fix(mcp): role-exclusive capability invariants and structured fail-closed submit (Closes #723)

Defect A - invariants:
- task_capability_map.ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS is now the single shared
  definition of role-exclusive tasks; the resolver's inline copy is gone
  (AC1/AC5 drift surface removed).
- tests: every role-exclusive task must exist in the capability map;
  formal-review tasks stay role-exclusive; canonical merger satisfies
  merge_pr; canonical reconciler satisfies branch-cleanup tasks
  (extends the #722 break-glass invariant suite).

Defect B - unactionable internal_error:
- AC3: gitea_resolve_task_capability records the capability purity
  baseline first but stamps _preflight_resolved_role/_task only for an
  ALLOWED resolve; a denied resolve clears any stale stamp
  (_clear_resolved_capability_stamp) so later mutation preflights key
  off the real profile role.
- AC4: _evaluate_pr_review_submission converts
  _verify_role_mutation_workspace failures (role binding, stale
  runtime) into result reasons with blocker_kind=workspace_role_binding
  instead of letting RuntimeError escape as a generic internal_error.
- AC5: _build_runtime_task_capabilities applies the resolver's
  role-exclusive filter when given the active role kind and labels each
  entry role_filtered/permission_only; matching_configured_profiles
  honors declared profile roles for role-exclusive tasks.

Validation: focused suites 22 passed (+48 subtests); adjacent resolver/
runtime/review suites 72 passed; full suite 2929 passed, 6 skipped,
221 subtests (single pre-existing Starlette warning, #682).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-17 01:00:12 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent 67e4a2b5e9
commit bc9366c394
4 changed files with 501 additions and 32 deletions
+45 -1
View File
@@ -19,7 +19,12 @@ import unittest
import gitea_config
from role_session_router import MERGER_TASKS, REVIEWER_TASKS
from task_capability_map import required_permission, required_role
from task_capability_map import (
ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS,
TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP,
required_permission,
required_role,
)
# Canonical role-profile permission shape. Mirrors the configured
# author/reviewer/merger/reconciler profiles (profiles.json v2 role split):
@@ -201,5 +206,44 @@ class TestMergerBoundary(unittest.TestCase):
)
class TestRoleExclusiveSetIntegrity(unittest.TestCase):
"""#723 AC1/AC5: the shared role-exclusive set stays coherent."""
def test_every_role_exclusive_task_exists_in_capability_map(self):
for task in sorted(ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS):
with self.subTest(task=task):
self.assertIn(
task,
TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP,
f"role-exclusive task {task!r} missing from the "
f"capability map — required_role() would raise and the "
f"resolver would 500 instead of failing closed",
)
def test_formal_review_tasks_are_role_exclusive(self):
for task in FORMAL_REVIEW_TASKS:
with self.subTest(task=task):
self.assertIn(task, ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS)
def test_merge_pr_is_role_exclusive_and_merger_satisfiable(self):
"""AC1 merger equivalent: merging must stay possible for a canonical
merger profile (permission AND role together)."""
self.assertIn("merge_pr", ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS)
self.assertTrue(
_profile_satisfies("merger", "merge_pr"),
"no canonical merger profile satisfies merge_pr — merging would "
"be impossible for every configured profile",
)
def test_reconciler_cleanup_tasks_stay_reconciler_satisfiable(self):
for task in ("cleanup_merged_pr_branch", "reconciliation_cleanup"):
with self.subTest(task=task):
self.assertIn(task, ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS)
self.assertTrue(
_profile_satisfies("reconciler", task),
f"no canonical reconciler profile satisfies {task!r}",
)
if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main()