Compare commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
a0fffae576 |
@@ -1,610 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Controller-owned work allocator policy (#600).
|
||||
|
||||
Builds on the #613 control-plane DB substrate (``ControlPlaneDB.assign_and_lease``).
|
||||
|
||||
Workers must not self-select exclusive work under the standard multi-LLM
|
||||
workflow. They call ``gitea_allocate_next_work`` which:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Inspects candidate Gitea issues/PRs (never raw monitoring incidents).
|
||||
2. Applies ADR routing policy (role, terminal path, leases, blocked, deps).
|
||||
3. Atomically assigns + leases the selected item in one DB transaction.
|
||||
|
||||
This module is pure selection + substrate orchestration. Gitea I/O for live
|
||||
inventory lives in the MCP tool wrapper so tests can inject candidates.
|
||||
|
||||
#612 remains downstream: bridge-created Gitea issues become candidates only
|
||||
after they exist as normal issues; this module never assigns incidents.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import uuid
|
||||
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
|
||||
from typing import Any, Sequence
|
||||
|
||||
from control_plane_db import (
|
||||
ControlPlaneDB,
|
||||
ControlPlaneError,
|
||||
InvalidWorkKindError,
|
||||
LeaseRequiredError,
|
||||
WORK_KINDS,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Outcomes required by #600 / ADR §5.
|
||||
OUTCOME_ASSIGNED = "assigned_work"
|
||||
OUTCOME_WAIT = "wait"
|
||||
OUTCOME_BLOCKED_TERMINAL = "blocked_by_terminal_path"
|
||||
OUTCOME_BLOCKED_LEASE = "blocked_by_active_lease"
|
||||
OUTCOME_NEEDS_CONTROLLER = "needs_controller"
|
||||
OUTCOME_NO_SAFE = "no_safe_work"
|
||||
OUTCOME_ROLE_INELIGIBLE = "role_ineligible"
|
||||
OUTCOME_PREVIEW = "preview" # dry-run only (apply=false)
|
||||
|
||||
ROLE_AUTHOR = "author"
|
||||
ROLE_REVIEWER = "reviewer"
|
||||
ROLE_MERGER = "merger"
|
||||
ROLE_RECONCILER = "reconciler"
|
||||
ROLE_CONTROLLER = "controller"
|
||||
|
||||
VALID_ROLES = frozenset(
|
||||
{ROLE_AUTHOR, ROLE_REVIEWER, ROLE_MERGER, ROLE_RECONCILER, ROLE_CONTROLLER}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Default action matrices by role (mutation gate will re-check).
|
||||
ROLE_ACTIONS: dict[str, tuple[tuple[str, ...], tuple[str, ...]]] = {
|
||||
ROLE_AUTHOR: (
|
||||
("implement", "comment", "push", "create_pr"),
|
||||
("approve", "merge", "request_changes", "self_select_without_assignment"),
|
||||
),
|
||||
ROLE_REVIEWER: (
|
||||
("review", "comment", "approve", "request_changes"),
|
||||
("merge", "push", "create_pr", "self_select_without_assignment"),
|
||||
),
|
||||
ROLE_MERGER: (
|
||||
("merge", "comment"),
|
||||
("approve", "request_changes", "push", "create_pr", "self_select_without_assignment"),
|
||||
),
|
||||
ROLE_RECONCILER: (
|
||||
("comment", "diagnose", "cleanup"),
|
||||
("approve", "merge", "push", "create_pr", "self_select_without_assignment"),
|
||||
),
|
||||
ROLE_CONTROLLER: (
|
||||
("comment", "diagnose", "allocate"),
|
||||
("approve", "merge", "push", "create_pr"),
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass
|
||||
class WorkCandidate:
|
||||
"""One assignable Gitea issue or PR presented to the allocator."""
|
||||
|
||||
kind: str # issue | pr
|
||||
number: int
|
||||
state: str = "open"
|
||||
labels: tuple[str, ...] = ()
|
||||
title: str = ""
|
||||
priority: int = 0
|
||||
head_sha: str | None = None
|
||||
# Routing signals (callers derive from Gitea / review feedback).
|
||||
request_changes_current_head: bool = False
|
||||
approval_on_current_head: bool = False
|
||||
approval_stale: bool = False
|
||||
approval_contaminated: bool = False
|
||||
mergeable: bool = False
|
||||
blocked: bool = False
|
||||
dependency_unmet: bool = False
|
||||
dependency_reason: str | None = None
|
||||
already_claimed_elsewhere: bool = False
|
||||
|
||||
def __post_init__(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.kind = (self.kind or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
self.state = (self.state or "open").strip().lower()
|
||||
self.labels = tuple(
|
||||
str(x).strip().lower() for x in (self.labels or ()) if str(x).strip()
|
||||
)
|
||||
if self.kind not in WORK_KINDS:
|
||||
raise InvalidWorkKindError(
|
||||
f"candidate kind '{self.kind}' is not assignable; only "
|
||||
f"{sorted(WORK_KINDS)} (never raw incidents)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def as_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"kind": self.kind,
|
||||
"number": self.number,
|
||||
"state": self.state,
|
||||
"labels": list(self.labels),
|
||||
"title": self.title,
|
||||
"priority": self.priority,
|
||||
"head_sha": self.head_sha,
|
||||
"request_changes_current_head": self.request_changes_current_head,
|
||||
"approval_on_current_head": self.approval_on_current_head,
|
||||
"approval_stale": self.approval_stale,
|
||||
"approval_contaminated": self.approval_contaminated,
|
||||
"mergeable": self.mergeable,
|
||||
"blocked": self.blocked,
|
||||
"dependency_unmet": self.dependency_unmet,
|
||||
"dependency_reason": self.dependency_reason,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass
|
||||
class SkipRecord:
|
||||
kind: str
|
||||
number: int
|
||||
reason: str
|
||||
|
||||
def as_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {"kind": self.kind, "number": self.number, "reason": self.reason}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def normalize_role(role: str | None, *, profile_name: str | None = None) -> str:
|
||||
"""Map profile/role strings to a canonical allocator role."""
|
||||
raw = (role or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
if raw in VALID_ROLES:
|
||||
return raw
|
||||
prof = (profile_name or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
for token in VALID_ROLES:
|
||||
if token in prof or prof.endswith(f"-{token}"):
|
||||
return token
|
||||
if "author" in raw:
|
||||
return ROLE_AUTHOR
|
||||
if "review" in raw:
|
||||
return ROLE_REVIEWER
|
||||
if "merg" in raw:
|
||||
return ROLE_MERGER
|
||||
if "reconcil" in raw:
|
||||
return ROLE_RECONCILER
|
||||
if "control" in raw:
|
||||
return ROLE_CONTROLLER
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError(
|
||||
f"unknown allocator role '{role}' (profile={profile_name!r}); "
|
||||
f"expected one of {sorted(VALID_ROLES)}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def expected_role_for_candidate(c: WorkCandidate) -> str:
|
||||
"""ADR §5.3 routing: which role should take this work next."""
|
||||
if c.kind == "pr":
|
||||
if c.approval_contaminated:
|
||||
return ROLE_RECONCILER
|
||||
if c.request_changes_current_head:
|
||||
return ROLE_AUTHOR
|
||||
if c.approval_stale:
|
||||
return ROLE_REVIEWER
|
||||
if c.approval_on_current_head and c.mergeable:
|
||||
return ROLE_MERGER
|
||||
# Open PR without terminal verdict → reviewer
|
||||
return ROLE_REVIEWER
|
||||
# Issues: ready work → author by default; blocked stays controller/none
|
||||
labels = set(c.labels)
|
||||
if "status:blocked" in labels or c.blocked:
|
||||
return ROLE_CONTROLLER
|
||||
return ROLE_AUTHOR
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def role_actions(role: str) -> tuple[tuple[str, ...], tuple[str, ...]]:
|
||||
return ROLE_ACTIONS.get(role, ROLE_ACTIONS[ROLE_AUTHOR])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def classify_skip(
|
||||
c: WorkCandidate,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
role: str,
|
||||
terminal_pr: int | None,
|
||||
) -> str | None:
|
||||
"""Return skip reason, or None if candidate is selectable for *role*."""
|
||||
if c.state in ("merged", "closed"):
|
||||
return f"{c.kind}#{c.number} is {c.state}; never assign"
|
||||
if c.blocked or "status:blocked" in c.labels:
|
||||
return f"{c.kind}#{c.number} is blocked"
|
||||
if c.dependency_unmet:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
c.dependency_reason
|
||||
or f"{c.kind}#{c.number} has unmet dependencies"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if c.already_claimed_elsewhere:
|
||||
return f"{c.kind}#{c.number} already claimed elsewhere"
|
||||
if c.kind == "pr" and not (c.head_sha or "").strip():
|
||||
return f"pr#{c.number} missing head_sha pin"
|
||||
|
||||
# Terminal path first: when an active terminal PR exists, only that PR
|
||||
# (or controller diagnosis) is assignable for review-path roles.
|
||||
if terminal_pr is not None and c.kind == "pr" and c.number != terminal_pr:
|
||||
if role in (ROLE_REVIEWER, ROLE_MERGER):
|
||||
return (
|
||||
f"pr#{c.number} skipped: active terminal-review lock on "
|
||||
f"PR #{terminal_pr} must be resolved first"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
expected = expected_role_for_candidate(c)
|
||||
if role == ROLE_CONTROLLER:
|
||||
# Controller may inspect anything but only assigns diagnosis targets
|
||||
# when contaminated / blocked.
|
||||
if expected == ROLE_RECONCILER or c.blocked:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
return f"{c.kind}#{c.number} does not require controller (expected {expected})"
|
||||
|
||||
if role != expected:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
f"{c.kind}#{c.number} expects role '{expected}', active role is '{role}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Ready-gate for issues: prefer status:ready when labels present.
|
||||
if c.kind == "issue" and c.labels:
|
||||
if "status:ready" not in c.labels and "status:in-progress" not in c.labels:
|
||||
# Allow unlabeled open issues; only skip explicit non-ready states.
|
||||
if any(l.startswith("status:") for l in c.labels):
|
||||
return f"issue#{c.number} not status:ready ({','.join(c.labels)})"
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def sort_candidates(candidates: Sequence[WorkCandidate]) -> list[WorkCandidate]:
|
||||
"""Higher priority first; then lower number (older issues) for stability."""
|
||||
return sorted(
|
||||
candidates,
|
||||
key=lambda c: (-int(c.priority), c.kind != "pr", int(c.number)),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def allocate_next_work(
|
||||
db: ControlPlaneDB,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
session_id: str,
|
||||
role: str,
|
||||
remote: str,
|
||||
org: str,
|
||||
repo: str,
|
||||
candidates: Sequence[WorkCandidate],
|
||||
apply: bool = False,
|
||||
profile_name: str | None = None,
|
||||
username: str | None = None,
|
||||
lease_ttl_seconds: int | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Select and optionally reserve the next work unit via control-plane DB.
|
||||
|
||||
*apply=False* (default): dry-run selection only — no lease/assignment.
|
||||
*apply=True*: atomic ``assign_and_lease`` for the selected candidate.
|
||||
|
||||
Never uses file locks or comment-only leases as the assignment source.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if db is None:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"control-plane DB substrate unavailable (fail closed, #600/#613)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"skipped": [],
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
role_norm = normalize_role(role, profile_name=profile_name)
|
||||
except ControlPlaneError as exc:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_ROLE_INELIGIBLE,
|
||||
"reasons": [str(exc)],
|
||||
"skipped": [],
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
session_id = (session_id or "").strip() or f"alloc-{uuid.uuid4().hex[:12]}"
|
||||
try:
|
||||
db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id=session_id,
|
||||
role=role_norm,
|
||||
profile=profile_name,
|
||||
pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001 — surface structured
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"failed to register session in control-plane DB: {exc} "
|
||||
"(fail closed, #613)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"skipped": [],
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Expire stale leases globally before selection.
|
||||
try:
|
||||
db.expire_stale_leases()
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
"reasons": [f"lease expiry failed: {exc} (fail closed)"],
|
||||
"skipped": [],
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
terminal = None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
terminal = db.get_active_terminal_lock(remote=remote, org=org, repo=repo)
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
"reasons": [f"terminal lock lookup failed: {exc} (fail closed)"],
|
||||
"skipped": [],
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
}
|
||||
terminal_pr = int(terminal["terminal_pr"]) if terminal else None
|
||||
|
||||
skipped: list[SkipRecord] = []
|
||||
ordered = sort_candidates(list(candidates))
|
||||
selected: WorkCandidate | None = None
|
||||
for c in ordered:
|
||||
reason = classify_skip(c, role=role_norm, terminal_pr=terminal_pr)
|
||||
if reason:
|
||||
skipped.append(SkipRecord(c.kind, c.number, reason))
|
||||
continue
|
||||
selected = c
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
if selected is None:
|
||||
# If terminal lock blocks all review work, surface that explicitly.
|
||||
if terminal_pr is not None and role_norm in (ROLE_REVIEWER, ROLE_MERGER):
|
||||
outcome = OUTCOME_BLOCKED_TERMINAL
|
||||
reasons = [
|
||||
f"no safe work for role '{role_norm}': active terminal-review "
|
||||
f"lock on PR #{terminal_pr} (resolve terminal path first, #332/#600)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
else:
|
||||
outcome = OUTCOME_NO_SAFE
|
||||
reasons = [
|
||||
f"no safe assignable work for role '{role_norm}' "
|
||||
f"among {len(ordered)} candidates"
|
||||
]
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"outcome": outcome,
|
||||
"apply": bool(apply),
|
||||
"role": role_norm,
|
||||
"profile_name": profile_name,
|
||||
"username": username,
|
||||
"session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"org": org,
|
||||
"repo": repo,
|
||||
"selected": None,
|
||||
"expected_role_next": None,
|
||||
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||
"skipped": [s.as_dict() for s in skipped],
|
||||
"terminal_pr": terminal_pr,
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
"downstream_note": (
|
||||
"#612 incident bridge remains downstream of #600; "
|
||||
"allocator never assigns raw monitoring incidents"
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expected_role = expected_role_for_candidate(selected)
|
||||
allowed, forbidden = role_actions(role_norm)
|
||||
selection = {
|
||||
"kind": selected.kind,
|
||||
"number": selected.number,
|
||||
"title": selected.title,
|
||||
"labels": list(selected.labels),
|
||||
"head_sha": selected.head_sha,
|
||||
"priority": selected.priority,
|
||||
"expected_role_next": expected_role,
|
||||
"reason_selected": (
|
||||
f"highest-priority candidate for role '{role_norm}' "
|
||||
f"(expected_role={expected_role})"
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if not apply:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_PREVIEW,
|
||||
"apply": False,
|
||||
"role": role_norm,
|
||||
"profile_name": profile_name,
|
||||
"username": username,
|
||||
"session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"org": org,
|
||||
"repo": repo,
|
||||
"selected": selection,
|
||||
"expected_role_next": expected_role,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"dry-run only (apply=false); no assignment/lease created — "
|
||||
"call again with apply=true to reserve via control-plane DB"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"skipped": [s.as_dict() for s in skipped],
|
||||
"terminal_pr": terminal_pr,
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
"downstream_note": (
|
||||
"#612 incident bridge remains downstream of #600; "
|
||||
"allocator never assigns raw monitoring incidents"
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Atomic reserve via #613 substrate.
|
||||
ttl = lease_ttl_seconds if lease_ttl_seconds is not None else None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
kwargs: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"role": role_norm,
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"org": org,
|
||||
"repo": repo,
|
||||
"kind": selected.kind,
|
||||
"number": selected.number,
|
||||
"expected_head_sha": selected.head_sha,
|
||||
"allowed_actions": allowed,
|
||||
"forbidden_actions": forbidden,
|
||||
"phase": "allocated",
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ttl is not None:
|
||||
kwargs["lease_ttl_seconds"] = int(ttl)
|
||||
result = db.assign_and_lease(**kwargs)
|
||||
except (InvalidWorkKindError, LeaseRequiredError, ControlPlaneError) as exc:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
"apply": True,
|
||||
"role": role_norm,
|
||||
"session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"org": org,
|
||||
"repo": repo,
|
||||
"selected": selection,
|
||||
"expected_role_next": expected_role,
|
||||
"reasons": [f"atomic assign+lease failed: {exc} (fail closed, #613)"],
|
||||
"skipped": [s.as_dict() for s in skipped],
|
||||
"terminal_pr": terminal_pr,
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if result.outcome == "wait":
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_WAIT,
|
||||
"apply": True,
|
||||
"role": role_norm,
|
||||
"session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"org": org,
|
||||
"repo": repo,
|
||||
"selected": selection,
|
||||
"expected_role_next": expected_role,
|
||||
"reasons": [result.reason or "foreign active lease"],
|
||||
"skipped": [s.as_dict() for s in skipped],
|
||||
"terminal_pr": terminal_pr,
|
||||
"assignment": result.as_dict(),
|
||||
"owner_session_id": result.owner_session_id,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if result.outcome == "no_safe_work":
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
"apply": True,
|
||||
"role": role_norm,
|
||||
"session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"org": org,
|
||||
"repo": repo,
|
||||
"selected": selection,
|
||||
"expected_role_next": expected_role,
|
||||
"reasons": [result.reason or "no_safe_work"],
|
||||
"skipped": [s.as_dict() for s in skipped],
|
||||
"terminal_pr": terminal_pr,
|
||||
"assignment": result.as_dict(),
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# assigned
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_ASSIGNED,
|
||||
"apply": True,
|
||||
"role": role_norm,
|
||||
"profile_name": profile_name,
|
||||
"username": username,
|
||||
"session_id": session_id,
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"org": org,
|
||||
"repo": repo,
|
||||
"selected": selection,
|
||||
"expected_role_next": expected_role,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
selection["reason_selected"],
|
||||
result.reason or "atomic assign+lease created",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"skipped": [s.as_dict() for s in skipped],
|
||||
"terminal_pr": terminal_pr,
|
||||
"assignment": result.as_dict(),
|
||||
"lease_proof": {
|
||||
"assignment_id": result.assignment_id,
|
||||
"lease_id": result.lease_id,
|
||||
"expires_at": result.expires_at,
|
||||
"expected_head_sha": result.expected_head_sha,
|
||||
"allowed_actions": list(result.allowed_actions),
|
||||
"forbidden_actions": list(result.forbidden_actions),
|
||||
"source": "control_plane_db.assign_and_lease",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"next_valid_command": _next_command(role_norm, selected),
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
"downstream_note": (
|
||||
"#612 incident bridge remains downstream of #600; "
|
||||
"allocator never assigns raw monitoring incidents"
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _next_command(role: str, c: WorkCandidate) -> str:
|
||||
if role == ROLE_AUTHOR and c.kind == "issue":
|
||||
return f"implement issue #{c.number} under a branches/ worktree; open PR when ready"
|
||||
if role == ROLE_AUTHOR and c.kind == "pr":
|
||||
return (
|
||||
f"address REQUEST_CHANGES on PR #{c.number} at head "
|
||||
f"{(c.head_sha or '')[:12]} and push fixes"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if role == ROLE_REVIEWER:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
f"review PR #{c.number} pinned at head {(c.head_sha or '')[:12]} "
|
||||
"via full reviewer workflow"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if role == ROLE_MERGER:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
f"merge PR #{c.number} only with explicit operator MERGE "
|
||||
f"authorization at head {(c.head_sha or '')[:12]}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if role == ROLE_RECONCILER:
|
||||
return f"diagnose contested state for {c.kind}#{c.number}"
|
||||
return f"proceed on {c.kind}#{c.number} under role {role}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def candidate_from_dict(data: dict[str, Any]) -> WorkCandidate:
|
||||
"""Build a WorkCandidate from a plain dict (tests / MCP inventory)."""
|
||||
return WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind=str(data.get("kind") or "issue"),
|
||||
number=int(data["number"]),
|
||||
state=str(data.get("state") or "open"),
|
||||
labels=tuple(data.get("labels") or ()),
|
||||
title=str(data.get("title") or ""),
|
||||
priority=int(data.get("priority") or 0),
|
||||
head_sha=data.get("head_sha"),
|
||||
request_changes_current_head=bool(data.get("request_changes_current_head")),
|
||||
approval_on_current_head=bool(data.get("approval_on_current_head")),
|
||||
approval_stale=bool(data.get("approval_stale")),
|
||||
approval_contaminated=bool(data.get("approval_contaminated")),
|
||||
mergeable=bool(data.get("mergeable")),
|
||||
blocked=bool(data.get("blocked")),
|
||||
dependency_unmet=bool(data.get("dependency_unmet")),
|
||||
dependency_reason=data.get("dependency_reason"),
|
||||
already_claimed_elsewhere=bool(data.get("already_claimed_elsewhere")),
|
||||
)
|
||||
-1179
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Control-plane DB substrate (#613)
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** Implemented (SQLite single-writer MVP)
|
||||
|
||||
**ADR:** [`mcp-allocator-control-plane-observability-adr.md`](mcp-allocator-control-plane-observability-adr.md)
|
||||
|
||||
**Module:** `control_plane_db.py`
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture statement
|
||||
|
||||
> **DB coordinates, Gitea records, Sentry/GlitchTip observe; the bridge is the only path that turns observations into Gitea work.**
|
||||
|
||||
## What this ships
|
||||
|
||||
| Capability | Notes |
|
||||
|------------|--------|
|
||||
| Schema | `sessions`, `work_items`, `leases`, `assignments`, `terminal_locks`, `events`, `incident_links` |
|
||||
| Atomic assign+lease | `ControlPlaneDB.assign_and_lease` — one `BEGIN IMMEDIATE` transaction |
|
||||
| Mutation gate | `require_valid_assignment` — live lease + allowed action + non-terminal work + non-stale head |
|
||||
| Heartbeat / release / expire | Lease lifecycle helpers |
|
||||
| Terminal-lock index | Routing signal for #600 (terminal path first) |
|
||||
| `incident_links` | Provider-neutral link model for #612 — **not** assignable work; scope keys NULL-safe |
|
||||
|
||||
## Hard rules (enforced in code)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Assignable `work_items.kind` ∈ {`issue`, `pr`} only — **never** raw Sentry/GlitchTip incidents.
|
||||
2. Two concurrent sessions cannot both receive an active assignment on the same open work item (second gets `wait`).
|
||||
3. Merged/closed work items return `no_safe_work` at assign time, and `require_valid_assignment` fails closed if the work item becomes terminal later.
|
||||
4. Assignments pin `expected_head_sha`; mutations fail closed if the work item head drifts.
|
||||
5. SQLite path is the **single-writer MVP** (`GITEA_CONTROL_PLANE_DB`, default under `~/.cache/gitea-tools/control-plane/`). Multi-session multi-host production requires **Postgres** or a **single allocator daemon** (ADR §6).
|
||||
6. `incident_links` optional scope fields are stored as empty strings (never NULL) so UNIQUE is canonical across minimal upserts.
|
||||
7. Legacy `incident_links` migration collapses NULL-scope duplicates **only** when Gitea targets **and** all meaningful observation metadata agree (fingerprint, status, event_count, permalink, timestamps, linked PRs, etc.). Conflicting metadata fails closed — no silent discard.
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependency chain
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
#613 control-plane DB (this) → #600 allocator API → #612 incident bridge
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- **#600** must call this substrate (not file locks / comment-only leases alone) for completion.
|
||||
- **#612** must write `incident_links` here and create **Gitea issues**; the allocator assigns those issues, not raw incidents.
|
||||
|
||||
## Allocator API (#600)
|
||||
|
||||
Module: `allocator_service.py` · MCP tool: `gitea_allocate_next_work`
|
||||
|
||||
- Workers call `gitea_allocate_next_work(apply=false|true)` instead of self-selecting work.
|
||||
- `apply=false` returns a dry-run selection (`outcome=preview`) with skip reasons.
|
||||
- `apply=true` reserves via `ControlPlaneDB.assign_and_lease` (atomic assignment+lease).
|
||||
- Coordination source is **always** the control-plane DB — not file locks or comment-only leases.
|
||||
- Routing follows ADR §5.3 (REQUEST_CHANGES → author, terminal path first, foreign lease → wait).
|
||||
- Raw monitoring incidents are never candidates.
|
||||
|
||||
## Incident bridge (#612)
|
||||
|
||||
Module: `incident_bridge.py` · MCP tools: `gitea_observability_*`
|
||||
|
||||
- Bridge converts Sentry/GlitchTip observations → **normal Gitea issues** + `incident_links`.
|
||||
- Phase-1: `gitea_observability_reconcile_incident(apply=false|true)` with JSON observation.
|
||||
- Dry-run performs **no** Gitea mutation and **no** DB write.
|
||||
- Apply reuses existing links or creates one Gitea issue; never invents `work_items.kind=incident`.
|
||||
- Config: `GITEA_OBSERVABILITY_PROJECTS_JSON` or `GITEA_OBSERVABILITY_PROJECTS_FILE`.
|
||||
- Provider tokens never appear in issue bodies, links, or tool results.
|
||||
- Allocator sees bridge work only after a Gitea issue exists.
|
||||
|
||||
## Non-goals (intentionally deferred)
|
||||
|
||||
- Full unsupervised watchdog auto-filing (prefer explicit reconcile first)
|
||||
- Assuming GlitchTip writeback API equals Sentry without verification
|
||||
- Gitea comment/label mirror writers for every assignment (optional later)
|
||||
|
||||
## Tests
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python3 -m pytest tests/test_control_plane_db.py -q
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -1,301 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# ADR: MCP allocator, control-plane DB, and Sentry/GlitchTip incident bridge architecture
|
||||
|
||||
- **Status:** Accepted (implementation pending; blocks code for #600 / #612 / #613)
|
||||
- **Date:** 2026-07-09
|
||||
- **Tracking issues:**
|
||||
- [#613](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/613) — control-plane DB (first)
|
||||
- [#600](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/600) — allocator API (second)
|
||||
- [#612](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/612) — Sentry/GlitchTip incident bridge (third)
|
||||
- **Related:** existing GlitchTip contracts (`glitchtip-to-gitea-workflow-design.md`, `glitchtip-gitea-deduplication-linking-design.md`), trust boundaries (`tool-boundaries.md`, `safety-model.md`), current leases (`pr_work_lease.py`, `issue_lock_store.py`)
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Context
|
||||
|
||||
Multiple LLM sessions can independently inspect the Gitea queue and start the same issue or PR. Existing coordination (Gitea comment leases, local issue-lock files, labels) often detects collisions **after** work has started. Parallel issues #600, #612, and #613 each describe part of a fix; without one ADR they risk overlapping stores, wrong dependency order, and trust-boundary violations.
|
||||
|
||||
This ADR is the canonical architecture decision **before** implementing those issues.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Decision summary (core)
|
||||
|
||||
| Layer | Owns | Must not |
|
||||
|-------|------|----------|
|
||||
| **Control-plane DB** | Sessions, atomic assignment, leases, heartbeats, terminal-lock index, events, incident links | Bypass Gitea workflow gates or replace issue/PR history |
|
||||
| **Gitea** | Durable work record: issues, PRs, comments, labels, reviews, merges | Be the only concurrency lock under multi-session load |
|
||||
| **Sentry / GlitchTip** | Incidents, events, provider UI | Assign work, approve/merge/close, or mutate Gitea outside the bridge |
|
||||
| **Incident bridge** | Provider adapters, reconcile/create Gitea issues, link storage upsert, optional provider writeback | Hand raw provider incidents to the allocator as work items |
|
||||
|
||||
**One-liner:** **DB coordinates. Gitea records. Sentry/GlitchTip observe. The bridge is the only path that turns observations into Gitea work. The allocator assigns only Gitea issues/PRs, never raw monitoring incidents.**
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Dependency order
|
||||
|
||||
Implementation **must** follow:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
#613 control-plane DB → #600 allocator API → #612 incident bridge
|
||||
(atomic substrate) (routing policy) (feeds Gitea work)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
| Issue | Role | Depends on |
|
||||
|-------|------|------------|
|
||||
| **#613** | Durable coordination DB + lease/assignment transactions | — |
|
||||
| **#600** | `gitea_allocate_next_work` policy and tool surface | **#613** (hard) |
|
||||
| **#612** | Multi-project Sentry/GlitchTip → Gitea bridge | **#613** for `incident_links` index; **#600** before treating bridge-created issues as allocator feed in multi-worker prod |
|
||||
|
||||
**Hard rules:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Do **not** implement #600 on file locks / comment-only leases and call it done.
|
||||
2. Do **not** ship #612 as a second assignment system for raw incidents.
|
||||
3. Partial previews (read-only list tools, schema stubs) may land earlier if they do not claim “allocator complete” or “bridge complete.”
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Authority boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.1 Gitea (durable source of truth for work)
|
||||
|
||||
Gitea remains authoritative for:
|
||||
|
||||
- Issue and PR identity, titles, bodies, state (open/closed/merged)
|
||||
- Comments, reviews, approvals, REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
- Labels and workflow status labels (`status:ready`, `status:in-progress`, …)
|
||||
- Merges, closes, branch refs as recorded by Gitea/git hosting
|
||||
|
||||
Operators and auditors read **history** from Gitea.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.2 Control-plane DB (coordination / index)
|
||||
|
||||
The control-plane DB is authoritative for **live multi-session coordination**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Which session holds which assignment/lease
|
||||
- Heartbeat freshness and expiry
|
||||
- Terminal-lock index for routing
|
||||
- Event log of allocation/lease transitions
|
||||
- `incident_links` index (see §8)
|
||||
|
||||
It is **not** a substitute for Gitea history. When DB and Gitea disagree on durable work state (e.g. PR already merged), **Gitea wins**; the DB is reconciled.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.3 Sentry / GlitchTip (observe)
|
||||
|
||||
Providers own incident lifecycle and raw event data. They:
|
||||
|
||||
- Must **not** bypass Gitea gates
|
||||
- Must **not** assign LLM work
|
||||
- May receive **writeback** of resolution status only through the bridge, when configured and supported
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.4 Trust boundaries for credentials
|
||||
|
||||
Aligned with `docs/tool-boundaries.md` and `docs/safety-model.md`:
|
||||
|
||||
- **One MCP server process per trust boundary** remains the default.
|
||||
- Monitor API tokens (Sentry/GlitchTip) live in the **bridge/orchestrator boundary** (or a dedicated observability write/read profile), **not** blindly inside every Gitea MCP author/reviewer/merger process.
|
||||
- Gitea tokens stay on Gitea MCP profiles only.
|
||||
- Orchestrators compose services; they must not become a single credential pool that silently mixes Gitea write + monitor tokens into every worker.
|
||||
|
||||
Tool names such as `gitea_observability_*` may exist as a **namespace façade** only if the runtime still enforces separate credential scopes (e.g. bridge process vs pure Gitea mutation process).
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Allocator rules (#600 on top of #613)
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.1 Worker contract
|
||||
|
||||
- Workers **do not self-select** work under the standard multi-LLM workflow.
|
||||
- Workers call **`gitea_allocate_next_work`** (with `apply=true` only when taking work).
|
||||
- Mutations that claim exclusive work require a **valid assignment and lease** from the control-plane DB.
|
||||
- Return values include at least: role, issue/PR number, expected head SHA (when applicable), lease ID, expiry, allowed actions, forbidden actions — or a non-assignment outcome (`WAIT`, terminal-path block, no safe work, needs controller, etc.).
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.2 Atomic reserve
|
||||
|
||||
- **Assignment creation and lease creation happen in one DB transaction.**
|
||||
- Two concurrent sessions **must not** receive the same issue/PR as assigned work.
|
||||
- On contention: second session gets **WAIT** or **owner-resume**, never a duplicate lease.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.3 Routing policy
|
||||
|
||||
| Condition | Route |
|
||||
|-----------|--------|
|
||||
| Current-head **REQUEST_CHANGES** | **Author** (not reviewer/merger) |
|
||||
| **Stale** approval (approval not on current head) | **Reviewer** |
|
||||
| **Clean** approval on current head, mergeable | **Merger** |
|
||||
| Contested / contaminated approval | **Diagnosis / reconciler** (controller path) |
|
||||
| Active **foreign** lease | **WAIT** or **owner-resume** |
|
||||
| **Terminal-review** lock present | **Terminal-path resolution first** before downstream review work |
|
||||
| Merged / closed PR | **Never assign** |
|
||||
| Issue locked by sanctioned lease | **Never assign** to another worker unless lease cleanup/adoption is sanctioned |
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.4 Relationship to Gitea mirrors
|
||||
|
||||
After a successful assignment, the allocator (or sanctioned tooling) may update Gitea comments/labels so humans and audits see state. Those mirrors **are not** the sole lock source.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Control-plane DB topology (#613)
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.1 Preferred architecture (multi-daemon / Proxmox)
|
||||
|
||||
For true multi-session concurrency (multiple MCP daemons, multiple hosts, or Proxmox VMs):
|
||||
|
||||
**Prefer either:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Shared Postgres** used by all Gitea MCP profiles / allocator callers, **or**
|
||||
2. A **single allocator daemon** (sole writer to the coordination store) that all workers call over MCP/RPC.
|
||||
|
||||
Both satisfy: one transactional authority for “who has this work item.”
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.2 SQLite MVP
|
||||
|
||||
SQLite is acceptable **only** for a **single-writer MVP**:
|
||||
|
||||
- One process owns writes (allocator daemon or single co-located MCP server), **or**
|
||||
- Documented single-host single-daemon experiments with file locking and no multi-host claims.
|
||||
|
||||
SQLite is **not** sufficient to declare multi-session production readiness when four independent LLM sessions talk to four MCP processes without a shared writer.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.3 Suggested entities (normative shape)
|
||||
|
||||
Minimum logical entities (names may vary; semantics must not):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **sessions** — session_id, role/profile, namespace, pid, started_at, last_heartbeat_at, status
|
||||
2. **work_items** — remote/org/repo, kind ∈ {`issue`, `pr`}, number, state, priority, current_head_sha, updated_at
|
||||
3. **leases** — lease_id, work_item_id, session_id, role, phase, expires_at, heartbeat_at, status
|
||||
4. **assignments** — assignment_id, work_item_id, session_id, allowed_action(s), expected_head_sha, status
|
||||
5. **terminal_locks** — repo/org, terminal_pr, review_id, decision, status, cleanup_state
|
||||
6. **events** — event_id, work_item_id, type, message, created_at
|
||||
7. **incident_links** — provider-neutral link model (see §8)
|
||||
|
||||
**Explicit non-kind:** do **not** use `work_items.kind = sentry_incident` (or glitchtip_incident) as an assignable work unit. Incidents become work only after the bridge creates/links a **Gitea issue**.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Lease migration (avoid split-brain)
|
||||
|
||||
### 7.1 Target state
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary** for live coordination: **control-plane DB** leases and assignments.
|
||||
- **Gitea comment leases** (e.g. `<!-- mcp-review-lease:v1 -->`) and **local issue-lock files** become:
|
||||
- **mirrors** of DB state for human visibility / recovery, and/or
|
||||
- written **only** through the allocator (or sanctioned lease tools that update DB + mirror in one workflow).
|
||||
|
||||
### 7.2 Migration rules
|
||||
|
||||
1. New exclusive claims go through DB assignment+lease first.
|
||||
2. Comment lease / file lock writers that skip the DB are **deprecated** once #613+#600 land.
|
||||
3. Reconciler tooling heals: expired DB lease, orphan Gitea comment, orphan local file — fail closed when ambiguous.
|
||||
4. **Split-brain is a defect:** “DB free + Gitea comment leased” or “DB leased + Gitea free” must be detectable and reconcilable; production paths must not rely on two independent writers.
|
||||
|
||||
### 7.3 Heartbeats
|
||||
|
||||
- Heartbeats update the **DB**.
|
||||
- Optional Gitea summaries must avoid comment spam (periodic summary or edit-in-place policy).
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Observability bridge (#612)
|
||||
|
||||
### 8.1 Role
|
||||
|
||||
The bridge:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Scans configured Sentry and/or GlitchTip projects (multi-project mappings).
|
||||
2. Deduplicates against existing links / Gitea issues.
|
||||
3. Creates or updates **normal Gitea issues** (labels, sanitized body, provider URL).
|
||||
4. Upserts **one** canonical `incident_links` row.
|
||||
5. Optionally writes resolution status back to the provider when supported.
|
||||
6. Never approves, merges, closes, or otherwise bypasses Gitea workflow gates.
|
||||
|
||||
### 8.2 Allocator interaction
|
||||
|
||||
- The allocator sees observability work **only after** a Gitea issue exists (typically `status:ready` + observability labels).
|
||||
- **Do not assign raw Sentry/GlitchTip incidents** as work items.
|
||||
- Bridge AC “allocator can see linked issues” means: **as ordinary Gitea issues**, not a special incident queue.
|
||||
|
||||
### 8.3 Provider adapters and trust
|
||||
|
||||
- Separate **Sentry** and **GlitchTip** adapters; document API differences; do not assume writeback parity.
|
||||
- Self-hosted base URLs supported (e.g. `https://sentry.prgs.cc`).
|
||||
- Tokens from environment / secret store only.
|
||||
- Prefer phase-1 **explicit reconcile / dry-run** before unsupervised watchdog auto-filing, consistent with existing GlitchTip filing safety contracts.
|
||||
|
||||
### 8.4 Home of implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Filing/orchestration may live in:
|
||||
|
||||
- a control-plane / bridge package or profile, and/or
|
||||
- Gitea-Tools as operator-facing tools that **delegate** to that boundary,
|
||||
|
||||
but must not violate §4.4 credential isolation.
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Incident link storage (single source of truth)
|
||||
|
||||
### 9.1 Canonical model: `incident_links` (provider-neutral)
|
||||
|
||||
Prefer a **provider-neutral** model over Sentry-only `sentry_links`:
|
||||
|
||||
| Field (logical) | Purpose |
|
||||
|-----------------|---------|
|
||||
| provider | `sentry` \| `glitchtip` \| … |
|
||||
| provider_base_url | Self-hosted base |
|
||||
| provider_org / provider_project | Mapping key |
|
||||
| provider_issue_id / provider_short_id | Provider identity |
|
||||
| provider_permalink | Human URL |
|
||||
| fingerprint | Stable dedupe key when available |
|
||||
| gitea_org / gitea_repo / gitea_issue_number | Linked work |
|
||||
| linked_pr_numbers | Optional PR association |
|
||||
| first_seen / last_seen / event_count | Summary metrics (safe) |
|
||||
| status | link lifecycle |
|
||||
| release_resolved_at / last_sync_at | Sync bookkeeping |
|
||||
|
||||
### 9.2 Gitea as human mirror
|
||||
|
||||
- Issue body markers / structured comments (e.g. HTML comment metadata) remain the **human- and audit-visible mirror**.
|
||||
- They must stay consistent with `incident_links` but are **not** a second independent write path for inventing links without the bridge.
|
||||
|
||||
### 9.3 One truth
|
||||
|
||||
- **Do not** maintain two independent systems of record (e.g. full mapping only in #612 storage **and** a separate #613 `sentry_links` with different semantics).
|
||||
- #612 implementation **must** use the same `incident_links` model introduced under #613 (or a single agreed store both reference).
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Security and redaction
|
||||
|
||||
Mandatory for bridge payloads, Gitea issue bodies/comments, DB-stored event summaries, and logs:
|
||||
|
||||
- No API tokens, DSNs, passwords, cookies, auth headers
|
||||
- No keychain IDs, private config contents, raw session-state files, full prompt bodies
|
||||
- Sanitize stack locals and request data; store only safe tags/context
|
||||
- Logs must never print provider tokens or DSNs
|
||||
- Redaction tests are required for #612
|
||||
|
||||
## 11. Non-goals
|
||||
|
||||
- Replace Gitea as the durable workflow record
|
||||
- Let Sentry/GlitchTip assign work or mutate Gitea workflow state outside sanctioned tools
|
||||
- Let the bridge approve, merge, close, release, or bypass Gitea gates
|
||||
- Implement #600 on file locks / comments alone and call allocator complete
|
||||
- Treat raw monitoring incidents as `work_items` for the allocator
|
||||
- Put monitor tokens into every Gitea MCP worker process by default
|
||||
|
||||
## 12. Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
### Positive
|
||||
|
||||
- Clear implementation order and ownership
|
||||
- Multi-session safety becomes testable at the DB layer
|
||||
- Observability becomes assignable work without special-casing the allocator
|
||||
- Trust boundaries stay compatible with existing control-plane docs
|
||||
|
||||
### Costs / risks
|
||||
|
||||
- Migration from comment/file leases requires reconciler work
|
||||
- Shared Postgres or single allocator daemon is operational cost
|
||||
- Bridge must be careful not to spam Gitea issues (dedupe, caps, policy modes)
|
||||
|
||||
### Follow-ups (documentation only until implemented)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Update #600, #612, and #613 bodies to **link this ADR** and restate hard dependencies.
|
||||
2. Implement #613 schema + atomic assign/lease.
|
||||
3. Implement #600 against the DB.
|
||||
4. Implement #612 against `incident_links` + Gitea create/update.
|
||||
5. Deprecate dual writers for leases.
|
||||
|
||||
## 13. Acceptance criteria for *this* ADR
|
||||
|
||||
This document is accepted when:
|
||||
|
||||
1. It is merged into `docs/architecture/` on the default branch.
|
||||
2. #600 / #612 / #613 (or their PRs) reference this path as the architecture source of truth.
|
||||
3. No implementation PR for those issues claims completion without conforming to §§2–11.
|
||||
|
||||
## 14. Document history
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Change |
|
||||
|------|--------|
|
||||
| 2026-07-09 | Initial ADR: dependency order, authority model, topology, lease migration, bridge, `incident_links`, security, non-goals |
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
|
||||
# ADR: Stable control runtime vs dev runtime (Gitea MCP)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Status:** Accepted (policy effective immediately for LLM sessions; tooling may lag)
|
||||
- **Date:** 2026-07-09
|
||||
- **Tracking issue:** [#615](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/615)
|
||||
- **Related:**
|
||||
- [#543](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/543) / `docs/mcp-namespace-health.md` — client-namespace health
|
||||
- `docs/mcp-namespace-eof-recovery.md` — reconnect-only EOF recovery (no PID kill)
|
||||
- [#558](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/558) / `docs/mcp-daemon-import-guard.md` — sanctioned daemon
|
||||
- [#557](https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/557) / `docs/bootstrap-review-path.md` — controller bootstrap for self-hosted fixes
|
||||
- Allocator / control-plane ADR: `docs/architecture/mcp-allocator-control-plane-observability-adr.md` (#613 / PR #614)
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Context
|
||||
|
||||
The Gitea MCP server is the **control plane** for real issue/PR mutations (create, comment, lock, review, merge, etc.). When author/reviewer/merger/reconciler sessions kill or restart that process, relaunch it from a feature worktree, or edit the checkout that process loads, operators observe:
|
||||
|
||||
- Mid-session identity/preflight resets
|
||||
- Stale-runtime vs master parity failures
|
||||
- IDE transport EOF / “tool not found” while code on disk has changed
|
||||
- Accidental production mutations from experimental code
|
||||
|
||||
This ADR separates **stable control runtime** from **dev/test runtime** and defines promotion proof.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Decision
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 Stable control runtime
|
||||
|
||||
The Gitea MCP server used for **real workflow mutations** is the **stable control runtime**.
|
||||
|
||||
Characteristics:
|
||||
|
||||
- Loads a known, promoted revision of Gitea-Tools (or the packaged release layout operators designate)
|
||||
- Registered in the IDE/client as the production namespaces (`gitea-tools`, `gitea-reviewer`, `gitea-merger`, `gitea-reconciler`, etc.)
|
||||
- Holds production profile credentials via sanctioned keychain/env paths only
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 Dev / test runtime
|
||||
|
||||
MCP **server code** development and testing:
|
||||
|
||||
- Happens in isolated **`branches/`** worktrees (or other non-stable checkouts)
|
||||
- May use a **separate** dev/test MCP runtime/process when process-level testing is required
|
||||
- **Must not** be used for real Gitea mutations on production issues/PRs
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.3 Forbidden actions (normal sessions)
|
||||
|
||||
Normal **author, reviewer, merger, and reconciler** sessions **must not**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Forbidden | Why |
|
||||
|-----------|-----|
|
||||
| Kill the running MCP server process | Drops all concurrent sessions; loses preflight state |
|
||||
| Restart the MCP server process | Same as kill; causes stale/identity churn mid-workflow |
|
||||
| Relaunch MCP from a development worktree | Runs unpromoted code against production mutations |
|
||||
| Edit files in the stable runtime checkout | Hot-mutates control plane under concurrent users |
|
||||
| Use experimental/dev MCP for real Gitea mutations | Bypasses promotion proof and audit expectations |
|
||||
|
||||
EOF / transport recovery: **client reconnect only** (see `docs/mcp-namespace-eof-recovery.md`). Do not “fix” health by killing PIDs or bumping MCP config mtimes as a normal session procedure.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.4 Promotion (operator / release-manager only)
|
||||
|
||||
Promotion of a new revision into the stable control runtime is an **explicit operator/release-manager action**, not an LLM self-service step.
|
||||
|
||||
A promotion **must record** (issue comment, release note, or promotion ledger):
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Description |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| **previous runtime SHA** | Commit previously loaded by stable runtime |
|
||||
| **promoted runtime SHA** | Commit after promotion |
|
||||
| **source branch/PR** | Where the change was reviewed |
|
||||
| **restart/reload method** | How the process was cycled (e.g. supervised restart, client reload) |
|
||||
| **health check proof** | Client-namespace probe success (`gitea_whoami` / namespace health) |
|
||||
| **identity/profile proof** | Expected profile(s) and username(s) after reload |
|
||||
| **workspace/root proof** | Stable checkout path / root matches intended layout |
|
||||
| **mutation capability proof** | Required permissions for the target role present; forbidden ops still forbidden |
|
||||
| **rollback instructions** | How to restore previous SHA and re-verify health |
|
||||
|
||||
Suggested durable marker:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
## MCP STABLE RUNTIME PROMOTION (#615)
|
||||
|
||||
Status: COMPLETED | ROLLED_BACK | ABORTED
|
||||
Previous-SHA: <full sha>
|
||||
Promoted-SHA: <full sha>
|
||||
Source-PR: <number>
|
||||
Source-Branch: <name>
|
||||
Reload-Method: <text>
|
||||
Health-Proof: client_namespace whoami OK / assess_mcp_namespace_health OK
|
||||
Identity-Proof: profile=<name> user=<name>
|
||||
Workspace-Proof: root=<path>
|
||||
Mutation-Proof: allowed_ops include <…>; forbidden include <…>
|
||||
Rollback: checkout <previous sha>; reload method <…>; re-run health/identity proofs
|
||||
Operator: <username>
|
||||
Timestamp: <ISO-8601>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.5 Unhealthy stable runtime → stop work
|
||||
|
||||
If the stable MCP runtime is **unhealthy** (client-namespace probes fail, wrong identity, wrong root, missing mutation capability, persistent EOF after reconnect):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Normal PR / review / merge / issue-mutation work must stop.**
|
||||
2. Do **not** improvise by switching to a dev worktree MCP for production mutations.
|
||||
3. Resume only after:
|
||||
- runtime is restored, **or**
|
||||
- a **controlled** promotion/rollback completes with the promotion record above, **or**
|
||||
- a controller invokes the narrow **bootstrap review path** (#557) when the defect is self-hosted and documented.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Relationship to other controls
|
||||
|
||||
| Doc / mechanism | Interaction |
|
||||
|-----------------|-------------|
|
||||
| Namespace health (#543) | Proves IDE client can call tools; does not authorize restart |
|
||||
| EOF recovery | Reconnect only; no process kill |
|
||||
| Daemon import guard (#558) | Mutations require sanctioned daemon; not a bare shell import |
|
||||
| Bootstrap path (#557) | Only controller-authorized exception when live runtime cannot review its own fix |
|
||||
| Allocator / control-plane ADR | Coordination DB is separate; still depends on a healthy MCP surface for Gitea writes |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
### Positive
|
||||
|
||||
- Predictable control plane for concurrent LLMs
|
||||
- Clear operator-only promotion gate with rollback
|
||||
- Aligns session behavior with health/EOF docs already landed
|
||||
|
||||
### Costs
|
||||
|
||||
- LLM sessions must wait when runtime is sick (no DIY restart)
|
||||
- Operators must maintain promotion discipline and dual-runtime config if they use a dev MCP
|
||||
|
||||
### Non-goals
|
||||
|
||||
- Does not ban operator-supervised restarts during incidents
|
||||
- Does not replace CI or code review for MCP changes
|
||||
- Does not authorize editing stable checkout “because tests need a quick fix”
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Implementation follow-ups (optional tooling)
|
||||
|
||||
These may land in later issues; the **policy binds sessions now**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Session preflight that refuses mutations if workspace root equals a `branches/` feature worktree configured as “dev only.”
|
||||
2. Explicit `runtime_kind=stable|dev` in MCP config and `gitea_whoami` profile metadata.
|
||||
3. Promotion checklist script that emits the durable promotion marker fields.
|
||||
4. Operator Guide wiki cross-link to this ADR.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Acceptance for this ADR
|
||||
|
||||
1. Document merged under `docs/architecture/`.
|
||||
2. Issue #615 references this path.
|
||||
3. LLM/operator runbooks treat kill/restart/relaunch-from-worktree as **violations**.
|
||||
4. Unhealthy runtime stops normal mutation work until restore/promotion/rollback/bootstrap.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Document history
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Change |
|
||||
|------|--------|
|
||||
| 2026-07-09 | Initial ADR: stable vs dev runtime, forbidden session actions, promotion proof fields, stop-work rule |
|
||||
+42
-624
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ import json
|
||||
import functools
|
||||
import contextlib
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
import uuid
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -833,9 +832,6 @@ import review_workflow_boundary # noqa: E402
|
||||
import review_workflow_load # noqa: E402
|
||||
import mcp_session_state # noqa: E402
|
||||
import stale_review_decision_lock # noqa: E402
|
||||
import allocator_service # noqa: E402
|
||||
import control_plane_db # noqa: E402
|
||||
import incident_bridge # noqa: E402
|
||||
import agent_temp_artifacts
|
||||
import issue_lock_worktree # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_provenance # noqa: E402
|
||||
@@ -1371,26 +1367,8 @@ def cleanup_in_progress_for_pr(pr_payload: dict, remote: str, host: str | None,
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Helpers ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
def _effective_remote(remote: str) -> str:
|
||||
"""If remote is the default ('dadeschools') but the active profile base_url maps to a known remote, use that remote instead."""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
profile = get_profile()
|
||||
base_url = profile.get("base_url")
|
||||
if remote == "dadeschools" and base_url:
|
||||
import urllib.parse
|
||||
url = urllib.parse.urlparse(base_url)
|
||||
host = (url.netloc or url.path or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
for k, v in REMOTES.items():
|
||||
if v.get("host") == host:
|
||||
return k
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
return remote
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _resolve(remote: str, host: str | None, org: str | None, repo: str | None):
|
||||
"""Resolve remote + overrides to (host, org, repo)."""
|
||||
remote = _effective_remote(remote)
|
||||
if remote not in REMOTES:
|
||||
raise ValueError(f"Unknown remote '{remote}'. Choose from: {list(REMOTES)}")
|
||||
profile = REMOTES[remote]
|
||||
@@ -1424,7 +1402,6 @@ def _resolve_control_plane_guide_target(
|
||||
if org is not None and repo is not None:
|
||||
return _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
|
||||
|
||||
remote = _effective_remote(remote)
|
||||
if remote not in REMOTES:
|
||||
raise ValueError(f"Unknown remote '{remote}'. Choose from: {list(REMOTES)}")
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3099,26 +3076,22 @@ def check_review_decision_gate(
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
prior = list(lock.get("live_mutations") or [])
|
||||
ready_head = lock.get("ready_expected_head_sha")
|
||||
if stale_review_decision_lock.prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
|
||||
lock, pr_number=pr_number, expected_head_sha=ready_head
|
||||
if prior and not lock.get("correction_authorized"):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"live review mutation already recorded in this run; only one live "
|
||||
"review mutation is allowed unless "
|
||||
"gitea_authorize_review_correction was invoked (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
elif (
|
||||
action in _TERMINAL_REVIEW_ACTIONS
|
||||
and any(m.get("action") in _TERMINAL_REVIEW_ACTIONS for m in prior)
|
||||
and not lock.get("correction_authorized")
|
||||
):
|
||||
if prior and not lock.get("correction_authorized"):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"live review mutation already recorded for this PR head in this "
|
||||
"run; only one live review mutation is allowed per head unless "
|
||||
"gitea_authorize_review_correction was invoked (fail closed, #620)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
elif (
|
||||
action in _TERMINAL_REVIEW_ACTIONS
|
||||
and any(m.get("action") in _TERMINAL_REVIEW_ACTIONS for m in prior)
|
||||
and not lock.get("correction_authorized")
|
||||
):
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"terminal review decision already submitted for this PR head in "
|
||||
"this run; blocked unless an operator-approved correction was "
|
||||
"authorized (fail closed, #620)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
"terminal review decision already submitted on this PR in this "
|
||||
"run; blocked unless an operator-approved correction was "
|
||||
"authorized (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return reasons
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3126,18 +3099,12 @@ def check_review_decision_gate(
|
||||
def record_live_review_mutation(pr_number: int, action: str, review_id: int | None = None):
|
||||
lock = _load_review_decision_lock() or {}
|
||||
mutations = list(lock.get("live_mutations") or [])
|
||||
head_sha = stale_review_decision_lock.normalize_head_sha(
|
||||
lock.get("ready_expected_head_sha")
|
||||
)
|
||||
entry = {
|
||||
mutations.append({
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"action": action,
|
||||
"review_id": review_id,
|
||||
"review_state": action,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if head_sha:
|
||||
entry["head_sha"] = head_sha
|
||||
mutations.append(entry)
|
||||
})
|
||||
lock["live_mutations"] = mutations
|
||||
if lock.get("correction_authorized"):
|
||||
lock["correction_authorized"] = False
|
||||
@@ -3145,28 +3112,17 @@ def record_live_review_mutation(pr_number: int, action: str, review_id: int | No
|
||||
_save_review_decision_lock(lock)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
|
||||
pr_number: int,
|
||||
operation: str,
|
||||
expected_head_sha: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> list[str]:
|
||||
"""Session hard-stop after a terminal live review mutation (#332 / #620).
|
||||
def terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(pr_number: int, operation: str) -> list[str]:
|
||||
"""Session hard-stop after a terminal live review mutation (#332).
|
||||
|
||||
After a terminal verdict is consumed for a given PR **head**, the only
|
||||
permitted continuation is the merge sequence for that same approved PR
|
||||
(merge does not require a new head). A REQUEST_CHANGES (or an approval of
|
||||
a different PR, or the same head) blocks further review/mark-ready/merge
|
||||
mutations for that boundary.
|
||||
After a terminal verdict is consumed in this run, the only permitted
|
||||
continuation is the merge sequence for the same PR that was approved.
|
||||
A REQUEST_CHANGES (or an approval of a different PR) blocks every
|
||||
further review/mark-ready/merge mutation. An operator-approved
|
||||
correction (#211) re-opens the review path only — never a cross-PR
|
||||
merge.
|
||||
|
||||
#620: when *expected_head_sha* differs from the last terminal's reviewed
|
||||
head on the **same open PR**, mark_ready / review / resume may proceed so
|
||||
a fresh formal decision can be recorded for the new head. Historical
|
||||
mutations are preserved.
|
||||
|
||||
An operator-approved correction (#211) re-opens the review path only —
|
||||
never a cross-PR merge.
|
||||
|
||||
*operation* is one of 'merge', 'mark_ready', 'review', or 'resume'.
|
||||
*operation* is one of 'merge', 'mark_ready', or 'review'.
|
||||
Returns [] when the operation may proceed.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
lock = _load_review_decision_lock()
|
||||
@@ -3185,19 +3141,8 @@ def terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
|
||||
and last.get("pr_number") == pr_number
|
||||
):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if operation in ("mark_ready", "review", "resume") and lock.get(
|
||||
"correction_authorized"
|
||||
):
|
||||
if operation in ("mark_ready", "review") and lock.get("correction_authorized"):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
# #620: same PR, different reviewed head → fresh decision boundary.
|
||||
if stale_review_decision_lock.terminal_boundary_allows_fresh_decision(
|
||||
lock,
|
||||
pr_number=pr_number,
|
||||
expected_head_sha=expected_head_sha,
|
||||
operation=operation,
|
||||
):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
locked_head = stale_review_decision_lock.mutation_head_sha(last, lock)
|
||||
if last.get("action") == "approve":
|
||||
guidance = (
|
||||
f"only the merge sequence for approved PR "
|
||||
@@ -3205,22 +3150,15 @@ def terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
guidance = "the session must stop and produce a final report"
|
||||
head_note = (
|
||||
f" at head {locked_head[:12]}…"
|
||||
if locked_head
|
||||
else ""
|
||||
)
|
||||
recovery = (
|
||||
"if that PR is already merged/closed, use "
|
||||
"gitea_cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock (apply=true) after live-state "
|
||||
"proof (#594); if the PR is still open but the head moved, mark/submit "
|
||||
"with the new expected_head_sha (#620); never delete session-state "
|
||||
"files by hand"
|
||||
"proof (#594); never delete session-state files by hand"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return [
|
||||
"terminal review mutation already consumed in this run "
|
||||
f"({last.get('action')} on PR #{last.get('pr_number')}{head_note}); "
|
||||
f"{guidance} (fail closed, #332); {recovery}"
|
||||
f"({last.get('action')} on PR #{last.get('pr_number')}); {guidance} "
|
||||
f"(fail closed, #332); {recovery}"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3843,11 +3781,18 @@ def gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
"reasons": workflow_blockers + (
|
||||
review_workflow_load.recovery_handoff_without_replay()),
|
||||
}
|
||||
hard_stop = terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
|
||||
pr_number, "mark_ready", expected_head_sha=expected_head_sha
|
||||
)
|
||||
hard_stop = terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(pr_number, "mark_ready")
|
||||
if hard_stop:
|
||||
return {"marked_ready": False, "reasons": hard_stop}
|
||||
if lock.get("live_mutations") and not lock.get("correction_authorized"):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"marked_ready": False,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"cannot mark final decision after a live review mutation was "
|
||||
"already recorded in this run unless an operator-approved "
|
||||
"correction was authorized"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
if action not in _REVIEW_ACTIONS:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"marked_ready": False,
|
||||
@@ -3864,17 +3809,6 @@ def gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
"decision (fail closed, #399)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
if stale_review_decision_lock.prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
|
||||
lock, pr_number=pr_number, expected_head_sha=expected_head_sha
|
||||
):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"marked_ready": False,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
"cannot mark final decision after a live review mutation was "
|
||||
"already recorded for this PR head unless an operator-approved "
|
||||
"correction was authorized (fail closed, #620)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
elig = gitea_check_pr_eligibility(
|
||||
pr_number=pr_number,
|
||||
action="review",
|
||||
@@ -3927,8 +3861,6 @@ def gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
"#332)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
# Preserve historical terminal head boundaries before advancing ready_* (#620).
|
||||
stale_review_decision_lock.backfill_terminal_heads_from_ready(lock)
|
||||
lock["final_review_decision_ready"] = True
|
||||
lock["ready_pr_number"] = pr_number
|
||||
lock["ready_action"] = action
|
||||
@@ -3946,7 +3878,6 @@ def gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
"org": org,
|
||||
"repo": repo,
|
||||
"final_review_decision_ready": True,
|
||||
"head_scoped": True,
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4113,12 +4044,6 @@ def gitea_cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock(
|
||||
"cleanup_allowed": assessment.get("cleanup_allowed"),
|
||||
"last_terminal_pr": assessment.get("last_terminal_pr"),
|
||||
"last_terminal_action": assessment.get("last_terminal_action"),
|
||||
"locked_head_sha": assessment.get("locked_head_sha"),
|
||||
"current_pr_head_sha": assessment.get("current_pr_head_sha"),
|
||||
"stale_by_head": assessment.get("stale_by_head"),
|
||||
"fresh_review_on_current_head_allowed": assessment.get(
|
||||
"fresh_review_on_current_head_allowed"
|
||||
),
|
||||
"pr_state": assessment.get("pr_state"),
|
||||
"pr_merged": assessment.get("pr_merged"),
|
||||
"pr_merged_or_closed": assessment.get("pr_merged_or_closed"),
|
||||
@@ -8825,7 +8750,6 @@ def gitea_whoami(
|
||||
metadata: profile_name + allowed_operations; never the token).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
record_preflight_check("whoami")
|
||||
remote = _effective_remote(remote)
|
||||
if remote not in REMOTES:
|
||||
raise ValueError(f"Unknown remote '{remote}'. Choose from: {list(REMOTES)}")
|
||||
h = host or REMOTES[remote]["host"]
|
||||
@@ -8934,6 +8858,8 @@ def gitea_get_profile(
|
||||
"execution_profile": profile.get("execution_profile"),
|
||||
"auth_source_type": profile.get("auth_source_type"),
|
||||
# Auth is reported as a status only (#120): the token source *name*
|
||||
# (env var name / keychain id) joins endpoint URLs behind the
|
||||
# GITEA_MCP_REVEAL_ENDPOINTS admin opt-in. Token values never appear.
|
||||
"auth_status": ("configured" if profile["token_source_name"]
|
||||
else "unconfigured"),
|
||||
"remote": remote if remote in REMOTES else None,
|
||||
@@ -8945,7 +8871,6 @@ def gitea_get_profile(
|
||||
result["base_url"] = profile["base_url"]
|
||||
result["server"] = None
|
||||
|
||||
remote = _effective_remote(remote)
|
||||
if remote not in REMOTES:
|
||||
# Mark ambiguity rather than raising: the tool stays inspectable.
|
||||
result["identity_status"] = "unknown"
|
||||
@@ -11113,513 +11038,6 @@ def gitea_capability_stop_terminal_report() -> dict:
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _control_plane_db_or_error() -> tuple[Any | None, list[str]]:
|
||||
"""Open the #613 control-plane DB substrate; fail closed on errors."""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
db = control_plane_db.ControlPlaneDB()
|
||||
return db, []
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
return None, [
|
||||
f"control-plane DB substrate unavailable: {_redact(str(exc))} "
|
||||
"(fail closed, #613/#600)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _allocator_candidates_from_gitea(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
remote: str,
|
||||
host: str | None,
|
||||
org: str,
|
||||
repo: str,
|
||||
include_issues: bool = True,
|
||||
include_prs: bool = True,
|
||||
limit: int = 50,
|
||||
) -> tuple[list[Any], list[str]]:
|
||||
"""Build allocator candidates from live Gitea open issues/PRs."""
|
||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
candidates: list[Any] = []
|
||||
try:
|
||||
h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
|
||||
auth = _auth(h)
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
return [], [f"failed to resolve Gitea target: {_redact(str(exc))}"]
|
||||
|
||||
if include_prs:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
prs = api_get_all(
|
||||
f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls?state=open", auth
|
||||
) or []
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
reasons.append(f"failed to list open PRs: {_redact(str(exc))}")
|
||||
prs = []
|
||||
for pr in prs[: max(1, int(limit))]:
|
||||
if not isinstance(pr, dict):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
number = pr.get("number")
|
||||
if number is None:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
head = pr.get("head") if isinstance(pr.get("head"), dict) else {}
|
||||
head_sha = head.get("sha") or pr.get("head_sha")
|
||||
labels = []
|
||||
for lab in pr.get("labels") or []:
|
||||
if isinstance(lab, dict) and lab.get("name"):
|
||||
labels.append(str(lab["name"]))
|
||||
elif isinstance(lab, str):
|
||||
labels.append(lab)
|
||||
# Lightweight review signals (best-effort; fail soft into reviewer path).
|
||||
rc_current = False
|
||||
approval_current = False
|
||||
approval_stale = False
|
||||
try:
|
||||
feedback = gitea_get_pr_review_feedback(
|
||||
int(number), remote=remote, org=o, repo=r
|
||||
)
|
||||
if feedback.get("success"):
|
||||
rc_current = bool(
|
||||
feedback.get("has_blocking_change_requests")
|
||||
and not feedback.get("review_feedback_stale")
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Stale RC means author pushed; reviewer still next.
|
||||
if feedback.get("has_blocking_change_requests") and feedback.get(
|
||||
"review_feedback_stale"
|
||||
):
|
||||
approval_stale = False
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
mergeable = bool(pr.get("mergeable"))
|
||||
try:
|
||||
candidates.append(
|
||||
allocator_service.WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=int(number),
|
||||
state="open",
|
||||
labels=tuple(labels),
|
||||
title=str(pr.get("title") or ""),
|
||||
priority=10 if rc_current else 5,
|
||||
head_sha=head_sha,
|
||||
request_changes_current_head=rc_current,
|
||||
approval_on_current_head=approval_current,
|
||||
approval_stale=approval_stale,
|
||||
mergeable=mergeable,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"skipped invalid PR candidate #{number}: {_redact(str(exc))}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if include_issues:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
issues = api_get_all(
|
||||
f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/issues?state=open&type=issues", auth
|
||||
) or []
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
# Fallback without type filter
|
||||
try:
|
||||
issues = api_get_all(
|
||||
f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/issues?state=open", auth
|
||||
) or []
|
||||
except Exception as exc2: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"failed to list open issues: {_redact(str(exc2))}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
issues = []
|
||||
for issue in issues[: max(1, int(limit))]:
|
||||
if not isinstance(issue, dict):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
# Pull requests also appear in /issues on Gitea — skip them.
|
||||
if issue.get("pull_request") is not None:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
number = issue.get("number")
|
||||
if number is None:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
labels = []
|
||||
for lab in issue.get("labels") or []:
|
||||
if isinstance(lab, dict) and lab.get("name"):
|
||||
labels.append(str(lab["name"]).lower())
|
||||
elif isinstance(lab, str):
|
||||
labels.append(lab.lower())
|
||||
body = str(issue.get("body") or "")
|
||||
title = str(issue.get("title") or "")
|
||||
blocked = "status:blocked" in labels
|
||||
# Explicit downstream dependency: #612 waits on #600 allocator.
|
||||
dep_unmet = False
|
||||
dep_reason = None
|
||||
# Generic body markers for blocked-on unfinished deps.
|
||||
# (Hard-coded #612→#600 block removed after #600 merged — #612.)
|
||||
lower_body = body.lower()
|
||||
if "blocked on #" in lower_body or "downstream of #" in lower_body:
|
||||
# Only treat as unmet when body still marks a live open dependency
|
||||
# pattern; callers may clear labels when deps complete.
|
||||
dep_unmet = "blocked on #" in lower_body
|
||||
dep_reason = (
|
||||
f"issue#{number} body marks an unmet dependency"
|
||||
if dep_unmet
|
||||
else None
|
||||
)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
candidates.append(
|
||||
allocator_service.WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=int(number),
|
||||
state="open",
|
||||
labels=tuple(labels),
|
||||
title=title,
|
||||
priority=20 if "status:ready" in labels else 1,
|
||||
blocked=blocked,
|
||||
dependency_unmet=dep_unmet,
|
||||
dependency_reason=dep_reason,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"skipped invalid issue candidate #{number}: {_redact(str(exc))}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return candidates, reasons
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@mcp.tool()
|
||||
def gitea_observability_list_projects(
|
||||
config_path: str | None = None,
|
||||
mappings_json: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""List configured Sentry/GlitchTip → Gitea project mappings (#612).
|
||||
|
||||
Does not load provider tokens. Mappings come from
|
||||
``GITEA_OBSERVABILITY_PROJECTS_JSON``,
|
||||
``GITEA_OBSERVABILITY_PROJECTS_FILE``, or explicit arguments.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
|
||||
if read_block:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"projects": [],
|
||||
"reasons": read_block,
|
||||
"permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
try:
|
||||
projects = incident_bridge.load_project_mappings(
|
||||
config_path=config_path, mappings_json=mappings_json
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"projects": [],
|
||||
"reasons": [incident_bridge.redact_text(exc)],
|
||||
}
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"projects": [p.as_dict() for p in projects],
|
||||
"count": len(projects),
|
||||
"reasons": [] if projects else ["no project mappings configured"],
|
||||
"note": (
|
||||
"Provider API tokens are never returned. "
|
||||
"Raw incidents are not assignable work (#612)."
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@mcp.tool()
|
||||
def gitea_observability_reconcile_incident(
|
||||
observation_json: str,
|
||||
apply: bool = False,
|
||||
mappings_json: str | None = None,
|
||||
config_path: str | None = None,
|
||||
remote: str = "dadeschools",
|
||||
host: str | None = None,
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
force_gitea_issue_number: int | None = None,
|
||||
worktree_path: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Reconcile one Sentry/GlitchTip observation into Gitea + incident_links (#612).
|
||||
|
||||
Phase-1: pass a sanitized observation as JSON. Dry-run is default
|
||||
(``apply=false``) — no Gitea mutation, no DB write.
|
||||
|
||||
When ``apply=true``:
|
||||
* reuses existing ``incident_links`` row when present
|
||||
* otherwise creates a **normal Gitea issue** (never a raw work_item incident)
|
||||
* upserts the canonical ``incident_links`` row on the #613 control-plane DB
|
||||
|
||||
Never assigns raw provider incidents to the #600 allocator.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
|
||||
if read_block:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"apply": bool(apply),
|
||||
"outcome": incident_bridge.OUTCOME_BLOCKED,
|
||||
"reasons": read_block,
|
||||
"permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
|
||||
"raw_incident_assignable": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if apply:
|
||||
create_block = _profile_permission_block(
|
||||
task_capability_map.required_permission("create_issue"),
|
||||
number=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if create_block:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"apply": True,
|
||||
"outcome": incident_bridge.OUTCOME_BLOCKED,
|
||||
"reasons": create_block.get("reasons")
|
||||
if isinstance(create_block, dict)
|
||||
else [str(create_block)],
|
||||
"raw_incident_assignable": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
observation = json.loads(observation_json)
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"apply": bool(apply),
|
||||
"outcome": incident_bridge.OUTCOME_BLOCKED,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"invalid observation_json: {incident_bridge.redact_text(exc)} "
|
||||
"(fail closed)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"raw_incident_assignable": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
mappings = incident_bridge.load_project_mappings(
|
||||
config_path=config_path, mappings_json=mappings_json
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"apply": bool(apply),
|
||||
"outcome": incident_bridge.OUTCOME_BLOCKED,
|
||||
"reasons": [incident_bridge.redact_text(exc)],
|
||||
"raw_incident_assignable": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Allow org/repo overrides on the observation when not mapped.
|
||||
if isinstance(observation, dict):
|
||||
try:
|
||||
_, o_def, r_def = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
|
||||
except ValueError:
|
||||
o_def, r_def = org, repo
|
||||
observation.setdefault("gitea_org", o_def)
|
||||
observation.setdefault("gitea_repo", r_def)
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
db = control_plane_db.ControlPlaneDB()
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"apply": bool(apply),
|
||||
"outcome": incident_bridge.OUTCOME_BLOCKED,
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"control-plane DB unavailable: {incident_bridge.redact_text(exc)} "
|
||||
"(fail closed, #613)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"raw_incident_assignable": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
create_fn = None
|
||||
if apply and force_gitea_issue_number is None:
|
||||
|
||||
def create_fn(title, body, labels, g_org, g_repo):
|
||||
return gitea_create_issue(
|
||||
title=title,
|
||||
body=body,
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
host=host,
|
||||
org=g_org,
|
||||
repo=g_repo,
|
||||
labels=list(labels),
|
||||
issue_type="bug",
|
||||
initial_status="ready",
|
||||
require_workflow_labels=False,
|
||||
worktree_path=worktree_path,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = incident_bridge.reconcile_incident(
|
||||
db,
|
||||
observation=observation if isinstance(observation, dict) else {},
|
||||
mappings=mappings,
|
||||
apply=bool(apply),
|
||||
create_issue_fn=create_fn,
|
||||
force_gitea_issue_number=force_gitea_issue_number,
|
||||
)
|
||||
result["remote"] = remote
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@mcp.tool()
|
||||
def gitea_observability_link_issue(
|
||||
observation_json: str,
|
||||
gitea_issue_number: int,
|
||||
apply: bool = False,
|
||||
mappings_json: str | None = None,
|
||||
config_path: str | None = None,
|
||||
remote: str = "dadeschools",
|
||||
host: str | None = None,
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Explicitly link a provider observation to an existing Gitea issue (#612).
|
||||
|
||||
Dry-run by default. ``apply=true`` upserts ``incident_links`` only — does
|
||||
not create a new issue. Fails closed on mapping/fingerprint conflicts.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
return gitea_observability_reconcile_incident(
|
||||
observation_json=observation_json,
|
||||
apply=apply,
|
||||
mappings_json=mappings_json,
|
||||
config_path=config_path,
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
host=host,
|
||||
org=org,
|
||||
repo=repo,
|
||||
force_gitea_issue_number=int(gitea_issue_number),
|
||||
worktree_path=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@mcp.tool()
|
||||
def gitea_allocate_next_work(
|
||||
apply: bool = False,
|
||||
role: str | None = None,
|
||||
session_id: str | None = None,
|
||||
remote: str = "dadeschools",
|
||||
host: str | None = None,
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
include_issues: bool = True,
|
||||
include_prs: bool = True,
|
||||
candidates_json: str | None = None,
|
||||
limit: int = 50,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Controller-owned next-work allocator using the #613 control-plane DB (#600).
|
||||
|
||||
Workers must not self-select exclusive work under the standard multi-LLM
|
||||
workflow. Call this tool instead.
|
||||
|
||||
*apply=false* (default): dry-run selection only — no assignment/lease.
|
||||
*apply=true*: atomically assign + lease the selected Gitea issue/PR via
|
||||
``ControlPlaneDB.assign_and_lease`` (never file locks or comment-only
|
||||
leases as the coordination source).
|
||||
|
||||
Outcomes include: ``assigned_work``, ``preview``, ``wait``,
|
||||
``blocked_by_terminal_path``, ``no_safe_work``, ``role_ineligible``.
|
||||
|
||||
*candidates_json* may inject a JSON list of candidate dicts (tests /
|
||||
controller overrides). When omitted, open issues/PRs are loaded from Gitea.
|
||||
|
||||
#612 remains downstream: raw monitoring incidents are never candidates.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
|
||||
if read_block:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": allocator_service.OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
"apply": bool(apply),
|
||||
"reasons": read_block,
|
||||
"permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
|
||||
except ValueError as exc:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": allocator_service.OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
"reasons": [str(exc)],
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
profile = get_profile()
|
||||
profile_name = (profile.get("profile_name") or "").strip() or None
|
||||
active_role = _profile_role_kind(profile)
|
||||
role_in = (role or active_role or "").strip() or "author"
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
username = _authenticated_username(h)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
username = None
|
||||
|
||||
db, db_errs = _control_plane_db_or_error()
|
||||
if db is None:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": allocator_service.OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
"apply": bool(apply),
|
||||
"reasons": db_errs,
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
"file_lock_only": False,
|
||||
"comment_lease_only": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inv_reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||
candidates: list[Any] = []
|
||||
if candidates_json:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
raw = json.loads(candidates_json)
|
||||
if not isinstance(raw, list):
|
||||
raise ValueError("candidates_json must be a JSON list")
|
||||
for item in raw:
|
||||
if not isinstance(item, dict):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
candidates.append(allocator_service.candidate_from_dict(item))
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"outcome": allocator_service.OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
"apply": bool(apply),
|
||||
"reasons": [
|
||||
f"invalid candidates_json: {_redact(str(exc))} (fail closed)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"assignment": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db",
|
||||
}
|
||||
else:
|
||||
candidates, inv_reasons = _allocator_candidates_from_gitea(
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
host=host,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
include_issues=include_issues,
|
||||
include_prs=include_prs,
|
||||
limit=limit,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
sid = (session_id or "").strip() or (
|
||||
f"{profile_name or 'session'}-{os.getpid()}-{uuid.uuid4().hex[:8]}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = allocator_service.allocate_next_work(
|
||||
db,
|
||||
session_id=sid,
|
||||
role=role_in,
|
||||
remote=remote if remote in REMOTES else remote,
|
||||
org=o,
|
||||
repo=r,
|
||||
candidates=candidates,
|
||||
apply=bool(apply),
|
||||
profile_name=profile_name,
|
||||
username=username,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if inv_reasons:
|
||||
result.setdefault("inventory_warnings", inv_reasons)
|
||||
result["candidate_count"] = len(candidates)
|
||||
result["inventory_source"] = (
|
||||
"candidates_json" if candidates_json else "gitea_live"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Entry point ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,788 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Observability incident bridge (#612).
|
||||
|
||||
Converts Sentry/GlitchTip **observations** into durable **Gitea issues** and
|
||||
``incident_links`` rows on the #613 control-plane DB.
|
||||
|
||||
Hard rules (ADR):
|
||||
* Gitea owns work; providers own incidents; the bridge only links them.
|
||||
* Raw monitoring incidents are **never** assignable ``work_items``.
|
||||
* The #600 allocator sees bridge work only as normal Gitea issues.
|
||||
* Phase-1 prefers dry-run / explicit reconcile; apply creates/links issues.
|
||||
* No tokens, DSNs, cookies, or other secrets in bodies, DB, or logs.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import re
|
||||
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
|
||||
from typing import Any, Callable, Sequence
|
||||
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB, ControlPlaneError, WORK_KINDS, _norm_scope
|
||||
|
||||
PROVIDERS = frozenset({"sentry", "glitchtip"})
|
||||
|
||||
OUTCOME_PREVIEW = "preview"
|
||||
OUTCOME_LINKED = "linked_existing"
|
||||
OUTCOME_CREATED = "created_issue"
|
||||
OUTCOME_UPDATED = "updated_link"
|
||||
OUTCOME_BLOCKED = "blocked"
|
||||
OUTCOME_NO_ACTION = "no_safe_action"
|
||||
|
||||
# Patterns scrubbed from any bridge-facing text (bodies, titles, tags, logs).
|
||||
_SECRET_PATTERNS: tuple[re.Pattern[str], ...] = (
|
||||
re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?i)\b(api[_-]?token|token|secret|password|passwd)\s*[:=]\s*\S+"
|
||||
),
|
||||
re.compile(
|
||||
r"(?i)\bAuthorization\s*[:=]\s*(?:Bearer\s+)?[A-Za-z0-9._\-+=/]{8,}"
|
||||
),
|
||||
re.compile(r"(?i)\bBearer\s+[A-Za-z0-9._\-]{8,}"),
|
||||
re.compile(r"(?i)\bBasic\s+[A-Za-z0-9+/=]{8,}"),
|
||||
re.compile(r"(?i)\b(dsn|sentry_dsn|glitchtip_dsn)\s*[:=]\s*\S+"),
|
||||
re.compile(r"https?://[^/\s]+:[^@/\s]+@"), # user:pass@host
|
||||
re.compile(r"(?i)\b(keychain[_-]?id|private[_-]?key)\s*[:=]\s*\S+"),
|
||||
re.compile(r"(?i)cookie\s*[:=]\s*[^\s;]+"),
|
||||
re.compile(r"(?i)\bsession[_-]?id\s*[:=]\s*\S+"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
_SENSITIVE_TAG_KEYS = frozenset(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"authorization",
|
||||
"cookie",
|
||||
"set-cookie",
|
||||
"password",
|
||||
"passwd",
|
||||
"secret",
|
||||
"token",
|
||||
"api_key",
|
||||
"apikey",
|
||||
"dsn",
|
||||
"sentry_dsn",
|
||||
"access_token",
|
||||
"refresh_token",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
DEFAULT_LABELS = (
|
||||
"type:bug",
|
||||
"observability",
|
||||
"status:ready",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class ProjectMapping:
|
||||
"""Maps a monitoring project to a Gitea repository."""
|
||||
|
||||
name: str
|
||||
provider: str
|
||||
monitor_base_url: str
|
||||
monitor_org: str
|
||||
monitor_project: str
|
||||
gitea_org: str
|
||||
gitea_repo: str
|
||||
default_labels: tuple[str, ...] = DEFAULT_LABELS
|
||||
environment_filters: tuple[str, ...] = ()
|
||||
severity_threshold: str | None = None
|
||||
|
||||
def __post_init__(self) -> None:
|
||||
prov = (self.provider or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
if prov not in PROVIDERS:
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError(
|
||||
f"unknown provider '{self.provider}'; expected one of {sorted(PROVIDERS)}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
object.__setattr__(self, "provider", prov)
|
||||
object.__setattr__(self, "monitor_base_url", (self.monitor_base_url or "").rstrip("/"))
|
||||
object.__setattr__(self, "monitor_org", (self.monitor_org or "").strip())
|
||||
object.__setattr__(self, "monitor_project", (self.monitor_project or "").strip())
|
||||
object.__setattr__(self, "gitea_org", (self.gitea_org or "").strip())
|
||||
object.__setattr__(self, "gitea_repo", (self.gitea_repo or "").strip())
|
||||
object.__setattr__(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
"default_labels",
|
||||
tuple(str(x).strip() for x in (self.default_labels or DEFAULT_LABELS) if str(x).strip()),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def as_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"name": self.name,
|
||||
"provider": self.provider,
|
||||
"monitor_base_url": self.monitor_base_url,
|
||||
"monitor_org": self.monitor_org,
|
||||
"monitor_project": self.monitor_project,
|
||||
"gitea_org": self.gitea_org,
|
||||
"gitea_repo": self.gitea_repo,
|
||||
"default_labels": list(self.default_labels),
|
||||
"environment_filters": list(self.environment_filters),
|
||||
"severity_threshold": self.severity_threshold,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def matches_observation(self, obs: dict[str, Any]) -> bool:
|
||||
if (obs.get("provider") or "").strip().lower() != self.provider:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
base = (obs.get("provider_base_url") or obs.get("monitor_base_url") or "").rstrip("/")
|
||||
if base and self.monitor_base_url and base != self.monitor_base_url:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
org = (obs.get("provider_org") or obs.get("monitor_org") or "").strip()
|
||||
if org and self.monitor_org and org != self.monitor_org:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
project = (obs.get("provider_project") or obs.get("monitor_project") or "").strip()
|
||||
if project and self.monitor_project and project != self.monitor_project:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
return True
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass
|
||||
class NormalizedIncident:
|
||||
provider: str
|
||||
provider_base_url: str
|
||||
provider_org: str
|
||||
provider_project: str
|
||||
provider_issue_id: str
|
||||
provider_short_id: str | None = None
|
||||
provider_permalink: str | None = None
|
||||
fingerprint: str | None = None
|
||||
first_seen: str | None = None
|
||||
last_seen: str | None = None
|
||||
event_count: int | None = None
|
||||
status: str = "open"
|
||||
environment: str | None = None
|
||||
severity: str | None = None
|
||||
culprit: str | None = None
|
||||
title: str = ""
|
||||
summary: str = ""
|
||||
tags: dict[str, str] = field(default_factory=dict)
|
||||
gitea_org: str = ""
|
||||
gitea_repo: str = ""
|
||||
default_labels: tuple[str, ...] = DEFAULT_LABELS
|
||||
|
||||
def provider_key(self) -> tuple[str, str, str, str, str]:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
self.provider,
|
||||
_norm_scope(self.provider_base_url),
|
||||
_norm_scope(self.provider_org),
|
||||
_norm_scope(self.provider_project),
|
||||
str(self.provider_issue_id),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def as_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"provider": self.provider,
|
||||
"provider_base_url": self.provider_base_url,
|
||||
"provider_org": self.provider_org,
|
||||
"provider_project": self.provider_project,
|
||||
"provider_issue_id": self.provider_issue_id,
|
||||
"provider_short_id": self.provider_short_id,
|
||||
"provider_permalink": self.provider_permalink,
|
||||
"fingerprint": self.fingerprint,
|
||||
"first_seen": self.first_seen,
|
||||
"last_seen": self.last_seen,
|
||||
"event_count": self.event_count,
|
||||
"status": self.status,
|
||||
"environment": self.environment,
|
||||
"severity": self.severity,
|
||||
"culprit": self.culprit,
|
||||
"title": self.title,
|
||||
"summary": self.summary,
|
||||
"tags": dict(self.tags),
|
||||
"gitea_org": self.gitea_org,
|
||||
"gitea_repo": self.gitea_repo,
|
||||
"default_labels": list(self.default_labels),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def redact_text(value: Any) -> str:
|
||||
"""Redact secret-like material from a string (fail closed to empty)."""
|
||||
if value is None:
|
||||
return ""
|
||||
text = str(value)
|
||||
for pat in _SECRET_PATTERNS:
|
||||
text = pat.sub("[REDACTED]", text)
|
||||
return text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def sanitize_tags(tags: Any) -> dict[str, str]:
|
||||
if not isinstance(tags, dict):
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
out: dict[str, str] = {}
|
||||
for k, v in tags.items():
|
||||
key = str(k).strip().lower()
|
||||
if not key or key in _SENSITIVE_TAG_KEYS:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
if any(s in key for s in ("token", "secret", "password", "cookie", "auth", "dsn")):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
val = redact_text(v)
|
||||
if "[REDACTED]" in val:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
if len(val) > 200:
|
||||
val = val[:200] + "…"
|
||||
out[key] = val
|
||||
return out
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def project_mapping_from_dict(data: dict[str, Any]) -> ProjectMapping:
|
||||
labels = data.get("default_labels") or DEFAULT_LABELS
|
||||
envs = data.get("environment_filters") or ()
|
||||
return ProjectMapping(
|
||||
name=str(data.get("name") or data.get("monitor_project") or "unnamed"),
|
||||
provider=str(data.get("provider") or ""),
|
||||
monitor_base_url=str(data.get("monitor_base_url") or data.get("provider_base_url") or ""),
|
||||
monitor_org=str(data.get("monitor_org") or data.get("provider_org") or ""),
|
||||
monitor_project=str(data.get("monitor_project") or data.get("provider_project") or ""),
|
||||
gitea_org=str(data.get("gitea_org") or ""),
|
||||
gitea_repo=str(data.get("gitea_repo") or ""),
|
||||
default_labels=tuple(labels),
|
||||
environment_filters=tuple(envs),
|
||||
severity_threshold=data.get("severity_threshold"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def load_project_mappings(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
config_path: str | None = None,
|
||||
mappings_json: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> list[ProjectMapping]:
|
||||
"""Load project mappings from JSON env, file, or explicit JSON string.
|
||||
|
||||
Env: ``GITEA_OBSERVABILITY_PROJECTS_JSON`` or path
|
||||
``GITEA_OBSERVABILITY_PROJECTS_FILE``.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
raw: Any = None
|
||||
if mappings_json:
|
||||
raw = json.loads(mappings_json)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
env_json = (os.environ.get("GITEA_OBSERVABILITY_PROJECTS_JSON") or "").strip()
|
||||
path = (
|
||||
(config_path or "").strip()
|
||||
or (os.environ.get("GITEA_OBSERVABILITY_PROJECTS_FILE") or "").strip()
|
||||
)
|
||||
if env_json:
|
||||
raw = json.loads(env_json)
|
||||
elif path and os.path.isfile(path):
|
||||
with open(path, encoding="utf-8") as fh:
|
||||
raw = json.load(fh)
|
||||
if raw is None:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if isinstance(raw, dict) and "projects" in raw:
|
||||
raw = raw["projects"]
|
||||
if not isinstance(raw, list):
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError("observability project mappings must be a list")
|
||||
return [project_mapping_from_dict(item) for item in raw if isinstance(item, dict)]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def resolve_mapping(
|
||||
observation: dict[str, Any],
|
||||
mappings: Sequence[ProjectMapping],
|
||||
*,
|
||||
explicit: ProjectMapping | None = None,
|
||||
) -> ProjectMapping | None:
|
||||
if explicit is not None:
|
||||
return explicit
|
||||
matches = [m for m in mappings if m.matches_observation(observation)]
|
||||
if len(matches) == 1:
|
||||
return matches[0]
|
||||
if len(matches) > 1:
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError(
|
||||
"ambiguous project mapping for observation: "
|
||||
+ ", ".join(m.name for m in matches)
|
||||
+ " (fail closed, #612)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Fallback: observation itself may carry gitea targets
|
||||
g_org = (observation.get("gitea_org") or "").strip()
|
||||
g_repo = (observation.get("gitea_repo") or "").strip()
|
||||
provider = (observation.get("provider") or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
if g_org and g_repo and provider in PROVIDERS:
|
||||
return ProjectMapping(
|
||||
name=f"inline-{provider}",
|
||||
provider=provider,
|
||||
monitor_base_url=str(
|
||||
observation.get("provider_base_url")
|
||||
or observation.get("monitor_base_url")
|
||||
or ""
|
||||
),
|
||||
monitor_org=str(
|
||||
observation.get("provider_org") or observation.get("monitor_org") or ""
|
||||
),
|
||||
monitor_project=str(
|
||||
observation.get("provider_project")
|
||||
or observation.get("monitor_project")
|
||||
or ""
|
||||
),
|
||||
gitea_org=g_org,
|
||||
gitea_repo=g_repo,
|
||||
default_labels=tuple(observation.get("default_labels") or DEFAULT_LABELS),
|
||||
)
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def normalize_incident(
|
||||
observation: dict[str, Any],
|
||||
mapping: ProjectMapping,
|
||||
) -> NormalizedIncident:
|
||||
"""Normalize + sanitize a raw provider observation (fail closed)."""
|
||||
if not isinstance(observation, dict):
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError("observation must be a dict (fail closed, #612)")
|
||||
|
||||
provider = (observation.get("provider") or mapping.provider or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
if provider not in PROVIDERS:
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError(
|
||||
f"unknown provider '{provider}'; expected {sorted(PROVIDERS)} (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if provider != mapping.provider:
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError(
|
||||
f"observation provider '{provider}' does not match mapping "
|
||||
f"'{mapping.provider}' (fail closed, #612)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
issue_id = observation.get("provider_issue_id") or observation.get("id")
|
||||
if issue_id is None or str(issue_id).strip() == "":
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError(
|
||||
"observation missing provider_issue_id (fail closed, #612)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
base = (
|
||||
observation.get("provider_base_url")
|
||||
or observation.get("monitor_base_url")
|
||||
or mapping.monitor_base_url
|
||||
or ""
|
||||
)
|
||||
org = (
|
||||
observation.get("provider_org")
|
||||
or observation.get("monitor_org")
|
||||
or mapping.monitor_org
|
||||
or ""
|
||||
)
|
||||
project = (
|
||||
observation.get("provider_project")
|
||||
or observation.get("monitor_project")
|
||||
or mapping.monitor_project
|
||||
or ""
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
title = redact_text(
|
||||
observation.get("title")
|
||||
or observation.get("culprit")
|
||||
or f"{provider} incident {issue_id}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
meta = observation.get("metadata")
|
||||
meta_value = meta.get("value") if isinstance(meta, dict) else None
|
||||
raw_sum = (
|
||||
observation.get("summary")
|
||||
or observation.get("message")
|
||||
or meta_value
|
||||
or title
|
||||
)
|
||||
summary = redact_text(raw_sum)
|
||||
|
||||
permalink = observation.get("provider_permalink") or observation.get("permalink")
|
||||
if permalink:
|
||||
permalink = redact_text(permalink)
|
||||
if "[REDACTED]" in permalink:
|
||||
permalink = None
|
||||
|
||||
tags = sanitize_tags(observation.get("tags") or {})
|
||||
event_count = observation.get("event_count") or observation.get("count")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
event_count_i = int(event_count) if event_count is not None else None
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
event_count_i = None
|
||||
|
||||
return NormalizedIncident(
|
||||
provider=provider,
|
||||
provider_base_url=str(base).rstrip("/"),
|
||||
provider_org=str(org).strip(),
|
||||
provider_project=str(project).strip(),
|
||||
provider_issue_id=str(issue_id).strip(),
|
||||
provider_short_id=redact_text(observation.get("provider_short_id") or observation.get("shortId") or "")
|
||||
or None,
|
||||
provider_permalink=permalink,
|
||||
fingerprint=redact_text(observation.get("fingerprint") or "") or None,
|
||||
first_seen=str(observation.get("first_seen") or observation.get("firstSeen") or "")
|
||||
or None,
|
||||
last_seen=str(observation.get("last_seen") or observation.get("lastSeen") or "")
|
||||
or None,
|
||||
event_count=event_count_i,
|
||||
status=str(observation.get("status") or "open").strip().lower() or "open",
|
||||
environment=redact_text(observation.get("environment") or "") or None,
|
||||
severity=redact_text(observation.get("severity") or observation.get("level") or "")
|
||||
or None,
|
||||
culprit=redact_text(observation.get("culprit") or "") or None,
|
||||
title=title[:200],
|
||||
summary=summary[:2000],
|
||||
tags=tags,
|
||||
gitea_org=mapping.gitea_org,
|
||||
gitea_repo=mapping.gitea_repo,
|
||||
default_labels=mapping.default_labels,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def build_gitea_issue_title(inc: NormalizedIncident) -> str:
|
||||
env = f" [{inc.environment}]" if inc.environment else ""
|
||||
sev = f" ({inc.severity})" if inc.severity else ""
|
||||
return redact_text(f"[obs:{inc.provider}]{env}{sev} {inc.title}")[:180]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def build_gitea_issue_body(inc: NormalizedIncident) -> str:
|
||||
"""Sanitized durable issue body (no secrets)."""
|
||||
lines = [
|
||||
"## Observability incident (bridge #612)",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"<!-- mcp-incident-bridge:v1 -->",
|
||||
f"<!-- provider={inc.provider} issue_id={inc.provider_issue_id} -->",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
f"- **provider:** `{inc.provider}`",
|
||||
f"- **provider_issue_id:** `{inc.provider_issue_id}`",
|
||||
]
|
||||
if inc.provider_short_id:
|
||||
lines.append(f"- **provider_short_id:** `{inc.provider_short_id}`")
|
||||
if inc.provider_permalink:
|
||||
lines.append(f"- **provider_url:** {inc.provider_permalink}")
|
||||
lines.extend(
|
||||
[
|
||||
f"- **provider_org/project:** `{inc.provider_org}` / `{inc.provider_project}`",
|
||||
f"- **base_url:** `{inc.provider_base_url}`",
|
||||
f"- **fingerprint:** `{inc.fingerprint or ''}`",
|
||||
f"- **first_seen:** `{inc.first_seen or ''}`",
|
||||
f"- **last_seen:** `{inc.last_seen or ''}`",
|
||||
f"- **event_count:** `{inc.event_count if inc.event_count is not None else ''}`",
|
||||
f"- **environment:** `{inc.environment or ''}`",
|
||||
f"- **severity:** `{inc.severity or ''}`",
|
||||
f"- **culprit:** `{inc.culprit or ''}`",
|
||||
f"- **status:** `{inc.status}`",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"### Summary",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
redact_text(inc.summary) or "(no summary)",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"### Safe tags",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
if inc.tags:
|
||||
for k, v in sorted(inc.tags.items()):
|
||||
lines.append(f"- `{k}`: `{v}`")
|
||||
else:
|
||||
lines.append("- (none)")
|
||||
lines.extend(
|
||||
[
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"### Canonical next action",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"Author: investigate and fix under normal Gitea workflow. "
|
||||
"Allocator may select this issue as ordinary Gitea work "
|
||||
"(never as a raw provider incident).",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"### Bridge notes",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"- Raw Sentry/GlitchTip incidents are **not** assignable work items.",
|
||||
"- Gitea remains the durable work record; DB stores `incident_links` only.",
|
||||
"- Provider tokens must never appear in this issue.",
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
return "\n".join(lines)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _link_conflict(existing: dict[str, Any], inc: NormalizedIncident) -> str | None:
|
||||
"""Fail closed if existing link targets a different Gitea issue/repo."""
|
||||
eg_org = str(existing.get("gitea_org") or "")
|
||||
eg_repo = str(existing.get("gitea_repo") or "")
|
||||
eg_num = existing.get("gitea_issue_number")
|
||||
if eg_org and eg_org != inc.gitea_org:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
f"existing link points to org '{eg_org}', mapping wants "
|
||||
f"'{inc.gitea_org}' (fail closed, #612)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if eg_repo and eg_repo != inc.gitea_repo:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
f"existing link points to repo '{eg_repo}', mapping wants "
|
||||
f"'{inc.gitea_repo}' (fail closed, #612)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
# fingerprint conflict when both present and disagree
|
||||
ef = (existing.get("fingerprint") or "").strip()
|
||||
nf = (inc.fingerprint or "").strip()
|
||||
if ef and nf and ef != nf:
|
||||
# Same provider issue id with different fingerprints is ambiguous.
|
||||
return (
|
||||
f"fingerprint conflict for provider issue {inc.provider_issue_id}: "
|
||||
f"link has '{ef}', observation has '{nf}' (fail closed, #612)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
CreateIssueFn = Callable[[str, str, list[str], str, str], dict[str, Any]]
|
||||
# create_issue_fn(title, body, labels, gitea_org, gitea_repo) -> {"number": int, ...}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def reconcile_incident(
|
||||
db: ControlPlaneDB | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
observation: dict[str, Any],
|
||||
mappings: Sequence[ProjectMapping] | None = None,
|
||||
mapping: ProjectMapping | None = None,
|
||||
apply: bool = False,
|
||||
create_issue_fn: CreateIssueFn | None = None,
|
||||
force_gitea_issue_number: int | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Reconcile one observation into incident_links + optional Gitea issue.
|
||||
|
||||
*apply=False* (default): preview only — no DB mutation, no Gitea mutation.
|
||||
*apply=True*: upsert link; create Gitea issue when none linked (requires
|
||||
``create_issue_fn``) or use ``force_gitea_issue_number`` for explicit link.
|
||||
|
||||
Never creates control-plane ``work_items`` for raw incidents.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
base: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"apply": bool(apply),
|
||||
"outcome": OUTCOME_NO_ACTION,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"gitea_mutated": False,
|
||||
"db_mutated": False,
|
||||
"raw_incident_assignable": False,
|
||||
"work_item_kind_would_be": None,
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
"skipped": None,
|
||||
"incident": None,
|
||||
"existing_link": None,
|
||||
"gitea_issue": None,
|
||||
"action": None,
|
||||
"mapping": None,
|
||||
"substrate": "control_plane_db.incident_links",
|
||||
"durable_work_system": "gitea_issues",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if db is None:
|
||||
base["reasons"] = [
|
||||
"control-plane DB substrate unavailable (fail closed, #613/#612)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
base["outcome"] = OUTCOME_BLOCKED
|
||||
return base
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
maps = list(mappings or [])
|
||||
resolved = resolve_mapping(observation, maps, explicit=mapping)
|
||||
if resolved is None:
|
||||
base["outcome"] = OUTCOME_BLOCKED
|
||||
base["reasons"] = [
|
||||
"no project mapping for observation (fail closed, #612); "
|
||||
"configure GITEA_OBSERVABILITY_PROJECTS_JSON or pass mapping"
|
||||
]
|
||||
return base
|
||||
base["mapping"] = resolved.as_dict()
|
||||
inc = normalize_incident(observation, resolved)
|
||||
base["incident"] = inc.as_dict()
|
||||
except (ControlPlaneError, json.JSONDecodeError, TypeError, ValueError) as exc:
|
||||
base["outcome"] = OUTCOME_BLOCKED
|
||||
base["reasons"] = [str(exc)]
|
||||
return base
|
||||
|
||||
# Environment filter (optional)
|
||||
if resolved.environment_filters and inc.environment:
|
||||
allowed = {e.lower() for e in resolved.environment_filters}
|
||||
if inc.environment.lower() not in allowed:
|
||||
base["outcome"] = OUTCOME_NO_ACTION
|
||||
base["reasons"] = [
|
||||
f"environment '{inc.environment}' not in filters "
|
||||
f"{sorted(allowed)}; skip (policy)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
base["success"] = True
|
||||
base["action"] = "skip_environment_filter"
|
||||
return base
|
||||
|
||||
existing = db.get_incident_link_by_provider(
|
||||
provider=inc.provider,
|
||||
provider_issue_id=inc.provider_issue_id,
|
||||
provider_base_url=inc.provider_base_url,
|
||||
provider_org=inc.provider_org,
|
||||
provider_project=inc.provider_project,
|
||||
)
|
||||
base["existing_link"] = existing
|
||||
|
||||
if existing:
|
||||
conflict = _link_conflict(existing, inc)
|
||||
if conflict:
|
||||
base["outcome"] = OUTCOME_BLOCKED
|
||||
base["reasons"] = [conflict]
|
||||
return base
|
||||
|
||||
title = build_gitea_issue_title(inc)
|
||||
body = build_gitea_issue_body(inc)
|
||||
labels = list(inc.default_labels)
|
||||
if inc.provider and f"{inc.provider}" not in labels:
|
||||
labels.append(inc.provider)
|
||||
if "observability" not in labels:
|
||||
labels.append("observability")
|
||||
|
||||
preview_issue = {
|
||||
"title": title,
|
||||
"body_preview": body[:500] + ("…" if len(body) > 500 else ""),
|
||||
"labels": labels,
|
||||
"gitea_org": inc.gitea_org,
|
||||
"gitea_repo": inc.gitea_repo,
|
||||
"would_create": existing is None and force_gitea_issue_number is None,
|
||||
"would_reuse_issue": int(existing["gitea_issue_number"])
|
||||
if existing
|
||||
else force_gitea_issue_number,
|
||||
}
|
||||
base["gitea_issue_preview"] = preview_issue
|
||||
|
||||
if not apply:
|
||||
base["success"] = True
|
||||
base["outcome"] = OUTCOME_PREVIEW
|
||||
base["action"] = (
|
||||
"preview_reuse_link" if existing else "preview_create_issue"
|
||||
)
|
||||
base["reasons"] = [
|
||||
"dry-run only (apply=false); no Gitea mutation and no DB write — "
|
||||
"call again with apply=true to create/link"
|
||||
]
|
||||
if existing:
|
||||
base["gitea_issue"] = {
|
||||
"number": existing.get("gitea_issue_number"),
|
||||
"org": existing.get("gitea_org"),
|
||||
"repo": existing.get("gitea_repo"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
# Prove we never treat this as work_item kind incident
|
||||
base["raw_incident_assignable"] = False
|
||||
base["work_item_kind_would_be"] = "issue" # only after Gitea issue exists
|
||||
return base
|
||||
|
||||
# --- apply path ---
|
||||
issue_number: int | None = None
|
||||
created = False
|
||||
if existing:
|
||||
issue_number = int(existing["gitea_issue_number"])
|
||||
action = "updated_existing_link"
|
||||
outcome = OUTCOME_UPDATED
|
||||
elif force_gitea_issue_number is not None:
|
||||
issue_number = int(force_gitea_issue_number)
|
||||
action = "link_explicit_issue"
|
||||
outcome = OUTCOME_LINKED
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if create_issue_fn is None:
|
||||
base["outcome"] = OUTCOME_BLOCKED
|
||||
base["reasons"] = [
|
||||
"apply=true requires create_issue_fn when no existing link "
|
||||
"(fail closed, #612)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
return base
|
||||
try:
|
||||
created_res = create_issue_fn(
|
||||
title, body, labels, inc.gitea_org, inc.gitea_repo
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
base["outcome"] = OUTCOME_BLOCKED
|
||||
base["reasons"] = [
|
||||
f"Gitea issue creation failed: {redact_text(exc)} (fail closed)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
return base
|
||||
number = created_res.get("number") if isinstance(created_res, dict) else None
|
||||
if number is None:
|
||||
base["outcome"] = OUTCOME_BLOCKED
|
||||
base["reasons"] = [
|
||||
"Gitea issue creation returned no issue number (fail closed, #612)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
base["create_result"] = created_res
|
||||
return base
|
||||
issue_number = int(number)
|
||||
created = True
|
||||
action = "created_gitea_issue"
|
||||
outcome = OUTCOME_CREATED
|
||||
base["gitea_mutated"] = True
|
||||
base["create_result"] = {
|
||||
k: created_res.get(k)
|
||||
for k in ("number", "success", "performed", "reasons")
|
||||
if isinstance(created_res, dict)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert issue_number is not None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
link = db.upsert_incident_link(
|
||||
provider=inc.provider,
|
||||
provider_issue_id=inc.provider_issue_id,
|
||||
gitea_org=inc.gitea_org,
|
||||
gitea_repo=inc.gitea_repo,
|
||||
gitea_issue_number=issue_number,
|
||||
provider_base_url=inc.provider_base_url,
|
||||
provider_org=inc.provider_org,
|
||||
provider_project=inc.provider_project,
|
||||
provider_short_id=inc.provider_short_id,
|
||||
provider_permalink=inc.provider_permalink,
|
||||
fingerprint=inc.fingerprint,
|
||||
first_seen=inc.first_seen,
|
||||
last_seen=inc.last_seen,
|
||||
event_count=inc.event_count,
|
||||
status=inc.status if not created else "open",
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001
|
||||
base["outcome"] = OUTCOME_BLOCKED
|
||||
base["reasons"] = [
|
||||
f"incident_links upsert failed: {redact_text(exc)} (fail closed, #613)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
base["gitea_issue"] = {
|
||||
"number": issue_number,
|
||||
"org": inc.gitea_org,
|
||||
"repo": inc.gitea_repo,
|
||||
"created": created,
|
||||
}
|
||||
return base
|
||||
|
||||
base["success"] = True
|
||||
base["performed"] = True
|
||||
base["db_mutated"] = True
|
||||
base["outcome"] = outcome
|
||||
base["action"] = action
|
||||
base["gitea_issue"] = {
|
||||
"number": issue_number,
|
||||
"org": inc.gitea_org,
|
||||
"repo": inc.gitea_repo,
|
||||
"created": created,
|
||||
}
|
||||
base["link"] = {
|
||||
k: link.get(k)
|
||||
for k in (
|
||||
"link_id",
|
||||
"provider",
|
||||
"provider_issue_id",
|
||||
"gitea_org",
|
||||
"gitea_repo",
|
||||
"gitea_issue_number",
|
||||
"fingerprint",
|
||||
"event_count",
|
||||
"status",
|
||||
"last_sync_at",
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
base["reasons"] = [
|
||||
(
|
||||
f"reused Gitea issue #{issue_number} for provider "
|
||||
f"{inc.provider}:{inc.provider_issue_id}"
|
||||
if not created
|
||||
else f"created Gitea issue #{issue_number} and stored incident_links row"
|
||||
),
|
||||
"raw provider incident is not an assignable work_item "
|
||||
f"(WORK_KINDS={sorted(WORK_KINDS)})",
|
||||
]
|
||||
base["raw_incident_assignable"] = False
|
||||
base["work_item_kind_would_be"] = "issue"
|
||||
base["allocator_visible_as"] = {
|
||||
"kind": "issue",
|
||||
"number": issue_number,
|
||||
"org": inc.gitea_org,
|
||||
"repo": inc.gitea_repo,
|
||||
"note": "allocator selects normal Gitea issues only (#600/#612)",
|
||||
}
|
||||
return base
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assert_not_raw_incident_work_item(kind: str) -> None:
|
||||
"""Guard used by tests / callers: incidents must not enter WORK_KINDS."""
|
||||
k = (kind or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
if k not in WORK_KINDS:
|
||||
if k in ("sentry_incident", "glitchtip_incident", "incident", "observation"):
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError(
|
||||
f"kind '{k}' is not assignable; bridge must create Gitea issues first (#612)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
raise ControlPlaneError(f"kind '{k}' is not assignable")
|
||||
@@ -6,9 +6,6 @@ Runs over stdio. All tools authenticate via macOS keychain (git credential fill)
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
|
||||
sys.stderr = open("/tmp/mcp_server_stderr.log", "a", buffering=1)
|
||||
sys.stderr.write(f"\n--- MCP SERVER STARTUP (PID {os.getpid()}) ---\n")
|
||||
|
||||
from role_session_router import (
|
||||
python_bytes_have_conflict_markers,
|
||||
skip_python_scan_walk_root,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
"""Stale / moot #332 review-decision lock detection and cleanup policy (#594/#620).
|
||||
"""Stale / moot #332 review-decision lock detection and cleanup policy (#594).
|
||||
|
||||
#332 correctly hard-stops a reviewer session after a terminal live review
|
||||
mutation. After #559 those locks are durable on disk, so they can outlive the
|
||||
@@ -6,12 +6,6 @@ work they protect: when the referenced PR is already merged or closed, no
|
||||
same-PR merge sequence remains, yet the durable ledger still blocks unrelated
|
||||
new terminal reviews.
|
||||
|
||||
#620 scopes the terminal boundary by **reviewed head SHA**: a prior
|
||||
REQUEST_CHANGES (or APPROVE) on head A must not block a fresh formal decision
|
||||
on head B of the **same open PR**. Same-head duplicates remain fail-closed.
|
||||
Open-PR lock *cleanup* remains forbidden unless the PR is truly merged/closed
|
||||
(#594); new-head re-review is allowed without deleting the durable lock.
|
||||
|
||||
This module is pure policy (no Gitea I/O). The MCP tool
|
||||
``gitea_cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock`` fetches live PR state, calls these
|
||||
helpers, and only then clears durable state when cleanup is allowed.
|
||||
@@ -29,45 +23,6 @@ from typing import Any
|
||||
TERMINAL_REVIEW_ACTIONS = frozenset({"approve", "request_changes"})
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def normalize_head_sha(value: Any) -> str | None:
|
||||
"""Normalize a git SHA for equality comparison; None if empty/invalid."""
|
||||
if value is None:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
text = str(value).strip().lower()
|
||||
if not text:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
return text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def heads_equal(a: Any, b: Any) -> bool:
|
||||
na = normalize_head_sha(a)
|
||||
nb = normalize_head_sha(b)
|
||||
if not na or not nb:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
return na == nb
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def mutation_head_sha(mutation: dict | None, lock: dict | None = None) -> str | None:
|
||||
"""Head SHA that bounds a live mutation (#620).
|
||||
|
||||
Prefers fields recorded on the mutation itself. For *legacy* mutations
|
||||
that predate head-scoping, falls back to the lock's
|
||||
``ready_expected_head_sha`` only when that ready binding is for the same
|
||||
PR number (the frozen durable PR #619-style ledger).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not isinstance(mutation, dict):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
for key in ("head_sha", "expected_head_sha", "reviewed_head_sha"):
|
||||
head = normalize_head_sha(mutation.get(key))
|
||||
if head:
|
||||
return head
|
||||
if not isinstance(lock, dict):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if lock.get("ready_pr_number") != mutation.get("pr_number"):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
return normalize_head_sha(lock.get("ready_expected_head_sha"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def last_terminal_mutation(lock: dict | None) -> dict | None:
|
||||
"""Return the last terminal live mutation on *lock*, or None."""
|
||||
if not lock:
|
||||
@@ -80,125 +35,18 @@ def last_terminal_mutation(lock: dict | None) -> dict | None:
|
||||
return terminals[-1] if terminals else None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
|
||||
lock: dict | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
pr_number: int,
|
||||
expected_head_sha: str | None,
|
||||
) -> bool:
|
||||
"""True when prior live mutations block a new decision for PR+head (#620).
|
||||
|
||||
Historical terminals on a **different head of the same PR** do not block.
|
||||
Any prior mutation on another PR, the same head, or without a comparable
|
||||
head SHA fails closed (blocks).
|
||||
|
||||
Head resolution uses ``mutation_head_sha(m, lock)`` so pre-#620 ledgers
|
||||
that only stored ``ready_expected_head_sha`` still compare correctly
|
||||
(PR #619-style).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not lock:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if lock.get("correction_authorized"):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
prior = list(lock.get("live_mutations") or [])
|
||||
if not prior:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
target = normalize_head_sha(expected_head_sha)
|
||||
for m in prior:
|
||||
if not isinstance(m, dict):
|
||||
return True
|
||||
m_pr = m.get("pr_number")
|
||||
m_head = mutation_head_sha(m, lock)
|
||||
if (
|
||||
m_pr == pr_number
|
||||
and target
|
||||
and m_head
|
||||
and not heads_equal(m_head, target)
|
||||
):
|
||||
# Same open PR, different reviewed head — historical boundary only.
|
||||
continue
|
||||
return True
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def terminal_boundary_allows_fresh_decision(
|
||||
lock: dict | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
pr_number: int,
|
||||
expected_head_sha: str | None,
|
||||
operation: str,
|
||||
) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Whether #332 hard-stop should yield for a new PR+head boundary (#620).
|
||||
|
||||
Only for ``mark_ready`` / ``review`` / ``resume`` on the **same PR** when
|
||||
the requested head differs from the last terminal's head. Merge is never
|
||||
reopened by head change (approved head merge path is separate).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if operation not in ("mark_ready", "review", "resume"):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if not lock:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if lock.get("correction_authorized"):
|
||||
return True
|
||||
last = last_terminal_mutation(lock)
|
||||
if last is None:
|
||||
return True
|
||||
if last.get("pr_number") != pr_number:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
locked_head = mutation_head_sha(last, lock)
|
||||
target = normalize_head_sha(expected_head_sha)
|
||||
if not locked_head or not target:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
return not heads_equal(locked_head, target)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def backfill_terminal_heads_from_ready(lock: dict) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Stamp head_sha onto legacy terminal mutations before overwriting ready_*.
|
||||
|
||||
Called when marking a fresh decision on a new head so historical rows keep
|
||||
their original boundary after ``ready_expected_head_sha`` advances (#620).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not isinstance(lock, dict):
|
||||
return lock
|
||||
ready_pr = lock.get("ready_pr_number")
|
||||
ready_head = normalize_head_sha(lock.get("ready_expected_head_sha"))
|
||||
if ready_pr is None or not ready_head:
|
||||
return lock
|
||||
mutations = list(lock.get("live_mutations") or [])
|
||||
changed = False
|
||||
for m in mutations:
|
||||
if not isinstance(m, dict):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
if m.get("action") not in TERMINAL_REVIEW_ACTIONS:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
if m.get("pr_number") != ready_pr:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
if mutation_head_sha(m):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
m["head_sha"] = ready_head
|
||||
changed = True
|
||||
if changed:
|
||||
lock["live_mutations"] = mutations
|
||||
return lock
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def classify_pr_live_state(pr_live: dict | None) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Normalize a Gitea PR payload into merge/closed flags."""
|
||||
pr = pr_live or {}
|
||||
merged = bool(pr.get("merged") or pr.get("merged_at"))
|
||||
state = (pr.get("state") or "").strip().lower() or None
|
||||
closed = state == "closed"
|
||||
head = pr.get("head") if isinstance(pr.get("head"), dict) else {}
|
||||
head_sha = normalize_head_sha(
|
||||
pr.get("head_sha") or pr.get("head_commit_sha") or head.get("sha")
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"pr_state": state,
|
||||
"pr_merged": merged,
|
||||
"pr_merged_or_closed": merged or closed,
|
||||
"merge_commit_sha": pr.get("merge_commit_sha")
|
||||
or pr.get("merged_commit_sha"),
|
||||
"current_pr_head_sha": head_sha,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -208,7 +56,6 @@ def lock_summary(lock: dict | None) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
last = last_terminal_mutation(lock)
|
||||
mutations = list(lock.get("live_mutations") or [])
|
||||
last_head = mutation_head_sha(last, lock) if last else None
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"task": lock.get("task"),
|
||||
"remote": lock.get("remote"),
|
||||
@@ -220,21 +67,16 @@ def lock_summary(lock: dict | None) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
|
||||
"session_profile": lock.get("session_profile"),
|
||||
"ready_pr_number": lock.get("ready_pr_number"),
|
||||
"ready_action": lock.get("ready_action"),
|
||||
"ready_expected_head_sha": normalize_head_sha(
|
||||
lock.get("ready_expected_head_sha")
|
||||
),
|
||||
"live_mutations_count": len(mutations),
|
||||
"last_terminal": (
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": last.get("pr_number"),
|
||||
"action": last.get("action"),
|
||||
"review_id": last.get("review_id"),
|
||||
"head_sha": last_head,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if last
|
||||
else None
|
||||
),
|
||||
"locked_head_sha": last_head,
|
||||
"correction_authorized": bool(lock.get("correction_authorized")),
|
||||
"updated_at": lock.get("updated_at") or lock.get("recorded_at"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -246,16 +88,13 @@ def assess_stale_review_decision_lock(
|
||||
pr_live: dict | None = None,
|
||||
pr_lookup_error: str | None = None,
|
||||
active_profile_identity: str | None = None,
|
||||
current_pr_head_sha: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Assess whether a durable review-decision lock is stale/moot (#594/#620).
|
||||
"""Assess whether a durable review-decision lock is stale/moot (#594).
|
||||
|
||||
*pr_live* must be the live Gitea payload for the **last terminal
|
||||
mutation's PR**. When no lock / no terminal mutation exists, cleanup is
|
||||
not applicable. When the PR is still open (or lookup fails), cleanup is
|
||||
forbidden (#594). Open PR + different live head reports
|
||||
``stale_by_head`` / ``fresh_review_on_current_head_allowed`` (#620)
|
||||
without enabling cleanup.
|
||||
forbidden and #332 hard-stop remains in force.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
summary = lock_summary(lock)
|
||||
result: dict[str, Any] = {
|
||||
@@ -263,10 +102,6 @@ def assess_stale_review_decision_lock(
|
||||
"lock_summary": summary,
|
||||
"last_terminal_pr": None,
|
||||
"last_terminal_action": None,
|
||||
"locked_head_sha": None,
|
||||
"current_pr_head_sha": normalize_head_sha(current_pr_head_sha),
|
||||
"stale_by_head": False,
|
||||
"fresh_review_on_current_head_allowed": False,
|
||||
"is_moot": False,
|
||||
"cleanup_allowed": False,
|
||||
"profile_match": True,
|
||||
@@ -306,10 +141,8 @@ def assess_stale_review_decision_lock(
|
||||
|
||||
pr_number = last.get("pr_number")
|
||||
action = last.get("action")
|
||||
locked_head = mutation_head_sha(last, lock)
|
||||
result["last_terminal_pr"] = pr_number
|
||||
result["last_terminal_action"] = action
|
||||
result["locked_head_sha"] = locked_head
|
||||
|
||||
if pr_number is None:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
@@ -332,46 +165,25 @@ def assess_stale_review_decision_lock(
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
live = classify_pr_live_state(pr_live)
|
||||
current_head = normalize_head_sha(
|
||||
current_pr_head_sha or live.get("current_pr_head_sha")
|
||||
)
|
||||
result.update(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_state": live["pr_state"],
|
||||
"pr_merged": live["pr_merged"],
|
||||
"pr_merged_or_closed": live["pr_merged_or_closed"],
|
||||
"merge_commit_sha": live["merge_commit_sha"],
|
||||
"current_pr_head_sha": current_head,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if not live["pr_merged_or_closed"]:
|
||||
stale_by_head = bool(
|
||||
locked_head and current_head and not heads_equal(locked_head, current_head)
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"terminal review mutation on open PR #{pr_number} is still active "
|
||||
f"({action}); #332 hard-stop remains — cleanup forbidden (#594)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result["stale_by_head"] = stale_by_head
|
||||
# Fresh formal decision is allowed on the new head without cleanup (#620).
|
||||
result["fresh_review_on_current_head_allowed"] = stale_by_head
|
||||
if stale_by_head:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"terminal {action} on PR #{pr_number} is bound to head "
|
||||
f"{locked_head[:12]}…; live head is {current_head[:12]}… — "
|
||||
"fresh formal review on current head is allowed without "
|
||||
"cleanup (fail closed for cleanup, #620); #332 same-head "
|
||||
"duplicate protection remains"
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"terminal review mutation on open PR #{pr_number} is still active "
|
||||
f"({action}); #332 hard-stop remains — cleanup forbidden (#594)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
# Merged or closed: lock is moot. Same-PR merge continuation is impossible.
|
||||
result["is_moot"] = True
|
||||
result["cleanup_allowed"] = True
|
||||
result["stale_by_head"] = False
|
||||
result["fresh_review_on_current_head_allowed"] = False
|
||||
result["reasons"].append(
|
||||
f"terminal mutation ({action} on PR #{pr_number}) is moot: PR is "
|
||||
f"{'merged' if live['pr_merged'] else 'closed'}; canonical cleanup allowed (#594)"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -139,44 +139,6 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
# #600: controller-owned allocator — any authenticated profile may call;
|
||||
# routing enforces role match to selected work. Uses control-plane DB (#613).
|
||||
"allocate_next_work": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.read",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"gitea_allocate_next_work": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.read",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
# #612 incident bridge — reconcile uses create_issue for apply;
|
||||
# dry-run needs read only. Tools gate apply paths themselves.
|
||||
"observability_reconcile_incident": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.read",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"gitea_observability_reconcile_incident": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.read",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"observability_list_projects": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.read",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"gitea_observability_list_projects": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.read",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"observability_link_issue": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.read",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"gitea_observability_link_issue": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.read",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
"reconcile_landed_pr": {
|
||||
"permission": "gitea.read",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ def main():
|
||||
servers[name],
|
||||
required_tool=REQUIRED_NAMESPACE_TOOLS.get(name),
|
||||
config_path=config_path,
|
||||
probe_source="offline_spawn",
|
||||
):
|
||||
failed = True
|
||||
else:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,366 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Tests for controller-owned allocator (#600) on control-plane DB (#613)."""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import threading
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor, as_completed
|
||||
|
||||
from allocator_service import (
|
||||
OUTCOME_ASSIGNED,
|
||||
OUTCOME_BLOCKED_TERMINAL,
|
||||
OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
OUTCOME_PREVIEW,
|
||||
OUTCOME_WAIT,
|
||||
WorkCandidate,
|
||||
allocate_next_work,
|
||||
candidate_from_dict,
|
||||
classify_skip,
|
||||
expected_role_for_candidate,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB, InvalidWorkKindError
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class AllocatorServiceTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.db_path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3")
|
||||
self.db = ControlPlaneDB(self.db_path)
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def _alloc(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
defaults = dict(
|
||||
db=self.db,
|
||||
session_id="s-test",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="org",
|
||||
repo="repo",
|
||||
candidates=[],
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-author",
|
||||
username="jcwalker3",
|
||||
)
|
||||
defaults.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return allocate_next_work(**defaults)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_selects_ready_issue_for_author(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=612,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
title="bridge",
|
||||
dependency_unmet=True,
|
||||
dependency_reason="downstream of #600",
|
||||
),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=600,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready", "type:feature"),
|
||||
title="allocator",
|
||||
priority=50,
|
||||
),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=601,
|
||||
labels=("status:blocked",),
|
||||
title="blocked",
|
||||
blocked=True,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands, apply=False)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_PREVIEW)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 600)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["kind"], "issue")
|
||||
# When 600 is highest priority valid work, lower-priority blocked/dep
|
||||
# candidates are not visited. Prove they are skipped when they sort first.
|
||||
res2 = self._alloc(
|
||||
candidates=[
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=612,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=99,
|
||||
dependency_unmet=True,
|
||||
dependency_reason="downstream of #600",
|
||||
),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=601,
|
||||
labels=("status:blocked",),
|
||||
priority=98,
|
||||
blocked=True,
|
||||
),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=600,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=1,
|
||||
),
|
||||
],
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
skipped_nums = {s["number"] for s in res2["skipped"]}
|
||||
self.assertIn(612, skipped_nums)
|
||||
self.assertIn(601, skipped_nums)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res2["selected"]["number"], 600)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(res["assignment"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["file_lock_only"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["comment_lease_only"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_atomic_assign_and_lease_on_apply(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=600,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=10,
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands, apply=True, session_id="s-a")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
asn = res["assignment"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(asn["outcome"], "assigned")
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(asn["assignment_id"])
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(asn["lease_id"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(asn["work_number"], 600)
|
||||
self.assertIn("implement", asn["allowed_actions"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("merge", asn["forbidden_actions"])
|
||||
proof = res["lease_proof"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(proof["source"], "control_plane_db.assign_and_lease")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_concurrent_allocators_no_double_assign(self) -> None:
|
||||
cand = WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=100,
|
||||
head_sha="a" * 40,
|
||||
priority=10,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Seed work item so both race the same target
|
||||
self.db.upsert_work_item(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="org",
|
||||
repo="repo",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=100,
|
||||
current_head_sha="a" * 40,
|
||||
)
|
||||
results = []
|
||||
lock = threading.Lock()
|
||||
|
||||
def worker(sid: str):
|
||||
r = allocate_next_work(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
session_id=sid,
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="org",
|
||||
repo="repo",
|
||||
candidates=[cand],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
)
|
||||
with lock:
|
||||
results.append(r)
|
||||
|
||||
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=2) as pool:
|
||||
futs = [pool.submit(worker, f"s-{i}") for i in range(2)]
|
||||
for f in as_completed(futs):
|
||||
f.result()
|
||||
|
||||
outcomes = [r["outcome"] for r in results]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(outcomes.count(OUTCOME_ASSIGNED), 1, outcomes)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(outcomes.count(OUTCOME_WAIT), 1, outcomes)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_blocked_and_dependency_skipped(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(kind="issue", number=1, blocked=True, labels=("status:blocked",)),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=612,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
dependency_unmet=True,
|
||||
dependency_reason="downstream of #600",
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands, apply=True, role="author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_NO_SAFE)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(res["selected"])
|
||||
reasons = " ".join(s["reason"] for s in res["skipped"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("blocked", reasons.lower())
|
||||
self.assertIn("600", reasons)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_already_leased_returns_wait(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="owner", role="author")
|
||||
self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="owner",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="org",
|
||||
repo="repo",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=50,
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc(
|
||||
session_id="other",
|
||||
candidates=[
|
||||
WorkCandidate(kind="issue", number=50, labels=("status:ready",))
|
||||
],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_WAIT)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["owner_session_id"], "owner")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_role_ineligible_skipped(self) -> None:
|
||||
# PR with current-head REQUEST_CHANGES expects author, not reviewer.
|
||||
cand = WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=9,
|
||||
head_sha="b" * 40,
|
||||
request_changes_current_head=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected_role_for_candidate(cand), "author")
|
||||
res = self._alloc(
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
candidates=[cand],
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_NO_SAFE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("expects role" in s["reason"] for s in res["skipped"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_terminal_lock_blocks_downstream_reviewer_prs(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.db.set_terminal_lock(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="org",
|
||||
repo="repo",
|
||||
terminal_pr=10,
|
||||
decision="request_changes",
|
||||
status="active",
|
||||
)
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(kind="pr", number=11, head_sha="c" * 40, priority=5),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(kind="pr", number=10, head_sha="d" * 40, priority=1),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
candidates=cands,
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Terminal PR #10 is selectable; #11 skipped for terminal path.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 10)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any(
|
||||
s["number"] == 11 and "terminal-review lock" in s["reason"]
|
||||
for s in res["skipped"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_terminal_lock_blocks_all_when_only_downstream(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.db.set_terminal_lock(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="org",
|
||||
repo="repo",
|
||||
terminal_pr=10,
|
||||
decision="request_changes",
|
||||
status="active",
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc(
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
candidates=[
|
||||
WorkCandidate(kind="pr", number=99, head_sha="e" * 40),
|
||||
],
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_BLOCKED_TERMINAL)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_work_structured(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=[], apply=True)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_NO_SAFE)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(res["selected"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["reasons"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rejects_incident_kind(self) -> None:
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(InvalidWorkKindError):
|
||||
WorkCandidate(kind="sentry_incident", number=1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_612_downstream_marker_in_result(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._alloc(
|
||||
candidates=[
|
||||
WorkCandidate(kind="issue", number=600, labels=("status:ready",))
|
||||
],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("612", res.get("downstream_note", ""))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_substrate_not_file_or_comment_lease(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._alloc(
|
||||
candidates=[
|
||||
WorkCandidate(kind="issue", number=1, labels=("status:ready",))
|
||||
],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["substrate"], "control_plane_db")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["file_lock_only"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["comment_lease_only"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
res["lease_proof"]["source"], "control_plane_db.assign_and_lease"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_candidate_from_dict(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = candidate_from_dict(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"kind": "pr",
|
||||
"number": 7,
|
||||
"head_sha": "f" * 40,
|
||||
"approval_on_current_head": True,
|
||||
"mergeable": True,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected_role_for_candidate(c), "merger")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merger_gets_clean_approval(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=3,
|
||||
head_sha="1" * 40,
|
||||
approval_on_current_head=True,
|
||||
mergeable=True,
|
||||
priority=100,
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc(
|
||||
role="merger",
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-merger",
|
||||
candidates=[c],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
session_id="merger-1",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["assignment"]["work_number"], 3)
|
||||
self.assertIn("merge", res["assignment"]["allowed_actions"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_db_unavailable_fails_closed(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = allocate_next_work(
|
||||
None, # type: ignore[arg-type]
|
||||
session_id="x",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
candidates=[],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("unavailable", res["reasons"][0].lower())
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1,824 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Tests for control-plane DB substrate (#613)."""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import threading
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor, as_completed
|
||||
from datetime import timedelta
|
||||
|
||||
from control_plane_db import (
|
||||
ControlPlaneDB,
|
||||
InvalidWorkKindError,
|
||||
LeaseRequiredError,
|
||||
WORK_KINDS,
|
||||
_ts,
|
||||
_utc_now,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ControlPlaneDBTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.db_path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3")
|
||||
self.db = ControlPlaneDB(self.db_path)
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_schema_and_architecture_meta(self) -> None:
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db_path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
rows = dict(conn.execute("SELECT key, value FROM schema_meta").fetchall())
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rows["schema_version"], "2")
|
||||
self.assertIn("DB coordinates", rows["architecture"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("bridge", rows["architecture"].lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rejects_raw_incident_as_work_kind(self) -> None:
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(InvalidWorkKindError):
|
||||
self.db.upsert_work_item(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="org",
|
||||
repo="repo",
|
||||
kind="sentry_incident",
|
||||
number=1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(InvalidWorkKindError):
|
||||
self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="org",
|
||||
repo="repo",
|
||||
kind="glitchtip_incident",
|
||||
number=9,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(WORK_KINDS, frozenset({"issue", "pr"}))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_atomic_assign_and_lease_fields(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s-a", role="author", profile="prgs-author")
|
||||
result = self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s-a",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=613,
|
||||
expected_head_sha="abc123",
|
||||
allowed_actions=("implement", "comment"),
|
||||
forbidden_actions=("approve", "merge"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result.outcome, "assigned")
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(result.assignment_id)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(result.lease_id)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result.role, "author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result.work_kind, "issue")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result.work_number, 613)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result.expected_head_sha, "abc123")
|
||||
self.assertIn("implement", result.allowed_actions)
|
||||
self.assertIn("merge", result.forbidden_actions)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(result.expires_at)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_second_session_waits_on_foreign_lease(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s1", role="author")
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s2", role="author")
|
||||
first = self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=100,
|
||||
expected_head_sha="deadbeef",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(first.outcome, "assigned")
|
||||
second = self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s2",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=100,
|
||||
expected_head_sha="deadbeef",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(second.outcome, "wait")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(second.owner_session_id, "s1")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_owner_resume_refreshes_lease(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s1", role="reviewer")
|
||||
a = self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=50,
|
||||
expected_head_sha="head-50",
|
||||
)
|
||||
b = self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=50,
|
||||
expected_head_sha="head-50",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(b.outcome, "assigned")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(b.lease_id, a.lease_id)
|
||||
self.assertIn("owner-resume", b.reason)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_require_valid_assignment_gates_mutations(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s1", role="author")
|
||||
self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=7,
|
||||
allowed_actions=("implement",),
|
||||
forbidden_actions=("merge",),
|
||||
)
|
||||
proof = self.db.require_valid_assignment(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=7,
|
||||
action="implement",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(proof["session_id"], "s1")
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(LeaseRequiredError):
|
||||
self.db.require_valid_assignment(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=7,
|
||||
action="merge",
|
||||
)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(LeaseRequiredError):
|
||||
self.db.require_valid_assignment(
|
||||
session_id="s-other",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=7,
|
||||
action="implement",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_lease_allows_reassign(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s1", role="author")
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s2", role="author")
|
||||
past = _utc_now() - timedelta(hours=1)
|
||||
# Create lease already expired by using negative TTL edge via direct assign then expire
|
||||
assigned = self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=3,
|
||||
lease_ttl_seconds=1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(assigned.outcome, "assigned")
|
||||
# Force expiry in DB
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db_path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE leases SET expires_at = ? WHERE lease_id = ?",
|
||||
(_ts(past), assigned.lease_id),
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
n = self.db.expire_stale_leases()
|
||||
self.assertGreaterEqual(n, 1)
|
||||
second = self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s2",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=3,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(second.outcome, "assigned")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(second.session_id, "s2")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merged_work_never_assigned(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s1", role="merger")
|
||||
self.db.upsert_work_item(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=99,
|
||||
state="merged",
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="merger",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=99,
|
||||
expected_head_sha="merged-head",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result.outcome, "no_safe_work")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_four_concurrent_sessions_unique_assignments(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Four concurrent assigners on four different issues — all succeed uniquely.
|
||||
|
||||
Also two concurrent assigners on the *same* issue: at most one assigned.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
for i in range(4):
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id=f"sess-{i}", role="author")
|
||||
|
||||
def claim_unique(i: int):
|
||||
return self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id=f"sess-{i}",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=1000 + i,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=4) as pool:
|
||||
results = [f.result() for f in as_completed([pool.submit(claim_unique, i) for i in range(4)])]
|
||||
self.assertEqual({r.outcome for r in results}, {"assigned"})
|
||||
numbers = sorted(r.work_number for r in results)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(numbers, [1000, 1001, 1002, 1003])
|
||||
|
||||
# Contention on one item
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="c1", role="author")
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="c2", role="author")
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="c3", role="author")
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="c4", role="author")
|
||||
barrier = threading.Barrier(4)
|
||||
outcomes: list[str] = []
|
||||
lock = threading.Lock()
|
||||
|
||||
def contend(sid: str) -> None:
|
||||
barrier.wait()
|
||||
res = self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id=sid,
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=7777,
|
||||
)
|
||||
with lock:
|
||||
outcomes.append(res.outcome)
|
||||
|
||||
threads = [threading.Thread(target=contend, args=(f"c{i}",)) for i in range(1, 5)]
|
||||
for t in threads:
|
||||
t.start()
|
||||
for t in threads:
|
||||
t.join()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(outcomes.count("assigned"), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(outcomes.count("wait"), 3)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_terminal_lock_index(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.db.set_terminal_lock(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
terminal_pr=332,
|
||||
review_id="rev-1",
|
||||
decision="approve",
|
||||
)
|
||||
row = self.db.get_active_terminal_lock(remote="prgs", org="o", repo="r")
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(row)
|
||||
assert row is not None
|
||||
self.assertEqual(row["terminal_pr"], 332)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(row["status"], "active")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_incident_links_not_work_items(self) -> None:
|
||||
link = self.db.upsert_incident_link(
|
||||
provider="sentry",
|
||||
provider_base_url="https://sentry.prgs.cc",
|
||||
provider_org="prgs",
|
||||
provider_project="gitea-tools-mcp",
|
||||
provider_issue_id="12345",
|
||||
gitea_org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
gitea_repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
gitea_issue_number=9001,
|
||||
fingerprint="fp-1",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(link["gitea_issue_number"], 9001)
|
||||
found = self.db.get_incident_link_for_gitea_issue(
|
||||
gitea_org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
gitea_repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
gitea_issue_number=9001,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(found)
|
||||
# Linking does not create a work_item of incident kind
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(InvalidWorkKindError):
|
||||
self.db.upsert_work_item(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
kind="sentry",
|
||||
number=12345,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_heartbeat_and_release(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s1", role="author")
|
||||
a = self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
hb = self.db.heartbeat_lease(a.lease_id, session_id="s1")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(hb["lease_id"], a.lease_id)
|
||||
self.db.release_lease(a.lease_id, session_id="s1")
|
||||
# After release another session can claim
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s2", role="author")
|
||||
b = self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s2",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(b.outcome, "assigned")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(b.session_id, "s2")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_require_valid_assignment_rejects_stale_head(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Assignment must not authorize mutations after work-item head drifts."""
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s1", role="author")
|
||||
self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=42,
|
||||
expected_head_sha="head-v1",
|
||||
allowed_actions=("implement",),
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Head drifts after assignment
|
||||
self.db.upsert_work_item(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=42,
|
||||
current_head_sha="head-v2",
|
||||
)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(LeaseRequiredError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.db.require_valid_assignment(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=42,
|
||||
action="implement",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("stale head", str(ctx.exception).lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_require_valid_assignment_rejects_terminal_state(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Assignment must not authorize mutations after work item is merged/closed."""
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s1", role="author")
|
||||
self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=55,
|
||||
expected_head_sha="abc",
|
||||
allowed_actions=("implement",),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_work_item(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=55,
|
||||
state="merged",
|
||||
current_head_sha="abc",
|
||||
)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(LeaseRequiredError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.db.require_valid_assignment(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=55,
|
||||
action="implement",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("terminal", str(ctx.exception).lower())
|
||||
|
||||
self.db.upsert_work_item(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=56,
|
||||
state="open",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=56,
|
||||
allowed_actions=("implement",),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_work_item(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=56,
|
||||
state="closed",
|
||||
)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(LeaseRequiredError):
|
||||
self.db.require_valid_assignment(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=56,
|
||||
action="implement",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr_assignment_requires_expected_head_sha(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""PR assign and mutation must fail closed without a head pin."""
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s1", role="author")
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(LeaseRequiredError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.db.assign_and_lease(
|
||||
session_id="s1",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=88,
|
||||
expected_head_sha=None,
|
||||
allowed_actions=("implement",),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("expected_head_sha", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
# Legacy path: force an unpinned PR assignment into the DB, then
|
||||
# populate head and prove mutation is still rejected.
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
|
||||
self.db.upsert_work_item(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=89,
|
||||
current_head_sha=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db_path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
wid = conn.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT work_item_id FROM work_items WHERE kind='pr' AND number=89"
|
||||
).fetchone()[0]
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
INSERT INTO sessions(session_id, role, started_at, last_heartbeat_at, status)
|
||||
VALUES ('legacy', 'author', '2020-01-01T00:00:00Z', '2020-01-01T00:00:00Z', 'active')
|
||||
"""
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
INSERT INTO leases(
|
||||
lease_id, work_item_id, session_id, role, phase,
|
||||
expires_at, heartbeat_at, status
|
||||
) VALUES (
|
||||
'lease-legacy', ?, 'legacy', 'author', 'claimed',
|
||||
'2099-01-01T00:00:00Z', '2020-01-01T00:00:00Z', 'active'
|
||||
)
|
||||
""",
|
||||
(wid,),
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
INSERT INTO assignments(
|
||||
assignment_id, work_item_id, session_id, lease_id,
|
||||
allowed_actions, forbidden_actions, expected_head_sha,
|
||||
role, status, created_at
|
||||
) VALUES (
|
||||
'asn-legacy', ?, 'legacy', 'lease-legacy',
|
||||
'["implement"]', '["merge"]', NULL,
|
||||
'author', 'active', '2020-01-01T00:00:00Z'
|
||||
)
|
||||
""",
|
||||
(wid,),
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
self.db.upsert_work_item(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=89,
|
||||
current_head_sha="populated-head",
|
||||
)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(LeaseRequiredError) as ctx2:
|
||||
self.db.require_valid_assignment(
|
||||
session_id="legacy",
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=89,
|
||||
action="implement",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("expected_head_sha pin", str(ctx2.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_migrate_duplicate_null_scope_incident_links(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Legacy NULL-scope duplicates must migrate without UNIQUE crash."""
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB, ControlPlaneError
|
||||
|
||||
# Build a v1-like table with nullable scope columns and insert dups
|
||||
# that collapse under normalization, then open ControlPlaneDB on it.
|
||||
path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "legacy_dups.sqlite3")
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
conn.executescript(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
CREATE TABLE schema_meta (key TEXT PRIMARY KEY, value TEXT NOT NULL);
|
||||
CREATE TABLE incident_links (
|
||||
link_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
|
||||
provider TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
provider_base_url TEXT,
|
||||
provider_org TEXT,
|
||||
provider_project TEXT,
|
||||
provider_issue_id TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
provider_short_id TEXT,
|
||||
provider_permalink TEXT,
|
||||
fingerprint TEXT,
|
||||
gitea_org TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
gitea_repo TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
gitea_issue_number INTEGER NOT NULL,
|
||||
linked_pr_numbers TEXT,
|
||||
first_seen TEXT,
|
||||
last_seen TEXT,
|
||||
event_count INTEGER,
|
||||
status TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT 'open',
|
||||
release_resolved_at TEXT,
|
||||
last_sync_at TEXT,
|
||||
UNIQUE (
|
||||
provider, provider_base_url, provider_org,
|
||||
provider_project, provider_issue_id
|
||||
)
|
||||
);
|
||||
INSERT INTO incident_links(
|
||||
provider, provider_base_url, provider_org, provider_project,
|
||||
provider_issue_id, gitea_org, gitea_repo, gitea_issue_number, status
|
||||
) VALUES
|
||||
('sentry', NULL, NULL, NULL, 'dup-1', 'org', 'repo', 10, 'open'),
|
||||
('sentry', NULL, NULL, NULL, 'dup-1', 'org', 'repo', 10, 'open');
|
||||
"""
|
||||
)
|
||||
# SQLite allows two NULL-scope rows with same provider/issue under UNIQUE.
|
||||
n = conn.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM incident_links").fetchone()[0]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(n, 2)
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
|
||||
db = ControlPlaneDB(path)
|
||||
conn2 = sqlite3.connect(path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
n2 = conn2.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM incident_links").fetchone()[0]
|
||||
rows = conn2.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT provider_base_url, provider_org, provider_project, gitea_issue_number "
|
||||
"FROM incident_links"
|
||||
).fetchall()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn2.close()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(n2, 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rows[0][0], "")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rows[0][1], "")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rows[0][2], "")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rows[0][3], 10)
|
||||
# Touch to silence unused import in type checkers if needed
|
||||
self.assertTrue(issubclass(ControlPlaneError, Exception))
|
||||
del db
|
||||
|
||||
def test_migrate_conflicting_duplicate_incident_links_fails_closed(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Conflicting Gitea targets for the same provider key must fail closed."""
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB, ControlPlaneError
|
||||
|
||||
path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "legacy_conflict.sqlite3")
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
conn.executescript(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
CREATE TABLE incident_links (
|
||||
link_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
|
||||
provider TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
provider_base_url TEXT,
|
||||
provider_org TEXT,
|
||||
provider_project TEXT,
|
||||
provider_issue_id TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
gitea_org TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
gitea_repo TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
gitea_issue_number INTEGER NOT NULL,
|
||||
status TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT 'open',
|
||||
UNIQUE (
|
||||
provider, provider_base_url, provider_org,
|
||||
provider_project, provider_issue_id
|
||||
)
|
||||
);
|
||||
INSERT INTO incident_links(
|
||||
provider, provider_base_url, provider_org, provider_project,
|
||||
provider_issue_id, gitea_org, gitea_repo, gitea_issue_number
|
||||
) VALUES
|
||||
('sentry', NULL, NULL, NULL, 'dup-c', 'org', 'repo', 1),
|
||||
('sentry', NULL, NULL, NULL, 'dup-c', 'org', 'repo', 2);
|
||||
"""
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ControlPlaneError) as ctx:
|
||||
ControlPlaneDB(path)
|
||||
self.assertIn("conflicting", str(ctx.exception).lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_migrate_conflicting_observation_metadata_fails_closed(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Same provider key + same Gitea target but differing obs metadata must fail closed.
|
||||
|
||||
Regression for silent data loss: migration used to keep lowest link_id and
|
||||
delete peers after comparing only Gitea targets (#619 RC3).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB, ControlPlaneError
|
||||
|
||||
path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "legacy_meta_conflict.sqlite3")
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
conn.executescript(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
CREATE TABLE schema_meta (key TEXT PRIMARY KEY, value TEXT NOT NULL);
|
||||
CREATE TABLE incident_links (
|
||||
link_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
|
||||
provider TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
provider_base_url TEXT,
|
||||
provider_org TEXT,
|
||||
provider_project TEXT,
|
||||
provider_issue_id TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
provider_short_id TEXT,
|
||||
provider_permalink TEXT,
|
||||
fingerprint TEXT,
|
||||
gitea_org TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
gitea_repo TEXT NOT NULL,
|
||||
gitea_issue_number INTEGER NOT NULL,
|
||||
linked_pr_numbers TEXT,
|
||||
first_seen TEXT,
|
||||
last_seen TEXT,
|
||||
event_count INTEGER,
|
||||
status TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT 'open',
|
||||
release_resolved_at TEXT,
|
||||
last_sync_at TEXT,
|
||||
UNIQUE (
|
||||
provider, provider_base_url, provider_org,
|
||||
provider_project, provider_issue_id
|
||||
)
|
||||
);
|
||||
INSERT INTO incident_links(
|
||||
provider, provider_base_url, provider_org, provider_project,
|
||||
provider_issue_id, provider_permalink, fingerprint,
|
||||
gitea_org, gitea_repo, gitea_issue_number,
|
||||
event_count, status, first_seen, last_seen
|
||||
) VALUES
|
||||
(
|
||||
'sentry', NULL, NULL, NULL, 'dup-meta',
|
||||
'https://sentry.example/issues/1', 'fingerprint-A',
|
||||
'org', 'repo', 42,
|
||||
1, 'open', '2026-01-01T00:00:00Z', '2026-01-01T01:00:00Z'
|
||||
),
|
||||
(
|
||||
'sentry', NULL, NULL, NULL, 'dup-meta',
|
||||
'https://sentry.example/issues/1', 'fingerprint-B',
|
||||
'org', 'repo', 42,
|
||||
99, 'resolved', '2026-01-01T00:00:00Z', '2026-01-02T00:00:00Z'
|
||||
);
|
||||
"""
|
||||
)
|
||||
n = conn.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM incident_links").fetchone()[0]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(n, 2)
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ControlPlaneError) as ctx:
|
||||
ControlPlaneDB(path)
|
||||
msg = str(ctx.exception).lower()
|
||||
self.assertIn("conflicting", msg)
|
||||
self.assertIn("observation metadata", msg)
|
||||
|
||||
# Rows must still be present — migration must not delete before failing.
|
||||
conn2 = sqlite3.connect(path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
remaining = conn2.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM incident_links").fetchone()[0]
|
||||
fps = {
|
||||
r[0]
|
||||
for r in conn2.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT fingerprint FROM incident_links ORDER BY link_id"
|
||||
).fetchall()
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn2.close()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(remaining, 2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(fps, {"fingerprint-A", "fingerprint-B"})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_incident_links_minimal_upsert_is_canonical(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Repeated minimal upserts must update one row (NULL-safe uniqueness)."""
|
||||
a = self.db.upsert_incident_link(
|
||||
provider="sentry",
|
||||
provider_issue_id="inc-1",
|
||||
gitea_org="org",
|
||||
gitea_repo="repo",
|
||||
gitea_issue_number=1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
b = self.db.upsert_incident_link(
|
||||
provider="sentry",
|
||||
provider_issue_id="inc-1",
|
||||
gitea_org="org",
|
||||
gitea_repo="repo",
|
||||
gitea_issue_number=2,
|
||||
# omit optional scope fields again
|
||||
)
|
||||
c = self.db.upsert_incident_link(
|
||||
provider="sentry",
|
||||
provider_issue_id="inc-1",
|
||||
gitea_org="org",
|
||||
gitea_repo="repo",
|
||||
gitea_issue_number=3,
|
||||
provider_base_url=None,
|
||||
provider_org="",
|
||||
provider_project=" ",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(a["link_id"], b["link_id"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(b["link_id"], c["link_id"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(c["gitea_issue_number"], 3)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(c["provider_base_url"], "")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(c["provider_org"], "")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(c["provider_project"], "")
|
||||
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db_path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
n = conn.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM incident_links WHERE provider_issue_id = ?",
|
||||
("inc-1",),
|
||||
).fetchone()[0]
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(n, 1)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1,397 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Head-scoped #332 review-decision locks (#620).
|
||||
|
||||
Proves:
|
||||
* REQUEST_CHANGES on head A does not block mark_ready/submit on head B
|
||||
* APPROVE on head B is allowed after RC on head A (same open PR)
|
||||
* same-head duplicate terminal remains blocked
|
||||
* open-PR cleanup remains forbidden; assessment reports stale_by_head
|
||||
* historical mutations keep their head_sha (preserved ledger)
|
||||
* PR #619-style: old RC at 036b78e…, current head 2429d9d…, approve allowed
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
import mcp_server
|
||||
import stale_review_decision_lock as srdl
|
||||
|
||||
HEAD_A = "036b78e31ea5d036452b3a52e0e086b01e0c763f"
|
||||
HEAD_B = "2429d9d2e826e519eb8eb4ade45987c00838aefb"
|
||||
HEAD_C = "c" * 40
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _lock(mutations=None, correction=False, ready_pr=None, ready_head=None, ready_action=None):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"task": "review_pr",
|
||||
"remote": "prgs",
|
||||
"org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
"repo": "Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
"session_pid": os.getpid(),
|
||||
"session_profile": "prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
"session_profile_lock": "prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
"profile_identity": "prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
"final_review_decision_ready": False,
|
||||
"ready_pr_number": ready_pr,
|
||||
"ready_action": ready_action,
|
||||
"ready_expected_head_sha": ready_head,
|
||||
"ready_remote": "prgs" if ready_pr else None,
|
||||
"ready_org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting" if ready_pr else None,
|
||||
"ready_repo": "Gitea-Tools" if ready_pr else None,
|
||||
"live_mutations": list(mutations or []),
|
||||
"correction_authorized": correction,
|
||||
"correction_reason": None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
RC_619_LEGACY = {
|
||||
"pr_number": 619,
|
||||
"action": "request_changes",
|
||||
"review_id": 410,
|
||||
"review_state": "request_changes",
|
||||
# no head_sha — pre-#620 durable ledger shape
|
||||
}
|
||||
RC_619_HEAD_A = {
|
||||
"pr_number": 619,
|
||||
"action": "request_changes",
|
||||
"review_id": 410,
|
||||
"review_state": "request_changes",
|
||||
"head_sha": HEAD_A,
|
||||
}
|
||||
APPROVE_619_HEAD_B = {
|
||||
"pr_number": 619,
|
||||
"action": "approve",
|
||||
"review_id": 411,
|
||||
"review_state": "approve",
|
||||
"head_sha": HEAD_B,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _seed(mutations=None, **kwargs):
|
||||
import review_workflow_load
|
||||
|
||||
review_workflow_load.record_review_workflow_load(mcp_server.PROJECT_ROOT)
|
||||
mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(_lock(mutations, **kwargs))
|
||||
mcp_server.gitea_load_review_workflow()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _open_pr(pr_number=619, head=HEAD_B):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"number": pr_number,
|
||||
"state": "open",
|
||||
"merged": False,
|
||||
"merged_at": None,
|
||||
"head": {"sha": head},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _no_lease():
|
||||
return {"block": False, "reasons": [], "mutation_allowed": True}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _feedback(blocking=False, stale=False, success=True):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": success,
|
||||
"has_blocking_change_requests": blocking,
|
||||
"review_feedback_stale": stale,
|
||||
"current_head_sha": HEAD_B,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestPureHeadScopeHelpers(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_mutation_head_prefers_recorded_sha(self):
|
||||
m = {"pr_number": 1, "head_sha": HEAD_A}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(srdl.mutation_head_sha(m), HEAD_A)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_mutation_uses_ready_expected_for_same_pr(self):
|
||||
lock = _lock(
|
||||
[RC_619_LEGACY],
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
ready_action="request_changes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(srdl.mutation_head_sha(RC_619_LEGACY, lock), HEAD_A)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_mutation_ignores_ready_for_other_pr(self):
|
||||
lock = _lock([RC_619_LEGACY], ready_pr=1, ready_head=HEAD_A)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(srdl.mutation_head_sha(RC_619_LEGACY, lock))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_prior_blocks_same_head_not_other_head(self):
|
||||
lock = _lock([RC_619_HEAD_A])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
srdl.prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
|
||||
lock, pr_number=619, expected_head_sha=HEAD_A
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
srdl.prior_live_mutations_block_boundary(
|
||||
lock, pr_number=619, expected_head_sha=HEAD_B
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_backfill_stamps_legacy_terminals(self):
|
||||
lock = _lock(
|
||||
[dict(RC_619_LEGACY)],
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
ready_action="request_changes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
srdl.backfill_terminal_heads_from_ready(lock)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(lock["live_mutations"][0]["head_sha"], HEAD_A)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestHardStopHeadScope(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(None)
|
||||
mcp_server.review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rc_head_a_allows_mark_ready_head_b(self):
|
||||
_seed(
|
||||
[RC_619_HEAD_A],
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
ready_action="request_changes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
|
||||
619, "mark_ready", expected_head_sha=HEAD_B
|
||||
),
|
||||
[],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rc_head_a_blocks_mark_ready_same_head(self):
|
||||
_seed(
|
||||
[RC_619_HEAD_A],
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
ready_action="request_changes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
reasons = mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
|
||||
619, "mark_ready", expected_head_sha=HEAD_A
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(reasons)
|
||||
self.assertIn("#332", reasons[0])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rc_head_a_blocks_other_pr(self):
|
||||
_seed([RC_619_HEAD_A], ready_pr=619, ready_head=HEAD_A)
|
||||
reasons = mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
|
||||
700, "mark_ready", expected_head_sha=HEAD_B
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(reasons)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_619_ledger_allows_new_head(self):
|
||||
"""PR #619-style durable lock without mutation head_sha."""
|
||||
_seed(
|
||||
[RC_619_LEGACY],
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
ready_action="request_changes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
mcp_server.terminal_review_hard_stop_reasons(
|
||||
619, "mark_ready", expected_head_sha=HEAD_B
|
||||
),
|
||||
[],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMarkFinalAndRecord(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(None)
|
||||
mcp_server.review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
|
||||
|
||||
def _mark(self, pr, action, head, feedback=None):
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]), patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block", return_value=_no_lease()
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server,
|
||||
"gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
return_value=feedback or _feedback(blocking=False, stale=True),
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server,
|
||||
"gitea_check_pr_eligibility",
|
||||
return_value={"eligible": True, "head_sha": head},
|
||||
):
|
||||
return mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=pr,
|
||||
action=action,
|
||||
expected_head_sha=head,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rc_then_rc_on_new_head(self):
|
||||
_seed(
|
||||
[RC_619_HEAD_A],
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
ready_action="request_changes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Prior RC at head A is unresolved but head moved → feedback stale.
|
||||
res = self._mark(
|
||||
619,
|
||||
"request_changes",
|
||||
HEAD_B,
|
||||
feedback=_feedback(blocking=True, stale=True),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("marked_ready"), res)
|
||||
lock = mcp_server._load_review_decision_lock()
|
||||
# Historical head A preserved on mutation after backfill.
|
||||
heads = {
|
||||
m.get("head_sha")
|
||||
for m in lock["live_mutations"]
|
||||
if m.get("action") == "request_changes"
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.assertIn(HEAD_A, heads)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(lock["ready_expected_head_sha"], HEAD_B)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rc_then_approve_on_new_head(self):
|
||||
_seed(
|
||||
[RC_619_HEAD_A],
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
ready_action="request_changes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._mark(619, "approve", HEAD_B)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("marked_ready"), res)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("head_scoped"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_same_head_rc_still_blocked_by_hard_stop(self):
|
||||
_seed(
|
||||
[RC_619_HEAD_A],
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
ready_action="request_changes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._mark(619, "approve", HEAD_A)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("marked_ready"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("#332" in r for r in res.get("reasons") or []))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr619_style_legacy_lock_approve_on_current_head(self):
|
||||
_seed(
|
||||
[RC_619_LEGACY],
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
ready_action="request_changes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._mark(619, "approve", HEAD_B)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("marked_ready"), res)
|
||||
lock = mcp_server._load_review_decision_lock()
|
||||
# Backfill should have stamped HEAD_A onto the legacy mutation.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(lock["live_mutations"][0].get("head_sha"), HEAD_A)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(lock["ready_expected_head_sha"], HEAD_B)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_record_live_mutation_stores_head(self):
|
||||
_seed(ready_pr=619, ready_head=HEAD_B, ready_action="approve")
|
||||
lock = mcp_server._load_review_decision_lock()
|
||||
lock["final_review_decision_ready"] = True
|
||||
lock["ready_pr_number"] = 619
|
||||
lock["ready_expected_head_sha"] = HEAD_B
|
||||
mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(lock)
|
||||
mcp_server.record_live_review_mutation(619, "approve", review_id=99)
|
||||
stored = mcp_server._load_review_decision_lock()["live_mutations"][-1]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(stored["head_sha"], HEAD_B)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(stored["pr_number"], 619)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_submit_gate_allows_new_head_after_prior_terminal(self):
|
||||
"""check_review_decision_gate must not block different-head submit."""
|
||||
mutations = [RC_619_HEAD_A]
|
||||
_seed(
|
||||
mutations,
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
ready_action="approve",
|
||||
)
|
||||
lock = mcp_server._load_review_decision_lock()
|
||||
lock["final_review_decision_ready"] = True
|
||||
lock["ready_pr_number"] = 619
|
||||
lock["ready_action"] = "approve"
|
||||
lock["ready_expected_head_sha"] = HEAD_B
|
||||
lock["ready_remote"] = "prgs"
|
||||
lock["ready_org"] = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting"
|
||||
lock["ready_repo"] = "Gitea-Tools"
|
||||
mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(lock)
|
||||
reasons = mcp_server.check_review_decision_gate(
|
||||
619,
|
||||
"approve",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reasons, [], reasons)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_submit_gate_blocks_same_head_duplicate(self):
|
||||
mutations = [RC_619_HEAD_A]
|
||||
_seed(
|
||||
mutations,
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
ready_action="request_changes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
lock = mcp_server._load_review_decision_lock()
|
||||
lock["final_review_decision_ready"] = True
|
||||
lock["ready_pr_number"] = 619
|
||||
lock["ready_action"] = "request_changes"
|
||||
lock["ready_expected_head_sha"] = HEAD_A
|
||||
lock["ready_remote"] = "prgs"
|
||||
lock["ready_org"] = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting"
|
||||
lock["ready_repo"] = "Gitea-Tools"
|
||||
mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(lock)
|
||||
reasons = mcp_server.check_review_decision_gate(
|
||||
619,
|
||||
"request_changes",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(reasons)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAssessmentOpenPrHead(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_open_pr_stale_by_head_no_cleanup(self):
|
||||
lock = _lock(
|
||||
[RC_619_HEAD_A],
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_A,
|
||||
ready_action="request_changes",
|
||||
)
|
||||
a = srdl.assess_stale_review_decision_lock(
|
||||
lock, pr_live=_open_pr(619, HEAD_B)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(a["has_lock"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(a["is_moot"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(a["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(a["stale_by_head"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(a["fresh_review_on_current_head_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(a["locked_head_sha"], HEAD_A)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(a["current_pr_head_sha"], HEAD_B)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_open_pr_same_head_no_fresh(self):
|
||||
lock = _lock([RC_619_HEAD_A], ready_pr=619, ready_head=HEAD_A)
|
||||
a = srdl.assess_stale_review_decision_lock(
|
||||
lock, pr_live=_open_pr(619, HEAD_A)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(a["stale_by_head"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(a["fresh_review_on_current_head_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(a["cleanup_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_historical_mutation_preserved_in_summary(self):
|
||||
lock = _lock(
|
||||
[RC_619_HEAD_A, APPROVE_619_HEAD_B],
|
||||
ready_pr=619,
|
||||
ready_head=HEAD_B,
|
||||
ready_action="approve",
|
||||
)
|
||||
summary = srdl.lock_summary(lock)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(summary["live_mutations_count"], 2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(summary["last_terminal"]["head_sha"], HEAD_B)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(summary["locked_head_sha"], HEAD_B)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1,345 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""Tests for observability incident bridge (#612) on #613 substrate."""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB, InvalidWorkKindError, WORK_KINDS
|
||||
from incident_bridge import (
|
||||
OUTCOME_BLOCKED,
|
||||
OUTCOME_CREATED,
|
||||
OUTCOME_LINKED,
|
||||
OUTCOME_PREVIEW,
|
||||
OUTCOME_UPDATED,
|
||||
ProjectMapping,
|
||||
assert_not_raw_incident_work_item,
|
||||
build_gitea_issue_body,
|
||||
load_project_mappings,
|
||||
normalize_incident,
|
||||
project_mapping_from_dict,
|
||||
reconcile_incident,
|
||||
redact_text,
|
||||
sanitize_tags,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _mapping(**kwargs) -> ProjectMapping:
|
||||
base = dict(
|
||||
name="gitea-tools-mcp",
|
||||
provider="sentry",
|
||||
monitor_base_url="https://sentry.prgs.cc",
|
||||
monitor_org="prgs",
|
||||
monitor_project="gitea-tools-mcp",
|
||||
gitea_org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
gitea_repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
default_labels=("type:bug", "observability", "sentry", "status:ready"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
base.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return ProjectMapping(**base)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _obs(**kwargs) -> dict:
|
||||
base = dict(
|
||||
provider="sentry",
|
||||
provider_base_url="https://sentry.prgs.cc",
|
||||
provider_org="prgs",
|
||||
provider_project="gitea-tools-mcp",
|
||||
provider_issue_id="ISSUE-100",
|
||||
provider_short_id="GITEA-TOOLS-1A",
|
||||
provider_permalink="https://sentry.prgs.cc/organizations/prgs/issues/100/",
|
||||
fingerprint="fp-abc",
|
||||
title="TypeError: boom",
|
||||
summary="TypeError: boom in handle_request",
|
||||
first_seen="2026-07-01T00:00:00Z",
|
||||
last_seen="2026-07-10T00:00:00Z",
|
||||
event_count=3,
|
||||
environment="production",
|
||||
severity="error",
|
||||
culprit="handle_request",
|
||||
tags={"runtime": "python", "release": "1.2.3"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
base.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return base
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class IncidentBridgeTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.db = ControlPlaneDB(os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3"))
|
||||
self.mapping = _mapping()
|
||||
self.created: list[dict] = []
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def _create_issue(self, title, body, labels, g_org, g_repo):
|
||||
n = 9000 + len(self.created)
|
||||
rec = {
|
||||
"number": n,
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"title": title,
|
||||
"body": body,
|
||||
"labels": labels,
|
||||
"org": g_org,
|
||||
"repo": g_repo,
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.created.append(rec)
|
||||
return rec
|
||||
|
||||
def test_redact_secrets(self) -> None:
|
||||
dirty = "token=supersecret123 Authorization: Bearer abcdefghijklmnop"
|
||||
clean = redact_text(dirty)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("supersecret", clean)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("abcdefghijklmnop", clean)
|
||||
self.assertIn("[REDACTED]", clean)
|
||||
tags = sanitize_tags(
|
||||
{"token": "x", "runtime": "py", "password": "nope", "release": "1.0"}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(tags, {"runtime": "py", "release": "1.0"})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_body_contains_no_secrets(self) -> None:
|
||||
inc = normalize_incident(
|
||||
_obs(
|
||||
summary="fail password=hunter2 token: abc",
|
||||
tags={"cookie": "sid=1", "runtime": "py"},
|
||||
),
|
||||
self.mapping,
|
||||
)
|
||||
body = build_gitea_issue_body(inc)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("hunter2", body)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("sid=1", body)
|
||||
self.assertIn("provider_issue_id", body)
|
||||
self.assertIn("not** assignable", body.lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_preview_no_mutation(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(),
|
||||
mapping=self.mapping,
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
create_issue_fn=self._create_issue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_PREVIEW)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["gitea_mutated"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["db_mutated"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["raw_incident_assignable"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.created), 0)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(
|
||||
self.db.get_incident_link_by_provider(
|
||||
provider="sentry",
|
||||
provider_issue_id="ISSUE-100",
|
||||
provider_base_url="https://sentry.prgs.cc",
|
||||
provider_org="prgs",
|
||||
provider_project="gitea-tools-mcp",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_apply_creates_issue_and_link(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(),
|
||||
mapping=self.mapping,
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
create_issue_fn=self._create_issue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_CREATED)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["gitea_mutated"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["db_mutated"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.created), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["gitea_issue"]["number"], self.created[0]["number"])
|
||||
link = self.db.get_incident_link_by_provider(
|
||||
provider="sentry",
|
||||
provider_issue_id="ISSUE-100",
|
||||
provider_base_url="https://sentry.prgs.cc",
|
||||
provider_org="prgs",
|
||||
provider_project="gitea-tools-mcp",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(link)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(int(link["gitea_issue_number"]), self.created[0]["number"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["allocator_visible_as"]["kind"], "issue")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_duplicate_observation_reuses_issue(self) -> None:
|
||||
first = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(),
|
||||
mapping=self.mapping,
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
create_issue_fn=self._create_issue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
second = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(event_count=9, last_seen="2026-07-11T00:00:00Z"),
|
||||
mapping=self.mapping,
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
create_issue_fn=self._create_issue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(first["outcome"], OUTCOME_CREATED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(second["outcome"], OUTCOME_UPDATED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.created), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
second["gitea_issue"]["number"], first["gitea_issue"]["number"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
link = self.db.get_incident_link_by_provider(
|
||||
provider="sentry",
|
||||
provider_issue_id="ISSUE-100",
|
||||
provider_base_url="https://sentry.prgs.cc",
|
||||
provider_org="prgs",
|
||||
provider_project="gitea-tools-mcp",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(int(link["event_count"]), 9)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_explicit_link_existing_issue(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(provider_issue_id="ISSUE-200"),
|
||||
mapping=self.mapping,
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
force_gitea_issue_number=555,
|
||||
create_issue_fn=self._create_issue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_LINKED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.created), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["gitea_issue"]["number"], 555)
|
||||
link = self.db.get_incident_link_for_gitea_issue(
|
||||
gitea_org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
gitea_repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
gitea_issue_number=555,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(link)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_fingerprint_conflict_fails_closed(self) -> None:
|
||||
reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(fingerprint="fp-a"),
|
||||
mapping=self.mapping,
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
create_issue_fn=self._create_issue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(fingerprint="fp-b"),
|
||||
mapping=self.mapping,
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
create_issue_fn=self._create_issue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_BLOCKED)
|
||||
self.assertIn("fingerprint conflict", res["reasons"][0].lower())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.created), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ambiguous_mapping_fails_closed(self) -> None:
|
||||
maps = [
|
||||
_mapping(name="a", monitor_project="gitea-tools-mcp"),
|
||||
_mapping(name="b", monitor_project="gitea-tools-mcp"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(),
|
||||
mappings=maps,
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_BLOCKED)
|
||||
self.assertIn("ambiguous", res["reasons"][0].lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_provider_issue_id_fails_closed(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(provider_issue_id=""),
|
||||
mapping=self.mapping,
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_BLOCKED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_raw_incident_not_work_kind(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("sentry_incident", WORK_KINDS)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(InvalidWorkKindError):
|
||||
self.db.upsert_work_item(
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="o",
|
||||
repo="r",
|
||||
kind="sentry_incident",
|
||||
number=1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(Exception):
|
||||
assert_not_raw_incident_work_item("glitchtip_incident")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_db_unavailable(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
None,
|
||||
observation=_obs(),
|
||||
mapping=self.mapping,
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
create_issue_fn=self._create_issue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_BLOCKED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_structured_skip_reason_environment(self) -> None:
|
||||
m = _mapping(environment_filters=("staging",))
|
||||
res = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(environment="production"),
|
||||
mapping=m,
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
create_issue_fn=self._create_issue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["action"], "skip_environment_filter")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.created), 0)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_load_mappings_json(self) -> None:
|
||||
payload = json.dumps(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"projects": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "gt",
|
||||
"provider": "glitchtip",
|
||||
"monitor_base_url": "https://glitchtip.example",
|
||||
"monitor_org": "org",
|
||||
"monitor_project": "proj",
|
||||
"gitea_org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
"gitea_repo": "Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
maps = load_project_mappings(mappings_json=payload)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(maps), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(maps[0].provider, "glitchtip")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_glitchtip_provider_accepted(self) -> None:
|
||||
m = _mapping(provider="glitchtip", monitor_base_url="https://glitchtip.example")
|
||||
res = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(
|
||||
provider="glitchtip",
|
||||
provider_base_url="https://glitchtip.example",
|
||||
),
|
||||
mapping=m,
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
create_issue_fn=self._create_issue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_CREATED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["incident"]["provider"], "glitchtip")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_allocator_only_sees_issue_kind(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = reconcile_incident(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
observation=_obs(),
|
||||
mapping=self.mapping,
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
create_issue_fn=self._create_issue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
vis = res["allocator_visible_as"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(vis["kind"], "issue")
|
||||
self.assertIn(vis["kind"], WORK_KINDS)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["raw_incident_assignable"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user