resolve conflicts for PR #461

Closes #442.

gitea_lock_issue treated ANY remote branch containing issue-<n> as
duplicate competing work (#400) and failed closed — including the issue's
own already-pushed branch. If the in-memory lock was lost (e.g. MCP server
restart) after the branch was pushed but before the PR, there was no
non-destructive way to reacquire the lock, deadlocking PR creation. This
surfaced during recovery of #420 (feat/issue-420-server-code-parity).

Adds a safe own-branch adoption path.

Changes:
- issue_lock_adoption.py — assess_own_branch_adoption() distinguishes the
  issue's exact requested branch (adopt) from a different same-issue branch
  (competing, still fail-closed); ambiguous (own + other) fails closed.
  build_adoption_proof() emits the required proof block.
- gitea_mcp_server.py — gitea_lock_issue consults the adoption assessment in
  place of the blanket branch-match block; on adoption the result carries an
  `adoption` proof (issue, branch, head commit, reason, no-existing-PR proof,
  no-competing-live-lock proof, lock file path/status). Open-PR and active-
  lease checks already run first, so adoption implies neither exists. Adds
  _branch_entry_commit_sha helper.
- Tests: tests/test_issue_lock_adoption.py (8 cases) + 3 MCP-level cases in
  test_mcp_server.py (adopt own branch, open PR blocks adoption, create_pr
  proceeds after adopted lock). Existing competing-branch block preserved
  (still raises "already has matching branch").

Safety:
- Different same-issue branch, competing branch, existing open PR, ambiguous
  ownership all remain fail-closed. #400 duplicate-work protection intact.
- #420's feature branch was only read (git ls-remote); not modified/deleted.

Validation:
  venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -q  ->  1611 passed, 6 skipped

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>

docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md

@@ -281,6 +281,21 @@ same-issue/same-operation lease blocks duplicate work. An expired lease still
 blocks takeover until a recovery review records why the prior work is abandoned,
 completed, or unsafe to continue.
 
+**Issue-lock recovery (#447):** Do not manually seed, restore, or delete
+`/tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json` as a normal recovery path. That file is global
+shared state and manual writes can clobber another session's live lease. Use
+`sanctioned recovery` instead:
+
+1. `gitea_lock_issue` on a clean `branches/` worktree (normal path).
+2. Own-branch adoption via #442 when the issue's exact branch is already pushed.
+3. Operator override only when explicitly authorized — record
+   `External-state mutations` and `operator override proof` in the final report.
+
+`gitea_create_pr` rejects lock files that lack sanctioned `lock_provenance`
+metadata. Final-report validation blocks handoffs that hide lock read/write/delete
+under `External-state mutations: none` or mix author PR creation with reviewer
+approval in one run. See also #438 (global lock redesign).
+
 Remote branches matching the issue number are also treated as active work unless
 the recovery review proves the branch is abandoned or superseded. Never delete
 or clean up a branch when it has an active lease, dirty worktree, open PR, or is

final_report_validator.py

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ import inspect
 import re
 from typing import Any, Callable
 
+import issue_lock_provenance
 from review_proofs import (
     HANDOFF_HEADING,
     assess_controller_handoff,
@@ -870,6 +871,54 @@ def _rule_reviewer_mutation_ledger(
     )
 
 
+def _rule_shared_issue_lock_external_state(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    result = issue_lock_provenance.assess_issue_lock_external_state_report(report_text)
+    if result.get("proven"):
+        return []
+    return _findings_from_reasons(
+        "shared.issue_lock_external_state",
+        result.get("reasons") or [],
+        field="External-state mutations",
+        severity="block",
+        safe_next_action=(
+            "disclose gitea_issue_lock.json read/write/delete under "
+            "External-state mutations; never claim none after lock seeding"
+        ),
+    )
+
+
+def _rule_shared_manual_lock_pr_override(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    result = issue_lock_provenance.assess_manual_lock_pr_without_override(report_text)
+    if result.get("proven"):
+        return []
+    return _findings_from_reasons(
+        "shared.manual_lock_pr_override",
+        result.get("reasons") or [],
+        field="External-state mutations",
+        severity="block",
+        safe_next_action=(
+            "use gitea_lock_issue or #442 adoption instead of manual lock seeding; "
+            "if operator override was authorized, cite override proof"
+        ),
+    )
+
+
+def _rule_shared_author_reviewer_same_run(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    result = issue_lock_provenance.assess_author_reviewer_same_run_report(report_text)
+    if result.get("proven"):
+        return []
+    return _findings_from_reasons(
+        "shared.author_reviewer_same_run",
+        result.get("reasons") or [],
+        field="Review mutations",
+        severity="block",
+        safe_next_action=(
+            "split author PR creation and reviewer approval across separate "
+            "sessions and handoffs"
+        ),
+    )
+
+
 def _rule_reviewer_review_mutation(
     report_text: str,
     *,
@@ -889,10 +938,17 @@ def _rule_reviewer_review_mutation(
     )
 
 
+_SHARED_ISSUE_LOCK_RULES = (
+    _rule_shared_issue_lock_external_state,
+    _rule_shared_manual_lock_pr_override,
+    _rule_shared_author_reviewer_same_run,
+)
+
 _RULES_BY_TASK: dict[str, list[Callable[..., list[dict[str, str]]]]] = {
     "review_pr": [
         _rule_shared_controller_handoff,
         _rule_shared_email_disclosure,
+        *_SHARED_ISSUE_LOCK_RULES,
         _rule_reviewer_legacy_workspace_mutations,
         _rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none,
         _rule_reviewer_mutation_categories,
@@ -913,6 +969,7 @@ _RULES_BY_TASK: dict[str, list[Callable[..., list[dict[str, str]]]]] = {
     "reconcile_already_landed": [
         _rule_reconcile_controller_handoff,
         _rule_shared_email_disclosure,
+        *_SHARED_ISSUE_LOCK_RULES,
         _rule_reconcile_stale_author_fields,
         _rule_reconcile_eligible_reviewed,
         _rule_reconcile_linked_issue_live,
@@ -924,25 +981,30 @@ _RULES_BY_TASK: dict[str, list[Callable[..., list[dict[str, str]]]]] = {
     "author_issue": [
         _rule_shared_controller_handoff,
         _rule_shared_email_disclosure,
+        *_SHARED_ISSUE_LOCK_RULES,
         _rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none,
     ],
     "work_issue": [
         _rule_shared_controller_handoff,
         _rule_shared_email_disclosure,
+        *_SHARED_ISSUE_LOCK_RULES,
         _rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none,
     ],
     "issue_filing": [
         _rule_shared_controller_handoff,
         _rule_shared_email_disclosure,
+        *_SHARED_ISSUE_LOCK_RULES,
     ],
     "inventory": [
         _rule_shared_controller_handoff,
         _rule_shared_email_disclosure,
+        *_SHARED_ISSUE_LOCK_RULES,
         _rule_reconcile_pagination_proof,
     ],
     "issue_selection": [
         _rule_shared_controller_handoff,
         _rule_shared_email_disclosure,
+        *_SHARED_ISSUE_LOCK_RULES,
     ],
 }
 

gitea_mcp_server.py

@@ -538,9 +538,12 @@ import task_capability_map  # noqa: E402
 import review_proofs  # noqa: E402
 import agent_temp_artifacts
 import issue_lock_worktree  # noqa: E402
+import issue_lock_provenance  # noqa: E402
 import already_landed_reconcile  # noqa: E402
 import author_mutation_worktree  # noqa: E402
 import issue_claim_heartbeat  # noqa: E402
+import issue_work_duplicate_gate  # noqa: E402
+import issue_lock_adoption  # noqa: E402
 import merged_cleanup_reconcile  # noqa: E402
 import reconciler_profile  # noqa: E402
 import reconciliation_workflow  # noqa: E402
@@ -585,7 +588,7 @@ def _load_existing_issue_lock() -> dict | None:
     if not os.path.exists(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE):
         return None
     try:
-        with open(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE, encoding="utf-8") as f:
+        with open(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
             data = json.load(f)
         return data if isinstance(data, dict) else None
     except Exception:
@@ -679,6 +682,132 @@ def _branch_entry_name(branch: dict | str) -> str:
     return str(branch.get("name") or branch.get("ref") or "")
 
 
+def _live_fetch_issue_duplicate_context(
+    h: str,
+    o: str,
+    r: str,
+    auth: str,
+    issue_number: int,
+) -> tuple[list[dict], list[str], dict]:
+    """Live open PRs, remote branch names, and claim state for one issue."""
+    base = repo_api_url(h, o, r)
+    open_prs = api_get_all(f"{base}/pulls?state=open", auth)
+    branches = api_get_all(f"{base}/branches", auth)
+    branch_names = [_branch_entry_name(b) for b in branches]
+    issue = api_request("GET", f"{base}/issues/{issue_number}", auth) or {}
+    comments = api_request(
+        "GET", f"{base}/issues/{issue_number}/comments", auth
+    ) or []
+    claim_entry = issue_claim_heartbeat.classify_issue_claim(
+        issue=issue,
+        comments=comments,
+        open_prs=open_prs,
+        branch_names=branch_names,
+    )
+    return open_prs, branch_names, claim_entry
+
+
+# Injectable duplicate-work context fetcher (#400). Production uses the live
+# Gitea API path above; unit tests patch this symbol instead of hitting the
+# network.
+issue_duplicate_context_fetcher = _live_fetch_issue_duplicate_context
+
+
+def _collect_issue_duplicate_context(
+    h: str,
+    o: str,
+    r: str,
+    auth: str,
+    issue_number: int,
+) -> tuple[list[dict], list[str], dict]:
+    return issue_duplicate_context_fetcher(h, o, r, auth, issue_number)
+
+
+def _assess_issue_duplicate_gate(
+    issue_number: int,
+    *,
+    h: str,
+    o: str,
+    r: str,
+    auth: str,
+    locked_branch: str | None = None,
+    phase: str,
+) -> dict:
+    open_prs, branch_names, claim_entry = _collect_issue_duplicate_context(
+        h, o, r, auth, issue_number
+    )
+    return issue_work_duplicate_gate.assess_work_issue_duplicate_gate(
+        issue_number,
+        open_prs=open_prs,
+        branch_names=branch_names,
+        claim_entry=claim_entry,
+        locked_branch=locked_branch,
+        phase=phase,
+    )
+
+
+def _duplicate_gate_block_response(gate: dict, **extra) -> dict:
+    out = {
+        "success": False,
+        "performed": False,
+        "reasons": list(gate.get("reasons") or []),
+        "duplicate_gate": gate,
+        "safe_next_action": gate.get("safe_next_action"),
+    }
+    out.update(extra)
+    return out
+
+
+def _enforce_locked_issue_duplicate_recheck(
+    remote: str,
+    phase: str,
+    *,
+    host: str | None = None,
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+) -> dict | None:
+    """Re-check duplicate-work gates for the locked issue (#400)."""
+    lock_data = _load_existing_issue_lock()
+    if not lock_data:
+        return None
+    issue_number = int(lock_data.get("issue_number") or 0)
+    locked_branch = lock_data.get("branch_name")
+    if not issue_number:
+        return None
+    h, o, r = _resolve(
+        remote or lock_data.get("remote") or "dadeschools",
+        host or lock_data.get("host"),
+        org or lock_data.get("org"),
+        repo or lock_data.get("repo"),
+    )
+    auth = _auth(h)
+    gate = _assess_issue_duplicate_gate(
+        issue_number,
+        h=h,
+        o=o,
+        r=r,
+        auth=auth,
+        locked_branch=locked_branch,
+        phase=phase,
+    )
+    if gate.get("block"):
+        return gate
+    return None
+
+
+def _branch_entry_commit_sha(branch: dict | str) -> str | None:
+    """Best-effort head SHA for a Gitea branch entry (None when absent)."""
+    if not isinstance(branch, dict):
+        return None
+    commit = branch.get("commit")
+    if isinstance(commit, dict):
+        sha = commit.get("id") or commit.get("sha")
+        if sha:
+            return str(sha)
+    sha = branch.get("commit_sha")
+    return str(sha) if sha else None
+
+
 def _reveal_endpoints() -> bool:
     """Admin/debug opt-in (#120): include endpoint URLs and token source
     names in tool output. Off by default so normal LLM-facing responses
@@ -1151,48 +1280,45 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
             issue_lock_worktree.format_issue_lock_worktree_error(lock_assessment)
         )
 
-    # 2. Check if the issue already has an open PR (reuse protection)
     h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
     auth = _auth(h)
-    url = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls?state=open"
-
-    try:
-        prs = api_get_all(url, auth)
-    except Exception as e:
-        raise RuntimeError(f"Could not list open PRs to verify issue lock: {e}")
-
-    for pr in prs:
-        pr_head = pr.get("head", {}).get("ref", "")
-        pr_title = pr.get("title", "")
-        pr_body = pr.get("body", "")
-
-        if expected_pattern in pr_head:
-            raise ValueError(
-                f"Issue #{issue_number} is already tied to an open PR (PR #{pr.get('number')}, branch '{pr_head}') (fail closed)"
-            )
-
-        patterns = [
-            f"closes #{issue_number}",
-            f"fixes #{issue_number}",
-        ]
-        text_to_check = f"{pr_title} {pr_body}".lower()
-        if any(p in text_to_check for p in patterns):
-            raise ValueError(
-                f"Issue #{issue_number} is already tied to an open PR (PR #{pr.get('number')}) via Closes/Fixes reference (fail closed)"
-            )
+    duplicate_gate = _assess_issue_duplicate_gate(
+        issue_number,
+        h=h,
+        o=o,
+        r=r,
+        auth=auth,
+        locked_branch=branch_name,
+        phase=issue_work_duplicate_gate.PHASE_LOCK,
+    )
+    if duplicate_gate.get("block"):
+        raise ValueError("; ".join(duplicate_gate.get("reasons") or [
+            f"duplicate work gate blocked issue #{issue_number} (fail closed)"
+        ]))
 
     branch_url = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/branches"
     try:
         branches = api_get_all(branch_url, auth)
     except Exception as e:
         raise RuntimeError(f"Could not list branches to verify issue lock: {e}")
-    for branch in branches:
-        name = _branch_entry_name(branch)
-        if expected_pattern in name:
-            raise ValueError(
-                f"Issue #{issue_number} already has matching branch '{name}' "
-                "(fail closed)"
-            )
+    existing_branch_entries = [
+        {
+            "name": _branch_entry_name(branch),
+            "commit_sha": _branch_entry_commit_sha(branch),
+        }
+        for branch in branches
+    ]
+    adoption = issue_lock_adoption.assess_own_branch_adoption(
+        issue_number=issue_number,
+        requested_branch=branch_name,
+        existing_branches=existing_branch_entries,
+    )
+    if adoption["block"]:
+        competing = ", ".join(adoption["competing_branches"])
+        raise ValueError(
+            f"Issue #{issue_number} already has matching branch '{competing}' "
+            "that is not the requested branch (fail closed)"
+        )
 
     work_lease = _build_author_issue_work_lease(
         issue_number=issue_number,
@@ -1208,6 +1334,10 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
         "repo": r,
         "worktree_path": resolved_worktree,
         "work_lease": work_lease,
+        "lock_provenance": issue_lock_provenance.build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
+            tool="gitea_lock_issue",
+            claimant=work_lease.get("claimant"),
+        ),
     }
 
     try:
@@ -1230,6 +1360,21 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
         "worktree_path": resolved_worktree,
         "work_lease": work_lease,
     }
+    if adoption["adopt"]:
+        # #442: recovery lock over the issue's own already-pushed branch.
+        result["adoption"] = issue_lock_adoption.build_adoption_proof(
+            issue_number=issue_number,
+            branch_name=branch_name,
+            assessment=adoption,
+            open_pr_checked=True,
+            competing_lock_checked=True,
+            lock_file_path=ISSUE_LOCK_FILE,
+            lock_file_status="written",
+        )
+        result["message"] = (
+            f"Adopted existing branch '{branch_name}' and locked issue "
+            f"#{issue_number} for recovery (fail-closed check complete)."
+        )
     if agent_artifacts:
         result["warnings"] = [
             "Agent temp artifacts at repo root (delete before implementation): "
@@ -1238,6 +1383,39 @@ def gitea_lock_issue(
     return result
 
 
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_assess_work_issue_duplicate(
+    issue_number: int,
+    branch_name: str | None = None,
+    phase: str = issue_work_duplicate_gate.PHASE_LOCK,
+    remote: str = "dadeschools",
+    host: str | None = None,
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Read-only duplicate-work gate for author sessions before mutations (#400)."""
+    read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
+    if read_block:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "performed": False,
+            "reasons": read_block,
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
+        }
+    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    auth = _auth(h)
+    gate = _assess_issue_duplicate_gate(
+        issue_number,
+        h=h,
+        o=o,
+        r=r,
+        auth=auth,
+        locked_branch=branch_name,
+        phase=phase,
+    )
+    return {"success": not gate.get("block"), **gate}
+
+
 @mcp.tool()
 def gitea_create_pr(
     title: str,
@@ -1298,6 +1476,14 @@ def gitea_create_pr(
     except Exception as e:
         raise RuntimeError(f"Could not read issue lock file: {e} (fail closed)")
 
+    lock_provenance_check = issue_lock_provenance.assess_lock_file_for_create_pr(
+        lock_data
+    )
+    if lock_provenance_check["block"]:
+        raise RuntimeError(
+            issue_lock_provenance.format_lock_provenance_error(lock_provenance_check)
+        )
+
     locked_issue = lock_data.get("issue_number")
     locked_branch = lock_data.get("branch_name")
     locked_worktree = lock_data.get("worktree_path")
@@ -1329,6 +1515,21 @@ def gitea_create_pr(
             f"PR title or body must contain 'Closes #{locked_issue}' or 'Fixes #{locked_issue}' exactly to ensure durable tracking (fail closed)"
         )
 
+    duplicate_block = _enforce_locked_issue_duplicate_recheck(
+        remote,
+        issue_work_duplicate_gate.PHASE_CREATE_PR,
+        host=host,
+        org=org,
+        repo=repo,
+    )
+    if duplicate_block:
+        return _duplicate_gate_block_response(
+            duplicate_block,
+            number=None,
+            issue_number=locked_issue,
+            branch_name=locked_branch,
+        )
+
     auth = _auth(h)
     url = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls"
     payload = {"title": title, "body": body, "head": head, "base": base}
@@ -2933,6 +3134,20 @@ def gitea_commit_files(
     if blocked:
         return blocked
 
+    duplicate_block = _enforce_locked_issue_duplicate_recheck(
+        remote,
+        issue_work_duplicate_gate.PHASE_COMMIT,
+        host=host,
+        org=org,
+        repo=repo,
+    )
+    if duplicate_block:
+        return _duplicate_gate_block_response(
+            duplicate_block,
+            commit="",
+            branch="",
+        )
+
     verify_preflight_purity(remote)
     processed_files, source_proofs = _prepare_commit_payload_files(files)
 

issue_lock_adoption.py

@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+"""Own-branch lock adoption / recovery for ``gitea_lock_issue`` (#442).
+
+When an issue's own already-pushed branch exists, lock reacquisition must be
+allowed (adoption) instead of being treated as #400 duplicate competing work.
+This module isolates the pure decision so it can be unit-tested apart from the
+MCP server's live Gitea calls.
+
+Adoption is granted only for the issue's *exact* requested branch. Any other
+branch that merely contains the same ``issue-<n>`` marker is competing work and
+stays fail-closed. Open-PR, competing-live-lock, capability, and worktree
+safety checks are enforced by the caller before this decision is consulted;
+this module additionally records whether they passed for proof purposes.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+ADOPT = "adopt_existing_branch"
+BLOCK_COMPETING = "block_competing_branch"
+NO_MATCH = "no_matching_branch"
+
+
+def _branch_name(entry) -> str:
+    if isinstance(entry, dict):
+        return str(entry.get("name") or "")
+    return str(entry or "")
+
+
+def _branch_sha(entry) -> str | None:
+    if isinstance(entry, dict):
+        sha = entry.get("commit_sha")
+        if sha:
+            return str(sha)
+    return None
+
+
+def assess_own_branch_adoption(
+    *,
+    issue_number: int,
+    requested_branch: str,
+    existing_branches,
+) -> dict:
+    """Decide whether an existing matching branch is adoptable.
+
+    Args:
+        issue_number: The tracking issue number being locked.
+        requested_branch: The exact branch the caller wants to lock.
+        existing_branches: Iterable of remote branch entries — either names or
+            dicts with ``name`` and optional ``commit_sha``.
+
+    Returns:
+        dict with:
+          * ``outcome`` — one of ADOPT / BLOCK_COMPETING / NO_MATCH
+          * ``adopt`` (bool), ``block`` (bool)
+          * ``reason`` (str)
+          * ``matched_branch`` (str | None), ``matched_head_sha`` (str | None)
+          * ``competing_branches`` (list[str])
+
+    ADOPT: the issue's exact branch exists and no other same-issue branch does.
+    BLOCK_COMPETING: at least one same-issue branch is not the requested branch.
+    NO_MATCH: no branch carries the issue marker — normal lock path applies.
+    """
+    marker = f"issue-{issue_number}"
+    requested = (requested_branch or "").strip()
+
+    matches: list[tuple[str, str | None]] = []
+    for entry in existing_branches or []:
+        name = _branch_name(entry).strip()
+        if marker in name:
+            matches.append((name, _branch_sha(entry)))
+
+    competing = sorted({name for name, _ in matches if name != requested})
+    exact = [(name, sha) for name, sha in matches if name == requested]
+
+    # Fail closed whenever any non-requested same-issue branch exists, even if
+    # the requested branch is also present: ownership is then ambiguous.
+    if competing:
+        return {
+            "outcome": BLOCK_COMPETING,
+            "adopt": False,
+            "block": True,
+            "reason": (
+                f"issue #{issue_number} already has matching branch(es) "
+                f"{competing} that are not the requested branch "
+                f"'{requested}' (fail closed)"
+            ),
+            "matched_branch": None,
+            "matched_head_sha": None,
+            "competing_branches": competing,
+        }
+
+    if exact:
+        name, sha = exact[0]
+        return {
+            "outcome": ADOPT,
+            "adopt": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "reason": (
+                f"existing branch '{name}' is the exact requested branch for "
+                f"issue #{issue_number}; adopting it for lock recovery"
+            ),
+            "matched_branch": name,
+            "matched_head_sha": sha,
+            "competing_branches": [],
+        }
+
+    return {
+        "outcome": NO_MATCH,
+        "adopt": False,
+        "block": False,
+        "reason": f"no existing branch matches issue #{issue_number}",
+        "matched_branch": None,
+        "matched_head_sha": None,
+        "competing_branches": [],
+    }
+
+
+def build_adoption_proof(
+    *,
+    issue_number: int,
+    branch_name: str,
+    assessment: dict,
+    open_pr_checked: bool,
+    competing_lock_checked: bool,
+    lock_file_path: str,
+    lock_file_status: str,
+) -> dict:
+    """Assemble the proof block returned by ``gitea_lock_issue`` on adoption.
+
+    Requirement #4: adoption results must carry issue number, branch name,
+    branch head commit, adoption reason, no-existing-PR proof, no-competing-
+    live-lock proof, and lock file path/status.
+    """
+    return {
+        "issue_number": issue_number,
+        "branch_name": branch_name,
+        "branch_head_commit": assessment.get("matched_head_sha"),
+        "adoption_reason": assessment.get("reason"),
+        "no_existing_pr_proof": bool(open_pr_checked),
+        "no_competing_live_lock_proof": bool(competing_lock_checked),
+        "lock_file_path": lock_file_path,
+        "lock_file_status": lock_file_status,
+    }

issue_lock_provenance.py

@@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
+"""Issue-lock provenance and external-state disclosure (#447).
+
+Sanctioned locks are written only by ``gitea_lock_issue`` (or adoption recovery
+#442). Manual seeding of ``/tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json`` is unsafe and must be
+blocked at PR creation unless explicit operator override proof is recorded.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import re
+from datetime import datetime, timezone
+
+ISSUE_LOCK_FILE = os.environ.get("GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_FILE", "/tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json")
+
+SOURCE_LOCK_ISSUE = "gitea_lock_issue"
+SOURCE_LOCK_ADOPTION = "gitea_lock_issue_adoption"
+SOURCE_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE = "operator_override"
+
+SANCTIONED_LOCK_SOURCES = frozenset({
+    SOURCE_LOCK_ISSUE,
+    SOURCE_LOCK_ADOPTION,
+    SOURCE_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE,
+})
+
+_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE_ENV = "GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE"
+
+_ISSUE_LOCK_PATH_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:/tmp/)?gitea_issue_lock\.json",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_LOCK_SEED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:seed(?:ed|ing)?|restor(?:e|ed|ing)|wrote|written|write|programmatically|"
+    r"hand[- ]forg|manual(?:ly)?).{0,80}gitea_issue_lock",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.DOTALL,
+)
+_LOCK_REMOVE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:\brm\b|remove|deleted?|unlink).{0,80}gitea_issue_lock",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.DOTALL,
+)
+_LOCK_READ_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:read|loaded?|parsed?).{0,80}gitea_issue_lock",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.DOTALL,
+)
+_EXTERNAL_NONE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"external[- ]state mutations\s*:\s*none\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_EXTERNAL_FIELD_RE = re.compile(
+    r"external[- ]state mutations\s*:\s*(.+)$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_CLEANUP_ONLY_RE = re.compile(
+    r"cleanup mutations\s*:\s*(?:none|lock removed|removed issue lock)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_PR_CREATED_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:\bgitea_create_pr\b|PR\s*#\s*\d+\s+created|created\s+PR\s*#|opened\s+PR\s*#|"
+    r"PR\s+creation\s+(?:succeeded|complete))",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_REVIEW_APPROVE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:submitted\s+(?:['\"]approve['\"]|approve\s+review)|"
+    r"review decision\s*:\s*approve|approved\s+PR\s*#|gitea_review_pr.*approve)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_OVERRIDE_PROOF_RE = re.compile(
+    r"operator[- ]override\s+proof\s*:\s*(.+)$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+
+
+def _utc_now_iso() -> str:
+    return datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
+
+
+def build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
+    *,
+    tool: str,
+    source: str = SOURCE_LOCK_ISSUE,
+    claimant: dict | None = None,
+    adoption: dict | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Return provenance metadata stored with a sanctioned lock write."""
+    entry = {
+        "source": source,
+        "written_at": _utc_now_iso(),
+        "written_by_tool": tool,
+        "lock_file_path": ISSUE_LOCK_FILE,
+    }
+    if claimant:
+        entry["claimant"] = claimant
+    if adoption:
+        entry["adoption"] = adoption
+    return entry
+
+
+def operator_override_requested() -> bool:
+    return os.environ.get(_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE_ENV, "").strip().lower() in {
+        "1",
+        "true",
+        "yes",
+    }
+
+
+def build_operator_override_provenance(*, reason: str, claimant: dict | None = None) -> dict:
+    text = (reason or "").strip()
+    if not text:
+        raise ValueError(
+            "operator override requires a non-empty override reason (fail closed)"
+        )
+    entry = build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
+        tool="operator_override",
+        source=SOURCE_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE,
+        claimant=claimant,
+    )
+    entry["override_reason"] = text
+    return entry
+
+
+def assess_lock_file_for_create_pr(lock_data: dict | None) -> dict:
+    """Fail closed when lock file lacks sanctioned provenance (#447)."""
+    data = lock_data if isinstance(lock_data, dict) else {}
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    provenance = data.get("lock_provenance")
+    if not isinstance(provenance, dict):
+        reasons.append(
+            "issue lock file lacks sanctioned lock_provenance; manual seeding is "
+            "not a normal recovery path — call gitea_lock_issue or use #442 adoption"
+        )
+        return _provenance_result(False, reasons, provenance)
+
+    source = str(provenance.get("source") or "").strip()
+    if source not in SANCTIONED_LOCK_SOURCES:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"issue lock provenance source '{source or '(missing)'}' is not sanctioned"
+        )
+
+    if source == SOURCE_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE and not str(
+        provenance.get("override_reason") or ""
+    ).strip():
+        reasons.append(
+            "operator_override lock provenance requires override_reason proof"
+        )
+
+    if not data.get("work_lease"):
+        reasons.append("issue lock file missing work_lease metadata")
+
+    if not str(provenance.get("written_by_tool") or "").strip():
+        reasons.append("issue lock provenance missing written_by_tool")
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return _provenance_result(proven, reasons, provenance)
+
+
+def _provenance_result(proven: bool, reasons: list[str], provenance: dict | None) -> dict:
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "lock_provenance": provenance,
+    }
+
+
+def format_lock_provenance_error(assessment: dict) -> str:
+    reasons = "; ".join(assessment.get("reasons") or ["unknown lock provenance violation"])
+    return f"Issue lock provenance guard (#447): {reasons} (fail closed)"
+
+
+def _lock_activity_detected(text: str) -> dict[str, bool]:
+    body = text or ""
+    return {
+        "seed_or_restore": bool(_LOCK_SEED_RE.search(body)),
+        "remove": bool(_LOCK_REMOVE_RE.search(body)),
+        "read": bool(_LOCK_READ_RE.search(body)),
+    }
+
+
+def _external_state_discloses_lock(text: str) -> bool:
+    match = _EXTERNAL_FIELD_RE.search(text or "")
+    if not match:
+        return False
+    value = (match.group(1) or "").strip().lower()
+    if value in {"", "none", "n/a"}:
+        return False
+    return "lock" in value or "gitea_issue_lock" in value or "issue-lock" in value
+
+
+def assess_issue_lock_external_state_report(report_text: str) -> dict:
+    """Require explicit external-state disclosure for issue-lock mutations (#447)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    activity = _lock_activity_detected(text)
+    if not any(activity.values()):
+        return {"proven": True, "block": False, "reasons": [], "activity": activity}
+
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    disclosed = _external_state_discloses_lock(text)
+
+    if activity["seed_or_restore"] and _EXTERNAL_NONE_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "report mentions seeding/restoring gitea_issue_lock.json but claims "
+            "External-state mutations: none"
+        )
+    elif activity["seed_or_restore"] and not disclosed:
+        reasons.append(
+            "report mentions issue-lock file activity but External-state mutations "
+            "does not disclose read/write of gitea_issue_lock.json"
+        )
+
+    if activity["remove"]:
+        if _EXTERNAL_NONE_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "report mentions removing gitea_issue_lock.json but claims "
+                "External-state mutations: none"
+            )
+        elif not disclosed and _CLEANUP_ONLY_RE.search(text):
+            reasons.append(
+                "report removes issue lock but classifies it as cleanup only; "
+                "record under External-state mutations"
+            )
+        elif not disclosed:
+            reasons.append(
+                "report mentions deleting issue lock without External-state "
+                "mutation disclosure"
+            )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "activity": activity,
+    }
+
+
+def assess_manual_lock_pr_without_override(report_text: str) -> dict:
+    """Block reports that created a PR via manual lock seed without override proof."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    seeded = bool(_LOCK_SEED_RE.search(text))
+    created = bool(_PR_CREATED_RE.search(text))
+    if not (seeded and created):
+        return {"proven": True, "block": False, "reasons": []}
+
+    if _OVERRIDE_PROOF_RE.search(text):
+        return {"proven": True, "block": False, "reasons": []}
+
+    return {
+        "proven": False,
+        "block": True,
+        "reasons": [
+            "report created/opened a PR after manual issue-lock seeding without "
+            "operator override proof"
+        ],
+    }
+
+
+def assess_author_reviewer_same_run_report(report_text: str) -> dict:
+    """Reviewer handoff must not create and approve the same PR in one run (#447)."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    if not (_PR_CREATED_RE.search(text) and _REVIEW_APPROVE_RE.search(text)):
+        return {"proven": True, "block": False, "reasons": []}
+    return {
+        "proven": False,
+        "block": True,
+        "reasons": [
+            "report mixes author-side PR creation and reviewer approval in one "
+            "final handoff; split author and reviewer sessions"
+        ],
+    }

issue_work_duplicate_gate.py

@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+"""Early duplicate-work detection for author work-issue sessions (#400)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from typing import Any
+
+import issue_claim_heartbeat as claim_hb
+
+PHASE_LOCK = "lock_issue"
+PHASE_COMMIT = "commit"
+PHASE_PUSH = "push"
+PHASE_CREATE_PR = "create_pr"
+
+OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_PR_PREVENTED = "duplicate_pr_prevented"
+OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_BRANCH_PREVENTED = "duplicate_branch_prevented"
+OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_COMMIT_PREVENTED = "duplicate_commit_prevented"
+OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_WORK_NOT_PREVENTED = "duplicate_work_not_prevented"
+
+_ACTIVE_CLAIM_STATUSES = frozenset({"active", "awaiting_review"})
+
+
+def _issue_pattern(issue_number: int) -> str:
+    return f"issue-{int(issue_number)}"
+
+
+def _linked_open_pr(issue_number: int, open_prs: list[dict]) -> dict | None:
+    return claim_hb._linked_open_pr(issue_number, open_prs)
+
+
+def _matching_branches(
+    issue_number: int,
+    branch_names: list[str],
+    *,
+    locked_branch: str | None = None,
+) -> list[str]:
+    pattern = _issue_pattern(issue_number)
+    matches = [
+        name for name in (branch_names or [])
+        if pattern in (name or "").lower()
+    ]
+    if locked_branch:
+        locked = locked_branch.strip()
+        matches = [name for name in matches if name != locked]
+    return matches
+
+
+def assess_work_issue_duplicate_gate(
+    issue_number: int,
+    *,
+    open_prs: list[dict] | None = None,
+    branch_names: list[str] | None = None,
+    claim_entry: dict | None = None,
+    locked_branch: str | None = None,
+    phase: str = PHASE_LOCK,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Fail closed when duplicate work is already in flight for an issue."""
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    outcome = OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_WORK_NOT_PREVENTED
+    prs = list(open_prs or [])
+    branches = list(branch_names or [])
+    pattern = _issue_pattern(issue_number)
+
+    linked = _linked_open_pr(issue_number, prs)
+    if linked:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"open PR #{linked.get('number')} already covers issue "
+            f"#{issue_number} (fail closed)"
+        )
+        outcome = OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_PR_PREVENTED
+
+    conflicting_branches = _matching_branches(
+        issue_number, branches, locked_branch=locked_branch
+    )
+    if conflicting_branches:
+        names = ", ".join(conflicting_branches[:5])
+        reasons.append(
+            f"remote branch(es) already match issue pattern '{pattern}': "
+            f"{names} (fail closed)"
+        )
+        if outcome == OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_WORK_NOT_PREVENTED:
+            outcome = OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_BRANCH_PREVENTED
+
+    entry = claim_entry or {}
+    if entry.get("linked_open_pr") and not linked:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"claim inventory reports open PR #{entry['linked_open_pr']} "
+            f"for issue #{issue_number} (fail closed)"
+        )
+        outcome = OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_PR_PREVENTED
+
+    status = (entry.get("status") or "").strip().lower()
+    if status in _ACTIVE_CLAIM_STATUSES and not linked:
+        heartbeat = entry.get("latest_heartbeat") or {}
+        claim_branch = (heartbeat.get("branch") or "").strip()
+        if locked_branch and claim_branch and claim_branch != locked_branch:
+            reasons.append(
+                f"active claim lease on branch '{claim_branch}' blocks "
+                f"work on '{locked_branch}' for issue #{issue_number} "
+                "(fail closed)"
+            )
+            if outcome == OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_WORK_NOT_PREVENTED:
+                outcome = OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_BRANCH_PREVENTED
+        elif not locked_branch and status == "active":
+            reasons.append(
+                f"issue #{issue_number} has an active claim lease "
+                "(fail closed)"
+            )
+            if outcome == OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_WORK_NOT_PREVENTED:
+                outcome = OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_BRANCH_PREVENTED
+
+    if phase in {PHASE_COMMIT, PHASE_PUSH} and reasons:
+        if outcome == OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_PR_PREVENTED:
+            outcome = OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_COMMIT_PREVENTED
+        elif outcome == OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_BRANCH_PREVENTED:
+            outcome = OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_COMMIT_PREVENTED
+
+    block = bool(reasons)
+    return {
+        "block": block,
+        "performed": not block,
+        "issue_number": issue_number,
+        "phase": phase,
+        "outcome": outcome,
+        "linked_open_pr": linked.get("number") if linked else entry.get("linked_open_pr"),
+        "conflicting_branches": conflicting_branches,
+        "claim_status": status or None,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "stop before mutating; preserve local work and produce a "
+            "reconciliation handoff if a concurrent PR appeared after push"
+            if block and phase == PHASE_CREATE_PR
+            else "stop before mutating; do not commit or push duplicate work"
+            if block
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def assess_work_issue_duplicate_report(report_text: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Require explicit duplicate-work outcome wording in work-issue reports."""
+    text = (report_text or "").lower()
+    markers = {
+        OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_PR_PREVENTED: (
+            "duplicate pr prevented",
+            "duplicate_pr_prevented",
+        ),
+        OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_BRANCH_PREVENTED: (
+            "duplicate branch prevented",
+            "duplicate_branch_prevented",
+        ),
+        OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_COMMIT_PREVENTED: (
+            "duplicate commit prevented",
+            "duplicate_commit_prevented",
+        ),
+        OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_WORK_NOT_PREVENTED: (
+            "duplicate work not prevented",
+            "duplicate_work_not_prevented",
+            "no duplicate work",
+        ),
+    }
+    matched = [
+        key for key, phrases in markers.items()
+        if any(phrase in text for phrase in phrases)
+    ]
+    if len(matched) != 1:
+        return {
+            "complete": False,
+            "downgraded": True,
+            "reasons": [
+                "work-issue report must state exactly one duplicate-work "
+                "outcome (duplicate PR/branch/commit prevented, or "
+                "duplicate work not prevented)"
+            ],
+        }
+    return {
+        "complete": True,
+        "downgraded": False,
+        "outcome": matched[0],
+        "reasons": [],
+    }

review_proofs.py

@@ -3624,9 +3624,12 @@ def assess_work_issue_mode_isolation(report_text: str) -> dict:
 
 def assess_work_issue_final_report(report_text: str) -> dict:
     """#139: composite verifier for work-issue final reports."""
+    from issue_work_duplicate_gate import assess_work_issue_duplicate_report
+
     checks = {
         "workflow_source": assess_work_issue_workflow_source(report_text),
         "mode_isolation": assess_work_issue_mode_isolation(report_text),
+        "duplicate_work_outcome": assess_work_issue_duplicate_report(report_text),
     }
 
     reasons = []

skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/work-issue.md

@@ -297,6 +297,36 @@ Report:
 
 Do not create another branch/PR for the same issue unless the project explicitly allows taking over or updating existing work and exact capability is proven.
 
+### 10A. Duplicate-work gate phases (#400)
+
+Before any file edits, prove duplicate-work clearance with
+`gitea_assess_work_issue_duplicate` or `gitea_lock_issue` (which runs the same
+gate). The gate checks live:
+
+* open PRs linked to the issue (head branch or Closes/Fixes reference),
+* remote branches matching `issue-<number>`,
+* active claim leases from structured heartbeats.
+
+Re-check immediately before:
+
+* `gitea_commit_files` (commit),
+* branch push,
+* `gitea_create_pr` (PR creation).
+
+If a concurrent open PR appears after work begins:
+
+* before commit/push → stop and preserve local work without pushing,
+* after commit but before push → stop without pushing,
+* after push but before PR creation → stop and produce a reconciliation
+  handoff instead of opening a PR.
+
+Final reports must state exactly one duplicate-work outcome:
+
+* `duplicate PR prevented`
+* `duplicate branch prevented`
+* `duplicate commit prevented`
+* `duplicate work not prevented`
+
 ## 11. Claim or lock the issue before implementation
 
 Claim/lock the issue before implementation if the project provides a claim/lock mechanism.
@@ -717,6 +747,12 @@ Use only precise categories:
 * External-state mutations:
 * Read-only diagnostics:
 
+Issue-lock file (`/tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json`) read/write/delete is always an
+external-state mutation. Never claim `External-state mutations: none` after
+seeding, restoring, or removing that file. Manual lock seeding is not a normal
+recovery path (#447); use `gitea_lock_issue` or the #442 adoption recovery path
+instead. Link broader redesign: #438.
+
 `git fetch`, `git remote update`, and any command that updates refs must be listed under `Git ref mutations`, not read-only diagnostics.
 
 If `git reset --hard`, checkout, clean, worktree add/remove, merge simulation, merge abort, or similar commands occurred, report them under `Worktree/index mutations`.

tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py

@@ -80,7 +80,10 @@ class TestIssueLockArtifactWarning(unittest.TestCase):
     def tearDown(self):
         self._env_patcher.stop()
 
-    @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[])
+    @patch(
+        "mcp_server.issue_duplicate_context_fetcher",
+        return_value=([], [], {"status": "not_claimed"}),
+    )
     @patch("mcp_server._auth", return_value="token x")
     @patch("mcp_server._resolve", return_value=("h", "o", "r"))
     @patch("mcp_server.ISSUE_LOCK_FILE", new_callable=lambda: tempfile.mktemp())

tests/test_commit_files_capability.py

@@ -76,7 +76,14 @@ class CommitFilesCapabilityBase(unittest.TestCase):
         with open(self.config_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
             fh.write(json.dumps(CONFIG))
 
+        self._dup_fetcher_patcher = patch(
+            "mcp_server.issue_duplicate_context_fetcher",
+            return_value=([], [], {"status": "not_claimed"}),
+        )
+        self._dup_fetcher_patcher.start()
+
     def tearDown(self):
+        self._dup_fetcher_patcher.stop()
         self._remotes.stop()
         mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
         mcp_server._preflight_whoami_called, mcp_server._preflight_capability_called = (

tests/test_commit_payloads.py

@@ -67,6 +67,15 @@ class TestCommitPayloads(unittest.TestCase):
         self.locked_worktree_path = os.path.realpath(self.locked_worktree_dir.name)
 
         self.lock_file_path = "/tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json"
+        import issue_lock_provenance
+
+        work_lease = {
+            "operation_type": "author_issue_work",
+            "issue_number": 263,
+            "branch": "feat/issue-263-native-commit-payloads",
+            "claimant": {"username": "test-user", "profile": "test-author"},
+            "expires_at": "2999-01-01T00:00:00Z",
+        }
         self.lock_data = {
             "issue_number": 263,
             "branch_name": "feat/issue-263-native-commit-payloads",
@@ -74,6 +83,11 @@ class TestCommitPayloads(unittest.TestCase):
             "org": "Example-Org",
             "repo": "Example-Repo",
             "worktree_path": self.locked_worktree_path,
+            "work_lease": work_lease,
+            "lock_provenance": issue_lock_provenance.build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
+                tool="gitea_lock_issue",
+                claimant=work_lease.get("claimant"),
+            ),
         }
         with open(self.lock_file_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
             fh.write(json.dumps(self.lock_data))
@@ -84,7 +98,14 @@ class TestCommitPayloads(unittest.TestCase):
         mcp_server._preflight_whoami_called = True
         mcp_server._preflight_capability_called = True
 
+        self._dup_fetcher_patcher = patch(
+            "mcp_server.issue_duplicate_context_fetcher",
+            return_value=([], [], {"status": "not_claimed"}),
+        )
+        self._dup_fetcher_patcher.start()
+
     def tearDown(self):
+        self._dup_fetcher_patcher.stop()
         self._remotes.stop()
         mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
 

tests/test_issue_lock_adoption.py

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+"""Unit tests for own-branch lock adoption decision (#442)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from issue_lock_adoption import (  # noqa: E402
+    ADOPT,
+    BLOCK_COMPETING,
+    NO_MATCH,
+    assess_own_branch_adoption,
+    build_adoption_proof,
+)
+
+REQ = "feat/issue-420-server-code-parity"
+
+
+class TestAssessOwnBranchAdoption(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_exact_own_branch_is_adopted(self):
+        result = assess_own_branch_adoption(
+            issue_number=420,
+            requested_branch=REQ,
+            existing_branches=[{"name": REQ, "commit_sha": "934688a"}],
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], ADOPT)
+        self.assertTrue(result["adopt"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["matched_branch"], REQ)
+        self.assertEqual(result["matched_head_sha"], "934688a")
+
+    def test_exact_own_branch_adopted_when_sha_missing(self):
+        result = assess_own_branch_adoption(
+            issue_number=420, requested_branch=REQ, existing_branches=[REQ]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], ADOPT)
+        self.assertIsNone(result["matched_head_sha"])
+
+    def test_different_branch_same_issue_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_own_branch_adoption(
+            issue_number=420,
+            requested_branch=REQ,
+            existing_branches=[{"name": "feat/issue-420-other-work"}],
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], BLOCK_COMPETING)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["adopt"])
+        self.assertIn("feat/issue-420-other-work", result["competing_branches"])
+        self.assertIn("fail closed", result["reason"])
+
+    def test_own_branch_plus_competing_branch_blocks(self):
+        # Ambiguous ownership: fail closed even though the exact branch exists.
+        result = assess_own_branch_adoption(
+            issue_number=420,
+            requested_branch=REQ,
+            existing_branches=[{"name": REQ}, {"name": "feat/issue-420-rogue"}],
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], BLOCK_COMPETING)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["competing_branches"], ["feat/issue-420-rogue"])
+
+    def test_no_matching_branch_is_normal_path(self):
+        result = assess_own_branch_adoption(
+            issue_number=420,
+            requested_branch=REQ,
+            existing_branches=[{"name": "feat/issue-999-unrelated"}],
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], NO_MATCH)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["adopt"])
+
+    def test_empty_branch_list_is_normal_path(self):
+        result = assess_own_branch_adoption(
+            issue_number=420, requested_branch=REQ, existing_branches=[]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], NO_MATCH)
+
+    def test_substring_issue_number_not_falsely_matched_as_exact(self):
+        # A different issue's branch must not be adopted as ours.
+        result = assess_own_branch_adoption(
+            issue_number=42,
+            requested_branch="feat/issue-42-thing",
+            existing_branches=[{"name": "feat/issue-420-server-code-parity"}],
+        )
+        # 'issue-42' is a substring of 'issue-420', so marker matches but the
+        # name differs -> competing block, never adoption of the wrong branch.
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], BLOCK_COMPETING)
+        self.assertNotEqual(result["matched_branch"], "feat/issue-420-server-code-parity")
+
+
+class TestBuildAdoptionProof(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_proof_has_all_required_fields(self):
+        assessment = assess_own_branch_adoption(
+            issue_number=420,
+            requested_branch=REQ,
+            existing_branches=[{"name": REQ, "commit_sha": "934688a"}],
+        )
+        proof = build_adoption_proof(
+            issue_number=420,
+            branch_name=REQ,
+            assessment=assessment,
+            open_pr_checked=True,
+            competing_lock_checked=True,
+            lock_file_path="/tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json",
+            lock_file_status="written",
+        )
+        for key in (
+            "issue_number",
+            "branch_name",
+            "branch_head_commit",
+            "adoption_reason",
+            "no_existing_pr_proof",
+            "no_competing_live_lock_proof",
+            "lock_file_path",
+            "lock_file_status",
+        ):
+            self.assertIn(key, proof)
+        self.assertEqual(proof["branch_head_commit"], "934688a")
+        self.assertTrue(proof["no_existing_pr_proof"])
+        self.assertTrue(proof["no_competing_live_lock_proof"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_issue_lock_provenance.py

@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+"""Tests for issue-lock provenance and external-state disclosure (#447)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import issue_lock_provenance as ilp  # noqa: E402
+from final_report_validator import assess_final_report_validator  # noqa: E402
+
+
+def _sanctioned_lock(**overrides):
+    work_lease = {
+        "operation_type": "author_issue_work",
+        "issue_number": 447,
+        "branch": "feat/issue-447-lock-provenance",
+        "claimant": {"username": "jcwalker3", "profile": "prgs-author"},
+        "expires_at": "2999-01-01T00:00:00Z",
+    }
+    data = {
+        "issue_number": 447,
+        "branch_name": "feat/issue-447-lock-provenance",
+        "work_lease": work_lease,
+        "lock_provenance": ilp.build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
+            tool="gitea_lock_issue",
+            claimant=work_lease["claimant"],
+        ),
+    }
+    data.update(overrides)
+    return data
+
+
+class TestLockProvenanceForCreatePr(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_sanctioned_lock_passes(self):
+        result = ilp.assess_lock_file_for_create_pr(_sanctioned_lock())
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_manual_seed_without_provenance_blocked(self):
+        result = ilp.assess_lock_file_for_create_pr(
+            {"issue_number": 420, "branch_name": "feat/x", "work_lease": {}}
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertIn("lock_provenance", result["reasons"][0])
+
+    def test_operator_override_requires_reason(self):
+        result = ilp.assess_lock_file_for_create_pr(
+            _sanctioned_lock(
+                lock_provenance=ilp.build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
+                    tool="operator_override",
+                    source=ilp.SOURCE_OPERATOR_OVERRIDE,
+                )
+            )
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestExternalStateReportRules(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_seed_with_external_none_blocked(self):
+        report = (
+            "Restored /tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json to unblock PR creation.\n"
+            "- External-state mutations: none\n"
+        )
+        result = ilp.assess_issue_lock_external_state_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_seed_with_disclosure_passes(self):
+        report = (
+            "Restored /tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json after MCP restart.\n"
+            "- External-state mutations: wrote /tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json\n"
+        )
+        result = ilp.assess_issue_lock_external_state_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_remove_claimed_as_cleanup_only_blocked(self):
+        report = (
+            "rm /tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json after PR creation.\n"
+            "- Cleanup mutations: lock removed\n"
+            "- External-state mutations: none\n"
+        )
+        result = ilp.assess_issue_lock_external_state_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_manual_lock_pr_without_override_blocked(self):
+        report = (
+            "Programmatically seeded gitea_issue_lock.json then gitea_create_pr.\n"
+            "PR #444 created.\n"
+        )
+        result = ilp.assess_manual_lock_pr_without_override(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_author_reviewer_same_run_blocked(self):
+        report = (
+            "gitea_create_pr opened PR #444.\n"
+            "Submitted approve review on PR #444.\n"
+        )
+        result = ilp.assess_author_reviewer_same_run_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestFinalReportValidatorIntegration(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_work_issue_blocks_hidden_lock_mutation(self):
+        report = (
+            "## Controller Handoff\n"
+            "- Task: work issue #420\n"
+            "- External-state mutations: none\n"
+            "Restored /tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json before PR creation.\n"
+        )
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "work_issue")
+        rule_ids = {f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]}
+        self.assertIn("shared.issue_lock_external_state", rule_ids)
+        self.assertTrue(result["blocked"])
+
+    def test_review_pr_blocks_create_and_approve(self):
+        report = (
+            "## Controller Handoff\n"
+            "- Task: review PR #444\n"
+            "- Review decision: approve\n"
+            "Created PR #444 via gitea_create_pr earlier in this run.\n"
+        )
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
+        rule_ids = {f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]}
+        self.assertIn("shared.author_reviewer_same_run", rule_ids)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_issue_work_duplicate_gate.py

@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
+"""Tests for early duplicate-work detection (#400)."""
+import json
+import os
+import sys
+import tempfile
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import issue_work_duplicate_gate as dup_gate
+import mcp_server
+from issue_work_duplicate_gate import (
+    OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_BRANCH_PREVENTED,
+    OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_COMMIT_PREVENTED,
+    OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_PR_PREVENTED,
+    OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_WORK_NOT_PREVENTED,
+    PHASE_COMMIT,
+    PHASE_CREATE_PR,
+    PHASE_LOCK,
+    assess_work_issue_duplicate_gate,
+    assess_work_issue_duplicate_report,
+)
+
+
+class TestDuplicateGateAssessment(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_clear_issue_passes(self):
+        result = assess_work_issue_duplicate_gate(
+            400,
+            open_prs=[],
+            branch_names=["feat/other-issue-99"],
+            claim_entry={"status": "not_claimed"},
+            locked_branch="feat/issue-400-duplicate-work-preflight",
+            phase=PHASE_LOCK,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_WORK_NOT_PREVENTED)
+
+    def test_open_pr_blocks(self):
+        prs = [{
+            "number": 397,
+            "title": "feat: handoff",
+            "body": "Closes #395",
+            "head": {"ref": "feat/issue-395-proof-backed-review-handoff"},
+        }]
+        result = assess_work_issue_duplicate_gate(
+            395,
+            open_prs=prs,
+            branch_names=[],
+            phase=PHASE_LOCK,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_PR_PREVENTED)
+
+    def test_conflicting_remote_branch_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_work_issue_duplicate_gate(
+            395,
+            open_prs=[],
+            branch_names=["feat/issue-395-proof-backed-handoff-claims"],
+            locked_branch="feat/issue-395-new-attempt",
+            phase=PHASE_LOCK,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_BRANCH_PREVENTED)
+
+    def test_active_claim_on_other_branch_blocks(self):
+        result = assess_work_issue_duplicate_gate(
+            398,
+            open_prs=[],
+            branch_names=[],
+            claim_entry={
+                "status": "active",
+                "latest_heartbeat": {
+                    "branch": "feat/issue-398-validation-cwd-proof",
+                },
+            },
+            locked_branch="feat/issue-398-other-branch",
+            phase=PHASE_LOCK,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_commit_phase_maps_to_commit_outcome(self):
+        prs = [{
+            "number": 411,
+            "title": "x",
+            "body": "Closes #398",
+            "head": {"ref": "feat/issue-398-validation-cwd-proof"},
+        }]
+        result = assess_work_issue_duplicate_gate(
+            398,
+            open_prs=prs,
+            branch_names=[],
+            locked_branch="feat/issue-398-alt",
+            phase=PHASE_COMMIT,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_COMMIT_PREVENTED)
+
+    def test_stale_claim_does_not_block_by_status_alone(self):
+        result = assess_work_issue_duplicate_gate(
+            400,
+            open_prs=[],
+            branch_names=[],
+            claim_entry={"status": "reclaimable", "reasons": ["stale"]},
+            locked_branch="feat/issue-400-duplicate-work-preflight",
+            phase=PHASE_LOCK,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestDuplicateReportOutcome(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_requires_exactly_one_outcome(self):
+        bad = assess_work_issue_duplicate_report("work finished")
+        self.assertFalse(bad["complete"])
+
+        good = assess_work_issue_duplicate_report(
+            "Duplicate work not prevented for issue #400."
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(good["complete"])
+        self.assertEqual(good["outcome"], OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_WORK_NOT_PREVENTED)
+
+
+class TestInjectableDuplicateFetcher(unittest.TestCase):
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token x")
+    def test_lock_issue_uses_injected_fetcher(self, _auth):
+        seen = {}
+
+        def fetcher(h, o, r, auth, issue_number):
+            seen["issue_number"] = issue_number
+            return [], [], {"status": "not_claimed"}
+
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server.issue_duplicate_context_fetcher",
+            side_effect=fetcher,
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+            return_value={
+                "current_branch": "master",
+                "porcelain_status": "",
+                "base_equivalent": True,
+            },
+        ), patch.dict(os.environ, {
+            "GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "gitea.issue.comment",
+        }, clear=True):
+            with patch.object(mcp_server, "ISSUE_LOCK_FILE", tempfile.mktemp()):
+                mcp_server.gitea_lock_issue(
+                    issue_number=400,
+                    branch_name="feat/issue-400-duplicate-work-preflight",
+                    remote="prgs",
+                )
+        self.assertEqual(seen["issue_number"], 400)
+
+
+class TestMcpDuplicateRecheck(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        self._dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
+        self.lock_path = os.path.join(self._dir.name, "gitea_issue_lock.json")
+        self._lock_patch = patch.object(
+            mcp_server, "ISSUE_LOCK_FILE", self.lock_path
+        )
+        self._lock_patch.start()
+        self._remotes = patch.dict(mcp_server.REMOTES, {
+            "prgs": {"host": "gitea.example.com", "org": "Example-Org",
+                     "repo": "Example-Repo"},
+        })
+        self._remotes.start()
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        patch.stopall()
+        self._dir.cleanup()
+
+    def _write_lock(self, issue_number=400, branch="feat/issue-400-x"):
+        with open(self.lock_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
+            json.dump({
+                "issue_number": issue_number,
+                "branch_name": branch,
+                "remote": "prgs",
+            }, fh)
+
+    @patch("mcp_server._assess_issue_duplicate_gate")
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_profile", return_value={
+        "profile_name": "test-author",
+        "allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.repo.commit"],
+        "forbidden_operations": [],
+        "audit_label": "test-author",
+    })
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token x")
+    def test_commit_files_blocked_on_recheck(self, _auth, _profile, mock_gate):
+        self._write_lock()
+        mock_gate.return_value = {
+            "block": True,
+            "reasons": ["open PR #412 already covers issue #400"],
+            "outcome": OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_COMMIT_PREVENTED,
+            "safe_next_action": "stop",
+        }
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("whoami")
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("capability", resolved_role="author")
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server.role_session_router.check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop",
+            return_value=(True, []),
+        ):
+            result = mcp_server.gitea_commit_files(
+                files=[{
+                    "operation": "create",
+                    "path": "a.txt",
+                    "content_plain": "hi",
+                }],
+                message="test",
+                remote="prgs",
+            )
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertIn("duplicate_gate", result)
+
+    @patch("mcp_server._assess_issue_duplicate_gate")
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_profile", return_value={
+        "profile_name": "test-author",
+        "allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.create"],
+        "forbidden_operations": [],
+        "audit_label": "test-author",
+    })
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token x")
+    def test_create_pr_returns_handoff_on_duplicate(self, _auth, _profile, mock_gate):
+        self._write_lock()
+        mock_gate.return_value = {
+            "block": True,
+            "reasons": ["open PR #412 already covers issue #400"],
+            "outcome": OUTCOME_DUPLICATE_PR_PREVENTED,
+            "safe_next_action": "reconciliation handoff",
+        }
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("whoami")
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("capability", resolved_role="author")
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server.role_session_router.check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop",
+            return_value=(True, []),
+        ):
+            result = mcp_server.gitea_create_pr(
+                title="feat: x (Closes #400)",
+                head="feat/issue-400-x",
+                base="master",
+                body="Closes #400",
+                remote="prgs",
+            )
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertIsNone(result.get("number"))
+        self.assertIn("duplicate_gate", result)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_mcp_server.py

@@ -101,17 +101,36 @@ ISSUE_LOCK_FILE = "/tmp/gitea_issue_lock.json"
 
 
 def _sample_issue_lock(issue_number=123, branch_name="feat/x", **overrides):
+    import issue_lock_provenance
+
+    work_lease = {
+        "operation_type": "author_issue_work",
+        "issue_number": issue_number,
+        "branch": branch_name,
+        "claimant": {"username": "test-user", "profile": "test-author"},
+        "expires_at": "2999-01-01T00:00:00Z",
+    }
     record = {
         "issue_number": issue_number,
         "branch_name": branch_name,
         "remote": "dadeschools",
         "org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
         "repo": "Gitea-Tools",
+        "work_lease": work_lease,
+        "lock_provenance": issue_lock_provenance.build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
+            tool="gitea_lock_issue",
+            claimant=work_lease.get("claimant"),
+        ),
     }
     record.update(overrides)
     return record
 
 
+def _clear_duplicate_context_fetcher(*_args, **_kwargs):
+    """Default injectable duplicate-work context for lock/create_pr tests."""
+    return [], [], {"status": "not_claimed"}
+
+
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # Create Issue
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -166,13 +185,17 @@ class TestCreateIssue(unittest.TestCase):
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 class TestCreatePR(unittest.TestCase):
 
+    @patch(
+        "mcp_server.issue_duplicate_context_fetcher",
+        return_value=([], [], {"status": "not_claimed"}),
+    )
     @patch("mcp_server.role_session_router.check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop",
            return_value=(True, []))
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
     @patch("os.path.exists", return_value=True)
     @patch("builtins.open")
-    def test_creates_pr(self, mock_open, mock_exists, _auth, mock_api, _role):
+    def test_creates_pr(self, mock_open, mock_exists, _auth, mock_api, _role, _dup_fetcher):
         lock_json = json.dumps(_sample_issue_lock(issue_number=123, branch_name="feat/x"))
         mock_open.return_value.__enter__.return_value.read.return_value = lock_json
         mock_api.return_value = {"number": 3, "html_url": "https://example.com/pulls/3"}
@@ -187,13 +210,17 @@ class TestCreatePR(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertEqual(payload["base"], "main")
         self.assertIn("Closes #123", payload["title"])
 
+    @patch(
+        "mcp_server.issue_duplicate_context_fetcher",
+        return_value=([], [], {"status": "not_claimed"}),
+    )
     @patch("mcp_server.role_session_router.check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop",
            return_value=(True, []))
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
     @patch("os.path.exists", return_value=True)
     @patch("builtins.open")
-    def test_create_pr_reveal_opt_in_includes_url(self, mock_open, mock_exists, _auth, mock_api, _role):
+    def test_create_pr_reveal_opt_in_includes_url(self, mock_open, mock_exists, _auth, mock_api, _role, _dup_fetcher):
         lock_json = json.dumps(_sample_issue_lock(issue_number=123, branch_name="feat/x"))
         mock_open.return_value.__enter__.return_value.read.return_value = lock_json
         mock_api.return_value = {"number": 3, "html_url": "https://example.com/pulls/3"}
@@ -3044,8 +3071,14 @@ class TestIssueLocking(unittest.TestCase):
     def setUp(self):
         self._env_patcher = patch.dict(os.environ, ISSUE_WRITE_ENV, clear=True)
         self._env_patcher.start()
+        self._dup_fetcher_patcher = patch(
+            "mcp_server.issue_duplicate_context_fetcher",
+            return_value=([], [], {"status": "not_claimed"}),
+        )
+        self.mock_dup_fetcher = self._dup_fetcher_patcher.start()
 
     def tearDown(self):
+        self._dup_fetcher_patcher.stop()
         self._env_patcher.stop()
         if os.path.exists(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE):
             os.remove(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE)
@@ -3054,10 +3087,9 @@ class TestIssueLocking(unittest.TestCase):
         "mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
         return_value=_clean_master_git_state_for_lock(),
     )
-    @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all")
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[])
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
-    def test_lock_issue_success(self, _auth, mock_api, _git_state):
-        mock_api.return_value = [] # no open PRs
+    def test_lock_issue_success(self, _auth, _api, _git_state):
         res = gitea_lock_issue(issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs")
         self.assertTrue(res["success"])
         self.assertEqual(res["work_lease"]["operation_type"], "author_issue_work")
@@ -3082,35 +3114,48 @@ class TestIssueLocking(unittest.TestCase):
         "mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
         return_value=_clean_master_git_state_for_lock(),
     )
-    @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all")
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
-    def test_lock_issue_reused_by_open_pr_branch(self, _auth, mock_api, _git_state):
-        mock_api.return_value = [{
+    def test_lock_issue_reused_by_open_pr_branch(self, _auth, _git_state):
+        self.mock_dup_fetcher.return_value = ([{
             "number": 200,
             "head": {"ref": "feat/issue-196-boundary"},
             "title": "Some PR",
-            "body": "No closes ref"
-        }]
+            "body": "No closes ref",
+        }], [], {"status": "not_claimed"})
         with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
             gitea_lock_issue(issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs")
-        self.assertIn("already tied to an open PR", str(ctx.exception))
+        self.assertIn("open PR #200 already covers issue", str(ctx.exception))
 
     @patch(
         "mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
         return_value=_clean_master_git_state_for_lock(),
     )
-    @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all")
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
-    def test_lock_issue_reused_by_open_pr_closes_ref(self, _auth, mock_api, _git_state):
-        mock_api.return_value = [{
+    def test_lock_issue_reused_by_open_pr_closes_ref(self, _auth, _git_state):
+        self.mock_dup_fetcher.return_value = ([{
             "number": 200,
             "head": {"ref": "feat/other-branch"},
             "title": "Some PR",
-            "body": "fixes #196"
-        }]
+            "body": "fixes #196",
+        }], [], {"status": "not_claimed"})
         with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
             gitea_lock_issue(issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs")
-        self.assertIn("already tied to an open PR", str(ctx.exception))
+        self.assertIn("open PR #200 already covers issue", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    @patch(
+        "mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+        return_value=_clean_master_git_state_for_lock(),
+    )
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    def test_lock_issue_reused_by_remote_branch(self, _auth, _git_state):
+        self.mock_dup_fetcher.return_value = (
+            [],
+            ["feat/issue-196-existing-work"],
+            {"status": "not_claimed"},
+        )
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
+            gitea_lock_issue(issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs")
+        self.assertIn("remote branch(es) already match issue pattern", str(ctx.exception))
 
     @patch(
         "mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
@@ -3118,16 +3163,98 @@ class TestIssueLocking(unittest.TestCase):
     )
     @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all")
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
-    def test_lock_issue_reused_by_remote_branch(self, _auth, mock_api, _git_state):
-        mock_api.side_effect = [
-            [],
-            [{"name": "feat/issue-196-existing-work"}],
-        ]
-        with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
-            gitea_lock_issue(issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs")
-        self.assertIn("already has matching branch", str(ctx.exception))
+    def test_lock_issue_adopts_own_existing_branch(self, _auth, mock_api, _git_state):
+        # #442: the issue's own already-pushed branch is adoptable for recovery.
+        sha = "934688a71dd19d9b46369e73fb3ac356ee0cc211"
 
-    def test_lock_issue_blocks_active_same_operation_lease(self):
+        def _api(url, *a, **k):
+            if "/pulls" in url:
+                return []
+            if "/branches" in url:
+                return [{"name": "feat/issue-196-mutations", "commit": {"id": sha}}]
+            return []
+
+        mock_api.side_effect = _api
+        res = gitea_lock_issue(
+            issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs"
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+        self.assertIn("adoption", res)
+        proof = res["adoption"]
+        self.assertEqual(proof["issue_number"], 196)
+        self.assertEqual(proof["branch_name"], "feat/issue-196-mutations")
+        self.assertEqual(proof["branch_head_commit"], sha)
+        self.assertTrue(proof["no_existing_pr_proof"])
+        self.assertTrue(proof["no_competing_live_lock_proof"])
+        self.assertEqual(proof["lock_file_path"], ISSUE_LOCK_FILE)
+        self.assertIn("adopt", proof["adoption_reason"].lower())
+        self.assertTrue(os.path.exists(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE))
+
+    @patch(
+        "mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+        return_value=_clean_master_git_state_for_lock(),
+    )
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    def test_lock_issue_open_pr_blocks_adoption(self, _auth, _git_state):
+        # Even with the exact own branch present, an open PR blocks adoption.
+        self.mock_dup_fetcher.return_value = ([{
+            "number": 200,
+            "head": {"ref": "feat/issue-196-mutations"},
+            "title": "WIP",
+            "body": "",
+        }], ["feat/issue-196-mutations"], {"status": "not_claimed"})
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
+            gitea_lock_issue(
+                issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs"
+            )
+        self.assertIn("open PR #200 already covers issue", str(ctx.exception))
+        self.assertFalse(os.path.exists(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE))
+
+    @patch("mcp_server.role_session_router.check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop",
+           return_value=(True, []))
+    @patch(
+        "mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+        return_value=_clean_master_git_state_for_lock(),
+    )
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all")
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    def test_create_pr_proceeds_after_adopted_lock(
+        self, _auth, mock_api, mock_req, _git_state, _role
+    ):
+        # #442 recovery goal: after adopting the own branch, create_pr proceeds.
+        sha = "934688a71dd19d9b46369e73fb3ac356ee0cc211"
+
+        def _api(url, *a, **k):
+            if "/pulls" in url:
+                return []
+            if "/branches" in url:
+                return [{"name": "feat/issue-196-mutations", "commit": {"id": sha}}]
+            return []
+
+        mock_api.side_effect = _api
+        lock_res = gitea_lock_issue(
+            issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs"
+        )
+        self.assertIn("adoption", lock_res)
+
+        mock_req.return_value = {"number": 7, "html_url": "https://gitea.prgs.cc/pulls/7"}
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, CREATE_PR_ENV, clear=True):
+            pr = gitea_create_pr(
+                title="feat: parity gate Closes #196",
+                head="feat/issue-196-mutations",
+                base="master",
+                remote="prgs",
+            )
+        self.assertEqual(pr["number"], 7)
+
+    @patch(
+        "mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+        return_value=_clean_master_git_state_for_lock(),
+    )
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[])
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    def test_lock_issue_blocks_active_same_operation_lease(self, _auth, _api, _git_state):
         with open(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
             json.dump({
                 "issue_number": 196,
@@ -3142,7 +3269,13 @@ class TestIssueLocking(unittest.TestCase):
             gitea_lock_issue(issue_number=196, branch_name="feat/issue-196-mutations", remote="prgs")
         self.assertIn("already has an active author_issue_work lease", str(ctx.exception))
 
-    def test_lock_issue_blocks_expired_same_operation_lease_for_recovery(self):
+    @patch(
+        "mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+        return_value=_clean_master_git_state_for_lock(),
+    )
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[])
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    def test_lock_issue_blocks_expired_same_operation_lease_for_recovery(self, _auth, _api, _git_state):
         with open(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
             json.dump({
                 "issue_number": 196,
@@ -3284,6 +3417,28 @@ class TestIssueLocking(unittest.TestCase):
                 )
         self.assertIn("does not match locked worktree", str(ctx.exception))
 
+    @patch("mcp_server.role_session_router.check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop",
+           return_value=(True, []))
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    def test_create_pr_manual_lock_seed_blocked(self, _auth, _role):
+        with open(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
+            json.dump(
+                _sample_issue_lock(
+                    issue_number=447,
+                    branch_name="feat/issue-447-lock-provenance",
+                    lock_provenance=None,
+                ),
+                f,
+            )
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, CREATE_PR_ENV, clear=True):
+            with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+                gitea_create_pr(
+                    title="feat: lock provenance Closes #447",
+                    head="feat/issue-447-lock-provenance",
+                    remote="prgs",
+                )
+        self.assertIn("lock provenance", str(ctx.exception).lower())
+
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
     @patch("mcp_server.role_session_router.check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop",
            return_value=(True, []))

tests/test_review_proofs.py

@@ -2346,6 +2346,7 @@ class TestWorkIssueFinalReport(unittest.TestCase):
             "- Safe next action: open PR",
             "- Next: open PR",
             "- Safety statement: no review/merge",
+            "- Duplicate work outcome: duplicate work not prevented",
         ])
 
     def test_complete_work_issue_report_earns_a(self):