Compare commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
00e526512a |
+46
-157
@@ -386,68 +386,6 @@ def run_compensating_recovery(
|
|||||||
return recovery_info
|
return recovery_info
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _normalize_sha(value: str | None) -> str | None:
|
|
||||||
"""Normalize a Git object id for comparison, or ``None`` when unknown."""
|
|
||||||
normalized = (value or "").strip().lower()
|
|
||||||
return normalized or None
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _author_bootstrap_assessment(
|
|
||||||
*,
|
|
||||||
not_applicable: bool,
|
|
||||||
allowed: bool,
|
|
||||||
block: bool,
|
|
||||||
reasons: list[str],
|
|
||||||
workspace: str,
|
|
||||||
root: str,
|
|
||||||
branch: str | None,
|
|
||||||
dirty: list[str],
|
|
||||||
under_branches: bool,
|
|
||||||
bootstrap_path: str | None = None,
|
|
||||||
local_head_sha: str | None = None,
|
|
||||||
remote_master_sha: str | None = None,
|
|
||||||
exact_next_action: str | None = None,
|
|
||||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
|
||||||
"""Structured author-bootstrap assessment consumable by bootstrap_permits (#892).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Field shape mirrors :func:`create_issue_bootstrap._result` so the shared
|
|
||||||
``bootstrap_permits_control_checkout`` predicate can prove control-checkout
|
|
||||||
eligibility for ``gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree`` the same way it
|
|
||||||
does for ``create_issue``. Allowed control assessments must use empty
|
|
||||||
``reasons`` — narrative belongs in other fields, not the refusal list.
|
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
local_tip = _normalize_sha(local_head_sha)
|
|
||||||
remote_tip = _normalize_sha(remote_master_sha)
|
|
||||||
base_tips_verified = bool(local_tip and remote_tip and local_tip == remote_tip)
|
|
||||||
return {
|
|
||||||
"not_applicable": not_applicable,
|
|
||||||
"allowed": allowed,
|
|
||||||
"block": block,
|
|
||||||
"proven": bool(allowed and not block and not not_applicable),
|
|
||||||
"reasons": list(reasons),
|
|
||||||
"workspace_path": workspace,
|
|
||||||
"canonical_repo_root": root,
|
|
||||||
"current_branch": branch,
|
|
||||||
"dirty_files": list(dirty),
|
|
||||||
"under_branches": under_branches,
|
|
||||||
"exact_next_action": exact_next_action,
|
|
||||||
"bootstrap_path": bootstrap_path,
|
|
||||||
"task_scope": "author_issue_bootstrap",
|
|
||||||
"local_head_sha": local_tip,
|
|
||||||
"remote_master_sha": remote_tip,
|
|
||||||
"base_tips_verified": base_tips_verified,
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
EXACT_NEXT_ACTION_AUTHOR_BOOTSTRAP = (
|
|
||||||
"Restore the canonical control checkout to a clean accepted base branch "
|
|
||||||
"(master/main/dev) that matches live master, with no tracked local edits. "
|
|
||||||
"Re-resolve bootstrap_author_issue_worktree, then re-run "
|
|
||||||
"gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree from that clean control checkout. "
|
|
||||||
"Do not use shell git worktree add as the primary path once bootstrap is healthy."
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
|
def assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
|
||||||
*,
|
*,
|
||||||
workspace_path: str,
|
workspace_path: str,
|
||||||
@@ -459,13 +397,7 @@ def assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
|
|||||||
remote_master_sha_error: str | None = None,
|
remote_master_sha_error: str | None = None,
|
||||||
task: str | None = None,
|
task: str | None = None,
|
||||||
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||||
"""Assess whether author issue worktree bootstrap may proceed from control or worktree root.
|
"""Assess whether author issue worktree bootstrap may proceed from control or worktree root."""
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#892: control-checkout successes emit the full field set required by
|
|
||||||
``create_issue_bootstrap.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout`` (empty reasons,
|
|
||||||
task_scope, base tip proof, binding paths) so the #274/#604 guards can
|
|
||||||
waive control-checkout for this one sanctioned bootstrap task.
|
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
root = os.path.realpath(canonical_repo_root or "")
|
root = os.path.realpath(canonical_repo_root or "")
|
||||||
workspace = os.path.realpath(workspace_path or root or ".")
|
workspace = os.path.realpath(workspace_path or root or ".")
|
||||||
branch = (current_branch or "").strip()
|
branch = (current_branch or "").strip()
|
||||||
@@ -475,50 +407,34 @@ def assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
|
|||||||
if root
|
if root
|
||||||
else False
|
else False
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
local_tip = _normalize_sha(head_sha)
|
|
||||||
remote_tip = _normalize_sha(remote_master_sha)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if not is_author_issue_bootstrap_task(task):
|
if not is_author_issue_bootstrap_task(task):
|
||||||
return _author_bootstrap_assessment(
|
return {
|
||||||
not_applicable=True,
|
"not_applicable": True,
|
||||||
allowed=False,
|
"allowed": False,
|
||||||
block=False,
|
"block": False,
|
||||||
reasons=["task is not author_issue_bootstrap"],
|
"proven": False,
|
||||||
workspace=workspace,
|
"reasons": ["task is not author_issue_bootstrap"],
|
||||||
root=root,
|
}
|
||||||
branch=branch or None,
|
|
||||||
dirty=dirty,
|
|
||||||
under_branches=under_branches,
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Already under branches/: ordinary #274 path applies; not a control waiver.
|
|
||||||
if under_branches:
|
if under_branches:
|
||||||
return _author_bootstrap_assessment(
|
return {
|
||||||
not_applicable=True,
|
"not_applicable": False,
|
||||||
allowed=False,
|
"allowed": True,
|
||||||
block=False,
|
"block": False,
|
||||||
reasons=["workspace is under branches/; ordinary #274 path applies"],
|
"proven": True,
|
||||||
workspace=workspace,
|
"bootstrap_path": "existing_branches_worktree",
|
||||||
root=root,
|
"reasons": [
|
||||||
branch=branch or None,
|
"workspace is already a registered worktree under branches/"
|
||||||
dirty=dirty,
|
],
|
||||||
under_branches=True,
|
}
|
||||||
bootstrap_path="existing_branches_worktree",
|
|
||||||
local_head_sha=local_tip,
|
|
||||||
remote_master_sha=remote_tip,
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
reasons: list[str] = []
|
reasons: list[str] = []
|
||||||
if not root or workspace != root:
|
if workspace != root:
|
||||||
reasons.append(
|
reasons.append(
|
||||||
"bootstrap requires workspace to be canonical control checkout or branches/ worktree"
|
"bootstrap requires workspace to be canonical control checkout or branches/ worktree"
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
if not branch:
|
if branch not in author_mutation_worktree.BASE_BRANCHES:
|
||||||
reasons.append(
|
|
||||||
"control checkout is detached HEAD; expected an accepted base branch "
|
|
||||||
f"({', '.join(sorted(author_mutation_worktree.BASE_BRANCHES))})"
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
elif branch not in author_mutation_worktree.BASE_BRANCHES:
|
|
||||||
reasons.append(
|
reasons.append(
|
||||||
f"control checkout branch '{branch}' is not an accepted base branch "
|
f"control checkout branch '{branch}' is not an accepted base branch "
|
||||||
f"({', '.join(sorted(author_mutation_worktree.BASE_BRANCHES))})"
|
f"({', '.join(sorted(author_mutation_worktree.BASE_BRANCHES))})"
|
||||||
@@ -528,64 +444,37 @@ def assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
|
|||||||
f"control checkout has tracked local edits: {', '.join(dirty[:5])}"
|
f"control checkout has tracked local edits: {', '.join(dirty[:5])}"
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Fail closed on missing tip proof (same bar as create_issue bootstrap #757).
|
if remote_master_sha_error:
|
||||||
if not local_tip:
|
|
||||||
reasons.append(
|
reasons.append(
|
||||||
"control checkout HEAD SHA is unknown; base equivalence to live "
|
f"could not verify live master tip: {remote_master_sha_error}"
|
||||||
"master cannot be proven (fail closed)"
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
resolver_error = (remote_master_sha_error or "").strip() or None
|
|
||||||
if resolver_error:
|
|
||||||
reasons.append(
|
|
||||||
f"live master tip could not be resolved ({resolver_error}); "
|
|
||||||
"base equivalence cannot be proven (fail closed)"
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
elif not remote_tip:
|
|
||||||
reasons.append(
|
|
||||||
"live master tip is unknown; base equivalence cannot be proven "
|
|
||||||
"(fail closed)"
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
elif local_tip and remote_tip and local_tip != remote_tip:
|
|
||||||
reasons.append(
|
|
||||||
f"control checkout HEAD ({local_tip[:12]}) != live master tip "
|
|
||||||
f"({remote_tip[:12]})"
|
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
elif remote_master_sha and head_sha:
|
||||||
|
h = head_sha.strip().lower()
|
||||||
|
rm = remote_master_sha.strip().lower()
|
||||||
|
if h != rm:
|
||||||
|
reasons.append(
|
||||||
|
f"control checkout HEAD ({h[:12]}) != live master tip ({rm[:12]})"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if reasons:
|
if reasons:
|
||||||
return _author_bootstrap_assessment(
|
return {
|
||||||
not_applicable=False,
|
"not_applicable": False,
|
||||||
allowed=False,
|
"allowed": False,
|
||||||
block=True,
|
"block": True,
|
||||||
reasons=reasons,
|
"proven": False,
|
||||||
workspace=workspace,
|
"reasons": reasons,
|
||||||
root=root,
|
}
|
||||||
branch=branch or None,
|
|
||||||
dirty=dirty,
|
|
||||||
under_branches=False,
|
|
||||||
local_head_sha=local_tip,
|
|
||||||
remote_master_sha=remote_tip,
|
|
||||||
exact_next_action=EXACT_NEXT_ACTION_AUTHOR_BOOTSTRAP,
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Allowed: empty reasons so bootstrap_permits_control_checkout can pass.
|
return {
|
||||||
return _author_bootstrap_assessment(
|
"not_applicable": False,
|
||||||
not_applicable=False,
|
"allowed": True,
|
||||||
allowed=True,
|
"block": False,
|
||||||
block=False,
|
"proven": True,
|
||||||
reasons=[],
|
"bootstrap_path": "clean_canonical_control_checkout",
|
||||||
workspace=workspace,
|
"reasons": [
|
||||||
root=root,
|
"control checkout is clean on accepted base branch matching live master"
|
||||||
branch=branch or None,
|
],
|
||||||
dirty=dirty,
|
}
|
||||||
under_branches=False,
|
|
||||||
bootstrap_path="clean_canonical_control_checkout",
|
|
||||||
local_head_sha=local_tip,
|
|
||||||
remote_master_sha=remote_tip,
|
|
||||||
exact_next_action=(
|
|
||||||
"Call gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree with the allocated "
|
|
||||||
"issue/lease pins; it will create the branches/ worktree and lock."
|
|
||||||
),
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
import fcntl
|
import fcntl
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -241,14 +241,9 @@ def bootstrap_permits_control_checkout(
|
|||||||
caller's ordinary block in force.
|
caller's ordinary block in force.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
``assessment`` is server-derived only: it is produced by
|
``assessment`` is server-derived only: it is produced by
|
||||||
:func:`assess_create_issue_bootstrap` or
|
:func:`assess_create_issue_bootstrap` from inspected repository state. It is
|
||||||
:func:`author_issue_bootstrap.assess_author_issue_bootstrap` from inspected
|
never accepted from an MCP tool argument, so no caller can assert
|
||||||
repository state. It is never accepted from an MCP tool argument, so no
|
eligibility it has not proven.
|
||||||
caller can assert eligibility it has not proven.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#892: author issue worktree bootstrap uses the same predicate with
|
|
||||||
``task_scope='author_issue_bootstrap'`` so a clean control checkout can
|
|
||||||
create the first ``branches/`` worktree without the lock↔worktree cycle.
|
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
if not isinstance(assessment, dict):
|
if not isinstance(assessment, dict):
|
||||||
return False
|
return False
|
||||||
@@ -269,16 +264,9 @@ def bootstrap_permits_control_checkout(
|
|||||||
if assessment.get("reasons"):
|
if assessment.get("reasons"):
|
||||||
return False
|
return False
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Scope proof: create_issue (#749) or author issue bootstrap (#850/#892),
|
# Scope proof: only the create_issue bootstrap, only via the clean
|
||||||
# only via the clean canonical control checkout path.
|
# canonical control checkout path.
|
||||||
task_scope = assessment.get("task_scope")
|
if assessment.get("task_scope") != "create_issue_only":
|
||||||
if is_create_issue_task(task):
|
|
||||||
if task_scope != "create_issue_only":
|
|
||||||
return False
|
|
||||||
elif author_issue_bootstrap.is_author_issue_bootstrap_task(task):
|
|
||||||
if task_scope != "author_issue_bootstrap":
|
|
||||||
return False
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
return False
|
return False
|
||||||
if assessment.get("bootstrap_path") != "clean_canonical_control_checkout":
|
if assessment.get("bootstrap_path") != "clean_canonical_control_checkout":
|
||||||
return False
|
return False
|
||||||
|
|||||||
+2
-2
@@ -577,10 +577,10 @@ def _get_workspace_porcelain(worktree_path: str | None = None) -> str:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _parse_porcelain_entries(porcelain: str) -> dict[str, str]:
|
def _parse_porcelain_entries(porcelain: str) -> dict[str, str]:
|
||||||
"""Map tracked path -> full porcelain line (untracked ``??`` ignored)."""
|
"""Map path -> full porcelain line (including untracked ``??``)."""
|
||||||
entries: dict[str, str] = {}
|
entries: dict[str, str] = {}
|
||||||
for line in (porcelain or "").splitlines():
|
for line in (porcelain or "").splitlines():
|
||||||
if not line or len(line) < 4 or line.startswith("??"):
|
if not line or len(line) < 4:
|
||||||
continue
|
continue
|
||||||
path = line[3:].strip()
|
path = line[3:].strip()
|
||||||
if " -> " in path:
|
if " -> " in path:
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|||||||
|
"""Regression test for Issue #697: Native workspace preflight explicitly includes untracked files.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Verifies that `_parse_porcelain_entries` includes untracked files (lines starting with '??')
|
||||||
|
so workspace preflight fails closed on untracked or dirty state.
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
import unittest
|
||||||
|
import gitea_mcp_server as mcp_server
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
class TestIssue697UntrackedPreflight(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||||
|
def test_parse_porcelain_entries_includes_untracked_files(self):
|
||||||
|
porcelain = " M gitea_mcp_server.py\n?? untracked_file.txt\n?? new_dir/test.py\n"
|
||||||
|
entries = mcp_server._parse_porcelain_entries(porcelain)
|
||||||
|
self.assertIn("untracked_file.txt", entries)
|
||||||
|
self.assertIn("new_dir/test.py", entries)
|
||||||
|
self.assertEqual(entries["untracked_file.txt"], "?? untracked_file.txt")
|
||||||
|
self.assertEqual(entries["new_dir/test.py"], "?? new_dir/test.py")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def test_parse_porcelain_entries_includes_tracked_and_untracked(self):
|
||||||
|
porcelain = " M tracked.py\n?? untracked.py\n D deleted.py\n"
|
||||||
|
entries = mcp_server._parse_porcelain_entries(porcelain)
|
||||||
|
self.assertEqual(len(entries), 3)
|
||||||
|
self.assertIn("tracked.py", entries)
|
||||||
|
self.assertIn("untracked.py", entries)
|
||||||
|
self.assertIn("deleted.py", entries)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||||
|
unittest.main()
|
||||||
@@ -1,215 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
"""Regression: author worktree bootstrap from clean control checkout (#892).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#892 is the four-door deadlock where every documented recovery path is closed:
|
|
||||||
bootstrap refuses control, lock demands an existing worktree, worktree-start
|
|
||||||
demands a lock, and shell worktree add is outside the sanctioned MCP path.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Root cause: assess_author_issue_bootstrap returned allowed/proven for a clean
|
|
||||||
control checkout, but bootstrap_permits_control_checkout only accepted
|
|
||||||
create_issue assessments (task_scope=create_issue_only + empty reasons + full
|
|
||||||
base-tip field set). Author assessments never satisfied the shared predicate,
|
|
||||||
so the #274/#604 guards kept the ordinary control-checkout block.
|
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
import os
|
|
||||||
import tempfile
|
|
||||||
import unittest
|
|
||||||
from unittest import mock
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
import author_issue_bootstrap as aib
|
|
||||||
import create_issue_bootstrap as cib
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
CONTROL = "/repo/Gitea-Tools"
|
|
||||||
MASTER = "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
|
|
||||||
OTHER = "bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _assess(
|
|
||||||
*,
|
|
||||||
workspace=CONTROL,
|
|
||||||
root=CONTROL,
|
|
||||||
branch="master",
|
|
||||||
head=MASTER,
|
|
||||||
porcelain="",
|
|
||||||
remote=MASTER,
|
|
||||||
remote_error=None,
|
|
||||||
task="bootstrap_author_issue_worktree",
|
|
||||||
):
|
|
||||||
return aib.assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
|
|
||||||
workspace_path=workspace,
|
|
||||||
canonical_repo_root=root,
|
|
||||||
current_branch=branch,
|
|
||||||
head_sha=head,
|
|
||||||
porcelain_status=porcelain,
|
|
||||||
remote_master_sha=remote,
|
|
||||||
remote_master_sha_error=remote_error,
|
|
||||||
task=task,
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
class TestAuthorBootstrapAssessmentShape(unittest.TestCase):
|
|
||||||
def test_clean_control_emits_predicate_compatible_fields(self):
|
|
||||||
assessment = _assess()
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(assessment["allowed"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(assessment["proven"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(assessment["block"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(assessment["not_applicable"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(assessment["reasons"], [])
|
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(assessment["task_scope"], "author_issue_bootstrap")
|
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(
|
|
||||||
assessment["bootstrap_path"], "clean_canonical_control_checkout"
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(assessment["dirty_files"], [])
|
|
||||||
self.assertIs(assessment["under_branches"], False)
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(assessment["base_tips_verified"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(assessment["local_head_sha"], MASTER)
|
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(assessment["remote_master_sha"], MASTER)
|
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(assessment["workspace_path"], os.path.realpath(CONTROL))
|
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(
|
|
||||||
assessment["canonical_repo_root"], os.path.realpath(CONTROL)
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_wrong_task_not_applicable(self):
|
|
||||||
assessment = _assess(task="lock_issue")
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(assessment["not_applicable"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(assessment["allowed"])
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_branches_worktree_not_applicable_for_control_waiver(self):
|
|
||||||
branches = os.path.join(CONTROL, "branches", "fix-issue-1")
|
|
||||||
assessment = _assess(workspace=branches)
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(assessment["not_applicable"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(assessment["allowed"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(assessment["bootstrap_path"], "existing_branches_worktree")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_dirty_control_blocks(self):
|
|
||||||
assessment = _assess(porcelain=" M gitea_mcp_server.py\n")
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(assessment["block"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(assessment["allowed"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(any("tracked local edits" in r for r in assessment["reasons"]))
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_head_remote_mismatch_blocks(self):
|
|
||||||
assessment = _assess(head=MASTER, remote=OTHER)
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(assessment["block"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(assessment["allowed"])
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_missing_remote_tip_blocks(self):
|
|
||||||
assessment = _assess(remote=None)
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(assessment["block"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(assessment["allowed"])
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
class TestAuthorBootstrapPredicate(unittest.TestCase):
|
|
||||||
def _permits(self, assessment, task="bootstrap_author_issue_worktree"):
|
|
||||||
return cib.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout(
|
|
||||||
assessment,
|
|
||||||
task=task,
|
|
||||||
workspace_path=os.path.realpath(CONTROL),
|
|
||||||
canonical_repo_root=os.path.realpath(CONTROL),
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_clean_author_bootstrap_permits(self):
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(self._permits(_assess()))
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_tool_alias_permits(self):
|
|
||||||
assessment = _assess(task="gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree")
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(
|
|
||||||
self._permits(assessment, task="gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree")
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_create_issue_scope_cannot_license_author_bootstrap(self):
|
|
||||||
# Cross-scope smuggling: a create_issue-shaped assessment must not
|
|
||||||
# authorize the author bootstrap task.
|
|
||||||
create_shaped = dict(_assess())
|
|
||||||
create_shaped["task_scope"] = "create_issue_only"
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(self._permits(create_shaped))
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_author_scope_cannot_license_create_issue(self):
|
|
||||||
assessment = _assess()
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(
|
|
||||||
cib.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout(
|
|
||||||
assessment,
|
|
||||||
task="create_issue",
|
|
||||||
workspace_path=os.path.realpath(CONTROL),
|
|
||||||
canonical_repo_root=os.path.realpath(CONTROL),
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_nonempty_reasons_fail_closed(self):
|
|
||||||
bad = dict(_assess(), reasons=["informational text must not be here"])
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(self._permits(bad))
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_dirty_fails_closed(self):
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(self._permits(_assess(porcelain=" M x.py\n")))
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_mismatch_fails_closed(self):
|
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(self._permits(_assess(remote=OTHER)))
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
class TestAuthorBootstrapPreflightIntegration(unittest.TestCase):
|
|
||||||
"""Server preflight path: clean control + author bootstrap task must not raise."""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_enforce_branches_only_allows_clean_control_for_bootstrap(self):
|
|
||||||
# Exercise the real enforcer wiring with a temporary clean repo.
|
|
||||||
import gitea_mcp_server as srv
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
|
|
||||||
repo = os.path.join(tmp, "repo")
|
|
||||||
os.makedirs(os.path.join(repo, "branches"))
|
|
||||||
# Minimal git repo on master at a known tip.
|
|
||||||
import subprocess
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
subprocess.check_call(["git", "init", "-b", "master", repo])
|
|
||||||
subprocess.check_call(
|
|
||||||
["git", "-C", repo, "commit", "--allow-empty", "-m", "init"]
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
head = subprocess.check_output(
|
|
||||||
["git", "-C", repo, "rev-parse", "HEAD"], text=True
|
|
||||||
).strip()
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assessment = aib.assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
|
|
||||||
workspace_path=repo,
|
|
||||||
canonical_repo_root=repo,
|
|
||||||
current_branch="master",
|
|
||||||
head_sha=head,
|
|
||||||
porcelain_status="",
|
|
||||||
remote_master_sha=head,
|
|
||||||
task="bootstrap_author_issue_worktree",
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(
|
|
||||||
cib.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout(
|
|
||||||
assessment,
|
|
||||||
task="bootstrap_author_issue_worktree",
|
|
||||||
workspace_path=repo,
|
|
||||||
canonical_repo_root=repo,
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Simulate what _enforce_branches_only_author_mutation does when
|
|
||||||
# durable resolution blocks control: the shared predicate must waive.
|
|
||||||
durable_block = {
|
|
||||||
"block": True,
|
|
||||||
"workspace_path": repo,
|
|
||||||
"workspace_binding_source": "process_project_root",
|
|
||||||
"reasons": [
|
|
||||||
"author mutation blocked: workspace is the stable control checkout"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
if cib.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout(
|
|
||||||
assessment,
|
|
||||||
task="bootstrap_author_issue_worktree",
|
|
||||||
workspace_path=repo,
|
|
||||||
canonical_repo_root=repo,
|
|
||||||
):
|
|
||||||
waived = True
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
waived = False
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(waived)
|
|
||||||
# Keep durable_block referenced so the scenario is explicit.
|
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(durable_block["block"])
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|
||||||
unittest.main()
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user