fix(review): cross-PR decision-lock isolation and recovery diagnosis (Closes #693)

Prevent foreign open-PR terminals on the durable review-decision lock from
blocking fresh formal reviews. Scope correction authorization to the named
prior review's PR/head, add read-only diagnosis with exact next_action and
durable handoff payloads, require thread-visible correction audits, and
cover the PR #688 → #692 recovery sequence in regression tests.

gitea_mcp_server.py

@@ -3338,6 +3338,8 @@ def init_review_decision_lock(remote: str | None, task: str | None, force: bool
         "live_mutations": [],
         "correction_authorized": False,
         "correction_reason": None,
+        "correction_pr_number": None,
+        "correction_head_sha": None,
     })
 
 
@@ -3422,21 +3424,30 @@ def check_review_decision_gate(
     if stale_review_decision_lock.prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
         lock, pr_number=pr_number, expected_head_sha=ready_head
     ):
-        if prior and not lock.get("correction_authorized"):
+        scoped = stale_review_decision_lock.correction_applies(
+            lock, pr_number=pr_number, expected_head_sha=ready_head
+        )
+        if prior and not scoped:
             reasons.append(
                 "live review mutation already recorded for this PR head in this "
                 "run; only one live review mutation is allowed per head unless "
-                "gitea_authorize_review_correction was invoked (fail closed, #620)"
+                "gitea_authorize_review_correction was invoked for this same "
+                "PR/head (fail closed, #620/#693)"
             )
         elif (
             action in _TERMINAL_REVIEW_ACTIONS
-            and any(m.get("action") in _TERMINAL_REVIEW_ACTIONS for m in prior)
-            and not lock.get("correction_authorized")
+            and any(
+                isinstance(m, dict)
+                and m.get("action") in _TERMINAL_REVIEW_ACTIONS
+                and m.get("pr_number") == pr_number
+                for m in prior
+            )
+            and not scoped
         ):
             reasons.append(
                 "terminal review decision already submitted for this PR head in "
                 "this run; blocked unless an operator-approved correction was "
-                "authorized (fail closed, #620)"
+                "authorized for this same PR/head (fail closed, #620/#693)"
             )
 
     return reasons
@@ -3461,6 +3472,8 @@ def record_live_review_mutation(pr_number: int, action: str, review_id: int | No
     if lock.get("correction_authorized"):
         lock["correction_authorized"] = False
         lock["correction_reason"] = None
+        lock["correction_pr_number"] = None
+        lock["correction_head_sha"] = None
     _save_review_decision_lock(lock)
 
 
@@ -3504,11 +3517,13 @@ def terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
         and last.get("pr_number") == pr_number
     ):
         return []
-    if operation in ("mark_ready", "review", "resume") and lock.get(
-        "correction_authorized"
+    if operation in ("mark_ready", "review", "resume") and (
+        stale_review_decision_lock.correction_applies(
+            lock, pr_number=pr_number, expected_head_sha=expected_head_sha
+        )
     ):
         return []
-    # #620: same PR, different reviewed head → fresh decision boundary.
+    # #620 same-PR new head + #693 cross-PR isolation.
     if stale_review_decision_lock.terminal_boundary_allows_fresh_decision(
         lock,
         pr_number=pr_number,
@@ -3530,16 +3545,20 @@ def terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
         else ""
     )
     recovery = (
-        "if that PR is already merged/closed, use "
-        "gitea_cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock (apply=true) after live-state "
-        "proof (#594); if the PR is still open but the head moved, mark/submit "
-        "with the new expected_head_sha (#620); never delete session-state "
-        "files by hand"
+        "exact_next_action: if that PR is already merged/closed, use "
+        "gitea_cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock(apply=true) after live-state "
+        "proof (#594); if the same PR head moved, mark/submit with the new "
+        "expected_head_sha (#620); if the target is a different PR, "
+        "gitea_diagnose_review_decision_lock then mark_final on the target "
+        "(cross-PR isolation, #693); if same-head verdict was mistaken, "
+        "gitea_authorize_review_correction with matching target_pr_number "
+        "(not a generic unlock); never delete session-state files by hand; "
+        "if still blocked create/update a durable Gitea issue and stop"
     )
     return [
         "terminal review mutation already consumed in this run "
         f"({last.get('action')} on PR #{last.get('pr_number')}{head_note}); "
-        f"{guidance} (fail closed, #332); {recovery}"
+        f"{guidance} (fail closed, #332/#693); {recovery}"
     ]
 
 
@@ -4121,10 +4140,33 @@ def gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
             "reasons": [
                 "review decision lock missing; resolve review_pr capability first"
             ],
+            "exact_next_action": (
+                "gitea_resolve_task_capability(task='review_pr') then retry "
+                "mark_final"
+            ),
+            "durable_issue_handoff": {
+                "required": True,
+                "instruction": (
+                    "If the lock cannot be seeded, create/update a durable "
+                    "Gitea issue and stop (#693 AC8)"
+                ),
+            },
         }
     session_reasons = _review_decision_session_reasons(lock)
     if session_reasons:
-        return {"marked_ready": False, "reasons": session_reasons}
+        classification = stale_review_decision_lock.classify_review_decision_lock(
+            lock,
+            target_pr_number=pr_number,
+            target_head_sha=expected_head_sha,
+            session_blockers=session_reasons,
+        )
+        fail = stale_review_decision_lock.build_precise_mark_final_failure(
+            classification
+        )
+        return {
+            "marked_ready": False,
+            **fail,
+        }
     if remote != lock.get("remote"):
         return {
             "marked_ready": False,
@@ -4132,6 +4174,7 @@ def gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
                 f"requested remote '{remote}' does not match locked remote "
                 f"'{lock.get('remote')}' (fail closed)"
             ],
+            "exact_next_action": "use the remote bound on the decision lock",
         }
     try:
         _, resolved_org, resolved_repo = _resolve(remote, None, org, repo)
@@ -4166,7 +4209,26 @@ def gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
         pr_number, "mark_ready", expected_head_sha=expected_head_sha
     )
     if hard_stop:
-        return {"marked_ready": False, "reasons": hard_stop}
+        classification = stale_review_decision_lock.classify_review_decision_lock(
+            lock,
+            target_pr_number=pr_number,
+            target_head_sha=expected_head_sha,
+            active_profile_identity=_decision_lock_binding().get(
+                "profile_identity"
+            ),
+        )
+        fail = stale_review_decision_lock.build_precise_mark_final_failure(
+            classification
+        )
+        # Prefer classification next_action when more precise; keep hard_stop
+        # text as primary reasons for operators.
+        return {
+            "marked_ready": False,
+            "reasons": hard_stop + list(fail.get("reasons") or []),
+            "classification": fail.get("classification"),
+            "exact_next_action": fail.get("exact_next_action"),
+            "durable_issue_handoff": fail.get("durable_issue_handoff"),
+        }
     if action not in _REVIEW_ACTIONS:
         return {
             "marked_ready": False,
@@ -4182,17 +4244,63 @@ def gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
                 "expected_head_sha required before marking final review "
                 "decision (fail closed, #399)"
             ],
+            "exact_next_action": "retry mark_final with expected_head_sha pin",
+        }
+    # Safe idempotency: already ready for same PR/action/head (#693 AC4).
+    ready_head = stale_review_decision_lock.normalize_head_sha(
+        lock.get("ready_expected_head_sha")
+    )
+    target_head = stale_review_decision_lock.normalize_head_sha(expected_head_sha)
+    if (
+        lock.get("final_review_decision_ready")
+        and lock.get("ready_pr_number") == pr_number
+        and lock.get("ready_action") == action
+        and ready_head
+        and target_head
+        and stale_review_decision_lock.heads_equal(ready_head, target_head)
+        and lock.get("ready_remote") == remote
+        and lock.get("ready_org") == org
+        and lock.get("ready_repo") == repo
+    ):
+        return {
+            "marked_ready": True,
+            "idempotent": True,
+            "pr_number": pr_number,
+            "action": action,
+            "expected_head_sha": expected_head_sha,
+            "remote": remote,
+            "org": org,
+            "repo": repo,
+            "final_review_decision_ready": True,
+            "head_scoped": True,
+            "reasons": [
+                "final review decision already marked ready for this PR/action/"
+                "head (idempotent, #693)"
+            ],
         }
     if stale_review_decision_lock.prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
         lock, pr_number=pr_number, expected_head_sha=expected_head_sha
     ):
+        classification = stale_review_decision_lock.classify_review_decision_lock(
+            lock,
+            target_pr_number=pr_number,
+            target_head_sha=expected_head_sha,
+        )
+        fail = stale_review_decision_lock.build_precise_mark_final_failure(
+            classification
+        )
         return {
             "marked_ready": False,
             "reasons": [
                 "cannot mark final decision after a live review mutation was "
                 "already recorded for this PR head unless an operator-approved "
-                "correction was authorized (fail closed, #620)"
-            ],
+                "correction was authorized for this same PR/head "
+                "(fail closed, #620/#693)"
+            ]
+            + list(fail.get("reasons") or []),
+            "classification": fail.get("classification"),
+            "exact_next_action": fail.get("exact_next_action"),
+            "durable_issue_handoff": fail.get("durable_issue_handoff"),
         }
     elig = gitea_check_pr_eligibility(
         pr_number=pr_number,
@@ -4276,8 +4384,19 @@ def gitea_authorize_review_correction(
     prior_review_state: str,
     reason: str,
     operator_authorized: bool = False,
+    target_pr_number: int | None = None,
+    expected_head_sha: str | None = None,
+    remote: str = "dadeschools",
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+    post_audit_comment: bool = True,
 ) -> dict:
-    """Authorize one operator-approved correction after a mistaken live review."""
+    """Authorize one operator-approved correction after a mistaken live review.
+
+    #693: correction is scoped to the named prior review's **PR and head**.
+    It cannot unlock a different PR (no generic decision-lock bypass).
+    Successful authorization posts a thread-visible audit on the target PR.
+    """
     reason = (reason or "").strip()
     prior_review_state = (prior_review_state or "").strip().lower()
     lock = _load_review_decision_lock()
@@ -4303,7 +4422,20 @@ def gitea_authorize_review_correction(
     last_mutation = prior[-1]
     last_review_id = last_mutation.get("review_id")
     last_review_state = last_mutation.get("action")
+    last_pr = last_mutation.get("pr_number")
+    last_head = stale_review_decision_lock.mutation_head_sha(last_mutation, lock)
     reasons = []
+    if target_pr_number is None:
+        reasons.append(
+            "target_pr_number is required so correction cannot become a "
+            "generic unlock (fail closed, #693)"
+        )
+    elif last_pr is not None and int(target_pr_number) != int(last_pr):
+        reasons.append(
+            f"target_pr_number #{target_pr_number} does not match last "
+            f"recorded mutation PR #{last_pr}; correction cannot unlock a "
+            f"different PR (fail closed, #693)"
+        )
     if last_review_id is not None and last_review_id != prior_review_id:
         reasons.append(
             f"prior review ID '{prior_review_id}' does not match last "
@@ -4314,14 +4446,202 @@ def gitea_authorize_review_correction(
             f"prior review state '{prior_review_state}' does not match last "
             f"recorded review state '{last_review_state}' (fail closed)"
         )
+    want_head = stale_review_decision_lock.normalize_head_sha(expected_head_sha)
+    if want_head and last_head and not stale_review_decision_lock.heads_equal(
+        want_head, last_head
+    ):
+        reasons.append(
+            f"expected_head_sha does not match last mutation head "
+            f"{last_head[:12]}… (fail closed, #693)"
+        )
     if not reason:
         reasons.append("correction reason is required")
+    try:
+        actor = None
+        h, o, r = _resolve(remote, None, org, repo)
+        try:
+            actor = _authenticated_username(h)
+        except Exception:
+            actor = None
+    except Exception as exc:  # noqa: BLE001
+        return {
+            "authorized": False,
+            "reasons": [f"could not resolve remote for audit: {_redact(str(exc))}"],
+        }
+    profile = get_profile()
+    profile_name = (profile.get("profile_name") or "").strip() or None
+    audit = stale_review_decision_lock.build_correction_audit_record(
+        prior_review_id=prior_review_id,
+        prior_review_state=prior_review_state,
+        target_pr_number=target_pr_number if target_pr_number is not None else last_pr,
+        target_head_sha=want_head or last_head,
+        reason=reason,
+        actor_username=actor,
+        profile_name=profile_name,
+        authorized=False,
+    )
     if reasons:
-        return {"authorized": False, "reasons": reasons}
+        return {
+            "authorized": False,
+            "reasons": reasons,
+            "audit": audit,
+            "exact_next_action": (
+                "use same-PR correction only, or for a different PR use "
+                "gitea_diagnose_review_decision_lock / cross-PR isolation "
+                "(#693) or moot cleanup (#594)"
+            ),
+        }
+    scope_pr = int(target_pr_number) if target_pr_number is not None else int(last_pr)
+    scope_head = want_head or last_head
     lock["correction_authorized"] = True
     lock["correction_reason"] = reason
+    lock["correction_pr_number"] = scope_pr
+    lock["correction_head_sha"] = scope_head
     _save_review_decision_lock(lock)
-    return {"authorized": True, "correction_reason": reason, "reasons": []}
+    audit = stale_review_decision_lock.build_correction_audit_record(
+        prior_review_id=prior_review_id,
+        prior_review_state=prior_review_state,
+        target_pr_number=scope_pr,
+        target_head_sha=scope_head,
+        reason=reason,
+        actor_username=actor,
+        profile_name=profile_name,
+        authorized=True,
+    )
+    report = {
+        "authorized": True,
+        "correction_reason": reason,
+        "correction_pr_number": scope_pr,
+        "correction_head_sha": scope_head,
+        "audit": audit,
+        "audit_comment_id": None,
+        "reasons": [],
+        "scope": "same_pr_head_only",
+    }
+    if post_audit_comment and scope_pr is not None:
+        comment_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.pr.comment")
+        if comment_block:
+            report["audit_comment_skipped"] = comment_block
+        else:
+            try:
+                auth = _auth(h)
+                body = stale_review_decision_lock.format_correction_audit_comment(
+                    audit
+                )
+                with _audited(
+                    "comment_pr",
+                    host=h,
+                    remote=remote,
+                    org=o,
+                    repo=r,
+                    pr_number=scope_pr,
+                    request_metadata={"source": "authorize_review_correction"},
+                ):
+                    posted = api_request(
+                        "POST",
+                        f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/issues/{scope_pr}/comments",
+                        auth,
+                        {"body": body},
+                    )
+                report["audit_comment_id"] = (posted or {}).get("id")
+            except Exception as exc:  # noqa: BLE001
+                report["audit_comment_error"] = _redact(str(exc))
+    return report
+
+
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_diagnose_review_decision_lock(
+    target_pr_number: int,
+    expected_head_sha: str | None = None,
+    remote: str = "dadeschools",
+    host: str | None = None,
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Read-only: classify durable review-decision lock state for a target PR (#693).
+
+    Returns a deterministic classification, owner/evidence, exact next_action,
+    and whether mark_final / cleanup / scoped correction are appropriate.
+    Never mutates the lock and never authorizes correction.
+    """
+    read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
+    if read_block:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "reasons": read_block,
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
+        }
+    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    auth = _auth(h)
+    binding = _decision_lock_binding()
+    lock = _load_review_decision_lock()
+    session_blockers = _review_decision_session_reasons(lock) if lock else []
+    last = stale_review_decision_lock.last_terminal_mutation(lock)
+    pr_live = None
+    pr_lookup_error = None
+    last_pr = last.get("pr_number") if last else None
+    if last_pr is not None:
+        try:
+            pr_live = api_request(
+                "GET", f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{last_pr}", auth
+            ) or {}
+            if not pr_live:
+                pr_lookup_error = "empty PR payload"
+        except Exception as exc:  # noqa: BLE001
+            pr_lookup_error = _redact(str(exc))
+    classification = stale_review_decision_lock.classify_review_decision_lock(
+        lock,
+        target_pr_number=target_pr_number,
+        target_head_sha=expected_head_sha,
+        pr_live=pr_live,
+        pr_lookup_error=pr_lookup_error,
+        active_profile_identity=binding.get("profile_identity"),
+        session_blockers=session_blockers,
+    )
+    recovery = stale_review_decision_lock.assess_open_pr_decision_lock_recovery(
+        lock,
+        target_pr_number=target_pr_number,
+        target_head_sha=expected_head_sha,
+        last_terminal_pr_live=pr_live,
+        pr_lookup_error=pr_lookup_error,
+        active_profile_identity=binding.get("profile_identity"),
+        session_blockers=session_blockers,
+    )
+    try:
+        actor = _authenticated_username(h)
+    except Exception:
+        actor = None
+    return {
+        "success": True,
+        "remote": remote,
+        "org": o,
+        "repo": r,
+        "authenticated_username": actor,
+        "active_profile_identity": binding.get("profile_identity"),
+        "classification": classification.get("classification"),
+        "mark_final_allowed": classification.get("mark_final_allowed"),
+        "cleanup_allowed": classification.get("cleanup_allowed"),
+        "correction_eligible": classification.get("correction_eligible"),
+        "recovery_allowed": recovery.get("recovery_allowed"),
+        "recovery_mode": recovery.get("recovery_mode"),
+        "exact_next_action": classification.get("next_action"),
+        "owner_profile_identity": classification.get("owner_profile_identity"),
+        "last_terminal_pr": classification.get("last_terminal_pr"),
+        "last_terminal_action": classification.get("last_terminal_action"),
+        "locked_head_sha": classification.get("locked_head_sha"),
+        "target_pr_number": target_pr_number,
+        "target_head_sha": stale_review_decision_lock.normalize_head_sha(
+            expected_head_sha
+        ),
+        "lock_summary": classification.get("lock_summary"),
+        "evidence": classification.get("evidence"),
+        "reasons": list(classification.get("reasons") or []),
+        "manual_file_delete_forbidden": True,
+        "correction_as_generic_unlock_forbidden": True,
+        "durable_issue_handoff": stale_review_decision_lock.build_precise_mark_final_failure(
+            classification
+        ).get("durable_issue_handoff"),
+    }
 
 
 @mcp.tool()
@@ -7964,11 +8284,12 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     org: str | None = None,
     repo: str | None = None,
 ) -> dict:
-    """Read-only: diagnose open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit next action (#599).
+    """Read-only: diagnose open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit next action (#599, #691).
 
-    Classifies no-lease / own / foreign / instructed-lease-missing-with-replacement
-    and worktree binding mismatch. Returns a canonical ``next_action`` without
-    mutating Gitea state. Never steals foreign leases.
+    Classifies no-lease / own / foreign / superseded-head / expired / orphan /
+    instructed-lease-missing-with-replacement and worktree binding mismatch.
+    Returns a canonical ``next_action`` (including guarded obsolete-lease cleanup)
+    without mutating Gitea state. Never steals foreign leases.
     """
     read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
     if read_block:
@@ -7979,7 +8300,7 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         }
     comments = _fetch_pr_comments(
         pr_number, remote=remote, host=host, org=org, repo=repo)
-    h, _o, _r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
     try:
         username = _authenticated_username(h)
     except Exception:
@@ -7993,6 +8314,64 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     # Prefer in-session lease id when present; otherwise diagnose as a fresh
     # caller without inventing ownership of an on-thread lease.
     session_id = (session_lease.get("session_id") or "").strip() or None
+
+    # Live PR head + formal reviews for #691 superseded/completed classification.
+    current_head_sha = None
+    formal_reviews: list[dict] = []
+    try:
+        auth = _auth(h)
+        pr_live = api_request(
+            "GET", f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}", auth
+        ) or {}
+        head = pr_live.get("head") or {}
+        current_head_sha = head.get("sha") or pr_live.get("head_commit_sha")
+        try:
+            reviews = api_request(
+                "GET",
+                f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews",
+                auth,
+            ) or []
+            for rev in reviews if isinstance(reviews, list) else []:
+                formal_reviews.append({
+                    "verdict": rev.get("state") or rev.get("verdict"),
+                    "reviewed_head_sha": rev.get("commit_id") or rev.get(
+                        "reviewed_head_sha"
+                    ),
+                    "dismissed": bool(rev.get("dismissed")),
+                    "reviewer": ((rev.get("user") or {}).get("login")),
+                    "submitted_at": rev.get("submitted_at"),
+                })
+        except Exception:
+            formal_reviews = []
+    except Exception:
+        current_head_sha = None
+
+    lease_wt = None
+    active = reviewer_pr_lease.find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
+        comments, pr_number=pr_number, include_expired=True
+    )
+    if active:
+        lease_wt = (active.get("worktree") or "").strip() or None
+    worktree_exists = None
+    worktree_clean = None
+    if lease_wt:
+        worktree_exists = os.path.isdir(lease_wt)
+        if worktree_exists:
+            try:
+                import subprocess
+
+                st = subprocess.run(
+                    ["git", "-C", lease_wt, "status", "--porcelain"],
+                    capture_output=True,
+                    text=True,
+                    timeout=30,
+                    check=False,
+                )
+                if st.returncode == 0:
+                    worktree_clean = not bool((st.stdout or "").strip())
+            except Exception:
+                worktree_clean = None
+
     diagnosis = reviewer_pr_lease.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         comments,
         pr_number=pr_number,
@@ -8002,6 +8381,11 @@ def gitea_diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         env_bound_worktree=env_wt,
         instructed_session_id=instructed_session_id,
         instructed_comment_id=instructed_comment_id,
+        current_head_sha=current_head_sha,
+        formal_reviews=formal_reviews,
+        worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
+        worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
+        owner_process_alive=None,  # PID never proves ownership; leave unset
     )
     diagnosis["success"] = True
     diagnosis["remote"] = remote
@@ -8129,6 +8513,212 @@ def gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease(
     return report
 
 
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease(
+    pr_number: int,
+    confirmation: str = "",
+    apply: bool = False,
+    controller_recovery_authorized: bool = False,
+    expected_lease_comment_id: int | None = None,
+    expected_session_id: str | None = None,
+    expected_leased_head: str | None = None,
+    owner_process_alive: bool | None = None,
+    current_head_review_in_progress: bool = False,
+    remote: str = "dadeschools",
+    host: str | None = None,
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Guarded cleanup for obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases on open PRs (#691).
+
+    Neutralises an expired and/or superseded-head foreign lease by posting a
+    terminal ``phase: released`` lease marker (append-only audit). Never deletes
+    comments, never repoints the lease to the new head, never transfers
+    validation/decision/workflow state, never uses PID equality as ownership,
+    and never steals a genuinely active foreign lease on the current head.
+
+    Read-first when ``apply`` is false. Apply requires:
+
+    - ``controller_recovery_authorized=True`` (explicit operator/controller
+      recovery capability — not implied by profile alone)
+    - ``confirmation`` exactly ``CLEANUP OBSOLETE REVIEWER LEASE <pr_number>``
+    - full eligibility evidence from
+      ``reviewer_pr_lease.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup``
+
+    Comment-backed leases need no control-plane DB ``lease_id``.
+    """
+    read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
+    if read_block:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "cleanup_performed": False,
+            "no_steal_or_adoption": True,
+            "reasons": read_block,
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
+        }
+
+    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    auth = _auth(h)
+    expected_repo = f"{o}/{r}"
+    comments = _fetch_pr_comments(
+        pr_number, remote=remote, host=host, org=org, repo=repo
+    )
+    pr_live = api_request(
+        "GET", f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}", auth
+    ) or {}
+    head = pr_live.get("head") or {}
+    current_head_sha = head.get("sha") or pr_live.get("head_commit_sha")
+
+    formal_reviews: list[dict] = []
+    try:
+        reviews = api_request(
+            "GET",
+            f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews",
+            auth,
+        ) or []
+        for rev in reviews if isinstance(reviews, list) else []:
+            formal_reviews.append({
+                "verdict": rev.get("state") or rev.get("verdict"),
+                "reviewed_head_sha": rev.get("commit_id")
+                or rev.get("reviewed_head_sha"),
+                "dismissed": bool(rev.get("dismissed")),
+                "reviewer": ((rev.get("user") or {}).get("login")),
+                "submitted_at": rev.get("submitted_at"),
+            })
+    except Exception:
+        formal_reviews = []
+
+    lease = reviewer_pr_lease.find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
+        comments, pr_number=pr_number, include_expired=True
+    )
+    lease_wt = ((lease or {}).get("worktree") or "").strip() or None
+    worktree_exists = None
+    worktree_clean = None
+    worktree_has_unpreserved_work = None
+    if lease_wt:
+        worktree_exists = os.path.isdir(lease_wt)
+        if worktree_exists:
+            try:
+                import subprocess
+
+                st = subprocess.run(
+                    ["git", "-C", lease_wt, "status", "--porcelain"],
+                    capture_output=True,
+                    text=True,
+                    timeout=30,
+                    check=False,
+                )
+                if st.returncode == 0:
+                    dirty = bool((st.stdout or "").strip())
+                    worktree_clean = not dirty
+                    worktree_has_unpreserved_work = dirty
+            except Exception:
+                worktree_clean = None
+
+    session = reviewer_pr_lease.get_session_lease() or {}
+    assessment = reviewer_pr_lease.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
+        comments,
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        current_head_sha=current_head_sha,
+        formal_reviews=formal_reviews,
+        repo=expected_repo,
+        expected_repo=expected_repo,
+        requesting_session_id=(session.get("session_id") or "").strip() or None,
+        controller_recovery_authorized=controller_recovery_authorized,
+        worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
+        worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
+        worktree_has_unpreserved_work=worktree_has_unpreserved_work,
+        owner_process_alive=owner_process_alive,
+        owner_pid_observed=None,
+        requesting_pid=os.getpid(),
+        current_head_review_in_progress=current_head_review_in_progress,
+        expected_lease_comment_id=expected_lease_comment_id,
+        expected_session_id=expected_session_id,
+        expected_leased_head=expected_leased_head,
+        confirmation=confirmation,
+        apply=apply,
+    )
+
+    report = {
+        "success": True,
+        "pr_number": pr_number,
+        "pr_state": pr_live.get("state"),
+        "cleanup_allowed": assessment.get("cleanup_allowed"),
+        "cleanup_performed": False,
+        "classification": assessment.get("classification"),
+        "blocker_kind": assessment.get("blocker_kind"),
+        "exact_next_action": assessment.get("exact_next_action"),
+        "mutation_eligibility": assessment.get("mutation_eligibility"),
+        "leased_head": assessment.get("leased_head"),
+        "current_head": assessment.get("current_head"),
+        "expires_at": assessment.get("expires_at"),
+        "terminal_review": assessment.get("terminal_review"),
+        "worktree_state": assessment.get("worktree_state"),
+        "owner_session_evidence": assessment.get("owner_session_evidence"),
+        "cleanup_tool": assessment.get("cleanup_tool"),
+        "required_confirmation": assessment.get("required_confirmation"),
+        "active_lease": assessment.get("active_lease"),
+        "no_steal_or_adoption": True,
+        "no_repoint": True,
+        "no_validation_transfer": True,
+        "mode": "apply" if apply else "read_only",
+        "reasons": assessment.get("reasons") or [],
+        "forbidden": assessment.get("forbidden") or [],
+    }
+
+    if not apply:
+        return report
+    if not assessment.get("cleanup_allowed"):
+        report["success"] = False
+        report["cleanup_skipped_reason"] = (
+            assessment.get("fail_closed_reasons")
+            or assessment.get("reasons")
+            or ["cleanup not allowed"]
+        )
+        return report
+
+    comment_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.pr.comment")
+    if comment_block:
+        report["success"] = False
+        report["reasons"] = comment_block
+        report["permission_report"] = _permission_block_report("gitea.pr.comment")
+        return report
+
+    verify_preflight_purity(remote)
+    # Terminal lease marker (preserves history; does not delete comment 10749-style
+    # entries — newest released marker neutralises the ledger).
+    release_body = assessment.get("release_body") or ""
+    audit_body = assessment.get("audit_comment_body") or ""
+    comment_url = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/issues/{pr_number}/comments"
+    with _audited(
+        "comment_pr",
+        host=h,
+        remote=remote,
+        org=o,
+        repo=r,
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        request_metadata={
+            "source": "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease",
+            "classification": assessment.get("classification"),
+        },
+    ):
+        posted_release = api_request(
+            "POST", comment_url, auth, {"body": release_body}
+        )
+        posted_audit = None
+        if audit_body.strip():
+            posted_audit = api_request(
+                "POST", comment_url, auth, {"body": audit_body}
+            )
+
+    # Never seed session lease from cleaned foreign lease.
+    report["cleanup_performed"] = True
+    report["released_comment_id"] = (posted_release or {}).get("id")
+    report["audit_comment_id"] = (posted_audit or {}).get("id")
+    report["session_lease_seeded"] = False
+    return report
+
+
 @mcp.tool()
 def gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease(
     pr_number: int,

mcp_native_cleanup_proof.py

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ from typing import Any
 
 AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP_TOOLS = frozenset({
     "gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease",
+    "gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease",
     "gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups",
     "gitea_delete_branch",
     "gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch",

reviewer_pr_lease.py

@@ -524,13 +524,26 @@ def assess_lease_inventory(
         "reclaimable_review_leases": reclaimable,
     }
 
-# Canonical next-action vocabulary for reviewer lease handoff (#599).
+# Canonical next-action vocabulary for reviewer lease handoff (#599, #691).
 NEXT_ACTION_ACQUIRE = "acquire"
 NEXT_ACTION_WAIT = "wait"
 NEXT_ACTION_RESUME_EXACT_OWNER_SESSION = "resume_exact_owner_session"
 NEXT_ACTION_RELEASE_EXPIRED_LEASE = "release_expired_lease"
 NEXT_ACTION_OPERATOR_AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP = "operator_authorized_cleanup"
 NEXT_ACTION_REPAIR_WORKTREE_BINDING = "repair_worktree_binding"
+NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE = "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease"
+
+CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL = "gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease"
+CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_CONFIRMATION_PREFIX = "CLEANUP OBSOLETE REVIEWER LEASE "
+
+# Formal terminal review verdicts that complete a leased-head workflow (#691).
+_TERMINAL_REVIEW_VERDICTS = frozenset({
+    "APPROVED",
+    "REQUEST_CHANGES",
+    "approved",
+    "request_changes",
+    "REQUESTCHANGES",
+})
 
 _HANDOFF_CLASSIFICATIONS = frozenset({
     "no_lease",
@@ -539,6 +552,12 @@ _HANDOFF_CLASSIFICATIONS = frozenset({
     "foreign_active",
     "foreign_reclaimable",
     "foreign_expired",
+    "foreign_active_current_head",
+    "foreign_expired_current_head",
+    "foreign_completed_superseded_head",
+    "foreign_expired_superseded_head",
+    "orphaned_owner_missing",
+    "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence",
     "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement",
     "worktree_binding_mismatch",
 })
@@ -551,6 +570,476 @@ def _norm_path(value: str | None) -> str:
     return os.path.normpath(text.rstrip("/"))
 
 
+def _normalize_verdict(value: str | None) -> str:
+    text = (value or "").strip().upper().replace("-", "_").replace(" ", "_")
+    if text in {"REQUESTCHANGES", "REQUEST_CHANGES", "CHANGES_REQUESTED"}:
+        return "REQUEST_CHANGES"
+    if text in {"APPROVED", "APPROVE"}:
+        return "APPROVED"
+    return text
+
+
+def formal_terminal_review_for_head(
+    formal_reviews: list[dict] | None,
+    *,
+    leased_head: str | None,
+) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
+    """Return the latest undismissed terminal formal review for *leased_head*."""
+    head = _normalize_sha(leased_head)
+    if not head:
+        return None
+    matches: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
+    for review in formal_reviews or []:
+        if review.get("dismissed"):
+            continue
+        verdict = _normalize_verdict(
+            review.get("verdict") or review.get("state") or review.get("body_state")
+        )
+        if verdict not in {"APPROVED", "REQUEST_CHANGES"}:
+            continue
+        rhead = _normalize_sha(
+            review.get("reviewed_head_sha")
+            or review.get("commit_id")
+            or review.get("head_sha")
+        )
+        if rhead != head:
+            continue
+        matches.append({**review, "verdict": verdict, "reviewed_head_sha": rhead})
+    if not matches:
+        return None
+    return matches[-1]
+
+
+def find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
+    comments: list[dict],
+    *,
+    pr_number: int,
+    now: datetime | None = None,
+    include_expired: bool = True,
+) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
+    """Newest non-terminal lease marker, optionally including expired ones (#691).
+
+    Unlike ``find_active_reviewer_lease``, this retains expired non-terminal
+    markers so diagnosis/cleanup can still name the obsolete lease after
+    ``expires_at`` (comment-backed ledger; no control-plane ``lease_id``).
+    """
+    now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+    entries = list(reversed(_lease_entries(comments, pr_number=pr_number)))
+    for entry in entries:
+        phase = (entry.get("phase") or "").strip().lower()
+        if phase in _TERMINAL_PHASES:
+            # Newest terminal ends the ledger chain for active acquisition, but
+            # an older non-terminal is not "active". Stop at newest marker.
+            return None
+        expired = _lease_expired(entry, now=now)
+        if expired and not include_expired:
+            return None
+        lease = dict(entry)
+        lease["freshness"] = classify_lease_freshness(lease, now=now)
+        lease["expired"] = expired
+        return lease
+    return None
+
+
+def cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number: int) -> str:
+    return f"{CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_CONFIRMATION_PREFIX}{int(pr_number)}"
+
+
+def assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
+    comments: list[dict],
+    *,
+    pr_number: int,
+    current_head_sha: str | None,
+    formal_reviews: list[dict] | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+    expected_repo: str | None = None,
+    requesting_session_id: str | None = None,
+    controller_recovery_authorized: bool = False,
+    worktree_exists: bool | None = None,
+    worktree_clean: bool | None = None,
+    worktree_has_unpreserved_work: bool | None = None,
+    owner_process_alive: bool | None = None,
+    owner_pid_observed: int | None = None,
+    requesting_pid: int | None = None,
+    current_head_review_in_progress: bool = False,
+    expected_lease_comment_id: int | None = None,
+    expected_session_id: str | None = None,
+    expected_leased_head: str | None = None,
+    confirmation: str | None = None,
+    apply: bool = False,
+    now: datetime | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Guarded cleanup eligibility for obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases (#691).
+
+    Cleanup is never transfer/adoption/repoint and never uses PID equality as
+    ownership. Eligible only when evidence proves the lease is past expiry and/or
+    pinned to a superseded head with a completed formal terminal review, and
+    every safety boundary holds.
+    """
+    now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    fail_closed_reasons: list[str] = []
+    current_head = _normalize_sha(current_head_sha)
+    req_session = (requesting_session_id or "").strip()
+
+    lease = find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
+        comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now, include_expired=True
+    )
+    if not lease:
+        # Fall back to active finder (unexpired only) for report consistency.
+        lease = find_active_reviewer_lease(comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now)
+
+    classification = "no_lease"
+    cleanup_allowed = False
+    release_body: str | None = None
+    audit_comment_body: str | None = None
+    terminal_review = None
+    leased_head = None
+    head_superseded = False
+    past_expiry = False
+    expires_parseable = True
+
+    if not lease:
+        fail_closed_reasons.append(
+            f"PR #{pr_number}: no non-terminal comment-backed reviewer lease to clean"
+        )
+        classification = "no_lease"
+    else:
+        leased_head = _normalize_sha(lease.get("candidate_head"))
+        expires_raw = lease.get("expires_at")
+        expires_at = _parse_timestamp(expires_raw)
+        if expires_raw and expires_at is None:
+            expires_parseable = False
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease expires_at cannot be parsed or trusted (fail closed)"
+            )
+        past_expiry = bool(expires_at and expires_at <= now)
+        freshness = lease.get("freshness") or classify_lease_freshness(lease, now=now)
+        owner_session = (lease.get("session_id") or "").strip()
+        is_requesting_owner = bool(
+            req_session and owner_session and req_session == owner_session
+        )
+
+        # Identity pins (repo / PR / session / head / comment) must match when
+        # the caller supplies expected evidence.
+        lease_repo = (lease.get("repo") or "").strip()
+        exp_repo = (expected_repo or repo or "").strip()
+        if exp_repo and lease_repo and exp_repo != lease_repo:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                f"repository identity mismatch: lease repo={lease_repo!r} "
+                f"expected={exp_repo!r}"
+            )
+        if lease.get("pr_number") not in (None, pr_number):
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                f"PR identity mismatch: lease pr={lease.get('pr_number')} "
+                f"requested={pr_number}"
+            )
+        if expected_lease_comment_id is not None:
+            cid = lease.get("comment_id")
+            if cid is None or int(cid) != int(expected_lease_comment_id):
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "lease comment_id does not match expected evidence "
+                    f"(lease={cid}, expected={expected_lease_comment_id})"
+                )
+        if expected_session_id:
+            if owner_session != expected_session_id.strip():
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "lease session_id does not match expected evidence "
+                    f"(lease={owner_session}, expected={expected_session_id})"
+                )
+        if expected_leased_head:
+            exp_head = _normalize_sha(expected_leased_head)
+            if not exp_head or exp_head != leased_head:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "leased head does not match expected evidence "
+                    f"(lease={leased_head}, expected={exp_head})"
+                )
+
+        # PID equality is never ownership proof (#691).
+        if (
+            owner_pid_observed is not None
+            and requesting_pid is not None
+            and int(owner_pid_observed) == int(requesting_pid)
+        ):
+            reasons.append(
+                "observed PID equals requesting PID but PID equality is NOT "
+                "ownership proof; ignored for authorization"
+            )
+
+        if is_requesting_owner:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "requesting session owns the lease; use "
+                "gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease (owner path), not non-owner cleanup"
+            )
+
+        if current_head_review_in_progress:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "a current-head review submission is in progress; cleanup denied"
+            )
+
+        if not current_head:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "current PR head SHA missing or unparseable (fail closed)"
+            )
+        if not leased_head:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease candidate_head missing or unparseable (fail closed)"
+            )
+
+        head_superseded = bool(
+            current_head and leased_head and current_head != leased_head
+        )
+        head_matches_current = bool(
+            current_head and leased_head and current_head == leased_head
+        )
+
+        terminal_review = formal_terminal_review_for_head(
+            formal_reviews, leased_head=leased_head
+        )
+        has_terminal = terminal_review is not None
+
+        # Worktree safety.
+        if worktree_has_unpreserved_work is True or worktree_clean is False:
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease worktree is dirty or has unpreserved work; cleanup denied"
+            )
+        if (
+            worktree_exists is True
+            and worktree_clean is None
+            and worktree_has_unpreserved_work is None
+        ):
+            # Unknown cleanliness when path exists — fail closed.
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease worktree exists but cleanliness is unknown (fail closed)"
+            )
+
+        # Classification matrix (#691).
+        if head_matches_current and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"}:
+            classification = "foreign_active_current_head"
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "genuinely active foreign lease on the current PR head; "
+                "cleanup denied (fail closed)"
+            )
+        elif head_matches_current and past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_expired_current_head"
+            # Expired on current head: owner-missing / orphan path may apply.
+            if owner_process_alive is True:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "lease expired on current head but owner process still alive "
+                    "with plausible activity; cleanup denied"
+                )
+            elif worktree_clean is False:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "owner process absent but worktree dirty; cleanup denied"
+                )
+            elif owner_process_alive is False and (
+                worktree_clean is True or worktree_exists is False
+            ):
+                if controller_recovery_authorized:
+                    classification = "orphaned_owner_missing"
+                else:
+                    fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                        "controller/recovery capability not authorized for orphan cleanup"
+                    )
+            else:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "insufficient orphan evidence for expired current-head lease "
+                    "(need owner_process_alive=false and clean/absent worktree)"
+                )
+        elif head_superseded and has_terminal and past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_expired_superseded_head"
+        elif head_superseded and has_terminal and not past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_completed_superseded_head"
+        elif head_superseded and not has_terminal:
+            classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease head is superseded but no formal terminal review exists "
+                "for the leased head (fail closed)"
+            )
+        elif not head_superseded and not past_expiry and freshness in {
+            "active", "stale_warning"
+        }:
+            classification = "foreign_active_current_head"
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "foreign lease still active on current head; wait or use owner release"
+            )
+        elif past_expiry and not head_superseded:
+            classification = "foreign_expired_current_head"
+        else:
+            classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "lease evidence is ambiguous; cleanup denied (fail closed)"
+            )
+
+        # Recent owner progress on a non-superseded active lease blocks cleanup.
+        minutes = _minutes_since_activity(lease, now=now)
+        if (
+            head_matches_current
+            and freshness == "active"
+            and minutes is not None
+            and minutes < STALE_WARNING_MINUTES
+        ):
+            fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                "owner session has recent authenticated progress on current head; "
+                "cleanup denied"
+            )
+
+        # Authority + confirmation for apply.
+        if not controller_recovery_authorized:
+            if classification in {
+                "foreign_completed_superseded_head",
+                "foreign_expired_superseded_head",
+                "foreign_expired_current_head",
+                "orphaned_owner_missing",
+            }:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "controller/recovery capability required "
+                    "(controller_recovery_authorized=true)"
+                )
+
+        expected_conf = cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number)
+        if apply:
+            if (confirmation or "").strip() != expected_conf:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    f"confirmation must equal exactly {expected_conf!r}"
+                )
+
+        # Superseded + terminal path does not require past_expiry (AC1).
+        eligible_class = classification in {
+            "foreign_completed_superseded_head",
+            "foreign_expired_superseded_head",
+            "orphaned_owner_missing",
+            "foreign_expired_current_head",
+        }
+        # foreign_expired_current_head needs orphan/clean worktree + authority.
+        if classification == "foreign_expired_current_head":
+            if worktree_clean is not True and worktree_exists is not False:
+                if "worktree" not in " ".join(fail_closed_reasons):
+                    fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                        "expired current-head cleanup requires proven-clean "
+                        "worktree or absent worktree"
+                    )
+            if owner_process_alive is True:
+                fail_closed_reasons.append(
+                    "owner process still alive on expired current-head lease"
+                )
+
+        cleanup_allowed = (
+            eligible_class
+            and expires_parseable
+            and not fail_closed_reasons
+            and not is_requesting_owner
+        )
+
+        if cleanup_allowed:
+            release_body = format_lease_body(
+                repo=lease.get("repo") or exp_repo or "",
+                pr_number=pr_number,
+                issue_number=lease.get("issue_number"),
+                reviewer_identity=lease.get("reviewer_identity") or "",
+                profile=lease.get("profile") or "unknown",
+                session_id=owner_session or "unknown",
+                worktree=lease.get("worktree") or "",
+                phase="released",
+                candidate_head=leased_head,
+                target_branch=lease.get("target_branch") or "master",
+                target_branch_sha=lease.get("target_branch_sha"),
+                last_activity=now,
+                blocker="obsolete-superseded-or-expired-lease",
+            )
+            audit_comment_body = (
+                "## Canonical obsolete reviewer lease cleanup (#691)\n\n"
+                f"- pr: #{pr_number}\n"
+                f"- lease_comment_id: {lease.get('comment_id')}\n"
+                f"- session_id: {owner_session}\n"
+                f"- leased_head: {leased_head}\n"
+                f"- current_head: {current_head}\n"
+                f"- expires_at: {lease.get('expires_at')}\n"
+                f"- classification: {classification}\n"
+                f"- terminal_review_verdict: "
+                f"{(terminal_review or {}).get('verdict')}\n"
+                f"- tool: {CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL}\n"
+                "- action: posted terminal phase=released lease marker; "
+                "did not transfer validation, decision, or workflow proof; "
+                "did not repoint lease to the new head; did not delete history\n"
+            )
+            reasons.append(
+                f"cleanup eligible ({classification}); post terminal released "
+                "marker via sanctioned tool"
+            )
+        else:
+            reasons.extend(fail_closed_reasons)
+
+    return {
+        "pr_number": pr_number,
+        "classification": classification,
+        "blocker_kind": classification if not cleanup_allowed else "none",
+        "cleanup_allowed": cleanup_allowed,
+        "mutation_allowed": False,  # never grants review mutation
+        "mutation_eligibility": "prohibited" if not cleanup_allowed else "cleanup_only",
+        "exact_next_action": (
+            NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+            if cleanup_allowed
+            else (
+                NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
+                if classification
+                in {
+                    "foreign_active_current_head",
+                    "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence",
+                }
+                else NEXT_ACTION_OPERATOR_AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP
+            )
+        ),
+        "cleanup_tool": CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL,
+        "required_confirmation": cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number),
+        "leased_head": leased_head,
+        "current_head": current_head,
+        "head_superseded": head_superseded,
+        "past_expiry": past_expiry,
+        "expires_at": (lease or {}).get("expires_at") if lease else None,
+        "expires_parseable": expires_parseable,
+        "terminal_review": terminal_review,
+        "terminal_review_present": terminal_review is not None,
+        "worktree_state": {
+            "path": (lease or {}).get("worktree") if lease else None,
+            "exists": worktree_exists,
+            "clean": worktree_clean,
+            "has_unpreserved_work": worktree_has_unpreserved_work,
+        },
+        "owner_session_evidence": {
+            "session_id": (lease or {}).get("session_id") if lease else None,
+            "reviewer_identity": (
+                (lease or {}).get("reviewer_identity") if lease else None
+            ),
+            "process_alive": owner_process_alive,
+            "pid_observed": owner_pid_observed,
+            "pid_is_not_ownership_proof": True,
+            "requesting_session_is_owner": bool(
+                lease
+                and req_session
+                and (lease.get("session_id") or "").strip() == req_session
+            ),
+        },
+        "active_lease": lease,
+        "release_body": release_body,
+        "audit_comment_body": audit_comment_body,
+        "controller_recovery_authorized": controller_recovery_authorized,
+        "reasons": reasons if reasons else fail_closed_reasons,
+        "fail_closed_reasons": fail_closed_reasons,
+        "forbidden": [
+            "manual comment deletion",
+            "database edits",
+            "mtime manipulation",
+            "PID-based ownership",
+            "direct session-state seeding",
+            "lease stealing or adoption",
+            "repointing old lease to new head",
+            "transfer of validation or decision state",
+            "worktree reuse by replacement reviewer",
+        ],
+    }
+
+
 def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     comments: list[dict],
     *,
@@ -561,40 +1050,50 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     env_bound_worktree: str | None = None,
     instructed_session_id: str | None = None,
     instructed_comment_id: int | None = None,
+    current_head_sha: str | None = None,
+    formal_reviews: list[dict] | None = None,
+    worktree_exists: bool | None = None,
+    worktree_clean: bool | None = None,
+    owner_process_alive: bool | None = None,
     now: datetime | None = None,
 ) -> dict[str, Any]:
-    """Classify open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit a canonical next action (#599).
+    """Classify open-PR reviewer lease handoff and emit a canonical next action (#599, #691).
 
     Read-only diagnosis. Never steals, releases, or adopts a foreign lease.
     Fail-closed acquisition rules for active foreign leases remain intact.
 
     Returns a structured diagnosis with:
-    - classification
-    - next_action (one of wait / resume_exact_owner_session /
-      release_expired_lease / operator_authorized_cleanup /
-      repair_worktree_binding / acquire)
+    - classification (including #691 superseded/expired distinctions)
+    - next_action (including cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease)
     - active_lease identity fields when present
     - worktree_binding match result
     - instructed-lease mismatch flags
+    - cleanup tool/confirmation when cleanup-eligible
     """
     now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
     session_id = (current_session_id or "").strip()
     identity = (current_reviewer_identity or "").strip()
     instructed_sid = (instructed_session_id or "").strip()
     reasons: list[str] = []
+    current_head = _normalize_sha(current_head_sha)
 
     active = find_active_reviewer_lease(comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now)
+    # Also surface expired non-terminal newest marker for #691 diagnosis.
+    newest_nt = find_newest_nonterminal_lease(
+        comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now, include_expired=True
+    )
+    lease_for_class = active or newest_nt
     session_lease = get_session_lease()
 
     # Worktree binding: env-bound vs proposed vs active lease worktree.
     env_wt = _norm_path(env_bound_worktree)
     prop_wt = _norm_path(proposed_worktree)
-    lease_wt = _norm_path((active or {}).get("worktree") if active else None)
+    lease_wt = _norm_path((lease_for_class or {}).get("worktree") if lease_for_class else None)
     binding_mismatch = False
     binding_details: dict[str, Any] = {
         "env_bound_worktree": env_bound_worktree or None,
         "proposed_worktree": proposed_worktree or None,
-        "lease_worktree": (active or {}).get("worktree") if active else None,
+        "lease_worktree": (lease_for_class or {}).get("worktree") if lease_for_class else None,
         "match": True,
     }
     paths = [p for p in (env_wt, prop_wt, lease_wt) if p]
@@ -608,13 +1107,13 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     # Instructed lease gone while a different lease is active (PR #592-style).
     instructed_missing_with_replacement = False
     if instructed_sid or instructed_comment_id is not None:
-        if not active:
+        if not lease_for_class:
             reasons.append(
                 "instructed lease is gone and no active replacement lease remains"
             )
         else:
-            owner = (active.get("session_id") or "").strip()
-            cid = active.get("comment_id")
+            owner = (lease_for_class.get("session_id") or "").strip()
+            cid = lease_for_class.get("comment_id")
             sid_mismatch = bool(instructed_sid and owner and owner != instructed_sid)
             cid_mismatch = (
                 instructed_comment_id is not None
@@ -631,35 +1130,94 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
     # Classification + next_action.
     classification = "no_lease"
     next_action = NEXT_ACTION_ACQUIRE
+    cleanup_hint: dict[str, Any] | None = None
 
-    if active:
-        owner = (active.get("session_id") or "").strip()
-        freshness = active.get("freshness") or classify_lease_freshness(
-            active, now=now
+    if lease_for_class:
+        owner = (lease_for_class.get("session_id") or "").strip()
+        freshness = lease_for_class.get("freshness") or classify_lease_freshness(
+            lease_for_class, now=now
         )
-        owner_identity = (active.get("reviewer_identity") or "").strip()
+        owner_identity = (lease_for_class.get("reviewer_identity") or "").strip()
         is_own = bool(session_id and owner and owner == session_id)
         # Same identity alone is NOT ownership for resume; session_id must match.
         same_identity = bool(
             identity and owner_identity and identity == owner_identity
         )
+        leased_head = _normalize_sha(lease_for_class.get("candidate_head"))
+        head_superseded = bool(
+            current_head and leased_head and current_head != leased_head
+        )
+        head_current = bool(
+            current_head and leased_head and current_head == leased_head
+        )
+        past_expiry = bool(lease_for_class.get("expired")) or freshness == "expired"
+        if not past_expiry:
+            past_expiry = _lease_expired(lease_for_class, now=now)
+        terminal = formal_terminal_review_for_head(
+            formal_reviews, leased_head=leased_head
+        )
 
-        if is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"}:
+        if is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"} and not past_expiry:
             classification = "own_active"
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_RESUME_EXACT_OWNER_SESSION
-        elif is_own and freshness in {"reclaimable", "expired"}:
+        elif is_own and (freshness in {"reclaimable", "expired"} or past_expiry):
             classification = "own_expired"
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_RELEASE_EXPIRED_LEASE
             reasons.append(
                 f"own lease freshness is '{freshness}'; release via "
                 "gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease then re-acquire"
             )
-        elif not is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"}:
-            classification = "foreign_active"
+        elif not is_own and head_superseded and terminal and past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_expired_superseded_head"
+            next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+            reasons.append(
+                "foreign lease expired and pinned to superseded head with "
+                "formal terminal review; use guarded obsolete-lease cleanup"
+            )
+        elif not is_own and head_superseded and terminal and not past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_completed_superseded_head"
+            next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+            reasons.append(
+                "foreign lease pinned to superseded head with completed formal "
+                "review; use guarded obsolete-lease cleanup (do not wait indefinitely)"
+            )
+        elif not is_own and head_superseded and not terminal:
+            classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
+            next_action = NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
+            reasons.append(
+                "lease head superseded but no formal terminal review for leased "
+                "head; fail closed / wait (no indefinite steal)"
+            )
+        elif not is_own and head_current and past_expiry:
+            classification = "foreign_expired_current_head"
+            if owner_process_alive is False and worktree_clean is True:
+                classification = "orphaned_owner_missing"
+                next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+                reasons.append(
+                    "foreign expired lease on current head; owner process absent "
+                    "and worktree clean — guarded orphan cleanup eligible"
+                )
+            elif owner_process_alive is False and worktree_clean is False:
+                classification = "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence"
+                next_action = NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
+                reasons.append(
+                    "owner process absent but worktree dirty; cleanup denied"
+                )
+            else:
+                next_action = NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+                reasons.append(
+                    "foreign expired lease on current head; use guarded cleanup "
+                    "when worktree/process evidence permits"
+                )
+        elif not is_own and freshness in {"active", "stale_warning"} and not past_expiry:
+            classification = (
+                "foreign_active_current_head" if head_current or not current_head
+                else "foreign_active"
+            )
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_WAIT
             reasons.append(
                 f"foreign active reviewer lease (session_id={owner}, "
-                f"phase={active.get('phase')}, freshness={freshness}); "
+                f"phase={lease_for_class.get('phase')}, freshness={freshness}); "
                 "do not submit; do not steal"
             )
             if same_identity:
@@ -674,11 +1232,12 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
                 f"foreign reclaimable lease (session_id={owner}); clear only via "
                 "sanctioned gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease when reclaimable"
             )
-        elif not is_own and freshness == "expired":
+        elif not is_own and (freshness == "expired" or past_expiry):
             classification = "foreign_expired"
             next_action = NEXT_ACTION_RELEASE_EXPIRED_LEASE
             reasons.append(
-                f"foreign expired lease (session_id={owner}); use sanctioned release"
+                f"foreign expired lease (session_id={owner}); use sanctioned release "
+                f"or {CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL}"
             )
         else:
             classification = "foreign_active"
@@ -691,13 +1250,26 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
         if instructed_missing_with_replacement and classification.startswith(
             "foreign"
         ):
-            classification = "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement"
-            # Foreign active still means wait; reclaimable still release.
-            if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_WAIT:
-                reasons.append(
-                    "replacement foreign lease is active — wait; "
-                    "operator_authorized_cleanup only with explicit operator authority"
-                )
+            # Preserve #691 cleanup path when superseded/expired; otherwise
+            # keep the PR #592 instructed-missing label.
+            if next_action != NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE:
+                classification = "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement"
+                if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_WAIT:
+                    reasons.append(
+                        "replacement foreign lease is active — wait; "
+                        "operator_authorized_cleanup only with explicit operator authority"
+                    )
+
+        if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE:
+            cleanup_hint = {
+                "cleanup_tool": CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL,
+                "required_confirmation": cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(pr_number),
+                "controller_recovery_authorized_required": True,
+                "leased_head": leased_head,
+                "current_head": current_head,
+                "expires_at": lease_for_class.get("expires_at"),
+                "terminal_review_verdict": (terminal or {}).get("verdict"),
+            }
     else:
         classification = "no_lease"
         next_action = NEXT_ACTION_ACQUIRE
@@ -720,29 +1292,55 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
             )
 
     lease_summary = None
-    if active:
+    if lease_for_class:
         lease_summary = {
-            "comment_id": active.get("comment_id"),
-            "session_id": active.get("session_id"),
-            "phase": active.get("phase"),
-            "candidate_head": active.get("candidate_head"),
-            "expires_at": active.get("expires_at"),
-            "last_activity": active.get("last_activity"),
-            "freshness": active.get("freshness")
-            or classify_lease_freshness(active, now=now),
-            "reviewer_identity": active.get("reviewer_identity"),
-            "profile": active.get("profile"),
-            "worktree": active.get("worktree"),
-            "blocker": active.get("blocker"),
+            "comment_id": lease_for_class.get("comment_id"),
+            "session_id": lease_for_class.get("session_id"),
+            "phase": lease_for_class.get("phase"),
+            "candidate_head": lease_for_class.get("candidate_head"),
+            "expires_at": lease_for_class.get("expires_at"),
+            "last_activity": lease_for_class.get("last_activity"),
+            "freshness": lease_for_class.get("freshness")
+            or classify_lease_freshness(lease_for_class, now=now),
+            "reviewer_identity": lease_for_class.get("reviewer_identity"),
+            "profile": lease_for_class.get("profile"),
+            "worktree": lease_for_class.get("worktree"),
+            "blocker": lease_for_class.get("blocker"),
         }
 
     return {
         "pr_number": pr_number,
         "classification": classification,
+        "blocker_kind": classification,
         "next_action": next_action,
+        "exact_next_action": next_action,
         "active_lease": lease_summary,
         "session_lease": session_lease,
         "worktree_binding": binding_details,
+        "leased_head": (lease_summary or {}).get("candidate_head"),
+        "current_head": current_head,
+        "expires_at": (lease_summary or {}).get("expires_at"),
+        "terminal_review_state": (
+            formal_terminal_review_for_head(
+                formal_reviews,
+                leased_head=(lease_summary or {}).get("candidate_head"),
+            )
+            if lease_summary
+            else None
+        ),
+        "worktree_state": {
+            "exists": worktree_exists,
+            "clean": worktree_clean,
+            "path": (lease_summary or {}).get("worktree"),
+        },
+        "owner_session_evidence": {
+            "session_id": (lease_summary or {}).get("session_id"),
+            "process_alive": owner_process_alive,
+            "pid_is_not_ownership_proof": True,
+        },
+        "cleanup": cleanup_hint,
+        "cleanup_tool": (cleanup_hint or {}).get("cleanup_tool"),
+        "required_confirmation": (cleanup_hint or {}).get("required_confirmation"),
         "instructed_session_id": instructed_session_id,
         "instructed_comment_id": instructed_comment_id,
         "instructed_lease_missing_with_replacement": instructed_missing_with_replacement,
@@ -751,6 +1349,19 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
             and not binding_mismatch
             and bool(session_lease)
         ),
+        "mutation_eligibility": (
+            "allowed"
+            if (
+                next_action == NEXT_ACTION_RESUME_EXACT_OWNER_SESSION
+                and not binding_mismatch
+                and bool(session_lease)
+            )
+            else (
+                "cleanup_only"
+                if next_action == NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+                else "prohibited"
+            )
+        ),
         "reasons": reasons,
         "forbidden": [
             "manual lock deletion",
@@ -758,5 +1369,8 @@ def diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
             "mtime manipulation",
             "direct _SESSION_LEASE seeding",
             "silent foreign lease steal",
+            "PID-based ownership",
+            "repointing old lease to new head",
+            "transfer of validation or decision state",
         ],
     }

stale_review_decision_lock.py

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-"""Stale / moot #332 review-decision lock detection and cleanup policy (#594/#620).
+"""Stale / moot #332 review-decision lock detection and cleanup policy (#594/#620/#693).
 
 #332 correctly hard-stops a reviewer session after a terminal live review
 mutation. After #559 those locks are durable on disk, so they can outlive the
@@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ on head B of the **same open PR**. Same-head duplicates remain fail-closed.
 Open-PR lock *cleanup* remains forbidden unless the PR is truly merged/closed
 (#594); new-head re-review is allowed without deleting the durable lock.
 
+#693 scopes the terminal boundary by **PR number**: a terminal on open PR A
+must not block a fresh formal decision on open PR B on the same durable
+profile lock (cross-PR isolation). Correction authorization is scoped to the
+named prior review's PR/head and cannot unlock a different PR.
+
 This module is pure policy (no Gitea I/O). The MCP tool
 ``gitea_cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock`` fetches live PR state, calls these
 helpers, and only then clears durable state when cleanup is allowed.
@@ -80,17 +85,45 @@ def last_terminal_mutation(lock: dict | None) -> dict | None:
     return terminals[-1] if terminals else None
 
 
+def correction_applies(
+    lock: dict | None,
+    *,
+    pr_number: int | None = None,
+    expected_head_sha: str | None = None,
+) -> bool:
+    """True when operator correction is active and scoped to the target (#693).
+
+    Global ``correction_authorized`` alone is not enough: correction must name
+    the same PR (and head when recorded) as the decision being re-opened.
+    Missing scope fields on legacy locks fail closed (do not apply).
+    """
+    if not lock or not lock.get("correction_authorized"):
+        return False
+    corr_pr = lock.get("correction_pr_number")
+    if corr_pr is None:
+        # Legacy unscoped correction — refuse as generic unlock (#693).
+        return False
+    if pr_number is not None and int(corr_pr) != int(pr_number):
+        return False
+    corr_head = normalize_head_sha(lock.get("correction_head_sha"))
+    target = normalize_head_sha(expected_head_sha)
+    if corr_head and target and not heads_equal(corr_head, target):
+        return False
+    return True
+
+
 def prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
     lock: dict | None,
     *,
     pr_number: int,
     expected_head_sha: str | None,
 ) -> bool:
-    """True when prior live mutations block a new decision for PR+head (#620).
+    """True when prior live mutations block a new decision for PR+head (#620/#693).
 
     Historical terminals on a **different head of the same PR** do not block.
-    Any prior mutation on another PR, the same head, or without a comparable
-    head SHA fails closed (blocks).
+    Terminals on a **different PR** do not block (#693 cross-PR isolation).
+    Same PR + same head (or same PR without a comparable head SHA) blocks
+    unless a scoped correction applies.
 
     Head resolution uses ``mutation_head_sha(m, lock)`` so pre-#620 ledgers
     that only stored ``ready_expected_head_sha`` still compare correctly
@@ -98,7 +131,9 @@ def prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
     """
     if not lock:
         return False
-    if lock.get("correction_authorized"):
+    if correction_applies(
+        lock, pr_number=pr_number, expected_head_sha=expected_head_sha
+    ):
         return False
     prior = list(lock.get("live_mutations") or [])
     if not prior:
@@ -108,10 +143,14 @@ def prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
         if not isinstance(m, dict):
             return True
         m_pr = m.get("pr_number")
+        if m_pr is None:
+            return True  # fail closed — unscoped mutation
+        if int(m_pr) != int(pr_number):
+            # #693: foreign-PR history on the shared durable lock does not block.
+            continue
         m_head = mutation_head_sha(m, lock)
         if (
-            m_pr == pr_number
-            and target
+            target
             and m_head
             and not heads_equal(m_head, target)
         ):
@@ -128,23 +167,34 @@ def terminal_boundary_allows_fresh_decision(
     expected_head_sha: str | None,
     operation: str,
 ) -> bool:
-    """Whether #332 hard-stop should yield for a new PR+head boundary (#620).
+    """Whether #332 hard-stop should yield for a new PR+head boundary (#620/#693).
 
-    Only for ``mark_ready`` / ``review`` / ``resume`` on the **same PR** when
-    the requested head differs from the last terminal's head. Merge is never
-    reopened by head change (approved head merge path is separate).
+    For ``mark_ready`` / ``review`` / ``resume``:
+
+    * **same PR, different head** — allowed (#620)
+    * **different PR than last terminal** — allowed (#693 cross-PR isolation)
+    * **same PR, same head** — not allowed (unless scoped correction)
+
+    Merge is never reopened by head change or cross-PR isolation (approved
+    head merge path is separate).
     """
     if operation not in ("mark_ready", "review", "resume"):
         return False
     if not lock:
         return False
-    if lock.get("correction_authorized"):
+    if correction_applies(
+        lock, pr_number=pr_number, expected_head_sha=expected_head_sha
+    ):
         return True
     last = last_terminal_mutation(lock)
     if last is None:
         return True
-    if last.get("pr_number") != pr_number:
+    last_pr = last.get("pr_number")
+    if last_pr is None:
         return False
+    if int(last_pr) != int(pr_number):
+        # #693: last terminal belongs to another PR — do not hard-stop this PR.
+        return True
     locked_head = mutation_head_sha(last, lock)
     target = normalize_head_sha(expected_head_sha)
     if not locked_head or not target:
@@ -438,3 +488,397 @@ def format_cleanup_audit_comment(audit: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
         "This path only clears a lock when the referenced PR is merged/closed.",
     ]
     return "\n".join(lines)
+
+
+# --- #693 classification / recovery / correction audit -----------------------
+
+# Deterministic classification labels for diagnostics and recovery routing.
+CLASS_NO_LOCK = "no_lock"
+CLASS_READY_FOR_TARGET = "ready_for_target"
+CLASS_IN_PROGRESS_SAME_HEAD = "in_progress_same_head"
+CLASS_TERMINAL_ACTIVE_SAME_HEAD = "terminal_active_same_head"
+CLASS_STALE_SUPERSEDED_HEAD = "stale_superseded_head"
+CLASS_FOREIGN_PR_TERMINAL = "foreign_pr_terminal"
+CLASS_MOOT_MERGED_CLOSED = "moot_merged_closed"
+CLASS_CORRECTION_ACTIVE = "correction_active"
+CLASS_SESSION_OR_PROFILE_MISMATCH = "session_or_profile_mismatch"
+CLASS_AMBIGUOUS = "ambiguous"
+
+
+def classify_review_decision_lock(
+    lock: dict | None,
+    *,
+    target_pr_number: int | None = None,
+    target_head_sha: str | None = None,
+    pr_live: dict | None = None,
+    pr_lookup_error: str | None = None,
+    active_profile_identity: str | None = None,
+    session_blockers: list[str] | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Deterministic review-decision-lock classification (#693).
+
+    Returns classification, exact next_action, owner/evidence fields, and
+    whether mark_final / cleanup / correction are appropriate.
+    """
+    summary = lock_summary(lock)
+    target_head = normalize_head_sha(target_head_sha)
+    result: dict[str, Any] = {
+        "classification": CLASS_NO_LOCK,
+        "has_lock": lock is not None,
+        "lock_summary": summary,
+        "target_pr_number": target_pr_number,
+        "target_head_sha": target_head,
+        "last_terminal_pr": None,
+        "last_terminal_action": None,
+        "locked_head_sha": None,
+        "owner_profile_identity": (summary or {}).get("profile_identity"),
+        "session_profile": (summary or {}).get("session_profile"),
+        "updated_at": (summary or {}).get("updated_at"),
+        "correction_authorized": bool((lock or {}).get("correction_authorized")),
+        "correction_pr_number": (lock or {}).get("correction_pr_number"),
+        "correction_head_sha": normalize_head_sha(
+            (lock or {}).get("correction_head_sha")
+        ),
+        "mark_final_allowed": True,
+        "cleanup_allowed": False,
+        "correction_eligible": False,
+        "next_action": "gitea_resolve_task_capability(task='review_pr') then mark_final",
+        "reasons": [],
+        "evidence": {},
+    }
+
+    if lock is None:
+        result["reasons"].append("no review decision lock present")
+        return result
+
+    session_blockers = list(session_blockers or [])
+    if session_blockers:
+        result["classification"] = CLASS_SESSION_OR_PROFILE_MISMATCH
+        result["mark_final_allowed"] = False
+        result["next_action"] = (
+            "reconnect matching prgs-reviewer session or wait for lock TTL; "
+            "do not use gitea_authorize_review_correction as unlock; "
+            "do not delete session-state files"
+        )
+        result["reasons"].extend(session_blockers)
+        return result
+
+    stored = (
+        (lock.get("profile_identity") or lock.get("session_profile_lock") or "")
+        .strip()
+    )
+    active = (active_profile_identity or "").strip()
+    if active and stored and active != stored:
+        result["classification"] = CLASS_SESSION_OR_PROFILE_MISMATCH
+        result["mark_final_allowed"] = False
+        result["next_action"] = (
+            f"switch to profile '{stored}' or wait for moot cleanup; "
+            "do not use correction authorization as a generic unlock"
+        )
+        result["reasons"].append(
+            f"lock profile '{stored}' does not match active '{active}'"
+        )
+        return result
+
+    last = last_terminal_mutation(lock)
+    if last is None:
+        ready_pr = lock.get("ready_pr_number")
+        ready_head = normalize_head_sha(lock.get("ready_expected_head_sha"))
+        if (
+            target_pr_number is not None
+            and ready_pr == target_pr_number
+            and ready_head
+            and target_head
+            and heads_equal(ready_head, target_head)
+            and lock.get("final_review_decision_ready")
+        ):
+            result["classification"] = CLASS_IN_PROGRESS_SAME_HEAD
+            result["mark_final_allowed"] = True  # idempotent re-mark
+            result["next_action"] = (
+                "gitea_submit_pr_review with final_review_decision_ready=true "
+                "for the ready PR/head"
+            )
+            result["reasons"].append(
+                "final decision already marked ready for this PR/head (idempotent)"
+            )
+            return result
+        result["classification"] = CLASS_READY_FOR_TARGET
+        result["next_action"] = "gitea_mark_final_review_decision then submit"
+        result["reasons"].append("no terminal live mutations; mark_final allowed")
+        return result
+
+    last_pr = last.get("pr_number")
+    last_action = last.get("action")
+    locked_head = mutation_head_sha(last, lock)
+    result["last_terminal_pr"] = last_pr
+    result["last_terminal_action"] = last_action
+    result["locked_head_sha"] = locked_head
+    result["evidence"] = {
+        "last_review_id": last.get("review_id"),
+        "live_mutations_count": len(lock.get("live_mutations") or []),
+    }
+
+    if correction_applies(
+        lock, pr_number=target_pr_number, expected_head_sha=target_head
+    ):
+        result["classification"] = CLASS_CORRECTION_ACTIVE
+        result["mark_final_allowed"] = True
+        result["next_action"] = (
+            "gitea_mark_final_review_decision for the correction-scoped PR/head, "
+            "then submit once"
+        )
+        result["reasons"].append(
+            f"scoped correction active for PR #{lock.get('correction_pr_number')}"
+        )
+        return result
+
+    # Live state of last terminal PR when provided.
+    live = None
+    if pr_lookup_error:
+        result["classification"] = CLASS_AMBIGUOUS
+        result["mark_final_allowed"] = False
+        result["next_action"] = (
+            "retry diagnosis after live PR state is available; "
+            "fail closed under ambiguous evidence"
+        )
+        result["reasons"].append(f"live PR lookup failed: {pr_lookup_error}")
+        return result
+    if pr_live is not None:
+        live = classify_pr_live_state(pr_live)
+        result["evidence"]["last_terminal_pr_state"] = live.get("pr_state")
+        result["evidence"]["last_terminal_pr_merged"] = live.get("pr_merged")
+        if live.get("pr_merged_or_closed"):
+            result["classification"] = CLASS_MOOT_MERGED_CLOSED
+            result["cleanup_allowed"] = True
+            result["mark_final_allowed"] = target_pr_number is not None and (
+                int(last_pr) != int(target_pr_number)
+                if last_pr is not None and target_pr_number is not None
+                else True
+            )
+            result["next_action"] = (
+                "gitea_cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock(apply=true, "
+                f"expected_terminal_pr={last_pr}) then mark_final on the target PR"
+            )
+            result["reasons"].append(
+                f"terminal on PR #{last_pr} is moot (merged/closed); cleanup allowed"
+            )
+            return result
+
+    if target_pr_number is None:
+        result["classification"] = CLASS_AMBIGUOUS
+        result["mark_final_allowed"] = False
+        result["next_action"] = "re-run diagnosis with target_pr_number"
+        result["reasons"].append("target_pr_number required for open-PR classification")
+        return result
+
+    if last_pr is not None and int(last_pr) != int(target_pr_number):
+        # Cross-PR isolation: foreign terminal is history, not a block.
+        result["classification"] = CLASS_FOREIGN_PR_TERMINAL
+        result["mark_final_allowed"] = True
+        result["correction_eligible"] = False  # must not use correction to "unlock"
+        result["next_action"] = (
+            f"gitea_mark_final_review_decision(pr_number={target_pr_number}, ...) "
+            f"— foreign terminal on PR #{last_pr} does not block (#693); "
+            "do not call gitea_authorize_review_correction for cross-PR unlock"
+        )
+        result["reasons"].append(
+            f"last terminal is {last_action} on foreign open/closed PR #{last_pr}; "
+            f"target PR #{target_pr_number} is isolated (#693)"
+        )
+        return result
+
+    # Same PR as target.
+    if (
+        locked_head
+        and target_head
+        and not heads_equal(locked_head, target_head)
+    ):
+        result["classification"] = CLASS_STALE_SUPERSEDED_HEAD
+        result["mark_final_allowed"] = True
+        result["next_action"] = (
+            f"gitea_mark_final_review_decision with expected_head_sha="
+            f"{target_head} (#620 same-PR new head)"
+        )
+        result["reasons"].append(
+            f"terminal {last_action} on head {locked_head[:12]}…; target head "
+            f"{target_head[:12]}… — fresh formal review allowed without cleanup"
+        )
+        return result
+
+    # Same PR + same head (or missing head comparison) — active terminal.
+    result["classification"] = CLASS_TERMINAL_ACTIVE_SAME_HEAD
+    result["mark_final_allowed"] = False
+    result["correction_eligible"] = True
+    result["next_action"] = (
+        "if the prior verdict was mistaken: gitea_authorize_review_correction "
+        f"with prior_review_id={last.get('review_id')}, "
+        f"prior_review_state={last_action}, target_pr_number={target_pr_number}, "
+        "operator_authorized=true, then re-mark once; "
+        "if the prior verdict is correct: stop and hand off (do not duplicate)"
+    )
+    result["reasons"].append(
+        f"terminal {last_action} already recorded for PR #{target_pr_number} "
+        f"at this head; same-head duplicate blocked (#332/#620)"
+    )
+    return result
+
+
+def build_precise_mark_final_failure(
+    classification: dict[str, Any],
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """One precise recovery instruction + durable issue handoff payload (#693 AC4/8)."""
+    cls = classification.get("classification")
+    next_action = classification.get("next_action") or (
+        "stop and create a durable Gitea issue with lock evidence"
+    )
+    reasons = list(classification.get("reasons") or [])
+    reasons.append(f"exact_next_action: {next_action}")
+    handoff = {
+        "required": cls
+        in (
+            CLASS_AMBIGUOUS,
+            CLASS_SESSION_OR_PROFILE_MISMATCH,
+            CLASS_TERMINAL_ACTIVE_SAME_HEAD,
+        )
+        and not classification.get("mark_final_allowed"),
+        "title_hint": (
+            "Review-decision-lock recovery failed during formal review"
+        ),
+        "classification": cls,
+        "exact_next_action": next_action,
+        "owner_profile_identity": classification.get("owner_profile_identity"),
+        "last_terminal_pr": classification.get("last_terminal_pr"),
+        "last_terminal_action": classification.get("last_terminal_action"),
+        "locked_head_sha": classification.get("locked_head_sha"),
+        "target_pr_number": classification.get("target_pr_number"),
+        "target_head_sha": classification.get("target_head_sha"),
+        "evidence": classification.get("evidence") or {},
+        "instruction": (
+            "If recovery cannot complete with the exact_next_action above, "
+            "create or update a durable Gitea issue with this payload and stop; "
+            "do not delete session-state files; do not misuse correction as unlock."
+        ),
+    }
+    return {
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "classification": cls,
+        "exact_next_action": next_action,
+        "durable_issue_handoff": handoff,
+    }
+
+
+def build_correction_audit_record(
+    *,
+    prior_review_id: int | None,
+    prior_review_state: str | None,
+    target_pr_number: int | None,
+    target_head_sha: str | None,
+    reason: str | None,
+    actor_username: str | None,
+    profile_name: str | None,
+    authorized: bool,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Structured durable audit for review-correction authorization (#693)."""
+    return {
+        "event": "review_correction_authorization",
+        "issue_ref": "#693",
+        "authorized": bool(authorized),
+        "timestamp": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
+        "actor_username": actor_username,
+        "profile_name": profile_name,
+        "prior_review_id": prior_review_id,
+        "prior_review_state": prior_review_state,
+        "target_pr_number": target_pr_number,
+        "target_head_sha": normalize_head_sha(target_head_sha),
+        "reason": reason,
+        "scope": "same_pr_head_only",
+    }
+
+
+def format_correction_audit_comment(audit: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
+    """Markdown body for a thread-visible correction authorization audit."""
+    status = "AUTHORIZED" if audit.get("authorized") else "DENIED"
+    lines = [
+        "## Review correction authorization audit (#693)",
+        "",
+        f"Status: **{status}**",
+        "",
+        f"- actor: `{audit.get('actor_username')}`",
+        f"- profile: `{audit.get('profile_name')}`",
+        f"- timestamp: `{audit.get('timestamp')}`",
+        f"- prior_review_id: `{audit.get('prior_review_id')}`",
+        f"- prior_review_state: `{audit.get('prior_review_state')}`",
+        f"- target_pr: `#{audit.get('target_pr_number')}`",
+        f"- target_head_sha: `{audit.get('target_head_sha')}`",
+        f"- reason: {audit.get('reason')}",
+        f"- scope: `{audit.get('scope')}` (cannot unlock a different PR)",
+        "",
+        "This is **not** a generic decision-lock unlock. Cross-PR recovery "
+        "uses isolation (#693) or moot cleanup (#594), never correction.",
+    ]
+    return "\n".join(lines)
+
+
+def assess_open_pr_decision_lock_recovery(
+    lock: dict | None,
+    *,
+    target_pr_number: int,
+    target_head_sha: str | None,
+    last_terminal_pr_live: dict | None = None,
+    pr_lookup_error: str | None = None,
+    active_profile_identity: str | None = None,
+    session_blockers: list[str] | None = None,
+    controller_recovery_authorized: bool = False,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Assess guarded recovery for decision locks affecting an open target PR (#693).
+
+    Recovery here means *workflow recovery routing*, not necessarily lock wipe.
+    Foreign-PR terminals are recoverable by isolation (mark_final allowed).
+    Moot terminals use #594 cleanup. Same-head active terminals refuse wipe.
+    """
+    classification = classify_review_decision_lock(
+        lock,
+        target_pr_number=target_pr_number,
+        target_head_sha=target_head_sha,
+        pr_live=last_terminal_pr_live,
+        pr_lookup_error=pr_lookup_error,
+        active_profile_identity=active_profile_identity,
+        session_blockers=session_blockers,
+    )
+    cls = classification["classification"]
+    recovery_allowed = False
+    recovery_mode = None
+    if cls == CLASS_FOREIGN_PR_TERMINAL:
+        recovery_allowed = True
+        recovery_mode = "cross_pr_isolation"
+    elif cls == CLASS_STALE_SUPERSEDED_HEAD:
+        recovery_allowed = True
+        recovery_mode = "same_pr_new_head"
+    elif cls == CLASS_MOOT_MERGED_CLOSED:
+        recovery_allowed = True
+        recovery_mode = "moot_cleanup"
+    elif cls == CLASS_READY_FOR_TARGET:
+        recovery_allowed = True
+        recovery_mode = "none_required"
+    elif cls == CLASS_CORRECTION_ACTIVE:
+        recovery_allowed = True
+        recovery_mode = "scoped_correction"
+    elif cls == CLASS_TERMINAL_ACTIVE_SAME_HEAD:
+        recovery_allowed = False
+        recovery_mode = "correction_only_if_mistake"
+    else:
+        recovery_allowed = False
+        recovery_mode = "fail_closed"
+
+    if recovery_mode == "moot_cleanup" and not controller_recovery_authorized:
+        # Cleanup still needs apply + capability; assess reports path.
+        pass
+
+    return {
+        **classification,
+        "recovery_allowed": recovery_allowed,
+        "recovery_mode": recovery_mode,
+        "controller_recovery_authorized": bool(controller_recovery_authorized),
+        "manual_file_delete_forbidden": True,
+        "correction_as_generic_unlock_forbidden": True,
+    }

task_capability_map.py

@@ -76,6 +76,16 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
         "role": "reviewer",
     },
+    # #691: guarded non-owner cleanup of obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases.
+    # Apply path posts lease release + audit comments (gitea.pr.comment).
+    "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
+        "role": "reviewer",
+    },
+    "gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
+        "role": "reviewer",
+    },
     "blind_pr_queue_review": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
         "role": "reviewer",
@@ -107,6 +117,23 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
         "role": "reviewer",
     },
+    # #693: read-only classification of durable decision locks (incl. open PRs).
+    "diagnose_review_decision_lock": {
+        "permission": "gitea.read",
+        "role": "reviewer",
+    },
+    "gitea_diagnose_review_decision_lock": {
+        "permission": "gitea.read",
+        "role": "reviewer",
+    },
+    "authorize_review_correction": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
+        "role": "reviewer",
+    },
+    "gitea_authorize_review_correction": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
+        "role": "reviewer",
+    },
     "delete_branch": {
         "permission": "gitea.branch.delete",
         "role": "author",

tests/test_head_scoped_review_decision_lock.py

@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ HEAD_C = "c" * 40
 
 
 def _lock(mutations=None, correction=False, ready_pr=None, ready_head=None, ready_action=None):
+    mutations = list(mutations or [])
+    corr_pr = None
+    if correction and mutations:
+        corr_pr = mutations[-1].get("pr_number")
     return {
         "task": "review_pr",
         "remote": "prgs",
@@ -40,9 +44,11 @@ def _lock(mutations=None, correction=False, ready_pr=None, ready_head=None, read
         "ready_remote": "prgs" if ready_pr else None,
         "ready_org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting" if ready_pr else None,
         "ready_repo": "Gitea-Tools" if ready_pr else None,
-        "live_mutations": list(mutations or []),
+        "live_mutations": mutations,
         "correction_authorized": correction,
-        "correction_reason": None,
+        "correction_reason": "test" if correction else None,
+        "correction_pr_number": corr_pr,
+        "correction_head_sha": None,
     }
 
 
@@ -174,12 +180,13 @@ class TestHardStopHeadScope(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertTrue(reasons)
         self.assertIn("#332", reasons[0])
 
-    def test_rc_head_a_blocks_other_pr(self):
+    def test_rc_head_a_allows_other_pr_via_cross_pr_isolation(self):
+        """#693: foreign-PR terminal must not hard-stop mark_ready on another PR."""
         _seed([RC_619_HEAD_A], ready_pr=619, ready_head=HEAD_A)
         reasons = mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
             700, "mark_ready", expected_head_sha=HEAD_B
         )
-        self.assertTrue(reasons)
+        self.assertEqual(reasons, [])
 
     def test_legacy_619_ledger_allows_new_head(self):
         """PR #619-style durable lock without mutation head_sha."""

tests/test_issue_691_obsolete_reviewer_lease_cleanup.py

@@ -0,0 +1,599 @@
+"""Guarded cleanup for obsolete comment-backed reviewer leases (#691).
+
+Reproduces PR #688 lease comment 10749 class of defect: completed
+REQUEST_CHANGES on head A, author pushes head B, foreign lease remains
+pinned to A (and after expiry still has no non-owner cleanup path that
+diagnosis can prescribe beyond indefinite wait).
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import sys
+import unittest
+from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+from pathlib import Path
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import merger_lease_adoption as mla  # noqa: E402
+import reviewer_pr_lease as leases  # noqa: E402
+
+# PR #688 / comment 10749 reproduction fixtures
+HEAD_A = "c7a444eb4b41cf916fdbd20a4999ffd78af496d0"
+HEAD_B = "4a6357800364718a27a36ebc73578d4b929ff4aa"
+SESSION_FOREIGN = "25883-7d4c6e6ebd53"
+COMMENT_10749 = 10749
+REPO = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"
+PR = 688
+ISSUE = 687
+EXPIRES_10749 = "2026-07-13T04:23:00Z"
+
+
+def _utc(dt: datetime) -> datetime:
+    return dt if dt.tzinfo else dt.replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+
+
+def _lease_comment(
+    *,
+    pr_number: int = PR,
+    session_id: str = SESSION_FOREIGN,
+    phase: str = "claimed",
+    candidate_head: str = HEAD_A,
+    comment_id: int = COMMENT_10749,
+    last_activity: datetime | None = None,
+    expires_at: datetime | None = None,
+    worktree: str = "branches/review-pr688-feat-issue-687-reconciler-branch-delete",
+    repo: str = REPO,
+) -> dict:
+    now = last_activity or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+    body = leases.format_lease_body(
+        repo=repo,
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        issue_number=ISSUE,
+        reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+        profile="prgs-reviewer",
+        session_id=session_id,
+        worktree=worktree,
+        phase=phase,
+        candidate_head=candidate_head,
+        target_branch="master",
+        target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
+        last_activity=now,
+        expires_at=expires_at,
+    )
+    return {
+        "id": comment_id,
+        "body": body,
+        "user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
+        "author": "sysadmin",
+        "created_at": now.isoformat(),
+        "updated_at": now.isoformat(),
+    }
+
+
+def _reviews_for_head(head: str, verdict: str = "REQUEST_CHANGES") -> list[dict]:
+    return [
+        {
+            "verdict": verdict,
+            "reviewed_head_sha": head,
+            "dismissed": False,
+            "reviewer": "sysadmin",
+        }
+    ]
+
+
+def _assess(
+    comments,
+    *,
+    current_head=HEAD_B,
+    formal_reviews=None,
+    controller=True,
+    worktree_exists=True,
+    worktree_clean=True,
+    owner_process_alive=False,
+    requesting_session="fresh-controller",
+    apply=False,
+    confirmation=None,
+    **kwargs,
+):
+    return leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
+        comments,
+        pr_number=PR,
+        current_head_sha=current_head,
+        formal_reviews=formal_reviews if formal_reviews is not None else _reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
+        repo=REPO,
+        expected_repo=REPO,
+        requesting_session_id=requesting_session,
+        controller_recovery_authorized=controller,
+        worktree_exists=worktree_exists,
+        worktree_clean=worktree_clean,
+        worktree_has_unpreserved_work=not worktree_clean if worktree_exists else False,
+        owner_process_alive=owner_process_alive,
+        owner_pid_observed=kwargs.get("owner_pid_observed"),
+        requesting_pid=kwargs.get("requesting_pid", 99999),
+        current_head_review_in_progress=kwargs.get(
+            "current_head_review_in_progress", False
+        ),
+        expected_lease_comment_id=kwargs.get("expected_lease_comment_id"),
+        expected_session_id=kwargs.get("expected_session_id"),
+        expected_leased_head=kwargs.get("expected_leased_head"),
+        confirmation=confirmation
+        if confirmation is not None
+        else (leases.cleanup_confirmation_for_pr(PR) if apply else ""),
+        apply=apply,
+        now=kwargs.get("now"),
+    )
+
+
+class TestIssue691SupersededHeadCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        leases.clear_session_lease()
+
+    def test_1_request_changes_then_push_expired_cleanup_succeeds(self):
+        """Completed REQUEST_CHANGES on A, push B, lease A expires → cleanup OK."""
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=2),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
+            now=now,
+            apply=True,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_expired_superseded_head")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            result["exact_next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+        )
+        self.assertIn("phase: released", result["release_body"])
+        self.assertIn("obsolete-superseded-or-expired-lease", result["release_body"])
+        self.assertIsNotNone(result["audit_comment_body"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["cleanup_tool"], leases.CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL)
+
+    def test_2_approve_then_push_cleanup_policy(self):
+        """Completed APPROVE on A, push B → cleanup eligible (completed superseded)."""
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 1, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)  # not yet expired
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=10),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "APPROVED"),
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_completed_superseded_head")
+
+    def test_3_active_current_head_cleanup_denied(self):
+        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=5),
+            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            current_head=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_B, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_active_current_head")
+
+    def test_4_foreign_owner_recent_progress_denied(self):
+        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=2),
+            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            current_head=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=[],
+            owner_process_alive=True,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("recent authenticated progress" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+            or any("current PR head" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_5_owner_absent_worktree_dirty_denied(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            current_head=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=[],
+            worktree_clean=False,
+            owner_process_alive=False,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("dirty" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_6_owner_absent_worktree_clean_orphan_ok(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            current_head=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=[],
+            worktree_clean=True,
+            owner_process_alive=False,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "orphaned_owner_missing")
+
+    def test_7_pid_reuse_not_ownership(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            now=now,
+            owner_pid_observed=4242,
+            requesting_pid=4242,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("PID equality" in r or "NOT ownership" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+            or result["owner_session_evidence"]["pid_is_not_ownership_proof"]
+        )
+        # Still eligible via superseded+terminal+expired despite matching PID.
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_8_comment_backed_no_db_lease_id(self):
+        """Cleanup uses comment ledger only — no control-plane lease_id required."""
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        # Explicitly no lease_id field anywhere.
+        self.assertNotIn("lease_id", claim)
+        result = _assess([claim], now=now)
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"], result["reasons"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["active_lease"]["comment_id"], COMMENT_10749)
+        self.assertIsNone(result["active_lease"].get("lease_id"))
+
+    def test_9_cleanup_posts_durable_audit_bodies(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertIn("#691", result["audit_comment_body"])
+        self.assertIn(str(COMMENT_10749), result["audit_comment_body"])
+        self.assertIn(HEAD_A, result["audit_comment_body"])
+        self.assertIn(HEAD_B, result["audit_comment_body"])
+
+    def test_10_fresh_acquire_after_cleanup_marker(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            expires_at=expires,
+            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1),
+            comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
+        )
+        assessed = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
+        self.assertTrue(assessed["cleanup_allowed"])
+        release = {
+            "id": 99999,
+            "body": assessed["release_body"],
+            "user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
+        }
+        # Newest terminal marker ends active lease.
+        active = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease(
+            [claim, release], pr_number=PR, now=now
+        )
+        self.assertIsNone(active)
+        acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
+            [claim, release],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            profile="prgs-reviewer",
+            session_id="fresh-reviewer-1",
+            repo=REPO,
+            issue_number=ISSUE,
+            worktree="branches/review-pr-688-fresh",
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            target_branch="master",
+            target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(acq["acquire_allowed"], acq["reasons"])
+
+    def test_11_no_validation_state_transfer(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
+        self.assertTrue(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        # Release body keeps old candidate_head (no repoint).
+        self.assertIn(f"candidate_head: {HEAD_A}", result["release_body"])
+        self.assertNotIn(HEAD_B, result["release_body"].split("candidate_head:")[1].split("\n")[0])
+        self.assertIn("did not transfer validation", result["audit_comment_body"])
+        self.assertIn("did not repoint", result["audit_comment_body"])
+        # Session lease must remain unset by assessment (tool never seeds).
+        self.assertIsNone(leases.get_session_lease())
+
+    def test_12_repeated_cleanup_idempotent(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        first = _assess([claim], now=now, apply=True)
+        self.assertTrue(first["cleanup_allowed"])
+        release = {"id": 100001, "body": first["release_body"], "user": {"login": "x"}}
+        second = _assess([claim, release], now=now, apply=True)
+        self.assertFalse(second["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(second["classification"], "no_lease")
+
+    def test_13_malformed_expiry_fails_closed(self):
+        claim = _lease_comment()
+        # Corrupt expires_at in the body.
+        claim["body"] = claim["body"].replace(
+            claim["body"].split("expires_at:")[1].split("\n")[0].strip(),
+            "not-a-timestamp",
+        )
+        result = _assess([claim], formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A))
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["expires_parseable"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("expires_at" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_14_wrong_identity_evidence_fails_closed(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        bad_repo = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            now=now,
+            # force repo mismatch via expected_repo
+        )
+        # Patch via direct call with wrong expected_repo
+        bad = leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
+            [claim],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
+            expected_repo="Other-Org/Other-Repo",
+            requesting_session_id="fresh",
+            controller_recovery_authorized=True,
+            worktree_exists=True,
+            worktree_clean=True,
+            owner_process_alive=False,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(bad["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("repository identity" in r for r in bad["reasons"]))
+
+        bad_pr = leases.assess_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease_cleanup(
+            [claim],
+            pr_number=999,
+            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A),
+            expected_repo=REPO,
+            requesting_session_id="fresh",
+            controller_recovery_authorized=True,
+            worktree_exists=True,
+            worktree_clean=True,
+            owner_process_alive=False,
+            expected_lease_comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(bad_pr["cleanup_allowed"])
+
+        bad_head = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            now=now,
+            expected_leased_head="0" * 40,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(bad_head["cleanup_allowed"])
+
+        bad_session = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            now=now,
+            expected_session_id="wrong-session",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(bad_session["cleanup_allowed"])
+
+    def test_15_current_head_active_cannot_be_displaced(self):
+        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=1),
+            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=2),
+        )
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            current_head=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_B),
+            now=now,
+            current_head_review_in_progress=True,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        # Acquire also blocked by foreign active lease.
+        acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
+            [claim],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            reviewer_identity="other",
+            profile="prgs-reviewer",
+            session_id="thief",
+            repo=REPO,
+            issue_number=ISSUE,
+            worktree="branches/steal",
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            target_branch="master",
+            target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(acq["acquire_allowed"])
+
+    def test_regression_pr688_comment_10749_after_expiry(self):
+        """Exact 10749 reproduction after recorded expires_at 2026-07-13T04:23:00Z."""
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 30, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime.fromisoformat(EXPIRES_10749.replace("Z", "+00:00"))
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
+            candidate_head=HEAD_A,
+            comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
+            last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=2),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        # Diagnosis must not prescribe indefinite wait-only for this case.
+        diag = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
+            [claim],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            current_session_id="fresh-reviewer",
+            current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
+            worktree_exists=True,
+            worktree_clean=True,
+            owner_process_alive=False,
+            instructed_session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
+            instructed_comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(diag["classification"], "foreign_expired_superseded_head")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            diag["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(diag["cleanup_tool"], leases.CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE_TOOL)
+        self.assertIn("CLEANUP OBSOLETE REVIEWER LEASE 688", diag["required_confirmation"])
+        self.assertEqual(diag["mutation_eligibility"], "cleanup_only")
+        self.assertFalse(diag["mutation_allowed"])
+
+        # Assessment still returns the lease as active/stale class of block for acquire
+        # when unexpired path... here it's expired so find_active is None; acquire free
+        # only after cleanup if somehow still active. With expired, find_active is None:
+        active = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease([claim], pr_number=PR, now=now)
+        self.assertIsNone(active)
+
+        # But superseded unexpired still blocks acquire and diagnosis points to cleanup:
+        unexpired_now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 1, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim2 = _lease_comment(
+            session_id=SESSION_FOREIGN,
+            candidate_head=HEAD_A,
+            comment_id=COMMENT_10749,
+            last_activity=unexpired_now - timedelta(minutes=45),
+            expires_at=expires,
+        )
+        active2 = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease(
+            [claim2], pr_number=PR, now=unexpired_now
+        )
+        self.assertIsNotNone(active2)
+        self.assertEqual(active2["freshness"], "stale_warning")
+        diag2 = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
+            [claim2],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            current_session_id="fresh-reviewer",
+            current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=_reviews_for_head(HEAD_A, "REQUEST_CHANGES"),
+            worktree_exists=True,
+            worktree_clean=True,
+            now=unexpired_now,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(diag2["classification"], "foreign_completed_superseded_head")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            diag2["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_CLEANUP_OBSOLETE_LEASE
+        )
+        acq = leases.assess_acquire_lease(
+            [claim2],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            profile="prgs-reviewer",
+            session_id="fresh-reviewer",
+            repo=REPO,
+            issue_number=ISSUE,
+            worktree="branches/review-pr-688-new",
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            target_branch="master",
+            target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
+            now=unexpired_now,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(acq["acquire_allowed"])
+
+    def test_missing_controller_auth_denied(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess([claim], controller=False, now=now)
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+
+    def test_wrong_confirmation_denied_on_apply(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim], now=now, apply=True, confirmation="MERGE PR 688"
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("confirmation" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_owner_session_must_use_owner_release(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess(
+            [claim],
+            now=now,
+            requesting_session=SESSION_FOREIGN,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("owns the lease" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_superseded_without_terminal_review_denied(self):
+        now = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 5, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        expires = datetime(2026, 7, 13, 4, 23, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(expires_at=expires, last_activity=expires - timedelta(hours=1))
+        result = _assess([claim], formal_reviews=[], now=now)
+        self.assertFalse(result["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "ambiguous_conflicting_evidence")
+
+
+class TestIssue691DiagnoseClassifications(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        leases.clear_session_lease()
+
+    def test_foreign_active_current_head_still_wait(self):
+        now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+        claim = _lease_comment(
+            candidate_head=HEAD_B,
+            last_activity=now - timedelta(minutes=5),
+            expires_at=now + timedelta(hours=1),
+        )
+        claim["id"] = 1
+        result = leases.diagnose_reviewer_pr_lease_handoff(
+            [claim],
+            pr_number=PR,
+            current_session_id="other",
+            current_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            current_head_sha=HEAD_B,
+            formal_reviews=[],
+            now=now,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["classification"], "foreign_active_current_head")
+        self.assertEqual(result["next_action"], leases.NEXT_ACTION_WAIT)
+        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_allowed"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_issue_693_review_decision_lock_recovery.py

@@ -0,0 +1,427 @@
+"""Review-decision-lock recovery / cross-PR isolation (#693).
+
+Reproduces the PR #688 → PR #692 formal-review sequence:
+
+  * durable lock holds REQUEST_CHANGES on open PR #688 @ head A (review_id 425)
+  * reviewer leases PR #692 @ head B (6d86db…)
+  * mark_final for #692 must succeed without correction unlock
+  * cleanup of open #688 terminal remains forbidden (#594)
+  * authorize_review_correction for #688 cannot unlock #692
+  * eventual #692 APPROVE is unique and head-bound (review_id 426)
+  * mark_final is idempotent for same PR/action/head
+  * diagnosis returns one exact next_action + durable handoff payload
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import unittest
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+import mcp_server
+import review_workflow_load
+import stale_review_decision_lock as srdl
+
+# PR #688 / #692 incident fixtures (sanitized reconstruction from issue #693)
+HEAD_688 = "c7a444eb4b41cf916fdbd20a4999ffd78af496d0"
+HEAD_692 = "6d86db793bbdfaed16bd54d93171f1dd66f234ca"
+PR_A = 688
+PR_B = 692
+REVIEW_ID_A = 425
+REVIEW_ID_B = 426
+
+RC_688 = {
+    "pr_number": PR_A,
+    "action": "request_changes",
+    "review_id": REVIEW_ID_A,
+    "review_state": "request_changes",
+    "head_sha": HEAD_688,
+}
+APPROVE_692 = {
+    "pr_number": PR_B,
+    "action": "approve",
+    "review_id": REVIEW_ID_B,
+    "review_state": "approve",
+    "head_sha": HEAD_692,
+}
+
+
+def _lock(mutations=None, **kwargs):
+    from datetime import datetime, timezone
+
+    now = datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat()
+    base = {
+        "task": "review_pr",
+        "remote": "prgs",
+        "org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+        "repo": "Gitea-Tools",
+        "session_pid": os.getpid(),
+        "session_profile": "prgs-reviewer",
+        "session_profile_lock": "prgs-reviewer",
+        "profile_identity": "prgs-reviewer",
+        "final_review_decision_ready": False,
+        "ready_pr_number": None,
+        "ready_action": None,
+        "ready_expected_head_sha": None,
+        "ready_remote": None,
+        "ready_org": None,
+        "ready_repo": None,
+        "live_mutations": list(mutations or []),
+        "correction_authorized": False,
+        "correction_reason": None,
+        "correction_pr_number": None,
+        "correction_head_sha": None,
+        "updated_at": now,
+        "recorded_at": now,
+        "writer_pid": os.getpid(),
+    }
+    base.update(kwargs)
+    # Ensure TTL fields stay fresh unless the caller is testing expiry.
+    if "recorded_at" not in kwargs:
+        base["recorded_at"] = now
+    if "updated_at" not in kwargs:
+        base["updated_at"] = now
+    return base
+
+
+REVIEWER_ENV = {
+    "GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "prgs-reviewer",
+    "GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": (
+        "gitea.read,gitea.pr.review,gitea.pr.approve,"
+        "gitea.pr.request_changes,gitea.pr.comment"
+    ),
+    "GITEA_SESSION_PROFILE_LOCK": "prgs-reviewer",
+}
+
+REVIEWER_PROFILE = {
+    "profile_name": "prgs-reviewer",
+    "allowed_operations": [
+        "gitea.read",
+        "gitea.pr.review",
+        "gitea.pr.approve",
+        "gitea.pr.request_changes",
+        "gitea.pr.comment",
+    ],
+    "forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.merge"],
+}
+
+
+def _seed(mutations=None, **kwargs):
+    review_workflow_load.record_review_workflow_load(mcp_server.PROJECT_ROOT)
+    mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(_lock(mutations, **kwargs))
+    mcp_server.gitea_load_review_workflow()
+
+
+def _no_lease():
+    return {"block": False, "reasons": [], "mutation_allowed": True}
+
+
+def _open_pr(number, head):
+    return {
+        "number": number,
+        "state": "open",
+        "merged": False,
+        "merged_at": None,
+        "head": {"sha": head},
+    }
+
+
+class TestCrossPrIsolationPure(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_foreign_terminal_does_not_block_mark_boundary(self):
+        lock = _lock([RC_688])
+        self.assertFalse(
+            srdl.prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
+                lock, pr_number=PR_B, expected_head_sha=HEAD_692
+            )
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(
+            srdl.prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
+                lock, pr_number=PR_A, expected_head_sha=HEAD_688
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_terminal_boundary_allows_fresh_decision_on_other_pr(self):
+        lock = _lock([RC_688])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            srdl.terminal_boundary_allows_fresh_decision(
+                lock,
+                pr_number=PR_B,
+                expected_head_sha=HEAD_692,
+                operation="mark_ready",
+            )
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(
+            srdl.terminal_boundary_allows_fresh_decision(
+                lock,
+                pr_number=PR_A,
+                expected_head_sha=HEAD_688,
+                operation="mark_ready",
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_unscoped_correction_does_not_apply(self):
+        lock = _lock([RC_688], correction_authorized=True, correction_reason="x")
+        # Missing correction_pr_number → fail closed (#693)
+        self.assertFalse(
+            srdl.correction_applies(lock, pr_number=PR_A, expected_head_sha=HEAD_688)
+        )
+
+    def test_scoped_correction_only_for_named_pr(self):
+        lock = _lock(
+            [RC_688],
+            correction_authorized=True,
+            correction_reason="mistake",
+            correction_pr_number=PR_A,
+            correction_head_sha=HEAD_688,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(
+            srdl.correction_applies(lock, pr_number=PR_A, expected_head_sha=HEAD_688)
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(
+            srdl.correction_applies(lock, pr_number=PR_B, expected_head_sha=HEAD_692)
+        )
+
+
+class TestClassification(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_foreign_pr_terminal_classification(self):
+        lock = _lock([RC_688])
+        c = srdl.classify_review_decision_lock(
+            lock,
+            target_pr_number=PR_B,
+            target_head_sha=HEAD_692,
+            pr_live=_open_pr(PR_A, HEAD_688),
+            active_profile_identity="prgs-reviewer",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(c["classification"], srdl.CLASS_FOREIGN_PR_TERMINAL)
+        self.assertTrue(c["mark_final_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(c["correction_eligible"])
+        self.assertIn("do not call gitea_authorize_review_correction", c["next_action"])
+
+    def test_same_head_terminal_classification(self):
+        lock = _lock([RC_688])
+        c = srdl.classify_review_decision_lock(
+            lock,
+            target_pr_number=PR_A,
+            target_head_sha=HEAD_688,
+            pr_live=_open_pr(PR_A, HEAD_688),
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(c["classification"], srdl.CLASS_TERMINAL_ACTIVE_SAME_HEAD)
+        self.assertFalse(c["mark_final_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(c["correction_eligible"])
+
+    def test_precise_failure_includes_durable_handoff(self):
+        lock = _lock([RC_688])
+        c = srdl.classify_review_decision_lock(
+            lock, target_pr_number=PR_A, target_head_sha=HEAD_688
+        )
+        fail = srdl.build_precise_mark_final_failure(c)
+        self.assertIn("exact_next_action", fail)
+        self.assertIn("durable_issue_handoff", fail)
+        self.assertTrue(fail["durable_issue_handoff"]["required"])
+
+
+class TestPr692Sequence(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        self._env = patch.dict(os.environ, REVIEWER_ENV, clear=False)
+        self._env.start()
+        self._prof = patch.object(
+            mcp_server, "get_profile", return_value=REVIEWER_PROFILE
+        )
+        self._prof.start()
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        self._prof.stop()
+        self._env.stop()
+        mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(None)
+        review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
+
+    def test_mark_final_692_succeeds_with_open_688_terminal(self):
+        _seed([RC_688], writer_pid=25883, session_pid=60615)
+        with patch("mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]), patch(
+            "mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block", return_value=_no_lease()
+        ), patch.object(
+            mcp_server,
+            "gitea_check_pr_eligibility",
+            return_value={"head_sha": HEAD_692, "eligible": True},
+        ):
+            result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
+                pr_number=PR_B,
+                action="approve",
+                expected_head_sha=HEAD_692,
+                remote="prgs",
+                org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+                repo="Gitea-Tools",
+            )
+        self.assertTrue(result["marked_ready"], result.get("reasons"))
+        lock = mcp_server._load_review_decision_lock()
+        self.assertEqual(lock["ready_pr_number"], PR_B)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            srdl.normalize_head_sha(lock["ready_expected_head_sha"]), HEAD_692
+        )
+        # Foreign terminal history preserved (non-destructive isolation).
+        self.assertEqual(lock["live_mutations"][0]["pr_number"], PR_A)
+
+    def test_mark_final_idempotent_same_binding(self):
+        _seed(
+            [RC_688],
+            final_review_decision_ready=True,
+            ready_pr_number=PR_B,
+            ready_action="approve",
+            ready_expected_head_sha=HEAD_692,
+            ready_remote="prgs",
+            ready_org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+            ready_repo="Gitea-Tools",
+        )
+        with patch("mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]), patch(
+            "mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block", return_value=_no_lease()
+        ), patch.object(
+            mcp_server,
+            "gitea_check_pr_eligibility",
+            return_value={"head_sha": HEAD_692, "eligible": True},
+        ):
+            result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
+                pr_number=PR_B,
+                action="approve",
+                expected_head_sha=HEAD_692,
+                remote="prgs",
+                org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+                repo="Gitea-Tools",
+            )
+        self.assertTrue(result["marked_ready"])
+        self.assertTrue(result.get("idempotent"))
+
+    def test_cleanup_still_forbidden_while_688_open(self):
+        _seed([RC_688])
+        assessment = srdl.assess_stale_review_decision_lock(
+            mcp_server._load_review_decision_lock(),
+            pr_live=_open_pr(PR_A, HEAD_688),
+            active_profile_identity="prgs-reviewer",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(assessment["cleanup_allowed"])
+        self.assertFalse(assessment["is_moot"])
+
+    def test_correction_cannot_unlock_different_pr(self):
+        _seed([RC_688])
+        r = mcp_server.gitea_authorize_review_correction(
+            prior_review_id=REVIEW_ID_A,
+            prior_review_state="request_changes",
+            reason="try unlock 692",
+            operator_authorized=True,
+            target_pr_number=PR_B,
+            remote="prgs",
+            org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+            repo="Gitea-Tools",
+            post_audit_comment=False,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(r["authorized"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("different PR" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_scoped_correction_for_same_pr_posts_audit(self):
+        _seed([RC_688])
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server._authenticated_username", return_value="sysadmin"
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="Basic dGVzdDp0ZXN0"
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server._auth", return_value="Basic dGVzdDp0ZXN0"
+        ), patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"id": 99901}):
+            r = mcp_server.gitea_authorize_review_correction(
+                prior_review_id=REVIEW_ID_A,
+                prior_review_state="request_changes",
+                reason="mistaken RC wording",
+                operator_authorized=True,
+                target_pr_number=PR_A,
+                expected_head_sha=HEAD_688,
+                remote="prgs",
+                org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+                repo="Gitea-Tools",
+                post_audit_comment=True,
+            )
+        self.assertTrue(r["authorized"], r.get("reasons"))
+        self.assertEqual(r.get("correction_pr_number"), PR_A)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            r.get("audit_comment_id"),
+            99901,
+            r.get("audit_comment_skipped") or r.get("audit_comment_error") or r,
+        )
+
+    def test_diagnose_foreign_terminal_next_action(self):
+        _seed([RC_688])
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server._authenticated_username", return_value="sysadmin"
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="Basic dGVzdDp0ZXN0"
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server._auth", return_value="Basic dGVzdDp0ZXN0"
+        ), patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value=_open_pr(PR_A, HEAD_688)):
+            d = mcp_server.gitea_diagnose_review_decision_lock(
+                target_pr_number=PR_B,
+                expected_head_sha=HEAD_692,
+                remote="prgs",
+                org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+                repo="Gitea-Tools",
+            )
+        self.assertTrue(d["success"], d.get("reasons"))
+        self.assertEqual(d["classification"], srdl.CLASS_FOREIGN_PR_TERMINAL)
+        self.assertTrue(d["mark_final_allowed"])
+        self.assertIn("mark_final", d["exact_next_action"])
+        self.assertTrue(d["correction_as_generic_unlock_forbidden"])
+
+    def test_approval_ledger_unique_and_bound_after_sequence(self):
+        """After mark_final + record mutation, ledger binds unique approve to 692 head."""
+        _seed([RC_688])
+        with patch("mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]), patch(
+            "mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block", return_value=_no_lease()
+        ), patch.object(
+            mcp_server,
+            "gitea_check_pr_eligibility",
+            return_value={"head_sha": HEAD_692, "eligible": True},
+        ):
+            marked = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
+                pr_number=PR_B,
+                action="approve",
+                expected_head_sha=HEAD_692,
+                remote="prgs",
+                org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+                repo="Gitea-Tools",
+            )
+        self.assertTrue(marked["marked_ready"])
+        mcp_server.record_live_review_mutation(PR_B, "approve", REVIEW_ID_B)
+        lock = mcp_server._load_review_decision_lock()
+        terminals = [
+            m
+            for m in lock["live_mutations"]
+            if m.get("action") in srdl.TERMINAL_REVIEW_ACTIONS
+            and m.get("pr_number") == PR_B
+        ]
+        self.assertEqual(len(terminals), 1)
+        self.assertEqual(terminals[0]["review_id"], REVIEW_ID_B)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            srdl.normalize_head_sha(terminals[0].get("head_sha")), HEAD_692
+        )
+        # Same-head duplicate still blocked.
+        self.assertTrue(
+            srdl.prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
+                lock, pr_number=PR_B, expected_head_sha=HEAD_692
+            )
+        )
+
+
+class TestSessionRestartWriterPid(unittest.TestCase):
+    def tearDown(self):
+        mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(None)
+        review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
+
+    def test_writer_pid_change_does_not_inherit_foreign_block(self):
+        # session_pid 60615 origin, writer later 25883 — still foreign isolation.
+        _seed([RC_688], session_pid=60615, writer_pid=25883)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
+                PR_B, "mark_ready", expected_head_sha=HEAD_692
+            ),
+            [],
+        )
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_mcp_server.py

@@ -2540,15 +2540,18 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
         lock = _load_review_decision_lock() or {}
         lock["live_mutations"] = [{"pr_number": 8, "action": "approve", "review_id": 42, "review_state": "approve"}]
         _save_review_decision_lock(lock)
-        r = gitea_authorize_review_correction(
-            prior_review_id=42,
-            prior_review_state="approve",
-            reason="typo",
-            operator_authorized=True,
-        )
+        with patch("mcp_server.api_request", return_value={"id": 9001}):
+            r = gitea_authorize_review_correction(
+                prior_review_id=42,
+                prior_review_state="approve",
+                reason="typo",
+                operator_authorized=True,
+                target_pr_number=8,
+            )
         self.assertTrue(r["authorized"])
         lock = _load_review_decision_lock()
         self.assertTrue(lock["correction_authorized"])
+        self.assertEqual(lock["correction_pr_number"], 8)
 
     def test_authorize_review_correction_mismatch(self):
         from mcp_server import _load_review_decision_lock, _save_review_decision_lock
@@ -2562,6 +2565,7 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
             prior_review_state="approve",
             reason="typo",
             operator_authorized=True,
+            target_pr_number=8,
         )
         self.assertFalse(r["authorized"])
         self.assertTrue(any("prior review ID" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
@@ -2572,10 +2576,22 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
             prior_review_state="request_changes",
             reason="typo",
             operator_authorized=True,
+            target_pr_number=8,
         )
         self.assertFalse(r["authorized"])
         self.assertTrue(any("prior review state" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
 
+        # Cross-PR unlock refused (#693)
+        r = gitea_authorize_review_correction(
+            prior_review_id=42,
+            prior_review_state="approve",
+            reason="unlock other pr",
+            operator_authorized=True,
+            target_pr_number=692,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(r["authorized"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("different PR" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
+
     def test_authorize_review_correction_requires_operator_auth(self):
         from mcp_server import _load_review_decision_lock, _save_review_decision_lock
         lock = _load_review_decision_lock() or {}
@@ -2588,6 +2604,7 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
             prior_review_state="approve",
             reason="typo",
             operator_authorized=False,
+            target_pr_number=8,
         )
         self.assertFalse(r["authorized"])
         self.assertTrue(any("operator authorization" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
@@ -2645,6 +2662,7 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
                     prior_review_state="approve",
                     reason="operator approved correcting mistaken approve",
                     operator_authorized=True,
+                    target_pr_number=8,
                 )
                 _mark_request_changes_ready(remote="prgs")
                 second = gitea_submit_pr_review(

tests/test_stale_review_decision_lock_cleanup.py

@@ -188,20 +188,32 @@ class TestActiveHardStopPreserved(unittest.TestCase):
         mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(None)
         mcp_server.review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
 
-    def test_open_approve_still_blocks_other_pr_mark_ready(self):
-        _seed([APPROVED_OPEN])
-        reasons = mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(592, "mark_ready")
-        self.assertTrue(reasons)
-        self.assertIn("#332", reasons[0])
-        self.assertIn("gitea_cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock", reasons[0])
+    def test_open_approve_blocks_same_pr_not_other_pr_mark_ready(self):
+        _seed([APPROVED_OPEN])  # approve on PR #700
+        # Same PR still hard-stopped for mark_ready.
+        reasons_same = mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
+            700, "mark_ready"
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(reasons_same)
+        self.assertIn("#332", reasons_same[0])
+        # #693: other PR may mark_ready without cleanup.
+        self.assertEqual(
+            mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(592, "mark_ready"),
+            [],
+        )
 
-    def test_request_changes_still_blocks_everything(self):
-        _seed([RC_OPEN])
+    def test_request_changes_still_blocks_same_pr(self):
+        _seed([RC_OPEN])  # request_changes on PR #701
         for op in ("merge", "mark_ready", "review"):
             self.assertTrue(
-                mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(592, op),
+                mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(701, op),
                 msg=op,
             )
+        # Foreign PR review path is open (#693).
+        self.assertEqual(
+            mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(592, "mark_ready"),
+            [],
+        )
 
 
 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #

tests/test_terminal_review_hard_stop.py

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-"""Tests for the session hard-stop after a terminal review mutation (#332).
+"""Tests for the session hard-stop after a terminal review mutation (#332/#693).
 
 Extends the single-terminal-decision machinery (#211): after a live
-REQUEST_CHANGES the run must stop; after an APPROVE only the merge sequence
-for that same PR may continue; a different PR can never be reviewed or
-merged in the same run; duplicate REQUEST_CHANGES at an unchanged head is
-suppressed.
+REQUEST_CHANGES on a PR head the same-head path must stop; after an APPROVE
+only the merge sequence for that same PR may continue; #693 allows a
+*different* PR to be mark_ready/review in the same durable lock (cross-PR
+isolation); duplicate REQUEST_CHANGES at an unchanged head is suppressed.
 """
 import os
 import unittest
@@ -15,7 +15,10 @@ import mcp_server
 HEAD_SHA = "a" * 40
 
 
-def _lock(mutations=None, correction=False):
+def _lock(mutations=None, correction=False, correction_pr=None):
+    mutations = list(mutations or [])
+    if correction and correction_pr is None and mutations:
+        correction_pr = mutations[-1].get("pr_number")
     return {
         "task": "review_pr",
         "remote": "prgs",
@@ -29,9 +32,11 @@ def _lock(mutations=None, correction=False):
         "ready_remote": None,
         "ready_org": None,
         "ready_repo": None,
-        "live_mutations": list(mutations or []),
+        "live_mutations": mutations,
         "correction_authorized": correction,
-        "correction_reason": None,
+        "correction_reason": "test" if correction else None,
+        "correction_pr_number": correction_pr if correction else None,
+        "correction_head_sha": None,
     }
 
 
@@ -64,25 +69,35 @@ class TestTerminalHardStopReasons(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertEqual(
             mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(5, "merge"), [])
 
-    def test_request_changes_blocks_everything(self):
+    def test_request_changes_blocks_same_pr_allows_other_pr_review(self):
         _seed([RC_A])
+        # Same PR: still hard-stopped for mark_ready/review/merge.
         for op in ("merge", "mark_ready", "review"):
-            for pr in (5, 6):
-                reasons = mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(pr, op)
-                self.assertTrue(reasons, f"{op}/{pr}")
-                self.assertIn("request_changes on PR #5", reasons[0])
-                self.assertIn("#332", reasons[0])
+            reasons = mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(5, op)
+            self.assertTrue(reasons, f"{op}/5")
+            self.assertIn("request_changes on PR #5", reasons[0])
+            self.assertIn("#332", reasons[0])
+        # #693: different PR may mark_ready / review (not merge via hard-stop alone).
+        self.assertEqual(
+            mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(6, "mark_ready"), [])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(6, "review"), [])
+        # Merge of an unapproved other PR remains blocked by hard-stop path
+        # (last terminal is not approve of PR 6).
+        self.assertTrue(
+            mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(6, "merge"))
 
-    def test_approve_allows_same_pr_merge_only(self):
+    def test_approve_allows_same_pr_merge_and_other_pr_review(self):
         _seed([APPROVED_A])
         self.assertEqual(
             mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(5, "merge"), [])
         self.assertTrue(
             mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(6, "merge"))
-        self.assertTrue(
-            mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(6, "mark_ready"))
-        self.assertTrue(
-            mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(6, "review"))
+        # #693 cross-PR isolation: other PR formal review path is open.
+        self.assertEqual(
+            mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(6, "mark_ready"), [])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(6, "review"), [])
 
     def test_correction_reopens_review_path_only(self):
         _seed([RC_A], correction=True)
@@ -90,9 +105,11 @@ class TestTerminalHardStopReasons(unittest.TestCase):
             mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(5, "mark_ready"), [])
         self.assertEqual(
             mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(5, "review"), [])
-        # correction never opens a cross-PR merge
+        # scoped correction never opens a cross-PR merge
         self.assertTrue(
             mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(6, "merge"))
+        # unscoped/cross-PR correction must not lift PR 6 via correction alone
+        # (PR 6 is allowed by isolation, not by correction scope)
 
 
 class TestMergeHardStopWiring(unittest.TestCase):
@@ -126,14 +143,29 @@ class TestMarkFinalHardStopWiring(unittest.TestCase):
         mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(None)
         mcp_server.review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
 
-    def test_mark_ready_blocked_after_terminal_mutation(self):
+    def test_mark_ready_same_pr_blocked_after_terminal_mutation(self):
         _seed([RC_A])
         result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
-            pr_number=6, action="approve", remote="prgs")
+            pr_number=5, action="approve", remote="prgs",
+            expected_head_sha=HEAD_SHA)
         self.assertFalse(result["marked_ready"])
         self.assertTrue(
             any("#332" in r for r in result["reasons"]), result["reasons"])
 
+    def test_mark_ready_other_pr_allowed_after_foreign_terminal(self):
+        """#693: foreign open-PR terminal must not block mark_final on PR B."""
+        _seed([RC_A])
+        no_lease = {"block": False, "reasons": [], "mutation_allowed": True}
+        with patch("mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]), \
+                patch("mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block",
+                      return_value=no_lease), \
+                patch.object(mcp_server, "gitea_check_pr_eligibility",
+                             return_value={"head_sha": HEAD_SHA, "eligible": True}):
+            result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
+                pr_number=6, action="approve", remote="prgs",
+                expected_head_sha=HEAD_SHA)
+        self.assertTrue(result["marked_ready"], result.get("reasons"))
+
 
 def _feedback(blocking, stale=False, success=True):
     return {