fix(profiles): canonical reconciler ops and guard raw branch delete (#687)

Address REQUEST_CHANGES on PR #688:

- migrate_profiles: emit fully canonical reconciler/author/reviewer defaults;
  canonicalize explicit ops; fail if reconciler loses required pr.close/read
- gitea_delete_branch: deny reconciler (and non-author roles); refuse
  preservation/protected branches before any API call
- gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch: require reconciler role only; block
  preservation/evidence branches via branch_cleanup_guard
- docs: end-to-end operator runbook for profile migrate/apply/reconnect/cleanup
- tests: migration canonicalization, idempotency, raw-delete denial, guarded
  cleanup success and unmerged/preserve rejections

Closes #687.

branch_cleanup_guard.py

@@ -7,6 +7,19 @@ from typing import Any
 
 PROTECTED_BRANCHES = frozenset({"master", "main", "dev"})
 
+# Evidence / preservation branches must never be removed by cleanup tools
+# (e.g. chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip).
+_PRESERVATION_MARKERS = ("preserve", "preservation", "evidence")
+
+
+def is_preservation_or_evidence_branch(branch: str | None) -> bool:
+    """Return True when *branch* is a preservation/evidence ref that must stay."""
+    if not branch:
+        return False
+    name = str(branch).lower()
+    return any(marker in name for marker in _PRESERVATION_MARKERS)
+
+
 _RAW_BRANCH_DELETE_PATTERNS = (
     re.compile(r"\bgit(?:\s+-C\s+\S+)?\s+branch\s+-[dD]\b[^\n\r]*", re.I),
     re.compile(r"\bgit(?:\s+-C\s+\S+)?\s+push\b[^\n\r]*\s--delete\b[^\n\r]*", re.I),
@@ -72,6 +85,11 @@ def assess_merged_pr_branch_cleanup(
         reasons.append("PR head branch is missing")
     if head_branch in protected:
         reasons.append(f"branch '{head_branch}' is protected")
+    if is_preservation_or_evidence_branch(head_branch):
+        reasons.append(
+            f"branch '{head_branch}' is a preservation/evidence branch and "
+            "cannot be deleted through merged-PR cleanup"
+        )
     if head_branch in open_pr_heads:
         reasons.append("an open PR still references this head branch")
     if head_on_target is False:

docs/gitea-execution-profiles.md

@@ -238,11 +238,43 @@ narrow operation set:
 - `gitea.issue.comment`
 - `gitea.issue.close`
 - `gitea.pr.close`
+- `gitea.branch.delete` (merged-branch cleanup only — see below)
 
 Forbidden on reconciler profiles: `gitea.pr.approve`, `gitea.pr.merge`,
 `gitea.pr.review`, `gitea.pr.create`, `gitea.branch.push`, and
 `gitea.repo.commit`.
 
+### Merged-branch cleanup ownership (`gitea.branch.delete`)
+
+The reconciler is the repository-supported owner of merged-PR source-branch
+cleanup: `task_capability_map` maps `cleanup_merged_pr_branch` (and
+`reconciliation_cleanup`) to role `reconciler` with permission
+`gitea.branch.delete`. Post-merge branch lifecycle is reconciliation work —
+it happens after the author, reviewer, and merger roles have completed, and
+it must not be reachable from those roles.
+
+Least-privilege constraints:
+
+- `gitea.branch.delete` is granted **only** to reconciler profiles. Author,
+  reviewer, and merger profiles must never hold it; `gitea_delete_branch`
+  and `gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch` fail closed on any profile without
+  the permission.
+- Even with the permission, reconciler deletion is only supported through the
+  guarded `gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch` path (#514 / #687): the PR must be
+  merged, the head an ancestor of the target, the branch not protected
+  (`master`/`main`/`dev`), the branch not a preservation/evidence ref (e.g.
+  `chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip`), no open PR may still use the
+  head, and an explicit `CLEANUP MERGED PR <n> BRANCH <branch>` confirmation is
+  required. Raw `gitea_delete_branch` is **denied** to reconciler even when
+  `gitea.branch.delete` is present.
+- Raw `git branch -d` / `git push --delete` cleanup remains blocked by
+  `branch_cleanup_guard` and the final-report validator regardless of
+  profile permissions.
+- `gitea.branch.delete` has no short alias in `GITEA_OPERATION_ALIASES`;
+  write it fully qualified in `allowed_operations`. Migration must emit
+  canonical names such as `gitea.pr.close` (never bare `pr.close` /
+  `issue.close`, which the production normalizer rejects or drops).
+
 Launch a static `gitea-reconciler` MCP namespace with
 `GITEA_MCP_PROFILE=prgs-reconciler`. Profile shape is validated by
 `reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile` (#304). Use the
@@ -251,6 +283,159 @@ Launch a static `gitea-reconciler` MCP namespace with
 fresh target-branch fetch, recorded target SHA, and ancestor proof. PRs whose
 heads are not already landed cannot be closed through this path.
 
+### Operational runbook: grant reconciler `gitea.branch.delete` (#687)
+
+Merging a code PR that updates `migrate_profiles.py` / `reconciler_profile.py`
+**does not** change the live operator profile on disk. Apply the profile
+change deliberately, then reconnect the client-managed namespace.
+
+1. **Approved migration / profile-update command** (from the repo root, using
+   the project venv if present):
+
+   ```bash
+   # Dry-run first (default): validates v2 output, writes nothing
+   python3 migrate_profiles.py -i ~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json
+
+   # Apply: creates backup then writes migrated v2 config
+   python3 migrate_profiles.py -i ~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json -w
+   # Optional explicit paths:
+   # python3 migrate_profiles.py -i ~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json \
+   #   -o ~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json \
+   #   --backup ~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json.bak -w
+   ```
+
+   If the live file is already v2, edit the reconciler identity’s
+   `allowed_operations` / `forbidden_operations` under
+   `environments.<env>.services.gitea.identities.reconciler` (or the
+   `prgs-reconciler` alias target) so allowed includes the canonical set
+   below — then re-validate with a load of the config (see step 3).
+
+2. **Inspect the generated (or edited) profile** — confirm the reconciler
+   identity, for example:
+
+   ```bash
+   python3 - <<'PY'
+   import json
+   from pathlib import Path
+   cfg = json.loads(Path.home().joinpath(".config/gitea-tools/profiles.json").read_text())
+   # v2 environments shape:
+   ident = cfg["environments"]["prgs"]["services"]["gitea"]["identities"]["reconciler"]
+   print("role:", ident.get("role"))
+   print("allowed:", ident.get("allowed_operations"))
+   print("forbidden:", ident.get("forbidden_operations"))
+   PY
+   ```
+
+3. **Validate canonical operation names and least privilege**
+
+   Expected canonical **allowed** (defaults after migration):
+
+   - `gitea.read`
+   - `gitea.pr.close` (required)
+   - `gitea.pr.comment`
+   - `gitea.issue.comment`
+   - `gitea.issue.close`
+   - `gitea.branch.delete` (recommended; cleanup only)
+
+   Expected **forbidden** includes at least: `gitea.pr.approve`,
+   `gitea.pr.merge`, `gitea.pr.review`, `gitea.pr.create`,
+   `gitea.branch.push`, `gitea.repo.commit`.
+
+   No shorthand (`pr.close`, `issue.close`, `pr.comment`) may remain.
+   Validate with the production loader:
+
+   ```bash
+   python3 - <<'PY'
+   import gitea_config, reconciler_profile
+   from pathlib import Path
+   path = str(Path.home() / ".config/gitea-tools/profiles.json")
+   gitea_config.load_config(path)  # fails closed on invalid config
+   # Or assess the reconciler lists directly after extracting them:
+   # print(reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(allowed, forbidden))
+   PY
+   ```
+
+4. **Merging PR #688 (or any code PR) does not update the live profile.**
+   Code changes only the migration helper, schema, docs, and tests. The
+   operator must still run `migrate_profiles.py -w` or an equivalent
+   authorized edit of `~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json`.
+
+5. **Supported apply method:** `python3 migrate_profiles.py … -w` (backup
+   created automatically) **or** operator-authorized edit of the live
+   profiles file after backup. Unsupported: silent mtime tricks, manual
+   process kill to “reload”, or undocumented env overrides.
+
+6. **Backup and validation:** `-w` copies the input to
+   `<input_path>.bak` (or `--backup PATH`) before writing. Re-run
+   `load_config` / `assess_reconciler_profile` after write. Keep the
+   `.bak` until live whoami/capability checks pass.
+
+7. **Client-managed namespace reconnect/reload:** reconnect or reload the
+   IDE MCP client so `gitea-reconciler` restarts from current `master` and
+   the updated `GITEA_MCP_PROFILE=prgs-reconciler` config. Do not hand-launch
+   `mcp_server.py` / `gitea_mcp_server.py` with ad hoc `GITEA_*` env
+   (see #686 / #630).
+
+8. **Live reverification** (through the client-managed `gitea-reconciler`
+   namespace only):
+
+   - `gitea_whoami` → identity + profile `prgs-reconciler`
+   - `gitea_assess_master_parity` → `stale=false`, `restart_required=false`
+   - `gitea_resolve_task_capability(task="cleanup_merged_pr_branch")` →
+     `allowed_in_current_session=true` only when permission and role match
+   - `gitea_resolve_task_capability(task="delete_branch")` →
+     **not** allowed for reconciler (role denial must be enforced)
+
+9. **Guarded cleanup usage** (example for a merged PR whose source branch
+   remains on the remote):
+
+   ```text
+   gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
+     pr_number=<N>,
+     branch=<exact PR head branch>,
+     confirmation="CLEANUP MERGED PR <N> BRANCH <exact PR head branch>",
+     remote="prgs",
+     org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+     repo="Gitea-Tools",
+     worktree_path="<path under branches/>",
+   )
+   ```
+
+   The tool refuses unmerged PRs, protected branches, preservation/evidence
+   branches, open-PR heads, mismatched branch names, and wrong confirmation.
+
+10. **Prohibitions**
+
+    - No raw `git push --delete`, `git branch -d` / `-D`, or delete refspecs
+    - No arbitrary `gitea_delete_branch` from reconciler
+    - No unsupported profile switching mid-run without full re-preflight
+    - No ad hoc hand-edits of live profiles **unless** operator-authorized,
+      backed up, and revalidated as above
+
+Canonical migrated reconciler example:
+
+```json
+{
+  "role": "reconciler",
+  "allowed_operations": [
+    "gitea.read",
+    "gitea.pr.close",
+    "gitea.pr.comment",
+    "gitea.issue.comment",
+    "gitea.issue.close",
+    "gitea.branch.delete"
+  ],
+  "forbidden_operations": [
+    "gitea.pr.approve",
+    "gitea.pr.merge",
+    "gitea.pr.review",
+    "gitea.pr.create",
+    "gitea.branch.push",
+    "gitea.repo.commit"
+  ]
+}
+```
+
 ## Identity and fail-closed rules
 
 Before **any** mutating action, a workflow must know both:

final_report_validator.py

@@ -134,22 +134,16 @@ _TARGET_BRANCH_SHA_RE = re.compile(
     r"target branch sha\s*:\s*[0-9a-f]{40}",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
-# #698: structured proof is rendered in several equivalent shapes —
-# `workflow_hash: abc...`, `workflow_hash=abc...`, or JSON
-# `"workflow_hash": "abc..."`. Recognize all of them; demanding one exact
-# punctuation style rejects legitimate structured workflow-load proof.
 _WORKFLOW_LOAD_HELPER_RE = re.compile(
-    r"workflow[-_ ]load[-_ ]helper[-_ ]result\s*[:=]",
+    r"workflow[- ]load helper result\s*:",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
 _WORKFLOW_LOAD_HASH_RE = re.compile(
-    r"workflow[-_ ]load[-_ ]helper[-_ ]result[\s\S]{0,400}?"
-    r"workflow[_ ]hash\"?\s*[:=]\s*\"?[0-9a-f]{12}",
+    r"workflow[- ]load helper result[\s\S]{0,400}?workflow[_ ]hash\s*:\s*[0-9a-f]{12}",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
 _WORKFLOW_LOAD_BOUNDARY_RE = re.compile(
-    r"workflow[-_ ]load[-_ ]helper[-_ ]result[\s\S]{0,400}?"
-    r"boundary[_ ]status\"?\s*[:=]\s*\"?(?:clean|violation)",
+    r"workflow[- ]load helper result[\s\S]{0,400}?boundary[_ ]status\s*:\s*(?:clean|violation)",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
 _WORKFLOW_FILE_VIEW_NARRATIVE_RE = re.compile(
@@ -250,59 +244,6 @@ def _normalize_task_kind(task_kind: str | None) -> str:
     return _TASK_KIND_ALIASES.get(raw, raw)
 
 
-def _iter_action_entries(action_log: list | None) -> list[dict]:
-    """Yield only structured (dict) action-log entries (#698).
-
-    Callers must never crash on malformed entries (strings, numbers, null)
-    that reach the validator from LLM-composed or partially parsed logs;
-    :func:`sanitize_action_log` reports them separately.
-    """
-    return [e for e in (action_log or []) if isinstance(e, dict)]
-
-
-def sanitize_action_log(
-    action_log: list | None,
-) -> tuple[list[dict], list[dict[str, str]]]:
-    """Split an action log into structured entries and sanitized findings (#698).
-
-    Malformed entries become clear, sanitized ``warning`` findings — the
-    offending value's content is never echoed back (only its position and
-    type), so secrets or garbage in a broken log cannot leak into validation
-    errors, and validation itself proceeds without secondary exceptions.
-    """
-    if action_log is None:
-        return [], []
-    if not isinstance(action_log, (list, tuple)):
-        return [], [
-            validator_finding(
-                "shared.action_log_malformed",
-                "downgrade",
-                "Action log",
-                "action_log is not a list of structured entries "
-                f"(got {type(action_log).__name__}); it was ignored",
-                "pass action_log as a list of dict entries",
-            )
-        ]
-    entries: list[dict] = []
-    findings: list[dict[str, str]] = []
-    for index, entry in enumerate(action_log):
-        if isinstance(entry, dict):
-            entries.append(entry)
-            continue
-        findings.append(
-            validator_finding(
-                "shared.action_log_malformed",
-                "downgrade",
-                "Action log",
-                f"action_log entry {index} is not a structured mapping "
-                f"(got {type(entry).__name__}); the entry was ignored",
-                "repair the malformed action_log entry or drop it before "
-                "revalidating",
-            )
-        )
-    return entries, findings
-
-
 def validator_finding(
     rule_id: str,
     severity: str,
@@ -480,7 +421,7 @@ def _rule_shared_canonical_comment_post_claim(
     rejected_in_report = bool(_CANONICAL_VALIDATION_REJECTED_RE.search(text))
     rejected_in_log = False
     if action_log:
-        for entry in _iter_action_entries(action_log):
+        for entry in action_log:
             validation = entry.get("canonical_comment_validation") or {}
             if validation.get("allowed") is False:
                 rejected_in_log = True
@@ -534,13 +475,9 @@ def _rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none(
     action_log: list[dict] | None = None,
     mutations_observed: bool = False,
 ) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
-    # #698: infer review mutations only from authoritative evidence — an
-    # entry proves a mutation only when it affirmatively records
-    # performed=true and was not gated. Read-only diagnostics and pre-API
-    # rejections (entries without a performed flag) are not mutations.
     performed = any(
-        e.get("performed") is True and not e.get("gated_rejected")
-        for e in _iter_action_entries(action_log)
+        e.get("performed") is not False and not e.get("gated_rejected")
+        for e in (action_log or [])
     )
     if not (mutations_observed or performed):
         return []
@@ -599,7 +536,7 @@ def _rule_reviewer_git_fetch_readonly(
     text = report_text or ""
     fetch_observed = any(
         _GIT_FETCH_RE.search(str(e.get("command") or e.get("action") or ""))
-        for e in _iter_action_entries(action_log)
+        for e in (action_log or [])
     ) or _GIT_FETCH_RE.search(text)
     if not fetch_observed:
         return []
@@ -1040,7 +977,7 @@ def _rule_reviewer_target_branch_freshness(
     fields = _handoff_fields(text)
     fetch_reported = bool(_GIT_FETCH_RE.search(text)) or any(
         _GIT_FETCH_RE.search(str(e.get("command") or e.get("action") or ""))
-        for e in _iter_action_entries(action_log)
+        for e in (action_log or [])
     )
     target_sha_reported = bool(_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA_RE.search(text)) or any(
         "target branch" in key and "sha" in key and _FULL_SHA_RE.search(value)
@@ -1798,12 +1735,6 @@ def assess_final_report_validator(
     checks: dict[str, Any] = {}
     findings: list[dict[str, str]] = []
 
-    # #698: malformed action_log data must never crash validation with a
-    # secondary exception; malformed entries surface as sanitized findings.
-    sanitized_action_log, action_log_findings = sanitize_action_log(action_log)
-    action_log = sanitized_action_log
-    findings.extend(action_log_findings)
-
     if normalized_kind == "issue_filing" and issue_filing_lock is not None:
         checks["issue_filing"] = assess_issue_filing_final_report(
             report_text,
@@ -1832,23 +1763,7 @@ def assess_final_report_validator(
     }
 
     for rule in _RULES_BY_TASK.get(normalized_kind, ()):
-        try:
-            findings.extend(
-                _call_rule(rule, report_text, normalized_kind, rule_kwargs)
-            )
-        except Exception as exc:  # #698: fail closed with a sanitized error
-            findings.append(
-                validator_finding(
-                    "shared.validator_rule_error",
-                    "block",
-                    "Validator",
-                    f"validator rule '{getattr(rule, '__name__', 'unknown')}' "
-                    f"failed with {type(exc).__name__} (details withheld; "
-                    "sanitized)",
-                    "file a validator defect with the rule name; do not "
-                    "bypass final-report validation",
-                )
-            )
+        findings.extend(_call_rule(rule, report_text, normalized_kind, rule_kwargs))
 
     grade, blocked, downgraded = _aggregate_grade(findings)
     reasons = [f"{f['rule_id']}: {f['reason']}" for f in findings]

gitea_mcp_server.py

@@ -5925,6 +5925,65 @@ def gitea_delete_branch(
             "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.branch.delete"),
         }
 
+    # Possessing gitea.branch.delete alone is not enough for arbitrary deletion.
+    # task_capability_map maps delete_branch → author; reconciler must use the
+    # guarded cleanup_merged_pr_branch path only (#687 / #514).
+    profile = get_profile()
+    active_role = _profile_role_kind(profile)
+    required_role = task_capability_map.required_role("delete_branch")
+    if active_role == "reconciler":
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "performed": False,
+            "required_permission": "gitea.branch.delete",
+            "required_role_kind": required_role,
+            "active_role_kind": active_role,
+            "reasons": [
+                "reconciler profile cannot use raw gitea_delete_branch; "
+                "use gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch for a fully merged PR "
+                "source branch only (fail closed)"
+            ],
+            "exact_next_action": (
+                "Call gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch with pr_number, the "
+                "exact PR head branch, and confirmation "
+                "'CLEANUP MERGED PR <n> BRANCH <branch>' after capability "
+                "resolve for cleanup_merged_pr_branch."
+            ),
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.branch.delete"),
+        }
+    if active_role != required_role:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "performed": False,
+            "required_permission": "gitea.branch.delete",
+            "required_role_kind": required_role,
+            "active_role_kind": active_role,
+            "reasons": [
+                f"Active profile role '{active_role}' cannot perform "
+                f"{required_role} task 'delete_branch' even when "
+                "gitea.branch.delete is present (fail closed)"
+            ],
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.branch.delete"),
+        }
+
+    if branch_cleanup_guard.is_preservation_or_evidence_branch(branch):
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "performed": False,
+            "required_permission": "gitea.branch.delete",
+            "reasons": [
+                f"branch '{branch}' is a preservation/evidence branch and "
+                "cannot be deleted (fail closed)"
+            ],
+        }
+    if branch in branch_cleanup_guard.PROTECTED_BRANCHES:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "performed": False,
+            "required_permission": "gitea.branch.delete",
+            "reasons": [f"branch '{branch}' is protected (fail closed)"],
+        }
+
     audit_allowed, audit_reasons = (
         audit_reconciliation_mode.check_audit_mutation_allowed("delete_branch")
     )
@@ -5976,18 +6035,20 @@ def gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
         }
 
     profile = get_profile()
-    active_role = _role_kind(
-        profile.get("allowed_operations", []),
-        profile.get("forbidden_operations", []),
-    )
-    if active_role == "reviewer":
+    active_role = _profile_role_kind(profile)
+    # cleanup_merged_pr_branch is reconciler-owned (task_capability_map).
+    # Author/reviewer/merger must not reach this path even if they somehow
+    # hold gitea.branch.delete.
+    if active_role != "reconciler":
         return {
             "success": False,
             "performed": False,
             "required_permission": "gitea.branch.delete",
+            "required_role_kind": "reconciler",
+            "active_role_kind": active_role,
             "reasons": [
-                "reviewer profile is not authorized for merged branch cleanup "
-                "(fail closed)"
+                f"profile role '{active_role}' is not authorized for merged "
+                "branch cleanup; required role is reconciler (fail closed)"
             ],
             "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.branch.delete"),
         }
@@ -7964,12 +8025,11 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     org: str | None = None,
     repo: str | None = None,
 ) -> dict:
-    """Read-only: diagnose open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit next action (#599, #691).
+    """Read-only: diagnose open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit next action (#599).
 
-    Classifies no-lease / own / foreign / superseded-head / expired / orphan /
-    instructed-lease-missing-with-replacement and worktree binding mismatch.
-    Returns a canonical ``next_action`` (including guarded obsolete-lease cleanup)
-    without mutating Gitea state. Never steals foreign leases.
+    Classifies no-lease / own / foreign / instructed-lease-missing-with-replacement
+    and worktree binding mismatch. Returns a canonical ``next_action`` without
+    mutating Gitea state. Never steals foreign leases.
     """
     read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
     if read_block:
@@ -7980,7 +8040,7 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         }
     comments = _fetch_pr_comments(
         pr_number, remote=remote, host=host, org=org, repo=repo)
-    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    h, _o, _r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
     try:
         username = _authenticated_username(h)
     except Exception:
@@ -7994,64 +8054,6 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     # Prefer in-session lease id when present; otherwise diagnose as a fresh
     # caller without inventing ownership of an on-thread lease.
     session_id = (session_lease.get("session_id") or "").strip() or None
-
-    # Live PR head + formal reviews for #691 superseded/completed classification.
-    current_head_sha = None
-    formal_reviews: list[dict] = []
-    try:
-        auth = _auth(h)
-        pr_live = api_request(
-            "GET", f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}", auth
-        ) or {}
-        head = pr_live.get("head") or {}
-        current_head_sha = head.get("sha") or pr_live.get("head_commit_sha")
-        try:
-            reviews = api_request(
-                "GET",
-                f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews",
-                auth,
-            ) or []
-            for rev in reviews if isinstance(reviews, list) else []:
-                formal_reviews.append({
-                    "verdict": rev.get("state") or rev.get("verdict"),
-                    "reviewed_head_sha": rev.get("commit_id") or rev.get(
-                        "reviewed_head_sha"
-                    ),
-                    "dismissed": bool(rev.get("dismissed")),
-                    "reviewer": ((rev.get("user") or {}).get("login")),
-                    "submitted_at": rev.get("submitted_at"),
-                })
-        except Exception:
-            formal_reviews = []
-    except Exception:
-        current_head_sha = None
-
-    lease_wt = None
-    active = reviewer_pr_lease.find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
-        comments, pr_number=pr_number, include_expired=True
-    )
-    if active:
-        lease_wt = (active.get("worktree") or "").strip() or None
-    worktree_exists = None
-    worktree_clean = None
-    if lease_wt:
-        worktree_exists = os.path.isdir(lease_wt)
-        if worktree_exists:
-            try:
-                import subprocess
-
-                st = subprocess.run(
-                    ["git", "-C", lease_wt, "status", "--porcelain"],
-                    capture_output=True,
-                    text=True,
-                    timeout=30,
-                    check=False,
-                )
-                if st.returncode == 0:
-                    worktree_clean = not bool((st.stdout or "").strip())
-            except Exception:
-                worktree_clean = None
-
     diagnosis = reviewer_pr_lease.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         comments,
         pr_number=pr_number,
@@ -8061,11 +8063,6 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         env_bound_worktree=env_wt,
         instructed_session_id=instructed_session_id,
         instructed_comment_id=instructed_comment_id,
-        current_head_sha=current_head_sha,
-        formal_reviews=formal_reviews,
-        worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
-        worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
-        owner_process_alive=None,  # PID never proves ownership; leave unset
     )
     diagnosis["success"] = True
     diagnosis["remote"] = remote
@@ -8193,212 +8190,6 @@ def gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease(
     return report
 
 
-@mcp.tool()
-def gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease(
-    pr_number: int,
-    confirmation: str = "",
-    apply: bool = False,
-    controller_recovery_authorized: bool = False,
-    expected_lease_comment_id: int | None = None,
-    expected_session_id: str | None = None,
-    expected_leased_head: str | None = None,
-    owner_process_alive: bool | None = None,
-    current_head_review_in_progress: bool = False,
-    remote: str = "dadeschools",
-    host: str | None = None,
-    org: str | None = None,
-    repo: str | None = None,
-) -> dict:
-    """Guarded cleanup for obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases on open PRs (#691).
-
-    Neutralises an expired and/or superseded-head foreign lease by posting a
-    terminal ``phase: released`` lease marker (append-only audit). Never deletes
-    comments, never repoints the lease to the new head, never transfers
-    validation/decision/workflow state, never uses PID equality as ownership,
-    and never steals a genuinely active foreign lease on the current head.
-
-    Read-first when ``apply`` is false. Apply requires:
-
-    - ``controller_recovery_authorized=True`` (explicit operator/controller
-      recovery capability — not implied by profile alone)
-    - ``confirmation`` exactly ``CLEANUP OBSOLETE REVIEWER LEASE <pr_number>``
-    - full eligibility evidence from
-      ``reviewer_pr_lease.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup``
-
-    Comment-backed leases need no control-plane DB ``lease_id``.
-    """
-    read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
-    if read_block:
-        return {
-            "success": False,
-            "cleanup_performed": False,
-            "no_steal_or_adoption": True,
-            "reasons": read_block,
-            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
-        }
-
-    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
-    auth = _auth(h)
-    expected_repo = f"{o}/{r}"
-    comments = _fetch_pr_comments(
-        pr_number, remote=remote, host=host, org=org, repo=repo
-    )
-    pr_live = api_request(
-        "GET", f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}", auth
-    ) or {}
-    head = pr_live.get("head") or {}
-    current_head_sha = head.get("sha") or pr_live.get("head_commit_sha")
-
-    formal_reviews: list[dict] = []
-    try:
-        reviews = api_request(
-            "GET",
-            f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews",
-            auth,
-        ) or []
-        for rev in reviews if isinstance(reviews, list) else []:
-            formal_reviews.append({
-                "verdict": rev.get("state") or rev.get("verdict"),
-                "reviewed_head_sha": rev.get("commit_id")
-                or rev.get("reviewed_head_sha"),
-                "dismissed": bool(rev.get("dismissed")),
-                "reviewer": ((rev.get("user") or {}).get("login")),
-                "submitted_at": rev.get("submitted_at"),
-            })
-    except Exception:
-        formal_reviews = []
-
-    lease = reviewer_pr_lease.find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
-        comments, pr_number=pr_number, include_expired=True
-    )
-    lease_wt = ((lease or {}).get("worktree") or "").strip() or None
-    worktree_exists = None
-    worktree_clean = None
-    worktree_has_unpreserved_work = None
-    if lease_wt:
-        worktree_exists = os.path.isdir(lease_wt)
-        if worktree_exists:
-            try:
-                import subprocess
-
-                st = subprocess.run(
-                    ["git", "-C", lease_wt, "status", "--porcelain"],
-                    capture_output=True,
-                    text=True,
-                    timeout=30,
-                    check=False,
-                )
-                if st.returncode == 0:
-                    dirty = bool((st.stdout or "").strip())
-                    worktree_clean = not dirty
-                    worktree_has_unpreserved_work = dirty
-            except Exception:
-                worktree_clean = None
-
-    session = reviewer_pr_lease.get_session_lease() or {}
-    assessment = reviewer_pr_lease.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
-        comments,
-        pr_number=pr_number,
-        current_head_sha=current_head_sha,
-        formal_reviews=formal_reviews,
-        repo=expected_repo,
-        expected_repo=expected_repo,
-        requesting_session_id=(session.get("session_id") or "").strip() or None,
-        controller_recovery_authorized=controller_recovery_authorized,
-        worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
-        worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
-        worktree_has_unpreserved_work=worktree_has_unpreserved_work,
-        owner_process_alive=owner_process_alive,
-        owner_pid_observed=None,
-        requesting_pid=os.getpid(),
-        current_head_review_in_progress=current_head_review_in_progress,
-        expected_lease_comment_id=expected_lease_comment_id,
-        expected_session_id=expected_session_id,
-        expected_leased_head=expected_leased_head,
-        confirmation=confirmation,
-        apply=apply,
-    )
-
-    report = {
-        "success": True,
-        "pr_number": pr_number,
-        "pr_state": pr_live.get("state"),
-        "cleanup_allowed": assessment.get("cleanup_allowed"),
-        "cleanup_performed": False,
-        "classification": assessment.get("classification"),
-        "blocker_kind": assessment.get("blocker_kind"),
-        "exact_next_action": assessment.get("exact_next_action"),
-        "mutation_eligibility": assessment.get("mutation_eligibility"),
-        "leased_head": assessment.get("leased_head"),
-        "current_head": assessment.get("current_head"),
-        "expires_at": assessment.get("expires_at"),
-        "terminal_review": assessment.get("terminal_review"),
-        "worktree_state": assessment.get("worktree_state"),
-        "owner_session_evidence": assessment.get("owner_session_evidence"),
-        "cleanup_tool": assessment.get("cleanup_tool"),
-        "required_confirmation": assessment.get("required_confirmation"),
-        "active_lease": assessment.get("active_lease"),
-        "no_steal_or_adoption": True,
-        "no_repoint": True,
-        "no_validation_transfer": True,
-        "mode": "apply" if apply else "read_only",
-        "reasons": assessment.get("reasons") or [],
-        "forbidden": assessment.get("forbidden") or [],
-    }
-
-    if not apply:
-        return report
-    if not assessment.get("cleanup_allowed"):
-        report["success"] = False
-        report["cleanup_skipped_reason"] = (
-            assessment.get("fail_closed_reasons")
-            or assessment.get("reasons")
-            or ["cleanup not allowed"]
-        )
-        return report
-
-    comment_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.pr.comment")
-    if comment_block:
-        report["success"] = False
-        report["reasons"] = comment_block
-        report["permission_report"] = _permission_block_report("gitea.pr.comment")
-        return report
-
-    verify_preflight_purity(remote)
-    # Terminal lease marker (preserves history; does not delete comment 10749-style
-    # entries — newest released marker neutralises the ledger).
-    release_body = assessment.get("release_body") or ""
-    audit_body = assessment.get("audit_comment_body") or ""
-    comment_url = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/issues/{pr_number}/comments"
-    with _audited(
-        "comment_pr",
-        host=h,
-        remote=remote,
-        org=o,
-        repo=r,
-        pr_number=pr_number,
-        request_metadata={
-            "source": "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease",
-            "classification": assessment.get("classification"),
-        },
-    ):
-        posted_release = api_request(
-            "POST", comment_url, auth, {"body": release_body}
-        )
-        posted_audit = None
-        if audit_body.strip():
-            posted_audit = api_request(
-                "POST", comment_url, auth, {"body": audit_body}
-            )
-
-    # Never seed session lease from cleaned foreign lease.
-    report["cleanup_performed"] = True
-    report["released_comment_id"] = (posted_release or {}).get("id")
-    report["audit_comment_id"] = (posted_audit or {}).get("id")
-    report["session_lease_seeded"] = False
-    return report
-
-
 @mcp.tool()
 def gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease(
     pr_number: int,
@@ -11539,6 +11330,8 @@ def gitea_resolve_task_capability(
         "gitea_commit_files",
         "address_pr_change_requests",
         "delete_branch",
+        "cleanup_merged_pr_branch",
+        "reconciliation_cleanup",
         "work_issue",
         "work-issue",
     }

mcp_native_cleanup_proof.py

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ from typing import Any
 
 AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP_TOOLS = frozenset({
     "gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease",
-    "gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease",
     "gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups",
     "gitea_delete_branch",
     "gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch",

migrate_profiles.py

@@ -20,12 +20,114 @@ if PROJECT_ROOT not in sys.path:
 import gitea_config
 
 
-AUTHOR_DEFAULT_ALLOWED = ["read", "branch", "commit", "push", "open_pr", "comment"]
-AUTHOR_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN = ["approve", "request_changes", "merge"]
-REVIEWER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED = [
-    "read", "review", "comment", "approve", "request_changes", "merge"
+# Defaults emit *canonical* operation names only. Shorthand that is not in
+# gitea_config.GITEA_OPERATION_ALIASES (e.g. ``pr.close``, ``issue.close``)
+# is silently dropped by the production loader and must never appear here.
+AUTHOR_DEFAULT_ALLOWED = [
+    "gitea.read",
+    "gitea.branch.create",
+    "gitea.repo.commit",
+    "gitea.branch.push",
+    "gitea.pr.create",
+    "gitea.pr.comment",
 ]
-REVIEWER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN = ["branch", "commit", "push", "open_pr"]
+AUTHOR_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN = [
+    "gitea.pr.approve",
+    "gitea.pr.request_changes",
+    "gitea.pr.merge",
+]
+REVIEWER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED = [
+    "gitea.read",
+    "gitea.pr.review",
+    "gitea.pr.comment",
+    "gitea.pr.approve",
+    "gitea.pr.request_changes",
+    "gitea.pr.merge",
+]
+REVIEWER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN = [
+    "gitea.branch.create",
+    "gitea.repo.commit",
+    "gitea.branch.push",
+    "gitea.pr.create",
+]
+# Required reconciler ops (read + pr.close) plus recommended comment/close and
+# branch.delete for guarded merged-PR cleanup. All names must normalize via
+# gitea_config.normalize_operation without being dropped.
+RECONCILER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED = [
+    "gitea.read",
+    "gitea.pr.close",
+    "gitea.pr.comment",
+    "gitea.issue.comment",
+    "gitea.issue.close",
+    "gitea.branch.delete",
+]
+RECONCILER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN = [
+    "gitea.pr.approve",
+    "gitea.pr.merge",
+    "gitea.pr.review",
+    "gitea.pr.create",
+    "gitea.branch.push",
+    "gitea.repo.commit",
+]
+
+# Migration-only expansions for common shorthands that are *not* in
+# GITEA_OPERATION_ALIASES. Emitted output is always the canonical form so a
+# second canonicalize pass is a no-op (idempotent).
+_MIGRATION_ONLY_ALIASES = {
+    "pr.close": "gitea.pr.close",
+    "pr.comment": "gitea.pr.comment",
+    "issue.close": "gitea.issue.close",
+    "branch.delete": "gitea.branch.delete",
+}
+
+# Reconciler required ops that must survive migration (from reconciler_profile).
+RECONCILER_REQUIRED_CANONICAL = ("gitea.read", "gitea.pr.close")
+
+
+def canonicalize_operation(op: str) -> str:
+    """Return a canonical operation name accepted by the production loader.
+
+    Fail closed on unknown/ambiguous spellings so required permissions cannot
+    be silently dropped by ``check_operation`` later.
+    """
+    if not isinstance(op, str) or not op.strip():
+        raise ValueError("operation must be a non-empty string (fail closed)")
+    op = op.strip()
+    try:
+        return gitea_config.normalize_operation(op)
+    except gitea_config.ConfigError:
+        pass
+    if op in _MIGRATION_ONLY_ALIASES:
+        return _MIGRATION_ONLY_ALIASES[op]
+    raise ValueError(
+        f"operation {op!r} cannot be canonicalized for migration "
+        "(unknown/ambiguous; fail closed — production loader would drop it)"
+    )
+
+
+def canonicalize_operations(ops, *, context: str = "operations") -> list[str]:
+    """Canonicalize a list of operations; preserve order, drop duplicates."""
+    if not isinstance(ops, list):
+        raise ValueError(f"{context} must be a list (fail closed)")
+    out: list[str] = []
+    seen: set[str] = set()
+    for entry in ops:
+        canon = canonicalize_operation(entry)
+        if canon not in seen:
+            seen.add(canon)
+            out.append(canon)
+    return out
+
+
+def _assert_reconciler_required_survive(allowed: list[str], profile_name: str) -> None:
+    """Fail visibly when migration would leave a reconciler without required ops."""
+    missing = [op for op in RECONCILER_REQUIRED_CANONICAL if op not in set(allowed)]
+    if missing:
+        raise ValueError(
+            f"Profile '{profile_name}' (reconciler) is missing required "
+            f"operation(s) after migration: {missing}. Refusing to emit a "
+            "profile that would silently fail pr.close / read (fail closed)."
+        )
 
 
 def infer_role(name, execution_profile):
@@ -90,9 +192,11 @@ def migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data):
             ident_name = "reviewer"
         elif role == "author":
             ident_name = "author"
+        elif role == "reconciler":
+            ident_name = "reconciler"
         else:
             role = prof.get("role")
-            if role not in (None, "author", "reviewer"):
+            if role not in (None, "author", "reviewer", "reconciler"):
                 raise ValueError(
                     f"Profile '{name}' has unsupported role {role!r}"
                 )
@@ -124,20 +228,35 @@ def migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data):
                 raise ValueError(
                     f"Profile '{name}' operation fields must be lists"
                 )
-            identity_data["allowed_operations"] = list(allowed)
-            identity_data["forbidden_operations"] = list(forbidden)
+            try:
+                identity_data["allowed_operations"] = canonicalize_operations(
+                    allowed, context=f"profile '{name}' allowed_operations"
+                )
+                identity_data["forbidden_operations"] = canonicalize_operations(
+                    forbidden, context=f"profile '{name}' forbidden_operations"
+                )
+            except ValueError as exc:
+                raise ValueError(f"Profile '{name}': {exc}") from exc
         elif role == "author":
             identity_data["allowed_operations"] = list(AUTHOR_DEFAULT_ALLOWED)
             identity_data["forbidden_operations"] = list(AUTHOR_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN)
         elif role == "reviewer":
             identity_data["allowed_operations"] = list(REVIEWER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED)
             identity_data["forbidden_operations"] = list(REVIEWER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN)
+        elif role == "reconciler":
+            identity_data["allowed_operations"] = list(RECONCILER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED)
+            identity_data["forbidden_operations"] = list(RECONCILER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN)
         else:
             raise ValueError(
                 f"Profile '{name}' has no explicit operation lists and no "
                 "unambiguous author/reviewer role marker (fail closed)"
             )
 
+        if role == "reconciler":
+            _assert_reconciler_required_survive(
+                identity_data["allowed_operations"], name
+            )
+
         # Nest inside environments/services structure
         env = environments.setdefault(env_name, {})
         services = env.setdefault("services", {})

post_merge_cleanup_proof.py

@@ -86,22 +86,6 @@ _WRONG_BRANCH_RE = re.compile(
     r"deleted branch (?:does not match|!=|differs from) (?:merged )?pr head",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
-# #698: canonical reviewer lease lifecycle operations are NOT post-merge
-# cleanup. Releasing a reviewer PR lease (or posting its terminal
-# phase=released marker) happens after every review — merged or not — and
-# must never trigger the post-merge branch/worktree cleanup checklist.
-_LEASE_LIFECYCLE_RE = re.compile(
-    r"(?:gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease|gitea_abandon_workflow_lease|"
-    r"release[d]? (?:the )?(?:reviewer|workflow) (?:pr )?lease|"
-    r"reviewer (?:pr )?lease release[d]?|"
-    r"lease (?:marker|comment).{0,40}phase\s*[:=]\s*released|"
-    r"phase\s*[:=]\s*released)",
-    re.IGNORECASE,
-)
-_CLEANUP_MUTATIONS_VALUE_RE = re.compile(
-    r"cleanup mutations\s*:\s*([^\n]+)",
-    re.IGNORECASE,
-)
 
 
 def _claims_remote_delete(text: str) -> bool:
@@ -220,19 +204,16 @@ def assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof(
             for field in _worktree_cleanup_fields_present(text)
         )
 
+    if (remote_delete or worktree_remove) and not (remote_delete or worktree_remove):
+        pass
+
     if not remote_delete and not worktree_remove:
-        value_match = _CLEANUP_MUTATIONS_VALUE_RE.search(text)
-        value = (value_match.group(1).strip() if value_match else "")
-        value_lower = value.lower()
-        substantive = bool(value) and value_lower not in {
-            "none", "n/a", "not applicable",
-        }
-        # #698: reviewer lease release / terminal lease markers are lease
-        # lifecycle, not post-merge cleanup — no checklist owed.
-        lease_lifecycle_only = substantive and bool(
-            _LEASE_LIFECYCLE_RE.search(value)
+        cleanup_mutations = re.search(
+            r"cleanup mutations\s*:\s*(?!none\b)\S",
+            text,
+            re.IGNORECASE,
         )
-        if substantive and not lease_lifecycle_only:
+        if cleanup_mutations:
             reasons.append(
                 "cleanup mutations reported without post-merge cleanup proof checklist"
             )

pr_work_lease.py

@@ -403,37 +403,10 @@ _REVIEWER_ACTIVE_RE = re.compile(
     r"whether any reviewer was active\s*:\s*(yes|no|true|false)",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
-# #698 phase detection for phase-specific head proofs.
-_NO_REVIEWED_HEAD_RE = re.compile(
-    r"(?:reviewed head sha|candidate head sha)\s*:\s*none\b",
-    re.IGNORECASE,
-)
-_VERDICT_RECORDED_RE = re.compile(
-    r"review decision\s*:\s*(?:approve[d]?|request[_ ]changes)\b"
-    r"|review_status\s*:\s*(?:approved|request_changes)\b"
-    r"|terminal review mutation\s*:\s*(?!none\b)\S",
-    re.IGNORECASE,
-)
-_MERGE_ATTEMPTED_RE = re.compile(
-    r"merge result\s*:\s*(?:merged|success|performed|failed|attempted)\b"
-    r"|merge mutations\s*:\s*(?!none\b|not applicable\b)\S",
-    re.IGNORECASE,
-)
-_VALIDATION_STARTED_RE = re.compile(
-    r"validation\s*:\s*(?!none\b|not run\b|not applicable\b|not started\b)"
-    r"[^\n]*(?:pass|fail|ran|executed|\d+\s+passed)",
-    re.IGNORECASE,
-)
 
 
 def assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(report_text: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
-    """Final-report proof for reviewed vs live head SHAs (#399 AC 6).
-
-    #698: head proofs are phase-specific. A legitimately blocked run that
-    never began validation (no reviewed head, no formal verdict, no merge)
-    owes none of them; approval-time and merge-time live-head proofs are
-    owed only once the corresponding phase actually begins.
-    """
+    """Final-report proof for reviewed vs live head SHAs (#399 AC 6)."""
     text = report_text or ""
     reasons: list[str] = []
     reviewed = _normalize_sha(_REVIEWED_HEAD_RE.search(text).group(1) if _REVIEWED_HEAD_RE.search(text) else None)
@@ -449,49 +422,15 @@ def assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(report_text: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
     )
     push_during = _PUSH_DURING_VALIDATION_RE.search(text)
 
-    # Phase detection from the report's own claims.
-    no_head_stated = bool(_NO_REVIEWED_HEAD_RE.search(text))
-    verdict_recorded = bool(_VERDICT_RECORDED_RE.search(text))
-    merge_attempted = bool(_MERGE_ATTEMPTED_RE.search(text))
-    validation_started = bool(reviewed) or bool(_VALIDATION_STARTED_RE.search(text))
-    blocked_before_validation = (
-        no_head_stated
-        and not reviewed
-        and not verdict_recorded
-        and not merge_attempted
-        and not validation_started
-    )
-
-    if blocked_before_validation:
-        return {
-            "proven": True,
-            "block": False,
-            "reasons": [],
-            "reviewed_head_sha": None,
-            "live_head_sha_before_approval": None,
-            "live_head_sha_before_merge": None,
-            "push_during_validation": (
-                push_during.group(1).lower() if push_during else None
-            ),
-            "phase": "blocked_before_validation",
-        }
-
-    if not reviewed and not no_head_stated:
-        # The head must always be STATED — either a SHA or an explicit
-        # 'none'. Silence is not a phase claim and fails closed.
-        reasons.append(
-            "reviewed head SHA not stated in final report "
-            "(state the SHA or an explicit 'none')"
-        )
-    elif not reviewed and (validation_started or verdict_recorded or merge_attempted):
+    if not reviewed:
         reasons.append("reviewed head SHA not stated in final report")
-    if verdict_recorded and not live_approval:
+    if not live_approval:
         reasons.append("final live head SHA before approval not stated")
-    if merge_attempted and not live_merge:
+    if not live_merge:
         reasons.append("final live head SHA before merge not stated")
-    if validation_started and not push_during:
+    if not push_during:
         reasons.append("whether push occurred during validation not stated")
-    if reviewed and live_approval and reviewed != live_approval:
+    elif reviewed and live_approval and reviewed != live_approval:
         reasons.append("live head before approval differs from reviewed head SHA")
     elif reviewed and live_merge and reviewed != live_merge:
         reasons.append("live head before merge differs from reviewed head SHA")

reconciler_profile.py

@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ RECONCILER_RECOMMENDED_OPERATIONS = (
     "gitea.pr.comment",
     "gitea.issue.comment",
     "gitea.issue.close",
+    # Merged-branch cleanup is reconciler-owned (task_capability_map maps
+    # cleanup_merged_pr_branch -> reconciler). The permission is only
+    # exercisable through the guarded gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch path
+    # (#514): merged proof, protected-branch refusal, explicit confirmation.
+    "gitea.branch.delete",
 )
 
 RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN_OPERATIONS = (

review_final_report_schema.py

@@ -25,13 +25,8 @@ _REVIEWED_HEAD_RE = re.compile(
     r"(?:pinned reviewed head|reviewed head sha)\s*:\s*([0-9a-f]{7,40})",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
-# #698: validation pass proof appears in several legitimate shapes —
-# "Validation: pass", "Validation: focused 50 passed; full 2665 passed",
-# or structured "validation_status: pass". Accept pass evidence anywhere in
-# the Validation field's value, not only as its first token.
 _VALIDATION_PASS_RE = re.compile(
-    r"validation(?:_status)?\s*:[^\n]{0,300}?"
-    r"(?:\bpass(?:ed)?\b|\bstrong\b|\bok\b|\bgreen\b|\d+\s+passed)",
+    r"validation\s*:\s*(?:pass|passed|strong|ok|green)",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
 _MERGED_CLAIM_RE = re.compile(

review_proofs.py

@@ -858,16 +858,9 @@ _WALKTHROUGH_ARTIFACT_RE = re.compile(r"walkthrough\.md", re.I)
 
 
 def _performed_file_mutations(action_log: list[dict] | None) -> list[dict]:
-    """Return performed local file mutations, excluding gated rejections.
-
-    Non-dict entries (malformed JSON, LLM mistakes) are ignored instead of
-    raising ``AttributeError`` (#698): a malformed ledger entry can never be
-    authoritative mutation evidence.
-    """
+    """Return performed local file mutations, excluding gated rejections."""
     performed: list[dict] = []
     for entry in action_log or []:
-        if not isinstance(entry, dict):
-            continue
         if entry.get("gated_rejected") or entry.get("performed") is False:
             continue
         action = (entry.get("action") or "").strip().lower()
@@ -2235,31 +2228,24 @@ HANDOFF_REVIEW_MUTATION_FIELDS = (
 )
 
 HANDOFF_ROLE_FIELDS = {
-    # #698: the review/merger required-field sets must stay aligned with the
-    # canonical schema (skills/llm-project-workflow/schemas/
-    # review-merge-final-report.md). The schema explicitly FORBIDS the legacy
-    # fields 'Pinned reviewed head', 'Scratch worktree used', and 'Workspace
-    # mutations' — a validator must never demand a field the schema bans.
     "review": (
         ("Selected PR", ("selected pr",)),
         ("Reviewer eligibility", ("reviewer eligibility", "eligibility")),
-        ("Reviewed head SHA", ("reviewed head sha", "candidate head sha")),
-        ("Review worktree path", ("review worktree path", "worktree path",
-                                  "starting worktree path")),
-        ("Review worktree dirty", ("review worktree dirty", "worktree dirty",
-                                   "whether worktree was dirty")),
+        ("Pinned reviewed head", ("pinned reviewed head", "pinned head")),
+        ("Worktree path", ("worktree path", "starting worktree path")),
+        ("Worktree dirty", ("worktree dirty", "whether worktree was dirty")),
+        ("Scratch worktree used", ("scratch worktree used", "scratch clone used",
+                                   "scratch worktree")),
         ("Unrelated local mutations", ("unrelated local mutations",
-                                       "unrelated files modified",
-                                       "file edits by reviewer")),
+                                       "unrelated files modified")),
         ("Review decision", ("review decision", "decision")),
         ("Merge result", ("merge result",)),
         ("Linked issue status", ("linked issue status", "linked issue")),
         ("Cleanup status", ("cleanup status", "cleanup")),
-        ("Safe next action", ("safe next action", "next")),
     ) + HANDOFF_REVIEW_MUTATION_FIELDS,
     "merger": (
         ("Selected PR", ("selected pr",)),
-        ("Reviewed head SHA", ("reviewed head sha", "candidate head sha")),
+        ("Pinned reviewed head", ("pinned reviewed head", "pinned head")),
         ("Active profile", ("active profile",)),
         ("Role kind", ("role kind",)),
         ("Merge capability source", ("merge capability source",)),
@@ -2447,22 +2433,9 @@ def assess_controller_handoff(report_text, role=None, local_edits=False):
         # Issue #320: reviewer and merger handoffs use the precise mutation categories
         # in HANDOFF_REVIEW_MUTATION_FIELDS instead of the legacy ambiguous
         # "Workspace mutations" field, which is rejected below.
-        # Issue #698: the canonical review-merge schema has no 'Mutations',
-        # 'Next', 'Issue/PR', 'Branch/SHA', or 'Files changed' fields — their
-        # content lives in the precise mutation categories, 'Safe next
-        # action', 'Selected PR'/'Linked issue', head-SHA fields, and 'Files
-        # reviewed'. Requiring the legacy names rejects canonical reports.
-        _non_canonical_for_review = {
-            "Workspace mutations",
-            "Mutations",
-            "Next",
-            "Issue/PR",
-            "Branch/SHA",
-            "Files changed",
-        }
         required = [
             field for field in required
-            if field[0] not in _non_canonical_for_review
+            if field[0] != "Workspace mutations"
         ]
         if any(label.startswith("workspace mutations") for label in labels):
             return {

reviewer_pr_lease.py

@@ -524,26 +524,13 @@ def assess_lease_inventory(
         "reclaimable_review_leases": reclaimable,
     }
 
-# Canonical next-action vocabulary for reviewer lease handoff (#599, #691).
+# Canonical next-action vocabulary for reviewer lease handoff (#599).
 NEXT_ACTION_ACQUIRE = "acquire"
 NEXT_ACTION_WAIT = "wait"
 NEXT_ACTION_RESUME_EXACT_OWNER_SESSION = "resume_exact_owner_session"
 NEXT_ACTION_RELEASE_EXPIRED_LEASE = "release_expired_lease"
 NEXT_ACTION_OPERATOR_AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP = "operator_authorized_cleanup"
 NEXT_ACTION_REPAIR_WORKTREE_BINDING = "repair_worktree_binding"
-NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE = "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease"
-
-CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL = "gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease"
-CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_CONFIRMATION_PREFIX = "CLEANUP OBSOLETE REVIEWER LEASE "
-
-# Formal terminal review verdicts that complete a leased-head workflow (#691).
-_TERMINAL_REVIEW_VERDICTS = frozenset({
-    "APPROVED",
-    "REQUEST_CHANGES",
-    "approved",
-    "request_changes",
-    "REQUESTCHANGES",
-})
 
 _HANDOFF_CLASSIFICATIONS = frozenset({
     "no_lease",
@@ -552,12 +539,6 @@ _HANDOFF_CLASSIFICATIONS = frozenset({
     "foreign_active",
     "foreign_reclaimable",
     "foreign_expired",
-    "foreign_active_current_head",
-    "foreign_expired_current_head",
-    "foreign_completed_superseded_head",
-    "foreign_expired_superseded_head",
-    "orphaned_owner_missing",
-    "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence",
     "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement",
     "worktree_binding_mismatch",
 })
@@ -570,476 +551,6 @@ def _norm_path(value: str | None) -> str:
     return os.path.normpath(text.rstrip("/"))
 
 
-def _normalize_verdict(value: str | None) -> str:
-    text = (value or "").strip().upper().replace("-", "_").replace(" ", "_")
-    if text in {"REQUESTCHANGES", "REQUEST_CHANGES", "CHANGES_REQUESTED"}:
-        return "REQUEST_CHANGES"
-    if text in {"APPROVED", "APPROVE"}:
-        return "APPROVED"
-    return text
-
-
-def formal_terminal_review_for_head(
-    formal_reviews: list[dict] | None,
-    *,
-    leased_head: str | None,
-) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
-    """Return the latest undismissed terminal formal review for *leased_head*."""
-    head = _normalize_sha(leased_head)
-    if not head:
-        return None
-    matches: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
-    for review in formal_reviews or []:
-        if review.get("dismissed"):
-            continue
-        verdict = _normalize_verdict(
-            review.get("verdict") or review.get("state") or review.get("body_state")
-        )
-        if verdict not in {"APPROVED", "REQUEST_CHANGES"}:
-            continue
-        rhead = _normalize_sha(
-            review.get("reviewed_head_sha")
-            or review.get("commit_id")
-            or review.get("head_sha")
-        )
-        if rhead != head:
-            continue
-        matches.append({**review, "verdict": verdict, "reviewed_head_sha": rhead})
-    if not matches:
-        return None
-    return matches[-1]
-
-
-def find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
-    comments: list[dict],
-    *,
-    pr_number: int,
-    now: datetime | None = None,
-    include_expired: bool = True,
-) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
-    """Newest non-terminal lease marker, optionally including expired ones (#691).
-
-    Unlike ``find_active_reviewer_lease``, this retains expired non-terminal
-    markers so diagnosis/cleanup can still name the obsolete lease after
-    ``expires_at`` (comment-backed ledger; no control-plane ``lease_id``).
-    """
-    now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
-    entries = list(reversed(_lease_entries(comments, pr_number=pr_number)))
-    for entry in entries:
-        phase = (entry.get("phase") or "").strip().lower()
-        if phase in _TERMINAL_PHASES:
-            # Newest terminal ends the ledger chain for active acquisition, but
-            # an older non-terminal is not "active". Stop at newest marker.
-            return None
-        expired = _lease_expired(entry, now=now)
-        if expired and not include_expired:
-            return None
-        lease = dict(entry)
-        lease["freshness"] = classify_lease_freshness(lease, now=now)
-        lease["expired"] = expired
-        return lease
-    return None
-
-
-def cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number: int) -> str:
-    return f"{CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_CONFIRMATION_PREFIX}{int(pr_number)}"
-
-
-def assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
-    comments: list[dict],
-    *,
-    pr_number: int,
-    current_head_sha: str | None,
-    formal_reviews: list[dict] | None = None,
-    repo: str | None = None,
-    expected_repo: str | None = None,
-    requesting_session_id: str | None = None,
-    controller_recovery_authorized: bool = False,
-    worktree_exists: bool | None = None,
-    worktree_clean: bool | None = None,
-    worktree_has_unpreserved_work: bool | None = None,
-    owner_process_alive: bool | None = None,
-    owner_pid_observed: int | None = None,
-    requesting_pid: int | None = None,
-    current_head_review_in_progress: bool = False,
-    expected_lease_comment_id: int | None = None,
-    expected_session_id: str | None = None,
-    expected_leased_head: str | None = None,
-    confirmation: str | None = None,
-    apply: bool = False,
-    now: datetime | None = None,
-) -> dict[str, Any]:
-    """Guarded cleanup eligibility for obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases (#691).
-
-    Cleanup is never transfer/adoption/repoint and never uses PID equality as
-    ownership. Eligible only when evidence proves the lease is past expiry and/or
-    pinned to a superseded head with a completed formal terminal review, and
-    every safety boundary holds.
-    """
-    now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
-    reasons: list[str] = []
-    fail_closed_reasons: list[str] = []
-    current_head = _normalize_sha(current_head_sha)
-    req_session = (requesting_session_id or "").strip()
-
-    lease = find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
-        comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now, include_expired=True
-    )
-    if not lease:
-        # Fall back to active finder (unexpired only) for report consistency.
-        lease = find_active_reviewer_lease(comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now)
-
-    classification = "no_lease"
-    cleanup_allowed = False
-    release_body: str | None = None
-    audit_comment_body: str | None = None
-    terminal_review = None
-    leased_head = None
-    head_superseded = False
-    past_expiry = False
-    expires_parseable = True
-
-    if not lease:
-        fail_closed_reasons.append(
-            f"PR #{pr_number}: no non-terminal comment-backed reviewer lease to clean"
-        )
-        classification = "no_lease"
-    else:
-        leased_head = _normalize_sha(lease.get("candidate_head"))
-        expires_raw = lease.get("expires_at")
-        expires_at = _parse_timestamp(expires_raw)
-        if expires_raw and expires_at is None:
-            expires_parseable = False
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "lease expires_at cannot be parsed or trusted (fail closed)"
-            )
-        past_expiry = bool(expires_at and expires_at <= now)
-        freshness = lease.get("freshness") or classify_lease_freshness(lease, now=now)
-        owner_session = (lease.get("session_id") or "").strip()
-        is_requesting_owner = bool(
-            req_session and owner_session and req_session == owner_session
-        )
-
-        # Identity pins (repo / PR / session / head / comment) must match when
-        # the caller supplies expected evidence.
-        lease_repo = (lease.get("repo") or "").strip()
-        exp_repo = (expected_repo or repo or "").strip()
-        if exp_repo and lease_repo and exp_repo != lease_repo:
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                f"repository identity mismatch: lease repo={lease_repo!r} "
-                f"expected={exp_repo!r}"
-            )
-        if lease.get("pr_number") not in (None, pr_number):
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                f"PR identity mismatch: lease pr={lease.get('pr_number')} "
-                f"requested={pr_number}"
-            )
-        if expected_lease_comment_id is not None:
-            cid = lease.get("comment_id")
-            if cid is None or int(cid) != int(expected_lease_comment_id):
-                fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                    "lease comment_id does not match expected evidence "
-                    f"(lease={cid}, expected={expected_lease_comment_id})"
-                )
-        if expected_session_id:
-            if owner_session != expected_session_id.strip():
-                fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                    "lease session_id does not match expected evidence "
-                    f"(lease={owner_session}, expected={expected_session_id})"
-                )
-        if expected_leased_head:
-            exp_head = _normalize_sha(expected_leased_head)
-            if not exp_head or exp_head != leased_head:
-                fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                    "leased head does not match expected evidence "
-                    f"(lease={leased_head}, expected={exp_head})"
-                )
-
-        # PID equality is never ownership proof (#691).
-        if (
-            owner_pid_observed is not None
-            and requesting_pid is not None
-            and int(owner_pid_observed) == int(requesting_pid)
-        ):
-            reasons.append(
-                "observed PID equals requesting PID but PID equality is NOT "
-                "ownership proof; ignored for authorization"
-            )
-
-        if is_requesting_owner:
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "requesting session owns the lease; use "
-                "gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease (owner path), not non-owner cleanup"
-            )
-
-        if current_head_review_in_progress:
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "a current-head review submission is in progress; cleanup denied"
-            )
-
-        if not current_head:
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "current PR head SHA missing or unparseable (fail closed)"
-            )
-        if not leased_head:
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "lease candidate_head missing or unparseable (fail closed)"
-            )
-
-        head_superseded = bool(
-            current_head and leased_head and current_head != leased_head
-        )
-        head_matches_current = bool(
-            current_head and leased_head and current_head == leased_head
-        )
-
-        terminal_review = formal_terminal_review_for_head(
-            formal_reviews, leased_head=leased_head
-        )
-        has_terminal = terminal_review is not None
-
-        # Worktree safety.
-        if worktree_has_unpreserved_work is True or worktree_clean is False:
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "lease worktree is dirty or has unpreserved work; cleanup denied"
-            )
-        if (
-            worktree_exists is True
-            and worktree_clean is None
-            and worktree_has_unpreserved_work is None
-        ):
-            # Unknown cleanliness when path exists — fail closed.
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "lease worktree exists but cleanliness is unknown (fail closed)"
-            )
-
-        # Classification matrix (#691).
-        if head_matches_current and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"}:
-            classification = "foreign_active_current_head"
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "genuinely active foreign lease on the current PR head; "
-                "cleanup denied (fail closed)"
-            )
-        elif head_matches_current and past_expiry:
-            classification = "foreign_expired_current_head"
-            # Expired on current head: owner-missing / orphan path may apply.
-            if owner_process_alive is True:
-                fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                    "lease expired on current head but owner process still alive "
-                    "with plausible activity; cleanup denied"
-                )
-            elif worktree_clean is False:
-                fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                    "owner process absent but worktree dirty; cleanup denied"
-                )
-            elif owner_process_alive is False and (
-                worktree_clean is True or worktree_exists is False
-            ):
-                if controller_recovery_authorized:
-                    classification = "orphaned_owner_missing"
-                else:
-                    fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                        "controller/recovery capability not authorized for orphan cleanup"
-                    )
-            else:
-                fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                    "insufficient orphan evidence for expired current-head lease "
-                    "(need owner_process_alive=false and clean/absent worktree)"
-                )
-        elif head_superseded and has_terminal and past_expiry:
-            classification = "foreign_expired_superseded_head"
-        elif head_superseded and has_terminal and not past_expiry:
-            classification = "foreign_completed_superseded_head"
-        elif head_superseded and not has_terminal:
-            classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "lease head is superseded but no formal terminal review exists "
-                "for the leased head (fail closed)"
-            )
-        elif not head_superseded and not past_expiry and freshness in {
-            "active", "stale_warning"
-        }:
-            classification = "foreign_active_current_head"
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "foreign lease still active on current head; wait or use owner release"
-            )
-        elif past_expiry and not head_superseded:
-            classification = "foreign_expired_current_head"
-        else:
-            classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "lease evidence is ambiguous; cleanup denied (fail closed)"
-            )
-
-        # Recent owner progress on a non-superseded active lease blocks cleanup.
-        minutes = _minutes_since_activity(lease, now=now)
-        if (
-            head_matches_current
-            and freshness == "active"
-            and minutes is not None
-            and minutes < STALE_WARNING_MINUTES
-        ):
-            fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                "owner session has recent authenticated progress on current head; "
-                "cleanup denied"
-            )
-
-        # Authority + confirmation for apply.
-        if not controller_recovery_authorized:
-            if classification in {
-                "foreign_completed_superseded_head",
-                "foreign_expired_superseded_head",
-                "foreign_expired_current_head",
-                "orphaned_owner_missing",
-            }:
-                fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                    "controller/recovery capability required "
-                    "(controller_recovery_authorized=true)"
-                )
-
-        expected_conf = cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number)
-        if apply:
-            if (confirmation or "").strip() != expected_conf:
-                fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                    f"confirmation must equal exactly {expected_conf!r}"
-                )
-
-        # Superseded + terminal path does not require past_expiry (AC1).
-        eligible_class = classification in {
-            "foreign_completed_superseded_head",
-            "foreign_expired_superseded_head",
-            "orphaned_owner_missing",
-            "foreign_expired_current_head",
-        }
-        # foreign_expired_current_head needs orphan/clean worktree + authority.
-        if classification == "foreign_expired_current_head":
-            if worktree_clean is not True and worktree_exists is not False:
-                if "worktree" not in " ".join(fail_closed_reasons):
-                    fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                        "expired current-head cleanup requires proven-clean "
-                        "worktree or absent worktree"
-                    )
-            if owner_process_alive is True:
-                fail_closed_reasons.append(
-                    "owner process still alive on expired current-head lease"
-                )
-
-        cleanup_allowed = (
-            eligible_class
-            and expires_parseable
-            and not fail_closed_reasons
-            and not is_requesting_owner
-        )
-
-        if cleanup_allowed:
-            release_body = format_lease_body(
-                repo=lease.get("repo") or exp_repo or "",
-                pr_number=pr_number,
-                issue_number=lease.get("issue_number"),
-                reviewer_identity=lease.get("reviewer_identity") or "",
-                profile=lease.get("profile") or "unknown",
-                session_id=owner_session or "unknown",
-                worktree=lease.get("worktree") or "",
-                phase="released",
-                candidate_head=leased_head,
-                target_branch=lease.get("target_branch") or "master",
-                target_branch_sha=lease.get("target_branch_sha"),
-                last_activity=now,
-                blocker="obsolete-superseded-or-expired-lease",
-            )
-            audit_comment_body = (
-                "## Canonical obsolete reviewer lease cleanup (#691)\n\n"
-                f"- pr: #{pr_number}\n"
-                f"- lease_comment_id: {lease.get('comment_id')}\n"
-                f"- session_id: {owner_session}\n"
-                f"- leased_head: {leased_head}\n"
-                f"- current_head: {current_head}\n"
-                f"- expires_at: {lease.get('expires_at')}\n"
-                f"- classification: {classification}\n"
-                f"- terminal_review_verdict: "
-                f"{(terminal_review or {}).get('verdict')}\n"
-                f"- tool: {CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL}\n"
-                "- action: posted terminal phase=released lease marker; "
-                "did not transfer validation, decision, or workflow proof; "
-                "did not repoint lease to the new head; did not delete history\n"
-            )
-            reasons.append(
-                f"cleanup eligible ({classification}); post terminal released "
-                "marker via sanctioned tool"
-            )
-        else:
-            reasons.extend(fail_closed_reasons)
-
-    return {
-        "pr_number": pr_number,
-        "classification": classification,
-        "blocker_kind": classification if not cleanup_allowed else "none",
-        "cleanup_allowed": cleanup_allowed,
-        "mutation_allowed": False,  # never grants review mutation
-        "mutation_eligibility": "prohibited" if not cleanup_allowed else "cleanup_only",
-        "exact_next_action": (
-            NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
-            if cleanup_allowed
-            else (
-                NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
-                if classification
-                in {
-                    "foreign_active_current_head",
-                    "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence",
-                }
-                else NEXT_ACTION_OPERATOR_AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP
-            )
-        ),
-        "cleanup_tool": CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL,
-        "required_confirmation": cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number),
-        "leased_head": leased_head,
-        "current_head": current_head,
-        "head_superseded": head_superseded,
-        "past_expiry": past_expiry,
-        "expires_at": (lease or {}).get("expires_at") if lease else None,
-        "expires_parseable": expires_parseable,
-        "terminal_review": terminal_review,
-        "terminal_review_present": terminal_review is not None,
-        "worktree_state": {
-            "path": (lease or {}).get("worktree") if lease else None,
-            "exists": worktree_exists,
-            "clean": worktree_clean,
-            "has_unpreserved_work": worktree_has_unpreserved_work,
-        },
-        "owner_session_evidence": {
-            "session_id": (lease or {}).get("session_id") if lease else None,
-            "reviewer_identity": (
-                (lease or {}).get("reviewer_identity") if lease else None
-            ),
-            "process_alive": owner_process_alive,
-            "pid_observed": owner_pid_observed,
-            "pid_is_not_ownership_proof": True,
-            "requesting_session_is_owner": bool(
-                lease
-                and req_session
-                and (lease.get("session_id") or "").strip() == req_session
-            ),
-        },
-        "active_lease": lease,
-        "release_body": release_body,
-        "audit_comment_body": audit_comment_body,
-        "controller_recovery_authorized": controller_recovery_authorized,
-        "reasons": reasons if reasons else fail_closed_reasons,
-        "fail_closed_reasons": fail_closed_reasons,
-        "forbidden": [
-            "manual comment deletion",
-            "database edits",
-            "mtime manipulation",
-            "PID-based ownership",
-            "direct session-state seeding",
-            "lease stealing or adoption",
-            "repointing old lease to new head",
-            "transfer of validation or decision state",
-            "worktree reuse by replacement reviewer",
-        ],
-    }
-
-
 def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     comments: list[dict],
     *,
@@ -1050,50 +561,40 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     env_bound_worktree: str | None = None,
     instructed_session_id: str | None = None,
     instructed_comment_id: int | None = None,
-    current_head_sha: str | None = None,
-    formal_reviews: list[dict] | None = None,
-    worktree_exists: bool | None = None,
-    worktree_clean: bool | None = None,
-    owner_process_alive: bool | None = None,
     now: datetime | None = None,
 ) -> dict[str, Any]:
-    """Classify open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit a canonical next action (#599, #691).
+    """Classify open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit a canonical next action (#599).
 
     Read-only diagnosis. Never steals, releases, or adopts a foreign lease.
     Fail-closed acquisition rules for active foreign leases remain intact.
 
     Returns a structured diagnosis with:
-    - classification (including #691 superseded/expired distinctions)
-    - next_action (including cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease)
+    - classification
+    - next_action (one of wait / resume_exact_owner_session /
+      release_expired_lease / operator_authorized_cleanup /
+      repair_worktree_binding / acquire)
     - active_lease identity fields when present
     - worktree_binding match result
     - instructed-lease mismatch flags
-    - cleanup tool/confirmation when cleanup-eligible
     """
     now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
     session_id = (current_session_id or "").strip()
     identity = (current_reviewer_identity or "").strip()
     instructed_sid = (instructed_session_id or "").strip()
     reasons: list[str] = []
-    current_head = _normalize_sha(current_head_sha)
 
     active = find_active_reviewer_lease(comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now)
-    # Also surface expired non-terminal newest marker for #691 diagnosis.
-    newest_nt = find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
-        comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now, include_expired=True
-    )
-    lease_for_class = active or newest_nt
     session_lease = get_session_lease()
 
     # Worktree binding: env-bound vs proposed vs active lease worktree.
     env_wt = _norm_path(env_bound_worktree)
     prop_wt = _norm_path(proposed_worktree)
-    lease_wt = _norm_path((lease_for_class or {}).get("worktree") if lease_for_class else None)
+    lease_wt = _norm_path((active or {}).get("worktree") if active else None)
     binding_mismatch = False
     binding_details: dict[str, Any] = {
         "env_bound_worktree": env_bound_worktree or None,
         "proposed_worktree": proposed_worktree or None,
-        "lease_worktree": (lease_for_class or {}).get("worktree") if lease_for_class else None,
+        "lease_worktree": (active or {}).get("worktree") if active else None,
         "match": True,
     }
     paths = [p for p in (env_wt, prop_wt, lease_wt) if p]
@@ -1107,13 +608,13 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     # Instructed lease gone while a different lease is active (PR #592-style).
     instructed_missing_with_replacement = False
     if instructed_sid or instructed_comment_id is not None:
-        if not lease_for_class:
+        if not active:
             reasons.append(
                 "instructed lease is gone and no active replacement lease remains"
             )
         else:
-            owner = (lease_for_class.get("session_id") or "").strip()
-            cid = lease_for_class.get("comment_id")
+            owner = (active.get("session_id") or "").strip()
+            cid = active.get("comment_id")
             sid_mismatch = bool(instructed_sid and owner and owner != instructed_sid)
             cid_mismatch = (
                 instructed_comment_id is not None
@@ -1130,94 +631,35 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     # Classification + next_action.
     classification = "no_lease"
     next_action = NEXT_ACTION_ACQUIRE
-    cleanup_hint: dict[str, Any] | None = None
 
-    if lease_for_class:
-        owner = (lease_for_class.get("session_id") or "").strip()
-        freshness = lease_for_class.get("freshness") or classify_lease_freshness(
-            lease_for_class, now=now
+    if active:
+        owner = (active.get("session_id") or "").strip()
+        freshness = active.get("freshness") or classify_lease_freshness(
+            active, now=now
         )
-        owner_identity = (lease_for_class.get("reviewer_identity") or "").strip()
+        owner_identity = (active.get("reviewer_identity") or "").strip()
         is_own = bool(session_id and owner and owner == session_id)
         # Same identity alone is NOT ownership for resume; session_id must match.
         same_identity = bool(
             identity and owner_identity and identity == owner_identity
         )
-        leased_head = _normalize_sha(lease_for_class.get("candidate_head"))
-        head_superseded = bool(
-            current_head and leased_head and current_head != leased_head
-        )
-        head_current = bool(
-            current_head and leased_head and current_head == leased_head
-        )
-        past_expiry = bool(lease_for_class.get("expired")) or freshness == "expired"
-        if not past_expiry:
-            past_expiry = _lease_expired(lease_for_class, now=now)
-        terminal = formal_terminal_review_for_head(
-            formal_reviews, leased_head=leased_head
-        )
 
-        if is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"} and not past_expiry:
+        if is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"}:
             classification = "own_active"
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_RESUME_EXACT_OWNER_SESSION
-        elif is_own and (freshness in {"reclaimable", "expired"} or past_expiry):
+        elif is_own and freshness in {"reclaimable", "expired"}:
             classification = "own_expired"
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_RELEASE_EXPIRED_LEASE
             reasons.append(
                 f"own lease freshness is '{freshness}'; release via "
                 "gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease then re-acquire"
             )
-        elif not is_own and head_superseded and terminal and past_expiry:
-            classification = "foreign_expired_superseded_head"
-            next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
-            reasons.append(
-                "foreign lease expired and pinned to superseded head with "
-                "formal terminal review; use guarded obsolete-lease cleanup"
-            )
-        elif not is_own and head_superseded and terminal and not past_expiry:
-            classification = "foreign_completed_superseded_head"
-            next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
-            reasons.append(
-                "foreign lease pinned to superseded head with completed formal "
-                "review; use guarded obsolete-lease cleanup (do not wait indefinitely)"
-            )
-        elif not is_own and head_superseded and not terminal:
-            classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
-            next_action = NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
-            reasons.append(
-                "lease head superseded but no formal terminal review for leased "
-                "head; fail closed / wait (no indefinite steal)"
-            )
-        elif not is_own and head_current and past_expiry:
-            classification = "foreign_expired_current_head"
-            if owner_process_alive is False and worktree_clean is True:
-                classification = "orphaned_owner_missing"
-                next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
-                reasons.append(
-                    "foreign expired lease on current head; owner process absent "
-                    "and worktree clean — guarded orphan cleanup eligible"
-                )
-            elif owner_process_alive is False and worktree_clean is False:
-                classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
-                next_action = NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
-                reasons.append(
-                    "owner process absent but worktree dirty; cleanup denied"
-                )
-            else:
-                next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
-                reasons.append(
-                    "foreign expired lease on current head; use guarded cleanup "
-                    "when worktree/process evidence permits"
-                )
-        elif not is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"} and not past_expiry:
-            classification = (
-                "foreign_active_current_head" if head_current or not current_head
-                else "foreign_active"
-            )
+        elif not is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"}:
+            classification = "foreign_active"
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
             reasons.append(
                 f"foreign active reviewer lease (session_id={owner}, "
-                f"phase={lease_for_class.get('phase')}, freshness={freshness}); "
+                f"phase={active.get('phase')}, freshness={freshness}); "
                 "do not submit; do not steal"
             )
             if same_identity:
@@ -1232,12 +674,11 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
                 f"foreign reclaimable lease (session_id={owner}); clear only via "
                 "sanctioned gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease when reclaimable"
             )
-        elif not is_own and (freshness == "expired" or past_expiry):
+        elif not is_own and freshness == "expired":
             classification = "foreign_expired"
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_RELEASE_EXPIRED_LEASE
             reasons.append(
-                f"foreign expired lease (session_id={owner}); use sanctioned release "
-                f"or {CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL}"
+                f"foreign expired lease (session_id={owner}); use sanctioned release"
             )
         else:
             classification = "foreign_active"
@@ -1250,26 +691,13 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         if instructed_missing_with_replacement and classification.startswith(
             "foreign"
         ):
-            # Preserve #691 cleanup path when superseded/expired; otherwise
-            # keep the PR #592 instructed-missing label.
-            if next_action != NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE:
-                classification = "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement"
-                if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_WAIT:
-                    reasons.append(
-                        "replacement foreign lease is active — wait; "
-                        "operator_authorized_cleanup only with explicit operator authority"
-                    )
-
-        if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE:
-            cleanup_hint = {
-                "cleanup_tool": CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL,
-                "required_confirmation": cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number),
-                "controller_recovery_authorized_required": True,
-                "leased_head": leased_head,
-                "current_head": current_head,
-                "expires_at": lease_for_class.get("expires_at"),
-                "terminal_review_verdict": (terminal or {}).get("verdict"),
-            }
+            classification = "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement"
+            # Foreign active still means wait; reclaimable still release.
+            if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_WAIT:
+                reasons.append(
+                    "replacement foreign lease is active — wait; "
+                    "operator_authorized_cleanup only with explicit operator authority"
+                )
     else:
         classification = "no_lease"
         next_action = NEXT_ACTION_ACQUIRE
@@ -1292,55 +720,29 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
             )
 
     lease_summary = None
-    if lease_for_class:
+    if active:
         lease_summary = {
-            "comment_id": lease_for_class.get("comment_id"),
-            "session_id": lease_for_class.get("session_id"),
-            "phase": lease_for_class.get("phase"),
-            "candidate_head": lease_for_class.get("candidate_head"),
-            "expires_at": lease_for_class.get("expires_at"),
-            "last_activity": lease_for_class.get("last_activity"),
-            "freshness": lease_for_class.get("freshness")
-            or classify_lease_freshness(lease_for_class, now=now),
-            "reviewer_identity": lease_for_class.get("reviewer_identity"),
-            "profile": lease_for_class.get("profile"),
-            "worktree": lease_for_class.get("worktree"),
-            "blocker": lease_for_class.get("blocker"),
+            "comment_id": active.get("comment_id"),
+            "session_id": active.get("session_id"),
+            "phase": active.get("phase"),
+            "candidate_head": active.get("candidate_head"),
+            "expires_at": active.get("expires_at"),
+            "last_activity": active.get("last_activity"),
+            "freshness": active.get("freshness")
+            or classify_lease_freshness(active, now=now),
+            "reviewer_identity": active.get("reviewer_identity"),
+            "profile": active.get("profile"),
+            "worktree": active.get("worktree"),
+            "blocker": active.get("blocker"),
         }
 
     return {
         "pr_number": pr_number,
         "classification": classification,
-        "blocker_kind": classification,
         "next_action": next_action,
-        "exact_next_action": next_action,
         "active_lease": lease_summary,
         "session_lease": session_lease,
         "worktree_binding": binding_details,
-        "leased_head": (lease_summary or {}).get("candidate_head"),
-        "current_head": current_head,
-        "expires_at": (lease_summary or {}).get("expires_at"),
-        "terminal_review_state": (
-            formal_terminal_review_for_head(
-                formal_reviews,
-                leased_head=(lease_summary or {}).get("candidate_head"),
-            )
-            if lease_summary
-            else None
-        ),
-        "worktree_state": {
-            "exists": worktree_exists,
-            "clean": worktree_clean,
-            "path": (lease_summary or {}).get("worktree"),
-        },
-        "owner_session_evidence": {
-            "session_id": (lease_summary or {}).get("session_id"),
-            "process_alive": owner_process_alive,
-            "pid_is_not_ownership_proof": True,
-        },
-        "cleanup": cleanup_hint,
-        "cleanup_tool": (cleanup_hint or {}).get("cleanup_tool"),
-        "required_confirmation": (cleanup_hint or {}).get("required_confirmation"),
         "instructed_session_id": instructed_session_id,
         "instructed_comment_id": instructed_comment_id,
         "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement": instructed_missing_with_replacement,
@@ -1349,19 +751,6 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
             and not binding_mismatch
             and bool(session_lease)
         ),
-        "mutation_eligibility": (
-            "allowed"
-            if (
-                next_action == NEXT_ACTION_RESUME_EXACT_OWNER_SESSION
-                and not binding_mismatch
-                and bool(session_lease)
-            )
-            else (
-                "cleanup_only"
-                if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
-                else "prohibited"
-            )
-        ),
         "reasons": reasons,
         "forbidden": [
             "manual lock deletion",
@@ -1369,8 +758,5 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
             "mtime manipulation",
             "direct _SESSION_LEASE seeding",
             "silent foreign lease steal",
-            "PID-based ownership",
-            "repointing old lease to new head",
-            "transfer of validation or decision state",
         ],
     }

task_capability_map.py

@@ -76,16 +76,6 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
         "role": "reviewer",
     },
-    # #691: guarded non-owner cleanup of obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases.
-    # Apply path posts lease release + audit comments (gitea.pr.comment).
-    "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease": {
-        "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
-        "role": "reviewer",
-    },
-    "gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease": {
-        "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
-        "role": "reviewer",
-    },
     "blind_pr_queue_review": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
         "role": "reviewer",

tests/test_audit_reconciliation_mode.py

@@ -27,7 +27,13 @@ from task_capability_map import required_permission, required_role
 
 DELETE_PROFILE = {
     "profile_name": "prgs-author-delete",
-    "allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
+    "role": "author",
+    "allowed_operations": [
+        "gitea.read",
+        "gitea.pr.create",
+        "gitea.branch.push",
+        "gitea.branch.delete",
+    ],
     "forbidden_operations": [],
     "audit_label": "prgs-author-delete",
 }

tests/test_branch_cleanup_guard.py

@@ -8,10 +8,33 @@ import branch_cleanup_guard as guard  # noqa: E402
 import mcp_server  # noqa: E402
 import task_capability_map  # noqa: E402
 from final_report_validator import assess_final_report_validator  # noqa: E402
-from mcp_server import gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch  # noqa: E402
+from mcp_server import gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch, gitea_delete_branch  # noqa: E402
 
 FAKE_AUTH = "token fake"
 
+# Reconciler-shaped profile that holds branch.delete (recommended) plus
+# required pr.close/read so _role_kind classifies as reconciler.
+RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE = {
+    "profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
+    "role": "reconciler",
+    "allowed_operations": [
+        "gitea.read",
+        "gitea.pr.close",
+        "gitea.pr.comment",
+        "gitea.issue.comment",
+        "gitea.issue.close",
+        "gitea.branch.delete",
+    ],
+    "forbidden_operations": [
+        "gitea.pr.approve",
+        "gitea.pr.merge",
+        "gitea.pr.review",
+        "gitea.pr.create",
+        "gitea.branch.push",
+        "gitea.repo.commit",
+    ],
+}
+
 
 class TestRawBranchDeleteGuard(unittest.TestCase):
     def test_detects_local_and_remote_raw_git_delete_commands(self):
@@ -93,14 +116,48 @@ class TestMergedPrBranchCleanupTool(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertEqual(res["required_permission"], "gitea.branch.delete")
         self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
 
+    def test_author_and_merger_without_delete_authority_fail_closed(self):
+        role_profiles = {
+            "author": [
+                "gitea.read",
+                "gitea.branch.create",
+                "gitea.branch.push",
+                "gitea.repo.commit",
+                "gitea.pr.create",
+            ],
+            "merger": ["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.merge"],
+        }
+        for name, allowed in role_profiles.items():
+            with self.subTest(role=name):
+                profile_patch = patch(
+                    "mcp_server.get_profile",
+                    return_value={
+                        "profile_name": name,
+                        "allowed_operations": allowed,
+                        "forbidden_operations": [],
+                    },
+                )
+                profile_patch.start()
+                try:
+                    res = gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
+                        pr_number=487,
+                        confirmation="CLEANUP MERGED PR 487 BRANCH feat/branch",
+                        branch="feat/branch",
+                        remote="prgs",
+                        worktree_path="/tmp/repo/branches/cleanup",
+                    )
+                finally:
+                    profile_patch.stop()
+                self.assertFalse(res["performed"])
+                self.assertEqual(
+                    res["required_permission"], "gitea.branch.delete"
+                )
+                self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
+
     def test_root_checkout_cleanup_fails_closed(self):
         patch(
             "mcp_server.get_profile",
-            return_value={
-                "profile_name": "branch-cleanup",
-                "allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
-                "forbidden_operations": [],
-            },
+            return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
         ).start()
         res = gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
             pr_number=487,
@@ -117,11 +174,7 @@ class TestMergedPrBranchCleanupTool(unittest.TestCase):
         branch = "feat/issue-485-lease-comments-non-list-guard"
         patch(
             "mcp_server.get_profile",
-            return_value={
-                "profile_name": "branch-cleanup",
-                "allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
-                "forbidden_operations": [],
-            },
+            return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
         ).start()
         self.mock_api.side_effect = [
             {
@@ -152,11 +205,7 @@ class TestMergedPrBranchCleanupTool(unittest.TestCase):
         branch = "feat/issue-485-lease-comments-non-list-guard"
         patch(
             "mcp_server.get_profile",
-            return_value={
-                "profile_name": "branch-cleanup",
-                "allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
-                "forbidden_operations": [],
-            },
+            return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
         ).start()
         self.mock_api.side_effect = [
             {
@@ -182,6 +231,168 @@ class TestMergedPrBranchCleanupTool(unittest.TestCase):
         ]
         self.assertFalse(delete_calls)
 
+    def test_reconciler_with_branch_delete_cannot_raw_delete(self):
+        """#687: reconciler + gitea.branch.delete still cannot call raw delete."""
+        patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_profile",
+            return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
+        ).start()
+        res = gitea_delete_branch(
+            branch="fix/issue-683-workflow-guard-hardening",
+            remote="prgs",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(res.get("success", True))
+        self.assertFalse(res.get("performed", True))
+        reasons = " ".join(res.get("reasons") or [])
+        self.assertIn("raw gitea_delete_branch", reasons)
+        self.assertIn("cleanup_merged_pr_branch", reasons)
+        self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_reconciler_raw_delete_denies_preservation_branch(self):
+        patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_profile",
+            return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
+        ).start()
+        res = gitea_delete_branch(
+            branch="chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip",
+            remote="prgs",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(res.get("performed", True))
+        self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_author_with_branch_delete_role_ok_but_preserve_blocked(self):
+        """Author role may use raw delete path when permitted; preserve fails closed."""
+        patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_profile",
+            return_value={
+                "profile_name": "prgs-author",
+                "role": "author",
+                "allowed_operations": [
+                    "gitea.read",
+                    "gitea.pr.create",
+                    "gitea.branch.push",
+                    "gitea.branch.delete",
+                ],
+                "forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge"],
+            },
+        ).start()
+        res = gitea_delete_branch(
+            branch="chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip",
+            remote="prgs",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(res.get("performed", True))
+        self.assertIn("preservation", " ".join(res.get("reasons") or []))
+        self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_unmerged_branch_cleanup_rejected(self):
+        branch = "feat/unmerged-work"
+        patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_profile",
+            return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
+        ).start()
+        self.mock_api.side_effect = [
+            {
+                "number": 999,
+                "merged": False,
+                "merged_at": None,
+                "head": {"ref": branch, "sha": "b" * 40},
+                "base": {"ref": "master"},
+            },
+            {},
+        ]
+        res = gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
+            pr_number=999,
+            confirmation=f"CLEANUP MERGED PR 999 BRANCH {branch}",
+            branch=branch,
+            remote="prgs",
+            worktree_path="/tmp/repo/branches/cleanup",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(res["performed"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("not merged" in r for r in (res.get("reasons") or []))
+        )
+        delete_calls = [
+            call for call in self.mock_api.call_args_list if call.args[0] == "DELETE"
+        ]
+        self.assertFalse(delete_calls)
+
+    def test_preservation_branch_cleanup_rejected(self):
+        branch = "chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip"
+        patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_profile",
+            return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
+        ).start()
+        self.mock_api.side_effect = [
+            {
+                "number": 681,
+                "merged": True,
+                "merged_at": "2026-07-08T01:00:00Z",
+                "head": {"ref": branch, "sha": "c" * 40},
+                "base": {"ref": "master"},
+            },
+            {},
+        ]
+        res = gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
+            pr_number=681,
+            confirmation=f"CLEANUP MERGED PR 681 BRANCH {branch}",
+            branch=branch,
+            remote="prgs",
+            worktree_path="/tmp/repo/branches/cleanup",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(res["performed"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("preservation" in r for r in (res.get("reasons") or []))
+        )
+        delete_calls = [
+            call for call in self.mock_api.call_args_list if call.args[0] == "DELETE"
+        ]
+        self.assertFalse(delete_calls)
+
+    def test_non_reconciler_with_delete_denied_cleanup(self):
+        patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_profile",
+            return_value={
+                "profile_name": "prgs-author",
+                "role": "author",
+                "allowed_operations": [
+                    "gitea.read",
+                    "gitea.pr.create",
+                    "gitea.branch.push",
+                    "gitea.branch.delete",
+                ],
+                "forbidden_operations": [],
+            },
+        ).start()
+        res = gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch(
+            pr_number=487,
+            confirmation="CLEANUP MERGED PR 487 BRANCH feat/branch",
+            branch="feat/branch",
+            remote="prgs",
+            worktree_path="/tmp/repo/branches/cleanup",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(res["performed"])
+        self.assertEqual(res.get("required_role_kind"), "reconciler")
+        self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_assess_guard_rejects_preservation_branch(self):
+        assessment = guard.assess_merged_pr_branch_cleanup(
+            pr_number=681,
+            head_branch="chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip",
+            merged=True,
+            remote_branch_exists=True,
+            open_pr_heads=set(),
+            head_on_target=True,
+            delete_capability_allowed=True,
+            confirmation=(
+                "CLEANUP MERGED PR 681 BRANCH "
+                "chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip"
+            ),
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(assessment["safe_to_delete"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("preservation" in r for r in assessment["block_reasons"])
+        )
+
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     unittest.main()

tests/test_issue_691_obsolete_reviewer_lease_cleanup.py

@@ -1,599 +0,0 @@
-"""Guarded cleanup for obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases (#691).
-
-Reproduces PR #688 lease comment 10749 class of defect: completed
-REQUEST_CHANGES on head A, author pushes head B, foreign lease remains
-pinned to A (and after expiry still has no non-owner cleanup path that
-diagnosis can prescribe beyond indefinite wait).
-"""
-
-from __future__ import annotations
-
-import sys
-import unittest
-from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
-from pathlib import Path
-from unittest.mock import patch
-
-sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
-
-import merger_lease_adoption as mla  # noqa: E402
-import reviewer_pr_lease as leases  # noqa: E402
-
-# PR #688 / comment 10749 reproduction fixtures
-HEAD_A = "c7a444eb4b41cf916fdbd20a4999ffd78af496d0"
-HEAD_B = "4a6357800364718a27a36ebc73578d4b929ff4aa"
-SESSION_FOREIGN = "25883-7d4c6e6ebd53"
-COMMENT_10749 = 10749
-REPO = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"
-PR = 688
-ISSUE = 687
-EXPIRES_10749 = "2026-07-13T04:23:00Z"
-
-
-def _utc(dt: datetime) -> datetime:
-    return dt if dt.tzinfo else dt.replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-
-
-def _lease_comment(
-    *,
-    pr_number: int = PR,
-    session_id: str = SESSION_FOREIGN,
-    phase: str = "claimed",
-    candidate_head: str = HEAD_A,
-    comment_id: int = COMMENT_10749,
-    last_activity: datetime | None = None,
-    expires_at: datetime | None = None,
-    worktree: str = "branches/review-pr688-feat-issue-687-reconciler-branch-delete",
-    repo: str = REPO,
-) -> dict:
-    now = last_activity or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
-    body = leases.format_lease_body(
-        repo=repo,
-        pr_number=pr_number,
-        issue_number=ISSUE,
-        reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
-        profile="prgs-reviewer",
-        session_id=session_id,
-        worktree=worktree,
-        phase=phase,
-        candidate_head=candidate_head,
-        target_branch="master",
-        target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
-        last_activity=now,
-        expires_at=expires_at,
-    )
-    return {
-        "id": comment_id,
-        "body": body,
-        "user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
-        "author": "sysadmin",
-        "created_at": now.isoformat(),
-        "updated_at": now.isoformat(),
-    }
-
-
-def _reviews_for_head(head: str, verdict: str = "REQUEST_CHANGES") -> list[dict]:
-    return [
-        {
-            "verdict": verdict,
-            "reviewed_head_sha": head,
-            "dismissed": False,
-            "reviewer": "sysadmin",
-        }
-    ]
-
-
-def _assess(
-    comments,
-    *,
-    current_head=HEAD_B,
-    formal_reviews=None,
-    controller=True,
-    worktree_exists=True,
-    worktree_clean=True,
-    owner_process_alive=False,
-    requesting_session="fresh-controller",
-    apply=False,
-    confirmation=None,
-    **kwargs,
-):
-    return leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
-        comments,
-        pr_number=PR,
-        current_head_sha=current_head,
-        formal_reviews=formal_reviews if formal_reviews is not None else _reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
-        repo=REPO,
-        expected_repo=REPO,
-        requesting_session_id=requesting_session,
-        controller_recovery_authorized=controller,
-        worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
-        worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
-        worktree_has_unpreserved_work=not worktree_clean if worktree_exists else False,
-        owner_process_alive=owner_process_alive,
-        owner_pid_observed=kwargs.get("owner_pid_observed"),
-        requesting_pid=kwargs.get("requesting_pid", 99999),
-        current_head_review_in_progress=kwargs.get(
-            "current_head_review_in_progress", False
-        ),
-        expected_lease_comment_id=kwargs.get("expected_lease_comment_id"),
-        expected_session_id=kwargs.get("expected_session_id"),
-        expected_leased_head=kwargs.get("expected_leased_head"),
-        confirmation=confirmation
-        if confirmation is not None
-        else (leases.cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(PR) if apply else ""),
-        apply=apply,
-        now=kwargs.get("now"),
-    )
-
-
-class TestIssue691SupersededHeadCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
-    def setUp(self):
-        leases.clear_session_lease()
-
-    def test_1_request_changes_then_push_expired_cleanup_succeeds(self):
-        """Completed REQUEST_CHANGES on A, push B, lease A expires → cleanup OK."""
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(
-            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=2),
-            expires_at=expires,
-        )
-        result = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
-            now=now,
-            apply=True,
-        )
-        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_expired_superseded_head")
-        self.assertEqual(
-            result["exact_next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
-        )
-        self.assertIn("phase: released", result["release_body"])
-        self.assertIn("obsolete-superseded-or-expired-lease", result["release_body"])
-        self.assertIsNotNone(result["audit_comment_body"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["cleanup_tool"], leases.CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL)
-
-    def test_2_approve_then_push_cleanup_policy(self):
-        """Completed APPROVE on A, push B → cleanup eligible (completed superseded)."""
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 1, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)  # not yet expired
-        claim = _lease_comment(
-            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=10),
-            expires_at=expires,
-        )
-        result = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "APPROVED"),
-            now=now,
-        )
-        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_completed_superseded_head")
-
-    def test_3_active_current_head_cleanup_denied(self):
-        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(
-            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
-            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=5),
-            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
-        )
-        result = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            current_head=HEAD_B,
-            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_B, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
-            now=now,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_active_current_head")
-
-    def test_4_foreign_owner_recent_progress_denied(self):
-        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(
-            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
-            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=2),
-            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
-        )
-        result = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            current_head=HEAD_B,
-            formal_reviews=[],
-            owner_process_alive=True,
-            now=now,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("recent authenticated progress" in r for r in result["reasons"])
-            or any("current PR head" in r for r in result["reasons"])
-        )
-
-    def test_5_owner_absent_worktree_dirty_denied(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(
-            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
-            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
-            expires_at=expires,
-        )
-        result = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            current_head=HEAD_B,
-            formal_reviews=[],
-            worktree_clean=False,
-            owner_process_alive=False,
-            now=now,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
-        self.assertTrue(any("dirty" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
-
-    def test_6_owner_absent_worktree_clean_orphan_ok(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(
-            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
-            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
-            expires_at=expires,
-        )
-        result = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            current_head=HEAD_B,
-            formal_reviews=[],
-            worktree_clean=True,
-            owner_process_alive=False,
-            now=now,
-        )
-        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "orphaned_owner_missing")
-
-    def test_7_pid_reuse_not_ownership(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
-        result = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            now=now,
-            owner_pid_observed=4242,
-            requesting_pid=4242,
-        )
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("PID equality" in r or "NOT ownership" in r for r in result["reasons"])
-            or result["owner_session_evidence"]["pid_is_not_ownership_proof"]
-        )
-        # Still eligible via superseded+terminal+expired despite matching PID.
-        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
-
-    def test_8_comment_backed_no_db_lease_id(self):
-        """Cleanup uses comment ledger only — no control-plane lease_id required."""
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
-        # Explicitly no lease_id field anywhere.
-        self.assertNotIn("lease_id", claim)
-        result = _assess([claim], now=now)
-        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["active_lease"]["comment_id"], COMMENT_10749)
-        self.assertIsNone(result["active_lease"].get("lease_id"))
-
-    def test_9_cleanup_posts_durable_audit_bodies(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
-        result = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
-        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"])
-        self.assertIn("#691", result["audit_comment_body"])
-        self.assertIn(str(COMMENT_10749), result["audit_comment_body"])
-        self.assertIn(HEAD_A, result["audit_comment_body"])
-        self.assertIn(HEAD_B, result["audit_comment_body"])
-
-    def test_10_fresh_acquire_after_cleanup_marker(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(
-            expires_at=expires,
-            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
-            comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
-        )
-        assessed = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
-        self.assertTrue(assessed["cleanup_allowed"])
-        release = {
-            "id": 99999,
-            "body": assessed["release_body"],
-            "user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
-        }
-        # Newest terminal marker ends active lease.
-        active = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease(
-            [claim, release], pr_number=PR, now=now
-        )
-        self.assertIsNone(active)
-        acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
-            [claim, release],
-            pr_number=PR,
-            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
-            profile="prgs-reviewer",
-            session_id="fresh-reviewer-1",
-            repo=REPO,
-            issue_number=ISSUE,
-            worktree="branches/review-pr-688-fresh",
-            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
-            target_branch="master",
-            target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
-            now=now,
-        )
-        self.assertTrue(acq["acquire_allowed"], acq["reasons"])
-
-    def test_11_no_validation_state_transfer(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
-        result = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
-        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"])
-        # Release body keeps old candidate_head (no repoint).
-        self.assertIn(f"candidate_head: {HEAD_A}", result["release_body"])
-        self.assertNotIn(HEAD_B, result["release_body"].split("candidate_head:")[1].split("\n")[0])
-        self.assertIn("did not transfer validation", result["audit_comment_body"])
-        self.assertIn("did not repoint", result["audit_comment_body"])
-        # Session lease must remain unset by assessment (tool never seeds).
-        self.assertIsNone(leases.get_session_lease())
-
-    def test_12_repeated_cleanup_idempotent(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
-        first = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
-        self.assertTrue(first["cleanup_allowed"])
-        release = {"id": 100001, "body": first["release_body"], "user": {"login": "x"}}
-        second = _assess([claim, release], now=now, apply=True)
-        self.assertFalse(second["cleanup_allowed"])
-        self.assertEqual(second["classification"], "no_lease")
-
-    def test_13_malformed_expiry_fails_closed(self):
-        claim = _lease_comment()
-        # Corrupt expires_at in the body.
-        claim["body"] = claim["body"].replace(
-            claim["body"].split("expires_at:")[1].split("\n")[0].strip(),
-            "not-a-timestamp",
-        )
-        result = _assess([claim], formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A))
-        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["expires_parseable"])
-        self.assertTrue(any("expires_at" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
-
-    def test_14_wrong_identity_evidence_fails_closed(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
-        bad_repo = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            now=now,
-            # force repo mismatch via expected_repo
-        )
-        # Patch via direct call with wrong expected_repo
-        bad = leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
-            [claim],
-            pr_number=PR,
-            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
-            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
-            expected_repo="Other-Org/Other-Repo",
-            requesting_session_id="fresh",
-            controller_recovery_authorized=True,
-            worktree_exists=True,
-            worktree_clean=True,
-            owner_process_alive=False,
-            now=now,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(bad["cleanup_allowed"])
-        self.assertTrue(any("repository identity" in r for r in bad["reasons"]))
-
-        bad_pr = leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
-            [claim],
-            pr_number=999,
-            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
-            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
-            expected_repo=REPO,
-            requesting_session_id="fresh",
-            controller_recovery_authorized=True,
-            worktree_exists=True,
-            worktree_clean=True,
-            owner_process_alive=False,
-            expected_lease_comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
-            now=now,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(bad_pr["cleanup_allowed"])
-
-        bad_head = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            now=now,
-            expected_leased_head="0" * 40,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(bad_head["cleanup_allowed"])
-
-        bad_session = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            now=now,
-            expected_session_id="wrong-session",
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(bad_session["cleanup_allowed"])
-
-    def test_15_current_head_active_cannot_be_displaced(self):
-        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(
-            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
-            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=1),
-            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
-        )
-        result = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            current_head=HEAD_B,
-            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_B),
-            now=now,
-            current_head_review_in_progress=True,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
-        # Acquire also blocked by foreign active lease.
-        acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
-            [claim],
-            pr_number=PR,
-            reviewer_identity="other",
-            profile="prgs-reviewer",
-            session_id="thief",
-            repo=REPO,
-            issue_number=ISSUE,
-            worktree="branches/steal",
-            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
-            target_branch="master",
-            target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
-            now=now,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(acq["acquire_allowed"])
-
-    def test_regression_pr688_comment_10749_after_expiry(self):
-        """Exact 10749 reproduction after recorded expires_at 2026-07-13T04:23:00Z."""
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 30, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime.fromisoformat(EXPIRES_10749.replace("Z", "+00:00"))
-        claim = _lease_comment(
-            session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
-            candidate_head=HEAD_A,
-            comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
-            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=2),
-            expires_at=expires,
-        )
-        # Diagnosis must not prescribe indefinite wait-only for this case.
-        diag = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
-            [claim],
-            pr_number=PR,
-            current_session_id="fresh-reviewer",
-            current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
-            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
-            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
-            worktree_exists=True,
-            worktree_clean=True,
-            owner_process_alive=False,
-            instructed_session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
-            instructed_comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
-            now=now,
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(diag["classification"], "foreign_expired_superseded_head")
-        self.assertEqual(
-            diag["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(diag["cleanup_tool"], leases.CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL)
-        self.assertIn("CLEANUP OBSOLETE REVIEWER LEASE 688", diag["required_confirmation"])
-        self.assertEqual(diag["mutation_eligibility"], "cleanup_only")
-        self.assertFalse(diag["mutation_allowed"])
-
-        # Assessment still returns the lease as active/stale class of block for acquire
-        # when unexpired path... here it's expired so find_active is None; acquire free
-        # only after cleanup if somehow still active. With expired, find_active is None:
-        active = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease([claim], pr_number=PR, now=now)
-        self.assertIsNone(active)
-
-        # But superseded unexpired still blocks acquire and diagnosis points to cleanup:
-        unexpired_now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 1, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim2 = _lease_comment(
-            session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
-            candidate_head=HEAD_A,
-            comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
-            last_activity=unexpired_now - timedelta(minutes=45),
-            expires_at=expires,
-        )
-        active2 = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease(
-            [claim2], pr_number=PR, now=unexpired_now
-        )
-        self.assertIsNotNone(active2)
-        self.assertEqual(active2["freshness"], "stale_warning")
-        diag2 = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
-            [claim2],
-            pr_number=PR,
-            current_session_id="fresh-reviewer",
-            current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
-            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
-            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
-            worktree_exists=True,
-            worktree_clean=True,
-            now=unexpired_now,
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(diag2["classification"], "foreign_completed_superseded_head")
-        self.assertEqual(
-            diag2["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
-        )
-        acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
-            [claim2],
-            pr_number=PR,
-            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
-            profile="prgs-reviewer",
-            session_id="fresh-reviewer",
-            repo=REPO,
-            issue_number=ISSUE,
-            worktree="branches/review-pr-688-new",
-            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
-            target_branch="master",
-            target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
-            now=unexpired_now,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(acq["acquire_allowed"])
-
-    def test_missing_controller_auth_denied(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
-        result = _assess([claim], controller=False, now=now)
-        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
-
-    def test_wrong_confirmation_denied_on_apply(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
-        result = _assess(
-            [claim], now=now, apply=True, confirmation="MERGE PR 688"
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
-        self.assertTrue(any("confirmation" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
-
-    def test_owner_session_must_use_owner_release(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
-        result = _assess(
-            [claim],
-            now=now,
-            requesting_session=SESSION_FOREIGN,
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
-        self.assertTrue(any("owns the lease" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
-
-    def test_superseded_without_terminal_review_denied(self):
-        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
-        result = _assess([claim], formal_reviews=[], now=now)
-        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence")
-
-
-class TestIssue691DiagnoseClassifications(unittest.TestCase):
-    def setUp(self):
-        leases.clear_session_lease()
-
-    def test_foreign_active_current_head_still_wait(self):
-        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
-        claim = _lease_comment(
-            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
-            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=5),
-            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=1),
-        )
-        claim["id"] = 1
-        result = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
-            [claim],
-            pr_number=PR,
-            current_session_id="other",
-            current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
-            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
-            formal_reviews=[],
-            now=now,
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_active_current_head")
-        self.assertEqual(result["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_WAIT)
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_allowed"])
-
-
-if __name__ == "__main__":
-    unittest.main()

tests/test_issue_698_report_validator_schema_alignment.py

@@ -1,461 +0,0 @@
-"""Regression tests for #698: final-report validator vs canonical schema.
-
-Covers the original #698 lead plus the independent reproduction recorded
-during the PR #703 formal review (issue #698 comment 11246):
-
-1. non-dict ``action_log`` entries must fail structured, never crash;
-2. the validator must not demand legacy fields the canonical schema forbids
-   (``Pinned reviewed head``, ``Scratch worktree used``, ``Worktree path``,
-   ``Worktree dirty``, ``Mutations``, ``Next``);
-3. a legitimately blocked report (``Candidate head SHA: none``, no formal
-   verdict) must not owe approval/merge live-head proofs;
-4. canonical reviewer lease release must not be misclassified as post-merge
-   cleanup;
-5. structured workflow-load and validation proof must be recognized;
-6. review mutations are inferred only from authoritative evidence.
-"""
-
-from __future__ import annotations
-
-import sys
-import unittest
-from pathlib import Path
-
-sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
-
-import final_report_validator as frv  # noqa: E402
-import post_merge_cleanup_proof as pmcp  # noqa: E402
-import pr_work_lease as pwl  # noqa: E402
-import review_proofs as rp  # noqa: E402
-from review_final_report_schema import (  # noqa: E402
-    assess_review_final_report_schema,
-)
-
-REVIEWED_HEAD = "a" * 40
-LIVE_HEAD = "a" * 40
-
-
-def _pr703_style_report(
-    *,
-    decision: str = "request_changes",
-    cleanup_mutations: str = (
-        "released reviewer PR lease via gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease "
-        "(terminal lease marker phase=released posted)"
-    ),
-) -> str:
-    """Canonical-schema report modeled on the PR #703 formal review handoff."""
-    return f"""
-Formal review completed with a REQUEST_CHANGES verdict submitted and read
-back via the native review API.
-
-## Controller Handoff
-
-- Task: review-merge-pr
-- Repo: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools
-- Role: reviewer
-- Identity: sysadmin / prgs-reviewer
-- Active profile: prgs-reviewer
-- Runtime context: neutral workspace binding
-- Selected PR: 703
-- Linked issue: #702 open
-- Eligibility class: reviewable
-- Queue ordering policy: oldest eligible first
-- Inventory pagination proof: has_more=false, total_count=8
-- Earlier PRs skipped: none
-- Candidate head SHA: {REVIEWED_HEAD}
-- Reviewed head SHA: {REVIEWED_HEAD}
-- Target branch: master
-- Target branch SHA: {"2" * 40}
-- Already-landed gate: not landed
-- Author-safety result: pass (author differs from reviewer)
-- Prior request-changes state: none
-- Review worktree used: true
-- Review worktree path: branches/review-pr-703-independent
-- Review worktree inside branches: true
-- Review worktree HEAD state: detached at pinned head
-- Review worktree dirty before validation: clean
-- Review worktree dirty after validation: clean
-- Baseline worktree used: false
-- Baseline worktree path: none
-- Files reviewed: 4
-- Validation: focused 50 passed; related 94 passed; full 2665 passed, 6 skipped
-- Official validation integrity status: intact
-- Terminal review mutation: one REQUEST_CHANGES review submitted and read back
-- Review decision: {decision}
-- Merge preflight: not run
-- Merge result: none
-- Linked issue status: open (live fetch proof: gitea_view_issue)
-- Main checkout branch: master
-- Main checkout dirty state: clean
-- Main checkout updated: false
-- File edits by reviewer: none
-- Worktree/index mutations: none
-- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs (recorded)
-- MCP/Gitea mutations: review submission and lease comments only
-- Review mutations: one formal REQUEST_CHANGES verdict
-- Merge mutations: none
-- Cleanup mutations: {cleanup_mutations}
-- External-state mutations: none
-- Read-only diagnostics: gitea_view_pr, gitea_get_pr_review_feedback
-- Blockers: findings F1-F6 recorded on the PR thread
-- Current status: review complete; author remediation required
-- Safe next action: author addresses findings and pushes a new head
-- Safety statement: no merge attempted; no self-review; no root-checkout edits
-- Workflow-load helper result: workflow_hash=da045d1e1f1f boundary_status=clean
-- Live head SHA before approval: {LIVE_HEAD}
-- Pushes occurred during validation: no
-"""
-
-
-def _blocked_preflight_report() -> str:
-    """Blocked-run report modeled on the #702 comment 11164 reproduction."""
-    return """
-Fresh review preflight stopped before any worktree or validation work.
-
-## Controller Handoff
-
-- Task: review-merge-pr
-- Repo: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools
-- Role: reviewer
-- Identity: sysadmin / prgs-reviewer
-- Active profile: prgs-reviewer
-- Runtime context: stale workspace binding detected
-- Selected PR: 701
-- Linked issue: #699 open
-- Eligibility class: blocked-before-validation
-- Queue ordering policy: oldest eligible first
-- Inventory pagination proof: has_more=false, total_count=8
-- Earlier PRs skipped: none
-- Candidate head SHA: none
-- Reviewed head SHA: none
-- Target branch: master
-- Target branch SHA: none
-- Already-landed gate: not run
-- Author-safety result: not run
-- Prior request-changes state: none
-- Review worktree used: false
-- Review worktree path: none
-- Review worktree inside branches: not applicable
-- Review worktree HEAD state: not applicable
-- Review worktree dirty before validation: not applicable
-- Review worktree dirty after validation: not applicable
-- Baseline worktree used: false
-- Baseline worktree path: none
-- Files reviewed: 0
-- Validation: not run
-- Official validation integrity status: not applicable
-- Terminal review mutation: none
-- Review decision: none
-- Merge preflight: not run
-- Merge result: none
-- Linked issue status: open (live fetch proof: gitea_view_issue)
-- Main checkout branch: master
-- Main checkout dirty state: clean
-- Main checkout updated: false
-- File edits by reviewer: none
-- Worktree/index mutations: none
-- Git ref mutations: none
-- MCP/Gitea mutations: none
-- Review mutations: none
-- Merge mutations: none
-- Cleanup mutations: none
-- External-state mutations: none
-- Read-only diagnostics: gitea_view_pr, gitea_get_runtime_context
-- Blockers: runtime bound to a foreign task worktree; mutation prohibited
-- Current status: stopped before validation began
-- Next actor: operator
-- Next action: repair the runtime workspace binding, then rerun the full
-  review workflow in a fresh reviewer session
-- Next prompt: Act as REVIEWER for PR 701 after the operator repairs the
-  runtime binding; acquire the lease before any validation.
-- Safe next action: operator repairs runtime binding, then a fresh reviewer
-  reruns the full workflow
-- Safety statement: no lease acquired; no verdict recorded; no source edits
-- Workflow-load helper result: workflow_hash=da045d1e1f1f boundary_status=clean
-"""
-
-
-class TestActionLogRobustness(unittest.TestCase):
-    """#698 original lead: non-dict action_log must not crash validation."""
-
-    MALFORMED = [
-        "git fetch prgs",
-        42,
-        None,
-        {"action": "edit", "path": "x.py", "performed": True, "tracked": True},
-    ]
-
-    def test_assess_final_report_validator_survives_malformed_entries(self):
-        result = frv.assess_final_report_validator(
-            _pr703_style_report(),
-            "review_pr",
-            action_log=self.MALFORMED,
-        )
-        self.assertIsInstance(result, dict)
-        rule_ids = {f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]}
-        self.assertIn("shared.action_log_malformed", rule_ids)
-
-    def test_malformed_entry_errors_are_sanitized(self):
-        _entries, findings = frv.sanitize_action_log(["secret-token-abc123"])
-        self.assertEqual(len(findings), 1)
-        reason = findings[0]["reason"]
-        self.assertNotIn("secret-token-abc123", reason)
-        self.assertIn("str", reason)
-        self.assertIn("entry 0", reason)
-
-    def test_non_list_action_log_is_reported_not_raised(self):
-        entries, findings = frv.sanitize_action_log("not-a-list")
-        self.assertEqual(entries, [])
-        self.assertEqual(len(findings), 1)
-        self.assertIn("not a list", findings[0]["reason"])
-
-    def test_performed_file_mutations_skips_non_dict_entries(self):
-        performed = rp._performed_file_mutations(
-            ["oops", {"action": "edited", "path": "a.py"}]
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(len(performed), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(performed[0]["path"], "a.py")
-
-    def test_schema_entrypoint_survives_string_only_log(self):
-        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(
-            _pr703_style_report(),
-            action_log=["just a string", "another string"],
-        )
-        self.assertIsInstance(result, dict)
-
-
-class TestLegacyFieldRequirementsRemoved(unittest.TestCase):
-    """#698: prohibited legacy fields must not be REQUIRED of reports."""
-
-    PROHIBITED = (
-        "Pinned reviewed head",
-        "Scratch worktree used",
-        "Worktree path",
-        "Worktree dirty",
-        "Workspace mutations",
-        "Mutations",
-        "Next",
-        "Issue/PR",
-        "Branch/SHA",
-        "Files changed",
-    )
-
-    def test_review_role_field_table_has_no_prohibited_requirements(self):
-        names = [name for name, _ in rp.HANDOFF_ROLE_FIELDS["review"]]
-        for prohibited in ("Pinned reviewed head", "Scratch worktree used",
-                           "Worktree path", "Worktree dirty"):
-            self.assertNotIn(prohibited, names)
-
-    def test_merger_role_field_table_has_no_pinned_reviewed_head(self):
-        names = [name for name, _ in rp.HANDOFF_ROLE_FIELDS["merger"]]
-        self.assertNotIn("Pinned reviewed head", names)
-
-    def test_canonical_report_missing_fields_never_include_prohibited(self):
-        result = rp.assess_controller_handoff(
-            _pr703_style_report(), role="review"
-        )
-        for prohibited in self.PROHIBITED:
-            self.assertNotIn(prohibited, result.get("missing_fields") or [])
-
-    def test_canonical_pr703_report_satisfies_required_fields(self):
-        result = rp.assess_controller_handoff(
-            _pr703_style_report(), role="review"
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(result.get("missing_fields") or [], [])
-        self.assertEqual(result.get("verdict"), "complete")
-
-
-class TestBlockedReportAccepted(unittest.TestCase):
-    """#698: blocked run with no reviewed head / verdict is legitimate."""
-
-    def test_stale_head_proof_waived_before_validation(self):
-        result = pwl.assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(
-            _blocked_preflight_report()
-        )
-        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
-        self.assertEqual(result.get("phase"), "blocked_before_validation")
-
-    def test_blocked_report_passes_schema_validation(self):
-        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(_blocked_preflight_report())
-        blocking = [
-            f for f in result["findings"] if f["severity"] == "block"
-        ]
-        self.assertEqual(blocking, [], blocking)
-
-    def test_verdict_phase_still_demands_approval_head_proof(self):
-        report = _blocked_preflight_report().replace(
-            "- Review decision: none",
-            "- Review decision: approve",
-        ).replace(
-            "- Candidate head SHA: none",
-            f"- Candidate head SHA: {REVIEWED_HEAD}",
-        )
-        result = pwl.assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(report)
-        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
-        joined = " ".join(result["reasons"])
-        self.assertIn("before approval", joined)
-
-    def test_merge_phase_still_demands_merge_head_proof(self):
-        report = _pr703_style_report().replace(
-            "- Merge result: none",
-            "- Merge result: merged",
-        )
-        result = pwl.assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(report)
-        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
-        self.assertIn(
-            "final live head SHA before merge not stated",
-            result["reasons"],
-        )
-
-    def test_validation_phase_demands_push_disclosure(self):
-        report = _pr703_style_report().replace(
-            "- Pushes occurred during validation: no\n", ""
-        )
-        result = pwl.assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(report)
-        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
-        self.assertIn(
-            "whether push occurred during validation not stated",
-            result["reasons"],
-        )
-
-
-class TestLeaseReleaseVsPostMergeCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
-    """#698 (PR #703 review reproduction): lease release is not cleanup."""
-
-    def test_lease_release_cleanup_mutations_do_not_demand_checklist(self):
-        result = pmcp.assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof(_pr703_style_report())
-        self.assertFalse(result["block"], result["reasons"])
-
-    def test_release_tool_name_alone_is_recognized(self):
-        report = _pr703_style_report(
-            cleanup_mutations="gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease comment 11244"
-        )
-        result = pmcp.assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof(report)
-        self.assertFalse(result["block"], result["reasons"])
-
-    def test_substantive_non_lease_cleanup_still_demands_checklist(self):
-        report = _pr703_style_report(
-            cleanup_mutations="deleted stale scratch directory manually"
-        )
-        result = pmcp.assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof(report)
-        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
-
-    def test_remote_branch_delete_claims_still_demand_full_proof(self):
-        report = _pr703_style_report(
-            cleanup_mutations="gitea_delete_branch removed the remote branch"
-        )
-        result = pmcp.assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof(report)
-        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("remote branch deletion missing" in r for r in result["reasons"])
-        )
-
-    def test_full_schema_run_accepts_lease_release_report(self):
-        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(_pr703_style_report())
-        lease_cleanup_blocks = [
-            f for f in result["findings"]
-            if f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.post_merge_cleanup_proof"
-        ]
-        self.assertEqual(lease_cleanup_blocks, [], lease_cleanup_blocks)
-
-
-class TestStructuredProofRecognition(unittest.TestCase):
-    """#698: structured workflow-load and validation proof must be accepted."""
-
-    def test_key_value_workflow_proof_recognized(self):
-        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_workflow_load_boundary(
-            _pr703_style_report()
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(findings, [], findings)
-
-    def test_colon_form_workflow_proof_still_recognized(self):
-        report = _pr703_style_report().replace(
-            "- Workflow-load helper result: workflow_hash=da045d1e1f1f "
-            "boundary_status=clean",
-            "- Workflow-load helper result: workflow_hash: da045d1e1f1f, "
-            "boundary_status: clean",
-        )
-        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_workflow_load_boundary(report)
-        self.assertEqual(findings, [], findings)
-
-    def test_incomplete_structured_proof_still_blocks(self):
-        report = _pr703_style_report().replace(
-            "workflow_hash=da045d1e1f1f boundary_status=clean",
-            "workflow_hash=da045d1e1f1f",
-        )
-        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_workflow_load_boundary(report)
-        self.assertTrue(findings)
-        self.assertIn("boundary_status", findings[0]["reason"])
-
-    def test_validation_counts_accepted_as_pass_proof(self):
-        # "Validation: focused 50 passed; ..." must satisfy the reviewed-head
-        # validation-proof rule (PR #703 reproduction).
-        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(_pr703_style_report())
-        head_blocks = [
-            f for f in result["findings"]
-            if f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.reviewed_head_without_validation"
-        ]
-        self.assertEqual(head_blocks, [], head_blocks)
-
-
-class TestAuthoritativeMutationInference(unittest.TestCase):
-    """#698: review mutations inferred only from authoritative evidence."""
-
-    def test_read_only_entries_do_not_imply_mutations(self):
-        report = "## Controller Handoff\n- Mutations: none\n"
-        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none(
-            report,
-            action_log=[
-                {"action": "gitea_view_pr"},
-                {"action": "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback", "performed": False},
-            ],
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(findings, [], findings)
-
-    def test_performed_mutation_still_blocks_vague_none(self):
-        report = "## Controller Handoff\n- Mutations: none\n"
-        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none(
-            report,
-            action_log=[{"action": "edit", "path": "a.py", "performed": True}],
-        )
-        self.assertTrue(findings)
-
-    def test_gated_rejection_is_not_a_mutation(self):
-        report = "## Controller Handoff\n- Mutations: none\n"
-        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none(
-            report,
-            action_log=[
-                {"action": "edit", "path": "a.py", "performed": True,
-                 "gated_rejected": True},
-            ],
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(findings, [], findings)
-
-
-class TestValidatorRuleErrorContainment(unittest.TestCase):
-    """#698: a defective rule fails closed with a sanitized error."""
-
-    def test_rule_exception_becomes_sanitized_block_finding(self):
-        def _boom(report_text):
-            raise ValueError("raw secret detail that must not leak")
-
-        original = frv._RULES_BY_TASK["review_pr"]
-        frv._RULES_BY_TASK["review_pr"] = [_boom]
-        try:
-            result = frv.assess_final_report_validator(
-                "report body", "review_pr"
-            )
-        finally:
-            frv._RULES_BY_TASK["review_pr"] = original
-        self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
-        finding = next(
-            f for f in result["findings"]
-            if f["rule_id"] == "shared.validator_rule_error"
-        )
-        self.assertNotIn("raw secret detail", finding["reason"])
-        self.assertIn("ValueError", finding["reason"])
-        self.assertIn("_boom", finding["reason"])
-
-
-if __name__ == "__main__":
-    unittest.main()

tests/test_mcp_server.py

@@ -1425,10 +1425,16 @@ class TestReviewPR(unittest.TestCase):
 class TestDeleteBranch(unittest.TestCase):
 
     DELETE_PROFILE = {
-        "profile_name": "test-deleter",
-        "allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
+        "profile_name": "test-author-deleter",
+        "role": "author",
+        "allowed_operations": [
+            "gitea.read",
+            "gitea.pr.create",
+            "gitea.branch.push",
+            "gitea.branch.delete",
+        ],
         "forbidden_operations": [],
-        "audit_label": "test-deleter",
+        "audit_label": "test-author-deleter",
     }
 
     @patch("mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=DELETE_PROFILE)

tests/test_migrate_profiles.py

@@ -92,14 +92,19 @@ class TestMigrateProfiles(unittest.TestCase):
         author = prgs_gitea["identities"]["author"]
         self.assertEqual(author["username"], "jcwalker3")
         self.assertEqual(author["auth"]["id"], "redacted-author-ref")
-        self.assertEqual(author["allowed_operations"], ["read", "comment"])
-        self.assertEqual(author["forbidden_operations"], ["approve", "merge"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            author["allowed_operations"], ["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.comment"]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            author["forbidden_operations"],
+            ["gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge"],
+        )
 
         reviewer = prgs_gitea["identities"]["reviewer"]
         self.assertEqual(reviewer["role"], "reviewer")
         self.assertEqual(reviewer["username"], "sysadmin")
         self.assertEqual(reviewer["auth"]["id"], "redacted-reviewer-ref")
-        self.assertIn("merge", reviewer["allowed_operations"])
+        self.assertIn("gitea.pr.merge", reviewer["allowed_operations"])
 
     def test_alias_generation(self):
         """Test that aliases are correctly generated to support old profile names."""
@@ -188,7 +193,7 @@ class TestMigrateProfiles(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertNotIn("token", stdout_output.lower())
 
     def test_explicit_operations_are_preserved(self):
-        """Explicit v1 permissions must not be replaced by role defaults."""
+        """Explicit v1 permissions are canonicalized, not replaced by role defaults."""
         v1_data = json.loads(json.dumps(self.v1_content))
         v1_data["profiles"]["prgs-reviewer"]["allowed_operations"] = ["read"]
         v1_data["profiles"]["prgs-reviewer"]["forbidden_operations"] = ["merge"]
@@ -198,8 +203,8 @@ class TestMigrateProfiles(unittest.TestCase):
             v2_data["environments"]["prgs"]["services"]["gitea"]
             ["identities"]["reviewer"]
         )
-        self.assertEqual(reviewer["allowed_operations"], ["read"])
-        self.assertEqual(reviewer["forbidden_operations"], ["merge"])
+        self.assertEqual(reviewer["allowed_operations"], ["gitea.read"])
+        self.assertEqual(reviewer["forbidden_operations"], ["gitea.pr.merge"])
 
     def test_inferred_role_defaults_only_when_unambiguous(self):
         """Role defaults are allowed only for clear author/reviewer profiles."""
@@ -306,6 +311,171 @@ class TestMigrateProfiles(unittest.TestCase):
                 migrate_profiles.main()
             self.assertEqual(cm.exception.code, 1)
 
+    def test_reconciler_profile_migration(self):
+        """Legacy reconciler shorthands migrate to valid canonical operations."""
+        import gitea_config
+        import reconciler_profile
+
+        v1_data = {
+            "version": 1,
+            "profiles": {
+                "prgs-reconciler": {
+                    "base_url": "redacted-prgs-service",
+                    "username": "reconciler-agent",
+                    "auth": {"type": "keychain", "id": "reconciler-ref"},
+                    "execution_profile": "prgs-reconciler",
+                    "allowed_operations": [
+                        "read",
+                        "pr.close",
+                        "pr.comment",
+                        "issue.comment",
+                        "issue.close",
+                        "gitea.branch.delete",
+                    ],
+                    "forbidden_operations": [
+                        "merge",
+                        "approve",
+                        "review",
+                        "pr.create",
+                        "branch.push",
+                        "commit",
+                    ],
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        v2_data = migrate_profiles.migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data)
+        reconciler = (
+            v2_data["environments"]["prgs"]["services"]["gitea"]
+            ["identities"]["reconciler"]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(reconciler["role"], "reconciler")
+        allowed = reconciler["allowed_operations"]
+        forbidden = reconciler["forbidden_operations"]
+        # No invalid shorthand remains
+        for bad in ("pr.close", "pr.comment", "issue.close", "read", "merge"):
+            self.assertNotIn(bad, allowed)
+            self.assertNotIn(bad, forbidden)
+        for required in (
+            "gitea.read",
+            "gitea.pr.close",
+            "gitea.pr.comment",
+            "gitea.issue.comment",
+            "gitea.issue.close",
+            "gitea.branch.delete",
+        ):
+            self.assertIn(required, allowed)
+            # Production loader accepts every allowed op
+            self.assertEqual(
+                gitea_config.normalize_operation(required), required
+            )
+        self.assertEqual(v2_data["aliases"]["prgs-reconciler"], "prgs.gitea.reconciler")
+        assessment = reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(allowed, forbidden)
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["valid"])
+        self.assertTrue(migrate_profiles.validate_v2_data(v2_data))
+
+    def test_reconciler_profile_defaults(self):
+        """Reconciler defaults are fully canonical and loader-valid."""
+        import gitea_config
+        import reconciler_profile
+
+        v1_data = {
+            "version": 1,
+            "profiles": {
+                "prgs-reconciler": {
+                    "base_url": "redacted-prgs-service",
+                    "username": "reconciler-agent",
+                    "auth": {"type": "keychain", "id": "reconciler-ref"},
+                    "execution_profile": "prgs-reconciler",
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        v2_data = migrate_profiles.migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data)
+        reconciler = (
+            v2_data["environments"]["prgs"]["services"]["gitea"]
+            ["identities"]["reconciler"]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(reconciler["role"], "reconciler")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            reconciler["allowed_operations"],
+            migrate_profiles.RECONCILER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            reconciler["forbidden_operations"],
+            migrate_profiles.RECONCILER_DEFAULT_FORBIDDEN,
+        )
+        for op in reconciler["allowed_operations"]:
+            self.assertEqual(gitea_config.normalize_operation(op), op)
+            self.assertTrue(op.startswith("gitea."))
+        assessment = reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(
+            reconciler["allowed_operations"],
+            reconciler["forbidden_operations"],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["valid"])
+        self.assertNotIn(
+            "gitea.branch.delete", assessment["missing_recommended_operations"]
+        )
+
+    def test_reconciler_migration_idempotent_canonicalize(self):
+        """Second canonicalize of already-canonical ops is a no-op."""
+        first = migrate_profiles.canonicalize_operations(
+            list(migrate_profiles.RECONCILER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED)
+        )
+        second = migrate_profiles.canonicalize_operations(first)
+        self.assertEqual(first, second)
+        self.assertEqual(first, list(migrate_profiles.RECONCILER_DEFAULT_ALLOWED))
+
+    def test_reconciler_missing_required_fails_visibly(self):
+        """Missing gitea.pr.close after migration fails closed (not silent drop)."""
+        v1_data = {
+            "version": 1,
+            "profiles": {
+                "prgs-reconciler": {
+                    "base_url": "redacted-prgs-service",
+                    "username": "reconciler-agent",
+                    "auth": {"type": "keychain", "id": "reconciler-ref"},
+                    "execution_profile": "prgs-reconciler",
+                    "allowed_operations": ["read", "gitea.branch.delete"],
+                    "forbidden_operations": ["merge"],
+                }
+            },
+        }
+        with self.assertRaisesRegex(ValueError, "missing required"):
+            migrate_profiles.migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data)
+
+    def test_unknown_operation_fails_visibly(self):
+        v1_data = {
+            "version": 1,
+            "profiles": {
+                "prgs-author": {
+                    "base_url": "redacted-prgs-service",
+                    "username": "jcwalker3",
+                    "auth": {"type": "keychain", "id": "hidden-author-ref"},
+                    "execution_profile": "prgs-author",
+                    "allowed_operations": ["read", "not.a.real.op"],
+                    "forbidden_operations": ["merge"],
+                }
+            },
+        }
+        with self.assertRaisesRegex(ValueError, "cannot be canonicalized"):
+            migrate_profiles.migrate_v1_to_v2(v1_data)
+
+    def test_role_inference_author_reviewer_merger_reconciler(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            migrate_profiles.infer_role("prgs-author", "prgs-author"), "author"
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            migrate_profiles.infer_role("prgs-reviewer", "prgs-reviewer"),
+            "reviewer",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            migrate_profiles.infer_role("prgs-reconciler", "prgs-reconciler"),
+            "reconciler",
+        )
+        self.assertIsNone(
+            migrate_profiles.infer_role("prgs-merger", "prgs-merger")
+        )
+
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     unittest.main()
+

tests/test_reconciler_profile.py

@@ -82,6 +82,42 @@ class TestReconcilerProfileModel(unittest.TestCase):
             "reconciler",
         )
 
+    def test_branch_delete_is_recommended_for_reconciler(self):
+        self.assertIn(
+            "gitea.branch.delete",
+            reconciler_profile.RECONCILER_RECOMMENDED_OPERATIONS,
+        )
+        self.assertNotIn(
+            "gitea.branch.delete",
+            reconciler_profile.RECONCILER_REQUIRED_OPERATIONS,
+        )
+
+    def test_reconciler_with_branch_delete_stays_valid(self):
+        allowed = PRGS_RECONCILER_ALLOWED + ["gitea.branch.delete"]
+        result = reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(
+            allowed,
+            PRGS_RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["is_reconciler_profile"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["valid"])
+        self.assertNotIn(
+            "gitea.branch.delete", result["missing_recommended_operations"]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            mcp_server._role_kind(allowed, PRGS_RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN),
+            "reconciler",
+        )
+
+    def test_reconciler_without_branch_delete_reports_missing_recommended(self):
+        result = reconciler_profile.assess_reconciler_profile(
+            PRGS_RECONCILER_ALLOWED,
+            PRGS_RECONCILER_FORBIDDEN,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["valid"])
+        self.assertIn(
+            "gitea.branch.delete", result["missing_recommended_operations"]
+        )
+
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     unittest.main()

tests/test_review_proofs.py

@@ -957,20 +957,17 @@ class TestControllerHandoff(unittest.TestCase):
             if not line.startswith("- Workspace mutations:"))
         result = assess_controller_handoff(review_base, role="review")
         self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "incomplete")
-        # #698: the canonical schema forbids the legacy fields, so the
-        # validator must demand the canonical names instead.
-        self.assertIn("Reviewed head SHA", result["missing_fields"])
-        self.assertIn("Review worktree path", result["missing_fields"])
+        self.assertIn("Pinned reviewed head", result["missing_fields"])
+        self.assertIn("Worktree path", result["missing_fields"])
         self.assertIn("Merge result", result["missing_fields"])
-        for legacy in ("Pinned reviewed head", "Scratch worktree used"):
-            self.assertNotIn(legacy, result["missing_fields"])
 
         complete = review_base + "\n" + "\n".join([
             "- Selected PR: #999",
             "- Reviewer eligibility: passed",
-            "- Reviewed head SHA: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
-            "- Review worktree path: /repo/branches/review-pr-999",
-            "- Review worktree dirty before validation: no",
+            "- Pinned reviewed head: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
+            "- Worktree path: /repo/branches/review-pr-999",
+            "- Worktree dirty: no",
+            "- Scratch worktree used: yes (/repo/branches/review-pr-999)",
             "- Unrelated local mutations: none",
             "- Review decision: approve",
             "- Merge result: merged",
@@ -1128,9 +1125,10 @@ class TestReviewHandoffPreciseMutationCategories(unittest.TestCase):
         "- Safety: no self-review; no self-merge; no secrets",
         "- Selected PR: #999",
         "- Reviewer eligibility: passed",
-        "- Reviewed head SHA: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
+        "- Pinned reviewed head: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
         "- Worktree path: /repo/branches/review-pr-999",
         "- Worktree dirty: no",
+        "- Scratch worktree used: yes (/repo/branches/review-pr-999)",
         "- Unrelated local mutations: none",
         "- Review decision: approve",
         "- Merge result: none",