910b6edbdcf0dec64cdf139b1a1dbac4bd38c1ef
5
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  jcwalker3andClaude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
|
99fda93bcc |
feat(mcp): publish an unpublished local commit on a registered issue worktree (Closes #812)
Entry point B of #812 is the state where an author's work has already advanced to a local commit: the worktree is registered, clean, on the issue branch, and carries the only copy of the implementation, but the branch has never been published. Two individually correct predicates close a cycle around it: exact-owner lease renewal refuses without an observable remote head, and every publication path is lock-derived under #618, so nothing can create that remote head without first holding the lock renewal would grant.
This adds the missing operation. gitea_publish_unpublished_issue_branch publishes an already-committed local head to its remote branch, so exact-owner renewal has the evidence its model requires. Publication is the whole of its authority: it renews, reclaims, rebinds, and clears nothing.
Why this is not a lock bypass: the operation can only publish a branch whose durable issue-lock record already names the caller as claimant. Ownership is read from the lock file, never asserted by the caller. Guard strictness is unchanged (AC15): a dirty tree, an untracked file the commit does not carry, an unregistered worktree, a non-issue or stable branch, a changed local HEAD, a remote head that is not an ancestor of the commit, a competing open PR for the same issue on another branch, and any declared-hash mismatch each fail closed. The refspec names the commit SHA explicitly and never forces.
Record separation (AC23): the durable issue-lock file and the control-plane workflow lease are distinct records. This reads the former as ownership evidence and writes neither.
Truthful process evidence (AC24): the recorded owner pid's liveness is never consulted or asserted. A regression pins the recorded pid to a live process, proves publication still succeeds, and proves expired-lock reclaim still refuses for that same pid.
Scope is AC20 only. AC21 cannot unblock on its own, so the two are separable and only the smaller one is implemented here.
Tests: 36 new cases against synthetic fixtures only, using a real git repository with a real local bare remote so publication and read-after-write verification are genuinely executed rather than mocked. AC17 is honoured and a regression asserts the protected worktree is never referenced.
Full suite: 11 failed, 4354 passed, 6 skipped, 533 subtests passed. The 11 failures are the documented pre-existing drift baseline at
|
||
  sysadminandClaude Opus 4.8
|
a002864a06 |
fix(mcp): add sanctioned gitea_edit_issue and a doc/registry drift guard (Closes #781)
The gitea-workflow documentation named a gitea_edit_issue tool that no
namespace had ever registered. There was no sanctioned MCP path to change an
issue title or body at all: the only edit tool, gitea_edit_pr, PATCHes the
pull-request endpoint. An authorized body correction on issue #780 therefore
had to be recorded as a discussion comment instead.
Add edit_issue.py as the authoritative rule and gitea_edit_issue as the tool
built on it:
- Only the fields the caller names are sent, so labels, state, assignee, and
milestone cannot be overwritten from a stale read.
- A pull-request number is refused. Gitea serves pull requests from the same
/issues/{n} collection, so without that check the issue path would quietly
become a second, ungated PR edit path. gitea_edit_pr stays PR-only.
- Structurally invalid requests raise before any credential or network work;
a request that would change nothing is reported as an explicit no-op with a
next action rather than a silent success.
- Read-after-write proves the applied title/body and proves that state,
labels, assignees, and milestone did not move. Transport failures on the
pre-read, the PATCH, and the read-back are each reported, redacted, with
the correct performed/verified state.
Gates match every other issue mutation: profile permission via the shared
capability map (resolver task edit_issue, gitea.issue.comment), preflight
purity, branches worktree validation, anti-stomp inventory membership, and
audited mutation.
Fix the drift that hid this. docs/mcp-tool-inventory.md is now the canonical
registered-tool list, and mcp_tool_inventory.py compares it to the live
registry in both directions, plus checks that every tool named under skills/
is registered. The new guard immediately found a second instance of the same
defect: gitea_record_pre_review_command had lost its @mcp.tool() decorator
while the canonical review workflow still instructed reviewers to call it, so
that registration is restored.
Validation:
PASSED: venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/test_issue_781_edit_issue_tool.py -s -q
— 50 passed
FAILED: venv/bin/python -m pytest -s -q — 4095 passed, 11 failed, 6 skipped.
The identical 11 tests fail on clean master
|
||
|
sysadminandClaude Opus 4.8
|
adc61255b2 |
fix(mcp): honor the create-issue bootstrap in anti-stomp preflight (Closes #757)
The sanctioned create_issue bootstrap from #749/#750 was unreachable in
production. Two guards assessed the same workspace for the same task and
reached opposite conclusions: the #274 branches-only guard consulted the
bootstrap and permitted a clean canonical control checkout, then the #604
anti-stomp preflight -- which never consulted it -- rejected that same
checkout as wrong_worktree.
The defect was wiring, not policy: the bootstrap decision was computed in
one guard and discarded, while the other re-derived a conflicting answer
from a lower-level assessor with no notion of the bootstrap phase.
Fix: one computation site, one interpretation site.
* create_issue_bootstrap.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout() is the single
predicate both guards use to interpret an assessment. It is fail-closed by
construction: missing, malformed, refused, incomplete, or contradictory
evidence returns False and leaves the ordinary block in force. It also
verifies the assessment describes the exact workspace and canonical root
being guarded, so a stale or foreign assessment cannot be reused.
* _create_issue_bootstrap_assessment() computes the assessment once per
preflight from inspected repository state. verify_preflight_purity threads
that single result into both guards.
* The #604 assessor accepts the assessment and waives ONLY the wrong-worktree
verdict. Root checkout, repo, role, stale runtime, lease, head-SHA,
workflow-hash, and contamination checks are evaluated independently and
still apply.
Evidence is server-derived only and travels an internal path: no MCP tool
signature gains a bootstrap argument, and no caller-controlled boolean can
manufacture eligibility. Behavior is unchanged for callers that supply no
evidence, and for every non-create_issue author mutation.
No issue or PR number is special-cased in production behavior.
Tests: new tests/test_issue_757_bootstrap_guard_agreement.py (38 tests, 26
subtests) covering the shared predicate, the narrow waiver, guard agreement
across the full workspace-state matrix, non-forgeable eligibility, and an
end-to-end native gitea_create_issue run with the #604 gate LIVE. All 38
fail against unfixed sources; the e2e reproduces the production error text
verbatim ("Anti-stomp preflight (#604) blocked mutation [wrong_worktree]").
tests/test_reconciler_close_workspace_guard.py: one case asserted that
create_issue stays blocked on the control checkout, which only held because
the bootstrap-blind #604 guard was overriding #750 -- it encoded the defect.
Re-pointed to lock_issue, which is issue-backed and legitimately still
requires a branches/ worktree. Its teardown now restores the module-level
preflight task/role so test order cannot leak resolved state.
Full suite: 3624 passed, 2 failed, 6 skipped (426 subtests).
Baseline at
|
||
|
sysadmin
|
3fd02a3c63 |
fix: anti-stomp capability auth, inventory wiring, side-effect proof (#604)
Address REQUEST_CHANGES on PR #680: Blocker A — role vs capability agreement - authorization_compatible allows reviewer/merger when they hold the task's required permission (e.g. gitea.issue.comment on comment_issue/mark_issue/ set_issue_labels/lock_issue) without broad role-bypass. - Unauthorized escalation without the permission remains fail closed. - Regression coverage for allowed and denied reviewer/merger cases. Blocker B — MUTATION_TASKS matches runtime wiring - Remove unenforced entries; document dedicated-gate exclusions (mark_final_review_decision, save/resume_review_draft, etc.). - Wire non-closing gitea_edit_pr as edit_pr; acquire lease uses acquire_reviewer_pr_lease task through verify_preflight_purity. - Inventory↔wiring consistency tests replace set-membership-only coverage. Blocker C — entrypoint side-effect ordering - Behavioral tests for merge_pr, submit_pr_review, and comment_issue prove the assessor block aborts before Gitea API mutation and local durable writes. Validation: 43 focused anti-stomp + related suites green; full suite 2639 passed / 6 skipped. Closes #604 |
||
|
sysadmin
|
ea8e186549 |
feat: common anti-stomp preflight before mutation tools (Closes #604)
Add a shared fail-closed anti-stomp preflight that mutation tools invoke before create/comment/lease/review/approve/request-changes/merge/cleanup/ label mutations. Composes repo/role/root/worktree/lease/terminal-lock/ head-SHA/stale-runtime/workflow-hash/contamination checks into a typed blocker with an exact next action. No agent bypass flags. |