Compare commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
6a636c58e7 | ||
|
|
d2fe0110a0 | ||
|
|
f1e4809930 | ||
|
|
dc1d0e045f | ||
|
|
badc4e636b | ||
|
|
243f52dc79 |
+13
-85
@@ -163,7 +163,19 @@ _TERMINAL_OWNERSHIP_STATUSES = frozenset(
|
||||
{"released", "abandoned", "done", "blocked", "terminal", "closed"}
|
||||
)
|
||||
_EXPIRED_STATUSES = frozenset({"expired"})
|
||||
_STALE_STATUSES = frozenset({"stale", "stale_dead_process", "stale_missing_worktree"})
|
||||
_STALE_STATUSES = frozenset(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stale",
|
||||
"stale_dead_process",
|
||||
"stale_missing_worktree",
|
||||
# #790 Slice A heartbeat-lifecycle bands. Listed here so they are
|
||||
# *classified* rather than falling through to the unknown-status branch;
|
||||
# they still block unless the ownership record proves
|
||||
# ``reclaim_allowed is True``, so the O2 fail-closed rule is unchanged.
|
||||
"stale_missed_heartbeat",
|
||||
"stale_absolute_cap",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _norm_str(value: Any) -> str:
|
||||
@@ -525,90 +537,6 @@ def assess_ownership_record_activity(record: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Reviewer-lease reclaim is only reachable from a non-live (expired/stale) lease.
|
||||
_RECLAIMABLE_REVIEWER_STATUSES = _EXPIRED_STATUSES | _STALE_STATUSES
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def is_active_ownership_status(status: str | None) -> bool:
|
||||
"""True when *status* denotes live/active ownership of a branch (#855).
|
||||
|
||||
Used to decide whether a *competing* active claimant still uses a branch
|
||||
when weighing an expired reviewer lease for reclaim. Expired, stale,
|
||||
released, and terminal statuses are not active.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
return _norm_str(status).lower() in _ACTIVE_OWNERSHIP_STATUSES
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess_expired_reviewer_lease_reclaim(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
role: str,
|
||||
status: str,
|
||||
pr_merged: bool | None,
|
||||
owner_pid_alive: bool | None,
|
||||
competing_active_claimant: bool | None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Decide, explicitly and fail-closed, whether an expired reviewer lease
|
||||
may stop protecting an already-merged branch (#855 AC4).
|
||||
|
||||
An expired reviewer lease should not protect a merged branch forever once
|
||||
its work is done and no live claimant remains. Reclaim is permitted only
|
||||
when **every** condition below is provably satisfied; any unknown
|
||||
(``None``) or contrary value keeps the lease protective:
|
||||
|
||||
- the lease is a ``reviewer`` lease (author/merger/controller/reconciler
|
||||
leases are out of scope and always keep protecting);
|
||||
- its status is expired or stale (never an active/live lease);
|
||||
- the PR is proven merged (``pr_merged is True``);
|
||||
- the lease owner process is proven dead (``owner_pid_alive is False``);
|
||||
- no competing active claimant uses the branch
|
||||
(``competing_active_claimant is False``).
|
||||
|
||||
Returns a decision dict with ``reclaim_allowed`` and, when refused, the
|
||||
fail-closed ``reasons``. The reasons never contain secrets — only the
|
||||
role, the status, and which condition was unproven.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
normalized_role = _norm_str(role).lower()
|
||||
normalized_status = _norm_str(status).lower()
|
||||
|
||||
if normalized_role != "reviewer":
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lease role '{normalized_role or 'unknown'}' is not a reviewer "
|
||||
"lease; expired-reviewer reclaim does not apply"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if normalized_status not in _RECLAIMABLE_REVIEWER_STATUSES:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lease status '{normalized_status or 'unknown'}' is not expired "
|
||||
"or stale; only a non-live reviewer lease may be reclaimed"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if pr_merged is not True:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"PR merged state is not proven true; reclaim requires an "
|
||||
"already-merged PR (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if owner_pid_alive is not False:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"lease owner process liveness is not proven dead; a live owner "
|
||||
"still protects the branch (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if competing_active_claimant is not False:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"a competing active claimant may still use the branch; reclaim "
|
||||
"requires no other active ownership (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
allowed = not reasons
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"reclaim_allowed": allowed,
|
||||
"role": normalized_role,
|
||||
"status": normalized_status,
|
||||
"decision": (
|
||||
"reclaim_expired_reviewer_lease" if allowed else "keep_protecting"
|
||||
),
|
||||
"reasons": [] if allowed else reasons,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess_active_branch_ownership(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
remote: str,
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1,223 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# ADR: MCP restart governance and authorization policy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Status:** Accepted (policy effective immediately for LLM and operator sessions; enforcement tooling may lag)
|
||||
- **Date:** 2026-07-23
|
||||
- **Tracking issue:** [#656](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/656)
|
||||
- **Policy version:** `restart-governance/v1`
|
||||
- **Related:**
|
||||
- Umbrella: [#655](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/655) — governed MCP restart coordination and zero-disruption recovery
|
||||
- Vision: [#652](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/652) — MCP Control Plane Web Console product vision (§A system health and process control)
|
||||
- Roadmap: [#653](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/653) — Control Plane Web Console phased delivery (Phase 2 restart controls)
|
||||
- Contamination guard: [#630](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/630) — blocks manual process-kill recovery
|
||||
- Console restart UX: [#642](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/642) — sanctioned restart and graceful reload
|
||||
- Existing restart / reconnect paths to inventory: [#591](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/591) — auto-restart on master advance (closed); [#584](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/584) — host auto-reconnect on transport flap
|
||||
- Stable-control runtime split: `docs/architecture/mcp-stable-control-runtime-policy-adr.md` (#615)
|
||||
- Client-namespace health: `docs/mcp-namespace-health.md` (#543)
|
||||
- Reconnect-only EOF recovery: `docs/mcp-namespace-eof-recovery.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Context
|
||||
|
||||
The Gitea MCP server is the **control plane** for real issue and PR mutations
|
||||
(create, comment, lock, review, merge, reconcile). The same process serves every
|
||||
role namespace (`gitea-author`, `gitea-reviewer`, `gitea-merger`,
|
||||
`gitea-reconciler`, `gitea-controller`) and holds the in-memory capability-gate
|
||||
code loaded at startup.
|
||||
|
||||
Restarting that process is destructive to concurrent work:
|
||||
|
||||
- It resets every session's identity, preflight, and capability-lease binding.
|
||||
- It can interrupt a mutation mid-critical-section (a lock acquire, a review
|
||||
submit, a merge), leaving durable state half-written.
|
||||
- Relaunching from the wrong checkout or worktree silently changes which code
|
||||
the control plane runs, defeating master-parity gates (#420 / #615).
|
||||
|
||||
Today there is **no durable written policy** stating who may restart MCP, under
|
||||
what conditions, that restart is a last resort, and how controller approval,
|
||||
automated safety gates, and break-glass interact. Operators and LLM sessions
|
||||
therefore invent restart behavior ad hoc, which makes concurrent multi-role work
|
||||
unsafe. #630 and #642 need this policy as their backbone.
|
||||
|
||||
This ADR defines that policy. It does **not** implement coordinator code or HA
|
||||
multi-instance restart (those are later children of #655).
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Decision
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 v1 decision (recorded)
|
||||
|
||||
**Restart authority in v1 is `controller approval + automated safety gates`.**
|
||||
|
||||
A restart of the stable control runtime is authorized only when **both** hold:
|
||||
|
||||
1. A **controller** role explicitly approves the restart, recording an audit
|
||||
entry (who, why, scope, affected sessions), **and**
|
||||
2. The **automated safety gates** pass: a completed drain acknowledgement (no
|
||||
affected session is mid-critical-section) or a declared break-glass incident
|
||||
(§2.5).
|
||||
|
||||
Quorum among multiple controllers is **not** required day-one. It is deferred
|
||||
unless a later investigation (tracked under #653) proves single-controller
|
||||
approval is insufficient. This ADR records the v1 decision so enforcement code
|
||||
(#630) has a fixed target; changing it requires a superseding ADR.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 Restart is a last resort — the recovery ladder
|
||||
|
||||
Restart is the **last** rung. Before any restart, exhaust the narrower
|
||||
recoveries, in order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Reconnect** the IDE/client MCP namespace (transport EOF, `client is
|
||||
closing: EOF`, transient `#584` flap). No process change. See
|
||||
`docs/mcp-namespace-eof-recovery.md`.
|
||||
2. **Refresh / rebind** the session workspace: re-run `gitea_whoami`,
|
||||
`gitea_resolve_task_capability`, and pass an explicit validated
|
||||
`worktree_path`. Fixes stale session context without touching the process.
|
||||
3. **Scoped restart** of a single misbehaving namespace/service (where the
|
||||
deployment supports per-service restart) rather than the whole control plane.
|
||||
4. **Full restart** of the stable control runtime process — operator-owned,
|
||||
controller-approved, drained.
|
||||
5. **Host / infrastructure restart** — the broadest action; same authorization
|
||||
as a full restart plus infrastructure ownership.
|
||||
|
||||
A session **must** try rungs 1–2 and record why they were insufficient before
|
||||
requesting a restart at rung 3 or above. Skipping straight to restart is a
|
||||
policy violation.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.3 Authorization matrix
|
||||
|
||||
| Role | Reconnect (1) | Refresh/rebind (2) | Scoped restart (3) | Full restart (4) | Host restart (5) |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **author** | self | self | request only | **forbidden** | forbidden |
|
||||
| **reviewer** | self | self | request only | **forbidden** | forbidden |
|
||||
| **merger** | self | self | request only | **forbidden** | forbidden |
|
||||
| **reconciler** | self | self | request only | **forbidden** | forbidden |
|
||||
| **controller** | self | self | **approve** (+gates) | **approve** (+gates) | request to operator |
|
||||
| **operator** | self | self | execute (controller-approved) | execute (controller-approved) | execute (controller-approved) |
|
||||
| **admin** | self | self | execute | execute | execute (break-glass) |
|
||||
|
||||
Legend: *self* = may perform for its own client session; *request only* = may
|
||||
raise a restart request but not authorize or execute it; *approve* = may
|
||||
authorize under §2.1 gates; *execute* = may perform the process action after the
|
||||
authorization is recorded.
|
||||
|
||||
Key invariants:
|
||||
|
||||
- **No LLM worker role (author/reviewer/merger/reconciler) may perform or
|
||||
authorize a full or host restart.** They may only reconnect/rebind their own
|
||||
client and file a restart request.
|
||||
- **Controller approval authorizes; operator/admin executes.** The approving
|
||||
controller and the executing operator may be the same human, but both the
|
||||
approval and the execution are audited.
|
||||
- Privileged process actions (full restart, host restart) are reserved to
|
||||
**operator/admin**, never to an automated worker.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.4 Approved conditions
|
||||
|
||||
A restart at rung 3+ is approved only under one of these recorded conditions:
|
||||
|
||||
- **No affected sessions:** the control plane has no live session that would be
|
||||
interrupted (verified, not assumed).
|
||||
- **Full drain acknowledged:** every affected session has drained
|
||||
(no open critical section — no held mutation lease mid-write) and the drain is
|
||||
acknowledged in the audit record.
|
||||
- **Controller + gates:** controller approval plus passing automated safety
|
||||
gates (§2.1), the standard v1 path.
|
||||
- **Quorum:** not required in v1; reserved for a future superseding ADR.
|
||||
- **Break-glass:** an incident-backed emergency exception (§2.5).
|
||||
|
||||
Restart **never** bypasses mutation gates mid-critical-section. Drain before
|
||||
restart is mandatory except under break-glass with a declared incident.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.5 Break-glass
|
||||
|
||||
Break-glass is a **separate, narrower** authorization path for emergencies where
|
||||
the normal drain-and-approve path cannot complete (e.g. the control plane is
|
||||
wedged and cannot drain).
|
||||
|
||||
Break-glass conditions:
|
||||
|
||||
- A declared incident record exists (id, timestamp, declarer) **before** the
|
||||
action.
|
||||
- The action is taken by **operator or admin** authority only — never by an LLM
|
||||
worker role, and never unilaterally by an operator with active peers when a
|
||||
controller is reachable.
|
||||
- The scope is the minimum necessary rung of the ladder.
|
||||
- A **mandatory post-hoc audit** entry is filed: what was restarted, why the
|
||||
normal path was impossible, which sessions were affected, and the incident id.
|
||||
|
||||
Break-glass suspends the drain requirement, not the audit requirement.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.6 Explicit prohibitions
|
||||
|
||||
- **A unilateral LLM or operator full restart while active peer sessions
|
||||
exist is forbidden.** An LLM worker role must not kill, restart, or relaunch
|
||||
the MCP process; a lone operator must not full-restart over live peer work
|
||||
without controller approval or a break-glass incident.
|
||||
- Process-kill recovery is forbidden as a routine tool (#630). This ADR does not
|
||||
introduce a kill path.
|
||||
- Ambiguous policy state **denies** restart (§4).
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Security requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- Full restart and host restart are **privileged**; only operator/admin execute
|
||||
them, only after a controller approval or break-glass incident is recorded.
|
||||
- Break-glass is a distinct authorization path with its own audit mandate; it is
|
||||
never the default and never silent.
|
||||
- **Every approval and every restart action is audited** (who approved, who
|
||||
executed, scope, affected sessions, condition, policy version). No restart is
|
||||
authorized without a durable audit entry.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Failure behavior
|
||||
|
||||
**Ambiguous policy → deny restart.** If it cannot be established that a
|
||||
restart is authorized under §2 — unknown affected-session state, missing
|
||||
controller approval, absent break-glass incident, or an unclassifiable request —
|
||||
the safe action is to **refuse** the restart and stop with a recovery report,
|
||||
never to restart on assumption.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Policy IDs (for enforcement code)
|
||||
|
||||
Enforcement code — the restart coordinator (a later child of #655), the #630
|
||||
contamination guard, and the #642 console restart UX — binds to these stable
|
||||
policy identifiers rather than to prose:
|
||||
|
||||
| Policy ID | Statement |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| `RG-01` | Restart is last resort; rungs 1–2 must be tried and recorded first (§2.2). |
|
||||
| `RG-02` | v1 authority = controller approval + automated safety gates (§2.1). |
|
||||
| `RG-03` | No LLM worker role performs or authorizes full/host restart (§2.3). |
|
||||
| `RG-04` | Full/host restart executed by operator/admin only, post approval (§2.3). |
|
||||
| `RG-05` | Drain before restart is mandatory except break-glass with incident (§2.4). |
|
||||
| `RG-06` | Break-glass requires a pre-declared incident and post-hoc audit (§2.5). |
|
||||
| `RG-07` | Unilateral LLM/operator full restart with active peers is forbidden (§2.6). |
|
||||
| `RG-08` | Ambiguous policy state denies restart (§4). |
|
||||
|
||||
The `restart-governance/v1` **policy version** field is emitted on future
|
||||
restart audit events so approvals can be reconciled against the policy revision
|
||||
in force.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Dogfooding
|
||||
|
||||
Gitea-Tools governs its own MCP control plane by this policy. Author, reviewer,
|
||||
merger, and reconciler sessions operating on this repository use the recovery
|
||||
ladder (§2.2) — reconnect and rebind, never self-restart — and any real restart
|
||||
of the Gitea-Tools stable control runtime follows the controller-approval +
|
||||
drain path defined here.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Acceptance and cross-links
|
||||
|
||||
This ADR is the authoritative restart-governance policy. It **must** stay
|
||||
cross-linked from the safety model and the web-console deployment boundary:
|
||||
|
||||
- `docs/safety-model.md` § Process restart governance references this ADR.
|
||||
- `docs/webui-deployment.md` references this ADR for restart/reload disposition.
|
||||
|
||||
It is linked to its issue lineage — umbrella **#655**, vision **#652**, roadmap
|
||||
**#653**, contamination guard **#630**, and console restart UX **#642** — in
|
||||
§ Related above.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Non-goals
|
||||
|
||||
- Implementing the restart coordinator or approval state machine (#630, later
|
||||
children of #655).
|
||||
- Implementing HA multi-instance restart or quorum machinery.
|
||||
- Introducing any process-kill or auto-restart tool; existing auto-restart
|
||||
behavior must be inventoried before any new restart tool is enabled.
|
||||
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ that gates each call, not which tools exist.
|
||||
- `gitea_get_profile`
|
||||
- `gitea_get_runtime_context`
|
||||
- `gitea_get_shell_health`
|
||||
- `gitea_heartbeat_issue_lock`
|
||||
- `gitea_heartbeat_reviewer_pr_lease`
|
||||
- `gitea_inspect_workflow_lease`
|
||||
- `gitea_issue_irrecoverable_provenance_authorization`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -46,17 +46,3 @@ If shell helpers are unavailable and MCP commit cannot run, stop with a recovery
|
||||
report (restart session, clear hung terminals, use MCP-native commit). See
|
||||
[`llm-workflow-runbooks.md`](llm-workflow-runbooks.md) § MCP-native commit path
|
||||
(#260) and agent temp artifact cleanup (#261).
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Process restart governance
|
||||
|
||||
Restarting the MCP control-plane process is destructive to concurrent multi-role
|
||||
work and is governed by a dedicated policy. Restart is a **last resort** behind
|
||||
narrower recoveries (reconnect, rebind), full/host restart is reserved to
|
||||
operator/admin under **controller approval + automated safety gates**, a
|
||||
unilateral LLM or operator full restart with active peers is **forbidden**, and
|
||||
ambiguous policy state **denies** restart. Break-glass is a separate,
|
||||
incident-backed path with a mandatory audit.
|
||||
|
||||
See [`architecture/mcp-restart-governance.md`](architecture/mcp-restart-governance.md)
|
||||
(#656) for the authorization matrix, the recovery ladder, break-glass
|
||||
conditions, and the `RG-01`–`RG-08` policy IDs.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -55,15 +55,6 @@ shipped to the browser.
|
||||
assumption paths, and the client-secret policy. Use it to verify an instance is
|
||||
configured for internal-only operation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Process restart / reload disposition
|
||||
|
||||
The console never exposes a restart or reload control; process restart of the
|
||||
MCP control-plane runtime is governed separately. Restart is a last resort behind
|
||||
reconnect/rebind, full restart is operator/admin-only under controller approval
|
||||
plus safety gates, and break-glass is an incident-backed path. See
|
||||
[`architecture/mcp-restart-governance.md`](architecture/mcp-restart-governance.md)
|
||||
(#656).
|
||||
|
||||
## Non-goals (MVP)
|
||||
|
||||
- Full SSO or session login in the UI
|
||||
|
||||
+142
-629
@@ -440,32 +440,13 @@ def _session_author_lock_worktree() -> str | None:
|
||||
|
||||
Used to derive the author mutation workspace when no explicit
|
||||
``worktree_path`` or env binding is provided. Never invents a path.
|
||||
|
||||
#864: a session pointer whose owner PID is dead and is not this process
|
||||
must not force workspace binding for other issues — rebind is required for
|
||||
that issue, and a stale dead-owner pointer must not poison unrelated work.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
lock = issue_lock_store.read_session_issue_lock() or {}
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
path = (lock.get("worktree_path") or "").strip()
|
||||
if not path:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
pid = lock.get("session_pid")
|
||||
if pid is None:
|
||||
pid = lock.get("pid")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
pid_i = int(pid) if pid is not None else None
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
pid_i = None
|
||||
if (
|
||||
pid_i is not None
|
||||
and pid_i != os.getpid()
|
||||
and not issue_lock_store.is_process_alive(pid_i)
|
||||
):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
return path
|
||||
return path or None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _resolve_preflight_workspace_path(worktree_path: str | None = None) -> str:
|
||||
@@ -2039,6 +2020,7 @@ import allocator_dependencies # noqa: E402
|
||||
import dependency_graph # noqa: E402 # #784 durable dependency edges
|
||||
import control_plane_db # noqa: E402
|
||||
import lease_lifecycle # noqa: E402
|
||||
import lease_policy # noqa: E402
|
||||
import workflow_dashboard # noqa: E402 # #605 live queue/lease dashboard
|
||||
import incident_bridge # noqa: E402
|
||||
import sentry_observability # noqa: E402 (#606 optional Sentry observability)
|
||||
@@ -2050,7 +2032,6 @@ import issue_lock_store # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_adoption # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_recovery # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_renewal # noqa: E402
|
||||
import dirty_same_claimant_session_rebind # noqa: E402 # #864
|
||||
import stacked_pr_support # noqa: E402
|
||||
import merge_approval_gate # noqa: E402
|
||||
import review_quarantine # noqa: E402 # #695 contaminated formal-review quarantine
|
||||
@@ -2282,7 +2263,6 @@ import canonical_comment_validator as ccv # noqa: E402
|
||||
# GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR, bound to the current MCP session via a per-PID pointer.
|
||||
# Legacy global path retained only for test/doc references — do not seed manually.
|
||||
ISSUE_LOCK_FILE = "/tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json"
|
||||
WORK_LEASE_TTL_HOURS = 4
|
||||
AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE = "author_issue_work"
|
||||
VALID_WORK_LEASE_OPERATIONS = frozenset({
|
||||
AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
@@ -2445,20 +2425,6 @@ def _evaluate_issue_lock_recovery(
|
||||
descendant_sha=local_head,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# #871: the inverse of the #768 descendant relation — the *remote* head may
|
||||
# have advanced past the local/recorded head via a sanctioned merge-based
|
||||
# branch sync (``gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge``) while the local worktree
|
||||
# stayed put. Observe that provenance server-side so the assessor can prove
|
||||
# it and nothing else. Probed only when the heads differ; never from any
|
||||
# caller-supplied value.
|
||||
sync_provenance: dict | None = None
|
||||
if remote_head and local_head and remote_head != local_head:
|
||||
sync_provenance = issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance(
|
||||
worktree_path,
|
||||
prior_head_sha=local_head,
|
||||
synced_head_sha=remote_head,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# #772: with no remote branch there is no head to measure against, so the
|
||||
# base the branch was cut from is observed instead. Probed only in that
|
||||
# case, so the published path's evidence is untouched (#772 AC8).
|
||||
@@ -2501,7 +2467,6 @@ def _evaluate_issue_lock_recovery(
|
||||
remote_branch_exists=remote_branch_exists,
|
||||
recorded_base_sha=recorded_base,
|
||||
base_ancestry=base_ancestry,
|
||||
sync_provenance=sync_provenance,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2597,7 +2562,12 @@ def _build_author_issue_work_lease(
|
||||
host: str | None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
created = _work_lease_now()
|
||||
expires = created + timedelta(hours=WORK_LEASE_TTL_HOURS)
|
||||
# #790 Slice A: the window comes from the central policy, not a literal here.
|
||||
# It is also now a *sliding* window — the lease lives ``initial_ttl_minutes``
|
||||
# past its last valid heartbeat rather than a fixed four hours past its
|
||||
# creation, so an abandoned task stops holding the claim within one TTL.
|
||||
policy = lease_policy.policy_for(lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
expires = created + timedelta(minutes=policy.initial_ttl_minutes)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"operation_type": AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
"issue_number": issue_number,
|
||||
@@ -2608,6 +2578,15 @@ def _build_author_issue_work_lease(
|
||||
"created_at": _work_lease_timestamp(created),
|
||||
"expires_at": _work_lease_timestamp(expires),
|
||||
"last_heartbeat_at": _work_lease_timestamp(created),
|
||||
# #790 AC-N1: the ownership key for this task. Distinct from the recorded
|
||||
# PID, which is the shared daemon and identifies no individual task.
|
||||
"task_session_id": issue_lock_store.mint_task_session_id(
|
||||
AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE
|
||||
),
|
||||
# #790 AC-N8: the explicit lifecycle marker. Its absence — never a
|
||||
# timestamp comparison — is what makes a lock legacy.
|
||||
"lifecycle_version": lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1,
|
||||
"heartbeat_count": 1,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4378,260 +4357,135 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@mcp.tool()
|
||||
def gitea_rebind_dirty_same_claimant_author_session(
|
||||
def gitea_heartbeat_issue_lock(
|
||||
issue_number: int,
|
||||
branch_name: str,
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
old_pid: int,
|
||||
expected_local_head: str,
|
||||
expected_remote_head: str,
|
||||
expected_dirty_paths: list[str],
|
||||
expected_fingerprints: dict,
|
||||
task_session_id: str | None = None,
|
||||
remote: str = "dadeschools",
|
||||
host: str | None = None,
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
dry_run: bool = False,
|
||||
authorize_reconciler_execute: bool = False,
|
||||
worktree_path: str | None = None,
|
||||
expected_generation: int | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Rebind a dirty registered issue worktree to this session (#864).
|
||||
"""Prove an owned author issue lease is still active (#790 Slice A).
|
||||
|
||||
Sanctioned only when every pin agrees: same claimant, dead old_pid matching
|
||||
the durable lock, matching local/remote heads, exact dirty path set, and
|
||||
per-path sha256 fingerprints. Preserves every tracked/untracked byte.
|
||||
Does not sync remote, create recovery worktrees, clean, reset, or move heads.
|
||||
The task-liveness signal the lifecycle was missing. Before this, an author
|
||||
lease carried a fixed four-hour expiry that nothing could shorten, and the
|
||||
only liveness evidence was the recorded PID — the long-lived MCP daemon,
|
||||
which stays alive across every task it serves and so proved nothing about
|
||||
whether the authoring task still held the work.
|
||||
|
||||
Role gate:
|
||||
* author — must match the lock claimant identity/profile
|
||||
* reconciler — execute only when ``authorize_reconciler_execute=True``
|
||||
* reviewer/merger — always refuse
|
||||
Each successful call slides the lease ``initial_ttl_minutes`` past *now*
|
||||
from the central policy, so an actively heartbeating session is never
|
||||
evicted while an abandoned one releases its claim within one TTL.
|
||||
|
||||
``gitea.issue.comment`` (author map entry) is required for mutation; dry_run
|
||||
still assesses fully but writes nothing. Permission alone is never ownership
|
||||
proof — every pin is re-checked server-side.
|
||||
What this tool cannot do, by construction:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Acquire.** It refuses when no durable lock exists.
|
||||
* **Take over.** Exact issue, branch, realpath-normalized worktree,
|
||||
claimant username, claimant profile, and recorded task-session identifier
|
||||
must all match; a superseded session holding an older identifier is
|
||||
refused.
|
||||
* **Revive.** A lease already past its grace is not heartbeatable — that
|
||||
would let a session restore ownership it had stopped proving. It must use
|
||||
the sanctioned reclaim path, which mints a new generation.
|
||||
|
||||
A lock predating the heartbeat lifecycle is rebound rather than heartbeated:
|
||||
its exact owner is re-verified and a genuine task-session identifier and
|
||||
first heartbeat are minted (#790 AC-N8). The rebind is decided server-side
|
||||
from the durable lifecycle marker; there is no caller-facing switch.
|
||||
|
||||
Args:
|
||||
issue_number: Tracking issue number on the durable lock.
|
||||
branch_name: Exact locked branch name.
|
||||
worktree_path: Registered dirty worktree path (must be under branches/).
|
||||
old_pid: Dead owner PID recorded on the lock (must match session_pid/pid).
|
||||
expected_local_head: Full local HEAD sha the caller observed.
|
||||
expected_remote_head: Full remote-tracking HEAD sha the caller observed.
|
||||
expected_dirty_paths: Exact set of dirty relative paths (tracked+untracked).
|
||||
expected_fingerprints: Map of relative path -> sha256 hex of file bytes.
|
||||
issue_number: The locked issue number.
|
||||
branch_name: The branch recorded on the lock.
|
||||
task_session_id: The identifier this session received when it acquired
|
||||
or rebound the lock. It is a fencing token, not an ownership
|
||||
assertion: it is compared against durable state and can only ever
|
||||
cause a refusal, never grant anything. Omitted only when rebinding a
|
||||
legacy lock, which has no identifier yet and mints one.
|
||||
remote: Known instance — 'dadeschools' or 'prgs'.
|
||||
host/org/repo: Optional target overrides (validated against binding).
|
||||
dry_run: When true, assess only (no lock/session writes).
|
||||
authorize_reconciler_execute: Reconciler-only execute gate.
|
||||
host: Override the Gitea host.
|
||||
org: Override the owner/organization.
|
||||
repo: Override the repository name.
|
||||
worktree_path: Author worktree recorded on the lock.
|
||||
expected_generation: Optional fencing value. The per-issue flock already
|
||||
serializes the read and the write, so this is for a caller that
|
||||
wants to pin the generation it last observed across calls; a moved
|
||||
generation fails closed.
|
||||
|
||||
Returns:
|
||||
dict with 'success', 'performed', the sliding 'expires_at',
|
||||
'last_heartbeat_at', 'lock_generation', 'task_session_id', the applied
|
||||
'policy', and post-write 'freshness'; on refusal 'success'/'performed'
|
||||
False with 'reasons' naming exactly what did not match.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
role = _profile_role_kind(get_profile())
|
||||
role_norm = (role or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
|
||||
# Permission: authors need comment; dry_run assess is reachable under read
|
||||
# for diagnosis, but execute always needs comment. Reconciler execute also
|
||||
# needs comment when authorized.
|
||||
if dry_run:
|
||||
read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
|
||||
if read_block:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"dry_run": True,
|
||||
"reasons": read_block,
|
||||
"permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
else:
|
||||
blocked = _profile_permission_block(
|
||||
task_capability_map.required_permission(
|
||||
"rebind_dirty_same_claimant_author_session"
|
||||
),
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
host=host,
|
||||
org=org,
|
||||
repo=repo,
|
||||
org_explicit=org is not None,
|
||||
repo_explicit=repo is not None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if blocked:
|
||||
return blocked
|
||||
|
||||
if role_norm in {"reviewer", "merger"}:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"dry_run": bool(dry_run),
|
||||
"outcome": dirty_same_claimant_session_rebind.REFUSED,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"role '{role_norm}' cannot rebind dirty same-claimant author "
|
||||
"sessions (fail closed)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
if role_norm == "reconciler" and not authorize_reconciler_execute and not dry_run:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"dry_run": False,
|
||||
"outcome": dirty_same_claimant_session_rebind.REFUSED,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"reconciler role requires authorize_reconciler_execute=True "
|
||||
"to execute dirty same-claimant rebind (fail closed)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
blocked = _profile_permission_block(
|
||||
task_capability_map.required_permission("heartbeat_issue_lock"),
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
host=host,
|
||||
org=org,
|
||||
repo=repo,
|
||||
org_explicit=org is not None,
|
||||
repo_explicit=repo is not None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if blocked:
|
||||
return blocked
|
||||
|
||||
resolved_worktree = issue_lock_worktree.resolve_author_worktree_path(
|
||||
worktree_path, _canonical_local_git_root()
|
||||
)
|
||||
h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
identity = _authenticated_username(h)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
identity = None
|
||||
profile = get_profile()
|
||||
profile_name = profile.get("profile_name")
|
||||
claimant = _work_lease_claimant(h)
|
||||
identity = claimant.get("username")
|
||||
profile = claimant.get("profile")
|
||||
|
||||
existing = _load_existing_issue_lock(
|
||||
remote=remote, org=o, repo=r, issue_number=issue_number
|
||||
)
|
||||
resolved_wt = os.path.realpath(os.path.abspath((worktree_path or "").strip()))
|
||||
inv = dirty_same_claimant_session_rebind.collect_dirty_inventory(resolved_wt)
|
||||
if not existing:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"issue_number": issue_number,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"no durable lock for issue #{issue_number}; heartbeat cannot "
|
||||
"acquire a claim (fail closed)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
branch_res = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", resolved_wt, "branch", "--show-current"],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
current_branch = (branch_res.stdout or "").strip() or None
|
||||
head_res = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", resolved_wt, "rev-parse", "HEAD"],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
local_head = (head_res.stdout or "").strip() if head_res.returncode == 0 else None
|
||||
|
||||
# Observe remote-tracking head without network when possible.
|
||||
remote_head = None
|
||||
for ref in (
|
||||
f"refs/remotes/origin/{branch_name}",
|
||||
f"origin/{branch_name}",
|
||||
f"refs/remotes/{remote}/{branch_name}",
|
||||
f"{remote}/{branch_name}",
|
||||
):
|
||||
rh = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", resolved_wt, "rev-parse", "--verify", "--quiet", ref],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
check=False,
|
||||
if issue_lock_store.is_legacy_lease(existing):
|
||||
# AC-N8 exit route one: canonical exact-owner rebinding. The other exit
|
||||
# is terminal retirement, which is Slice B.
|
||||
outcome = issue_lock_store.rebind_legacy_lock(
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=branch_name,
|
||||
worktree_path=resolved_worktree,
|
||||
identity=identity,
|
||||
profile=profile,
|
||||
expected_generation=expected_generation,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if rh.returncode == 0 and (rh.stdout or "").strip():
|
||||
remote_head = (rh.stdout or "").strip()
|
||||
break
|
||||
if remote_head is None:
|
||||
# Fall back to caller's pin only for observation absence — assessment
|
||||
# still requires pin==observed, so missing observation fails closed.
|
||||
remote_head = None
|
||||
outcome["operation"] = "legacy_rebind"
|
||||
return outcome
|
||||
|
||||
# Competing live locks (other issues / other worktrees).
|
||||
competing_live = []
|
||||
for entry in issue_lock_store.list_live_locks():
|
||||
competing_live.append(entry)
|
||||
|
||||
# Session pointers that claim this issue lock.
|
||||
competing_sessions = []
|
||||
lock_dir = issue_lock_store.default_lock_dir()
|
||||
lock_path = issue_lock_store.lock_file_path(
|
||||
remote=remote, org=o, repo=r, issue_number=issue_number, lock_dir=lock_dir
|
||||
)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
for name in os.listdir(lock_dir):
|
||||
if not name.startswith("session-") or not name.endswith(".json"):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
ptr = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(os.path.join(lock_dir, name))
|
||||
if not ptr:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
ptr_lock = str(ptr.get("lock_file_path") or "").strip()
|
||||
if not ptr_lock:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
try:
|
||||
same = os.path.realpath(ptr_lock) == os.path.realpath(lock_path)
|
||||
except OSError:
|
||||
same = ptr_lock == lock_path
|
||||
if not same:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
try:
|
||||
sess_pid = int(str(name)[len("session-") : -len(".json")])
|
||||
except ValueError:
|
||||
sess_pid = ptr.get("pid")
|
||||
competing_sessions.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pid": sess_pid,
|
||||
"lock_file_path": ptr_lock,
|
||||
"live": issue_lock_store.is_process_alive(sess_pid),
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
except OSError:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
# Best-effort workflow-lease scan: any live lock file whose work_lease is a
|
||||
# non-author workflow lease on this issue/branch counts as active.
|
||||
workflow_lease_active = False
|
||||
for path in issue_lock_store.iter_lock_files(lock_dir):
|
||||
rec = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(path)
|
||||
if not rec:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
lease = rec.get("work_lease") if isinstance(rec.get("work_lease"), dict) else {}
|
||||
op = str(lease.get("operation_type") or "")
|
||||
if op and op != issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE:
|
||||
if rec.get("issue_number") == issue_number or str(
|
||||
rec.get("branch_name") or ""
|
||||
) == branch_name:
|
||||
if issue_lock_store.is_lease_live(rec):
|
||||
workflow_lease_active = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
repo_root = _canonical_local_git_root()
|
||||
# permission_allowed reflects profile gate only — never ownership proof.
|
||||
permission_allowed = True
|
||||
|
||||
result = dirty_same_claimant_session_rebind.apply_dirty_same_claimant_session_rebind(
|
||||
outcome = issue_lock_store.heartbeat_session_lock(
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=branch_name,
|
||||
worktree_path=resolved_wt,
|
||||
claimant_identity=identity,
|
||||
claimant_profile=profile_name,
|
||||
old_pid=old_pid,
|
||||
expected_local_head=expected_local_head,
|
||||
expected_remote_head=expected_remote_head,
|
||||
expected_dirty_paths=list(expected_dirty_paths or []),
|
||||
expected_fingerprints=dict(expected_fingerprints or {}),
|
||||
existing_lock=existing,
|
||||
current_identity=identity,
|
||||
current_profile=profile_name,
|
||||
role_kind=role_norm or role,
|
||||
current_pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
current_branch=current_branch,
|
||||
local_head=local_head,
|
||||
remote_head=remote_head,
|
||||
dirty_inventory=inv,
|
||||
competing_live_locks=competing_live,
|
||||
competing_sessions=competing_sessions,
|
||||
workflow_lease_active=workflow_lease_active,
|
||||
authorize_reconciler_execute=bool(authorize_reconciler_execute),
|
||||
permission_allowed=permission_allowed,
|
||||
repo_root=repo_root,
|
||||
dry_run=bool(dry_run),
|
||||
lock_dir=lock_dir,
|
||||
worktree_path=resolved_worktree,
|
||||
identity=identity,
|
||||
profile=profile,
|
||||
task_session_id=str(task_session_id or ""),
|
||||
expected_generation=expected_generation,
|
||||
)
|
||||
result["observed"] = {
|
||||
"local_head": local_head,
|
||||
"remote_head": remote_head,
|
||||
"current_branch": current_branch,
|
||||
"dirty_paths": inv.get("dirty_paths"),
|
||||
"fingerprints": inv.get("fingerprints"),
|
||||
"identity": identity,
|
||||
"profile": profile_name,
|
||||
"role_kind": role_norm,
|
||||
}
|
||||
return result
|
||||
outcome["operation"] = "heartbeat"
|
||||
return outcome
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@mcp.tool()
|
||||
@@ -11131,9 +10985,6 @@ def _collect_branch_ownership_records(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
records: list[dict] = []
|
||||
inventory_error = False
|
||||
# #855 AC4: expired/stale reviewer-lease records eligible for an explicit
|
||||
# reclaim decision, evaluated after the full ownership inventory is built.
|
||||
reviewer_reclaim_candidates: list[tuple[dict, bool | None]] = []
|
||||
target_branch = (branch or "").strip()
|
||||
if not target_branch:
|
||||
return {"records": records, "inventory_error": False}
|
||||
@@ -11282,28 +11133,15 @@ def _collect_branch_ownership_records(
|
||||
else:
|
||||
status = freshness_status
|
||||
reclaim_allowed = False
|
||||
rec = _base_rec(
|
||||
category=category,
|
||||
status=status,
|
||||
reclaim_allowed=reclaim_allowed,
|
||||
role=role,
|
||||
host=lease_host or host_n or host,
|
||||
records.append(
|
||||
_base_rec(
|
||||
category=category,
|
||||
status=status,
|
||||
reclaim_allowed=reclaim_allowed,
|
||||
role=role,
|
||||
host=lease_host or host_n or host,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
records.append(rec)
|
||||
# #855 AC4: a reviewer lease that is expired/stale (its owner
|
||||
# gone) becomes a candidate for an explicit, fail-closed
|
||||
# reclaim decision made once the full inventory is known.
|
||||
if (
|
||||
role == "reviewer"
|
||||
and status
|
||||
in branch_cleanup_guard._RECLAIMABLE_REVIEWER_STATUSES
|
||||
):
|
||||
owner_alive = (
|
||||
fr.get("owner_pid_alive") if isinstance(fr, dict) else None
|
||||
)
|
||||
reviewer_reclaim_candidates.append(
|
||||
(rec, owner_alive if isinstance(owner_alive, bool) else None)
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
# O1: fail closed on control-plane inventory errors.
|
||||
inventory_error = True
|
||||
@@ -11374,44 +11212,6 @@ def _collect_branch_ownership_records(
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# #855 AC4: decide, explicitly and fail-closed, whether any expired/stale
|
||||
# reviewer lease may stop protecting an already-merged branch. This runs
|
||||
# only after the full ownership inventory is built, so a competing active
|
||||
# claimant (an active lease, author session, worktree binding, or active
|
||||
# reviewer comment lease) is visible. An inventory failure keeps every
|
||||
# reclaim candidate protective (reclaim_allowed stays False).
|
||||
if reviewer_reclaim_candidates and not inventory_error:
|
||||
pr_merged_state: bool | None = None
|
||||
if pr_number is not None and auth and base_api:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
pr_live = api_request(
|
||||
"GET", f"{base_api}/pulls/{int(pr_number)}", auth
|
||||
)
|
||||
if isinstance(pr_live, dict) and pr_live:
|
||||
pr_merged_state = bool(
|
||||
pr_live.get("merged") or pr_live.get("merged_at")
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
# Unknown merged state fails closed (candidate stays protective).
|
||||
pr_merged_state = None
|
||||
for cand_rec, owner_alive in reviewer_reclaim_candidates:
|
||||
competing = any(
|
||||
other is not cand_rec
|
||||
and branch_cleanup_guard.is_active_ownership_status(
|
||||
other.get("status")
|
||||
)
|
||||
for other in records
|
||||
)
|
||||
decision = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_expired_reviewer_lease_reclaim(
|
||||
role=str(cand_rec.get("role")),
|
||||
status=str(cand_rec.get("status")),
|
||||
pr_merged=pr_merged_state,
|
||||
owner_pid_alive=owner_alive,
|
||||
competing_active_claimant=competing,
|
||||
)
|
||||
cand_rec["reclaim_allowed"] = decision["reclaim_allowed"]
|
||||
cand_rec["reclaim_decision"] = decision["decision"]
|
||||
|
||||
return {"records": records, "inventory_error": inventory_error}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -11474,7 +11274,6 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run: bool = True,
|
||||
execute_confirmed: bool = False,
|
||||
limit: int = 50,
|
||||
pr_number: int | None = None,
|
||||
remote: str = "dadeschools",
|
||||
host: str | None = None,
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
@@ -11485,11 +11284,7 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
Args:
|
||||
dry_run: Defaults to True. When True, only builds the reconciliation report.
|
||||
execute_confirmed: Must be True when dry_run=False.
|
||||
limit: Max number of closed PRs to inspect (batch mode only; ignored when
|
||||
``pr_number`` is set).
|
||||
pr_number: Optional exact merged PR selector (#855). When set, only that
|
||||
PR is assessed/acted on (fail closed if missing, unmerged, or
|
||||
ambiguous). When omitted, existing batch behaviour is preserved.
|
||||
limit: Max number of closed PRs to inspect.
|
||||
remote: Known Gitea instance ('dadeschools' or 'prgs').
|
||||
host: Override the Gitea host.
|
||||
org: Override the owner/organization.
|
||||
@@ -11524,120 +11319,11 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
"audit_phase": audit_reconciliation_mode.current_phase(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# #855: optional exact PR pin. Fail closed before any inventory mutation.
|
||||
exact_pr: int | None = None
|
||||
if pr_number is not None:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
exact_pr = int(pr_number)
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"executed": False,
|
||||
"dry_run": bool(dry_run),
|
||||
"selection_mode": "exact_pr",
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"pr_number={pr_number!r} is not a valid integer "
|
||||
"(fail closed; no mutation)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"blocker_kind": "invalid_pr_number",
|
||||
}
|
||||
if exact_pr <= 0:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"executed": False,
|
||||
"dry_run": bool(dry_run),
|
||||
"selection_mode": "exact_pr",
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": exact_pr,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"pr_number={exact_pr} must be a positive integer "
|
||||
"(fail closed; no mutation)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"blocker_kind": "invalid_pr_number",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
|
||||
auth = _auth(h)
|
||||
base = repo_api_url(h, o, r)
|
||||
|
||||
selection_mode = "batch"
|
||||
closed_prs: list[dict] = []
|
||||
open_prs: list[dict] = []
|
||||
if exact_pr is not None:
|
||||
selection_mode = "exact_pr"
|
||||
try:
|
||||
pr_live = api_request("GET", f"{base}/pulls/{exact_pr}", auth)
|
||||
except Exception as exc:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"executed": False,
|
||||
"dry_run": bool(dry_run),
|
||||
"selection_mode": selection_mode,
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": exact_pr,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"PR #{exact_pr} could not be uniquely resolved "
|
||||
f"(fail closed; no mutation): {_redact(str(exc))}"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"blocker_kind": "pr_unresolvable",
|
||||
}
|
||||
if not isinstance(pr_live, dict) or not pr_live:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"executed": False,
|
||||
"dry_run": bool(dry_run),
|
||||
"selection_mode": selection_mode,
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": exact_pr,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"PR #{exact_pr} could not be uniquely resolved "
|
||||
"(empty response; fail closed; no mutation)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"blocker_kind": "pr_unresolvable",
|
||||
}
|
||||
live_number = pr_live.get("number")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
live_number_int = int(live_number) if live_number is not None else None
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
live_number_int = None
|
||||
if live_number_int != exact_pr:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"executed": False,
|
||||
"dry_run": bool(dry_run),
|
||||
"selection_mode": selection_mode,
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": exact_pr,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"PR #{exact_pr} resolution is ambiguous or mismatched "
|
||||
f"(live number={live_number!r}; fail closed; no mutation)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"blocker_kind": "pr_ambiguous",
|
||||
}
|
||||
if not (pr_live.get("merged") or pr_live.get("merged_at")):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"executed": False,
|
||||
"dry_run": bool(dry_run),
|
||||
"selection_mode": selection_mode,
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": exact_pr,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"PR #{exact_pr} is not merged "
|
||||
"(exact-target cleanup requires a merged PR; "
|
||||
"fail closed; no mutation)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"blocker_kind": "pr_not_merged",
|
||||
}
|
||||
closed_prs = [pr_live]
|
||||
# Exact mode still needs open heads for remote-delete safety gates.
|
||||
open_prs = api_get_all(f"{base}/pulls?state=open", auth)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# Preserve historical call order (closed then open) for batch callers/tests.
|
||||
closed_prs = api_get_all(f"{base}/pulls?state=closed", auth, limit=limit)
|
||||
open_prs = api_get_all(f"{base}/pulls?state=open", auth)
|
||||
closed_prs = api_get_all(f"{base}/pulls?state=closed", auth, limit=limit)
|
||||
open_prs = api_get_all(f"{base}/pulls?state=open", auth)
|
||||
|
||||
merged_closed: list[dict] = []
|
||||
remote_branch_exists: dict[str, bool] = {}
|
||||
@@ -11664,13 +11350,6 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
scratch_candidates = merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees(
|
||||
_canonical_local_git_root()
|
||||
)
|
||||
# #855: exact-target never inventories or mutates foreign PR scratch trees.
|
||||
if exact_pr is not None:
|
||||
scratch_candidates = [
|
||||
s
|
||||
for s in scratch_candidates
|
||||
if int(s.get("pr_number") or 0) == int(exact_pr)
|
||||
]
|
||||
active_reviewer_leases: dict[int, bool] = {}
|
||||
pr_states: dict[int, dict] = {}
|
||||
for scratch in scratch_candidates:
|
||||
@@ -11705,33 +11384,6 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
active_reviewer_leases=active_reviewer_leases,
|
||||
pr_states=pr_states,
|
||||
)
|
||||
report["selection_mode"] = selection_mode
|
||||
if exact_pr is not None:
|
||||
report["selected_pr_number"] = exact_pr
|
||||
# Fail closed if exact pin somehow produced other or zero entries.
|
||||
entries = list(report.get("entries") or [])
|
||||
entry_numbers = []
|
||||
for entry in entries:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
entry_numbers.append(int(entry.get("pr_number")))
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
entry_numbers.append(entry.get("pr_number"))
|
||||
if entry_numbers != [exact_pr]:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"executed": False,
|
||||
"dry_run": bool(dry_run),
|
||||
"selection_mode": selection_mode,
|
||||
"selected_pr_number": exact_pr,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"exact PR #{exact_pr} selection produced unexpected "
|
||||
f"candidate set {entry_numbers!r} "
|
||||
"(fail closed; no mutation)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"blocker_kind": "exact_selection_mismatch",
|
||||
"entries": entries,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if dry_run:
|
||||
report["dry_run"] = True
|
||||
@@ -12128,7 +11780,6 @@ def gitea_audit_worktree_cleanup(
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
ttl_hours: float = worktree_cleanup_audit.DEFAULT_TTL_HOURS,
|
||||
merged_pr_limit: int = 200,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Read-only: classify every session-owned worktree under ``branches/`` (#401).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12139,26 +11790,17 @@ def gitea_audit_worktree_cleanup(
|
||||
the active issue-lock branch is read from the local lock file and treated
|
||||
as active work. Deletes nothing and mutates no Gitea state.
|
||||
|
||||
Merged PRs are fetched as well, so an issue worktree can be linked to the
|
||||
PR that owns its branch (#858). Such a worktree only becomes removable
|
||||
when that owning PR is unambiguous and merged, the worktree head is
|
||||
already contained in authoritative master, and nothing else protects it —
|
||||
no open or competing PR, lease, issue lock, live session, dirty file, or
|
||||
protected/control checkout. Anything unproven keeps it classified as
|
||||
active issue work.
|
||||
|
||||
Fails closed if the live open-PR list, the merged-PR list, or the
|
||||
control-plane lease state cannot be read: without them removability
|
||||
cannot be proven, so no candidates are returned.
|
||||
Fails closed if the live open-PR list cannot be fetched: without it,
|
||||
removability cannot be proven, so no candidates are returned.
|
||||
|
||||
Args:
|
||||
remote: Known instance — 'dadeschools' or 'prgs'.
|
||||
host: Override the Gitea host.
|
||||
org: Override the owner/organization.
|
||||
repo: Override the repository name.
|
||||
ttl_hours: Age (hours) after which a clean conflict-fix worktree
|
||||
becomes stale-removable (default from GITEA_WORKTREE_TTL_HOURS).
|
||||
merged_pr_limit: Max closed PRs scanned for merged-PR ownership.
|
||||
ttl_hours: Age (hours) after which a clean issue/conflict-fix
|
||||
worktree becomes stale-removable (default from
|
||||
GITEA_WORKTREE_TTL_HOURS).
|
||||
|
||||
Returns:
|
||||
dict with per-worktree classifications, counts, removable
|
||||
@@ -12194,84 +11836,22 @@ def gitea_audit_worktree_cleanup(
|
||||
if (pr.get("head") or {}).get("ref")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# #858: merged PRs are the ownership evidence that lets a landed issue
|
||||
# worktree stop being reported as active work. Without them the audit can
|
||||
# never agree with the PR-scoped reconciler, so treat a fetch failure the
|
||||
# same way an open-PR fetch failure is treated: fail closed.
|
||||
try:
|
||||
closed_prs = api_get_all(
|
||||
f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls?state=closed", auth, limit=merged_pr_limit
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as exc:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"open_pr_state_verified": True,
|
||||
"merged_pr_state_verified": False,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"could not fetch merged PRs; worktree ownership unverified "
|
||||
f"(fail closed): {_redact(str(exc))}"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
merged_prs = [pr for pr in closed_prs if (pr.get("merged") or pr.get("merged_at"))]
|
||||
pr_index = worktree_cleanup_audit.build_pr_index(list(open_prs) + merged_prs)
|
||||
|
||||
# #858: the auditor already accepted lease evidence but nothing ever
|
||||
# supplied it, so every worktree looked unleased. Removability is now
|
||||
# reachable for issue worktrees, so authoritative control-plane leases
|
||||
# must be readable or the audit fails closed.
|
||||
db, lease_errs = _control_plane_db_or_error()
|
||||
if db is None:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"open_pr_state_verified": True,
|
||||
"merged_pr_state_verified": True,
|
||||
"lease_state_verified": False,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"could not read control-plane leases; worktree protection "
|
||||
"unverified (fail closed)",
|
||||
*lease_errs,
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
lease_result = lease_lifecycle.list_active_leases(
|
||||
db, remote=remote, org=o, repo=r, include_non_active=False, limit=500
|
||||
)
|
||||
leased_issue_numbers: set[int] = set()
|
||||
live_session_paths: set[str] = set()
|
||||
for lease in lease_result.get("leases") or []:
|
||||
if lease.get("work_kind") == "issue" and lease.get("work_number") is not None:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
leased_issue_numbers.add(int(lease["work_number"]))
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
if lease.get("worktree_path"):
|
||||
live_session_paths.add(str(lease["worktree_path"]))
|
||||
|
||||
active_issue_branches: set[str] = set()
|
||||
lock = merged_cleanup_reconcile.read_issue_lock(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE)
|
||||
if lock and lock.get("branch_name"):
|
||||
active_issue_branches.add(str(lock["branch_name"]).strip())
|
||||
|
||||
master_ref = f"{remote}/master" if remote in REMOTES else "origin/master"
|
||||
report = worktree_cleanup_audit.audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
_canonical_local_git_root(),
|
||||
open_pr_branches=open_pr_branches,
|
||||
active_issue_branches=active_issue_branches,
|
||||
now=datetime.now(timezone.utc),
|
||||
ttl_hours=ttl_hours,
|
||||
pr_index=pr_index,
|
||||
leased_issue_numbers=leased_issue_numbers,
|
||||
live_session_paths=live_session_paths,
|
||||
master_ref=master_ref,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"open_pr_state_verified": True,
|
||||
"merged_pr_state_verified": True,
|
||||
"lease_state_verified": True,
|
||||
"master_ref": master_ref,
|
||||
"task_mode": "work-issue",
|
||||
**report,
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -19106,59 +18686,10 @@ def gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge(
|
||||
prepared_verdict_head_sha=live_pr_head,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# #871: the remote head is now advanced; the durable linked-issue lock must
|
||||
# be advanced with it, or a later dead-session recovery can never prove
|
||||
# ownership at the new head. This runs AFTER the successful remote update, so
|
||||
# a failure here is a *partial* lifecycle failure — the remote moved but the
|
||||
# durable state did not — and must never be reported as a full success.
|
||||
claimant = _work_lease_claimant(h)
|
||||
matched_issue = ownership.get("matched_issue")
|
||||
synced_at = datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
|
||||
lock_refresh: dict = {
|
||||
"refreshed": False,
|
||||
"reasons": ["durable lock head refresh was not attempted"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
if new_head and matched_issue and source_branch and (wt or None):
|
||||
try:
|
||||
lock_refresh = issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh(
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
issue_number=int(matched_issue),
|
||||
branch_name=source_branch,
|
||||
worktree_path=wt,
|
||||
pr_number=pr_number,
|
||||
identity=claimant.get("username"),
|
||||
profile=claimant.get("profile"),
|
||||
current_pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
expected_old_head=live_pr_head,
|
||||
new_head=new_head,
|
||||
synced_at=synced_at,
|
||||
base_head=live_base_head,
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as exc:
|
||||
lock_refresh = {
|
||||
"refreshed": False,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"durable lock head refresh raised (fail closed): {_redact(str(exc))}"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
else:
|
||||
lock_refresh = {
|
||||
"refreshed": False,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"durable lock head refresh could not run: missing new head, "
|
||||
"linked issue, source branch, or worktree binding"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
durable_refreshed = bool(lock_refresh.get("refreshed"))
|
||||
base_result = {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"mutation_allowed": True,
|
||||
"durable_lock_refreshed": durable_refreshed,
|
||||
"durable_lock_refresh": lock_refresh,
|
||||
"fully_synchronized": durable_refreshed,
|
||||
"style": "merge",
|
||||
"force_push": False,
|
||||
"rebase": False,
|
||||
@@ -19180,37 +18711,19 @@ def gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge(
|
||||
"prepared_verdict_invalidated": transition.get(
|
||||
"prepared_verdict_invalidated"
|
||||
),
|
||||
"recommended_next_action": transition.get(
|
||||
"recommended_next_action",
|
||||
pr_sync_status.ACTION_FRESH_REVIEW_REQUIRED,
|
||||
),
|
||||
"transition": transition,
|
||||
"role_kind": role,
|
||||
"profile_name": profile.get("profile_name"),
|
||||
"worktree_path": wt or None,
|
||||
"reasons": list(transition.get("reasons") or []) + [
|
||||
"update-by-merge completed via native Gitea API (style=merge only)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if durable_refreshed:
|
||||
base_result["success"] = True
|
||||
base_result["recommended_next_action"] = transition.get(
|
||||
"recommended_next_action",
|
||||
pr_sync_status.ACTION_FRESH_REVIEW_REQUIRED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
base_result["reasons"] = list(transition.get("reasons") or []) + [
|
||||
"update-by-merge completed via native Gitea API (style=merge only)",
|
||||
f"durable linked-issue lock #{matched_issue} head refreshed to "
|
||||
f"{new_head} (verified by read-after-write)",
|
||||
]
|
||||
return base_result
|
||||
|
||||
# Partial lifecycle failure: the remote advanced but the durable lock did
|
||||
# not. Do NOT report a fully successful synchronization (#871).
|
||||
base_result["success"] = False
|
||||
base_result["partial_lifecycle_failure"] = True
|
||||
base_result["recommended_next_action"] = pr_sync_status.ACTION_BLOCKED
|
||||
base_result["reasons"] = list(lock_refresh.get("reasons") or []) + [
|
||||
f"PARTIAL LIFECYCLE FAILURE: PR #{pr_number} remote head advanced to "
|
||||
f"{new_head} but the durable linked-issue lock head was not refreshed; "
|
||||
"the synchronization is NOT complete",
|
||||
]
|
||||
return base_result
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@mcp.tool()
|
||||
def gitea_assess_conflict_fix_push(
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,16 +16,11 @@ ISSUE_LOCK_FILE = os.environ.get("GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_FILE", "/tmp/gitea_issue_lock
|
||||
SOURCE_LOCK_ISSUE = "gitea_lock_issue"
|
||||
SOURCE_LOCK_ADOPTION = "gitea_lock_issue_adoption"
|
||||
SOURCE_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE = "operator_override"
|
||||
# #864: dirty-preserving same-claimant author-session rebind (dead owner PID).
|
||||
SOURCE_DIRTY_SAME_CLAIMANT_REBIND = (
|
||||
"gitea_rebind_dirty_same_claimant_author_session"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
SANCTIONED_LOCK_SOURCES = frozenset({
|
||||
SOURCE_LOCK_ISSUE,
|
||||
SOURCE_LOCK_ADOPTION,
|
||||
SOURCE_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE,
|
||||
SOURCE_DIRTY_SAME_CLAIMANT_REBIND,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE_ENV = "GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE"
|
||||
|
||||
+8
-130
@@ -85,12 +85,6 @@ HEAD_RELATION_STRICT_DESCENDANT = "strict_descendant"
|
||||
# #772: an unpublished claim has no recorded head to compare against at all, so
|
||||
# its head is measured against the base the branch was cut from instead.
|
||||
HEAD_RELATION_DESCENDS_FROM_BASE = "descends_from_recorded_base"
|
||||
# #871: the remote/PR head advanced *past* the recorded head via a sanctioned
|
||||
# merge-based branch synchronization (``gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge``) while
|
||||
# the local worktree stayed at the recorded head. This is the inverse of the
|
||||
# #768 descendant relation — here the *remote* strictly descends the local head,
|
||||
# and only because a base was merged into the branch, proven server-side.
|
||||
HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED = "remote_merge_synced"
|
||||
|
||||
# Which body of evidence a recovery was decided on (#772 AC10). These are not
|
||||
# interchangeable: a published claim proves ownership against a remote/PR head,
|
||||
@@ -272,70 +266,6 @@ def _assess_base_descendancy(
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _assess_remote_merge_synced(
|
||||
sync_provenance: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
recorded_head: str,
|
||||
remote_head: str,
|
||||
) -> tuple[bool, list[str]]:
|
||||
"""Did ``remote_head`` advance past ``recorded_head`` via a sanctioned
|
||||
merge-based branch sync (#871)?
|
||||
|
||||
``sync_provenance`` is the server-side git observation from
|
||||
``issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance``. Its own
|
||||
``prior_head_sha`` / ``synced_head_sha`` are re-checked against the heads
|
||||
this assessment is actually reasoning about, so an observation taken for some
|
||||
other pair of commits — stale, mismatched, or hand-built — can never
|
||||
authorize recovery. This is the inverse of ``_assess_strict_descendant``: the
|
||||
recorded head is the ancestor and the *remote* head is the descendant, and it
|
||||
is accepted only because the remote head is a base-into-branch merge that
|
||||
preserved the branch mainline back to the recorded head.
|
||||
|
||||
Returns ``(proven, notes)``. Notes name the exact missing element so a
|
||||
refused caller sees why, never a bare "unproven".
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not isinstance(sync_provenance, Mapping):
|
||||
return False, [
|
||||
"no server-derived merge-sync provenance observation was available; a "
|
||||
"remote head ahead of the recorded head cannot be accepted"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
probe_prior = _text(sync_provenance.get("prior_head_sha"))
|
||||
probe_synced = _text(sync_provenance.get("synced_head_sha"))
|
||||
if probe_prior != recorded_head or probe_synced != remote_head:
|
||||
return False, [
|
||||
f"merge-sync observation covers {probe_prior or 'unknown'} -> "
|
||||
f"{probe_synced or 'unknown'}, not the heads under assessment "
|
||||
f"({recorded_head} -> {remote_head})"
|
||||
]
|
||||
if not sync_provenance.get("probe_ok"):
|
||||
return False, (
|
||||
list(sync_provenance.get("reasons") or [])
|
||||
or ["merge-sync provenance probe did not complete; provenance unproven"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
if not sync_provenance.get("prior_is_ancestor"):
|
||||
return False, [
|
||||
f"recorded head {recorded_head} is not an ancestor of remote head "
|
||||
f"{remote_head}; a rewritten or force-moved head cannot be recovered"
|
||||
]
|
||||
if not sync_provenance.get("is_merge_sync"):
|
||||
return False, (
|
||||
list(sync_provenance.get("reasons") or [])
|
||||
or [
|
||||
f"remote head {remote_head} is not a sanctioned merge-based sync "
|
||||
f"of the base into the branch above {recorded_head}"
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
proof = _text(sync_provenance.get("proof")) or (
|
||||
f"{remote_head} merged the base into the branch above {recorded_head}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return True, [
|
||||
f"remote head {remote_head} advanced past recorded head {recorded_head} "
|
||||
f"via a sanctioned merge-based branch sync ({proof})"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess_dead_session_lock_recovery(
|
||||
existing_lock: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
@@ -360,7 +290,6 @@ def assess_dead_session_lock_recovery(
|
||||
remote_branch_exists: bool | None = None,
|
||||
recorded_base_sha: str | None = None,
|
||||
base_ancestry: Mapping[str, Any] | None = None,
|
||||
sync_provenance: Mapping[str, Any] | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Decide whether a dead-session author lock may be natively recovered.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -540,39 +469,19 @@ def assess_dead_session_lock_recovery(
|
||||
head_relation = HEAD_RELATION_STRICT_DESCENDANT
|
||||
ancestry_proof = notes[0] if notes else None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# #871: the reverse relation — the remote head advanced past
|
||||
# the recorded/local head via a sanctioned merge-based branch
|
||||
# sync while the local worktree stayed put. Accepted only on
|
||||
# server-proven merge-sync provenance, never a caller claim.
|
||||
synced, sync_notes = _assess_remote_merge_synced(
|
||||
sync_provenance,
|
||||
recorded_head=local_head,
|
||||
remote_head=remote_head,
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"local head {local_head} does not match remote branch head "
|
||||
f"{remote_head}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if synced:
|
||||
head_relation = HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED
|
||||
ancestry_proof = sync_notes[0] if sync_notes else None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"local head {local_head} does not match remote branch "
|
||||
f"head {remote_head}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
reasons.extend(notes)
|
||||
reasons.extend(sync_notes)
|
||||
reasons.extend(notes)
|
||||
evidence["recorded_base"] = recorded_base or None
|
||||
evidence["local_head"] = local_head or None
|
||||
evidence["remote_head"] = remote_head or None
|
||||
# ``recorded_head`` is the head recovery is being measured against;
|
||||
# ``accepted_head`` is the head this recovery actually adopts. They differ
|
||||
# only in the descendant case, and downstream gates need both (#768 AC2/AC7).
|
||||
# #871: in the merge-sync case the branch/PR already carries the synced
|
||||
# remote head, so that is the head recovery adopts; the local worktree stays
|
||||
# at the ancestor recorded head.
|
||||
evidence["recorded_head"] = remote_head or None
|
||||
if head_relation == HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED:
|
||||
evidence["accepted_head"] = remote_head or None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
evidence["accepted_head"] = local_head or None
|
||||
evidence["accepted_head"] = local_head or None
|
||||
evidence["head_relation"] = head_relation
|
||||
evidence["ancestry_proof"] = ancestry_proof
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -584,17 +493,12 @@ def assess_dead_session_lock_recovery(
|
||||
# contradictory; re-stating it as a head mismatch would only obscure why.
|
||||
if not unpublished and local_head and pr_head != local_head:
|
||||
# A descendant recovery has not been published yet, so the open PR
|
||||
# legitimately still points at the recorded head. A merge-sync
|
||||
# recovery's PR legitimately sits at the advanced remote head. Any
|
||||
# other disagreement is a real mismatch.
|
||||
# legitimately still points at the recorded head. Any other
|
||||
# disagreement is a real mismatch.
|
||||
if not (
|
||||
head_relation == HEAD_RELATION_STRICT_DESCENDANT
|
||||
and remote_head
|
||||
and pr_head == remote_head
|
||||
) and not (
|
||||
head_relation == HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED
|
||||
and remote_head
|
||||
and pr_head == remote_head
|
||||
):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"open PR #{pr_number} head {pr_head} does not match local head "
|
||||
@@ -715,11 +619,7 @@ def assess_dead_session_lock_recovery(
|
||||
)
|
||||
if (
|
||||
head_relation
|
||||
in (
|
||||
HEAD_RELATION_STRICT_DESCENDANT,
|
||||
HEAD_RELATION_DESCENDS_FROM_BASE,
|
||||
HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
in (HEAD_RELATION_STRICT_DESCENDANT, HEAD_RELATION_DESCENDS_FROM_BASE)
|
||||
and ancestry_proof
|
||||
):
|
||||
proof.append(ancestry_proof)
|
||||
@@ -797,16 +697,6 @@ def owning_pr_recovery_evidence(
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if accepted_head != local_head:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
elif relation == HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED:
|
||||
# #871: the PR already sits at the advanced remote head; the local
|
||||
# worktree is the ancestor the merge preserved. The head the open PR
|
||||
# shows and the head recovery adopts are both the synced remote head.
|
||||
if not remote_head or pr_head != remote_head:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if accepted_head != remote_head:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if not local_head or local_head == remote_head:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
@@ -875,18 +765,6 @@ def recovered_owning_pr_from_lock(
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if not accepted_head or accepted_head == recorded_head:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
elif relation == HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED:
|
||||
# #871: PR sits at the advanced remote head, which is both the recorded
|
||||
# measured-against head and the adopted head; the local worktree is the
|
||||
# ancestor the merge preserved.
|
||||
remote_head = _text(record.get("remote_head"))
|
||||
local_head = _text(record.get("local_head"))
|
||||
if not remote_head or pr_head != remote_head:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if accepted_head and accepted_head != remote_head:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if not local_head or local_head == remote_head:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
|
||||
+554
-334
@@ -15,15 +15,27 @@ import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import re
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import uuid
|
||||
from contextlib import contextmanager
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
import lease_policy
|
||||
|
||||
LOCK_DIR_ENV = "GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"
|
||||
DEFAULT_LOCK_DIR = os.path.expanduser("~/.cache/gitea-tools/issue-locks")
|
||||
WORK_LEASE_TTL_HOURS = 4
|
||||
AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE = "author_issue_work"
|
||||
|
||||
# Freshness classifications. ``STATUS_STALE`` remains the dead-PID band that
|
||||
# #753 recovery keys on; the two bands below are new in #790 Slice A and apply
|
||||
# only to leases minted under the heartbeat lifecycle.
|
||||
STATUS_LIVE = "live"
|
||||
STATUS_EXPIRED = "expired"
|
||||
STATUS_ABSENT = "absent"
|
||||
STATUS_STALE = "stale"
|
||||
STATUS_STALE_MISSED_HEARTBEAT = "stale_missed_heartbeat"
|
||||
STATUS_STALE_ABSOLUTE_CAP = "stale_absolute_cap"
|
||||
|
||||
_SAFE_SEGMENT_RE = re.compile(r"[^A-Za-z0-9._+-]+")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -253,6 +265,331 @@ def bind_session_lock(
|
||||
return path
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _ownership_refusals(
|
||||
lock: dict[str, Any],
|
||||
*,
|
||||
issue_number: int,
|
||||
branch_name: str,
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
identity: str | None,
|
||||
profile: str | None,
|
||||
) -> list[str]:
|
||||
"""Exact-ownership mismatches between a durable lock and a live caller.
|
||||
|
||||
Shared by the heartbeat writer and the legacy rebind path so the two cannot
|
||||
disagree about what "the same owner" means. Every field is compared against
|
||||
durable state; nothing is taken on the caller's word beyond the identity the
|
||||
server itself resolved.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
if lock.get("issue_number") != issue_number:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lock targets issue #{lock.get('issue_number')}, not #{issue_number}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if str(lock.get("branch_name") or "") != str(branch_name or ""):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lock branch '{lock.get('branch_name')}' does not match '{branch_name}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if not _same_realpath(str(lock.get("worktree_path") or ""), worktree_path):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lock worktree '{lock.get('worktree_path')}' does not match "
|
||||
f"'{worktree_path}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
lease = lock.get("work_lease") if isinstance(lock, dict) else None
|
||||
claimant = lease.get("claimant") if isinstance(lease, dict) else None
|
||||
claimant = claimant if isinstance(claimant, dict) else {}
|
||||
recorded_identity = str(claimant.get("username") or "").strip()
|
||||
recorded_profile = str(claimant.get("profile") or "").strip()
|
||||
if not recorded_identity or not recorded_profile:
|
||||
reasons.append("lock does not record both a claimant username and profile")
|
||||
if recorded_identity and recorded_identity != str(identity or "").strip():
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lock claimant '{recorded_identity}' does not match active identity "
|
||||
f"'{str(identity or '').strip() or 'unknown'}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if recorded_profile and recorded_profile != str(profile or "").strip():
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lock profile '{recorded_profile}' does not match active profile "
|
||||
f"'{str(profile or '').strip() or 'unknown'}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return reasons
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _refusal(reasons: list[str], **extra: Any) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {"success": False, "performed": False, "reasons": reasons, **extra}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def heartbeat_session_lock(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
remote: str,
|
||||
org: str,
|
||||
repo: str,
|
||||
issue_number: int,
|
||||
branch_name: str,
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
identity: str | None,
|
||||
profile: str | None,
|
||||
task_session_id: str,
|
||||
expected_generation: int | None = None,
|
||||
lock_dir: str | None = None,
|
||||
now: datetime | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Slide a heartbeat-lifecycle lease forward (#790 Slice A, A4).
|
||||
|
||||
The write happens inside the same per-issue ``flock`` that serializes
|
||||
acquisition, and under the #772 generation compare-and-swap, so a heartbeat
|
||||
can never race a concurrent reclaim: whichever lands first moves the
|
||||
generation and the other fails closed.
|
||||
|
||||
Refuses — never revives — in every ambiguous case. A lease that has already
|
||||
lapsed past its grace is *not* heartbeatable: allowing that would let a
|
||||
session that stopped proving liveness restore ownership retroactively, which
|
||||
is precisely the revival AC-N5 forbids. Such a session must go through the
|
||||
sanctioned reclaim path, which mints a fresh generation.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
current = _lease_now(now)
|
||||
root = _ensure_lock_dir(lock_dir)
|
||||
path = lock_file_path(
|
||||
remote=remote, org=org, repo=repo, issue_number=issue_number, lock_dir=root
|
||||
)
|
||||
declared_session = str(task_session_id or "").strip()
|
||||
if not declared_session:
|
||||
return _refusal(["no task_session_id supplied (fail closed)"])
|
||||
|
||||
sentinel = flock_path(path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
with _exclusive_file_lock(sentinel):
|
||||
lock = read_lock_file(path)
|
||||
if not lock:
|
||||
return _refusal([f"no durable lock for issue #{issue_number}"])
|
||||
|
||||
if is_legacy_lease(lock):
|
||||
return _refusal(
|
||||
[
|
||||
"lock predates the heartbeat lifecycle; it must be rebound "
|
||||
"by its exact owner before it can be heartbeated"
|
||||
],
|
||||
lifecycle=lease_lifecycle_version(lock),
|
||||
legacy_lease=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
reasons = _ownership_refusals(
|
||||
lock,
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=branch_name,
|
||||
worktree_path=worktree_path,
|
||||
identity=identity,
|
||||
profile=profile,
|
||||
)
|
||||
recorded_session = lease_task_session_id(lock)
|
||||
if not recorded_session:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"lock declares the heartbeat lifecycle but records no "
|
||||
"task_session_id (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
elif recorded_session != declared_session:
|
||||
# A superseded session holding an old identifier cannot heartbeat
|
||||
# over the session that replaced it.
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"task_session_id does not match the session recorded on the lock"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if reasons:
|
||||
return _refusal(reasons)
|
||||
|
||||
current_generation = lock_generation(lock)
|
||||
if (
|
||||
expected_generation is not None
|
||||
and current_generation != expected_generation
|
||||
):
|
||||
return _refusal(
|
||||
[
|
||||
f"lock generation changed: expected {expected_generation}, "
|
||||
f"found {current_generation}; another session reclaimed or "
|
||||
"replaced this claim (fail closed)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
lock_generation=current_generation,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
freshness = assess_lock_freshness(lock, now=current)
|
||||
if not freshness.get("live"):
|
||||
return _refusal(
|
||||
[
|
||||
f"lease is not live ({freshness.get('status')}): "
|
||||
f"{freshness.get('reason')}; a lapsed lease must be "
|
||||
"reclaimed, not heartbeated"
|
||||
],
|
||||
freshness=freshness,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
policy = lease_policy.policy_for(lease_task_class(lock))
|
||||
expires = current + timedelta(minutes=policy.initial_ttl_minutes)
|
||||
record = dict(lock)
|
||||
lease = dict(record.get("work_lease") or {})
|
||||
prior_heartbeat = lease.get("last_heartbeat_at")
|
||||
lease["last_heartbeat_at"] = _format_lease_timestamp(current)
|
||||
lease["expires_at"] = _format_lease_timestamp(expires)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
lease["heartbeat_count"] = int(lease.get("heartbeat_count") or 0) + 1
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
lease["heartbeat_count"] = 1
|
||||
record["work_lease"] = lease
|
||||
record["lock_generation"] = current_generation + 1
|
||||
save_lock_file(path, record)
|
||||
except LockContentionError as exc:
|
||||
return _refusal([f"issue #{issue_number} lock contention: {exc} (fail closed)"])
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"issue_number": issue_number,
|
||||
"branch_name": branch_name,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
||||
"task_session_id": declared_session,
|
||||
"lock_generation": record["lock_generation"],
|
||||
"prior_generation": current_generation,
|
||||
"prior_heartbeat_at": prior_heartbeat,
|
||||
"last_heartbeat_at": lease["last_heartbeat_at"],
|
||||
"expires_at": lease["expires_at"],
|
||||
"heartbeat_count": lease["heartbeat_count"],
|
||||
"lock_file_path": path,
|
||||
"policy": lease_policy.describe(lease_task_class(record)),
|
||||
"freshness": assess_lock_freshness(record, now=current),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def rebind_legacy_lock(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
remote: str,
|
||||
org: str,
|
||||
repo: str,
|
||||
issue_number: int,
|
||||
branch_name: str,
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
identity: str | None,
|
||||
profile: str | None,
|
||||
expected_generation: int | None = None,
|
||||
lock_dir: str | None = None,
|
||||
now: datetime | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Move a legacy lock into the heartbeat lifecycle (#790 AC-N8).
|
||||
|
||||
One of the two sanctioned exits from the preserved-expiry legacy state; the
|
||||
other is terminal retirement, which is Slice B. Only the exact recorded
|
||||
owner may rebind, and only while the legacy lock is still live under its
|
||||
original absolute expiry — an already-expired legacy lease belongs to the
|
||||
#760 renewal path or #601 reclaim, and this must not become a second, weaker
|
||||
way to revive one.
|
||||
|
||||
The rebind mints a genuine task-session identifier and a genuine first
|
||||
heartbeat. It does not fabricate history: the original creation and expiry
|
||||
are preserved under ``legacy_origin`` for audit, and the new lifecycle's
|
||||
absolute cap runs from the rebind, not from the legacy claim.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
current = _lease_now(now)
|
||||
root = _ensure_lock_dir(lock_dir)
|
||||
path = lock_file_path(
|
||||
remote=remote, org=org, repo=repo, issue_number=issue_number, lock_dir=root
|
||||
)
|
||||
sentinel = flock_path(path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
with _exclusive_file_lock(sentinel):
|
||||
lock = read_lock_file(path)
|
||||
if not lock:
|
||||
return _refusal([f"no durable lock for issue #{issue_number}"])
|
||||
if not is_legacy_lease(lock):
|
||||
return _refusal(
|
||||
[
|
||||
"lock is already on the heartbeat lifecycle; use the "
|
||||
"heartbeat path"
|
||||
],
|
||||
lifecycle=lease_lifecycle_version(lock),
|
||||
legacy_lease=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
reasons = _ownership_refusals(
|
||||
lock,
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=branch_name,
|
||||
worktree_path=worktree_path,
|
||||
identity=identity,
|
||||
profile=profile,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if reasons:
|
||||
return _refusal(reasons)
|
||||
|
||||
current_generation = lock_generation(lock)
|
||||
if (
|
||||
expected_generation is not None
|
||||
and current_generation != expected_generation
|
||||
):
|
||||
return _refusal(
|
||||
[
|
||||
f"lock generation changed: expected {expected_generation}, "
|
||||
f"found {current_generation} (fail closed)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
lock_generation=current_generation,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
freshness = assess_lock_freshness(lock, now=current)
|
||||
if not freshness.get("live"):
|
||||
return _refusal(
|
||||
[
|
||||
f"legacy lease is not live ({freshness.get('status')}): "
|
||||
f"{freshness.get('reason')}; rebinding is not a recovery "
|
||||
"path for a lapsed lease"
|
||||
],
|
||||
freshness=freshness,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
policy = lease_policy.policy_for(lease_task_class(lock))
|
||||
expires = current + timedelta(minutes=policy.initial_ttl_minutes)
|
||||
session_id = mint_task_session_id(lease_task_class(lock))
|
||||
record = dict(lock)
|
||||
lease = dict(record.get("work_lease") or {})
|
||||
legacy_origin = {
|
||||
"created_at": lease.get("created_at"),
|
||||
"expires_at": lease.get("expires_at"),
|
||||
"last_heartbeat_at": lease.get("last_heartbeat_at"),
|
||||
"lifecycle": lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_LEGACY,
|
||||
}
|
||||
lease["lifecycle_version"] = lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1
|
||||
lease["task_session_id"] = session_id
|
||||
lease["created_at"] = _format_lease_timestamp(current)
|
||||
lease["last_heartbeat_at"] = _format_lease_timestamp(current)
|
||||
lease["expires_at"] = _format_lease_timestamp(expires)
|
||||
lease["heartbeat_count"] = 1
|
||||
record["work_lease"] = lease
|
||||
record["legacy_rebind"] = {
|
||||
"rebound_at": _format_lease_timestamp(current),
|
||||
"task_session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"prior_generation": current_generation,
|
||||
"legacy_origin": legacy_origin,
|
||||
"reason": (
|
||||
"legacy lock rebound into the heartbeat lifecycle by its exact "
|
||||
"recorded owner"
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
record["lock_generation"] = current_generation + 1
|
||||
save_lock_file(path, record)
|
||||
except LockContentionError as exc:
|
||||
return _refusal([f"issue #{issue_number} lock contention: {exc} (fail closed)"])
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"issue_number": issue_number,
|
||||
"task_session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"lock_generation": record["lock_generation"],
|
||||
"prior_generation": current_generation,
|
||||
"lifecycle": lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1,
|
||||
"legacy_rebind": record["legacy_rebind"],
|
||||
"expires_at": lease["expires_at"],
|
||||
"last_heartbeat_at": lease["last_heartbeat_at"],
|
||||
"lock_file_path": path,
|
||||
"freshness": assess_lock_freshness(record, now=current),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def read_session_issue_lock(lock_dir: str | None = None) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
|
||||
root = (lock_dir or default_lock_dir()).strip()
|
||||
pointer = read_lock_file(session_pointer_path(root))
|
||||
@@ -336,6 +673,16 @@ def _parse_lease_timestamp(value: str | None) -> datetime | None:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _format_lease_timestamp(value: datetime) -> str:
|
||||
"""Serialize a lease timestamp in the durable ``...Z`` form already on disk."""
|
||||
return (
|
||||
value.astimezone(timezone.utc)
|
||||
.replace(microsecond=0)
|
||||
.isoformat()
|
||||
.replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def lease_expires_at(lock: dict[str, Any] | None) -> datetime | None:
|
||||
if not lock:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
@@ -356,60 +703,216 @@ def is_lease_live(lock: dict[str, Any] | None, *, now: datetime | None = None) -
|
||||
return assess_lock_freshness(lock, now=now)["live"]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def lease_task_class(lock_data: dict[str, Any] | None) -> str:
|
||||
"""Policy task class for a durable lock; author work when unrecorded."""
|
||||
lease = lock_data.get("work_lease") if isinstance(lock_data, dict) else None
|
||||
if isinstance(lease, dict):
|
||||
recorded = str(lease.get("operation_type") or "").strip()
|
||||
if recorded:
|
||||
return recorded
|
||||
return AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def lease_lifecycle_version(lock_data: dict[str, Any] | None) -> str:
|
||||
"""Read the durable lifecycle marker (#790 AC-N8).
|
||||
|
||||
The marker is the *only* discriminator between a heartbeat-lifecycle lease
|
||||
and a legacy one. Timestamps are deliberately not consulted: a lock minted
|
||||
before this lifecycle existed has ``last_heartbeat_at == created_at``
|
||||
forever, and reading that equality as "recently heartbeated" would treat
|
||||
every never-heartbeated legacy lock as fresh — the precise inversion AC-N8
|
||||
forbids. A newly minted heartbeat lease also has the two equal, so the
|
||||
equality carries no information in either direction.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
lease = lock_data.get("work_lease") if isinstance(lock_data, dict) else None
|
||||
if isinstance(lease, dict):
|
||||
recorded = str(lease.get("lifecycle_version") or "").strip()
|
||||
if recorded:
|
||||
return recorded
|
||||
return lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_LEGACY
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def is_legacy_lease(lock_data: dict[str, Any] | None) -> bool:
|
||||
"""True when a lock predates the shared heartbeat lifecycle."""
|
||||
return lease_lifecycle_version(lock_data) != lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def lease_task_session_id(lock_data: dict[str, Any] | None) -> str:
|
||||
"""Recorded per-task session identifier, or empty for a legacy lock."""
|
||||
lease = lock_data.get("work_lease") if isinstance(lock_data, dict) else None
|
||||
if isinstance(lease, dict):
|
||||
return str(lease.get("task_session_id") or "").strip()
|
||||
return ""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def mint_task_session_id(task_class: str = AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE) -> str:
|
||||
"""Mint an ownership key for one task (#790 AC-N1).
|
||||
|
||||
Deliberately contains no process identifier. The recorded PID belongs to the
|
||||
long-lived MCP daemon, which outlives any individual task and is reused by
|
||||
every task it serves, so PID digits cannot identify *which* task holds a
|
||||
claim. The PID is still recorded alongside this value as evidence.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
prefix = _sanitize_segment(str(task_class or AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE))
|
||||
return f"{prefix}-{uuid.uuid4().hex[:16]}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _lease_heartbeat_at(lock_data: dict[str, Any] | None) -> datetime | None:
|
||||
lease = lock_data.get("work_lease") if isinstance(lock_data, dict) else None
|
||||
heartbeat_at = None
|
||||
if isinstance(lock_data, dict):
|
||||
heartbeat_at = _parse_lease_timestamp(lock_data.get("last_heartbeat_at"))
|
||||
if heartbeat_at is None and isinstance(lease, dict):
|
||||
heartbeat_at = _parse_lease_timestamp(lease.get("last_heartbeat_at"))
|
||||
return heartbeat_at
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess_lock_freshness(
|
||||
lock_data: dict[str, Any] | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
now: datetime | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Classify a lock as live, expired, stale, or absent."""
|
||||
"""Classify a lock as live, expired, stale, or absent.
|
||||
|
||||
#790 Slice A makes the heartbeat load-bearing. Before this change
|
||||
``last_heartbeat_at`` was parsed and then never consulted: liveness was
|
||||
decided entirely by the absolute ``expires_at`` and by PID liveness, and
|
||||
since the recorded PID is the long-lived MCP daemon, an abandoned author
|
||||
task stayed "live" for the full four-hour TTL.
|
||||
|
||||
Two rules govern the rewrite:
|
||||
|
||||
* **An alive PID never establishes freshness** (AC-N2). It proves the daemon
|
||||
is up, nothing about the task. It is recorded as evidence and no branch
|
||||
returns ``live`` because of it.
|
||||
* **A dead PID still corroborates staleness.** The dead-PID band is
|
||||
unchanged and still precedes every heartbeat evaluation, so #753
|
||||
dead-session recovery keys on exactly the classification it always did.
|
||||
|
||||
Legacy leases (AC-N8) keep their recorded absolute expiry and are never
|
||||
evaluated against the short heartbeat grace, so deploying this change cannot
|
||||
make an existing claim instantly reclaimable.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
current = _lease_now(now)
|
||||
if not lock_data:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": "absent",
|
||||
"status": STATUS_ABSENT,
|
||||
"live": False,
|
||||
"stale": False,
|
||||
"reason": "no lock record",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expires_at = lease_expires_at(lock_data)
|
||||
lease = lock_data.get("work_lease")
|
||||
heartbeat_at = _parse_lease_timestamp(lock_data.get("last_heartbeat_at"))
|
||||
if heartbeat_at is None and isinstance(lease, dict):
|
||||
heartbeat_at = _parse_lease_timestamp(lease.get("last_heartbeat_at"))
|
||||
expires_at = lease_expires_at(lock_data)
|
||||
heartbeat_at = _lease_heartbeat_at(lock_data)
|
||||
created_at = (
|
||||
_parse_lease_timestamp(lease.get("created_at"))
|
||||
if isinstance(lease, dict)
|
||||
else None
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
pid = lock_data.get("session_pid")
|
||||
if pid is None:
|
||||
pid = lock_data.get("pid")
|
||||
# Evidence only. Never consulted to grant liveness (AC-N2).
|
||||
pid_alive = is_process_alive(pid) if pid is not None else False
|
||||
|
||||
if expires_at and expires_at <= current:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": "expired",
|
||||
"live": False,
|
||||
"stale": True,
|
||||
"reason": f"lease expired at {expires_at.isoformat()}",
|
||||
"pid_alive": pid_alive,
|
||||
}
|
||||
lifecycle = lease_lifecycle_version(lock_data)
|
||||
legacy = lifecycle != lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1
|
||||
policy = lease_policy.policy_for(lease_task_class(lock_data))
|
||||
|
||||
if pid is not None and not pid_alive:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": "stale",
|
||||
"live": False,
|
||||
"stale": True,
|
||||
"reason": f"owner pid {pid} is not alive",
|
||||
"pid_alive": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": "live",
|
||||
"live": True,
|
||||
"stale": False,
|
||||
"reason": "lock heartbeat and lease are fresh",
|
||||
evidence: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"pid_alive": pid_alive,
|
||||
"lifecycle": lifecycle,
|
||||
"legacy_lease": legacy,
|
||||
"task_session_id": lease_task_session_id(lock_data) or None,
|
||||
"heartbeat_at": heartbeat_at.isoformat() if heartbeat_at else None,
|
||||
"expires_at": expires_at.isoformat() if expires_at else None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def _result(status: str, *, live: bool, reason: str, **extra: Any) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": status,
|
||||
"live": live,
|
||||
"stale": not live and status != STATUS_ABSENT,
|
||||
"reason": reason,
|
||||
**evidence,
|
||||
**extra,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if legacy:
|
||||
# AC-N8: the preserved absolute expiry is the only clock for a lock
|
||||
# written before task-session heartbeats existed.
|
||||
if expires_at and expires_at <= current:
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
STATUS_EXPIRED,
|
||||
live=False,
|
||||
reason=f"lease expired at {expires_at.isoformat()}",
|
||||
)
|
||||
if pid is not None and not pid_alive:
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
STATUS_STALE, live=False, reason=f"owner pid {pid} is not alive"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
STATUS_LIVE,
|
||||
live=True,
|
||||
reason=(
|
||||
"legacy lease is within its recorded absolute expiry; the "
|
||||
"heartbeat grace does not apply retroactively"
|
||||
),
|
||||
legacy_expiry_preserved=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Heartbeat lifecycle ──
|
||||
if pid is not None and not pid_alive:
|
||||
# Unchanged dead-PID band: #753 recovery depends on this exact status.
|
||||
return _result(STATUS_STALE, live=False, reason=f"owner pid {pid} is not alive")
|
||||
|
||||
if heartbeat_at is None:
|
||||
# Contradictory: a heartbeat lease must carry a heartbeat. Fail closed.
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
STATUS_STALE_MISSED_HEARTBEAT,
|
||||
live=False,
|
||||
reason=(
|
||||
f"lease declares lifecycle '{lifecycle}' but records no "
|
||||
"last_heartbeat_at (fail closed)"
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if policy.absolute_cap_hours and created_at is not None:
|
||||
cap_at = created_at + timedelta(hours=policy.absolute_cap_hours)
|
||||
if cap_at <= current:
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
STATUS_STALE_ABSOLUTE_CAP,
|
||||
live=False,
|
||||
reason=(
|
||||
f"lease exceeded its {policy.absolute_cap_hours}h absolute cap "
|
||||
f"at {cap_at.isoformat()}; canonical re-adoption is required"
|
||||
),
|
||||
absolute_cap_at=cap_at.isoformat(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
grace_at = heartbeat_at + timedelta(minutes=policy.missed_heartbeat_grace_minutes)
|
||||
if grace_at <= current or (expires_at is not None and expires_at <= current):
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
STATUS_STALE_MISSED_HEARTBEAT,
|
||||
live=False,
|
||||
reason=(
|
||||
f"no valid heartbeat since {heartbeat_at.isoformat()}; the "
|
||||
f"{policy.missed_heartbeat_grace_minutes}min grace lapsed at "
|
||||
f"{grace_at.isoformat()}"
|
||||
),
|
||||
missed_heartbeat_since=grace_at.isoformat(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
warning_at = heartbeat_at + timedelta(minutes=policy.stale_warning_minutes)
|
||||
return _result(
|
||||
STATUS_LIVE,
|
||||
live=True,
|
||||
reason="lease heartbeat is fresh within the configured grace",
|
||||
heartbeat_warning=warning_at <= current,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _same_realpath(left: str | None, right: str | None) -> bool:
|
||||
if not left or not right:
|
||||
@@ -446,6 +949,27 @@ def assess_expired_lock_reclaim(
|
||||
"reasons": ["lock is still live; cannot reclaim (fail closed)"],
|
||||
"freshness": freshness,
|
||||
}
|
||||
status = str(freshness.get("status") or "")
|
||||
if status in (STATUS_STALE_MISSED_HEARTBEAT, STATUS_STALE_ABSOLUTE_CAP):
|
||||
# #790: under the heartbeat lifecycle the heartbeat *is* the liveness
|
||||
# proof, so a session that stopped heartbeating past its grace has
|
||||
# released its claim by definition. Requiring a dead PID on top of that
|
||||
# would reinstate the original defect — the recorded PID is the shared
|
||||
# daemon, which stays alive across every abandoned task it ever served.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# This band is unreachable for a legacy lease (AC-N8), so no lock
|
||||
# written before this lifecycle can be reclaimed by this path.
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"reclaim_allowed": True,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"heartbeat-lifecycle lease is {status}: {freshness.get('reason')}"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"freshness": freshness,
|
||||
"prior_branch": existing_lock.get("branch_name"),
|
||||
"prior_worktree": existing_lock.get("worktree_path"),
|
||||
"prior_pid": existing_lock.get("session_pid") or existing_lock.get("pid"),
|
||||
"prior_task_session_id": lease_task_session_id(existing_lock) or None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
pid = existing_lock.get("session_pid")
|
||||
if pid is None:
|
||||
pid = existing_lock.get("pid")
|
||||
@@ -737,308 +1261,4 @@ def format_lock_proof(
|
||||
parts.append("lock released")
|
||||
elif released is False:
|
||||
parts.append("lock retained")
|
||||
return "; ".join(parts)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── #871: durable linked-issue lock head refresh after branch synchronization ──
|
||||
_FULL_SHA_RE = re.compile(r"^[0-9a-f]{40}$", re.IGNORECASE)
|
||||
|
||||
# Provenance recorded on the lock when the head is refreshed by a sanctioned
|
||||
# merge-based branch synchronization (``gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge``).
|
||||
LOCK_HEAD_REFRESH_PROVENANCE_MERGE_SYNC = "gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _norm_sha(value: Any) -> str | None:
|
||||
text = str(value or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
return text if _FULL_SHA_RE.match(text) else None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _lock_claimant_view(lock: dict[str, Any] | None) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
if not isinstance(lock, dict):
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
claimant = lock.get("claimant")
|
||||
if not isinstance(claimant, dict):
|
||||
lease = lock.get("work_lease")
|
||||
claimant = lease.get("claimant") if isinstance(lease, dict) else None
|
||||
return dict(claimant) if isinstance(claimant, dict) else {}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess_durable_lock_head_refresh(
|
||||
existing_lock: dict[str, Any] | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
remote: str,
|
||||
org: str,
|
||||
repo: str,
|
||||
issue_number: int,
|
||||
branch_name: str,
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
pr_number: int | None,
|
||||
identity: str | None,
|
||||
profile: str | None,
|
||||
current_pid: int | None,
|
||||
expected_old_head: str | None,
|
||||
new_head: str | None,
|
||||
base_head: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Fail-closed assessment for refreshing a durable lock's recorded head (#871).
|
||||
|
||||
A successful ``gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge`` advances the *remote* PR head
|
||||
but must also advance the durable linked-issue lock so a later dead-session
|
||||
recovery can prove ownership. This decides whether that refresh is permitted;
|
||||
it mutates nothing.
|
||||
|
||||
Every element of durable ownership is re-verified against the persisted lock —
|
||||
repository, issue, branch, worktree, claimant identity/profile, and the live
|
||||
owning session — and the recorded head is compare-and-swapped: the lock's
|
||||
currently recorded synced head (if any) must equal ``expected_old_head``, so a
|
||||
lock whose head or provenance changed concurrently is never overwritten.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
old = _norm_sha(expected_old_head)
|
||||
new = _norm_sha(new_head)
|
||||
evidence: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"issue_number": issue_number,
|
||||
"branch_name": branch_name,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"expected_old_head": old,
|
||||
"new_head": new,
|
||||
"base_head": _norm_sha(base_head),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if not isinstance(existing_lock, dict) or not existing_lock:
|
||||
reasons.append("no durable lock exists for this issue; nothing to refresh")
|
||||
return {"allowed": False, "reasons": reasons, "evidence": evidence,
|
||||
"expected_generation": 0}
|
||||
|
||||
lock = dict(existing_lock)
|
||||
evidence["current_generation"] = lock_generation(lock)
|
||||
|
||||
if lock.get("issue_number") != issue_number:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"durable lock targets issue #{lock.get('issue_number')}, not "
|
||||
f"#{issue_number}; refusing head refresh"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
for field, expected in (("remote", remote), ("org", org), ("repo", repo)):
|
||||
actual = str(lock.get(field) or "").strip()
|
||||
if actual != str(expected or "").strip():
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lock {field} '{actual}' does not match requested "
|
||||
f"'{str(expected or '').strip()}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
locked_branch = str(lock.get("branch_name") or "").strip()
|
||||
if locked_branch != str(branch_name or "").strip():
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lock branch '{locked_branch}' does not match requested "
|
||||
f"'{str(branch_name or '').strip()}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
locked_worktree = str(lock.get("worktree_path") or "").strip()
|
||||
try:
|
||||
same_wt = bool(locked_worktree) and bool(worktree_path) and (
|
||||
os.path.realpath(locked_worktree) == os.path.realpath(worktree_path)
|
||||
)
|
||||
except OSError:
|
||||
same_wt = locked_worktree == (worktree_path or "")
|
||||
if not same_wt:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lock worktree '{locked_worktree}' does not match declared "
|
||||
f"'{str(worktree_path or '').strip()}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
claimant = _lock_claimant_view(lock)
|
||||
locked_identity = str(claimant.get("username") or "").strip()
|
||||
locked_profile = str(claimant.get("profile") or "").strip()
|
||||
if not locked_identity or not locked_profile:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"durable lock does not record a claimant identity/profile; "
|
||||
"ownership could not be proven for head refresh"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if not str(identity or "").strip() or not str(profile or "").strip():
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"active session identity/profile is unknown; ownership could not be "
|
||||
"proven for head refresh"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if locked_identity and str(identity or "").strip() and locked_identity != str(identity).strip():
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lock claimant '{locked_identity}' does not match active identity "
|
||||
f"'{str(identity).strip()}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if locked_profile and str(profile or "").strip() and locked_profile != str(profile).strip():
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"lock profile '{locked_profile}' does not match active profile "
|
||||
f"'{str(profile).strip()}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# The refresh is written by the LIVE owning author session. A refresh is not
|
||||
# a recovery: the current process must be the recorded owner.
|
||||
recorded_pid = lock.get("session_pid")
|
||||
if recorded_pid is None:
|
||||
recorded_pid = lock.get("pid")
|
||||
evidence["recorded_pid"] = recorded_pid
|
||||
evidence["current_pid"] = current_pid
|
||||
if current_pid is None:
|
||||
reasons.append("current session pid is unknown; cannot prove live ownership")
|
||||
else:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
if recorded_pid is None or int(recorded_pid) != int(current_pid):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"durable lock is owned by pid {recorded_pid}, not the current "
|
||||
f"session pid {current_pid}; head refresh requires the live owner"
|
||||
)
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"durable lock owner pid is malformed; cannot prove live ownership"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if not old:
|
||||
reasons.append("expected_old_head is not a full 40-char hex SHA (fail closed)")
|
||||
if not new:
|
||||
reasons.append("new_head is not a full 40-char hex SHA (fail closed)")
|
||||
if old and new and old == new:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"new head equals the expected old head; a sync must advance the head"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Compare-and-swap on the recorded head: if the lock already records a synced
|
||||
# head it must be exactly the expected old head, else another sync moved it.
|
||||
recorded_synced = _norm_sha(lock.get("synced_pr_head"))
|
||||
evidence["recorded_synced_pr_head"] = recorded_synced
|
||||
if recorded_synced is not None and old is not None and recorded_synced != old:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"durable lock already records synced head {recorded_synced}, not the "
|
||||
f"expected old head {old}; a concurrent sync changed it (CAS fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if reasons:
|
||||
return {"allowed": False, "reasons": reasons, "evidence": evidence,
|
||||
"expected_generation": lock_generation(lock)}
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"allowed": True,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"durable lock for issue #{issue_number} branch '{locked_branch}' is "
|
||||
f"owned by the live session; refresh recorded head {old} -> {new}"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"evidence": evidence,
|
||||
"expected_generation": lock_generation(lock),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def apply_durable_lock_head_refresh(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
remote: str,
|
||||
org: str,
|
||||
repo: str,
|
||||
issue_number: int,
|
||||
branch_name: str,
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
pr_number: int | None,
|
||||
identity: str | None,
|
||||
profile: str | None,
|
||||
current_pid: int | None,
|
||||
expected_old_head: str | None,
|
||||
new_head: str | None,
|
||||
synced_at: str,
|
||||
base_head: str | None = None,
|
||||
provenance: str = LOCK_HEAD_REFRESH_PROVENANCE_MERGE_SYNC,
|
||||
lock_dir: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""CAS-refresh the durable lock's recorded head after a branch sync (#871).
|
||||
|
||||
Reads the durable lock from disk, re-asserts ownership via
|
||||
``assess_durable_lock_head_refresh``, and — only when permitted — writes the
|
||||
new synced head through ``bind_session_lock`` with a generation compare-and-
|
||||
swap. Then re-reads the lock and proves it records the complete new head
|
||||
(read-after-write). Any failure at any step returns ``refreshed=False`` with
|
||||
reasons; the caller must treat that as a partial lifecycle failure and never
|
||||
report a fully successful synchronization.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
existing = load_issue_lock(
|
||||
remote=remote, org=org, repo=repo, issue_number=issue_number, lock_dir=lock_dir
|
||||
)
|
||||
assessment = assess_durable_lock_head_refresh(
|
||||
existing,
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
org=org,
|
||||
repo=repo,
|
||||
issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
branch_name=branch_name,
|
||||
worktree_path=worktree_path,
|
||||
pr_number=pr_number,
|
||||
identity=identity,
|
||||
profile=profile,
|
||||
current_pid=current_pid,
|
||||
expected_old_head=expected_old_head,
|
||||
new_head=new_head,
|
||||
base_head=base_head,
|
||||
)
|
||||
result: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"refreshed": False,
|
||||
"read_after_write_ok": False,
|
||||
"prior_head": _norm_sha(expected_old_head),
|
||||
"new_head": _norm_sha(new_head),
|
||||
"reasons": list(assessment.get("reasons") or []),
|
||||
"evidence": assessment.get("evidence"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
if not assessment.get("allowed"):
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
new = _norm_sha(new_head)
|
||||
old = _norm_sha(expected_old_head)
|
||||
record = dict(existing or {})
|
||||
sync_block = {
|
||||
"last_synced_pr_head": new,
|
||||
"prior_pr_head": old,
|
||||
"base_head": _norm_sha(base_head),
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"provenance": provenance,
|
||||
"synced_at": synced_at,
|
||||
"synced_by_pid": current_pid,
|
||||
"synced_by": {
|
||||
"username": str(identity or "").strip() or None,
|
||||
"profile": str(profile or "").strip() or None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
record["synced_pr_head"] = new
|
||||
record["branch_sync"] = sync_block
|
||||
history = record.get("branch_sync_history")
|
||||
if not isinstance(history, list):
|
||||
history = []
|
||||
history = list(history)
|
||||
history.append(sync_block)
|
||||
record["branch_sync_history"] = history
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
bind_session_lock(
|
||||
record,
|
||||
lock_dir=lock_dir,
|
||||
expected_generation=assessment.get("expected_generation"),
|
||||
renewal_sanctioned=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # CAS miss or write failure — partial lifecycle failure
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"durable lock head refresh write failed (fail closed): {exc}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
after = load_issue_lock(
|
||||
remote=remote, org=org, repo=repo, issue_number=issue_number, lock_dir=lock_dir
|
||||
)
|
||||
after_head = _norm_sha((after or {}).get("synced_pr_head"))
|
||||
result["lock_generation_after"] = lock_generation(after)
|
||||
if after_head == new and new is not None:
|
||||
result["refreshed"] = True
|
||||
result["read_after_write_ok"] = True
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"durable lock recorded head refreshed to {new} and verified by "
|
||||
"read-after-write"
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
"read-after-write verification failed: durable lock does not record "
|
||||
f"the new head {new} (found {after_head}); partial lifecycle failure"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
return "; ".join(parts)
|
||||
@@ -145,175 +145,6 @@ def read_head_ancestry(
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def read_merge_sync_provenance(
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
prior_head_sha: str | None,
|
||||
synced_head_sha: str | None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Observe whether ``synced_head_sha`` is a sanctioned merge-based branch sync
|
||||
that advanced the PR branch past ``prior_head_sha`` (#871).
|
||||
|
||||
``gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge`` advances a PR branch by merging the base
|
||||
branch *into* the branch (``POST /pulls/{n}/update?style=merge``). The result
|
||||
is a merge commit ``M`` on the branch whose **first** parent is the prior
|
||||
branch head and whose second parent is the base tip. When the owning session
|
||||
then dies without the durable lock's recorded head being refreshed, the local
|
||||
worktree still sits at ``prior_head_sha`` while the live PR head is ``M``.
|
||||
|
||||
Recovering that drift safely requires proving the remote head is *exactly*
|
||||
such a merge-sync — not a rewrite, rebase, force-push, or an unrelated
|
||||
commit. This is that server-side observation. It reports facts only; the
|
||||
disposition lives in ``issue_lock_recovery``. Every field is read from git in
|
||||
the declared worktree — nothing is supplied by, or reachable from, an MCP
|
||||
caller (#871).
|
||||
|
||||
Provenance is proven only when ALL hold:
|
||||
|
||||
* both commits are present (a rewritten/force-moved prior head leaves the
|
||||
object graph and fails closed);
|
||||
* ``prior_head_sha`` is a strict ancestor of ``synced_head_sha`` (the branch
|
||||
history is preserved, never replaced);
|
||||
* ``synced_head_sha`` is a merge commit (two or more parents), i.e. a base
|
||||
merged in — a plain fast-forward of new direct commits is not a sync;
|
||||
* ``prior_head_sha`` is an ancestor of the merge's **first** parent, so the
|
||||
branch mainline (first-parent lineage) still reaches the prior head — a
|
||||
rebase/force-push that re-authored the branch side fails this.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
path = (worktree_path or "").strip()
|
||||
prior = (prior_head_sha or "").strip()
|
||||
synced = (synced_head_sha or "").strip()
|
||||
result: dict = {
|
||||
"prior_head_sha": prior or None,
|
||||
"synced_head_sha": synced or None,
|
||||
"probe_ok": False,
|
||||
"prior_present": False,
|
||||
"synced_present": False,
|
||||
"prior_is_ancestor": False,
|
||||
"synced_is_merge": False,
|
||||
"first_parent_reaches_prior": False,
|
||||
"is_merge_sync": False,
|
||||
"first_parent_sha": None,
|
||||
"parent_count": None,
|
||||
"proof": None,
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
if not path or not prior or not synced:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
"merge-sync provenance probe requires a worktree path and both "
|
||||
"commit SHAs"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
if prior == synced:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
"prior and synced heads are identical; no branch sync occurred"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
def _present(sha: str) -> bool:
|
||||
res = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", path, "rev-parse", "--verify", "--quiet", f"{sha}^{{commit}}"],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return res.returncode == 0
|
||||
|
||||
def _is_ancestor(ancestor: str, descendant: str) -> bool | None:
|
||||
res = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", path, "merge-base", "--is-ancestor", ancestor, descendant],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if res.returncode == 0:
|
||||
return True
|
||||
if res.returncode == 1:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
return None # failed probe — never a silent "no"
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
result["prior_present"] = _present(prior)
|
||||
result["synced_present"] = _present(synced)
|
||||
except OSError as exc: # git unavailable — fail closed, never assume
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(f"merge-sync provenance probe could not run: {exc}")
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
if not result["prior_present"]:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"prior head {prior} is not reachable in '{path}'; history may have "
|
||||
"been rewritten or force-moved"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if not result["synced_present"]:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"synced head {synced} is not reachable in '{path}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if not (result["prior_present"] and result["synced_present"]):
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
ancestor = _is_ancestor(prior, synced)
|
||||
if ancestor is None:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
"ancestry probe failed; merge-sync provenance unproven"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
result["prior_is_ancestor"] = bool(ancestor)
|
||||
if not ancestor:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"prior head {prior} is not an ancestor of synced head {synced}; "
|
||||
"the branch history was not preserved (not a merge-based sync)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
parents_res = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", path, "rev-list", "--parents", "-n", "1", synced],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if parents_res.returncode != 0:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"could not read parents of {synced}; merge-sync provenance unproven"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
tokens = (parents_res.stdout or "").split()
|
||||
# tokens[0] is the commit itself; the rest are its parents.
|
||||
parents = tokens[1:]
|
||||
result["parent_count"] = len(parents)
|
||||
result["synced_is_merge"] = len(parents) >= 2
|
||||
if not result["synced_is_merge"]:
|
||||
result["probe_ok"] = True
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"synced head {synced} has {len(parents)} parent(s); a merge-based "
|
||||
"branch sync produces a merge commit (two or more parents)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
first_parent = parents[0]
|
||||
result["first_parent_sha"] = first_parent
|
||||
|
||||
fp_reaches = _is_ancestor(prior, first_parent) if prior != first_parent else True
|
||||
if fp_reaches is None:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
"first-parent ancestry probe failed; merge-sync provenance unproven"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
result["first_parent_reaches_prior"] = bool(fp_reaches)
|
||||
result["probe_ok"] = True
|
||||
if not fp_reaches:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"merge first parent {first_parent} does not reach prior head "
|
||||
f"{prior}; the branch mainline was re-authored (not a sanctioned sync)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
result["is_merge_sync"] = True
|
||||
result["proof"] = (
|
||||
f"synced head {synced} is a merge commit (parents={len(parents)}) whose "
|
||||
f"first-parent lineage reaches prior head {prior}; base merged into branch"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def read_recorded_base(
|
||||
worktree_path: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
|
||||
+212
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
|
||||
"""Central lease policy configuration (#790 Slice A, AC-N7).
|
||||
|
||||
The single authoritative source for every lease duration in the project. Before
|
||||
this module the numbers were scattered: a four-hour author TTL was declared
|
||||
twice (``issue_lock_store`` and ``gitea_mcp_server``), the reviewer/merger
|
||||
sliding window lived in ``reviewer_pr_lease``, the conflict-fix window in
|
||||
``pr_work_lease``, and the control-plane default in ``control_plane_db``.
|
||||
Nothing tied them together, so tuning one class silently diverged from the
|
||||
others and no reader could answer "how long does a lease live?" without
|
||||
grepping four files.
|
||||
|
||||
AC-N7 requires that this configuration exist *before* the first heartbeat and
|
||||
TTL behavior that reads from it, so it ships in Slice A rather than trailing the
|
||||
code it governs.
|
||||
|
||||
Deliberate boundaries:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Declaration is not rewiring.** Every task class is declared here, but only
|
||||
those with ``heartbeat_lifecycle_active`` were migrated onto the shared
|
||||
heartbeat lifecycle in Slice A — currently ``author_issue_work`` alone.
|
||||
Reviewer, merger, and conflict-fix leases keep their own existing behavior
|
||||
until Slice C moves them; their numbers are recorded here so the two cannot
|
||||
drift apart unnoticed, and ``tests/test_issue_790_lease_policy.py`` asserts
|
||||
the recorded values still equal the constants those modules use.
|
||||
* **No policy decision lives here.** This module answers "how long", never "may
|
||||
this session proceed". Freshness, reclaim, and renewal dispositions stay in
|
||||
``issue_lock_store``.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
# Task classes. Only the first is migrated onto the shared lifecycle in Slice A.
|
||||
TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK = "author_issue_work"
|
||||
TASK_CLASS_REVIEWER_PR = "reviewer_pr"
|
||||
TASK_CLASS_MERGER_PR = "merger_pr"
|
||||
TASK_CLASS_CONFLICT_FIX = "conflict_fix"
|
||||
|
||||
# Durable marker for a lease minted under the shared heartbeat lifecycle.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# #790 AC-N8: this explicit marker — never a timestamp comparison — is what
|
||||
# distinguishes a heartbeat-lifecycle lease from a legacy one. A lock written
|
||||
# before this lifecycle existed carries no marker and reads as
|
||||
# ``LIFECYCLE_LEGACY``.
|
||||
LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1 = "heartbeat-v1"
|
||||
LIFECYCLE_LEGACY = "legacy"
|
||||
|
||||
_ENV_PREFIX = "GITEA_LEASE_POLICY"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class LeasePolicy:
|
||||
"""Durations governing one task class.
|
||||
|
||||
All intervals are minutes except ``absolute_cap_hours``. ``None`` for the
|
||||
cap means the class has no maximum continuous duration.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
task_class: str
|
||||
initial_ttl_minutes: float
|
||||
heartbeat_cadence_minutes: float
|
||||
stale_warning_minutes: float
|
||||
missed_heartbeat_grace_minutes: float
|
||||
absolute_cap_hours: float | None
|
||||
recovery_grace_minutes: float
|
||||
terminal_race_drain_minutes: float
|
||||
terminal_retirement_eligible: bool
|
||||
heartbeat_lifecycle_active: bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Defaults. ``author_issue_work`` adopts the reviewer window proven by #747
|
||||
# rather than inventing new numbers: a lease expires 10 minutes after its last
|
||||
# valid heartbeat, warns at half that, and an actively heartbeating session is
|
||||
# never evicted. The prior value was a fixed four hours (240 minutes) that no
|
||||
# heartbeat could shorten — the defect this issue exists to correct.
|
||||
_DEFAULTS: dict[str, LeasePolicy] = {
|
||||
TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK: LeasePolicy(
|
||||
task_class=TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK,
|
||||
initial_ttl_minutes=10.0,
|
||||
heartbeat_cadence_minutes=2.0,
|
||||
stale_warning_minutes=5.0,
|
||||
missed_heartbeat_grace_minutes=10.0,
|
||||
absolute_cap_hours=8.0,
|
||||
recovery_grace_minutes=10.0,
|
||||
terminal_race_drain_minutes=2.0,
|
||||
terminal_retirement_eligible=True,
|
||||
heartbeat_lifecycle_active=True,
|
||||
),
|
||||
# Declared, not rewired. These mirror reviewer_pr_lease.LEASE_TTL_MINUTES
|
||||
# and STALE_WARNING_MINUTES; Slice C migrates the call sites.
|
||||
TASK_CLASS_REVIEWER_PR: LeasePolicy(
|
||||
task_class=TASK_CLASS_REVIEWER_PR,
|
||||
initial_ttl_minutes=10.0,
|
||||
heartbeat_cadence_minutes=2.0,
|
||||
stale_warning_minutes=5.0,
|
||||
missed_heartbeat_grace_minutes=10.0,
|
||||
absolute_cap_hours=None,
|
||||
recovery_grace_minutes=10.0,
|
||||
terminal_race_drain_minutes=2.0,
|
||||
terminal_retirement_eligible=False,
|
||||
heartbeat_lifecycle_active=False,
|
||||
),
|
||||
TASK_CLASS_MERGER_PR: LeasePolicy(
|
||||
task_class=TASK_CLASS_MERGER_PR,
|
||||
initial_ttl_minutes=10.0,
|
||||
heartbeat_cadence_minutes=2.0,
|
||||
stale_warning_minutes=5.0,
|
||||
missed_heartbeat_grace_minutes=10.0,
|
||||
absolute_cap_hours=None,
|
||||
recovery_grace_minutes=10.0,
|
||||
terminal_race_drain_minutes=2.0,
|
||||
terminal_retirement_eligible=False,
|
||||
heartbeat_lifecycle_active=False,
|
||||
),
|
||||
# Mirrors pr_work_lease.DEFAULT_CONFLICT_FIX_TTL_MINUTES. Deliberately left
|
||||
# at its current window; shortening it is Slice C's call, not this slice's.
|
||||
TASK_CLASS_CONFLICT_FIX: LeasePolicy(
|
||||
task_class=TASK_CLASS_CONFLICT_FIX,
|
||||
initial_ttl_minutes=120.0,
|
||||
heartbeat_cadence_minutes=2.0,
|
||||
stale_warning_minutes=5.0,
|
||||
missed_heartbeat_grace_minutes=10.0,
|
||||
absolute_cap_hours=None,
|
||||
recovery_grace_minutes=10.0,
|
||||
terminal_race_drain_minutes=2.0,
|
||||
terminal_retirement_eligible=False,
|
||||
heartbeat_lifecycle_active=False,
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
_NUMERIC_FIELDS = (
|
||||
"initial_ttl_minutes",
|
||||
"heartbeat_cadence_minutes",
|
||||
"stale_warning_minutes",
|
||||
"missed_heartbeat_grace_minutes",
|
||||
"absolute_cap_hours",
|
||||
"recovery_grace_minutes",
|
||||
"terminal_race_drain_minutes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def env_var_name(task_class: str, field: str) -> str:
|
||||
"""Environment variable that overrides one field of one task class."""
|
||||
return f"{_ENV_PREFIX}_{task_class.upper()}_{field.upper()}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _override(task_class: str, field: str, default: float | None) -> float | None:
|
||||
"""Read one override, falling back to *default* on anything unusable.
|
||||
|
||||
A malformed or non-positive override is ignored rather than raised: a typo
|
||||
in an environment variable must not be able to mint a zero-length lease that
|
||||
makes every claim instantly reclaimable, nor crash the server at import.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
raw = (os.environ.get(env_var_name(task_class, field)) or "").strip()
|
||||
if not raw:
|
||||
return default
|
||||
try:
|
||||
value = float(raw)
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
return default
|
||||
if value <= 0:
|
||||
return default
|
||||
return value
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def policy_for(task_class: str) -> LeasePolicy:
|
||||
"""Return the effective policy for *task_class*.
|
||||
|
||||
Unknown task classes fall back to the author policy, which is the most
|
||||
conservative migrated class, rather than raising — a new caller must never
|
||||
be able to crash a lock write by naming a class this table has not learned.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
key = str(task_class or "").strip() or TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK
|
||||
base = _DEFAULTS.get(key) or _DEFAULTS[TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK]
|
||||
resolved = {
|
||||
field: _override(base.task_class, field, getattr(base, field))
|
||||
for field in _NUMERIC_FIELDS
|
||||
}
|
||||
if all(resolved[field] == getattr(base, field) for field in _NUMERIC_FIELDS):
|
||||
return base
|
||||
return LeasePolicy(
|
||||
task_class=base.task_class,
|
||||
terminal_retirement_eligible=base.terminal_retirement_eligible,
|
||||
heartbeat_lifecycle_active=base.heartbeat_lifecycle_active,
|
||||
**resolved,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def known_task_classes() -> tuple[str, ...]:
|
||||
"""Every declared task class, migrated or not."""
|
||||
return tuple(_DEFAULTS)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def describe(task_class: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Serializable view of a policy, for audit records and tool payloads."""
|
||||
policy = policy_for(task_class)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"task_class": policy.task_class,
|
||||
"initial_ttl_minutes": policy.initial_ttl_minutes,
|
||||
"heartbeat_cadence_minutes": policy.heartbeat_cadence_minutes,
|
||||
"stale_warning_minutes": policy.stale_warning_minutes,
|
||||
"missed_heartbeat_grace_minutes": policy.missed_heartbeat_grace_minutes,
|
||||
"absolute_cap_hours": policy.absolute_cap_hours,
|
||||
"recovery_grace_minutes": policy.recovery_grace_minutes,
|
||||
"terminal_race_drain_minutes": policy.terminal_race_drain_minutes,
|
||||
"terminal_retirement_eligible": policy.terminal_retirement_eligible,
|
||||
"heartbeat_lifecycle_active": policy.heartbeat_lifecycle_active,
|
||||
"lifecycle_version": LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1,
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -32,14 +32,12 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.issue.comment",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
# #864: dirty-preserving same-claimant author-session rebind (dead owner PID).
|
||||
# Author MCP tool path. Reconciler execute is gated inside the tool via
|
||||
# authorize_reconciler_execute + role_kind checks (not this map entry).
|
||||
"rebind_dirty_same_claimant_author_session": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.issue.comment",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"gitea_rebind_dirty_same_claimant_author_session": {
|
||||
# #790 Slice A: prove an owned author lease is still active. Strictly
|
||||
# narrower than lock_issue — it can only slide a lease this exact session
|
||||
# already owns, never acquire, take over, or revive one — so it gates on the
|
||||
# same authority rather than introducing an operation name that every
|
||||
# already-configured author profile would be missing.
|
||||
"heartbeat_issue_lock": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.issue.comment",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1639,358 +1639,6 @@ class TestSecondRemediationIntegration(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(ownership_calls)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestIssue855ExactPrSelector(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""#855: exact pr_number pin for reconcile_merged_cleanups (#851 lifecycle)."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._remotes = patch.dict(
|
||||
mcp_server.REMOTES,
|
||||
{
|
||||
"prgs": {
|
||||
"host": "gitea.example.com",
|
||||
"org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
"repo": "Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._remotes.start()
|
||||
patch("gitea_audit.audit_enabled", return_value=False).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api = patch("mcp_server.api_request").start()
|
||||
self.mock_all = patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[]).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.is_head_ancestor_of_ref",
|
||||
return_value=True,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._profile_operation_gate",
|
||||
return_value=[],
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
|
||||
return_value={"records": [], "inventory_error": False},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=[],
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.audit_reconciliation_mode.check_cleanup_execution_allowed",
|
||||
return_value=(True, []),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
patch.stopall()
|
||||
|
||||
def _merged_pr(self, number, branch, sha="c" * 40):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"number": number,
|
||||
"title": f"PR {number}",
|
||||
"body": f"Closes #{number - 4}",
|
||||
"merged": True,
|
||||
"merged_at": "2026-07-23T12:00:00Z",
|
||||
"merge_commit_sha": "f" * 40,
|
||||
"state": "closed",
|
||||
"head": {"ref": branch, "sha": sha},
|
||||
"base": {"ref": "master"},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exact_pr_848_ignores_newer_852_in_batch_queue(self):
|
||||
"""pr_number=848 selects only #848 even when #852 is newer/first."""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
pr_848 = self._merged_pr(
|
||||
848, "fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers", sha="c3f282ba" + "0" * 32
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Closed list would rank #852 first in batch mode; exact pin must ignore it.
|
||||
closed_batch = [
|
||||
self._merged_pr(852, "fix/issue-851-cleanup-worktree-before-remote-delete"),
|
||||
pr_848,
|
||||
self._merged_pr(849, "fix/issue-849-other"),
|
||||
self._merged_pr(846, "fix/issue-846-other"),
|
||||
self._merged_pr(845, "fix/issue-845-other"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
batch_fetch_calls = []
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api(method, url, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and url.rstrip("/").endswith("/pulls/848"):
|
||||
return dict(pr_848)
|
||||
if method == "GET" and "/pulls/" in url:
|
||||
raise AssertionError(f"unexpected PR fetch: {url}")
|
||||
if method == "GET" and "/branches/" in url:
|
||||
return {"name": "present"}
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_all(url, auth, limit=None):
|
||||
batch_fetch_calls.append((url, limit))
|
||||
if "state=open" in url:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if "state=closed" in url:
|
||||
# Exact mode must not use the closed batch list.
|
||||
raise AssertionError(
|
||||
"exact pr_number mode must not page closed PRs: " + url
|
||||
)
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
self.mock_all.side_effect = fake_all
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._remote_branch_exists",
|
||||
return_value=True,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
side_effect=lambda **kwargs: {
|
||||
"entries": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": int(pr["number"]),
|
||||
"head_branch": (pr.get("head") or {}).get("ref"),
|
||||
"issue_number": 844,
|
||||
"remote_branch": {
|
||||
"safe_to_delete_remote": True,
|
||||
"head_branch": (pr.get("head") or {}).get("ref"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": True,
|
||||
"worktree_path": (
|
||||
"/tmp/branches/fix-issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"
|
||||
),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"planned_execution_order": (
|
||||
mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.plan_cleanup_execution_order(
|
||||
remote_assessment={"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
local_assessment={"safe_to_remove_worktree": True},
|
||||
)
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
for pr in kwargs.get("closed_prs") or []
|
||||
if pr.get("merged_at") or pr.get("merged")
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
|
||||
"merged_pr_count": len(kwargs.get("closed_prs") or []),
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=True,
|
||||
pr_number=848,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("performed"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("selection_mode"), "exact_pr")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("selected_pr_number"), 848)
|
||||
entries = res.get("entries") or []
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(entries), 1, entries)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entries[0].get("pr_number"), 848)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
entries[0].get("head_branch"),
|
||||
"fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers",
|
||||
)
|
||||
# No other PR appears in plan.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(list((res.get("planned_execution_orders") or {}).keys()), ["848"])
|
||||
plan = (res.get("planned_execution_orders") or {}).get("848") or []
|
||||
actions = [s.get("action") for s in plan]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
actions,
|
||||
[
|
||||
"remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
"reassess_branch_ownership",
|
||||
"delete_remote_branch",
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Prove we never scanned the multi-PR closed batch.
|
||||
self.assertFalse(any("state=closed" in (u or "") for u, _ in batch_fetch_calls))
|
||||
# closed_batch fixture must remain unused (sanity).
|
||||
self.assertEqual(closed_batch[0]["number"], 852)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exact_pr_execute_only_mutates_selected_pr(self):
|
||||
"""Execute with pr_number must never touch #845/#846/#849/#852."""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
pr_848 = self._merged_pr(848, "fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers")
|
||||
worktree_path = "/tmp/branches/fix-issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"
|
||||
remove_calls = []
|
||||
delete_api_calls = []
|
||||
ownership_branches = []
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api(method, url, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and url.rstrip("/").endswith("/pulls/848"):
|
||||
return dict(pr_848)
|
||||
if method == "DELETE":
|
||||
delete_api_calls.append(url)
|
||||
# Forbid foreign PR branch deletion by URL content.
|
||||
for forbidden in ("845", "846", "849", "852"):
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(forbidden, url)
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_remove(project_root, branch, worktree_path=None):
|
||||
remove_calls.append({"branch": branch, "worktree_path": worktree_path})
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"message": f"removed {worktree_path}",
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_collect(**kwargs):
|
||||
ownership_branches.append(kwargs.get("branch"))
|
||||
return {"records": [], "inventory_error": False}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_probe(h, o, r, auth, br):
|
||||
return guard.classify_branch_readback_http_status(
|
||||
404, not_found_scope=guard.NOT_FOUND_SCOPE_BRANCH
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
self.mock_all.side_effect = lambda url, auth, limit=None: []
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._remote_branch_exists", return_value=True).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"entries": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": 848,
|
||||
"head_branch": "fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers",
|
||||
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": True,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
||||
},
|
||||
"planned_execution_order": [
|
||||
{"action": "remove_local_worktree", "phase": 1},
|
||||
{"action": "reassess_branch_ownership", "phase": 2},
|
||||
{"action": "delete_remote_branch", "phase": 3},
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [
|
||||
# Foreign scratch must be filtered before report execute loop;
|
||||
# if present here it would still be a test failure if acted on.
|
||||
],
|
||||
"merged_pr_count": 1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_remove,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_collect,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._probe_remote_branch", side_effect=fake_probe).start()
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=False,
|
||||
execute_confirmed=True,
|
||||
pr_number=848,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("performed") or res.get("executed"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("selection_mode"), "exact_pr")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("selected_pr_number"), 848)
|
||||
actions = res.get("actions") or []
|
||||
pr_numbers_touched = {
|
||||
a.get("pr_number") for a in actions if a.get("pr_number") is not None
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.assertTrue(pr_numbers_touched.issubset({None, 848}) or not pr_numbers_touched)
|
||||
removes = [a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree"]
|
||||
deletes = [a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(removes), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(remove_calls[0]["branch"], "fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(deletes), 1)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(deletes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(deletes[0].get("after_worktree_removal"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(delete_api_calls), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
ownership_branches, ["fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exact_pr_unknown_fails_closed_without_mutation(self):
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api(method, url, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and "/pulls/99999" in url:
|
||||
raise RuntimeError("HTTP 404 Not Found")
|
||||
raise AssertionError(f"unexpected API call {method} {url}")
|
||||
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=True,
|
||||
pr_number=99999,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("performed"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("blocker_kind"), "pr_unresolvable")
|
||||
self.assertIn("99999", " ".join(res.get("reasons") or []))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exact_pr_not_merged_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api(method, url, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and url.rstrip("/").endswith("/pulls/900"):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"number": 900,
|
||||
"merged": False,
|
||||
"merged_at": None,
|
||||
"state": "open",
|
||||
"head": {"ref": "feat/x", "sha": "a" * 40},
|
||||
}
|
||||
raise AssertionError(f"unexpected {method} {url}")
|
||||
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=False,
|
||||
execute_confirmed=True,
|
||||
pr_number=900,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("performed"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("blocker_kind"), "pr_not_merged")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exact_pr_invalid_number_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=True,
|
||||
pr_number=0,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("blocker_kind"), "invalid_pr_number")
|
||||
self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_batch_mode_still_works_without_pr_number(self):
|
||||
"""Unfiltered batch path remains backward compatible."""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
self.mock_all.side_effect = lambda url, auth, limit=None: []
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = lambda *a, **k: {}
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"entries": [],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
|
||||
"merged_pr_count": 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(dry_run=True, remote="prgs", limit=10)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("selection_mode"), "batch")
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(res.get("selected_pr_number"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -0,0 +1,444 @@
|
||||
"""Task heartbeat through the native MCP author path (#790 Slice A, AC-N6).
|
||||
|
||||
Assessor-level coverage is not sufficient here, and this project has already
|
||||
paid for learning that: in review #499 on PR #791 the #760 renewal waiver was
|
||||
computed correctly and then *discarded* at two later gates, so every real
|
||||
renewal still failed while the unit suite stayed green. AC-N6 exists because of
|
||||
that, and requires driving the real tools against a real git repository and a
|
||||
real durable lock file, composing the gates in production order.
|
||||
|
||||
These tests therefore call ``gitea_lock_issue`` and
|
||||
``gitea_heartbeat_issue_lock`` themselves and assert on what lands on disk,
|
||||
never on an assessor's return value alone.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))
|
||||
|
||||
from mutation_profile_fixture import shared_mutation_env # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
import issue_lock_provenance # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_store # noqa: E402
|
||||
import lease_policy # noqa: E402
|
||||
import mcp_server # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
ISSUE = 9791
|
||||
BRANCH = f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-heartbeat-mcp"
|
||||
IDENTITY = "example-user"
|
||||
PROFILE = "test-author-prgs"
|
||||
ORG = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting"
|
||||
REPO = "Gitea-Tools"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _ts(moment: datetime) -> str:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
moment.astimezone(timezone.utc)
|
||||
.replace(microsecond=0)
|
||||
.isoformat()
|
||||
.replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _HeartbeatMcpBase(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Real git repo plus a real durable lock, driven through the real tools."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.lock_dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self.lock_dir.cleanup)
|
||||
self.repo = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="issue790-mcp-")
|
||||
self.addCleanup(lambda: subprocess.run(["rm", "-rf", self.repo], check=False))
|
||||
self._init_worktree()
|
||||
self.remotes = patch.dict(
|
||||
mcp_server.REMOTES,
|
||||
{"prgs": {"host": "gitea.prgs.cc", "org": ORG, "repo": REPO}},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.remotes.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(patch.stopall)
|
||||
mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
|
||||
|
||||
def _git(self, *args):
|
||||
return subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", self.repo, *args], capture_output=True, text=True, check=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _init_worktree(self):
|
||||
self._git("init", "-q", "-b", "master")
|
||||
self._git("config", "user.email", "[email protected]")
|
||||
self._git("config", "user.name", "Test")
|
||||
with open(os.path.join(self.repo, "seed.txt"), "w") as fh:
|
||||
fh.write("seed\n")
|
||||
self._git("add", "seed.txt")
|
||||
self._git("commit", "-q", "-m", "seed")
|
||||
self.base_sha = self._git("rev-parse", "HEAD").stdout.strip()
|
||||
# A fresh claim starts base-equivalent, which is the ordinary first-lock
|
||||
# shape and exercises assess_issue_lock_worktree on its normal path.
|
||||
self._git("checkout", "-q", "-b", BRANCH)
|
||||
self.head_sha = self.base_sha
|
||||
self.worktree = os.path.realpath(self.repo)
|
||||
|
||||
def _lock_path(self):
|
||||
return issue_lock_store.lock_file_path(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org=ORG,
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
lock_dir=self.lock_dir.name,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _tool_env(self):
|
||||
env = shared_mutation_env(
|
||||
PROFILE, include_example_repo=True, GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR=self.lock_dir.name
|
||||
)
|
||||
env["GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"] = self.lock_dir.name
|
||||
return env
|
||||
|
||||
def _git_state(self, *, porcelain="", base_equivalent=True):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"current_branch": BRANCH,
|
||||
"porcelain_status": porcelain,
|
||||
"base_equivalent": base_equivalent,
|
||||
"head_sha": self.head_sha,
|
||||
"inspected_git_root": self.worktree,
|
||||
"base_branch": "master",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def run_lock_issue(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
branch_entries=None,
|
||||
open_prs=None,
|
||||
git_state=None,
|
||||
identity=IDENTITY,
|
||||
profile=PROFILE,
|
||||
):
|
||||
branch_entries = branch_entries if branch_entries is not None else []
|
||||
open_prs = open_prs if open_prs is not None else []
|
||||
git_state = git_state or self._git_state()
|
||||
env = self._tool_env()
|
||||
with patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=list(branch_entries)
|
||||
), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._list_open_pulls", return_value=list(open_prs)
|
||||
), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token x"
|
||||
), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._work_lease_claimant",
|
||||
return_value={"username": identity, "profile": profile},
|
||||
), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
|
||||
return_value=git_state,
|
||||
), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.issue_duplicate_context_fetcher",
|
||||
side_effect=lambda h, o, r, auth, issue_number: (
|
||||
list(open_prs),
|
||||
[b.get("name") for b in branch_entries if isinstance(b, dict)],
|
||||
{"status": "not_claimed"},
|
||||
),
|
||||
), patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
os.environ["GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"] = self.lock_dir.name
|
||||
return mcp_server.gitea_lock_issue(
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.worktree,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def run_heartbeat(
|
||||
self, *, task_session_id, identity=IDENTITY, profile=PROFILE, **kwargs
|
||||
):
|
||||
env = self._tool_env()
|
||||
with patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._work_lease_claimant",
|
||||
return_value={"username": identity, "profile": profile},
|
||||
), patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token x"), patch.dict(
|
||||
os.environ, env, clear=True
|
||||
):
|
||||
os.environ["GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"] = self.lock_dir.name
|
||||
return mcp_server.gitea_heartbeat_issue_lock(
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=kwargs.pop("branch_name", BRANCH),
|
||||
task_session_id=task_session_id,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
worktree_path=kwargs.pop("worktree_path", self.worktree),
|
||||
**kwargs,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def write_legacy_lock(self, *, hours_old: float = 3.0, ttl_hours: float = 4.0):
|
||||
"""A durable lock in the shape the store wrote before this slice."""
|
||||
now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
|
||||
claimant = {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE}
|
||||
created = now - timedelta(hours=hours_old)
|
||||
record = {
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"remote": "prgs",
|
||||
"org": ORG,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"worktree_path": self.worktree,
|
||||
"session_pid": os.getpid(),
|
||||
"pid": os.getpid(),
|
||||
"lock_generation": 1,
|
||||
"work_lease": {
|
||||
"operation_type": issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"pr_number": None,
|
||||
"branch": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": self.worktree,
|
||||
"claimant": claimant,
|
||||
"created_at": _ts(created),
|
||||
# The legacy signature: never advanced past creation.
|
||||
"last_heartbeat_at": _ts(created),
|
||||
"expires_at": _ts(created + timedelta(hours=ttl_hours)),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lock_provenance": issue_lock_provenance.build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
|
||||
tool="gitea_lock_issue", claimant=claimant
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
path = self._lock_path()
|
||||
record["lock_file_path"] = path
|
||||
issue_lock_store.save_lock_file(path, record)
|
||||
return record
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestLockIssueMintsTheLifecycle(_HeartbeatMcpBase):
|
||||
"""Durable lock creation and read-back through the real tool."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_native_lock_writes_the_marker_and_a_task_session_id(self):
|
||||
result = self.run_lock_issue()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["success"], result)
|
||||
|
||||
written = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(result["lock_file_path"])
|
||||
lease = written["work_lease"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
lease["lifecycle_version"], lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(lease["task_session_id"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(issue_lock_store.is_legacy_lease(written))
|
||||
# AC-N1: the ownership key is not the daemon pid, which is recorded
|
||||
# separately as evidence.
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(str(written["session_pid"]), lease["task_session_id"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(written["session_pid"], os.getpid())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_native_lease_uses_the_policy_window_not_four_hours(self):
|
||||
result = self.run_lock_issue()
|
||||
lease = result["work_lease"]
|
||||
created = datetime.fromisoformat(lease["created_at"].replace("Z", "+00:00"))
|
||||
expires = datetime.fromisoformat(lease["expires_at"].replace("Z", "+00:00"))
|
||||
policy = lease_policy.policy_for(lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
(expires - created).total_seconds() / 60.0, policy.initial_ttl_minutes
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_freshness_of_a_new_native_lock_is_live(self):
|
||||
result = self.run_lock_issue()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
result["lock_freshness"]["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_LIVE
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["lock_freshness"]["live"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestHeartbeatThroughTheTool(_HeartbeatMcpBase):
|
||||
def _lock_and_session(self):
|
||||
result = self.run_lock_issue()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["success"], result)
|
||||
return result, result["work_lease"]["task_session_id"]
|
||||
|
||||
def test_heartbeat_slides_the_lease_and_advances_the_generation(self):
|
||||
locked, session = self._lock_and_session()
|
||||
before = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(locked["lock_file_path"])
|
||||
|
||||
beat = self.run_heartbeat(task_session_id=session)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(beat["success"], beat)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(beat["operation"], "heartbeat")
|
||||
after = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(locked["lock_file_path"])
|
||||
self.assertGreater(
|
||||
issue_lock_store.lock_generation(after),
|
||||
issue_lock_store.lock_generation(before),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertGreaterEqual(
|
||||
after["work_lease"]["expires_at"], before["work_lease"]["expires_at"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(after["work_lease"]["heartbeat_count"], 2)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_heartbeat_evidence_survives_the_downstream_mutation_gate(self):
|
||||
"""The #499 F2 lesson, applied.
|
||||
|
||||
A sanction that is computed and then discarded downstream is worthless.
|
||||
After a heartbeat the lock must still satisfy the gate every author
|
||||
mutation runs through.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
locked, session = self._lock_and_session()
|
||||
self.run_heartbeat(task_session_id=session)
|
||||
|
||||
written = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(locked["lock_file_path"])
|
||||
verdict = issue_lock_store.verify_lock_for_mutation(
|
||||
written,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.worktree,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(verdict["proven"], verdict)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(verdict["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def _duplicate_gate(self, *, open_prs, branches):
|
||||
env = self._tool_env()
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token x"), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.issue_duplicate_context_fetcher",
|
||||
side_effect=lambda h, o, r, auth, issue_number: (
|
||||
list(open_prs),
|
||||
list(branches),
|
||||
{"status": "not_claimed"},
|
||||
),
|
||||
), patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
os.environ["GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"] = self.lock_dir.name
|
||||
return mcp_server.gitea_assess_work_issue_duplicate(
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE, branch_name=BRANCH, remote="prgs"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_heartbeat_does_not_change_the_duplicate_gate_verdict(self):
|
||||
"""The gate must be invariant under heartbeating.
|
||||
|
||||
The point is not that the gate passes — with a linked open PR at the
|
||||
lock phase it correctly blocks (#400), heartbeat or not. The property
|
||||
that matters is that sliding a lease neither loosens the gate nor
|
||||
corrupts the lock state it reads: the verdict before and after a
|
||||
heartbeat must be identical, for both the clear and the blocking shape.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
_, session = self._lock_and_session()
|
||||
linked = [{"number": 4242, "head": {"ref": BRANCH, "sha": self.head_sha}}]
|
||||
|
||||
clear_before = self._duplicate_gate(open_prs=[], branches=[])
|
||||
blocked_before = self._duplicate_gate(open_prs=linked, branches=[BRANCH])
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(self.run_heartbeat(task_session_id=session)["success"])
|
||||
|
||||
clear_after = self._duplicate_gate(open_prs=[], branches=[])
|
||||
blocked_after = self._duplicate_gate(open_prs=linked, branches=[BRANCH])
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(clear_before["outcome"], clear_after["outcome"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(clear_after["block"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(blocked_before["outcome"], blocked_after["outcome"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(blocked_after["block"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(blocked_after["linked_open_pr"], 4242)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_foreign_session_id_is_refused_through_the_tool(self):
|
||||
self._lock_and_session()
|
||||
beat = self.run_heartbeat(task_session_id="author_issue_work-ffffffffffffffff")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(beat["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("task_session_id does not match", " ".join(beat["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_generation_is_refused_through_the_tool(self):
|
||||
locked, session = self._lock_and_session()
|
||||
current = issue_lock_store.lock_generation(
|
||||
issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(locked["lock_file_path"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
beat = self.run_heartbeat(
|
||||
task_session_id=session, expected_generation=current + 5
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(beat["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("generation changed", beat["reasons"][0])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_foreign_claimant_is_refused_through_the_tool(self):
|
||||
_, session = self._lock_and_session()
|
||||
beat = self.run_heartbeat(task_session_id=session, identity="someone-else")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(beat["success"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_heartbeat_cannot_acquire_a_missing_lock(self):
|
||||
beat = self.run_heartbeat(task_session_id="author_issue_work-000000000000")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(beat["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("no durable lock", beat["reasons"][0])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_alive_pid_alone_does_not_keep_a_lease_live_through_the_tool(self):
|
||||
"""PID-only refusal, end to end.
|
||||
|
||||
The recorded pid is this live process. The lock is aged past its grace
|
||||
with no heartbeat, so the tool must refuse to slide it and the durable
|
||||
record must classify as a missed heartbeat rather than as live.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
locked, session = self._lock_and_session()
|
||||
record = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(locked["lock_file_path"])
|
||||
record["work_lease"]["last_heartbeat_at"] = _ts(
|
||||
datetime.now(timezone.utc) - timedelta(minutes=30)
|
||||
)
|
||||
record["work_lease"]["expires_at"] = _ts(
|
||||
datetime.now(timezone.utc) + timedelta(hours=2)
|
||||
)
|
||||
issue_lock_store.save_lock_file(locked["lock_file_path"], record)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(issue_lock_store.is_process_alive(record["session_pid"]))
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(record)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_STALE_MISSED_HEARTBEAT
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(fresh["pid_alive"])
|
||||
|
||||
beat = self.run_heartbeat(task_session_id=session)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(beat["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("reclaimed", " ".join(beat["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestLegacyLocksThroughTheTool(_HeartbeatMcpBase):
|
||||
"""AC-N8 end to end: protected on deployment, and rebindable."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_lock_stays_protected_after_deployment(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_legacy_lock(hours_old=3.0, ttl_hours=4.0)
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(record)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_LIVE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(fresh["legacy_lease"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(fresh["legacy_expiry_preserved"])
|
||||
# It had never heartbeated, so under the new grace alone it would be
|
||||
# long gone; the preserved absolute expiry is what protects it.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
record["work_lease"]["created_at"],
|
||||
record["work_lease"]["last_heartbeat_at"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_tool_rebinds_a_legacy_lock_and_mints_a_first_heartbeat(self):
|
||||
self.write_legacy_lock(hours_old=3.0, ttl_hours=4.0)
|
||||
|
||||
result = self.run_heartbeat(task_session_id=None)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["success"], result)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["operation"], "legacy_rebind")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["task_session_id"])
|
||||
|
||||
written = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(self._lock_path())
|
||||
lease = written["work_lease"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
lease["lifecycle_version"], lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(lease["heartbeat_count"], 1)
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(
|
||||
lease["created_at"],
|
||||
written["legacy_rebind"]["legacy_origin"]["created_at"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(issue_lock_store.is_legacy_lease(written))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rebound_lock_then_heartbeats_through_the_tool(self):
|
||||
self.write_legacy_lock(hours_old=3.0, ttl_hours=4.0)
|
||||
rebound = self.run_heartbeat(task_session_id=None)
|
||||
beat = self.run_heartbeat(task_session_id=rebound["task_session_id"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(beat["success"], beat)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(beat["operation"], "heartbeat")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(beat["heartbeat_count"], 2)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rebind_refuses_a_foreign_owner_through_the_tool(self):
|
||||
self.write_legacy_lock(hours_old=3.0, ttl_hours=4.0)
|
||||
result = self.run_heartbeat(task_session_id=None, identity="someone-else")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["operation"], "legacy_rebind")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,594 @@
|
||||
"""Central lease policy and load-bearing heartbeat freshness (#790 Slice A).
|
||||
|
||||
Before this slice, ``issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness`` parsed
|
||||
``last_heartbeat_at`` and then never consulted it: liveness was decided by an
|
||||
absolute four-hour ``expires_at`` and by PID liveness. Because the recorded PID
|
||||
is the long-lived MCP daemon rather than the authoring task, an abandoned claim
|
||||
stayed "live" for the full four hours, and a claim whose work had already landed
|
||||
blocked reconciliation for just as long (Issue #787 / PR #789, and again Issue
|
||||
#760 / PR #791).
|
||||
|
||||
These tests pin the corrected semantics, including the two asymmetries that are
|
||||
easy to lose in a refactor:
|
||||
|
||||
* an **alive** PID must never make anything live (AC-N2), while
|
||||
* a **dead** PID must still mark a lease stale, because #753 dead-session
|
||||
recovery keys on exactly that classification.
|
||||
|
||||
Durable-state helpers here write real lock files through the real flock path;
|
||||
they are not mocks of the store.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
|
||||
|
||||
import issue_lock_store # noqa: E402
|
||||
import lease_policy # noqa: E402
|
||||
import pr_work_lease # noqa: E402
|
||||
import reviewer_pr_lease # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
ISSUE = 9790
|
||||
BRANCH = f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-heartbeat"
|
||||
IDENTITY = "example-user"
|
||||
PROFILE = "test-author-prgs"
|
||||
ORG = "Example-Org"
|
||||
REPO = "Example-Repo"
|
||||
REMOTE = "prgs"
|
||||
DEAD_PID = 2**22 # far above any live pid on a test host
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _ts(moment: datetime) -> str:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
moment.astimezone(timezone.utc)
|
||||
.replace(microsecond=0)
|
||||
.isoformat()
|
||||
.replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _LockFixture(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.lock_dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self.lock_dir.cleanup)
|
||||
self.now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
|
||||
self.worktree = os.path.realpath(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="issue790-"))
|
||||
self.addCleanup(patch.stopall)
|
||||
|
||||
def _path(self):
|
||||
return issue_lock_store.lock_file_path(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE,
|
||||
org=ORG,
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
lock_dir=self.lock_dir.name,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def write_lock(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
lifecycle: str | None = lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1,
|
||||
created_delta: timedelta = timedelta(minutes=1),
|
||||
heartbeat_delta: timedelta = timedelta(minutes=1),
|
||||
expires_delta: timedelta = timedelta(minutes=9),
|
||||
pid: int | None = None,
|
||||
task_session_id: str | None = "author_issue_work-aaaabbbbccccdddd",
|
||||
generation: int = 1,
|
||||
identity: str = IDENTITY,
|
||||
profile: str = PROFILE,
|
||||
branch: str = BRANCH,
|
||||
worktree: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Write a real durable lock and return the record.
|
||||
|
||||
Deltas are relative to ``self.now``; ``expires_delta`` is added, the
|
||||
others subtracted, so "in the past" reads naturally at each call site.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
lease: dict = {
|
||||
"operation_type": issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"pr_number": None,
|
||||
"branch": branch,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree or self.worktree,
|
||||
"claimant": {"username": identity, "profile": profile},
|
||||
"created_at": _ts(self.now - created_delta),
|
||||
"last_heartbeat_at": _ts(self.now - heartbeat_delta),
|
||||
"expires_at": _ts(self.now + expires_delta),
|
||||
}
|
||||
if lifecycle is not None:
|
||||
lease["lifecycle_version"] = lifecycle
|
||||
if task_session_id is not None:
|
||||
lease["task_session_id"] = task_session_id
|
||||
pid_value = os.getpid() if pid is None else pid
|
||||
record = {
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch_name": branch,
|
||||
"remote": REMOTE,
|
||||
"org": ORG,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree or self.worktree,
|
||||
"session_pid": pid_value,
|
||||
"pid": pid_value,
|
||||
"lock_generation": generation,
|
||||
"work_lease": lease,
|
||||
}
|
||||
path = self._path()
|
||||
record["lock_file_path"] = path
|
||||
issue_lock_store.save_lock_file(path, record)
|
||||
return record
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestPolicyIsTheSingleSource(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC-N7: one authoritative configuration source for every duration."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_policy_carries_the_agreed_values(self):
|
||||
policy = lease_policy.policy_for(lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(policy.initial_ttl_minutes, 10.0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(policy.heartbeat_cadence_minutes, 2.0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(policy.stale_warning_minutes, 5.0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(policy.missed_heartbeat_grace_minutes, 10.0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(policy.absolute_cap_hours, 8.0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(policy.recovery_grace_minutes, 10.0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(policy.terminal_race_drain_minutes, 2.0)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy.terminal_retirement_eligible)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy.heartbeat_lifecycle_active)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_the_four_hour_author_ttl_literal_is_gone(self):
|
||||
"""The duplicated literal AC-N7 exists to remove."""
|
||||
self.assertFalse(hasattr(issue_lock_store, "WORK_LEASE_TTL_HOURS"))
|
||||
import gitea_mcp_server
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertFalse(hasattr(gitea_mcp_server, "WORK_LEASE_TTL_HOURS"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_declared_reviewer_values_match_the_module_still_using_them(self):
|
||||
"""Slice A declares reviewer/merger numbers without rewiring them.
|
||||
|
||||
Recording a value in two places is only safe if drift is detectable, so
|
||||
this asserts the declaration still equals the constants #747 owns. When
|
||||
Slice C migrates those call sites, this test becomes the proof the
|
||||
migration changed nothing.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
policy = lease_policy.policy_for(lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_REVIEWER_PR)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
policy.initial_ttl_minutes, float(reviewer_pr_lease.LEASE_TTL_MINUTES)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
policy.stale_warning_minutes,
|
||||
float(reviewer_pr_lease.STALE_WARNING_MINUTES),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(policy.heartbeat_lifecycle_active)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_declared_conflict_fix_value_matches_its_module(self):
|
||||
policy = lease_policy.policy_for(lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_CONFLICT_FIX)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
policy.initial_ttl_minutes,
|
||||
float(pr_work_lease.DEFAULT_CONFLICT_FIX_TTL_MINUTES),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(policy.heartbeat_lifecycle_active)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_environment_override_applies(self):
|
||||
var = lease_policy.env_var_name(
|
||||
lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK, "initial_ttl_minutes"
|
||||
)
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {var: "7"}):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
lease_policy.policy_for(
|
||||
lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK
|
||||
).initial_ttl_minutes,
|
||||
7.0,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unusable_override_falls_back_instead_of_minting_a_zero_lease(self):
|
||||
"""A typo must not make every claim instantly reclaimable."""
|
||||
var = lease_policy.env_var_name(
|
||||
lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK, "initial_ttl_minutes"
|
||||
)
|
||||
for bad in ("0", "-5", "not-a-number", " "):
|
||||
with self.subTest(value=bad), patch.dict(os.environ, {var: bad}):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
lease_policy.policy_for(
|
||||
lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK
|
||||
).initial_ttl_minutes,
|
||||
10.0,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_task_class_does_not_raise(self):
|
||||
policy = lease_policy.policy_for("something-new")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(policy.task_class, lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestLifecycleDiscrimination(_LockFixture):
|
||||
"""AC-N8: the marker, never a timestamp, decides legacy vs heartbeat."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_marker_reads_as_legacy(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(lifecycle=None)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(issue_lock_store.is_legacy_lease(record))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
issue_lock_store.lease_lifecycle_version(record),
|
||||
lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_LEGACY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_marker_present_reads_as_heartbeat_lifecycle(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_lock()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(issue_lock_store.is_legacy_lease(record))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_equal_created_and_heartbeat_never_implies_a_fresh_heartbeat(self):
|
||||
"""The exact inversion AC-N8 forbids.
|
||||
|
||||
A legacy lock has ``last_heartbeat_at == created_at`` forever because
|
||||
nothing ever advanced it. Reading that equality as "recently
|
||||
heartbeated" would classify every never-heartbeated lock as fresh.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
legacy = self.write_lock(
|
||||
lifecycle=None,
|
||||
created_delta=timedelta(hours=3),
|
||||
heartbeat_delta=timedelta(hours=3),
|
||||
)
|
||||
lease = legacy["work_lease"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(lease["created_at"], lease["last_heartbeat_at"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(issue_lock_store.is_legacy_lease(legacy))
|
||||
|
||||
# A brand-new heartbeat lease has them equal too, so the equality
|
||||
# carries no information in either direction.
|
||||
fresh = self.write_lock(
|
||||
created_delta=timedelta(seconds=0), heartbeat_delta=timedelta(seconds=0)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
fresh["work_lease"]["created_at"],
|
||||
fresh["work_lease"]["last_heartbeat_at"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(issue_lock_store.is_legacy_lease(fresh))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_minted_session_id_contains_no_pid(self):
|
||||
"""AC-N1: the ownership key must not be derived from the daemon pid."""
|
||||
minted = issue_lock_store.mint_task_session_id()
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(str(os.getpid()), minted)
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(minted, issue_lock_store.mint_task_session_id())
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestFreshnessIsHeartbeatDriven(_LockFixture):
|
||||
"""AC-N2 and the new bands."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_fresh_heartbeat_is_live(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(heartbeat_delta=timedelta(minutes=1))
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_LIVE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(fresh["live"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(fresh["heartbeat_warning"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_heartbeat_past_warning_is_still_live_but_flagged(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(heartbeat_delta=timedelta(minutes=6))
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_LIVE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(fresh["heartbeat_warning"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missed_heartbeat_past_grace_is_classified_explicitly(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(
|
||||
heartbeat_delta=timedelta(minutes=11),
|
||||
expires_delta=timedelta(minutes=30),
|
||||
)
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_STALE_MISSED_HEARTBEAT
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(fresh["live"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(fresh["stale"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_alive_pid_never_establishes_freshness(self):
|
||||
"""The defect in one assertion.
|
||||
|
||||
The recorded PID is this very process, so it is unambiguously alive —
|
||||
and the lease is still not live, because the task stopped heartbeating.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(
|
||||
pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
heartbeat_delta=timedelta(hours=4),
|
||||
expires_delta=timedelta(hours=4),
|
||||
)
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(fresh["pid_alive"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(fresh["live"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_STALE_MISSED_HEARTBEAT
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dead_pid_still_marks_stale_for_issue_753(self):
|
||||
"""The opposite asymmetry: dead-PID corroboration is preserved."""
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(pid=DEAD_PID, heartbeat_delta=timedelta(minutes=1))
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_STALE)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(fresh["live"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("not alive", fresh["reason"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_absolute_cap_requires_readoption(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(
|
||||
created_delta=timedelta(hours=9), heartbeat_delta=timedelta(minutes=1)
|
||||
)
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_STALE_ABSOLUTE_CAP)
|
||||
self.assertIn("re-adoption", fresh["reason"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_heartbeat_lifecycle_without_a_heartbeat_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_lock()
|
||||
del record["work_lease"]["last_heartbeat_at"]
|
||||
issue_lock_store.save_lock_file(self._path(), record)
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_STALE_MISSED_HEARTBEAT
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("fail closed", fresh["reason"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_absent_lock(self):
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(None)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_ABSENT)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(fresh["stale"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestLegacyLocksStayProtected(_LockFixture):
|
||||
"""AC-N8: deployment must not retroactively shorten an existing claim."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_lock_with_a_stale_heartbeat_remains_live(self):
|
||||
"""The deployment-safety case.
|
||||
|
||||
A four-hour legacy lease minted three hours ago has not heartbeated
|
||||
once. Under the new grace it would be long gone; under its preserved
|
||||
absolute expiry it is still live, and must stay that way.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(
|
||||
lifecycle=None,
|
||||
created_delta=timedelta(hours=3),
|
||||
heartbeat_delta=timedelta(hours=3),
|
||||
expires_delta=timedelta(hours=1),
|
||||
)
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_LIVE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(fresh["live"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(fresh["legacy_lease"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(fresh["legacy_expiry_preserved"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_lock_past_its_absolute_expiry_is_expired_as_before(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(
|
||||
lifecycle=None,
|
||||
created_delta=timedelta(hours=5),
|
||||
heartbeat_delta=timedelta(hours=5),
|
||||
expires_delta=timedelta(hours=-1),
|
||||
)
|
||||
fresh = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(fresh["status"], issue_lock_store.STATUS_EXPIRED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_lock_is_never_reclaimed_by_the_heartbeat_band(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(
|
||||
lifecycle=None,
|
||||
created_delta=timedelta(hours=3),
|
||||
heartbeat_delta=timedelta(hours=3),
|
||||
expires_delta=timedelta(hours=1),
|
||||
)
|
||||
reclaim = issue_lock_store.assess_expired_lock_reclaim(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(reclaim["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestReclaimAfterMissedHeartbeat(_LockFixture):
|
||||
def test_missed_heartbeat_makes_ownership_reclaimable(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(
|
||||
pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
heartbeat_delta=timedelta(minutes=15),
|
||||
expires_delta=timedelta(hours=3),
|
||||
)
|
||||
reclaim = issue_lock_store.assess_expired_lock_reclaim(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(reclaim["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("stale_missed_heartbeat", reclaim["reasons"][0])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_lease_is_never_reclaimable(self):
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(heartbeat_delta=timedelta(minutes=1))
|
||||
reclaim = issue_lock_store.assess_expired_lock_reclaim(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(reclaim["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dead_pid_reclaim_path_is_unchanged(self):
|
||||
"""#753 must keep working through its original conditions."""
|
||||
record = self.write_lock(pid=DEAD_PID, heartbeat_delta=timedelta(minutes=1))
|
||||
reclaim = issue_lock_store.assess_expired_lock_reclaim(record, now=self.now)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(reclaim["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(reclaim["owner_pid_dead"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestHeartbeatWriter(_LockFixture):
|
||||
"""A4: flock + CAS + exact verification, and no revival path."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _heartbeat(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
params = {
|
||||
"remote": REMOTE,
|
||||
"org": ORG,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": self.worktree,
|
||||
"identity": IDENTITY,
|
||||
"profile": PROFILE,
|
||||
"task_session_id": "author_issue_work-aaaabbbbccccdddd",
|
||||
"lock_dir": self.lock_dir.name,
|
||||
"now": self.now,
|
||||
}
|
||||
params.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return issue_lock_store.heartbeat_session_lock(**params)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_heartbeat_slides_expiry_and_advances_generation(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock(heartbeat_delta=timedelta(minutes=4), generation=5)
|
||||
result = self._heartbeat()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["success"], result)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["prior_generation"], 5)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["lock_generation"], 6)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["heartbeat_count"], 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["last_heartbeat_at"], _ts(self.now))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["expires_at"], _ts(self.now + timedelta(minutes=10)))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["freshness"]["live"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_heartbeat_is_durable_and_repeatable(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock(heartbeat_delta=timedelta(minutes=4))
|
||||
self._heartbeat()
|
||||
second = self._heartbeat(now=self.now + timedelta(minutes=1))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(second["success"], second)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(second["heartbeat_count"], 2)
|
||||
written = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(self._path())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(written["work_lease"]["heartbeat_count"], 2)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_generation_is_refused(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock(generation=5)
|
||||
result = self._heartbeat(expected_generation=4)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("generation changed", result["reasons"][0])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_foreign_session_is_refused(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock()
|
||||
result = self._heartbeat(task_session_id="author_issue_work-ffffffffffffffff")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("task_session_id does not match", " ".join(result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_session_id_is_refused(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock()
|
||||
result = self._heartbeat(task_session_id="")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_foreign_claimant_is_refused(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock()
|
||||
for field, value in (
|
||||
("identity", "someone-else"),
|
||||
("profile", "other-profile"),
|
||||
):
|
||||
with self.subTest(field=field):
|
||||
result = self._heartbeat(**{field: value})
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_branch_and_worktree_mismatch_are_refused(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock()
|
||||
wrong_branch = self._heartbeat(branch_name=f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-other")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(wrong_branch["success"])
|
||||
wrong_worktree = self._heartbeat(worktree_path="/tmp/not-the-worktree")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(wrong_worktree["success"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_lapsed_lease_cannot_be_heartbeated_back_to_life(self):
|
||||
"""No revival path (A4).
|
||||
|
||||
A session that stopped proving liveness must reclaim under a fresh
|
||||
generation, not restore ownership retroactively.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
self.write_lock(
|
||||
heartbeat_delta=timedelta(minutes=30), expires_delta=timedelta(hours=1)
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = self._heartbeat()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("reclaimed", " ".join(result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_absent_lock_cannot_be_created_by_heartbeat(self):
|
||||
result = self._heartbeat()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("no durable lock", result["reasons"][0])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_lock_is_refused_until_rebound(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock(lifecycle=None)
|
||||
result = self._heartbeat()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["legacy_lease"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("rebound", " ".join(result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestLegacyRebind(_LockFixture):
|
||||
"""AC-N8 exit route: canonical exact-owner rebinding."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _rebind(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
params = {
|
||||
"remote": REMOTE,
|
||||
"org": ORG,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": self.worktree,
|
||||
"identity": IDENTITY,
|
||||
"profile": PROFILE,
|
||||
"lock_dir": self.lock_dir.name,
|
||||
"now": self.now,
|
||||
}
|
||||
params.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return issue_lock_store.rebind_legacy_lock(**params)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rebind_mints_a_session_and_a_genuine_first_heartbeat(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock(
|
||||
lifecycle=None,
|
||||
created_delta=timedelta(hours=3),
|
||||
heartbeat_delta=timedelta(hours=3),
|
||||
expires_delta=timedelta(hours=1),
|
||||
generation=2,
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = self._rebind()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["success"], result)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["task_session_id"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["lock_generation"], 3)
|
||||
|
||||
written = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(self._path())
|
||||
lease = written["work_lease"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
lease["lifecycle_version"], lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(lease["last_heartbeat_at"], _ts(self.now))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(lease["expires_at"], _ts(self.now + timedelta(minutes=10)))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(issue_lock_store.is_legacy_lease(written))
|
||||
# The original claim is preserved for audit rather than overwritten.
|
||||
origin = written["legacy_rebind"]["legacy_origin"]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(origin["created_at"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(origin["lifecycle"], lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_LEGACY)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rebound_lock_can_then_heartbeat(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock(
|
||||
lifecycle=None,
|
||||
created_delta=timedelta(hours=3),
|
||||
heartbeat_delta=timedelta(hours=3),
|
||||
expires_delta=timedelta(hours=1),
|
||||
)
|
||||
rebound = self._rebind()
|
||||
beat = issue_lock_store.heartbeat_session_lock(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE,
|
||||
org=ORG,
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.worktree,
|
||||
identity=IDENTITY,
|
||||
profile=PROFILE,
|
||||
task_session_id=rebound["task_session_id"],
|
||||
lock_dir=self.lock_dir.name,
|
||||
now=self.now + timedelta(minutes=1),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(beat["success"], beat)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rebind_refuses_a_foreign_owner(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock(lifecycle=None, expires_delta=timedelta(hours=1))
|
||||
result = self._rebind(identity="someone-else")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rebind_refuses_a_lock_already_on_the_lifecycle(self):
|
||||
self.write_lock()
|
||||
result = self._rebind()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["legacy_lease"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rebind_is_not_a_recovery_path_for_a_lapsed_legacy_lease(self):
|
||||
"""An expired legacy lease belongs to #760 renewal or #601 reclaim."""
|
||||
self.write_lock(
|
||||
lifecycle=None,
|
||||
created_delta=timedelta(hours=5),
|
||||
heartbeat_delta=timedelta(hours=5),
|
||||
expires_delta=timedelta(hours=-1),
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = self._rebind()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("not a recovery path", " ".join(result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1,244 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""#855 AC4: an expired reviewer lease must not indefinitely protect an
|
||||
already-merged branch when no live claimant exists.
|
||||
|
||||
Two layers are covered:
|
||||
|
||||
* ``branch_cleanup_guard.assess_expired_reviewer_lease_reclaim`` — the pure,
|
||||
fail-closed reclaim decision. Every condition must be provably satisfied or
|
||||
the lease keeps protecting the branch.
|
||||
* ``gitea_mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records`` — the wiring that
|
||||
supplies authoritative evidence (PR merged state, owner-process liveness,
|
||||
competing ownership) to that decision, and flips an expired reviewer lease
|
||||
to reclaimable only under the full policy.
|
||||
|
||||
All inputs are fabricated; no real repository, lease, or credential is used.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
import importlib
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
import branch_cleanup_guard
|
||||
|
||||
mcp_server = importlib.import_module("gitea_mcp_server")
|
||||
|
||||
FAKE_AUTH = "token fake"
|
||||
REMOTE = "prgs"
|
||||
ORG = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting"
|
||||
REPO = "Gitea-Tools"
|
||||
HOST = "gitea.prgs.cc"
|
||||
BRANCH = "feat/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1"
|
||||
PR_NUMBER = 818
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAssessExpiredReviewerLeaseReclaim(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Pure fail-closed reclaim decision (#855 AC4)."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _call(self, **overrides):
|
||||
base = dict(
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
status="expired",
|
||||
pr_merged=True,
|
||||
owner_pid_alive=False,
|
||||
competing_active_claimant=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
base.update(overrides)
|
||||
return branch_cleanup_guard.assess_expired_reviewer_lease_reclaim(**base)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_full_policy_satisfied_allows_reclaim(self):
|
||||
out = self._call()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["reasons"], [])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["decision"], "reclaim_expired_reviewer_lease")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_dead_process_reviewer_also_reclaimable(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(status="stale_dead_process")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_reviewer_role_never_reclaims(self):
|
||||
for role in ("author", "merger", "controller", "reconciler", "unknown"):
|
||||
with self.subTest(role=role):
|
||||
out = self._call(role=role)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(out["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["decision"], "keep_protecting")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_active_status_never_reclaims(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(status="active")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr_not_merged_blocks_reclaim(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(pr_merged=False)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr_merged_unknown_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(pr_merged=None)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_owner_process_alive_blocks_reclaim(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(owner_pid_alive=True)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_owner_liveness_unknown_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(owner_pid_alive=None)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_competing_active_claimant_blocks_reclaim(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(competing_active_claimant=True)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_competing_claimant_unknown_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(competing_active_claimant=None)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reasons_never_leak_secrets(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(role="author")
|
||||
blob = " ".join(out["reasons"]).lower()
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("token", blob)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("password", blob)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _FakeLease(dict):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestCollectorExpiredReviewerReclaimWiring(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""`_collect_branch_ownership_records` supplies authoritative evidence and
|
||||
flips an expired reviewer lease to reclaimable only under the full policy."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _run(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
lease_role="reviewer",
|
||||
lease_freshness="stale_dead_process",
|
||||
owner_pid_alive=False,
|
||||
pr_merged=True,
|
||||
extra_leases=None,
|
||||
worktree_on_branch=False,
|
||||
):
|
||||
lease = _FakeLease(
|
||||
role=lease_role,
|
||||
work_kind="pr",
|
||||
work_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
branch=BRANCH,
|
||||
status="active",
|
||||
owner_pid=999999,
|
||||
remote=REMOTE,
|
||||
org=ORG,
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
host=HOST,
|
||||
freshness={
|
||||
"freshness": lease_freshness,
|
||||
"owner_pid": 999999,
|
||||
"owner_pid_alive": owner_pid_alive,
|
||||
"expired_by_time": lease_freshness == "expired",
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
leases = [lease] + list(extra_leases or [])
|
||||
|
||||
pr_payload = {
|
||||
"number": PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
"merged": pr_merged,
|
||||
"merged_at": "2026-07-23T00:00:00Z" if pr_merged else None,
|
||||
"head": {"ref": BRANCH},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api_request(method, url, *a, **k):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and f"/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}" in url:
|
||||
return pr_payload
|
||||
raise AssertionError(f"unexpected api_request {method} {url}")
|
||||
|
||||
wt_entries = []
|
||||
if worktree_on_branch:
|
||||
wt_entries = [{"branch": BRANCH, "path": f"/x/branches/{BRANCH}"}]
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server.lease_lifecycle,
|
||||
"list_active_leases",
|
||||
return_value={"leases": leases},
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server.control_plane_db, "get_db", return_value=object(), create=True
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server.issue_lock_store, "iter_lock_files", return_value=[]
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server.worktree_cleanup_audit,
|
||||
"list_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=wt_entries,
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server, "api_get_all", return_value=[]
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server, "api_request", side_effect=fake_api_request
|
||||
):
|
||||
return mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE,
|
||||
host=HOST,
|
||||
org=ORG,
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
branch=BRANCH,
|
||||
pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
project_root="/x",
|
||||
auth=FAKE_AUTH,
|
||||
base_api="https://gitea.prgs.cc/api/v1/repos/x/y",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _reviewer_records(self, bundle):
|
||||
return [
|
||||
rec
|
||||
for rec in bundle["records"]
|
||||
if rec.get("category")
|
||||
== branch_cleanup_guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_REVIEWER_LEASE
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merged_dead_uncontested_reviewer_lease_is_reclaimable(self):
|
||||
bundle = self._run()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(bundle["inventory_error"])
|
||||
recs = self._reviewer_records(bundle)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(recs), 1)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(recs[0]["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
# And the guard consequently does not block deletion on it.
|
||||
ownership = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_active_branch_ownership(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, branch=BRANCH, host=HOST,
|
||||
records=bundle["records"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(ownership["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unmerged_pr_keeps_reviewer_lease_protective(self):
|
||||
bundle = self._run(pr_merged=False)
|
||||
recs = self._reviewer_records(bundle)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(recs), 1)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(recs[0]["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
ownership = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_active_branch_ownership(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, branch=BRANCH, host=HOST,
|
||||
records=bundle["records"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(ownership["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_owner_process_alive_keeps_reviewer_lease_protective(self):
|
||||
bundle = self._run(owner_pid_alive=True, lease_freshness="expired")
|
||||
recs = self._reviewer_records(bundle)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(recs[0]["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_competing_worktree_binding_keeps_reviewer_lease_protective(self):
|
||||
bundle = self._run(worktree_on_branch=True)
|
||||
recs = self._reviewer_records(bundle)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(recs[0]["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
ownership = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_active_branch_ownership(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, branch=BRANCH, host=HOST,
|
||||
records=bundle["records"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(ownership["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_author_lease_never_reclaimed_by_reviewer_policy(self):
|
||||
bundle = self._run(lease_role="author")
|
||||
author_recs = [
|
||||
rec
|
||||
for rec in bundle["records"]
|
||||
if rec.get("category")
|
||||
== branch_cleanup_guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_AUTHOR_LEASE
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(author_recs), 1)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(author_recs[0]["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1,551 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Merged-PR awareness for the worktree cleanup audit (#858).
|
||||
|
||||
Before #858 an ``issue_work`` worktree could never leave ``active_issue_work``:
|
||||
the audit had no PR linkage at all (``pr_number`` was structurally ``None``)
|
||||
and its only route to ``clean_stale_removable`` was a TTL derived from a
|
||||
``last_used_at`` that nothing ever populated. A merged, clean, unprotected
|
||||
worktree was therefore reported as active work forever, disagreeing with the
|
||||
PR-scoped reconciler.
|
||||
|
||||
These tests use fabricated temporary repositories and synthetic PR records
|
||||
only. Nothing here removes a worktree or deletes a branch.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
import merged_cleanup_reconcile as mcr # noqa: E402
|
||||
import worktree_cleanup_audit as wca # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
MERGED_BRANCH = "feat/issue-777-timeline"
|
||||
MERGED_PATH = "/repo/branches/issue-777-timeline"
|
||||
HEAD_SHA = "a" * 40
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _pr(number, branch, *, merged=True, sha=HEAD_SHA, state=None):
|
||||
"""Synthetic Gitea PR payload."""
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"number": number,
|
||||
"head": {"ref": branch, "sha": sha},
|
||||
"merged_at": "2026-07-24T01:00:00Z" if merged else None,
|
||||
"state": state or ("closed" if merged else "open"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _porcelain(*entries):
|
||||
out = []
|
||||
for path, branch, sha in entries:
|
||||
out.append(f"worktree {path}")
|
||||
out.append(f"HEAD {sha}")
|
||||
if branch is None:
|
||||
out.append("detached")
|
||||
else:
|
||||
out.append(f"branch refs/heads/{branch}")
|
||||
out.append("")
|
||||
return "\n".join(out)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _AuditHarness(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Runs audit_branches_directory over a fabricated worktree listing."""
|
||||
|
||||
PORCELAIN = _porcelain(
|
||||
("/repo", "master", "f" * 40),
|
||||
(MERGED_PATH, MERGED_BRANCH, HEAD_SHA),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def run_audit(self, *, dirty_paths=(), contained=True, **kwargs):
|
||||
def fake_dirty(path):
|
||||
if path in dirty_paths:
|
||||
return {"exists": True, "dirty": True, "dirty_files": [" M x.py"]}
|
||||
return {"exists": True, "dirty": False, "dirty_files": []}
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "list_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(self.PORCELAIN),
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "read_worktree_dirty", side_effect=fake_dirty
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "git_worktree_list", return_value="(mocked)"
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "is_head_ancestor_of_ref", return_value=contained
|
||||
):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory("/repo", **kwargs)
|
||||
return {wt["path"]: wt for wt in report["worktrees"]}, report
|
||||
|
||||
def merged_audit(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
kwargs.setdefault("pr_index", wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)]))
|
||||
kwargs.setdefault("master_ref", "prgs/master")
|
||||
return self.run_audit(**kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMergedWorktreeBecomesRemovable(_AuditHarness):
|
||||
def test_clean_merged_issue_worktree_is_linked_and_removable(self):
|
||||
by_path, report = self.merged_audit()
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_linkage"]["status"], wca.LINKAGE_MERGED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"], [])
|
||||
self.assertIn(MERGED_PATH, [c["path"] for c in report["removable_candidates"]])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr_number_populated_from_authoritative_linkage(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(by_path[MERGED_PATH]["pr_number"], 849)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_regression_without_pr_evidence_stays_active_issue_work(self):
|
||||
"""The pre-#858 behaviour, still correct when no PR state is supplied."""
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit()
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(entry["pr_number"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestProtectiveSignalsSurvive(_AuditHarness):
|
||||
def test_open_pr_worktree_is_not_removable(self):
|
||||
index = wca.build_pr_index([_pr(900, MERGED_BRANCH, merged=False)])
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(
|
||||
pr_index=index,
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
open_pr_branches={MERGED_BRANCH},
|
||||
)
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_OPEN_PR)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
# linkage still reports the owning PR, it just is not merge proof
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_linkage"]["status"], wca.LINKAGE_OPEN)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["pr_number"], 900)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dirty_tracked_worktree_is_not_removable(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(dirty_paths=(MERGED_PATH,))
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_DIRTY_LOCAL)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"worktree has uncommitted changes",
|
||||
entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_untracked_only_worktree_is_not_removable(self):
|
||||
"""``git status --porcelain`` reports untracked files as dirty too."""
|
||||
def untracked(path):
|
||||
if path == MERGED_PATH:
|
||||
return {"exists": True, "dirty": True, "dirty_files": ["?? scratch.txt"]}
|
||||
return {"exists": True, "dirty": False, "dirty_files": []}
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "list_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(self.PORCELAIN),
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "read_worktree_dirty", side_effect=untracked
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "git_worktree_list", return_value="(mocked)"
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "is_head_ancestor_of_ref", return_value=True
|
||||
):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
"/repo",
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)]),
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
)
|
||||
entry = {wt["path"]: wt for wt in report["worktrees"]}[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_DIRTY_LOCAL)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_active_lease_by_issue_number_is_protective(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(leased_issue_numbers={777})
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(entry["has_active_lease"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_active_lease_by_branch_is_protective(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(leased_branches={MERGED_BRANCH})
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(entry["has_active_lease"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_active_issue_lock_is_protective(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(active_issue_branches={MERGED_BRANCH})
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(entry["has_active_issue_lock"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_session_worktree_is_protective(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(live_session_paths={MERGED_PATH})
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(entry["has_live_session"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_head_not_contained_in_master_is_not_removable(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(contained=False)
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"worktree head is not contained in authoritative master "
|
||||
"(unmerged commits remain)",
|
||||
entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_containment_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(contained=None)
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"containment of the worktree head in master is unknown",
|
||||
entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_master_ref_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)])
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(by_path[MERGED_PATH]["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unmerged_owning_pr_is_not_removable(self):
|
||||
index = wca.build_pr_index([_pr(901, MERGED_BRANCH, merged=False)])
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(pr_index=index, master_ref="prgs/master")
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"owning PR #901 is not merged",
|
||||
entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_control_checkout_is_never_removable(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit()
|
||||
control = by_path["/repo"]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(control["is_protected"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(control["classification"], wca.CLASS_UNSAFE_UNKNOWN)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(control["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_control_checkout_not_removable_even_if_linked_and_merged(self):
|
||||
"""A merged PR on the control checkout must not unlock removal."""
|
||||
porcelain = _porcelain(("/repo", MERGED_BRANCH, HEAD_SHA))
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "list_worktrees", return_value=wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(porcelain)
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "read_worktree_dirty",
|
||||
return_value={"exists": True, "dirty": False, "dirty_files": []},
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "git_worktree_list", return_value="(mocked)"
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "is_head_ancestor_of_ref", return_value=True
|
||||
):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
"/repo",
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)]),
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
)
|
||||
entry = report["worktrees"][0]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_UNSAFE_UNKNOWN)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAmbiguousLinkageFailsClosed(_AuditHarness):
|
||||
def test_competing_prs_on_one_branch_fail_closed(self):
|
||||
index = wca.build_pr_index(
|
||||
[_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH), _pr(860, MERGED_BRANCH)]
|
||||
)
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(pr_index=index, master_ref="prgs/master")
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_linkage"]["status"], wca.LINKAGE_AMBIGUOUS)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(entry["pr_number"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merged_plus_open_pr_on_one_branch_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
index = wca.build_pr_index(
|
||||
[_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH), _pr(861, MERGED_BRANCH, merged=False)]
|
||||
)
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(pr_index=index, master_ref="prgs/master")
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_linkage"]["status"], wca.LINKAGE_AMBIGUOUS)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_owning_pr_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, "feat/other-branch")]),
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
)
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_linkage"]["status"], wca.LINKAGE_NONE)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_malformed_pr_records_are_dropped_not_guessed(self):
|
||||
index = wca.build_pr_index(
|
||||
[
|
||||
{"number": None, "head": {"ref": MERGED_BRANCH}},
|
||||
{"number": 5, "head": {}},
|
||||
{"number": "not-an-int", "head": {"ref": MERGED_BRANCH}},
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(index, {})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
wca.resolve_owning_pr(branch=MERGED_BRANCH, pr_index=index)["status"],
|
||||
wca.LINKAGE_NONE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_detached_worktree_has_no_branch_linkage(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
wca.resolve_owning_pr(branch=None, pr_index={})["status"],
|
||||
wca.LINKAGE_UNKNOWN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestUnrelatedClassificationsUnchanged(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Non-issue_work worktrees keep their pre-#858 classifications."""
|
||||
|
||||
PORCELAIN = _porcelain(
|
||||
("/repo", "master", "f" * 40),
|
||||
("/repo/branches/review-pr42", "review-pr42", "2" * 40),
|
||||
("/repo/branches/baseline-master-x", "baseline-master-x", "3" * 40),
|
||||
("/repo/branches/conflict-fix-pr50", "conflict-fix-pr50", "4" * 40),
|
||||
("/repo/branches/review-pr99", None, "5" * 40),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _audit(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "list_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(self.PORCELAIN),
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "read_worktree_dirty",
|
||||
return_value={"exists": True, "dirty": False, "dirty_files": []},
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "git_worktree_list", return_value="(mocked)"
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "is_head_ancestor_of_ref", return_value=True
|
||||
):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory("/repo", **kwargs)
|
||||
return {wt["path"]: wt for wt in report["worktrees"]}
|
||||
|
||||
def test_classifications_identical_with_and_without_pr_evidence(self):
|
||||
without = self._audit()
|
||||
with_evidence = self._audit(
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)]),
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
{p: e["classification"] for p, e in without.items()},
|
||||
{p: e["classification"] for p, e in with_evidence.items()},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_lease_on_issue_does_not_capture_similarly_named_scratch_trees(self):
|
||||
"""A lease on issue 777 protects issue work, not baseline/review trees."""
|
||||
porcelain = _porcelain(
|
||||
("/repo/branches/baseline-master-issue-777", "baseline-issue-777", "7" * 40),
|
||||
("/repo/branches/issue-777-timeline", MERGED_BRANCH, HEAD_SHA),
|
||||
)
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "list_worktrees", return_value=wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(porcelain)
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "read_worktree_dirty",
|
||||
return_value={"exists": True, "dirty": False, "dirty_files": []},
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "git_worktree_list", return_value="(mocked)"
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "is_head_ancestor_of_ref", return_value=True
|
||||
):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
"/repo",
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)]),
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
leased_issue_numbers={777},
|
||||
)
|
||||
by_path = {wt["path"]: wt for wt in report["worktrees"]}
|
||||
|
||||
baseline = by_path["/repo/branches/baseline-master-issue-777"]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(baseline["has_active_lease"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(baseline["classification"], wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE)
|
||||
|
||||
issue_work = by_path["/repo/branches/issue-777-timeline"]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(issue_work["has_active_lease"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(issue_work["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_review_and_baseline_still_removable(self):
|
||||
by_path = self._audit(
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([]), master_ref="prgs/master"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
by_path["/repo/branches/review-pr42"]["classification"],
|
||||
wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
by_path["/repo/branches/baseline-master-x"]["classification"],
|
||||
wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
by_path["/repo/branches/review-pr99"]["classification"],
|
||||
wca.CLASS_DETACHED_REVIEW_LEFTOVER,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_conflict_fix_ttl_behaviour_unchanged(self):
|
||||
"""conflict_fix still needs only TTL expiry; #858 did not touch it."""
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_CONFLICT_FIX,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=True,
|
||||
),
|
||||
wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_CONFLICT_FIX,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=False,
|
||||
),
|
||||
wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_work_ttl_alone_no_longer_grants_removal(self):
|
||||
"""Age is not landing proof: TTL alone must not reclaim issue work."""
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=True,
|
||||
),
|
||||
wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAssessorPerformsNoDeletion(_AuditHarness):
|
||||
def test_audit_never_removes_a_worktree(self):
|
||||
with patch.object(wca, "remove_worktree") as removal:
|
||||
self.merged_audit()
|
||||
removal.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_audit_shells_out_to_no_destructive_git_command(self):
|
||||
seen = []
|
||||
real_run = subprocess.run
|
||||
|
||||
def recording_run(cmd, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
seen.append(cmd)
|
||||
return real_run(["true"], *args, **kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.object(subprocess, "run", side_effect=recording_run):
|
||||
wca.audit_branches_directory("/nonexistent-repo-for-audit")
|
||||
|
||||
joined = [" ".join(c) if isinstance(c, list) else str(c) for c in seen]
|
||||
for cmd in joined:
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("worktree remove", cmd)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("branch -D", cmd)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("push", cmd)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAgreementWithPrScopedReconciler(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""The audit and merged_cleanup_reconcile must agree on identical input.
|
||||
|
||||
Uses a real throwaway git repository so containment is computed by git
|
||||
rather than asserted. Nothing outside the temporary directory is touched.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def _git(self, *args):
|
||||
subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", self.root, *args],
|
||||
check=True,
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.root = os.path.realpath(self._tmp.name)
|
||||
self._git("init", "-b", "master", ".")
|
||||
self._git("config", "user.email", "[email protected]")
|
||||
self._git("config", "user.name", "Test")
|
||||
with open(os.path.join(self.root, "seed.txt"), "w") as fh:
|
||||
fh.write("seed\n")
|
||||
self._git("add", "seed.txt")
|
||||
self._git("commit", "-m", "seed")
|
||||
|
||||
self.branch = "feat/issue-777-timeline"
|
||||
self._git("checkout", "-b", self.branch)
|
||||
with open(os.path.join(self.root, "feature.txt"), "w") as fh:
|
||||
fh.write("feature\n")
|
||||
self._git("add", "feature.txt")
|
||||
self._git("commit", "-m", "feature")
|
||||
self.head_sha = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", self.root, "rev-parse", "HEAD"],
|
||||
capture_output=True, text=True, check=True,
|
||||
).stdout.strip()
|
||||
self._git("checkout", "master")
|
||||
self._git("merge", "--no-ff", "-m", "merge feature", self.branch)
|
||||
|
||||
self.worktree = os.path.join(self.root, "branches", "issue-777-timeline")
|
||||
self._git("worktree", "add", self.worktree, self.branch)
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def _pr_index(self):
|
||||
return wca.build_pr_index(
|
||||
[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"number": 849,
|
||||
"head": {"ref": self.branch, "sha": self.head_sha},
|
||||
"merged_at": "2026-07-24T01:00:00Z",
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _audit_entry(self):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
self.root, pr_index=self._pr_index(), master_ref="master"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return next(wt for wt in report["worktrees"] if wt["path"] == self.worktree)
|
||||
|
||||
def _reconciler_entry(self):
|
||||
return mcr.assess_local_worktree_cleanup(
|
||||
pr_number=849,
|
||||
head_branch=self.branch,
|
||||
merged=True,
|
||||
worktree_state=mcr.resolve_cleanup_worktree_state(
|
||||
project_root=self.root,
|
||||
head_branch=self.branch,
|
||||
issue_number=777,
|
||||
pr_head_sha=self.head_sha,
|
||||
target_ref="master",
|
||||
),
|
||||
active_lock=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_both_assessors_agree_the_worktree_is_safe(self):
|
||||
audit_entry = self._audit_entry()
|
||||
reconciler = self._reconciler_entry()
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(reconciler["safe_to_remove_worktree"], reconciler)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(audit_entry["removable"], audit_entry)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(audit_entry["pr_number"], reconciler["pr_number"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(audit_entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"], [])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reconciler["block_reasons"], [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_both_assessors_agree_a_dirty_worktree_is_unsafe(self):
|
||||
with open(os.path.join(self.worktree, "feature.txt"), "a") as fh:
|
||||
fh.write("local edit\n")
|
||||
|
||||
audit_entry = self._audit_entry()
|
||||
reconciler = self._reconciler_entry()
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertFalse(audit_entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(reconciler["safe_to_remove_worktree"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_worktree_still_present_after_audit(self):
|
||||
self._audit_entry()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(os.path.isdir(self.worktree))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1,630 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Durable linked-issue lock head refresh + merge-sync dead-session recovery (#871).
|
||||
|
||||
``gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge`` advances a PR's *remote* head but historically
|
||||
never advanced the linked durable issue lock's recorded head. After the owning
|
||||
session died the drifted lock became unrecoverable and no further synchronization
|
||||
was possible (PR #866 / issue #855).
|
||||
|
||||
Two halves are covered:
|
||||
|
||||
* the write-side refresh (``issue_lock_store.assess/apply_durable_lock_head_refresh``)
|
||||
that records the new synced head under compare-and-swap with read-after-write; and
|
||||
* the read-side recovery relation (``issue_lock_recovery`` +
|
||||
``issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance``) that lets a dead-session lock
|
||||
whose recorded head is a merge-sync *ancestor* of the live PR head be recovered —
|
||||
and nothing else.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
import issue_lock_recovery # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_store # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_worktree # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
ISSUE = 8710
|
||||
PR_NUMBER = 8711
|
||||
BRANCH = f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-durable-lock-head-refresh"
|
||||
IDENTITY = "example-user"
|
||||
PROFILE = "example-author"
|
||||
OLD = "a" * 40
|
||||
NEW1 = "b" * 40
|
||||
NEW2 = "c" * 40
|
||||
BASE = "d" * 40
|
||||
REMOTE = "prgs"
|
||||
ORG = "ExampleOrg"
|
||||
REPO = "ExampleRepo"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def dead_pid() -> int:
|
||||
proc = subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, "-c", "pass"])
|
||||
proc.wait()
|
||||
return proc.pid
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def future_ts(hours: int = 4) -> str:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
(datetime.now(timezone.utc) + timedelta(hours=hours))
|
||||
.isoformat()
|
||||
.replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _git(cwd, *args):
|
||||
return subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", cwd, *args],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
check=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rev(cwd, ref="HEAD") -> str:
|
||||
return _git(cwd, "rev-parse", ref).stdout.strip()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def build_merge_sync_repo(tmp: str) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Build a repo where a feature branch was synced by merging master in.
|
||||
|
||||
Returns a dict with the prior (branch) head, the synced merge-commit head,
|
||||
the master tip, plus a rebase-style linear descendant and an unrelated head.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
_git(tmp, "init", "-q", "-b", "master")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "config", "user.email", "[email protected]")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "config", "user.name", "T")
|
||||
Path(tmp, "base.txt").write_text("base\n")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "add", "-A")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "commit", "-q", "-m", "root")
|
||||
|
||||
# Feature branch cut from root, one commit — this is the PRIOR/recorded head.
|
||||
_git(tmp, "checkout", "-q", "-b", BRANCH)
|
||||
Path(tmp, "feature.txt").write_text("feature\n")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "add", "-A")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "commit", "-q", "-m", "feature work")
|
||||
prior = _rev(tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
# Master advances (the base the sync will merge in).
|
||||
_git(tmp, "checkout", "-q", "master")
|
||||
Path(tmp, "base.txt").write_text("base\nmore\n")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "add", "-A")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "commit", "-q", "-m", "master advance")
|
||||
master_tip = _rev(tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
# Sync: merge master INTO the feature branch → merge commit, first parent = prior.
|
||||
_git(tmp, "checkout", "-q", BRANCH)
|
||||
_git(tmp, "merge", "-q", "--no-ff", "-m", "Merge master into feature", "master")
|
||||
synced = _rev(tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
# A plain linear descendant of prior (NOT a merge) — a rebase/extra-commit shape.
|
||||
_git(tmp, "checkout", "-q", "-b", "linear-branch", prior)
|
||||
Path(tmp, "extra.txt").write_text("extra\n")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "add", "-A")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "commit", "-q", "-m", "extra linear commit")
|
||||
linear = _rev(tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
# An unrelated root (force-push / rewritten history shape).
|
||||
unrelated_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
_git(unrelated_dir, "init", "-q", "-b", "x")
|
||||
_git(unrelated_dir, "config", "user.email", "[email protected]")
|
||||
_git(unrelated_dir, "config", "user.name", "T")
|
||||
Path(unrelated_dir, "z.txt").write_text("z\n")
|
||||
_git(unrelated_dir, "add", "-A")
|
||||
_git(unrelated_dir, "commit", "-q", "-m", "unrelated")
|
||||
unrelated = _rev(unrelated_dir)
|
||||
|
||||
# Leave the worktree checked out on the feature branch at the PRIOR head, as
|
||||
# a dead author session that never advanced would have left it.
|
||||
_git(tmp, "checkout", "-q", BRANCH)
|
||||
_git(tmp, "reset", "-q", "--hard", prior)
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"prior": prior,
|
||||
"master_tip": master_tip,
|
||||
"synced": synced,
|
||||
"linear": linear,
|
||||
"unrelated": unrelated,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ─────────────────────────── write-side refresh ───────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDurableLockHeadRefresh(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.lock_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
self.wt = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
lock_data = {
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": self.wt,
|
||||
"remote": REMOTE,
|
||||
"org": ORG,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"claimant": {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
|
||||
"work_lease": {
|
||||
"operation_type": issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": self.wt,
|
||||
"claimant": {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
|
||||
"expires_at": future_ts(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
issue_lock_store.bind_session_lock(lock_data, lock_dir=self.lock_dir)
|
||||
|
||||
def _apply(self, **over):
|
||||
kw = dict(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH, worktree_path=self.wt, pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
identity=IDENTITY, profile=PROFILE, current_pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
expected_old_head=OLD, new_head=NEW1, synced_at=future_ts(0),
|
||||
base_head=BASE, lock_dir=self.lock_dir,
|
||||
)
|
||||
kw.update(over)
|
||||
return issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh(**kw)
|
||||
|
||||
def _load(self):
|
||||
return issue_lock_store.load_issue_lock(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
lock_dir=self.lock_dir,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_first_sync_updates_recorded_head(self):
|
||||
"""AC1: first base sync writes the resulting head to the durable lock."""
|
||||
res = self._apply()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["refreshed"], res["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["read_after_write_ok"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self._load().get("synced_pr_head"), NEW1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_second_sync_after_master_advance(self):
|
||||
"""AC2: a later master advance permits a second sanctioned sync."""
|
||||
self.assertTrue(self._apply()["refreshed"])
|
||||
res2 = self._apply(expected_old_head=NEW1, new_head=NEW2)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res2["refreshed"], res2["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self._load().get("synced_pr_head"), NEW2)
|
||||
history = self._load().get("branch_sync_history")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(history), 2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(history[0]["last_synced_pr_head"], NEW1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(history[1]["prior_pr_head"], NEW1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_cas_detects_concurrent_head_change(self):
|
||||
"""AC6: CAS refuses when the recorded synced head is not the old head."""
|
||||
self.assertTrue(self._apply()["refreshed"]) # recorded head now NEW1
|
||||
# A second sync claiming the old head is still OLD must fail closed.
|
||||
res = self._apply(expected_old_head=OLD, new_head=NEW2)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("CAS" in r or "concurrent" in r for r in res["reasons"]))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self._load().get("synced_pr_head"), NEW1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_issue_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(issue_number=999999)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_branch_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(branch_name="fix/issue-8710-wrong")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_repo_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(repo="OtherRepo")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_identity_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(identity="intruder")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_profile_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(profile="prgs-reviewer")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_foreign_session_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""A refresh is not a recovery: the current process must own the lock."""
|
||||
path = issue_lock_store.lock_file_path(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
lock_dir=self.lock_dir,
|
||||
)
|
||||
rec = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(path)
|
||||
rec["session_pid"] = dead_pid()
|
||||
rec["pid"] = rec["session_pid"]
|
||||
issue_lock_store.save_lock_file(path, rec)
|
||||
res = self._apply()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("current session" in r or "live owner" in r for r in res["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_new_equals_old_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(expected_old_head=OLD, new_head=OLD)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_full_sha_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self._apply(new_head="deadbeef")["refreshed"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self._apply(expected_old_head="xyz")["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_lock_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
assessment = issue_lock_store.assess_durable_lock_head_refresh(
|
||||
None, remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH, worktree_path=self.wt, pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
identity=IDENTITY, profile=PROFILE, current_pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
expected_old_head=OLD, new_head=NEW1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(assessment["allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ─────────────────────── merge-sync provenance (real git) ───────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMergeSyncProvenanceObservation(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
self.shas = build_merge_sync_repo(self.tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merge_sync_is_recognized(self):
|
||||
obs = issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance(
|
||||
self.tmp, prior_head_sha=self.shas["prior"],
|
||||
synced_head_sha=self.shas["synced"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obs["is_merge_sync"], obs["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obs["prior_is_ancestor"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obs["synced_is_merge"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obs["first_parent_reaches_prior"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_linear_descendant_is_not_a_merge_sync(self):
|
||||
"""A plain non-merge descendant (rebase/extra commit) is not a sync."""
|
||||
obs = issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance(
|
||||
self.tmp, prior_head_sha=self.shas["prior"],
|
||||
synced_head_sha=self.shas["linear"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obs["probe_ok"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obs["is_merge_sync"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obs["synced_is_merge"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unrelated_history_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""A rewritten/force-pushed head where prior is unreachable fails closed."""
|
||||
obs = issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance(
|
||||
self.tmp, prior_head_sha=self.shas["prior"],
|
||||
synced_head_sha=self.shas["unrelated"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obs["is_merge_sync"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_args_fail_closed(self):
|
||||
obs = issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance(
|
||||
self.tmp, prior_head_sha=None, synced_head_sha=self.shas["synced"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obs["is_merge_sync"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ──────────────────── merge-sync dead-session recovery ──────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def make_dead_lock(worktree, **over):
|
||||
pid = dead_pid()
|
||||
lock = {
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree,
|
||||
"remote": REMOTE,
|
||||
"org": ORG,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"session_pid": pid,
|
||||
"pid": pid,
|
||||
"claimant": {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
|
||||
"work_lease": {
|
||||
"operation_type": issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree,
|
||||
"claimant": {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
|
||||
"expires_at": future_ts(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
lock.update(over)
|
||||
return lock
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def sync_prov(prior, synced, **over):
|
||||
d = {
|
||||
"prior_head_sha": prior,
|
||||
"synced_head_sha": synced,
|
||||
"probe_ok": True,
|
||||
"prior_present": True,
|
||||
"synced_present": True,
|
||||
"prior_is_ancestor": True,
|
||||
"synced_is_merge": True,
|
||||
"first_parent_reaches_prior": True,
|
||||
"is_merge_sync": True,
|
||||
"first_parent_sha": prior,
|
||||
"parent_count": 2,
|
||||
"proof": f"{synced} merged base into branch above {prior}",
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
d.update(over)
|
||||
return d
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMergeSyncRecovery(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
self.shas = build_merge_sync_repo(self.tmp)
|
||||
self.prior = self.shas["prior"]
|
||||
self.synced = self.shas["synced"]
|
||||
|
||||
def _assess(self, **over):
|
||||
lock = over.pop("_lock", None) or make_dead_lock(self.tmp)
|
||||
kw = dict(
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE, branch_name=BRANCH, worktree_path=self.tmp,
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, identity=IDENTITY, profile=PROFILE,
|
||||
current_branch=BRANCH, porcelain_status="",
|
||||
head_sha=self.prior, remote_head_sha=self.synced,
|
||||
pr_head_sha=self.synced, pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
competing_live_locks=[], candidate_branches=[BRANCH],
|
||||
current_pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
remote_branch_exists=True,
|
||||
sync_provenance=sync_prov(self.prior, self.synced),
|
||||
)
|
||||
kw.update(over)
|
||||
return issue_lock_recovery.assess_dead_session_lock_recovery(lock, **kw)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merge_sync_drift_is_recoverable(self):
|
||||
"""AC3/AC4: dead session, recorded head is a merge-sync ancestor of PR head."""
|
||||
res = self._assess()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.RECOVERY_SANCTIONED, res["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
res["evidence"]["head_relation"],
|
||||
issue_lock_recovery.HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["evidence"]["accepted_head"], self.synced)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_provenance_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""No server-derived provenance → cannot accept a remote ahead of local."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(sync_provenance=None)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_ancestor_recorded_head_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC7: provenance that does not prove ancestry is rejected."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(
|
||||
sync_provenance=sync_prov(
|
||||
self.prior, self.synced, prior_is_ancestor=False, is_merge_sync=False,
|
||||
reasons=["prior head is not an ancestor"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_force_pushed_history_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC8: a rewritten head (not a merge sync) stays protected."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(
|
||||
sync_provenance=sync_prov(
|
||||
self.prior, self.synced, is_merge_sync=False, synced_is_merge=False,
|
||||
reasons=["not a merge-based sync"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_provenance_for_other_commits_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""Provenance whose endpoints differ from the heads under assessment is rejected."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(
|
||||
sync_provenance=sync_prov("f" * 40, self.synced),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dirty_worktree_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC11: dirty worktrees remain protected."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(porcelain_status=" M feature.txt\n")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_owner_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC10: a live recorded owner is not a dead-session recovery."""
|
||||
lock = make_dead_lock(self.tmp, session_pid=os.getpid(), pid=os.getpid())
|
||||
res = self._assess(_lock=lock)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_competing_claimant_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC13: a competing live lock blocks recovery."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(
|
||||
competing_live_locks=[{
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE, "branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": "/some/other/wt", "pid": os.getpid(),
|
||||
}]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_branch_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC9: worktree on a different branch fails closed."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(current_branch="fix/issue-8710-other")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_identity_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._assess(identity="intruder")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr_head_mismatch_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""The open PR must sit at the synced remote head."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(pr_head_sha="e" * 40)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_owning_pr_evidence_for_merge_sync(self):
|
||||
res = self._assess()
|
||||
ev = issue_lock_recovery.owning_pr_recovery_evidence(res)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(ev)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ev["pr_number"], PR_NUMBER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ev["head_sha"], self.synced)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
ev["head_relation"],
|
||||
issue_lock_recovery.HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_recovered_owning_pr_from_persisted_record(self):
|
||||
res = self._assess()
|
||||
record = issue_lock_recovery.build_recovery_record(res, recovered_at=future_ts(0))
|
||||
lock = {"issue_number": ISSUE, "branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"dead_session_recovery": record}
|
||||
rebuilt = issue_lock_recovery.recovered_owning_pr_from_lock(lock)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(rebuilt)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rebuilt["head_sha"], self.synced)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
rebuilt["head_relation"],
|
||||
issue_lock_recovery.HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestExistingRelationsUnchanged(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC14/AC15: equal-head recovery still works; merge-sync did not weaken it."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
self.shas = build_merge_sync_repo(self.tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_equal_head_recovery_still_sanctioned(self):
|
||||
# Worktree at prior head; remote also at prior head → the #753 equal case.
|
||||
prior = self.shas["prior"]
|
||||
lock = make_dead_lock(self.tmp)
|
||||
res = issue_lock_recovery.assess_dead_session_lock_recovery(
|
||||
lock, issue_number=ISSUE, branch_name=BRANCH, worktree_path=self.tmp,
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, identity=IDENTITY, profile=PROFILE,
|
||||
current_branch=BRANCH, porcelain_status="",
|
||||
head_sha=prior, remote_head_sha=prior,
|
||||
pr_head_sha=prior, pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
competing_live_locks=[], candidate_branches=[BRANCH],
|
||||
current_pid=os.getpid(), remote_branch_exists=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.RECOVERY_SANCTIONED, res["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
res["evidence"]["head_relation"], issue_lock_recovery.HEAD_RELATION_EQUAL,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestUpdatePrWrapperPartialFailure(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC5/AC16: the tool advances the remote head then refreshes the durable lock.
|
||||
|
||||
When the durable refresh fails after the remote advance, the tool must report a
|
||||
partial lifecycle failure and NOT a fully successful synchronization. Exact PR-
|
||||
head / base-head pinning is preserved (delegated to the real preflight, stubbed
|
||||
here only to isolate the post-update lifecycle branch).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
import gitea_mcp_server as gms # noqa: E402
|
||||
self.gms = gms
|
||||
self._orig = {}
|
||||
|
||||
def _patch(name, value):
|
||||
self._orig[name] = getattr(gms, name)
|
||||
setattr(gms, name, value)
|
||||
|
||||
_patch("get_profile", lambda *a, **k: {
|
||||
"allowed_operations": ["gitea.branch.push"],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-author",
|
||||
})
|
||||
_patch("_role_kind", lambda *a, **k: "author")
|
||||
_patch("_profile_operation_gate", lambda *a, **k: None)
|
||||
_patch("_permission_block_report", lambda *a, **k: {})
|
||||
_patch("_resolve", lambda *a, **k: ("gitea.prgs.cc", ORG, REPO))
|
||||
_patch("_verify_role_mutation_workspace", lambda *a, **k: None)
|
||||
_patch("_get_workspace_porcelain", lambda *a, **k: "")
|
||||
_patch("_canonical_local_git_root", lambda *a, **k: "/x")
|
||||
_patch("_master_parity_block", lambda *a, **k: None)
|
||||
_patch("_auth", lambda *a, **k: {"token": "x"})
|
||||
_patch("repo_api_url", lambda *a, **k: "http://api")
|
||||
_patch("_redact", lambda s: s)
|
||||
_patch("_work_lease_claimant", lambda *a, **k: {
|
||||
"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE,
|
||||
})
|
||||
_patch("_prove_author_ownership_for_pr", lambda *a, **k: {
|
||||
"has_author_lock": True, "matched_issue": ISSUE,
|
||||
"matched_via": "branch", "linked_issues": [ISSUE],
|
||||
"recovered_owning_pr": None, "reasons": [],
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
# Real preflight is unit-tested elsewhere; stub it to isolate the
|
||||
# post-update durable-lock lifecycle branch under test.
|
||||
orig_pf = gms.pr_sync_status.assess_update_pr_branch_preflight
|
||||
self._orig_pf = orig_pf
|
||||
gms.pr_sync_status.assess_update_pr_branch_preflight = (
|
||||
lambda *a, **k: {"mutation_allowed": True, "reasons": [], "performed": False}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Sequence the two GET /pulls calls: OLD before update, NEW after.
|
||||
self._pull_calls = {"n": 0}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api_request(method, url, auth, *a, **k):
|
||||
m = method.upper()
|
||||
if m == "GET" and url.endswith(f"/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}"):
|
||||
self._pull_calls["n"] += 1
|
||||
head = OLD if self._pull_calls["n"] == 1 else NEW1
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"state": "open",
|
||||
"head": {"sha": head, "ref": BRANCH},
|
||||
"base": {"sha": BASE, "ref": "master"},
|
||||
"mergeable": True, "title": "t", "body": "b",
|
||||
}
|
||||
if m == "GET" and "/branches/" in url:
|
||||
return {"commit": {"id": BASE}}
|
||||
if m == "POST" and "/update" in url:
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
|
||||
_patch("api_request", fake_api_request)
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
for name, value in self._orig.items():
|
||||
setattr(self.gms, name, value)
|
||||
self.gms.pr_sync_status.assess_update_pr_branch_preflight = self._orig_pf
|
||||
|
||||
def _run(self):
|
||||
return self.gms.gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge(
|
||||
pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
expected_pr_head_sha=OLD,
|
||||
expected_base_head_sha=BASE,
|
||||
remote=REMOTE,
|
||||
worktree_path="/tmp/branches/wt-871",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_partial_failure_when_refresh_fails(self):
|
||||
self._orig["apply_durable_lock_head_refresh"] = (
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh = (
|
||||
lambda **k: {"refreshed": False, "reasons": ["forced refresh failure"]}
|
||||
)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
res = self._run()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh = (
|
||||
self._orig["apply_durable_lock_head_refresh"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["new_pr_head_sha"], NEW1)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["partial_lifecycle_failure"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["durable_lock_refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_full_success_when_refresh_succeeds(self):
|
||||
self._orig["apply_durable_lock_head_refresh"] = (
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh = (
|
||||
lambda **k: {"refreshed": True, "read_after_write_ok": True,
|
||||
"new_head": NEW1, "reasons": ["ok"]}
|
||||
)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
res = self._run()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh = (
|
||||
self._orig["apply_durable_lock_head_refresh"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["durable_lock_refreshed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["fully_synchronized"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["new_pr_head_sha"], NEW1)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1,107 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Documentation acceptance for the MCP restart governance ADR (#656).
|
||||
|
||||
Enforces issue #656 acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
* AC1 — policy document exists with an authorization matrix and the recorded
|
||||
v1 decision (controller approval + automated safety gates).
|
||||
* AC2 — restart is stated as a last resort with enumerated narrower recoveries.
|
||||
* AC3 — a unilateral LLM full restart with affected sessions is forbidden.
|
||||
* AC4 — break-glass conditions are listed.
|
||||
* AC5 — the ADR is linked to #655, #652, #653, #630, #642, and is cross-linked
|
||||
from the safety model and the web-console deployment boundary docs.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
|
||||
ADR = REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "architecture" / "mcp-restart-governance.md"
|
||||
ADR_BASENAME = "mcp-restart-governance.md"
|
||||
|
||||
CROSS_LINK_DOCS = (
|
||||
REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "safety-model.md",
|
||||
REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "webui-deployment.md",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
LINKED_ISSUES = ("#655", "#652", "#653", "#630", "#642")
|
||||
POLICY_IDS = ("RG-01", "RG-02", "RG-03", "RG-04", "RG-05", "RG-06", "RG-07", "RG-08")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _read(path: Path) -> str:
|
||||
assert path.is_file(), f"missing {path.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)}"
|
||||
return path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac1_adr_exists_with_matrix_and_v1_decision():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert text.lstrip().startswith("#"), "ADR lacks a title"
|
||||
assert "#656" in text
|
||||
assert "authorization matrix" in lower
|
||||
# The matrix is a real table with the worker and privileged roles.
|
||||
for role in ("author", "reviewer", "merger", "reconciler", "controller",
|
||||
"operator", "admin"):
|
||||
assert role in lower, f"authorization matrix missing role {role!r}"
|
||||
# Recorded v1 decision.
|
||||
assert "restart-governance/v1" in text
|
||||
assert "controller approval" in lower and "automated safety gates" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac2_restart_is_last_resort_with_narrower_recoveries():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "last resort" in lower
|
||||
# Enumerated narrower recoveries precede full restart on the ladder.
|
||||
for rung in ("reconnect", "rebind", "scoped restart", "full restart",
|
||||
"host"):
|
||||
assert rung in lower, f"recovery ladder missing rung {rung!r}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac3_forbids_unilateral_llm_full_restart_with_affected_sessions():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "forbidden" in lower
|
||||
assert "llm" in lower and "restart" in lower
|
||||
assert "unilateral" in lower
|
||||
# A worker role must not perform or authorize full/host restart.
|
||||
assert "must not" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac4_break_glass_conditions_listed():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "break-glass" in lower
|
||||
assert "incident" in lower
|
||||
assert "audit" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac5_adr_links_issue_lineage():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
for issue in LINKED_ISSUES:
|
||||
assert issue in text, f"ADR must link issue {issue}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac5_safety_model_and_deployment_cross_link_adr():
|
||||
for path in CROSS_LINK_DOCS:
|
||||
text = _read(path)
|
||||
assert ADR_BASENAME in text, (
|
||||
f"{path.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)} must cross-link {ADR_BASENAME} "
|
||||
f"(issue #656 acceptance criterion 5)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_policy_ids_present_for_enforcement_code():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
for pid in POLICY_IDS:
|
||||
assert pid in text, f"policy id {pid} missing from ADR"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_failure_behavior_denies_on_ambiguity():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "ambiguous" in lower and "deny" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_cross_links_do_not_embed_secrets():
|
||||
for path in (ADR,) + CROSS_LINK_DOCS:
|
||||
text = _read(path)
|
||||
for marker in ("ghp_", "BEGIN PRIVATE KEY", "Authorization: Bearer"):
|
||||
assert marker not in text, f"{path} contains {marker!r}"
|
||||
@@ -134,35 +134,13 @@ class TestClassification(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_OPEN_PR)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_clean_issue_worktree_needs_merged_pr_proof(self):
|
||||
# Scenario 5 (#858): age is not proof that the branch landed, so a
|
||||
# TTL-expired issue worktree stays active work. Only authoritative
|
||||
# merged-PR evidence makes it removable, which is what keeps a
|
||||
# worktree holding unmerged commits from being reclaimed by age.
|
||||
def test_stale_clean_issue_worktree_removable(self):
|
||||
# Scenario 5: clean issue worktree, TTL expired, no lock -> removable.
|
||||
cls = wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
|
||||
|
||||
cls = wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=True,
|
||||
merged_pr_cleanup={"proven": True},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(wca.is_removable(cls))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_clean_conflict_fix_worktree_removable(self):
|
||||
# conflict_fix keeps the original TTL rule; #858 changed issue work only.
|
||||
cls = wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_CONFLICT_FIX,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(wca.is_removable(cls))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+4
-271
@@ -34,11 +34,7 @@ import subprocess
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timezone
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
from merged_cleanup_reconcile import (
|
||||
branch_worktree_folder,
|
||||
is_head_ancestor_of_ref,
|
||||
read_local_worktree_state,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from merged_cleanup_reconcile import branch_worktree_folder, read_local_worktree_state
|
||||
from reviewer_worktree import parse_dirty_tracked_files, REVIEW_WORKTREE_RE
|
||||
|
||||
PROTECTED_BRANCHES = frozenset({"master", "main", "dev"})
|
||||
@@ -71,14 +67,6 @@ REMOVABLE_CLASSES = frozenset(
|
||||
{CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE, CLASS_DETACHED_REVIEW_LEFTOVER}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Merged-PR linkage outcomes for issue worktrees (#858). Only ``LINKAGE_MERGED``
|
||||
# is ownership proof; every other outcome leaves the worktree protected.
|
||||
LINKAGE_MERGED = "merged_pr"
|
||||
LINKAGE_OPEN = "open_pr"
|
||||
LINKAGE_NONE = "no_owning_pr"
|
||||
LINKAGE_AMBIGUOUS = "ambiguous"
|
||||
LINKAGE_UNKNOWN = "unknown"
|
||||
|
||||
_ISSUE_REF_RE = re.compile(r"issue-(\d+)", re.IGNORECASE)
|
||||
_ISSUE_BRANCH_PREFIXES = ("feat/", "fix/", "docs/", "chore/")
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -181,186 +169,6 @@ def is_ttl_expired(
|
||||
return (now_dt - last).total_seconds() > ttl_hours * 3600.0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def build_pr_index(prs: list[dict[str, Any]] | None) -> dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]]:
|
||||
"""Index PR records by head branch for deterministic worktree linkage (#858).
|
||||
|
||||
Accepts Gitea PR payloads (``head`` as a dict) and pre-flattened records
|
||||
(``head_branch``/``head_sha``). Records without a usable head branch or
|
||||
number are dropped rather than guessed at, so a branch is only ever linked
|
||||
to a PR the caller actually proved.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
index: dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]] = {}
|
||||
for pr in prs or []:
|
||||
head = pr.get("head")
|
||||
if isinstance(head, dict):
|
||||
head_branch = head.get("ref")
|
||||
head_sha = head.get("sha")
|
||||
else:
|
||||
head_branch = pr.get("head_branch") or (head if isinstance(head, str) else None)
|
||||
head_sha = pr.get("head_sha")
|
||||
number = pr.get("number")
|
||||
if not head_branch or number is None:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
try:
|
||||
pr_number = int(number)
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
index.setdefault(str(head_branch).strip(), []).append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"head_branch": str(head_branch).strip(),
|
||||
"head_sha": head_sha,
|
||||
"merged": bool(pr.get("merged") or pr.get("merged_at")),
|
||||
"state": pr.get("state"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
return index
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def resolve_owning_pr(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
branch: str | None,
|
||||
pr_index: dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]] | None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Resolve the single PR that owns ``branch``, failing closed when unclear.
|
||||
|
||||
Ownership is only ``LINKAGE_MERGED`` when exactly one PR claims the branch
|
||||
and that PR is merged. Several distinct PRs on one branch is a competing
|
||||
claim (``LINKAGE_AMBIGUOUS``), and a still-open owner is reported as
|
||||
``LINKAGE_OPEN`` — both keep the worktree protected while still exposing
|
||||
the PR number the audit resolved.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if pr_index is None:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": LINKAGE_UNKNOWN,
|
||||
"pr_number": None,
|
||||
"candidate_pr_numbers": [],
|
||||
"reasons": ["live PR state was not supplied; ownership unproven"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
branch_name = (branch or "").strip()
|
||||
if not branch_name:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": LINKAGE_UNKNOWN,
|
||||
"pr_number": None,
|
||||
"candidate_pr_numbers": [],
|
||||
"reasons": ["worktree has no attached branch; ownership unproven"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
candidates = list(pr_index.get(branch_name) or [])
|
||||
numbers = sorted({c["pr_number"] for c in candidates})
|
||||
if not candidates:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": LINKAGE_NONE,
|
||||
"pr_number": None,
|
||||
"candidate_pr_numbers": [],
|
||||
"reasons": [f"no PR claims branch '{branch_name}'"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(numbers) > 1:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": LINKAGE_AMBIGUOUS,
|
||||
"pr_number": None,
|
||||
"candidate_pr_numbers": numbers,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"branch '{branch_name}' is claimed by competing PRs {numbers}; "
|
||||
"ownership is ambiguous"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
owner = candidates[0]
|
||||
pr_number = owner["pr_number"]
|
||||
if owner.get("head_branch") != branch_name:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": LINKAGE_UNKNOWN,
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"candidate_pr_numbers": numbers,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"PR #{pr_number} head branch '{owner.get('head_branch')}' does not "
|
||||
f"match worktree branch '{branch_name}'"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
if not owner.get("merged"):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": LINKAGE_OPEN,
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"candidate_pr_numbers": numbers,
|
||||
"pr_head_sha": owner.get("head_sha"),
|
||||
"reasons": [f"owning PR #{pr_number} is not merged"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"status": LINKAGE_MERGED,
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"candidate_pr_numbers": numbers,
|
||||
"pr_head_sha": owner.get("head_sha"),
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assess_merged_pr_worktree_cleanup(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
linkage: dict[str, Any] | None,
|
||||
head_sha: str | None,
|
||||
head_in_master: bool | None,
|
||||
is_dirty: bool,
|
||||
has_open_pr: bool,
|
||||
has_active_lease: bool,
|
||||
has_active_issue_lock: bool,
|
||||
is_protected: bool,
|
||||
has_live_session: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Decide whether a merged issue worktree satisfies the full cleanup policy.
|
||||
|
||||
Every condition must be independently proven: conclusive merged-PR
|
||||
ownership, agreement between the worktree branch and the PR head branch,
|
||||
containment of the worktree head in authoritative master (which is what
|
||||
proves no unmerged commits remain), absence of any open/competing PR,
|
||||
lease, issue lock, or live session, a clean tree, and a worktree that is
|
||||
not the protected control checkout. Anything unknown blocks.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
link = linkage or {
|
||||
"status": LINKAGE_UNKNOWN,
|
||||
"pr_number": None,
|
||||
"reasons": ["no linkage assessment supplied"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
status = link.get("status")
|
||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
|
||||
if status != LINKAGE_MERGED:
|
||||
reasons.extend(
|
||||
link.get("reasons") or ["owning PR could not be conclusively identified"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
if is_protected:
|
||||
reasons.append("worktree is protected or the stable control checkout")
|
||||
if is_dirty:
|
||||
reasons.append("worktree has uncommitted changes")
|
||||
if has_open_pr:
|
||||
reasons.append("worktree branch has an open PR")
|
||||
if has_active_lease:
|
||||
reasons.append("worktree has an active lease")
|
||||
if has_active_issue_lock:
|
||||
reasons.append("an active issue lock references this branch")
|
||||
if has_live_session:
|
||||
reasons.append("a live process or session is using this worktree")
|
||||
if not head_sha:
|
||||
reasons.append("worktree head sha is unknown")
|
||||
if head_in_master is None:
|
||||
reasons.append("containment of the worktree head in master is unknown")
|
||||
elif not head_in_master:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"worktree head is not contained in authoritative master "
|
||||
"(unmerged commits remain)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
proven = not reasons
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"linkage_status": status,
|
||||
"pr_number": link.get("pr_number"),
|
||||
"pr_head_sha": link.get("pr_head_sha"),
|
||||
"head_in_master": head_in_master,
|
||||
"proven": proven,
|
||||
"block_reasons": reasons,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def classify_worktree(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
workflow_type: str,
|
||||
@@ -373,8 +181,6 @@ def classify_worktree(
|
||||
ttl_expired: bool = False,
|
||||
is_protected: bool = False,
|
||||
metadata_known: bool = True,
|
||||
merged_pr_cleanup: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
|
||||
has_live_session: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> str:
|
||||
"""Classify a worktree, safety-first: any preservation signal wins.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -393,8 +199,6 @@ def classify_worktree(
|
||||
return CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK # never auto-deleted (criterion 8)
|
||||
if has_active_issue_lock:
|
||||
return CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK
|
||||
if has_live_session:
|
||||
return CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK # a live session still owns this tree
|
||||
if not metadata_known or workflow_type == WORKFLOW_UNKNOWN:
|
||||
return CLASS_UNSAFE_UNKNOWN # never auto-deleted without proof
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -403,15 +207,7 @@ def classify_worktree(
|
||||
if is_detached or branch_gone:
|
||||
return CLASS_DETACHED_REVIEW_LEFTOVER
|
||||
return CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE
|
||||
if workflow_type == WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK:
|
||||
# #858: an issue worktree becomes removable only on authoritative
|
||||
# merged-PR evidence satisfying the whole cleanup policy. Age alone
|
||||
# never proves the branch landed, so TTL cannot qualify one by itself
|
||||
# — otherwise a worktree holding unmerged commits would be reclaimed.
|
||||
if (merged_pr_cleanup or {}).get("proven"):
|
||||
return CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE
|
||||
return CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK
|
||||
# conflict_fix: only removable once the TTL has expired.
|
||||
# issue_work / conflict_fix: only removable once the TTL has expired.
|
||||
if ttl_expired:
|
||||
return CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE
|
||||
return CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK
|
||||
@@ -604,20 +400,6 @@ def remove_worktree(project_root: str, path: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def head_contained_in_ref(
|
||||
project_root: str, head_sha: str | None, ref: str | None
|
||||
) -> bool | None:
|
||||
"""Return True when ``head_sha`` is already contained in ``ref``.
|
||||
|
||||
Shares :mod:`merged_cleanup_reconcile`'s ancestry check so the audit and
|
||||
the PR-scoped reconciler agree on what "already landed" means (#858).
|
||||
Returns None when containment cannot be determined, which fails closed.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not head_sha or not ref:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
return is_head_ancestor_of_ref(project_root, head_sha, ref)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _is_under_branches(project_root: str, path: str) -> bool:
|
||||
branches_root = os.path.join(os.path.abspath(project_root), "branches")
|
||||
return os.path.abspath(path or "").startswith(branches_root + os.sep)
|
||||
@@ -631,30 +413,16 @@ def audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
active_issue_branches: set[str] | None = None,
|
||||
now: datetime | str | None = None,
|
||||
ttl_hours: float = DEFAULT_TTL_HOURS,
|
||||
pr_index: dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]] | None = None,
|
||||
leased_issue_numbers: set[int] | None = None,
|
||||
live_session_paths: set[str] | None = None,
|
||||
master_ref: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Classify every session-owned worktree under ``branches/``.
|
||||
|
||||
Read-only: shells out to git for discovery and dirty state, then applies
|
||||
the pure classifier. Returns per-worktree classifications, counts, the
|
||||
list of removable candidates, and the ``git worktree list`` proof.
|
||||
|
||||
``pr_index`` (see :func:`build_pr_index`) supplies the authoritative PR
|
||||
ownership used to link issue worktrees to their merged PR (#858).
|
||||
``master_ref`` is the ref a worktree head must be contained in before it
|
||||
can be considered landed. Both are optional and their absence only ever
|
||||
fails closed: without them no issue worktree becomes removable.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
open_pr_branches = open_pr_branches or set()
|
||||
leased_branches = leased_branches or set()
|
||||
active_issue_branches = active_issue_branches or set()
|
||||
leased_issue_numbers = leased_issue_numbers or set()
|
||||
live_session_paths = {
|
||||
os.path.abspath(p) for p in (live_session_paths or set()) if p
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
worktrees: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
|
||||
for entry in list_worktrees(project_root):
|
||||
@@ -665,42 +433,12 @@ def audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
)
|
||||
dirty_state = read_worktree_dirty(path)
|
||||
is_dirty = bool(dirty_state.get("dirty"))
|
||||
head_sha = entry.get("head")
|
||||
linkage = resolve_owning_pr(branch=branch, pr_index=pr_index)
|
||||
metadata = build_worktree_metadata(
|
||||
path=path,
|
||||
branch=branch,
|
||||
head_sha=head_sha,
|
||||
pr_number=linkage.get("pr_number"),
|
||||
path=path, branch=branch, head_sha=entry.get("head")
|
||||
)
|
||||
has_open_pr = bool(branch) and branch in open_pr_branches
|
||||
# A lease on issue N protects that issue's own work worktree. It must
|
||||
# not incidentally protect a baseline/review scratch tree that merely
|
||||
# carries the same issue marker in its name, which would change the
|
||||
# classification of worktrees this policy does not own.
|
||||
has_active_lease = (bool(branch) and branch in leased_branches) or (
|
||||
metadata["workflow_type"] == WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK
|
||||
and metadata.get("issue_number") is not None
|
||||
and metadata["issue_number"] in leased_issue_numbers
|
||||
)
|
||||
has_active_lease = bool(branch) and branch in leased_branches
|
||||
has_active_lock = bool(branch) and branch in active_issue_branches
|
||||
has_live_session = bool(path) and os.path.abspath(path) in live_session_paths
|
||||
head_in_master = (
|
||||
head_contained_in_ref(project_root, head_sha, master_ref)
|
||||
if master_ref
|
||||
else None
|
||||
)
|
||||
merged_pr_cleanup = assess_merged_pr_worktree_cleanup(
|
||||
linkage=linkage,
|
||||
head_sha=head_sha,
|
||||
head_in_master=head_in_master,
|
||||
is_dirty=is_dirty,
|
||||
has_open_pr=has_open_pr,
|
||||
has_active_lease=has_active_lease,
|
||||
has_active_issue_lock=has_active_lock,
|
||||
is_protected=is_protected,
|
||||
has_live_session=has_live_session,
|
||||
)
|
||||
ttl_expired = is_ttl_expired(
|
||||
last_used_at=metadata.get("last_used_at"), now=now, ttl_hours=ttl_hours
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -714,8 +452,6 @@ def audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
branch_gone=branch is None and not entry.get("detached"),
|
||||
ttl_expired=ttl_expired,
|
||||
is_protected=is_protected,
|
||||
merged_pr_cleanup=merged_pr_cleanup,
|
||||
has_live_session=has_live_session,
|
||||
)
|
||||
metadata["cleanup_eligibility"] = classification
|
||||
worktrees.append(
|
||||
@@ -727,10 +463,7 @@ def audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
"has_open_pr": has_open_pr,
|
||||
"has_active_lease": has_active_lease,
|
||||
"has_active_issue_lock": has_active_lock,
|
||||
"has_live_session": has_live_session,
|
||||
"is_protected": is_protected,
|
||||
"merged_pr_linkage": linkage,
|
||||
"merged_pr_cleanup": merged_pr_cleanup,
|
||||
"classification": classification,
|
||||
"removable": is_removable(classification),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user