Remove allocator-first and role-first normal operation #994
Open
opened 2026-07-31 10:20:10 -05:00 by jcwalker3
·
0 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
master
fix/issue-987-native-mcp-bootstrap
feat/issue-985-project-scoped-launcher-identity
fix/issue-983-cross-repo-base-ref
feat/issue-980-stale-worker-retirement
fix/issue-975-client-identity-heartbeat
fix/issue-973-cross-repo-canonical-roots
fix/issue-970-safely-resolve-missing-worktrees
fix/issue-969-native-mcp-bootstrap
feat/issue-664-break-glass-restart
feat/issue-708-mcp-namespace-attachment
feat/issue-665-restart-audit
fix/issue-700-durable-walls
fix/issue-704-prevent-env-workspace-bindings
feat/issue-707-cross-project-boundaries
fix/issue-690-review-profile-switch-guard
fix/issue-953-bootstrap-lock-provenance
feat/issue-949-native-fleet-inventory
fix/issue-943-runtime-context-helpers
fix/issue-945-owning-pr-renewal-evidence
fix/issue-941-scope-guard-bootstrap-wiring
docs/issue-930-remote-mcp-coupling-inventory
fix/issue-892-author-bootstrap-deadlock
fix/issue-686-detect-reject-manual-mcp
fix/issue-672-mcp-config-drift
fix/issue-689-deterministic-mcp-namespace
feat/issue-666-concurrent-mcp-restart-tests
feat/issue-659-maintenance-drain-mode
feat/issue-648-notifications-console
fix/issue-670-direct-master-incident
feat/issue-644-console-recovery
feat/issue-650-providers-insights
feat/issue-669-scoped-component-recovery
docs/issue-668-mcp-ha-rolling-restart
feat/issue-667-console-restart-controls
feat/issue-645-linkage-console
feat/issue-643-request-preview-initiate
fix/issue-897-permission-stale-runtime-classification
feat/issue-641-runtime-session-view
feat/issue-663-restart-classes
feat/issue-661-drain-proof-hard-gate
fix/issue-854-semantic-container-exclusion
issue-640
fix/issue-682-starlette-httpx2
v1.1.0
Labels
Clear labels
allocator
anti-stomp
architecture
bug
chore
codex
concurrency
contamination
control-plane
dashboard
database
design
documentation
enhancement
gitea
glitchtip
important
incident
incident-bridge
integration
jenkins
labels
leases
mcp
mcp-health
mcp-menu
multi-project
mutating
nice-to-have
observability
portability
preflight
protected-branch
queue
read-only
reconnect
recovery
refactor
release
reliability
resumable-review
reviewer
roadmap
safety
security
self-hosted
sentry
stale-runtime
status:blocked
status:in-progress
status:pr-open
status:ready
terminal-lock
testing
tracker
type:bug
type:feature
type:feature
type:guardrail
visibility
workflow
workflow-hardening
workflow-hardening
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Controller-owned work allocator
Prevent concurrent LLM session stomping
Architecture / structural design
OpenAI Codex client / workflow session surface
Concurrent session safety
Workflow or session contamination incident
MCP control-plane coordination and allocation authority
MCP operational dashboard/queue view
Internal coordination storage (SQLite/Postgres)
Design / investigation, no implementation
Docs / runbooks
New feature or improvement
Gitea MCP workflow
GlitchTip integration
Operational or process incident requiring durable audit trail
Sentry-to-Gitea incident bridging
Integration testing
Jenkins integration
Label taxonomy management
Lease adopt/release/expire lifecycle
MCP server / tooling
MCP namespace and runtime health
MCP menu surface
Work spanning multiple monitoring projects or Gitea repos
Mutating action; requires gating
Observability, metrics, traces, error reporting
Cross-platform / portability
Shared preflight gates before mutation
Protected branch / stable-branch policy concern
Work queue visibility and allocation
Read-only, no mutation
MCP client reconnect/reload recovery path
Recovery paths for stale/foreign leases
Code refactor / restructure
Release / versioning
Reliability / failure handling
Persist and resume prepared review verdicts across sessions
Reviewer workflow tooling
Roadmap / umbrella issue
Safety rails and fail-closed mutation guards
Security / trust boundary
Self-hosted infrastructure integration
Sentry error monitoring integration
Stale backend daemon / runtime-vs-master parity failures
Issue is blocked
Issue is being worked on
Issue has an open pull request
Issue is ready for work
Terminal review lock (#332) path
Tests / test coverage
Issue tracker hygiene / meta
Bug or defect
Feature or enhancement
Feature or enhancement
Safety gate or guardrail
Workflow state visibility for LLMs/operators
Cross-tool workflow
LLM workflow coordination hardening
LLM workflow coordination hardening
Something is not working
This issue or pull request already exists
New feature
Need some help
Something is wrong
More information is needed
This won't be fixed
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools#994
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Parent umbrella: issue #989. Informative bootstrap evidence only, not a machine-enforced dependency; Child 1 delivers structured relationships and backfills this.
Problem
Normal operation still begins with a bound role and an allocator-selected task. The preceding children build the compliant path; this issue removes the non-compliant one.
Charter connection
What this project is not forbids permanently launching an LLM as only one role, turning the MCP into a dispatcher including de facto dispatch through rejection policy, making a queue allocator authoritative over the LLM's decision, and choosing a role first then searching for fitting work. Roles states a worker never begins a cycle already holding a role. The Responsibilities guardrail requires rejection rules to be durable, reviewable Gitea artifacts so routing patterns can be audited.
Verified current gap
The allocator's contract instructs workers not to self-select and to call it instead; with apply enabled it atomically assigns and leases. Closed issue #600 codifies both. The unified queue surface emits a primary next-safe-action and per-role next targets; closed issue #605 requires per-role next-action prompts and records that assignment goes through #600. The pre-task router classifies a task against the already-active profile. The readiness filter keyed on the ready status label makes label-less open issues unselectable — a routing pattern requiring audit.
Scope
Remove role-first startup guidance from normal autonomous operation. Remove allocator-selected work from the normal worker path. Classify apply-enabled allocation as authoritative allocation. Permit retained allocator components only when read-only, non-assigning, and outside normal worker operation. Ensure no normal path emits a recommended task or per-role next target. Make rejection and eligibility rules durable and reviewable in Gitea. Audit whether ready-status filtering creates de facto steering. Contain and sunset legacy role-scoped compatibility paths. Correct charter-conflicting workflow and dashboard guidance where authorized.
Non-goals
Deleting the allocator or the dashboard. Removing diagnostic, recovery, administrative, or reconciliation tooling. Editing, reopening, or closing #600 or #605 — they are closed historical records, superseded in behaviour, not retracted. Weakening any safety guarantee.
Functional requirements
Safety and authority boundaries
Preserve identity, capability, parity, provenance, ownership, lock, lease, independent-review, approval, handoff, fail-closed, and reconciliation behaviour as classified in the umbrella — verifying rather than assuming. Defective implementations may be corrected where a verified defect requires it.
Acceptance criteria
Required tests and validation
A full cycle with the allocator unavailable. An assertion that no normal path emits a recommended task or per-role next target. An assertion that a compatibility allocator invocation writes no assignment and no lease. The rollback path asserted to halt rather than fall back. The routing-pattern audit. Contract tests for the retained diagnostic and recovery surfaces.
Dependencies
Until Child 1 delivers sanctioned structured relationship operations, the references below are informative bootstrap evidence only. They must not be treated as machine-enforced hard dependencies. Child 1 must backfill the appropriate structured relationships.
Child 4 — the compliant path must exist before the non-compliant one is removed. References #600 and #605.
Compatibility and rollout
The only guidance-breaking step in the program. Legacy scheduled or role-scoped integrations may use an explicitly temporary compatibility path with a stated sunset, but that path is excluded from normal autonomous worker operation and cannot select, assign, or lease work for the worker. No path may require a general worker to accept an allocator-selected task during migration. Intentional breaking changes are versioned with documented migration.
Rollback behavior
Rollback stops autonomous operation safely: admit no new claims; allow an in-flight cycle to finish only while every identity, capability, parity, ownership, and lease gate remains valid; otherwise fail closed, record a durable handoff, release safely, and halt. Rollback must never restore allocator-selected assignment, allocator-created claims, permanent roles, or role-first task discovery. "It is the previous behaviour" is not an exemption; the approved charter controls the roadmap regardless of what shipped earlier.
Documentation requirements
Updated canonical workflow guide and control-plane guide. The published rejection-rule artifact. The compatibility boundary and sunset plan. A rollback procedure stating explicitly that allocator authority is never a rollback target.
Completion evidence
The allocator-free cycle recording, the routing-pattern audit result, and the rollback test result.
Reusable existing issues, PRs, and primitives
#600 and #605 — referenced, superseded in behaviour, not retracted. The existing allocator dry-run path as the basis for a read-only compatibility invocation.
Fundamental-workflow stage supported
inspect -> choose entry conditions — charter steps 1 and 5, plus What this project is not and the Responsibilities dispatcher guardrail.