fix: resolve conflicts for PR #365 against latest master
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
|
||||
"""Tests for already-landed final-report wording validator (#298).
|
||||
|
||||
An already-landed PR is reconciliation-only, never review/merge
|
||||
eligible, and a head SHA may not be called reviewed unless validation
|
||||
and diff review actually passed. Final reports and controller handoffs
|
||||
must use the reconciliation wording, not the legacy eligible/reviewed
|
||||
fields.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
from review_proofs import assess_already_landed_report_wording # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED = (
|
||||
"Controller Handoff\n"
|
||||
"- Oldest open PR requiring action: PR #278\n"
|
||||
"- Eligibility class: ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED\n"
|
||||
"- Candidate head SHA: 2a544b7\n"
|
||||
"- Reviewed head SHA: none\n"
|
||||
"- Review worktree used: false\n"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAlreadyLandedWording(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_correct_reconciliation_wording_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
|
||||
GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED, already_landed=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["downgraded"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["reasons"], [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_oldest_eligible_wording_fails(self):
|
||||
report = GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED + "- oldest eligible PR: PR #278\n"
|
||||
result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
|
||||
report, already_landed=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("oldest eligible pr" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_next_eligible_wording_fails(self):
|
||||
report = GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED + "- next eligible PR: PR #278\n"
|
||||
result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
|
||||
report, already_landed=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pinned_reviewed_head_fails(self):
|
||||
report = GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED + "- Pinned reviewed head: 2a544b7\n"
|
||||
result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
|
||||
report, already_landed=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("pinned reviewed head" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_scratch_worktree_field_fails(self):
|
||||
report = GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED + "- Scratch worktree used: False\n"
|
||||
result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
|
||||
report, already_landed=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_eligibility_class_fails(self):
|
||||
report = (
|
||||
"Controller Handoff\n"
|
||||
"- Oldest open PR requiring action: PR #278\n"
|
||||
"- Candidate head SHA: 2a544b7\n"
|
||||
"- Reviewed head SHA: none\n"
|
||||
"- Review worktree used: false\n"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
|
||||
report, already_landed=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("eligibility class" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_populated_reviewed_head_sha_fails(self):
|
||||
report = GOOD_ALREADY_LANDED.replace(
|
||||
"- Reviewed head SHA: none\n",
|
||||
"- Reviewed head SHA: 2a544b7\n",
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
|
||||
report, already_landed=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("reviewed head" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestNonAlreadyLandedReports(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_normal_reviewed_report_passes(self):
|
||||
report = (
|
||||
"- Selected PR: 281\n"
|
||||
"- Pinned reviewed head: abc1234\n"
|
||||
"- Review decision: approve\n"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
|
||||
report, already_landed=False, review_validated=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_blocked_infra_report_with_pinned_head_fails(self):
|
||||
report = (
|
||||
"- Selected PR: 281\n"
|
||||
"- Pinned reviewed head: abc1234\n"
|
||||
"- Current status: blocked on infra_stop\n"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
|
||||
report, already_landed=False, review_validated=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("before validation" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_validation_failed_report_with_reviewed_sha_fails(self):
|
||||
report = (
|
||||
"- Selected PR: 281\n"
|
||||
"- Reviewed head SHA: abc1234\n"
|
||||
"- Validation: full suite failed\n"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
|
||||
report, already_landed=False, review_validated=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_validation_failed_report_with_reviewed_none_passes(self):
|
||||
report = (
|
||||
"- Selected PR: 281\n"
|
||||
"- Reviewed head SHA: none\n"
|
||||
"- Validation: full suite failed\n"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_already_landed_report_wording(
|
||||
report, already_landed=False, review_validated=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -136,6 +136,12 @@ def test_create_issue_final_report_verifier_exported():
|
||||
assert callable(assess_create_issue_final_report)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merge_simulation_verifier_exported():
|
||||
from review_proofs import assess_merge_simulation_report
|
||||
|
||||
assert callable(assess_merge_simulation_report)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_prior_blocker_skip_verifier_exported():
|
||||
from review_proofs import assess_prior_blocker_skip_proof
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -148,6 +154,12 @@ def test_non_mergeable_skip_verifier_exported():
|
||||
assert callable(assess_non_mergeable_skip_proof)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_validation_worktree_edit_verifier_exported():
|
||||
from review_proofs import assess_validation_worktree_edit_report
|
||||
|
||||
assert callable(assess_validation_worktree_edit_report)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mutation_categories_verifier_exported():
|
||||
from review_proofs import assess_mutation_categories_report
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+105
-3
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ from review_proofs import ( # noqa: E402
|
||||
ISSUE_SELECTION_CONTINUATION_EXPLICIT,
|
||||
ISSUE_SELECTION_REPRESENTED_BY_OPEN_PR,
|
||||
assess_author_pr_report,
|
||||
assess_validation_environment_proof,
|
||||
assess_full_suite_failure_approval_gate,
|
||||
assess_queue_ordering_proof,
|
||||
assess_reviewer_baseline_validation_proof,
|
||||
@@ -2315,10 +2316,108 @@ class TestCreateIssueFinalReport(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["downgraded"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestQueueOrderingProof(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Issue #321: reviewer queue selection must prove ordering."""
|
||||
class TestValidationEnvironmentProof(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Issue #311: exact validation command and execution environment."""
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT = "/repo/Gitea-Tools/branches/review-pr-280"
|
||||
|
||||
def test_venv_pytest_with_full_report_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
|
||||
report_text=(
|
||||
"Validation command: venv/bin/pytest tests/ --ignore=branches\n"
|
||||
f"Working directory: {self.ROOT}\n"
|
||||
"Result: 1014 passed, 6 skipped"
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_bare_pytest_without_path_proof_fails(self):
|
||||
result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
|
||||
report_text=(
|
||||
"Validation command: pytest\n"
|
||||
f"Working directory: {self.ROOT}\n"
|
||||
"1014 passed, 6 skipped"
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_bare_pytest_with_path_and_version_proof_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
|
||||
report_text=(
|
||||
"Validation command: pytest tests/\n"
|
||||
f"Working directory: {self.ROOT}\n"
|
||||
"which pytest: /repo/Gitea-Tools/venv/bin/pytest\n"
|
||||
"pytest --version: pytest 8.3.4\n"
|
||||
"Resolves to the project venv: yes\n"
|
||||
"1014 passed, 6 skipped"
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_vague_pytest_summary_without_command_fails(self):
|
||||
result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
|
||||
report_text=(
|
||||
f"Working directory: {self.ROOT}\n"
|
||||
"pytest executed inside the worktree: 1014 passed, 6 skipped"
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_structured_environment_proof_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
|
||||
validation_environment={
|
||||
"command": "pytest tests/",
|
||||
"working_directory": self.ROOT,
|
||||
"which_pytest": "/repo/Gitea-Tools/venv/bin/pytest",
|
||||
"pytest_version": "pytest 8.3.4",
|
||||
"venv_resolved": True,
|
||||
"passed": 1014,
|
||||
"skipped": 6,
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_working_directory_fails(self):
|
||||
result = assess_validation_environment_proof(
|
||||
report_text=(
|
||||
"Validation command: venv/bin/pytest tests/\n"
|
||||
"1014 passed, 6 skipped"
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_build_final_report_downgrades_missing_environment_proof(self):
|
||||
report = build_final_report(
|
||||
checkout_proof=_good_checkout(),
|
||||
inventory=_good_inventory(),
|
||||
validation=_good_validation(),
|
||||
contamination=_good_contamination(),
|
||||
identity_eligible=True,
|
||||
merge_performed=False,
|
||||
issue_status_verified=True,
|
||||
capability_evidence=_good_capability_evidence(),
|
||||
sweep=_good_sweep(),
|
||||
live_state=_good_live_state(),
|
||||
role_boundary=_good_role_boundary(),
|
||||
review_mutation=_good_review_mutation(),
|
||||
controller_handoff=_good_handoff(),
|
||||
capability_proof=_good_capability_proof(),
|
||||
sweep_proof=_good_secret_sweep(),
|
||||
worktree_proof={
|
||||
"worktree_path": "/repo/branches/review-feat-issue-224",
|
||||
"porcelain_status": "",
|
||||
"pr_scope_files": ["docs/wiki/Repositories.md"],
|
||||
"scratch_used": True,
|
||||
},
|
||||
report_text=(
|
||||
f"Working directory: {self.ROOT}\n"
|
||||
"pytest executed: 1014 passed, 6 skipped"
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(report["validation_environment_proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_next_eligible_claim_without_policy_fails(self):
|
||||
result = assess_queue_ordering_proof(
|
||||
report_text="Selected the next eligible PR: PR #286.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -2707,3 +2806,6 @@ class TestFullSuiteFailureApprovalGate(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
|
||||
"""Tests for merge-simulation worktree mutation verifier (#317)."""
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
from reviewer_merge_simulation import ( # noqa: E402
|
||||
assess_merge_simulation_report,
|
||||
merge_simulation_commands,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _good_simulation_report(**overrides) -> str:
|
||||
lines = [
|
||||
"Worktree/index mutations: merge simulation in branches/review-pr281",
|
||||
"Worktree path: branches/review-pr281",
|
||||
"Pre-simulation clean status: clean (git status --porcelain empty)",
|
||||
"Merge result: conflicts in review_proofs.py",
|
||||
"Abort command: git merge --abort",
|
||||
"Post-abort clean status: clean after abort (git status --porcelain empty)",
|
||||
]
|
||||
text = "\n".join(lines)
|
||||
for key, value in overrides.items():
|
||||
text = text.replace(f"{key}:", f"{key}: {value}")
|
||||
return text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMergeSimulationDetection(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_detects_no_commit_merge(self):
|
||||
commands = merge_simulation_commands([
|
||||
"git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff",
|
||||
"git status",
|
||||
])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(commands, ["git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_detects_merge_abort(self):
|
||||
commands = merge_simulation_commands([
|
||||
"git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff",
|
||||
"git merge --abort",
|
||||
])
|
||||
self.assertIn("git merge --abort", commands)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMergeSimulationReport(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_no_simulation_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
|
||||
"Review complete. Worktree/index mutations: none",
|
||||
command_log=["git status --porcelain", "git diff prgs/master...HEAD"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_documented_simulation_passes(self):
|
||||
report = _good_simulation_report()
|
||||
result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
|
||||
report,
|
||||
command_log=[
|
||||
"git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff",
|
||||
"git merge --abort",
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_readonly_classification_blocks(self):
|
||||
report = "\n".join([
|
||||
"Read-only diagnostics: git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff, git status",
|
||||
"Worktree/index mutations: none",
|
||||
])
|
||||
result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
|
||||
report,
|
||||
command_log=["git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["block"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("read-only" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_worktree_field_blocks(self):
|
||||
report = "Merge simulation ran but only noted in prose."
|
||||
result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
|
||||
report,
|
||||
command_log=["git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("worktree/index mutations" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_conflict_simulation_requires_merge_result(self):
|
||||
report = _good_simulation_report().replace(
|
||||
"Merge result: conflicts in review_proofs.py",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
|
||||
report,
|
||||
command_log=["git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("merge result" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_aborted_simulation_requires_post_clean_proof(self):
|
||||
report = _good_simulation_report().replace(
|
||||
"Post-abort clean status: clean after abort (git status --porcelain empty)",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
|
||||
report,
|
||||
command_log=[
|
||||
"git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff",
|
||||
"git merge --abort",
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("post-abort" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_successful_simulation_without_abort_omits_abort_fields(self):
|
||||
report = "\n".join([
|
||||
"Worktree/index mutations: merge simulation completed cleanly",
|
||||
"Worktree path: branches/review-pr281",
|
||||
"Pre-simulation clean status: clean before simulation",
|
||||
"Merge result: clean fast-forward simulation",
|
||||
])
|
||||
result = assess_merge_simulation_report(
|
||||
report,
|
||||
command_log=["git merge prgs/master --no-commit --no-ff"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
|
||||
from review_proofs import assess_merge_simulation_report as exported
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
|
||||
"""Tests for PR validation worktree no-edit verifier (#315)."""
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
from reviewer_validation_worktree_edits import ( # noqa: E402
|
||||
assess_validation_worktree_edit_report,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _read_only_report() -> str:
|
||||
return "\n".join([
|
||||
"Validation worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
|
||||
"Official PR-head validation on unmodified worktree.",
|
||||
"Official validation result: failed (1 failed)",
|
||||
"File edits by reviewer: none",
|
||||
"Review decision: request_changes",
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _diagnostic_report() -> str:
|
||||
return "\n".join([
|
||||
"Validation worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
|
||||
"Official PR-head validation on unmodified worktree.",
|
||||
"Official validation result: failed (1 failed)",
|
||||
"Review decision: request_changes",
|
||||
"Diagnostic local experiment — not PR-head validation",
|
||||
"Diagnostic scratch worktree path: branches/diagnostic-pr280-fix-test",
|
||||
"File edits by reviewer: tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py (diagnostic only)",
|
||||
"Diagnostic result: passed after local fix",
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestValidationWorktreeEdits(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_read_only_review_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
|
||||
_read_only_report(),
|
||||
validation_session={
|
||||
"validation_worktree_path": (
|
||||
"branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim"
|
||||
),
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_validation_worktree_edit_blocks(self):
|
||||
result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
|
||||
_read_only_report(),
|
||||
validation_session={
|
||||
"validation_worktree_path": (
|
||||
"branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim"
|
||||
),
|
||||
"validation_worktree_edits": ["tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["block"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("validation worktree" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_file_edits_none_contradiction_blocks(self):
|
||||
result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
|
||||
_read_only_report(),
|
||||
validation_session={
|
||||
"validation_worktree_path": (
|
||||
"branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim"
|
||||
),
|
||||
},
|
||||
action_log=[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"path": "tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py",
|
||||
"kind": "file_edit",
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"worktree_path": "branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("file edits" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_diagnostic_scratch_with_reporting_passes(self):
|
||||
result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
|
||||
_diagnostic_report(),
|
||||
validation_session={
|
||||
"validation_worktree_path": (
|
||||
"branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim"
|
||||
),
|
||||
"diagnostic_worktree_path": "branches/diagnostic-pr280-fix-test",
|
||||
"diagnostic_edits": ["tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py"],
|
||||
"diagnostic_experiment": True,
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"], result["reasons"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_diagnostic_without_scratch_worktree_blocks(self):
|
||||
result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
|
||||
"File edits by reviewer: tests/test_example.py",
|
||||
validation_session={
|
||||
"diagnostic_edits": ["tests/test_example.py"],
|
||||
"diagnostic_experiment": True,
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("diagnostic" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_post_edit_official_validation_blocks(self):
|
||||
report = "\n".join([
|
||||
"Validation worktree path: branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim",
|
||||
"Official validation result: passed after local edit",
|
||||
"File edits by reviewer: tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py",
|
||||
])
|
||||
result = assess_validation_worktree_edit_report(
|
||||
report,
|
||||
validation_session={
|
||||
"validation_worktree_path": (
|
||||
"branches/review-pr280-feat-issue-275-claim"
|
||||
),
|
||||
"validation_worktree_edits": ["tests/test_agent_temp_artifacts.py"],
|
||||
"official_validation_after_edit": True,
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestExport(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_review_proofs_reexport(self):
|
||||
from review_proofs import assess_validation_worktree_edit_report as exported
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(callable(exported))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user