feat(review-workflow): enforce single terminal review decision per review run (#211)
This commit is contained in:
+72
-18
@@ -925,24 +925,17 @@ _REVIEW_ACTIONS = {
|
||||
_TERMINAL_REVIEW_ACTIONS = frozenset({"approve", "request_changes"})
|
||||
|
||||
REVIEW_DECISION_FILE = "/tmp/gitea_review_decision.lock"
|
||||
_REVIEW_DECISION_LOCK: dict | None = None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _load_review_decision_lock():
|
||||
if not os.path.exists(REVIEW_DECISION_FILE):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
with open(REVIEW_DECISION_FILE, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
|
||||
return json.load(f)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
global _REVIEW_DECISION_LOCK
|
||||
return _REVIEW_DECISION_LOCK
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _save_review_decision_lock(data):
|
||||
try:
|
||||
with open(REVIEW_DECISION_FILE, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
|
||||
json.dump(data, f)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
global _REVIEW_DECISION_LOCK
|
||||
_REVIEW_DECISION_LOCK = data
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def init_review_decision_lock(remote: str | None, task: str | None):
|
||||
@@ -956,6 +949,9 @@ def init_review_decision_lock(remote: str | None, task: str | None):
|
||||
"ready_pr_number": None,
|
||||
"ready_action": None,
|
||||
"ready_expected_head_sha": None,
|
||||
"ready_remote": None,
|
||||
"ready_org": None,
|
||||
"ready_repo": None,
|
||||
"live_mutations": [],
|
||||
"correction_authorized": False,
|
||||
"correction_reason": None,
|
||||
@@ -967,6 +963,9 @@ def check_review_decision_gate(
|
||||
action: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready: bool,
|
||||
remote: str | None = None,
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> list[str]:
|
||||
"""Fail closed unless validation completed and the final decision is ready."""
|
||||
reasons = []
|
||||
@@ -1004,6 +1003,21 @@ def check_review_decision_gate(
|
||||
f"ready action '{lock.get('ready_action')}' does not match "
|
||||
f"requested action '{action}' (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if lock.get("ready_remote") != remote:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"ready remote '{lock.get('ready_remote')}' does not match "
|
||||
f"requested remote '{remote}' (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if lock.get("ready_org") != org:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"ready org '{lock.get('ready_org')}' does not match "
|
||||
f"requested org '{org}' (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if lock.get("ready_repo") != repo:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"ready repo '{lock.get('ready_repo')}' does not match "
|
||||
f"requested repo '{repo}' (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
prior = list(lock.get("live_mutations") or [])
|
||||
if prior and not lock.get("correction_authorized"):
|
||||
@@ -1026,10 +1040,15 @@ def check_review_decision_gate(
|
||||
return reasons
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def record_live_review_mutation(pr_number: int, action: str):
|
||||
def record_live_review_mutation(pr_number: int, action: str, review_id: int | None = None):
|
||||
lock = _load_review_decision_lock() or {}
|
||||
mutations = list(lock.get("live_mutations") or [])
|
||||
mutations.append({"pr_number": pr_number, "action": action})
|
||||
mutations.append({
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"action": action,
|
||||
"review_id": review_id,
|
||||
"review_state": action,
|
||||
})
|
||||
lock["live_mutations"] = mutations
|
||||
if lock.get("correction_authorized"):
|
||||
lock["correction_authorized"] = False
|
||||
@@ -1245,6 +1264,9 @@ def _evaluate_pr_review_submission(
|
||||
pr_number,
|
||||
action,
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=final_review_decision_ready,
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
org=org,
|
||||
repo=repo,
|
||||
))
|
||||
if reasons:
|
||||
return result
|
||||
@@ -1332,6 +1354,8 @@ def gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
action: str,
|
||||
expected_head_sha: str | None = None,
|
||||
remote: str = "dadeschools",
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Mark validation complete; the final review decision is ready to submit."""
|
||||
action = (action or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
@@ -1363,31 +1387,59 @@ def gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
lock["ready_pr_number"] = pr_number
|
||||
lock["ready_action"] = action
|
||||
lock["ready_expected_head_sha"] = expected_head_sha
|
||||
lock["ready_remote"] = remote
|
||||
lock["ready_org"] = org
|
||||
lock["ready_repo"] = repo
|
||||
_save_review_decision_lock(lock)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"marked_ready": True,
|
||||
"pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"action": action,
|
||||
"expected_head_sha": expected_head_sha,
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"org": org,
|
||||
"repo": repo,
|
||||
"final_review_decision_ready": True,
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@mcp.tool()
|
||||
def gitea_authorize_review_correction(reason: str) -> dict:
|
||||
def gitea_authorize_review_correction(
|
||||
prior_review_id: int,
|
||||
prior_review_state: str,
|
||||
reason: str,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Authorize one operator-approved correction after a mistaken live review."""
|
||||
reason = (reason or "").strip()
|
||||
prior_review_state = (prior_review_state or "").strip().lower()
|
||||
lock = _load_review_decision_lock()
|
||||
if lock is None:
|
||||
return {"authorized": False, "reasons": ["review decision lock missing"]}
|
||||
if not lock.get("live_mutations"):
|
||||
prior = list(lock.get("live_mutations") or [])
|
||||
if not prior:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"authorized": False,
|
||||
"reasons": ["no prior live review mutation to correct"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
last_mutation = prior[-1]
|
||||
last_review_id = last_mutation.get("review_id")
|
||||
last_review_state = last_mutation.get("action")
|
||||
reasons = []
|
||||
if last_review_id is not None and last_review_id != prior_review_id:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"prior review ID '{prior_review_id}' does not match last "
|
||||
f"recorded review ID '{last_review_id}' (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if last_review_state != prior_review_state:
|
||||
reasons.append(
|
||||
f"prior review state '{prior_review_state}' does not match last "
|
||||
f"recorded review state '{last_review_state}' (fail closed)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if not reason:
|
||||
return {"authorized": False, "reasons": ["correction reason is required"]}
|
||||
reasons.append("correction reason is required")
|
||||
if reasons:
|
||||
return {"authorized": False, "reasons": reasons}
|
||||
lock["correction_authorized"] = True
|
||||
lock["correction_reason"] = reason
|
||||
_save_review_decision_lock(lock)
|
||||
@@ -1885,6 +1937,7 @@ def gitea_review_pr(
|
||||
host: str | None = None,
|
||||
org: str | None = None,
|
||||
repo: str | None = None,
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Submit a review on a Gitea pull request (Legacy wrapper).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2059,7 +2112,8 @@ def gitea_review_pr(
|
||||
remote=remote,
|
||||
host=host,
|
||||
org=org,
|
||||
repo=repo
|
||||
repo=repo,
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=final_review_decision_ready
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Include the inventory report in the response message
|
||||
|
||||
+14
-14
@@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ from gitea_auth import get_auth_header, resolve_remote, add_remote_args, api_req
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def main(argv=None):
|
||||
if os.environ.get("GITEA_SESSION_PROFILE_LOCK"):
|
||||
print(
|
||||
"Direct CLI review submission is disabled within MCP sessions. "
|
||||
"Use MCP tools instead.",
|
||||
file=sys.stderr,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return 2
|
||||
|
||||
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Review and sign-off on a Gitea pull request.")
|
||||
add_remote_args(parser)
|
||||
parser.add_argument("--pr-number", type=int, required=True, help="PR number/index to review.")
|
||||
@@ -71,20 +79,12 @@ def main(argv=None):
|
||||
# spoof it and it cannot go stale across sessions.
|
||||
session_lock = (os.environ.get("GITEA_SESSION_PROFILE_LOCK") or "").strip()
|
||||
if session_lock:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
cli_profile = (get_profile().get("profile_name") or "").strip()
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
print(f"Mutation authority check failed: {e}", file=sys.stderr)
|
||||
return 3
|
||||
if cli_profile != session_lock:
|
||||
print(
|
||||
f"Mismatched active profile vs session profile lock "
|
||||
f"(CLI override rejected): CLI profile '{cli_profile}' does "
|
||||
f"not match locked session profile '{session_lock}' "
|
||||
f"(fail closed)",
|
||||
file=sys.stderr,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return 3
|
||||
print(
|
||||
"Direct CLI review submission is disabled within MCP sessions. "
|
||||
"Use the gated 'gitea_submit_pr_review' MCP tool instead.",
|
||||
file=sys.stderr,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return 2
|
||||
|
||||
body = args.body
|
||||
if args.body_file:
|
||||
|
||||
+38
-1
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ def build_final_report(checkout_proof, inventory, validation, contamination,
|
||||
identity_eligible, merge_performed,
|
||||
issue_status_verified,
|
||||
capability_evidence=None, sweep=None, live_state=None,
|
||||
role_boundary=None):
|
||||
role_boundary=None, review_mutation=None):
|
||||
"""Required behavior 6 + acceptance criteria: one report, distinct proofs.
|
||||
|
||||
Combines the individual proof verdicts into the final-report fields the
|
||||
@@ -652,6 +652,8 @@ def build_final_report(checkout_proof, inventory, validation, contamination,
|
||||
(``assess_live_state_recheck`` — also required for ``merge_allowed``),
|
||||
and a clean role boundary (``assess_role_boundary``). Omitting any of
|
||||
them downgrades; a merge without the live recheck is a violation.
|
||||
|
||||
#211: the report must also carry the review mutation proof (``assess_review_mutation_final_report``).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
contamination_status = contamination.get("status", "unknown")
|
||||
checkout_proven = bool(checkout_proof.get("proven"))
|
||||
@@ -682,10 +684,23 @@ def build_final_report(checkout_proof, inventory, validation, contamination,
|
||||
"proven": False,
|
||||
"reasons": ["role-boundary/namespace usage not reported (#179)"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
review_mutation = review_mutation or {
|
||||
"complete": False,
|
||||
"downgraded": True,
|
||||
"reasons": ["review mutation proof not provided (#211)"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
capability_proven = bool(capability_evidence.get("proven"))
|
||||
sweep_proven = bool(sweep.get("proven"))
|
||||
live_state_proven = bool(live_state.get("proven"))
|
||||
role_boundary_clean = bool(role_boundary.get("proven"))
|
||||
review_mutation_complete = bool(review_mutation.get("complete"))
|
||||
|
||||
review_mutation = review_mutation or {
|
||||
"complete": False,
|
||||
"reasons": ["review mutation proof missing"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
review_mutation_complete = bool(review_mutation.get("complete"))
|
||||
|
||||
downgrade_reasons = []
|
||||
if not identity_eligible:
|
||||
@@ -727,6 +742,9 @@ def build_final_report(checkout_proof, inventory, validation, contamination,
|
||||
if not role_boundary_clean:
|
||||
downgrade_reasons.append("role/namespace boundary not clean (#179)")
|
||||
downgrade_reasons.extend(role_boundary.get("reasons", []))
|
||||
if not review_mutation_complete:
|
||||
downgrade_reasons.append("review mutation proof missing or incomplete (#211)")
|
||||
downgrade_reasons.extend(review_mutation.get("reasons", []))
|
||||
|
||||
merge_allowed = (
|
||||
identity_eligible
|
||||
@@ -775,6 +793,7 @@ def build_final_report(checkout_proof, inventory, validation, contamination,
|
||||
"sweep_verdict": sweep.get("verdict"),
|
||||
"live_state_recheck_proven": live_state_proven,
|
||||
"role_boundary_clean": role_boundary_clean,
|
||||
"review_mutation_complete": review_mutation_complete,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1038,3 +1057,21 @@ def assess_duplicate_search_proof(report_text, matches):
|
||||
return issue_duplicate_gate.assess_duplicate_search_proof(
|
||||
report_text, matches
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def build_review_mutation_proof(run_log: list[dict]) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Assess the live review mutations recorded during this run."""
|
||||
mutations = [e for e in (run_log or []) if e.get("kind") == "live_review_mutation"]
|
||||
if not mutations:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"complete": False,
|
||||
"downgraded": True,
|
||||
"missing_fields": ["live review mutation"],
|
||||
"reasons": ["no live review mutation recorded in run log"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"complete": True,
|
||||
"downgraded": False,
|
||||
"missing_fields": [],
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -25,4 +25,5 @@ def _reset_mutation_authority(monkeypatch):
|
||||
return
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(mcp_server, "_MUTATION_AUTHORITY", None)
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(mcp_server, "_IDENTITY_CACHE", {})
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(mcp_server, "_REVIEW_DECISION_LOCK", None)
|
||||
yield
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -821,11 +821,16 @@ class TestReviewPR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
{"login": "jcwalker3"}, # /api/v1/user (eligibility)
|
||||
{"state": "open", "head": {"sha": "abc1234"}, "mergeable": True, "user": {"login": "jcwalker3"}}, # /pulls/1
|
||||
]
|
||||
from mcp_server import init_review_decision_lock
|
||||
init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(1, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = gitea_review_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=1,
|
||||
event="APPROVE",
|
||||
body="Self approve",
|
||||
merge=False
|
||||
merge=False,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("Review submission failed eligibility gates", result["message"])
|
||||
@@ -1773,6 +1778,65 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertIn("[REDACTED]", blob)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("abc-secret-xyz", blob)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_authorize_review_correction_success(self):
|
||||
from mcp_server import _load_review_decision_lock, _save_review_decision_lock
|
||||
lock = _load_review_decision_lock() or {}
|
||||
lock["live_mutations"] = [{"pr_number": 8, "action": "approve", "review_id": 42, "review_state": "approve"}]
|
||||
_save_review_decision_lock(lock)
|
||||
r = gitea_authorize_review_correction(prior_review_id=42, prior_review_state="approve", reason="typo")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(r["authorized"])
|
||||
lock = _load_review_decision_lock()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(lock["correction_authorized"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_authorize_review_correction_mismatch(self):
|
||||
from mcp_server import _load_review_decision_lock, _save_review_decision_lock
|
||||
lock = _load_review_decision_lock() or {}
|
||||
lock["live_mutations"] = [{"pr_number": 8, "action": "approve", "review_id": 42, "review_state": "approve"}]
|
||||
_save_review_decision_lock(lock)
|
||||
|
||||
# Mismatched ID
|
||||
r = gitea_authorize_review_correction(prior_review_id=99, prior_review_state="approve", reason="typo")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["authorized"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("prior review ID" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
# Mismatched State
|
||||
r = gitea_authorize_review_correction(prior_review_id=42, prior_review_state="request_changes", reason="typo")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["authorized"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("prior review state" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.api_request")
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
|
||||
def test_remote_org_repo_validation_mismatch(self, _auth, mock_api):
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-reviewer",
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,review,approve"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
# Mark decision for specific remote, org, repo
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "approve", remote="prgs", org="MyOrg", repo="MyRepo")
|
||||
|
||||
# Mismatched remote
|
||||
r = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="approve", remote="dadeschools", org="MyOrg", repo="MyRepo",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("ready remote" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
# Mismatched org
|
||||
r = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="approve", remote="prgs", org="OtherOrg", repo="MyRepo",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("ready org" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
# Mismatched repo
|
||||
r = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="approve", remote="prgs", org="MyOrg", repo="OtherRepo",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("ready repo" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -127,7 +127,10 @@ class TestPRQueueInventory(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
{"id": 100} # POST review
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
result = gitea_review_pr(pr_number=1, event="APPROVE", remote="prgs")
|
||||
from mcp_server import init_review_decision_lock, gitea_mark_final_review_decision
|
||||
init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(1, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = gitea_review_pr(pr_number=1, event="APPROVE", remote="prgs", final_review_decision_ready=True)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("=== PR Queue Inventory ===", result["message"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("Repository:", result["message"])
|
||||
|
||||
+5
-23
@@ -112,15 +112,10 @@ class TestAPIPayload(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMutationAuthorityLock(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""#199 (refs #194): the CLI refuses to run under a profile that differs
|
||||
from the session profile lock exported by the launching MCP session."""
|
||||
"""#199 (refs #194): the CLI refuses to run under active MCP sessions."""
|
||||
|
||||
@patch("review_pr.get_profile")
|
||||
def test_cli_blocked_on_session_lock_mismatch(self, mock_get_profile):
|
||||
# An author-bound session exported the lock; the CLI resolves a
|
||||
# reviewer profile (GITEA_MCP_PROFILE side-channel override) — reject
|
||||
# before any API call.
|
||||
mock_get_profile.return_value = {"profile_name": "prgs-reviewer"}
|
||||
def test_cli_disabled_on_session_lock(self):
|
||||
# When running inside an MCP session, direct review submission via CLI is disabled entirely.
|
||||
import io
|
||||
buf = io.StringIO()
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ,
|
||||
@@ -129,22 +124,9 @@ class TestMutationAuthorityLock(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
rc = review_pr.main([
|
||||
"--pr-number", "81", "--event", "APPROVE",
|
||||
])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rc, 3)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rc, 2)
|
||||
msg = buf.getvalue().lower()
|
||||
self.assertIn("cli override rejected", msg)
|
||||
|
||||
@patch("review_pr.get_profile")
|
||||
@patch("review_pr.api_request")
|
||||
@patch("review_pr.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_CREDS)
|
||||
def test_cli_allowed_on_profile_match(self, _auth, mock_api, mock_get_profile):
|
||||
mock_get_profile.return_value = {"profile_name": "prgs-reviewer"}
|
||||
mock_api.side_effect = [FAKE_PR_DATA, {}]
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ,
|
||||
{"GITEA_SESSION_PROFILE_LOCK": "prgs-reviewer"}):
|
||||
rc = review_pr.main([
|
||||
"--pr-number", "81", "--event", "APPROVE",
|
||||
])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rc, 0)
|
||||
self.assertIn("disabled within mcp sessions", msg)
|
||||
|
||||
@patch("review_pr.api_request")
|
||||
@patch("review_pr.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_CREDS)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -167,6 +167,15 @@ def _good_live_state(**overrides):
|
||||
return assess_live_state_recheck(recheck)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _good_review_mutation():
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"complete": True,
|
||||
"downgraded": False,
|
||||
"missing_fields": [],
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _good_role_boundary_179(**overrides):
|
||||
kwargs = {
|
||||
"task_role": "reviewer",
|
||||
@@ -531,6 +540,7 @@ class TestFinalReport(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"sweep": _good_sweep(),
|
||||
"live_state": _good_live_state(),
|
||||
"role_boundary": _good_role_boundary(),
|
||||
"review_mutation": _good_review_mutation(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
kwargs.update(overrides)
|
||||
return build_final_report(**kwargs)
|
||||
@@ -625,6 +635,7 @@ class TestFinalReport(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"identity_eligible": True,
|
||||
"merge_performed": False,
|
||||
"issue_status_verified": True,
|
||||
"review_mutation": _good_review_mutation(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
report = build_final_report(**kwargs)
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
|
||||
@@ -1131,6 +1142,7 @@ class TestFinalReport179Bar(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"sweep": _good_sweep(),
|
||||
"live_state": _good_live_state(),
|
||||
"role_boundary": _good_role_boundary(),
|
||||
"review_mutation": _good_review_mutation(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
kwargs.update(overrides)
|
||||
return build_final_report(**kwargs)
|
||||
@@ -1195,6 +1207,16 @@ class TestFinalReport179Bar(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(report["inventory_complete"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(report["validated_on_pinned_head"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_review_mutation_downgrades(self):
|
||||
report = self._report(review_mutation=None)
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(report["review_mutation_complete"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_incomplete_review_mutation_downgrades(self):
|
||||
report = self._report(review_mutation={"complete": False, "downgraded": True, "reasons": []})
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(report["review_mutation_complete"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user