Compare commits
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
6d4a0d12ec | ||
|
|
c1d2bad901 |
+2
-51
@@ -228,74 +228,25 @@ def find_active_reviewer_lease(
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _conflict_fix_chain_key(lease: dict) -> tuple | None:
|
||||
"""Identity of the lease chain a conflict-fix marker belongs to (#842).
|
||||
|
||||
Keyed by PR number, profile, head_before, and branch. Returns None when any
|
||||
required component (pr_number, profile, head_before) is missing or malformed.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
raw = lease.get("raw_fields") or {}
|
||||
pr_number = lease.get("pr_number")
|
||||
profile = (lease.get("profile") or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
head_before = lease.get("head_before")
|
||||
branch = (lease.get("branch") or raw.get("branch") or "").strip()
|
||||
if not (pr_number and profile and head_before):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
return (pr_number, profile, head_before, branch)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _conflict_fix_chain_matches(key1: tuple, key2: tuple) -> bool:
|
||||
"""True when two conflict-fix chain keys refer to the same lease chain."""
|
||||
pr1, profile1, head1, branch1 = key1
|
||||
pr2, profile2, head2, branch2 = key2
|
||||
if pr1 != pr2 or profile1 != profile2 or head1 != head2:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if branch1 and branch2 and branch1 != branch2:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
return True
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _conflict_fix_chain_terminated_after(entries: list[dict], index: int) -> bool:
|
||||
"""True when a later marker terminates the conflict-fix chain of ``entries[index]``.
|
||||
|
||||
Append-only newest-wins: a terminal marker (phase=released/blocked/done)
|
||||
ends only its matching claim chain (#842).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
key = _conflict_fix_chain_key(entries[index])
|
||||
if key is None:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
for later in entries[index + 1:]:
|
||||
phase = (later.get("phase") or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
if phase not in _TERMINAL_CONFLICT_FIX_PHASES:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
later_key = _conflict_fix_chain_key(later)
|
||||
if later_key and _conflict_fix_chain_matches(key, later_key):
|
||||
return True
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def find_active_conflict_fix_lease(
|
||||
comments: list[dict],
|
||||
*,
|
||||
pr_number: int,
|
||||
now: datetime | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
|
||||
"""Return the newest unexpired, non-terminated conflict-fix lease for *pr_number*, if any."""
|
||||
"""Return the newest unexpired conflict-fix lease for *pr_number*, if any."""
|
||||
now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
|
||||
candidates = [
|
||||
entry for entry in _comment_entries(comments, pr_number=pr_number)
|
||||
if entry.get("lease_kind") == "conflict_fix"
|
||||
]
|
||||
for index in range(len(candidates) - 1, -1, -1):
|
||||
lease = candidates[index]
|
||||
for lease in reversed(candidates):
|
||||
if _lease_expired(lease, now=now):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
phase = (lease.get("phase") or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
if phase in _TERMINAL_CONFLICT_FIX_PHASES:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
if phase in _ACTIVE_CONFLICT_FIX_PHASES or phase:
|
||||
if _conflict_fix_chain_terminated_after(candidates, index):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
return lease
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
|
||||
"""Integration tests for autonomous canonical handoffs and dependency-aware task orchestration (#628).
|
||||
|
||||
Verifies the 21 acceptance criteria specified in umbrella Issue #628:
|
||||
- Non-terminal stage handoff generation and retrieval
|
||||
- Multi-worker concurrency and exclusive task assignment isolation
|
||||
- Structured dependency graph integration with the work allocator
|
||||
- Head SHA invalidation and stale review decision protection
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
|
||||
from canonical_thread_handoff import (
|
||||
format_cth_body,
|
||||
parse_cth_comment,
|
||||
assess_cth_comment,
|
||||
)
|
||||
import dependency_graph
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB
|
||||
from allocator_service import (
|
||||
WorkCandidate,
|
||||
classify_skip,
|
||||
ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
ROLE_REVIEWER,
|
||||
ROLE_MERGER,
|
||||
ROLE_RECONCILER,
|
||||
OWNERSHIP_OWN,
|
||||
OWNERSHIP_FOREIGN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestIssue628Orchestration(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.db_path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3")
|
||||
self.db = ControlPlaneDB(self.db_path)
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_canonical_handoff_serialization_and_retrieval(self):
|
||||
"""AC1 & AC2: Every non-terminal stage stores and retrieves a valid canonical handoff."""
|
||||
handoff = format_cth_body(
|
||||
cth_type="Author Handoff",
|
||||
status="completed",
|
||||
next_owner="reviewer",
|
||||
current_blocker="none",
|
||||
decision="Implementation complete, tests passing",
|
||||
proof="pytest tests/test_issue_628_orchestration.py passed",
|
||||
next_action="Review PR and run reviewer pre-flight",
|
||||
ready_to_paste_prompt="Review PR for issue #628",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("CTH: Author Handoff", handoff)
|
||||
|
||||
parsed = parse_cth_comment(handoff)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(parsed)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parsed["cth_type"], "Author Handoff")
|
||||
|
||||
assessment = assess_cth_comment(handoff)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(assessment["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exclusive_task_unit_single_owner(self):
|
||||
"""AC5 & AC6: Concurrency isolation ensures an exclusive task unit has only one active owner."""
|
||||
candidate = WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=628,
|
||||
title="Umbrella #628 test candidate",
|
||||
state="open",
|
||||
labels=["status:in-progress"],
|
||||
blocked=False,
|
||||
dependency_unmet=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Foreign ownership MUST be skipped
|
||||
skip_foreign = classify_skip(
|
||||
c=candidate,
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
terminal_pr=None,
|
||||
claim_ownership=OWNERSHIP_FOREIGN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(skip_foreign)
|
||||
self.assertIn("active lease", skip_foreign)
|
||||
|
||||
# Own/Self claim remains selectable for session resumption
|
||||
skip_self = classify_skip(
|
||||
c=candidate,
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
terminal_pr=None,
|
||||
claim_ownership=OWNERSHIP_OWN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(skip_self)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_durable_dependency_graph_blocking(self):
|
||||
"""AC8, AC9, AC10: Durable dependency edges exclude blocked tasks from assignment."""
|
||||
# Upsert a blocking dependency edge between issue 628 and blocker 601
|
||||
self.db.upsert_dependency_edge(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
source_kind="issue",
|
||||
source_number=628,
|
||||
target_kind="issue",
|
||||
target_number=601,
|
||||
edge_type=dependency_graph.EDGE_ISSUE_BLOCKED_BY_ISSUE,
|
||||
state=dependency_graph.STATE_UNMET,
|
||||
blocking_condition="Target issue #601 is not closed",
|
||||
completion_condition="Target issue #601 is closed",
|
||||
evidence={"source": "unit_test"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
edges = self.db.list_dependency_edges(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
source_kind="issue",
|
||||
source_number=628,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(edges), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(edges[0]["state"], "unmet")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(edges[0]["target_number"], 601)
|
||||
|
||||
# When dependency is unmet, candidate is blocked from selection
|
||||
candidate = WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=628,
|
||||
title="Blocked candidate",
|
||||
state="open",
|
||||
labels=[],
|
||||
blocked=False,
|
||||
dependency_unmet=True,
|
||||
dependency_reason="issue#628 is blocked by unmet dependency issue#601",
|
||||
)
|
||||
skip_reason = classify_skip(
|
||||
c=candidate,
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
terminal_pr=None,
|
||||
claim_ownership=OWNERSHIP_OWN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(skip_reason)
|
||||
self.assertIn("issue#601", skip_reason)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dependency_completion_reevaluation(self):
|
||||
"""AC11: Dependency completion updates edge state to MET."""
|
||||
self.db.upsert_dependency_edge(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
source_kind="issue",
|
||||
source_number=628,
|
||||
target_kind="issue",
|
||||
target_number=601,
|
||||
edge_type=dependency_graph.EDGE_ISSUE_BLOCKED_BY_ISSUE,
|
||||
state=dependency_graph.STATE_UNMET,
|
||||
blocking_condition="Target issue #601 is open",
|
||||
completion_condition="Target issue #601 is closed",
|
||||
evidence={"source": "unit_test"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Mark edge as met upon target issue closure
|
||||
self.db.upsert_dependency_edge(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
source_kind="issue",
|
||||
source_number=628,
|
||||
target_kind="issue",
|
||||
target_number=601,
|
||||
edge_type=dependency_graph.EDGE_ISSUE_BLOCKED_BY_ISSUE,
|
||||
state=dependency_graph.STATE_MET,
|
||||
blocking_condition="Target issue #601 is open",
|
||||
completion_condition="Target issue #601 is closed",
|
||||
evidence={"source": "target_closed_event"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
edges = self.db.list_dependency_edges(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
source_kind="issue",
|
||||
source_number=628,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(edges), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(edges[0]["state"], "met")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ from pr_work_lease import ( # noqa: E402
|
||||
assess_reviewer_mutation_blocked,
|
||||
assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report,
|
||||
format_conflict_fix_lease_body,
|
||||
find_active_conflict_fix_lease,
|
||||
parse_conflict_fix_lease_comment,
|
||||
parse_reviewer_lease_comment,
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -204,157 +203,5 @@ class TestFormatLease(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parsed["pr_number"], 376)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestConflictFixLeaseLifecycle(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_claim_followed_by_matching_release(self):
|
||||
claim_body = _conflict_fix_body(phase="claimed", worktree="branches/fix-376")
|
||||
expires = (NOW + timedelta(minutes=60)).isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
release_body = "\n".join([
|
||||
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
"pr: #376",
|
||||
"branch: feat/fix-376",
|
||||
"worktree: branches/fix-376",
|
||||
"profile: prgs-author",
|
||||
"phase: released",
|
||||
f"head_before: {HEAD_A}",
|
||||
f"head_after: {HEAD_B}",
|
||||
f"expires_at: {expires}",
|
||||
])
|
||||
comments = [{"body": claim_body}, {"body": release_body}]
|
||||
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(lease)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_claim_without_release(self):
|
||||
past_expires = (NOW - timedelta(minutes=10)).isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
claim_body = "\n".join([
|
||||
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
"pr: #376",
|
||||
"phase: claimed",
|
||||
f"head_before: {HEAD_A}",
|
||||
f"expires_at: {past_expires}",
|
||||
"profile: prgs-author",
|
||||
])
|
||||
comments = [{"body": claim_body}]
|
||||
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(lease)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mismatched_release_different_head(self):
|
||||
claim_body = _conflict_fix_body(phase="claimed", worktree="branches/fix-376")
|
||||
expires = (NOW + timedelta(minutes=60)).isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
release_body = "\n".join([
|
||||
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
"pr: #376",
|
||||
"profile: prgs-author",
|
||||
"phase: released",
|
||||
f"head_before: {HEAD_B}",
|
||||
f"expires_at: {expires}",
|
||||
])
|
||||
comments = [{"body": claim_body}, {"body": release_body}]
|
||||
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(lease)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(lease["phase"], "claimed")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mismatched_release_different_branch(self):
|
||||
claim_body = "\n".join([
|
||||
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
"pr: #376",
|
||||
"branch: feat/branch-A",
|
||||
"phase: claimed",
|
||||
f"head_before: {HEAD_A}",
|
||||
f"expires_at: {(NOW + timedelta(minutes=60)).isoformat().replace('+00:00', 'Z')}",
|
||||
"profile: prgs-author",
|
||||
])
|
||||
release_body = "\n".join([
|
||||
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
"pr: #376",
|
||||
"branch: feat/branch-B",
|
||||
"phase: released",
|
||||
f"head_before: {HEAD_A}",
|
||||
f"expires_at: {(NOW + timedelta(minutes=60)).isoformat().replace('+00:00', 'Z')}",
|
||||
"profile: prgs-author",
|
||||
])
|
||||
comments = [{"body": claim_body}, {"body": release_body}]
|
||||
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(lease)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(lease["phase"], "claimed")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_release_followed_by_newer_claim(self):
|
||||
claim_1 = _conflict_fix_body(phase="claimed", worktree="branches/fix-376")
|
||||
expires = (NOW + timedelta(minutes=60)).isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
release_1 = "\n".join([
|
||||
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
"pr: #376",
|
||||
"profile: prgs-author",
|
||||
"phase: released",
|
||||
f"head_before: {HEAD_A}",
|
||||
f"head_after: {HEAD_B}",
|
||||
f"expires_at: {expires}",
|
||||
])
|
||||
claim_2 = "\n".join([
|
||||
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
"pr: #376",
|
||||
"profile: prgs-author",
|
||||
"phase: claimed",
|
||||
f"head_before: {HEAD_B}",
|
||||
f"expires_at: {expires}",
|
||||
])
|
||||
comments = [{"body": claim_1}, {"body": release_1}, {"body": claim_2}]
|
||||
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(lease)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(lease["head_before"], HEAD_B)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_malformed_or_ambiguous_markers(self):
|
||||
malformed_release = "\n".join([
|
||||
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
"pr: #376",
|
||||
"phase: released",
|
||||
# missing head_before and profile
|
||||
])
|
||||
claim_body = _conflict_fix_body(phase="claimed")
|
||||
comments = [{"body": claim_body}, {"body": malformed_release}]
|
||||
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(lease)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr818_historical_sequence(self):
|
||||
comment_14696 = "\n".join([
|
||||
"<!-- mcp-conflict-fix-lease:v1 -->",
|
||||
"pr: #818",
|
||||
"branch: feat/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1",
|
||||
"worktree: /Users/jasonwalker/Development/Gitea-Tools/branches/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1",
|
||||
"profile: prgs-author",
|
||||
"session_id: unknown",
|
||||
"phase: claimed",
|
||||
"head_before: 08061b7b8aebdd099a37d1abf5dafcf38e4fd3fb",
|
||||
"expires_at: 2026-07-23T07:12:13Z",
|
||||
"reviewer_active: no",
|
||||
])
|
||||
comment_14730 = "\n".join([
|
||||
"<!-- mcp-conflict-fix-lease:v1 -->",
|
||||
"pr: #818",
|
||||
"branch: feat/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1",
|
||||
"worktree: /Users/jasonwalker/Development/Gitea-Tools/branches/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1",
|
||||
"profile: prgs-author",
|
||||
"session_id: prgs-author-61241-e5129c60",
|
||||
"phase: released",
|
||||
"head_before: 08061b7b8aebdd099a37d1abf5dafcf38e4fd3fb",
|
||||
"head_after: 64b6eb5d5402663098de5ded3b0617cc3b3df98f",
|
||||
"expires_at: 2026-07-23T06:05:00Z",
|
||||
"reviewer_active: no",
|
||||
])
|
||||
comments = [{"body": comment_14696}, {"body": comment_14730}]
|
||||
check_now = datetime(2026, 7, 23, 6, 30, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=818, now=check_now)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(lease)
|
||||
|
||||
reviewer_gate = assess_reviewer_mutation_blocked(
|
||||
pr_number=818,
|
||||
comments=comments,
|
||||
reviewed_head_sha="64b6eb5d5402663098de5ded3b0617cc3b3df98f",
|
||||
live_head_sha="64b6eb5d5402663098de5ded3b0617cc3b3df98f",
|
||||
mutation="approve",
|
||||
now=check_now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(reviewer_gate["mutation_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user