test: forward-direction issue-comment permission separation (#137 follow-up) #140
No Reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
allocator
anti-stomp
architecture
bug
chore
codex
concurrency
contamination
control-plane
dashboard
database
design
documentation
enhancement
gitea
glitchtip
important
incident
incident-bridge
integration
jenkins
labels
leases
mcp
mcp-health
mcp-menu
multi-project
mutating
nice-to-have
observability
portability
preflight
protected-branch
queue
read-only
reconnect
recovery
refactor
release
reliability
resumable-review
reviewer
roadmap
safety
security
self-hosted
sentry
stale-runtime
status:blocked
status:in-progress
status:pr-open
status:ready
terminal-lock
testing
tracker
type:bug
type:feature
type:feature
type:guardrail
visibility
workflow
workflow-hardening
workflow-hardening
Controller-owned work allocator
Prevent concurrent LLM session stomping
Architecture / structural design
OpenAI Codex client / workflow session surface
Concurrent session safety
Workflow or session contamination incident
MCP control-plane coordination and allocation authority
MCP operational dashboard/queue view
Internal coordination storage (SQLite/Postgres)
Design / investigation, no implementation
Docs / runbooks
New feature or improvement
Gitea MCP workflow
GlitchTip integration
Operational or process incident requiring durable audit trail
Sentry-to-Gitea incident bridging
Integration testing
Jenkins integration
Label taxonomy management
Lease adopt/release/expire lifecycle
MCP server / tooling
MCP namespace and runtime health
MCP menu surface
Work spanning multiple monitoring projects or Gitea repos
Mutating action; requires gating
Observability, metrics, traces, error reporting
Cross-platform / portability
Shared preflight gates before mutation
Protected branch / stable-branch policy concern
Work queue visibility and allocation
Read-only, no mutation
MCP client reconnect/reload recovery path
Recovery paths for stale/foreign leases
Code refactor / restructure
Release / versioning
Reliability / failure handling
Persist and resume prepared review verdicts across sessions
Reviewer workflow tooling
Roadmap / umbrella issue
Safety rails and fail-closed mutation guards
Security / trust boundary
Self-hosted infrastructure integration
Sentry error monitoring integration
Stale backend daemon / runtime-vs-master parity failures
Issue is blocked
Issue is being worked on
Issue has an open pull request
Issue is ready for work
Terminal review lock (#332) path
Tests / test coverage
Issue tracker hygiene / meta
Bug or defect
Feature or enhancement
Feature or enhancement
Safety gate or guardrail
Workflow state visibility for LLMs/operators
Cross-tool workflow
LLM workflow coordination hardening
LLM workflow coordination hardening
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools#140
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Refs #137 (closed by #138), groundwork for #139 requirement 9.
Summary
PR #138 added the
issue.commentalias, example grants, and alias-normalization tests. This follow-up adds the forward-direction permission-separation guards the #137 migration decision requires but which only existed in the reverse direction (test_review_permissions_do_not_grant_issue_comments):gitea.issue.commentdoes not imply issue closegitea.issue.commentdoes not imply PR review/approve/merge/request_changesgitea.issue.commentdoes not imply branch push / repo commit / branch create / PR creategitea.pr.commentdoes not implygitea.issue.commentprgs-authorop set still fails closed with the operator-facing reason string (regression pin for the #51 audit blocker)Files changed
tests/test_mcp_server.pyonly (+1 import, +1 test class, 8 tests). No production code.Validation
pytest tests/ -q: 523 passed, 6 skipped (515 baseline + 8 new)py_compileon the test file: OKgit diff --check: clean; secret sweep: 0 hits (example keychain item names only, which the repo already ships)Verification note
This PR was authored while the running MCP session was failing closed on the stale pre-#138 alias table (every tool returning "operation issue.comment cannot be normalized"). This CLI invocation itself runs the post-#138 code against the live config successfully — confirming the #138 fix + live-config migration work together and only the MCP session reconnect remains.
Generated with Claude Code
Reviewed at pinned head
9b84ecfas sysadmin/prgs-reviewer.Scope: tests only (tests/test_mcp_server.py, +96) — matches PR/issue exactly. Validation: targeted 8/8; full suite 523 passed, 6 skipped; py_compile OK; git diff --check clean; secret sweep 0 hits.
Separation matrix verified against the #137 requirements: issue.comment implies none of issue close / review / approve / merge / request_changes / branch push / repo commit / branch create / PR create; pr.comment does not imply issue.comment; pre-#137 live author op set pinned with the exact fail-closed reason; v1+v2 examples keep the grant while preserving author/reviewer role separation. No production code, no config, no dynamic-switching scope.
Nit (non-blocking, follow-up welcome): test_pre_137_author_op_set_fails_closed does not patch api_request — safe today because the cleared env cannot resolve credentials and the gate precedes auth, but patching it would make the no-network guarantee explicit.