[regression][allocator] process_work_queue still selects vision, roadmap, and umbrella containers after #844 #854

New Issue

2026-07-23T16:39:51-05:00

jcwalker3 commented

2026-07-23 16:39:51 -05:00

Problem

On live prgs/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools, gitea_allocate_next_work(allocation_mode=cross_role, apply=false) still selects non-implementable coordination containers after issue #844 was closed and its fix is present on current master.

The live allocator correctly excludes #631 as epic_or_child_only_container, but it does not apply the same semantic exclusion to equivalent product-vision, roadmap, and umbrella records.

Affected runtime and identity

Repository / remote: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools / prgs
Discovery namespace/profile/identity/role: gitea-controller / prgs-controller / sysadmin / controller
Recording namespace/profile/identity/role: gitea-author / prgs-author / jcwalker3 / author
Server implementation, local master, and live remote master: b70d5f3efa410a7a8acdd3ddaa1778f4dd4e64e9
Master parity: true; restart required: false; mutation safety: true

Failed transition

Expected: preview eligibility excludes semantic coordination containers before ranking and returns a bounded independently executable candidate.

Actual live sequence:

#646 was initially selected, then excluded for this run because MCP worktree audit found existing issue-specific branches/worktrees and no safe new allocation.
#652 was selected for action=implement; its body says, “Do not implement features on this issue.”
After sanctioned exclusion of #652, #653 was selected; its non-goals say not to implement features on the roadmap issue.
After sanctioned exclusion of #653, #655 was selected; its body says implementation is via linked children only.

The three-invalid-candidate skip ceiling was exhausted with #655 still invalid. No apply call was made.

Expected behavior

Semantic container classification must cover equivalent scope evidence independently of a single title prefix. Vision, roadmap, umbrella, epic, and child-only records must be excluded before ranking and before assignment/lease mutation. Independently executable children must remain eligible.

Authoritative evidence

gitea_whoami, mcp_get_control_plane_guide, mcp_check_workflow_skill_preflight, gitea_assess_master_parity, and gitea_resolve_task_capability proved repository, identity, workflow, parity, and safety.
gitea_allocate_next_work(..., apply=false) produced fingerprints:
- #646: ecd96c7adad38b22106ad918f34dd7296eb23219dc793d1c59cf16a2e3f6d9e1
- #652 after excluding #646: c4fb5b80a07b6aded347c12ff4d28603471a8c49ad8b824044dcc3a92fb4209c
- #653 after excluding #646/#652: 158905be098404bb1be3ed9675e14d278e919ba1e997f35cfd7da0da7df01ba6
- #655 after excluding #646/#652/#653: 6bd19597c06a2bcf2799a34ac267ff7841679e9c5c9fae0830307bcd712ddad1
gitea_view_issue confirmed the non-implementation scope in #652, #653, and #655.
gitea_list_workflow_leases showed no lease was created for these previews.
gitea_list_issues(state=all, limit=1000) returned 471 issues. Search terms included allocator, process_work_queue, epic, child-only, container, umbrella, roadmap, product vision, pre-rank, and regression. No open issue covers this post-closure regression. Closed #844 is the predecessor; closed #776 is related pre-rank infrastructure, not this live semantic regression.

Recovery attempts and partial mutations

Recovery used the canonical per-run exclude_issue_numbers preview path for exactly three invalid candidates. It advanced selection but did not reach bounded work.

No assignment, workflow lease, issue lock, Git ref, branch, worktree, file edit, commit, push, PR, review, or merge mutation was produced by the failed allocation path.

Scheduled-run impact

Unattended cycles cannot safely apply the controller selection: without semantic validation they may allocate a non-implementable container; with validation they exhaust the bounded skip ceiling without reaching executable work.

Acceptance criteria

Reproduce this chain against fixtures shaped like #652, #653, and #655 on top of the #844 implementation.
Classify vision, roadmap, umbrella, epic, and authoritative child-only/non-implementation body signals consistently before ranking.
Keep independently executable children eligible.
Do not exclude ordinary issues solely because they incidentally mention vision, roadmap, umbrella, or epic.
Return a structured semantic skip reason for every excluded container.
Prove excluded containers cannot receive assignments or workflow leases.
Add a live-equivalent regression canary showing #631/#652/#653/#655-shaped records are all excluded in one inventory.
Preserve candidate-set fingerprint/CAS behavior after exclusions.

Non-goals

Implementing any feature directly on #652, #653, or #655.
Cleaning up #646 worktrees.
Recovering unrelated stale leases.
Changing ranking among candidates that are already semantically eligible.

## Problem On live `prgs/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools`, `gitea_allocate_next_work(allocation_mode=cross_role, apply=false)` still selects non-implementable coordination containers after issue #844 was closed and its fix is present on current master. The live allocator correctly excludes #631 as `epic_or_child_only_container`, but it does not apply the same semantic exclusion to equivalent product-vision, roadmap, and umbrella records. ## Affected runtime and identity - Repository / remote: `Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools` / `prgs` - Discovery namespace/profile/identity/role: `gitea-controller` / `prgs-controller` / `sysadmin` / controller - Recording namespace/profile/identity/role: `gitea-author` / `prgs-author` / `jcwalker3` / author - Server implementation, local master, and live remote master: `b70d5f3efa410a7a8acdd3ddaa1778f4dd4e64e9` - Master parity: true; restart required: false; mutation safety: true ## Failed transition Expected: preview eligibility excludes semantic coordination containers before ranking and returns a bounded independently executable candidate. Actual live sequence: 1. #646 was initially selected, then excluded for this run because MCP worktree audit found existing issue-specific branches/worktrees and no safe new allocation. 2. #652 was selected for `action=implement`; its body says, “Do not implement features on this issue.” 3. After sanctioned exclusion of #652, #653 was selected; its non-goals say not to implement features on the roadmap issue. 4. After sanctioned exclusion of #653, #655 was selected; its body says implementation is via linked children only. The three-invalid-candidate skip ceiling was exhausted with #655 still invalid. No apply call was made. ## Expected behavior Semantic container classification must cover equivalent scope evidence independently of a single title prefix. Vision, roadmap, umbrella, epic, and child-only records must be excluded before ranking and before assignment/lease mutation. Independently executable children must remain eligible. ## Authoritative evidence - `gitea_whoami`, `mcp_get_control_plane_guide`, `mcp_check_workflow_skill_preflight`, `gitea_assess_master_parity`, and `gitea_resolve_task_capability` proved repository, identity, workflow, parity, and safety. - `gitea_allocate_next_work(..., apply=false)` produced fingerprints: - #646: `ecd96c7adad38b22106ad918f34dd7296eb23219dc793d1c59cf16a2e3f6d9e1` - #652 after excluding #646: `c4fb5b80a07b6aded347c12ff4d28603471a8c49ad8b824044dcc3a92fb4209c` - #653 after excluding #646/#652: `158905be098404bb1be3ed9675e14d278e919ba1e997f35cfd7da0da7df01ba6` - #655 after excluding #646/#652/#653: `6bd19597c06a2bcf2799a34ac267ff7841679e9c5c9fae0830307bcd712ddad1` - `gitea_view_issue` confirmed the non-implementation scope in #652, #653, and #655. - `gitea_list_workflow_leases` showed no lease was created for these previews. - `gitea_list_issues(state=all, limit=1000)` returned 471 issues. Search terms included allocator, process_work_queue, epic, child-only, container, umbrella, roadmap, product vision, pre-rank, and regression. No open issue covers this post-closure regression. Closed #844 is the predecessor; closed #776 is related pre-rank infrastructure, not this live semantic regression. ## Recovery attempts and partial mutations Recovery used the canonical per-run `exclude_issue_numbers` preview path for exactly three invalid candidates. It advanced selection but did not reach bounded work. No assignment, workflow lease, issue lock, Git ref, branch, worktree, file edit, commit, push, PR, review, or merge mutation was produced by the failed allocation path. ## Scheduled-run impact Unattended cycles cannot safely apply the controller selection: without semantic validation they may allocate a non-implementable container; with validation they exhaust the bounded skip ceiling without reaching executable work. ## Acceptance criteria - [ ] Reproduce this chain against fixtures shaped like #652, #653, and #655 on top of the #844 implementation. - [ ] Classify vision, roadmap, umbrella, epic, and authoritative child-only/non-implementation body signals consistently before ranking. - [ ] Keep independently executable children eligible. - [ ] Do not exclude ordinary issues solely because they incidentally mention vision, roadmap, umbrella, or epic. - [ ] Return a structured semantic skip reason for every excluded container. - [ ] Prove excluded containers cannot receive assignments or workflow leases. - [ ] Add a live-equivalent regression canary showing #631/#652/#653/#655-shaped records are all excluded in one inventory. - [ ] Preserve candidate-set fingerprint/CAS behavior after exclusions. ## Non-goals - Implementing any feature directly on #652, #653, or #655. - Cleaning up #646 worktrees. - Recovering unrelated stale leases. - Changing ranking among candidates that are already semantically eligible. ## Related - Predecessor: #844 (closed) - Related pre-rank exclusion infrastructure: #776 (closed)

jcwalker3 added the status:ready workflow-hardening type:bug labels 2026-07-23 16:39:52 -05:00

sysadmin commented

2026-07-23 16:41:11 -05:00

Canonical Issue State

STATE: needs-author
WHO_IS_NEXT: author
NEXT_ACTION: Implement issue #854 acceptance criteria by extending semantic pre-rank container classification and regression coverage; validate; open one PR against master.
WHAT_HAPPENED: A live controller cycle on current master exhausted three exclusions and still selected #655, after #652 and #653 were also proven non-implementable containers. A post-closure regression defect was recorded as #854.
WHY: The live #844 implementation excludes the #631 epic shape but still ranks product-vision, roadmap, and umbrella child-only records for author implementation.
RELATED_PRS: none
BLOCKERS: process_work_queue semantic container exclusion is incomplete on current master.
VALIDATION: Live dry-run allocator previews, issue reads, 471-issue duplicate inventory, authoritative lease inspection, workflow proof, identity/capability checks, and master parity at b70d5f3efa.
LAST_UPDATED_BY: sysadmin (prgs-controller)

Canonical Handoff

REPOSITORY: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools
ISSUE: 854
PR: none
WORKFLOW_STATE: needs-author
HEAD_SHA: none
BASE_BRANCH: master
BASE_OR_MERGE_SHA: b70d5f3efa410a7a8acdd3ddaa1778f4dd4e64e9
ACTING_ROLE: controller
ACTING_IDENTITY: sysadmin (prgs-controller)
COMPLETED_ACTIONS: Recorded and verified regression issue #854, then recovered the durable handoff through the controller issue-comment capability after the author stable-checkout guard rejected the first comment attempt.
VALIDATION_EVIDENCE: gitea_allocate_next_work dry-run fingerprints for #646/#652/#653/#655; live issue reads; authoritative lease table; 471-issue all-state inventory; exact create/comment capabilities; workflow skill preflight; master parity at b70d5f3efa410a7a8acdd3ddaa1778f4dd4e64e9.
MUTATION_LEDGER: Created issue #854 through gitea-author with labels status:ready, type:bug, workflow-hardening; posted this canonical handoff comment through gitea-controller. The rejected author comment attempt made no mutation. No allocation, assignment, lease, lock, Git ref, branch, worktree, file, commit, push, PR, review, or merge mutation.
BLOCKERS: Current process_work_queue still ranks product-vision, roadmap, and umbrella child-only containers for action=implement.
NEXT_ACTOR: author
NEXT_ACTION: Implement #854 under the canonical work-issue workflow, add regression coverage for #631/#652/#653/#655-shaped records, validate, create one PR against master, and record the next canonical state.
PROHIBITED_ACTIONS: Do not implement #652, #653, or #655 directly; do not bypass allocator or role gates; do not weaken child-issue eligibility.
NEXT_PROMPT: In Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools, work only issue #854 as gitea-author under the canonical work-issue workflow. Extend process_work_queue semantic pre-rank exclusion for product-vision, roadmap, umbrella, epic, and authoritative child-only/non-implementation signals; preserve ordinary and child issue eligibility; add the acceptance-criteria regression tests; validate; open one PR against master; post the canonical handoff; stop.
WORKFLOW_FAILURE_ISSUES: #854
LAST_UPDATED: 2026-07-23T21:40:52Z

## Canonical Issue State STATE: needs-author WHO_IS_NEXT: author NEXT_ACTION: Implement issue #854 acceptance criteria by extending semantic pre-rank container classification and regression coverage; validate; open one PR against master. WHAT_HAPPENED: A live controller cycle on current master exhausted three exclusions and still selected #655, after #652 and #653 were also proven non-implementable containers. A post-closure regression defect was recorded as #854. WHY: The live #844 implementation excludes the #631 epic shape but still ranks product-vision, roadmap, and umbrella child-only records for author implementation. RELATED_PRS: none BLOCKERS: process_work_queue semantic container exclusion is incomplete on current master. VALIDATION: Live dry-run allocator previews, issue reads, 471-issue duplicate inventory, authoritative lease inspection, workflow proof, identity/capability checks, and master parity at b70d5f3efa410a7a8acdd3ddaa1778f4dd4e64e9. LAST_UPDATED_BY: sysadmin (prgs-controller)  ## Canonical Handoff ```text REPOSITORY: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools ISSUE: 854 PR: none WORKFLOW_STATE: needs-author HEAD_SHA: none BASE_BRANCH: master BASE_OR_MERGE_SHA: b70d5f3efa410a7a8acdd3ddaa1778f4dd4e64e9 ACTING_ROLE: controller ACTING_IDENTITY: sysadmin (prgs-controller) COMPLETED_ACTIONS: Recorded and verified regression issue #854, then recovered the durable handoff through the controller issue-comment capability after the author stable-checkout guard rejected the first comment attempt. VALIDATION_EVIDENCE: gitea_allocate_next_work dry-run fingerprints for #646/#652/#653/#655; live issue reads; authoritative lease table; 471-issue all-state inventory; exact create/comment capabilities; workflow skill preflight; master parity at b70d5f3efa410a7a8acdd3ddaa1778f4dd4e64e9. MUTATION_LEDGER: Created issue #854 through gitea-author with labels status:ready, type:bug, workflow-hardening; posted this canonical handoff comment through gitea-controller. The rejected author comment attempt made no mutation. No allocation, assignment, lease, lock, Git ref, branch, worktree, file, commit, push, PR, review, or merge mutation. BLOCKERS: Current process_work_queue still ranks product-vision, roadmap, and umbrella child-only containers for action=implement. NEXT_ACTOR: author NEXT_ACTION: Implement #854 under the canonical work-issue workflow, add regression coverage for #631/#652/#653/#655-shaped records, validate, create one PR against master, and record the next canonical state. PROHIBITED_ACTIONS: Do not implement #652, #653, or #655 directly; do not bypass allocator or role gates; do not weaken child-issue eligibility. NEXT_PROMPT: In Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools, work only issue #854 as gitea-author under the canonical work-issue workflow. Extend process_work_queue semantic pre-rank exclusion for product-vision, roadmap, umbrella, epic, and authoritative child-only/non-implementation signals; preserve ordinary and child issue eligibility; add the acceptance-criteria regression tests; validate; open one PR against master; post the canonical handoff; stop. WORKFLOW_FAILURE_ISSUES: #854 LAST_UPDATED: 2026-07-23T21:40:52Z ```

sysadmin commented

2026-07-24 00:39:07 -05:00

Material new evidence — canonical handoff is itself allocator-ineligible

A fresh controller cycle on live prgs/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools at server/local/live-master SHA ef14622ba0badd0cd7d654c05af13aca7d81bc05 reproduced #854 and exposed an additional self-blocking failure:

Cross-role previews selected #652, then #653 after excluding #652, then #655 after excluding #652/#653.
Live issue reads proved each is a vision, roadmap, or umbrella record explicitly delegated to children.
Fingerprints: #652 a58f31aeb966da15cdc2bdc0acc2d7f3c4c4995490976bce2464f72c6d56e19e; #653 dfe1c9edd59560d67510b7a53417003077b7ff36d5782440bfdeb5bb8fd1eac9; #655 a4c73f3cdbd364445deab2637ade776e38a9b749942c04f7e4ef316b6f422ff8.
A focused dry-run containing the live #854 candidate returned no_safe_work and classified #854 itself as epic_or_child_only_container because its problem statement mentions “coordination container.” Fingerprint: f6683a038252c30d3617d9c454f971ce2ae10652c4d6e0265516dcb7444b77cd.
#854 is open, status:ready, bounded, independently executable, has no linked open PR, conflicting branch, claim, or workflow lease, and already carries a canonical needs-author handoff.
exclude_issue_numbers is negative-only. Supplying #854 through candidates_json still invokes the faulty classifier.

Required regression: an actionable allocator-defect issue that discusses container exclusion must remain eligible. Quoted/problem-description vocabulary must not be treated as authoritative scope delegation.

No apply call was made. The allocator probes created no assignment, lease, lock, Git ref, branch, worktree, file edit, commit, push, PR, review, or merge mutation.

Canonical Issue State

STATE: blocked
WHO_IS_NEXT: user
NEXT_ACTION: Repair or expose a sanctioned controller path that can allocate this specifically validated canonical handoff without treating incidental defect-description text as child-only scope; then rerun the full controller allocation and author workflow for #854.
NEXT_PROMPT:

In Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools, re-run the full canonical controller workflow for issue #854 after the sanctioned allocator route is repaired; verify live identity, parity, issue state, duplicate/lease state, and allocator eligibility; allocate atomically to gitea-author; implement only #854 acceptance criteria; validate; open one PR; post the next canonical handoff.

WHAT_HAPPENED: #854 covers the invalid-candidate chain, but the allocator also false-positively excludes #854 itself, preventing its needs-author handoff from receiving an assignment and lease.
WHY: Semantic classification treats incidental “coordination container” text in the defect description as authoritative child-only scope evidence.
RELATED_PRS: none
BLOCKERS: The sanctioned allocator has no positive pin/route operation for a validated canonical handoff and false-positively excludes #854. Unblock condition: deploy such a route or repair the classifier, then prove a live dry-run selects #854 for author.
VALIDATION: Live controller identity/capability proof, workflow mount proof, parity at ef14622ba0, live issue/comment reads, duplicate-work gate, three bounded queue previews, and focused candidates_json replay.
LAST_UPDATED_BY: sysadmin (prgs-controller)

Canonical Handoff

REPOSITORY: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools
ISSUE: 854
PR: none
WORKFLOW_STATE: blocked
HEAD_SHA: none
BASE_BRANCH: master
BASE_OR_MERGE_SHA: ef14622ba0badd0cd7d654c05af13aca7d81bc05
ACTING_ROLE: controller
ACTING_IDENTITY: sysadmin (prgs-controller)
COMPLETED_ACTIONS: Revalidated the existing defect; exhausted the three-invalid-candidate preview ceiling; proved #854 itself is false-positively excluded; recorded this materially new evidence.
VALIDATION_EVIDENCE: Workflow skill ready; controller identity/repository/remote verified; server/local/live-master parity true at ef14622ba0badd0cd7d654c05af13aca7d81bc05; live #652/#653/#655 scope reads; #854 live state/comments/duplicate-work gate; allocator fingerprints a58f31aeb966da15cdc2bdc0acc2d7f3c4c4995490976bce2464f72c6d56e19e, dfe1c9edd59560d67510b7a53417003077b7ff36d5782440bfdeb5bb8fd1eac9, a4c73f3cdbd364445deab2637ade776e38a9b749942c04f7e4ef316b6f422ff8, f6683a038252c30d3617d9c454f971ce2ae10652c4d6e0265516dcb7444b77cd.
MUTATION_LEDGER: Posted this one issue comment to #854. The prior validation-rejected attempt performed no mutation. No allocation, assignment, lease, lock, Git ref, branch, worktree, file, commit, push, PR, review, or merge mutation.
BLOCKERS: The allocator false-positively excludes #854, and no sanctioned positive pin/route capability exists. Unblock when that route is deployed or the classifier is repaired and a live preview selects #854.
NEXT_ACTOR: operator
NEXT_ACTION: Repair or expose a sanctioned controller allocation path for this validated handoff, then rerun the full workflow from identity and capability preflight.
PROHIBITED_ACTIONS: Do not implement #652, #653, or #655 directly; do not bypass allocator/lease gates; do not omit authoritative candidate text to evade classification.
NEXT_PROMPT: In Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools, re-run the full canonical controller workflow for issue #854 after the sanctioned allocator route is repaired; verify live identity, parity, issue state, duplicate/lease state, and allocator eligibility; allocate atomically to gitea-author; implement only #854 acceptance criteria; validate; open one PR; post the next canonical handoff.
WORKFLOW_FAILURE_ISSUES: #854
LAST_UPDATED: 2026-07-24T05:39:06.928Z

## Material new evidence — canonical handoff is itself allocator-ineligible A fresh controller cycle on live `prgs/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools` at server/local/live-master SHA `ef14622ba0badd0cd7d654c05af13aca7d81bc05` reproduced #854 and exposed an additional self-blocking failure: - Cross-role previews selected #652, then #653 after excluding #652, then #655 after excluding #652/#653. - Live issue reads proved each is a vision, roadmap, or umbrella record explicitly delegated to children. - Fingerprints: #652 `a58f31aeb966da15cdc2bdc0acc2d7f3c4c4995490976bce2464f72c6d56e19e`; #653 `dfe1c9edd59560d67510b7a53417003077b7ff36d5782440bfdeb5bb8fd1eac9`; #655 `a4c73f3cdbd364445deab2637ade776e38a9b749942c04f7e4ef316b6f422ff8`. - A focused dry-run containing the live #854 candidate returned `no_safe_work` and classified #854 itself as `epic_or_child_only_container` because its problem statement mentions “coordination container.” Fingerprint: `f6683a038252c30d3617d9c454f971ce2ae10652c4d6e0265516dcb7444b77cd`. - #854 is open, `status:ready`, bounded, independently executable, has no linked open PR, conflicting branch, claim, or workflow lease, and already carries a canonical `needs-author` handoff. - `exclude_issue_numbers` is negative-only. Supplying #854 through `candidates_json` still invokes the faulty classifier. Required regression: an actionable allocator-defect issue that discusses container exclusion must remain eligible. Quoted/problem-description vocabulary must not be treated as authoritative scope delegation. No apply call was made. The allocator probes created no assignment, lease, lock, Git ref, branch, worktree, file edit, commit, push, PR, review, or merge mutation. ## Canonical Issue State STATE: blocked WHO_IS_NEXT: user NEXT_ACTION: Repair or expose a sanctioned controller path that can allocate this specifically validated canonical handoff without treating incidental defect-description text as child-only scope; then rerun the full controller allocation and author workflow for #854. NEXT_PROMPT: ```text In Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools, re-run the full canonical controller workflow for issue #854 after the sanctioned allocator route is repaired; verify live identity, parity, issue state, duplicate/lease state, and allocator eligibility; allocate atomically to gitea-author; implement only #854 acceptance criteria; validate; open one PR; post the next canonical handoff. ``` WHAT_HAPPENED: #854 covers the invalid-candidate chain, but the allocator also false-positively excludes #854 itself, preventing its needs-author handoff from receiving an assignment and lease. WHY: Semantic classification treats incidental “coordination container” text in the defect description as authoritative child-only scope evidence. RELATED_PRS: none BLOCKERS: The sanctioned allocator has no positive pin/route operation for a validated canonical handoff and false-positively excludes #854. Unblock condition: deploy such a route or repair the classifier, then prove a live dry-run selects #854 for author. VALIDATION: Live controller identity/capability proof, workflow mount proof, parity at ef14622ba0badd0cd7d654c05af13aca7d81bc05, live issue/comment reads, duplicate-work gate, three bounded queue previews, and focused candidates_json replay. LAST_UPDATED_BY: sysadmin (prgs-controller)  ## Canonical Handoff ```text REPOSITORY: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools ISSUE: 854 PR: none WORKFLOW_STATE: blocked HEAD_SHA: none BASE_BRANCH: master BASE_OR_MERGE_SHA: ef14622ba0badd0cd7d654c05af13aca7d81bc05 ACTING_ROLE: controller ACTING_IDENTITY: sysadmin (prgs-controller) COMPLETED_ACTIONS: Revalidated the existing defect; exhausted the three-invalid-candidate preview ceiling; proved #854 itself is false-positively excluded; recorded this materially new evidence. VALIDATION_EVIDENCE: Workflow skill ready; controller identity/repository/remote verified; server/local/live-master parity true at ef14622ba0badd0cd7d654c05af13aca7d81bc05; live #652/#653/#655 scope reads; #854 live state/comments/duplicate-work gate; allocator fingerprints a58f31aeb966da15cdc2bdc0acc2d7f3c4c4995490976bce2464f72c6d56e19e, dfe1c9edd59560d67510b7a53417003077b7ff36d5782440bfdeb5bb8fd1eac9, a4c73f3cdbd364445deab2637ade776e38a9b749942c04f7e4ef316b6f422ff8, f6683a038252c30d3617d9c454f971ce2ae10652c4d6e0265516dcb7444b77cd. MUTATION_LEDGER: Posted this one issue comment to #854. The prior validation-rejected attempt performed no mutation. No allocation, assignment, lease, lock, Git ref, branch, worktree, file, commit, push, PR, review, or merge mutation. BLOCKERS: The allocator false-positively excludes #854, and no sanctioned positive pin/route capability exists. Unblock when that route is deployed or the classifier is repaired and a live preview selects #854. NEXT_ACTOR: operator NEXT_ACTION: Repair or expose a sanctioned controller allocation path for this validated handoff, then rerun the full workflow from identity and capability preflight. PROHIBITED_ACTIONS: Do not implement #652, #653, or #655 directly; do not bypass allocator/lease gates; do not omit authoritative candidate text to evade classification. NEXT_PROMPT: In Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools, re-run the full canonical controller workflow for issue #854 after the sanctioned allocator route is repaired; verify live identity, parity, issue state, duplicate/lease state, and allocator eligibility; allocate atomically to gitea-author; implement only #854 acceptance criteria; validate; open one PR; post the next canonical handoff. WORKFLOW_FAILURE_ISSUES: #854 LAST_UPDATED: 2026-07-24T05:39:06.928Z ```

jcwalker3 referenced this issue from a commit

2026-07-24 16:17:12 -05:00

fix(allocator): exclude vision/roadmap/umbrella coordination containers (#854)

jcwalker3 referenced a pull request that will close this issue

2026-07-24 16:19:46 -05:00

fix(allocator): exclude vision/roadmap/umbrella coordination containers (Closes #854) #883

jcwalker3 added status:pr-open and removed status:ready labels 2026-07-24 16:19:47 -05:00

sysadmin referenced this issue

2026-07-24 17:50:46 -05:00

fix(allocator): exclude vision/roadmap/umbrella coordination containers (Closes #854) #883

sysadmin referenced this issue

2026-07-24 17:50:53 -05:00