Extends review_proofs.py with the four #179 proofs, the successor set to
the #173 checkout/inventory proofs:
- assess_capability_evidence: a capability claim (review_pr, merge_pr, ...)
counts only with exact evidence citing gitea_resolve_task_capability
output or equivalent runtime context; no claims at all fails closed.
- assess_sweep_evidence: secret/provenance sweeps must state the exact
command/script/pattern/named method, the scope scanned, and a boolean
result; vague summaries are downgraded and a missing sweep fails closed.
- assess_live_state_recheck: an explicit pre-mutation recheck must prove
the PR is still open, the live head equals the pinned head (full
40-hex), the base branch is unchanged, and blocking review state was
checked and absent; not performing it fails closed.
- assess_role_boundary: a reviewer run using an author namespace (or vice
versa) is clean only with an explicit justification; unreported
namespace usage fails closed.
build_final_report now takes the four proofs as keyword arguments: any
missing or failed proof downgrades the grade, merge_allowed additionally
requires the proven live-state recheck, and a merge performed without it
is a blocked violation. Existing #173 semantics are unchanged otherwise;
gates only get stricter.
tests/test_review_proofs.py adds 29 tests covering the issue's harness
assertions: capability claims without evidence downgraded, vague sweeps
downgraded, missing/stale live-state recheck downgrades and blocks merge
(violation when a merge is claimed anyway), unjustified author-namespace
use downgraded, and the #173 positive baseline preserved.
SKILL.md sections F/G and the review-pr/merge-pr templates now require the
capability evidence, exact sweep, pre-verdict and pre-merge live-state
rechecks, and reviewer-namespace discipline.
Closes#179
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>
sysadminandClaude Fable 5
e2247fab85