gitea_mcp_server.py

@@ -2068,6 +2068,7 @@ import lease_lifecycle  # noqa: E402
 import lease_policy  # noqa: E402
 import workflow_dashboard  # noqa: E402  # #605 live queue/lease dashboard
 import restart_coordinator  # noqa: E402  # #658 MCP restart coordinator/impact
+import drain_proof  # noqa: E402  # #661 pre-restart drain proof and hard gate
 import incident_bridge  # noqa: E402
 import sentry_observability  # noqa: E402  (#606 optional Sentry observability)
 import sentry_incident_bridge  # noqa: E402  (#607 Sentry→Gitea incident bridge)
@@ -22342,6 +22343,8 @@ def gitea_request_mcp_restart(
     request_override: bool = False,
     session_id: str | None = None,
     limit: int = 200,
+    drain_proof_json: str | None = None,
+    request_break_glass: bool = False,
 ) -> dict:
     """Evaluate a proposed MCP restart and return an impact preview (#658).
 
@@ -22351,10 +22354,15 @@ def gitea_request_mcp_restart(
     verdict, so the console (#642/#652) and operators can see what a restart
     would disrupt *before* any concurrent LLM work is destroyed.
 
-    This tool is **dry-run and never restarts anything.** The mutative apply
+    This tool **never restarts a process.** In dry-run (the default) it returns
-    path is a separate child gated by a drain proof (non-goal here); calling
+    only the impact preview. With ``dry_run=False`` it enforces the #661 hard
-    with ``dry_run=False`` still performs no restart and reports that apply is
+    gate: the apply request must present a valid, unexpired, clean drain proof
-    not yet available.
+    (``drain_proof_json``) or it is denied and a durable incident descriptor is
+    returned under ``incident``. Break-glass is the only bypass and is honoured
+    only when ``request_break_glass`` is set *and* the environment carries
+    ``GITEA_BREAKGLASS_RESTART_AUTHORIZATION``. Even an authorized gate performs
+    no restart here; actual execution is a further child. The gate outcome is
+    reported under ``apply_gate`` / ``apply_authorized``.
 
     Operator override authority is read from the process environment
     (``GITEA_OPERATOR_RESTART_OVERRIDE_AUTHORIZATION``), never self-asserted by
@@ -22473,12 +22481,54 @@ def gitea_request_mcp_restart(
     payload["requesting_session_id"] = sid
     payload["operator_override_requested"] = bool(request_override)
     payload["operator_override_authorized"] = operator_authorized
+    # Actual restart execution remains a further child; this tool never restarts
+    # a process. What #661 adds is the *hard gate*: an apply request (dry_run
+    # False) must present a valid, unexpired, clean drain proof, or it is denied
+    # and a durable incident is raised. Break-glass is the only bypass and its
+    # authorization is read from the environment, never self-asserted.
     payload["apply_supported"] = False
     if not dry_run:
-        payload["reasons"] = list(payload.get("reasons") or []) + [
+        proof_obj: dict | None = None
-            "apply requested but not supported: sanctioned restart apply is "
+        proof_parse_error: str | None = None
-            "gated by a drain proof (separate child); no restart performed (#658)"
+        if drain_proof_json:
-        ]
+            try:
+                parsed = json.loads(drain_proof_json)
+                proof_obj = parsed if isinstance(parsed, dict) else None
+                if proof_obj is None:
+                    proof_parse_error = "drain_proof_json is not a JSON object"
+            except (ValueError, TypeError) as exc:
+                proof_parse_error = f"invalid drain_proof_json: {_redact(str(exc))}"
+
+        break_glass_authorized = bool(
+            (
+                os.environ.get("GITEA_BREAKGLASS_RESTART_AUTHORIZATION") or ""
+            ).strip()
+        )
+        break_glass = bool(request_break_glass and break_glass_authorized)
+
+        expected_fp = drain_proof.impact_fingerprint(report.as_dict())
+        gate = drain_proof.gate_apply_restart(
+            proof=proof_obj,
+            break_glass=break_glass,
+            expected_impact_fingerprint=expected_fp,
+            requesting_session_id=sid,
+        )
+        gate_payload = gate.as_dict()
+        if proof_parse_error and not break_glass:
+            gate_payload["reasons"] = [proof_parse_error] + list(
+                gate_payload.get("reasons") or []
+            )
+        payload["apply_gate"] = gate_payload
+        payload["apply_authorized"] = gate.allow
+        payload["break_glass_requested"] = bool(request_break_glass)
+        payload["break_glass_authorized"] = break_glass_authorized
+        # Even an authorized gate performs no restart here: execution is a later
+        # child. The gate proves the apply path *would* be permitted.
+        payload["reasons"] = list(payload.get("reasons") or []) + list(
+            gate_payload.get("reasons") or []
+        )
+        if not gate.allow and gate.incident is not None:
+            payload["incident"] = gate.incident
     return payload
 
 

tests/test_drain_proof.py

@@ -0,0 +1,907 @@
+"""Tests for the pre-restart drain proof and hard gate (#661).
+
+Covers the acceptance criteria:
+
+1. Restart apply without a proof fails closed.
+2. A successful drain produces a verifiable proof.
+3. An open unsafe mutation makes the proof fail (multi-session fixture).
+4. Pass / fail / expired verification paths.
+
+Plus the security posture: forged/tampered proofs are rejected, break-glass is
+the only bypass and is never silent, a stale blast-radius fingerprint rejects a
+proof, and no per-process secret ever leaks into a serialized artifact.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import unittest
+from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+
+import drain_proof as dp
+import restart_coordinator as rc
+
+
+NOW = datetime(2026, 7, 24, 6, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+SECRET = b"unit-test-drain-proof-secret-0123456789abcdef"
+
+
+def _live_pid() -> int:
+    return os.getpid()
+
+
+def _clean_drain_state() -> dict:
+    """Every drain action succeeded, no sessions outstanding."""
+
+    return {
+        "assignments_stopped": True,
+        "checkpoints_complete": True,
+        "handoffs_verified": True,
+        "leases_handled": True,
+        "acks": {},  # no other live sessions to acknowledge
+        "ack_timeout_policy_applied": False,
+    }
+
+
+def _safe_report() -> dict:
+    """Impact report with no other live work: a restart here is safe."""
+
+    report = rc.evaluate_restart_impact(
+        {"sessions": [], "leases": [], "inventory_complete": True},
+        now=NOW,
+        requesting_session_id="prgs-controller-1-req",
+    )
+    return report.as_dict()
+
+
+def _unsafe_mutation_report() -> dict:
+    """Multi-session report: a second session holds a live author mutation."""
+
+    sessions = [
+        {
+            "session_id": "prgs-controller-1-req",
+            "role": "controller",
+            "profile": "prgs-controller",
+            "pid": _live_pid(),
+            "status": "active",
+            "last_heartbeat_at": NOW.isoformat(),
+        },
+        {
+            "session_id": "prgs-author-99",
+            "role": "author",
+            "profile": "prgs-author",
+            "pid": _live_pid(),
+            "status": "active",
+            "last_heartbeat_at": NOW.isoformat(),
+        },
+    ]
+    leases = [
+        {
+            "lease_id": "lease-mut",
+            "session_id": "prgs-author-99",
+            "role": "author",
+            "phase": "implementing",
+            "work_kind": "issue",
+            "work_number": 661,
+            "worktree_path": "branches/issue-661",
+            "freshness": {"freshness": "active"},
+        }
+    ]
+    report = rc.evaluate_restart_impact(
+        {"sessions": sessions, "leases": leases, "inventory_complete": True},
+        now=NOW,
+        requesting_session_id="prgs-controller-1-req",
+    )
+    return report.as_dict()
+
+
+class BuildDrainProofTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_clean_drain_produces_verifiable_clean_proof(self):
+        """AC#2: a successful drain produces a verifiable proof."""
+
+        proof = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_safe_report(),
+            drain_state=_clean_drain_state(),
+            requesting_session_id="prgs-controller-1-req",
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(proof.clean)
+        self.assertEqual(proof.failed_checks, [])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            {c.name for c in proof.checks}, set(dp.REQUIRED_CHECKS)
+        )
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(
+            proof.as_dict(), now=NOW, secret=SECRET
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result.valid, result.reasons)
+        self.assertFalse(result.expired)
+        self.assertFalse(result.tampered)
+
+    def test_open_mutation_makes_proof_unclean(self):
+        """AC#3: an unsafe mutation still in flight fails the proof."""
+
+        proof = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_unsafe_mutation_report(),
+            drain_state=_clean_drain_state(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(proof.clean)
+        self.assertIn(dp.CHECK_NO_INFLIGHT_MUTATIONS, proof.failed_checks)
+        # Leases-handled also fails: the report still shows a disruptive lease.
+        self.assertIn(dp.CHECK_LEASES_HANDLED, proof.failed_checks)
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(proof.as_dict(), now=NOW, secret=SECRET)
+        self.assertFalse(result.valid)
+
+    def test_incomplete_inventory_fails_no_mutations_check(self):
+        proof = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report={"inventory_complete": False},
+            drain_state=_clean_drain_state(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(proof.clean)
+        self.assertIn(dp.CHECK_NO_INFLIGHT_MUTATIONS, proof.failed_checks)
+
+    def test_missing_checkpoint_flag_fails_closed(self):
+        state = _clean_drain_state()
+        del state["checkpoints_complete"]
+        proof = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_safe_report(), drain_state=state, now=NOW, secret=SECRET
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(proof.clean)
+        self.assertIn(dp.CHECK_CHECKPOINTS_COMPLETE, proof.failed_checks)
+
+    def test_non_true_flags_fail_closed(self):
+        """A truthy-but-not-True value (e.g. the string 'yes') must not pass."""
+
+        state = _clean_drain_state()
+        state["assignments_stopped"] = "yes"
+        proof = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_safe_report(), drain_state=state, now=NOW, secret=SECRET
+        )
+        self.assertIn(dp.CHECK_ASSIGNMENTS_STOPPED, proof.failed_checks)
+
+    def test_ack_timeout_policy_satisfies_ack_check(self):
+        state = _clean_drain_state()
+        state["acks"] = {"prgs-author-99": "pending"}
+        state["ack_timeout_policy_applied"] = True
+        proof = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_safe_report(), drain_state=state, now=NOW, secret=SECRET
+        )
+        names = {c.name: c.passed for c in proof.checks}
+        self.assertTrue(names[dp.CHECK_ACKS_OR_TIMEOUT])
+
+    def test_outstanding_acks_without_timeout_fail(self):
+        state = _clean_drain_state()
+        state["acks"] = {"prgs-author-99": "pending"}
+        state["ack_timeout_policy_applied"] = False
+        proof = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_safe_report(), drain_state=state, now=NOW, secret=SECRET
+        )
+        self.assertIn(dp.CHECK_ACKS_OR_TIMEOUT, proof.failed_checks)
+
+    def test_all_acked_satisfies_ack_check(self):
+        state = _clean_drain_state()
+        state["acks"] = {"prgs-author-99": "acked", "prgs-author-2": "acknowledged"}
+        proof = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_safe_report(), drain_state=state, now=NOW, secret=SECRET
+        )
+        names = {c.name: c.passed for c in proof.checks}
+        self.assertTrue(names[dp.CHECK_ACKS_OR_TIMEOUT])
+
+
+class VerifyDrainProofTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    def _clean_proof_dict(self) -> dict:
+        return dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_safe_report(),
+            drain_state=_clean_drain_state(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+        ).as_dict()
+
+    def test_missing_proof_is_invalid(self):
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(None, now=NOW, secret=SECRET)
+        self.assertFalse(result.valid)
+        self.assertIsNone(result.proof_id)
+
+    def test_expired_proof_is_invalid(self):
+        """AC#4: an expired proof fails verification."""
+
+        proof = self._clean_proof_dict()
+        later = NOW + timedelta(seconds=dp.DEFAULT_PROOF_TTL_SECONDS + 1)
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(proof, now=later, secret=SECRET)
+        self.assertFalse(result.valid)
+        self.assertTrue(result.expired)
+
+    def test_proof_valid_just_before_expiry(self):
+        proof = self._clean_proof_dict()
+        almost = NOW + timedelta(seconds=dp.DEFAULT_PROOF_TTL_SECONDS - 1)
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(proof, now=almost, secret=SECRET)
+        self.assertTrue(result.valid, result.reasons)
+
+    def test_wrong_secret_rejected(self):
+        """A proof minted in a prior process (different secret) will not verify."""
+
+        proof = self._clean_proof_dict()
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(proof, now=NOW, secret=b"other-secret")
+        self.assertFalse(result.valid)
+        self.assertTrue(result.tampered)
+
+    def test_flipping_clean_flag_is_detected(self):
+        """Forging clean=True on an unclean proof breaks the signature."""
+
+        unclean = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_unsafe_mutation_report(),
+            drain_state=_clean_drain_state(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+        ).as_dict()
+        self.assertFalse(unclean["clean"])
+        unclean["clean"] = True  # forge
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(unclean, now=NOW, secret=SECRET)
+        self.assertFalse(result.valid)
+        self.assertTrue(result.tampered)
+
+    def test_tampering_a_check_is_detected(self):
+        unclean = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_unsafe_mutation_report(),
+            drain_state=_clean_drain_state(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+        ).as_dict()
+        for c in unclean["checks"]:
+            if c["name"] == dp.CHECK_NO_INFLIGHT_MUTATIONS:
+                c["passed"] = True  # forge the failing check to pass
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(unclean, now=NOW, secret=SECRET)
+        self.assertFalse(result.valid)
+        self.assertTrue(result.tampered)
+
+    def test_missing_required_check_rejected(self):
+        proof = self._clean_proof_dict()
+        proof["checks"] = [
+            c for c in proof["checks"] if c["name"] != dp.CHECK_HANDOFFS_OK
+        ]
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(proof, now=NOW, secret=SECRET)
+        self.assertFalse(result.valid)
+
+    def test_stale_fingerprint_rejected(self):
+        proof = self._clean_proof_dict()
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(
+            proof,
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+            expected_impact_fingerprint="deadbeef",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result.valid)
+
+    def test_matching_fingerprint_accepted(self):
+        report = _safe_report()
+        proof = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=report,
+            drain_state=_clean_drain_state(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+        ).as_dict()
+        fp = dp.impact_fingerprint(report)
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(
+            proof, now=NOW, secret=SECRET, expected_impact_fingerprint=fp
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result.valid, result.reasons)
+
+
+class GateApplyRestartTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    def _clean_proof_dict(self) -> dict:
+        return dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_safe_report(),
+            drain_state=_clean_drain_state(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+        ).as_dict()
+
+    def test_apply_without_proof_denied(self):
+        """AC#1: restart apply without a proof fails closed + raises incident."""
+
+        decision = dp.gate_apply_restart(proof=None, now=NOW, secret=SECRET)
+        self.assertFalse(decision.allow)
+        self.assertEqual(decision.verdict, dp.GATE_DENY)
+        self.assertIsNotNone(decision.incident)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            decision.incident["kind"], "restart_drain_gate_denied"
+        )
+
+    def test_apply_with_valid_proof_allowed(self):
+        decision = dp.gate_apply_restart(
+            proof=self._clean_proof_dict(), now=NOW, secret=SECRET
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(decision.allow)
+        self.assertEqual(decision.verdict, dp.GATE_ALLOW)
+        self.assertIsNone(decision.incident)
+
+    def test_apply_with_expired_proof_denied_with_incident(self):
+        later = NOW + timedelta(seconds=dp.DEFAULT_PROOF_TTL_SECONDS + 5)
+        decision = dp.gate_apply_restart(
+            proof=self._clean_proof_dict(), now=later, secret=SECRET
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(decision.allow)
+        self.assertIsNotNone(decision.incident)
+
+    def test_apply_with_unclean_proof_denied(self):
+        """AC#3 at the gate: an unsafe-mutation proof is denied."""
+
+        unclean = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_unsafe_mutation_report(),
+            drain_state=_clean_drain_state(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+        ).as_dict()
+        decision = dp.gate_apply_restart(proof=unclean, now=NOW, secret=SECRET)
+        self.assertFalse(decision.allow)
+        self.assertIsNotNone(decision.incident)
+
+    def test_break_glass_allows_without_proof_but_records_bypass(self):
+        decision = dp.gate_apply_restart(
+            proof=None, now=NOW, secret=SECRET, break_glass=True
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(decision.allow)
+        self.assertEqual(decision.verdict, dp.GATE_BREAK_GLASS)
+        self.assertTrue(decision.break_glass)
+        self.assertIsNone(decision.incident)
+        self.assertTrue(decision.audit_record["break_glass"])
+
+    def test_denied_gate_carries_stale_fingerprint_reason(self):
+        decision = dp.gate_apply_restart(
+            proof=self._clean_proof_dict(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+            expected_impact_fingerprint="not-the-fingerprint",
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(decision.allow)
+
+
+class SecretHygieneTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_secret_never_serialized(self):
+        proof = dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=_safe_report(),
+            drain_state=_clean_drain_state(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+        )
+        blob = dp._canonical(proof.as_dict())
+        self.assertNotIn(SECRET.decode(), blob)
+        # The signature is a hex digest, not the raw secret.
+        self.assertNotIn(SECRET.hex(), blob)
+
+    def test_incident_descriptor_has_no_secret(self):
+        decision = dp.gate_apply_restart(proof=None, now=NOW, secret=SECRET)
+        blob = dp._canonical(decision.incident)
+        self.assertNotIn(SECRET.decode(), blob)
+
+
+def _drained_report_with_live_sessions(count: int) -> dict:
+    """Report with ``count`` other live sessions but nothing in flight.
+
+    Every other checklist item passes against this report, so a failure
+    isolates the acknowledgement check rather than tripping on mutations.
+    """
+
+    sessions = [
+        {
+            "session_id": "prgs-controller-1-req",
+            "role": "controller",
+            "profile": "prgs-controller",
+            "pid": _live_pid(),
+            "status": "active",
+            "last_heartbeat_at": NOW.isoformat(),
+        }
+    ]
+    for index in range(count):
+        sessions.append(
+            {
+                "session_id": f"prgs-author-{index}",
+                "role": "author",
+                "profile": "prgs-author",
+                "pid": _live_pid(),
+                "status": "active",
+                "last_heartbeat_at": NOW.isoformat(),
+            }
+        )
+    report = rc.evaluate_restart_impact(
+        {"sessions": sessions, "leases": [], "inventory_complete": True},
+        now=NOW,
+        requesting_session_id="prgs-controller-1-req",
+    )
+    return report.as_dict()
+
+
+class AcknowledgementFailClosedTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Acknowledgement evidence must fail closed unless explicitly verified.
+
+    Regression cover for the reviewed fail-open on PR #882: an absent ``acks``
+    key collapsed to ``{}`` and was read as "no other live sessions required to
+    acknowledge", so a proof minted clean and the restart gate allowed while the
+    impact report still showed other live sessions.
+    """
+
+    def _state(self, **overrides) -> dict:
+        state = _clean_drain_state()
+        state.pop("acks", None)
+        state["ack_timeout_policy_applied"] = False
+        state.update(overrides)
+        return state
+
+    def _acks_check(self, proof) -> dp.DrainCheck:
+        return next(c for c in proof.checks if c.name == dp.CHECK_ACKS_OR_TIMEOUT)
+
+    def _build(self, report: dict, state: dict):
+        return dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=report, drain_state=state, now=NOW, secret=SECRET
+        )
+
+    def assertAcksFailClosed(self, report: dict, state: dict) -> None:
+        proof = self._build(report, state)
+        self.assertFalse(self._acks_check(proof).passed)
+        self.assertIn(dp.CHECK_ACKS_OR_TIMEOUT, proof.failed_checks)
+        self.assertFalse(proof.clean)
+
+    # --- missing / null / empty / malformed ------------------------------
+
+    def test_missing_acks_key_with_live_sessions_fails_closed(self):
+        """The exact reviewed defect: absent key, three other live sessions."""
+        report = _drained_report_with_live_sessions(3)
+        self.assertEqual(report["counts"]["sessions_live_other"], 3)
+        state = self._state()
+        self.assertNotIn("acks", state)
+        proof = self._build(report, state)
+        check = self._acks_check(proof)
+        self.assertFalse(check.passed)
+        self.assertNotIn("no other live sessions", check.detail)
+        self.assertIn("fail closed", check.detail)
+        self.assertFalse(proof.clean)
+        self.assertEqual(proof.failed_checks, [dp.CHECK_ACKS_OR_TIMEOUT])
+
+    def test_none_acks_with_live_sessions_fails_closed(self):
+        self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+            _drained_report_with_live_sessions(2), self._state(acks=None)
+        )
+
+    def test_empty_acks_with_live_sessions_fails_closed(self):
+        self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+            _drained_report_with_live_sessions(1), self._state(acks={})
+        )
+
+    def test_malformed_acks_fail_closed(self):
+        for malformed in ([], "ack", 7, ("ack",), True):
+            with self.subTest(malformed=malformed):
+                self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+                    _drained_report_with_live_sessions(1),
+                    self._state(acks=malformed),
+                )
+
+    # --- stale / unproven values -----------------------------------------
+
+    def test_stale_or_unproven_ack_values_fail_closed(self):
+        for value in ("pending", "stale", "unknown", "", None, True, 1, NOW):
+            with self.subTest(value=value):
+                self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+                    _drained_report_with_live_sessions(1),
+                    self._state(acks={"prgs-author-0": value}),
+                )
+
+    def test_partial_coverage_fails_closed(self):
+        """Fewer acknowledgements than the report's live-session count."""
+        self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+            _drained_report_with_live_sessions(3),
+            self._state(acks={"prgs-author-0": "ack"}),
+        )
+
+    def test_one_unacked_entry_among_many_fails_closed(self):
+        self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+            _drained_report_with_live_sessions(2),
+            self._state(acks={"prgs-author-0": "ack", "prgs-author-1": "pending"}),
+        )
+
+    def test_unproven_live_session_count_fails_closed(self):
+        """A missing or malformed count cannot prove nobody had to acknowledge."""
+        malformed_counts = (
+            None,
+            {},
+            {"sessions_live_other": None},
+            {"sessions_live_other": "3"},
+            {"sessions_live_other": -1},
+            {"sessions_live_other": True},
+        )
+        for counts in malformed_counts:
+            with self.subTest(counts=counts):
+                report = _drained_report_with_live_sessions(0)
+                if counts is None:
+                    report.pop("counts", None)
+                else:
+                    report["counts"] = counts
+                self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, self._state())
+
+    # --- valid evidence still passes -------------------------------------
+
+    def test_complete_valid_acks_pass(self):
+        report = _drained_report_with_live_sessions(2)
+        state = self._state(
+            acks={"prgs-author-0": "ack", "prgs-author-1": "acknowledged"}
+        )
+        proof = self._build(report, state)
+        self.assertTrue(self._acks_check(proof).passed)
+        self.assertTrue(proof.clean)
+        self.assertEqual(proof.failed_checks, [])
+
+    def test_no_other_live_sessions_still_passes(self):
+        """Intended behavior retained: zero live sessions needs no acks."""
+        report = _drained_report_with_live_sessions(0)
+        self.assertEqual(report["counts"]["sessions_live_other"], 0)
+        proof = self._build(report, self._state())
+        check = self._acks_check(proof)
+        self.assertTrue(check.passed)
+        self.assertIn("sessions_live_other=0", check.detail)
+        self.assertTrue(proof.clean)
+
+    # --- timeout policy cannot become a second fail-open ------------------
+
+    def test_unproven_timeout_policy_cannot_open_the_gate(self):
+        for value in (None, "true", "yes", 1, "True", [], {}):
+            with self.subTest(value=value):
+                self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+                    _drained_report_with_live_sessions(2),
+                    self._state(ack_timeout_policy_applied=value),
+                )
+
+    def test_explicit_timeout_policy_permits(self):
+        proof = self._build(
+            _drained_report_with_live_sessions(2),
+            self._state(ack_timeout_policy_applied=True),
+        )
+        check = self._acks_check(proof)
+        self.assertTrue(check.passed)
+        self.assertIn("timeout policy", check.detail)
+        self.assertTrue(proof.clean)
+
+    # --- the gate itself must deny ---------------------------------------
+
+    def test_failed_ack_check_denies_the_restart_gate(self):
+        report = _drained_report_with_live_sessions(3)
+        proof = self._build(report, self._state())
+        self.assertFalse(proof.clean)
+        decision = dp.gate_apply_restart(
+            proof=proof.as_dict(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+            expected_impact_fingerprint=dp.impact_fingerprint(report),
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(decision.allow)
+        self.assertEqual(decision.verdict, dp.GATE_DENY)
+        self.assertIsNotNone(decision.incident)
+
+    def test_unclean_ack_proof_fails_verification(self):
+        report = _drained_report_with_live_sessions(3)
+        proof = self._build(report, self._state())
+        result = dp.verify_drain_proof(
+            proof.as_dict(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+            expected_impact_fingerprint=dp.impact_fingerprint(report),
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result.valid)
+        self.assertFalse(result.clean)
+
+
+def _identity_report(*, requester: str, others: tuple[str, ...]) -> dict:
+    """Report with explicitly named requester and other live sessions.
+
+    Unlike :func:`_drained_report_with_live_sessions`, the session ids are
+    chosen by the caller so a test can supply acknowledgements for the *wrong*
+    identities while keeping the count correct.
+    """
+
+    sessions = [
+        {
+            "session_id": requester,
+            "role": "controller",
+            "profile": "prgs-controller",
+            "pid": _live_pid(),
+            "status": "active",
+            "last_heartbeat_at": NOW.isoformat(),
+        }
+    ]
+    for session_id in others:
+        sessions.append(
+            {
+                "session_id": session_id,
+                "role": "author",
+                "profile": "prgs-author",
+                "pid": _live_pid(),
+                "status": "active",
+                "last_heartbeat_at": NOW.isoformat(),
+            }
+        )
+    report = rc.evaluate_restart_impact(
+        {"sessions": sessions, "leases": [], "inventory_complete": True},
+        now=NOW,
+        requesting_session_id=requester,
+    )
+    return report.as_dict()
+
+
+class AcknowledgementIdentityBindingTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Acknowledgement coverage must be bound to session identity, not counted.
+
+    Regression cover for the second reviewed fail-open on PR #882 (review 582,
+    blocker B1): coverage compared ``acked_count`` against
+    ``counts.sessions_live_other``, so acknowledgements supplied for the
+    requesting session and for ids that do not exist satisfied the obligations
+    of the live sessions that never answered. The required identities are
+    carried by the report itself — ``ack_state`` keys and ``affected_sessions``
+    filtered on ``live and not is_requester`` — and only an acknowledgement
+    keyed by one of those ids may count for it.
+    """
+
+    def _state(self, **overrides) -> dict:
+        state = _clean_drain_state()
+        state.pop("acks", None)
+        state["ack_timeout_policy_applied"] = False
+        state.update(overrides)
+        return state
+
+    def _acks_check(self, proof) -> dp.DrainCheck:
+        return next(c for c in proof.checks if c.name == dp.CHECK_ACKS_OR_TIMEOUT)
+
+    def _build(self, report: dict, state: dict):
+        return dp.build_drain_proof(
+            impact_report=report, drain_state=state, now=NOW, secret=SECRET
+        )
+
+    def assertAcksFailClosed(self, report: dict, state: dict) -> dp.DrainCheck:
+        """Failure must propagate through the check, the proof, and the gate."""
+
+        proof = self._build(report, state)
+        check = self._acks_check(proof)
+        self.assertFalse(check.passed)
+        self.assertFalse(proof.clean)
+        self.assertIn(dp.CHECK_ACKS_OR_TIMEOUT, proof.failed_checks)
+        decision = dp.gate_apply_restart(
+            proof=proof.as_dict(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+            expected_impact_fingerprint=dp.impact_fingerprint(report),
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(decision.verdict, dp.GATE_DENY)
+        self.assertFalse(decision.allow)
+        return check
+
+    # --- the reviewer's exact reproduction --------------------------------
+
+    def test_requester_plus_unknown_id_cannot_satisfy_two_live_sessions(self):
+        """Review 582 B1 verbatim: requester + a nonexistent session.
+
+        ``sessions_live_other=2`` with ``ack_state`` naming ``other-0`` and
+        ``other-1``; the drain state supplies an acknowledgement from the
+        requesting session itself and from a session that does not exist. The
+        count matches, the identities do not.
+        """
+
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0", "other-1"))
+        self.assertEqual(report["counts"]["sessions_live_other"], 2)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            report["ack_state"], {"other-0": "pending", "other-1": "pending"}
+        )
+        state = self._state(acks={"req": "ack", "totally-bogus-session": "ack"})
+        check = self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, state)
+        self.assertIn("other-0", check.detail)
+        self.assertIn("other-1", check.detail)
+        self.assertIn("fail closed", check.detail)
+
+    # --- wrong / unknown / requester identities ---------------------------
+
+    def test_sufficient_count_of_wrong_ids_fails_closed(self):
+        """Right cardinality, wrong identities: two acks, neither required."""
+
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0", "other-1"))
+        state = self._state(acks={"ghost-a": "ack", "ghost-b": "ack"})
+        check = self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, state)
+        self.assertIn("do not count", check.detail)
+
+    def test_more_acks_than_required_still_fails_on_wrong_ids(self):
+        """Coverage cannot be bought with volume: five acks, none required."""
+
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0", "other-1"))
+        state = self._state(acks={f"ghost-{i}": "acknowledged" for i in range(5)})
+        self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, state)
+
+    def test_partial_identity_match_fails_closed(self):
+        """One required id acknowledged, the rest padded with unknown ids."""
+
+        report = _identity_report(
+            requester="req", others=("other-0", "other-1", "other-2")
+        )
+        state = self._state(
+            acks={"other-0": "ack", "ghost-1": "ack", "ghost-2": "ack"}
+        )
+        check = self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, state)
+        self.assertIn("other-1", check.detail)
+        self.assertIn("other-2", check.detail)
+
+    def test_requester_ack_never_satisfies_another_sessions_obligation(self):
+        """The requester is excluded from the required set and stays excluded."""
+
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+        requester_rows = [s for s in report["affected_sessions"] if s["is_requester"]]
+        self.assertEqual([s["session_id"] for s in requester_rows], ["req"])
+        self.assertNotIn("req", report["ack_state"])
+        check = self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, self._state(acks={"req": "ack"}))
+        self.assertIn("other-0", check.detail)
+
+    def test_fabricated_ids_do_not_count_toward_coverage(self):
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+        for bogus in ("", " ", "other-0 extra", "OTHER-0", "other-01", "0"):
+            with self.subTest(bogus=bogus):
+                self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, self._state(acks={bogus: "ack"}))
+
+    # --- per-session state must be explicitly valid ------------------------
+
+    def test_unproven_per_session_states_fail_closed(self):
+        """A required id present but not explicitly acknowledged fails closed."""
+
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0", "other-1"))
+        for value in ("pending", "stale", "unknown", "", None, True, 1, NOW):
+            with self.subTest(value=value):
+                self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+                    report,
+                    self._state(acks={"other-0": "ack", "other-1": value}),
+                )
+
+    def test_report_ack_state_placeholder_is_never_read_as_an_ack(self):
+        """``ack_state`` values are the report's own placeholders, not evidence."""
+
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+        report["ack_state"] = {"other-0": "ack"}
+        self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, self._state())
+
+    # --- missing / malformed / contradictory identity evidence -------------
+
+    def test_missing_identity_evidence_fails_closed(self):
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+        report.pop("ack_state", None)
+        report.pop("affected_sessions", None)
+        check = self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, self._state(acks={"other-0": "ack"}))
+        self.assertIn("no session-identity evidence", check.detail)
+
+    def test_malformed_ack_state_fails_closed(self):
+        for malformed in ([], "other-0", 7, None, ("other-0",)):
+            with self.subTest(malformed=malformed):
+                report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+                report["ack_state"] = malformed
+                self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+                    report, self._state(acks={"other-0": "ack"})
+                )
+
+    def test_non_string_ack_state_key_fails_closed(self):
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+        report["ack_state"] = {7: "pending"}
+        self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, self._state(acks={"other-0": "ack"}))
+
+    def test_malformed_affected_sessions_fails_closed(self):
+        for malformed in ("sessions", 7, {"session_id": "other-0"}, [None], [7]):
+            with self.subTest(malformed=malformed):
+                report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+                report.pop("ack_state", None)
+                report["affected_sessions"] = malformed
+                self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+                    report, self._state(acks={"other-0": "ack"})
+                )
+
+    def test_affected_sessions_without_explicit_booleans_fails_closed(self):
+        """``live``/``is_requester`` must be real booleans, never inferred."""
+
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+        report.pop("ack_state", None)
+        for row in report["affected_sessions"]:
+            if row["session_id"] == "other-0":
+                row["is_requester"] = "false"
+        self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, self._state(acks={"other-0": "ack"}))
+
+    def test_affected_sessions_missing_live_flag_fails_closed(self):
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+        report.pop("ack_state", None)
+        for row in report["affected_sessions"]:
+            row.pop("live", None)
+        self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, self._state(acks={"other-0": "ack"}))
+
+    def test_contradictory_ack_state_and_affected_sessions_fails_closed(self):
+        """Both views present and disagreeing is unresolvable, not a tie-break."""
+
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0", "other-1"))
+        report["ack_state"] = {"other-0": "pending", "other-9": "pending"}
+        check = self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+            report, self._state(acks={"other-0": "ack", "other-9": "ack"})
+        )
+        self.assertIn("contradicts itself", check.detail)
+
+    def test_identity_count_mismatch_fails_closed(self):
+        """Identity evidence that cannot be reconciled with the count denies."""
+
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0", "other-1"))
+        report["counts"] = dict(report["counts"], sessions_live_other=1)
+        check = self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+            report, self._state(acks={"other-0": "ack", "other-1": "ack"})
+        )
+        self.assertIn("cannot be reconciled", check.detail)
+
+    def test_broken_identity_evidence_outranks_timeout_policy(self):
+        """The sanctioned timeout path cannot paper over an unreadable report."""
+
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+        report["ack_state"] = "not-a-mapping"
+        self.assertAcksFailClosed(report, self._state(ack_timeout_policy_applied=True))
+
+    # --- legitimate success is preserved -----------------------------------
+
+    def test_every_required_session_acknowledged_passes(self):
+        report = _identity_report(
+            requester="req", others=("other-0", "other-1", "other-2")
+        )
+        state = self._state(
+            acks={
+                "other-0": "ack",
+                "other-1": "acked",
+                "other-2": "acknowledged",
+            }
+        )
+        proof = self._build(report, state)
+        check = self._acks_check(proof)
+        self.assertTrue(check.passed)
+        self.assertTrue(proof.clean)
+        self.assertEqual(proof.failed_checks, [])
+        self.assertIn("acknowledged by identity", check.detail)
+        decision = dp.gate_apply_restart(
+            proof=proof.as_dict(),
+            now=NOW,
+            secret=SECRET,
+            expected_impact_fingerprint=dp.impact_fingerprint(report),
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(decision.verdict, dp.GATE_ALLOW)
+        self.assertTrue(decision.allow)
+
+    def test_required_session_ack_tolerates_surrounding_whitespace(self):
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+        proof = self._build(report, self._state(acks={" other-0 ": " ACK "}))
+        self.assertTrue(self._acks_check(proof).passed)
+        self.assertTrue(proof.clean)
+
+    def test_no_other_live_sessions_still_passes_with_identity_evidence(self):
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=())
+        self.assertEqual(report["counts"]["sessions_live_other"], 0)
+        self.assertEqual(report["ack_state"], {})
+        proof = self._build(report, self._state())
+        check = self._acks_check(proof)
+        self.assertTrue(check.passed)
+        self.assertIn("sessions_live_other=0", check.detail)
+        self.assertTrue(proof.clean)
+
+    def test_explicit_timeout_policy_retains_intended_behavior(self):
+        """Valid, correctly typed timeout evidence still permits the check."""
+
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0", "other-1"))
+        proof = self._build(report, self._state(ack_timeout_policy_applied=True))
+        check = self._acks_check(proof)
+        self.assertTrue(check.passed)
+        self.assertIn("timeout policy", check.detail)
+        self.assertTrue(proof.clean)
+
+    def test_timeout_policy_still_strictly_typed_under_identity_binding(self):
+        report = _identity_report(requester="req", others=("other-0",))
+        for value in (None, "true", "True", 1, [], {}):
+            with self.subTest(value=value):
+                self.assertAcksFailClosed(
+                    report, self._state(ack_timeout_policy_applied=value)
+                )
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()