fix(scope): wire author bootstrap scope into workflow scope guard (Closes #941)
PR #926 (#892) taught create_issue_bootstrap.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout to accept task_scope=author_issue_bootstrap and wired that canonical decision into the #274 branches-only enforcer and the #604 anti-stomp preflight. A third enforcement path was left unwired. workflow_scope_guard kept its own copy of the clean-root author decision, gated on create_issue_bootstrap.is_create_issue_task -- a task-name allowlist that never contained bootstrap_author_issue_worktree. The real call path gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree -> verify_preflight_purity -> _enforce_issue_scope_guard -> workflow_scope_guard.assess_production_mutation_guards therefore raised ProductionGuardError(missing_issue_worktree) before assess_author_issue_bootstrap was ever consulted, leaving the #892 deadlock partially present and blocking issue #931. Changes: * workflow_scope_guard.assess_root_source_mutation accepts the server-derived bootstrap_assessment and, for the clean-root author case, consults the canonical bootstrap_permits_control_checkout decision instead of a local task-name allowlist. The create_issue arm is unchanged. * workflow_scope_guard.assess_production_mutation_guards forwards the evidence. * _enforce_issue_scope_guard accepts and threads the same assessment the #274 and #604 guards already consume, so all three judge identical evidence, and waives the pre-ownership issue-lock requirement for the bootstrap task via that same canonical decision rather than a second task-name allowlist. * verify_preflight_purity passes the once-computed assessment at both sites. The waiver cannot widen: the predicate fails closed on missing, malformed, cross-scope, dirty, drifted, or wrongly bound evidence, so ordinary author source and test mutation from the control checkout stays forbidden and the #274/#604/#618/#683 protections are unchanged. Regression: tests/test_issue_941_scope_guard_bootstrap_wiring.py drives the real enforcer rather than the authorization helper in isolation, which is why #892's own predicate tests passed while the live bootstrap stayed blocked. Closes #941 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
+32
-1
@@ -1546,6 +1546,7 @@ def verify_preflight_purity(
|
||||
task=task,
|
||||
target_issue_number=target_issue_number,
|
||||
require_author_lock=require_author_lock,
|
||||
bootstrap_assessment=bootstrap_assessment,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# #604: common anti-stomp preflight after legacy + #683 enforcers.
|
||||
_run_anti_stomp_preflight(
|
||||
@@ -1585,6 +1586,7 @@ def verify_preflight_purity(
|
||||
task=task,
|
||||
target_issue_number=target_issue_number,
|
||||
require_author_lock=require_author_lock,
|
||||
bootstrap_assessment=bootstrap_assessment,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if force_anti_stomp:
|
||||
_run_anti_stomp_preflight(
|
||||
@@ -1652,8 +1654,15 @@ def _enforce_issue_scope_guard(
|
||||
task: str | None = None,
|
||||
target_issue_number: int | None = None,
|
||||
require_author_lock: bool = False,
|
||||
bootstrap_assessment: object = _BOOTSTRAP_UNSET,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""#683: fail closed on missing/out-of-scope issue ownership for mutations."""
|
||||
"""#683: fail closed on missing/out-of-scope issue ownership for mutations.
|
||||
|
||||
#941: the shared bootstrap assessment is threaded in so this guard judges
|
||||
the author issue-worktree bootstrap on the same server-derived evidence as
|
||||
the #274 branches-only and #604 anti-stomp guards. Callers that supply
|
||||
none fall back to computing it here, which preserves behaviour.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
ctx = _resolve_namespace_mutation_context(worktree_path)
|
||||
workspace = ctx["workspace_path"]
|
||||
git_state = issue_lock_worktree.read_worktree_git_state(workspace)
|
||||
@@ -1703,11 +1712,32 @@ def _enforce_issue_scope_guard(
|
||||
import create_issue_bootstrap as _cib
|
||||
|
||||
is_create_issue = _cib.is_create_issue_task(task)
|
||||
# #941: consume the caller-computed bootstrap assessment when one was
|
||||
# threaded in, so this guard and the #274/#604 guards judge identical
|
||||
# evidence. Falling back preserves behaviour for callers that supply none.
|
||||
bootstrap = (
|
||||
_create_issue_bootstrap_assessment(task, worktree_path)
|
||||
if bootstrap_assessment is _BOOTSTRAP_UNSET
|
||||
else bootstrap_assessment
|
||||
)
|
||||
# #941: the author issue-worktree bootstrap is pre-ownership for the same
|
||||
# reason create_issue is — it exists to break the lock<->worktree cycle, so
|
||||
# no owning lock can exist yet. The exemption is granted by the canonical
|
||||
# shared decision over server-derived evidence, never by a task-name list,
|
||||
# and fails closed on missing, malformed, cross-scope, dirty, drifted, or
|
||||
# wrongly bound evidence.
|
||||
bootstrap_waives_ownership = _cib.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout(
|
||||
bootstrap,
|
||||
task=task,
|
||||
workspace_path=workspace,
|
||||
canonical_repo_root=ctx["canonical_repo_root"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
require_lock = bool(require_author_lock) or (
|
||||
authorish
|
||||
and workflow_scope_guard.production_guards_forced()
|
||||
and role == "author"
|
||||
and not is_create_issue
|
||||
and not bootstrap_waives_ownership
|
||||
)
|
||||
assessment = workflow_scope_guard.assess_production_mutation_guards(
|
||||
workspace_path=workspace,
|
||||
@@ -1720,6 +1750,7 @@ def _enforce_issue_scope_guard(
|
||||
require_author_lock=require_lock,
|
||||
in_test_mode=_preflight_in_test_mode(),
|
||||
mutation_task=task,
|
||||
bootstrap_assessment=bootstrap,
|
||||
)
|
||||
workflow_scope_guard.raise_if_blocked(assessment)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
|
||||
"""Regression: author bootstrap scope reaches workflow_scope_guard (#941).
|
||||
|
||||
PR #926 (#892) made ``bootstrap_permits_control_checkout`` accept
|
||||
``task_scope=author_issue_bootstrap`` and wired that canonical decision into
|
||||
the #274 branches-only enforcer and the #604 anti-stomp preflight. A third
|
||||
enforcement path was left unwired.
|
||||
|
||||
``workflow_scope_guard.assess_root_source_mutation`` kept its own copy of the
|
||||
clean-root author decision, gated on ``create_issue_bootstrap.is_create_issue_task``
|
||||
— a task-name allowlist that never contained ``bootstrap_author_issue_worktree``.
|
||||
So the real call path
|
||||
|
||||
gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree
|
||||
-> verify_preflight_purity
|
||||
-> _enforce_issue_scope_guard
|
||||
-> workflow_scope_guard.assess_production_mutation_guards
|
||||
|
||||
raised ProductionGuardError(missing_issue_worktree) before
|
||||
``assess_author_issue_bootstrap`` was ever consulted.
|
||||
|
||||
These tests drive the real enforcer, not the authorization helper in
|
||||
isolation. A helper-only test cannot observe this defect: #892's own predicate
|
||||
tests all passed while the live bootstrap stayed blocked.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from unittest import mock
|
||||
|
||||
import author_issue_bootstrap as aib
|
||||
import create_issue_bootstrap as cib
|
||||
import workflow_scope_guard
|
||||
|
||||
BOOTSTRAP_TASK = "bootstrap_author_issue_worktree"
|
||||
BOOTSTRAP_TOOL = "gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _make_control_repo(tmp: str) -> tuple[str, str]:
|
||||
"""Create a clean control checkout on master and return (path, head)."""
|
||||
repo = os.path.join(tmp, "repo")
|
||||
os.makedirs(os.path.join(repo, "branches"))
|
||||
subprocess.check_call(
|
||||
["git", "init", "-b", "master", repo],
|
||||
stdout=subprocess.DEVNULL,
|
||||
stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL,
|
||||
)
|
||||
subprocess.check_call(
|
||||
[
|
||||
"git", "-C", repo,
|
||||
"-c", "user.email=t@t", "-c", "user.name=t",
|
||||
"commit", "--allow-empty", "-m", "init",
|
||||
],
|
||||
stdout=subprocess.DEVNULL,
|
||||
stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL,
|
||||
)
|
||||
head = subprocess.check_output(
|
||||
["git", "-C", repo, "rev-parse", "HEAD"], text=True
|
||||
).strip()
|
||||
return repo, head
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _assessment(
|
||||
repo: str,
|
||||
head: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
task: str = BOOTSTRAP_TASK,
|
||||
porcelain: str = "",
|
||||
remote: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
return aib.assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
|
||||
workspace_path=repo,
|
||||
canonical_repo_root=repo,
|
||||
current_branch="master",
|
||||
head_sha=head,
|
||||
porcelain_status=porcelain,
|
||||
remote_master_sha=head if remote is None else remote,
|
||||
task=task,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _ControlCheckoutHarness(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Drive the real server guard against a temporary clean control checkout."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._tmp.cleanup)
|
||||
self.repo, self.head = _make_control_repo(self._tmp.name)
|
||||
|
||||
# #683 force-on: production guards must execute under pytest.
|
||||
patcher = mock.patch.dict(
|
||||
os.environ,
|
||||
{workflow_scope_guard.FORCE_PRODUCTION_GUARDS_ENV: "1"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
patcher.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(patcher.stop)
|
||||
|
||||
def _enforce(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
task: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
porcelain: str = "",
|
||||
assessment: object = "auto",
|
||||
role_kind: str = "author",
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""Call the real _enforce_issue_scope_guard for *task*."""
|
||||
import gitea_mcp_server as srv
|
||||
|
||||
if assessment == "auto":
|
||||
assessment = _assessment(
|
||||
self.repo, self.head, task=task, porcelain=porcelain
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
ctx = {
|
||||
"workspace_path": self.repo,
|
||||
"canonical_repo_root": self.repo,
|
||||
"workspace_role_kind": role_kind,
|
||||
"workspace_binding_source": "process_project_root",
|
||||
}
|
||||
git_state = {
|
||||
"current_branch": "master",
|
||||
"head_sha": self.head,
|
||||
"porcelain_status": porcelain,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
with mock.patch.object(
|
||||
srv, "_resolve_namespace_mutation_context", return_value=ctx
|
||||
), mock.patch.object(
|
||||
srv.issue_lock_worktree,
|
||||
"read_worktree_git_state",
|
||||
return_value=git_state,
|
||||
), mock.patch.object(
|
||||
srv,
|
||||
"_session_issue_lock_snapshot",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"locked_issue_number": None,
|
||||
"lock_branch_name": None,
|
||||
"worktrees_match": False,
|
||||
},
|
||||
), mock.patch.object(
|
||||
srv, "_actual_profile_role", return_value=role_kind
|
||||
), mock.patch.object(
|
||||
srv, "_effective_workspace_role", return_value=role_kind
|
||||
), mock.patch.object(
|
||||
srv, "_create_issue_bootstrap_assessment", return_value=assessment
|
||||
):
|
||||
srv._enforce_issue_scope_guard(None, task=task)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRealPathBootstrapReachesGuard(_ControlCheckoutHarness):
|
||||
"""The defect and its fix, observed through the real enforcer."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_bootstrap_task_passes_scope_guard_from_clean_control(self):
|
||||
# Pre-fix this raises ProductionGuardError(missing_issue_worktree)
|
||||
# because the guard consulted a task-name allowlist instead of the
|
||||
# canonical authorization decision.
|
||||
self._enforce(BOOTSTRAP_TASK)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_bootstrap_tool_alias_passes_scope_guard(self):
|
||||
self._enforce(BOOTSTRAP_TOOL)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_guard_consults_canonical_predicate(self):
|
||||
"""The guard must reach bootstrap_permits_control_checkout, not a name list."""
|
||||
real = cib.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout
|
||||
seen: list[str | None] = []
|
||||
|
||||
def _spy(assessment, *, task, workspace_path, canonical_repo_root):
|
||||
seen.append(task)
|
||||
return real(
|
||||
assessment,
|
||||
task=task,
|
||||
workspace_path=workspace_path,
|
||||
canonical_repo_root=canonical_repo_root,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
with mock.patch.object(
|
||||
cib, "bootstrap_permits_control_checkout", side_effect=_spy
|
||||
):
|
||||
self._enforce(BOOTSTRAP_TASK)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
BOOTSTRAP_TASK,
|
||||
seen,
|
||||
"workflow_scope_guard did not consult the canonical bootstrap "
|
||||
"authorization decision",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestFailClosedOnBadEvidence(_ControlCheckoutHarness):
|
||||
"""Missing, malformed, or mismatched scope evidence must still block."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _assert_blocked(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(workflow_scope_guard.ProductionGuardError):
|
||||
self._enforce(BOOTSTRAP_TASK, **kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_assessment_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
self._assert_blocked(assessment=None)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_malformed_assessment_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
self._assert_blocked(assessment={"allowed": True})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_dict_assessment_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
self._assert_blocked(assessment="allowed")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_task_scope_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
bad = dict(_assessment(self.repo, self.head))
|
||||
bad["task_scope"] = "create_issue_only"
|
||||
self._assert_blocked(assessment=bad)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_nonempty_reasons_fail_closed(self):
|
||||
bad = dict(_assessment(self.repo, self.head), reasons=["note"])
|
||||
self._assert_blocked(assessment=bad)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mismatched_base_tips_fail_closed(self):
|
||||
bad = dict(_assessment(self.repo, self.head))
|
||||
bad["remote_master_sha"] = "b" * 40
|
||||
self._assert_blocked(assessment=bad)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unverified_base_tips_fail_closed(self):
|
||||
bad = dict(_assessment(self.repo, self.head), base_tips_verified=False)
|
||||
self._assert_blocked(assessment=bad)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mismatched_workspace_binding_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
bad = dict(_assessment(self.repo, self.head))
|
||||
bad["workspace_path"] = os.path.join(self.repo, "elsewhere")
|
||||
self._assert_blocked(assessment=bad)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mismatched_repo_root_binding_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
bad = dict(_assessment(self.repo, self.head))
|
||||
bad["canonical_repo_root"] = os.path.join(self.repo, "other-root")
|
||||
self._assert_blocked(assessment=bad)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_blocked_assessment_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
bad = dict(_assessment(self.repo, self.head), block=True, allowed=False)
|
||||
self._assert_blocked(assessment=bad)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestOrdinaryControlCheckoutMutationStillForbidden(_ControlCheckoutHarness):
|
||||
"""The waiver must not leak to ordinary author work."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ordinary_author_task_still_blocked(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(workflow_scope_guard.ProductionGuardError):
|
||||
self._enforce("commit_files", assessment=None)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_lock_issue_still_blocked_from_control(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(workflow_scope_guard.ProductionGuardError):
|
||||
self._enforce("lock_issue", assessment=None)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_bootstrap_assessment_cannot_license_other_task(self):
|
||||
# Cross-task smuggling: valid bootstrap evidence must not waive a
|
||||
# different author mutation.
|
||||
good = _assessment(self.repo, self.head)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(workflow_scope_guard.ProductionGuardError):
|
||||
self._enforce("commit_files", assessment=good)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dirty_control_checkout_still_blocked_for_bootstrap(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(workflow_scope_guard.ProductionGuardError):
|
||||
self._enforce(BOOTSTRAP_TASK, porcelain=" M gitea_mcp_server.py\n")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestCreateIssueBehaviorUnchanged(_ControlCheckoutHarness):
|
||||
"""#749 create_issue keeps its own sanctioned path."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_create_issue_still_allowed_from_clean_control(self):
|
||||
self._enforce("create_issue", assessment=None)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_create_issue_tool_alias_still_allowed(self):
|
||||
self._enforce("gitea_create_issue", assessment=None)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_create_issue_blocked_when_control_dirty(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(workflow_scope_guard.ProductionGuardError):
|
||||
self._enforce(
|
||||
"create_issue",
|
||||
porcelain=" M gitea_mcp_server.py\n",
|
||||
assessment=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestGuardUnitLevelWiring(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""assess_root_source_mutation itself must accept and honour the evidence."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._tmp.cleanup)
|
||||
self.repo, self.head = _make_control_repo(self._tmp.name)
|
||||
patcher = mock.patch.dict(
|
||||
os.environ,
|
||||
{workflow_scope_guard.FORCE_PRODUCTION_GUARDS_ENV: "1"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
patcher.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(patcher.stop)
|
||||
|
||||
def _assess(self, *, task=BOOTSTRAP_TASK, bootstrap_assessment="auto"):
|
||||
if bootstrap_assessment == "auto":
|
||||
bootstrap_assessment = _assessment(self.repo, self.head, task=task)
|
||||
return workflow_scope_guard.assess_root_source_mutation(
|
||||
workspace_path=self.repo,
|
||||
canonical_repo_root=self.repo,
|
||||
porcelain_status="",
|
||||
current_branch="master",
|
||||
role_kind="author",
|
||||
mutation_task=task,
|
||||
bootstrap_assessment=bootstrap_assessment,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_valid_evidence_unblocks(self):
|
||||
result = self._assess()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["block"])
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(result["blocker_kind"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_absent_evidence_blocks(self):
|
||||
result = self._assess(bootstrap_assessment=None)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["block"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
result["blocker_kind"], workflow_scope_guard.BLOCKER_MISSING_WORKTREE
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reconciler_exemption_preserved(self):
|
||||
result = workflow_scope_guard.assess_root_source_mutation(
|
||||
workspace_path=self.repo,
|
||||
canonical_repo_root=self.repo,
|
||||
porcelain_status="",
|
||||
current_branch="master",
|
||||
role_kind="reconciler",
|
||||
mutation_task=BOOTSTRAP_TASK,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_signature_accepts_evidence_without_it_being_required(self):
|
||||
# Callers that supply no evidence keep the pre-existing behaviour.
|
||||
result = workflow_scope_guard.assess_root_source_mutation(
|
||||
workspace_path=self.repo,
|
||||
canonical_repo_root=self.repo,
|
||||
porcelain_status="",
|
||||
current_branch="master",
|
||||
role_kind="author",
|
||||
mutation_task="create_issue",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
+30
-1
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ def assess_root_source_mutation(
|
||||
locked_issue_number: int | None = None,
|
||||
role_kind: str | None = None,
|
||||
mutation_task: str | None = None,
|
||||
bootstrap_assessment: Any | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Fail closed for diagnostic/source edits on the control/root checkout.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -286,6 +287,13 @@ def assess_root_source_mutation(
|
||||
tracked source/test files on the control checkout always block, including
|
||||
temporary/diagnostic/test-only intent.
|
||||
|
||||
#941: ``bootstrap_author_issue_worktree`` is judged by the canonical
|
||||
``create_issue_bootstrap.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout`` decision over
|
||||
*bootstrap_assessment* — the same server-derived evidence the #274 and
|
||||
#604 guards consume — instead of a task-name allowlist local to this
|
||||
module. Evidence that is absent, malformed, wrongly scoped, or bound to
|
||||
another workspace leaves the ordinary block in force.
|
||||
|
||||
#749: ``create_issue`` is a pure remote mutation with no local tree write.
|
||||
When *mutation_task* is create_issue and the control checkout has no dirty
|
||||
source/test files, the missing-worktree signal is suppressed so the
|
||||
@@ -336,6 +344,19 @@ def assess_root_source_mutation(
|
||||
if _cib is not None and _cib.is_create_issue_task(mutation_task):
|
||||
# #749: clean-root create_issue is the sanctioned bootstrap path.
|
||||
create_issue_bootstrap = True
|
||||
elif _cib is not None and _cib.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout(
|
||||
bootstrap_assessment,
|
||||
task=mutation_task,
|
||||
workspace_path=workspace,
|
||||
canonical_repo_root=root,
|
||||
):
|
||||
# #941: the author issue-worktree bootstrap is authorized by the
|
||||
# canonical shared decision over server-derived task-scope
|
||||
# evidence, never by a task-name allowlist kept in this module.
|
||||
# The predicate fails closed on missing, malformed, cross-scope,
|
||||
# dirty, drifted, or wrongly bound evidence, so this arm cannot
|
||||
# widen the waiver beyond the one sanctioned bootstrap task.
|
||||
create_issue_bootstrap = True
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# Explicit missing-worktree signal for force-on author entrypoints.
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
@@ -393,8 +414,15 @@ def assess_production_mutation_guards(
|
||||
require_author_lock: bool = False,
|
||||
in_test_mode: bool = False,
|
||||
mutation_task: str | None = None,
|
||||
bootstrap_assessment: Any | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Compose root + scope production guards when they must be active (#683)."""
|
||||
"""Compose root + scope production guards when they must be active (#683).
|
||||
|
||||
#941: *bootstrap_assessment* is the server-derived author-bootstrap
|
||||
evidence, forwarded unchanged to :func:`assess_root_source_mutation` so
|
||||
this guard reaches the same canonical decision as the #274 and #604
|
||||
guards. Omitting it preserves the pre-existing behaviour.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not production_guards_active(in_test_mode=in_test_mode):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"proven": True,
|
||||
@@ -414,6 +442,7 @@ def assess_production_mutation_guards(
|
||||
locked_issue_number=locked_issue_number,
|
||||
role_kind=role_kind,
|
||||
mutation_task=mutation_task,
|
||||
bootstrap_assessment=bootstrap_assessment,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if root_assess["block"]:
|
||||
return {**root_assess, "skipped": False}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user