The stable-control runtime ADR (docs/architecture/mcp-stable-control-runtime-policy-adr.md)
established the policy but had no runtime enforcement: a daemon relaunched from a
feature worktree still holds production credentials and will happily mutate real
issues. This adds the enforcement layer (acceptance criteria 6-11).
stable_control_runtime.py:
- classify_runtime_mode(): stable-control | dev-test | unknown, inferred from the
process root and checkout branch, with an explicit GITEA_MCP_RUNTIME_MODE
declaration for packaged layouts that have no git checkout.
- build_runtime_report(): runtime mode, git SHA, branch, checkout path, process
root, active workspace, repo binding, profile, identity, dirty files,
alignment, and real_mutations_allowed.
- assess_runtime_mutation_gate(): fails closed on dev-test targeting production,
unknown runtime, dirty stable checkout, dev-worktree launch, and unsafe
process-root/workspace alignment.
- Post-transport-flap re-proving tracked per namespace, so proving the author
namespace never implies reviewer, merger, or reconciler (#584).
- assess_promotion_record(): promotion must record previous and promoted SHAs
plus health, identity, profile, workspace, capability, and rollback proof.
Server wiring:
- _profile_operation_gate() consults the runtime gate alongside the #420 parity
gate. gitea.read is never blocked, so an operator can still diagnose a sick
runtime.
- The gate reads a startup snapshot rather than shelling out per mutation, for
the same reason parity uses a startup baseline: the runtime a process serves
from is fixed when it loads its code. Enforcement is decided from how the
process was loaded, so per-test production simulation cannot switch it on.
- gitea_get_runtime_context() reports the live runtime under
stable_control_runtime and points at the promotion runbook when blocked.
Docs and tooling:
- docs/stable-runtime-promotion-runbook.md: operator promotion procedure,
required record fields, per-namespace re-proving, rollback.
- scripts/promote-stable-runtime: read-only helper that emits and validates a
promotion record; it never restarts anything.
- Five canonical [THREAD STATE LEDGER] examples: runtime healthy, transport flap
recovered, namespace not yet re-proven, promotion completed, rollback required.
- ADR section 5 follow-ups marked landed; runbooks cross-link the new runbook.
Validation: 47 new tests in tests/test_stable_control_runtime.py. Full suite
3827 passed / 6 skipped / 2 failed; both failures are pre-existing on master
059ee77 (verified in a clean baseline worktree: identical 2 failures,
3780 passed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
12 KiB
ADR: Stable control runtime vs dev runtime (Gitea MCP)
- Status: Accepted (policy effective immediately for LLM sessions; tooling may lag)
- Date: 2026-07-09
- Tracking issue: #615
- Related:
- #543 /
docs/mcp-namespace-health.md— client-namespace health docs/mcp-namespace-eof-recovery.md— reconnect-only EOF recovery (no PID kill)- #558 /
docs/mcp-daemon-import-guard.md— sanctioned daemon - #557 /
docs/bootstrap-review-path.md— controller bootstrap for self-hosted fixes - Allocator / control-plane ADR:
docs/architecture/mcp-allocator-control-plane-observability-adr.md(#613 / PR #614)
- #543 /
1. Context
The Gitea MCP server is the control plane for real issue/PR mutations (create, comment, lock, review, merge, etc.). When author/reviewer/merger/reconciler sessions kill or restart that process, relaunch it from a feature worktree, or edit the checkout that process loads, operators observe:
- Mid-session identity/preflight resets
- Stale-runtime vs master parity failures
- IDE transport EOF / “tool not found” while code on disk has changed
- Accidental production mutations from experimental code
This ADR separates stable control runtime from dev/test runtime and defines promotion proof.
2. Decision
2.1 Stable control runtime
The Gitea MCP server used for real workflow mutations is the stable control runtime.
Characteristics:
- Loads a known, promoted revision of Gitea-Tools (or the packaged release layout operators designate)
- Registered in the IDE/client as the production namespaces (
gitea-tools,gitea-reviewer,gitea-merger,gitea-reconciler, etc.) - Holds production profile credentials via sanctioned keychain/env paths only
2.2 Dev / test runtime
MCP server code development and testing:
- Happens in isolated
branches/worktrees (or other non-stable checkouts) - May use a separate dev/test MCP runtime/process when process-level testing is required
- Must not be used for real Gitea mutations on production issues/PRs
2.3 Forbidden actions (normal sessions)
Normal author, reviewer, merger, and reconciler LLM sessions must not:
| Forbidden | Why |
|---|---|
| Kill the running MCP server process | Drops all concurrent sessions; loses preflight state |
| Restart / relaunch the MCP server process | Same as kill; causes stale/identity churn mid-workflow |
| Relaunch MCP from a development worktree | Runs unpromoted code against production mutations |
| Edit files in the stable runtime checkout | Hot-mutates control plane under concurrent users |
| Use experimental/dev MCP for real Gitea mutations | Bypasses promotion proof and audit expectations |
| Bypass or self-reset a stale master-parity gate | The gate is fail-closed; only an operator reload restores parity |
LLM-allowed vs operator-owned (authoritative split):
| Actor | May do | Must not do |
|---|---|---|
| LLM session | Call tools on the already-running stable namespaces; client reconnect after transport EOF (no process kill); pass worktree_path / role worktree args; report blockers and stop mutations when unhealthy/stale |
Kill, restart, or relaunch any MCP process; bump config mtimes to force reload; edit the stable checkout; switch to a dev MCP for production mutations |
| Operator / release-manager | Supervised restart/reload of the stable control runtime; dual-namespace client configuration; §2.4 promotions; incident recovery | — |
EOF / transport recovery for LLM sessions: client reconnect only (see docs/mcp-namespace-eof-recovery.md). Do not “fix” health by killing PIDs or bumping MCP config mtimes as a normal session procedure.
This ADR supersedes any older runbook wording that told the LLM to relaunch or restart the client/MCP as a self-service step. Where docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md (or wiki runbooks) discuss dual-namespace setup or workspace rebind, process restart/relaunch is operator-owned; the LLM stops, reports, and waits.
2.4 Promotion (operator / release-manager only)
Promotion of a new revision into the stable control runtime is an explicit operator/release-manager action, not an LLM self-service step.
A promotion must record (issue comment, release note, or promotion ledger):
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| previous runtime SHA | Commit previously loaded by stable runtime |
| promoted runtime SHA | Commit after promotion |
| source branch/PR | Where the change was reviewed |
| restart/reload method | How the process was cycled (e.g. supervised restart, client reload) |
| health check proof | Client-namespace probe success (gitea_whoami / namespace health) |
| identity/profile proof | Expected profile(s) and username(s) after reload |
| workspace/root proof | Stable checkout path / root matches intended layout |
| mutation capability proof | Required permissions for the target role present; forbidden ops still forbidden |
| rollback instructions | How to restore previous SHA and re-verify health |
Suggested durable marker:
## MCP STABLE RUNTIME PROMOTION (#615)
Status: COMPLETED | ROLLED_BACK | ABORTED
Previous-SHA: <full sha>
Promoted-SHA: <full sha>
Source-PR: <number>
Source-Branch: <name>
Reload-Method: <text>
Health-Proof: client_namespace whoami OK / assess_mcp_namespace_health OK
Identity-Proof: profile=<name> user=<name>
Workspace-Proof: root=<path>
Mutation-Proof: allowed_ops include <…>; forbidden include <…>
Rollback: checkout <previous sha>; reload method <…>; re-run health/identity proofs
Operator: <username>
Timestamp: <ISO-8601>
2.5 Unhealthy stable runtime → stop work
If the stable MCP runtime is unhealthy, including any of:
- client-namespace probes fail
- wrong identity / wrong profile
- wrong workspace root
- missing mutation capability for the intended role
- persistent EOF after client reconnect
- master parity is stale (
startup_headbehind on-diskmaster/restart_requiredfrom the parity gate)
then:
- Normal PR / review / merge / issue-mutation work must stop immediately.
- The session reports the unhealthy/stale state (tool error, CTH, or operator handoff) with startup vs current head when known.
- Do not improvise: no LLM process kill/restart, no dev-worktree MCP for production mutations, no env escape hatches, no manual gate bypass.
- Resume only after:
- an operator restores the runtime (see §2.6 for routine post-merge parity reload), or
- a controlled promotion/rollback completes with the §2.4 promotion record, or
- a controller invokes the narrow bootstrap review path (#557) when the defect is self-hosted and documented,
- and the session re-verifies health (and master parity when applicable) before the next mutation.
2.6 Routine post-merge master-parity staleness (operator reload, not promotion)
Symptom: After merges land on master, a long-lived stable MCP process still runs the pre-merge startup_head. The master-parity gate marks the server stale / restart_required and blocks mutations.
Sanctioned response (authoritative):
| Step | Actor | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | LLM session | Mutations stop immediately when the gate reports stale. |
| 2 | LLM session | Report the stale state (startup head, current master head, that operator reload is required). Do not retry mutations. |
| 3 | Operator | Reload/restart the stable control MCP so it loads current master (supervised client/daemon reload). |
| 4 | LLM session | Resume only after startup/current-head parity is verified (e.g. gitea_get_runtime_context / parity assessment shows in parity). |
Not a §2.4 promotion: Catching the already-designated stable control checkout up to a newly advanced master is a routine operator reload of the stable runtime. It does not require the nine-field promotion ledger. Use §2.4 only when changing which unpromoted/dev revision becomes the stable control runtime (new source branch/PR into the stable designation).
Code note: master_parity_gate.py may still say “restart the server” in machine-facing reason strings. That string names the operator recovery action, not an LLM self-service instruction. This ADR and the runbooks define the actor split.
3. Relationship to other controls
| Doc / mechanism | Interaction |
|---|---|
| Namespace health (#543) | Proves IDE client can call tools; does not authorize restart |
| EOF recovery | Reconnect only; no process kill |
| Daemon import guard (#558) | Mutations require sanctioned daemon; not a bare shell import |
| Bootstrap path (#557) | Only controller-authorized exception when live runtime cannot review its own fix |
| Allocator / control-plane ADR | Coordination DB is separate; still depends on a healthy MCP surface for Gitea writes |
4. Consequences
Positive
- Predictable control plane for concurrent LLMs
- Clear operator-only promotion gate with rollback
- Aligns session behavior with health/EOF docs already landed
Costs
- LLM sessions must wait when runtime is sick (no DIY restart)
- Operators must maintain promotion discipline and dual-runtime config if they use a dev MCP
Non-goals
- Does not ban operator-supervised restarts during incidents
- Does not replace CI or code review for MCP changes
- Does not authorize editing stable checkout “because tests need a quick fix”
5. Implementation follow-ups
The policy binds sessions now. The enforcement layer landed with issue #615
acceptance criteria 6–11 in stable_control_runtime.py:
Session preflight that refuses mutations if workspace root equals aLanded.branches/feature worktree configured as “dev only.”_runtime_mode_block()refuses every mutating operation from adev-test, dev-worktree-launched, dirty-stable, misaligned, orunknownruntime;gitea.readis never blocked, so an operator can still diagnose a sick runtime.ExplicitLanded asruntime_kind=stable|devin MCP config andgitea_whoamiprofile metadata.runtime_mode(stable-control|dev-test|unknown), reported bygitea_get_runtime_contextunderstable_control_runtimetogether with the runtime git SHA, branch, checkout path, process root, active workspace, alignment, dirty files, andreal_mutations_allowed. Operators running a packaged layout with no git checkout declare the mode explicitly withGITEA_MCP_RUNTIME_MODE.Promotion checklist script that emits the durable promotion marker fields.Landed asscripts/promote-stable-runtime(read-only; emits and validates the record) plus../stable-runtime-promotion-runbook.md.
Post-transport-flap proof is enforced per namespace: a flap invalidates every
gitea-* namespace at once, and author proof never transfers to reviewer,
merger, or reconciler (namespace_not_reproven_after_flap).
Not optional (issue #615 acceptance criterion 2): operator guide and runbooks must cross-link this ADR (see §6). Cross-links are documentation acceptance, not deferred tooling.
6. Acceptance for this ADR
- Document merged under
docs/architecture/mcp-stable-control-runtime-policy-adr.md. - Operator guide / runbooks cross-link this ADR (
docs/wiki/Operator-Guide.md,docs/wiki/Runbooks.md,docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md). - Issue #615 references this path.
- LLM/operator runbooks treat kill/restart/relaunch-from-worktree as LLM violations; process restart is operator-owned.
- Unhealthy runtime (including stale master parity) stops normal mutation work until operator restore/reload, promotion/rollback, or #557 bootstrap — then re-verify parity before mutating.
- Routine post-merge parity reload is documented as operator reload (§2.6), not an LLM self-restart and not a full §2.4 promotion.
7. Document history
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| 2026-07-09 | Initial ADR: stable vs dev runtime, forbidden session actions, promotion proof fields, stop-work rule |
| 2026-07-16 | Review 443 remediation (#615 / PR #616): mandatory cross-links; LLM vs operator restart split; routine post-merge parity staleness (§2.6); stale parity in §2.5 unhealthy triggers |