Files
Gitea-Tools/role_namespace_gate.py
T
sysadminandClaude Opus 4.8 55d66c57e4 fix(author): gate bootstrap-lock recovery on the namespace mutation wall (#953)
Review 632 F1. `gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock` writes the same
durable author issue lock as `gitea_recover_dirty_orphaned_issue_worktree`
but gated only on the reviewer-stop router check and the profile permission
block. Every other author state-creating mutation carries a third gate,
`_namespace_mutation_block`, and this tool was the outlier.

The surviving gates did not cover the gap: the task's required permission is
`gitea.issue.comment`, which every configured role holds, and
`_ensure_matching_profile` returns a profile name both call sites discard, so
it refuses nothing. A reviewer-bound session reached the exact-owner claimant
comparison inside `assess_bootstrap_lock_recovery` and was refused there —
one layer too late, with no namespace evaluation and no BLOCKED audit record
of the attempt.

Adding the call alone would have been inert. `check_author_mutation_namespace`
routes through `role_session_router.required_role_for_task`, which reads
`TASK_REQUIRED_ROLE` — not `task_capability_map` — and that table had no entry
for this task, so the check short-circuited to "allowed" for every caller.
The task is therefore registered in `TASK_REQUIRED_ROLE` and `AUTHOR_TASKS`,
matching the role the capability map already records.

The reviewer-namespace check alone is also insufficient for a task gated on
`gitea.issue.comment`, since merger, controller, and reconciler profiles hold
it too. `role_namespace_gate.check_author_role_kind` is added as an opt-in,
additive wall requiring the active profile's derived role kind to be exactly
`author`; `mixed` is refused rather than admitted. `_namespace_mutation_block`
gains a keyword-only `author_role_exclusive` flag, default off, so the six
pre-existing call sites are byte-for-byte unchanged.

Refusals produce the standard structured denial (`namespace_block: true`,
`mcp_namespace`) and the standard BLOCKED audit record, and no lock, lease,
generation, branch, worktree, issue, or PR is touched. Valid `prgs-author`
execution is unaffected. No reviewer permission is broadened and no existing
role wall is weakened.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-07-28 02:08:21 -04:00

126 lines
4.7 KiB
Python

"""Block author mutations from reviewer-bound MCP namespaces (#209).
Every mutation must prove that the active profile role, inferred MCP
namespace, and declared task role align. Reviewer sessions cannot silently
perform author-side work (especially PR creation).
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import gitea_config
import role_session_router
def infer_mcp_namespace(profile_name: str | None) -> str:
"""Map a runtime profile name to its MCP namespace label."""
lower = (profile_name or "").strip().lower()
if "reviewer" in lower and "author" not in lower:
return "gitea-reviewer"
if "author" in lower:
return "gitea-author"
return profile_name or "gitea-default"
def derive_role_kind(allowed, forbidden=()) -> str:
"""Classify the active profile the same way as ``mcp_server._role_kind``."""
def can(op):
return gitea_config.check_operation(op, allowed, forbidden)[0]
review = can("gitea.pr.approve") or can("gitea.pr.merge")
author = can("gitea.pr.create") or can("gitea.branch.push")
if review and author:
return "mixed"
if review:
return "reviewer"
if author:
return "author"
return "limited"
def check_author_mutation_namespace(
mutation_task: str,
profile: dict,
) -> tuple[bool, list[str]]:
"""Return (allowed, reasons). Fail closed on reviewer/author mismatch."""
required_role = role_session_router.required_role_for_task(mutation_task)
if required_role != "author":
return True, []
allowed = profile.get("allowed_operations") or []
forbidden = profile.get("forbidden_operations") or []
active_role = derive_role_kind(allowed, forbidden)
profile_name = profile.get("profile_name") or ""
namespace = infer_mcp_namespace(profile_name)
if mutation_task == "create_pr":
if active_role == "reviewer" or namespace == "gitea-reviewer":
return False, [
"author mutation 'create_pr' blocked in reviewer MCP namespace "
f"({namespace}); launch gitea-author",
]
if active_role == "reviewer" or namespace == "gitea-reviewer":
if mutation_task == "create_issue":
ok, _ = gitea_config.check_operation(
"gitea.issue.create", allowed, forbidden)
if ok:
return True, []
return False, [
f"author mutation '{mutation_task}' blocked: active session is "
f"reviewer-bound ({profile_name} / {namespace})",
]
return True, []
def check_author_role_kind(
mutation_task: str,
profile: dict,
) -> tuple[bool, list[str]]:
"""Author-exclusive wall for durable-lock mutations (#953 F1).
``check_author_mutation_namespace`` walls off reviewer-bound sessions, which
is the whole gate for tasks whose required permission is itself author-only
(``gitea.pr.create``, ``gitea.repo.commit``). It is *not* sufficient for a
task gated on ``gitea.issue.comment``, which every configured role holds: a
merger, controller, or reconciler session would clear both the namespace
check and the permission gate and still reach the durable write.
Opt-in per call site and additive. It refuses any active profile whose
derived role kind is not exactly ``author`` for a task the router declares
author-required, and grants nothing to anyone — a ``mixed`` profile is
refused rather than admitted.
"""
required_role = role_session_router.required_role_for_task(mutation_task)
if required_role != "author":
return True, []
allowed = profile.get("allowed_operations") or []
forbidden = profile.get("forbidden_operations") or []
active_role = derive_role_kind(allowed, forbidden)
if active_role == "author":
return True, []
profile_name = profile.get("profile_name") or ""
namespace = infer_mcp_namespace(profile_name)
return False, [
f"author mutation '{mutation_task}' blocked: active session role kind is "
f"'{active_role}', not 'author' ({profile_name} / {namespace}); this "
"operation writes a durable author issue lock and is author-exclusive",
]
def mutation_audit_context(mutation_task: str, profile: dict, *,
remote=None, repository=None) -> dict:
"""Structured mutation metadata for audit records (#209)."""
allowed = profile.get("allowed_operations") or []
forbidden = profile.get("forbidden_operations") or []
return {
"mcp_namespace": infer_mcp_namespace(profile.get("profile_name")),
"profile_name": profile.get("profile_name"),
"task_role": role_session_router.required_role_for_task(mutation_task),
"operation": mutation_task,
"remote": remote,
"repository": repository,
}