ARCH-01 — Evidence attestations, typed subjects, digest binding, and immutability #825
Open
opened 2026-07-22 19:43:08 -05:00 by jcwalker3
·
0 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
master
fix/issue-842-conflict-fix-lease-lifecycle
fix/issue-843-cross-role-allocation-handoff
fix/issue-790-slice-a-heartbeat-policy
feat/issue-628-autonomous-handoffs-orchestration
feat/issue-634-readonly-system-health-api
feat/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1
fix/issue-840-cross-role-queue-allocation
feat/issue-822-atomic-install-authority-kernel
feat/issue-633-console-authz-audit-model
feat/issue-636-inventory-api
fix/issue-815-preflight-worktree-forwarding
feat/issue-812-publish-unpublished-commit
feat/issue-635-project-registry-api
feat/issue-798-worker-registry-schema
feat/issue-610-live-remote-parity
docs/issue-632-web-console-architecture
fix/issue-760-exact-owner-renewal
fix/issue-787-kill-segment-separators
chore/issue-681-preserve-review-session-wip
v1.1.0
Labels
Clear labels
allocator
anti-stomp
architecture
bug
chore
codex
concurrency
contamination
control-plane
dashboard
database
design
documentation
enhancement
gitea
glitchtip
important
incident
incident-bridge
integration
jenkins
labels
leases
mcp
mcp-health
mcp-menu
multi-project
mutating
nice-to-have
observability
portability
preflight
protected-branch
queue
read-only
reconnect
recovery
refactor
release
reliability
resumable-review
reviewer
roadmap
safety
security
self-hosted
sentry
stale-runtime
status:blocked
status:in-progress
status:pr-open
status:ready
terminal-lock
testing
tracker
type:bug
type:feature
type:feature
type:guardrail
visibility
workflow
workflow-hardening
workflow-hardening
Controller-owned work allocator
Prevent concurrent LLM session stomping
Architecture / structural design
OpenAI Codex client / workflow session surface
Concurrent session safety
Workflow or session contamination incident
MCP control-plane coordination and allocation authority
MCP operational dashboard/queue view
Internal coordination storage (SQLite/Postgres)
Design / investigation, no implementation
Docs / runbooks
New feature or improvement
Gitea MCP workflow
GlitchTip integration
Operational or process incident requiring durable audit trail
Sentry-to-Gitea incident bridging
Integration testing
Jenkins integration
Label taxonomy management
Lease adopt/release/expire lifecycle
MCP server / tooling
MCP namespace and runtime health
MCP menu surface
Work spanning multiple monitoring projects or Gitea repos
Mutating action; requires gating
Observability, metrics, traces, error reporting
Cross-platform / portability
Shared preflight gates before mutation
Protected branch / stable-branch policy concern
Work queue visibility and allocation
Read-only, no mutation
MCP client reconnect/reload recovery path
Recovery paths for stale/foreign leases
Code refactor / restructure
Release / versioning
Reliability / failure handling
Persist and resume prepared review verdicts across sessions
Reviewer workflow tooling
Roadmap / umbrella issue
Safety rails and fail-closed mutation guards
Security / trust boundary
Self-hosted infrastructure integration
Sentry error monitoring integration
Stale backend daemon / runtime-vs-master parity failures
Issue is blocked
Issue is being worked on
Issue has an open pull request
Issue is ready for work
Terminal review lock (#332) path
Tests / test coverage
Issue tracker hygiene / meta
Bug or defect
Feature or enhancement
Feature or enhancement
Safety gate or guardrail
Workflow state visibility for LLMs/operators
Cross-tool workflow
LLM workflow coordination hardening
LLM workflow coordination hardening
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools#825
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Candidate architecture requiring executable validation; not yet approved, production-ready, or certified.
Parents: #820, #821. Depends on: #822.
1. Summary / objective
Implement evidence records bound one-to-one to issuer attestations, each carrying exactly one typed subject whose canonical digest is bound into the attestation, all immutable.
2. Security/correctness problem
Downstream authority (repository external-id proof, operator approval, principal linkage, workspace probe) trusts evidence. If an evidence record does not bind the exact subject it claims to prove, a service can pair a correctly-typed subject with an attestation that authenticated different content.
3. Threat model / failure modes
Attestation reuse across records; an attestation appearing in multiple subject tables; subject_digest disagreeing with the actual subject; a record naming an attestation of a different store/generation/kind/reference/digest; failed-scan evidence promoted; digest recomputation trusted to a nonexistent DB SHA-256.
4. In-scope behavior
evidence_issuance_attestationswithUNIQUE(store_id,store_reference_id)(one per reference) and a composite candidate key(attestation_id,store_id,config_generation,reference_kind,store_reference_id,content_digest).[SCHEMA].evidence_recordswithUNIQUE(attestation_id)(single-use) and one composite FK to that candidate key (all six fields agree).[SCHEMA].repository_external_id,operator_binding_approval,principal_linkage,workspace_probe);subject_kindmust match the table; no attestation in two subject tables.[SCHEMA]via per-table triggers scanning the others.subject_digest(sha256 over the canonical typed subject) stored on the attestation;subject_canon_versionrecorded. Digest computation is[TRUSTED-SERVICE](or a named registered DB function if adopted — do not claim SQLite/PG recompute SHA-256 natively); digest equality at consume time is[SCHEMA].[0-9a-f]only.[SCHEMA].status.[SCHEMA].attested_byprincipal from the verifying service identity and session (verifying_service_session_id).5. Exclusions
No remote signature verification (→ issuer-proof issue), no store-config lifecycle beyond the FK to it (→ issuer-proof issue), no consumers' business logic.
6. Schema/operation contracts
Tables above +
evidence_reference_kinds(subject_kind per kind) +evidence_subject_*(4). Operations:record_evidence(supervisor.verify or internal_service with capability), subject insert bundled into the same transaction.7. SQLite behavior
Composite FK + unique indexes; per-table subject-exclusivity triggers scan the other three tables in the same statement.
8. PostgreSQL behavior
Same constraints; digest function is the service's, invoked before insert;
EXECUTErestricted.9. Concurrency / transaction requirements
Attestation + subject + record created in one transaction; a second record for the same attestation or a second subject fails on the unique/exclusivity checks.
10. Structured results
EVIDENCE_RECORDED,EVIDENCE_COMPOSITE_MISMATCH,SUBJECT_KIND_MISMATCH,SUBJECT_DIGEST_MISMATCH,ATTESTATION_REUSE,RECORD_EVIDENCE_UNAUTHORIZED.11. Enforcement classification
Composite FK, single-use, subject exclusivity, digest hex-shape, immutability
[SCHEMA]; digest computation[TRUSTED-SERVICE]; issuer signature[RUNTIME-ADAPTER](deferred).12. Acceptance criteria
SUBJECT_DIGEST_MISMATCH.record_evidencelimited to supervisor.verify or capable internal service.13. Named tests
t_evid_store_mismatch(−),t_attestation_reuse(−),t_conflicting_attestation(−),t_two_subjects(−),t_wrong_subject_kind(−),t_subject_digest_mismatch(−),t_bad_digest(−),t_attestation_immutable(raw-bypass),t_record_evidence_unauth(−).14. Audit events / evidence
evidence_recorded,evidence_subject_bound. Test output is evidence.15. Dependencies / parent
Parents #820, #821; depends #822; consumes
store_config_generationsfrom the issuer-proof issue.16. Definition of done
Executable on SQLite (PostgreSQL parity via #8 issue); ACs pass incl. raw-bypass; bounded PR; no self-review/merge.
17. Known limitations / deferred
Remote signature verification and store-generation lifecycle → issuer-proof issue. Digest-function conformance vector required in readiness checks.