gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree referenced four globals that commit
a942afe (#850) introduced without ever defining:
_active_username 1 reference, 0 definitions
_active_profile_name 1 reference, 0 definitions
_current_session_id 1 reference, 0 definitions
_author_mutation_block 1 reference, 0 definitions
Evaluating the call arguments therefore raised
NameError: name '_active_username' is not defined
before author_issue_bootstrap.bootstrap_author_issue_worktree was entered, so
the capability was unusable for every caller including dry_run=true. The fourth
name, _author_mutation_block, sits on the reviewer-stop refusal path and was
found by the generalised regression test rather than by the original report.
The defect was unreachable until PR #942 (#941) wired the bootstrap scope into
workflow_scope_guard: before that, verify_preflight_purity refused first with
missing_issue_worktree, masking it.
Changes:
* _active_username reads the immutable #714 session context that gitea_whoami
seeds — the identity pin every other mutation gate already consults. An
unbound context returns None so callers fail closed rather than acting as an
unverified actor; a profile's expected_username is never substituted.
* _active_profile_name prefers the live get_profile() and falls back to the
bound session context only when the profile cannot be read.
* _current_session_id mints the same "<profile>-<pid>-<hex>" shape as the three
pre-existing lease call sites, bound once per process so repeated calls
describe one session instead of a fresh owner per call, which would make
lease-ownership comparisons unsatisfiable. None is never memoised.
* _author_mutation_block returns the uniform refusal shape the other author
mutations already return for the same check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop
block.
No guard, signature, or permission changes. Wrong-role, wrong-profile,
wrong-identity, stale-runtime, expected-base and workflow-scope enforcement all
still gate the call; the helpers only supply values the service then validates
fail-closed (missing_active_identity / missing_active_profile /
missing_owner_session / stale_concurrency_pin).
Regression: tests/test_issue_943_runtime_context_helpers.py (27 tests). The
generalised test resolves every global the wrapper's body references against
module globals and builtins, so the next missing reference fails too rather
than only the three named here — that test is what found
_author_mutation_block. Coverage also coversdry-run reaching and completing the
service with helper-produced bindings, dry-run leaving no branch, worktree,
assignment or lease, apply reaching its intended transition, each fail-closed
mismatch, expected-base mismatch, and the #941/PR #942 scope wiring.
Pre-fix 20 failed / 13 passed against unmodified aab54d48; post-fix 27 passed.
Targeted bootstrap and guard suites: 245 passed, 59 subtests.
Full suite: 28 failed, 5552 passed, 6 skipped, 1006 subtests — the 28 are the
standing baseline, every one of which also fails on the unmodified base.
Closes#943
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013ygVZQLbbhJTChuVuLaJWb
PR #926 (#892) taught create_issue_bootstrap.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout
to accept task_scope=author_issue_bootstrap and wired that canonical decision
into the #274 branches-only enforcer and the #604 anti-stomp preflight. A third
enforcement path was left unwired.
workflow_scope_guard kept its own copy of the clean-root author decision, gated
on create_issue_bootstrap.is_create_issue_task -- a task-name allowlist that
never contained bootstrap_author_issue_worktree. The real call path
gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree
-> verify_preflight_purity
-> _enforce_issue_scope_guard
-> workflow_scope_guard.assess_production_mutation_guards
therefore raised ProductionGuardError(missing_issue_worktree) before
assess_author_issue_bootstrap was ever consulted, leaving the #892 deadlock
partially present and blocking issue #931.
Changes:
* workflow_scope_guard.assess_root_source_mutation accepts the server-derived
bootstrap_assessment and, for the clean-root author case, consults the
canonical bootstrap_permits_control_checkout decision instead of a local
task-name allowlist. The create_issue arm is unchanged.
* workflow_scope_guard.assess_production_mutation_guards forwards the evidence.
* _enforce_issue_scope_guard accepts and threads the same assessment the #274
and #604 guards already consume, so all three judge identical evidence, and
waives the pre-ownership issue-lock requirement for the bootstrap task via
that same canonical decision rather than a second task-name allowlist.
* verify_preflight_purity passes the once-computed assessment at both sites.
The waiver cannot widen: the predicate fails closed on missing, malformed,
cross-scope, dirty, drifted, or wrongly bound evidence, so ordinary author
source and test mutation from the control checkout stays forbidden and the
#274/#604/#618/#683 protections are unchanged.
Regression: tests/test_issue_941_scope_guard_bootstrap_wiring.py drives the
real enforcer rather than the authorization helper in isolation, which is why
#892's own predicate tests passed while the live bootstrap stayed blocked.
Closes#941
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Align assess_author_issue_bootstrap with bootstrap_permits_control_checkout
so gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree can create the first branches/
worktree without the lock↔worktree deadlock.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Adds the session_checkpoints section to the control-plane DB substrate
architecture doc: schema version and row identity, the column groups, the
public API surface, and the hard rules (redaction at write, reconcile
rather than blind restore, unknown live state is not a mismatch, drain
fails closed on an incomplete checkpoint, no transcript storage).
Satisfies acceptance criterion 1 of #660 ("Schema documented and
versioned") for the implementation added in 7e18dcc.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Introduce an explicit, fail-closed recovery operation that rebinds a live
author session to an already-registered dirty issue worktree when the durable
lock still belongs to the same identity/profile and the recorded owner PID is
provably dead. Ordinary locking remains clean-worktree-only; this path updates
only stale lock/session provenance, preserves every dirty byte under fingerprint
pins, and grants create-PR-sanctioned provenance without remote sync or recovery
worktrees.
Also stop treating dead-owner session pointers as live mutation workspace
bindings so a stale dead-owner pointer cannot poison unrelated author work.
- Fix F1: Prepare recovery worktree detached at remote_head without git checkout -B to avoid exit 128 when branch is held by source worktree
- Fix F2: Pass recovery_sanctioned=True in bind_session_lock and assess_same_issue_lease_conflict
- Fix F3: Add SOURCE_RECOVER_DIRTY_ORPHANED to SANCTIONED_LOCK_SOURCES
- Fix F4: Stop after Phase 4 dirty apply when conflicts exist; do not finalize session binding
- Fix F5: Dynamically query competing live locks and workflow leases in MCP server
- Fix F6: Fail closed on recovery worktree resume when HEAD does not match expected remote_head
- Fix F7: Fail closed on remote HEAD observation failure rather than copying expected_remote_head pin
- Fix F8: Enforce foreign overwrite protection requiring same claimant or sanctioned reclaim
- Fix F9: Add real multi-worktree integration tests for prepare_recovery_worktree and lock rebind
- Fix TestWorktreeStart: Bypass session lock check for dry-run and review/pr-* branches in scripts/worktree-start
Add an explicit recovery operation for same-claimant dirty registered
worktrees under malformed PID-less durable locks, with crash-safe journals,
dirty byte preservation, path-level conflict detection, and live session
binding. PID-less locks are never treated as live merely because expiry is
absent.
Closes#860
Co-Authored-By: Grok 4.5 (xAI) <[email protected]>
jcwalker3andClaude Opus 5
