feat: verify linked-issue consistency for the selected PR (Closes #314) #360
Labels
Clear labels
allocator
anti-stomp
architecture
bug
chore
codex
concurrency
contamination
control-plane
dashboard
database
design
documentation
enhancement
gitea
glitchtip
important
incident
incident-bridge
integration
jenkins
labels
leases
mcp
mcp-health
mcp-menu
multi-project
mutating
nice-to-have
observability
portability
preflight
protected-branch
queue
read-only
reconnect
recovery
refactor
release
reliability
resumable-review
reviewer
roadmap
safety
security
self-hosted
sentry
stale-runtime
status:blocked
status:in-progress
status:pr-open
status:ready
terminal-lock
testing
tracker
type:bug
type:feature
type:feature
type:guardrail
visibility
workflow
workflow-hardening
workflow-hardening
Controller-owned work allocator
Prevent concurrent LLM session stomping
Architecture / structural design
OpenAI Codex client / workflow session surface
Concurrent session safety
Workflow or session contamination incident
MCP control-plane coordination and allocation authority
MCP operational dashboard/queue view
Internal coordination storage (SQLite/Postgres)
Design / investigation, no implementation
Docs / runbooks
New feature or improvement
Gitea MCP workflow
GlitchTip integration
Operational or process incident requiring durable audit trail
Sentry-to-Gitea incident bridging
Integration testing
Jenkins integration
Label taxonomy management
Lease adopt/release/expire lifecycle
MCP server / tooling
MCP namespace and runtime health
MCP menu surface
Work spanning multiple monitoring projects or Gitea repos
Mutating action; requires gating
Observability, metrics, traces, error reporting
Cross-platform / portability
Shared preflight gates before mutation
Protected branch / stable-branch policy concern
Work queue visibility and allocation
Read-only, no mutation
MCP client reconnect/reload recovery path
Recovery paths for stale/foreign leases
Code refactor / restructure
Release / versioning
Reliability / failure handling
Persist and resume prepared review verdicts across sessions
Reviewer workflow tooling
Roadmap / umbrella issue
Safety rails and fail-closed mutation guards
Security / trust boundary
Self-hosted infrastructure integration
Sentry error monitoring integration
Stale backend daemon / runtime-vs-master parity failures
Issue is blocked
Issue is being worked on
Issue has an open pull request
Issue is ready for work
Terminal review lock (#332) path
Tests / test coverage
Issue tracker hygiene / meta
Bug or defect
Feature or enhancement
Feature or enhancement
Safety gate or guardrail
Workflow state visibility for LLMs/operators
Cross-tool workflow
LLM workflow coordination hardening
LLM workflow coordination hardening
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools#360
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Summary
Implements #314: reviewer reports must verify linked issue consistency for the selected PR.
Adds
assess_linked_issue_consistency(report_text, *, selected_pr=None, linked_issues=None)toreview_proofs.py:linked_issuescarries the issue numbers the selected PR was live-verified to link this session. When it isNone(no live verification), any populatedLinked issue statusclaim fails; the only passing wording isLinked issue status: not verified in this session(required behavior #3 of the issue).Linked issue statusfield must name every linked issue; a missing linked issue fails, and any issue number in the field outside the verified set fails.Issue #Nmention anywhere in the report that is not a live-verified linked issue fails as stale leakage (the PR #280 report mentioning Issue #260 instead of Issue #275, the incident that filed this issue).PR #Nmentions are not confused with issue mentions.Linked issue statusfield fails closed. Returns{complete, downgraded, reasons}matching sibling verifiers.Tests
tests/test_linked_issue_consistency.py: 9 tests covering correct linked issue, stale previous issue in the status field, stale issue in read-only diagnostics, missing live proof, passing unverified wording, missing field, multiple linked issues (all reported / one missing), and PR-number mentions (acceptance criteria of #314).1161 passed, 6 skipped, 20 subtests passed, 1 failed— the failuretests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py::TestIssueLockArtifactWarning::test_lock_success_includes_artifact_warningis pre-existing on cleanmasterbaseline (stale mock missing newer base-equivalence lock-gate fields), not introduced by this branch.Closes #314
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
All tests pass successfully. Reviewed the implementation of
assess_linked_issue_consistencyinreview_proofs.pyand the test coverage intests/test_linked_issue_consistency.py. It correctly verifies that the linked issue status field matches the selected PR and that no stale issue numbers leak into the final report. Verified that the test failures are pre-existing on master.