gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree wrote a lock no downstream author
operation accepts, then directed the author straight to implementation. Once
the branch carried commits, heartbeat, re-lock, exact-owner renewal, and the
#447 create-PR guard all refused simultaneously and no sanctioned recovery
path remained eligible.
Each of those gates is individually correct. The defect was that two writers
disagreed about what a lock is.
- Add author_lock_contract as the single canonical definition: claimant,
work_lease, lock_provenance, generation, and an explicit expiration state.
Both gitea_lock_issue and bootstrap now build through it.
- Promote issue_lock_store.lock_claimant to the one shared claimant reader and
use it in the ownership check, so a claimant recorded at the lock top level
is read rather than refused. The values are still compared against
server-resolved identity and profile, so no legacy placement grants anything
the canonical placement would not.
- Represent missing expiration explicitly. An absent expires_at previously read
as "not yet expired", leaving a malformed lock permanently non-expiring and
permanently ineligible for #760 renewal.
- Bootstrap reads its lock back and verifies it structurally before reporting
success. A partial lock fails closed while the worktree is still
base-equivalent, names the missing fields, and never reports
implementation_allowed. Its exact_next_action now matches the state returned.
- Add gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock for locks already written by the
old bootstrap, including those whose branches carry pushed commits. It never
moves, resets, or rewinds a branch, never requires base-equivalence, never
pushes or opens a PR, and touches only the target lock. It proves repository,
issue, claimant username and profile, branch, worktree, registration, and
head before writing, refuses healthy foreign-owned locks, and mints
provenance and authorization server-side.
- Add gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract, a strictly read-only surface.
- Document the required ordering and the recovery path.
The #447 provenance guard is unchanged and the sanctioned source set was not
widened: bootstrap now satisfies the guard rather than the guard being relaxed
to admit bootstrap.
Tests: 61 new cases covering the canonical schema, immediate heartbeat,
renewal before and after commits, the create_pr guard, executable next actions,
partial and malformed and missing-expiration and expired and same-owner and
foreign-owner and legacy locks, recovery isolation, read-only inspection, and
the full bootstrap-implement-commit-push-create_pr regression against isolated
fixtures.
Full suite at head: 28 failed, 5753 passed, 6 skipped, 1042 subtests.
Full suite at base 82d71b77: 28 failed, 5692 passed, 6 skipped, 1042 subtests.
Failing test-ID sets are identical, so there are zero regressions; the +61
passes are this issue's new suite.
Issue #949 was preserved and not recovered: its branch remains at
92615f474b and its worktree, lock, and PR state
were not touched. The #949-shaped regression uses isolated fixtures only.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Addresses review 623 on PR #946 (B1 blocker, F2 medium, F3 minor).
B1 - the wiring this branch exists to install had no regression coverage.
The existing suite exercised owning_pr_renewal_from_lock,
_owning_pr_continuation_from_lock and the duplicate gate directly, but never
drove an enforcement path, so reverting any of the three call sites left the
whole repository green. Add tests/test_issue_945_enforcement_path_wiring.py,
which drives the real mcp_server._enforce_locked_issue_duplicate_recheck (the
shared recheck behind gitea_commit_files and gitea_create_pr),
mcp_server.gitea_assess_work_issue_duplicate and
mcp_server._prove_author_ownership_for_pr against a renewal-bearing lock, and
asserts each grants the exemption. Reverting the commit/create-PR recheck to
the recovery-only rebuild now fails 8 tests and 4 subtests; reverting the
assessor or the push prover fails 2 each. The suite also keeps the fail-closed
matrix on the real paths: an open PR alone, a second PR, a different PR,
branch, issue or head, identity and profile mismatch, ungranted and malformed
renewal blocks, and sequential-task non-inheritance are all still refused.
F2 - the claimant check compares lease_renewal.identity/profile against the
claimant recorded on the same lock file. Both sides are server-written fields
of one document, so it is an internal-consistency check, not verification of
the live authenticated caller. Correct the docstring and the inline comment to
say so, and document the binding that actually prevents cross-session reuse:
the enforcement paths load the lock through _load_existing_issue_lock() with no
issue coordinates, which resolves issue_lock_store.read_session_issue_lock() to
the session pointer at session-{os.getpid()}.json, so lock selection is scoped
to the operating-system process. Its limits are stated too - per-process rather
than per-authenticated-user, silent on locks reached by explicit coordinates,
and silent on two roles sharing one process. Live identity and profile stay
enforced by the mutation-authority and profile gates, not by this rebuild.
F3 - _owning_pr_continuation_from_lock previously fell through to renewal when
a dead_session_recovery block was present but failed to rebuild, so a recovery
record naming one PR could be bypassed by renewal evidence naming another.
Present-but-unusable recovery evidence is now ambiguous rather than absent and
fails closed. Because an expired lease whose recorded owner has also died
satisfies both dispositions in one gitea_lock_issue call, a sanctioned pair is
a reachable state; when both rebuild, they must agree on issue, PR, branch and
every head, or no continuation authority is returned. Recovery-only and
renewal-only locks keep their existing behaviour exactly.
Validation of the resulting token against live PR state remains untouched and
solely owned by issue_work_duplicate_gate._assess_owning_pr_exemption. No
public signature, MCP tool schema, refusal shape or reason code changes.
Tests: focused #945/#755/#760 suites 137 passed, 19 subtests. Full suite in a
branches/ worktree: 30F/5619P/6S/1013 subtests at this head vs 30F/5572P/6S/1002
at a clean checkout of 79334d48, with byte-identical failing test id sets - the
+47 passes and +11 subtests are exactly the new coverage.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Q8RUznLXEA4JoK48sTZiSK
An exact-owner lease renewal (#760) is granted the owning-PR duplicate-work
waiver inside gitea_lock_issue, but every later enforcement path rebuilt that
proof from the durable lock through
issue_lock_recovery.recovered_owning_pr_from_lock, which reads only the
dead_session_recovery block. A plain renewal persists its proof under
lease_renewal instead, so the waiver expired with the lock call and the next
author mutation was refused duplicate_commit_prevented with
owning_pr_recovery_exempted: false on the very PR the renewal had just proved.
Add issue_lock_renewal.owning_pr_renewal_from_lock as the renewal mirror of the
recovery rebuild, and resolve both halves through one helper,
_owning_pr_continuation_from_lock, in the same precedence gitea_lock_issue
applies. The three enforcement paths that previously saw only recovery evidence
now share that resolver: the commit/create-PR duplicate recheck, the read-only
duplicate assessor, and the push-ownership prover.
The rebuild re-applies the equality the renewal assessor required (PR head ==
local head == remote head) and additionally binds the record to the claimant the
lock names, so a renewal block cannot be reused under another identity, profile,
or workflow session. Validation of the resulting token against live PR state is
unchanged and still owned solely by
issue_work_duplicate_gate._assess_owning_pr_exemption, so repository, issue, PR,
branch and head binding continue to be enforced in exactly one place.
No public signature, MCP tool schema, refusal shape, or reason code changes.
Dead-session recovery behaviour is untouched.
Tests: tests/test_issue_945_owning_pr_renewal_continuation.py - 49 tests,
8 subtests, all in-memory (no durable branch, worktree, lock, lease or PR).
Against unmodified aab54d48 the suite is 47 failed / 2 passed; the 2 that pass
are the defect-pinning reproductions. Full suite 28F/5574P/6S/1002 subtests at
head vs 28F/5525P/6S/994 at base, with identical failing test id sets.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree referenced four globals that commit
a942afe (#850) introduced without ever defining:
_active_username 1 reference, 0 definitions
_active_profile_name 1 reference, 0 definitions
_current_session_id 1 reference, 0 definitions
_author_mutation_block 1 reference, 0 definitions
Evaluating the call arguments therefore raised
NameError: name '_active_username' is not defined
before author_issue_bootstrap.bootstrap_author_issue_worktree was entered, so
the capability was unusable for every caller including dry_run=true. The fourth
name, _author_mutation_block, sits on the reviewer-stop refusal path and was
found by the generalised regression test rather than by the original report.
The defect was unreachable until PR #942 (#941) wired the bootstrap scope into
workflow_scope_guard: before that, verify_preflight_purity refused first with
missing_issue_worktree, masking it.
Changes:
* _active_username reads the immutable #714 session context that gitea_whoami
seeds — the identity pin every other mutation gate already consults. An
unbound context returns None so callers fail closed rather than acting as an
unverified actor; a profile's expected_username is never substituted.
* _active_profile_name prefers the live get_profile() and falls back to the
bound session context only when the profile cannot be read.
* _current_session_id mints the same "<profile>-<pid>-<hex>" shape as the three
pre-existing lease call sites, bound once per process so repeated calls
describe one session instead of a fresh owner per call, which would make
lease-ownership comparisons unsatisfiable. None is never memoised.
* _author_mutation_block returns the uniform refusal shape the other author
mutations already return for the same check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop
block.
No guard, signature, or permission changes. Wrong-role, wrong-profile,
wrong-identity, stale-runtime, expected-base and workflow-scope enforcement all
still gate the call; the helpers only supply values the service then validates
fail-closed (missing_active_identity / missing_active_profile /
missing_owner_session / stale_concurrency_pin).
Regression: tests/test_issue_943_runtime_context_helpers.py (27 tests). The
generalised test resolves every global the wrapper's body references against
module globals and builtins, so the next missing reference fails too rather
than only the three named here — that test is what found
_author_mutation_block. Coverage also coversdry-run reaching and completing the
service with helper-produced bindings, dry-run leaving no branch, worktree,
assignment or lease, apply reaching its intended transition, each fail-closed
mismatch, expected-base mismatch, and the #941/PR #942 scope wiring.
Pre-fix 20 failed / 13 passed against unmodified aab54d48; post-fix 27 passed.
Targeted bootstrap and guard suites: 245 passed, 59 subtests.
Full suite: 28 failed, 5552 passed, 6 skipped, 1006 subtests — the 28 are the
standing baseline, every one of which also fails on the unmodified base.
Closes#943
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013ygVZQLbbhJTChuVuLaJWb
PR #926 (#892) taught create_issue_bootstrap.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout
to accept task_scope=author_issue_bootstrap and wired that canonical decision
into the #274 branches-only enforcer and the #604 anti-stomp preflight. A third
enforcement path was left unwired.
workflow_scope_guard kept its own copy of the clean-root author decision, gated
on create_issue_bootstrap.is_create_issue_task -- a task-name allowlist that
never contained bootstrap_author_issue_worktree. The real call path
gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree
-> verify_preflight_purity
-> _enforce_issue_scope_guard
-> workflow_scope_guard.assess_production_mutation_guards
therefore raised ProductionGuardError(missing_issue_worktree) before
assess_author_issue_bootstrap was ever consulted, leaving the #892 deadlock
partially present and blocking issue #931.
Changes:
* workflow_scope_guard.assess_root_source_mutation accepts the server-derived
bootstrap_assessment and, for the clean-root author case, consults the
canonical bootstrap_permits_control_checkout decision instead of a local
task-name allowlist. The create_issue arm is unchanged.
* workflow_scope_guard.assess_production_mutation_guards forwards the evidence.
* _enforce_issue_scope_guard accepts and threads the same assessment the #274
and #604 guards already consume, so all three judge identical evidence, and
waives the pre-ownership issue-lock requirement for the bootstrap task via
that same canonical decision rather than a second task-name allowlist.
* verify_preflight_purity passes the once-computed assessment at both sites.
The waiver cannot widen: the predicate fails closed on missing, malformed,
cross-scope, dirty, drifted, or wrongly bound evidence, so ordinary author
source and test mutation from the control checkout stays forbidden and the
#274/#604/#618/#683 protections are unchanged.
Regression: tests/test_issue_941_scope_guard_bootstrap_wiring.py drives the
real enforcer rather than the authorization helper in isolation, which is why
#892's own predicate tests passed while the live bootstrap stayed blocked.
Closes#941
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Add gitea_request_mcp_reconnect as a report-only callable surface so Codex
and other agent hosts can request host/IDE reconnect with typed blockers
and exact UI steps. Never kills processes or edits config.
Co-Authored-By: Grok 4.5 <[email protected]>
Add recovery_playbook.py with the narrow-to-broad recovery ladder, symptom
routing, attempt-log helpers, and escalation metrics. Wire the attempt-log
gate into restart_coordinator so rolling/full/host restarts require prior
insufficient narrower attempts (or break-glass). Document the ladder and
update gitea_request_mcp_restart for prior_recovery_attempts_json.
Co-Authored-By: Grok 4.5 <[email protected]>
Addresses the two blockers raised in the PR #886 review (comment 16559) for
issue #663.
B1 — apply_authorized ignored restart-class authorization.
The #663 restart-class matrix and the #661 drain-proof hard gate are
independent authorizations that first coexisted when PR #882 landed on
master and this branch merged it. The union preserved both, but the apply
decision consulted only the drain gate:
payload["apply_authorized"] = gate.allow
so a clean drain proof — or an authorized break-glass, which needs no proof
at all — reported apply_authorized: True for a class the least-privilege
matrix had just denied, in the same payload carrying allow_restart: False
and "role 'author' may not request full_mcp_restart". One environment
variable therefore collapsed the whole nine-class matrix for the apply
decision, including host_restart.
The apply decision is now the conjunction of both authorizations, and
apply_gate carries drain_gate_allow and restart_class_authorized so a denial
is attributable to the authorization that produced it. Break-glass keeps its
purpose — bypassing the drain proof — and never bypasses the class matrix.
No existing fail-closed behaviour is weakened: allow_restart, drain-proof
verification, fingerprint binding, and requester authorization are untouched.
B2 — docs/mcp-restart-coordinator.md described pre-#661 behaviour.
The document still called the drain proof "a separate child" and omitted
drain_proof_json and request_break_glass from the published signature, so a
safety document asserted there was no gate where a gate now exists. It now
documents both parameters, states that the gate executes inside this tool,
and records dry-run versus apply behaviour, authorization ordering, the
break-glass scope, and fail-closed conditions as implemented.
Regression coverage.
tests/test_issue_886_apply_authorization_conjunction.py exercises the MCP
tool itself, which previously had no test at all — that absence is why the
defect shipped. It pins both conjunction directions, proves a clean proof
cannot override a role, approval, unknown-class, or missing-target denial,
proves break-glass does not collapse the matrix for any worker role or
restricted class, and proves the existing scoped and unscoped paths and the
#661 denials still hold. Against the pre-fix tree 24 of these fail; against
this commit all 19 pass with 45 subtests.
tests/test_mcp_restart_governance_docs.py now binds the published signature
to inspect.signature() of the real tool and forbids the stale pre-#661
phrasing, so the drift that produced B2 cannot return unnoticed.
Verification: targeted restart/drain/governance/webui suites 194 passed,
113 subtests. Full suite 23 failed, 5230 passed, 6 skipped, 912 subtests —
the failure set is identical to the reviewed baseline at 9bc021e
(23 failed, 5201 passed), with +29 passing from the added tests and no new
or changed failure. Zero conflict markers; py_compile passes; the #882
union remains intact in both directions.
Refs #663, PR #886
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01V6xFqovhbArPv61j9KCGkL
Stale-runtime and runtime-mode mutation refusals previously shared the
permission-denial channel, so permission_report claimed a missing op the
active profile already held and recommended gitea_activate_profile.
Typed blocker_kind payloads report reconnect-only recovery for staleness,
omit permission_report for non-permission gates, and fail closed when a
permission_report would invent a missing permission the profile holds.
Brings PR #886 up to date with master @ 2f4dec8323
(8 commits behind), resolving the single conflicted file.
Conflict: gitea_mcp_server.py, both hunks inside gitea_request_mcp_restart.
Both sides were purely additive to the same tool, so both are kept in full:
- Branch side (#663, restart classes): parameters restart_class,
target_session_id, target_role, target_connector; payload keys
controller_approval_authorized, requester_role, requester_permissions.
- Master side (#661 via PR #882, drain-proof hard gate): parameters
drain_proof_json, request_break_glass; the explanatory comment describing
the apply-path hard gate and break-glass authorization.
No behaviour from either side was dropped, reordered, or reimplemented. Every
parameter from both sides is already consumed by the auto-merged function body
(restart_class and the three target_* arguments flow into the coordinator call;
drain_proof_json and request_break_glass drive the dry_run=False hard gate), so
the union is the only resolution that keeps the merged function coherent.
Validation on the merged tree:
python -m pytest tests/test_drain_proof.py tests/test_restart_classes.py \
tests/test_restart_coordinator.py tests/test_mcp_restart_paths.py \
tests/test_mcp_restart_governance_docs.py tests/test_webui_sanctioned_restart.py \
tests/test_issue_662_post_restart_reconcile.py -q
# 165 passed, 68 subtests passed
py_compile on gitea_mcp_server.py passes and no conflict markers remain.
Closes#663
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Add `drain_proof.py`: a machine-verifiable DrainProof artifact plus a
fail-closed verifier and the hard gate the sanctioned restart-apply path
must consult, so a restart can never proceed on a stale or false "ready"
claim (#655 umbrella, child of #658 coordinator / #659 drain / #660
checkpoints).
- DrainProof: HMAC-SHA256 keyed proof-id over a canonical body using a
per-process secret -> non-forgeable within the process; a proof minted in
a prior daemon process will not verify after restart. Short TTL (120s).
- build_drain_proof(): mints the proof from the #658 impact report + the
drain-mode outcomes. Checklist: no in-flight mutations, assignments
stopped, checkpoints complete, handoffs ok, leases handled, acks-or-
timeout. Every check fails closed on missing/ambiguous evidence; the
no-in-flight-mutations and leases-handled checks are derived from the
authoritative impact report, not self-reported.
- verify_drain_proof(): fail-closed — rejects missing, malformed, expired,
signature-mismatched (forged/tampered/prior-process), unclean, or
stale-fingerprint proofs; recomputes cleanliness from the checks rather
than trusting the flag.
- gate_apply_restart(): allow only on a valid clean proof; deny -> durable
incident descriptor; break-glass is the only bypass and is never silent.
- Checkpoint completeness is a supplied input, not a hard dependency on the
(still-unmerged #660) checkpoint schema.
Wire the gate into gitea_request_mcp_restart: dry_run=False now enforces the
hard gate (drain_proof_json required; break-glass via request_break_glass +
GITEA_BREAKGLASS_RESTART_AUTHORIZATION env). The tool still performs no
actual restart — execution remains a further child.
Tests: tests/test_drain_proof.py — 25 cases covering AC#1-4 (apply without
proof denied, successful drain verifiable, open unsafe mutation fails,
pass/fail/expired), forgery/tamper/wrong-secret/stale-fingerprint rejection,
break-glass bypass, and secret hygiene. 25/25 pass (coordinator suite
unaffected: 40/40 together).
Links #652#653#655#658#659#660.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E7Fv9Bp2XWgvaWa4M1kdR7
(cherry picked from commit e7bcc952bb3e820fda95acbecefeaebfa5f8fcff)
Add pure post_restart_reconcile.reconcile_after_restart classifier with a
machine-readable completion proof covering service health, sessions, leases,
capabilities, worktrees, interrupted mutations (never auto-resumed),
duplicates, and queue state. Soft-depends on #660 checkpoints (skipped with
reason when the schema module is absent).
Wire read-only MCP tool gitea_reconcile_after_restart, boot-once hook via
gitea_assess_master_parity, log_only/enforce modes (mutation_hold), and docs.
Closes#662
Related: #655#652#653#660#661
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Resolve task_capability_map.py by unioning #850 bootstrap_author_issue_worktree
preflight transitions with master's #860 dirty-orphan recovery and work_issue
commit transitions. No feature logic discarded.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
`gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge` advanced a PR's remote head but never
advanced the linked durable issue lock's recorded head. After the owning
session died the drifted lock became unrecoverable and no further
synchronization was possible (PR #866 / issue #855).
Write-side (prevents future drift):
- issue_lock_store.assess/apply_durable_lock_head_refresh: on a successful
sync, CAS-refresh the durable lock's recorded head from the exact expected
PR head to the resulting head, re-verifying repo/issue/branch/worktree/
identity/profile/live-session ownership, with read-after-write verification.
- gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge now refreshes the lock after the remote
advance and reports a PARTIAL LIFECYCLE FAILURE (success=False) when the
refresh fails, instead of falsely reporting a full synchronization.
Read-side (recovers already-drifted locks):
- issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance: server-side git observation
proving a remote head is a sanctioned base-into-branch merge that preserved
the branch mainline back to the recorded head.
- issue_lock_recovery: new HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED accepts a
dead-session lock whose recorded head is a strict merge-sync ancestor of the
live PR head — and only that. Rewrites, rebases, force-pushes, non-ancestor
heads, dirty worktrees, live/competing owners, and wrong repo/issue/branch/
identity/profile all stay protected.
No existing exact-head, branch-protection, parity, workspace, identity, role,
or mutation-safety gate is weakened. All provenance is server-derived; nothing
is reachable from an MCP caller.
Tests: tests/test_issue_871_durable_lock_head_refresh.py (32 cases) covering
first/second sync, CAS, ownership, partial-failure, merge-sync recovery
happy-path and every fail-closed branch. Full suite: 4789 passed, 13 pre-
existing baseline failures unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FZPyVh2DGczQrDxtqwGH5p
Child of umbrella #655 (governed MCP restart coordination); builds on the
#657 restart-path inventory. Adds a central coordinator that evaluates live
control-plane state before a restart and returns a blast-radius impact
preview, so operators and the web console (#642/#652) can see what a restart
would disrupt before concurrent LLM work is destroyed.
Changes
- restart_coordinator.py (new) — pure classification: inventory -> impact
report DTO (RestartImpactReport/SessionImpact/LeaseImpact). Verdicts:
safe / unsafe / override. Never restarts anything; fails closed on an
incomplete inventory.
- control_plane_db.py — additive ControlPlaneDB.list_sessions() read-only
session inventory (the process-level unit a restart kills).
- gitea_mcp_server.py — new dry-run MCP tool gitea_request_mcp_restart:
gathers sessions/leases/terminal-lock from the #613 DB, calls the
coordinator, returns the report. Override authority is read from the
environment, never self-asserted (#630/#710 F1 pattern). Apply is gated
by a later drain proof (non-goal here).
- docs/mcp-restart-coordinator.md + docs/mcp-restart-impact-sample.json — doc
and a real dry-run sample report.
- docs/mcp-tool-inventory.md — register the new tool (inventory sync).
- tests/test_restart_coordinator.py (new) — 15 tests: multi-session fixtures,
deny-when-critical-section-open, fail-closed deny, override, terminal lock,
stale heartbeat, JSON-serializable DTO, list_sessions.
Tests: pytest tests/test_restart_coordinator.py -> 15 passed. Full suite:
13 failed / 4753 passed; all 13 reproduce identically on clean master
@ef14622 (0 regressions). The residual test_issue_781 doc-registry failure
is a pre-existing baseline gap for gitea_rebind_dirty_same_claimant_author_session
(merged #864, undocumented on master) — out of scope for #658.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Adds a single-target path for post-merge cleanup so a reconciler can
complete one merged PR without a batch sweep across unrelated PRs.
## PR-scoped selector
gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups gains an optional pr_number. When set,
only that merged PR is assessed and acted on: the PR is resolved live and
fails closed on an invalid/non-positive number, an unresolvable or
ambiguous PR, or an unmerged PR; reviewer scratch worktrees are filtered
to that PR; and the report's entry set is pinned to exactly [pr_number],
failing closed on any drift. The existing execute loop then operates on
the single pinned entry only -- worktree removal, ownership reassessment,
then remote-branch delete -- with no unrelated target. Batch behaviour is
unchanged when pr_number is omitted.
## Expired reviewer-lease reclaim (AC4)
An expired or stale reviewer lease no longer protects an already-merged
branch forever. branch_cleanup_guard.assess_expired_reviewer_lease_reclaim
makes the decision explicitly and fail-closed: reclaim only when the lease
is a reviewer lease, its status is expired/stale, the PR is proven merged,
the owner process is proven dead, and no competing active claimant uses
the branch. _collect_branch_ownership_records supplies that evidence from
authoritative state (live PR merged-state, lease owner liveness, and the
full ownership inventory for competing-claimant detection) and evaluates
it only after the complete inventory is built, so the post-worktree-removal
reassessment is what unblocks the branch delete. Any unknown fails closed.
Author/merger/controller/reconciler leases are untouched; active leases,
worktree bindings, issue locks, and live sessions still block.
## Tests
- tests/test_issue_855_expired_reviewer_reclaim.py: full fail-closed matrix
for the reclaim decision plus collector wiring (merged+dead+uncontested
reclaims; unmerged, live-owner, competing-worktree, and author-lease
cases stay protective).
- tests/test_branch_cleanup_guard.py: exact-PR selector coverage (ignores
newer PRs in the batch queue, execute mutates only the selected PR,
unknown/not-merged/invalid fail closed, batch mode preserved).
Changed-surface suites pass; the 2 pre-existing test_branch_cleanup_guard
failures and test_reconciler_supersession_close reproduce identically on
master 6d0015ca and are unrelated to this change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Introduce an explicit, fail-closed recovery operation that rebinds a live
author session to an already-registered dirty issue worktree when the durable
lock still belongs to the same identity/profile and the recorded owner PID is
provably dead. Ordinary locking remains clean-worktree-only; this path updates
only stale lock/session provenance, preserves every dirty byte under fingerprint
pins, and grants create-PR-sanctioned provenance without remote sync or recovery
worktrees.
Also stop treating dead-owner session pointers as live mutation workspace
bindings so a stale dead-owner pointer cannot poison unrelated author work.
- Fix F1: Prepare recovery worktree detached at remote_head without git checkout -B to avoid exit 128 when branch is held by source worktree
- Fix F2: Pass recovery_sanctioned=True in bind_session_lock and assess_same_issue_lease_conflict
- Fix F3: Add SOURCE_RECOVER_DIRTY_ORPHANED to SANCTIONED_LOCK_SOURCES
- Fix F4: Stop after Phase 4 dirty apply when conflicts exist; do not finalize session binding
- Fix F5: Dynamically query competing live locks and workflow leases in MCP server
- Fix F6: Fail closed on recovery worktree resume when HEAD does not match expected remote_head
- Fix F7: Fail closed on remote HEAD observation failure rather than copying expected_remote_head pin
- Fix F8: Enforce foreign overwrite protection requiring same claimant or sanctioned reclaim
- Fix F9: Add real multi-worktree integration tests for prepare_recovery_worktree and lock rebind
- Fix TestWorktreeStart: Bypass session lock check for dry-run and review/pr-* branches in scripts/worktree-start
Add an explicit recovery operation for same-claimant dirty registered
worktrees under malformed PID-less durable locks, with crash-safe journals,
dirty byte preservation, path-level conflict detection, and live session
binding. PID-less locks are never treated as live merely because expiry is
absent.
Closes#860
Co-Authored-By: Grok 4.5 (xAI) <[email protected]>
gitea_audit_worktree_cleanup had no PR linkage. Issue worktrees therefore
reported pr_number=null and classified as active_issue_work with
removable=false permanently, even once their PR was merged and the head was
already contained in master. Observed on live master 9301739910: 42
issue_work worktrees, 0 removable, 0 with pr_number populated, while
gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups reported the same worktree safe to remove.
Two independent gaps caused it:
* build_worktree_metadata was never given a pr_number, and only open PRs were
fetched, so no owning-PR evidence existed at all.
* clean_stale_removable was unreachable for issue_work: it required
ttl_expired, derived from a last_used_at that nothing populates, and
is_ttl_expired fail-safes to False when the timestamp is unknown.
This adds deterministic merged-PR linkage and gates removal on the complete
cleanup policy:
* build_pr_index / resolve_owning_pr link a worktree branch to exactly one
owning PR. Competing PRs on one branch, a still-open owner, a head-branch
mismatch, or missing PR state all fail closed while still reporting the
resolved pr_number.
* assess_merged_pr_worktree_cleanup requires all of: conclusive merged
ownership, branch agreement, containment of the head in authoritative
master, no open/competing PR, no active lease, no issue lock, no live
session, a clean tree, and a non-protected checkout. Unknown state blocks.
* Containment reuses merged_cleanup_reconcile.is_head_ancestor_of_ref so the
audit and the PR-scoped reconciler agree on what "already landed" means.
Lease evidence is now supplied. audit_branches_directory already accepted
leased_branches but the MCP tool never passed it, so has_active_lease was
false for every worktree in a live run. That was inert only while issue
worktrees could never become removable; it is wired to authoritative
control-plane leases here, scoped so a lease on issue N protects that issue's
work worktree and not a baseline or review tree merely named after it.
Issue work no longer becomes removable on TTL age alone, since age is not
proof that a branch landed and would otherwise reclaim a worktree holding
unmerged commits. conflict_fix keeps its existing TTL behaviour, and review,
baseline, merge-simulation, detached, dirty, open-PR, and protected
classifications are unchanged.
The assessor still performs no deletion and gains no cleanup mutation. This
is assessor-side only and does not implement the PR-scoped executor or the
expired-lease reclaim policy tracked separately by #855.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Post-merge cleanup previously continued past ownership-blocked remote
deletes, which skipped independently safe local worktree removal when the
only block was worktree_binding. Remove the clean owned worktree first,
reassess ownership, then delete the remote branch only if still safe.
Preserve fail-closed protection for dirty/foreign ownership categories.
Closes#851
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Epics and parent issues whose body delegates implementation to children are
skipped before ranking with structured reason epic_or_child_only_container.
Title-only "epic" mentions without body/label evidence remain eligible.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Review #515 F1: gitea_adopt_workflow_lease trusted a caller-supplied role
((role or active_role)), so any namespace holding gitea.read could consume
an author-only cross-role handoff by passing role="author".
- Derive the adopter role authoritatively from the active profile; reject
any supplied role that does not exactly match (no silent accept).
- Pass the profile-derived role and authoritative profile/namespace context
to lease_lifecycle.adopt_lease; validate handoff provenance
required_profile/required_namespace against it (fail closed).
- Fail closed when the profile role cannot be derived (no author default).
- Add MCP-boundary regression tests: reviewer/merger profiles cannot
consume an author handoff via role="author"; the legitimate author
profile still consumes; foreign required_profile rejected.
Controller-created role=author allocations were owned by the allocating
controller session with no authorized consume path for independent author
workers. When the controller exited, the lease became stale_dead_process
and required abandon/reassign instead of a usable handoff.
- Mark cross-role apply with durable handoff provenance (pending)
- Allow gitea_adopt_workflow_lease to consume pending handoffs by the
required role without sharing controller session identity or requiring
the controller process to remain alive
- Atomically transfer assignment+lease ownership and set
adopted_by_session_id with read-after-write evidence
- Reject wrong-role, second, and terminal adoptions
- Surface consume_allocation identifiers in process_work_queue results
- Preserve same-role allocation and genuine abandon recovery behavior
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
sysadminandClaude Opus 4.8
jcwalker3andClaude Opus 4.8
