": CRASHED_SESSION}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(verdict["orphan_evidence"])
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(verdict["owner_process_alive"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestOldHeadLeaseCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Scenario 2: expired superseded-head lease with no terminal review."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _assess(self, comments, **kwargs):
|
||||
defaults = dict(
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
current_head_sha=NEW_HEAD,
|
||||
formal_reviews=[],
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
expected_repo=REPO,
|
||||
requesting_session_id="fresh-controller",
|
||||
controller_recovery_authorized=True,
|
||||
worktree_exists=True,
|
||||
worktree_clean=True,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
defaults.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
|
||||
comments, **defaults
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_orphan_with_full_evidence_is_cleanup_eligible(self):
|
||||
result = self._assess(_expired_superseded_comments())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "orphaned_expired_superseded_head")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("phase: released", result["release_body"] or "")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
result["exact_next_action"], "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_orphan_without_owner_evidence_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
result = self._assess(
|
||||
_expired_superseded_comments(), owner_process_alive=None
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"provable owner-process-exit evidence",
|
||||
" ".join(result["fail_closed_reasons"]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_orphan_without_controller_authority_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
result = self._assess(
|
||||
_expired_superseded_comments(), controller_recovery_authorized=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_orphan_with_dirty_worktree_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
result = self._assess(
|
||||
_expired_superseded_comments(),
|
||||
worktree_clean=False,
|
||||
worktree_has_unpreserved_work=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unexpired_superseded_no_terminal_stays_ambiguous_wait(self):
|
||||
# Regression guard: pre-expiry there is still no steal path.
|
||||
result = self._assess(_fresh_superseded_comments())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["exact_next_action"], "wait")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRuntimeWorktreeMismatch(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Scenario 3: env bindings to deleted worktrees are demoted (#702 AC2)."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_active_env_binding_is_demoted(self):
|
||||
demotions: list[str] = []
|
||||
missing = "/nonexistent/branches/review-pr-654"
|
||||
path, source = nwb.resolve_namespace_workspace(
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
process_project_root=os.getcwd(),
|
||||
env={"GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE": missing},
|
||||
demotions=demotions,
|
||||
verify_paths=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(source, "MCP server process root (default)")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(demotions), 1)
|
||||
self.assertIn("no longer exists", demotions[0])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_active_falls_through_to_existing_role_env(self):
|
||||
existing = os.getcwd()
|
||||
path, source = nwb.resolve_namespace_workspace(
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
process_project_root="/tmp",
|
||||
env={
|
||||
"GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE": "/nonexistent/branches/review-pr-654",
|
||||
"GITEA_REVIEWER_WORKTREE": existing,
|
||||
},
|
||||
verify_paths=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(path, os.path.realpath(existing))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(source, "GITEA_REVIEWER_WORKTREE environment variable")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_existing_active_env_binding_still_wins(self):
|
||||
existing = os.getcwd()
|
||||
path, source = nwb.resolve_namespace_workspace(
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
process_project_root="/tmp",
|
||||
env={"GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE": existing},
|
||||
verify_paths=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(path, os.path.realpath(existing))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(source, "GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE environment variable")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_explicit_worktree_path_argument_is_never_demoted(self):
|
||||
missing = "/nonexistent/branches/explicit"
|
||||
path, source = nwb.resolve_namespace_workspace(
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
worktree_path=missing,
|
||||
process_project_root="/tmp",
|
||||
env={},
|
||||
verify_paths=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(source, "worktree_path argument")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mutation_context_reports_demotion_in_ignored_bindings(self):
|
||||
ctx = nwb.resolve_namespace_mutation_context(
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
worktree_path=None,
|
||||
process_project_root=os.getcwd(),
|
||||
env={"GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE": "/nonexistent/branches/review-pr-654"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
joined = " ".join(ctx["ignored_bindings"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("stale binding, #702", joined)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestManagedReconnectRecovery(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Scenario 4: boot-inherited bindings and the sanctioned recovery plan."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_uncorroborated_inherited_reviewer_binding_is_unverified(self):
|
||||
classification = sbr.classify_active_worktree_binding(
|
||||
active_value=os.getcwd(),
|
||||
role_env_value=None,
|
||||
session_lease_worktree=None,
|
||||
boot_inherited=True,
|
||||
path_exists=True,
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
classification["classification"], sbr.CLASSIFICATION_UNVERIFIED_INHERITED
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(classification["clear_eligible"])
|
||||
plan = sbr.plan_recovery(classification)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(plan["clear_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("managed", plan["exact_next_action"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("do not clear or rewrite", plan["exact_next_action"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_path_binding_is_provably_stale_and_clear_eligible(self):
|
||||
classification = sbr.classify_active_worktree_binding(
|
||||
active_value="/nonexistent/branches/review-pr-654",
|
||||
boot_inherited=True,
|
||||
path_exists=False,
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
classification["classification"],
|
||||
sbr.CLASSIFICATION_PROVABLY_STALE_MISSING_PATH,
|
||||
)
|
||||
plan = sbr.plan_recovery(classification)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(plan["clear_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_inherited_binding_superseded_by_session_lease_is_clear_eligible(self):
|
||||
classification = sbr.classify_active_worktree_binding(
|
||||
active_value="/tmp",
|
||||
session_lease_worktree=os.getcwd(),
|
||||
boot_inherited=True,
|
||||
path_exists=True,
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
classification["classification"],
|
||||
sbr.CLASSIFICATION_SUPERSEDED_BY_SESSION_LEASE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(sbr.plan_recovery(classification)["clear_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_post_boot_binding_conflict_is_surfaced_not_cleared(self):
|
||||
classification = sbr.classify_active_worktree_binding(
|
||||
active_value="/tmp",
|
||||
session_lease_worktree=os.getcwd(),
|
||||
boot_inherited=False,
|
||||
path_exists=True,
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
classification["classification"], sbr.CLASSIFICATION_UNVERIFIED_INHERITED
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(sbr.plan_recovery(classification)["clear_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_corroborated_bindings_are_untouched(self):
|
||||
for kwargs in (
|
||||
dict(role_env_value=os.getcwd()),
|
||||
dict(session_lease_worktree=os.getcwd()),
|
||||
):
|
||||
classification = sbr.classify_active_worktree_binding(
|
||||
active_value=os.getcwd(),
|
||||
boot_inherited=True,
|
||||
path_exists=True,
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
**kwargs,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
classification["classification"], sbr.CLASSIFICATION_CORROBORATED
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(sbr.plan_recovery(classification)["clear_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_inherited_binding_stays_corroborated(self):
|
||||
classification = sbr.classify_active_worktree_binding(
|
||||
active_value=os.getcwd(),
|
||||
boot_inherited=True,
|
||||
path_exists=True,
|
||||
role_kind="author",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
classification["classification"], sbr.CLASSIFICATION_CORROBORATED
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_apply_recovery_clears_env_only_for_authorized_plan(self):
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE": "/nonexistent/branches/review-pr-654"}
|
||||
plan = sbr.plan_recovery(
|
||||
sbr.classify_active_worktree_binding(
|
||||
active_value=env["GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE"],
|
||||
boot_inherited=True,
|
||||
path_exists=False,
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
applied = sbr.apply_recovery(plan, env=env)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(applied["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE", env)
|
||||
self.assertIn("review-pr-654", applied["cleared_value"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_apply_recovery_refuses_unauthorized_plan(self):
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE": os.getcwd()}
|
||||
plan = sbr.plan_recovery(
|
||||
sbr.classify_active_worktree_binding(
|
||||
active_value=env["GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE"],
|
||||
boot_inherited=True,
|
||||
path_exists=True,
|
||||
role_kind="reviewer",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
applied = sbr.apply_recovery(plan, env=env)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(applied["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE", env)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestSafeExpiryDiagnosis(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Scenario 5: canonical expiry flips wait into acquire/guarded cleanup."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _diagnose(self, comments, **kwargs):
|
||||
defaults = dict(
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
current_session_id=None,
|
||||
current_reviewer_identity="fresh-reviewer",
|
||||
current_head_sha=NEW_HEAD,
|
||||
formal_reviews=[],
|
||||
)
|
||||
defaults.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(comments, **defaults)
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
leases._SESSION_LEASE = None
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pre_expiry_superseded_no_terminal_stays_wait(self):
|
||||
diagnosis = self._diagnose(_fresh_superseded_comments())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
diagnosis["classification"], "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(diagnosis["next_action"], "wait")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_post_expiry_without_orphan_evidence_unlocks_acquire(self):
|
||||
diagnosis = self._diagnose(_expired_superseded_comments())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
diagnosis["classification"], "orphaned_expired_superseded_head"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(diagnosis["next_action"], "acquire")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_post_expiry_with_orphan_evidence_offers_guarded_cleanup(self):
|
||||
diagnosis = self._diagnose(
|
||||
_expired_superseded_comments(),
|
||||
owner_process_alive=False,
|
||||
worktree_clean=True,
|
||||
worktree_exists=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
diagnosis["classification"], "orphaned_expired_superseded_head"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
diagnosis["next_action"], "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_lease_no_longer_blocks_fresh_acquisition(self):
|
||||
assessment = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
|
||||
_expired_superseded_comments(),
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
reviewer_identity="fresh-reviewer",
|
||||
profile="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
session_id="99999-fresh",
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
worktree="branches/review-pr-701-fresh",
|
||||
candidate_head=NEW_HEAD,
|
||||
target_branch="master",
|
||||
target_branch_sha="2" * 40,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(assessment.get("acquire_allowed"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unparseable_expiry_fails_closed_in_cleanup(self):
|
||||
comment = _lease_comment(
|
||||
last_activity=_now() - timedelta(hours=3), expires_at=None
|
||||
)
|
||||
comment["body"] = comment["body"].replace(
|
||||
"expires_at: ", "expires_at: not-a-timestamp"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
|
||||
[comment],
|
||||
pr_number=PR,
|
||||
current_head_sha=NEW_HEAD,
|
||||
formal_reviews=[],
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
expected_repo=REPO,
|
||||
requesting_session_id="fresh-controller",
|
||||
controller_recovery_authorized=True,
|
||||
worktree_exists=True,
|
||||
worktree_clean=True,
|
||||
owner_process_alive=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1425,10 +1425,16 @@ class TestReviewPR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
class TestDeleteBranch(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
DELETE_PROFILE = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "test-deleter",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
|
||||
"profile_name": "test-author-deleter",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
"audit_label": "test-deleter",
|
||||
"audit_label": "test-author-deleter",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=DELETE_PROFILE)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -92,14 +92,19 @@ class TestMigrateProfiles(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
author = prgs_gitea["identities"]["author"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(author["username"], "jcwalker3")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(author["auth"]["id"], "redacted-author-ref")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(author["allowed_operations"], ["read", "comment"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(author["forbidden_operations"], ["approve", "merge"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
author["allowed_operations"], ["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.comment"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
author["forbidden_operations"],
|
||||
["gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
reviewer = prgs_gitea["identities"]["reviewer"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reviewer["role"], "reviewer")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reviewer["username"], "sysadmin")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reviewer["auth"]["id"], "redacted-reviewer-ref")
|
||||
self.assertIn("merge", reviewer["allowed_operations"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("gitea.pr.merge", reviewer["allowed_operations"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_alias_generation(self):
|
||||
"""Test that aliases are correctly generated to support old profile names."""
|
||||
@@ -188,7 +193,7 @@ class TestMigrateProfiles(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("token", stdout_output.lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_explicit_operations_are_preserved(self):
|
||||
"""Explicit v1 permissions must not be replaced by role defaults."""
|
||||
"""Explicit v1 permissions are canonicalized, not replaced by role defaults."""
|
||||
v1_data = json.loads(json.dumps(self.v1_content))
|
||||
v1_data["profiles"]["prgs-reviewer"]["allowed_operations"] = ["read"]
|
||||
v1_data["profiles"]["prgs-reviewer"]["forbidden_operations"] = ["merge"]
|
||||
@@ -198,8 +203,8 @@ class TestMigrateProfiles(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
v2_data["environments"]["prgs"]["services"]["gitea"]
|
||||
["identities"]["reviewer"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reviewer["allowed_operations"], ["read"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reviewer["forbidden_operations"], ["merge"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reviewer["allowed_operations"], ["gitea.read"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reviewer["forbidden_operations"], ["gitea.pr.merge"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_inferred_role_defaults_only_when_unambiguous(self):
|
||||
"""Role defaults are allowed only for clear author/reviewer profiles."""
|
||||
@@ -306,6 +311,171 @@ class TestMigrateProfiles(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
migrate_profiles.main()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(cm.exception.code, 1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reconciler_profile_migration(self):
|
||||
"""Legacy reconciler shorthands migrate to valid canonical operations."""
|
||||
import gitea_config
|
||||
import reconciler_profile
|
||||
|
||||
v1_data = {
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"profiles": {
|
||||
"prgs-reconciler": {
|
||||
"base_url": "redacted-prgs-service",
|
||||
"username": "reconciler-agent",
|
||||
"auth": {"type": "keychain", "id": "reconciler-ref"},
|
||||
"execution_profile": "prgs-reconciler",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"read",
|
||||
"pr.close",
|
||||
"pr.comment",
|
||||
"issue.comment",
|
||||
"issue.close",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [
|
||||
"merge",
|
||||
"approve",
|
||||
"review",
|
||||
"pr.create",
|
||||
"branch.push",
|
||||
"commit",
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
v2_data = migrate_profiles.migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data)
|
||||
reconciler = (
|
||||
v2_data["environments"]["prgs"]["services"]["gitea"]
|
||||
["identities"]["reconciler"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reconciler["role"], "reconciler")
|
||||
allowed = reconciler["allowed_operations"]
|
||||
forbidden = reconciler["forbidden_operations"]
|
||||
# No invalid shorthand remains
|
||||
for bad in ("pr.close", "pr.comment", "issue.close", "read", "merge"):
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(bad, allowed)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(bad, forbidden)
|
||||
for required in (
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.close",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.issue.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.issue.close",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
):
|
||||
self.assertIn(required, allowed)
|
||||
# Production loader accepts every allowed op
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
gitea_config.normalize_operation(required), required
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(v2_data["aliases"]["prgs-reconciler"], "prgs.gitea.reconciler")
|
||||
assessment = reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(allowed, forbidden)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(assessment["valid"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(migrate_profiles.validate_v2_data(v2_data))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reconciler_profile_defaults(self):
|
||||
"""Reconciler defaults are fully canonical and loader-valid."""
|
||||
import gitea_config
|
||||
import reconciler_profile
|
||||
|
||||
v1_data = {
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"profiles": {
|
||||
"prgs-reconciler": {
|
||||
"base_url": "redacted-prgs-service",
|
||||
"username": "reconciler-agent",
|
||||
"auth": {"type": "keychain", "id": "reconciler-ref"},
|
||||
"execution_profile": "prgs-reconciler",
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
v2_data = migrate_profiles.migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data)
|
||||
reconciler = (
|
||||
v2_data["environments"]["prgs"]["services"]["gitea"]
|
||||
["identities"]["reconciler"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reconciler["role"], "reconciler")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
reconciler["allowed_operations"],
|
||||
migrate_profiles.RECONCILER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
reconciler["forbidden_operations"],
|
||||
migrate_profiles.RECONCILER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
for op in reconciler["allowed_operations"]:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(gitea_config.normalize_operation(op), op)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(op.startswith("gitea."))
|
||||
assessment = reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(
|
||||
reconciler["allowed_operations"],
|
||||
reconciler["forbidden_operations"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(assessment["valid"])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete", assessment["missing_recommended_operations"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reconciler_migration_idempotent_canonicalize(self):
|
||||
"""Second canonicalize of already-canonical ops is a no-op."""
|
||||
first = migrate_profiles.canonicalize_operations(
|
||||
list(migrate_profiles.RECONCILER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED)
|
||||
)
|
||||
second = migrate_profiles.canonicalize_operations(first)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(first, second)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(first, list(migrate_profiles.RECONCILER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reconciler_missing_required_fails_visibly(self):
|
||||
"""Missing gitea.pr.close after migration fails closed (not silent drop)."""
|
||||
v1_data = {
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"profiles": {
|
||||
"prgs-reconciler": {
|
||||
"base_url": "redacted-prgs-service",
|
||||
"username": "reconciler-agent",
|
||||
"auth": {"type": "keychain", "id": "reconciler-ref"},
|
||||
"execution_profile": "prgs-reconciler",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": ["read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": ["merge"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
with self.assertRaisesRegex(ValueError, "missing required"):
|
||||
migrate_profiles.migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_operation_fails_visibly(self):
|
||||
v1_data = {
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"profiles": {
|
||||
"prgs-author": {
|
||||
"base_url": "redacted-prgs-service",
|
||||
"username": "jcwalker3",
|
||||
"auth": {"type": "keychain", "id": "hidden-author-ref"},
|
||||
"execution_profile": "prgs-author",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": ["read", "not.a.real.op"],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": ["merge"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
with self.assertRaisesRegex(ValueError, "cannot be canonicalized"):
|
||||
migrate_profiles.migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_role_inference_author_reviewer_merger_reconciler(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
migrate_profiles.infer_role("prgs-author", "prgs-author"), "author"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
migrate_profiles.infer_role("prgs-reviewer", "prgs-reviewer"),
|
||||
"reviewer",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
migrate_profiles.infer_role("prgs-reconciler", "prgs-reconciler"),
|
||||
"reconciler",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(
|
||||
migrate_profiles.infer_role("prgs-merger", "prgs-merger")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -82,6 +82,42 @@ class TestReconcilerProfileModel(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"reconciler",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_branch_delete_is_recommended_for_reconciler(self):
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
reconciler_profile.RECONCILER_RECOMMENDED_OPERATIONS,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
reconciler_profile.RECONCILER_REQUIRED_OPERATIONS,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reconciler_with_branch_delete_stays_valid(self):
|
||||
allowed = PRGS_RECONCILER_ALLOWED + ["gitea.branch.delete"]
|
||||
result = reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(
|
||||
allowed,
|
||||
PRGS_RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["is_reconciler_profile"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["valid"])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete", result["missing_recommended_operations"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
mcp_server._role_kind(allowed, PRGS_RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN),
|
||||
"reconciler",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reconciler_without_branch_delete_reports_missing_recommended(self):
|
||||
result = reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(
|
||||
PRGS_RECONCILER_ALLOWED,
|
||||
PRGS_RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["valid"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete", result["missing_recommended_operations"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user