An exact-owner lease renewal (#760) is granted the owning-PR duplicate-work
waiver inside gitea_lock_issue, but every later enforcement path rebuilt that
proof from the durable lock through
issue_lock_recovery.recovered_owning_pr_from_lock, which reads only the
dead_session_recovery block. A plain renewal persists its proof under
lease_renewal instead, so the waiver expired with the lock call and the next
author mutation was refused duplicate_commit_prevented with
owning_pr_recovery_exempted: false on the very PR the renewal had just proved.
Add issue_lock_renewal.owning_pr_renewal_from_lock as the renewal mirror of the
recovery rebuild, and resolve both halves through one helper,
_owning_pr_continuation_from_lock, in the same precedence gitea_lock_issue
applies. The three enforcement paths that previously saw only recovery evidence
now share that resolver: the commit/create-PR duplicate recheck, the read-only
duplicate assessor, and the push-ownership prover.
The rebuild re-applies the equality the renewal assessor required (PR head ==
local head == remote head) and additionally binds the record to the claimant the
lock names, so a renewal block cannot be reused under another identity, profile,
or workflow session. Validation of the resulting token against live PR state is
unchanged and still owned solely by
issue_work_duplicate_gate._assess_owning_pr_exemption, so repository, issue, PR,
branch and head binding continue to be enforced in exactly one place.
No public signature, MCP tool schema, refusal shape, or reason code changes.
Dead-session recovery behaviour is untouched.
Tests: tests/test_issue_945_owning_pr_renewal_continuation.py - 49 tests,
8 subtests, all in-memory (no durable branch, worktree, lock, lease or PR).
Against unmodified aab54d48 the suite is 47 failed / 2 passed; the 2 that pass
are the defect-pinning reproductions. Full suite 28F/5574P/6S/1002 subtests at
head vs 28F/5525P/6S/994 at base, with identical failing test id sets.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
566 lines
22 KiB
Python
566 lines
22 KiB
Python
"""Exact-owner renewal of an expired author issue lease (#760).
|
|
|
|
An author issue lease carries an absolute wall-clock expiry stamped once at
|
|
lock time. The PID recorded alongside it is the long-lived MCP daemon, not the
|
|
authoring task, so a lease that expires while its daemon is still up is the
|
|
ordinary case for any author task that outlives the TTL — not an anomaly.
|
|
|
|
Before this module, that case was unreachable.
|
|
``issue_lock_store.assess_same_issue_lease_conflict`` computed same-owner
|
|
evidence and then returned on the expired branch before consulting it, and
|
|
``assess_expired_lock_reclaim`` only permits takeover on a dead PID or a
|
|
missing worktree. An exact owner whose daemon is alive and whose worktree is
|
|
present satisfied neither, so its own lock became permanently unmodifiable
|
|
through sanctioned tools.
|
|
|
|
This module is the pure evidence assessor for that one narrow case. It answers
|
|
a single question: may *this* session renew a lease it can prove it already
|
|
owns? It performs no mutation and no network I/O, and it never trusts a caller
|
|
assertion — every field is compared against durable lock state or a live
|
|
observation supplied by the caller and gathered server-side.
|
|
|
|
Deliberate boundaries:
|
|
|
|
* **Renewal is not takeover.** A refusal here never widens what
|
|
``assess_expired_lock_reclaim`` already allows; foreign expired locks keep
|
|
requiring a dead PID or missing worktree (#760 AC11), and a *live* foreign
|
|
lease stays non-recoverable by construction because only an expired lease is
|
|
ever a candidate (AC12).
|
|
* **PID liveness is never authorization.** A live recorded PID proves the
|
|
daemon is up, nothing more. It is recorded as evidence and is neither
|
|
necessary nor sufficient for renewal (AC16).
|
|
* **Absolute expiry is preserved.** Renewal issues a new absolute expiry from
|
|
the moment of the write. It does not introduce sliding heartbeat renewal,
|
|
lease generations as fencing tokens, or a shared cross-role lifecycle — that
|
|
is #790's scope and is deliberately not implemented here.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import os
|
|
from typing import Any, Iterable, Mapping, Sequence
|
|
|
|
from issue_lock_store import AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE, is_lease_expired, is_process_alive
|
|
from reviewer_worktree import parse_dirty_tracked_files
|
|
|
|
# Outcome values.
|
|
RENEWAL_SANCTIONED = "RENEWAL_SANCTIONED"
|
|
NO_CANDIDATE = "NO_CANDIDATE"
|
|
REFUSED = "REFUSED"
|
|
|
|
# Durable fields a lock must carry before it can be considered at all.
|
|
REQUIRED_LOCK_FIELDS = ("issue_number", "branch_name", "worktree_path")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _text(value: Any) -> str:
|
|
return str(value or "").strip()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _same_realpath(left: str | None, right: str | None) -> bool:
|
|
if not left or not right:
|
|
return False
|
|
try:
|
|
return os.path.realpath(left) == os.path.realpath(right)
|
|
except OSError:
|
|
return left == right
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _lock_claimant(lock: Mapping[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
|
claimant = lock.get("claimant")
|
|
if not isinstance(claimant, Mapping):
|
|
lease = lock.get("work_lease")
|
|
claimant = lease.get("claimant") if isinstance(lease, Mapping) else None
|
|
return dict(claimant) if isinstance(claimant, Mapping) else {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _lock_lease(lock: Mapping[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
|
lease = lock.get("work_lease")
|
|
return dict(lease) if isinstance(lease, Mapping) else {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _lock_operation_type(lock: Mapping[str, Any]) -> str:
|
|
lease = _lock_lease(lock)
|
|
return _text(lease.get("operation_type")) or AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _recorded_pid(lock: Mapping[str, Any]) -> Any:
|
|
pid = lock.get("session_pid")
|
|
if pid is None:
|
|
pid = lock.get("pid")
|
|
return pid
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _malformed_reasons(lock: Mapping[str, Any]) -> list[str]:
|
|
"""Names of durable fields that are missing or unusable."""
|
|
missing: list[str] = []
|
|
for field in REQUIRED_LOCK_FIELDS:
|
|
if not _text(lock.get(field)):
|
|
missing.append(field)
|
|
pid = _recorded_pid(lock)
|
|
if pid is None or _text(pid) == "":
|
|
missing.append("session_pid/pid")
|
|
else:
|
|
try:
|
|
if int(pid) <= 0:
|
|
missing.append("session_pid/pid")
|
|
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
|
missing.append("session_pid/pid")
|
|
return missing
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _competing_lock_reasons(
|
|
competing_live_locks: Iterable[Mapping[str, Any]] | None,
|
|
*,
|
|
issue_number: int,
|
|
branch_name: str,
|
|
worktree_path: str,
|
|
) -> list[str]:
|
|
"""Live locks that would contend with this renewal (#760 AC7).
|
|
|
|
A live lock on the *same* issue cannot coexist with this expired lease, so
|
|
any live entry naming this issue, branch, or worktree belongs to somebody
|
|
else and refuses the renewal.
|
|
"""
|
|
reasons: list[str] = []
|
|
for entry in competing_live_locks or ():
|
|
if not isinstance(entry, Mapping):
|
|
continue
|
|
entry_issue = entry.get("issue_number")
|
|
entry_branch = _text(entry.get("branch_name"))
|
|
entry_worktree = _text(entry.get("worktree_path"))
|
|
if entry_issue == issue_number:
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"a live lock already exists for issue #{issue_number} "
|
|
f"(pid {entry.get('pid')}); renewal would contend with it"
|
|
)
|
|
continue
|
|
if entry_branch and entry_branch == _text(branch_name):
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"live lock for issue #{entry_issue} already holds branch "
|
|
f"'{branch_name}'"
|
|
)
|
|
if entry_worktree and _same_realpath(entry_worktree, worktree_path):
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"live lock for issue #{entry_issue} already holds worktree "
|
|
f"'{worktree_path}'"
|
|
)
|
|
return reasons
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assess_exact_owner_lease_renewal(
|
|
existing_lock: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
|
|
*,
|
|
issue_number: int,
|
|
branch_name: str,
|
|
worktree_path: str,
|
|
remote: str,
|
|
org: str,
|
|
repo: str,
|
|
identity: str | None,
|
|
profile: str | None,
|
|
operation_type: str = AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
|
current_branch: str | None = None,
|
|
porcelain_status: str = "",
|
|
worktree_exists: bool = False,
|
|
head_sha: str | None = None,
|
|
remote_head_sha: str | None = None,
|
|
pr_head_sha: str | None = None,
|
|
pr_number: int | None = None,
|
|
competing_live_locks: Sequence[Mapping[str, Any]] | None = None,
|
|
candidate_branches: Sequence[str] | None = None,
|
|
current_pid: int | None = None,
|
|
now: Any = None,
|
|
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
|
"""Decide whether an expired lease may be renewed by its exact owner.
|
|
|
|
Returns a disposition dict; it never raises and never mutates. A refusal
|
|
withholds permission, leaving every pre-existing guard to fail closed
|
|
exactly as before — this assessment can only ever *add* permission.
|
|
|
|
``NO_CANDIDATE`` means the situation is not an exact-owner renewal at all
|
|
(no lock, different issue, different operation, or an unexpired lease) and
|
|
the caller should carry on with its normal path. ``REFUSED`` means it looked
|
|
like one but the evidence did not hold, and ``reasons`` names exactly what
|
|
was missing.
|
|
"""
|
|
evidence: dict[str, Any] = {
|
|
"issue_number": issue_number,
|
|
"branch_name": branch_name,
|
|
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
|
"remote": remote,
|
|
"org": org,
|
|
"repo": repo,
|
|
"operation_type": operation_type,
|
|
"identity": identity,
|
|
"profile": profile,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
def _result(outcome: str, reasons: list[str], **extra: Any) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
|
return {
|
|
"outcome": outcome,
|
|
"renewal_sanctioned": outcome == RENEWAL_SANCTIONED,
|
|
"is_candidate": outcome in (RENEWAL_SANCTIONED, REFUSED),
|
|
"reasons": reasons,
|
|
"evidence": {**evidence, **extra},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if not isinstance(existing_lock, Mapping) or not existing_lock:
|
|
return _result(NO_CANDIDATE, ["no existing lock to renew"])
|
|
|
|
if existing_lock.get("issue_number") != issue_number:
|
|
return _result(
|
|
NO_CANDIDATE,
|
|
[
|
|
f"existing lock is for issue #{existing_lock.get('issue_number')}, "
|
|
f"not #{issue_number}"
|
|
],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
existing_operation = _lock_operation_type(existing_lock)
|
|
if existing_operation != operation_type:
|
|
return _result(
|
|
NO_CANDIDATE,
|
|
[
|
|
f"existing lease operation '{existing_operation}' is not "
|
|
f"'{operation_type}'"
|
|
],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Only an *expired* lease is ever a renewal candidate. An unexpired lease —
|
|
# live, or stale by dead PID — is somebody else's problem: the first needs no
|
|
# renewal, and the second is #753's dead-session recovery. This is also what
|
|
# makes a live foreign lease non-recoverable here (#760 AC12).
|
|
if not is_lease_expired(existing_lock, now=now):
|
|
return _result(
|
|
NO_CANDIDATE,
|
|
["lease has not expired; renewal does not apply"],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
malformed = _malformed_reasons(existing_lock)
|
|
if malformed:
|
|
return _result(
|
|
REFUSED,
|
|
["durable lock is missing or has unusable fields: " + ", ".join(malformed)],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
lease = _lock_lease(existing_lock)
|
|
claimant = _lock_claimant(existing_lock)
|
|
recorded_pid = _recorded_pid(existing_lock)
|
|
prior_expires_at = _text(lease.get("expires_at"))
|
|
|
|
# #760 AC16: recorded purely as evidence. A live daemon PID is neither
|
|
# necessary nor sufficient for renewal, and nothing below branches on it.
|
|
recorded_pid_alive = is_process_alive(recorded_pid)
|
|
|
|
extra: dict[str, Any] = {
|
|
"prior_pid": recorded_pid,
|
|
"prior_pid_alive": recorded_pid_alive,
|
|
"prior_expires_at": prior_expires_at,
|
|
"replacement_pid": current_pid,
|
|
"recorded_claimant": claimant,
|
|
"head_sha": head_sha,
|
|
"remote_head_sha": remote_head_sha,
|
|
"pr_head_sha": pr_head_sha,
|
|
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
reasons: list[str] = []
|
|
|
|
# ── AC3: exact ownership identity ──
|
|
if _text(existing_lock.get("remote")) != _text(remote):
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"recorded remote '{existing_lock.get('remote')}' does not match "
|
|
f"'{remote}'"
|
|
)
|
|
if _text(existing_lock.get("org")) != _text(org):
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"recorded org '{existing_lock.get('org')}' does not match '{org}'"
|
|
)
|
|
if _text(existing_lock.get("repo")) != _text(repo):
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"recorded repo '{existing_lock.get('repo')}' does not match '{repo}'"
|
|
)
|
|
if _text(existing_lock.get("branch_name")) != _text(branch_name):
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"recorded branch '{existing_lock.get('branch_name')}' does not match "
|
|
f"'{branch_name}'"
|
|
)
|
|
if not _same_realpath(_text(existing_lock.get("worktree_path")), worktree_path):
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"recorded worktree '{existing_lock.get('worktree_path')}' does not "
|
|
f"match '{worktree_path}'"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
recorded_identity = _text(claimant.get("username"))
|
|
recorded_profile = _text(claimant.get("profile"))
|
|
if not recorded_identity or not recorded_profile:
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
"durable lock does not record both a claimant username and profile"
|
|
)
|
|
if recorded_identity and recorded_identity != _text(identity):
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"recorded claimant '{recorded_identity}' does not match active "
|
|
f"identity '{_text(identity) or 'unknown'}'"
|
|
)
|
|
if recorded_profile and recorded_profile != _text(profile):
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"recorded profile '{recorded_profile}' does not match active profile "
|
|
f"'{_text(profile) or 'unknown'}'"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# ── AC4: the registered worktree still exists, is on the branch, and is clean ──
|
|
if not worktree_exists:
|
|
reasons.append(f"declared worktree '{worktree_path}' does not exist")
|
|
if _text(current_branch) != _text(branch_name):
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"worktree is on branch '{_text(current_branch) or 'unknown'}', not "
|
|
f"'{branch_name}'"
|
|
)
|
|
dirty = parse_dirty_tracked_files(porcelain_status or "")
|
|
if dirty:
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
"worktree has uncommitted tracked changes: " + ", ".join(sorted(dirty))
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# ── AC5/AC6: published heads must agree ──
|
|
if not _text(head_sha):
|
|
reasons.append("local head could not be observed")
|
|
if not _text(remote_head_sha):
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
"remote branch head could not be observed; an unpublished branch "
|
|
"cannot prove exact-owner renewal"
|
|
)
|
|
if _text(head_sha) and _text(remote_head_sha) and head_sha != remote_head_sha:
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"local head {head_sha} does not equal remote head {remote_head_sha}"
|
|
)
|
|
if pr_number is not None:
|
|
if not _text(pr_head_sha):
|
|
reasons.append(f"owning PR #{pr_number} head could not be observed")
|
|
elif _text(head_sha) and pr_head_sha != head_sha:
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
f"owning PR #{pr_number} head {pr_head_sha} does not equal local "
|
|
f"head {head_sha}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# ── AC7: nothing else claims this work ──
|
|
reasons.extend(
|
|
_competing_lock_reasons(
|
|
competing_live_locks,
|
|
issue_number=issue_number,
|
|
branch_name=branch_name,
|
|
worktree_path=worktree_path,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
other_branches = [
|
|
name
|
|
for name in (candidate_branches or ())
|
|
if _text(name) and _text(name) != _text(branch_name)
|
|
]
|
|
if other_branches:
|
|
reasons.append(
|
|
"other branches already carry this issue marker: "
|
|
+ ", ".join(sorted(other_branches))
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if reasons:
|
|
return _result(REFUSED, reasons, **extra)
|
|
|
|
return _result(
|
|
RENEWAL_SANCTIONED,
|
|
[
|
|
f"exact owner '{recorded_identity}' ({recorded_profile}) proved "
|
|
f"ownership of issue #{issue_number} on branch '{branch_name}' from "
|
|
f"worktree '{worktree_path}'; local, remote"
|
|
+ (f", and PR #{pr_number}" if pr_number is not None else "")
|
|
+ f" heads all equal {head_sha}; lease expired at "
|
|
f"{prior_expires_at or 'unknown'}"
|
|
],
|
|
**extra,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def owning_pr_renewal_evidence(
|
|
assessment: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
|
|
) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
|
|
"""Server-derived proof of the open PR a sanctioned renewal already owns.
|
|
|
|
The mirror of ``issue_lock_recovery.owning_pr_recovery_evidence`` (#755) for
|
|
the renewal disposition. An exact-owner renewal of a published branch is, by
|
|
construction, renewal of work that already has an open PR — so the
|
|
duplicate-work gate's linked-open-PR blocker would otherwise discard every
|
|
sanctioned renewal, exactly as it once discarded every sanctioned recovery.
|
|
|
|
Returns ``None`` unless renewal was actually granted and the evidence names
|
|
one owning PR whose head agrees with both the local and remote heads the
|
|
assessor accepted. Nothing is caller-supplied: every field is copied from
|
|
evidence built out of durable lock state plus live git/Gitea observation.
|
|
|
|
Renewal has no descendant case — it requires the local, remote, and PR heads
|
|
to be equal — so there is only one head to report.
|
|
"""
|
|
if not isinstance(assessment, Mapping):
|
|
return None
|
|
if assessment.get("outcome") != RENEWAL_SANCTIONED:
|
|
return None
|
|
if not assessment.get("renewal_sanctioned"):
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
evidence = assessment.get("evidence") or {}
|
|
branch_name = _text(evidence.get("branch_name"))
|
|
pr_head = _text(evidence.get("pr_head_sha"))
|
|
local_head = _text(evidence.get("head_sha"))
|
|
remote_head = _text(evidence.get("remote_head_sha"))
|
|
raw_pr_number = evidence.get("pr_number")
|
|
|
|
if raw_pr_number is None or not branch_name or not pr_head:
|
|
return None
|
|
# The assessor already required these to agree. Re-check, so a truncated or
|
|
# hand-built evidence map can never authorize an exemption.
|
|
if pr_head != local_head or pr_head != remote_head:
|
|
return None
|
|
try:
|
|
pr_number = int(raw_pr_number)
|
|
issue_number = int(evidence.get("issue_number"))
|
|
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
"issue_number": issue_number,
|
|
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
|
"branch_name": branch_name,
|
|
"head_sha": pr_head,
|
|
"recorded_head": pr_head,
|
|
"accepted_head": pr_head,
|
|
"head_relation": "equal",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def owning_pr_renewal_from_lock(
|
|
lock_record: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
|
|
) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
|
|
"""Rebuild owning-PR renewal evidence from a persisted lock (#945).
|
|
|
|
The renewal mirror of ``issue_lock_recovery.recovered_owning_pr_from_lock``.
|
|
``owning_pr_renewal_evidence`` supplies the waiver for the duration of the
|
|
``gitea_lock_issue`` call only. The commit, push, create-PR, and
|
|
duplicate-assessment gates run later in their own calls and re-derive
|
|
ownership from the durable lock instead — so without this the open PR that
|
|
renewal already proved belongs to this author reappears there as competing
|
|
duplicate work, and the exact owner is refused with
|
|
``duplicate_commit_prevented`` despite complete matching evidence.
|
|
|
|
This reads only the ``lease_renewal`` block that the server itself writes,
|
|
on a lock the caller must already own. Like the recovery mirror it is a
|
|
re-read of server-derived state, never a fresh assertion: a caller able to
|
|
forge it could equally forge the lock file every other ownership gate
|
|
already treats as authoritative.
|
|
|
|
Renewal has no descendant case — the assessor required the local, remote and
|
|
PR heads to be equal — so that equality is re-checked here, and the record
|
|
must still name the claimant the lock records.
|
|
"""
|
|
if not isinstance(lock_record, Mapping):
|
|
return None
|
|
record = lock_record.get("lease_renewal")
|
|
if not isinstance(record, Mapping) or not record.get("renewed"):
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
branch_name = _text(record.get("branch_name")) or _text(
|
|
lock_record.get("branch_name")
|
|
)
|
|
pr_head = _text(record.get("pr_head_sha"))
|
|
local_head = _text(record.get("head_sha"))
|
|
remote_head = _text(record.get("remote_head_sha"))
|
|
raw_pr_number = record.get("pr_number")
|
|
raw_issue_number = lock_record.get("issue_number")
|
|
|
|
if raw_pr_number is None or raw_issue_number is None:
|
|
return None
|
|
if not branch_name or not pr_head:
|
|
return None
|
|
# The assessor required all three heads to agree before it granted renewal.
|
|
# Re-check, so a truncated, drifted, or hand-built record cannot widen the
|
|
# exemption past the single head the renewal disposition actually proved.
|
|
if not local_head or not remote_head:
|
|
return None
|
|
if pr_head != local_head or pr_head != remote_head:
|
|
return None
|
|
# Renewal is refused outright unless the durable lock records both a
|
|
# claimant username and profile, so a sanctioned record always carries them.
|
|
# Requiring them to still agree keeps a renewal block from being reused
|
|
# under an identity or profile the lock no longer names.
|
|
claimant = lock_record.get("claimant")
|
|
if not isinstance(claimant, Mapping):
|
|
lease = lock_record.get("work_lease")
|
|
claimant = lease.get("claimant") if isinstance(lease, Mapping) else None
|
|
if not isinstance(claimant, Mapping):
|
|
return None
|
|
identity = _text(record.get("identity"))
|
|
profile = _text(record.get("profile"))
|
|
if not identity or identity != _text(claimant.get("username")):
|
|
return None
|
|
if not profile or profile != _text(claimant.get("profile")):
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
pr_number = int(raw_pr_number)
|
|
issue_number = int(raw_issue_number)
|
|
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
"issue_number": issue_number,
|
|
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
|
"branch_name": branch_name,
|
|
"head_sha": pr_head,
|
|
"recorded_head": pr_head,
|
|
"accepted_head": pr_head,
|
|
"head_relation": "equal",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def build_renewal_record(
|
|
assessment: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
|
|
*,
|
|
renewed_at: str,
|
|
new_expires_at: str,
|
|
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
|
"""Durable audit record for a sanctioned renewal (#760 AC9).
|
|
|
|
Records both sides of the transition — prior PID and expiry, replacement PID
|
|
and new expiry — so a renewed lock is never mistakable for an original
|
|
claim, and so the evidence the waiver was granted on stays inspectable.
|
|
"""
|
|
data = dict(assessment or {})
|
|
evidence = dict(data.get("evidence") or {})
|
|
recorded_claimant = dict(evidence.get("recorded_claimant") or {})
|
|
return {
|
|
"renewed": bool(data.get("renewal_sanctioned")),
|
|
"renewed_at": renewed_at,
|
|
"prior_pid": evidence.get("prior_pid"),
|
|
"prior_pid_alive": evidence.get("prior_pid_alive"),
|
|
"prior_expires_at": evidence.get("prior_expires_at"),
|
|
"replacement_pid": evidence.get("replacement_pid"),
|
|
"new_expires_at": new_expires_at,
|
|
"identity": recorded_claimant.get("username"),
|
|
"profile": recorded_claimant.get("profile"),
|
|
"branch_name": evidence.get("branch_name"),
|
|
"worktree_path": evidence.get("worktree_path"),
|
|
"head_sha": evidence.get("head_sha"),
|
|
"remote_head_sha": evidence.get("remote_head_sha"),
|
|
"pr_head_sha": evidence.get("pr_head_sha"),
|
|
"pr_number": evidence.get("pr_number"),
|
|
"reason": "expired lease renewed by its exact recorded owner",
|
|
"proof": list(data.get("reasons") or []),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def format_renewal_refusal(assessment: Mapping[str, Any] | None) -> str:
|
|
"""One-line refusal summary for a blocked caller."""
|
|
data = dict(assessment or {})
|
|
reasons = list(data.get("reasons") or [])
|
|
if not reasons:
|
|
return "exact-owner lease renewal was not available (no evidence recorded)"
|
|
return "exact-owner lease renewal refused: " + "; ".join(reasons)
|