Files
Gitea-Tools/tests/test_task_capability_role_invariants.py
T
jcwalker3andClaude Opus 4.8 c763161702 fix(reconcile): server-enforced, revalidated missing-worktree cleanup (#970 review 644 B1-B5)
Addresses the five blocking findings of review 644 on PR #972.

B1 — live ownership and status revalidation. resolve_missing_worktree_binding
now re-reads the authoritative lease, session, checkpoint, and issue-lock rows
immediately before mutating and diffs them against the snapshot the audit
recorded (binding path and identity, lease id/status/session/owner pid,
checkpoint path/status, live-session evidence, trustworthy ownership evidence,
issue-lock state). Any drift fails closed without mutation, and the binding is
reclassified from the live values rather than the audit snapshot. A candidate
carrying no audited snapshot is refused rather than trusted.

B2 — server-enforced cleanup authorization. Apply mode no longer accepts a
client-supplied operator_authorized boolean; it is rejected outright at the MCP
tool and in the module (#709 F1 / review 434). Authorization is now the
project's own reconciliation cleanup gate, required at both the task-capability
boundary (new reconciler-only reconcile_missing_worktree_bindings capability,
gitea.branch.delete, role-exclusive) and the production mutation boundary
(an authorized audit_reconciliation_mode cleanup phase, re-checked at the point
of mutation so a forged authorization mapping cannot stand in for the gate).
Dry-run remains available to any gitea.read profile and stays non-mutating.
Existing role, repository, parity, and provenance gates are unchanged.

B3 — expected-path compare-and-swap. retire_session_checkpoint_worktree_path
now requires expected_path and performs a guarded update keyed on the stored
path, refusing without mutation when the stored path was moved, replaced, or
concurrently changed, when the row is unknown, or when a selector matches more
than one checkpoint. retire_lease_worktree_path gains the same treatment plus
optional status/session/owner-pid compare-and-swap, and its UPDATE is keyed on
the audited path. Both report an idempotent already_retired outcome instead of
falsely reporting a retirement.

B4 — live-session and issue-lock evidence. session_active is now derived from
the control-plane sessions table instead of never being set, along two axes:
genuine liveness (recorded active, PID not dead, heartbeat fresh — the rule
reused from restart_coordinator) and weaker but still trustworthy recorded
ownership. A non-terminal lease now protects its binding regardless of whether
the recorded PID is alive, so dead-PID evidence alone can no longer retire a
lease the control plane still holds. The previously unused issue_lock_store is
now read: a live durable issue lock binding the path or branch blocks cleanup,
and locks whose own paths are missing are reported for release through their
own lifecycle rather than retired here.

B5 — adversarial regression coverage. The suite now drives the registered MCP
tools through mcp_server, the real ControlPlaneDB, and the real cleanup gate,
covering lease status/ownership/session/path drift, expected-path mismatch,
concurrent recreation, an unauthorized caller submitting operator_authorized,
wrong profile and missing capability, live-session and trustworthy-owner
evidence, conflicting issue locks, non-mutating dry-run, exact-binding-only
retirement, preservation of unrelated worktrees and git metadata, idempotent
re-execution, and worktrees-dimension resolution.

All original #970 acceptance criteria are preserved, including the distinctions
between deleted paths, moved paths, unavailable hosts or mounts, transient
filesystem failures, live ownership, and concurrent recreation.

Tests: focused #970 suite 47 passed. Adjacent suites (capability role
invariants, audit reconciliation mode, control plane DB, lease lifecycle,
reconciler cleanup integration, delete-branch capability, restart coordinator,
bootstrap lock contract) 252 passed / 93 subtests. Full suite 28 failed /
6000 passed, an exact match of the pre-change baseline's 28 failing test ids
at 3f584352 (28 failed / 5960 passed).

Closes #970

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-07-29 06:31:52 -05:00

283 lines
10 KiB
Python

"""Invariant tests pinning task_capability_map role assignments (#722/#723).
Added with the operator-authorized break-glass repair for incident #722:
commit 970e68b remapped ten reviewer tasks to ``role="merger"`` while every
configured merger profile forbids the review permissions, so no configured
profile could resolve any formal review task (``matching_configured_profile``
was empty repository-wide). These tests fail loudly if that class of
regression recurs:
- every role-exclusive formal-review task must be satisfiable by at least one
canonical role profile (permission AND role together);
- the capability map must agree with ``role_session_router`` task sets;
- ``adopt_merger_pr_lease`` stays merger-only (the legitimate hunk of
970e68b, preserved by the repair);
- merger profiles must not be able to resolve review_pr/approve_pr.
"""
import unittest
import gitea_config
from role_session_router import MERGER_TASKS, REVIEWER_TASKS
from task_capability_map import (
ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS,
TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP,
required_permission,
required_role,
)
# Canonical role-profile permission shape. Mirrors the configured
# author/reviewer/merger/reconciler profiles (profiles.json v2 role split):
# reviewers review/approve/request changes but never merge; mergers merge but
# never review/approve/request changes.
CANONICAL_ROLE_PROFILES = {
"author": {
"allowed": [
"gitea.read",
"gitea.branch.create",
"gitea.branch.push",
"gitea.repo.commit",
"gitea.pr.create",
"gitea.pr.comment",
"gitea.issue.create",
"gitea.issue.comment",
"gitea.issue.close",
],
"forbidden": [
"gitea.pr.approve",
"gitea.pr.request_changes",
"gitea.pr.merge",
],
},
"reviewer": {
"allowed": [
"gitea.read",
"gitea.pr.review",
"gitea.pr.approve",
"gitea.pr.request_changes",
"gitea.pr.comment",
"gitea.issue.comment",
],
"forbidden": [
"gitea.branch.create",
"gitea.branch.push",
"gitea.repo.commit",
"gitea.pr.create",
"gitea.pr.merge",
],
},
"merger": {
"allowed": [
"gitea.read",
"gitea.pr.merge",
"gitea.pr.comment",
"gitea.issue.comment",
],
"forbidden": [
"gitea.branch.create",
"gitea.branch.push",
"gitea.repo.commit",
"gitea.pr.create",
"gitea.pr.approve",
"gitea.pr.review",
"gitea.pr.request_changes",
],
},
"reconciler": {
"allowed": [
"gitea.read",
"gitea.pr.close",
"gitea.pr.comment",
"gitea.issue.comment",
"gitea.branch.delete",
"gitea.decision_lock.irrecoverable_recovery",
],
"forbidden": [
"gitea.pr.approve",
"gitea.pr.merge",
"gitea.pr.review",
"gitea.pr.request_changes",
"gitea.pr.create",
"gitea.branch.create",
"gitea.branch.push",
"gitea.repo.commit",
],
},
}
# Role-exclusive formal-review tasks (mirrors the resolver's role-exclusive
# handling for review work): permission alone is not enough — the profile's
# role kind must also match, so both dimensions are pinned here.
FORMAL_REVIEW_TASKS = (
"review_pr",
"approve_pr",
"request_changes_pr",
"blind_pr_queue_review",
"pr_queue_cleanup",
"pr-queue-cleanup",
)
# Complete resolver role-exclusive set on master when #723 was reconstructed.
# The shared constant must replace this exact inline authority without dropping
# later lease and PR-sync aliases added after the preserved source commits.
EXPECTED_ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS = frozenset(
{
"acquire_reviewer_pr_lease",
"gitea_acquire_reviewer_pr_lease",
"review_pr",
"approve_pr",
"request_changes_pr",
"blind_pr_queue_review",
"pr_queue_cleanup",
"pr-queue-cleanup",
"merge_pr",
"acquire_merger_pr_lease",
"gitea_acquire_merger_pr_lease",
"adopt_merger_pr_lease",
"gitea_adopt_merger_pr_lease",
"release_merger_pr_lease",
"gitea_release_merger_pr_lease",
"create_branch",
"push_branch",
"bootstrap_author_issue_worktree",
"gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree",
# #812 AC20: publishing an unpublished local head is author-only for the
# same reason every other push is — it writes a branch to the remote.
"publish_unpublished_branch",
"create_pr",
"commit_files",
"gitea_commit_files",
"address_pr_change_requests",
"update_pr_branch_by_merge",
"gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge",
"delete_branch",
"cleanup_merged_pr_branch",
"reconciliation_cleanup",
# #970 review 644 B2: retiring a missing worktree binding is a
# control-plane cleanup mutation, so it carries the same reconciler-only
# authority as every other reconciliation cleanup. Permission alone must
# not authorize it.
"reconcile_missing_worktree_bindings",
"gitea_reconcile_missing_worktree_bindings",
"work_issue",
"work-issue",
}
)
def _profile_satisfies(role_name, task):
"""True when the canonical *role_name* profile can perform *task*."""
profile = CANONICAL_ROLE_PROFILES[role_name]
ok, _reason = gitea_config.check_operation(
required_permission(task), profile["allowed"], profile["forbidden"]
)
return ok and role_name == required_role(task)
class TestFormalReviewProfileCoverage(unittest.TestCase):
"""#722: some configured profile must be able to formally review."""
def test_every_formal_review_task_has_a_satisfying_role_profile(self):
for task in FORMAL_REVIEW_TASKS:
with self.subTest(task=task):
satisfying = [
role
for role in CANONICAL_ROLE_PROFILES
if _profile_satisfies(role, task)
]
self.assertTrue(
satisfying,
f"no canonical role profile satisfies both permission "
f"{required_permission(task)!r} and role "
f"{required_role(task)!r} for task {task!r} — formal "
f"review would be impossible for every configured "
f"profile (incident #722)",
)
def test_formal_review_tasks_are_reviewer_role(self):
for task in FORMAL_REVIEW_TASKS:
with self.subTest(task=task):
self.assertEqual(required_role(task), "reviewer")
class TestMapRouterAgreement(unittest.TestCase):
"""#723 AC2: the map and the role session router must not drift."""
def test_reviewer_tasks_map_to_reviewer_role(self):
for task in sorted(REVIEWER_TASKS):
with self.subTest(task=task):
self.assertEqual(
required_role(task),
"reviewer",
f"router classifies {task!r} as a reviewer task but the "
f"capability map assigns role {required_role(task)!r}",
)
def test_merger_tasks_map_to_merger_role(self):
for task in sorted(MERGER_TASKS):
with self.subTest(task=task):
self.assertEqual(
required_role(task),
"merger",
f"router classifies {task!r} as a merger task but the "
f"capability map assigns role {required_role(task)!r}",
)
class TestMergerBoundary(unittest.TestCase):
"""Preserve the legitimate hunk of 970e68b and the merger fence."""
def test_adopt_merger_pr_lease_requires_merger_role(self):
self.assertEqual(required_role("adopt_merger_pr_lease"), "merger")
self.assertEqual(
required_permission("adopt_merger_pr_lease"), "gitea.pr.comment"
)
def test_merge_pr_requires_merger_role(self):
self.assertEqual(required_role("merge_pr"), "merger")
self.assertEqual(required_permission("merge_pr"), "gitea.pr.merge")
def test_merger_profile_cannot_resolve_formal_review_tasks(self):
merger = CANONICAL_ROLE_PROFILES["merger"]
for task in ("review_pr", "approve_pr", "request_changes_pr"):
with self.subTest(task=task):
ok, reason = gitea_config.check_operation(
required_permission(task),
merger["allowed"],
merger["forbidden"],
)
self.assertFalse(
ok,
f"merger profile must not hold {task!r} permission "
f"(got reason {reason!r})",
)
class TestRoleExclusiveSetIntegrity(unittest.TestCase):
"""#723: the shared set is complete, mapped, and role-satisfiable."""
def test_complete_current_role_exclusive_set(self):
self.assertEqual(ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS, EXPECTED_ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS)
def test_every_role_exclusive_task_exists_in_capability_map(self):
for task in sorted(ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS):
with self.subTest(task=task):
self.assertIn(task, TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP)
def test_formal_review_tasks_are_role_exclusive(self):
self.assertTrue(set(FORMAL_REVIEW_TASKS) <= ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS)
def test_every_role_exclusive_task_has_a_satisfying_profile(self):
for task in sorted(ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS):
with self.subTest(task=task):
role = required_role(task)
self.assertIn(role, CANONICAL_ROLE_PROFILES)
self.assertTrue(
_profile_satisfies(role, task),
f"canonical {role!r} profile cannot satisfy {task!r}",
)
if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main()