Gitea-Tools/docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md

# LLM-Operated Gitea Workflow Runbooks

## Purpose

Runbooks for the common Gitea workflows an LLM performs through the `gitea-mcp`
package of the MCP Control Plane: creating issues, implementing them, opening
and reviewing pull requests, merging, and closing out — safely and
reproducibly.

> For the **project-agnostic** version of these operating rules (issue-first,
> isolated worktrees, no self-review/merge, profile safety, cleanup, fail-closed)
> that can be copied into any repository, see the reusable skill
> [`skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md`](../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md)
> and its `templates/`. This runbook is the Gitea-specific application of it.

These runbooks are **operational guidance only**. They add no tooling; the
behavior they rely on already exists (canonical runtime profiles, the
interactive setup menu, identity/eligibility checks, gated review/merge, and
audit logging). See [Related documents](#related-documents).

> **New session? Call the guide tools first (#128 / #129).** Before using any other
> Gitea MCP tool in a fresh session, call `mcp_get_control_plane_guide`
> (read-only): it reports the active profile, authenticated identity,
> allowed/forbidden operations, profile-aware do/don't guidance, and the
> non-negotiable rules (hard stops, fail-closed behavior, head-SHA pinning,
> merge confirmation, redaction, author/reviewer separation, profile
> switching). Also call `gitea_get_runtime_context` and `mcp_list_project_skills`
> to discover the available project workflows and `mcp_get_skill_guide(<name>)`
> for step-by-step instructions. This replaces long pasted operator prompts for
> the standard rules; operator prompts still control task-specific scope.
> See issue #129 for the skill registry design.

Jenkins and GlitchTip workflows use separate MCP servers, not this Gitea MCP
runtime. Register them as `jenkins-mcp` and `glitchtip-mcp`, reconnect or
reload the client, and verify visible tools before claiming either integration
is usable. See [`mcp-client-registration.md`](mcp-client-registration.md).

For cross-project use, copy the portable workflow skill at
[`../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md`](../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md).
It extracts the issue-first, isolated-worktree, no-self-review, profile-safety,
merge-cleanup, fail-closed, and recovery rules into a reusable package that can
be adapted to other repositories.

## Principle: the profile is the role, not the LLM

```text
The LLM is not the role.
The MCP execution profile used for the task is the role.
```

An LLM session is never permanently an "author," "reviewer," or "merger." Any
session may perform any of these roles — but only while operating through a
**task-appropriate profile** whose authenticated Gitea identity and allowed
operations fit the task. A task selects a profile; a profile is not assigned to
a model. See [`gitea-execution-profiles.md`](gitea-execution-profiles.md).

Example role-scoped instructions:

```text
Use an author profile to implement issue #N and open a PR.
Use any eligible reviewer profile to review PR #N.
Use any eligible merger profile to merge PR #N if checks pass.
```

### Attribution: `LLM-Agent-SHA` (metadata only)

Sessions may attribute their work with an opaque `LLM-Agent-SHA`
(`llm-<12 lowercase hex>`, e.g. `llm-8f3a9c2d6b41`) in PR-body and
review-handoff metadata blocks — see
[`llm-agent-sha.md`](llm-agent-sha.md) for the full convention. It is
**attribution only**: eligibility is decided solely by the authenticated
Gitea user and the profile's allowed operations. Two sessions with different
SHAs under the same Gitea user are the same actor — a different SHA never
permits self-review or self-merge. Keep the SHA out of branch and worktree
names.

## Prerequisites: canonical config + thin launchers

Runtime profiles live in **one canonical JSON file**, referenced by every LLM
launcher. No client config contains raw credentials.

### Canonical config file

Selected by two environment variables:

- `GITEA_MCP_CONFIG` — path to the canonical file (e.g.
  `~/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json`).
- `GITEA_MCP_PROFILE` — the named profile to activate.

Shape (see [`../gitea-mcp.example.json`](../gitea-mcp.example.json)):

```json
{
  "version": 1,
  "profiles": {
    "prgs-reviewer": {
      "base_url": "https://gitea.example.invalid",
      "username": "<reviewer-username>",
      "auth": { "type": "keychain", "id": "prgs-reviewer-token" },
      "default_owner": "<owner>",
      "execution_profile": "gitea-reviewer"
    },
    "prgs-author": {
      "base_url": "https://gitea.example.invalid",
      "username": "<author-username>",
      "auth": { "type": "env", "name": "GITEA_TOKEN_PRGS_AUTHOR" },
      "default_owner": "<owner>",
      "execution_profile": "gitea-author"
    }
  }
}
```

- `version` — canonical schema version (currently `1`).
- `profiles` — map of profile name → profile.
- `auth` — a **reference**, never an inline secret:
  - **keychain**: `{ "type": "keychain", "id": "<service-id>" }` — the token is
    read from the macOS keychain on demand.
  - **env**: `{ "type": "env", "name": "<ENV_VAR_NAME>" }` — the token is read
    from that environment variable.

Inline `token`/`password` keys are rejected. Token *values* are never stored in,
returned by, or logged from profile metadata. Precedence: explicit process env
vars override JSON profile values; the JSON profile fills only what the
environment leaves unset. With `GITEA_MCP_CONFIG` unset, behavior is exactly the
legacy environment-only mode.

### Thin launcher pattern

An LLM MCP launcher (Claude / Gemini / Codex) contains **only** command, args,
and the two `GITEA_MCP_*` variables — never a token or password:

```json
"gitea-tools": {
  "command": "/path/to/Gitea-Tools/venv/bin/python3",
  "args": ["/path/to/Gitea-Tools/mcp_server.py"],
  "env": {
    "GITEA_MCP_CONFIG": "/path/to/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json",
    "GITEA_MCP_PROFILE": "prgs-reviewer"
  }
}
```

### Dual-profile MCP launcher pattern (Recommended)

To avoid the bottleneck of relaunching/restarting the MCP server to switch between author and reviewer roles, the client should register **both** profiles concurrently as separate server instances in the client's MCP configuration:

```json
"gitea-author": {
  "command": "/path/to/Gitea-Tools/venv/bin/python3",
  "args": ["/path/to/Gitea-Tools/mcp_server.py"],
  "env": {
    "GITEA_MCP_CONFIG": "/path/to/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json",
    "GITEA_MCP_PROFILE": "prgs-author"
  }
},
"gitea-reviewer": {
  "command": "/path/to/Gitea-Tools/venv/bin/python3",
  "args": ["/path/to/Gitea-Tools/mcp_server.py"],
  "env": {
    "GITEA_MCP_CONFIG": "/path/to/.config/gitea-tools/profiles.json",
    "GITEA_MCP_PROFILE": "prgs-reviewer"
  }
}
```

* **Tool Namespaces:** Tool calls become distinct and identity-scoped in the client UI:
  * `mcp__gitea-author__*` (for creating issues, pushing branches, creating PRs)
  * `mcp__gitea-reviewer__*` (for reviewing PRs, approving, requesting changes, merging)
* **Trust Model:** Separate tokens remain separate in the keychain/environment. Each instance operates under its own `GITEA_MCP_PROFILE` and enforces its own `allowed_operations`. A runtime `whoami` identity check is still performed independently, and self-review/self-merge checks remain strictly mandatory. The dual-server pattern is a operational convenience and never a security bypass.
* **Reviewer-Identity PR Creation Deadlock:** Reviewer/merge identities must not create PRs or push branches. Doing so makes the reviewer identity the PR author in Gitea, blocking subsequent independent review and causing a review deadlock. Normally, PRs must be created by the author/work identity (`gitea-author`), leaving the reviewer identity (`gitea-reviewer`) clean and available for independent review and merge.
* **Fallback:** If the dual-profile MCP launcher pattern is not supported or configured in the client, the LLM must relaunch or restart the client/MCP with the correct profile environment variable before claiming or working on any tasks.

## Setup runbook — interactive menu

Create and manage profiles without hand-editing JSON:

```bash
./scripts/gitea-config-menu
```

Menu options: list / add / edit / remove profiles · validate config · test
profile authentication · show authenticated user · generate launcher snippets
(Claude/Gemini/Codex) · check reviewer eligibility for a PR.

In a real terminal the menu takes a **single keypress** (no Enter), **Enter**
quits the main menu and cancels/back-outs of any submenu, and you pick a profile
from a **numbered list** instead of typing its name. Non-interactive runs
(pipes/tests) fall back to line input and never block.

**Create an author + a reviewer profile:**

1. `add profile` → name `prgs-author`, base URL, username, default owner/repo,
   execution profile `gitea-author`, auth type `keychain` or `env`.
   - keychain: store the token now (hidden prompt); it goes to the keychain
     under an id like `prgs-author-token` — never into the JSON.
   - env: record a var name like `GITEA_TOKEN_PRGS_AUTHOR`; set that variable
     yourself in the environment.
2. `add profile` again → name `prgs-reviewer`, execution profile
   `gitea-reviewer`. Existing profiles are preserved.
3. `validate config` → confirm no problems.
4. `generate launcher snippets` → paste the printed snippet into each LLM
   client's MCP config (it contains no secret).
5. `test profile authentication` → prints the resolved Gitea username (the only
   time an API call is made, and only on request).
6. `check reviewer eligibility for a PR` → enter a PR number; prints the
   authenticated user, the PR author, and `ELIGIBLE` / `INELIGIBLE`. Read-only —
   it never approves or merges.

## Migration runbook — away from duplicated credential blocks

Old setups duplicated `GITEA_USER_*`, `GITEA_PASS_*`, and `GITEA_SITE_*` across
every LLM's `mcp_config.json` — duplicating profiles and exposing secrets.

1. For each instance/role, create one canonical profile (menu → `add profile`),
   storing the secret in the keychain or an env var and referencing it by
   id/name only.
2. `validate config`, then `test profile authentication` for each profile.
3. Replace each LLM's server block with the thin launcher (command + args +
   `GITEA_MCP_CONFIG` + `GITEA_MCP_PROFILE`).
4. Delete the `GITEA_USER_*` / `GITEA_PASS_*` / `GITEA_SITE_*` blocks from every
   LLM config.
5. Rotate any token that previously sat in a client config.

Legacy environment-only setups keep working unchanged until migrated.

## Workflow runbooks

Each runbook names the **profile role** it runs under, the steps, and a safe
prompt. Confirm the active profile first (`gitea_get_profile` / `gitea_whoami`).

## Work Selection Rule for LLMs

Before starting any issue or PR work, acquire or verify a work lease. Do not
begin coding, reviewing, fixing, branching, committing, pushing, commenting,
or creating a PR until you prove the target is not already being worked.

Required checks:

1. List open PRs.
2. Search for PRs linked to the target issue.
3. Search local and remote branches for the issue number.
4. Search registered worktrees for the issue branch.
5. Check dirty worktrees.
6. Check active leases or recent handoffs.
7. Check whether the issue was already completed by a merged PR.

If another active LLM/session owns the lease, stop. Allowed responses:
continue as the lease owner; review the existing PR if reviewer capability
allows; produce a handoff; request takeover after lease expiry; stop with
"work already claimed."

Never create a parallel branch or PR for the same issue unless the old branch
is proven abandoned and the takeover is recorded.

Gitea-Tools lease gates: `gitea_lock_issue` (fail-closed before author
mutations), `status:in-progress`, and claim comments. Full portable wording:
[`skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md`](../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md).

## Global LLM Worktree Rule

The main project checkout is a stable control checkout. It must stay on the
configured stable branch: `master`, `main`, or `dev`.

All LLM task work must happen inside the project's `branches/` directory.

Before any mutation, prove:

1. current project root
2. current working directory
3. current branch
4. stable branch for the main checkout
5. session-owned worktree path under `branches/`

If `cwd` is not inside `branches/`, stop. Do not edit, create, delete, format,
test-write, commit, merge, rebase, checkout task branches, resolve conflicts,
or run cleanup.

There are no exceptions for small fixes, docs, tests, cleanup, PR review fixes,
conflict resolution, or emergencies.

The main checkout may only be used for read-only inspection, fetching,
stable-branch update after merged PRs, creating `branches/` worktrees, or
explicit control-checkout repair.

Portable wording: [`skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md`](../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md).

## Branch worktree isolation

All LLM implementation and review work happens in an isolated branch worktree
under `branches/`. The main repository checkout is an orchestration checkout:
use it for status checks, issue creation/claiming, and creating worktrees, but
do not edit tracked repository files there.

**Issue → branch → worktree → PR → cleanup.** Every implementation branch is
tied to an issue number so the work is traceable end to end:

| Stage | Form |
|-------|------|
| Issue | `#123` (claimed with `status:in-progress`) |
| Branch | `(fix\|feat\|docs\|chore)/issue-123-<slug>` (review: `review/pr-456-<slug>`) |
| Worktree | `branches/fix-issue-123-<slug>` (slashes → hyphens) |
| PR | body says `Closes #123` or `Fixes #123` (closes issue); `Implements #123` or `Refs #123` (does NOT close) |
| Cleanup | remove remote+local branch + worktree folder; drop `status:in-progress` |

`scripts/worktree-start` **rejects** implementation branches that are not
issue-linked (use `--allow-unlinked` only for genuine exceptions). When claiming,
post a comment like
`Claimed. Branch: fix/issue-123-<slug>. Worktree: branches/fix-issue-123-<slug>.`
Gitea has no native issue→branch API field (only a PR's head branch), so this
linkage is enforced by branch name + claim comment + PR body + cleanup.

Branch folders are ignored by git via `branches/`, so dirty work in one issue
does not block starting an unrelated issue in a separate branch folder. No LLM
may edit another issue's branch folder unless explicitly assigned to that issue.
No LLM may clean another issue's branch folder unless the PR is merged or closed
and cleanup is explicitly part of the task.

Implementation work and review work must use separate branch folders. For
example, an implementation branch might live under
`branches/fix-issue-123-example`, while a review branch for the resulting PR
uses its own folder.

Issue creation and claiming may happen from the orchestration checkout:

1. Create or identify the tracking issue.
2. Claim it with `status:in-progress`.
3. Create the issue branch worktree.
4. `cd` into the branch worktree and perform all file edits there.

Preferred helper:

```bash
scripts/worktree-start fix/issue-123-example
cd branches/fix-issue-123-example
```

Because `venv/` is ignored and not copied into new worktrees, run checks with a
known Python interpreter. Either create a venv inside the branch folder, or use
the orchestration checkout's venv by explicit path.

Equivalent manual commands:

```bash
git fetch prgs --prune
git worktree add -b fix/issue-123-example branches/fix-issue-123-example prgs/master
cd branches/fix-issue-123-example
```

For review work, create a separate **detached** review worktree instead of
reusing the author's implementation folder:

```bash
scripts/worktree-review fix/issue-123-example   # → branches/review-fix-issue-123-example
```

Cleanup is explicit and only after merge or close. Use the helper (it fetches/
prunes first, refuses to remove a dirty worktree, and only safe-deletes a merged
branch), or the equivalent manual commands:

```bash
scripts/worktree-clean --delete-branch fix/issue-123-example
# equivalent manual commands:
cd <main-repo>
git fetch prgs --prune
git worktree remove branches/fix-issue-123-example
git branch -d fix/issue-123-example
```

All three helpers accept `--dry-run` to print the exact commands/paths without
touching anything.

### Create an issue / child issues

- **Profile:** issue-manager or author (any profile allowed to create issues).
- **Steps:** create the parent/roadmap issue; create child issues; apply the
  minimal label set; link children to the parent.
- **Prompt:** `Using the issue-manager profile, create issue "<title>" with body
  <body>, then create child issues for <list> and link them to the parent.`

### Implement an issue and open a PR

- **Profile:** author.
- **Steps:** claim the issue (`status:in-progress`); create an isolated branch
  worktree from latest `master` under `branches/` (`feat/issue-<n>-...` /
  `fix/...` / `docs/...`); `cd` into that worktree; implement narrowly; add or
  update tests if behavior changes; run the full suite; commit with an
  issue-linked message; open a PR to `master`. **Do not** review or merge your
  own PR. Include an `LLM Handoff Metadata` block (with `LLM-Agent-SHA`) in
  the PR body — see [`llm-agent-sha.md`](llm-agent-sha.md).
- **Prompt:** `Use an author profile to implement issue #N and open a PR to
  master. Do not self-review or self-merge.`

### Review a PR / request changes / approve

- **Profile:** reviewer (must be allowed to review/approve/request_changes, and
  must **not** be the PR author).
- **Steps:** confirm identity + eligibility (menu eligibility check or
  `gitea_check_pr_eligibility`); read the diff; confirm scope matches the linked
  issue; post the review (`comment` / `request_changes` / `approve`) via the
  gated review tool. Pin the reviewed head SHA where supported. Include a
  `Review Metadata` block (with your own `LLM-Agent-SHA`) in the review —
  and remember: a different `LLM-Agent-SHA` does **not** make you a different
  actor; only a different authenticated Gitea user does
  ([`llm-agent-sha.md`](llm-agent-sha.md)).
- **Prompt:** `Use any eligible reviewer profile to review PR #N. Approve only
  if scope matches issue #M and checks pass; otherwise request changes.`

**Live queue reconciliation (mandatory before any review/merge decision):**

- Reconcile live state first. Do **not** assume prior handoffs, cached tool
  output, or chat summaries are current.
- Steps (in order):
  1. Call `gitea_list_prs` (open state) with explicit remote/org/repo.
  2. Immediately `gitea_view_pr <number>` for the candidate; capture head SHA,
     state, mergeable, updated_at, merged_at/merge_commit_sha if present.
  3. Verify against any prior report: state, head SHA, updated timestamp,
     linked issue state (use `gitea_view_issue` + `gitea_list_issues`).
  4. `git fetch <remote> --prune && git checkout master && git pull <remote> master --ff-only`
  5. If conflict/staleness detected (prior said "merged" but live open; head or
     updated_at differs from claimed; merge commit missing on master), report
     the inconsistency explicitly and **STOP** before review or merge.
- After a successful merge: re-run list_prs + view_pr on the PR, confirm
  master advanced, and include the live post-merge verification in the handoff.
- Treat any ambiguous queue state as a blocker until a fresh, consistent live
  picture is obtained.

### Merge a PR

- **Profile:** merger (allowed to merge; must **not** be the PR author).
- **Steps:** confirm eligibility; require explicit confirmation
  (`MERGE PR <n>`); optionally pin head SHA / changed-file set; merge only when
  Gitea reports the PR mergeable (branch-protection checks satisfied). No force,
  no ignore-checks. Verify that remote master contains the merge commit or the expected squashed changes (do not assume a "closed" PR succeeded without verifying the actual landed changes).
- **Prompt:** `Use any eligible merger profile to merge PR #N if checks pass and
  it is mergeable. Confirm with "MERGE PR N". Do not force-merge.`

### Close the issue after merge / Reconciliation

- **Profile:** issue-manager or merger.
- **Steps:** Verify remote `master` actually contains the merge (post-merge file-presence verification):
  - Run: `git fetch <remote> --prune; git checkout master; git pull <remote> master --ff-only`
  - Verify that expected files added/modified in the PR are present on `master` (or absent if deleted).
  - Alternatively, verify with: `git log --oneline -- <expected-file>` or `git merge-base --is-ancestor <pr-head-sha> master`
  - Close the issue; release `status:in-progress` (if it cannot be removed, report why).
- **If closed but not merged (`merged=false`):** Stop normal flow. Do not delete worktrees. Compare PR content to remote `master`.
  - **fully landed:** comment it landed, remove `status:in-progress`, clean up.
  - **partially landed:** reopen issue, create corrective PR for missing pieces.
  - **not landed:** reopen issue/PR, do not clean up.
- **Direct push to master:** is forbidden except as a documented recovery exception. Final reports must include why, commits, PR metadata, and repaired labels.
- **Final reports:** must include both PR metadata (state, merged flag, merge commit) and Git content (remote master hash, expected content present, verification method used & results).
- **Prompt (normal):** `After verifying master contains the merge of PR #N using post-merge file-presence verification, close issue #M and delete the merged branch. Include verification details in the report.`
- **Prompt (reconcile):** `Reconcile closed-not-merged PR #N by verifying if its content landed on master.`

### Stop on blocker

- **Any profile.** If a required gate cannot be satisfied — identity
  unverifiable, ineligible profile, self-authored PR, moved head, unexpected
  files, detected secret, or any production/deploy behavior — **stop, report the
  blocker, and take no mutating action.** Fail closed; never work around a gate.

## Task/role alignment (#167)

The **requested task** decides what a session may do — not the credential it
happens to hold. Resolve the task first with
`gitea_resolve_task_capability(task=...)`: it returns `stop_required` and
`task_role_guidance` alongside the permission decision. An LLM asked to
review must never degrade into author work just because it is connected as
an author.

| Requested task | Required identity/profile | Allowed | Forbidden | Stop when |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review PR (`review_pr`) | reviewer (e.g. `sysadmin` / `prgs-reviewer`) | read, gated review verdicts | commits, pushes, file edits, author comments, merge without eligibility | active profile is an author profile — stop immediately; do **not** switch to author-side fixes unless the operator explicitly re-tasks |
| Address PR change requests (`address_pr_change_requests`) | author (e.g. `jcwalker3` / `prgs-author`) | commit/push fixes to the PR branch, PR comment summarizing fixes | review verdicts, approve, request-changes, merge | active profile lacks branch push |
| Merge PR (`merge_pr`) | reviewer/merger | gated merge after eligibility + approval | merging own PR, merging without pinned head match | active profile is an author profile, or any merge gate fails |
| Comment on issue discussion (`comment_issue`) | any profile with `gitea.issue.comment` | issue thread comments | review verdicts, closing via comment | permission missing (`gitea.pr.comment` does **not** imply it) |
| Comment on PR (`comment_pr`) | any profile with `gitea.pr.comment` | PR thread comments | review verdicts | permission missing |
| Author implementation (`create_branch`/`push_branch`/`create_pr`) | author | branch, commit, push, open PR | self-review, self-merge | profile lacks the author permissions |

If the task is review/merge and the session is an author profile, the only
correct outputs are: the read-only PR queue inventory (#164), the structured
permission report (#142), and a stop. Ask the operator to reconnect to the
reviewer namespace; a credential or profile swap in the same session never
cures same-session authorship.

## Review feedback discovery (MCP-native)

Formal review verdicts (APPROVED / REQUEST_CHANGES / COMMENT) live on the
review endpoints, **not** in the issue-comment thread. Never infer review
state from issue comments — use `gitea_get_pr_review_feedback(pr_number=...)`
(read-only, requires `gitea.read`). It reports:

- every submitted review: reviewer, verdict, redacted body, timestamp, and
  the head SHA it reviewed;
- `latest_review_state_by_reviewer` (PENDING drafts never count);
- `has_blocking_change_requests` / `approval_visible` (dismissed reviews do
  not block);
- `current_head_sha` vs `latest_reviewed_head_sha`, `review_feedback_stale`,
  and `author_pushed_after_request_changes` — so a reviewer can see whether
  feedback predates new commits, and an author can see whether fixes have
  been pushed since the REQUEST_CHANGES.

A permission block returns `feedback_not_attempted: true` with a structured
permission report — distinct from a successful "no reviews yet" result, so a
blocked lookup is never misread as "no feedback exists".

## Validation reporting discipline (#167)

Validation results in handoffs and PR bodies must state exactly what ran and
what happened. Build the validation section with
`build_validation_report(...)` (in `mcp_server.py`) or follow its contract by
hand — every command is one of:

- `passed` — the exact command ran and succeeded;
- `failed` — must include the exact command **and its output**; never
  paraphrase ("shell-invocation quirks" is not a status);
- `skipped` — deliberately not run; name the reason and any targeted check
  that replaced it;
- `not-run` — was required but never executed; say so plainly.

Never imply full-suite success unless the full-suite command itself passed
(`full_suite_passed: true`). A report that hides a failed or skipped check
is worse than a failing report.

## Controller Handoff (required, every task)

Every task — implementation, review, merge, triage, documentation,
discussion-only, or blocked planning — **must end with a
`Controller Handoff`** so a controller LLM can pick up the state
without rereading the conversation. The canonical formats and rules live in
the portable skill:
[`../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md`](../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md) §K.

**Compact format is the default** — nine lines (`Task / Repo/state /
Issues/PRs / Changed / Validation / Blockers / Review / Next / Safety`),
written for controller-LLM readability, not a full human status report. The
`Safety:` line is never omitted (usually
`no self-review; no self-merge; no tags; no secrets; no prod`). PR bodies
still carry the full review detail — the handoff never replaces PR
documentation.

**The long form** (Work performed · Current state · Files changed ·
Validation · Issues encountered · Review needed? · Next recommended action ·
Safety confirmations) **is reserved for high-risk or complex tasks**: a
merge/tag/release happened, validation failed, permissions/profile gates
blocked work, secrets or production access were involved, an owner decision
is complicated, the task spanned multiple repos or cross-issue state, or the
owner explicitly asks for it.

Hard rules: never omit it; never bury blockers earlier only; an opened PR
means "Review needed — PR is open"; a blocked merge names the exact gate;
discussion-only comments need owner/design feedback, not code review; any
touched release state names the exact tag/commit and why. Design debates
belong in **discussion/RFC issues** (e.g. #100 `profiles.json v2`) — comment
on the issue, create no branches/PRs, and end the comment with this handoff.

## Fail-closed behavior

Before any mutating action the workflow verifies identity, active profile,
requested operation, target repo, target issue/PR, and (for review/merge) the PR
author. If any check cannot be satisfied, it **fails closed** — no mutation:

| Condition | Result |
|-----------|--------|
| Authenticated identity cannot be verified | blocked |
| Unknown / unconfigured profile | blocked |
| Profile not allowed the requested operation | blocked |
| Authenticated user **is** the PR author (approve/merge) | blocked (no self-review/-merge) |
| PR head SHA changed since review | blocked |
| PR's changed-file set differs from expected | blocked |
| PR not open, or Gitea reports it not mergeable | blocked |
| Secret / token detected in content | blocked |
| Production / deploy / Ops behavior requested | blocked (out of scope for gitea-mcp) |

All mutating attempts — allowed, blocked, failed, or succeeded — are audit-logged
with the profile and authenticated user when `GITEA_AUDIT_LOG` is set (see
[`safety-model.md`](safety-model.md)).

## Releases and version tags

All release tagging, version bumps, and validation must comply with the [Release / Version Process SOP](release-version-sop.md).


Versions follow SemVer — **`vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH`**, using **`v0.x.y`** while
unstable. Pick the bump by the largest change since the last tag:

- **PATCH** — bug fixes, docs, tests, wrappers, non-breaking workflow polish.
- **MINOR** — new MCP tools, new workflow helpers, new config features;
  backward-compatible behavior.
- **MAJOR** — breaking config/schema/API behavior or a changed MCP contract.

Tags are **annotated** (`git tag -a`), created **only from the exact commit on
remote `master`**, **only after the full suite passes**, and carry release notes
referencing the merged PRs/issues. **Never tag** feature branches, dirty
worktrees, unreviewed or self-authored work, or commits not on remote `master`.

Release runbook (see [`../skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/release-tag.md`](../skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/release-tag.md)):

1. `git fetch prgs --prune`.
2. Confirm local `master` equals `prgs/master` (`0	0`) and the tree is clean.
3. Run the full test suite; stop on failure.
4. Review merged issues/PRs since the last tag
   (`git log --oneline <last-tag>..prgs/master`).
5. Choose the version bump.
6. `git tag -a <vX.Y.Z> prgs/master -m "<notes referencing #issues / PRs>"`.
7. `git push prgs <vX.Y.Z>`; add release notes if the forge supports it.

`scripts/release-tag` automates steps 1–7 with these gates built in (SemVer
check, fetch/prune, on-master, clean tree, local==remote master, HEAD on remote
master, no duplicate tag, tests run unless `--skip-tests`, annotated tag only).
It is **safe by default** — no push unless `--push`, and `--dry-run` changes
nothing:

```bash
scripts/release-tag --dry-run v0.4.0
scripts/release-tag v0.4.0 --notes-file /tmp/release-notes.md
scripts/release-tag v0.4.0 --notes-file /tmp/release-notes.md --push
```

## Safety notes

- Never place raw tokens or passwords in any LLM MCP config; reference secrets
  by keychain id or env var name only.
- Never self-review or self-merge; never bypass Gitea branch protections.
- No Jenkins / Ops / deploy / production behavior in `gitea-mcp`.

## Related documents

- [`../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md`](../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md) — portable cross-project LLM workflow skill.
- [`gitea-execution-profiles.md`](gitea-execution-profiles.md) — the profile model.
- [`gitea-dual-namespace-deployment.md`](gitea-dual-namespace-deployment.md) — static author/reviewer namespace deployment (#139 decision).
- [`llm-agent-sha.md`](llm-agent-sha.md) — opaque agent attribution metadata (never an eligibility input).
- [`safety-model.md`](safety-model.md) — trust boundaries and audit logging.
- [`tool-boundaries.md`](tool-boundaries.md) — per-tool allowed operations.
- [`credential-isolation.md`](credential-isolation.md) — credential handling.
- [`release-workflows.md`](release-workflows.md) — release/merge workflow.
- [`../README.md`](../README.md) — canonical config, thin launchers, the menu.