feat(controller): expose native instance-level fleet identity and health snapshots #978
Closed
opened 2026-07-30 01:57:00 -05:00 by jcwalker3
·
1 comment
No Branch/Tag Specified
master
fix/issue-975-client-identity-heartbeat
fix/issue-973-cross-repo-canonical-roots
fix/issue-970-safely-resolve-missing-worktrees
fix/issue-969-native-mcp-bootstrap
feat/issue-664-break-glass-restart
feat/issue-708-mcp-namespace-attachment
feat/issue-665-restart-audit
fix/issue-700-durable-walls
fix/issue-704-prevent-env-workspace-bindings
feat/issue-707-cross-project-boundaries
fix/issue-690-review-profile-switch-guard
fix/issue-953-bootstrap-lock-provenance
feat/issue-949-native-fleet-inventory
fix/issue-943-runtime-context-helpers
fix/issue-945-owning-pr-renewal-evidence
fix/issue-941-scope-guard-bootstrap-wiring
docs/issue-930-remote-mcp-coupling-inventory
fix/issue-892-author-bootstrap-deadlock
fix/issue-686-detect-reject-manual-mcp
fix/issue-672-mcp-config-drift
fix/issue-689-deterministic-mcp-namespace
feat/issue-666-concurrent-mcp-restart-tests
feat/issue-659-maintenance-drain-mode
feat/issue-648-notifications-console
fix/issue-670-direct-master-incident
feat/issue-644-console-recovery
feat/issue-650-providers-insights
feat/issue-669-scoped-component-recovery
docs/issue-668-mcp-ha-rolling-restart
feat/issue-667-console-restart-controls
feat/issue-645-linkage-console
feat/issue-643-request-preview-initiate
fix/issue-897-permission-stale-runtime-classification
feat/issue-641-runtime-session-view
feat/issue-663-restart-classes
feat/issue-661-drain-proof-hard-gate
fix/issue-854-semantic-container-exclusion
issue-640
fix/issue-682-starlette-httpx2
v1.1.0
Labels
Clear labels
allocator
anti-stomp
architecture
bug
chore
codex
concurrency
contamination
control-plane
dashboard
database
design
documentation
enhancement
gitea
glitchtip
important
incident
incident-bridge
integration
jenkins
labels
leases
mcp
mcp-health
mcp-menu
multi-project
mutating
nice-to-have
observability
portability
preflight
protected-branch
queue
read-only
reconnect
recovery
refactor
release
reliability
resumable-review
reviewer
roadmap
safety
security
self-hosted
sentry
stale-runtime
status:blocked
status:in-progress
status:pr-open
status:ready
terminal-lock
testing
tracker
type:bug
type:feature
type:feature
type:guardrail
visibility
workflow
workflow-hardening
workflow-hardening
Controller-owned work allocator
Prevent concurrent LLM session stomping
Architecture / structural design
OpenAI Codex client / workflow session surface
Concurrent session safety
Workflow or session contamination incident
MCP control-plane coordination and allocation authority
MCP operational dashboard/queue view
Internal coordination storage (SQLite/Postgres)
Design / investigation, no implementation
Docs / runbooks
New feature or improvement
Gitea MCP workflow
GlitchTip integration
Operational or process incident requiring durable audit trail
Sentry-to-Gitea incident bridging
Integration testing
Jenkins integration
Label taxonomy management
Lease adopt/release/expire lifecycle
MCP server / tooling
MCP namespace and runtime health
MCP menu surface
Work spanning multiple monitoring projects or Gitea repos
Mutating action; requires gating
Observability, metrics, traces, error reporting
Cross-platform / portability
Shared preflight gates before mutation
Protected branch / stable-branch policy concern
Work queue visibility and allocation
Read-only, no mutation
MCP client reconnect/reload recovery path
Recovery paths for stale/foreign leases
Code refactor / restructure
Release / versioning
Reliability / failure handling
Persist and resume prepared review verdicts across sessions
Reviewer workflow tooling
Roadmap / umbrella issue
Safety rails and fail-closed mutation guards
Security / trust boundary
Self-hosted infrastructure integration
Sentry error monitoring integration
Stale backend daemon / runtime-vs-master parity failures
Issue is blocked
Issue is being worked on
Issue has an open pull request
Issue is ready for work
Terminal review lock (#332) path
Tests / test coverage
Issue tracker hygiene / meta
Bug or defect
Feature or enhancement
Feature or enhancement
Safety gate or guardrail
Workflow state visibility for LLMs/operators
Cross-tool workflow
LLM workflow coordination hardening
LLM workflow coordination hardening
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools#978
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Related: #963, #949, #951, #948, #900, #975
Problem
Issue #963 cannot complete its simultaneous multi-instance fleet-readiness gate because the sanctioned controller/reconciler interface cannot enumerate the complete active fleet or prove which namespace workers belong to each running LLM application instance.
The current duplicate-process model groups workers primarily by profile or generalized client type. This incorrectly treats legitimate concurrent clients as duplicate MCP processes.
A client type such as
codex,claude_code,gemini,grok, orkimi_kis not a unique client identity. Multiple concurrent launches of the same application type must also be supported.For example, two independent Codex launches must be recognized as two valid instances — not collapsed into one Codex participant or rejected merely because they share
client_type: codex.Process inspection, PID proximity, timestamps, configuration files, and direct registry or SQLite access are not authoritative substitutes for native control-plane evidence.
Related issues include #949, #951, #948, #900, and #975, but none supplies the complete instance-level native observability required by #963.
Required identity model
Expose these separate identities:
client_type: application family, such ascodexclient_instance_id: unique and stable identity for one running application instanceworker_id: unique identity for one namespace workernamespace: author, reviewer, merger, controller, or reconcilerfleet_run_idor equivalent: operator-approved enrollment identity for a rollout or canaryRequirements:
client_type.client_instance_id.client_instance_id.worker_id, process identity, generation identity, and PID.client_instance_idfails closed.Native fleet snapshot
Add a sanctioned, read-only controller/reconciler capability that returns an authoritative point-in-time fleet snapshot.
Each active worker row must include:
The native result must classify:
Acceptance criteria
Two simultaneous Codex instances with different
client_instance_idvalues are accepted independently.Their ten namespace workers are attributed to the correct two instances.
Sharing only
client_type: codexis not classified as duplication.Two active launches claiming the same
client_instance_idfail closed.More than one active worker for the same namespace within one instance fails closed.
Reused worker, session, generation, process, PID, ownership, or fencing identity is detected.
An extra, unenrolled application instance is classified as unmanifested.
Historical dead rows are distinguished from live conflicts.
Two native snapshots can prove heartbeat continuity and stable ownership.
The fleet gate requires no shell, process-table, SQLite, source, or configuration inspection.
Controller and reconciler roles can access the read-only snapshot without gaining unrelated mutation permissions.
Tests cover:
Documentation defines the identity lifecycle and explains how an operator obtains an exact approved instance manifest.
Issue #963 remains blocked until this capability is merged and its multi-instance fleet gate and canary pass natively.
Scope boundaries
This issue must not:
Duplicate verdict
NOT a duplicate. Verified against live open and closed issue state before creation.
exactly_one_per_profile, and its acceptance criterion 2 mandates that two processes sharing a profile be reported as a duplicate that fails the mutation gate. That is precisely the model this issue must replace. #949 also has noclient_instance_idaxis, so it cannot attribute five namespace workers to a specific application launch or distinguish two concurrent launches of one client type.Canonical issue state
Issue claim heartbeat