Add gitea_list_issue_comments and gitea_create_issue_comment so
discussion/design workflows can read and post issue comments through
the MCP layer instead of direct API scripts.
- List requires gitea.read; create requires gitea.issue.comment —
gated separately from the gitea.pr.* review/merge family, fail closed.
- Issue comments never touch PR review endpoints.
- LLM-safe output: comment id/author/timestamps/body only; web links
appear solely under the GITEA_MCP_REVEAL_ENDPOINTS admin opt-in.
- Create operations are audit-logged (create_issue_comment) and errors
are redacted before being raised.
- Tests cover list/create success, permission blocks (including PR
review permissions not granting issue comments), forbidden-overrides,
empty body, missing issue with redacted error, endpoint separation,
and reveal opt-in.
- Document issue comments versus PR reviews in
docs/gitea-execution-profiles.md.
Closes#126
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
sysadmin