Compare commits
8
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
df58b5fb90 | ||
|
|
b70d5f3efa | ||
|
|
fa6ba8a162 | ||
|
|
f0c9ffb25e | ||
|
|
79256f9093 | ||
|
|
c3f282ba44 | ||
|
|
5eb89f8830 | ||
|
|
a6c15afec1 |
+176
-5
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ OUTCOME_CANDIDATE_SET_DRIFT = "candidate_set_drift"
|
||||
SKIP_CLAIMED_BY_OTHER_SESSION = "claimed_by_other_session"
|
||||
# #776: controller-supplied pre-rank exclusion.
|
||||
SKIP_EXCLUDED_BY_CONTROLLER = "excluded_by_controller"
|
||||
# #844: epic / child-only implementation container (pre-rank).
|
||||
SKIP_EPIC_OR_CHILD_ONLY_CONTAINER = "epic_or_child_only_container"
|
||||
|
||||
# Ownership verdicts for a live claim on a candidate (#765).
|
||||
OWNERSHIP_OWN = "own"
|
||||
@@ -130,6 +132,39 @@ ROLE_ACTIONS: dict[str, tuple[tuple[str, ...], tuple[str, ...]]] = {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Body phrases that prove an issue is an implementation container, not a
|
||||
# unit of direct author work (#844). Matched case-insensitively against the
|
||||
# issue body. Title alone is never sufficient (ordinary issues may mention
|
||||
# "epic" incidentally).
|
||||
_CHILD_ONLY_BODY_MARKERS: tuple[str, ...] = (
|
||||
"implementation is delivered via child issues only",
|
||||
"implementation is delivered through child issues only",
|
||||
"implementation is delivered via child issues",
|
||||
"implementation is delivered through child issues",
|
||||
"do not implement product features in this epic",
|
||||
"do not implement product features in this epic issue itself",
|
||||
"no product feature implementation is claimed complete solely on this epic",
|
||||
"implementable child issues remain independently eligible",
|
||||
"owns the product roadmap and linkage",
|
||||
"this epic owns the product roadmap",
|
||||
"coordination container",
|
||||
"child-only container",
|
||||
"implementation is delegated to child",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Explicit epic / umbrella labels (structured evidence preferred over title).
|
||||
_EPIC_LABELS: frozenset[str] = frozenset(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type:epic",
|
||||
"epic",
|
||||
"kind:epic",
|
||||
"scope:epic",
|
||||
"type:umbrella",
|
||||
"umbrella",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass
|
||||
class WorkCandidate:
|
||||
"""One assignable Gitea issue or PR presented to the allocator."""
|
||||
@@ -139,6 +174,7 @@ class WorkCandidate:
|
||||
state: str = "open"
|
||||
labels: tuple[str, ...] = ()
|
||||
title: str = ""
|
||||
body: str = ""
|
||||
priority: int = 0
|
||||
head_sha: str | None = None
|
||||
# Routing signals (callers derive from Gitea / review feedback).
|
||||
@@ -158,6 +194,7 @@ class WorkCandidate:
|
||||
self.labels = tuple(
|
||||
str(x).strip().lower() for x in (self.labels or ()) if str(x).strip()
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.body = str(self.body or "")
|
||||
if self.kind not in WORK_KINDS:
|
||||
raise InvalidWorkKindError(
|
||||
f"candidate kind '{self.kind}' is not assignable; only "
|
||||
@@ -171,6 +208,7 @@ class WorkCandidate:
|
||||
"state": self.state,
|
||||
"labels": list(self.labels),
|
||||
"title": self.title,
|
||||
"body": self.body,
|
||||
"priority": self.priority,
|
||||
"head_sha": self.head_sha,
|
||||
"request_changes_current_head": self.request_changes_current_head,
|
||||
@@ -184,6 +222,51 @@ class WorkCandidate:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def classify_epic_or_child_only_container(
|
||||
c: WorkCandidate,
|
||||
) -> tuple[bool, str | None]:
|
||||
"""Return whether *c* is an epic / child-only implementation container (#844).
|
||||
|
||||
Exclusion uses structured evidence first (labels, body scope language).
|
||||
A bare title containing the word "epic" is **not** enough — ordinary
|
||||
implementable issues may mention epics incidentally. A title that is
|
||||
explicitly prefixed ``Epic:`` only counts when the body also proves
|
||||
child-only / no-direct-implementation scope (or an epic label is present).
|
||||
|
||||
PRs are never classified as containers here (they already have a head).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if c.kind != "issue":
|
||||
return False, None
|
||||
|
||||
labels = set(c.labels)
|
||||
epic_label = sorted(labels & _EPIC_LABELS)
|
||||
body_l = (c.body or "").lower()
|
||||
title = (c.title or "").strip()
|
||||
title_l = title.lower()
|
||||
|
||||
body_hits = [m for m in _CHILD_ONLY_BODY_MARKERS if m in body_l]
|
||||
title_epic_prefix = title_l.startswith("epic:") or title_l.startswith("epic ")
|
||||
|
||||
if epic_label:
|
||||
detail = f"label={epic_label[0]}"
|
||||
if body_hits:
|
||||
detail = f"{detail}; body_marker={body_hits[0]!r}"
|
||||
return True, detail
|
||||
|
||||
if body_hits:
|
||||
# Body proves child-only / umbrella scope. Title "Epic:" is corroborating
|
||||
# but not required — containers without the word still exclude.
|
||||
detail = f"body_marker={body_hits[0]!r}"
|
||||
if title_epic_prefix:
|
||||
detail = f"title_epic_prefix; {detail}"
|
||||
return True, detail
|
||||
|
||||
# Title-only "Epic:" without body scope evidence is insufficient (#844 AC:
|
||||
# eligibility does not rely solely on the word "Epic" in a title).
|
||||
# Similarly, incidental "epic" mid-title without markers stays eligible.
|
||||
return False, None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass
|
||||
class SkipRecord:
|
||||
kind: str
|
||||
@@ -850,7 +933,8 @@ def allocate_next_work(
|
||||
ownership_defects: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
|
||||
controller_excluded: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
|
||||
|
||||
# #776 AC2: remove excluded numbers *before* ranking / selection / lease.
|
||||
# #776 AC2 + #844: remove excluded numbers *and* epic/child-only containers
|
||||
# *before* ranking / selection / lease so they never receive assignments.
|
||||
rankable: list[WorkCandidate] = []
|
||||
for c in candidates:
|
||||
if int(c.number) in exclude_set:
|
||||
@@ -929,6 +1013,23 @@ def allocate_next_work(
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
continue
|
||||
# #844: epics / child-only containers are never direct implement targets.
|
||||
is_container, container_detail = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(c)
|
||||
if is_container:
|
||||
detail = container_detail or "epic or child-only container"
|
||||
reason = (
|
||||
f"{c.kind}#{c.number} {SKIP_EPIC_OR_CHILD_ONLY_CONTAINER}: "
|
||||
f"{detail}; implementation is delegated to child issues"
|
||||
)
|
||||
skipped.append(
|
||||
SkipRecord(
|
||||
c.kind,
|
||||
c.number,
|
||||
reason,
|
||||
SKIP_EPIC_OR_CHILD_ONLY_CONTAINER,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
rankable.append(c)
|
||||
|
||||
ordered = sort_candidates(rankable)
|
||||
@@ -1115,6 +1216,12 @@ def allocate_next_work(
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"dry-run only (apply=false); no assignment/lease created — "
|
||||
"call again with apply=true to reserve via control-plane DB"
|
||||
+ (
|
||||
"; after apply, the required-role worker consumes via "
|
||||
"gitea_adopt_workflow_lease (#843)"
|
||||
if mode == ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE and expected_role != role_norm
|
||||
else ""
|
||||
)
|
||||
],
|
||||
"skipped": [s.as_dict() for s in skipped],
|
||||
"terminal_pr": terminal_pr,
|
||||
@@ -1146,6 +1253,9 @@ def allocate_next_work(
|
||||
# Atomic reserve via #613 substrate.
|
||||
ttl = lease_ttl_seconds if lease_ttl_seconds is not None else None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
cross_role_handoff = (
|
||||
mode == ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE and lease_role != role_norm
|
||||
)
|
||||
kwargs: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"role": lease_role,
|
||||
@@ -1157,7 +1267,8 @@ def allocate_next_work(
|
||||
"expected_head_sha": selected.head_sha,
|
||||
"allowed_actions": allowed,
|
||||
"forbidden_actions": forbidden,
|
||||
"phase": "allocated",
|
||||
# #843: mark cross-role allocations as awaiting independent consume
|
||||
"phase": "awaiting_handoff" if cross_role_handoff else "allocated",
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ttl is not None:
|
||||
kwargs["lease_ttl_seconds"] = int(ttl)
|
||||
@@ -1237,7 +1348,52 @@ def allocate_next_work(
|
||||
"lease_role": lease_role,
|
||||
"source": "control_plane_db.assign_and_lease",
|
||||
}
|
||||
return {
|
||||
consume_allocation = None
|
||||
if cross_role_handoff and result.lease_id:
|
||||
# Durable handoff marker so independent required-role workers can
|
||||
# consume without sharing the controller session (#843).
|
||||
handoff_prov = {
|
||||
"cross_role_handoff": True,
|
||||
"handoff_status": "pending",
|
||||
"allocating_session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"allocating_role": role_norm,
|
||||
"required_role": expected_role,
|
||||
"required_profile": selection["required_profile"],
|
||||
"required_namespace": selection["required_namespace"],
|
||||
"assignment_id": result.assignment_id,
|
||||
"lease_id": result.lease_id,
|
||||
"allocation_mode": mode,
|
||||
"adopted_by_session_id": None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
try:
|
||||
db.attach_lease_provenance(result.lease_id, handoff_prov)
|
||||
except ControlPlaneError:
|
||||
# Still return assignment evidence; consume path may be unavailable
|
||||
handoff_prov["attach_failed"] = True
|
||||
consume_allocation = {
|
||||
"tool": "gitea_adopt_workflow_lease",
|
||||
"lease_id": result.lease_id,
|
||||
"assignment_id": result.assignment_id,
|
||||
"required_role": expected_role,
|
||||
"required_profile": selection["required_profile"],
|
||||
"required_namespace": selection["required_namespace"],
|
||||
"handoff_status": "pending",
|
||||
"controller_session_required": False,
|
||||
"instructions": (
|
||||
f"From an independent {expected_role} session "
|
||||
f"({selection['required_namespace']} / "
|
||||
f"{selection['required_profile']}), call "
|
||||
f"gitea_adopt_workflow_lease(lease_id={result.lease_id!r}) "
|
||||
"to consume this controller allocation. The allocating "
|
||||
"controller process does not need to remain alive. Wrong-role "
|
||||
"and second-adoption attempts fail closed."
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
lease_proof["cross_role_handoff"] = True
|
||||
lease_proof["handoff_status"] = "pending"
|
||||
lease_proof["consume_tool"] = "gitea_adopt_workflow_lease"
|
||||
|
||||
out = {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_ASSIGNED,
|
||||
"apply": True,
|
||||
@@ -1271,8 +1427,17 @@ def allocate_next_work(
|
||||
"lease_role": lease_role,
|
||||
"lease_proof": lease_proof,
|
||||
"selection_policy": SELECTION_POLICY,
|
||||
"cross_role_handoff": bool(cross_role_handoff),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"next_valid_command": _next_command(lease_role, selected),
|
||||
"next_valid_command": (
|
||||
(
|
||||
f"consume lease {result.lease_id} via gitea_adopt_workflow_lease "
|
||||
f"as {expected_role}, then "
|
||||
)
|
||||
+ _next_command(lease_role, selected)
|
||||
if cross_role_handoff
|
||||
else _next_command(lease_role, selected)
|
||||
),
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
@@ -1287,9 +1452,14 @@ def allocate_next_work(
|
||||
"downstream_note": (
|
||||
"#612 incident bridge remains downstream of #600; "
|
||||
"allocator never assigns raw monitoring incidents; "
|
||||
"controller routes only under cross_role (#840)"
|
||||
"controller routes only under cross_role (#840); "
|
||||
"cross-role assignments are consumable by independent "
|
||||
"required-role workers via gitea_adopt_workflow_lease (#843)"
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
if consume_allocation is not None:
|
||||
out["consume_allocation"] = consume_allocation
|
||||
return out
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _next_command(role: str, c: WorkCandidate) -> str:
|
||||
@@ -1341,6 +1511,7 @@ def candidate_from_dict(data: dict[str, Any]) -> WorkCandidate:
|
||||
state=str(data.get("state") or "open"),
|
||||
labels=tuple(data.get("labels") or ()),
|
||||
title=str(data.get("title") or ""),
|
||||
body=str(data.get("body") or ""),
|
||||
priority=priority,
|
||||
head_sha=data.get("head_sha"),
|
||||
request_changes_current_head=bool(data.get("request_changes_current_head")),
|
||||
|
||||
+169
-3
@@ -1637,11 +1637,13 @@ class ControlPlaneDB:
|
||||
provenance: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
|
||||
lease_ttl_seconds: int = DEFAULT_LEASE_TTL_SECONDS,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Transfer or refresh a lease with provenance (#601).
|
||||
"""Transfer or refresh a lease with provenance (#601 / #843).
|
||||
|
||||
* Same owner + active → refresh (owner-resume).
|
||||
* Cross-role handoff pending + matching required role → atomic consume
|
||||
(even while the allocating controller session still "owns" the lease).
|
||||
* Expired/abandoned/released → create new assignment+lease with provenance.
|
||||
* Active foreign → raise ForeignLeaseError (never silent steal).
|
||||
* Active foreign (non-handoff) → raise ForeignLeaseError (never silent steal).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
now = _utc_now()
|
||||
now_s = _ts(now)
|
||||
@@ -1677,7 +1679,35 @@ class ControlPlaneDB:
|
||||
status = "expired"
|
||||
|
||||
owner = lease["session_id"]
|
||||
if status == "active" and owner != adopter_session_id:
|
||||
# Parse durable provenance for cross-role handoff consume (#843).
|
||||
lease_prov: dict[str, Any] = {}
|
||||
if "provenance_json" in lease.keys() and lease["provenance_json"]:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
loaded = json.loads(lease["provenance_json"])
|
||||
if isinstance(loaded, dict):
|
||||
lease_prov = loaded
|
||||
except (TypeError, json.JSONDecodeError):
|
||||
lease_prov = {}
|
||||
handoff_pending = bool(lease_prov.get("cross_role_handoff")) and (
|
||||
str(lease_prov.get("handoff_status") or "pending").strip().lower()
|
||||
== "pending"
|
||||
)
|
||||
already_adopted = bool(
|
||||
(lease["adopted_by_session_id"] if "adopted_by_session_id" in lease.keys() else None)
|
||||
or lease_prov.get("adopted_by_session_id")
|
||||
)
|
||||
required_role = str(
|
||||
lease_prov.get("required_role") or lease["role"] or ""
|
||||
).strip().lower()
|
||||
adopter_role = (role or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
cross_role_consume = (
|
||||
handoff_pending
|
||||
and not already_adopted
|
||||
and status == "active"
|
||||
and owner != adopter_session_id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if status == "active" and owner != adopter_session_id and not cross_role_consume:
|
||||
raise ForeignLeaseError(
|
||||
f"cannot adopt active foreign lease {lease_id} owned by {owner}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -1761,6 +1791,142 @@ class ControlPlaneDB:
|
||||
"reasons": ["owner-resume: refreshed lease with provenance"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# #843: controller→required-role handoff consume (atomic, same lease_id)
|
||||
if cross_role_consume:
|
||||
if not required_role:
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError(
|
||||
f"cross-role handoff lease {lease_id} missing required_role"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if adopter_role != required_role:
|
||||
raise ForeignLeaseError(
|
||||
f"wrong role for cross-role handoff consume: "
|
||||
f"required={required_role} adopter={adopter_role or 'none'} "
|
||||
f"(fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
# CAS: only transfer if still owned by allocating session and unadopted
|
||||
cols = self._lease_columns(conn)
|
||||
adopted_col_null = (
|
||||
"(adopted_by_session_id IS NULL OR adopted_by_session_id = '')"
|
||||
if "adopted_by_session_id" in cols
|
||||
else "1=1"
|
||||
)
|
||||
cas = conn.execute(
|
||||
f"""
|
||||
UPDATE leases
|
||||
SET session_id = ?,
|
||||
heartbeat_at = ?,
|
||||
expires_at = ?,
|
||||
phase = ?,
|
||||
role = ?
|
||||
WHERE lease_id = ?
|
||||
AND status = 'active'
|
||||
AND session_id = ?
|
||||
AND {adopted_col_null}
|
||||
""",
|
||||
(
|
||||
adopter_session_id,
|
||||
now_s,
|
||||
expires,
|
||||
"adopted",
|
||||
required_role,
|
||||
lease_id,
|
||||
owner,
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if cas.rowcount != 1:
|
||||
raise ForeignLeaseError(
|
||||
f"cross-role handoff consume lost race for lease {lease_id} "
|
||||
"(already adopted or no longer pending; fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if "adopted_from_session_id" in cols:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
UPDATE leases
|
||||
SET adopted_from_session_id = ?, adopted_by_session_id = ?
|
||||
WHERE lease_id = ?
|
||||
""",
|
||||
(owner, adopter_session_id, lease_id),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if "worktree_path" in cols and worktree_path:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE leases SET worktree_path = ? WHERE lease_id = ?",
|
||||
(worktree_path, lease_id),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if "owner_pid" in cols and owner_pid is not None:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE leases SET owner_pid = ? WHERE lease_id = ?",
|
||||
(owner_pid, lease_id),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if "expected_head_sha" in cols and expected_head_sha:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE leases SET expected_head_sha = ? WHERE lease_id = ?",
|
||||
(expected_head_sha, lease_id),
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Merge handoff provenance + caller provenance
|
||||
merged = dict(lease_prov)
|
||||
merged.update(provenance or {})
|
||||
merged["cross_role_handoff"] = True
|
||||
merged["handoff_status"] = "adopted"
|
||||
merged["adopted_from_session_id"] = owner
|
||||
merged["adopted_by_session_id"] = adopter_session_id
|
||||
merged["required_role"] = required_role
|
||||
if "provenance_json" in cols:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE leases SET provenance_json = ? WHERE lease_id = ?",
|
||||
(json.dumps(merged), lease_id),
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Transfer active assignment ownership atomically
|
||||
asn_cas = conn.execute(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
UPDATE assignments
|
||||
SET session_id = ?, role = ?
|
||||
WHERE lease_id = ? AND status = 'active' AND session_id = ?
|
||||
""",
|
||||
(adopter_session_id, required_role, lease_id, owner),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if asn_cas.rowcount < 1:
|
||||
# Fail closed: assignment must move with the lease
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError(
|
||||
f"cross-role handoff: no active assignment for lease {lease_id} "
|
||||
f"owned by {owner}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
lease2 = conn.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT * FROM leases WHERE lease_id = ?", (lease_id,)
|
||||
).fetchone()
|
||||
asn = conn.execute(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
SELECT * FROM assignments
|
||||
WHERE lease_id = ? AND status = 'active'
|
||||
ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 1
|
||||
""",
|
||||
(lease_id,),
|
||||
).fetchone()
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
INSERT INTO events(work_item_id, event_type, message, created_at)
|
||||
VALUES (?, 'lease_adopted', ?, ?)
|
||||
""",
|
||||
(
|
||||
lease["work_item_id"],
|
||||
f"cross-role handoff: {adopter_session_id} consumed "
|
||||
f"{lease_id} from {owner} as {required_role}",
|
||||
now_s,
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"outcome": "adopted_cross_role_handoff",
|
||||
"lease": dict(lease2) if lease2 else dict(lease),
|
||||
"assignment": dict(asn) if asn else None,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"cross-role handoff: independent required-role worker consumed "
|
||||
"controller allocation without abandonment"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"adopted_by_session_id": adopter_session_id,
|
||||
"adopted_from_session_id": owner,
|
||||
"required_role": required_role,
|
||||
"handoff_status": "adopted",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Non-active: create new lease + assignment (transfer)
|
||||
new_lease_id = f"lease-{uuid.uuid4().hex[:16]}"
|
||||
new_asn_id = f"asn-{uuid.uuid4().hex[:16]}"
|
||||
|
||||
+193
-106
@@ -11242,127 +11242,163 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
if dry_run:
|
||||
report["dry_run"] = True
|
||||
report["executed"] = False
|
||||
# #851: surface planned lifecycle order so dry-run matches execute.
|
||||
report["planned_execution_orders"] = {
|
||||
str(entry.get("pr_number")): entry.get("planned_execution_order") or []
|
||||
for entry in (report.get("entries") or [])
|
||||
}
|
||||
return {"success": True, "performed": False, **report}
|
||||
|
||||
verify_preflight_purity(
|
||||
remote, task="reconcile_merged_cleanups", org=org, repo=repo
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions: list[dict] = []
|
||||
project_root = _canonical_local_git_root()
|
||||
|
||||
def _ownership_records_for_branch(
|
||||
head_branch: str, pr_num_int: int | None
|
||||
) -> list[dict]:
|
||||
ownership_bundle = _collect_branch_ownership_records(
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
host=h,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
branch=head_branch,
|
||||
pr_number=pr_num_int,
|
||||
project_root=project_root,
|
||||
auth=auth,
|
||||
base_api=base,
|
||||
)
|
||||
ownership_records = list(ownership_bundle.get("records") or [])
|
||||
if ownership_bundle.get("inventory_error"):
|
||||
ownership_records.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"category": (
|
||||
branch_cleanup_guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_INVENTORY_ERROR
|
||||
),
|
||||
"status": "unknown",
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"host": h,
|
||||
"org": o,
|
||||
"repo": r,
|
||||
"branch": head_branch,
|
||||
"reclaim_allowed": False,
|
||||
"role": "inventory",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
return ownership_records
|
||||
|
||||
def _attempt_owned_remote_delete(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
head_branch: str,
|
||||
pr_num_int: int | None,
|
||||
after_worktree_removal: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Fail-closed remote delete with live ownership reassessment (#851)."""
|
||||
import urllib.parse
|
||||
|
||||
ownership_records = _ownership_records_for_branch(head_branch, pr_num_int)
|
||||
ownership = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_active_branch_ownership(
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
branch=head_branch,
|
||||
host=h,
|
||||
records=ownership_records,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if ownership.get("block"):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"action": "delete_remote_branch",
|
||||
"branch": head_branch,
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"delete_acknowledged": False,
|
||||
"verified_absent": False,
|
||||
"blocker_kind": "active_branch_ownership",
|
||||
"reasons": ownership.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
"blocking_categories": ownership.get("blocking_categories") or [],
|
||||
"after_worktree_removal": after_worktree_removal,
|
||||
"ownership_reassessed": after_worktree_removal,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
encoded = urllib.parse.quote(head_branch, safe="")
|
||||
url = f"{base}/branches/{encoded}"
|
||||
with _audited(
|
||||
"delete_branch",
|
||||
host=h,
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
target_branch=head_branch,
|
||||
request_metadata={
|
||||
"branch": head_branch,
|
||||
"source": "reconcile_merged_cleanups",
|
||||
"ownership_checked": True,
|
||||
"after_worktree_removal": after_worktree_removal,
|
||||
},
|
||||
):
|
||||
api_request("DELETE", url, auth)
|
||||
readback = _probe_remote_branch(h, o, r, auth, head_branch)
|
||||
readback_assessment = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_post_delete_readback(
|
||||
readback
|
||||
)
|
||||
verified = bool(readback_assessment.get("verified_absent"))
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"action": "delete_remote_branch",
|
||||
"branch": head_branch,
|
||||
"success": bool(readback_assessment.get("ok")),
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"delete_acknowledged": True,
|
||||
"verified_absent": verified,
|
||||
"readback": readback_assessment.get("readback"),
|
||||
"reasons": readback_assessment.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
"after_worktree_removal": after_worktree_removal,
|
||||
"ownership_reassessed": after_worktree_removal,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for entry in report.get("entries") or []:
|
||||
head_branch = entry.get("head_branch") or ""
|
||||
remote_assessment = entry.get("remote_branch") or {}
|
||||
local_assessment = entry.get("local_worktree") or {}
|
||||
pr_num = entry.get("pr_number")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
pr_num_int = int(pr_num) if pr_num is not None else None
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
pr_num_int = None
|
||||
|
||||
if remote_assessment.get("safe_to_delete_remote"):
|
||||
import urllib.parse
|
||||
|
||||
pr_num = entry.get("pr_number")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
pr_num_int = int(pr_num) if pr_num is not None else None
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
pr_num_int = None
|
||||
ownership_bundle = _collect_branch_ownership_records(
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
host=h,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
branch=head_branch,
|
||||
pr_number=pr_num_int,
|
||||
project_root=_canonical_local_git_root(),
|
||||
auth=auth,
|
||||
base_api=base,
|
||||
)
|
||||
ownership_records = list(ownership_bundle.get("records") or [])
|
||||
if ownership_bundle.get("inventory_error"):
|
||||
ownership_records.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"category": (
|
||||
branch_cleanup_guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_INVENTORY_ERROR
|
||||
),
|
||||
"status": "unknown",
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"host": h,
|
||||
"org": o,
|
||||
"repo": r,
|
||||
"branch": head_branch,
|
||||
"reclaim_allowed": False,
|
||||
"role": "inventory",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
ownership = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_active_branch_ownership(
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
branch=head_branch,
|
||||
host=h,
|
||||
records=ownership_records,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if ownership.get("block"):
|
||||
actions.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "delete_remote_branch",
|
||||
"branch": head_branch,
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"delete_acknowledged": False,
|
||||
"verified_absent": False,
|
||||
"blocker_kind": "active_branch_ownership",
|
||||
"reasons": ownership.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
"blocking_categories": ownership.get(
|
||||
"blocking_categories"
|
||||
)
|
||||
or [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
encoded = urllib.parse.quote(head_branch, safe="")
|
||||
url = f"{base}/branches/{encoded}"
|
||||
with _audited(
|
||||
"delete_branch",
|
||||
host=h,
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
target_branch=head_branch,
|
||||
request_metadata={
|
||||
"branch": head_branch,
|
||||
"source": "reconcile_merged_cleanups",
|
||||
"ownership_checked": True,
|
||||
},
|
||||
):
|
||||
api_request("DELETE", url, auth)
|
||||
readback = _probe_remote_branch(h, o, r, auth, head_branch)
|
||||
readback_assessment = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_post_delete_readback(
|
||||
readback
|
||||
)
|
||||
verified = bool(readback_assessment.get("verified_absent"))
|
||||
actions.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "delete_remote_branch",
|
||||
"branch": head_branch,
|
||||
"success": bool(readback_assessment.get("ok")),
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"delete_acknowledged": True,
|
||||
"verified_absent": verified,
|
||||
"readback": readback_assessment.get("readback"),
|
||||
"reasons": readback_assessment.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# #851 lifecycle: when the target worktree is independently safe, remove
|
||||
# it first so worktree_binding ownership does not permanently strand
|
||||
# both the worktree and the remote branch. Never skip worktree removal
|
||||
# merely because remote delete would be blocked by that binding.
|
||||
# Ownership protection for remote delete remains fail-closed below.
|
||||
worktree_removed = False
|
||||
if local_assessment.get("safe_to_remove_worktree"):
|
||||
result = merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree(
|
||||
_canonical_local_git_root(),
|
||||
project_root,
|
||||
head_branch,
|
||||
worktree_path=local_assessment.get("worktree_path"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions.append({"action": "remove_local_worktree", **result})
|
||||
# Idempotent resume: absent worktree is already gone.
|
||||
msg = (result.get("message") or "").lower()
|
||||
worktree_removed = bool(result.get("success")) or (
|
||||
"not found" in msg
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if remote_assessment.get("safe_to_delete_remote"):
|
||||
actions.append(
|
||||
_attempt_owned_remote_delete(
|
||||
head_branch=head_branch,
|
||||
pr_num_int=pr_num_int,
|
||||
after_worktree_removal=worktree_removed,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
for scratch in report.get("reviewer_scratch_entries") or []:
|
||||
if not scratch.get("safe_to_remove_worktree"):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
result = merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_reviewer_scratch_worktree(
|
||||
_canonical_local_git_root(), scratch.get("worktree_path") or ""
|
||||
project_root, scratch.get("worktree_path") or ""
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions.append({"action": "remove_reviewer_scratch_worktree", **result})
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19912,6 +19948,7 @@ def _allocator_candidates_from_gitea(
|
||||
state="open",
|
||||
labels=tuple(labels),
|
||||
title=title,
|
||||
body=body,
|
||||
priority=20 if "status:ready" in labels else 1,
|
||||
blocked=blocked,
|
||||
dependency_unmet=dep_unmet,
|
||||
@@ -21148,10 +21185,21 @@ def gitea_adopt_workflow_lease(
|
||||
remote: str = "dadeschools",
|
||||
host: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Adopt a control-plane lease through the sanctioned path (#601).
|
||||
"""Adopt a control-plane lease through the sanctioned path (#601 / #843).
|
||||
|
||||
Same-owner resume refreshes provenance. Foreign active leases are refused.
|
||||
Expired leases may be reclaimed; provenance records adopted_from/by.
|
||||
Same-owner resume refreshes provenance. Foreign active leases are refused
|
||||
unless the lease is a pending controller cross-role handoff and the caller
|
||||
holds the required role (independent consume without sharing the
|
||||
controller session). Expired leases may be reclaimed; provenance records
|
||||
adopted_from/by. Terminal (abandoned/released) leases cannot be adopted.
|
||||
|
||||
#843 F1: the adopter role is derived authoritatively from the active
|
||||
authenticated profile — never from caller input. A supplied ``role`` that
|
||||
does not exactly match the profile-derived role is rejected (no silent
|
||||
accept or reinterpretation), and handoff provenance ``required_profile`` /
|
||||
``required_namespace`` restrictions are validated against the same
|
||||
authoritative caller context. Caller-supplied role/profile/namespace can
|
||||
never grant authority.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
|
||||
if read_block:
|
||||
@@ -21160,25 +21208,64 @@ def gitea_adopt_workflow_lease(
|
||||
"reasons": read_block,
|
||||
"permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
profile = get_profile()
|
||||
profile_name = (profile.get("profile_name") or "").strip() or "session"
|
||||
active_role = (_profile_role_kind(profile) or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
if not active_role:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": "blocked",
|
||||
"mutation_performed": False,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"active profile role could not be derived authoritatively; "
|
||||
"refusing lease adoption (fail closed, #843)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"lease_id": lease_id,
|
||||
"authoritative_source": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if role is not None and str(role).strip():
|
||||
supplied_role = str(role).strip().lower()
|
||||
if supplied_role != active_role:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": "blocked",
|
||||
"mutation_performed": False,
|
||||
"profile_role_kind": active_role,
|
||||
"supplied_role": supplied_role,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"caller-supplied role '{supplied_role}' does not match "
|
||||
f"the authenticated profile-derived role '{active_role}'; "
|
||||
"caller-supplied role/profile/namespace can never grant "
|
||||
"authority (fail closed, #843)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"lease_id": lease_id,
|
||||
"authoritative_source": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
db, errs = _control_plane_db_or_error()
|
||||
if db is None:
|
||||
return {"success": False, "reasons": errs}
|
||||
profile = get_profile()
|
||||
profile_name = (profile.get("profile_name") or "").strip() or "session"
|
||||
active_role = _profile_role_kind(profile) or "author"
|
||||
sid = (session_id or "").strip() or (
|
||||
f"{profile_name}-{os.getpid()}-{uuid.uuid4().hex[:8]}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
adopter_namespace = allocator_service.DEFAULT_ROLE_NAMESPACES.get(
|
||||
active_role, f"gitea-{active_role}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
return lease_lifecycle.adopt_lease(
|
||||
db,
|
||||
lease_id=lease_id,
|
||||
adopter_session_id=sid,
|
||||
role=(role or active_role).strip() or "author",
|
||||
role=active_role,
|
||||
worktree_path=worktree_path,
|
||||
expected_head_sha=expected_head_sha,
|
||||
owner_pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
operator_authorized=bool(operator_authorized),
|
||||
adopter_profile_name=profile_name,
|
||||
adopter_namespace=adopter_namespace,
|
||||
)
|
||||
except (lease_lifecycle.LeaseLifecycleError, control_plane_db.ControlPlaneError) as exc:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
|
||||
+209
-13
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ SAFE_RELEASE_OWNED = "release_owned"
|
||||
SAFE_STALE_PROMPT = "stale_prompt_lease"
|
||||
SAFE_UNKNOWN = "inspect_only"
|
||||
SAFE_NO_AUTHORITY = "file_or_comment_not_authoritative"
|
||||
SAFE_CONSUME_CROSS_ROLE = "consume_cross_role_handoff"
|
||||
|
||||
LEASE_STATUS_ACTIVE = "active"
|
||||
LEASE_STATUS_RELEASED = "released"
|
||||
@@ -250,6 +251,23 @@ def decide_safe_next_action(
|
||||
"same_owner": True,
|
||||
"also_allowed": [SAFE_ABANDON_ALLOWED, SAFE_RELEASE_OWNED],
|
||||
}
|
||||
handoff = is_pending_cross_role_handoff({"lease": lease})
|
||||
if handoff:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"safe_next_action": SAFE_CONSUME_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"controller allocation pending handoff (freshness={status}); "
|
||||
"required-role worker may consume without abandon/reassign; "
|
||||
f"required_role={handoff['required_role']}"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"block": False,
|
||||
"same_owner": False,
|
||||
"owner_session_id": owner,
|
||||
"required_role": handoff["required_role"],
|
||||
"cross_role_handoff": True,
|
||||
"handoff_status": "pending",
|
||||
"also_allowed": [SAFE_ABANDON_ALLOWED],
|
||||
}
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"safe_next_action": SAFE_ABANDON_ALLOWED,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
@@ -272,6 +290,24 @@ def decide_safe_next_action(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if not same_owner and status == "active":
|
||||
# #843: pending cross-role handoff is consumable by required role
|
||||
handoff = is_pending_cross_role_handoff({"lease": lease})
|
||||
if handoff:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"safe_next_action": SAFE_CONSUME_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"controller cross-role allocation pending handoff; "
|
||||
f"required_role={handoff['required_role']}; "
|
||||
"consume via gitea_adopt_workflow_lease without "
|
||||
"abandonment or sharing the controller session"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"block": False,
|
||||
"same_owner": False,
|
||||
"owner_session_id": owner,
|
||||
"required_role": handoff["required_role"],
|
||||
"cross_role_handoff": True,
|
||||
"handoff_status": "pending",
|
||||
}
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"safe_next_action": SAFE_WAIT_FOREIGN,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
@@ -440,6 +476,84 @@ def list_active_leases(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def parse_lease_provenance(lease_or_state: Mapping[str, Any] | None) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Return durable lease provenance dict (empty when absent/unparseable)."""
|
||||
if not lease_or_state:
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
if "provenance" in lease_or_state and isinstance(lease_or_state.get("provenance"), dict):
|
||||
return dict(lease_or_state["provenance"])
|
||||
raw = None
|
||||
if "provenance_json" in lease_or_state:
|
||||
raw = lease_or_state.get("provenance_json")
|
||||
elif "lease" in lease_or_state and isinstance(lease_or_state.get("lease"), Mapping):
|
||||
raw = lease_or_state["lease"].get("provenance_json")
|
||||
if not raw:
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
if isinstance(raw, dict):
|
||||
return dict(raw)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
loaded = json.loads(raw)
|
||||
except (TypeError, json.JSONDecodeError):
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
return dict(loaded) if isinstance(loaded, dict) else {}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def is_pending_cross_role_handoff(
|
||||
state: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
|
||||
"""Return handoff evidence when a controller allocation awaits consume (#843).
|
||||
|
||||
A pending handoff is identified by durable provenance written at
|
||||
cross-role apply time — not by title heuristics or session-id guessing.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not state:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
lease = state.get("lease") if isinstance(state.get("lease"), Mapping) else state
|
||||
if not isinstance(lease, Mapping):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
status = str(lease.get("status") or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
if status in (LEASE_STATUS_ABANDONED, LEASE_STATUS_RELEASED, LEASE_STATUS_EXPIRED):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
prov = parse_lease_provenance(state)
|
||||
if not prov and isinstance(lease, Mapping):
|
||||
prov = parse_lease_provenance(lease)
|
||||
if not prov.get("cross_role_handoff"):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
handoff_status = str(prov.get("handoff_status") or "pending").strip().lower()
|
||||
if handoff_status != "pending":
|
||||
return None
|
||||
adopted_by = (
|
||||
lease.get("adopted_by_session_id")
|
||||
or prov.get("adopted_by_session_id")
|
||||
or ""
|
||||
)
|
||||
if str(adopted_by).strip():
|
||||
return None
|
||||
required_role = str(
|
||||
prov.get("required_role") or lease.get("role") or ""
|
||||
).strip().lower()
|
||||
if not required_role:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"cross_role_handoff": True,
|
||||
"handoff_status": "pending",
|
||||
"required_role": required_role,
|
||||
"allocating_session_id": str(
|
||||
prov.get("allocating_session_id") or lease.get("session_id") or ""
|
||||
),
|
||||
"allocating_role": str(prov.get("allocating_role") or "controller"),
|
||||
"lease_id": str(lease.get("lease_id") or ""),
|
||||
"assignment_id": (
|
||||
str(state["assignment"]["assignment_id"])
|
||||
if isinstance(state.get("assignment"), Mapping)
|
||||
and state["assignment"].get("assignment_id")
|
||||
else None
|
||||
),
|
||||
"provenance": prov,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def adopt_lease(
|
||||
db: cpd.ControlPlaneDB,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
@@ -450,8 +564,17 @@ def adopt_lease(
|
||||
expected_head_sha: str | None = None,
|
||||
owner_pid: int | None = None,
|
||||
operator_authorized: bool = False,
|
||||
adopter_profile_name: str | None = None,
|
||||
adopter_namespace: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Sanctioned adopt path with provenance; never silent foreign steal."""
|
||||
"""Sanctioned adopt path with provenance; never silent foreign steal.
|
||||
|
||||
#843 F1: for a pending cross-role handoff, ``role`` must be the
|
||||
authoritative profile-derived role supplied by the MCP boundary — never
|
||||
caller-asserted authority. When the handoff provenance declares
|
||||
``required_profile`` / ``required_namespace`` and the caller context is
|
||||
provided, both are validated exactly; a mismatch fails closed.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
state = db.get_lease_workflow_state(lease_id)
|
||||
if not state:
|
||||
raise LeaseLifecycleError(
|
||||
@@ -463,11 +586,8 @@ def adopt_lease(
|
||||
owner = str(lease.get("session_id") or "")
|
||||
same_owner = owner == str(adopter_session_id)
|
||||
|
||||
if freshness["freshness"] == "active" and not same_owner:
|
||||
raise LeaseLifecycleError(
|
||||
f"refusing to steal active foreign lease {lease_id} owned by "
|
||||
f"{owner} (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
handoff = is_pending_cross_role_handoff(state)
|
||||
adopter_role = (role or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
|
||||
if freshness["freshness"] in ("abandoned", "released"):
|
||||
raise LeaseLifecycleError(
|
||||
@@ -475,13 +595,64 @@ def adopt_lease(
|
||||
"(fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Expired or stale: require abandon-style safety before ownership transfer
|
||||
# when not same owner; same owner may reclaim.
|
||||
if not same_owner and freshness["freshness"] in (
|
||||
if handoff and not same_owner:
|
||||
# Terminal statuses already rejected above. Freshness may be
|
||||
# active OR stale_dead_process (controller exited) — both are
|
||||
# consumable without abandonment when handoff is still pending.
|
||||
if freshness["freshness"] not in (
|
||||
"active",
|
||||
"stale_dead_process",
|
||||
"stale_missing_worktree",
|
||||
):
|
||||
raise LeaseLifecycleError(
|
||||
f"lease {lease_id} freshness={freshness['freshness']}; "
|
||||
"terminal or non-active allocation cannot be handoff-consumed "
|
||||
"(fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
required = handoff["required_role"]
|
||||
if adopter_role != required:
|
||||
raise LeaseLifecycleError(
|
||||
f"wrong role for cross-role handoff consume of {lease_id}: "
|
||||
f"required={required} adopter={adopter_role or 'none'} "
|
||||
"(fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
# #843 F1: provenance profile/namespace restrictions are validated
|
||||
# against the authoritative caller context when declared. Caller
|
||||
# input can never widen authority; a mismatch fails closed.
|
||||
handoff_prov = handoff.get("provenance") or {}
|
||||
required_profile = str(
|
||||
handoff_prov.get("required_profile") or ""
|
||||
).strip()
|
||||
if required_profile and adopter_profile_name is not None:
|
||||
if str(adopter_profile_name).strip() != required_profile:
|
||||
raise LeaseLifecycleError(
|
||||
f"wrong profile for cross-role handoff consume of "
|
||||
f"{lease_id}: required_profile={required_profile} "
|
||||
f"adopter_profile={adopter_profile_name} (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
required_namespace = str(
|
||||
handoff_prov.get("required_namespace") or ""
|
||||
).strip()
|
||||
if required_namespace and adopter_namespace is not None:
|
||||
if str(adopter_namespace).strip() != required_namespace:
|
||||
raise LeaseLifecycleError(
|
||||
f"wrong namespace for cross-role handoff consume of "
|
||||
f"{lease_id}: required_namespace={required_namespace} "
|
||||
f"adopter_namespace={adopter_namespace} (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
reason = "cross-role-handoff-consume"
|
||||
elif freshness["freshness"] == "active" and not same_owner:
|
||||
raise LeaseLifecycleError(
|
||||
f"refusing to steal active foreign lease {lease_id} owned by "
|
||||
f"{owner} (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
elif not same_owner and freshness["freshness"] in (
|
||||
"expired",
|
||||
"stale_dead_process",
|
||||
"stale_missing_worktree",
|
||||
):
|
||||
# Expired or stale (non-handoff): require abandon-style safety before
|
||||
# ownership transfer when not same owner; same owner may reclaim.
|
||||
if not operator_authorized and freshness["freshness"] == "expired":
|
||||
# Deterministic reclaim of expired foreign lease is allowed
|
||||
# without operator flag (sanctioned expire reclaim).
|
||||
@@ -492,6 +663,9 @@ def adopt_lease(
|
||||
f"lease {lease_id} freshness={freshness['freshness']}; "
|
||||
"use abandon with proof before foreign adopt (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
reason = "sanctioned-reclaim-adopt"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
reason = "owner-resume-adopt" if same_owner else "sanctioned-reclaim-adopt"
|
||||
|
||||
provenance = build_adopt_provenance(
|
||||
adopted_from_session_id=owner,
|
||||
@@ -504,10 +678,14 @@ def adopt_lease(
|
||||
worktree_path=worktree_path,
|
||||
expected_head_sha=expected_head_sha or lease.get("expected_head_sha"),
|
||||
prior_lease_id=lease_id,
|
||||
reason=(
|
||||
"owner-resume-adopt" if same_owner else "sanctioned-reclaim-adopt"
|
||||
),
|
||||
reason=reason,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if handoff and not same_owner:
|
||||
provenance["cross_role_handoff"] = True
|
||||
provenance["handoff_status"] = "adopted"
|
||||
provenance["required_role"] = handoff["required_role"]
|
||||
provenance["allocating_session_id"] = handoff["allocating_session_id"]
|
||||
provenance["allocating_role"] = handoff["allocating_role"]
|
||||
|
||||
result = db.adopt_lease(
|
||||
lease_id=lease_id,
|
||||
@@ -518,7 +696,7 @@ def adopt_lease(
|
||||
owner_pid=owner_pid if owner_pid is not None else os.getpid(),
|
||||
provenance=provenance,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
out = {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"outcome": result.get("outcome"),
|
||||
"same_owner": same_owner,
|
||||
@@ -531,6 +709,24 @@ def adopt_lease(
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
"reasons": result.get("reasons") or [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
if handoff and not same_owner:
|
||||
out["cross_role_handoff"] = True
|
||||
out["handoff_status"] = "adopted"
|
||||
out["required_role"] = handoff["required_role"]
|
||||
out["adopted_by_session_id"] = adopter_session_id
|
||||
out["adopted_from_session_id"] = owner
|
||||
lease_row = result.get("lease") or {}
|
||||
if isinstance(lease_row, Mapping):
|
||||
out["read_after_write"] = {
|
||||
"lease_id": lease_row.get("lease_id"),
|
||||
"session_id": lease_row.get("session_id"),
|
||||
"role": lease_row.get("role"),
|
||||
"status": lease_row.get("status"),
|
||||
"adopted_by_session_id": lease_row.get("adopted_by_session_id"),
|
||||
"adopted_from_session_id": lease_row.get("adopted_from_session_id"),
|
||||
"phase": lease_row.get("phase"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
return out
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def release_lease(
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -566,6 +566,10 @@ def build_pr_cleanup_entry(
|
||||
worktree_state=worktree_state,
|
||||
active_lock=active_lock,
|
||||
)
|
||||
planned = plan_cleanup_execution_order(
|
||||
remote_assessment=remote,
|
||||
local_assessment=local,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"issue_number": issue_number,
|
||||
@@ -576,9 +580,63 @@ def build_pr_cleanup_entry(
|
||||
"merged": merged,
|
||||
"remote_branch": remote,
|
||||
"local_worktree": local,
|
||||
# #851: dry-run and execute share the same lifecycle order description.
|
||||
"planned_execution_order": planned,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def plan_cleanup_execution_order(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
remote_assessment: dict[str, Any] | None,
|
||||
local_assessment: dict[str, Any] | None,
|
||||
) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
|
||||
"""Describe independent worktree-then-reassess-then-remote cleanup order (#851).
|
||||
|
||||
Remote ownership protection remains fail-closed at execute time. A worktree
|
||||
that is independently safe to remove is never skipped merely because remote
|
||||
deletion may be blocked by that same ``worktree_binding``.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
remote = remote_assessment or {}
|
||||
local = local_assessment or {}
|
||||
steps: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
|
||||
worktree_safe = bool(local.get("safe_to_remove_worktree"))
|
||||
remote_safe = bool(remote.get("safe_to_delete_remote"))
|
||||
|
||||
if worktree_safe:
|
||||
steps.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
"reason": "independently_safe_to_remove",
|
||||
"phase": 1,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
if remote_safe:
|
||||
if worktree_safe:
|
||||
steps.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "reassess_branch_ownership",
|
||||
"reason": "after_worktree_removal_clear_worktree_binding",
|
||||
"phase": 2,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
steps.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "delete_remote_branch",
|
||||
"reason": "only_if_independently_safe_after_reassessment",
|
||||
"phase": 3,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
steps.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "delete_remote_branch",
|
||||
"reason": "safe_to_delete_and_no_independent_worktree_removal",
|
||||
"phase": 1,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
return steps
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def build_reconciliation_report(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
project_root: str,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
|
||||
"""Allocator epic / child-only container pre-rank exclusion (#844).
|
||||
|
||||
Covers:
|
||||
* Issue #631-shaped child-only epic is excluded before ranking.
|
||||
* Implementable child issues remain eligible and can be selected.
|
||||
* Ordinary issues that merely mention "epic" in title/body are not excluded.
|
||||
* Excluded containers never receive assignments or workflow leases.
|
||||
* Structured skip reason ``epic_or_child_only_container`` is reported.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
|
||||
from allocator_service import (
|
||||
OUTCOME_ASSIGNED,
|
||||
OUTCOME_PREVIEW,
|
||||
SKIP_EPIC_OR_CHILD_ONLY_CONTAINER,
|
||||
WorkCandidate,
|
||||
allocate_next_work,
|
||||
classify_epic_or_child_only_container,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB
|
||||
|
||||
REMOTE = "prgs"
|
||||
ORG = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting"
|
||||
REPO = "Gitea-Tools"
|
||||
|
||||
# Minimal body mirroring issue #631 authoritative scope language.
|
||||
_EPIC_631_BODY = """
|
||||
## Scope (umbrella)
|
||||
|
||||
This epic owns the **product roadmap and linkage** for the Web Console.
|
||||
Implementation is delivered via child issues only.
|
||||
|
||||
## Explicit non-goals
|
||||
|
||||
* Do not implement product features in this epic issue itself.
|
||||
* No product feature implementation is claimed complete solely on this epic.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
_CHILD_BODY = """
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Operators need a workflow-event timeline model for Phase 1.
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Timeline model API exists
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _issue(
|
||||
number: int,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
title: str = "",
|
||||
body: str = "",
|
||||
labels: tuple[str, ...] = ("status:ready", "type:feature"),
|
||||
priority: int = 20,
|
||||
) -> WorkCandidate:
|
||||
return WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=number,
|
||||
state="open",
|
||||
labels=labels,
|
||||
title=title or f"issue {number}",
|
||||
body=body,
|
||||
priority=priority,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ClassifyEpicContainerTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_631_shaped_body_and_title_is_container(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = _issue(
|
||||
631,
|
||||
title="Epic: MCP Control Plane Web Console",
|
||||
body=_EPIC_631_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, detail = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(c)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(is_c)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(detail)
|
||||
self.assertIn("body_marker", detail or "")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_body_markers_without_epic_title(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = _issue(
|
||||
900,
|
||||
title="Control plane roadmap tracker",
|
||||
body="Implementation is delivered via child issues only.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, _ = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(c)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(is_c)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_epic_label_alone_is_container(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = _issue(
|
||||
901,
|
||||
title="Roadmap linkage",
|
||||
body="Track children.",
|
||||
labels=("status:ready", "type:epic"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, detail = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(c)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(is_c)
|
||||
self.assertIn("type:epic", detail or "")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_title_epic_prefix_alone_not_container(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Title-only 'Epic:' without body scope evidence stays eligible (#844)."""
|
||||
c = _issue(
|
||||
902,
|
||||
title="Epic: something mentioned only in title",
|
||||
body="Implement a concrete fix for the allocator skip list.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, detail = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(c)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(is_c)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(detail)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_incidental_epic_word_not_container(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = _issue(
|
||||
903,
|
||||
title="Document epic handoff conventions",
|
||||
body=(
|
||||
"Update the docs so implementable issues that mention an epic "
|
||||
"remain independently executable."
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, _ = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(c)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(is_c)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_prs_never_classified(self) -> None:
|
||||
pr = WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=10,
|
||||
state="open",
|
||||
title="Epic: fake",
|
||||
body="Implementation is delivered via child issues only.",
|
||||
head_sha="a" * 40,
|
||||
priority=5,
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, _ = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(pr)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(is_c)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class AllocateEpicContainerExclusionTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._tmp.cleanup)
|
||||
self.db = ControlPlaneDB(os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3"))
|
||||
|
||||
def _alloc(self, candidates, **kwargs):
|
||||
defaults = dict(
|
||||
session_id="sess-844",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote=REMOTE,
|
||||
org=ORG,
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-author",
|
||||
username="jcwalker3",
|
||||
claims={},
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
defaults.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return allocate_next_work(self.db, candidates=candidates, **defaults)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_631_shaped_epic_excluded_child_selected(self) -> None:
|
||||
epic = _issue(
|
||||
631,
|
||||
title="Epic: MCP Control Plane Web Console",
|
||||
body=_EPIC_631_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
child = _issue(
|
||||
637,
|
||||
title="Web Console: Workflow-event timeline model (Phase 1)",
|
||||
body=_CHILD_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc([epic, child], apply=False)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"], res)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_PREVIEW)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 637)
|
||||
skipped = {s["number"]: s for s in res["skipped"]}
|
||||
self.assertIn(631, skipped)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
skipped[631]["reason_code"], SKIP_EPIC_OR_CHILD_ONLY_CONTAINER
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn(SKIP_EPIC_OR_CHILD_ONLY_CONTAINER, skipped[631]["reason"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_container_cannot_receive_assignment_or_lease(self) -> None:
|
||||
epic = _issue(
|
||||
631,
|
||||
title="Epic: MCP Control Plane Web Console",
|
||||
body=_EPIC_631_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc([epic], apply=True)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"], res)
|
||||
# Only container present → no safe work; never assigned_work.
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(res.get("assignment"))
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(res.get("selected"))
|
||||
skipped = {s["number"]: s for s in res["skipped"]}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
skipped[631]["reason_code"], SKIP_EPIC_OR_CHILD_ONLY_CONTAINER
|
||||
)
|
||||
# No lease row for the epic.
|
||||
leases = self.db.list_active_leases(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO
|
||||
) if hasattr(self.db, "list_active_leases") else []
|
||||
# Prefer generic inventory if available.
|
||||
if not leases and hasattr(self.db, "list_leases"):
|
||||
leases = self.db.list_leases(remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO)
|
||||
for lease in leases or []:
|
||||
work_number = lease.get("work_number") if isinstance(lease, dict) else None
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(work_number, 631)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_incidental_epic_title_remains_eligible(self) -> None:
|
||||
ordinary = _issue(
|
||||
700,
|
||||
title="Document epic handoff conventions",
|
||||
body="Write runbook text about epic vs child issues.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc([ordinary], apply=False)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"], res)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 700)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["skipped"], [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_apply_selects_child_not_epic(self) -> None:
|
||||
epic = _issue(
|
||||
631,
|
||||
title="Epic: MCP Control Plane Web Console",
|
||||
body=_EPIC_631_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
child = _issue(
|
||||
637,
|
||||
title="Web Console: Workflow-event timeline model (Phase 1)",
|
||||
body=_CHILD_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc([epic, child], apply=True)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"], res)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 637)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["assignment"]["work_number"], 637)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1266,6 +1266,378 @@ class TestSecondRemediationIntegration(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertIn("delete_acknowledged", delete_actions[0])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(delete_actions[0].get("verified_absent"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_worktree_removed_when_remote_blocked_only_by_worktree_binding(self):
|
||||
"""#851: remote blocked by worktree_binding must not skip safe worktree removal.
|
||||
|
||||
Lifecycle: remove clean owned worktree → reassess ownership → delete
|
||||
remote only if independently safe. Unrelated entries stay untouched.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
target_branch = "fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"
|
||||
foreign_branch = "fix/issue-999-unrelated-active"
|
||||
worktree_path = "/tmp/branches/fix-issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"
|
||||
ownership_calls = []
|
||||
remove_calls = []
|
||||
delete_api_calls = []
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_collect(**kwargs):
|
||||
ownership_calls.append(dict(kwargs))
|
||||
# Ownership is reassessed *after* independent worktree removal (#851).
|
||||
# Target worktree is already gone → no worktree_binding remains.
|
||||
# Foreign branch keeps an active author lease → remote delete blocked.
|
||||
if kwargs.get("branch") == foreign_branch:
|
||||
# Match session-bound org/repo + host used by the tool resolve path.
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"records": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"category": guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_AUTHOR_LEASE,
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"remote": kwargs.get("remote") or "prgs",
|
||||
"host": kwargs.get("host") or "gitea.example.com",
|
||||
"org": kwargs.get("org") or "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
"repo": kwargs.get("repo") or "Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
"branch": foreign_branch,
|
||||
"reclaim_allowed": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"inventory_error": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
return {"records": [], "inventory_error": False}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_remove(project_root, branch, worktree_path=None):
|
||||
remove_calls.append(
|
||||
{"branch": branch, "worktree_path": worktree_path}
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"message": f"removed worktree {worktree_path}",
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_probe(h, o, r, auth, br):
|
||||
return guard.classify_branch_readback_http_status(
|
||||
404, not_found_scope=guard.NOT_FOUND_SCOPE_BRANCH
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api(method, url, auth, **kwargs):
|
||||
if method == "DELETE":
|
||||
delete_api_calls.append(url)
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
|
||||
report = {
|
||||
"entries": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": 848,
|
||||
"head_branch": target_branch,
|
||||
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": True,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": 999,
|
||||
"head_branch": foreign_branch,
|
||||
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": False,
|
||||
"worktree_path": None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
|
||||
"role": "reconciler",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.close",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[]).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
return_value=report,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=[],
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.audit_reconciliation_mode.check_cleanup_execution_allowed",
|
||||
return_value=(True, []),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_collect,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._probe_remote_branch", side_effect=fake_probe).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_remove,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=False,
|
||||
execute_confirmed=True,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("performed") or res.get("executed"))
|
||||
actions = res.get("actions") or []
|
||||
|
||||
remove_actions = [
|
||||
a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree"
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(remove_actions), 1, actions)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(remove_actions[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(remove_calls[0]["branch"], target_branch)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(remove_calls[0]["worktree_path"], worktree_path)
|
||||
|
||||
# Target remote delete succeeds after worktree removal + reassessment.
|
||||
target_deletes = [
|
||||
a
|
||||
for a in actions
|
||||
if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
|
||||
and a.get("branch") == target_branch
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(target_deletes), 1, actions)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("after_worktree_removal"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("ownership_reassessed"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("verified_absent"))
|
||||
|
||||
# Foreign branch remains protected (author lease) and is not deleted.
|
||||
foreign_deletes = [
|
||||
a
|
||||
for a in actions
|
||||
if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
|
||||
and a.get("branch") == foreign_branch
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(foreign_deletes), 1, actions)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(foreign_deletes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
foreign_deletes[0].get("blocker_kind"), "active_branch_ownership"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_AUTHOR_LEASE,
|
||||
foreign_deletes[0].get("blocking_categories") or [],
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Only the target branch should hit the DELETE API.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(delete_api_calls), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
# Ownership collected for target (post-removal) and foreign; worktree
|
||||
# removal happened before target remote delete in the action log.
|
||||
target_idx = next(
|
||||
i
|
||||
for i, a in enumerate(actions)
|
||||
if a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree"
|
||||
)
|
||||
delete_idx = next(
|
||||
i
|
||||
for i, a in enumerate(actions)
|
||||
if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
|
||||
and a.get("branch") == target_branch
|
||||
and a.get("success")
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertLess(target_idx, delete_idx)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_dirty_worktree_not_removed_and_remote_stays_protected(self):
|
||||
"""#851: dirty/foreign worktrees remain protected; no unsafe cleanup."""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
branch = "fix/issue-851-dirty"
|
||||
remove_calls = []
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_collect(**kwargs):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"records": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"category": guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_WORKTREE_BINDING,
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"remote": kwargs.get("remote") or "prgs",
|
||||
"host": kwargs.get("host") or "gitea.example.com",
|
||||
"org": kwargs.get("org") or "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
"repo": kwargs.get("repo") or "Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
"branch": branch,
|
||||
"reclaim_allowed": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"inventory_error": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
report = {
|
||||
"entries": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": 851,
|
||||
"head_branch": branch,
|
||||
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": False,
|
||||
"worktree_path": "/tmp/dirty-wt",
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
|
||||
"role": "reconciler",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[]).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
return_value=report,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=[],
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.audit_reconciliation_mode.check_cleanup_execution_allowed",
|
||||
return_value=(True, []),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_collect,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
side_effect=lambda *a, **k: remove_calls.append(k) or {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = lambda *a, **k: {}
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=False,
|
||||
execute_confirmed=True,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions = res.get("actions") or []
|
||||
self.assertEqual(remove_calls, [])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
any(a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree" for a in actions)
|
||||
)
|
||||
deletes = [
|
||||
a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(deletes), 1)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(deletes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(deletes[0].get("blocker_kind"), "active_branch_ownership")
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_WORKTREE_BINDING,
|
||||
deletes[0].get("blocking_categories") or [],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_idempotent_resume_when_worktree_already_absent(self):
|
||||
"""#851: partial failures remain resumable and idempotent."""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
branch = "fix/issue-851-resume"
|
||||
ownership_calls = []
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_collect(**kwargs):
|
||||
ownership_calls.append(kwargs)
|
||||
return {"records": [], "inventory_error": False}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_remove(project_root, branch, worktree_path=None):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"message": f"worktree not found: {worktree_path}",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_probe(h, o, r, auth, br):
|
||||
return guard.classify_branch_readback_http_status(
|
||||
404, not_found_scope=guard.NOT_FOUND_SCOPE_BRANCH
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
report = {
|
||||
"entries": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": 851,
|
||||
"head_branch": branch,
|
||||
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": True,
|
||||
"worktree_path": "/tmp/already-gone",
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
|
||||
"role": "reconciler",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[]).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
return_value=report,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=[],
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.audit_reconciliation_mode.check_cleanup_execution_allowed",
|
||||
return_value=(True, []),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_collect,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._probe_remote_branch", side_effect=fake_probe).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_remove,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = lambda *a, **k: {}
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=False,
|
||||
execute_confirmed=True,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions = res.get("actions") or []
|
||||
removes = [a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree"]
|
||||
deletes = [a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(removes), 1)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(removes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(deletes), 1)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(deletes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(deletes[0].get("after_worktree_removal"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(ownership_calls)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,682 @@
|
||||
"""Cross-role allocation handoff consumable by independent workers (#843).
|
||||
|
||||
Regression coverage for the controller→required-role consume path:
|
||||
|
||||
* controller allocates author work; independent author adopts successfully
|
||||
* author adoption succeeds after allocating controller process exits
|
||||
* author adoption without sharing controller session identity
|
||||
* wrong-role adoption rejected
|
||||
* concurrent/second adoption rejected without state corruption
|
||||
* terminal allocation adoption rejected
|
||||
* successful adoption produces authoritative ownership evidence
|
||||
* genuine abandoned-lease recovery remains valid
|
||||
* process_work_queue / allocate results include consume identifiers
|
||||
* same-role allocation behavior remains compatible
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import timedelta
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
from allocator_service import (
|
||||
ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
|
||||
OUTCOME_ASSIGNED,
|
||||
ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
ROLE_CONTROLLER,
|
||||
ROLE_REVIEWER,
|
||||
WorkCandidate,
|
||||
allocate_next_work,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB, ForeignLeaseError, _ts, _utc_now
|
||||
import lease_lifecycle as ll
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class CrossRoleHandoffTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.db_path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3")
|
||||
self.db = ControlPlaneDB(self.db_path)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="ctrl-session",
|
||||
role="controller",
|
||||
profile="prgs-controller",
|
||||
pid=99999999, # dead-looking pid
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
profile="prgs-author",
|
||||
pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
profile="prgs-author",
|
||||
pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="reviewer-worker",
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
profile="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.wt = self._tmp.name
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def _ready_issue(self, number: int = 843, title: str = "handoff target") -> WorkCandidate:
|
||||
return WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=number,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready", "type:bug"),
|
||||
title=title,
|
||||
priority=20,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _controller_allocate(self, number: int = 843, **kwargs):
|
||||
defaults = dict(
|
||||
db=self.db,
|
||||
session_id="ctrl-session",
|
||||
role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
candidates=[self._ready_issue(number)],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-controller",
|
||||
username="controller-user",
|
||||
allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
defaults.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return allocate_next_work(**defaults)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_controller_allocates_author_independent_author_adopts(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
self.assertIn("consume_allocation", res)
|
||||
consume = res["consume_allocation"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(consume["tool"], "gitea_adopt_workflow_lease")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(consume["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(consume["controller_session_required"])
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(consume["lease_id"], lid)
|
||||
self.assertIn(lid, res["next_valid_command"])
|
||||
|
||||
adopted = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(adopted["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["adopted_from_session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
raw = adopted["read_after_write"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["status"], "active")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["phase"], "adopted")
|
||||
|
||||
# Authoritative re-read
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["assignment"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["provenance"]["handoff_status"], "adopted")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_adoption_after_controller_process_exits(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=900)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
# Force owner_pid dead + freshness stale_dead_process
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db_path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE leases SET owner_pid = 99999999 WHERE lease_id = ?",
|
||||
(lid,),
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
fr = ll.classify_lease_freshness(
|
||||
state["lease"], pid_checker=lambda _p: False
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(fr["freshness"], "stale_dead_process")
|
||||
|
||||
adopted = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
# No abandon required
|
||||
state2 = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state2["lease"]["status"], "active")
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(state2["lease"]["status"], "abandoned")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_adoption_without_sharing_controller_session_identity(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=901)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
adopted = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(adopted["adopted_by_session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(adopted["same_owner"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["adopted_from_session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_role_adoption_rejected(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=902)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ll.LeaseLifecycleError) as ctx:
|
||||
ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="reviewer-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_REVIEWER,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("wrong role", str(ctx.exception).lower())
|
||||
# State unchanged
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(state["lease"].get("adopted_by_session_id") or None)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["provenance"]["handoff_status"], "pending")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_second_adoption_rejected_without_corruption(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=903)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
first = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(first["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ll.LeaseLifecycleError):
|
||||
ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["assignment"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["status"], "active")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_terminal_allocation_adoption_rejected(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=904)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
# Abandon as terminal
|
||||
proof = ll.AbandonProof(
|
||||
dead_process=True,
|
||||
missing_worktree=True,
|
||||
no_open_pr=True,
|
||||
no_live_mutation_risk=True,
|
||||
owner_pid=99999999,
|
||||
worktree_path="/nonexistent/for-843",
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Attach dead pid / missing wt for abandon eligibility
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db_path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE leases SET owner_pid = 99999999, worktree_path = ? WHERE lease_id = ?",
|
||||
("/nonexistent/for-843", lid),
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
abandoned = ll.abandon_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
requester_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
proof=proof,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(abandoned["outcome"], "abandoned")
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ll.LeaseLifecycleError) as ctx:
|
||||
ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("abandoned", str(ctx.exception).lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_successful_adoption_read_after_write_ownership(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=905)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
adopted = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
raw = adopted["read_after_write"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["lease_id"], lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["adopted_from_session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
# Re-fetch proves durable write
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], raw["session_id"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
state["lease"]["adopted_by_session_id"], raw["adopted_by_session_id"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_genuine_abandoned_recovery_still_valid(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Same-role author lease abandoned remains reclaimable via abandon path."""
|
||||
same = allocate_next_work(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
candidates=[self._ready_issue(906, "same-role")],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-author",
|
||||
username="author-user",
|
||||
allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(same["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
lid = same["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db_path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE leases SET owner_pid = 99999999, worktree_path = ? WHERE lease_id = ?",
|
||||
("/nonexistent/same-role", lid),
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
proof = ll.AbandonProof(
|
||||
dead_process=True,
|
||||
missing_worktree=True,
|
||||
no_open_pr=True,
|
||||
no_live_mutation_risk=True,
|
||||
owner_pid=99999999,
|
||||
worktree_path="/nonexistent/same-role",
|
||||
)
|
||||
abandoned = ll.abandon_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
requester_session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
proof=proof,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(abandoned["outcome"], "abandoned")
|
||||
# Foreign author cannot handoff-consume an abandoned non-handoff lease
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ll.LeaseLifecycleError):
|
||||
ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Reclaim path still works for expired/abandoned after force-expire
|
||||
reclaimed = ll.reclaim_expired_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reclaimed["outcome"], "reclaimed")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reclaimed["assignment"]["session_id"], "author-worker-2")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_allocate_payload_includes_consume_identifiers(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=907)
|
||||
self.assertIn("consume_allocation", res)
|
||||
c = res["consume_allocation"]
|
||||
for key in (
|
||||
"tool",
|
||||
"lease_id",
|
||||
"assignment_id",
|
||||
"required_role",
|
||||
"required_profile",
|
||||
"required_namespace",
|
||||
"instructions",
|
||||
"handoff_status",
|
||||
):
|
||||
self.assertIn(key, c)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(c["required_namespace"], "gitea-author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(c["required_profile"], "prgs-author")
|
||||
self.assertIn("gitea_adopt_workflow_lease", c["instructions"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["lease_proof"]["cross_role_handoff"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["lease_proof"]["handoff_status"], "pending")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_same_role_allocation_remains_compatible(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = allocate_next_work(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
candidates=[self._ready_issue(908)],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-author",
|
||||
username="author-user",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("consume_allocation", res)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
# No cross-role handoff provenance
|
||||
prov = state.get("provenance") or {}
|
||||
self.assertFalse(prov.get("cross_role_handoff"))
|
||||
# Owner resume still works
|
||||
resume = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(resume["same_owner"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(resume["outcome"], "adopted_owner_resume")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_inspect_points_required_role_at_consume(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=909)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
decision = ll.inspect_lease(
|
||||
self.db, lid, caller_session_id="author-worker"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
decision["safe_next_action"], ll.SAFE_CONSUME_CROSS_ROLE
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision["block"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(decision["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_db_cas_rejects_concurrent_second_consume(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=910)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
# First consume via DB layer directly
|
||||
first = self.db.adopt_lease(
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
provenance={
|
||||
"cross_role_handoff": True,
|
||||
"handoff_status": "adopted",
|
||||
"required_role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(first["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
# Second CAS must fail
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ForeignLeaseError):
|
||||
self.db.adopt_lease(
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
provenance={
|
||||
"cross_role_handoff": True,
|
||||
"handoff_status": "pending",
|
||||
"required_role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class MCPBoundaryAdoptRoleBindingTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""#843 F1: MCP-boundary role binding for ``gitea_adopt_workflow_lease``.
|
||||
|
||||
The library-level wrong-role test calls ``lease_lifecycle.adopt_lease``
|
||||
directly. These tests prove the MCP entry point derives the adopter role
|
||||
authoritatively from the active authenticated profile and rejects any
|
||||
caller-supplied role that disagrees, so a reviewer/merger profile cannot
|
||||
consume an author handoff by passing ``role="author"``.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
AUTHOR_PROFILE = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-author",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
REVIEWER_PROFILE = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
"role": "reviewer",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.review",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.approve",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.request_changes",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.create", "gitea.branch.push"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
MERGER_PROFILE = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-merger",
|
||||
"role": "merger",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.merge"],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.create", "gitea.branch.push"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
FOREIGN_AUTHOR_PROFILE = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "dadeschools-author",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.db_path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3")
|
||||
self.db = ControlPlaneDB(self.db_path)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="ctrl-session",
|
||||
role="controller",
|
||||
profile="prgs-controller",
|
||||
pid=99999999,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
profile="prgs-author",
|
||||
pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.wt = self._tmp.name
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def _ready_issue(self, number: int) -> WorkCandidate:
|
||||
return WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=number,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready", "type:bug"),
|
||||
title="handoff target",
|
||||
priority=20,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _handoff_lease(self, number: int = 843) -> str:
|
||||
res = allocate_next_work(
|
||||
db=self.db,
|
||||
session_id="ctrl-session",
|
||||
role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
candidates=[self._ready_issue(number)],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-controller",
|
||||
username="controller-user",
|
||||
allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
return res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
|
||||
def _call_adopt_tool(self, profile: dict, **kwargs):
|
||||
import gitea_mcp_server as mcp_server
|
||||
|
||||
with (
|
||||
patch.object(mcp_server, "get_profile", return_value=profile),
|
||||
patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server,
|
||||
"_control_plane_db_or_error",
|
||||
return_value=(self.db, []),
|
||||
),
|
||||
):
|
||||
return mcp_server.gitea_adopt_workflow_lease(
|
||||
remote="prgs", **kwargs
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _assert_handoff_untouched(self, lease_id: str) -> None:
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lease_id)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(state["lease"].get("adopted_by_session_id") or None)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["status"], "active")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["provenance"]["handoff_status"], "pending")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reviewer_profile_cannot_consume_author_handoff_via_role_author(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(920)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.REVIEWER_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="reviewer-worker",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "blocked")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["profile_role_kind"], "reviewer")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["supplied_role"], "author")
|
||||
self.assertIn("does not match", result["reasons"][0])
|
||||
self._assert_handoff_untouched(lid)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merger_profile_cannot_consume_author_handoff_via_role_author(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(921)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.MERGER_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="merger-worker",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "blocked")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["profile_role_kind"], "merger")
|
||||
self._assert_handoff_untouched(lid)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reviewer_profile_rejected_without_role_argument(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Even without a spoofed role, the profile-derived role binds."""
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(922)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.REVIEWER_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="reviewer-worker",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "blocked")
|
||||
self.assertIn("wrong role", result["reasons"][0].lower())
|
||||
self._assert_handoff_untouched(lid)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_profile_mismatching_supplied_role_rejected(self) -> None:
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(923)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.AUTHOR_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "blocked")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["profile_role_kind"], "author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["supplied_role"], "reviewer")
|
||||
self._assert_handoff_untouched(lid)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_foreign_profile_name_rejected_for_author_handoff(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Provenance required_profile binds even when the role matches."""
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(924)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.FOREIGN_AUTHOR_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="foreign-author-worker",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "blocked")
|
||||
self.assertIn("wrong profile", result["reasons"][0].lower())
|
||||
self._assert_handoff_untouched(lid)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_profile_consumes_author_handoff(self) -> None:
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(925)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.AUTHOR_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["adopted_from_session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
state["lease"]["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["assignment"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["provenance"]["handoff_status"], "adopted")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_profile_consumes_author_handoff_without_role_argument(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(926)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.AUTHOR_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["role"], "author")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -12,6 +12,59 @@ import merged_cleanup_reconcile as mcr # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMergedCleanupAssessment(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_issue_851_plan_order_worktree_then_reassess_then_remote(self):
|
||||
"""#851 dry-run plan: remove worktree, reassess ownership, then remote."""
|
||||
plan = mcr.plan_cleanup_execution_order(
|
||||
remote_assessment={"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
local_assessment={"safe_to_remove_worktree": True},
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions = [s["action"] for s in plan]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
actions,
|
||||
[
|
||||
"remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
"reassess_branch_ownership",
|
||||
"delete_remote_branch",
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(plan[0]["phase"], 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(plan[-1]["phase"], 3)
|
||||
self.assertIn("independently_safe", plan[0]["reason"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("reassessment", plan[-1]["reason"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_plan_remote_only_when_worktree_not_safe(self):
|
||||
plan = mcr.plan_cleanup_execution_order(
|
||||
remote_assessment={"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
local_assessment={"safe_to_remove_worktree": False},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual([s["action"] for s in plan], ["delete_remote_branch"])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("reassess_branch_ownership", [s["action"] for s in plan])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_plan_worktree_only_when_remote_not_safe(self):
|
||||
plan = mcr.plan_cleanup_execution_order(
|
||||
remote_assessment={"safe_to_delete_remote": False},
|
||||
local_assessment={"safe_to_remove_worktree": True},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual([s["action"] for s in plan], ["remove_local_worktree"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_entry_includes_planned_execution_order(self):
|
||||
entry = mcr.build_pr_cleanup_entry(
|
||||
pr={
|
||||
"number": 848,
|
||||
"title": "Closes #844",
|
||||
"body": "",
|
||||
"merged_at": "2026-07-23T00:00:00Z",
|
||||
"head": {"ref": "fix/issue-844-x", "sha": "a" * 40},
|
||||
},
|
||||
project_root="/tmp/not-a-real-root",
|
||||
open_pr_heads=set(),
|
||||
remote_branch_exists=True,
|
||||
head_on_master=True,
|
||||
delete_capability_allowed=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("planned_execution_order", entry)
|
||||
self.assertIsInstance(entry["planned_execution_order"], list)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_extract_linked_issue_from_closes(self):
|
||||
issue = mcr.extract_linked_issue(
|
||||
"feat: cleanup (Closes #269)",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user