ARCH-04 — Atomic workspace probing, overlap exclusion, and action-time drift detection #835
Open
opened 2026-07-22 19:50:06 -05:00 by jcwalker3
·
0 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
master
fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers
fix/issue-842-conflict-fix-lease-lifecycle
feat/issue-646-policy-guardrail-visibility
fix/issue-843-cross-role-allocation-handoff
fix/issue-790-slice-a-heartbeat-policy
feat/issue-628-autonomous-handoffs-orchestration
feat/issue-634-readonly-system-health-api
feat/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1
fix/issue-840-cross-role-queue-allocation
feat/issue-822-atomic-install-authority-kernel
feat/issue-633-console-authz-audit-model
feat/issue-636-inventory-api
fix/issue-815-preflight-worktree-forwarding
feat/issue-812-publish-unpublished-commit
feat/issue-635-project-registry-api
feat/issue-798-worker-registry-schema
feat/issue-610-live-remote-parity
docs/issue-632-web-console-architecture
fix/issue-760-exact-owner-renewal
fix/issue-787-kill-segment-separators
chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip
v1.1.0
Labels
Clear labels
allocator
anti-stomp
architecture
bug
chore
codex
concurrency
contamination
control-plane
dashboard
database
design
documentation
enhancement
gitea
glitchtip
important
incident
incident-bridge
integration
jenkins
labels
leases
mcp
mcp-health
mcp-menu
multi-project
mutating
nice-to-have
observability
portability
preflight
protected-branch
queue
read-only
reconnect
recovery
refactor
release
reliability
resumable-review
reviewer
roadmap
safety
security
self-hosted
sentry
stale-runtime
status:blocked
status:in-progress
status:pr-open
status:ready
terminal-lock
testing
tracker
type:bug
type:feature
type:feature
type:guardrail
visibility
workflow
workflow-hardening
workflow-hardening
Controller-owned work allocator
Prevent concurrent LLM session stomping
Architecture / structural design
OpenAI Codex client / workflow session surface
Concurrent session safety
Workflow or session contamination incident
MCP control-plane coordination and allocation authority
MCP operational dashboard/queue view
Internal coordination storage (SQLite/Postgres)
Design / investigation, no implementation
Docs / runbooks
New feature or improvement
Gitea MCP workflow
GlitchTip integration
Operational or process incident requiring durable audit trail
Sentry-to-Gitea incident bridging
Integration testing
Jenkins integration
Label taxonomy management
Lease adopt/release/expire lifecycle
MCP server / tooling
MCP namespace and runtime health
MCP menu surface
Work spanning multiple monitoring projects or Gitea repos
Mutating action; requires gating
Observability, metrics, traces, error reporting
Cross-platform / portability
Shared preflight gates before mutation
Protected branch / stable-branch policy concern
Work queue visibility and allocation
Read-only, no mutation
MCP client reconnect/reload recovery path
Recovery paths for stale/foreign leases
Code refactor / restructure
Release / versioning
Reliability / failure handling
Persist and resume prepared review verdicts across sessions
Reviewer workflow tooling
Roadmap / umbrella issue
Safety rails and fail-closed mutation guards
Security / trust boundary
Self-hosted infrastructure integration
Sentry error monitoring integration
Stale backend daemon / runtime-vs-master parity failures
Issue is blocked
Issue is being worked on
Issue has an open pull request
Issue is ready for work
Terminal review lock (#332) path
Tests / test coverage
Issue tracker hygiene / meta
Bug or defect
Feature or enhancement
Feature or enhancement
Safety gate or guardrail
Workflow state visibility for LLMs/operators
Cross-tool workflow
LLM workflow coordination hardening
LLM workflow coordination hardening
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools#835
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Candidate architecture requiring executable validation; not yet approved, production-ready, or certified.
Parents: #820, #832. Depends on: #833 (domains/membership generation), #834 (config generations/current evidence).
1. Summary / objective
Define and implement the mutation-safety contract: an authoritative physical observation bound to the protected mutation, and a race-free probe/record protocol under the exclusion domain.
2. Security/correctness problem
DB checks of recorded generation/status/expiry cannot detect an external filesystem/mount/symlink change after a clean probe. If immediate ineligibility is required, an authoritative physical observation must occur at the mutation-sensitive use and be bound to that mutation. Two probes racing before the domain lock can both observe a clean pre-change state.
3. Threat model / failure modes
Drift between probe and use; probe/record race producing two clean records for overlapping workspaces; stale membership generation; probe timeout/crash mid-verify; cross-domain lock ordering deadlock.
4. In-scope behavior — explicit mutation-safety contract
[RUNTIME-ADAPTER]observation +[SCHEMA]binding.[SCHEMA]lock/generation +[TRUSTED-SERVICE]orchestration.5. Exclusions
No global identity registration (→ #833), no verified-evidence schema (→ #834), no retirement fencing (→ lifecycle child).
6. Schema/operation contracts
domain_locks/ membership-generation columns from #833;mutation_observation_fingerprints. Operations:probe_workspace,record_workspace_verification(extends #834 with the lock/generation protocol),bind_observation_to_mutation.7. SQLite behavior
BEGIN IMMEDIATE+ a domain-lock row; option (b) re-checks membership generation after acquiring the lock and retries the probe if changed.8. PostgreSQL behavior
SELECT … FOR UPDATEon the exclusion-domain row;SERIALIZABLEretry; advisory lock for cross-domain ordering.9. Concurrency / transaction requirements
Two probes of overlapping workspaces cannot both finalize clean: the second observes a changed membership generation (or is blocked by the domain lock) and retries; proven-isolated domains may proceed in parallel.
10. Structured results
OBSERVED_CLEAN,OBSERVED_DRIFT,PROBE_TIMEOUT,PROBE_CRASHED,DOMAIN_LOCK_CONFLICT,GENERATION_CHANGED_RETRY,MUTATION_BOUND.11. Enforcement classification
Physical observation
[RUNTIME-ADAPTER]; domain lock + membership generation + fingerprint binding[SCHEMA]; orchestration/timeout[TRUSTED-SERVICE].12. Acceptance criteria
13. Named tests
t_action_time_drift(−),t_probe_record_race(concurrency),t_generation_changed_retry(concurrency),t_cross_domain_lock_order(concurrency),t_isolated_domain_parallel(+),t_probe_timeout(−),t_probe_crash(−),t_observation_bound_to_mutation(+).14. Audit events / evidence
workspace_probed,observation_bound,probe_conflict. Test output evidence.15. Dependencies / parent
Parents #820, #832; depends #833, #834.
16. Definition of done
Executable SQLite (+PG) with a real probe adapter (or a deterministic test double whose contract matches the adapter); ACs pass incl. race + drift; bounded PR; no self-review/merge.
17. Known limitations / deferred
Physical observation is
[RUNTIME-ADAPTER]; a bounded staleness window is acceptable only if explicitly stated and never described as immediate. Retirement fencing → lifecycle child.