Files
Gitea-Tools/docs/architecture/mcp-restart-governance.md
T
sysadminandClaude Opus 4.8 9f759150b8 docs(governance): correct linked-issue descriptions in restart ADR (#656)
The Related section and cross-reference lines described #652, #653, #630, #642,
and #591 by roles they do not hold. Align each description with the linked
issue's actual title and scope:

- #652 is the Control Plane Web Console product vision (restart controls live in
  its capability area A), not a restart-specific vision.
- #653 is the console phased-delivery roadmap; restart controls are Phase 2.
- #630 is the manual process-kill contamination guard, not the coordinator; the
  coordinator remains an unimplemented later child of #655.
- #642 is the sanctioned restart / graceful reload console UX.
- #591 is auto-restart on master advance (closed); only #584 is transport-flap
  reconnect. They were previously collapsed into one transport-recovery label.

Documentation-only wording change. Policy IDs RG-01..RG-08, the policy version
restart-governance/v1, the authorization matrix, and every normative statement
are unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-07-23 19:18:47 -04:00

224 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# ADR: MCP restart governance and authorization policy
- **Status:** Accepted (policy effective immediately for LLM and operator sessions; enforcement tooling may lag)
- **Date:** 2026-07-23
- **Tracking issue:** [#656](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/656)
- **Policy version:** `restart-governance/v1`
- **Related:**
- Umbrella: [#655](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/655) — governed MCP restart coordination and zero-disruption recovery
- Vision: [#652](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/652) — MCP Control Plane Web Console product vision (§A system health and process control)
- Roadmap: [#653](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/653) — Control Plane Web Console phased delivery (Phase 2 restart controls)
- Contamination guard: [#630](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/630) — blocks manual process-kill recovery
- Console restart UX: [#642](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/642) — sanctioned restart and graceful reload
- Existing restart / reconnect paths to inventory: [#591](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/591) — auto-restart on master advance (closed); [#584](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/584) — host auto-reconnect on transport flap
- Stable-control runtime split: `docs/architecture/mcp-stable-control-runtime-policy-adr.md` (#615)
- Client-namespace health: `docs/mcp-namespace-health.md` (#543)
- Reconnect-only EOF recovery: `docs/mcp-namespace-eof-recovery.md`
## 1. Context
The Gitea MCP server is the **control plane** for real issue and PR mutations
(create, comment, lock, review, merge, reconcile). The same process serves every
role namespace (`gitea-author`, `gitea-reviewer`, `gitea-merger`,
`gitea-reconciler`, `gitea-controller`) and holds the in-memory capability-gate
code loaded at startup.
Restarting that process is destructive to concurrent work:
- It resets every session's identity, preflight, and capability-lease binding.
- It can interrupt a mutation mid-critical-section (a lock acquire, a review
submit, a merge), leaving durable state half-written.
- Relaunching from the wrong checkout or worktree silently changes which code
the control plane runs, defeating master-parity gates (#420 / #615).
Today there is **no durable written policy** stating who may restart MCP, under
what conditions, that restart is a last resort, and how controller approval,
automated safety gates, and break-glass interact. Operators and LLM sessions
therefore invent restart behavior ad hoc, which makes concurrent multi-role work
unsafe. #630 and #642 need this policy as their backbone.
This ADR defines that policy. It does **not** implement coordinator code or HA
multi-instance restart (those are later children of #655).
## 2. Decision
### 2.1 v1 decision (recorded)
**Restart authority in v1 is `controller approval + automated safety gates`.**
A restart of the stable control runtime is authorized only when **both** hold:
1. A **controller** role explicitly approves the restart, recording an audit
entry (who, why, scope, affected sessions), **and**
2. The **automated safety gates** pass: a completed drain acknowledgement (no
affected session is mid-critical-section) or a declared break-glass incident
(§2.5).
Quorum among multiple controllers is **not** required day-one. It is deferred
unless a later investigation (tracked under #653) proves single-controller
approval is insufficient. This ADR records the v1 decision so enforcement code
(#630) has a fixed target; changing it requires a superseding ADR.
### 2.2 Restart is a last resort — the recovery ladder
Restart is the **last** rung. Before any restart, exhaust the narrower
recoveries, in order:
1. **Reconnect** the IDE/client MCP namespace (transport EOF, `client is
closing: EOF`, transient `#584` flap). No process change. See
`docs/mcp-namespace-eof-recovery.md`.
2. **Refresh / rebind** the session workspace: re-run `gitea_whoami`,
`gitea_resolve_task_capability`, and pass an explicit validated
`worktree_path`. Fixes stale session context without touching the process.
3. **Scoped restart** of a single misbehaving namespace/service (where the
deployment supports per-service restart) rather than the whole control plane.
4. **Full restart** of the stable control runtime process — operator-owned,
controller-approved, drained.
5. **Host / infrastructure restart** — the broadest action; same authorization
as a full restart plus infrastructure ownership.
A session **must** try rungs 12 and record why they were insufficient before
requesting a restart at rung 3 or above. Skipping straight to restart is a
policy violation.
### 2.3 Authorization matrix
| Role | Reconnect (1) | Refresh/rebind (2) | Scoped restart (3) | Full restart (4) | Host restart (5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **author** | self | self | request only | **forbidden** | forbidden |
| **reviewer** | self | self | request only | **forbidden** | forbidden |
| **merger** | self | self | request only | **forbidden** | forbidden |
| **reconciler** | self | self | request only | **forbidden** | forbidden |
| **controller** | self | self | **approve** (+gates) | **approve** (+gates) | request to operator |
| **operator** | self | self | execute (controller-approved) | execute (controller-approved) | execute (controller-approved) |
| **admin** | self | self | execute | execute | execute (break-glass) |
Legend: *self* = may perform for its own client session; *request only* = may
raise a restart request but not authorize or execute it; *approve* = may
authorize under §2.1 gates; *execute* = may perform the process action after the
authorization is recorded.
Key invariants:
- **No LLM worker role (author/reviewer/merger/reconciler) may perform or
authorize a full or host restart.** They may only reconnect/rebind their own
client and file a restart request.
- **Controller approval authorizes; operator/admin executes.** The approving
controller and the executing operator may be the same human, but both the
approval and the execution are audited.
- Privileged process actions (full restart, host restart) are reserved to
**operator/admin**, never to an automated worker.
### 2.4 Approved conditions
A restart at rung 3+ is approved only under one of these recorded conditions:
- **No affected sessions:** the control plane has no live session that would be
interrupted (verified, not assumed).
- **Full drain acknowledged:** every affected session has drained
(no open critical section — no held mutation lease mid-write) and the drain is
acknowledged in the audit record.
- **Controller + gates:** controller approval plus passing automated safety
gates (§2.1), the standard v1 path.
- **Quorum:** not required in v1; reserved for a future superseding ADR.
- **Break-glass:** an incident-backed emergency exception (§2.5).
Restart **never** bypasses mutation gates mid-critical-section. Drain before
restart is mandatory except under break-glass with a declared incident.
### 2.5 Break-glass
Break-glass is a **separate, narrower** authorization path for emergencies where
the normal drain-and-approve path cannot complete (e.g. the control plane is
wedged and cannot drain).
Break-glass conditions:
- A declared incident record exists (id, timestamp, declarer) **before** the
action.
- The action is taken by **operator or admin** authority only — never by an LLM
worker role, and never unilaterally by an operator with active peers when a
controller is reachable.
- The scope is the minimum necessary rung of the ladder.
- A **mandatory post-hoc audit** entry is filed: what was restarted, why the
normal path was impossible, which sessions were affected, and the incident id.
Break-glass suspends the drain requirement, not the audit requirement.
### 2.6 Explicit prohibitions
- **A unilateral LLM or operator full restart while active peer sessions
exist is forbidden.** An LLM worker role must not kill, restart, or relaunch
the MCP process; a lone operator must not full-restart over live peer work
without controller approval or a break-glass incident.
- Process-kill recovery is forbidden as a routine tool (#630). This ADR does not
introduce a kill path.
- Ambiguous policy state **denies** restart (§4).
## 3. Security requirements
- Full restart and host restart are **privileged**; only operator/admin execute
them, only after a controller approval or break-glass incident is recorded.
- Break-glass is a distinct authorization path with its own audit mandate; it is
never the default and never silent.
- **Every approval and every restart action is audited** (who approved, who
executed, scope, affected sessions, condition, policy version). No restart is
authorized without a durable audit entry.
## 4. Failure behavior
**Ambiguous policy → deny restart.** If it cannot be established that a
restart is authorized under §2 — unknown affected-session state, missing
controller approval, absent break-glass incident, or an unclassifiable request —
the safe action is to **refuse** the restart and stop with a recovery report,
never to restart on assumption.
## 5. Policy IDs (for enforcement code)
Enforcement code — the restart coordinator (a later child of #655), the #630
contamination guard, and the #642 console restart UX — binds to these stable
policy identifiers rather than to prose:
| Policy ID | Statement |
|---|---|
| `RG-01` | Restart is last resort; rungs 12 must be tried and recorded first (§2.2). |
| `RG-02` | v1 authority = controller approval + automated safety gates (§2.1). |
| `RG-03` | No LLM worker role performs or authorizes full/host restart (§2.3). |
| `RG-04` | Full/host restart executed by operator/admin only, post approval (§2.3). |
| `RG-05` | Drain before restart is mandatory except break-glass with incident (§2.4). |
| `RG-06` | Break-glass requires a pre-declared incident and post-hoc audit (§2.5). |
| `RG-07` | Unilateral LLM/operator full restart with active peers is forbidden (§2.6). |
| `RG-08` | Ambiguous policy state denies restart (§4). |
The `restart-governance/v1` **policy version** field is emitted on future
restart audit events so approvals can be reconciled against the policy revision
in force.
## 6. Dogfooding
Gitea-Tools governs its own MCP control plane by this policy. Author, reviewer,
merger, and reconciler sessions operating on this repository use the recovery
ladder (§2.2) — reconnect and rebind, never self-restart — and any real restart
of the Gitea-Tools stable control runtime follows the controller-approval +
drain path defined here.
## 7. Acceptance and cross-links
This ADR is the authoritative restart-governance policy. It **must** stay
cross-linked from the safety model and the web-console deployment boundary:
- `docs/safety-model.md` § Process restart governance references this ADR.
- `docs/webui-deployment.md` references this ADR for restart/reload disposition.
It is linked to its issue lineage — umbrella **#655**, vision **#652**, roadmap
**#653**, contamination guard **#630**, and console restart UX **#642** — in
§ Related above.
## 8. Non-goals
- Implementing the restart coordinator or approval state machine (#630, later
children of #655).
- Implementing HA multi-instance restart or quorum machinery.
- Introducing any process-kill or auto-restart tool; existing auto-restart
behavior must be inventoried before any new restart tool is enabled.