fix: anti-stomp capability auth, inventory wiring, side-effect proof (#604)
Address REQUEST_CHANGES on PR #680: Blocker A — role vs capability agreement - authorization_compatible allows reviewer/merger when they hold the task's required permission (e.g. gitea.issue.comment on comment_issue/mark_issue/ set_issue_labels/lock_issue) without broad role-bypass. - Unauthorized escalation without the permission remains fail closed. - Regression coverage for allowed and denied reviewer/merger cases. Blocker B — MUTATION_TASKS matches runtime wiring - Remove unenforced entries; document dedicated-gate exclusions (mark_final_review_decision, save/resume_review_draft, etc.). - Wire non-closing gitea_edit_pr as edit_pr; acquire lease uses acquire_reviewer_pr_lease task through verify_preflight_purity. - Inventory↔wiring consistency tests replace set-membership-only coverage. Blocker C — entrypoint side-effect ordering - Behavioral tests for merge_pr, submit_pr_review, and comment_issue prove the assessor block aborts before Gitea API mutation and local durable writes. Validation: 43 focused anti-stomp + related suites green; full suite 2639 passed / 6 skipped. Closes #604
This commit is contained in:
+129
-27
@@ -67,50 +67,79 @@ BLOCKER_KINDS = frozenset({
|
||||
BLOCKER_MANUAL_BYPASS,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
# Mutation tasks that must invoke this preflight before acting.
|
||||
# Covers create issue/comment, lease acquire, submit review, approve,
|
||||
# request changes, merge, cleanup, and label mutation (issue #604 AC1).
|
||||
# Mutation tasks that must invoke the shared anti-stomp preflight before
|
||||
# acting (issue #604 AC1). Every member must appear as a live task= kwarg
|
||||
# to verify_preflight_purity / _run_anti_stomp_preflight (or the review
|
||||
# anti_task map) in gitea_mcp_server.py. Inventory↔wiring tests fail if
|
||||
# a declared task is not wired.
|
||||
MUTATION_TASKS = frozenset({
|
||||
"create_issue",
|
||||
"comment_issue",
|
||||
"close_issue",
|
||||
"claim_issue",
|
||||
"mark_issue",
|
||||
"lock_issue",
|
||||
"set_issue_labels",
|
||||
"create_label",
|
||||
"create_pr",
|
||||
"comment_pr",
|
||||
"close_pr",
|
||||
"edit_pr",
|
||||
"commit_files",
|
||||
"gitea_commit_files",
|
||||
"create_branch",
|
||||
"push_branch",
|
||||
"delete_branch",
|
||||
"cleanup_merged_pr_branch",
|
||||
"cleanup_stale_claims",
|
||||
"cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock",
|
||||
"gitea_cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock",
|
||||
"reconcile_merged_cleanups",
|
||||
"reconcile_already_landed_pr",
|
||||
"reconcile_close_superseded_pr",
|
||||
"reconciliation_cleanup",
|
||||
"post_heartbeat",
|
||||
"acquire_reviewer_pr_lease",
|
||||
"gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease",
|
||||
"adopt_merger_pr_lease",
|
||||
"heartbeat_reviewer_pr_lease",
|
||||
"release_reviewer_pr_lease",
|
||||
"review_pr",
|
||||
"submit_pr_review",
|
||||
"approve_pr",
|
||||
"request_changes_pr",
|
||||
"merge_pr",
|
||||
"mark_final_review_decision",
|
||||
"save_review_draft",
|
||||
"resume_review_draft",
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
# Intentionally excluded from MUTATION_TASKS. Each has a dedicated
|
||||
# fail-closed gate that preserves decision-lock ownership, workflow-hash,
|
||||
# head-SHA, and repository consistency. Do not re-add without either
|
||||
# wiring shared preflight or updating this rationale (#604 Blocker B).
|
||||
DEDICATED_GATE_MUTATIONS: dict[str, str] = {
|
||||
"mark_final_review_decision": (
|
||||
"Local review-decision lock only. Enforced by session lock ownership, "
|
||||
"workflow-hash, expected head SHA, PR work lease, eligibility, and "
|
||||
"terminal-lock gates. No Gitea review POST; shared anti-stomp would "
|
||||
"duplicate without side-effect-ordering value."
|
||||
),
|
||||
"save_review_draft": (
|
||||
"Local session-state draft save with live PR head/base consistency "
|
||||
"checks. Not a Gitea review/merge mutation; dedicated head-SHA and "
|
||||
"worktree resolution gates apply."
|
||||
),
|
||||
"resume_review_draft": (
|
||||
"Live-state resume with terminal lock, lease ownership, head/base SHA, "
|
||||
"and parity checks. When submit=True, delegates to gitea_submit_pr_review "
|
||||
"which runs shared anti-stomp before the Gitea review POST."
|
||||
),
|
||||
"cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock": (
|
||||
"Moot-lock cleanup with identity match, live PR merged/closed proof, "
|
||||
"and reviewer capability gate (#594). Distinct from shared anti-stomp."
|
||||
),
|
||||
"gitea_cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock": (
|
||||
"Alias of cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock; dedicated #594 path."
|
||||
),
|
||||
"heartbeat_reviewer_pr_lease": (
|
||||
"Lease heartbeat posts via verify_preflight_purity(task='review_pr') "
|
||||
"plus in-session lease ownership checks; not a separate mutation class."
|
||||
),
|
||||
"release_reviewer_pr_lease": (
|
||||
"Lease release uses workspace binding + ownership checks; posts only "
|
||||
"when the session owns the active lease."
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Roles that must mutate from a branches/ worktree (not the control checkout).
|
||||
_BRANCHES_REQUIRED_ROLES = frozenset({"author"})
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -122,13 +151,9 @@ _LEASE_AWARE_TASKS = frozenset({
|
||||
"approve_pr",
|
||||
"request_changes_pr",
|
||||
"merge_pr",
|
||||
"mark_final_review_decision",
|
||||
"acquire_reviewer_pr_lease",
|
||||
"gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease",
|
||||
"adopt_merger_pr_lease",
|
||||
"heartbeat_reviewer_pr_lease",
|
||||
"release_reviewer_pr_lease",
|
||||
"resume_review_draft",
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
_NEXT_ACTIONS: dict[str, str] = {
|
||||
@@ -199,6 +224,10 @@ def roles_compatible(active_role: str | None, required_role: str | None) -> bool
|
||||
(comment/close/cleanup) that the capability map stamps as ``author`` —
|
||||
matching the long-standing reconciler exemption for control-checkout
|
||||
work. No other cross-role substitutions are allowed.
|
||||
|
||||
Capability-authorized multi-role tasks (e.g. reviewer holding
|
||||
``gitea.issue.comment`` for ``comment_issue``) are handled by
|
||||
:func:`authorization_compatible`, not by expanding this role matrix.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
active = (active_role or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
required = (required_role or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
@@ -211,6 +240,43 @@ def roles_compatible(active_role: str | None, required_role: str | None) -> bool
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def authorization_compatible(
|
||||
active_role: str | None,
|
||||
required_role: str | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
required_permission: str | None = None,
|
||||
allowed_operations: Any = None,
|
||||
) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Whether the active session may run a task given role *and* capability.
|
||||
|
||||
Order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. :func:`roles_compatible` (exact role or narrow reconciler→author).
|
||||
2. Capability possession: when *required_permission* is non-empty and
|
||||
present in *allowed_operations*, allow even if the nominal task role
|
||||
differs (e.g. reviewer/merger with ``gitea.issue.comment`` on
|
||||
``comment_issue`` / ``mark_issue`` / ``set_issue_labels`` /
|
||||
``lock_issue``).
|
||||
|
||||
Fail closed otherwise. This is **not** a broad reviewer→author or
|
||||
merger→author role rewrite: without the specific permission the check
|
||||
still denies. Missing *allowed_operations* when a permission is required
|
||||
also fails closed (callers must supply the live profile op list).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if roles_compatible(active_role, required_role):
|
||||
return True
|
||||
perm = (required_permission or "").strip()
|
||||
if not perm:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if allowed_operations is None:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
try:
|
||||
ops = {str(o).strip() for o in allowed_operations if o is not None}
|
||||
except TypeError:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
return perm in ops
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _blocker(
|
||||
kind: str,
|
||||
reasons: list[str],
|
||||
@@ -272,10 +338,12 @@ def assess_anti_stomp_preflight(
|
||||
org_explicit: bool = False,
|
||||
repo_explicit: bool = False,
|
||||
check_repo: bool = True,
|
||||
# profile/role
|
||||
# profile/role + capability
|
||||
profile_name: str | None = None,
|
||||
profile_role: str | None = None,
|
||||
required_role: str | None = None,
|
||||
required_permission: str | None = None,
|
||||
allowed_operations: Any = None,
|
||||
check_role: bool = True,
|
||||
# root checkout + worktree
|
||||
workspace_path: str | None = None,
|
||||
@@ -327,11 +395,13 @@ def assess_anti_stomp_preflight(
|
||||
task_name = (task or "").strip()
|
||||
role = (profile_role or "").strip().lower() or None
|
||||
req_role = (required_role or "").strip().lower() or None
|
||||
req_perm = (required_permission or "").strip() or None
|
||||
checks: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"task": task_name or None,
|
||||
"profile_name": profile_name,
|
||||
"profile_role": role,
|
||||
"required_role": req_role,
|
||||
"required_permission": req_perm,
|
||||
}
|
||||
blockers: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -376,15 +446,33 @@ def assess_anti_stomp_preflight(
|
||||
else:
|
||||
checks["repo"] = {"block": False, "skipped": True}
|
||||
|
||||
# ── profile/role ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
# ── profile/role + capability ────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
# Role match OR possession of the task's required permission (Blocker A).
|
||||
# Reviewer/merger may run issue-comment-class tasks when they hold
|
||||
# gitea.issue.comment; unauthorized escalation without the permission
|
||||
# still fails closed.
|
||||
if check_role and req_role and role:
|
||||
if not roles_compatible(role, req_role):
|
||||
authorized = authorization_compatible(
|
||||
role,
|
||||
req_role,
|
||||
required_permission=req_perm,
|
||||
allowed_operations=allowed_operations,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if not authorized:
|
||||
perm_clause = (
|
||||
f", required_permission='{req_perm}'" if req_perm else ""
|
||||
)
|
||||
reasons = [
|
||||
f"active profile role '{role}' does not match required role "
|
||||
f"'{req_role}' for task '{task_name or '(unknown)'}' "
|
||||
f"(profile={profile_name or '(unknown)'})"
|
||||
f"active profile role '{role}' is not authorized for task "
|
||||
f"'{task_name or '(unknown)'}' (required_role='{req_role}'"
|
||||
f"{perm_clause}; profile={profile_name or '(unknown)'})"
|
||||
]
|
||||
checks["role"] = {"block": True, "reasons": reasons}
|
||||
checks["role"] = {
|
||||
"block": True,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
"required_permission": req_perm,
|
||||
"capability_authorized": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
blockers.append(
|
||||
_blocker(
|
||||
BLOCKER_WRONG_ROLE,
|
||||
@@ -393,11 +481,25 @@ def assess_anti_stomp_preflight(
|
||||
"profile_name": profile_name,
|
||||
"profile_role": role,
|
||||
"required_role": req_role,
|
||||
"required_permission": req_perm,
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
checks["role"] = {"block": False, "reasons": []}
|
||||
checks["role"] = {
|
||||
"block": False,
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
"required_permission": req_perm,
|
||||
"capability_authorized": bool(
|
||||
req_perm
|
||||
and allowed_operations is not None
|
||||
and req_perm in {
|
||||
str(o).strip() for o in (allowed_operations or [])
|
||||
if o is not None
|
||||
}
|
||||
and not roles_compatible(role, req_role)
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
else:
|
||||
checks["role"] = {"block": False, "skipped": True}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user