Gitea-Tools/tests/test_review_proofs.py

"""Tests for blind PR queue review proofs (Issue #173).

Issue #173 requires the reviewer-side workflow to *prove* — not assume —
each precondition of a blind queue review:

1. Pinned PR head vs local checkout HEAD (checkout proof).
2. Complete open-PR inventory across all configured repositories.
3. Evidence-strength of validation reporting (exact commands, counts,
   justified ignores, output actually read).
4. Evidence-backed self-review contamination assessment (never assumed).
5. A final report that distinguishes each proof and can only claim an
   "A"-grade run when every proof is present; otherwise it downgrades or
   blocks instead of merging confidently.

These are the harness assertions from the issue's Required behavior 7.
"""
import io
import sys
import unittest

sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))

from review_proofs import (  # noqa: E402
    assess_author_pr_report,
    assess_capability_evidence,
    assess_capability_proof,
    assess_controller_handoff,
    assess_inventory_completeness,
    assess_live_state_recheck,
    assess_review_mutation_final_report,
    assess_role_boundary,
    assess_secret_sweep,
    assess_self_review_contamination,
    assess_sweep_evidence,
    assess_validation_report,
    build_final_report,
    pr_inventory_trust_gate,
    resolve_repos_from_user_reference,
    verify_pinned_head_checkout,
)

PINNED = "0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9"
OTHER = "a4060c5de00f2b1c9e88f4f6f0f3f9a7b2c1d0e9"


def _good_checkout():
    return verify_pinned_head_checkout(
        pinned_head_sha=PINNED,
        local_head_sha=PINNED,
        pr_base_ref="master",
        diff_base_ref="prgs/master",
    )


def _good_inventory():
    return assess_inventory_completeness(
        repo_reports=[
            {
                "repo": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
                "state_filter": "open",
                "pagination_complete": True,
                "open_pr_count": 2,
            },
            {
                "repo": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/mcp-control-plane",
                "state_filter": "open",
                "pagination_complete": True,
                "open_pr_count": 1,
            },
        ],
        required_repos=[
            "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
            "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/mcp-control-plane",
        ],
    )


def _good_validation(**overrides):
    report = {
        "command": "venv/bin/pytest tests/ --ignore=branches",
        "output_read": True,
        "result": "pass",
        "passed": 421,
        "failed": 0,
        "skipped": 13,
        "ignored_paths": [
            {
                "path": "branches",
                "justification": (
                    "review worktrees under branches/ duplicate test module "
                    "names and break collection; they are not part of the "
                    "repository's own suite"
                ),
            }
        ],
        "canonical_command": "venv/bin/pytest tests/ --ignore=branches",
    }
    report.update(overrides)
    return assess_validation_report(report)


def _good_contamination():
    return assess_self_review_contamination(
        reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
        pr_author="jcwalker3",
        session_authored=False,
        evidence_source="session transcript: branch never checked out or pushed here",
    )


def _good_role_boundary():
    return assess_role_boundary(
        {
            "task_role": "reviewer",
            "task_kind": "blind_pr_queue_review",
            "reviewer_namespace_used": True,
            "author_namespace_used": False,
            "author_mutations": [],
            "review_mutations": [],
            "operator_authorized_author_work": False,
            "scratch_evidence_claimed": False,
        }
    )


def _good_capability_evidence():
    return assess_capability_evidence([
        {
            "task": "review_pr",
            "allowed": True,
            "evidence_source": (
                "gitea_resolve_task_capability(review_pr) output: "
                "allowed_in_current_session=true, profile prgs-reviewer"
            ),
        },
        {
            "task": "merge_pr",
            "allowed": True,
            "evidence_source": (
                "gitea_resolve_task_capability(merge_pr) output: "
                "allowed_in_current_session=true, profile prgs-reviewer"
            ),
        },
    ])


def _good_sweep(**overrides):
    sweep = {
        "command": (
            "git diff prgs/master...HEAD | grep -inE "
            "'password|token|secret|api[_-]?key|authorization|bearer|https?://'"
        ),
        "scope": "full PR diff against prgs/master",
        "clean": True,
    }
    sweep.update(overrides)
    return assess_sweep_evidence(sweep)


def _good_live_state(**overrides):
    recheck = {
        "pr_state": "open",
        "pinned_head_sha": PINNED,
        "live_head_sha": PINNED,
        "pinned_base_ref": "master",
        "live_base_ref": "master",
        "blocking_change_requests": False,
    }
    recheck.update(overrides)
    return assess_live_state_recheck(recheck)


def _good_review_mutation():
    report = (
        "Review complete on PR #203.\n"
        "Review mutations: one request_changes on #203.\n"
        "Review decision: request_changes."
    )
    lock = {
        "live_mutations": [{"pr_number": 203, "action": "request_changes"}],
        "correction_authorized": False,
    }
    return assess_review_mutation_final_report(report, lock)


def _good_worktree(**overrides):
    proof = {
        "worktree_path": "/repo/branches/review-feat-issue-224",
        "porcelain_status": "",
        "pr_scope_files": ["docs/wiki/Repositories.md"],
        "scratch_used": True,
        "scratch_path": "/repo/branches/review-feat-issue-224",
        "git_commands": [
            "git fetch prgs master feat/issue-224-wiki-proof-refresh",
            "git diff prgs/master...prgs/feat/issue-224-wiki-proof-refresh",
        ],
    }
    proof.update(overrides)
    from reviewer_worktree import assess_reviewer_worktree_proof  # noqa: E402

    return assess_reviewer_worktree_proof(proof)


def _good_role_boundary_179(**overrides):
    kwargs = {
        "task_role": "reviewer",
        "namespaces_used": ["gitea-reviewer"],
        "justification": None,
    }
    kwargs.update(overrides)
    return assess_role_boundary(**kwargs)


GOOD_HANDOFF = "\n".join([
    "## Controller Handoff",
    "",
    "- Task: review PR #999",
    "- Repo: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
    "- Role: reviewer",
    "- Identity: sysadmin / prgs-reviewer",
    "- Issue/PR: #182 / PR #999",
    "- Branch/SHA: feat/x @ 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
    "- Files changed: review_proofs.py",
    "- Validation: 700 passed, 6 skipped",
    "- Mutations: review only",
    "- Workspace mutations: none",
    "- Current status: PR open",
    "- Blockers: none",
    "- Next: merge if approved",
    "- Safety: no self-review; no self-merge; no secrets",
])


def _good_handoff():
    return assess_controller_handoff(GOOD_HANDOFF)


def _good_capability_proof():
    return assess_capability_proof({
        "comment_issue": {
            "requested_task": "comment_issue",
            "required_operation_permission": "gitea.issue.comment",
            "allowed_in_current_session": True,
        }
    })


def _good_secret_sweep(**overrides):
    sweep = {
        "method": "git diff prgs/master...HEAD | grep -iE 'token|secret'",
        "scope": "full PR diff relative to prgs/master",
        "clean": True,
    }
    sweep.update(overrides)
    return assess_secret_sweep(sweep)


class TestCheckoutProof(unittest.TestCase):
    """Required behavior 1 + 2: prove HEAD == pinned PR head or stop."""

    def test_matching_pinned_and_local_head_is_proven(self):
        proof = _good_checkout()
        self.assertTrue(proof["proven"])
        self.assertFalse(proof["block"])

    def test_fetched_sha_but_unchecked_out_head_blocks(self):
        # Harness assertion (behavior 7, bullet 1): fetching/pinning a SHA
        # without checking it out must block review and merge.
        proof = verify_pinned_head_checkout(
            pinned_head_sha=PINNED,
            local_head_sha=OTHER,
            pr_base_ref="master",
            diff_base_ref="prgs/master",
        )
        self.assertFalse(proof["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(proof["block"])
        self.assertTrue(any("HEAD" in r for r in proof["reasons"]))

    def test_missing_pinned_sha_fails_closed(self):
        proof = verify_pinned_head_checkout(
            pinned_head_sha="",
            local_head_sha=PINNED,
            pr_base_ref="master",
            diff_base_ref="master",
        )
        self.assertFalse(proof["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(proof["block"])

    def test_missing_local_head_fails_closed(self):
        proof = verify_pinned_head_checkout(
            pinned_head_sha=PINNED,
            local_head_sha=None,
            pr_base_ref="master",
            diff_base_ref="master",
        )
        self.assertFalse(proof["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(proof["block"])

    def test_abbreviated_sha_is_not_proof(self):
        # A prefix match is not proof of the exact pinned head.
        proof = verify_pinned_head_checkout(
            pinned_head_sha=PINNED,
            local_head_sha=PINNED[:12],
            pr_base_ref="master",
            diff_base_ref="master",
        )
        self.assertFalse(proof["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(proof["block"])

    def test_wrong_diff_base_blocks(self):
        proof = verify_pinned_head_checkout(
            pinned_head_sha=PINNED,
            local_head_sha=PINNED,
            pr_base_ref="master",
            diff_base_ref="develop",
        )
        self.assertFalse(proof["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(proof["block"])
        self.assertTrue(any("base" in r.lower() for r in proof["reasons"]))

    def test_remote_tracking_diff_base_matches_pr_base(self):
        proof = verify_pinned_head_checkout(
            pinned_head_sha=PINNED,
            local_head_sha=PINNED,
            pr_base_ref="master",
            diff_base_ref="refs/remotes/prgs/master",
        )
        self.assertTrue(proof["proven"])


class TestInventoryCompleteness(unittest.TestCase):
    """Required behavior 3: inventory must prove completeness."""

    def test_complete_multi_repo_inventory(self):
        # Harness assertion (behavior 7, bullet 2): complete queue inventory
        # with multiple PRs across repos.
        result = _good_inventory()
        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
        self.assertTrue(result["can_claim_exhaustive"])
        self.assertEqual(
            result["total_open_prs"],
            {
                "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools": 2,
                "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/mcp-control-plane": 1,
            },
        )

    def test_missing_repo_makes_inventory_incomplete(self):
        result = assess_inventory_completeness(
            repo_reports=[
                {
                    "repo": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
                    "state_filter": "open",
                    "pagination_complete": True,
                    "open_pr_count": 1,
                }
            ],
            required_repos=[
                "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
                "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/mcp-control-plane",
            ],
        )
        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
        self.assertFalse(result["can_claim_exhaustive"])
        self.assertTrue(
            any("mcp-control-plane" in r for r in result["reasons"])
        )

    def test_unfinished_pagination_blocks_exhaustive_claim(self):
        # Harness assertion (behavior 7, bullet 3): pagination / multi-page
        # PR listing must be handled or the claim is refused.
        result = assess_inventory_completeness(
            repo_reports=[
                {
                    "repo": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
                    "state_filter": "open",
                    "pagination_complete": False,
                    "open_pr_count": 50,
                }
            ],
            required_repos=["Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"],
        )
        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
        self.assertFalse(result["can_claim_exhaustive"])
        self.assertTrue(any("pagination" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))

    def test_missing_state_filter_blocks_exhaustive_claim(self):
        result = assess_inventory_completeness(
            repo_reports=[
                {
                    "repo": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
                    "pagination_complete": True,
                    "open_pr_count": 1,
                }
            ],
            required_repos=["Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"],
        )
        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])

    def test_missing_count_blocks_exhaustive_claim(self):
        result = assess_inventory_completeness(
            repo_reports=[
                {
                    "repo": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
                    "state_filter": "open",
                    "pagination_complete": True,
                }
            ],
            required_repos=["Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"],
        )
        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])

    def test_empty_inventory_fails_closed(self):
        result = assess_inventory_completeness(
            repo_reports=[],
            required_repos=["Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"],
        )
        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
        self.assertFalse(result["can_claim_exhaustive"])


class TestValidationReporting(unittest.TestCase):
    """Required behavior 4: exact commands and exact results."""

    def test_full_report_is_strong(self):
        result = _good_validation()
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "strong")
        self.assertTrue(result["claimable"])

    def test_missing_test_counts_is_weak(self):
        # Harness assertion (behavior 7, bullet 4): validation result missing
        # test counts is flagged as weak/incomplete.
        result = _good_validation(passed=None, failed=None, skipped=None)
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "weak")
        self.assertTrue(any("count" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))

    def test_output_not_read_cannot_claim_result(self):
        # Harness assertion (behavior 7, bullet 6): a report cannot say
        # validation passed unless the command output was actually read.
        result = _good_validation(output_read=False)
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "invalid")
        self.assertFalse(result["claimable"])

    def test_missing_command_cannot_claim_result(self):
        result = _good_validation(command="")
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "invalid")
        self.assertFalse(result["claimable"])

    def test_unjustified_ignored_path_is_weak(self):
        # Harness assertion (behavior 7, bullet 7): ignored paths in
        # validation must be explicitly justified.
        result = _good_validation(
            ignored_paths=[{"path": "branches", "justification": ""}]
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "weak")
        self.assertTrue(any("branches" in r for r in result["reasons"]))

    def test_non_canonical_command_without_note_is_weak(self):
        result = _good_validation(
            command="venv/bin/pytest tests/test_prs.py",
            canonical_command="venv/bin/pytest tests/ --ignore=branches",
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "weak")
        self.assertTrue(any("canonical" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))

    def test_non_canonical_command_with_justification_is_strong(self):
        result = _good_validation(
            command="venv/bin/pytest tests/test_prs.py",
            canonical_command="venv/bin/pytest tests/ --ignore=branches",
            deviation_justification="targeted re-run of the only failing file",
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "strong")


class TestSelfReviewContamination(unittest.TestCase):
    """Required behavior 5: contamination claims need evidence."""

    def test_identity_match_is_contaminated(self):
        result = assess_self_review_contamination(
            reviewer_identity="jcwalker3",
            pr_author="jcwalker3",
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "contaminated")

    def test_session_authorship_claim_without_evidence_is_unknown(self):
        # Harness assertion (behavior 7, bullet 5): self-review contamination
        # requires evidence, not assumption.
        result = assess_self_review_contamination(
            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
            pr_author="jcwalker3",
            session_authored=True,
            evidence_source=None,
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "unknown")
        self.assertIn("choose another PR or stop", result["safe_next_action"])

    def test_session_authorship_with_evidence_is_contaminated(self):
        result = assess_self_review_contamination(
            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
            pr_author="jcwalker3",
            session_authored=True,
            evidence_source="this session created branch feat/x and opened the PR",
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "contaminated")

    def test_clean_requires_evidence_too(self):
        result = assess_self_review_contamination(
            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
            pr_author="jcwalker3",
            session_authored=False,
            evidence_source=None,
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "unknown")

    def test_distinct_identities_with_evidence_is_clean(self):
        result = _good_contamination()
        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "clean")

    def test_missing_identities_are_unknown(self):
        result = assess_self_review_contamination(
            reviewer_identity=None,
            pr_author="jcwalker3",
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "unknown")


class TestRoleBoundary(unittest.TestCase):
    """Issue #175: reviewer queue tasks must not pivot into author work."""

    def test_reviewer_queue_without_author_mutations_is_clean(self):
        result = _good_role_boundary()
        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "clean")
        self.assertEqual(result["violations"], [])

    def test_reviewer_queue_author_mutation_without_authorization_violates(self):
        result = assess_role_boundary(
            {
                "task_role": "reviewer",
                "task_kind": "blind_pr_queue_review",
                "reviewer_namespace_used": True,
                "author_namespace_used": True,
                "author_mutations": ["claim issue #171", "push branch"],
                "operator_authorized_author_work": False,
                "mixed_namespace_justification": (
                    "author namespace was used for implementation"
                ),
            }
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "violation")
        self.assertTrue(any("pivot" in r for r in result["violations"]))

    def test_mixed_namespace_use_without_justification_is_warning(self):
        result = assess_role_boundary(
            {
                "task_role": "reviewer",
                "task_kind": "blind_pr_queue_review",
                "reviewer_namespace_used": True,
                "author_namespace_used": True,
                "author_mutations": [],
            }
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "warning")
        self.assertTrue(
            any("mixed" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"])
        )

    def test_author_task_cannot_perform_review_mutations(self):
        result = assess_role_boundary(
            {
                "task_role": "author",
                "reviewer_namespace_used": False,
                "author_namespace_used": True,
                "review_mutations": ["approve PR"],
            }
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "violation")
        self.assertTrue(
            any("reviewer-only" in r for r in result["violations"])
        )

    def test_scratch_only_notes_are_not_durable_evidence(self):
        result = assess_role_boundary(
            {
                "task_role": "reviewer",
                "task_kind": "blind_pr_queue_review",
                "reviewer_namespace_used": True,
                "scratch_evidence_claimed": True,
                "scratch_evidence_durable": False,
            }
        )
        self.assertEqual(result["status"], "warning")
        self.assertTrue(any("scratch-only" in r for r in result["reasons"]))


class TestFinalReport(unittest.TestCase):
    """Required behavior 6 + acceptance criteria: the report must
    distinguish each proof, and only a fully proven run earns an "A"."""

    def _report(self, **overrides):
        kwargs = {
            "checkout_proof": _good_checkout(),
            "inventory": _good_inventory(),
            "validation": _good_validation(),
            "contamination": _good_contamination(),
            "identity_eligible": True,
            "merge_performed": False,
            "issue_status_verified": True,
            "capability_evidence": _good_capability_evidence(),
            "sweep": _good_sweep(),
            "live_state": _good_live_state(),
            "role_boundary": _good_role_boundary(),
            "review_mutation": _good_review_mutation(),
            "controller_handoff": _good_handoff(),
            "capability_proof": _good_capability_proof(),
            "sweep_proof": _good_secret_sweep(),
            "worktree_proof": {
                "worktree_path": "/repo/branches/review-feat-issue-224",
                "porcelain_status": "",
                "pr_scope_files": ["docs/wiki/Repositories.md"],
                "scratch_used": True,
                "scratch_path": "/repo/branches/review-feat-issue-224",
            },
        }
        kwargs.update(overrides)
        return build_final_report(**kwargs)

    def test_fully_proven_run_is_grade_a(self):
        report = self._report()
        self.assertEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertEqual(report["violations"], [])
        # Behavior 6: each distinction is a distinct field.
        self.assertTrue(report["identity_eligible"])
        self.assertTrue(report["pr_author_distinct_from_reviewer"])
        self.assertEqual(report["session_contamination"], "clean")
        self.assertEqual(report["role_boundary"], "clean")
        self.assertTrue(report["validated_on_pinned_head"])
        self.assertFalse(report["merge_performed"])
        self.assertTrue(report["issue_status_verified"])

    def test_unproven_checkout_downgrades_and_blocks_merge(self):
        proof = verify_pinned_head_checkout(
            pinned_head_sha=PINNED,
            local_head_sha=OTHER,
            pr_base_ref="master",
            diff_base_ref="master",
        )
        report = self._report(checkout_proof=proof)
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertFalse(report["merge_allowed"])
        self.assertFalse(report["validated_on_pinned_head"])

    def test_merge_claim_without_checkout_proof_is_a_violation(self):
        proof = verify_pinned_head_checkout(
            pinned_head_sha=PINNED,
            local_head_sha=OTHER,
            pr_base_ref="master",
            diff_base_ref="master",
        )
        report = self._report(checkout_proof=proof, merge_performed=True)
        self.assertEqual(report["grade"], "blocked")
        self.assertTrue(report["violations"])

    def test_unread_validation_output_cannot_be_reported_as_passed(self):
        report = self._report(validation=_good_validation(output_read=False))
        self.assertFalse(report["validation_passed"])
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")

    def test_weak_validation_downgrades(self):
        report = self._report(
            validation=_good_validation(passed=None, failed=None, skipped=None)
        )
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")

    def test_incomplete_inventory_downgrades(self):
        inventory = assess_inventory_completeness(
            repo_reports=[],
            required_repos=["Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"],
        )
        report = self._report(inventory=inventory)
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")

    def test_unknown_contamination_downgrades_and_blocks_merge(self):
        contamination = assess_self_review_contamination(
            reviewer_identity="sysadmin",
            pr_author="jcwalker3",
            session_authored=True,
            evidence_source=None,
        )
        report = self._report(contamination=contamination)
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertFalse(report["merge_allowed"])
        self.assertEqual(report["session_contamination"], "unknown")

    def test_merge_by_contaminated_reviewer_is_a_violation(self):
        contamination = assess_self_review_contamination(
            reviewer_identity="jcwalker3",
            pr_author="jcwalker3",
        )
        report = self._report(contamination=contamination, merge_performed=True)
        self.assertEqual(report["grade"], "blocked")
        self.assertTrue(report["violations"])

    def test_ineligible_identity_downgrades_and_blocks_merge(self):
        report = self._report(identity_eligible=False)
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertFalse(report["merge_allowed"])

    def test_missing_role_boundary_downgrades_and_blocks_merge(self):
        kwargs = {
            "checkout_proof": _good_checkout(),
            "inventory": _good_inventory(),
            "validation": _good_validation(),
            "contamination": _good_contamination(),
            "identity_eligible": True,
            "merge_performed": False,
            "issue_status_verified": True,
            "review_mutation": _good_review_mutation(),
        }
        report = build_final_report(**kwargs)
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertFalse(report["merge_allowed"])
        self.assertEqual(report["role_boundary"], "warning")

    def test_role_boundary_violation_blocks_report(self):
        boundary = assess_role_boundary(
            {
                "task_role": "reviewer",
                "task_kind": "blind_pr_queue_review",
                "reviewer_namespace_used": True,
                "author_namespace_used": True,
                "author_mutations": ["create PR"],
                "operator_authorized_author_work": False,
                "mixed_namespace_justification": "implementation pivot",
            }
        )
        report = self._report(role_boundary=boundary)
        self.assertEqual(report["grade"], "blocked")
        self.assertFalse(report["merge_allowed"])

    def test_failed_capability_proof_downgrades(self):
        report = self._report(
            capability_proof={
                "proven": False,
                "reasons": ["task mark_issue not allowed"],
            }
        )
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertTrue(
            any("capability" in r for r in report["downgrade_reasons"])
        )

    def test_failed_sweep_proof_downgrades(self):
        report = self._report(
            sweep_proof={
                "proven": False,
                "reasons": ["method missing"],
            }
        )
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertTrue(any("sweep" in r for r in report["downgrade_reasons"]))


class TestStdoutIsolation(unittest.TestCase):
    """Regression test for #178: tests must not close or corrupt stdout/stderr
    (prevents need for junitxml workaround in full suite runs and review validation).
    """

    def test_stdout_remains_usable(self):
        """After typical test activity (mocks, redirects, prints from mains), stdout should be usable."""
        # Verify not closed
        self.assertFalse(getattr(sys.stdout, "closed", False))
        # Should be able to write (even if captured by pytest)
        try:
            sys.stdout.write("")
            sys.stdout.flush()
        except Exception as exc:
            self.fail(f"stdout write failed after test activity: {exc}")

    def test_stderr_remains_usable(self):
        self.assertFalse(getattr(sys.stderr, "closed", False))
        try:
            sys.stderr.write("")
            sys.stderr.flush()
        except Exception as exc:
            self.fail(f"stderr write failed: {exc}")


class TestRepoNameDisambiguation(unittest.TestCase):
    """Harness assertions for repo name disambiguation (new blind-review hardening).

    "MCP Gitea tool" etc. must resolve to Gitea-Tools, not silently default to
    mcp-control-plane. "open PRs" or ambiguous must check both. Single-repo
    zero-result must not hide PRs in the other configured repo.
    """

    CONFIGURED = [
        "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
        "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/mcp-control-plane",
    ]

    def test_gitea_tools_aliases_resolve_to_gitea_tools_only(self):
        for ref in [
            "MCP Gitea tool",
            "gitea tool",
            "Gitea-Tools",
            "gitea mcp tool",
            "gitea-tools repo",
        ]:
            result = resolve_repos_from_user_reference(ref, self.CONFIGURED)
            self.assertEqual(result, ["Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"])

    def test_mcp_control_plane_alias_resolves_only_to_it(self):
        result = resolve_repos_from_user_reference(
            "mcp-control-plane", self.CONFIGURED
        )
        self.assertEqual(result, ["Scaled-Tech-Consulting/mcp-control-plane"])

    def test_ambiguous_or_empty_defaults_to_both(self):
        self.assertEqual(
            resolve_repos_from_user_reference("open PRs", self.CONFIGURED),
            self.CONFIGURED,
        )
        self.assertEqual(
            resolve_repos_from_user_reference("", self.CONFIGURED),
            self.CONFIGURED,
        )
        self.assertEqual(
            resolve_repos_from_user_reference("review the queue", self.CONFIGURED),
            self.CONFIGURED,
        )

    def test_single_repo_zero_result_does_not_hide_other(self):
        # Simulate a run that only inventoried mcp because of bad alias resolution.
        # The inventory must still require Gitea-Tools to claim "no open PRs".
        mcp_only_reports = [
            {
                "repo": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/mcp-control-plane",
                "state_filter": "open",
                "pagination_complete": True,
                "open_pr_count": 0,
            }
        ]
        result = assess_inventory_completeness(
            repo_reports=mcp_only_reports,
            required_repos=self.CONFIGURED,
        )
        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
        self.assertTrue(
            any("Gitea-Tools" in r for r in result["reasons"])
        )

    def test_full_inventory_of_both_is_required_for_exhaustive_claim(self):
        both_reports = [
            {
                "repo": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
                "state_filter": "open",
                "pagination_complete": True,
                "open_pr_count": 1,
            },
            {
                "repo": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/mcp-control-plane",
                "state_filter": "open",
                "pagination_complete": True,
                "open_pr_count": 0,
            },
        ]
        result = assess_inventory_completeness(
            repo_reports=both_reports, required_repos=self.CONFIGURED
        )
        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
        self.assertTrue(result["can_claim_exhaustive"])


class TestControllerHandoff(unittest.TestCase):
    """Issue #182: final reports must end with a Controller Handoff."""

    BASE_HANDOFF = "\n".join([
        "## Controller Handoff",
        "",
        "- Task: implement issue #182",
        "- Repo: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools",
        "- Role: author",
        "- Identity: jcwalker3 / prgs-author",
        "- Issue/PR: #182 / PR #999",
        "- Branch/SHA: feat/x @ 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
        "- Files changed: review_proofs.py",
        "- Validation: 700 passed, 6 skipped",
        "- Mutations: one PR opened",
        "- Workspace mutations: none",
        "- Current status: PR open",
        "- Blockers: none",
        "- Next: review PR #999",
        "- Safety: no self-review; no self-merge; no secrets",
    ])

    def test_report_without_handoff_is_downgraded(self):
        result = assess_controller_handoff("long report text, no handoff")
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "missing")
        self.assertTrue(result["downgraded"])

    def test_wrong_title_is_downgraded(self):
        text = self.BASE_HANDOFF.replace(
            "## Controller Handoff", "## Handoff Summary")
        result = assess_controller_handoff(text)
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "missing")

    def test_complete_base_handoff_passes(self):
        result = assess_controller_handoff(
            "full report body...\n\n" + self.BASE_HANDOFF)
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "complete")
        self.assertFalse(result["downgraded"])

    def test_missing_base_fields_are_listed(self):
        text = "\n".join(
            line for line in self.BASE_HANDOFF.splitlines()
            if not line.startswith(("- Mutations:", "- Safety:")))
        result = assess_controller_handoff(text)
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "incomplete")
        self.assertTrue(result["downgraded"])
        self.assertIn("Mutations", result["missing_fields"])
        self.assertIn("Safety", result["missing_fields"])

    def test_review_role_requires_review_fields(self):
        result = assess_controller_handoff(self.BASE_HANDOFF, role="review")
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "incomplete")
        self.assertIn("Pinned reviewed head", result["missing_fields"])
        self.assertIn("Worktree path", result["missing_fields"])
        self.assertIn("Merge result", result["missing_fields"])

        complete = self.BASE_HANDOFF + "\n" + "\n".join([
            "- Selected PR: #999",
            "- Reviewer eligibility: passed",
            "- Pinned reviewed head: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
            "- Worktree path: /repo/branches/review-pr-999",
            "- Worktree dirty: no",
            "- Scratch worktree used: yes (/repo/branches/review-pr-999)",
            "- Unrelated local mutations: none",
            "- Review decision: approve",
            "- Merge result: merged",
            "- Linked issue status: closed",
            "- Cleanup status: branch deleted",
        ])
        result = assess_controller_handoff(complete, role="review")
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "complete")

    def _author_role_fields(self, issue_number=182, pr_number=999):
        return [
            f"- Selected issue: #{issue_number}",
            "- Issue lock proof: lock before diff on feat/x @ master",
            "- Claim/comment status: comment-claimed",
            f"- PR number opened: #{pr_number}",
            "- No review/merge: confirmed",
        ]

    def test_handoff_role_fields_author_includes_issue_lock_proof(self):
        from review_proofs import HANDOFF_ROLE_FIELDS
        names = [name for name, _ in HANDOFF_ROLE_FIELDS["author"]]
        self.assertIn("Issue lock proof", names)

    def test_author_role_requires_author_fields(self):
        complete = self.BASE_HANDOFF + "\n" + "\n".join(self._author_role_fields())
        result = assess_controller_handoff(complete, role="author")
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "complete")

        result = assess_controller_handoff(self.BASE_HANDOFF, role="author")
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "incomplete")
        self.assertIn("Issue lock proof", result["missing_fields"])
        self.assertIn("No review/merge confirmation", result["missing_fields"])

    def test_author_role_requires_issue_lock_proof(self):
        without_lock = self.BASE_HANDOFF + "\n" + "\n".join([
            "- Selected issue: #182",
            "- Claim/comment status: comment-claimed",
            "- PR number opened: #999",
            "- No review/merge: confirmed",
        ])
        result = assess_controller_handoff(without_lock, role="author")
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "incomplete")
        self.assertIn("Issue lock proof", result["missing_fields"])

    def test_author_role_rejects_equivalent_or_multiple_issues(self):
        # 1. equivalent reference blocked
        incomplete_eq = self.BASE_HANDOFF + "\n" + "\n".join([
            "- Selected issue: Issue #194 / #196 equivalent",
            "- Issue lock proof: lock before diff on feat/x @ master",
            "- Claim/comment status: comment-claimed",
            "- PR number opened: #999",
            "- No review/merge: confirmed",
        ])
        res = assess_controller_handoff(incomplete_eq, role="author")
        self.assertEqual(res["verdict"], "incomplete")
        self.assertIn("Selected issue", res["missing_fields"])

        # 2. multiple issues blocked
        incomplete_multi = self.BASE_HANDOFF + "\n" + "\n".join([
            "- Selected issue: #194, #196",
            "- Issue lock proof: lock before diff on feat/x @ master",
            "- Claim/comment status: comment-claimed",
            "- PR number opened: #999",
            "- No review/merge: confirmed",
        ])
        res = assess_controller_handoff(incomplete_multi, role="author")
        self.assertEqual(res["verdict"], "incomplete")
        self.assertIn("Selected issue", res["missing_fields"])

    def test_author_role_rejects_fuzzy_pr_number(self):
        incomplete_pr = self.BASE_HANDOFF + "\n" + "\n".join([
            "- Selected issue: #196",
            "- Issue lock proof: lock before diff on feat/issue-196 @ master",
            "- Claim/comment status: comment-claimed",
            "- PR number opened: PR #203 / #204 equivalent",
            "- No review/merge: confirmed",
        ])
        res = assess_controller_handoff(incomplete_pr, role="author")
        self.assertEqual(res["verdict"], "incomplete")
        self.assertIn("PR number opened", res["missing_fields"])

    def test_inventory_role_requires_inventory_fields(self):
        complete = self.BASE_HANDOFF + "\n" + "\n".join([
            "- Repositories checked: Gitea-Tools, mcp-control-plane",
            "- Open PR counts: 2 / 0",
            "- Selected PR or reason: none eligible (self-authored)",
            "- Inventory completeness: complete, no pagination needed",
        ])
        result = assess_controller_handoff(complete, role="inventory")
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "complete")

    def test_skill_doc_declares_handoff_requirement(self):
        # Doc-contract: SKILL.md must keep requiring the exact section and
        # naming this validator, or the convention silently rots.
        skill = (
            __import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
            / "skills" / "llm-project-workflow" / "SKILL.md"
        ).read_text(encoding="utf-8")
        self.assertIn("## Controller Handoff", skill)
        self.assertIn("assess_controller_handoff", skill)
        self.assertIn("issue #182", skill)

    def test_handoff_rejects_none_workspace_mutations_when_local_edits_exist(self):
        # 1. Workspace mutations: none is rejected when local_edits is True
        incomplete_eq = self.BASE_HANDOFF + "\n" + "\n".join(
            self._author_role_fields(issue_number=196, pr_number=203))
        res = assess_controller_handoff(incomplete_eq, role="author", local_edits=True)
        self.assertEqual(res["verdict"], "incomplete")
        self.assertIn("Workspace mutations", res["missing_fields"])

        # 2. Workspace mutations: edited files is allowed when local_edits is True
        complete_eq = self.BASE_HANDOFF.replace(
            "- Workspace mutations: none",
            "- Workspace mutations: edited review_proofs.py",
        ) + "\n" + "\n".join(self._author_role_fields(issue_number=196, pr_number=203))
        res2 = assess_controller_handoff(complete_eq, role="author", local_edits=True)
        self.assertEqual(res2["verdict"], "complete")



class TestReviewMutationFinalReport(unittest.TestCase):
    """Final reports must list exactly one live review mutation."""

    LOCK_ONE = {
        "live_mutations": [{"pr_number": 203, "action": "request_changes"}],
        "correction_authorized": False,
    }

    def test_single_mutation_report_complete(self):
        report = (
            "Review complete on PR #203.\n"
            "Review mutations: one request_changes on #203.\n"
            "Review decision: request_changes."
        )
        result = assess_review_mutation_final_report(report, self.LOCK_ONE)
        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])
        self.assertFalse(result["downgraded"])

    def test_missing_mutation_details_downgraded(self):
        result = assess_review_mutation_final_report(
            "Review complete. No details.", self.LOCK_ONE
        )
        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
        self.assertTrue(result["downgraded"])

    def test_two_mutations_require_correction_explanation(self):
        lock = {
            "live_mutations": [
                {"pr_number": 203, "action": "approve"},
                {"pr_number": 203, "action": "request_changes"},
            ],
            "correction_authorized": True,
            "correction_reason": "operator approved correcting mistaken approve",
        }
        incomplete = assess_review_mutation_final_report(
            "Submitted approve then request_changes on #203.", lock
        )
        self.assertFalse(incomplete["complete"])

        complete = assess_review_mutation_final_report(
            "\n".join([
                "Review mutations: approve (mistake), then request_changes (final).",
                "Correction flow: operator approved correcting mistaken approve on PR #203.",
            ]),
            lock,
        )
        self.assertTrue(complete["complete"])

    def test_build_final_report_wires_review_mutation_from_report_text(self):
        report_text = (
            "Review complete on PR #203.\n"
            "Review mutations: one request_changes on #203."
        )
        lock = {
            "live_mutations": [{"pr_number": 203, "action": "request_changes"}],
            "correction_authorized": False,
        }
        final = build_final_report(
            checkout_proof=_good_checkout(),
            inventory=_good_inventory(),
            validation=_good_validation(),
            contamination=_good_contamination(),
            identity_eligible=True,
            merge_performed=False,
            issue_status_verified=True,
            capability_evidence=_good_capability_evidence(),
            sweep=_good_sweep(),
            live_state=_good_live_state(),
            role_boundary=_good_role_boundary(),
            report_text=report_text,
            review_decision_lock=lock,
        )
        self.assertTrue(final["review_mutation_complete"])


class TestPRInventoryTrustGate(unittest.TestCase):
    """Issue #194: unit tests for the PR inventory trust gate."""

    def setUp(self):
        self.profile = {
            "profile_name": "prgs-reviewer",
            "allowed_operations": ["read", "gitea.read", "gitea.pr.approve"],
        }
        self.local_url = "https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools.git"

    def test_trusted_nonempty(self):
        res = pr_inventory_trust_gate([{"number": 1}])
        self.assertEqual(res["status"], "trusted_nonempty")
        self.assertFalse(res["corroborated"])

    def test_inventory_error_none_or_not_list(self):
        self.assertEqual(pr_inventory_trust_gate(None)["status"], "inventory_error")
        self.assertEqual(pr_inventory_trust_gate("not a list")["status"], "inventory_error")

    def test_untrusted_empty_no_pagination_or_corroboration(self):
        res = pr_inventory_trust_gate(
            [], remote="prgs", org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting", repo="Gitea-Tools",
            state="open", authenticated_profile=self.profile,
            local_remote_url=self.local_url, user_context=None,
            corroboration_open_pr_counter=None, has_finality_metadata=False
        )
        self.assertEqual(res["status"], "untrusted_empty")
        self.assertIn("pagination finality not proven and open_pr_counter corroboration is missing or non-zero", res["reasons"])

    def test_untrusted_empty_profile_permission_mismatch(self):
        bad_profile = {"profile_name": "prgs-bad", "allowed_operations": ["write"]}
        res = pr_inventory_trust_gate(
            [], remote="prgs", org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting", repo="Gitea-Tools",
            state="open", authenticated_profile=bad_profile,
            local_remote_url=self.local_url, user_context=None,
            corroboration_open_pr_counter=0, has_finality_metadata=False
        )
        self.assertEqual(res["status"], "untrusted_empty")
        self.assertIn("authenticated profile lacks read permissions", res["reasons"])

    def test_untrusted_empty_remote_url_mismatch(self):
        bad_url = "https://gitea.prgs.cc/other-org/other-repo.git"
        res = pr_inventory_trust_gate(
            [], remote="prgs", org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting", repo="Gitea-Tools",
            state="open", authenticated_profile=self.profile,
            local_remote_url=bad_url, user_context=None,
            corroboration_open_pr_counter=0, has_finality_metadata=False
        )
        self.assertEqual(res["status"], "untrusted_empty")
        self.assertIn("local remote URL does not match target repository 'Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools'", res["reasons"])

    def test_untrusted_empty_user_context_indicates_prs(self):
        res = pr_inventory_trust_gate(
            [], remote="prgs", org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting", repo="Gitea-Tools",
            state="open", authenticated_profile=self.profile,
            local_remote_url=self.local_url, user_context="please check open PR #181",
            corroboration_open_pr_counter=0, has_finality_metadata=False
        )
        self.assertEqual(res["status"], "untrusted_empty")
        self.assertTrue(any("user context indicates open PRs should exist" in r for r in res["reasons"]))

    def test_trusted_empty_with_corroboration(self):
        res = pr_inventory_trust_gate(
            [], remote="prgs", org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting", repo="Gitea-Tools",
            state="open", authenticated_profile=self.profile,
            local_remote_url=self.local_url, user_context=None,
            corroboration_open_pr_counter=0, has_finality_metadata=False
        )
        self.assertEqual(res["status"], "trusted_empty")
        self.assertTrue(res["corroborated"])

    def test_trusted_empty_with_finality_metadata(self):
        res = pr_inventory_trust_gate(
            [], remote="prgs", org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting", repo="Gitea-Tools",
            state="open", authenticated_profile=self.profile,
            local_remote_url=self.local_url, user_context=None,
            corroboration_open_pr_counter=None, has_finality_metadata=True
        )
        self.assertEqual(res["status"], "trusted_empty")
        self.assertTrue(res["corroborated"])


class TestCapabilityEvidence(unittest.TestCase):
    """#179 gap 1: capability claims need exact evidence."""

    def test_evidence_backed_claims_are_proven(self):
        result = _good_capability_evidence()
        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
        self.assertEqual(result["reasons"], [])

    def test_claim_without_evidence_source_is_not_proven(self):
        result = assess_capability_evidence([
            {"task": "review_pr", "allowed": True, "evidence_source": ""},
        ])
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(any("evidence" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))

    def test_no_claims_at_all_fails_closed(self):
        result = assess_capability_evidence([])
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])

    def test_disallowed_task_is_not_proven(self):
        result = assess_capability_evidence([
            {
                "task": "merge_pr",
                "allowed": False,
                "evidence_source": "gitea_resolve_task_capability output",
            },
        ])
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])


class TestSweepEvidence(unittest.TestCase):
    """#179 gap 2: secret/provenance sweep must be exact."""

    def test_exact_sweep_is_proven(self):
        result = _good_sweep()
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "exact")
        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])

    def test_vague_sweep_without_command_is_downgraded(self):
        result = _good_sweep(command="")
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "vague")
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])

    def test_sweep_without_scope_is_downgraded(self):
        result = _good_sweep(scope="")
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "vague")
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])

    def test_missing_sweep_fails_closed(self):
        result = assess_sweep_evidence(None)
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "missing")
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])

    def test_unstated_result_is_downgraded(self):
        result = _good_sweep(clean=None)
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])


class TestLiveStateRecheck(unittest.TestCase):
    """#179 gap 3: explicit pre-mutation live-state recheck."""

    def test_clean_recheck_is_proven(self):
        result = _good_live_state()
        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
        self.assertFalse(result["block"])

    def test_missing_recheck_fails_closed(self):
        result = assess_live_state_recheck(None)
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(result["block"])

    def test_closed_pr_blocks(self):
        result = _good_live_state(pr_state="closed")
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(result["block"])

    def test_moved_head_blocks(self):
        result = _good_live_state(live_head_sha=OTHER)
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(any("head" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))

    def test_changed_base_blocks(self):
        result = _good_live_state(live_base_ref="develop")
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])

    def test_unresolved_blocking_reviews_block(self):
        result = _good_live_state(blocking_change_requests=True)
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])

    def test_unchecked_blocking_state_fails_closed(self):
        result = _good_live_state(blocking_change_requests=None)
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])


class TestRoleBoundary179(unittest.TestCase):
    """#179 gap 4: reviewer flows avoid unjustified author-namespace use."""

    def test_native_namespace_only_is_clean(self):
        result = _good_role_boundary_179()
        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])

    def test_foreign_namespace_without_justification_is_downgraded(self):
        result = _good_role_boundary_179(
            namespaces_used=["gitea-reviewer", "gitea-author"]
        )
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(any("justif" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))

    def test_foreign_namespace_with_justification_is_clean(self):
        result = _good_role_boundary_179(
            namespaces_used=["gitea-reviewer", "gitea-author"],
            justification=(
                "author namespace read-only whoami used to evidence "
                "self-review contamination status"
            ),
        )
        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])

    def test_unreported_namespaces_fail_closed(self):
        result = _good_role_boundary_179(namespaces_used=None)
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])


class TestFinalReport179Bar(unittest.TestCase):
    """#179 acceptance adds capability, sweep, live-state, and role proofs."""

    def _report(self, **overrides):
        kwargs = {
            "checkout_proof": _good_checkout(),
            "inventory": _good_inventory(),
            "validation": _good_validation(),
            "contamination": _good_contamination(),
            "identity_eligible": True,
            "merge_performed": False,
            "issue_status_verified": True,
            "capability_evidence": _good_capability_evidence(),
            "sweep": _good_sweep(),
            "live_state": _good_live_state(),
            "role_boundary": _good_role_boundary(),
            "review_mutation": _good_review_mutation(),
            "controller_handoff": _good_handoff(),
            "capability_proof": _good_capability_proof(),
            "sweep_proof": _good_secret_sweep(),
            "worktree_proof": {
                "worktree_path": "/repo/branches/review-feat-issue-224",
                "porcelain_status": "",
                "pr_scope_files": ["docs/wiki/Repositories.md"],
                "scratch_used": True,
                "scratch_path": "/repo/branches/review-feat-issue-224",
            },
        }
        kwargs.update(overrides)
        return build_final_report(**kwargs)

    def test_all_179_proofs_present_is_grade_a(self):
        report = self._report()
        self.assertEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertTrue(report["capability_evidence_proven"])
        self.assertEqual(report["sweep_verdict"], "exact")
        self.assertTrue(report["live_state_recheck_proven"])
        self.assertTrue(report["role_boundary_clean"])

    def test_missing_capability_evidence_downgrades(self):
        report = self._report(capability_evidence=None)
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertFalse(report["capability_evidence_proven"])

    def test_unevidenced_capability_claim_downgrades(self):
        report = self._report(
            capability_evidence=assess_capability_evidence([
                {"task": "review_pr", "allowed": True, "evidence_source": ""},
            ])
        )
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")

    def test_vague_sweep_downgrades(self):
        report = self._report(sweep=_good_sweep(command=""))
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertEqual(report["sweep_verdict"], "vague")

    def test_missing_sweep_downgrades(self):
        report = self._report(sweep=None)
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")

    def test_missing_live_state_recheck_downgrades_and_blocks_merge(self):
        report = self._report(live_state=None)
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertFalse(report["merge_allowed"])
        self.assertFalse(report["live_state_recheck_proven"])

    def test_stale_live_state_blocks_merge(self):
        report = self._report(live_state=_good_live_state(live_head_sha=OTHER))
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertFalse(report["merge_allowed"])

    def test_merge_claim_without_live_recheck_is_a_violation(self):
        report = self._report(live_state=None, merge_performed=True)
        self.assertEqual(report["grade"], "blocked")
        self.assertTrue(report["violations"])

    def test_unjustified_author_namespace_downgrades(self):
        report = self._report(
            role_boundary=_good_role_boundary_179(
                namespaces_used=["gitea-reviewer", "gitea-author"]
            )
        )
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertFalse(report["role_boundary_clean"])

    def test_positive_baseline_from_173_still_holds(self):
        report = self._report()
        self.assertTrue(report["inventory_complete"])
        self.assertTrue(report["validated_on_pinned_head"])

    def test_missing_review_mutation_downgrades(self):
        report = self._report(review_mutation=None)
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertFalse(report["review_mutation_complete"])

    def test_incomplete_review_mutation_downgrades(self):
        report = self._report(review_mutation={"complete": False, "downgraded": True, "reasons": []})
        self.assertNotEqual(report["grade"], "A")
        self.assertFalse(report["review_mutation_complete"])


class TestAuthorReporting(unittest.TestCase):
    """Harness assertions for author reporting and capability/sweep proofs."""

    def test_good_capability_proof_passes(self):
        result = _good_capability_proof()
        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])

    def test_missing_capability_proof_fails_closed(self):
        result = assess_capability_proof({})
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(any("fail closed" in r for r in result["reasons"]))

    def test_unresolved_capability_proof_fails_closed(self):
        result = assess_capability_proof({
            "mark_issue": {
                "requested_task": "unknown_task",
                "required_operation_permission": None,
                "allowed_in_current_session": None,
            }
        })
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
        self.assertTrue(
            any("could not be resolved" in r for r in result["reasons"])
        )

    def test_good_secret_sweep_passes(self):
        result = _good_secret_sweep()
        self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "strong")

    def test_vague_secret_sweep_without_method_is_weak(self):
        result = _good_secret_sweep(method="")
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "weak")
        self.assertTrue(
            any("method" in r or "scan" in r for r in result["reasons"])
        )

    def test_unconfirmed_secret_sweep_is_weak(self):
        result = _good_secret_sweep(clean=False)
        self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
        self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "weak")

    def test_good_author_pr_report_passes(self):
        result = assess_author_pr_report({
            "pr_number": 185,
            "branch": "feat/issue-184-repo-name-disambiguation",
            "head_sha": "e2bccbafeeb93124ba068bfb06058d5aa7467cae",
        })
        self.assertTrue(result["complete"])

    def test_author_pr_report_without_head_sha_is_incomplete(self):
        result = assess_author_pr_report({
            "pr_number": 185,
            "branch": "feat/issue-184-repo-name-disambiguation",
            "head_sha": "",
        })
        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])
        self.assertTrue(any("head SHA" in r for r in result["reasons"]))

    def test_author_pr_report_rejects_short_sha(self):
        result = assess_author_pr_report({
            "pr_number": 185,
            "branch": "feat/issue-184-repo-name-disambiguation",
            "head_sha": "e2bccba",
        })
        self.assertFalse(result["complete"])


if __name__ == "__main__":
    unittest.main()