fix(validator): align final-report validator with canonical schema (Closes #698)

Fixes the final-report validator defects from Issue #698 (original lead
plus the independent reproduction recorded during the PR #703 formal
review, comment 11246):

- Legacy fields: the review/merger required-field tables no longer demand
  'Pinned reviewed head', 'Scratch worktree used', 'Worktree path',
  'Worktree dirty', 'Mutations', 'Next', 'Issue/PR', 'Branch/SHA', or
  'Files changed' — names the canonical review-merge-final-report schema
  forbids or replaces. The canonical names ('Reviewed head SHA', 'Review
  worktree path/dirty', 'Safe next action', mutation categories) are
  required instead, with backward-compatible aliases where the schema
  permits them.
- Structured proof: workflow-load helper results are recognized in
  colon, key=value, and JSON renderings; validation pass proof is
  accepted anywhere in the Validation field value (for example
  'focused 50 passed; full 2665 passed').
- Mutation inference: review mutations are inferred only from
  authoritative evidence (performed=true and not gated); read-only
  diagnostics and pre-API rejections no longer count as mutations.
- Lease release vs cleanup: canonical reviewer lease release (release
  tool call or terminal phase=released marker) is lease lifecycle, not
  post-merge cleanup, and no longer triggers the branch/worktree cleanup
  checklist; genuine delete/remove claims still require full proof.
- Blocked reports: a legitimately blocked run that states an explicit
  'Reviewed/Candidate head SHA: none' with no verdict, merge, or started
  validation owes no head proofs; approval-time and merge-time live-head
  proofs are demanded only once the corresponding phase begins, and a
  report that states no head at all still fails closed.
- action_log robustness: malformed (non-dict) entries and non-list logs
  are reported as clear sanitized findings (position and type only, no
  content echo) instead of crashing with AttributeError; a defective
  validator rule now fails closed with a sanitized block finding rather
  than raising a secondary exception.

27 new regression tests, including canonical fixtures modeled on the
PR #703 formal-review handoff and the blocked preflight report from the
prior #698 reproductions. Two legacy-field test fixtures updated to the
canonical schema. Full suite: 2663 passed, 6 skipped, 161 subtests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>

final_report_validator.py

@@ -134,16 +134,22 @@ _TARGET_BRANCH_SHA_RE = re.compile(
     r"target branch sha\s*:\s*[0-9a-f]{40}",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
+# #698: structured proof is rendered in several equivalent shapes —
+# `workflow_hash: abc...`, `workflow_hash=abc...`, or JSON
+# `"workflow_hash": "abc..."`. Recognize all of them; demanding one exact
+# punctuation style rejects legitimate structured workflow-load proof.
 _WORKFLOW_LOAD_HELPER_RE = re.compile(
-    r"workflow[- ]load helper result\s*:",
+    r"workflow[-_ ]load[-_ ]helper[-_ ]result\s*[:=]",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
 _WORKFLOW_LOAD_HASH_RE = re.compile(
-    r"workflow[- ]load helper result[\s\S]{0,400}?workflow[_ ]hash\s*:\s*[0-9a-f]{12}",
+    r"workflow[-_ ]load[-_ ]helper[-_ ]result[\s\S]{0,400}?"
+    r"workflow[_ ]hash\"?\s*[:=]\s*\"?[0-9a-f]{12}",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
 _WORKFLOW_LOAD_BOUNDARY_RE = re.compile(
-    r"workflow[- ]load helper result[\s\S]{0,400}?boundary[_ ]status\s*:\s*(?:clean|violation)",
+    r"workflow[-_ ]load[-_ ]helper[-_ ]result[\s\S]{0,400}?"
+    r"boundary[_ ]status\"?\s*[:=]\s*\"?(?:clean|violation)",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
 _WORKFLOW_FILE_VIEW_NARRATIVE_RE = re.compile(
@@ -244,6 +250,59 @@ def _normalize_task_kind(task_kind: str | None) -> str:
     return _TASK_KIND_ALIASES.get(raw, raw)
 
 
+def _iter_action_entries(action_log: list | None) -> list[dict]:
+    """Yield only structured (dict) action-log entries (#698).
+
+    Callers must never crash on malformed entries (strings, numbers, null)
+    that reach the validator from LLM-composed or partially parsed logs;
+    :func:`sanitize_action_log` reports them separately.
+    """
+    return [e for e in (action_log or []) if isinstance(e, dict)]
+
+
+def sanitize_action_log(
+    action_log: list | None,
+) -> tuple[list[dict], list[dict[str, str]]]:
+    """Split an action log into structured entries and sanitized findings (#698).
+
+    Malformed entries become clear, sanitized ``warning`` findings — the
+    offending value's content is never echoed back (only its position and
+    type), so secrets or garbage in a broken log cannot leak into validation
+    errors, and validation itself proceeds without secondary exceptions.
+    """
+    if action_log is None:
+        return [], []
+    if not isinstance(action_log, (list, tuple)):
+        return [], [
+            validator_finding(
+                "shared.action_log_malformed",
+                "downgrade",
+                "Action log",
+                "action_log is not a list of structured entries "
+                f"(got {type(action_log).__name__}); it was ignored",
+                "pass action_log as a list of dict entries",
+            )
+        ]
+    entries: list[dict] = []
+    findings: list[dict[str, str]] = []
+    for index, entry in enumerate(action_log):
+        if isinstance(entry, dict):
+            entries.append(entry)
+            continue
+        findings.append(
+            validator_finding(
+                "shared.action_log_malformed",
+                "downgrade",
+                "Action log",
+                f"action_log entry {index} is not a structured mapping "
+                f"(got {type(entry).__name__}); the entry was ignored",
+                "repair the malformed action_log entry or drop it before "
+                "revalidating",
+            )
+        )
+    return entries, findings
+
+
 def validator_finding(
     rule_id: str,
     severity: str,
@@ -421,7 +480,7 @@ def _rule_shared_canonical_comment_post_claim(
     rejected_in_report = bool(_CANONICAL_VALIDATION_REJECTED_RE.search(text))
     rejected_in_log = False
     if action_log:
-        for entry in action_log:
+        for entry in _iter_action_entries(action_log):
             validation = entry.get("canonical_comment_validation") or {}
             if validation.get("allowed") is False:
                 rejected_in_log = True
@@ -475,9 +534,13 @@ def _rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none(
     action_log: list[dict] | None = None,
     mutations_observed: bool = False,
 ) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    # #698: infer review mutations only from authoritative evidence — an
+    # entry proves a mutation only when it affirmatively records
+    # performed=true and was not gated. Read-only diagnostics and pre-API
+    # rejections (entries without a performed flag) are not mutations.
     performed = any(
-        e.get("performed") is not False and not e.get("gated_rejected")
-        for e in (action_log or [])
+        e.get("performed") is True and not e.get("gated_rejected")
+        for e in _iter_action_entries(action_log)
     )
     if not (mutations_observed or performed):
         return []
@@ -536,7 +599,7 @@ def _rule_reviewer_git_fetch_readonly(
     text = report_text or ""
     fetch_observed = any(
         _GIT_FETCH_RE.search(str(e.get("command") or e.get("action") or ""))
-        for e in (action_log or [])
+        for e in _iter_action_entries(action_log)
     ) or _GIT_FETCH_RE.search(text)
     if not fetch_observed:
         return []
@@ -977,7 +1040,7 @@ def _rule_reviewer_target_branch_freshness(
     fields = _handoff_fields(text)
     fetch_reported = bool(_GIT_FETCH_RE.search(text)) or any(
         _GIT_FETCH_RE.search(str(e.get("command") or e.get("action") or ""))
-        for e in (action_log or [])
+        for e in _iter_action_entries(action_log)
     )
     target_sha_reported = bool(_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA_RE.search(text)) or any(
         "target branch" in key and "sha" in key and _FULL_SHA_RE.search(value)
@@ -1735,6 +1798,12 @@ def assess_final_report_validator(
     checks: dict[str, Any] = {}
     findings: list[dict[str, str]] = []
 
+    # #698: malformed action_log data must never crash validation with a
+    # secondary exception; malformed entries surface as sanitized findings.
+    sanitized_action_log, action_log_findings = sanitize_action_log(action_log)
+    action_log = sanitized_action_log
+    findings.extend(action_log_findings)
+
     if normalized_kind == "issue_filing" and issue_filing_lock is not None:
         checks["issue_filing"] = assess_issue_filing_final_report(
             report_text,
@@ -1763,7 +1832,23 @@ def assess_final_report_validator(
     }
 
     for rule in _RULES_BY_TASK.get(normalized_kind, ()):
-        findings.extend(_call_rule(rule, report_text, normalized_kind, rule_kwargs))
+        try:
+            findings.extend(
+                _call_rule(rule, report_text, normalized_kind, rule_kwargs)
+            )
+        except Exception as exc:  # #698: fail closed with a sanitized error
+            findings.append(
+                validator_finding(
+                    "shared.validator_rule_error",
+                    "block",
+                    "Validator",
+                    f"validator rule '{getattr(rule, '__name__', 'unknown')}' "
+                    f"failed with {type(exc).__name__} (details withheld; "
+                    "sanitized)",
+                    "file a validator defect with the rule name; do not "
+                    "bypass final-report validation",
+                )
+            )
 
     grade, blocked, downgraded = _aggregate_grade(findings)
     reasons = [f"{f['rule_id']}: {f['reason']}" for f in findings]

gitea_mcp_server.py

@@ -7964,11 +7964,12 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     org: str | None = None,
     repo: str | None = None,
 ) -> dict:
-    """Read-only: diagnose open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit next action (#599).
+    """Read-only: diagnose open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit next action (#599, #691).
 
-    Classifies no-lease / own / foreign / instructed-lease-missing-with-replacement
-    and worktree binding mismatch. Returns a canonical ``next_action`` without
-    mutating Gitea state. Never steals foreign leases.
+    Classifies no-lease / own / foreign / superseded-head / expired / orphan /
+    instructed-lease-missing-with-replacement and worktree binding mismatch.
+    Returns a canonical ``next_action`` (including guarded obsolete-lease cleanup)
+    without mutating Gitea state. Never steals foreign leases.
     """
     read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
     if read_block:
@@ -7979,7 +7980,7 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         }
     comments = _fetch_pr_comments(
         pr_number, remote=remote, host=host, org=org, repo=repo)
-    h, _o, _r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
     try:
         username = _authenticated_username(h)
     except Exception:
@@ -7993,6 +7994,64 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     # Prefer in-session lease id when present; otherwise diagnose as a fresh
     # caller without inventing ownership of an on-thread lease.
     session_id = (session_lease.get("session_id") or "").strip() or None
+
+    # Live PR head + formal reviews for #691 superseded/completed classification.
+    current_head_sha = None
+    formal_reviews: list[dict] = []
+    try:
+        auth = _auth(h)
+        pr_live = api_request(
+            "GET", f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}", auth
+        ) or {}
+        head = pr_live.get("head") or {}
+        current_head_sha = head.get("sha") or pr_live.get("head_commit_sha")
+        try:
+            reviews = api_request(
+                "GET",
+                f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews",
+                auth,
+            ) or []
+            for rev in reviews if isinstance(reviews, list) else []:
+                formal_reviews.append({
+                    "verdict": rev.get("state") or rev.get("verdict"),
+                    "reviewed_head_sha": rev.get("commit_id") or rev.get(
+                        "reviewed_head_sha"
+                    ),
+                    "dismissed": bool(rev.get("dismissed")),
+                    "reviewer": ((rev.get("user") or {}).get("login")),
+                    "submitted_at": rev.get("submitted_at"),
+                })
+        except Exception:
+            formal_reviews = []
+    except Exception:
+        current_head_sha = None
+
+    lease_wt = None
+    active = reviewer_pr_lease.find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
+        comments, pr_number=pr_number, include_expired=True
+    )
+    if active:
+        lease_wt = (active.get("worktree") or "").strip() or None
+    worktree_exists = None
+    worktree_clean = None
+    if lease_wt:
+        worktree_exists = os.path.isdir(lease_wt)
+        if worktree_exists:
+            try:
+                import subprocess
+
+                st = subprocess.run(
+                    ["git", "-C", lease_wt, "status", "--porcelain"],
+                    capture_output=True,
+                    text=True,
+                    timeout=30,
+                    check=False,
+                )
+                if st.returncode == 0:
+                    worktree_clean = not bool((st.stdout or "").strip())
+            except Exception:
+                worktree_clean = None
+
     diagnosis = reviewer_pr_lease.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         comments,
         pr_number=pr_number,
@@ -8002,6 +8061,11 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         env_bound_worktree=env_wt,
         instructed_session_id=instructed_session_id,
         instructed_comment_id=instructed_comment_id,
+        current_head_sha=current_head_sha,
+        formal_reviews=formal_reviews,
+        worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
+        worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
+        owner_process_alive=None,  # PID never proves ownership; leave unset
     )
     diagnosis["success"] = True
     diagnosis["remote"] = remote
@@ -8129,6 +8193,212 @@ def gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease(
     return report
 
 
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease(
+    pr_number: int,
+    confirmation: str = "",
+    apply: bool = False,
+    controller_recovery_authorized: bool = False,
+    expected_lease_comment_id: int | None = None,
+    expected_session_id: str | None = None,
+    expected_leased_head: str | None = None,
+    owner_process_alive: bool | None = None,
+    current_head_review_in_progress: bool = False,
+    remote: str = "dadeschools",
+    host: str | None = None,
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Guarded cleanup for obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases on open PRs (#691).
+
+    Neutralises an expired and/or superseded-head foreign lease by posting a
+    terminal ``phase: released`` lease marker (append-only audit). Never deletes
+    comments, never repoints the lease to the new head, never transfers
+    validation/decision/workflow state, never uses PID equality as ownership,
+    and never steals a genuinely active foreign lease on the current head.
+
+    Read-first when ``apply`` is false. Apply requires:
+
+    - ``controller_recovery_authorized=True`` (explicit operator/controller
+      recovery capability — not implied by profile alone)
+    - ``confirmation`` exactly ``CLEANUP OBSOLETE REVIEWER LEASE <pr_number>``
+    - full eligibility evidence from
+      ``reviewer_pr_lease.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup``
+
+    Comment-backed leases need no control-plane DB ``lease_id``.
+    """
+    read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
+    if read_block:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "cleanup_performed": False,
+            "no_steal_or_adoption": True,
+            "reasons": read_block,
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
+        }
+
+    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    auth = _auth(h)
+    expected_repo = f"{o}/{r}"
+    comments = _fetch_pr_comments(
+        pr_number, remote=remote, host=host, org=org, repo=repo
+    )
+    pr_live = api_request(
+        "GET", f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}", auth
+    ) or {}
+    head = pr_live.get("head") or {}
+    current_head_sha = head.get("sha") or pr_live.get("head_commit_sha")
+
+    formal_reviews: list[dict] = []
+    try:
+        reviews = api_request(
+            "GET",
+            f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews",
+            auth,
+        ) or []
+        for rev in reviews if isinstance(reviews, list) else []:
+            formal_reviews.append({
+                "verdict": rev.get("state") or rev.get("verdict"),
+                "reviewed_head_sha": rev.get("commit_id")
+                or rev.get("reviewed_head_sha"),
+                "dismissed": bool(rev.get("dismissed")),
+                "reviewer": ((rev.get("user") or {}).get("login")),
+                "submitted_at": rev.get("submitted_at"),
+            })
+    except Exception:
+        formal_reviews = []
+
+    lease = reviewer_pr_lease.find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
+        comments, pr_number=pr_number, include_expired=True
+    )
+    lease_wt = ((lease or {}).get("worktree") or "").strip() or None
+    worktree_exists = None
+    worktree_clean = None
+    worktree_has_unpreserved_work = None
+    if lease_wt:
+        worktree_exists = os.path.isdir(lease_wt)
+        if worktree_exists:
+            try:
+                import subprocess
+
+                st = subprocess.run(
+                    ["git", "-C", lease_wt, "status", "--porcelain"],
+                    capture_output=True,
+                    text=True,
+                    timeout=30,
+                    check=False,
+                )
+                if st.returncode == 0:
+                    dirty = bool((st.stdout or "").strip())
+                    worktree_clean = not dirty
+                    worktree_has_unpreserved_work = dirty
+            except Exception:
+                worktree_clean = None
+
+    session = reviewer_pr_lease.get_session_lease() or {}
+    assessment = reviewer_pr_lease.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
+        comments,
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        current_head_sha=current_head_sha,
+        formal_reviews=formal_reviews,
+        repo=expected_repo,
+        expected_repo=expected_repo,
+        requesting_session_id=(session.get("session_id") or "").strip() or None,
+        controller_recovery_authorized=controller_recovery_authorized,
+        worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
+        worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
+        worktree_has_unpreserved_work=worktree_has_unpreserved_work,
+        owner_process_alive=owner_process_alive,
+        owner_pid_observed=None,
+        requesting_pid=os.getpid(),
+        current_head_review_in_progress=current_head_review_in_progress,
+        expected_lease_comment_id=expected_lease_comment_id,
+        expected_session_id=expected_session_id,
+        expected_leased_head=expected_leased_head,
+        confirmation=confirmation,
+        apply=apply,
+    )
+
+    report = {
+        "success": True,
+        "pr_number": pr_number,
+        "pr_state": pr_live.get("state"),
+        "cleanup_allowed": assessment.get("cleanup_allowed"),
+        "cleanup_performed": False,
+        "classification": assessment.get("classification"),
+        "blocker_kind": assessment.get("blocker_kind"),
+        "exact_next_action": assessment.get("exact_next_action"),
+        "mutation_eligibility": assessment.get("mutation_eligibility"),
+        "leased_head": assessment.get("leased_head"),
+        "current_head": assessment.get("current_head"),
+        "expires_at": assessment.get("expires_at"),
+        "terminal_review": assessment.get("terminal_review"),
+        "worktree_state": assessment.get("worktree_state"),
+        "owner_session_evidence": assessment.get("owner_session_evidence"),
+        "cleanup_tool": assessment.get("cleanup_tool"),
+        "required_confirmation": assessment.get("required_confirmation"),
+        "active_lease": assessment.get("active_lease"),
+        "no_steal_or_adoption": True,
+        "no_repoint": True,
+        "no_validation_transfer": True,
+        "mode": "apply" if apply else "read_only",
+        "reasons": assessment.get("reasons") or [],
+        "forbidden": assessment.get("forbidden") or [],
+    }
+
+    if not apply:
+        return report
+    if not assessment.get("cleanup_allowed"):
+        report["success"] = False
+        report["cleanup_skipped_reason"] = (
+            assessment.get("fail_closed_reasons")
+            or assessment.get("reasons")
+            or ["cleanup not allowed"]
+        )
+        return report
+
+    comment_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.pr.comment")
+    if comment_block:
+        report["success"] = False
+        report["reasons"] = comment_block
+        report["permission_report"] = _permission_block_report("gitea.pr.comment")
+        return report
+
+    verify_preflight_purity(remote)
+    # Terminal lease marker (preserves history; does not delete comment 10749-style
+    # entries — newest released marker neutralises the ledger).
+    release_body = assessment.get("release_body") or ""
+    audit_body = assessment.get("audit_comment_body") or ""
+    comment_url = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/issues/{pr_number}/comments"
+    with _audited(
+        "comment_pr",
+        host=h,
+        remote=remote,
+        org=o,
+        repo=r,
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        request_metadata={
+            "source": "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease",
+            "classification": assessment.get("classification"),
+        },
+    ):
+        posted_release = api_request(
+            "POST", comment_url, auth, {"body": release_body}
+        )
+        posted_audit = None
+        if audit_body.strip():
+            posted_audit = api_request(
+                "POST", comment_url, auth, {"body": audit_body}
+            )
+
+    # Never seed session lease from cleaned foreign lease.
+    report["cleanup_performed"] = True
+    report["released_comment_id"] = (posted_release or {}).get("id")
+    report["audit_comment_id"] = (posted_audit or {}).get("id")
+    report["session_lease_seeded"] = False
+    return report
+
+
 @mcp.tool()
 def gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease(
     pr_number: int,

mcp_native_cleanup_proof.py

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ from typing import Any
 
 AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP_TOOLS = frozenset({
     "gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease",
+    "gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease",
     "gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups",
     "gitea_delete_branch",
     "gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch",

post_merge_cleanup_proof.py

@@ -86,6 +86,22 @@ _WRONG_BRANCH_RE = re.compile(
     r"deleted branch (?:does not match|!=|differs from) (?:merged )?pr head",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
+# #698: canonical reviewer lease lifecycle operations are NOT post-merge
+# cleanup. Releasing a reviewer PR lease (or posting its terminal
+# phase=released marker) happens after every review — merged or not — and
+# must never trigger the post-merge branch/worktree cleanup checklist.
+_LEASE_LIFECYCLE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease|gitea_abandon_workflow_lease|"
+    r"release[d]? (?:the )?(?:reviewer|workflow) (?:pr )?lease|"
+    r"reviewer (?:pr )?lease release[d]?|"
+    r"lease (?:marker|comment).{0,40}phase\s*[:=]\s*released|"
+    r"phase\s*[:=]\s*released)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_CLEANUP_MUTATIONS_VALUE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"cleanup mutations\s*:\s*([^\n]+)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
 
 
 def _claims_remote_delete(text: str) -> bool:
@@ -204,16 +220,19 @@ def assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof(
             for field in _worktree_cleanup_fields_present(text)
         )
 
-    if (remote_delete or worktree_remove) and not (remote_delete or worktree_remove):
-        pass
-
     if not remote_delete and not worktree_remove:
-        cleanup_mutations = re.search(
-            r"cleanup mutations\s*:\s*(?!none\b)\S",
-            text,
-            re.IGNORECASE,
+        value_match = _CLEANUP_MUTATIONS_VALUE_RE.search(text)
+        value = (value_match.group(1).strip() if value_match else "")
+        value_lower = value.lower()
+        substantive = bool(value) and value_lower not in {
+            "none", "n/a", "not applicable",
+        }
+        # #698: reviewer lease release / terminal lease markers are lease
+        # lifecycle, not post-merge cleanup — no checklist owed.
+        lease_lifecycle_only = substantive and bool(
+            _LEASE_LIFECYCLE_RE.search(value)
         )
-        if cleanup_mutations:
+        if substantive and not lease_lifecycle_only:
             reasons.append(
                 "cleanup mutations reported without post-merge cleanup proof checklist"
             )

pr_work_lease.py

@@ -403,10 +403,37 @@ _REVIEWER_ACTIVE_RE = re.compile(
     r"whether any reviewer was active\s*:\s*(yes|no|true|false)",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
+# #698 phase detection for phase-specific head proofs.
+_NO_REVIEWED_HEAD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:reviewed head sha|candidate head sha)\s*:\s*none\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_VERDICT_RECORDED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"review decision\s*:\s*(?:approve[d]?|request[_ ]changes)\b"
+    r"|review_status\s*:\s*(?:approved|request_changes)\b"
+    r"|terminal review mutation\s*:\s*(?!none\b)\S",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_MERGE_ATTEMPTED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"merge result\s*:\s*(?:merged|success|performed|failed|attempted)\b"
+    r"|merge mutations\s*:\s*(?!none\b|not applicable\b)\S",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_VALIDATION_STARTED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"validation\s*:\s*(?!none\b|not run\b|not applicable\b|not started\b)"
+    r"[^\n]*(?:pass|fail|ran|executed|\d+\s+passed)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
 
 
 def assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(report_text: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
-    """Final-report proof for reviewed vs live head SHAs (#399 AC 6)."""
+    """Final-report proof for reviewed vs live head SHAs (#399 AC 6).
+
+    #698: head proofs are phase-specific. A legitimately blocked run that
+    never began validation (no reviewed head, no formal verdict, no merge)
+    owes none of them; approval-time and merge-time live-head proofs are
+    owed only once the corresponding phase actually begins.
+    """
     text = report_text or ""
     reasons: list[str] = []
     reviewed = _normalize_sha(_REVIEWED_HEAD_RE.search(text).group(1) if _REVIEWED_HEAD_RE.search(text) else None)
@@ -422,15 +449,49 @@ def assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(report_text: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
     )
     push_during = _PUSH_DURING_VALIDATION_RE.search(text)
 
-    if not reviewed:
+    # Phase detection from the report's own claims.
+    no_head_stated = bool(_NO_REVIEWED_HEAD_RE.search(text))
+    verdict_recorded = bool(_VERDICT_RECORDED_RE.search(text))
+    merge_attempted = bool(_MERGE_ATTEMPTED_RE.search(text))
+    validation_started = bool(reviewed) or bool(_VALIDATION_STARTED_RE.search(text))
+    blocked_before_validation = (
+        no_head_stated
+        and not reviewed
+        and not verdict_recorded
+        and not merge_attempted
+        and not validation_started
+    )
+
+    if blocked_before_validation:
+        return {
+            "proven": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "reasons": [],
+            "reviewed_head_sha": None,
+            "live_head_sha_before_approval": None,
+            "live_head_sha_before_merge": None,
+            "push_during_validation": (
+                push_during.group(1).lower() if push_during else None
+            ),
+            "phase": "blocked_before_validation",
+        }
+
+    if not reviewed and not no_head_stated:
+        # The head must always be STATED — either a SHA or an explicit
+        # 'none'. Silence is not a phase claim and fails closed.
+        reasons.append(
+            "reviewed head SHA not stated in final report "
+            "(state the SHA or an explicit 'none')"
+        )
+    elif not reviewed and (validation_started or verdict_recorded or merge_attempted):
         reasons.append("reviewed head SHA not stated in final report")
-    if not live_approval:
+    if verdict_recorded and not live_approval:
         reasons.append("final live head SHA before approval not stated")
-    if not live_merge:
+    if merge_attempted and not live_merge:
         reasons.append("final live head SHA before merge not stated")
-    if not push_during:
+    if validation_started and not push_during:
         reasons.append("whether push occurred during validation not stated")
-    elif reviewed and live_approval and reviewed != live_approval:
+    if reviewed and live_approval and reviewed != live_approval:
         reasons.append("live head before approval differs from reviewed head SHA")
     elif reviewed and live_merge and reviewed != live_merge:
         reasons.append("live head before merge differs from reviewed head SHA")

review_final_report_schema.py

@@ -25,8 +25,13 @@ _REVIEWED_HEAD_RE = re.compile(
     r"(?:pinned reviewed head|reviewed head sha)\s*:\s*([0-9a-f]{7,40})",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
+# #698: validation pass proof appears in several legitimate shapes —
+# "Validation: pass", "Validation: focused 50 passed; full 2665 passed",
+# or structured "validation_status: pass". Accept pass evidence anywhere in
+# the Validation field's value, not only as its first token.
 _VALIDATION_PASS_RE = re.compile(
-    r"validation\s*:\s*(?:pass|passed|strong|ok|green)",
+    r"validation(?:_status)?\s*:[^\n]{0,300}?"
+    r"(?:\bpass(?:ed)?\b|\bstrong\b|\bok\b|\bgreen\b|\d+\s+passed)",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
 _MERGED_CLAIM_RE = re.compile(

review_proofs.py

@@ -858,9 +858,16 @@ _WALKTHROUGH_ARTIFACT_RE = re.compile(r"walkthrough\.md", re.I)
 
 
 def _performed_file_mutations(action_log: list[dict] | None) -> list[dict]:
-    """Return performed local file mutations, excluding gated rejections."""
+    """Return performed local file mutations, excluding gated rejections.
+
+    Non-dict entries (malformed JSON, LLM mistakes) are ignored instead of
+    raising ``AttributeError`` (#698): a malformed ledger entry can never be
+    authoritative mutation evidence.
+    """
     performed: list[dict] = []
     for entry in action_log or []:
+        if not isinstance(entry, dict):
+            continue
         if entry.get("gated_rejected") or entry.get("performed") is False:
             continue
         action = (entry.get("action") or "").strip().lower()
@@ -2228,24 +2235,31 @@ HANDOFF_REVIEW_MUTATION_FIELDS = (
 )
 
 HANDOFF_ROLE_FIELDS = {
+    # #698: the review/merger required-field sets must stay aligned with the
+    # canonical schema (skills/llm-project-workflow/schemas/
+    # review-merge-final-report.md). The schema explicitly FORBIDS the legacy
+    # fields 'Pinned reviewed head', 'Scratch worktree used', and 'Workspace
+    # mutations' — a validator must never demand a field the schema bans.
     "review": (
         ("Selected PR", ("selected pr",)),
         ("Reviewer eligibility", ("reviewer eligibility", "eligibility")),
-        ("Pinned reviewed head", ("pinned reviewed head", "pinned head")),
-        ("Worktree path", ("worktree path", "starting worktree path")),
-        ("Worktree dirty", ("worktree dirty", "whether worktree was dirty")),
-        ("Scratch worktree used", ("scratch worktree used", "scratch clone used",
-                                   "scratch worktree")),
+        ("Reviewed head SHA", ("reviewed head sha", "candidate head sha")),
+        ("Review worktree path", ("review worktree path", "worktree path",
+                                  "starting worktree path")),
+        ("Review worktree dirty", ("review worktree dirty", "worktree dirty",
+                                   "whether worktree was dirty")),
         ("Unrelated local mutations", ("unrelated local mutations",
-                                       "unrelated files modified")),
+                                       "unrelated files modified",
+                                       "file edits by reviewer")),
         ("Review decision", ("review decision", "decision")),
         ("Merge result", ("merge result",)),
         ("Linked issue status", ("linked issue status", "linked issue")),
         ("Cleanup status", ("cleanup status", "cleanup")),
+        ("Safe next action", ("safe next action", "next")),
     ) + HANDOFF_REVIEW_MUTATION_FIELDS,
     "merger": (
         ("Selected PR", ("selected pr",)),
-        ("Pinned reviewed head", ("pinned reviewed head", "pinned head")),
+        ("Reviewed head SHA", ("reviewed head sha", "candidate head sha")),
         ("Active profile", ("active profile",)),
         ("Role kind", ("role kind",)),
         ("Merge capability source", ("merge capability source",)),
@@ -2433,9 +2447,22 @@ def assess_controller_handoff(report_text, role=None, local_edits=False):
         # Issue #320: reviewer and merger handoffs use the precise mutation categories
         # in HANDOFF_REVIEW_MUTATION_FIELDS instead of the legacy ambiguous
         # "Workspace mutations" field, which is rejected below.
+        # Issue #698: the canonical review-merge schema has no 'Mutations',
+        # 'Next', 'Issue/PR', 'Branch/SHA', or 'Files changed' fields — their
+        # content lives in the precise mutation categories, 'Safe next
+        # action', 'Selected PR'/'Linked issue', head-SHA fields, and 'Files
+        # reviewed'. Requiring the legacy names rejects canonical reports.
+        _non_canonical_for_review = {
+            "Workspace mutations",
+            "Mutations",
+            "Next",
+            "Issue/PR",
+            "Branch/SHA",
+            "Files changed",
+        }
         required = [
             field for field in required
-            if field[0] != "Workspace mutations"
+            if field[0] not in _non_canonical_for_review
         ]
         if any(label.startswith("workspace mutations") for label in labels):
             return {

reviewer_pr_lease.py

@@ -524,13 +524,26 @@ def assess_lease_inventory(
         "reclaimable_review_leases": reclaimable,
     }
 
-# Canonical next-action vocabulary for reviewer lease handoff (#599).
+# Canonical next-action vocabulary for reviewer lease handoff (#599, #691).
 NEXT_ACTION_ACQUIRE = "acquire"
 NEXT_ACTION_WAIT = "wait"
 NEXT_ACTION_RESUME_EXACT_OWNER_SESSION = "resume_exact_owner_session"
 NEXT_ACTION_RELEASE_EXPIRED_LEASE = "release_expired_lease"
 NEXT_ACTION_OPERATOR_AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP = "operator_authorized_cleanup"
 NEXT_ACTION_REPAIR_WORKTREE_BINDING = "repair_worktree_binding"
+NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE = "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease"
+
+CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL = "gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease"
+CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_CONFIRMATION_PREFIX = "CLEANUP OBSOLETE REVIEWER LEASE "
+
+# Formal terminal review verdicts that complete a leased-head workflow (#691).
+_TERMINAL_REVIEW_VERDICTS = frozenset({
+    "APPROVED",
+    "REQUEST_CHANGES",
+    "approved",
+    "request_changes",
+    "REQUESTCHANGES",
+})
 
 _HANDOFF_CLASSIFICATIONS = frozenset({
     "no_lease",
@@ -539,6 +552,12 @@ _HANDOFF_CLASSIFICATIONS = frozenset({
     "foreign_active",
     "foreign_reclaimable",
     "foreign_expired",
+    "foreign_active_current_head",
+    "foreign_expired_current_head",
+    "foreign_completed_superseded_head",
+    "foreign_expired_superseded_head",
+    "orphaned_owner_missing",
+    "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence",
     "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement",
     "worktree_binding_mismatch",
 })
@@ -551,6 +570,476 @@ def _norm_path(value: str | None) -> str:
     return os.path.normpath(text.rstrip("/"))
 
 
+def _normalize_verdict(value: str | None) -> str:
+    text = (value or "").strip().upper().replace("-", "_").replace(" ", "_")
+    if text in {"REQUESTCHANGES", "REQUEST_CHANGES", "CHANGES_REQUESTED"}:
+        return "REQUEST_CHANGES"
+    if text in {"APPROVED", "APPROVE"}:
+        return "APPROVED"
+    return text
+
+
+def formal_terminal_review_for_head(
+    formal_reviews: list[dict] | None,
+    *,
+    leased_head: str | None,
+) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
+    """Return the latest undismissed terminal formal review for *leased_head*."""
+    head = _normalize_sha(leased_head)
+    if not head:
+        return None
+    matches: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
+    for review in formal_reviews or []:
+        if review.get("dismissed"):
+            continue
+        verdict = _normalize_verdict(
+            review.get("verdict") or review.get("state") or review.get("body_state")
+        )
+        if verdict not in {"APPROVED", "REQUEST_CHANGES"}:
+            continue
+        rhead = _normalize_sha(
+            review.get("reviewed_head_sha")
+            or review.get("commit_id")
+            or review.get("head_sha")
+        )
+        if rhead != head:
+            continue
+        matches.append({**review, "verdict": verdict, "reviewed_head_sha": rhead})
+    if not matches:
+        return None
+    return matches[-1]
+
+
+def find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
+    comments: list[dict],
+    *,
+    pr_number: int,
+    now: datetime | None = None,
+    include_expired: bool = True,
+) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
+    """Newest non-terminal lease marker, optionally including expired ones (#691).
+
+    Unlike ``find_active_reviewer_lease``, this retains expired non-terminal
+    markers so diagnosis/cleanup can still name the obsolete lease after
+    ``expires_at`` (comment-backed ledger; no control-plane ``lease_id``).
+    """
+    now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+    entries = list(reversed(_lease_entries(comments, pr_number=pr_number)))
+    for entry in entries:
+        phase = (entry.get("phase") or "").strip().lower()
+        if phase in _TERMINAL_PHASES:
+            # Newest terminal ends the ledger chain for active acquisition, but
+            # an older non-terminal is not "active". Stop at newest marker.
+            return None
+        expired = _lease_expired(entry, now=now)
+        if expired and not include_expired:
+            return None
+        lease = dict(entry)
+        lease["freshness"] = classify_lease_freshness(lease, now=now)
+        lease["expired"] = expired
+        return lease
+    return None
+
+
+def cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number: int) -> str:
+    return f"{CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_CONFIRMATION_PREFIX}{int(pr_number)}"
+
+
+def assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
+    comments: list[dict],
+    *,
+    pr_number: int,
+    current_head_sha: str | None,
+    formal_reviews: list[dict] | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+    expected_repo: str | None = None,
+    requesting_session_id: str | None = None,
+    controller_recovery_authorized: bool = False,
+    worktree_exists: bool | None = None,
+    worktree_clean: bool | None = None,
+    worktree_has_unpreserved_work: bool | None = None,
+    owner_process_alive: bool | None = None,
+    owner_pid_observed: int | None = None,
+    requesting_pid: int | None = None,
+    current_head_review_in_progress: bool = False,
+    expected_lease_comment_id: int | None = None,
+    expected_session_id: str | None = None,
+    expected_leased_head: str | None = None,
+    confirmation: str | None = None,
+    apply: bool = False,
+    now: datetime | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Guarded cleanup eligibility for obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases (#691).
+
+    Cleanup is never transfer/adoption/repoint and never uses PID equality as
+    ownership. Eligible only when evidence proves the lease is past expiry and/or
+    pinned to a superseded head with a completed formal terminal review, and
+    every safety boundary holds.
+    """
+    now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    fail_closed_reasons: list[str] = []
+    current_head = _normalize_sha(current_head_sha)
+    req_session = (requesting_session_id or "").strip()
+
+    lease = find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
+        comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now, include_expired=True
+    )
+    if not lease:
+        # Fall back to active finder (unexpired only) for report consistency.
+        lease = find_active_reviewer_lease(comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now)
+
+    classification = "no_lease"
+    cleanup_allowed = False
+    release_body: str | None = None
+    audit_comment_body: str | None = None
+    terminal_review = None
+    leased_head = None
+    head_superseded = False
+    past_expiry = False
+    expires_parseable = True
+
+    if not lease:
+        fail_closed_reasons.append(
+            f"PR #{pr_number}: no non-terminal comment-backed reviewer lease to clean"
+        )
+        classification = "no_lease"
+    else:
+        leased_head = _normalize_sha(lease.get("candidate_head"))
+        expires_raw = lease.get("expires_at")
+        expires_at = _parse_timestamp(expires_raw)
+        if expires_raw and expires_at is None:
+            expires_parseable = False
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease expires_at cannot be parsed or trusted (fail closed)"
+            )
+        past_expiry = bool(expires_at and expires_at <= now)
+        freshness = lease.get("freshness") or classify_lease_freshness(lease, now=now)
+        owner_session = (lease.get("session_id") or "").strip()
+        is_requesting_owner = bool(
+            req_session and owner_session and req_session == owner_session
+        )
+
+        # Identity pins (repo / PR / session / head / comment) must match when
+        # the caller supplies expected evidence.
+        lease_repo = (lease.get("repo") or "").strip()
+        exp_repo = (expected_repo or repo or "").strip()
+        if exp_repo and lease_repo and exp_repo != lease_repo:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                f"repository identity mismatch: lease repo={lease_repo!r} "
+                f"expected={exp_repo!r}"
+            )
+        if lease.get("pr_number") not in (None, pr_number):
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                f"PR identity mismatch: lease pr={lease.get('pr_number')} "
+                f"requested={pr_number}"
+            )
+        if expected_lease_comment_id is not None:
+            cid = lease.get("comment_id")
+            if cid is None or int(cid) != int(expected_lease_comment_id):
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "lease comment_id does not match expected evidence "
+                    f"(lease={cid}, expected={expected_lease_comment_id})"
+                )
+        if expected_session_id:
+            if owner_session != expected_session_id.strip():
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "lease session_id does not match expected evidence "
+                    f"(lease={owner_session}, expected={expected_session_id})"
+                )
+        if expected_leased_head:
+            exp_head = _normalize_sha(expected_leased_head)
+            if not exp_head or exp_head != leased_head:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "leased head does not match expected evidence "
+                    f"(lease={leased_head}, expected={exp_head})"
+                )
+
+        # PID equality is never ownership proof (#691).
+        if (
+            owner_pid_observed is not None
+            and requesting_pid is not None
+            and int(owner_pid_observed) == int(requesting_pid)
+        ):
+            reasons.append(
+                "observed PID equals requesting PID but PID equality is NOT "
+                "ownership proof; ignored for authorization"
+            )
+
+        if is_requesting_owner:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "requesting session owns the lease; use "
+                "gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease (owner path), not non-owner cleanup"
+            )
+
+        if current_head_review_in_progress:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "a current-head review submission is in progress; cleanup denied"
+            )
+
+        if not current_head:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "current PR head SHA missing or unparseable (fail closed)"
+            )
+        if not leased_head:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease candidate_head missing or unparseable (fail closed)"
+            )
+
+        head_superseded = bool(
+            current_head and leased_head and current_head != leased_head
+        )
+        head_matches_current = bool(
+            current_head and leased_head and current_head == leased_head
+        )
+
+        terminal_review = formal_terminal_review_for_head(
+            formal_reviews, leased_head=leased_head
+        )
+        has_terminal = terminal_review is not None
+
+        # Worktree safety.
+        if worktree_has_unpreserved_work is True or worktree_clean is False:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease worktree is dirty or has unpreserved work; cleanup denied"
+            )
+        if (
+            worktree_exists is True
+            and worktree_clean is None
+            and worktree_has_unpreserved_work is None
+        ):
+            # Unknown cleanliness when path exists — fail closed.
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease worktree exists but cleanliness is unknown (fail closed)"
+            )
+
+        # Classification matrix (#691).
+        if head_matches_current and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"}:
+            classification = "foreign_active_current_head"
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "genuinely active foreign lease on the current PR head; "
+                "cleanup denied (fail closed)"
+            )
+        elif head_matches_current and past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_expired_current_head"
+            # Expired on current head: owner-missing / orphan path may apply.
+            if owner_process_alive is True:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "lease expired on current head but owner process still alive "
+                    "with plausible activity; cleanup denied"
+                )
+            elif worktree_clean is False:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "owner process absent but worktree dirty; cleanup denied"
+                )
+            elif owner_process_alive is False and (
+                worktree_clean is True or worktree_exists is False
+            ):
+                if controller_recovery_authorized:
+                    classification = "orphaned_owner_missing"
+                else:
+                    fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                        "controller/recovery capability not authorized for orphan cleanup"
+                    )
+            else:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "insufficient orphan evidence for expired current-head lease "
+                    "(need owner_process_alive=false and clean/absent worktree)"
+                )
+        elif head_superseded and has_terminal and past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_expired_superseded_head"
+        elif head_superseded and has_terminal and not past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_completed_superseded_head"
+        elif head_superseded and not has_terminal:
+            classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease head is superseded but no formal terminal review exists "
+                "for the leased head (fail closed)"
+            )
+        elif not head_superseded and not past_expiry and freshness in {
+            "active", "stale_warning"
+        }:
+            classification = "foreign_active_current_head"
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "foreign lease still active on current head; wait or use owner release"
+            )
+        elif past_expiry and not head_superseded:
+            classification = "foreign_expired_current_head"
+        else:
+            classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease evidence is ambiguous; cleanup denied (fail closed)"
+            )
+
+        # Recent owner progress on a non-superseded active lease blocks cleanup.
+        minutes = _minutes_since_activity(lease, now=now)
+        if (
+            head_matches_current
+            and freshness == "active"
+            and minutes is not None
+            and minutes < STALE_WARNING_MINUTES
+        ):
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "owner session has recent authenticated progress on current head; "
+                "cleanup denied"
+            )
+
+        # Authority + confirmation for apply.
+        if not controller_recovery_authorized:
+            if classification in {
+                "foreign_completed_superseded_head",
+                "foreign_expired_superseded_head",
+                "foreign_expired_current_head",
+                "orphaned_owner_missing",
+            }:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "controller/recovery capability required "
+                    "(controller_recovery_authorized=true)"
+                )
+
+        expected_conf = cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number)
+        if apply:
+            if (confirmation or "").strip() != expected_conf:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    f"confirmation must equal exactly {expected_conf!r}"
+                )
+
+        # Superseded + terminal path does not require past_expiry (AC1).
+        eligible_class = classification in {
+            "foreign_completed_superseded_head",
+            "foreign_expired_superseded_head",
+            "orphaned_owner_missing",
+            "foreign_expired_current_head",
+        }
+        # foreign_expired_current_head needs orphan/clean worktree + authority.
+        if classification == "foreign_expired_current_head":
+            if worktree_clean is not True and worktree_exists is not False:
+                if "worktree" not in " ".join(fail_closed_reasons):
+                    fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                        "expired current-head cleanup requires proven-clean "
+                        "worktree or absent worktree"
+                    )
+            if owner_process_alive is True:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "owner process still alive on expired current-head lease"
+                )
+
+        cleanup_allowed = (
+            eligible_class
+            and expires_parseable
+            and not fail_closed_reasons
+            and not is_requesting_owner
+        )
+
+        if cleanup_allowed:
+            release_body = format_lease_body(
+                repo=lease.get("repo") or exp_repo or "",
+                pr_number=pr_number,
+                issue_number=lease.get("issue_number"),
+                reviewer_identity=lease.get("reviewer_identity") or "",
+                profile=lease.get("profile") or "unknown",
+                session_id=owner_session or "unknown",
+                worktree=lease.get("worktree") or "",
+                phase="released",
+                candidate_head=leased_head,
+                target_branch=lease.get("target_branch") or "master",
+                target_branch_sha=lease.get("target_branch_sha"),
+                last_activity=now,
+                blocker="obsolete-superseded-or-expired-lease",
+            )
+            audit_comment_body = (
+                "## Canonical obsolete reviewer lease cleanup (#691)\n\n"
+                f"- pr: #{pr_number}\n"
+                f"- lease_comment_id: {lease.get('comment_id')}\n"
+                f"- session_id: {owner_session}\n"
+                f"- leased_head: {leased_head}\n"
+                f"- current_head: {current_head}\n"
+                f"- expires_at: {lease.get('expires_at')}\n"
+                f"- classification: {classification}\n"
+                f"- terminal_review_verdict: "
+                f"{(terminal_review or {}).get('verdict')}\n"
+                f"- tool: {CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL}\n"
+                "- action: posted terminal phase=released lease marker; "
+                "did not transfer validation, decision, or workflow proof; "
+                "did not repoint lease to the new head; did not delete history\n"
+            )
+            reasons.append(
+                f"cleanup eligible ({classification}); post terminal released "
+                "marker via sanctioned tool"
+            )
+        else:
+            reasons.extend(fail_closed_reasons)
+
+    return {
+        "pr_number": pr_number,
+        "classification": classification,
+        "blocker_kind": classification if not cleanup_allowed else "none",
+        "cleanup_allowed": cleanup_allowed,
+        "mutation_allowed": False,  # never grants review mutation
+        "mutation_eligibility": "prohibited" if not cleanup_allowed else "cleanup_only",
+        "exact_next_action": (
+            NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+            if cleanup_allowed
+            else (
+                NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
+                if classification
+                in {
+                    "foreign_active_current_head",
+                    "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence",
+                }
+                else NEXT_ACTION_OPERATOR_AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP
+            )
+        ),
+        "cleanup_tool": CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL,
+        "required_confirmation": cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number),
+        "leased_head": leased_head,
+        "current_head": current_head,
+        "head_superseded": head_superseded,
+        "past_expiry": past_expiry,
+        "expires_at": (lease or {}).get("expires_at") if lease else None,
+        "expires_parseable": expires_parseable,
+        "terminal_review": terminal_review,
+        "terminal_review_present": terminal_review is not None,
+        "worktree_state": {
+            "path": (lease or {}).get("worktree") if lease else None,
+            "exists": worktree_exists,
+            "clean": worktree_clean,
+            "has_unpreserved_work": worktree_has_unpreserved_work,
+        },
+        "owner_session_evidence": {
+            "session_id": (lease or {}).get("session_id") if lease else None,
+            "reviewer_identity": (
+                (lease or {}).get("reviewer_identity") if lease else None
+            ),
+            "process_alive": owner_process_alive,
+            "pid_observed": owner_pid_observed,
+            "pid_is_not_ownership_proof": True,
+            "requesting_session_is_owner": bool(
+                lease
+                and req_session
+                and (lease.get("session_id") or "").strip() == req_session
+            ),
+        },
+        "active_lease": lease,
+        "release_body": release_body,
+        "audit_comment_body": audit_comment_body,
+        "controller_recovery_authorized": controller_recovery_authorized,
+        "reasons": reasons if reasons else fail_closed_reasons,
+        "fail_closed_reasons": fail_closed_reasons,
+        "forbidden": [
+            "manual comment deletion",
+            "database edits",
+            "mtime manipulation",
+            "PID-based ownership",
+            "direct session-state seeding",
+            "lease stealing or adoption",
+            "repointing old lease to new head",
+            "transfer of validation or decision state",
+            "worktree reuse by replacement reviewer",
+        ],
+    }
+
+
 def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     comments: list[dict],
     *,
@@ -561,40 +1050,50 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     env_bound_worktree: str | None = None,
     instructed_session_id: str | None = None,
     instructed_comment_id: int | None = None,
+    current_head_sha: str | None = None,
+    formal_reviews: list[dict] | None = None,
+    worktree_exists: bool | None = None,
+    worktree_clean: bool | None = None,
+    owner_process_alive: bool | None = None,
     now: datetime | None = None,
 ) -> dict[str, Any]:
-    """Classify open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit a canonical next action (#599).
+    """Classify open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit a canonical next action (#599, #691).
 
     Read-only diagnosis. Never steals, releases, or adopts a foreign lease.
     Fail-closed acquisition rules for active foreign leases remain intact.
 
     Returns a structured diagnosis with:
-    - classification
-    - next_action (one of wait / resume_exact_owner_session /
-      release_expired_lease / operator_authorized_cleanup /
-      repair_worktree_binding / acquire)
+    - classification (including #691 superseded/expired distinctions)
+    - next_action (including cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease)
     - active_lease identity fields when present
     - worktree_binding match result
     - instructed-lease mismatch flags
+    - cleanup tool/confirmation when cleanup-eligible
     """
     now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
     session_id = (current_session_id or "").strip()
     identity = (current_reviewer_identity or "").strip()
     instructed_sid = (instructed_session_id or "").strip()
     reasons: list[str] = []
+    current_head = _normalize_sha(current_head_sha)
 
     active = find_active_reviewer_lease(comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now)
+    # Also surface expired non-terminal newest marker for #691 diagnosis.
+    newest_nt = find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
+        comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now, include_expired=True
+    )
+    lease_for_class = active or newest_nt
     session_lease = get_session_lease()
 
     # Worktree binding: env-bound vs proposed vs active lease worktree.
     env_wt = _norm_path(env_bound_worktree)
     prop_wt = _norm_path(proposed_worktree)
-    lease_wt = _norm_path((active or {}).get("worktree") if active else None)
+    lease_wt = _norm_path((lease_for_class or {}).get("worktree") if lease_for_class else None)
     binding_mismatch = False
     binding_details: dict[str, Any] = {
         "env_bound_worktree": env_bound_worktree or None,
         "proposed_worktree": proposed_worktree or None,
-        "lease_worktree": (active or {}).get("worktree") if active else None,
+        "lease_worktree": (lease_for_class or {}).get("worktree") if lease_for_class else None,
         "match": True,
     }
     paths = [p for p in (env_wt, prop_wt, lease_wt) if p]
@@ -608,13 +1107,13 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     # Instructed lease gone while a different lease is active (PR #592-style).
     instructed_missing_with_replacement = False
     if instructed_sid or instructed_comment_id is not None:
-        if not active:
+        if not lease_for_class:
             reasons.append(
                 "instructed lease is gone and no active replacement lease remains"
             )
         else:
-            owner = (active.get("session_id") or "").strip()
-            cid = active.get("comment_id")
+            owner = (lease_for_class.get("session_id") or "").strip()
+            cid = lease_for_class.get("comment_id")
             sid_mismatch = bool(instructed_sid and owner and owner != instructed_sid)
             cid_mismatch = (
                 instructed_comment_id is not None
@@ -631,35 +1130,94 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     # Classification + next_action.
     classification = "no_lease"
     next_action = NEXT_ACTION_ACQUIRE
+    cleanup_hint: dict[str, Any] | None = None
 
-    if active:
-        owner = (active.get("session_id") or "").strip()
-        freshness = active.get("freshness") or classify_lease_freshness(
-            active, now=now
+    if lease_for_class:
+        owner = (lease_for_class.get("session_id") or "").strip()
+        freshness = lease_for_class.get("freshness") or classify_lease_freshness(
+            lease_for_class, now=now
         )
-        owner_identity = (active.get("reviewer_identity") or "").strip()
+        owner_identity = (lease_for_class.get("reviewer_identity") or "").strip()
         is_own = bool(session_id and owner and owner == session_id)
         # Same identity alone is NOT ownership for resume; session_id must match.
         same_identity = bool(
             identity and owner_identity and identity == owner_identity
         )
+        leased_head = _normalize_sha(lease_for_class.get("candidate_head"))
+        head_superseded = bool(
+            current_head and leased_head and current_head != leased_head
+        )
+        head_current = bool(
+            current_head and leased_head and current_head == leased_head
+        )
+        past_expiry = bool(lease_for_class.get("expired")) or freshness == "expired"
+        if not past_expiry:
+            past_expiry = _lease_expired(lease_for_class, now=now)
+        terminal = formal_terminal_review_for_head(
+            formal_reviews, leased_head=leased_head
+        )
 
-        if is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"}:
+        if is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"} and not past_expiry:
             classification = "own_active"
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_RESUME_EXACT_OWNER_SESSION
-        elif is_own and freshness in {"reclaimable", "expired"}:
+        elif is_own and (freshness in {"reclaimable", "expired"} or past_expiry):
             classification = "own_expired"
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_RELEASE_EXPIRED_LEASE
             reasons.append(
                 f"own lease freshness is '{freshness}'; release via "
                 "gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease then re-acquire"
             )
-        elif not is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"}:
-            classification = "foreign_active"
+        elif not is_own and head_superseded and terminal and past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_expired_superseded_head"
+            next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+            reasons.append(
+                "foreign lease expired and pinned to superseded head with "
+                "formal terminal review; use guarded obsolete-lease cleanup"
+            )
+        elif not is_own and head_superseded and terminal and not past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_completed_superseded_head"
+            next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+            reasons.append(
+                "foreign lease pinned to superseded head with completed formal "
+                "review; use guarded obsolete-lease cleanup (do not wait indefinitely)"
+            )
+        elif not is_own and head_superseded and not terminal:
+            classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
+            next_action = NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
+            reasons.append(
+                "lease head superseded but no formal terminal review for leased "
+                "head; fail closed / wait (no indefinite steal)"
+            )
+        elif not is_own and head_current and past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_expired_current_head"
+            if owner_process_alive is False and worktree_clean is True:
+                classification = "orphaned_owner_missing"
+                next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+                reasons.append(
+                    "foreign expired lease on current head; owner process absent "
+                    "and worktree clean — guarded orphan cleanup eligible"
+                )
+            elif owner_process_alive is False and worktree_clean is False:
+                classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
+                next_action = NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
+                reasons.append(
+                    "owner process absent but worktree dirty; cleanup denied"
+                )
+            else:
+                next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+                reasons.append(
+                    "foreign expired lease on current head; use guarded cleanup "
+                    "when worktree/process evidence permits"
+                )
+        elif not is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"} and not past_expiry:
+            classification = (
+                "foreign_active_current_head" if head_current or not current_head
+                else "foreign_active"
+            )
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
             reasons.append(
                 f"foreign active reviewer lease (session_id={owner}, "
-                f"phase={active.get('phase')}, freshness={freshness}); "
+                f"phase={lease_for_class.get('phase')}, freshness={freshness}); "
                 "do not submit; do not steal"
             )
             if same_identity:
@@ -674,11 +1232,12 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
                 f"foreign reclaimable lease (session_id={owner}); clear only via "
                 "sanctioned gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease when reclaimable"
             )
-        elif not is_own and freshness == "expired":
+        elif not is_own and (freshness == "expired" or past_expiry):
             classification = "foreign_expired"
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_RELEASE_EXPIRED_LEASE
             reasons.append(
-                f"foreign expired lease (session_id={owner}); use sanctioned release"
+                f"foreign expired lease (session_id={owner}); use sanctioned release "
+                f"or {CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL}"
             )
         else:
             classification = "foreign_active"
@@ -691,13 +1250,26 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         if instructed_missing_with_replacement and classification.startswith(
             "foreign"
         ):
-            classification = "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement"
-            # Foreign active still means wait; reclaimable still release.
-            if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_WAIT:
-                reasons.append(
-                    "replacement foreign lease is active — wait; "
-                    "operator_authorized_cleanup only with explicit operator authority"
-                )
+            # Preserve #691 cleanup path when superseded/expired; otherwise
+            # keep the PR #592 instructed-missing label.
+            if next_action != NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE:
+                classification = "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement"
+                if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_WAIT:
+                    reasons.append(
+                        "replacement foreign lease is active — wait; "
+                        "operator_authorized_cleanup only with explicit operator authority"
+                    )
+
+        if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE:
+            cleanup_hint = {
+                "cleanup_tool": CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL,
+                "required_confirmation": cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number),
+                "controller_recovery_authorized_required": True,
+                "leased_head": leased_head,
+                "current_head": current_head,
+                "expires_at": lease_for_class.get("expires_at"),
+                "terminal_review_verdict": (terminal or {}).get("verdict"),
+            }
     else:
         classification = "no_lease"
         next_action = NEXT_ACTION_ACQUIRE
@@ -720,29 +1292,55 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
             )
 
     lease_summary = None
-    if active:
+    if lease_for_class:
         lease_summary = {
-            "comment_id": active.get("comment_id"),
-            "session_id": active.get("session_id"),
-            "phase": active.get("phase"),
-            "candidate_head": active.get("candidate_head"),
-            "expires_at": active.get("expires_at"),
-            "last_activity": active.get("last_activity"),
-            "freshness": active.get("freshness")
-            or classify_lease_freshness(active, now=now),
-            "reviewer_identity": active.get("reviewer_identity"),
-            "profile": active.get("profile"),
-            "worktree": active.get("worktree"),
-            "blocker": active.get("blocker"),
+            "comment_id": lease_for_class.get("comment_id"),
+            "session_id": lease_for_class.get("session_id"),
+            "phase": lease_for_class.get("phase"),
+            "candidate_head": lease_for_class.get("candidate_head"),
+            "expires_at": lease_for_class.get("expires_at"),
+            "last_activity": lease_for_class.get("last_activity"),
+            "freshness": lease_for_class.get("freshness")
+            or classify_lease_freshness(lease_for_class, now=now),
+            "reviewer_identity": lease_for_class.get("reviewer_identity"),
+            "profile": lease_for_class.get("profile"),
+            "worktree": lease_for_class.get("worktree"),
+            "blocker": lease_for_class.get("blocker"),
         }
 
     return {
         "pr_number": pr_number,
         "classification": classification,
+        "blocker_kind": classification,
         "next_action": next_action,
+        "exact_next_action": next_action,
         "active_lease": lease_summary,
         "session_lease": session_lease,
         "worktree_binding": binding_details,
+        "leased_head": (lease_summary or {}).get("candidate_head"),
+        "current_head": current_head,
+        "expires_at": (lease_summary or {}).get("expires_at"),
+        "terminal_review_state": (
+            formal_terminal_review_for_head(
+                formal_reviews,
+                leased_head=(lease_summary or {}).get("candidate_head"),
+            )
+            if lease_summary
+            else None
+        ),
+        "worktree_state": {
+            "exists": worktree_exists,
+            "clean": worktree_clean,
+            "path": (lease_summary or {}).get("worktree"),
+        },
+        "owner_session_evidence": {
+            "session_id": (lease_summary or {}).get("session_id"),
+            "process_alive": owner_process_alive,
+            "pid_is_not_ownership_proof": True,
+        },
+        "cleanup": cleanup_hint,
+        "cleanup_tool": (cleanup_hint or {}).get("cleanup_tool"),
+        "required_confirmation": (cleanup_hint or {}).get("required_confirmation"),
         "instructed_session_id": instructed_session_id,
         "instructed_comment_id": instructed_comment_id,
         "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement": instructed_missing_with_replacement,
@@ -751,6 +1349,19 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
             and not binding_mismatch
             and bool(session_lease)
         ),
+        "mutation_eligibility": (
+            "allowed"
+            if (
+                next_action == NEXT_ACTION_RESUME_EXACT_OWNER_SESSION
+                and not binding_mismatch
+                and bool(session_lease)
+            )
+            else (
+                "cleanup_only"
+                if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+                else "prohibited"
+            )
+        ),
         "reasons": reasons,
         "forbidden": [
             "manual lock deletion",
@@ -758,5 +1369,8 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
             "mtime manipulation",
             "direct _SESSION_LEASE seeding",
             "silent foreign lease steal",
+            "PID-based ownership",
+            "repointing old lease to new head",
+            "transfer of validation or decision state",
         ],
     }

task_capability_map.py

@@ -76,6 +76,16 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
         "role": "reviewer",
     },
+    # #691: guarded non-owner cleanup of obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases.
+    # Apply path posts lease release + audit comments (gitea.pr.comment).
+    "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
+        "role": "reviewer",
+    },
+    "gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
+        "role": "reviewer",
+    },
     "blind_pr_queue_review": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
         "role": "reviewer",

tests/test_issue_691_obsolete_reviewer_lease_cleanup.py

@@ -0,0 +1,599 @@
+"""Guarded cleanup for obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases (#691).
+
+Reproduces PR #688 lease comment 10749 class of defect: completed
+REQUEST_CHANGES on head A, author pushes head B, foreign lease remains
+pinned to A (and after expiry still has no non-owner cleanup path that
+diagnosis can prescribe beyond indefinite wait).
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import sys
+import unittest
+from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+from pathlib import Path
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import merger_lease_adoption as mla  # noqa: E402
+import reviewer_pr_lease as leases  # noqa: E402
+
+# PR #688 / comment 10749 reproduction fixtures
+HEAD_A = "c7a444eb4b41cf916fdbd20a4999ffd78af496d0"
+HEAD_B = "4a6357800364718a27a36ebc73578d4b929ff4aa"
+SESSION_FOREIGN = "25883-7d4c6e6ebd53"
+COMMENT_10749 = 10749
+REPO = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"
+PR = 688
+ISSUE = 687
+EXPIRES_10749 = "2026-07-13T04:23:00Z"
+
+
+def _utc(dt: datetime) -> datetime:
+    return dt if dt.tzinfo else dt.replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+
+
+def _lease_comment(
+    *,
+    pr_number: int = PR,
+    session_id: str = SESSION_FOREIGN,
+    phase: str = "claimed",
+    candidate_head: str = HEAD_A,
+    comment_id: int = COMMENT_10749,
+    last_activity: datetime | None = None,
+    expires_at: datetime | None = None,
+    worktree: str = "branches/review-pr688-feat-issue-687-reconciler-branch-delete",
+    repo: str = REPO,
+) -> dict:
+    now = last_activity or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+    body = leases.format_lease_body(
+        repo=repo,
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        issue_number=ISSUE,
+        reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+        profile="prgs-reviewer",
+        session_id=session_id,
+        worktree=worktree,
+        phase=phase,
+        candidate_head=candidate_head,
+        target_branch="master",
+        target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
+        last_activity=now,
+        expires_at=expires_at,
+    )
+    return {
+        "id": comment_id,
+        "body": body,
+        "user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
+        "author": "sysadmin",
+        "created_at": now.isoformat(),
+        "updated_at": now.isoformat(),
+    }
+
+
+def _reviews_for_head(head: str, verdict: str = "REQUEST_CHANGES") -> list[dict]:
+    return [
+        {
+            "verdict": verdict,
+            "reviewed_head_sha": head,
+            "dismissed": False,
+            "reviewer": "sysadmin",
+        }
+    ]
+
+
+def _assess(
+    comments,
+    *,
+    current_head=HEAD_B,
+    formal_reviews=None,
+    controller=True,
+    worktree_exists=True,
+    worktree_clean=True,
+    owner_process_alive=False,
+    requesting_session="fresh-controller",
+    apply=False,
+    confirmation=None,
+    **kwargs,
+):
+    return leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
+        comments,
+        pr_number=PR,
+        current_head_sha=current_head,
+        formal_reviews=formal_reviews if formal_reviews is not None else _reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
+        repo=REPO,
+        expected_repo=REPO,
+        requesting_session_id=requesting_session,
+        controller_recovery_authorized=controller,
+        worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
+        worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
+        worktree_has_unpreserved_work=not worktree_clean if worktree_exists else False,
+        owner_process_alive=owner_process_alive,
+        owner_pid_observed=kwargs.get("owner_pid_observed"),
+        requesting_pid=kwargs.get("requesting_pid", 99999),
+        current_head_review_in_progress=kwargs.get(
+            "current_head_review_in_progress", False
+        ),
+        expected_lease_comment_id=kwargs.get("expected_lease_comment_id"),
+        expected_session_id=kwargs.get("expected_session_id"),
+        expected_leased_head=kwargs.get("expected_leased_head"),
+        confirmation=confirmation
+        if confirmation is not None
+        else (leases.cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(PR) if apply else ""),
+        apply=apply,
+        now=kwargs.get("now"),
+    )
+
+
+class TestIssue691SupersededHeadCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        leases.clear_session_lease()
+
+    def test_1_request_changes_then_push_expired_cleanup_succeeds(self):
+        """Completed REQUEST_CHANGES on A, push B, lease A expires → cleanup OK."""
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=2),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
+            now=now,
+            apply=True,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_expired_superseded_head")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            result["exact_next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+        )
+        self.assertIn("phase: released", result["release_body"])
+        self.assertIn("obsolete-superseded-or-expired-lease", result["release_body"])
+        self.assertIsNotNone(result["audit_comment_body"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["cleanup_tool"], leases.CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL)
+
+    def test_2_approve_then_push_cleanup_policy(self):
+        """Completed APPROVE on A, push B → cleanup eligible (completed superseded)."""
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 1, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)  # not yet expired
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=10),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "APPROVED"),
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_completed_superseded_head")
+
+    def test_3_active_current_head_cleanup_denied(self):
+        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=5),
+            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            current_head=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_B, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_active_current_head")
+
+    def test_4_foreign_owner_recent_progress_denied(self):
+        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=2),
+            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            current_head=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=[],
+            owner_process_alive=True,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("recent authenticated progress" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+            or any("current PR head" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_5_owner_absent_worktree_dirty_denied(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            current_head=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=[],
+            worktree_clean=False,
+            owner_process_alive=False,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("dirty" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_6_owner_absent_worktree_clean_orphan_ok(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            current_head=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=[],
+            worktree_clean=True,
+            owner_process_alive=False,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "orphaned_owner_missing")
+
+    def test_7_pid_reuse_not_ownership(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            now=now,
+            owner_pid_observed=4242,
+            requesting_pid=4242,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("PID equality" in r or "NOT ownership" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+            or result["owner_session_evidence"]["pid_is_not_ownership_proof"]
+        )
+        # Still eligible via superseded+terminal+expired despite matching PID.
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_8_comment_backed_no_db_lease_id(self):
+        """Cleanup uses comment ledger only — no control-plane lease_id required."""
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        # Explicitly no lease_id field anywhere.
+        self.assertNotIn("lease_id", claim)
+        result = _assess([claim], now=now)
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["active_lease"]["comment_id"], COMMENT_10749)
+        self.assertIsNone(result["active_lease"].get("lease_id"))
+
+    def test_9_cleanup_posts_durable_audit_bodies(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertIn("#691", result["audit_comment_body"])
+        self.assertIn(str(COMMENT_10749), result["audit_comment_body"])
+        self.assertIn(HEAD_A, result["audit_comment_body"])
+        self.assertIn(HEAD_B, result["audit_comment_body"])
+
+    def test_10_fresh_acquire_after_cleanup_marker(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            expires_at=expires,
+            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
+            comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
+        )
+        assessed = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
+        self.assertTrue(assessed["cleanup_allowed"])
+        release = {
+            "id": 99999,
+            "body": assessed["release_body"],
+            "user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
+        }
+        # Newest terminal marker ends active lease.
+        active = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease(
+            [claim, release], pr_number=PR, now=now
+        )
+        self.assertIsNone(active)
+        acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
+            [claim, release],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            profile="prgs-reviewer",
+            session_id="fresh-reviewer-1",
+            repo=REPO,
+            issue_number=ISSUE,
+            worktree="branches/review-pr-688-fresh",
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            target_branch="master",
+            target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(acq["acquire_allowed"], acq["reasons"])
+
+    def test_11_no_validation_state_transfer(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        # Release body keeps old candidate_head (no repoint).
+        self.assertIn(f"candidate_head: {HEAD_A}", result["release_body"])
+        self.assertNotIn(HEAD_B, result["release_body"].split("candidate_head:")[1].split("\n")[0])
+        self.assertIn("did not transfer validation", result["audit_comment_body"])
+        self.assertIn("did not repoint", result["audit_comment_body"])
+        # Session lease must remain unset by assessment (tool never seeds).
+        self.assertIsNone(leases.get_session_lease())
+
+    def test_12_repeated_cleanup_idempotent(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        first = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
+        self.assertTrue(first["cleanup_allowed"])
+        release = {"id": 100001, "body": first["release_body"], "user": {"login": "x"}}
+        second = _assess([claim, release], now=now, apply=True)
+        self.assertFalse(second["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(second["classification"], "no_lease")
+
+    def test_13_malformed_expiry_fails_closed(self):
+        claim = _lease_comment()
+        # Corrupt expires_at in the body.
+        claim["body"] = claim["body"].replace(
+            claim["body"].split("expires_at:")[1].split("\n")[0].strip(),
+            "not-a-timestamp",
+        )
+        result = _assess([claim], formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A))
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["expires_parseable"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("expires_at" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_14_wrong_identity_evidence_fails_closed(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        bad_repo = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            now=now,
+            # force repo mismatch via expected_repo
+        )
+        # Patch via direct call with wrong expected_repo
+        bad = leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
+            [claim],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
+            expected_repo="Other-Org/Other-Repo",
+            requesting_session_id="fresh",
+            controller_recovery_authorized=True,
+            worktree_exists=True,
+            worktree_clean=True,
+            owner_process_alive=False,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(bad["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("repository identity" in r for r in bad["reasons"]))
+
+        bad_pr = leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
+            [claim],
+            pr_number=999,
+            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
+            expected_repo=REPO,
+            requesting_session_id="fresh",
+            controller_recovery_authorized=True,
+            worktree_exists=True,
+            worktree_clean=True,
+            owner_process_alive=False,
+            expected_lease_comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(bad_pr["cleanup_allowed"])
+
+        bad_head = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            now=now,
+            expected_leased_head="0" * 40,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(bad_head["cleanup_allowed"])
+
+        bad_session = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            now=now,
+            expected_session_id="wrong-session",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(bad_session["cleanup_allowed"])
+
+    def test_15_current_head_active_cannot_be_displaced(self):
+        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=1),
+            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            current_head=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_B),
+            now=now,
+            current_head_review_in_progress=True,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        # Acquire also blocked by foreign active lease.
+        acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
+            [claim],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            reviewer_identity="other",
+            profile="prgs-reviewer",
+            session_id="thief",
+            repo=REPO,
+            issue_number=ISSUE,
+            worktree="branches/steal",
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            target_branch="master",
+            target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(acq["acquire_allowed"])
+
+    def test_regression_pr688_comment_10749_after_expiry(self):
+        """Exact 10749 reproduction after recorded expires_at 2026-07-13T04:23:00Z."""
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 30, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime.fromisoformat(EXPIRES_10749.replace("Z", "+00:00"))
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
+            candidate_head=HEAD_A,
+            comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
+            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=2),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        # Diagnosis must not prescribe indefinite wait-only for this case.
+        diag = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
+            [claim],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            current_session_id="fresh-reviewer",
+            current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
+            worktree_exists=True,
+            worktree_clean=True,
+            owner_process_alive=False,
+            instructed_session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
+            instructed_comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(diag["classification"], "foreign_expired_superseded_head")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            diag["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(diag["cleanup_tool"], leases.CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL)
+        self.assertIn("CLEANUP OBSOLETE REVIEWER LEASE 688", diag["required_confirmation"])
+        self.assertEqual(diag["mutation_eligibility"], "cleanup_only")
+        self.assertFalse(diag["mutation_allowed"])
+
+        # Assessment still returns the lease as active/stale class of block for acquire
+        # when unexpired path... here it's expired so find_active is None; acquire free
+        # only after cleanup if somehow still active. With expired, find_active is None:
+        active = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease([claim], pr_number=PR, now=now)
+        self.assertIsNone(active)
+
+        # But superseded unexpired still blocks acquire and diagnosis points to cleanup:
+        unexpired_now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 1, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim2 = _lease_comment(
+            session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
+            candidate_head=HEAD_A,
+            comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
+            last_activity=unexpired_now - timedelta(minutes=45),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        active2 = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease(
+            [claim2], pr_number=PR, now=unexpired_now
+        )
+        self.assertIsNotNone(active2)
+        self.assertEqual(active2["freshness"], "stale_warning")
+        diag2 = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
+            [claim2],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            current_session_id="fresh-reviewer",
+            current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
+            worktree_exists=True,
+            worktree_clean=True,
+            now=unexpired_now,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(diag2["classification"], "foreign_completed_superseded_head")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            diag2["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+        )
+        acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
+            [claim2],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            profile="prgs-reviewer",
+            session_id="fresh-reviewer",
+            repo=REPO,
+            issue_number=ISSUE,
+            worktree="branches/review-pr-688-new",
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            target_branch="master",
+            target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
+            now=unexpired_now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(acq["acquire_allowed"])
+
+    def test_missing_controller_auth_denied(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess([claim], controller=False, now=now)
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+
+    def test_wrong_confirmation_denied_on_apply(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim], now=now, apply=True, confirmation="MERGE PR 688"
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("confirmation" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_owner_session_must_use_owner_release(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            now=now,
+            requesting_session=SESSION_FOREIGN,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("owns the lease" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_superseded_without_terminal_review_denied(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess([claim], formal_reviews=[], now=now)
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence")
+
+
+class TestIssue691DiagnoseClassifications(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        leases.clear_session_lease()
+
+    def test_foreign_active_current_head_still_wait(self):
+        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=5),
+            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=1),
+        )
+        claim["id"] = 1
+        result = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
+            [claim],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            current_session_id="other",
+            current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=[],
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_active_current_head")
+        self.assertEqual(result["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_WAIT)
+        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_allowed"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_issue_698_report_validator_schema_alignment.py

@@ -0,0 +1,461 @@
+"""Regression tests for #698: final-report validator vs canonical schema.
+
+Covers the original #698 lead plus the independent reproduction recorded
+during the PR #703 formal review (issue #698 comment 11246):
+
+1. non-dict ``action_log`` entries must fail structured, never crash;
+2. the validator must not demand legacy fields the canonical schema forbids
+   (``Pinned reviewed head``, ``Scratch worktree used``, ``Worktree path``,
+   ``Worktree dirty``, ``Mutations``, ``Next``);
+3. a legitimately blocked report (``Candidate head SHA: none``, no formal
+   verdict) must not owe approval/merge live-head proofs;
+4. canonical reviewer lease release must not be misclassified as post-merge
+   cleanup;
+5. structured workflow-load and validation proof must be recognized;
+6. review mutations are inferred only from authoritative evidence.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import final_report_validator as frv  # noqa: E402
+import post_merge_cleanup_proof as pmcp  # noqa: E402
+import pr_work_lease as pwl  # noqa: E402
+import review_proofs as rp  # noqa: E402
+from review_final_report_schema import (  # noqa: E402
+    assess_review_final_report_schema,
+)
+
+REVIEWED_HEAD = "a" * 40
+LIVE_HEAD = "a" * 40
+
+
+def _pr703_style_report(
+    *,
+    decision: str = "request_changes",
+    cleanup_mutations: str = (
+        "released reviewer PR lease via gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease "
+        "(terminal lease marker phase=released posted)"
+    ),
+) -> str:
+    """Canonical-schema report modeled on the PR #703 formal review handoff."""
+    return f"""
+Formal review completed with a REQUEST_CHANGES verdict submitted and read
+back via the native review API.
+
+## Controller Handoff
+
+- Task: review-merge-pr
+- Repo: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools
+- Role: reviewer
+- Identity: sysadmin / prgs-reviewer
+- Active profile: prgs-reviewer
+- Runtime context: neutral workspace binding
+- Selected PR: 703
+- Linked issue: #702 open
+- Eligibility class: reviewable
+- Queue ordering policy: oldest eligible first
+- Inventory pagination proof: has_more=false, total_count=8
+- Earlier PRs skipped: none
+- Candidate head SHA: {REVIEWED_HEAD}
+- Reviewed head SHA: {REVIEWED_HEAD}
+- Target branch: master
+- Target branch SHA: {"2" * 40}
+- Already-landed gate: not landed
+- Author-safety result: pass (author differs from reviewer)
+- Prior request-changes state: none
+- Review worktree used: true
+- Review worktree path: branches/review-pr-703-independent
+- Review worktree inside branches: true
+- Review worktree HEAD state: detached at pinned head
+- Review worktree dirty before validation: clean
+- Review worktree dirty after validation: clean
+- Baseline worktree used: false
+- Baseline worktree path: none
+- Files reviewed: 4
+- Validation: focused 50 passed; related 94 passed; full 2665 passed, 6 skipped
+- Official validation integrity status: intact
+- Terminal review mutation: one REQUEST_CHANGES review submitted and read back
+- Review decision: {decision}
+- Merge preflight: not run
+- Merge result: none
+- Linked issue status: open (live fetch proof: gitea_view_issue)
+- Main checkout branch: master
+- Main checkout dirty state: clean
+- Main checkout updated: false
+- File edits by reviewer: none
+- Worktree/index mutations: none
+- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs (recorded)
+- MCP/Gitea mutations: review submission and lease comments only
+- Review mutations: one formal REQUEST_CHANGES verdict
+- Merge mutations: none
+- Cleanup mutations: {cleanup_mutations}
+- External-state mutations: none
+- Read-only diagnostics: gitea_view_pr, gitea_get_pr_review_feedback
+- Blockers: findings F1-F6 recorded on the PR thread
+- Current status: review complete; author remediation required
+- Safe next action: author addresses findings and pushes a new head
+- Safety statement: no merge attempted; no self-review; no root-checkout edits
+- Workflow-load helper result: workflow_hash=da045d1e1f1f boundary_status=clean
+- Live head SHA before approval: {LIVE_HEAD}
+- Pushes occurred during validation: no
+"""
+
+
+def _blocked_preflight_report() -> str:
+    """Blocked-run report modeled on the #702 comment 11164 reproduction."""
+    return """
+Fresh review preflight stopped before any worktree or validation work.
+
+## Controller Handoff
+
+- Task: review-merge-pr
+- Repo: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools
+- Role: reviewer
+- Identity: sysadmin / prgs-reviewer
+- Active profile: prgs-reviewer
+- Runtime context: stale workspace binding detected
+- Selected PR: 701
+- Linked issue: #699 open
+- Eligibility class: blocked-before-validation
+- Queue ordering policy: oldest eligible first
+- Inventory pagination proof: has_more=false, total_count=8
+- Earlier PRs skipped: none
+- Candidate head SHA: none
+- Reviewed head SHA: none
+- Target branch: master
+- Target branch SHA: none
+- Already-landed gate: not run
+- Author-safety result: not run
+- Prior request-changes state: none
+- Review worktree used: false
+- Review worktree path: none
+- Review worktree inside branches: not applicable
+- Review worktree HEAD state: not applicable
+- Review worktree dirty before validation: not applicable
+- Review worktree dirty after validation: not applicable
+- Baseline worktree used: false
+- Baseline worktree path: none
+- Files reviewed: 0
+- Validation: not run
+- Official validation integrity status: not applicable
+- Terminal review mutation: none
+- Review decision: none
+- Merge preflight: not run
+- Merge result: none
+- Linked issue status: open (live fetch proof: gitea_view_issue)
+- Main checkout branch: master
+- Main checkout dirty state: clean
+- Main checkout updated: false
+- File edits by reviewer: none
+- Worktree/index mutations: none
+- Git ref mutations: none
+- MCP/Gitea mutations: none
+- Review mutations: none
+- Merge mutations: none
+- Cleanup mutations: none
+- External-state mutations: none
+- Read-only diagnostics: gitea_view_pr, gitea_get_runtime_context
+- Blockers: runtime bound to a foreign task worktree; mutation prohibited
+- Current status: stopped before validation began
+- Next actor: operator
+- Next action: repair the runtime workspace binding, then rerun the full
+  review workflow in a fresh reviewer session
+- Next prompt: Act as REVIEWER for PR 701 after the operator repairs the
+  runtime binding; acquire the lease before any validation.
+- Safe next action: operator repairs runtime binding, then a fresh reviewer
+  reruns the full workflow
+- Safety statement: no lease acquired; no verdict recorded; no source edits
+- Workflow-load helper result: workflow_hash=da045d1e1f1f boundary_status=clean
+"""
+
+
+class TestActionLogRobustness(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#698 original lead: non-dict action_log must not crash validation."""
+
+    MALFORMED = [
+        "git fetch prgs",
+        42,
+        None,
+        {"action": "edit", "path": "x.py", "performed": True, "tracked": True},
+    ]
+
+    def test_assess_final_report_validator_survives_malformed_entries(self):
+        result = frv.assess_final_report_validator(
+            _pr703_style_report(),
+            "review_pr",
+            action_log=self.MALFORMED,
+        )
+        self.assertIsInstance(result, dict)
+        rule_ids = {f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]}
+        self.assertIn("shared.action_log_malformed", rule_ids)
+
+    def test_malformed_entry_errors_are_sanitized(self):
+        _entries, findings = frv.sanitize_action_log(["secret-token-abc123"])
+        self.assertEqual(len(findings), 1)
+        reason = findings[0]["reason"]
+        self.assertNotIn("secret-token-abc123", reason)
+        self.assertIn("str", reason)
+        self.assertIn("entry 0", reason)
+
+    def test_non_list_action_log_is_reported_not_raised(self):
+        entries, findings = frv.sanitize_action_log("not-a-list")
+        self.assertEqual(entries, [])
+        self.assertEqual(len(findings), 1)
+        self.assertIn("not a list", findings[0]["reason"])
+
+    def test_performed_file_mutations_skips_non_dict_entries(self):
+        performed = rp._performed_file_mutations(
+            ["oops", {"action": "edited", "path": "a.py"}]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(len(performed), 1)
+        self.assertEqual(performed[0]["path"], "a.py")
+
+    def test_schema_entrypoint_survives_string_only_log(self):
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(
+            _pr703_style_report(),
+            action_log=["just a string", "another string"],
+        )
+        self.assertIsInstance(result, dict)
+
+
+class TestLegacyFieldRequirementsRemoved(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#698: prohibited legacy fields must not be REQUIRED of reports."""
+
+    PROHIBITED = (
+        "Pinned reviewed head",
+        "Scratch worktree used",
+        "Worktree path",
+        "Worktree dirty",
+        "Workspace mutations",
+        "Mutations",
+        "Next",
+        "Issue/PR",
+        "Branch/SHA",
+        "Files changed",
+    )
+
+    def test_review_role_field_table_has_no_prohibited_requirements(self):
+        names = [name for name, _ in rp.HANDOFF_ROLE_FIELDS["review"]]
+        for prohibited in ("Pinned reviewed head", "Scratch worktree used",
+                           "Worktree path", "Worktree dirty"):
+            self.assertNotIn(prohibited, names)
+
+    def test_merger_role_field_table_has_no_pinned_reviewed_head(self):
+        names = [name for name, _ in rp.HANDOFF_ROLE_FIELDS["merger"]]
+        self.assertNotIn("Pinned reviewed head", names)
+
+    def test_canonical_report_missing_fields_never_include_prohibited(self):
+        result = rp.assess_controller_handoff(
+            _pr703_style_report(), role="review"
+        )
+        for prohibited in self.PROHIBITED:
+            self.assertNotIn(prohibited, result.get("missing_fields") or [])
+
+    def test_canonical_pr703_report_satisfies_required_fields(self):
+        result = rp.assess_controller_handoff(
+            _pr703_style_report(), role="review"
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result.get("missing_fields") or [], [])
+        self.assertEqual(result.get("verdict"), "complete")
+
+
+class TestBlockedReportAccepted(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#698: blocked run with no reviewed head / verdict is legitimate."""
+
+    def test_stale_head_proof_waived_before_validation(self):
+        result = pwl.assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(
+            _blocked_preflight_report()
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+        self.assertEqual(result.get("phase"), "blocked_before_validation")
+
+    def test_blocked_report_passes_schema_validation(self):
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(_blocked_preflight_report())
+        blocking = [
+            f for f in result["findings"] if f["severity"] == "block"
+        ]
+        self.assertEqual(blocking, [], blocking)
+
+    def test_verdict_phase_still_demands_approval_head_proof(self):
+        report = _blocked_preflight_report().replace(
+            "- Review decision: none",
+            "- Review decision: approve",
+        ).replace(
+            "- Candidate head SHA: none",
+            f"- Candidate head SHA: {REVIEWED_HEAD}",
+        )
+        result = pwl.assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        joined = " ".join(result["reasons"])
+        self.assertIn("before approval", joined)
+
+    def test_merge_phase_still_demands_merge_head_proof(self):
+        report = _pr703_style_report().replace(
+            "- Merge result: none",
+            "- Merge result: merged",
+        )
+        result = pwl.assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertIn(
+            "final live head SHA before merge not stated",
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_validation_phase_demands_push_disclosure(self):
+        report = _pr703_style_report().replace(
+            "- Pushes occurred during validation: no\n", ""
+        )
+        result = pwl.assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+        self.assertIn(
+            "whether push occurred during validation not stated",
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+
+class TestLeaseReleaseVsPostMergeCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#698 (PR #703 review reproduction): lease release is not cleanup."""
+
+    def test_lease_release_cleanup_mutations_do_not_demand_checklist(self):
+        result = pmcp.assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof(_pr703_style_report())
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_release_tool_name_alone_is_recognized(self):
+        report = _pr703_style_report(
+            cleanup_mutations="gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease comment 11244"
+        )
+        result = pmcp.assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_substantive_non_lease_cleanup_still_demands_checklist(self):
+        report = _pr703_style_report(
+            cleanup_mutations="deleted stale scratch directory manually"
+        )
+        result = pmcp.assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_remote_branch_delete_claims_still_demand_full_proof(self):
+        report = _pr703_style_report(
+            cleanup_mutations="gitea_delete_branch removed the remote branch"
+        )
+        result = pmcp.assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("remote branch deletion missing" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_full_schema_run_accepts_lease_release_report(self):
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(_pr703_style_report())
+        lease_cleanup_blocks = [
+            f for f in result["findings"]
+            if f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.post_merge_cleanup_proof"
+        ]
+        self.assertEqual(lease_cleanup_blocks, [], lease_cleanup_blocks)
+
+
+class TestStructuredProofRecognition(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#698: structured workflow-load and validation proof must be accepted."""
+
+    def test_key_value_workflow_proof_recognized(self):
+        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_workflow_load_boundary(
+            _pr703_style_report()
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(findings, [], findings)
+
+    def test_colon_form_workflow_proof_still_recognized(self):
+        report = _pr703_style_report().replace(
+            "- Workflow-load helper result: workflow_hash=da045d1e1f1f "
+            "boundary_status=clean",
+            "- Workflow-load helper result: workflow_hash: da045d1e1f1f, "
+            "boundary_status: clean",
+        )
+        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_workflow_load_boundary(report)
+        self.assertEqual(findings, [], findings)
+
+    def test_incomplete_structured_proof_still_blocks(self):
+        report = _pr703_style_report().replace(
+            "workflow_hash=da045d1e1f1f boundary_status=clean",
+            "workflow_hash=da045d1e1f1f",
+        )
+        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_workflow_load_boundary(report)
+        self.assertTrue(findings)
+        self.assertIn("boundary_status", findings[0]["reason"])
+
+    def test_validation_counts_accepted_as_pass_proof(self):
+        # "Validation: focused 50 passed; ..." must satisfy the reviewed-head
+        # validation-proof rule (PR #703 reproduction).
+        result = assess_review_final_report_schema(_pr703_style_report())
+        head_blocks = [
+            f for f in result["findings"]
+            if f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.reviewed_head_without_validation"
+        ]
+        self.assertEqual(head_blocks, [], head_blocks)
+
+
+class TestAuthoritativeMutationInference(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#698: review mutations inferred only from authoritative evidence."""
+
+    def test_read_only_entries_do_not_imply_mutations(self):
+        report = "## Controller Handoff\n- Mutations: none\n"
+        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none(
+            report,
+            action_log=[
+                {"action": "gitea_view_pr"},
+                {"action": "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback", "performed": False},
+            ],
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(findings, [], findings)
+
+    def test_performed_mutation_still_blocks_vague_none(self):
+        report = "## Controller Handoff\n- Mutations: none\n"
+        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none(
+            report,
+            action_log=[{"action": "edit", "path": "a.py", "performed": True}],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(findings)
+
+    def test_gated_rejection_is_not_a_mutation(self):
+        report = "## Controller Handoff\n- Mutations: none\n"
+        findings = frv._rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none(
+            report,
+            action_log=[
+                {"action": "edit", "path": "a.py", "performed": True,
+                 "gated_rejected": True},
+            ],
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(findings, [], findings)
+
+
+class TestValidatorRuleErrorContainment(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#698: a defective rule fails closed with a sanitized error."""
+
+    def test_rule_exception_becomes_sanitized_block_finding(self):
+        def _boom(report_text):
+            raise ValueError("raw secret detail that must not leak")
+
+        original = frv._RULES_BY_TASK["review_pr"]
+        frv._RULES_BY_TASK["review_pr"] = [_boom]
+        try:
+            result = frv.assess_final_report_validator(
+                "report body", "review_pr"
+            )
+        finally:
+            frv._RULES_BY_TASK["review_pr"] = original
+        self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
+        finding = next(
+            f for f in result["findings"]
+            if f["rule_id"] == "shared.validator_rule_error"
+        )
+        self.assertNotIn("raw secret detail", finding["reason"])
+        self.assertIn("ValueError", finding["reason"])
+        self.assertIn("_boom", finding["reason"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_review_proofs.py

@@ -957,17 +957,20 @@ class TestControllerHandoff(unittest.TestCase):
             if not line.startswith("- Workspace mutations:"))
         result = assess_controller_handoff(review_base, role="review")
         self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "incomplete")
-        self.assertIn("Pinned reviewed head", result["missing_fields"])
-        self.assertIn("Worktree path", result["missing_fields"])
+        # #698: the canonical schema forbids the legacy fields, so the
+        # validator must demand the canonical names instead.
+        self.assertIn("Reviewed head SHA", result["missing_fields"])
+        self.assertIn("Review worktree path", result["missing_fields"])
         self.assertIn("Merge result", result["missing_fields"])
+        for legacy in ("Pinned reviewed head", "Scratch worktree used"):
+            self.assertNotIn(legacy, result["missing_fields"])
 
         complete = review_base + "\n" + "\n".join([
             "- Selected PR: #999",
             "- Reviewer eligibility: passed",
-            "- Pinned reviewed head: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
-            "- Worktree path: /repo/branches/review-pr-999",
-            "- Worktree dirty: no",
-            "- Scratch worktree used: yes (/repo/branches/review-pr-999)",
+            "- Reviewed head SHA: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
+            "- Review worktree path: /repo/branches/review-pr-999",
+            "- Review worktree dirty before validation: no",
             "- Unrelated local mutations: none",
             "- Review decision: approve",
             "- Merge result: merged",
@@ -1125,10 +1128,9 @@ class TestReviewHandoffPreciseMutationCategories(unittest.TestCase):
         "- Safety: no self-review; no self-merge; no secrets",
         "- Selected PR: #999",
         "- Reviewer eligibility: passed",
-        "- Pinned reviewed head: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
+        "- Reviewed head SHA: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
         "- Worktree path: /repo/branches/review-pr-999",
         "- Worktree dirty: no",
-        "- Scratch worktree used: yes (/repo/branches/review-pr-999)",
         "- Unrelated local mutations: none",
         "- Review decision: approve",
         "- Merge result: none",