fix: resolve conflicts for PR #486

Merge prgs/master into PR branch to restore mergeability.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>

docs/developer-testing-guidelines.md

@@ -13,6 +13,25 @@ credentials.** Every test mocks the HTTP client and the keychain/auth lookup.
 
 ## 1. Standard test commands
 
+### Canonical runner: `./run-tests.sh`
+
+The canonical full-validation command is the root-level runner. It invokes the
+project virtualenv interpreter and passes any extra arguments straight through
+to `pytest`:
+
+```bash
+# Full validation
+./run-tests.sh
+
+# Focused validation (extra args forward to pytest)
+./run-tests.sh tests/test_mcp_server.py -q
+```
+
+`run-tests.sh` runs `venv/bin/python -m pytest "$@"` and fails with a clear
+setup message if the virtualenv Python is missing (so a session never silently
+falls back to the wrong interpreter). The explicit `venv/bin/python -m pytest`
+forms below remain valid and equivalent.
+
 The test suite needs the project virtualenv (it provides the MCP SDK):
 
 ```bash

docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md

@@ -377,6 +377,37 @@ explicit control-checkout repair.
 
 Portable wording: [`skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md`](../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md).
 
+### Root checkout guard (#475)
+
+The MCP server enforces a fail-closed **root checkout guard** before author,
+reviewer, and merger mutations when the active workspace is not an isolated
+`branches/...` worktree (reconciler close paths remain exempt per #468).
+
+The guard blocks when the **control checkout** (repository root) is:
+
+- on a non-stable branch (`master` / `main` / `dev` expected),
+- detached HEAD,
+- dirty (tracked edits),
+- or its `HEAD` does not match `prgs/master` when that ref is available.
+
+**Remediation (never auto-reset or stash):**
+
+> Root checkout is not on master. Preserve state, switch root back to master,
+> and use `scripts/worktree-review` or the sanctioned issue worktree flow.
+
+**Recovery after root hijack:**
+
+1. Preserve any in-progress edits (copy paths, note branch name, or commit on a
+   rescue branch from a `branches/...` worktree).
+2. From the repository root: `git checkout master` (or `main` / `dev` per repo
+   policy) and `git fetch prgs && git merge --ff-only prgs/master` when safe.
+3. Confirm `git status` is clean and `git branch --show-current` is `master`.
+4. Resume work only inside `branches/issue-<n>-<slug>` via `gitea_lock_issue` /
+   `git worktree add`.
+
+`branches/...` directories are disposable role worktrees; the root checkout is
+the stable orchestration surface only.
+
 ## Shell Spawn Hard-Stop Rule
 
 Symptom: a shell tool call returns `exit_code: -1` with empty stdout/stderr.
@@ -641,6 +672,33 @@ loop and do **not** substitute WebFetch/Playwright/manual base64.
 - **Prompt:** `Use any eligible merger profile to merge PR #N if checks pass and
   it is mergeable. Confirm with "MERGE PR N". Do not force-merge.`
 
+#### Merger lease adoption (#536)
+
+When review and merge run in **separate sessions**, the merger must **not**
+manually seed `reviewer_pr_lease._SESSION_LEASE` or equivalent in-process state.
+That ad hoc pattern was used incidentally for PR #493 and PR #421; it is not
+canonical proof and is rejected by mutation gates.
+
+**Canonical merger handoff:**
+
+1. Confirm a reviewer session holds an active PR lease and posted **APPROVED**
+   at the current live head (`gitea_get_pr_review_feedback`).
+2. In a clean merger worktree under `branches/`, call
+   `gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease` with `worktree`, `expected_head_sha`, and
+   optional `issue_number`.
+3. The tool posts durable adoption proof on the PR thread (`<!-- mcp-review-lease-adoption:v1 -->`)
+   recording actor, profiles, adopted-from session/comment, adoption reason, and
+   timestamp, then records sanctioned in-session provenance.
+4. Call `gitea_merge_pr` with the same pinned `expected_head_sha`.
+
+**Forbidden:** Python one-liners or scripts that call `record_session_lease()`
+without provenance from `gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease`,
+`gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease`, or `gitea_heartbeat_reviewer_pr_lease`.
+
+**Same-session review+merge:** the reviewer session may use
+`gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease` directly; adoption is only for cross-session
+merger handoff.
+
 ### Close the issue after merge / Reconciliation
 
 - **Profile:** issue-manager or merger.

docs/mcp-menu.md

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+# MCP operator shell menu
+
+## Purpose
+
+`./mcp-menu.sh` is a repository-root terminal menu for onboarding and operating
+the Gitea-Tools MCP/Gitea workflow without memorizing every prompt, script path,
+or runbook section.
+
+It is intentionally **safe by default**: status checks and copy-paste workflow
+prompts. It does not delete branches, force-push, edit lock files, or bypass
+sanctioned MCP tools.
+
+## How to run
+
+From the repository root:
+
+```bash
+./mcp-menu.sh
+```
+
+The script must be executable (`chmod +x mcp-menu.sh`). It uses bash with
+`set -euo pipefail`.
+
+## Safety rules
+
+- **Read-only by default** — root checkout health is inspection only.
+- **No destructive git** — no `git push --force`, branch deletion, or
+  `--delete` refspecs.
+- **No lock-file editing** — issue locks are acquired only through
+  `gitea_lock_issue`.
+- **No raw API bypass** — prompts direct operators to sanctioned MCP tools.
+- **Remote mutations require confirmation** — any future menu action that would
+  mutate remote or server state must be clearly labeled and require explicit
+  operator confirmation before running.
+- **Author work stays under `branches/`** — the root checkout is a stable
+  control checkout on `master` / `prgs/master`.
+
+## Menu options
+
+| Option | Description |
+|--------|-------------|
+| Project status / root checkout health | Shows cwd, branch, `git status --short --branch`, HEAD SHA, `prgs/master` SHA, and warnings when the root checkout is dirty or off `master`. |
+| Author workflow prompts | Ready-to-copy prompts for issue work, conflict-fix sessions, and root checkout recovery. |
+| Reviewer workflow prompts | PR review prompt (review-only; no merge). |
+| Merger workflow prompts | PR merge prompt (merge gates and explicit approval). |
+| Reconciler workflow prompts | Already-landed / closed PR reconciliation prompt. |
+| Onboarding new project | Checklist prompt for adding a repository to the MCP workflow. |
+| Proxmox deployment placeholder | **Not implemented** — informational message only. |
+| Create Proxmox LXC placeholder | **Not implemented** — informational message only. |
+| Run tests | Runs `./run-tests.sh` when present; otherwise `venv/bin/python -m pytest`; otherwise fails closed with a clear error. |
+| Exit | Quit the menu. |
+
+## Placeholder-only entries
+
+**Proxmox deployment** and **Create Proxmox LXC** are placeholders until
+dedicated issues implement sanctioned automation. The menu prints a clear
+message and does not invoke deploy scripts.
+
+## Related documentation
+
+- [`docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md`](llm-workflow-runbooks.md) — Gitea-specific workflow runbooks
+- [`skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md`](../skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md) — portable workflow skill
+- [`skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/`](../skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/) — canonical task workflows
+
+## Tests
+
+Hermetic coverage lives in `tests/test_mcp_menu_script.py`.

docs/wiki/MCP-Tools.md

@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
 - `gitea_dry_run_pr_review` — validation-phase review mechanics.
 - `gitea_mark_final_review_decision` — mark validation complete.
 - `gitea_submit_pr_review` / `gitea_review_pr` — gated live review.
+- `gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease` / `gitea_heartbeat_reviewer_pr_lease` — per-PR reviewer lease (#407).
+- `gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease` — guarded cross-session merger lease adoption (#536).
 - `gitea_merge_pr` — gated merge (only merge path).
 
 ## Read tools

final_report_validator.py

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ import re
 from typing import Any, Callable
 
 import issue_lock_provenance
+from mcp_native_cleanup_proof import assess_mcp_native_cleanup_proof
 from post_merge_cleanup_proof import assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof
 from review_proofs import (
     HANDOFF_HEADING,
@@ -122,6 +123,22 @@ _TARGET_BRANCH_SHA_RE = re.compile(
     r"target branch sha\s*:\s*[0-9a-f]{40}",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
+_WORKFLOW_LOAD_HELPER_RE = re.compile(
+    r"workflow[- ]load helper result\s*:",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_WORKFLOW_LOAD_HASH_RE = re.compile(
+    r"workflow[- ]load helper result[\s\S]{0,400}?workflow[_ ]hash\s*:\s*[0-9a-f]{12}",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_WORKFLOW_LOAD_BOUNDARY_RE = re.compile(
+    r"workflow[- ]load helper result[\s\S]{0,400}?boundary[_ ]status\s*:\s*(?:clean|violation)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_WORKFLOW_FILE_VIEW_NARRATIVE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:read|viewed|loaded)\s+(?:the\s+)?(?:canonical\s+)?(?:workflow|review-merge-pr\.md)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
 _FULL_SHA_RE = re.compile(r"\b[0-9a-f]{40}\b", re.IGNORECASE)
 _RECONCILE_STALE_FIELDS = (
     "pr number opened",
@@ -572,6 +589,27 @@ def _rule_conflict_fix_push_proof(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
     )
 
 
+def _rule_worktree_cleanup_audit_proof(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    from worktree_cleanup_audit import assess_cleanup_audit_final_report
+
+    text = report_text or ""
+    if "cleanup audit" not in text.lower() and "reconciliation table" not in text.lower():
+        return []
+    result = assess_cleanup_audit_final_report(text)
+    if result.get("proven"):
+        return []
+    return _findings_from_reasons(
+        "author.worktree_cleanup_audit_proof",
+        result.get("reasons") or [],
+        field="Worktree cleanup audit",
+        severity="block",
+        safe_next_action=(
+            "include reconciliation table counts, disposition rows, and "
+            "final git worktree list proof"
+        ),
+    )
+
+
 def _rule_reviewer_validation_command(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
     text = report_text or ""
     if not _BARE_PYTEST_RE.search(text):
@@ -1028,6 +1066,54 @@ def _rule_shared_author_reviewer_same_run(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, st
     )
 
 
+def _rule_reviewer_workflow_load_boundary(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    """#403: require structured workflow-load helper result, not file-view narrative."""
+    if not report_text.strip():
+        return []
+    findings: list[dict[str, str]] = []
+    has_helper = bool(_WORKFLOW_LOAD_HELPER_RE.search(report_text))
+    has_hash = bool(_WORKFLOW_LOAD_HASH_RE.search(report_text))
+    has_boundary = bool(_WORKFLOW_LOAD_BOUNDARY_RE.search(report_text))
+    has_narrative_only = bool(_WORKFLOW_FILE_VIEW_NARRATIVE_RE.search(report_text))
+
+    if has_narrative_only and not has_helper:
+        findings.append(validator_finding(
+            "reviewer.workflow_load_boundary",
+            "block",
+            "Workflow-load helper result",
+            (
+                "canonical workflow file-view narrative without structured "
+                "gitea_load_review_workflow helper result"
+            ),
+            (
+                "include Workflow-load helper result with workflow_hash and "
+                "boundary_status from gitea_load_review_workflow"
+            ),
+        ))
+        return findings
+
+    if has_helper and (not has_hash or not has_boundary):
+        missing = []
+        if not has_hash:
+            missing.append("workflow_hash")
+        if not has_boundary:
+            missing.append("boundary_status")
+        findings.append(validator_finding(
+            "reviewer.workflow_load_boundary",
+            "block",
+            "Workflow-load helper result",
+            (
+                "workflow-load helper result incomplete; missing "
+                + ", ".join(missing)
+            ),
+            (
+                "copy workflow_load_helper_result fields from "
+                "gitea_load_review_workflow into the final report"
+            ),
+        ))
+    return findings
+
+
 def _rule_audit_reconciliation_boundary(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
     from audit_reconciliation_mode import assess_audit_reconciliation_report
 
@@ -1063,6 +1149,22 @@ def _rule_reviewer_review_mutation(
     )
 
 
+def _rule_reviewer_mutation_capability_proof(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    from reviewer_mutation_capability_proof import assess_mutation_capability_proof
+
+    result = assess_mutation_capability_proof(report_text)
+    if not result.get("block"):
+        return []
+    return _findings_from_reasons(
+        "reviewer.mutation_capability_proof",
+        result.get("reasons") or [],
+        field="Capabilities proven",
+        severity="block",
+        safe_next_action=result.get("safe_next_action")
+        or "document exact per-mutation capability proof before each mutation",
+    )
+
+
 def _rule_reviewer_post_merge_cleanup_proof(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
     result = assess_post_merge_cleanup_proof(report_text)
     if not result.get("block"):
@@ -1077,12 +1179,30 @@ def _rule_reviewer_post_merge_cleanup_proof(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str,
     )
 
 
+def _rule_shared_mcp_native_cleanup_proof(report_text: str) -> list[dict[str, str]]:
+    result = assess_mcp_native_cleanup_proof(report_text)
+    if not result.get("block"):
+        return []
+    return _findings_from_reasons(
+        "shared.mcp_native_cleanup_proof",
+        result.get("reasons") or [],
+        field="Cleanup mutations",
+        severity="block",
+        safe_next_action=result.get("safe_next_action")
+        or "use authorized reconciler MCP cleanup tools; never raw scripts",
+    )
+
+
 _SHARED_ISSUE_LOCK_RULES = (
     _rule_shared_issue_lock_external_state,
     _rule_shared_manual_lock_pr_override,
     _rule_shared_author_reviewer_same_run,
 )
 
+_SHARED_CLEANUP_PROOF_RULES = (
+    _rule_shared_mcp_native_cleanup_proof,
+)
+
 _RULES_BY_TASK: dict[str, list[Callable[..., list[dict[str, str]]]]] = {
     "review_pr": [
         _rule_shared_controller_handoff,
@@ -1104,9 +1224,12 @@ _RULES_BY_TASK: dict[str, list[Callable[..., list[dict[str, str]]]]] = {
         _rule_reviewer_already_landed_eligible,
         _rule_reviewer_already_landed_state,
         _rule_reviewer_target_branch_freshness,
+        _rule_reviewer_workflow_load_boundary,
         _rule_reviewer_mutation_ledger,
         _rule_reviewer_review_mutation,
+        _rule_reviewer_mutation_capability_proof,
         _rule_reviewer_post_merge_cleanup_proof,
+        *_SHARED_CLEANUP_PROOF_RULES,
         _rule_reviewer_stale_head_proof,
     ],
     "merge_pr": [
@@ -1124,6 +1247,7 @@ _RULES_BY_TASK: dict[str, list[Callable[..., list[dict[str, str]]]]] = {
         _rule_reconcile_controller_handoff,
         _rule_shared_email_disclosure,
         *_SHARED_ISSUE_LOCK_RULES,
+        *_SHARED_CLEANUP_PROOF_RULES,
         _rule_reconcile_stale_author_fields,
         _rule_reconcile_eligible_reviewed,
         _rule_reconcile_linked_issue_live,
@@ -1145,6 +1269,7 @@ _RULES_BY_TASK: dict[str, list[Callable[..., list[dict[str, str]]]]] = {
         *_SHARED_ISSUE_LOCK_RULES,
         _rule_reviewer_vague_mutations_none,
         _rule_conflict_fix_push_proof,
+        _rule_worktree_cleanup_audit_proof,
     ],
     "issue_filing": [
         _rule_shared_controller_handoff,

gitea_mcp_server.py

@@ -211,6 +211,28 @@ def _effective_workspace_role() -> str:
     )
 
 
+def _actual_profile_role() -> str:
+    """Resolve the workspace role from the ACTIVE PROFILE alone (#540).
+
+    Unlike :func:`_effective_workspace_role`, this never consults
+    ``_preflight_resolved_role``. A task capability whose ``required_role_kind``
+    is ``author`` (e.g. ``comment_issue``) stamps ``_preflight_resolved_role =
+    "author"``; the #274/#475 role exemptions must key off the real profile
+    identity so that stamp cannot poison a genuine reviewer/merger/reconciler
+    session into being treated as an author. Author profiles still classify as
+    ``author`` here, so author blocking is preserved.
+    """
+    profile = get_profile()
+    role = _role_kind(
+        profile.get("allowed_operations") or [],
+        profile.get("forbidden_operations") or [],
+    )
+    return nwb.normalize_role_kind(
+        role,
+        profile_name=profile.get("profile_name"),
+    )
+
+
 def _resolve_preflight_workspace_path(worktree_path: str | None = None) -> str:
     """Resolve the namespace-scoped workspace root inspected by pre-flight guards."""
     role = _effective_workspace_role()
@@ -539,11 +561,21 @@ def _enforce_branches_only_author_mutation(worktree_path: str | None = None) ->
     """#274: author file/branch mutations must run from a branches/ worktree.
 
     Reviewer, merger, and reconciler roles are exempt: reconciler ``close_pr``
-    and merger metadata mutations must not require ``GITEA_AUTHOR_WORKTREE``
+    is a Gitea metadata mutation and must not require ``GITEA_AUTHOR_WORKTREE``
     (#468, #483). Non-author namespaces use dedicated workspace env vars (#510).
+
+    The exemption honours BOTH the effective workspace role and the actual
+    profile role (#540). ``comment_issue`` preflight stamps
+    ``_preflight_resolved_role = "author"`` (its ``required_role_kind``), which
+    would otherwise poison :func:`_effective_workspace_role` into classifying a
+    genuine reconciler as an author and defeat this exemption. Keying off the
+    real profile role as well preserves the exemption without weakening author
+    blocking — an actual author profile classifies as ``author`` in both.
     """
-    role = _effective_workspace_role()
-    if role in nwb.NON_AUTHOR_ROLES:
+    if (
+        _effective_workspace_role() in nwb.NON_AUTHOR_ROLES
+        or _actual_profile_role() in nwb.NON_AUTHOR_ROLES
+    ):
         return
     ctx = _resolve_namespace_mutation_context(worktree_path)
     workspace = ctx["workspace_path"]
@@ -651,6 +683,7 @@ def verify_preflight_purity(
                     f"{_format_preflight_files(reviewer_delta)}"
                 )
 
+    _enforce_root_checkout_guard(worktree_path)
     _enforce_branches_only_author_mutation(worktree_path)
     _clear_preflight_capability_state()
 
@@ -693,6 +726,28 @@ def _verify_role_mutation_workspace(
     verify_preflight_purity(remote, worktree_path=resolved, task=task)
     return resolved
 
+
+def _enforce_root_checkout_guard(worktree_path: str | None = None) -> None:
+    """#475: fail closed when the stable control checkout is contaminated."""
+    ctx = _resolve_author_mutation_context(worktree_path)
+    canonical_root = ctx["canonical_repo_root"]
+    workspace = ctx["workspace_path"]
+    git_state = issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state(canonical_root)
+    remote_master_sha = root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha(canonical_root)
+    assessment = root_checkout_guard.assess_root_checkout_guard(
+        workspace_path=workspace,
+        canonical_repo_root=canonical_root,
+        current_branch=git_state.get("current_branch"),
+        head_sha=git_state.get("head_sha"),
+        porcelain_status=git_state.get("porcelain_status") or "",
+        remote_master_sha=remote_master_sha,
+        resolved_role=_preflight_resolved_role,
+        actual_role=_actual_profile_role(),
+    )
+    if assessment["block"]:
+        raise RuntimeError(root_checkout_guard.format_root_checkout_guard_error(assessment))
+
+
 from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP  # noqa: E402
 
 from gitea_auth import (  # noqa: E402
@@ -714,6 +769,7 @@ import role_session_router  # noqa: E402
 import role_namespace_gate  # noqa: E402
 import task_capability_map  # noqa: E402
 import review_proofs  # noqa: E402
+import review_workflow_boundary  # noqa: E402
 import review_workflow_load  # noqa: E402
 import agent_temp_artifacts
 import issue_lock_worktree  # noqa: E402
@@ -724,16 +780,21 @@ import stacked_pr_support  # noqa: E402
 import merge_approval_gate  # noqa: E402
 import already_landed_reconcile  # noqa: E402
 import author_mutation_worktree  # noqa: E402
+import root_checkout_guard  # noqa: E402
+import remote_repo_guard  # noqa: E402
 import issue_claim_heartbeat  # noqa: E402
 import issue_work_duplicate_gate  # noqa: E402
 import reviewer_pr_lease  # noqa: E402
+import merger_lease_adoption  # noqa: E402
 import merged_cleanup_reconcile  # noqa: E402
+import worktree_cleanup_audit  # noqa: E402
 import reconciler_profile  # noqa: E402
 import reconciliation_workflow  # noqa: E402
 import audit_reconciliation_mode  # noqa: E402
 import review_merge_state_machine  # noqa: E402
 import pr_work_lease  # noqa: E402
 import native_mcp_preference  # noqa: E402
+import worktree_cleanup_audit  # noqa: E402
 
 
 # Keyed issue-lock storage (#443): per remote/org/repo/issue files under
@@ -1135,11 +1196,49 @@ def _resolve(remote: str, host: str | None, org: str | None, repo: str | None):
     if remote not in REMOTES:
         raise ValueError(f"Unknown remote '{remote}'. Choose from: {list(REMOTES)}")
     profile = REMOTES[remote]
-    return (
-        host or profile["host"],
-        org or profile["org"],
-        repo or profile["repo"],
+    resolved_host = host or profile["host"]
+    resolved_org = org or profile["org"]
+    resolved_repo = repo or profile["repo"]
+    _enforce_remote_repo_guard(
+        remote,
+        resolved_org,
+        resolved_repo,
+        org_explicit=org is not None,
+        repo_explicit=repo is not None,
     )
+    return (resolved_host, resolved_org, resolved_repo)
+
+
+def _enforce_remote_repo_guard(
+    remote: str,
+    resolved_org: str,
+    resolved_repo: str,
+    *,
+    org_explicit: bool,
+    repo_explicit: bool,
+) -> None:
+    """Fail closed on a remote/repo mismatch vs. the local git remote (#530).
+
+    Best-effort: bypassed under pytest unless ``GITEA_FORCE_REMOTE_REPO_CHECK`` is
+    set, so the unit suite (which calls tools with bare remotes against mocked APIs)
+    is unaffected. In production it protects every read/lookup/mutation tool because
+    they all resolve targets through :func:`_resolve`.
+    """
+    if "pytest" in sys.modules and not os.environ.get(
+        "GITEA_FORCE_REMOTE_REPO_CHECK"
+    ):
+        return
+    local_remote_url = _local_git_remote_url(remote)
+    assessment = remote_repo_guard.assess_remote_repo_match(
+        remote=remote,
+        resolved_org=resolved_org,
+        resolved_repo=resolved_repo,
+        local_remote_url=local_remote_url,
+        org_explicit=org_explicit,
+        repo_explicit=repo_explicit,
+    )
+    if assessment["block"]:
+        raise RuntimeError(remote_repo_guard.format_remote_repo_guard_error(assessment))
 
 
 def _auth(host: str) -> str:
@@ -2394,10 +2493,18 @@ def _review_decision_session_reasons(lock: dict | None) -> list[str]:
     return reasons
 
 
-def init_review_decision_lock(remote: str | None, task: str | None):
+def init_review_decision_lock(remote: str | None, task: str | None, force: bool = True):
     """Seed read-only-until-ready state for reviewer PR review tasks."""
     if task != "review_pr":
         return
+    if not force:
+        lock = _load_review_decision_lock()
+        if lock is not None:
+            if lock.get("remote") == remote and lock.get("session_pid") == os.getpid():
+                env_lock = (os.environ.get(SESSION_PROFILE_LOCK_ENV) or "").strip()
+                stored_lock = (lock.get("session_profile_lock") or "").strip()
+                if not env_lock or not stored_lock or env_lock == stored_lock:
+                    return
     review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
     profile = get_profile()
     profile_name = (profile.get("profile_name") or "").strip()
@@ -2790,6 +2897,85 @@ def gitea_get_pr_review_feedback(
     }
 
 
+def _fetch_pr_lease_comments_safe(
+    pr_number: int,
+    *,
+    remote: str,
+    host: str | None,
+    org: str | None,
+    repo: str | None,
+    limit: int = 100,
+    require_open: bool = False,
+) -> dict:
+    """Fetch PR thread comments with structured fail-closed errors (#519)."""
+    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    auth = _auth(h)
+    resolved_repo = f"{o}/{r}"
+    pr_url = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}"
+    try:
+        pr = api_request("GET", pr_url, auth)
+    except RuntimeError as exc:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "comments": [],
+            "reasons": [
+                "PR lookup failed before conflict-fix push assessment "
+                f"(pr_number={pr_number}, repo={resolved_repo}, remote={remote}): "
+                f"{_redact(str(exc))}"
+            ],
+            "pr_lookup": "failed",
+            "resolved_repo": resolved_repo,
+            "remote": remote,
+            "pr_number": pr_number,
+        }
+    pr_state = (pr.get("state") or "").strip().lower()
+    if require_open and pr_state != "open":
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "comments": [],
+            "reasons": [
+                f"PR #{pr_number} on {resolved_repo} is not open "
+                f"(state={pr_state or 'unknown'})"
+            ],
+            "pr_lookup": "not_open",
+            "resolved_repo": resolved_repo,
+            "remote": remote,
+            "pr_number": pr_number,
+            "head_sha": (pr.get("head") or {}).get("sha"),
+        }
+    api = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/issues/{pr_number}/comments"
+    try:
+        comments = api_request("GET", api, auth)
+    except RuntimeError as exc:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "comments": [],
+            "reasons": [
+                "PR comment fetch failed during conflict-fix push assessment "
+                f"(pr_number={pr_number}, issue_index={pr_number}, "
+                f"repo={resolved_repo}, remote={remote}): "
+                f"{_redact(str(exc))}"
+            ],
+            "pr_lookup": "ok",
+            "resolved_repo": resolved_repo,
+            "remote": remote,
+            "pr_number": pr_number,
+            "head_sha": (pr.get("head") or {}).get("sha"),
+        }
+    if not isinstance(comments, list):
+        comments = []
+    return {
+        "success": True,
+        "comments": list(comments[:limit]),
+        "reasons": [],
+        "pr_lookup": "ok",
+        "resolved_repo": resolved_repo,
+        "remote": remote,
+        "pr_number": pr_number,
+        "head_sha": (pr.get("head") or {}).get("sha"),
+    }
+
+
 def _list_pr_lease_comments(
     pr_number: int,
     *,
@@ -2799,7 +2985,15 @@ def _list_pr_lease_comments(
     repo: str | None,
     limit: int = 100,
 ) -> list[dict]:
-    """Fetch PR/issue thread comments used for reviewer/conflict-fix leases."""
+    """Fetch PR/issue thread comments used for reviewer/conflict-fix leases.
+
+    Intentionally does **not** pre-fetch the PR via GET /pulls/{n}. Shared
+    callers (merge approval feedback, reviewer lease gates) depend on a single
+    comments GET so mock sequences and fail-open #485 non-list handling stay
+    stable. Structured PR-lookup failures belong only to
+    :func:`_fetch_pr_lease_comments_safe` used by conflict-fix push assessment
+    (#519).
+    """
     h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
     auth = _auth(h)
     api = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/issues/{pr_number}/comments"
@@ -4326,6 +4520,59 @@ def _remote_branch_exists(h: str, o: str, r: str, auth: str, branch: str) -> boo
         raise
 
 
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_capture_branches_worktree_snapshot(
+    open_pr_branches: list[str] | None = None,
+    active_lock_branch: str | None = None,
+    leased_paths: list[str] | None = None,
+    worktree_path: str | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Read-only: capture ``branches/`` and worktree audit snapshot (#404)."""
+    read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
+    if read_block:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "reasons": read_block,
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
+        }
+    root = PROJECT_ROOT
+    if worktree_path:
+        root = os.path.realpath(os.path.abspath(worktree_path))
+        git_root = _get_git_root(root)
+        if git_root:
+            root = git_root
+    snapshot = worktree_cleanup_audit.capture_branches_worktree_snapshot(
+        root,
+        open_pr_branches=open_pr_branches,
+        active_lock_branch=active_lock_branch,
+        leased_paths=leased_paths,
+    )
+    return {"success": True, "snapshot": snapshot}
+
+
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_assess_worktree_cleanup_integrity(
+    before_snapshot: dict,
+    after_snapshot: dict,
+    removals: list[dict] | None = None,
+    explained_missing: dict[str, str] | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Read-only: reconcile cleanup before/after snapshots (#404)."""
+    read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
+    if read_block:
+        return {
+            "integrity_passed": False,
+            "reasons": read_block,
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
+        }
+    return worktree_cleanup_audit.assess_worktree_cleanup_integrity(
+        before=before_snapshot,
+        after=after_snapshot,
+        removals=removals,
+        explained_missing=explained_missing,
+    )
+
+
 @mcp.tool()
 def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
     dry_run: bool = True,
@@ -4677,6 +4924,90 @@ def gitea_scan_already_landed_open_prs(
     }
 
 
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_audit_worktree_cleanup(
+    remote: str = "dadeschools",
+    host: str | None = None,
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+    ttl_hours: float = worktree_cleanup_audit.DEFAULT_TTL_HOURS,
+) -> dict:
+    """Read-only: classify every session-owned worktree under ``branches/`` (#401).
+
+    Audits the local ``branches/`` directory, classifying each worktree as
+    active open PR, active issue work, dirty local, clean stale removable,
+    detached review leftover, or unsafe/unknown. Open PR branch heads are
+    fetched live so a worktree tied to an open PR is never marked removable;
+    the active issue-lock branch is read from the local lock file and treated
+    as active work. Deletes nothing and mutates no Gitea state.
+
+    Fails closed if the live open-PR list cannot be fetched: without it,
+    removability cannot be proven, so no candidates are returned.
+
+    Args:
+        remote: Known instance — 'dadeschools' or 'prgs'.
+        host: Override the Gitea host.
+        org: Override the owner/organization.
+        repo: Override the repository name.
+        ttl_hours: Age (hours) after which a clean issue/conflict-fix
+            worktree becomes stale-removable (default from
+            GITEA_WORKTREE_TTL_HOURS).
+
+    Returns:
+        dict with per-worktree classifications, counts, removable
+        candidates, and the ``git worktree list`` verification proof.
+    """
+    read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
+    if read_block:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "performed": False,
+            "reasons": read_block,
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
+        }
+
+    try:
+        h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+        auth = _auth(h)
+        open_prs = api_get_all(f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls?state=open", auth)
+    except Exception as exc:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "performed": False,
+            "open_pr_state_verified": False,
+            "reasons": [
+                "could not fetch live open PRs; removability unverified "
+                f"(fail closed): {_redact(str(exc))}"
+            ],
+        }
+
+    open_pr_branches = {
+        str((pr.get("head") or {}).get("ref"))
+        for pr in open_prs
+        if (pr.get("head") or {}).get("ref")
+    }
+
+    active_issue_branches: set[str] = set()
+    lock = merged_cleanup_reconcile.read_issue_lock(ISSUE_LOCK_FILE)
+    if lock and lock.get("branch_name"):
+        active_issue_branches.add(str(lock["branch_name"]).strip())
+
+    report = worktree_cleanup_audit.audit_branches_directory(
+        PROJECT_ROOT,
+        open_pr_branches=open_pr_branches,
+        active_issue_branches=active_issue_branches,
+        now=datetime.now(timezone.utc),
+        ttl_hours=ttl_hours,
+    )
+    return {
+        "success": True,
+        "performed": False,
+        "open_pr_state_verified": True,
+        "task_mode": "work-issue",
+        **report,
+    }
+
+
 @mcp.tool()
 def gitea_reconcile_already_landed_pr(
     pr_number: int,
@@ -5374,7 +5705,10 @@ def gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease(
         "target_branch_sha": target_branch_sha,
         "repo": repo_label,
         "comment_id": posted.get("id"),
-    })
+    }, lease_provenance=merger_lease_adoption.build_lease_provenance(
+        source=merger_lease_adoption.SOURCE_ACQUIRE,
+        comment_id=posted.get("id"),
+    ))
     return {
         "success": True,
         "acquired": True,
@@ -5386,6 +5720,175 @@ def gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease(
     }
 
 
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease(
+    pr_number: int,
+    worktree: str,
+    expected_head_sha: str,
+    issue_number: int | None = None,
+    session_id: str | None = None,
+    remote: str = "dadeschools",
+    host: str | None = None,
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Adopt an active reviewer PR lease for a merger session (#536).
+
+    Merger sessions must not manually seed ``reviewer_pr_lease._SESSION_LEASE``.
+    This tool posts durable adoption proof on the PR thread and records
+    sanctioned in-session lease provenance so ``gitea_merge_pr`` can proceed
+    after a separate reviewer session held the lease.
+
+    Args:
+        pr_number: Open PR to adopt.
+        worktree: Merger workspace under ``branches/``.
+        expected_head_sha: Approved head the merger will pin during merge.
+        issue_number: Optional linked issue for the adoption record.
+        session_id: Optional merger session id (generated when omitted).
+        remote: Known instance — 'dadeschools' or 'prgs'.
+        host: Override the Gitea host.
+        org: Override the owner/organization.
+        repo: Override the repository name.
+
+    Returns:
+        dict with adoption proof, session lease, and block reasons when the
+        guarded preconditions are not met.
+    """
+    read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
+    if read_block:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "adopted": False,
+            "reasons": read_block,
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
+        }
+    comment_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.pr.comment")
+    if comment_block:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "adopted": False,
+            "reasons": comment_block,
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.pr.comment"),
+        }
+    merge_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.pr.merge")
+    if merge_block:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "adopted": False,
+            "reasons": merge_block,
+            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.pr.merge"),
+        }
+
+    _verify_role_mutation_workspace(
+        remote, worktree=worktree, task="adopt_merger_pr_lease"
+    )
+    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    auth = _auth(h)
+    profile = get_profile()
+    profile_name = profile.get("profile_name") or "unknown"
+    identity = _authenticated_username(remote) or profile.get("username") or ""
+    sid = (session_id or "").strip() or reviewer_pr_lease.new_session_id()
+    repo_label = f"{o}/{r}"
+
+    pr_live = api_request(
+        "GET", f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/pulls/{pr_number}", auth) or {}
+    pr_state = (pr_live.get("state") or "").strip().lower()
+    pr_open = pr_state == "open" and not pr_live.get("merged")
+    live_head = (pr_live.get("head", {}) or {}).get("sha") or pr_live.get(
+        "head_sha"
+    )
+
+    feedback = gitea_get_pr_review_feedback(
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        remote=remote,
+        host=host,
+        org=org,
+        repo=repo,
+    )
+    approval_at_head = bool(feedback.get("approval_at_current_head"))
+
+    comments = _fetch_pr_comments(
+        pr_number, remote=remote, host=host, org=org, repo=repo)
+    assessment = merger_lease_adoption.assess_adopt_merger_lease(
+        comments,
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        adopter_identity=identity,
+        adopter_profile=profile_name,
+        adopter_session_id=sid,
+        repo=repo_label,
+        issue_number=issue_number,
+        worktree=worktree,
+        expected_head_sha=expected_head_sha,
+        live_head_sha=live_head,
+        approval_at_head=approval_at_head,
+        pr_open=pr_open,
+    )
+    if not assessment.get("adopt_allowed"):
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "adopted": False,
+            "pr_number": pr_number,
+            "reasons": assessment.get("reasons") or [],
+            "active_lease": assessment.get("active_lease"),
+            "expected_head_sha": expected_head_sha,
+            "live_head_sha": live_head,
+        }
+
+    active = assessment.get("active_lease") or {}
+    body = assessment["adoption_body"]
+    comment_url = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/issues/{pr_number}/comments"
+    with _audited(
+        "comment_pr",
+        host=h,
+        remote=remote,
+        org=o,
+        repo=r,
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        request_metadata={"source": "adopt_merger_pr_lease"},
+    ):
+        posted = api_request("POST", comment_url, auth, {"body": body})
+
+    provenance = merger_lease_adoption.build_lease_provenance(
+        source=merger_lease_adoption.SOURCE_ADOPT,
+        comment_id=posted.get("id"),
+        adopted_from_session_id=active.get("session_id"),
+        adopted_from_profile=active.get("profile"),
+        adopted_from_reviewer_identity=active.get("reviewer_identity"),
+        adoption_reason=merger_lease_adoption.DEFAULT_ADOPTION_REASON,
+    )
+    session_lease = reviewer_pr_lease.record_session_lease({
+        "pr_number": pr_number,
+        "issue_number": issue_number or active.get("issue_number"),
+        "session_id": sid,
+        "reviewer_identity": identity,
+        "profile": profile_name,
+        "worktree": worktree,
+        "phase": "adopted",
+        "candidate_head": live_head,
+        "target_branch": active.get("target_branch") or "master",
+        "target_branch_sha": active.get("target_branch_sha"),
+        "repo": repo_label,
+        "comment_id": posted.get("id"),
+    }, lease_provenance=provenance)
+
+    return {
+        "success": True,
+        "adopted": True,
+        "pr_number": pr_number,
+        "session_id": sid,
+        "adoption_comment_id": posted.get("id"),
+        "adopted_from_session_id": active.get("session_id"),
+        "adopted_from_profile": active.get("profile"),
+        "adopted_from_reviewer_identity": active.get("reviewer_identity"),
+        "adoption_reason": merger_lease_adoption.DEFAULT_ADOPTION_REASON,
+        "expected_head_sha": expected_head_sha,
+        "live_head_sha": live_head,
+        "session_lease": session_lease,
+        "lease_provenance": provenance,
+        "reasons": [],
+    }
+
+
 @mcp.tool()
 def gitea_heartbeat_reviewer_pr_lease(
     pr_number: int,
@@ -5446,6 +5949,17 @@ def gitea_heartbeat_reviewer_pr_lease(
     ):
         posted = api_request("POST", comment_url, auth, {"body": body})
 
+    prior_provenance = (session.get("lease_provenance") or {}).copy()
+    heartbeat_provenance = merger_lease_adoption.build_lease_provenance(
+        source=merger_lease_adoption.SOURCE_HEARTBEAT,
+        comment_id=posted.get("id"),
+        adopted_from_session_id=prior_provenance.get("adopted_from_session_id"),
+        adopted_from_profile=prior_provenance.get("adopted_from_profile"),
+        adopted_from_reviewer_identity=prior_provenance.get(
+            "adopted_from_reviewer_identity"
+        ),
+        adoption_reason=prior_provenance.get("adoption_reason"),
+    )
     updated = reviewer_pr_lease.record_session_lease({
         **session,
         "phase": phase,
@@ -5453,7 +5967,8 @@ def gitea_heartbeat_reviewer_pr_lease(
         "candidate_head": candidate_head or session.get("candidate_head"),
         "target_branch_sha": target_branch_sha or session.get("target_branch_sha"),
         "last_comment_id": posted.get("id"),
-    })
+        "comment_id": posted.get("id"),
+    }, lease_provenance=heartbeat_provenance)
     return {
         "success": True,
         "posted": True,
@@ -5614,6 +6129,118 @@ def gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease(
     return report
 
 
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease(
+    pr_number: int,
+    worktree: str | None = None,
+    remote: str = "dadeschools",
+    host: str | None = None,
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Safely release an active reviewer lease owned by the current session on an open PR.
+
+    This provides a canonical way to clean up reviewer leases when a review fails
+    before submission.
+
+    Args:
+        pr_number: The PR number whose reviewer lease to release.
+        worktree: Optional worktree path (resolves automatically if not supplied).
+        remote: Known instance — 'dadeschools' or 'prgs'.
+        host: Override the Gitea host.
+        org: Override the owner/organization.
+        repo: Override the repository name.
+
+    Returns:
+        dict reporting release status.
+    """
+    _verify_role_mutation_workspace(
+        remote, worktree=worktree, task="review_pr"
+    )
+    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    auth = _auth(h)
+
+    comments = _fetch_pr_comments(
+        pr_number, remote=remote, host=host, org=org, repo=repo
+    )
+    active = reviewer_pr_lease.find_active_reviewer_lease(
+        comments, pr_number=pr_number
+    )
+
+    if not active:
+        return {
+            "success": True,
+            "released": False,
+            "reasons": ["no active reviewer lease found on PR"],
+        }
+
+    identity = _authenticated_username(remote) or ""
+    session = reviewer_pr_lease.get_session_lease() or {}
+    session_id = session.get("session_id")
+
+    owner_identity = active.get("reviewer_identity")
+    owner_session_id = active.get("session_id")
+
+    # Authorize release: identity matches, session_id matches, or lease is expired/reclaimable
+    authorized = False
+    reasons = []
+    if owner_identity and identity and owner_identity == identity:
+        authorized = True
+    elif owner_session_id and session_id and owner_session_id == session_id:
+        authorized = True
+    else:
+        freshness = reviewer_pr_lease.classify_lease_freshness(active)
+        if freshness in {"expired", "reclaimable"}:
+            authorized = True
+
+    if not authorized:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "released": False,
+            "reasons": [
+                f"unauthorized to release active lease: owned by {owner_identity} "
+                f"(session {owner_session_id})"
+            ],
+        }
+
+    # Format and post release comment
+    body = reviewer_pr_lease.format_lease_body(
+        repo=active.get("repo") or f"{o}/{r}",
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        issue_number=active.get("issue_number"),
+        reviewer_identity=owner_identity or identity,
+        profile=active.get("profile") or "reviewer",
+        session_id=owner_session_id or session_id or "unknown",
+        worktree=active.get("worktree") or "",
+        phase="released",
+        candidate_head=active.get("candidate_head"),
+        target_branch=active.get("target_branch") or "master",
+        target_branch_sha=active.get("target_branch_sha"),
+        blocker="manual-release",
+    )
+
+    comment_url = f"{repo_api_url(h, o, r)}/issues/{pr_number}/comments"
+    with _audited(
+        "comment_pr",
+        host=h,
+        remote=remote,
+        org=o,
+        repo=r,
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        request_metadata={"source": "release_reviewer_pr_lease"},
+    ):
+        posted = api_request("POST", comment_url, auth, {"body": body})
+
+    reviewer_pr_lease.clear_session_lease()
+
+    return {
+        "success": True,
+        "released": True,
+        "comment_id": posted.get("id"),
+        "reasons": [],
+    }
+
+
 @mcp.tool()
 def gitea_list_issue_comments(
     issue_number: int,
@@ -5685,6 +6312,7 @@ def gitea_create_issue_comment(
     host: str | None = None,
     org: str | None = None,
     repo: str | None = None,
+    worktree_path: str | None = None,
 ) -> dict:
     """Post a markdown comment to a Gitea issue's discussion thread.
 
@@ -5706,6 +6334,7 @@ def gitea_create_issue_comment(
         host: Override the Gitea host.
         org: Override the owner/organization.
         repo: Override the repository name.
+        worktree_path: Optional path to verify branches-only guard.
 
     Returns:
         dict with 'success', 'comment_id', and 'issue_number' ('url' only
@@ -5714,7 +6343,7 @@ def gitea_create_issue_comment(
         (permission blocks also carry a structured 'permission_report',
         #142).
     """
-    verify_preflight_purity(remote, task="comment_issue")
+    verify_preflight_purity(remote, worktree_path=worktree_path, task="comment_issue")
     gate_reasons = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.issue.comment")
     reasons = list(gate_reasons)
     if not (body or "").strip():
@@ -6958,14 +7587,42 @@ def gitea_get_runtime_context(
     return result
 
 
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_record_pre_review_command(
+    command: str,
+    cwd: str | None = None,
+    classification: str | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Classify and record a command executed before workflow load (#403).
+
+    Read-only with respect to Gitea API. Pre-review inventory/diagnostic commands
+    may be recorded as allowed; boundary violations block reviewer mutations.
+    """
+    recorded = review_workflow_boundary.record_pre_review_command(
+        command,
+        cwd=cwd,
+        project_root=PROJECT_ROOT,
+        classification=classification,
+    )
+    boundary_state = review_workflow_boundary.assess_boundary_status(PROJECT_ROOT)
+    return {
+        "success": True,
+        "recorded": recorded,
+        "boundary_status": boundary_state.get("boundary_status"),
+        "boundary_clean": boundary_state.get("boundary_clean"),
+        "reasons": list(boundary_state.get("reasons") or []),
+    }
+
+
 @mcp.tool()
 def gitea_load_review_workflow(
     prompt_text: str | None = None,
 ) -> dict:
-    """Load and record canonical review-merge workflow proof for this session (#389).
+    """Load and record canonical review-merge workflow proof for this session (#389, #403).
 
     Read-only with respect to Gitea API; records in-process workflow source/hash
-    proof required before reviewer review or merge mutations.
+    proof and session boundary state required before reviewer review or merge
+    mutations.
     """
     try:
         recorded = review_workflow_load.record_review_workflow_load(
@@ -6977,8 +7634,11 @@ def gitea_load_review_workflow(
             "reasons": [str(exc)],
             "recovery_handoff": review_workflow_load.recovery_handoff_without_replay(),
         }
+    boundary_reasons = review_workflow_boundary.boundary_blockers(PROJECT_ROOT)
+    helper = review_workflow_boundary.workflow_load_helper_result(
+        recorded, PROJECT_ROOT)
     return {
-        "success": True,
+        "success": not boundary_reasons,
         "loaded": True,
         "workflow_source": recorded["workflow_source"],
         "task_mode": recorded["task_mode"],
@@ -6990,7 +7650,14 @@ def gitea_load_review_workflow(
             "prompt_conflicts_with_workflow"],
         "prompt_conflict_reasons": recorded.get("prompt_conflict_reasons") or [],
         "workflow_load_proof_present": True,
-        "reasons": [],
+        "boundary_status": recorded.get("boundary_status"),
+        "boundary_clean": recorded.get("boundary_clean"),
+        "workflow_load_helper_result": helper,
+        "reasons": boundary_reasons,
+        "recovery_handoff": (
+            review_workflow_load.recovery_handoff_without_replay()
+            if boundary_reasons else []
+        ),
     }
 
 
@@ -7485,22 +8152,39 @@ def gitea_assess_conflict_fix_push(
             "reasons": read_block,
             "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
         }
-    comments = _list_pr_lease_comments(
+    fetched = _fetch_pr_lease_comments_safe(
         pr_number,
         remote=remote,
         host=host,
         org=org,
         repo=repo,
+        require_open=True,
     )
-    return pr_work_lease.assess_conflict_fix_push(
+    if not fetched["success"]:
+        return {
+            "push_allowed": False,
+            "block": True,
+            "reasons": fetched["reasons"],
+            "pr_lookup": fetched.get("pr_lookup"),
+            "resolved_repo": fetched.get("resolved_repo"),
+            "remote": fetched.get("remote"),
+            "pr_number": pr_number,
+            "assessment_failed": True,
+        }
+    assessment = pr_work_lease.assess_conflict_fix_push(
         pr_number=pr_number,
-        comments=comments,
+        comments=fetched["comments"],
         branch_head_before=branch_head_before,
         branch_head_after=branch_head_after,
         worktree_path=worktree_path,
         push_cwd=push_cwd,
         is_fast_forward=is_fast_forward,
     )
+    assessment["pr_lookup"] = fetched.get("pr_lookup")
+    assessment["resolved_repo"] = fetched.get("resolved_repo")
+    assessment["remote"] = fetched.get("remote")
+    assessment["live_pr_head_sha"] = fetched.get("head_sha")
+    return assessment
 
 
 @mcp.tool()
@@ -8138,6 +8822,7 @@ def gitea_resolve_task_capability(
         init_review_decision_lock(
             remote if remote in REMOTES else None,
             task,
+            force=False,
         )
 
     record_mutation_authority(profile["profile_name"], username, remote if remote in REMOTES else None, task)

mcp-menu.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# mcp-menu.sh — Repository-root operator menu for MCP/Gitea workflow onboarding.
+#
+# Safe by default: read-only status and copy-paste prompts unless an action is
+# explicitly labeled and confirmed. No branch deletion, force-push, lock-file
+# editing, or raw API bypass.
+set -euo pipefail
+
+SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+REPO_ROOT="$SCRIPT_DIR"
+
+pause() {
+  read -r -p "Press Enter to return to the menu..."
+}
+
+print_banner() {
+  printf '\n=== Gitea-Tools MCP Operator Menu ===\n'
+  printf 'Repository: %s\n' "$REPO_ROOT"
+  printf 'Safe by default — destructive actions require explicit confirmation.\n\n'
+}
+
+show_root_checkout_health() {
+  printf '\n--- Project status / root checkout health ---\n\n'
+  printf 'Current directory: %s\n' "$(pwd)"
+  local branch head_sha prgs_master_sha dirty
+  branch="$(git -C "$REPO_ROOT" branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || true)"
+  if [[ -z "$branch" ]]; then
+    branch="(detached HEAD)"
+  fi
+  printf 'Current branch: %s\n' "$branch"
+  printf '\nGit status (short, branch):\n'
+  git -C "$REPO_ROOT" status --short --branch || true
+  head_sha="$(git -C "$REPO_ROOT" rev-parse HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo 'unknown')"
+  printf '\nHEAD SHA: %s\n' "$head_sha"
+  if git -C "$REPO_ROOT" rev-parse --verify prgs/master >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+    prgs_master_sha="$(git -C "$REPO_ROOT" rev-parse prgs/master)"
+    printf 'prgs/master SHA: %s\n' "$prgs_master_sha"
+    if [[ "$head_sha" != "$prgs_master_sha" ]]; then
+      printf '\nWARNING: root checkout HEAD does not match prgs/master.\n'
+      printf 'Keep the stable control checkout on master/prgs/master.\n'
+    fi
+  else
+    printf 'prgs/master SHA: unavailable (remote ref not fetched)\n'
+  fi
+  if [[ -n "$(git -C "$REPO_ROOT" status --porcelain 2>/dev/null || true)" ]]; then
+    printf '\nWARNING: root checkout has uncommitted changes (dirty).\n'
+    printf 'Author mutations belong in a session worktree under branches/.\n'
+  fi
+  if [[ "$branch" != "master" && "$branch" != "main" && "$branch" != "dev" ]]; then
+    printf '\nWARNING: root checkout is not on a stable base branch (master/main/dev).\n'
+    printf 'Return to master before using the control checkout.\n'
+  fi
+  pause
+}
+
+print_prompt_block() {
+  local title="$1"
+  local body="$2"
+  printf '\n--- %s ---\n\n' "$title"
+  printf '%s\n' "$body"
+  printf '\n(Copy the prompt above into your LLM session.)\n'
+  pause
+}
+
+show_author_prompts() {
+  while true; do
+    printf '\n--- Author workflow prompts ---\n'
+    printf '  1) Work issue (author/coder)\n'
+    printf '  2) Conflict-fix author session\n'
+    printf '  3) Root checkout recovery session\n'
+    printf '  0) Back\n'
+    read -r -p 'Choice: ' choice
+    case "$choice" in
+      1)
+        print_prompt_block "Author — work issue" \
+"You are the AUTHOR session for <org>/<repo>.
+
+Goal: implement issue #<N> only.
+
+Workflow:
+1. Preflight: prove identity, work_issue/create_pr capability, clean session worktree under branches/.
+2. gitea_lock_issue for issue #<N> and branch feat/issue-<N>-<short-desc>.
+3. Implement in the locked worktree only — never mutate the root control checkout.
+4. Validate, commit, push, gitea_create_pr. Final report with issue, branch, SHA, PR, tests, mutation ledger."
+        ;;
+      2)
+        print_prompt_block "Author — conflict-fix session" \
+"You are the AUTHOR session for <org>/<repo> in conflict-fix mode.
+
+Goal: resolve merge conflicts on PR #<P> / branch <branch> only.
+
+Workflow:
+1. Preflight: prove author identity and exact push/commit capability for the locked PR branch.
+2. Confirm conflict-fix lease and stale-head protection before pushing.
+3. Work only in the session-owned worktree under branches/ — never the root checkout.
+4. Rebase or merge target branch, run tests, push, update PR. No force-push without explicit operator approval.
+5. Final report: conflict resolution proof, new HEAD SHA, tests, mutation ledger."
+        ;;
+      3)
+        print_prompt_block "Author — root checkout recovery" \
+"You are a RECOVERY session for <org>/<repo>.
+
+Goal: restore the stable root control checkout to clean master/prgs/master.
+
+Workflow:
+1. Inspect root checkout: branch, git status --short --branch, HEAD vs prgs/master.
+2. Do not implement features from the root checkout. Stash or move work to branches/<session> first.
+3. Return root to master (or main/dev per project policy) matching prgs/master with no dirty tracked files.
+4. Report before/after branch, SHA, dirty state, and safe next action for author worktree creation."
+        ;;
+      0) return ;;
+      *) printf 'Invalid choice.\n' ;;
+    esac
+  done
+}
+
+show_reviewer_prompts() {
+  print_prompt_block "Reviewer — PR review" \
+"You are the REVIEWER session for <org>/<repo>.
+
+Goal: review PR #<P> only — do not merge unless explicitly switched to merger mode.
+
+Workflow:
+1. Load canonical workflow: skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/review-merge-pr.md
+2. Preflight: prove reviewer identity, review_pr capability, clean review worktree.
+3. gitea_view_pr, validate scope, run required checks in the correct worktree.
+4. gitea_review_pr with approve, request-changes, or comment as warranted.
+5. Final report: PR head SHA, verdict, validation evidence, mutation ledger. No merge in reviewer-only runs."
+}
+
+show_merger_prompts() {
+  print_prompt_block "Merger — PR merge" \
+"You are the MERGER session for <org>/<repo>.
+
+Goal: merge PR #<P> only after every gate passes.
+
+Workflow:
+1. Load canonical workflow: skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/review-merge-pr.md
+2. Preflight: prove merger identity and exact merge_pr capability for the current PR head SHA.
+3. Confirm approval pins the current head SHA; re-validate if the branch moved.
+4. gitea_merge_pr only on explicit operator approval after all gates pass.
+5. Final report: merged SHA, cleanup handoff, mutation ledger."
+}
+
+show_reconciler_prompts() {
+  print_prompt_block "Reconciler — already-landed / closed PR cleanup" \
+"You are the RECONCILER session for <org>/<repo>.
+
+Goal: reconcile already-landed open PRs — close or comment only when exact capability is proven.
+
+Workflow:
+1. Load canonical workflow: skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/reconcile-landed-pr.md
+2. Preflight: prove reconciler identity and gitea.pr.close (or authorized close) capability.
+3. Do not review, merge, implement code, or create branches.
+4. gitea_scan_already_landed_open_prs / gitea_reconcile_already_landed_pr as appropriate.
+5. Final report: PR numbers handled, close proof, mutation ledger."
+}
+
+show_onboarding_prompt() {
+  print_prompt_block "Onboarding — new project to MCP workflow" \
+"Onboard <org>/<repo> into the MCP Control Plane workflow.
+
+Checklist:
+1. Prove identity and task capability via gitea_whoami and gitea_resolve_task_capability.
+2. Configure separate MCP namespaces/profiles: author, reviewer, merger/reconciler as needed.
+3. Register gitea-tools (and jenkins-mcp / glitchtip-mcp if applicable) in the client MCP config.
+4. Copy skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md guidance into the target repo or ECC install.
+5. Verify gitea_get_runtime_context, gitea_lock_issue, and worktree rules under branches/.
+6. Run ./mcp-menu.sh for day-to-day prompts; use docs/mcp-menu.md and docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md.
+
+Canonical router: skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md"
+}
+
+show_proxmox_placeholder() {
+  printf '\n--- Proxmox deployment (placeholder) ---\n\n'
+  printf 'Push this project to Proxmox — TODO / issue-backed\n'
+  printf 'Create Proxmox LXC — TODO / issue-backed\n\n'
+  printf 'These actions are NOT implemented yet.\n'
+  printf 'Track deployment automation in dedicated Gitea issues before enabling here.\n'
+  printf 'This menu will not run deploy scripts until sanctioned tooling exists.\n'
+  pause
+}
+
+run_tests() {
+  printf '\n--- Run tests ---\n\n'
+  if [[ -x "$REPO_ROOT/run-tests.sh" ]]; then
+    printf 'Running ./run-tests.sh ...\n\n'
+    (cd "$REPO_ROOT" && ./run-tests.sh)
+    pause
+    return
+  fi
+  if [[ -x "$REPO_ROOT/venv/bin/python" ]]; then
+    printf 'run-tests.sh not found; falling back to venv/bin/python -m pytest\n\n'
+    (cd "$REPO_ROOT" && ./venv/bin/python -m pytest)
+    pause
+    return
+  fi
+  printf 'ERROR: No test runner available (fail closed).\n' >&2
+  printf 'Expected ./run-tests.sh or venv/bin/python for pytest fallback.\n' >&2
+  exit 1
+}
+
+main_menu() {
+  while true; do
+    print_banner
+    printf '  1) Project status / root checkout health\n'
+    printf '  2) Author workflow prompts\n'
+    printf '  3) Reviewer workflow prompts\n'
+    printf '  4) Merger workflow prompts\n'
+    printf '  5) Reconciler workflow prompts\n'
+    printf '  6) Onboarding new project to this MCP workflow\n'
+    printf '  7) Proxmox deployment menu placeholder\n'
+    printf '  8) Create Proxmox LXC placeholder\n'
+    printf '  9) Run tests\n'
+    printf '  0) Exit\n'
+    read -r -p 'Choice: ' choice
+    case "$choice" in
+      1) show_root_checkout_health ;;
+      2) show_author_prompts ;;
+      3) show_reviewer_prompts ;;
+      4) show_merger_prompts ;;
+      5) show_reconciler_prompts ;;
+      6) show_onboarding_prompt ;;
+      7|8) show_proxmox_placeholder ;;
+      9) run_tests ;;
+      0) printf 'Goodbye.\n'; exit 0 ;;
+      *) printf 'Invalid choice.\n'; pause ;;
+    esac
+  done
+}
+
+main_menu

mcp_native_cleanup_proof.py

@@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
+"""MCP-native post-merge cleanup proof verifier (#517).
+
+Post-merge cleanup of leases, comments, branches, and worktrees must be
+proven through explicit MCP tools (or approved helpers), never raw scripts or
+ad hoc git/API commands. Merger/reviewer sessions must hand cleanup to a
+reconciler profile with the right capability proof.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP_TOOLS = frozenset({
+    "gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease",
+    "gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups",
+    "gitea_delete_branch",
+    "gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch",
+    "gitea_audit_worktree_cleanup",
+    "gitea_capture_branches_worktree_snapshot",
+    "gitea_assess_worktree_cleanup_integrity",
+    "gitea_authorize_reconciliation_cleanup_phase",
+})
+
+_RAW_BRANCH_DELETE_PATTERNS = (
+    re.compile(r"\bgit(?:\s+-C\s+\S+)?\s+branch\s+-[dD]\b[^\n\r]*", re.I),
+    re.compile(r"\bgit(?:\s+-C\s+\S+)?\s+push\b[^\n\r]*\s--delete\b[^\n\r]*", re.I),
+    re.compile(r"\bgit(?:\s+-C\s+\S+)?\s+push\b[^\n\r]*\s:[^\s`]+", re.I),
+)
+
+_RAW_COMMENT_DELETE_PATTERNS = (
+    re.compile(
+        r"(?:curl|wget|httpie)\b[^\n\r]*\b(?:DELETE|delete)\b[^\n\r]*"
+        r"(?:/comments/|issues/\d+/comments)",
+        re.I,
+    ),
+    re.compile(
+        r"\bDELETE\b[^\n\r]*/repos/[^\n\r]*/issues/\d+/comments/\d+",
+        re.I,
+    ),
+    re.compile(
+        r"\b(?:delete_issue_comment|remove_issue_comment|purge_comments?)\b",
+        re.I,
+    ),
+    re.compile(
+        r"\b(?:raw|ad hoc|adhoc)\b[^\n\r]{0,40}\bcomment\b[^\n\r]{0,40}\bdelete",
+        re.I,
+    ),
+)
+
+_CLEANUP_MUTATIONS_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*cleanup mutations\s*:\s*(.+)$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_GIT_REF_MUTATIONS_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*git ref mutations\s*:\s*(.+)$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_WORKTREE_MUTATIONS_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*worktree mutations\s*:\s*(.+)$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_MERGE_MUTATIONS_RE = re.compile(
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*merge mutations\s*:\s*(.+)$",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_NONE_LEDGER_VALUES = frozenset({"", "none", "n/a"})
+_MUTATION_LEDGER_PATTERNS = (
+    _CLEANUP_MUTATIONS_RE,
+    _GIT_REF_MUTATIONS_RE,
+    _WORKTREE_MUTATIONS_RE,
+)
+_RAW_WORKTREE_REMOVE_PATTERNS = (
+    re.compile(r"\bgit(?:\s+-C\s+\S+)?\s+worktree\s+remove\b", re.I),
+)
+_AUTHORIZED_TOOL_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(" + "|".join(re.escape(t) for t in sorted(AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP_TOOLS)) + r")\b",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_RECONCILER_CAPABILITY_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:reconciler|gitea\.branch\.delete|delete_branch|reconcile_merged_cleanups)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_MERGER_CLEANUP_ROLE_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:merger|reviewer).{0,80}(?:deleted|removed|cleaned).{0,80}"
+    r"(?:branch|worktree|comment|lease)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+_HANDOFF_TO_RECONCILER_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(?:hand(?:ed)? off|defer(?:red)?|next actor).{0,60}reconciler",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+
+def _ledger_field_body(text: str, pattern: re.Pattern[str]) -> str | None:
+    match = pattern.search(text)
+    if not match:
+        return None
+    return (match.group(1) or "").strip()
+
+
+def _is_none_ledger_value(value: str) -> bool:
+    return value.strip().lower() in _NONE_LEDGER_VALUES
+
+
+def scoped_cleanup_mutation_ledger_text(text: str | None) -> str:
+    """Return mutation-ledger bodies scoped to cleanup enforcement (#517)."""
+    text = text or ""
+    parts: list[str] = []
+    for pattern in _MUTATION_LEDGER_PATTERNS:
+        body = _ledger_field_body(text, pattern)
+        if body is not None and not _is_none_ledger_value(body):
+            parts.append(body)
+    return "\n".join(parts)
+
+
+def _git_ref_cleanup_claimed(body: str) -> bool:
+    return bool(raw_branch_delete_commands(body))
+
+
+def _worktree_cleanup_claimed(body: str) -> bool:
+    for pattern in _RAW_WORKTREE_REMOVE_PATTERNS:
+        if pattern.search(body):
+            return True
+    return bool(
+        re.search(
+            r"\b(?:removed|deleted)\b[^\n]{0,40}\bworktree\b",
+            body,
+            re.IGNORECASE,
+        )
+    )
+
+
+def _cleanup_claiming_ledger_fields(text: str) -> list[tuple[str, str]]:
+    claiming: list[tuple[str, str]] = []
+    cleanup_body = _ledger_field_body(text, _CLEANUP_MUTATIONS_RE)
+    if cleanup_body is not None and not _is_none_ledger_value(cleanup_body):
+        claiming.append(("Cleanup mutations", cleanup_body))
+
+    git_ref_body = _ledger_field_body(text, _GIT_REF_MUTATIONS_RE)
+    if git_ref_body is not None and not _is_none_ledger_value(git_ref_body):
+        if _git_ref_cleanup_claimed(git_ref_body):
+            claiming.append(("Git ref mutations", git_ref_body))
+
+    worktree_body = _ledger_field_body(text, _WORKTREE_MUTATIONS_RE)
+    if worktree_body is not None and not _is_none_ledger_value(worktree_body):
+        if _worktree_cleanup_claimed(worktree_body):
+            claiming.append(("Worktree mutations", worktree_body))
+    return claiming
+
+
+def raw_branch_delete_commands(text: str | None) -> list[str]:
+    """Return raw git branch-delete commands cited in *text*."""
+    if not text:
+        return []
+    commands: list[str] = []
+    for pattern in _RAW_BRANCH_DELETE_PATTERNS:
+        commands.extend(match.group(0).strip("` ") for match in pattern.finditer(text))
+    return list(dict.fromkeys(commands))
+
+
+def raw_comment_delete_commands(text: str | None) -> list[str]:
+    """Return raw comment-deletion commands/scripts cited in *text*."""
+    if not text:
+        return []
+    commands: list[str] = []
+    for pattern in _RAW_COMMENT_DELETE_PATTERNS:
+        commands.extend(match.group(0).strip("` ") for match in pattern.finditer(text))
+    return list(dict.fromkeys(commands))
+
+
+def assess_raw_branch_delete_report(text: str | None) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Fail closed when mutation ledgers cite raw git branch deletion."""
+    commands = raw_branch_delete_commands(scoped_cleanup_mutation_ledger_text(text))
+    reasons = [
+        (
+            "raw git branch deletion bypasses MCP branch.delete cleanup gates: "
+            f"{command}"
+        )
+        for command in commands
+    ]
+    return {
+        "proven": not reasons,
+        "block": bool(reasons),
+        "commands": commands,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "use gitea_delete_branch, gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups, or another "
+            "approved MCP cleanup helper with explicit branch.delete capability"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def assess_raw_comment_delete_report(text: str | None) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Fail closed when mutation ledgers cite raw comment deletion."""
+    commands = raw_comment_delete_commands(scoped_cleanup_mutation_ledger_text(text))
+    reasons = [
+        (
+            "raw comment deletion bypasses MCP lease cleanup gates: "
+            f"{command}"
+        )
+        for command in commands
+    ]
+    return {
+        "proven": not reasons,
+        "block": bool(reasons),
+        "commands": commands,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "use gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease (append-only release comment) "
+            "or hand cleanup to a reconciler session; never delete lease comments"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def assess_merge_cleanup_mutation_separation(text: str | None) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Require merge mutations and cleanup mutations in separate ledger fields."""
+    text = text or ""
+    merge_match = _MERGE_MUTATIONS_RE.search(text)
+    cleanup_match = _CLEANUP_MUTATIONS_RE.search(text)
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    if cleanup_match and not merge_match:
+        combined = re.search(
+            r"merge.{0,40}cleanup mutations|cleanup.{0,40}merge mutations",
+            text,
+            re.IGNORECASE,
+        )
+        if combined:
+            reasons.append(
+                "merge and cleanup mutations must use separate 'Merge mutations' "
+                "and 'Cleanup mutations' ledger fields"
+            )
+
+    if merge_match and cleanup_match:
+        merge_val = (merge_match.group(1) or "").strip().lower()
+        cleanup_val = (cleanup_match.group(1) or "").strip().lower()
+        if merge_val == cleanup_val and merge_val not in {"", "none"}:
+            reasons.append(
+                "merge mutations and cleanup mutations must not duplicate the "
+                "same ledger entry"
+            )
+
+    return {
+        "proven": not reasons,
+        "block": bool(reasons),
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "split merge mutations (gitea_merge_pr) from cleanup mutations "
+            "(reconciler MCP tools) in the controller handoff"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def assess_authorized_reconciler_cleanup_path(text: str | None) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Validate cleanup claims cite authorized MCP tools and reconciler capability."""
+    text = text or ""
+    claiming = _cleanup_claiming_ledger_fields(text)
+    if not claiming:
+        return {
+            "proven": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "reasons": [],
+            "safe_next_action": "proceed",
+        }
+
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    for field_name, body in claiming:
+        if not _AUTHORIZED_TOOL_RE.search(body):
+            reasons.append(
+                f"{field_name} cleanup must name an authorized MCP cleanup tool "
+                f"({', '.join(sorted(AUTHORIZED_CLEANUP_TOOLS))})"
+            )
+    if not _RECONCILER_CAPABILITY_RE.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "post-merge cleanup requires reconciler capability proof "
+            "(reconciler profile, gitea.branch.delete, or reconcile_merged_cleanups)"
+        )
+
+    return {
+        "proven": not reasons,
+        "block": bool(reasons),
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "hand cleanup to a prgs-reconciler session and cite the exact MCP tool "
+            "plus delete_branch/reconcile_merged_cleanups capability proof"
+            if reasons
+            else "proceed"
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def assess_merger_cleanup_handoff_guidance(text: str | None) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Merger sessions that performed cleanup must hand off to reconciler."""
+    text = text or ""
+    if not _MERGER_CLEANUP_ROLE_RE.search(text):
+        return {
+            "proven": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "reasons": [],
+            "safe_next_action": "proceed",
+        }
+    if _HANDOFF_TO_RECONCILER_RE.search(text):
+        return {
+            "proven": True,
+            "block": False,
+            "reasons": [],
+            "safe_next_action": "proceed",
+        }
+    return {
+        "proven": False,
+        "block": True,
+        "reasons": [
+            "merger/reviewer session performed cleanup but did not hand off to "
+            "reconciler for MCP-native cleanup"
+        ],
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "merger sessions must end with cleanup handed to prgs-reconciler; "
+            "do not perform ad hoc branch/comment/worktree cleanup as merger"
+        ),
+    }
+
+
+def assess_mcp_native_cleanup_proof(report_text: str | None) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Composite #517 verifier for MCP-native post-merge cleanup proof."""
+    text = report_text or ""
+    checks = (
+        assess_raw_branch_delete_report(text),
+        assess_raw_comment_delete_report(text),
+        assess_merge_cleanup_mutation_separation(text),
+        assess_authorized_reconciler_cleanup_path(text),
+        assess_merger_cleanup_handoff_guidance(text),
+    )
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    safe_next = "proceed"
+    for result in checks:
+        reasons.extend(result.get("reasons") or [])
+        if result.get("block") and result.get("safe_next_action"):
+            safe_next = result["safe_next_action"]
+
+    block = bool(reasons)
+    return {
+        "proven": not block,
+        "block": block,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": safe_next,
+        "raw_branch_commands": raw_branch_delete_commands(
+            scoped_cleanup_mutation_ledger_text(text)
+        ),
+        "raw_comment_commands": raw_comment_delete_commands(
+            scoped_cleanup_mutation_ledger_text(text)
+        ),
+    }

merger_lease_adoption.py

@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+"""Guarded merger adoption of an existing reviewer PR lease (#536).
+
+Replaces manual in-process ``_SESSION_LEASE`` seeding with an auditable,
+comment-backed adoption path for merger sessions that inherit a reviewer lease
+after formal approval at the current PR head.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from datetime import datetime, timezone
+from typing import Any
+
+import reviewer_pr_lease as leases
+
+ADOPTION_MARKER = "<!-- mcp-review-lease-adoption:v1 -->"
+DEFAULT_ADOPTION_REASON = "merger-handoff-approved-head"
+
+SOURCE_ADOPT = "gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease"
+SOURCE_ACQUIRE = "gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease"
+SOURCE_HEARTBEAT = "gitea_heartbeat_reviewer_pr_lease"
+
+SANCTIONED_PROVENANCE_SOURCES = frozenset({
+    SOURCE_ADOPT,
+    SOURCE_ACQUIRE,
+    SOURCE_HEARTBEAT,
+})
+
+_MERGER_ADOPTABLE_FRESHNESS = frozenset({"active", "stale_warning"})
+
+
+def format_adoption_body(
+    *,
+    repo: str,
+    pr_number: int,
+    issue_number: int | None,
+    adopter_identity: str,
+    adopter_profile: str,
+    adopter_session_id: str,
+    worktree: str,
+    candidate_head: str | None,
+    target_branch: str,
+    target_branch_sha: str | None,
+    adopted_from_session_id: str,
+    adopted_from_profile: str,
+    adopted_from_reviewer_identity: str,
+    adopted_from_comment_id: int | None,
+    adoption_reason: str = DEFAULT_ADOPTION_REASON,
+    adopted_at: datetime | None = None,
+) -> str:
+    """Render a durable merger adoption proof comment."""
+    adopted_at = adopted_at or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+    adopted_text = adopted_at.astimezone(timezone.utc).replace(microsecond=0).isoformat().replace(
+        "+00:00", "Z"
+    )
+    lease_body = leases.format_lease_body(
+        repo=repo,
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        issue_number=issue_number,
+        reviewer_identity=adopter_identity,
+        profile=adopter_profile,
+        session_id=adopter_session_id,
+        worktree=worktree,
+        phase="adopted",
+        candidate_head=candidate_head,
+        target_branch=target_branch,
+        target_branch_sha=target_branch_sha,
+        last_activity=adopted_at,
+        blocker="none",
+    )
+    lines = [
+        ADOPTION_MARKER,
+        f"adopted_at: {adopted_text}",
+        f"adopted_by_identity: {adopter_identity}",
+        f"adopted_by_profile: {adopter_profile}",
+        f"adopted_from_session_id: {adopted_from_session_id}",
+        f"adopted_from_profile: {adopted_from_profile}",
+        f"adopted_from_reviewer_identity: {adopted_from_reviewer_identity}",
+        f"adopted_from_comment_id: {adopted_from_comment_id or 'none'}",
+        f"adoption_reason: {adoption_reason}",
+        lease_body,
+    ]
+    return "\n".join(lines)
+
+
+def is_adoption_comment(body: str) -> bool:
+    return ADOPTION_MARKER in (body or "")
+
+
+def build_lease_provenance(
+    *,
+    source: str,
+    comment_id: int | None = None,
+    adopted_from_session_id: str | None = None,
+    adopted_from_profile: str | None = None,
+    adopted_from_reviewer_identity: str | None = None,
+    adoption_reason: str | None = None,
+    recorded_at: datetime | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    recorded_at = recorded_at or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+    recorded_text = recorded_at.astimezone(timezone.utc).replace(microsecond=0).isoformat().replace(
+        "+00:00", "Z"
+    )
+    proof = {
+        "source": source,
+        "recorded_at": recorded_text,
+    }
+    if comment_id is not None:
+        proof["comment_id"] = comment_id
+    if adopted_from_session_id:
+        proof["adopted_from_session_id"] = adopted_from_session_id
+    if adopted_from_profile:
+        proof["adopted_from_profile"] = adopted_from_profile
+    if adopted_from_reviewer_identity:
+        proof["adopted_from_reviewer_identity"] = adopted_from_reviewer_identity
+    if adoption_reason:
+        proof["adoption_reason"] = adoption_reason
+    return proof
+
+
+def is_sanctioned_session_lease(session: dict[str, Any] | None) -> bool:
+    if not session:
+        return False
+    provenance = session.get("lease_provenance") or {}
+    source = (provenance.get("source") or "").strip()
+    if source not in SANCTIONED_PROVENANCE_SOURCES:
+        return False
+    if source == SOURCE_ADOPT:
+        return bool(provenance.get("comment_id")) and bool(
+            provenance.get("adopted_from_session_id")
+        )
+    if source in {SOURCE_ACQUIRE, SOURCE_HEARTBEAT}:
+        return bool(session.get("comment_id") or provenance.get("comment_id"))
+    return False
+
+
+def assess_adopt_merger_lease(
+    comments: list[dict],
+    *,
+    pr_number: int,
+    adopter_identity: str,
+    adopter_profile: str,
+    adopter_session_id: str,
+    repo: str,
+    issue_number: int | None,
+    worktree: str,
+    expected_head_sha: str | None,
+    live_head_sha: str | None,
+    approval_at_head: bool,
+    pr_open: bool = True,
+    now: datetime | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Decide whether a merger may adopt the active reviewer lease (#536)."""
+    now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    pinned = leases._normalize_sha(expected_head_sha)
+    live = leases._normalize_sha(live_head_sha)
+
+    if not pr_open:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"PR #{pr_number} is not open; merger lease adoption is only for open PRs"
+        )
+    if not approval_at_head:
+        reasons.append(
+            "formal APPROVED review at the current PR head is required before "
+            "merger lease adoption (fail closed)"
+        )
+    if not pinned:
+        reasons.append("expected_head_sha is required for merger lease adoption")
+    if not live:
+        reasons.append("live PR head SHA unavailable (fail closed)")
+    elif pinned and live and pinned != live:
+        reasons.append(
+            "expected_head_sha does not match live PR head; refresh approval before adoption"
+        )
+
+    active = leases.find_active_reviewer_lease(
+        comments, pr_number=pr_number, now=now
+    )
+    if not active:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"no active reviewer lease on PR #{pr_number} to adopt; reviewer "
+            "must acquire first"
+        )
+    else:
+        owner_session = (active.get("session_id") or "").strip()
+        freshness = active.get("freshness") or leases.classify_lease_freshness(
+            active, now=now
+        )
+        if freshness not in _MERGER_ADOPTABLE_FRESHNESS:
+            reasons.append(
+                f"active reviewer lease freshness is '{freshness}'; explicit "
+                "reclaim is not implemented (fail closed)"
+            )
+        lease_head = active.get("candidate_head")
+        if lease_head and live and lease_head != live:
+            reasons.append(
+                "active reviewer lease candidate_head differs from live PR head"
+            )
+        if owner_session and owner_session == adopter_session_id:
+            # Same session already holds the thread lease — allow idempotent adopt
+            # only when the newest entry is not yet an adoption by this session.
+            entries = leases._lease_entries(comments, pr_number=pr_number)
+            newest = entries[-1] if entries else None
+            if newest and (newest.get("phase") or "") == "adopted":
+                reasons.append(
+                    "merger session already recorded an adoption lease on this PR"
+                )
+        elif owner_session and owner_session != adopter_session_id:
+            # Cross-session merger handoff: adopt the foreign reviewer lease.
+            pass
+
+    if not (adopter_identity or "").strip():
+        reasons.append("adopter identity required")
+    if not (adopter_session_id or "").strip():
+        reasons.append("adopter session_id required")
+    if not (worktree or "").strip():
+        reasons.append("merger worktree path required")
+    if "merger" not in (adopter_profile or "").lower():
+        reasons.append(
+            f"profile '{adopter_profile}' is not a merger profile; adoption is "
+            "merger-only (fail closed)"
+        )
+
+    adopt_allowed = not reasons
+    adoption_body = None
+    if adopt_allowed and active:
+        adoption_body = format_adoption_body(
+            repo=repo,
+            pr_number=pr_number,
+            issue_number=issue_number or active.get("issue_number"),
+            adopter_identity=adopter_identity,
+            adopter_profile=adopter_profile,
+            adopter_session_id=adopter_session_id,
+            worktree=worktree,
+            candidate_head=live,
+            target_branch=active.get("target_branch") or "master",
+            target_branch_sha=active.get("target_branch_sha"),
+            adopted_from_session_id=active.get("session_id") or "",
+            adopted_from_profile=active.get("profile") or "unknown",
+            adopted_from_reviewer_identity=active.get("reviewer_identity") or "",
+            adopted_from_comment_id=active.get("comment_id"),
+            adopted_at=now,
+        )
+
+    return {
+        "adopt_allowed": adopt_allowed,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "active_lease": active,
+        "adoption_body": adoption_body,
+        "adopter_session_id": adopter_session_id,
+        "expected_head_sha": pinned,
+        "live_head_sha": live,
+    }

remote_repo_guard.py

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+"""Remote/repo mismatch guard (#530).
+
+Bare ``remote`` names resolve to a default ``org``/``repo`` via the ``REMOTES``
+table in :mod:`gitea_auth`. For the ``prgs`` instance the hardcoded default repo
+is ``Timesheet``, but the tools in this project operate on
+``Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools``. When a session runs inside a Gitea-Tools
+worktree and calls a tool with a bare ``remote=prgs`` (no explicit ``org``/``repo``),
+the resolved target silently points at the wrong repository, producing false 404s
+and risking mutation of a different repo.
+
+This module provides a pure assessment that compares the MCP-resolved ``org/repo``
+against the local git remote URL and fails closed on a genuine mismatch, unless the
+caller supplied explicit ``org``/``repo`` (in which case their intent is authoritative)
+or the local remote URL is unavailable (best-effort corroboration only).
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+REMEDIATION = (
+    "Pass explicit org= and repo= matching the local git remote, "
+    "e.g. org=Scaled-Tech-Consulting repo=Gitea-Tools."
+)
+
+
+def assess_remote_repo_match(
+    *,
+    remote: str,
+    resolved_org: str,
+    resolved_repo: str,
+    local_remote_url: str | None,
+    org_explicit: bool,
+    repo_explicit: bool,
+) -> dict:
+    """Fail closed when the resolved org/repo disagrees with the local git remote.
+
+    The guard is intentionally conservative:
+
+    * When the caller passed both ``org`` and ``repo`` explicitly, their intent is
+      authoritative and the guard never blocks.
+    * When the local git remote URL is unavailable (``None``/empty), corroboration
+      is impossible, so the guard does not block (best-effort only).
+    * Otherwise, the resolved ``org/repo`` slug must appear in the local remote URL
+      (case-insensitive); if it does not, the guard blocks.
+    """
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    if org_explicit and repo_explicit:
+        return _assessment(True, reasons, remote, resolved_org, resolved_repo, local_remote_url)
+
+    url = (local_remote_url or "").strip()
+    if not url:
+        return _assessment(True, reasons, remote, resolved_org, resolved_repo, local_remote_url)
+
+    expected_slug = f"{resolved_org}/{resolved_repo}".lower()
+    if expected_slug in url.lower():
+        return _assessment(True, reasons, remote, resolved_org, resolved_repo, local_remote_url)
+
+    reasons.append(
+        f"MCP-resolved repository '{resolved_org}/{resolved_repo}' for remote "
+        f"'{remote}' does not match the local git remote URL '{url}'"
+    )
+    return _assessment(False, reasons, remote, resolved_org, resolved_repo, local_remote_url)
+
+
+def format_remote_repo_guard_error(assessment: dict) -> str:
+    """Single RuntimeError message for the MCP resolver gate."""
+    reasons = "; ".join(
+        assessment.get("reasons") or ["remote/repo resolution mismatch"]
+    )
+    resolved = (
+        f"{assessment.get('resolved_org')}/{assessment.get('resolved_repo')}"
+    )
+    local = assessment.get("local_remote_url") or "(unknown)"
+    return (
+        f"Remote/repo guard (#530): {reasons}. "
+        f"Resolved target: {resolved}; local git remote: {local}. "
+        f"{REMEDIATION}"
+    )
+
+
+def _assessment(
+    proven: bool,
+    reasons: list[str],
+    remote: str,
+    resolved_org: str,
+    resolved_repo: str,
+    local_remote_url: str | None,
+) -> dict:
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "remote": remote,
+        "resolved_org": resolved_org,
+        "resolved_repo": resolved_repo,
+        "local_remote_url": local_remote_url,
+        "remediation": REMEDIATION,
+    }

review_proofs.py

@@ -5629,3 +5629,12 @@ def assess_proof_backed_handoff_report(report_text, **kwargs):
     from reviewer_proof_backed_handoff import assess_proof_backed_handoff_report as _assess
 
     return _assess(report_text, **kwargs)
+
+
+def assess_mutation_capability_proof(report_text, **kwargs):
+    """#405: exact per-mutation capability proof in reviewer final reports."""
+    from reviewer_mutation_capability_proof import (
+        assess_mutation_capability_proof as _assess,
+    )
+
+    return _assess(report_text, **kwargs)

review_workflow_boundary.py

@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+"""Reviewer session boundary tracking for workflow-load gate (#403).
+
+Pre-review commands executed before ``gitea_load_review_workflow`` must be
+classified. Boundary violations block downstream reviewer mutations even when
+workflow hash proof is present.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import re
+from typing import Any
+
+CLASSIFICATION_READ_ONLY_INVENTORY = "read_only_inventory"
+CLASSIFICATION_DIAGNOSTIC = "diagnostic"
+CLASSIFICATION_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION = "boundary_violation"
+CLASSIFICATION_UNCLASSIFIED = "unclassified"
+
+ALLOWED_CLASSIFICATIONS = frozenset({
+    CLASSIFICATION_READ_ONLY_INVENTORY,
+    CLASSIFICATION_DIAGNOSTIC,
+    CLASSIFICATION_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION,
+    CLASSIFICATION_UNCLASSIFIED,
+})
+
+_PRE_REVIEW_COMMANDS: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
+
+_READ_ONLY_INVENTORY_PATTERNS = (
+    re.compile(
+        r"\bgitea[_-](?:list|view|whoami|get[-_]|resolve[-_]task|check[-_]pr|route[-_]task)",
+        re.I,
+    ),
+    re.compile(r"\bgit\s+(?:fetch|remote\s+update|branch\s+-a|log|show|rev-parse)\b", re.I),
+    re.compile(r"\bgit\s+status\b", re.I),
+    re.compile(r"\bgit\s+worktree\s+list\b", re.I),
+)
+
+_DIAGNOSTIC_PATTERNS = (
+    re.compile(r"\bgit\s+diff(?:\s+--stat)?\b", re.I),
+    re.compile(r"\bwhich\s+pytest\b", re.I),
+    re.compile(r"\bpytest\s+--version\b", re.I),
+)
+
+_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION_PATTERNS: tuple[tuple[re.Pattern[str], str], ...] = (
+    (re.compile(r"\b(?:pytest|python\s+-m\s+pytest|python\s+-m\s+unittest)\b", re.I),
+     "validation command before workflow load"),
+    (re.compile(r"\bprofiles\.json\b", re.I), "local profile config inspection"),
+    (re.compile(r"\bgitea-mcp(?:\.v2-contexts)?\.json\b", re.I),
+     "local Gitea MCP config inspection"),
+    (re.compile(r"\b\.env(?:\.|$|\b)", re.I), "credential file inspection"),
+    (re.compile(r"\bkeychain\b", re.I), "credential store inspection"),
+    (re.compile(r"\bpkill\b", re.I), "MCP repair activity"),
+    (re.compile(r"\b(?:edit|write|modify).{0,40}\bmcp\b", re.I),
+     "MCP config exploration"),
+    (re.compile(r"\bgit\s+(?:add|commit|reset|clean|checkout|merge|rebase|push)\b", re.I),
+     "git mutation before workflow load"),
+)
+
+
+def clear_pre_review_commands() -> None:
+    """Test helper and session reset."""
+    global _PRE_REVIEW_COMMANDS
+    _PRE_REVIEW_COMMANDS = []
+
+
+def pre_review_commands() -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
+    """Return a shallow copy of recorded pre-review commands."""
+    return [dict(entry) for entry in _PRE_REVIEW_COMMANDS]
+
+
+def _normalize_path(path: str | None) -> str:
+    return os.path.realpath(os.path.abspath((path or "").strip() or os.getcwd()))
+
+
+def is_main_checkout_path(cwd: str | None, project_root: str | None) -> bool:
+    """True when *cwd* is the stable control checkout (not under branches/)."""
+    if not project_root:
+        return False
+    root = _normalize_path(project_root)
+    path = _normalize_path(cwd)
+    if path != root:
+        return False
+    marker = f"{os.sep}branches{os.sep}"
+    return marker not in path
+
+
+def classify_pre_review_command(
+    command: str,
+    *,
+    cwd: str | None = None,
+    project_root: str | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Classify a command executed before workflow load."""
+    text = (command or "").strip()
+    path = _normalize_path(cwd)
+    root = _normalize_path(project_root) if project_root else None
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    for pattern, label in _BOUNDARY_VIOLATION_PATTERNS:
+        if pattern.search(text):
+            if label.startswith("validation") and root and not is_main_checkout_path(path, root):
+                continue
+            if label.startswith("git mutation") and root and not is_main_checkout_path(path, root):
+                continue
+            reasons.append(label)
+            return {
+                "command": text,
+                "cwd": path,
+                "classification": CLASSIFICATION_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION,
+                "reasons": reasons,
+            }
+
+    for pattern in _READ_ONLY_INVENTORY_PATTERNS:
+        if pattern.search(text):
+            return {
+                "command": text,
+                "cwd": path,
+                "classification": CLASSIFICATION_READ_ONLY_INVENTORY,
+                "reasons": [],
+            }
+
+    for pattern in _DIAGNOSTIC_PATTERNS:
+        if pattern.search(text):
+            return {
+                "command": text,
+                "cwd": path,
+                "classification": CLASSIFICATION_DIAGNOSTIC,
+                "reasons": [],
+            }
+
+    if root and is_main_checkout_path(path, root):
+        if re.search(r"\b(?:cat|head|less|read)\b", text, re.I):
+            if re.search(r"workflow|skill|runbook", text, re.I):
+                return {
+                    "command": text,
+                    "cwd": path,
+                    "classification": CLASSIFICATION_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION,
+                    "reasons": [
+                        "canonical workflow viewed as local file without "
+                        "gitea_load_review_workflow (narrative load is not proof)"
+                    ],
+                }
+
+    return {
+        "command": text,
+        "cwd": path,
+        "classification": CLASSIFICATION_UNCLASSIFIED,
+        "reasons": [
+            "pre-review command not classified; record via "
+            "gitea_record_pre_review_command before workflow load"
+        ],
+    }
+
+
+def record_pre_review_command(
+    command: str,
+    *,
+    cwd: str | None = None,
+    project_root: str | None = None,
+    classification: str | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Record and classify a pre-review command for the current session."""
+    assessed = classify_pre_review_command(
+        command, cwd=cwd, project_root=project_root)
+    if classification:
+        if classification not in ALLOWED_CLASSIFICATIONS:
+            assessed["classification"] = CLASSIFICATION_UNCLASSIFIED
+            assessed["reasons"] = [
+                f"unknown classification '{classification}'; fail closed"
+            ]
+        else:
+            assessed["classification"] = classification
+            assessed["reasons"] = []
+    entry = {
+        **assessed,
+        "session_pid": os.getpid(),
+    }
+    _PRE_REVIEW_COMMANDS.append(entry)
+    return dict(entry)
+
+
+def assess_boundary_status(project_root: str | None = None) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Summarize pre-review boundary state for session proof and reports."""
+    violations = [
+        entry for entry in _PRE_REVIEW_COMMANDS
+        if entry.get("classification") == CLASSIFICATION_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION
+    ]
+    unclassified = [
+        entry for entry in _PRE_REVIEW_COMMANDS
+        if entry.get("classification") == CLASSIFICATION_UNCLASSIFIED
+    ]
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    for entry in violations:
+        reasons.extend(entry.get("reasons") or [
+            f"boundary violation: {entry.get('command', '')[:80]}"
+        ])
+    for entry in unclassified:
+        reasons.extend(entry.get("reasons") or [
+            "unclassified pre-review command blocks reviewer mutations"
+        ])
+
+    clean = not reasons
+    return {
+        "boundary_status": "clean" if clean else "violation",
+        "boundary_clean": clean,
+        "pre_review_command_count": len(_PRE_REVIEW_COMMANDS),
+        "boundary_violation_count": len(violations),
+        "unclassified_command_count": len(unclassified),
+        "violations": [
+            {
+                "command": v.get("command"),
+                "cwd": v.get("cwd"),
+                "reasons": list(v.get("reasons") or []),
+            }
+            for v in violations
+        ],
+        "reasons": reasons,
+    }
+
+
+def boundary_blockers(project_root: str | None = None) -> list[str]:
+    """Reasons reviewer mutations must fail closed due to boundary state."""
+    status = assess_boundary_status(project_root)
+    if status.get("boundary_clean"):
+        return []
+    return list(status.get("reasons") or [
+        "reviewer session boundary violation before workflow load"
+    ])
+
+
+def workflow_load_helper_result(
+    load: dict | None,
+    project_root: str | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Structured helper result for final reports (#403)."""
+    boundary = assess_boundary_status(project_root)
+    if load is None:
+        return {
+            "workflow_load_proof_present": False,
+            "workflow_source": None,
+            "workflow_hash": None,
+            "final_report_schema_hash": None,
+            "boundary_status": boundary.get("boundary_status"),
+            "boundary_clean": False,
+            "reasons": [
+                "gitea_load_review_workflow helper result missing from report"
+            ],
+        }
+    return {
+        "workflow_load_proof_present": True,
+        "workflow_source": load.get("workflow_source"),
+        "workflow_hash": load.get("workflow_hash"),
+        "final_report_schema_path": load.get("final_report_schema_path"),
+        "final_report_schema_hash": load.get("final_report_schema_hash"),
+        "boundary_status": load.get("boundary_status", boundary.get("boundary_status")),
+        "boundary_clean": bool(load.get("boundary_clean", boundary.get("boundary_clean"))),
+        "pre_review_command_count": boundary.get("pre_review_command_count"),
+        "reasons": [],
+    }

review_workflow_load.py

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-"""Canonical review-merge workflow load proof for reviewer mutations (#389)."""
+"""Canonical review-merge workflow load proof for reviewer mutations (#389, #403)."""
 
 from __future__ import annotations
 
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ import os
 import re
 from pathlib import Path
 
+import review_workflow_boundary as boundary
+
 WORKFLOW_REL_PATH = (
     "skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/review-merge-pr.md"
 )
@@ -95,10 +97,16 @@ def record_review_workflow_load(
     global _REVIEW_WORKFLOW_LOAD
     meta = build_canonical_workflow_metadata(
         project_root, prompt_text=prompt_text)
+    boundary_state = boundary.assess_boundary_status(project_root)
     _REVIEW_WORKFLOW_LOAD = {
         **meta,
         "session_pid": os.getpid(),
         "loaded": True,
+        "boundary_status": boundary_state.get("boundary_status"),
+        "boundary_clean": boundary_state.get("boundary_clean"),
+        "pre_review_command_count": boundary_state.get("pre_review_command_count"),
+        "boundary_violation_count": boundary_state.get("boundary_violation_count"),
+        "boundary_reasons": list(boundary_state.get("reasons") or []),
     }
     return dict(_REVIEW_WORKFLOW_LOAD)
 
@@ -107,6 +115,7 @@ def clear_review_workflow_load() -> None:
     """Test helper and review_pr session reset."""
     global _REVIEW_WORKFLOW_LOAD
     _REVIEW_WORKFLOW_LOAD = None
+    boundary.clear_pre_review_commands()
 
 
 def workflow_load_status(project_root: str | None = None) -> dict:
@@ -125,6 +134,9 @@ def workflow_load_status(project_root: str | None = None) -> dict:
             ],
         }
     reasons = _session_validation_reasons(load, project_root)
+    boundary_reasons = boundary.boundary_blockers(project_root)
+    if boundary_reasons:
+        reasons = list(reasons) + boundary_reasons
     return {
         "workflow_load_proof_present": True,
         "workflow_load_valid": not reasons,
@@ -136,6 +148,10 @@ def workflow_load_status(project_root: str | None = None) -> dict:
         "prompt_conflicts_with_workflow": load.get(
             "prompt_conflicts_with_workflow"),
         "session_pid": load.get("session_pid"),
+        "boundary_status": load.get("boundary_status"),
+        "boundary_clean": load.get("boundary_clean"),
+        "workflow_load_helper_result": boundary.workflow_load_helper_result(
+            load, project_root),
         "reasons": reasons,
     }
 
@@ -179,9 +195,12 @@ def review_workflow_load_blockers(
     project_root: str | None = None,
 ) -> list[str]:
     """Reasons reviewer mutations must fail closed."""
+    boundary_reasons = boundary.boundary_blockers(project_root)
+    if boundary_reasons and _REVIEW_WORKFLOW_LOAD is None:
+        return boundary_reasons
     status = workflow_load_status(project_root)
     if not status.get("workflow_load_proof_present"):
-        return list(status.get("reasons") or [])
+        return list(status.get("reasons") or []) + boundary_reasons
     if not status.get("workflow_load_valid"):
         return list(status.get("reasons") or [])
     return []

reviewer_mutation_capability_proof.py

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+"""Exact per-mutation capability proof verifier for reviewer reports (#405).
+
+A reviewer final report may prove ``review_pr`` capability and then also merge
+a PR or delete a remote branch. Merge and branch deletion are separate
+mutations that require their own exact capability proof — a nearby capability
+must never authorize a different operation. This verifier requires a
+mutation-capability table pairing every performed mutation with the exact
+task/permission resolved *before* that mutation.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import re
+
+# Mutations this verifier tracks, with the exact capability tokens that
+# authorize each. A row for the mutation must cite one of its own tokens;
+# tokens from a different mutation (a "nearby capability") never count.
+_REVIEW_TOKENS = ("review_pr", "gitea.pr.review", "gitea.pr.approve",
+                  "gitea.pr.request_changes", "request_changes_pr", "approve_pr")
+_MERGE_TOKENS = ("merge_pr", "gitea.pr.merge")
+_DELETE_TOKENS = ("delete_branch", "gitea.branch.delete")
+
+# Detect that a mutation was actually performed (not merely mentioned as a
+# non-goal or skipped).
+_MERGE_PERFORMED = re.compile(
+    r"(?:gitea_merge_pr\b(?![^\n]*\b(?:not called|skipped|blocked)\b)|"
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*merge result\s*:\s*merged\b|"
+    r"\bpr merged\b|\bmerge commit\s*(?:sha)?\s*[:=]?\s*[0-9a-f]{7,})",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_DELETE_PERFORMED = re.compile(
+    r"(?:gitea_delete_branch\b(?![^\n]*\b(?:not called|skipped|blocked)\b)|"
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*(?:remote )?branch deleted\s*:|"
+    r"\bdeleted (?:the )?(?:remote )?branch\b|"
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*branch deletion\s*:\s*(?!skipped|none|not)\S)",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+_REVIEW_PERFORMED = re.compile(
+    r"(?:gitea_submit_pr_review\b|gitea_mark_final_review_decision\b|"
+    r"^\s*[-*]?\s*review (?:decision|verdict|mutation)\s*:\s*"
+    r"(?:approved|request[_ ]changes)\b|\breview submitted\b)",
+    re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE,
+)
+
+# Post-hoc proof: capability resolved *after* the mutation is never valid.
+_POST_HOC = re.compile(
+    r"capabilit(?:y|ies)\s+(?:resolved|proven|checked)\s+(?:after|post[- ])\s*"
+    r"(?:the\s+)?(?:merge|deletion|delete|mutation|review)",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+# The report must carry an explicit mutation-capability table.
+_TABLE_MARKER = re.compile(
+    r"mutation[- ]capability(?:\s+table)?|capability[- ]per[- ]mutation",
+    re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+
+def _tokens_present(text: str, tokens: tuple[str, ...]) -> bool:
+    low = text.lower()
+    return any(tok.lower() in low for tok in tokens)
+
+
+def assess_mutation_capability_proof(report_text: str) -> dict:
+    """Validate exact per-mutation capability proof in a reviewer report.
+
+    Returns ``{proven, block, reasons, safe_next_action}``. A report that
+    performs no mutation beyond an ordinary review passes only when its
+    review capability is cited; merge/delete each demand their own exact
+    capability row. Fail closed on nearby-capability substitution, a
+    missing table, missing rows, or post-hoc proof.
+    """
+    text = report_text or ""
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+
+    merged = bool(_MERGE_PERFORMED.search(text))
+    deleted = bool(_DELETE_PERFORMED.search(text))
+    reviewed = bool(_REVIEW_PERFORMED.search(text))
+
+    extra_mutation = merged or deleted
+
+    if _POST_HOC.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "capability proof recorded after the mutation; exact capability "
+            "must be resolved before each mutation"
+        )
+
+    # A review-only report needs its review capability cited; no table required.
+    if reviewed and not _tokens_present(text, _REVIEW_TOKENS):
+        reasons.append(
+            "review mutation performed without exact review capability proof "
+            "(review_pr / gitea.pr.review)"
+        )
+
+    if extra_mutation and not _TABLE_MARKER.search(text):
+        reasons.append(
+            "mutation beyond review performed without a mutation-capability "
+            "table (mutation, exact task/capability, result, order-before)"
+        )
+
+    if merged:
+        if not _tokens_present(text, _MERGE_TOKENS):
+            reasons.append(
+                "merge performed without exact merge capability proof "
+                "(merge_pr / gitea.pr.merge); nearby review_pr does not "
+                "authorize merge"
+            )
+
+    if deleted:
+        if not _tokens_present(text, _DELETE_TOKENS):
+            reasons.append(
+                "branch deletion performed without exact delete capability "
+                "proof (delete_branch / gitea.branch.delete); nearby "
+                "merge_pr does not authorize branch deletion"
+            )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "safe_next_action": (
+            "proceed"
+            if proven
+            else "add a mutation-capability table with the exact resolved "
+            "task/permission and pre-mutation order for every mutation; "
+            "skip any mutation whose exact capability is unproven"
+        ),
+    }

reviewer_pr_lease.py

@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ _ACTIVE_PHASES = frozenset({
     "approved",
     "request-changes",
     "merging",
+    "adopted",
 })
 
 DEFAULT_LEASE_TTL_MINUTES = 120
@@ -380,9 +381,22 @@ def assess_post_merge_moot_lease(
     }
 
 
-def record_session_lease(lease: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
+def record_session_lease(
+    lease: dict[str, Any],
+    *,
+    lease_provenance: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Record the in-session lease mirror for mutation gates.
+
+    *lease_provenance* must be supplied by sanctioned MCP tools (#536). Bare
+    manual seeding without provenance cannot satisfy merger/reviewer mutation
+    gates.
+    """
     global _SESSION_LEASE
-    _SESSION_LEASE = dict(lease)
+    stored = dict(lease)
+    if lease_provenance:
+        stored["lease_provenance"] = dict(lease_provenance)
+    _SESSION_LEASE = stored
     return dict(_SESSION_LEASE)
 
 
@@ -415,13 +429,25 @@ def assess_mutation_lease_gate(
     if not session:
         reasons.append(
             f"no in-session reviewer lease recorded; acquire via "
-            f"gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease before {mutation}"
+            f"gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease or adopt via "
+            f"gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease before {mutation}"
         )
-    elif session.get("pr_number") != pr_number:
+    else:
+        import merger_lease_adoption as mla
+
+        if not mla.is_sanctioned_session_lease(session):
+            reasons.append(
+                "in-session lease lacks sanctioned provenance; manual "
+                "_SESSION_LEASE seeding is not canonical proof — use "
+                "gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease or gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease"
+            )
+    if session and session.get("pr_number") != pr_number:
         reasons.append(
             f"session lease is for PR #{session.get('pr_number')}, not #{pr_number}"
         )
-    elif (session.get("session_id") or "") != (session_id or session.get("session_id")):
+    elif session and (session.get("session_id") or "") != (
+        session_id or session.get("session_id")
+    ):
         reasons.append("session lease session_id mismatch (fail closed)")
 
     if active:

root_checkout_guard.py

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+"""Root checkout guard (#475).
+
+The project root checkout is the stable control checkout on master/prgs/master.
+Author/reviewer/merge flows must fail closed when the control checkout is
+contaminated (wrong branch, detached HEAD, dirty, or HEAD behind/ahead of
+prgs/master). Isolated ``branches/...`` worktrees remain allowed.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import subprocess
+
+from author_mutation_worktree import is_path_under_branches
+from reviewer_worktree import parse_dirty_tracked_files
+
+REMEDIATION = (
+    "Root checkout is not on master. Preserve state, switch root back to master, "
+    "and use scripts/worktree-review or the sanctioned issue worktree flow."
+)
+
+BASE_BRANCHES = frozenset({"master", "main", "dev"})
+REMOTE_MASTER_REFS = ("prgs/master", "refs/remotes/prgs/master")
+
+
+def resolve_remote_master_sha(
+    canonical_repo_root: str,
+    *,
+    remote_refs: tuple[str, ...] | None = None,
+) -> str | None:
+    """Return the commit SHA for the tracking master ref when available."""
+    root = (canonical_repo_root or "").strip()
+    if not root:
+        return None
+    for ref in remote_refs or REMOTE_MASTER_REFS:
+        res = subprocess.run(
+            ["git", "-C", root, "rev-parse", "--verify", ref],
+            capture_output=True,
+            text=True,
+            check=False,
+        )
+        if res.returncode == 0:
+            sha = (res.stdout or "").strip()
+            if sha:
+                return sha
+    return None
+
+
+resolve_tracking_master_sha = resolve_remote_master_sha
+
+
+def assess_root_checkout_guard(
+    *,
+    workspace_path: str,
+    canonical_repo_root: str,
+    current_branch: str | None,
+    head_sha: str | None,
+    porcelain_status: str,
+    remote_master_sha: str | None,
+    resolved_role: str | None = None,
+    actual_role: str | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Fail closed when the control checkout is not clean master/prgs/master.
+
+    ``resolved_role`` is the preflight-resolved *task* role and ``actual_role``
+    is the *active profile* role (#540). The reconciler exemption honours either
+    signal so a ``comment_issue`` preflight (which stamps the task role as
+    ``author``) cannot strip a genuine reconciler of its exemption. An actual
+    author profile classifies as ``author`` in both signals, so author blocking
+    on a contaminated control checkout is preserved.
+
+    Merger *strictness* (a merger must not be auto-exempted by working from a
+    ``branches/`` worktree) stays keyed on the resolved task role: merge
+    operations resolve their own task role, and widening the merger test with
+    ``actual_role`` would wrongly subject a merger operating from its clean
+    workspace under a non-merge task to full control-checkout checks.
+    """
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    root = os.path.realpath(canonical_repo_root)
+    workspace = os.path.realpath(workspace_path)
+    branch = (current_branch or "").strip()
+    dirty_files = parse_dirty_tracked_files(porcelain_status)
+
+    if resolved_role == "reconciler" or actual_role == "reconciler":
+        return _assessment(True, [], root, workspace, branch, head_sha, dirty_files)
+
+    if resolved_role != "merger" and is_path_under_branches(workspace, root):
+        return _assessment(True, [], root, workspace, branch, head_sha, dirty_files)
+
+    if dirty_files:
+        reasons.append(
+            "control checkout has tracked local edits before role work "
+            f"(dirty files: {', '.join(dirty_files)})"
+        )
+
+    if not branch:
+        reasons.append("control checkout is detached HEAD; expected branch 'master'")
+    elif branch not in BASE_BRANCHES:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"control checkout branch '{branch}' is not a stable base branch "
+            f"({'/'.join(sorted(BASE_BRANCHES))})"
+        )
+
+    if remote_master_sha and head_sha and head_sha != remote_master_sha:
+        reasons.append(
+            "control checkout HEAD does not match prgs/master "
+            f"(HEAD {head_sha[:12]}, prgs/master {remote_master_sha[:12]})"
+        )
+
+    proven = not reasons
+    return _assessment(proven, reasons, root, workspace, branch or None, head_sha, dirty_files)
+
+
+def format_root_checkout_guard_error(assessment: dict) -> str:
+    """Single RuntimeError message for MCP preflight gates."""
+    root = assessment.get("canonical_repo_root") or "(unknown)"
+    workspace = assessment.get("workspace_path") or "(unknown)"
+    reasons = "; ".join(assessment.get("reasons") or ["unknown root checkout violation"])
+    return (
+        f"Root checkout guard (#475): {reasons}. "
+        f"canonical repository root: {root}; workspace: {workspace}. "
+        f"{REMEDIATION}"
+    )
+
+
+def _assessment(
+    proven: bool,
+    reasons: list[str],
+    canonical_repo_root: str,
+    workspace_path: str,
+    current_branch: str | None,
+    head_sha: str | None,
+    dirty_files: list[str],
+) -> dict:
+    return {
+        "proven": proven,
+        "block": not proven,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "canonical_repo_root": canonical_repo_root,
+        "workspace_path": workspace_path,
+        "current_branch": current_branch,
+        "head_sha": head_sha,
+        "dirty_files": dirty_files,
+        "remediation": REMEDIATION,
+    }
+
+
+assess_root_checkout = assess_root_checkout_guard

run-tests.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+set -euo pipefail
+
+ROOT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+PYTHON="$ROOT_DIR/venv/bin/python"
+
+if [[ ! -x "$PYTHON" ]]; then
+  echo "ERROR: expected virtualenv Python at $PYTHON" >&2
+  echo "Create the venv first, then run: venv/bin/python -m pytest" >&2
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+exec "$PYTHON" -m pytest "$@"

skills/llm-project-workflow/schemas/review-merge-final-report.md

@@ -63,8 +63,14 @@ Do not use legacy fields: `Pinned reviewed head`, `Scratch worktree used`,
 - Current status:
 - Safe next action:
 - Safety statement:
+- Workflow-load helper result:
 ```
 
+The **Workflow-load helper result** field must carry structured output from
+`gitea_load_review_workflow` (workflow_hash, final_report_schema_hash,
+boundary_status). Narrative claims that workflow files were viewed locally are
+not sufficient (#403).
+
 ### Already-landed handoff overrides
 
 When eligibility class is `ALREADY_LANDED_RECONCILE_REQUIRED`:

skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/merge-pr.md

@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ Load the canonical workflow first:
 Final report schema: `schemas/review-merge-final-report.md`.
 
 Rules (llm-project-workflow):
+- Repository targeting (#530): pass explicit `remote=`, `org=`, and `repo=` on
+  every gitea-tools call (e.g. `remote=prgs org=Scaled-Tech-Consulting
+  repo=Gitea-Tools`). A bare `remote=prgs` can resolve to the wrong default repo
+  and is blocked when it disagrees with the local git remote URL.
 - Only an eligible, NON-author merger merges. If authenticated user == PR
   author → STOP.
 - Review and merge are separate workflow roles. A reviewer approval is not merge authorization.
@@ -42,7 +46,15 @@ Steps:
 8. Confirm remote master now contains the merge commit (or the expected changes if squash merged).
    *Note: Gitea PR "closed" state is NOT equivalent to "merged". Do not assume a closed PR succeeded without verifying the actual landed changes.*
 
-Then run the cleanup template (worktree-cleanup.md):
+Post-merge cleanup (#517): merger sessions must NOT perform ad hoc cleanup.
+- Record merge mutations separately from cleanup mutations in the controller handoff.
+- Hand cleanup to a `prgs-reconciler` session — never raw `git branch -d`,
+  `git push --delete`, curl/API comment deletion, or local scripts.
+- Reconciler cleanup must cite authorized MCP tools
+  (`gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups`, `gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease`,
+  `gitea_delete_branch`, etc.) plus `gitea.branch.delete` capability proof.
+
+Then run the cleanup template (worktree-cleanup.md) in a reconciler session:
 - Verify expected file/commit presence on master (post-merge file-presence verification):
   - Run: git fetch <remote> --prune; git checkout master; git pull <remote> master --ff-only
   - Verify that the expected files added/modified in the PR are present on master (or absent if deleted).

skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/post-merge-cleanup-handoff.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# Template: post-merge cleanup (reconciler only)
+
+Copy, fill the `<...>` fields, and paste as the task prompt. Run only after merge
+is confirmed on remote master. Merger sessions must hand off here — never perform
+this cleanup inline (#517).
+
+```text
+Task: MCP-native post-merge cleanup for PR #<pr> / issue #<n>.
+
+Rules:
+- Active profile must be reconciler (`prgs-reconciler`) with `gitea.branch.delete`.
+- Use MCP tools only — no raw git branch delete, no API comment deletion scripts.
+- Record cleanup mutations separately from merge mutations in the handoff.
+
+Steps:
+1. `gitea_resolve_task_capability(task="reconcile_merged_cleanups", remote=prgs)`
+2. Confirm PR #<pr> merged on <remote>/master.
+3. `gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease` if a reviewer lease remains (append-only).
+4. `gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups` for branch/worktree cleanup with dry-run first.
+5. Report authorized cleanup tools used and reconciler capability proof.
+
+Handoff ledger (required fields):
+- Merge mutations: (none — merger already recorded gitea_merge_pr)
+- Cleanup mutations: list exact MCP tools invoked
+- Reconciler capability: profile + gitea.branch.delete proof
+- Next actor: controller acceptance or none
+```

skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/review-pr.md

@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ Load the canonical workflow first:
 Final report schema: `schemas/review-merge-final-report.md`.
 
 Rules (llm-project-workflow):
+- Repository targeting (#530): pass explicit `remote=`, `org=`, and `repo=` on
+  every gitea-tools call (e.g. `remote=prgs org=Scaled-Tech-Consulting
+  repo=Gitea-Tools`). A bare `remote=prgs` can resolve to the wrong default repo
+  and is blocked when it disagrees with the local git remote URL.
 - Review in a SEPARATE detached review worktree, never the author's folder.
 - Worktree safety (#233): before checkout, diff, validation, review, or merge,
   report the starting worktree path and whether it was dirty. If unrelated

skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/start-issue.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ Rules (llm-project-workflow):
 - Work only in an isolated branch worktree under branches/. The main checkout
   is orchestration/status only.
 - Do not self-review or self-merge.
+- Repository targeting (#530): pass explicit `remote=`, `org=`, and `repo=` on
+  every gitea-tools call (e.g. `remote=prgs org=Scaled-Tech-Consulting
+  repo=Gitea-Tools`). A bare `remote=prgs` can resolve to the wrong default repo
+  and is blocked when it disagrees with the local git remote URL.
 
 Steps:
 0. Work Selection Rule — before any claim, branch, or file edits, acquire or

skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/worktree-cleanup.md

@@ -26,3 +26,43 @@ Steps:
 
 Handoff: merge confirmed, issue closed, branch+worktree removed, checkout clean.
 ```
+
+## Branches cleanup audit integrity (#404)
+
+Any bulk or multi-path cleanup under `branches/` must capture auditable before/after
+identity for every initial directory and registered worktree. Use
+`worktree_cleanup_audit.capture_cleanup_snapshot` before and after cleanup, record
+every intentional removal in a removal log (path, method, order, timestamp,
+pre-removal proof), then run `reconcile_cleanup_audit` and
+`assess_cleanup_audit_integrity`.
+
+The cleanup report must include a reconciliation table:
+
+* initial count
+* removed count
+* preserved count
+* missing-unexplained count
+* final count
+
+Fail closed when:
+
+* a preserved (active PR, dirty, claim/lease, or unsafe) worktree disappears without
+  a removal log entry or explicit explanation
+* the removal log omits a removed clean-stale path
+* final counts do not reconcile with initial minus removed
+
+If another session removes or mutates a worktree during cleanup, record the path
+under explained missing entries — never treat silent disappearance as success.
+
+## Bulk `branches/` cleanup audit (#404)
+
+Before removing multiple session-owned worktrees:
+
+1. Call `gitea_capture_branches_worktree_snapshot` and record the before snapshot.
+2. Remove only paths classified as `clean_stale_removable` with explicit per-path proof.
+3. Log every removal with path, method, and timestamp/order.
+4. Capture an after snapshot with the same tool.
+5. Call `gitea_assess_worktree_cleanup_integrity` with before, after, and the removal log.
+6. Fail closed when any protected path (active PR, dirty, claim/lease) disappears
+   without an explained state transition.
+7. Final report must include the reconciliation table and `git worktree list` proof.

skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/review-merge-pr.md

@@ -36,6 +36,44 @@ If available, load it first and report:
 
 If the canonical workflow cannot be loaded and the project requires it, stop and produce a recovery handoff only.
 
+## 0A. Workflow-load and session boundary anchor (#403)
+
+The MCP gate is the authority — not local file viewing.
+
+Before any reviewer mutation:
+
+1. Record pre-review commands with `gitea_record_pre_review_command` when they
+   are not automatically classified (inventory/diagnostic commands may be
+   recorded explicitly for proof).
+2. Call `gitea_load_review_workflow` to establish workflow hash proof **and**
+   session boundary state in the same in-process session proof.
+3. Do not claim the workflow was loaded by reading
+   `skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/review-merge-pr.md` as a local file;
+   that narrative does not satisfy the validator.
+
+Allowed before workflow load (classify as `read_only_inventory` or
+`diagnostic`):
+
+* `gitea_whoami`, `gitea_resolve_task_capability`, `gitea_list_prs`,
+  `gitea_view_pr`, `gitea_get_runtime_context`
+* `git fetch` / `git remote update` for inventory
+* `git status`, `git worktree list` (read-only)
+
+Boundary violations (block downstream reviewer mutations even after load):
+
+* validation commands (`pytest`, `python -m unittest`) in the main checkout
+* local profile/credential/config inspection (`profiles.json`, `gitea-mcp.json`,
+  `.env`, keychain dumps)
+* MCP repair (`pkill`, MCP config edits)
+* git mutations before workflow load
+
+Final reports must include a structured **Workflow-load helper result** block
+copied from `gitea_load_review_workflow`, including at minimum:
+
+* `workflow_hash`
+* `final_report_schema_hash`
+* `boundary_status` (`clean` or `violation`)
+
 ## 1. Start with live identity, profile, runtime, and capability checks
 
 Prove:
@@ -796,6 +834,21 @@ inventory before continuing.
 Final reports must include lease session id, acquisition proof, heartbeat
 status, and release/blocked status.
 
+## 26B-1. Merger lease adoption (#536)
+
+When review and merge are **different sessions**, the merger must adopt the
+reviewer's lease — never manually seed `reviewer_pr_lease._SESSION_LEASE`.
+
+Before merge in a merger-only session:
+
+1. Confirm `approval_at_current_head` via `gitea_get_pr_review_feedback`.
+2. Call `gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease` from a clean merger worktree under
+   `branches/`, passing `expected_head_sha` pinned to the approved head.
+3. Quote the adoption comment id and `adopted_from_session_id` in the handoff.
+4. Proceed to `gitea_merge_pr` only after adoption succeeds.
+
+Manual in-process lease seeding is rejected by mutation gates (fail closed).
+
 ## 26C. Conflict-fix lease and stale-head protection (#399)
 
 Before validating, approving, or merging a PR:
@@ -871,6 +924,16 @@ Confirm:
 
 Clean only the session-owned `branches/` review worktree if the project workflow explicitly allows cleanup.
 
+Review, baseline, and merge-simulation worktrees created during this run are
+transient and are removed automatically at successful completion once they are
+clean, carry no open PR, and hold no active lease (#401). Use
+`gitea_audit_worktree_cleanup` (read-only) to classify `branches/` entries; only
+`clean_stale_removable` and `detached_review_leftover` may be removed, one-by-one,
+after `git worktree list` proof plus per-worktree proof of path, branch/HEAD,
+clean/dirty status, no active PR/lease, and the removal result. Dirty,
+active-PR, active-issue, and leased worktrees are never deleted automatically; a
+failed removal must be reported with the leftover path and reason.
+
 Do not delete or mutate unrelated branches/worktrees.
 
 Do not touch the main checkout except to update the stable branch after merge if explicitly allowed by the workflow.
@@ -915,6 +978,27 @@ If any gate fails, report:
 
 Skipped cleanup with an exact blocker passes validation. Performed-cleanup claims without the checklist fail validation.
 
+## 28B. MCP-native cleanup only (#517)
+
+Post-merge cleanup of leases, comments, branches, and worktrees must go through
+explicit MCP tools — never raw git, curl/API scripts, or ad hoc helper scripts.
+
+Merger and reviewer sessions must **not** perform cleanup inline. Record:
+
+* **Merge mutations** — only `gitea_merge_pr` (or review mutations for review-only runs)
+* **Cleanup mutations** — only authorized reconciler MCP tools, cited by exact tool name
+
+Authorized cleanup tools include `gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups`,
+`gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease`, `gitea_delete_branch`, and
+`gitea_cleanup_merged_pr_branch` (when available). Lease cleanup uses
+append-only release comments — never delete another session's lease comment.
+
+Hand cleanup to a `prgs-reconciler` session with `gitea.branch.delete` capability
+proof. Raw `git branch -d`, `git push --delete`, and comment-deletion API calls
+are blocked in final-report validation.
+
+Template: `templates/post-merge-cleanup-handoff.md`.
+
 ## 29. Recovery handoff rules
 
 If blocked, produce a recovery handoff with:
@@ -1013,6 +1097,26 @@ Use precise wording:
 
 Do not collapse review, merge, cleanup, or external-state mutations into vague wording.
 
+## 31B. Mutation-capability table (#405)
+
+Every performed mutation requires exact capability proof resolved **before** that
+mutation executes. Nearby capabilities never authorize a different operation —
+`review_pr` does not authorize `merge_pr`, and `merge_pr` does not authorize
+`delete_branch` / `gitea.branch.delete`.
+
+When any mutation beyond a bare review occurs (merge, branch delete, issue
+close/comment, etc.), the final report must include a **mutation-capability table**
+with one row per performed mutation:
+
+* mutation (tool/action name)
+* exact task/capability resolved (for example `merge_pr` / `gitea.pr.merge`)
+* result
+* order/timestamp proof that capability was resolved before the mutation
+
+If exact capability proof is missing, skip the mutation or stop the workflow —
+never claim a performed mutation without its row. Post-hoc capability proof after
+the mutation fails validation.
+
 ## 31A. Local artifact and report consistency rule
 
 Do not create local walkthrough, notes, markdown, JSON, or report artifacts during reviewer runs unless the canonical workflow or operator explicitly requires it.

skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/work-issue.md

@@ -626,9 +626,14 @@ When pushing to an existing PR branch to resolve merge conflicts:
    * session worktree path
    * push cwd
    * whether the push is fast-forward
-3. Do not push when a reviewer holds an active lease on the same PR.
-4. Do not force-push.
-5. Do not push from the main checkout or wrong cwd.
+   * explicit `remote`, `org`, and `repo` when not using defaults
+3. If assessment returns `assessment_failed: true` or `pr_lookup: failed`, stop
+   and produce a recovery handoff with the structured `reasons` and
+   `resolved_repo` fields — do not treat an MCP HTTP 500 as proof the push was
+   unsafe or safe (#519).
+4. Do not push when a reviewer holds an active lease on the same PR.
+5. Do not force-push.
+6. Do not push from the main checkout or wrong cwd.
 
 Conflict-fix final reports must state:
 
@@ -699,6 +704,39 @@ Do not update the main checkout unless the canonical workflow explicitly allows
 
 Any cleanup is a mutation and must be reported.
 
+### 22A. Session-owned worktree cleanup and TTL (#401)
+
+Every session-owned worktree created under `branches/` has ownership metadata:
+path, workflow type, issue number, PR number, branch/head SHA, creator
+identity/profile, created timestamp, last-used timestamp, and cleanup
+eligibility.
+
+Cleanup is classification-driven. `gitea_audit_worktree_cleanup` (read-only)
+classifies every `branches/` entry as exactly one of:
+
+* `active_open_pr` — branch has an open PR; never auto-removed.
+* `active_issue_work` — active claim/lease or fresh issue worktree; never
+  auto-removed.
+* `dirty_local_worktree` — uncommitted changes; never auto-removed.
+* `clean_stale_removable` — clean, no PR, no lease; removable.
+* `detached_review_leftover` — clean detached review/baseline/merge-simulation
+  worktree; removable.
+* `unsafe_unknown` — protected base checkout or unknown workflow type; never
+  auto-removed.
+
+Only `clean_stale_removable` and `detached_review_leftover` may be removed, and
+only one-by-one after `git worktree list` proof plus per-worktree proof of:
+worktree path, branch/HEAD, clean/dirty status, no active PR/lease, and the
+removal result. Review, baseline, and merge-simulation worktrees are removed
+automatically at successful workflow completion; issue/conflict-fix worktrees
+are removed only after their TTL (`GITEA_WORKTREE_TTL_HOURS`, default 24h)
+expires and no lock/lease is held.
+
+Dirty, active-PR, active-issue, and leased worktrees are never deleted
+automatically. If a removal fails, the final report must list the leftover
+worktree path and the reason. Include the `git worktree list` output as final
+cleanup verification.
+
 ## 23. Recovery handoff rules
 
 If blocked, produce a recovery handoff with:

task_capability_map.py

@@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.merge",
         "role": "merger",
     },
+    "adopt_merger_pr_lease": {
+        "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
+        "role": "reviewer",
+    },
     "blind_pr_queue_review": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
         "role": "reviewer",

tests/test_assess_conflict_fix_push_tool.py

@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+"""Regression tests for gitea_assess_conflict_fix_push structured failures (#519)."""
+
+import os
+import sys
+import unittest
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from mcp_server import (  # noqa: E402
+    _fetch_pr_lease_comments_safe,
+    gitea_assess_conflict_fix_push,
+)
+
+FAKE_AUTH = "Basic dGVzdDp0ZXN0"
+AUTHOR_ENV = {
+    "GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "prgs-author",
+    "GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "gitea.read,gitea.branch.push,gitea.pr.create",
+}
+
+HEAD_BEFORE = "dad1dc8d5108ab01ed83065334116d7425a4471c"
+HEAD_AFTER = "3f3d6cb35d0fe225dcb236247f2a2d0ec193fa35"
+OPEN_PR = {
+    "number": 508,
+    "state": "open",
+    "head": {"sha": HEAD_AFTER},
+}
+
+
+class TestFetchPrLeaseCommentsSafe(unittest.TestCase):
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    def test_pr_lookup_404_returns_structured_failure(self, _auth, mock_api):
+        mock_api.side_effect = RuntimeError(
+            'HTTP 404: {"message":"issue does not exist","index":508}'
+        )
+        result = _fetch_pr_lease_comments_safe(
+            508, remote="prgs", host=None, org=None, repo=None)
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["comments"], [])
+        self.assertTrue(result["reasons"])
+        self.assertIn("PR lookup failed", result["reasons"][0])
+        self.assertEqual(result["pr_lookup"], "failed")
+
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    def test_comment_fetch_404_after_pr_lookup(self, _auth, mock_api):
+        def _api(method, url, auth, *args, **kwargs):
+            if "/pulls/" in url:
+                return OPEN_PR
+            raise RuntimeError(
+                'HTTP 404: {"message":"issue does not exist","index":508}'
+            )
+
+        mock_api.side_effect = _api
+        result = _fetch_pr_lease_comments_safe(
+            508, remote="prgs", host=None, org=None, repo=None)
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertIn("comment fetch failed", result["reasons"][0].lower())
+        self.assertEqual(result["pr_lookup"], "ok")
+
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    def test_success_returns_comments_and_head_sha(self, _auth, mock_api):
+        comment = {"id": 1, "body": "<!-- mcp-conflict-fix-lease:v1 -->"}
+
+        def _api(method, url, auth, *args, **kwargs):
+            if "/pulls/" in url:
+                return OPEN_PR
+            return [comment]
+
+        mock_api.side_effect = _api
+        result = _fetch_pr_lease_comments_safe(
+            508, remote="prgs", host=None, org=None, repo=None)
+        self.assertTrue(result["success"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["comments"], [comment])
+        self.assertEqual(result["head_sha"], OPEN_PR["head"]["sha"])
+
+
+class TestAssessConflictFixPushTool(unittest.TestCase):
+    @patch("mcp_server._fetch_pr_lease_comments_safe")
+    @patch("mcp_server._profile_operation_gate", return_value=None)
+    def test_returns_structured_block_when_pr_lookup_fails(
+        self, _gate, mock_fetch,
+    ):
+        mock_fetch.return_value = {
+            "success": False,
+            "comments": [],
+            "reasons": ["PR lookup failed"],
+            "pr_lookup": "failed",
+            "resolved_repo": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
+            "remote": "prgs",
+            "pr_number": 508,
+        }
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, AUTHOR_ENV, clear=True):
+            result = gitea_assess_conflict_fix_push(
+                pr_number=508,
+                branch_head_before=HEAD_BEFORE,
+                branch_head_after=HEAD_AFTER,
+                worktree_path="/proj/branches/fix-pr508",
+                push_cwd="/proj/branches/fix-pr508",
+                is_fast_forward=True,
+                remote="prgs",
+            )
+        self.assertFalse(result["push_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(result.get("assessment_failed"))
+        self.assertEqual(result["pr_lookup"], "failed")
+
+    @patch("mcp_server._fetch_pr_lease_comments_safe")
+    @patch("mcp_server._profile_operation_gate", return_value=None)
+    def test_valid_push_assessment_when_pr_and_comments_resolve(
+        self, _gate, mock_fetch,
+    ):
+        mock_fetch.return_value = {
+            "success": True,
+            "comments": [],
+            "reasons": [],
+            "pr_lookup": "ok",
+            "resolved_repo": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
+            "remote": "prgs",
+            "pr_number": 508,
+            "head_sha": HEAD_AFTER,
+        }
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, AUTHOR_ENV, clear=True):
+            result = gitea_assess_conflict_fix_push(
+                pr_number=508,
+                branch_head_before=HEAD_BEFORE,
+                branch_head_after=HEAD_AFTER,
+                worktree_path="/proj/branches/fix-pr508",
+                push_cwd="/proj/branches/fix-pr508",
+                is_fast_forward=True,
+                remote="prgs",
+            )
+        self.assertTrue(result["push_allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(result.get("live_pr_head_sha"), HEAD_AFTER)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_audit.py

@@ -294,9 +294,13 @@ class TestGatedToolAudit(_AuditWiringBase):
         super().setUp()
         from tests.test_mcp_server import _init_reviewer_session, _install_owned_reviewer_lease
         import reviewer_pr_lease
+        import review_workflow_boundary
+        import review_workflow_load
 
         # Session init clears any prior session lease (#407) and loads workflow (#389).
         _init_reviewer_session("prgs")
+        self.addCleanup(review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load)
+        self.addCleanup(review_workflow_boundary.clear_pre_review_commands)
         self._lease_patch = _install_owned_reviewer_lease(8)
         self._lease_patch.start()
         self._auth_identity_patch = patch(

tests/test_create_issue_workspace_guard.py

@@ -38,8 +38,18 @@ class TestCreateIssueWorkspaceGuard(unittest.TestCase):
     @patch("gitea_mcp_server.role_session_router.check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop", return_value=(True, []))
     @patch("gitea_mcp_server.api_request")
     @patch("gitea_mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[])
-    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state", return_value={"current_branch": "feat/issue-1"})
-    def test_create_issue_stable_checkout_rejected(self, _git, _get_all, mock_api, _role, _ns, _prof, _auth):
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha", return_value="a" * 40)
+    @patch(
+        "gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+        return_value={
+            "current_branch": "master",
+            "head_sha": "a" * 40,
+            "porcelain_status": "",
+        },
+    )
+    def test_create_issue_stable_checkout_rejected(
+        self, _git, _remote_sha, _get_all, mock_api, _role, _ns, _prof, _auth,
+    ):
         # Without worktree_path/env hints, workspace resolves to PROJECT_ROOT. When that
         # path is the stable control checkout (not under branches/), mutation must fail.
         with patch.object(srv, "PROJECT_ROOT", CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT):

tests/test_issue_540_comment_role_poison.py

@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+"""Regression tests for #540: comment_issue preflight must not poison the
+actual reconciler role for #274 branch-only / #475 root-checkout exemptions.
+
+`resolve_task_capability("comment_issue")` stamps
+``_preflight_resolved_role = "author"`` because ``comment_issue`` has
+``required_role_kind = author``. Before the fix, ``_effective_workspace_role``
+preferred that stamp and a genuine ``prgs-reconciler`` session was treated as an
+author inside the #274 branch-only mutation guard and the #475 root checkout
+guard, blocking ``gitea_create_issue_comment`` from the control checkout.
+
+The fix keys the role exemptions off the *actual profile role* as well, so the
+exemption survives the poisoned task role while author profiles stay blocked.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import gitea_mcp_server as srv  # noqa: E402
+import root_checkout_guard as rcg  # noqa: E402
+
+FAKE_AUTH = "token test"
+CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT = str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[3])
+MASTER_SHA = "a" * 40
+OTHER_SHA = "b" * 40
+
+RECONCILER_PROFILE = {
+    "profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
+    "allowed_operations": [
+        "gitea.read",
+        "gitea.pr.close",
+        "gitea.pr.comment",
+        "gitea.issue.comment",
+    ],
+    "forbidden_operations": [
+        "gitea.pr.approve",
+        "gitea.pr.merge",
+        "gitea.pr.create",
+        "gitea.branch.push",
+        "gitea.repo.commit",
+    ],
+    "audit_label": "prgs-reconciler",
+}
+
+AUTHOR_PROFILE = {
+    "profile_name": "prgs-author",
+    "allowed_operations": [
+        "gitea.read",
+        "gitea.issue.comment",
+        "gitea.issue.create",
+        "gitea.pr.create",
+        "gitea.branch.push",
+        "gitea.repo.commit",
+    ],
+    "forbidden_operations": [
+        "gitea.pr.approve",
+        "gitea.pr.merge",
+    ],
+    "audit_label": "prgs-author",
+}
+
+REVIEWER_PROFILE = {
+    "profile_name": "prgs-reviewer",
+    "allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge"],
+    "forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.create", "gitea.branch.push"],
+    "audit_label": "prgs-reviewer",
+}
+
+
+class TestActualProfileRole(unittest.TestCase):
+    """`_actual_profile_role` ignores the poisoned preflight task role (#540)."""
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = None
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=RECONCILER_PROFILE)
+    def test_reconciler_profile_role_survives_author_task_stamp(self, _profile):
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = "author"  # comment_issue poison
+        self.assertEqual(srv._actual_profile_role(), "reconciler")
+        # _effective_workspace_role is still poisoned to author (unchanged #510)...
+        self.assertEqual(srv._effective_workspace_role(), "author")
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=AUTHOR_PROFILE)
+    def test_author_profile_role_is_author(self, _profile):
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = "author"
+        self.assertEqual(srv._actual_profile_role(), "author")
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=REVIEWER_PROFILE)
+    def test_reviewer_profile_role_is_reviewer(self, _profile):
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = "author"
+        self.assertEqual(srv._actual_profile_role(), "reviewer")
+
+
+class TestBranchesOnlyExemptionRealRole(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#274 branches-only exemption keys off the actual profile role (#540)."""
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = None
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=RECONCILER_PROFILE)
+    def test_reconciler_exempt_despite_author_task_stamp(self, _profile):
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = "author"  # poison
+        # Must return without raising and without resolving an author worktree.
+        with patch("gitea_mcp_server._resolve_namespace_mutation_context") as ctx:
+            srv._enforce_branches_only_author_mutation()
+            ctx.assert_not_called()
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=AUTHOR_PROFILE)
+    def test_author_not_exempt(self, _profile):
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = "author"
+        sentinel = RuntimeError("author-mutation-guard-reached")
+
+        def _blow_up(*_a, **_k):
+            raise sentinel
+
+        # Author is not exempt: the guard proceeds to resolve/assess the
+        # workspace (proven by reaching the patched context resolver).
+        with patch(
+            "gitea_mcp_server._resolve_namespace_mutation_context",
+            side_effect=_blow_up,
+        ):
+            with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as raised:
+                srv._enforce_branches_only_author_mutation()
+        self.assertIs(raised.exception, sentinel)
+
+
+class TestRootCheckoutGuardRealRole(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#475 root guard honours the actual profile role too (#540)."""
+
+    def _assess(self, **kwargs):
+        defaults = {
+            "workspace_path": CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT,
+            "canonical_repo_root": CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT,
+            "current_branch": "feat/some-branch",
+            "head_sha": OTHER_SHA,
+            "porcelain_status": " M gitea_mcp_server.py\n",
+            "remote_master_sha": MASTER_SHA,
+            "resolved_role": "author",  # poisoned task role
+        }
+        defaults.update(kwargs)
+        return rcg.assess_root_checkout_guard(**defaults)
+
+    def test_actual_reconciler_exempt_despite_poisoned_resolved_author(self):
+        result = self._assess(actual_role="reconciler")
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_actual_author_still_blocked_on_contaminated_root(self):
+        result = self._assess(actual_role="author")
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_merger_strictness_stays_keyed_on_resolved_task_role(self):
+        # When the merge task resolves the merger role, the branches/ auto
+        # exemption is denied and a clean control checkout is required.
+        blocked = self._assess(
+            workspace_path=f"{CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT}/branches/review-pr-1",
+            current_branch="review-pr-1",
+            porcelain_status="",
+            head_sha=OTHER_SHA,
+            resolved_role="merger",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(blocked["block"])
+
+    def test_actual_merger_does_not_over_tighten_non_merge_task(self):
+        # A merger profile whose current task did NOT resolve to merger keeps
+        # the branches/ workspace exemption (regression guard for #540): the
+        # actual_role signal must not force merger strictness here.
+        result = self._assess(
+            workspace_path=f"{CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT}/branches/review-pr-1",
+            current_branch="review-pr-1",
+            porcelain_status="",
+            head_sha=OTHER_SHA,
+            resolved_role="reviewer",
+            actual_role="merger",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_backward_compatible_without_actual_role(self):
+        # No actual_role supplied: behaviour falls back to resolved_role.
+        result = self._assess(resolved_role="reconciler")
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+
+class TestReconcilerCommentThroughCanonicalPath(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Integration: reconciler comment survives the poisoned author task role."""
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        srv._preflight_whoami_called = True
+        srv._preflight_capability_called = True
+        srv._preflight_whoami_violation = False
+        srv._preflight_capability_violation = False
+        srv._preflight_capability_baseline_porcelain = ""
+        self._orig_in_test = srv._preflight_in_test_mode
+        srv._preflight_in_test_mode = lambda: False
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        srv._preflight_in_test_mode = self._orig_in_test
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = None
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._get_workspace_porcelain", return_value="")
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._auth", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.api_request")
+    @patch(
+        "gitea_mcp_server.root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha",
+        return_value=MASTER_SHA,
+    )
+    @patch(
+        "gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+        return_value={
+            "current_branch": "master",
+            "head_sha": MASTER_SHA,
+            "porcelain_status": "",
+        },
+    )
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=RECONCILER_PROFILE)
+    def test_reconciler_comment_from_control_checkout_succeeds(
+        self, _profile, _git, _remote_sha, mock_api, _auth, _porcelain
+    ):
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = "author"  # comment_issue poison
+        mock_api.return_value = {"id": 9001, "html_url": "https://x/y"}
+        with patch.object(srv, "PROJECT_ROOT", CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT):
+            with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=False):
+                os.environ.pop("GITEA_AUTHOR_WORKTREE", None)
+                os.environ.pop("GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE", None)
+                os.environ.pop("GITEA_RECONCILER_WORKTREE", None)
+                result = srv.gitea_create_issue_comment(
+                    515, "canonical reconciler audit", remote="prgs"
+                )
+        self.assertTrue(result["success"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["comment_id"], 9001)
+        mock_api.assert_called_once()
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._get_workspace_porcelain", return_value="")
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._auth", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.api_request")
+    @patch(
+        "gitea_mcp_server.root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha",
+        return_value=MASTER_SHA,
+    )
+    @patch(
+        "gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+        return_value={
+            "current_branch": "master",
+            "head_sha": MASTER_SHA,
+            "porcelain_status": "",
+        },
+    )
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.get_profile", return_value=AUTHOR_PROFILE)
+    def test_author_comment_from_control_checkout_blocked(
+        self, _profile, _git, _remote_sha, mock_api, _auth, _porcelain
+    ):
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = "author"
+        with patch.object(srv, "PROJECT_ROOT", CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT):
+            with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=False):
+                os.environ.pop("GITEA_AUTHOR_WORKTREE", None)
+                os.environ.pop("GITEA_ACTIVE_WORKTREE", None)
+                with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError):
+                    srv.gitea_create_issue_comment(
+                        515, "author note", remote="prgs"
+                    )
+        mock_api.assert_not_called()
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_issue_comment_workspace_guard.py

@@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
+import os
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import gitea_mcp_server as srv
+
+
+FAKE_AUTH = {"Authorization": "token test-token"}
+CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT = str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[3])
+
+
+class TestIssueCommentWorkspaceGuard(unittest.TestCase):
+    AUTHOR_ENV = {
+        "GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-author",
+        "GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "gitea.read,gitea.issue.comment",
+    }
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        srv._preflight_whoami_called = True
+        srv._preflight_capability_called = True
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = "author"
+        srv._preflight_resolved_task = "comment_issue"
+        srv._preflight_whoami_violation = False
+        srv._preflight_capability_violation = False
+        srv._preflight_reviewer_violation_files = []
+
+        self._orig_in_test = srv._preflight_in_test_mode
+        srv._preflight_in_test_mode = lambda: False
+        self.addCleanup(self._restore_preflight_mode)
+
+    def _restore_preflight_mode(self):
+        srv._preflight_in_test_mode = self._orig_in_test
+
+    def _git_state(self, valid_worktree: str):
+        def side_effect(path):
+            real = os.path.realpath(path)
+            if real == os.path.realpath(CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT):
+                return {
+                    "current_branch": "master",
+                    "head_sha": "a" * 40,
+                    "porcelain_status": "",
+                }
+            if real == os.path.realpath(valid_worktree):
+                return {
+                    "current_branch": "fix/issue-560-issue-comment-worktree-path",
+                    "head_sha": "b" * 40,
+                    "porcelain_status": "",
+                }
+            return {
+                "current_branch": "other",
+                "head_sha": "c" * 40,
+                "porcelain_status": "",
+            }
+
+        return side_effect
+
+    def _subprocess(self, valid_worktree: str, outside_worktree: str | None = None):
+        def side_effect(cmd, *args, **kwargs):
+            result = MagicMock(returncode=0, stdout="")
+            cwd = ""
+            if isinstance(cmd, list) and "-C" in cmd:
+                cwd = os.path.realpath(cmd[cmd.index("-C") + 1])
+
+            if isinstance(cmd, list) and "--show-toplevel" in cmd:
+                if cwd == os.path.realpath(valid_worktree):
+                    result.stdout = f"{valid_worktree}\n"
+                elif outside_worktree and cwd == os.path.realpath(outside_worktree):
+                    result.stdout = f"{outside_worktree}\n"
+                else:
+                    result.stdout = f"{CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT}\n"
+                return result
+
+            if isinstance(cmd, list) and "--git-common-dir" in cmd:
+                if cwd == os.path.realpath(valid_worktree):
+                    result.stdout = f"{CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT}/.git\n"
+                elif outside_worktree and cwd == os.path.realpath(outside_worktree):
+                    result.stdout = "/tmp/other-repo/.git\n"
+                else:
+                    result.stdout = f"{CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT}/.git\n"
+                return result
+
+            return result
+
+        return side_effect
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._auth", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.api_request")
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha", return_value="a" * 40)
+    def test_comment_rejects_control_checkout_without_worktree_path(
+        self, _remote_sha, mock_api, _auth
+    ):
+        valid_worktree = os.path.join(
+            CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT,
+            "branches",
+            "issue-560-issue-comment-worktree-path",
+        )
+        mock_api.return_value = {"id": 42}
+        with patch.object(srv, "PROJECT_ROOT", CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT):
+            with patch(
+                "gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+                side_effect=self._git_state(valid_worktree),
+            ):
+                with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+                    srv.gitea_create_issue_comment(
+                        issue_number=557,
+                        body="canonical evidence",
+                        remote="prgs",
+                    )
+        self.assertIn("stable control checkout", str(ctx.exception))
+        mock_api.assert_not_called()
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._auth", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.api_request")
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha", return_value="a" * 40)
+    @patch("os.path.isdir", return_value=True)
+    @patch("os.path.exists", return_value=True)
+    def test_comment_accepts_valid_branches_worktree_path_with_explicit_repo(
+        self, _exists, _isdir, _remote_sha, mock_api, _auth
+    ):
+        valid_worktree = os.path.join(
+            CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT,
+            "branches",
+            "issue-560-issue-comment-worktree-path",
+        )
+        mock_api.return_value = {"id": 43}
+        with patch.object(srv, "PROJECT_ROOT", CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT):
+            with patch("gitea_mcp_server._get_workspace_porcelain", return_value=""):
+                with patch(
+                    "gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+                    side_effect=self._git_state(valid_worktree),
+                ):
+                    with patch(
+                        "gitea_mcp_server.subprocess.run",
+                        side_effect=self._subprocess(valid_worktree),
+                    ):
+                        with patch.dict(os.environ, self.AUTHOR_ENV, clear=True):
+                            result = srv.gitea_create_issue_comment(
+                                issue_number=557,
+                                body="canonical evidence",
+                                remote="prgs",
+                                org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+                                repo="Gitea-Tools",
+                                worktree_path=valid_worktree,
+                            )
+
+        self.assertTrue(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["performed"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["comment_id"], 43)
+        method, url, _auth_arg, payload = mock_api.call_args[0]
+        self.assertEqual(method, "POST")
+        self.assertIn("/repos/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools/issues/557/comments", url)
+        self.assertEqual(payload, {"body": "canonical evidence"})
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._auth", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.api_request")
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha", return_value="a" * 40)
+    @patch("os.path.isdir", return_value=True)
+    @patch("os.path.exists", return_value=True)
+    def test_comment_rejects_outside_repo_worktree_path(
+        self, _exists, _isdir, _remote_sha, mock_api, _auth
+    ):
+        valid_worktree = os.path.join(
+            CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT,
+            "branches",
+            "issue-560-issue-comment-worktree-path",
+        )
+        outside_worktree = "/tmp/not-gitea-tools-worktree"
+        with patch.object(srv, "PROJECT_ROOT", CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT):
+            with patch("gitea_mcp_server._get_workspace_porcelain", return_value=""):
+                with patch(
+                    "gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+                    side_effect=self._git_state(valid_worktree),
+                ):
+                    with patch(
+                        "gitea_mcp_server.subprocess.run",
+                        side_effect=self._subprocess(valid_worktree, outside_worktree),
+                    ):
+                        with patch.dict(os.environ, self.AUTHOR_ENV, clear=True):
+                            with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+                                srv.gitea_create_issue_comment(
+                                    issue_number=557,
+                                    body="canonical evidence",
+                                    remote="prgs",
+                                    worktree_path=outside_worktree,
+                                )
+        self.assertIn("does not belong to the target repository", str(ctx.exception))
+        mock_api.assert_not_called()
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._auth", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.api_request")
+    def test_comment_still_requires_capability_preflight(self, mock_api, _auth):
+        srv._preflight_capability_called = False
+        with patch.object(srv, "PROJECT_ROOT", CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT):
+            with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+                srv.gitea_create_issue_comment(
+                    issue_number=557,
+                    body="canonical evidence",
+                    remote="prgs",
+                    worktree_path=os.path.join(
+                        CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT,
+                        "branches",
+                        "issue-560-issue-comment-worktree-path",
+                    ),
+                )
+        self.assertIn("Task capability", str(ctx.exception))
+        mock_api.assert_not_called()
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._auth", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.api_request")
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha", return_value="a" * 40)
+    @patch("os.path.isdir", return_value=True)
+    @patch("os.path.exists", return_value=True)
+    def test_comment_still_requires_issue_comment_permission(
+        self, _exists, _isdir, _remote_sha, mock_api, _auth
+    ):
+        valid_worktree = os.path.join(
+            CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT,
+            "branches",
+            "issue-560-issue-comment-worktree-path",
+        )
+        denied_env = {
+            "GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-author",
+            "GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "gitea.read,gitea.pr.comment",
+        }
+        with patch.object(srv, "PROJECT_ROOT", CONTROL_CHECKOUT_ROOT):
+            with patch("gitea_mcp_server._get_workspace_porcelain", return_value=""):
+                with patch(
+                    "gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+                    side_effect=self._git_state(valid_worktree),
+                ):
+                    with patch(
+                        "gitea_mcp_server.subprocess.run",
+                        side_effect=self._subprocess(valid_worktree),
+                    ):
+                        with patch.dict(os.environ, denied_env, clear=True):
+                            result = srv.gitea_create_issue_comment(
+                                issue_number=557,
+                                body="canonical evidence",
+                                remote="prgs",
+                                worktree_path=valid_worktree,
+                            )
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["performed"])
+        self.assertIn("permission_report", result)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            result["permission_report"]["missing_permission"],
+            "gitea.issue.comment",
+        )
+        mock_api.assert_not_called()
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_mcp_menu_script.py

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+"""Hermetic tests for repository-root MCP operator menu (#478)."""
+import os
+import stat
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
+SCRIPT = REPO_ROOT / "mcp-menu.sh"
+DOCS = REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "mcp-menu.md"
+
+REQUIRED_MENU_LABELS = (
+    "Project status / root checkout health",
+    "Author workflow prompts",
+    "Reviewer workflow prompts",
+    "Merger workflow prompts",
+    "Reconciler workflow prompts",
+    "Onboarding new project to this MCP workflow",
+    "Proxmox deployment menu placeholder",
+    "Create Proxmox LXC placeholder",
+    "Run tests",
+    "Exit",
+)
+
+DANGEROUS_PATTERNS = (
+    "git push --force",
+    "git push -f",
+    "--force-with-lease",
+    "delete-branch",
+    "gitea_delete_branch",
+    "issue-locks",
+    "issue_lock_store",
+    "curl ",
+    "wget ",
+)
+
+
+class TestMcpMenuScript(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        self.assertTrue(SCRIPT.is_file(), "mcp-menu.sh must exist at repo root")
+        self.content = SCRIPT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+
+    def test_script_exists_at_repo_root(self):
+        self.assertEqual(SCRIPT.name, "mcp-menu.sh")
+        self.assertEqual(SCRIPT.parent, REPO_ROOT)
+
+    def test_executable_bit_is_set(self):
+        mode = SCRIPT.stat().st_mode
+        self.assertTrue(mode & stat.S_IXUSR, "mcp-menu.sh must be executable by owner")
+
+    def test_shebang(self):
+        first_line = self.content.splitlines()[0]
+        self.assertEqual(first_line, "#!/usr/bin/env bash")
+
+    def test_uses_set_euo_pipefail(self):
+        self.assertIn("set -euo pipefail", self.content)
+
+    def test_no_dangerous_commands(self):
+        lowered = self.content.lower()
+        for pattern in DANGEROUS_PATTERNS:
+            with self.subTest(pattern=pattern):
+                self.assertNotIn(pattern.lower(), lowered)
+
+    def test_no_branch_deletion_verbs(self):
+        for token in ("git branch -D", "git branch -d", "push :refs"):
+            with self.subTest(token=token):
+                self.assertNotIn(token, self.content)
+
+    def test_contains_required_menu_labels(self):
+        for label in REQUIRED_MENU_LABELS:
+            with self.subTest(label=label):
+                self.assertIn(label, self.content)
+
+    def test_run_tests_prefers_run_tests_sh(self):
+        self.assertIn('run-tests.sh', self.content)
+        run_tests_idx = self.content.index("run_tests()")
+        run_tests_body = self.content[run_tests_idx : run_tests_idx + 800]
+        pytest_idx = run_tests_body.find("pytest")
+        run_tests_sh_idx = run_tests_body.find("run-tests.sh")
+        self.assertGreater(pytest_idx, 0)
+        self.assertGreater(run_tests_sh_idx, 0)
+        self.assertLess(run_tests_sh_idx, pytest_idx)
+
+    def test_run_tests_fail_closed_without_runner(self):
+        self.assertIn("fail closed", self.content.lower())
+        self.assertIn("exit 1", self.content)
+
+    def test_proxmox_entries_are_placeholders(self):
+        self.assertIn("TODO / issue-backed", self.content)
+        self.assertIn("NOT implemented", self.content)
+
+    def test_root_health_shows_required_fields(self):
+        health_fn = self._extract_function("show_root_checkout_health")
+        for snippet in (
+            "status --short --branch",
+            "rev-parse HEAD",
+            "prgs/master",
+            "WARNING: root checkout",
+        ):
+            with self.subTest(snippet=snippet):
+                self.assertIn(snippet, health_fn)
+
+    def test_docs_mention_mcp_menu_sh(self):
+        self.assertTrue(DOCS.is_file(), "docs/mcp-menu.md must exist")
+        docs_text = DOCS.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        self.assertIn("./mcp-menu.sh", docs_text)
+        self.assertIn("placeholder", docs_text.lower())
+
+    def _extract_function(self, name: str) -> str:
+        marker = f"{name}() {{"
+        start = self.content.index(marker)
+        depth = 0
+        for idx in range(start, len(self.content)):
+            char = self.content[idx]
+            if char == "{":
+                depth += 1
+            elif char == "}":
+                depth -= 1
+                if depth == 0:
+                    return self.content[start : idx + 1]
+        self.fail(f"Could not parse function {name}")
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_mcp_native_cleanup_proof.py

@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
+"""Tests for MCP-native post-merge cleanup proof (#517)."""
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from final_report_validator import assess_final_report_validator  # noqa: E402
+from mcp_native_cleanup_proof import (  # noqa: E402
+    assess_authorized_reconciler_cleanup_path,
+    assess_mcp_native_cleanup_proof,
+    assess_merger_cleanup_handoff_guidance,
+    assess_raw_branch_delete_report,
+    assess_raw_comment_delete_report,
+)
+
+
+def _authorized_cleanup_report(**overrides):
+    fields = {
+        "Merge mutations": "gitea_merge_pr on PR #100",
+        "Cleanup mutations": (
+            "gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups deleted remote branch; "
+            "gitea_cleanup_post_merge_moot_lease released lease"
+        ),
+        "Reconciler capability": "prgs-reconciler / gitea.branch.delete resolved",
+        "Next actor": "reconciler session complete",
+    }
+    fields.update(overrides)
+    lines = ["## Controller Handoff", ""]
+    lines.extend(f"- {key}: {value}" for key, value in fields.items())
+    return "\n".join(lines)
+
+
+class TestRawBranchDeleteBlocked(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_git_branch_d_blocked(self):
+        report = "Cleanup mutations: git branch -d feat/issue-1-x"
+        result = assess_raw_branch_delete_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertIn("git branch -d", result["commands"][0])
+
+    def test_git_push_delete_in_ledger_blocked(self):
+        report = "- Git ref mutations: git push origin --delete feat/x"
+        result = assess_raw_branch_delete_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_narrative_git_push_delete_not_blocked(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Validation",
+            "Workflow §28B forbids raw git push --delete for cleanup.",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: none",
+            "- Git ref mutations: none",
+            "- Worktree mutations: none",
+        ])
+        result = assess_raw_branch_delete_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_authorized_mcp_path_passes(self):
+        report = _authorized_cleanup_report()
+        result = assess_raw_branch_delete_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestRawCommentDeleteBlocked(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_curl_delete_comment_in_ledger_blocked(self):
+        report = (
+            "- Cleanup mutations: curl -X DELETE https://gitea.example/api/v1/repos/o/r/"
+            "issues/9/comments/42"
+        )
+        result = assess_raw_comment_delete_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_narrative_comment_delete_not_blocked(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Files reviewed: post_merge_cleanup_proof.py (raw comment delete patterns)",
+            "Validation note: never use delete_issue_comment for lease cleanup.",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: none",
+            "- Git ref mutations: none",
+            "- Worktree mutations: none",
+        ])
+        result = assess_raw_comment_delete_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_delete_issue_comment_helper_in_ledger_blocked(self):
+        report = "- Cleanup mutations: delete_issue_comment purged lease comments"
+        result = assess_raw_comment_delete_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_moot_lease_append_only_passes(self):
+        report = _authorized_cleanup_report()
+        result = assess_raw_comment_delete_report(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestAuthorizedReconcilerPath(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_cleanup_without_mcp_tool_blocked(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: removed branch manually after merge",
+            "- Reconciler capability: prgs-reconciler",
+        ])
+        result = assess_authorized_reconciler_cleanup_path(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("authorized MCP" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_authorized_cleanup_succeeds(self):
+        result = assess_authorized_reconciler_cleanup_path(_authorized_cleanup_report())
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_git_ref_cleanup_without_mcp_tool_blocked(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: none",
+            "- Git ref mutations: git branch -D feat/issue-517-test",
+            "- Reconciler capability: prgs-reconciler",
+        ])
+        result = assess_authorized_reconciler_cleanup_path(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("Git ref mutations cleanup must name" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_worktree_cleanup_without_mcp_tool_blocked(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: none",
+            "- Worktree mutations: git worktree remove branches/review-pr542",
+            "- Reconciler capability: prgs-reconciler",
+        ])
+        result = assess_authorized_reconciler_cleanup_path(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("Worktree mutations cleanup must name" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_git_fetch_in_git_ref_mutations_not_cleanup_claim(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: none",
+            "- Git ref mutations: git fetch prgs master",
+        ])
+        result = assess_authorized_reconciler_cleanup_path(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestMergerHandoffGuidance(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_merger_cleanup_without_handoff_blocked(self):
+        report = "Merger deleted remote branch and removed worktree after merge"
+        result = assess_merger_cleanup_handoff_guidance(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+    def test_merger_cleanup_with_reconciler_handoff_passes(self):
+        report = (
+            "Merger deleted remote branch; next actor: reconciler for worktree audit"
+        )
+        result = assess_merger_cleanup_handoff_guidance(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestCompositeVerifier(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_full_authorized_report_passes(self):
+        result = assess_mcp_native_cleanup_proof(_authorized_cleanup_report())
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_raw_bypasses_fail_composite(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Merge mutations: gitea_merge_pr",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: git branch -D feat/x; curl -X DELETE .../comments/1",
+        ])
+        result = assess_mcp_native_cleanup_proof(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertGreaterEqual(len(result["reasons"]), 2)
+
+    def test_narrative_cleanup_mentions_pass_when_ledgers_none(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Review summary",
+            "Validated workflow §28B MCP-native cleanup guidance.",
+            "Files reviewed describe raw git branch -d and delete_issue_comment blocks.",
+            "",
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: none",
+            "- Git ref mutations: none",
+            "- Worktree mutations: none",
+        ])
+        result = assess_mcp_native_cleanup_proof(report)
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"], result["reasons"])
+
+    def test_git_ref_cleanup_bypass_blocked_in_composite(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: none",
+            "- Git ref mutations: git branch -D feat/issue-517-test",
+            "- Reconciler capability: prgs-reconciler",
+        ])
+        result = assess_mcp_native_cleanup_proof(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("Git ref mutations cleanup must name" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+
+class TestFinalReportValidatorIntegration(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_validator_blocks_raw_branch_delete_in_review_report(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: git branch -d feat/issue-517-test",
+        ])
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
+        rules = {f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"]}
+        self.assertIn("shared.mcp_native_cleanup_proof", rules)
+
+    def test_validator_passes_authorized_cleanup_report(self):
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(_authorized_cleanup_report(), "review_pr")
+        blocked = [f for f in result["findings"] if f.get("severity") == "block"]
+        mcp_blocks = [
+            f for f in blocked if f.get("rule_id") == "shared.mcp_native_cleanup_proof"
+        ]
+        self.assertEqual(mcp_blocks, [])
+
+    def test_validator_passes_narrative_cleanup_mentions_with_none_ledgers(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Review summary",
+            "Workflow §28B documents raw git push --delete and delete_issue_comment blocks.",
+            "",
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: none",
+            "- Git ref mutations: none",
+            "- Worktree mutations: none",
+        ])
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
+        mcp_blocks = [
+            f for f in result["findings"]
+            if f.get("rule_id") == "shared.mcp_native_cleanup_proof"
+            and f.get("severity") == "block"
+        ]
+        self.assertEqual(mcp_blocks, [])
+
+    def test_validator_blocks_git_ref_cleanup_bypass(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "## Controller Handoff",
+            "- Cleanup mutations: none",
+            "- Git ref mutations: git branch -D feat/issue-517-test",
+            "- Reconciler capability: prgs-reconciler",
+        ])
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "reconcile_already_landed")
+        rules = {f["rule_id"] for f in result["findings"] if f.get("severity") == "block"}
+        self.assertIn("shared.mcp_native_cleanup_proof", rules)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_mcp_server.py

@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ def _install_owned_reviewer_lease(
     session_id=_DEFAULT_LEASE_SESSION,
     head_sha="abc123",
 ):
+    import merger_lease_adoption as mla
     import reviewer_pr_lease
 
     reviewer_pr_lease.clear_session_lease()
@@ -135,7 +136,11 @@ def _install_owned_reviewer_lease(
         "session_id": session_id,
         "candidate_head": head_sha,
         "target_branch": "master",
-    })
+        "comment_id": 9001,
+    }, lease_provenance=mla.build_lease_provenance(
+        source=mla.SOURCE_ACQUIRE,
+        comment_id=9001,
+    ))
     return patch(
         "mcp_server._fetch_pr_comments",
         return_value=[
@@ -1069,8 +1074,8 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
                "GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,merge"}
         with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
             r = gitea_merge_pr(
-                pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8),
-                expected_head_sha=new_sha, remote="prgs")
+                pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8), remote="prgs",
+                expected_head_sha=new_sha)
         self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
         self.assertTrue(r.get("approval_visible"))
         self.assertFalse(r.get("approval_at_current_head"))
@@ -3972,3 +3977,167 @@ class TestPreflightVerification(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertIn("worktree_path argument", msg)
         self.assertIn("task_file.py", msg)
         self.assertIn("author namespace", msg)
+
+
+class TestIssue546Deadlock(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        import reviewer_pr_lease
+        import review_workflow_load
+        import mcp_server
+        reviewer_pr_lease.clear_session_lease()
+        review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
+        mcp_server._preflight_capability_called = False
+        mcp_server._preflight_resolved_role = None
+        mcp_server._REVIEW_DECISION_LOCK = None
+
+        self.auth_user_patch = patch("mcp_server._authenticated_username", return_value="reviewer-bot")
+        self.auth_user_patch.start()
+        self.addCleanup(self.auth_user_patch.stop)
+
+        self.verify_purity_patch = patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None)
+        self.verify_purity_patch.start()
+        self.addCleanup(self.verify_purity_patch.stop)
+
+        self.verify_workspace_patch = patch("mcp_server._verify_role_mutation_workspace", return_value="/workspace")
+        self.verify_workspace_patch.start()
+        self.addCleanup(self.verify_workspace_patch.stop)
+
+        self.get_profile_patch = patch("mcp_server.get_profile", return_value={
+            "profile_name": "prgs-reviewer",
+            "allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.comment", "gitea.pr.review", "gitea.pr.approve"],
+            "forbidden_operations": [],
+        })
+        self.get_profile_patch.start()
+        self.addCleanup(self.get_profile_patch.stop)
+
+        self.pr_work_lease_patch = patch(
+            "mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block",
+            return_value=dict(_NO_PR_WORK_LEASE_BLOCK),
+        )
+        self.pr_work_lease_patch.start()
+        self.addCleanup(self.pr_work_lease_patch.stop)
+
+        self.auth_header_patch = patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token test")
+        self.auth_header_patch.start()
+        self.addCleanup(self.auth_header_patch.stop)
+
+    def test_workflow_no_deadlock(self):
+        import mcp_server
+        import reviewer_pr_lease
+
+        # 1. Resolve capability
+        res = mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(task="review_pr", remote="prgs")
+        self.assertTrue(res["allowed_in_current_session"])
+
+        # 2. Load review workflow
+        res = mcp_server.gitea_load_review_workflow()
+        self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+
+        # Mock API requests for lease comments and PR retrieval
+        comments = []
+        def mock_api_side(method, url, auth, data=None):
+            if "/api/v1/user" in url:
+                return {"login": "reviewer-bot"}
+            if "/pulls/" in url:
+                if "/reviews" in url:
+                    if method == "POST":
+                        return {"id": 2001, "state": "APPROVED"}
+                    return [{"id": 2001, "user": {"login": "reviewer-bot"}, "state": "APPROVED", "commit_id": "abc123"}]
+                return {"user": {"login": "author-user"}, "state": "open", "head": {"sha": "abc123"}, "mergeable": True}
+            if "/comments" in url:
+                if method == "POST":
+                    comments.append({"id": 1001, "body": data["body"], "user": {"login": "reviewer-bot"}})
+                    return {"id": 1001}
+                return comments
+            return {}
+
+        with patch("mcp_server.api_request", side_effect=mock_api_side):
+            # 3. Acquire reviewer lease
+            res = mcp_server.gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease(
+                pr_number=550,
+                worktree="/workspace",
+                candidate_head="abc123",
+                remote="prgs",
+            )
+            self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+            self.assertEqual(res["comment_id"], 1001)
+
+            # verify lease is recorded in session
+            session_lease = reviewer_pr_lease.get_session_lease()
+            self.assertIsNotNone(session_lease)
+            self.assertEqual(session_lease["pr_number"], 550)
+
+            # 4. Resolve capability again (simulating subsequent tool call preflight check/token refresh)
+            # This should NOT clear the session lease or decision lock!
+            mcp_server._preflight_capability_called = False  # simulate clearance from prior mutation
+            res = mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(task="review_pr", remote="prgs")
+            self.assertTrue(res["allowed_in_current_session"])
+            self.assertIsNotNone(reviewer_pr_lease.get_session_lease()) # Preserved!
+
+            # 5. Mark final review decision APPROVED
+            res = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
+                pr_number=550,
+                action="approve",
+                expected_head_sha="abc123",
+                remote="prgs",
+            )
+            self.assertTrue(res["marked_ready"])
+
+            # 6. Submit review (should succeed without deadlock)
+            res = mcp_server.gitea_submit_pr_review(
+                pr_number=550,
+                action="approve",
+                body="APPROVED",
+                expected_head_sha="abc123",
+                final_review_decision_ready=True,
+                remote="prgs",
+                worktree_path="/workspace",
+            )
+            self.assertTrue(res["performed"])
+
+    def test_release_reviewer_pr_lease(self):
+        import mcp_server
+        import reviewer_pr_lease
+
+        # Resolve capability and load workflow
+        mcp_server.gitea_resolve_task_capability(task="review_pr", remote="prgs")
+        mcp_server.gitea_load_review_workflow()
+
+        comments = [_reviewer_lease_comment(550, session_id=_DEFAULT_LEASE_SESSION, head_sha="abc123")]
+        posted_comments = []
+
+        def mock_api_side(method, url, auth, data=None):
+            if "/api/v1/user" in url:
+                return {"login": "reviewer-bot"}
+            if "/pulls/" in url:
+                return {"user": {"login": "author-user"}, "state": "open", "head": {"sha": "abc123"}, "mergeable": True}
+            if "/comments" in url:
+                if method == "POST":
+                    new_c = {"id": 1002, "body": data["body"], "user": {"login": "reviewer-bot"}}
+                    comments.append(new_c)
+                    posted_comments.append(new_c)
+                    return {"id": 1002}
+                return comments
+            return {}
+
+        # Set session lease in memory
+        import merger_lease_adoption as mla
+        reviewer_pr_lease.record_session_lease({
+            "pr_number": 550,
+            "session_id": _DEFAULT_LEASE_SESSION,
+            "candidate_head": "abc123",
+            "target_branch": "master",
+            "comment_id": 9001,
+        }, lease_provenance=mla.build_lease_provenance(source=mla.SOURCE_ACQUIRE, comment_id=9001))
+
+        with patch("mcp_server.api_request", side_effect=mock_api_side):
+            # Release lease
+            res = mcp_server.gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease(pr_number=550, remote="prgs")
+            self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+            self.assertTrue(res["released"])
+            self.assertEqual(res["comment_id"], 1002)
+
+            # verify lease is cleared in session
+            self.assertIsNone(reviewer_pr_lease.get_session_lease())
+            # verify comment phase is released
+            self.assertIn("phase: released", posted_comments[0]["body"])

tests/test_merger_lease_adoption.py

@@ -0,0 +1,431 @@
+"""Merger lease adoption / recovery (#536)."""
+
+import os
+import sys
+import unittest
+from datetime import datetime, timezone
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import merger_lease_adoption as mla
+import reviewer_pr_lease as leases
+
+
+def _lease_comment(
+    pr_number: int,
+    session_id: str,
+    *,
+    phase: str = "claimed",
+    profile: str = "prgs-reviewer",
+    identity: str = "sysadmin",
+    candidate_head: str = "a" * 40,
+    comment_id: int = 100,
+) -> dict:
+    body = leases.format_lease_body(
+        repo="Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
+        pr_number=pr_number,
+        issue_number=536,
+        reviewer_identity=identity,
+        profile=profile,
+        session_id=session_id,
+        worktree="branches/review-pr536",
+        phase=phase,
+        candidate_head=candidate_head,
+        target_branch="master",
+        target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
+        last_activity=datetime.now(timezone.utc),
+    )
+    return {"id": comment_id, "body": body, "user": {"login": identity}}
+
+
+HEAD = "f" * 40
+
+
+class TestSanctionedProvenance(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        leases.clear_session_lease()
+
+    def test_manual_session_seed_rejected_by_mutation_gate(self):
+        comments = [_lease_comment(536, "reviewer-session", candidate_head=HEAD)]
+        leases.record_session_lease({
+            "pr_number": 536,
+            "session_id": "merger-session",
+            "candidate_head": HEAD,
+            "comment_id": 999,
+        })
+        result = leases.assess_mutation_lease_gate(
+            pr_number=536,
+            comments=comments,
+            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            session_id="merger-session",
+            mutation="merge",
+            live_head_sha=HEAD,
+            pinned_head_sha=HEAD,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("sanctioned provenance" in r for r in result["reasons"])
+        )
+
+    def test_sanctioned_acquire_provenance_allows_mutation(self):
+        comments = [_lease_comment(536, "my-session", candidate_head=HEAD)]
+        leases.record_session_lease(
+            {
+                "pr_number": 536,
+                "session_id": "my-session",
+                "candidate_head": HEAD,
+                "comment_id": 101,
+            },
+            lease_provenance=mla.build_lease_provenance(
+                source=mla.SOURCE_ACQUIRE,
+                comment_id=101,
+            ),
+        )
+        result = leases.assess_mutation_lease_gate(
+            pr_number=536,
+            comments=comments,
+            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            session_id="my-session",
+            mutation="merge",
+            live_head_sha=HEAD,
+            pinned_head_sha=HEAD,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestAdoptAssessment(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_adopt_allowed_for_merger_with_reviewer_lease_and_approval(self):
+        comments = [_lease_comment(536, "reviewer-sess", candidate_head=HEAD)]
+        result = mla.assess_adopt_merger_lease(
+            comments,
+            pr_number=536,
+            adopter_identity="sysadmin",
+            adopter_profile="prgs-merger",
+            adopter_session_id="merger-sess",
+            repo="Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
+            issue_number=536,
+            worktree="branches/merge-pr536",
+            expected_head_sha=HEAD,
+            live_head_sha=HEAD,
+            approval_at_head=True,
+            pr_open=True,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["adopt_allowed"])
+        self.assertIn(mla.ADOPTION_MARKER, result["adoption_body"])
+        self.assertIn("adopted_from_session_id: reviewer-sess", result["adoption_body"])
+
+    def test_adopt_blocked_without_approval(self):
+        comments = [_lease_comment(536, "reviewer-sess", candidate_head=HEAD)]
+        result = mla.assess_adopt_merger_lease(
+            comments,
+            pr_number=536,
+            adopter_identity="sysadmin",
+            adopter_profile="prgs-merger",
+            adopter_session_id="merger-sess",
+            repo="Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
+            issue_number=536,
+            worktree="branches/merge-pr536",
+            expected_head_sha=HEAD,
+            live_head_sha=HEAD,
+            approval_at_head=False,
+            pr_open=True,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["adopt_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("APPROVED" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_adopt_blocked_for_non_merger_profile(self):
+        comments = [_lease_comment(536, "reviewer-sess", candidate_head=HEAD)]
+        result = mla.assess_adopt_merger_lease(
+            comments,
+            pr_number=536,
+            adopter_identity="sysadmin",
+            adopter_profile="prgs-reviewer",
+            adopter_session_id="merger-sess",
+            repo="Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
+            issue_number=536,
+            worktree="branches/review-pr536",
+            expected_head_sha=HEAD,
+            live_head_sha=HEAD,
+            approval_at_head=True,
+            pr_open=True,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["adopt_allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("merger profile" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_adopt_blocked_when_pr_not_open(self):
+        comments = [_lease_comment(536, "reviewer-sess", candidate_head=HEAD)]
+        result = mla.assess_adopt_merger_lease(
+            comments,
+            pr_number=536,
+            adopter_identity="sysadmin",
+            adopter_profile="prgs-merger",
+            adopter_session_id="merger-sess",
+            repo="Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
+            issue_number=536,
+            worktree="branches/merge-pr536",
+            expected_head_sha=HEAD,
+            live_head_sha=HEAD,
+            approval_at_head=True,
+            pr_open=False,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["adopt_allowed"])
+
+
+class TestMergerHandoffMutationGate(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        leases.clear_session_lease()
+
+    def test_cross_session_merge_blocked_without_adoption_comment(self):
+        reviewer_comment = _lease_comment(536, "reviewer-sess", candidate_head=HEAD)
+        provenance = mla.build_lease_provenance(
+            source=mla.SOURCE_ADOPT,
+            comment_id=7001,
+            adopted_from_session_id="reviewer-sess",
+        )
+        leases.record_session_lease(
+            {
+                "pr_number": 536,
+                "session_id": "merger-sess",
+                "candidate_head": HEAD,
+                "comment_id": 7001,
+                "phase": "adopted",
+            },
+            lease_provenance=provenance,
+        )
+        result = leases.assess_mutation_lease_gate(
+            pr_number=536,
+            comments=[reviewer_comment],
+            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            session_id="merger-sess",
+            mutation="merge",
+            live_head_sha=HEAD,
+            pinned_head_sha=HEAD,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("owned by session_id=reviewer-sess" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_cross_session_merge_allowed_after_adoption_comment(self):
+        reviewer_comment = _lease_comment(536, "reviewer-sess", candidate_head=HEAD)
+        adoption_body = mla.format_adoption_body(
+            repo="Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
+            pr_number=536,
+            issue_number=536,
+            adopter_identity="sysadmin",
+            adopter_profile="prgs-merger",
+            adopter_session_id="merger-sess",
+            worktree="branches/merge-pr536",
+            candidate_head=HEAD,
+            target_branch="master",
+            target_branch_sha="b" * 40,
+            adopted_from_session_id="reviewer-sess",
+            adopted_from_profile="prgs-reviewer",
+            adopted_from_reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            adopted_from_comment_id=100,
+        )
+        adoption_comment = {
+            "id": 7001,
+            "body": adoption_body,
+            "user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
+        }
+        provenance = mla.build_lease_provenance(
+            source=mla.SOURCE_ADOPT,
+            comment_id=7001,
+            adopted_from_session_id="reviewer-sess",
+        )
+        leases.record_session_lease(
+            {
+                "pr_number": 536,
+                "session_id": "merger-sess",
+                "candidate_head": HEAD,
+                "comment_id": 7001,
+                "phase": "adopted",
+            },
+            lease_provenance=provenance,
+        )
+        result = leases.assess_mutation_lease_gate(
+            pr_number=536,
+            comments=[reviewer_comment, adoption_comment],
+            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            session_id="merger-sess",
+            mutation="merge",
+            live_head_sha=HEAD,
+            pinned_head_sha=HEAD,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestAdoptTool(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        leases.clear_session_lease()
+        # Patch only the role workspace verifier (which internally does the single
+        # verify_preflight_purity); the direct duplicate call was removed to prevent
+        # capability state clearing. See fix for #548.
+        patch("mcp_server._verify_role_mutation_workspace", return_value=None).start()
+        patch("gitea_audit.audit_enabled", return_value=False).start()
+        mcp_server = __import__("mcp_server")
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+        mcp_server.init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "adopt_merger_pr_lease")
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("whoami")
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check(
+            "capability", "reviewer", resolved_task="adopt_merger_pr_lease"
+        )
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        patch.stopall()
+        leases.clear_session_lease()
+
+    @patch("mcp_server._authenticated_username", return_value="sysadmin")
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="Basic dGVzdDp0ZXN0")
+    @patch("mcp_server.get_profile")
+    @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
+    def test_adopt_tool_posts_proof_and_records_sanctioned_session(
+        self, mock_api, mock_profile, _mock_auth, _mock_user
+    ):
+        mock_profile.return_value = {
+            "profile_name": "prgs-merger",
+            "allowed_operations": [
+                "gitea.read",
+                "gitea.pr.comment",
+                "gitea.pr.merge",
+            ],
+            "forbidden_operations": [],
+        }
+        reviewer_comment = _lease_comment(536, "reviewer-sess", candidate_head=HEAD)
+        posted_bodies: list[str] = []
+
+        def _side(method, url, auth=None, payload=None, *a, **k):
+            m = (method or "").upper()
+            if m == "POST":
+                if payload and payload.get("body"):
+                    posted_bodies.append(payload["body"])
+                return {"id": 7001}
+            if "/pulls/" in url and "/files" not in url:
+                return {
+                    "state": "open",
+                    "number": 536,
+                    "head": {"sha": HEAD},
+                    "merged": False,
+                }
+            if "/reviews" in url:
+                return []
+            if "/comments" in url:
+                return [reviewer_comment]
+            return {}
+
+        mock_api.side_effect = _side
+        from mcp_server import gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease
+
+        with patch.object(
+            __import__("mcp_server"),
+            "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
+            return_value={
+                "approval_at_current_head": True,
+                "latest_approved_head_sha": HEAD,
+            },
+        ):
+            with patch.dict(
+                os.environ,
+                {
+                    "GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "prgs-merger",
+                    "GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "gitea.read,gitea.pr.comment,gitea.pr.merge",
+                },
+                clear=True,
+            ):
+                result = gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease(
+                    pr_number=536,
+                    worktree="branches/merge-pr536",
+                    expected_head_sha=HEAD,
+                    issue_number=536,
+                    remote="prgs",
+                )
+        self.assertTrue(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["adopted"])
+        self.assertEqual(result["adopted_from_session_id"], "reviewer-sess")
+        self.assertEqual(result["adoption_comment_id"], 7001)
+        self.assertEqual(len(posted_bodies), 1)
+        self.assertIn(mla.ADOPTION_MARKER, posted_bodies[0])
+
+        session = leases.get_session_lease()
+        self.assertTrue(mla.is_sanctioned_session_lease(session))
+
+        adoption_comment = {
+            "id": 7001,
+            "body": posted_bodies[0],
+            "user": {"login": "sysadmin"},
+        }
+        gate = leases.assess_mutation_lease_gate(
+            pr_number=536,
+            comments=[reviewer_comment, adoption_comment],
+            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
+            session_id=result["session_id"],
+            mutation="merge",
+            live_head_sha=HEAD,
+            pinned_head_sha=HEAD,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(gate["block"])
+
+    def test_adopt_preserves_preflight_capability_state_no_duplicate_clear(self):
+        """Prove fix for #548: adopt calls _verify (single purity) and does not
+        trigger duplicate verify that would clear capability state, avoiding
+        need for temp local patches or raw fallbacks.
+        """
+        from unittest.mock import patch, MagicMock
+        import mcp_server as mcp_server_mod
+
+        # fresh preflight state (as controller/reconciler would have from resolve)
+        mcp_server_mod.record_preflight_check("whoami")
+        mcp_server_mod.record_preflight_check(
+            "capability", "merger", resolved_task="adopt_merger_pr_lease"
+        )
+        initial_cap_called = mcp_server_mod._preflight_capability_called
+
+        verify_patch = patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", wraps=mcp_server_mod.verify_preflight_purity)
+        def _role_side(*a, **k):
+            # simulate the real _verify which calls verify once with path
+            mcp_server_mod.verify_preflight_purity(k.get("remote") or a[0] if a else None, worktree_path=k.get("worktree") or "branches/work", task=k.get("task"))
+            return "branches/work"
+        role_patch = patch("mcp_server._verify_role_mutation_workspace", side_effect=_role_side)
+        with verify_patch as vmock, role_patch, \
+             patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token test"), \
+             patch("mcp_server._authenticated_username", return_value="sysadmin"):
+            # minimal mocks to let adopt reach end without full api
+            with patch("mcp_server.get_profile") as gp:
+                gp.return_value = {
+                    "profile_name": "prgs-merger",
+                    "allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.comment", "gitea.pr.merge"],
+                    "forbidden_operations": [],
+                }
+                with patch("mcp_server.api_request") as api:
+                    def _side(url, *a, **k):
+                        if "/pulls/" in str(url) and "/comments" not in str(url):
+                            return {"state": "open", "head": {"sha": "deadbeef"*5}, "merged": False, "number": 999}
+                        if "/comments" in str(url):
+                            return []  # list of comments for fetch
+                        return {"id": 42}
+                    api.side_effect = _side
+                    with patch("mcp_server.gitea_get_pr_review_feedback", return_value={"approval_at_current_head": True}):
+                        with patch("merger_lease_adoption.assess_adopt_merger_lease", return_value={
+                            "adopt_allowed": True,
+                            "active_lease": {"session_id": "rev", "profile": "prgs-reviewer", "reviewer_identity": "sysadmin", "issue_number": 548, "target_branch": "master"},
+                            "adoption_body": "<!-- mcp-review-lease-adoption:v1 --> adopted",
+                        }):
+                            res = mcp_server_mod.gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease(
+                                pr_number=999,
+                                worktree="branches/merge-test",
+                                expected_head_sha="deadbeef"*5,
+                                issue_number=548,
+                                remote="prgs",
+                            )
+        self.assertTrue(res.get("success"))
+        # verify_preflight_purity should have been invoked exactly once (via the _verify_role path)
+        # not twice (old dup would have cleared state mid-way, requiring temp patches)
+        self.assertEqual(vmock.call_count, 1)
+        # capability state management: the single verify consumes (clears) as designed;
+        # prior state was valid, no unexpected clear between "checks" or hidden reset
+        # (the removed dup line was the source of the #548 clearing bug)
+        self.assertTrue(initial_cap_called)
+        # final may be set by other records in flow, but key is single invocation and success without bypasses
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_permission_reports.py

@@ -95,8 +95,12 @@ class PermissionReportBase(unittest.TestCase):
         self._dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
         self.config_path = os.path.join(self._dir.name, "profiles.json")
         self._write_config(CONFIG)
+        import review_workflow_load
+        review_workflow_load.record_review_workflow_load(mcp_server.PROJECT_ROOT)
 
     def tearDown(self):
+        import review_workflow_load
+        review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
         self._remotes.stop()
         mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
         mcp_server.review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()

tests/test_pr_lease_comments_non_list_guard.py

@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ class TestPrLeaseCommentsNonListGuard(unittest.TestCase):
         result = _list_pr_lease_comments(
             12, remote="prgs", host=None, org=None, repo=None)
         self.assertEqual(result, [])
+        # Single comments GET only — no pre-flight PR lookup (#519 isolation).
+        mock_api.assert_called_once()
+        _method, url, _auth_arg = mock_api.call_args[0][:3]
+        self.assertIn("/issues/12/comments", url)
+        self.assertNotIn("/pulls/", url)
 
     @patch("mcp_server.api_request")
     @patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
@@ -73,4 +78,4 @@ class TestPrLeaseCommentsNonListGuard(unittest.TestCase):
 
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
-    unittest.main()
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_remote_repo_guard.py

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+"""Regression coverage for the remote/repo mismatch guard (#530).
+
+Bare ``remote=prgs`` historically resolved to ``Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Timesheet``
+(the hardcoded ``REMOTES`` default) instead of ``Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools``,
+which is what the local git remote actually points at. That silent mismatch caused
+false 404s and risked mutating the wrong repository. The guard fails closed when the
+MCP-resolved org/repo disagrees with the local git remote URL and the caller did not
+pass explicit ``org``/``repo``.
+"""
+
+import os
+import unittest
+from unittest import mock
+
+import remote_repo_guard
+
+
+LOCAL_GITEA_TOOLS_URL = "https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools.git"
+
+
+class TestAssessRemoteRepoMatch(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_explicit_org_and_repo_skips_guard(self):
+        # Caller supplied both org and repo explicitly: never block, even on mismatch.
+        assessment = remote_repo_guard.assess_remote_repo_match(
+            remote="prgs",
+            resolved_org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+            resolved_repo="Timesheet",
+            local_remote_url=LOCAL_GITEA_TOOLS_URL,
+            org_explicit=True,
+            repo_explicit=True,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(assessment["block"])
+        self.assertEqual(assessment["reasons"], [])
+
+    def test_missing_local_remote_url_skips_guard(self):
+        # Best-effort lookup: no local remote URL (non-checkout usage) => do not block.
+        assessment = remote_repo_guard.assess_remote_repo_match(
+            remote="prgs",
+            resolved_org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+            resolved_repo="Timesheet",
+            local_remote_url=None,
+            org_explicit=False,
+            repo_explicit=False,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(assessment["block"])
+
+    def test_matching_repo_is_proven(self):
+        assessment = remote_repo_guard.assess_remote_repo_match(
+            remote="prgs",
+            resolved_org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+            resolved_repo="Gitea-Tools",
+            local_remote_url=LOCAL_GITEA_TOOLS_URL,
+            org_explicit=False,
+            repo_explicit=False,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(assessment["block"])
+
+    def test_regression_prgs_default_timesheet_vs_local_gitea_tools(self):
+        # The exact #530 scenario: default repo Timesheet, local remote Gitea-Tools.
+        assessment = remote_repo_guard.assess_remote_repo_match(
+            remote="prgs",
+            resolved_org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+            resolved_repo="Timesheet",
+            local_remote_url=LOCAL_GITEA_TOOLS_URL,
+            org_explicit=False,
+            repo_explicit=False,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(assessment["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["block"])
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["reasons"])
+        self.assertEqual(assessment["resolved_repo"], "Timesheet")
+        self.assertEqual(assessment["resolved_org"], "Scaled-Tech-Consulting")
+
+    def test_only_org_explicit_still_checks_repo(self):
+        # Repo left as default => still guarded even if org was explicit.
+        assessment = remote_repo_guard.assess_remote_repo_match(
+            remote="prgs",
+            resolved_org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+            resolved_repo="Timesheet",
+            local_remote_url=LOCAL_GITEA_TOOLS_URL,
+            org_explicit=True,
+            repo_explicit=False,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["block"])
+
+    def test_case_insensitive_match(self):
+        assessment = remote_repo_guard.assess_remote_repo_match(
+            remote="prgs",
+            resolved_org="scaled-tech-consulting",
+            resolved_repo="gitea-tools",
+            local_remote_url=LOCAL_GITEA_TOOLS_URL,
+            org_explicit=False,
+            repo_explicit=False,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(assessment["proven"])
+
+    def test_format_error_mentions_resolved_and_local(self):
+        assessment = remote_repo_guard.assess_remote_repo_match(
+            remote="prgs",
+            resolved_org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+            resolved_repo="Timesheet",
+            local_remote_url=LOCAL_GITEA_TOOLS_URL,
+            org_explicit=False,
+            repo_explicit=False,
+        )
+        message = remote_repo_guard.format_remote_repo_guard_error(assessment)
+        self.assertIn("Timesheet", message)
+        self.assertIn("Gitea-Tools", message)
+        self.assertIn("org=", message)
+        self.assertIn("repo=", message)
+
+
+class TestResolveServerWiring(unittest.TestCase):
+    """The guard is wired into gitea_mcp_server._resolve, so every read/lookup/
+    mutation tool that resolves a target fails closed on a repo mismatch.
+
+    Under pytest the guard is bypassed unless GITEA_FORCE_REMOTE_REPO_CHECK is set,
+    so these tests set the force flag and patch the local remote lookup + REMOTES.
+    """
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        import gitea_mcp_server
+
+        self.server = gitea_mcp_server
+
+        force = mock.patch.dict(
+            os.environ, {"GITEA_FORCE_REMOTE_REPO_CHECK": "1"}, clear=False
+        )
+        force.start()
+        self.addCleanup(force.stop)
+
+        url_patch = mock.patch.object(
+            gitea_mcp_server,
+            "_local_git_remote_url",
+            return_value=LOCAL_GITEA_TOOLS_URL,
+        )
+        url_patch.start()
+        self.addCleanup(url_patch.stop)
+
+    def _set_prgs_default_repo(self, repo):
+        original = dict(self.server.REMOTES["prgs"])
+        self.addCleanup(self.server.REMOTES.__setitem__, "prgs", original)
+        self.server.REMOTES["prgs"] = {**original, "repo": repo}
+
+    def test_resolve_blocks_on_default_repo_mismatch(self):
+        self._set_prgs_default_repo("Timesheet")
+        with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+            self.server._resolve("prgs", None, None, None)
+        self.assertIn("Timesheet", str(ctx.exception))
+        self.assertIn("Gitea-Tools", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_resolve_allows_explicit_org_and_repo(self):
+        self._set_prgs_default_repo("Timesheet")
+        # Explicit org/repo is authoritative even if it does not match local remote.
+        host, org, repo = self.server._resolve(
+            "prgs", None, "Scaled-Tech-Consulting", "Timesheet"
+        )
+        self.assertEqual((org, repo), ("Scaled-Tech-Consulting", "Timesheet"))
+
+    def test_resolve_allows_matching_default(self):
+        self._set_prgs_default_repo("Gitea-Tools")
+        host, org, repo = self.server._resolve("prgs", None, None, None)
+        self.assertEqual((org, repo), ("Scaled-Tech-Consulting", "Gitea-Tools"))
+
+    def test_lookup_tool_cannot_silently_query_different_repo(self):
+        # gitea_view_issue resolves the target via _resolve first, so a bare
+        # remote=prgs pointing at the wrong default repo fails closed before any
+        # API call is made.
+        self._set_prgs_default_repo("Timesheet")
+        with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError):
+            self.server.gitea_view_issue(issue_number=1, remote="prgs")
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_review_workflow_boundary.py

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+"""Tests for workflow-load session boundary tracking (#403)."""
+
+import os
+import sys
+import unittest
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import final_report_validator
+import review_workflow_boundary
+import review_workflow_load
+import mcp_server
+
+
+class TestPreReviewClassification(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        review_workflow_boundary.clear_pre_review_commands()
+        review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
+
+    def test_inventory_command_allowed(self):
+        result = review_workflow_boundary.classify_pre_review_command(
+            "gitea_list_prs remote=prgs",
+            cwd="/tmp",
+            project_root="/repo/Gitea-Tools",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            result["classification"],
+            review_workflow_boundary.CLASSIFICATION_READ_ONLY_INVENTORY,
+        )
+
+    def test_main_checkout_pytest_is_boundary_violation(self):
+        root = "/repo/Gitea-Tools"
+        result = review_workflow_boundary.classify_pre_review_command(
+            "python -m pytest tests/",
+            cwd=root,
+            project_root=root,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            result["classification"],
+            review_workflow_boundary.CLASSIFICATION_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION,
+        )
+
+    def test_profiles_json_inspection_is_boundary_violation(self):
+        result = review_workflow_boundary.classify_pre_review_command(
+            "cat profiles.json",
+            cwd="/repo/Gitea-Tools",
+            project_root="/repo/Gitea-Tools",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            result["classification"],
+            review_workflow_boundary.CLASSIFICATION_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION,
+        )
+
+
+class TestWorkflowLoadBoundaryGate(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        review_workflow_boundary.clear_pre_review_commands()
+        review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
+        mcp_server.init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("whoami")
+        mcp_server.record_preflight_check("capability", "reviewer")
+
+    def _root(self) -> str:
+        return str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent)
+
+    def test_boundary_violation_blocks_mutation_after_load(self):
+        root = self._root()
+        review_workflow_boundary.record_pre_review_command(
+            "python -m pytest tests/",
+            cwd=root,
+            project_root=root,
+        )
+        res = mcp_server.gitea_load_review_workflow()
+        self.assertFalse(res["success"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["boundary_status"], "violation")
+        blocked = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
+            42, "approve", remote="prgs")
+        self.assertFalse(blocked["marked_ready"])
+        joined = " ".join(blocked["reasons"]).lower()
+        self.assertTrue(
+            "validation" in joined or "boundary" in joined or "workflow" in joined
+        )
+
+    def test_clean_inventory_then_load_passes(self):
+        root = self._root()
+        review_workflow_boundary.record_pre_review_command(
+            "gitea_list_prs remote=prgs",
+            cwd=root,
+            project_root=root,
+        )
+        res = mcp_server.gitea_load_review_workflow()
+        self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["boundary_status"], "clean")
+        blockers = review_workflow_load.review_workflow_load_blockers(root)
+        self.assertEqual(blockers, [])
+
+    def test_file_view_narrative_fails_validator_without_helper(self):
+        report = (
+            "## Controller Handoff\n"
+            "- Task: review-merge-pr\n"
+            "- I read the canonical workflow review-merge-pr.md before review.\n"
+        )
+        findings = final_report_validator.assess_final_report_validator(
+            report,
+            task_kind="review_pr",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(any(
+            f["rule_id"] == "reviewer.workflow_load_boundary"
+            for f in findings.get("findings") or []
+        ))
+
+    def test_helper_result_passes_validator(self):
+        root = self._root()
+        review_workflow_load.record_review_workflow_load(root)
+        helper = review_workflow_boundary.workflow_load_helper_result(
+            review_workflow_load._REVIEW_WORKFLOW_LOAD,
+            root,
+        )
+        report = (
+            "## Controller Handoff\n"
+            "- Task: review-merge-pr\n"
+            f"- Workflow-load helper result: workflow_hash: {helper['workflow_hash']}; "
+            f"boundary_status: {helper['boundary_status']}\n"
+        )
+        findings = final_report_validator.assess_final_report_validator(
+            report,
+            task_kind="review_pr",
+        )
+        boundary_findings = [
+            f for f in (findings.get("findings") or [])
+            if f.get("rule_id") == "reviewer.workflow_load_boundary"
+        ]
+        self.assertEqual(boundary_findings, [])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_mutation_capability_proof.py

@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+"""Tests for exact per-mutation capability proof in reviewer reports (#405)."""
+
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from reviewer_mutation_capability_proof import assess_mutation_capability_proof
+from review_proofs import assess_mutation_capability_proof as proofs_assess
+from final_report_validator import assess_final_report_validator
+
+
+REVIEW_ONLY = """
+Review decision: approved
+Mutation capability table:
+- gitea_submit_pr_review | review_pr (gitea.pr.review) | submitted | resolved before review
+"""
+
+MERGE_PROVEN = """
+Review decision: approved
+Merge result: merged 0123456789ab
+Mutation capability table:
+- gitea_submit_pr_review | review_pr (gitea.pr.review) | submitted | before review
+- gitea_merge_pr | merge_pr (gitea.pr.merge) | merged | resolved before merge
+"""
+
+MERGE_AND_DELETE_PROVEN = """
+Review decision: approved
+Merge result: merged 0123456789ab
+Remote branch deleted: feat/issue-x
+Mutation capability table:
+- gitea_submit_pr_review | review_pr (gitea.pr.review) | submitted | before review
+- gitea_merge_pr | merge_pr (gitea.pr.merge) | merged | before merge
+- gitea_delete_branch | delete_branch (gitea.branch.delete) | deleted | before delete
+"""
+
+
+class TestModule(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_only_with_capability_passes(self):
+        r = assess_mutation_capability_proof(REVIEW_ONLY)
+        self.assertTrue(r["proven"], r["reasons"])
+
+    def test_merge_with_exact_capability_passes(self):
+        r = assess_mutation_capability_proof(MERGE_PROVEN)
+        self.assertTrue(r["proven"], r["reasons"])
+
+    def test_merge_and_delete_fully_proven_passes(self):
+        r = assess_mutation_capability_proof(MERGE_AND_DELETE_PROVEN)
+        self.assertTrue(r["proven"], r["reasons"])
+
+    def test_review_pr_does_not_authorize_merge(self):
+        report = """
+Review decision: approved
+Merge result: merged 0123456789ab
+Mutation capability table:
+- gitea_submit_pr_review | review_pr (gitea.pr.review) | submitted | before review
+"""
+        r = assess_mutation_capability_proof(report)
+        self.assertFalse(r["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("merge" in x.lower() for x in r["reasons"]), r["reasons"])
+
+    def test_merge_pr_does_not_authorize_branch_deletion(self):
+        report = """
+Review decision: approved
+Merge result: merged 0123456789ab
+Remote branch deleted: feat/issue-x
+Mutation capability table:
+- gitea_submit_pr_review | review_pr (gitea.pr.review) | submitted | before review
+- gitea_merge_pr | merge_pr (gitea.pr.merge) | merged | before merge
+"""
+        r = assess_mutation_capability_proof(report)
+        self.assertFalse(r["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("delet" in x.lower() for x in r["reasons"]), r["reasons"])
+
+    def test_delete_skipped_when_capability_missing_passes(self):
+        report = """
+Review decision: approved
+Merge result: merged 0123456789ab
+Branch deletion: skipped — delete_branch capability not available
+Mutation capability table:
+- gitea_submit_pr_review | review_pr (gitea.pr.review) | submitted | before review
+- gitea_merge_pr | merge_pr (gitea.pr.merge) | merged | before merge
+"""
+        r = assess_mutation_capability_proof(report)
+        self.assertTrue(r["proven"], r["reasons"])
+
+    def test_missing_table_when_merging_blocks(self):
+        report = """
+Review decision: approved
+Merge result: merged 0123456789ab
+merge_pr gitea.pr.merge resolved
+"""
+        r = assess_mutation_capability_proof(report)
+        self.assertFalse(r["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("table" in x.lower() for x in r["reasons"]), r["reasons"])
+
+    def test_post_hoc_proof_blocks(self):
+        report = """
+Review decision: approved
+Merge result: merged 0123456789ab
+Mutation capability table:
+- gitea_merge_pr | merge_pr (gitea.pr.merge) | merged | capability resolved after merge
+"""
+        r = assess_mutation_capability_proof(report)
+        self.assertFalse(r["proven"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("after" in x.lower() for x in r["reasons"]), r["reasons"])
+
+    def test_review_without_capability_blocks(self):
+        report = "Review decision: approved\nreview submitted\n"
+        r = assess_mutation_capability_proof(report)
+        self.assertFalse(r["proven"])
+
+    def test_no_mutation_no_requirement(self):
+        r = assess_mutation_capability_proof("Selected PR: #1\nSkipped, no action.")
+        self.assertTrue(r["proven"], r["reasons"])
+
+
+class TestWiring(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_proofs_wrapper_matches_module(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            proofs_assess(MERGE_PROVEN)["proven"],
+            assess_mutation_capability_proof(MERGE_PROVEN)["proven"],
+        )
+
+    def test_final_report_validator_flags_nearby_capability_merge(self):
+        report = """
+## Controller Handoff
+- Task: review_pr
+Review decision: approved
+Merge result: merged 0123456789ab
+Mutation capability table:
+- gitea_submit_pr_review | review_pr (gitea.pr.review) | submitted | before review
+"""
+        result = assess_final_report_validator(report, "review_pr")
+        rule_ids = [f["rule_id"] for f in result.get("findings", [])]
+        self.assertIn("reviewer.mutation_capability_proof", rule_ids)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_reviewer_pr_lease.py

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ from unittest.mock import patch
 
 sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
 
+import merger_lease_adoption as mla
 import reviewer_pr_lease as leases
 
 
@@ -123,7 +124,11 @@ class TestReviewerLeaseMutationGate(unittest.TestCase):
             "session_id": "my-session",
             "candidate_head": head,
             "target_branch": "master",
-        })
+            "comment_id": 101,
+        }, lease_provenance=mla.build_lease_provenance(
+            source=mla.SOURCE_ACQUIRE,
+            comment_id=101,
+        ))
         result = leases.assess_mutation_lease_gate(
             pr_number=382,
             comments=comments,
@@ -143,7 +148,11 @@ class TestReviewerLeaseMutationGate(unittest.TestCase):
             "pr_number": 382,
             "session_id": "my-session",
             "candidate_head": reviewed,
-        })
+            "comment_id": 102,
+        }, lease_provenance=mla.build_lease_provenance(
+            source=mla.SOURCE_ACQUIRE,
+            comment_id=102,
+        ))
         result = leases.assess_mutation_lease_gate(
             pr_number=382,
             comments=comments,

tests/test_root_checkout_guard.py

@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+"""Tests for root checkout guard (#475)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import sys
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import gitea_mcp_server as srv  # noqa: E402
+import root_checkout_guard as rcg  # noqa: E402
+
+CONTROL_ROOT = str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[3])
+BRANCHES_WORKTREE = str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1])
+MASTER_SHA = "a" * 40
+OTHER_SHA = "b" * 40
+
+
+class TestAssessRootCheckoutGuard(unittest.TestCase):
+    def _assess(self, **kwargs):
+        defaults = {
+            "workspace_path": CONTROL_ROOT,
+            "canonical_repo_root": CONTROL_ROOT,
+            "current_branch": "master",
+            "head_sha": MASTER_SHA,
+            "porcelain_status": "",
+            "remote_master_sha": MASTER_SHA,
+            "resolved_role": "author",
+        }
+        defaults.update(kwargs)
+        return rcg.assess_root_checkout_guard(**defaults)
+
+    def test_clean_master_control_checkout_allowed(self):
+        result = self._assess()
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["block"])
+
+    def test_branches_worktree_allowed_for_author(self):
+        result = self._assess(
+            workspace_path=BRANCHES_WORKTREE,
+            current_branch="feat/issue-475-root-checkout-guard",
+            head_sha=OTHER_SHA,
+            resolved_role="author",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_branches_worktree_allowed_for_reviewer(self):
+        result = self._assess(
+            workspace_path=f"{CONTROL_ROOT}/branches/review-pr-1",
+            current_branch="review-pr-1",
+            resolved_role="reviewer",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_reconciler_always_allowed(self):
+        result = self._assess(
+            current_branch="feat/some-branch",
+            head_sha=OTHER_SHA,
+            porcelain_status=" M gitea_mcp_server.py\n",
+            resolved_role="reconciler",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_feature_branch_on_control_checkout_blocked(self):
+        result = self._assess(
+            current_branch="feat/issue-99-example",
+            head_sha=OTHER_SHA,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertIn("not a stable base branch", result["reasons"][0])
+
+    def test_detached_head_blocked(self):
+        result = self._assess(current_branch=None)
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertIn("detached HEAD", result["reasons"][0])
+
+    def test_dirty_control_checkout_blocked(self):
+        result = self._assess(porcelain_status=" M gitea_mcp_server.py\n")
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertIn("tracked local edits", result["reasons"][0])
+
+    def test_head_behind_prgs_master_blocked(self):
+        result = self._assess(
+            head_sha=OTHER_SHA,
+            remote_master_sha=MASTER_SHA,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+        self.assertIn("does not match prgs/master", result["reasons"][0])
+
+    def test_merger_requires_clean_control_checkout(self):
+        result = self._assess(
+            workspace_path=BRANCHES_WORKTREE,
+            current_branch="feat/issue-475-root-checkout-guard",
+            head_sha=OTHER_SHA,
+            resolved_role="merger",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["block"])
+
+
+class TestVerifyPreflightRootGuardIntegration(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        srv._preflight_whoami_called = True
+        srv._preflight_capability_called = True
+        srv._preflight_resolved_role = "reviewer"
+        srv._preflight_whoami_violation = False
+        srv._preflight_capability_violation = False
+        self._orig_in_test = srv._preflight_in_test_mode
+        srv._preflight_in_test_mode = lambda: False
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        srv._preflight_in_test_mode = self._orig_in_test
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._get_workspace_porcelain", return_value="")
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha", return_value=MASTER_SHA)
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state")
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._resolve_author_mutation_context")
+    def test_reviewer_from_contaminated_root_blocked(
+        self, mock_ctx, mock_git, _remote_sha, _porcelain,
+    ):
+        srv._preflight_capability_baseline_porcelain = ""
+        mock_ctx.return_value = {
+            "workspace_path": CONTROL_ROOT,
+            "canonical_repo_root": CONTROL_ROOT,
+            "process_project_root": CONTROL_ROOT,
+        }
+        mock_git.return_value = {
+            "current_branch": "feat/hijacked-root",
+            "head_sha": OTHER_SHA,
+            "porcelain_status": "",
+        }
+        with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+            srv.verify_preflight_purity("prgs", worktree_path=CONTROL_ROOT)
+        self.assertIn("Root checkout guard (#475)", str(ctx.exception))
+        self.assertIn(rcg.REMEDIATION, str(ctx.exception))
+
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._get_workspace_porcelain", return_value="")
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha", return_value=MASTER_SHA)
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state")
+    @patch("gitea_mcp_server._resolve_author_mutation_context")
+    def test_reviewer_from_branches_worktree_allowed(
+        self, mock_ctx, mock_git, _remote_sha, _porcelain,
+    ):
+        srv._preflight_capability_baseline_porcelain = ""
+        mock_ctx.return_value = {
+            "workspace_path": BRANCHES_WORKTREE,
+            "canonical_repo_root": CONTROL_ROOT,
+            "process_project_root": BRANCHES_WORKTREE,
+        }
+        mock_git.return_value = {
+            "current_branch": "feat/issue-475-root-checkout-guard",
+            "head_sha": OTHER_SHA,
+            "porcelain_status": "",
+        }
+        srv.verify_preflight_purity("prgs", worktree_path=BRANCHES_WORKTREE)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_run_tests_script.py

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+"""Contract checks for the root-level `run-tests.sh` convenience runner (#473).
+
+`run-tests.sh` is the canonical full-validation entry point. It must invoke the
+project virtualenv interpreter, forward extra args to pytest, fail closed when
+the venv Python is missing, and stay repo-local (no network, no lock files).
+These checks pin that behavior so it cannot silently regress, and confirm the
+developer testing guide names the runner.
+"""
+import stat
+from pathlib import Path
+
+REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
+SCRIPT = REPO_ROOT / "run-tests.sh"
+GUIDE = REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "developer-testing-guidelines.md"
+
+
+def _script_text() -> str:
+    return SCRIPT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+
+
+def test_run_tests_script_exists():
+    assert SCRIPT.is_file(), "run-tests.sh must exist at the repository root"
+
+
+def test_run_tests_script_is_executable():
+    mode = SCRIPT.stat().st_mode
+    assert mode & stat.S_IXUSR, "run-tests.sh must be executable (chmod +x)"
+
+
+def test_run_tests_script_has_strict_bash_flags():
+    text = _script_text()
+    assert text.startswith("#!/usr/bin/env bash"), "must use the bash shebang"
+    assert "set -euo pipefail" in text, "must set -euo pipefail"
+
+
+def test_run_tests_script_uses_venv_pytest_and_forwards_args():
+    text = _script_text()
+    # Resolves the venv interpreter relative to the script's own directory.
+    assert "venv/bin/python" in text, "must use the project virtualenv Python"
+    assert "-m pytest" in text, "must run pytest via the module"
+    assert '"$@"' in text, "must forward extra CLI args to pytest"
+
+
+def test_run_tests_script_fails_closed_without_venv():
+    text = _script_text()
+    # Missing venv must be an explicit, non-zero-exit error, not a silent
+    # fallback to the wrong interpreter.
+    assert "if [[ ! -x" in text, "must guard on an executable venv Python"
+    assert "exit 1" in text, "must exit non-zero when the venv is missing"
+    assert "ERROR" in text, "must print a clear error message"
+
+
+def test_run_tests_script_stays_repo_local():
+    text = _script_text()
+    # No network calls, no lock-file writes from the runner itself.
+    for forbidden in ("curl", "wget", "gitea_issue_lock.json"):
+        assert forbidden not in text, f"runner must not reference {forbidden!r}"
+
+
+def test_guide_names_canonical_runner():
+    text = " ".join(GUIDE.read_text(encoding="utf-8").split())
+    assert "./run-tests.sh" in text, "testing guide must name ./run-tests.sh"
+    assert "./run-tests.sh tests/test_mcp_server.py -q" in text, (
+        "testing guide must show the focused-validation example"
+    )

tests/test_terminal_review_hard_stop.py

@@ -36,10 +36,13 @@ def _lock(mutations=None, correction=False):
 
 
 def _seed(mutations=None, correction=False):
+    import review_workflow_load
+    review_workflow_load.record_review_workflow_load(mcp_server.PROJECT_ROOT)
     mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(_lock(mutations, correction))
     mcp_server.gitea_load_review_workflow()
 
 
+
 APPROVED_A = {"pr_number": 5, "action": "approve", "review_id": 1,
               "review_state": "approve"}
 RC_A = {"pr_number": 5, "action": "request_changes", "review_id": 2,
@@ -94,6 +97,8 @@ class TestTerminalHardStopReasons(unittest.TestCase):
 
 class TestMergeHardStopWiring(unittest.TestCase):
     def tearDown(self):
+        import review_workflow_load
+        review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
         mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(None)
         mcp_server.review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
 
@@ -116,6 +121,8 @@ class TestMergeHardStopWiring(unittest.TestCase):
 
 class TestMarkFinalHardStopWiring(unittest.TestCase):
     def tearDown(self):
+        import review_workflow_load
+        review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
         mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(None)
         mcp_server.review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
 
@@ -149,6 +156,8 @@ def _mark(action, pr_number=6, **kwargs):
 
 class TestDuplicateRequestChangesSuppression(unittest.TestCase):
     def tearDown(self):
+        import review_workflow_load
+        review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
         mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(None)
         mcp_server.review_workflow_load.clear_review_workflow_load()
 

tests/test_workspace_guard_alignment.py

@@ -126,17 +126,37 @@ class TestRuntimeContextGuardAlignment(unittest.TestCase):
             with mock.patch.dict("os.environ", {"GITEA_TEST_PORCELAIN": ""}, clear=False):
                 srv.verify_preflight_purity(worktree_path=BRANCHES_WORKTREE)
 
-    def test_stable_checkout_still_rejected(self):
+    @mock.patch("gitea_mcp_server.root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha", return_value="a" * 40)
+    @mock.patch(
+        "gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+        return_value={
+            "current_branch": "master",
+            "head_sha": "a" * 40,
+            "porcelain_status": "",
+        },
+    )
+    def test_stable_checkout_still_rejected(self, _git, _remote_sha):
         with mock.patch.object(srv, "PROJECT_ROOT", CONTROL_ROOT):
             with mock.patch.dict("os.environ", {"GITEA_TEST_PORCELAIN": ""}, clear=False):
                 with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
                     srv.verify_preflight_purity()
         self.assertIn("stable control checkout", str(ctx.exception))
 
+    @mock.patch("gitea_mcp_server.root_checkout_guard.resolve_remote_master_sha", return_value="a" * 40)
+    @mock.patch(
+        "gitea_mcp_server.issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state",
+        return_value={
+            "current_branch": "master",
+            "head_sha": "a" * 40,
+            "porcelain_status": "",
+        },
+    )
     @mock.patch("os.path.isdir", return_value=True)
     @mock.patch("os.path.exists", return_value=True)
     @mock.patch("subprocess.run")
-    def test_non_branches_worktree_rejected(self, mock_run, *_exists):
+    def test_non_branches_worktree_rejected(
+        self, mock_run, mock_exists, mock_isdir, _git, _remote_sha,
+    ):
         outside = "/tmp/outside-repo-checkout"
         mock_run.return_value = MagicMock(
             returncode=0,

tests/test_worktree_cleanup_audit.py

@@ -0,0 +1,532 @@
+"""Tests for session-owned worktree cleanup audit, TTL, and integrity (#401, #404)."""
+
+import sys
+import unittest
+from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import worktree_cleanup_audit as wca  # noqa: E402
+
+
+NOW = datetime(2026, 7, 7, 12, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+
+
+def _iso(dt):
+    return dt.isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
+
+
+class TestWorkflowTypeInference(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_pr_path(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            wca.infer_workflow_type("branches/review-pr376", "review-pr376"),
+            wca.WORKFLOW_REVIEW,
+        )
+
+    def test_baseline_path(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            wca.infer_workflow_type("branches/baseline-master-issue-401"),
+            wca.WORKFLOW_BASELINE,
+        )
+
+    def test_merge_simulation_path(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            wca.infer_workflow_type("branches/merge-sim-pr380"),
+            wca.WORKFLOW_MERGE_SIMULATION,
+        )
+
+    def test_issue_work_branch(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            wca.infer_workflow_type(
+                "branches/issue-401-worktree", "feat/issue-401-worktree"
+            ),
+            wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
+        )
+
+    def test_conflict_fix_path(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            wca.infer_workflow_type("branches/conflict-fix-pr376"),
+            wca.WORKFLOW_CONFLICT_FIX,
+        )
+
+    def test_unknown_path(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            wca.infer_workflow_type("branches/scratchpad"), wca.WORKFLOW_UNKNOWN
+        )
+
+
+class TestMetadata(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_metadata_fields_present(self):
+        meta = wca.build_worktree_metadata(
+            path="branches/issue-401-worktree",
+            branch="feat/issue-401-worktree",
+            head_sha="abc123",
+            creator="jcwalker3",
+            profile="prgs-author",
+            created_at=_iso(NOW),
+            last_used_at=_iso(NOW),
+        )
+        for field in (
+            "path",
+            "workflow_type",
+            "issue_number",
+            "pr_number",
+            "branch",
+            "head_sha",
+            "creator",
+            "profile",
+            "created_at",
+            "last_used_at",
+            "cleanup_eligibility",
+        ):
+            self.assertIn(field, meta)
+        self.assertEqual(meta["issue_number"], 401)
+        self.assertEqual(meta["workflow_type"], wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK)
+
+    def test_review_metadata_auto_removable_flag(self):
+        meta = wca.build_worktree_metadata(path="branches/review-pr42")
+        self.assertTrue(meta["auto_remove_on_success"])
+
+
+class TestTTL(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_expired(self):
+        old = _iso(NOW - timedelta(hours=48))
+        self.assertTrue(wca.is_ttl_expired(last_used_at=old, now=NOW, ttl_hours=24))
+
+    def test_not_expired(self):
+        recent = _iso(NOW - timedelta(hours=1))
+        self.assertFalse(
+            wca.is_ttl_expired(last_used_at=recent, now=NOW, ttl_hours=24)
+        )
+
+    def test_unknown_timestamp_fails_safe(self):
+        self.assertFalse(wca.is_ttl_expired(last_used_at=None, now=NOW))
+        self.assertFalse(
+            wca.is_ttl_expired(last_used_at="not-a-date", now=NOW)
+        )
+
+
+class TestClassification(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_successful_review_cleanup(self):
+        # Scenario 1: clean review worktree -> removable.
+        cls = wca.classify_worktree(
+            workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_REVIEW, is_dirty=False
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE)
+        self.assertTrue(wca.is_removable(cls))
+
+    def test_dirty_worktree_preserved(self):
+        # Scenario 3: dirty worktree is never removable.
+        cls = wca.classify_worktree(
+            workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_REVIEW, is_dirty=True
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_DIRTY_LOCAL)
+        self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
+
+    def test_active_pr_worktree_preserved(self):
+        # Scenario 4: open PR wins over an otherwise-removable review worktree.
+        cls = wca.classify_worktree(
+            workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_REVIEW,
+            is_dirty=False,
+            has_open_pr=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_OPEN_PR)
+        self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
+
+    def test_stale_clean_issue_worktree_removable(self):
+        # Scenario 5: clean issue worktree, TTL expired, no lock -> removable.
+        cls = wca.classify_worktree(
+            workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
+            is_dirty=False,
+            ttl_expired=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE)
+        self.assertTrue(wca.is_removable(cls))
+
+    def test_fresh_clean_issue_worktree_preserved(self):
+        # Clean issue worktree not yet TTL-expired stays active.
+        cls = wca.classify_worktree(
+            workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
+            is_dirty=False,
+            ttl_expired=False,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
+        self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
+
+    def test_detached_review_worktree_classified(self):
+        # Scenario 6: detached review worktree -> detached_review_leftover.
+        cls = wca.classify_worktree(
+            workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_REVIEW,
+            is_dirty=False,
+            is_detached=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_DETACHED_REVIEW_LEFTOVER)
+        self.assertTrue(wca.is_removable(cls))
+
+    def test_ttl_expired_but_dirty_preserved(self):
+        # Scenario 7: dirty wins over TTL expiry.
+        cls = wca.classify_worktree(
+            workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
+            is_dirty=True,
+            ttl_expired=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_DIRTY_LOCAL)
+        self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
+
+    def test_lease_protected_worktree_preserved(self):
+        # Scenario 8: active lease is never removable.
+        cls = wca.classify_worktree(
+            workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_REVIEW,
+            is_dirty=False,
+            has_active_lease=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
+        self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
+
+    def test_active_issue_lock_preserved(self):
+        cls = wca.classify_worktree(
+            workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
+            is_dirty=False,
+            has_active_issue_lock=True,
+            ttl_expired=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
+        self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
+
+    def test_protected_base_worktree_never_removable(self):
+        cls = wca.classify_worktree(
+            workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
+            is_dirty=False,
+            is_protected=True,
+            ttl_expired=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_UNSAFE_UNKNOWN)
+        self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
+
+    def test_unknown_workflow_type_unsafe(self):
+        cls = wca.classify_worktree(
+            workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_UNKNOWN, is_dirty=False, ttl_expired=True
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_UNSAFE_UNKNOWN)
+        self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
+
+
+class TestRemovalDecision(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_safe_removal_proof(self):
+        decision = wca.assess_worktree_removal(
+            path="branches/review-pr42",
+            branch="review-pr42",
+            head_sha="abc123",
+            is_dirty=False,
+            has_open_pr=False,
+            has_active_lease=False,
+            classification=wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE,
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(decision["safe_to_remove"])
+        self.assertEqual(decision["block_reasons"], [])
+        self.assertTrue(decision["clean"])
+        self.assertTrue(decision["no_active_pr"])
+        self.assertTrue(decision["no_active_lease"])
+
+    def test_dirty_blocks_removal(self):
+        decision = wca.assess_worktree_removal(
+            path="branches/review-pr42",
+            branch="review-pr42",
+            head_sha="abc123",
+            is_dirty=True,
+            has_open_pr=False,
+            has_active_lease=False,
+            classification=wca.CLASS_DIRTY_LOCAL,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(decision["safe_to_remove"])
+        self.assertIn("worktree has uncommitted changes", decision["block_reasons"])
+
+    def test_open_pr_and_lease_block_removal(self):
+        decision = wca.assess_worktree_removal(
+            path="branches/review-pr42",
+            branch="review-pr42",
+            head_sha="abc123",
+            is_dirty=False,
+            has_open_pr=True,
+            has_active_lease=True,
+            classification=wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_OPEN_PR,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(decision["safe_to_remove"])
+        self.assertIn("worktree branch has an open PR", decision["block_reasons"])
+        self.assertIn("worktree has an active lease", decision["block_reasons"])
+
+
+class TestSuccessCleanupPlan(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_review_worktree_removed_at_success(self):
+        # Scenario 1 end-to-end: clean review worktree removed at success.
+        meta = wca.build_worktree_metadata(path="branches/review-pr42")
+        plan = wca.plan_success_cleanup(
+            metadata=meta, is_dirty=False, has_open_pr=False, has_active_lease=False
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(plan["remove"])
+
+    def test_failed_review_leaves_worktree_reported(self):
+        # Scenario 2: dirty review worktree preserved and reported at failure.
+        meta = wca.build_worktree_metadata(path="branches/review-pr42")
+        plan = wca.plan_success_cleanup(
+            metadata=meta, is_dirty=True, has_open_pr=False, has_active_lease=False
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(plan["remove"])
+        self.assertIn("uncommitted", plan["reason"])
+        report = wca.cleanup_failure_report(meta["path"], plan["reason"])
+        self.assertFalse(report["removed"])
+        self.assertEqual(report["path"], "branches/review-pr42")
+
+    def test_issue_worktree_preserved_by_policy(self):
+        meta = wca.build_worktree_metadata(
+            path="branches/issue-401-worktree", branch="feat/issue-401-worktree"
+        )
+        plan = wca.plan_success_cleanup(
+            metadata=meta, is_dirty=False, has_open_pr=False, has_active_lease=False
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(plan["remove"])
+        self.assertIn("preserved by policy", plan["reason"])
+
+
+class TestPorcelainParser(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_parse_branch_and_detached(self):
+        text = (
+            "worktree /repo\n"
+            "HEAD 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111\n"
+            "branch refs/heads/master\n"
+            "\n"
+            "worktree /repo/branches/review-pr42\n"
+            "HEAD 2222222222222222222222222222222222222222\n"
+            "detached\n"
+        )
+        entries = wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(text)
+        self.assertEqual(len(entries), 2)
+        self.assertEqual(entries[0]["branch"], "master")
+        self.assertFalse(entries[0]["detached"])
+        self.assertIsNone(entries[1]["branch"])
+        self.assertTrue(entries[1]["detached"])
+
+
+class TestAuditReportAccuracy(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Scenario 9: cleanup report accuracy over a mixed branches/ directory."""
+
+    PORCELAIN = (
+        "worktree /repo\n"
+        "HEAD 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111\n"
+        "branch refs/heads/master\n"
+        "\n"
+        "worktree /repo/branches/review-pr42\n"
+        "HEAD 2222222222222222222222222222222222222222\n"
+        "branch refs/heads/review-pr42\n"
+        "\n"
+        "worktree /repo/branches/issue-400-open-pr\n"
+        "HEAD 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333\n"
+        "branch refs/heads/feat/issue-400-open-pr\n"
+        "\n"
+        "worktree /repo/branches/issue-401-dirty\n"
+        "HEAD 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444\n"
+        "branch refs/heads/feat/issue-401-dirty\n"
+    )
+
+    def _fake_dirty(self, path):
+        if path.endswith("issue-401-dirty"):
+            return {"exists": True, "dirty": True, "dirty_files": [" M x.py"]}
+        return {"exists": True, "dirty": False, "dirty_files": []}
+
+    def test_mixed_directory_classified(self):
+        with patch.object(
+            wca,
+            "list_worktrees",
+            return_value=wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(self.PORCELAIN),
+        ), patch.object(
+            wca, "read_worktree_dirty", side_effect=self._fake_dirty
+        ), patch.object(
+            wca, "git_worktree_list", return_value="(mocked)"
+        ):
+            report = wca.audit_branches_directory(
+                "/repo",
+                open_pr_branches={"feat/issue-400-open-pr"},
+            )
+
+        by_path = {wt["path"]: wt for wt in report["worktrees"]}
+        # main checkout on master -> protected -> unsafe/unknown, not removable
+        self.assertEqual(
+            by_path["/repo"]["classification"], wca.CLASS_UNSAFE_UNKNOWN
+        )
+        # clean review worktree -> removable
+        self.assertEqual(
+            by_path["/repo/branches/review-pr42"]["classification"],
+            wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE,
+        )
+        # open PR branch -> preserved
+        self.assertEqual(
+            by_path["/repo/branches/issue-400-open-pr"]["classification"],
+            wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_OPEN_PR,
+        )
+        # dirty worktree -> preserved
+        self.assertEqual(
+            by_path["/repo/branches/issue-401-dirty"]["classification"],
+            wca.CLASS_DIRTY_LOCAL,
+        )
+        # exactly one removable candidate (the clean review worktree)
+        self.assertEqual(report["removable_count"], 1)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            report["removable_candidates"][0]["path"],
+            "/repo/branches/review-pr42",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(report["total"], 4)
+        self.assertEqual(report["git_worktree_list"], "(mocked)")
+
+
+def _integrity_entry(
+    path: str,
+    *,
+    classification: str,
+    registered: bool = True,
+    preserve: bool | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    preserve_flag = preserve if preserve is not None else classification in {
+        "active_open_pr",
+        "active_issue_work",
+        "dirty_local_worktree",
+        "unsafe_unknown",
+    }
+    return {
+        "path": path,
+        "classification": classification,
+        "preserve": preserve_flag,
+        "registered_worktree": registered,
+        "worktree_state": {"exists": True, "clean": classification == "clean_stale_removable"},
+        "worktree_record": {"branch": "feat/x"} if registered else None,
+    }
+
+
+def _integrity_snapshot(entries: list[dict]) -> dict:
+    return {"entries": entries}
+
+
+class TestParseWorktreePorcelain(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_parses_multiple_worktrees(self):
+        text = "\n".join([
+            "worktree /proj/branches/foo",
+            "HEAD abcdef0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef0",
+            "branch refs/heads/feat/foo",
+            "",
+            "worktree /proj",
+            "HEAD 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111",
+            "branch refs/heads/master",
+        ])
+        parsed = wca.parse_worktree_list_porcelain(text)
+        self.assertEqual(len(parsed), 2)
+        self.assertEqual(parsed[0]["branch"], "feat/foo")
+
+
+class TestClassifyEntry(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_active_pr_classification(self):
+        result = wca.classify_branches_entry(
+            rel_path="branches/feat-issue-1-x",
+            worktree_record={"branch": "feat/issue-1-x"},
+            worktree_state={"exists": True, "clean": True, "dirty_files": []},
+            open_pr_branches={"feat/issue-1-x"},
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result, "active_open_pr")
+
+    def test_dirty_classification(self):
+        result = wca.classify_branches_entry(
+            rel_path="branches/dirty-one",
+            worktree_record={"branch": "feat/dirty-one"},
+            worktree_state={"exists": True, "dirty_files": ["a.py"]},
+            open_pr_branches=set(),
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result, "dirty_local_worktree")
+
+
+class TestCleanupIntegrity(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_preserved_worktree_remains(self):
+        path = "branches/keep-me"
+        before = _integrity_snapshot([
+            _integrity_entry(path, classification="clean_stale_removable", preserve=False),
+        ])
+        after = _integrity_snapshot([
+            _integrity_entry(path, classification="clean_stale_removable", preserve=False),
+        ])
+        result = wca.assess_worktree_cleanup_integrity(before=before, after=after)
+        self.assertTrue(result["integrity_passed"])
+
+    def test_intentional_removal_passes(self):
+        path = "branches/remove-me"
+        before = _integrity_snapshot([
+            _integrity_entry(path, classification="clean_stale_removable", preserve=False),
+        ])
+        after = _integrity_snapshot([])
+        result = wca.assess_worktree_cleanup_integrity(
+            before=before,
+            after=after,
+            removals=[{
+                "path": path,
+                "method": "git worktree remove",
+                "pre_removal_proof": "clean status",
+            }],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["integrity_passed"])
+
+    def test_dirty_worktree_disappears_fails(self):
+        path = "branches/dirty-wt"
+        before = _integrity_snapshot([_integrity_entry(path, classification="dirty_local_worktree")])
+        after = _integrity_snapshot([])
+        recon = wca.reconcile_cleanup_audit(before, after)
+        result = wca.assess_cleanup_audit_integrity(recon)
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_active_pr_worktree_disappears_fails(self):
+        path = "branches/review-pr99"
+        before = _integrity_snapshot([_integrity_entry(path, classification="active_open_pr")])
+        after = _integrity_snapshot([])
+        result = wca.assess_worktree_cleanup_integrity(before=before, after=after)
+        self.assertFalse(result["integrity_passed"])
+
+    def test_explained_missing_allowed(self):
+        path = "branches/review-pr382"
+        before = _integrity_snapshot([
+            _integrity_entry(path, classification="detached_review_leftover", preserve=False),
+        ])
+        after = _integrity_snapshot([])
+        result = wca.assess_worktree_cleanup_integrity(
+            before=before,
+            after=after,
+            explained_missing={path: "removed concurrently by sibling session"},
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(result["integrity_passed"])
+
+    def test_removal_log_omits_clean_stale_fails(self):
+        path = "branches/a"
+        before = _integrity_snapshot([
+            _integrity_entry(path, classification="clean_stale_removable", preserve=False),
+        ])
+        after = _integrity_snapshot([])
+        recon = wca.reconcile_cleanup_audit(before, after, removal_log=[])
+        self.assertFalse(recon["removal_log_complete"])
+
+
+class TestCleanupReportProof(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_complete_report_passes(self):
+        report = "\n".join([
+            "Cleanup audit reconciliation table:",
+            "Initial count: 10",
+            "Removed count: 3",
+            "Preserved count: 7",
+            "Missing-unexplained count: 0",
+            "Final count: 7",
+            "Final verification: git worktree list proof attached",
+        ])
+        result = wca.assess_cleanup_audit_final_report(report)
+        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
+
+    def test_incomplete_report_fails(self):
+        result = wca.assess_cleanup_audit_final_report("removed some worktrees")
+        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()