Compare commits

..
6 changed files with 303 additions and 620 deletions
+26 -62
View File
@@ -11242,22 +11242,25 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
if dry_run:
report["dry_run"] = True
report["executed"] = False
# #851: surface planned lifecycle order so dry-run matches execute.
report["planned_execution_orders"] = {
str(entry.get("pr_number")): entry.get("planned_execution_order") or []
for entry in (report.get("entries") or [])
}
return {"success": True, "performed": False, **report}
verify_preflight_purity(
remote, task="reconcile_merged_cleanups", org=org, repo=repo
)
actions: list[dict] = []
project_root = _canonical_local_git_root()
for entry in report.get("entries") or []:
head_branch = entry.get("head_branch") or ""
remote_assessment = entry.get("remote_branch") or {}
local_assessment = entry.get("local_worktree") or {}
def _ownership_records_for_branch(
head_branch: str, pr_num_int: int | None
) -> list[dict]:
if remote_assessment.get("safe_to_delete_remote"):
import urllib.parse
pr_num = entry.get("pr_number")
try:
pr_num_int = int(pr_num) if pr_num is not None else None
except (TypeError, ValueError):
pr_num_int = None
ownership_bundle = _collect_branch_ownership_records(
remote=remote,
host=h,
@@ -11265,7 +11268,7 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
repo=r,
branch=head_branch,
pr_number=pr_num_int,
project_root=project_root,
project_root=_canonical_local_git_root(),
auth=auth,
base_api=base,
)
@@ -11286,18 +11289,6 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
"role": "inventory",
}
)
return ownership_records
def _attempt_owned_remote_delete(
*,
head_branch: str,
pr_num_int: int | None,
after_worktree_removal: bool = False,
) -> dict:
"""Fail-closed remote delete with live ownership reassessment (#851)."""
import urllib.parse
ownership_records = _ownership_records_for_branch(head_branch, pr_num_int)
ownership = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_active_branch_ownership(
remote=remote,
org=o,
@@ -11307,7 +11298,8 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
records=ownership_records,
)
if ownership.get("block"):
return {
actions.append(
{
"action": "delete_remote_branch",
"branch": head_branch,
"success": False,
@@ -11316,10 +11308,13 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
"verified_absent": False,
"blocker_kind": "active_branch_ownership",
"reasons": ownership.get("reasons") or [],
"blocking_categories": ownership.get("blocking_categories") or [],
"after_worktree_removal": after_worktree_removal,
"ownership_reassessed": after_worktree_removal,
"blocking_categories": ownership.get(
"blocking_categories"
)
or [],
}
)
continue
encoded = urllib.parse.quote(head_branch, safe="")
url = f"{base}/branches/{encoded}"
@@ -11334,7 +11329,6 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
"branch": head_branch,
"source": "reconcile_merged_cleanups",
"ownership_checked": True,
"after_worktree_removal": after_worktree_removal,
},
):
api_request("DELETE", url, auth)
@@ -11343,7 +11337,8 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
readback
)
verified = bool(readback_assessment.get("verified_absent"))
return {
actions.append(
{
"action": "delete_remote_branch",
"branch": head_branch,
"success": bool(readback_assessment.get("ok")),
@@ -11352,53 +11347,22 @@ def gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
"verified_absent": verified,
"readback": readback_assessment.get("readback"),
"reasons": readback_assessment.get("reasons") or [],
"after_worktree_removal": after_worktree_removal,
"ownership_reassessed": after_worktree_removal,
}
)
for entry in report.get("entries") or []:
head_branch = entry.get("head_branch") or ""
remote_assessment = entry.get("remote_branch") or {}
local_assessment = entry.get("local_worktree") or {}
pr_num = entry.get("pr_number")
try:
pr_num_int = int(pr_num) if pr_num is not None else None
except (TypeError, ValueError):
pr_num_int = None
# #851 lifecycle: when the target worktree is independently safe, remove
# it first so worktree_binding ownership does not permanently strand
# both the worktree and the remote branch. Never skip worktree removal
# merely because remote delete would be blocked by that binding.
# Ownership protection for remote delete remains fail-closed below.
worktree_removed = False
if local_assessment.get("safe_to_remove_worktree"):
result = merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree(
project_root,
_canonical_local_git_root(),
head_branch,
worktree_path=local_assessment.get("worktree_path"),
)
actions.append({"action": "remove_local_worktree", **result})
# Idempotent resume: absent worktree is already gone.
msg = (result.get("message") or "").lower()
worktree_removed = bool(result.get("success")) or (
"not found" in msg
)
if remote_assessment.get("safe_to_delete_remote"):
actions.append(
_attempt_owned_remote_delete(
head_branch=head_branch,
pr_num_int=pr_num_int,
after_worktree_removal=worktree_removed,
)
)
for scratch in report.get("reviewer_scratch_entries") or []:
if not scratch.get("safe_to_remove_worktree"):
continue
result = merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_reviewer_scratch_worktree(
project_root, scratch.get("worktree_path") or ""
_canonical_local_git_root(), scratch.get("worktree_path") or ""
)
actions.append({"action": "remove_reviewer_scratch_worktree", **result})
-58
View File
@@ -566,10 +566,6 @@ def build_pr_cleanup_entry(
worktree_state=worktree_state,
active_lock=active_lock,
)
planned = plan_cleanup_execution_order(
remote_assessment=remote,
local_assessment=local,
)
return {
"pr_number": pr_number,
"issue_number": issue_number,
@@ -580,63 +576,9 @@ def build_pr_cleanup_entry(
"merged": merged,
"remote_branch": remote,
"local_worktree": local,
# #851: dry-run and execute share the same lifecycle order description.
"planned_execution_order": planned,
}
def plan_cleanup_execution_order(
*,
remote_assessment: dict[str, Any] | None,
local_assessment: dict[str, Any] | None,
) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
"""Describe independent worktree-then-reassess-then-remote cleanup order (#851).
Remote ownership protection remains fail-closed at execute time. A worktree
that is independently safe to remove is never skipped merely because remote
deletion may be blocked by that same ``worktree_binding``.
"""
remote = remote_assessment or {}
local = local_assessment or {}
steps: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
worktree_safe = bool(local.get("safe_to_remove_worktree"))
remote_safe = bool(remote.get("safe_to_delete_remote"))
if worktree_safe:
steps.append(
{
"action": "remove_local_worktree",
"reason": "independently_safe_to_remove",
"phase": 1,
}
)
if remote_safe:
if worktree_safe:
steps.append(
{
"action": "reassess_branch_ownership",
"reason": "after_worktree_removal_clear_worktree_binding",
"phase": 2,
}
)
steps.append(
{
"action": "delete_remote_branch",
"reason": "only_if_independently_safe_after_reassessment",
"phase": 3,
}
)
else:
steps.append(
{
"action": "delete_remote_branch",
"reason": "safe_to_delete_and_no_independent_worktree_removal",
"phase": 1,
}
)
return steps
def build_reconciliation_report(
*,
project_root: str,
+51 -2
View File
@@ -228,25 +228,74 @@ def find_active_reviewer_lease(
return None
def _conflict_fix_chain_key(lease: dict) -> tuple | None:
"""Identity of the lease chain a conflict-fix marker belongs to (#842).
Keyed by PR number, profile, head_before, and branch. Returns None when any
required component (pr_number, profile, head_before) is missing or malformed.
"""
raw = lease.get("raw_fields") or {}
pr_number = lease.get("pr_number")
profile = (lease.get("profile") or "").strip().lower()
head_before = lease.get("head_before")
branch = (lease.get("branch") or raw.get("branch") or "").strip()
if not (pr_number and profile and head_before):
return None
return (pr_number, profile, head_before, branch)
def _conflict_fix_chain_matches(key1: tuple, key2: tuple) -> bool:
"""True when two conflict-fix chain keys refer to the same lease chain."""
pr1, profile1, head1, branch1 = key1
pr2, profile2, head2, branch2 = key2
if pr1 != pr2 or profile1 != profile2 or head1 != head2:
return False
if branch1 and branch2 and branch1 != branch2:
return False
return True
def _conflict_fix_chain_terminated_after(entries: list[dict], index: int) -> bool:
"""True when a later marker terminates the conflict-fix chain of ``entries[index]``.
Append-only newest-wins: a terminal marker (phase=released/blocked/done)
ends only its matching claim chain (#842).
"""
key = _conflict_fix_chain_key(entries[index])
if key is None:
return False
for later in entries[index + 1:]:
phase = (later.get("phase") or "").strip().lower()
if phase not in _TERMINAL_CONFLICT_FIX_PHASES:
continue
later_key = _conflict_fix_chain_key(later)
if later_key and _conflict_fix_chain_matches(key, later_key):
return True
return False
def find_active_conflict_fix_lease(
comments: list[dict],
*,
pr_number: int,
now: datetime | None = None,
) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
"""Return the newest unexpired conflict-fix lease for *pr_number*, if any."""
"""Return the newest unexpired, non-terminated conflict-fix lease for *pr_number*, if any."""
now = now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
candidates = [
entry for entry in _comment_entries(comments, pr_number=pr_number)
if entry.get("lease_kind") == "conflict_fix"
]
for lease in reversed(candidates):
for index in range(len(candidates) - 1, -1, -1):
lease = candidates[index]
if _lease_expired(lease, now=now):
continue
phase = (lease.get("phase") or "").strip().lower()
if phase in _TERMINAL_CONFLICT_FIX_PHASES:
continue
if phase in _ACTIVE_CONFLICT_FIX_PHASES or phase:
if _conflict_fix_chain_terminated_after(candidates, index):
continue
return lease
return None
-372
View File
@@ -1266,378 +1266,6 @@ class TestSecondRemediationIntegration(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertIn("delete_acknowledged", delete_actions[0])
self.assertTrue(delete_actions[0].get("verified_absent"))
def test_issue_851_worktree_removed_when_remote_blocked_only_by_worktree_binding(self):
"""#851: remote blocked by worktree_binding must not skip safe worktree removal.
Lifecycle: remove clean owned worktree → reassess ownership → delete
remote only if independently safe. Unrelated entries stay untouched.
"""
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
target_branch = "fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"
foreign_branch = "fix/issue-999-unrelated-active"
worktree_path = "/tmp/branches/fix-issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"
ownership_calls = []
remove_calls = []
delete_api_calls = []
def fake_collect(**kwargs):
ownership_calls.append(dict(kwargs))
# Ownership is reassessed *after* independent worktree removal (#851).
# Target worktree is already gone → no worktree_binding remains.
# Foreign branch keeps an active author lease → remote delete blocked.
if kwargs.get("branch") == foreign_branch:
# Match session-bound org/repo + host used by the tool resolve path.
return {
"records": [
{
"category": guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_AUTHOR_LEASE,
"status": "active",
"remote": kwargs.get("remote") or "prgs",
"host": kwargs.get("host") or "gitea.example.com",
"org": kwargs.get("org") or "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
"repo": kwargs.get("repo") or "Gitea-Tools",
"branch": foreign_branch,
"reclaim_allowed": False,
}
],
"inventory_error": False,
}
return {"records": [], "inventory_error": False}
def fake_remove(project_root, branch, worktree_path=None):
remove_calls.append(
{"branch": branch, "worktree_path": worktree_path}
)
return {
"success": True,
"performed": True,
"message": f"removed worktree {worktree_path}",
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
}
def fake_probe(h, o, r, auth, br):
return guard.classify_branch_readback_http_status(
404, not_found_scope=guard.NOT_FOUND_SCOPE_BRANCH
)
def fake_api(method, url, auth, **kwargs):
if method == "DELETE":
delete_api_calls.append(url)
return {}
report = {
"entries": [
{
"pr_number": 848,
"head_branch": target_branch,
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
"local_worktree": {
"safe_to_remove_worktree": True,
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
},
},
{
"pr_number": 999,
"head_branch": foreign_branch,
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
"local_worktree": {
"safe_to_remove_worktree": False,
"worktree_path": None,
},
},
],
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
}
patch(
"mcp_server.get_profile",
return_value={
"profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
"role": "reconciler",
"allowed_operations": [
"gitea.read",
"gitea.branch.delete",
"gitea.pr.close",
],
"forbidden_operations": [],
},
).start()
patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[]).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
return_value=report,
).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees",
return_value=[],
).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.audit_reconciliation_mode.check_cleanup_execution_allowed",
return_value=(True, []),
).start()
patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None).start()
patch(
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
side_effect=fake_collect,
).start()
patch("mcp_server._probe_remote_branch", side_effect=fake_probe).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree",
side_effect=fake_remove,
).start()
self.mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
dry_run=False,
execute_confirmed=True,
remote="prgs",
)
self.assertTrue(res.get("performed") or res.get("executed"))
actions = res.get("actions") or []
remove_actions = [
a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree"
]
self.assertEqual(len(remove_actions), 1, actions)
self.assertTrue(remove_actions[0].get("success"))
self.assertEqual(remove_calls[0]["branch"], target_branch)
self.assertEqual(remove_calls[0]["worktree_path"], worktree_path)
# Target remote delete succeeds after worktree removal + reassessment.
target_deletes = [
a
for a in actions
if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
and a.get("branch") == target_branch
]
self.assertEqual(len(target_deletes), 1, actions)
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("success"))
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("after_worktree_removal"))
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("ownership_reassessed"))
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("verified_absent"))
# Foreign branch remains protected (author lease) and is not deleted.
foreign_deletes = [
a
for a in actions
if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
and a.get("branch") == foreign_branch
]
self.assertEqual(len(foreign_deletes), 1, actions)
self.assertFalse(foreign_deletes[0].get("success"))
self.assertEqual(
foreign_deletes[0].get("blocker_kind"), "active_branch_ownership"
)
self.assertIn(
guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_AUTHOR_LEASE,
foreign_deletes[0].get("blocking_categories") or [],
)
# Only the target branch should hit the DELETE API.
self.assertEqual(len(delete_api_calls), 1)
# Ownership collected for target (post-removal) and foreign; worktree
# removal happened before target remote delete in the action log.
target_idx = next(
i
for i, a in enumerate(actions)
if a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree"
)
delete_idx = next(
i
for i, a in enumerate(actions)
if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
and a.get("branch") == target_branch
and a.get("success")
)
self.assertLess(target_idx, delete_idx)
def test_issue_851_dirty_worktree_not_removed_and_remote_stays_protected(self):
"""#851: dirty/foreign worktrees remain protected; no unsafe cleanup."""
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
branch = "fix/issue-851-dirty"
remove_calls = []
def fake_collect(**kwargs):
return {
"records": [
{
"category": guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_WORKTREE_BINDING,
"status": "active",
"remote": kwargs.get("remote") or "prgs",
"host": kwargs.get("host") or "gitea.example.com",
"org": kwargs.get("org") or "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
"repo": kwargs.get("repo") or "Gitea-Tools",
"branch": branch,
"reclaim_allowed": False,
}
],
"inventory_error": False,
}
report = {
"entries": [
{
"pr_number": 851,
"head_branch": branch,
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
"local_worktree": {
"safe_to_remove_worktree": False,
"worktree_path": "/tmp/dirty-wt",
},
}
],
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
}
patch(
"mcp_server.get_profile",
return_value={
"profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
"role": "reconciler",
"allowed_operations": [
"gitea.read",
"gitea.branch.delete",
],
"forbidden_operations": [],
},
).start()
patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[]).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
return_value=report,
).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees",
return_value=[],
).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.audit_reconciliation_mode.check_cleanup_execution_allowed",
return_value=(True, []),
).start()
patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None).start()
patch(
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
side_effect=fake_collect,
).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree",
side_effect=lambda *a, **k: remove_calls.append(k) or {
"success": True,
"performed": True,
},
).start()
self.mock_api.side_effect = lambda *a, **k: {}
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
dry_run=False,
execute_confirmed=True,
remote="prgs",
)
actions = res.get("actions") or []
self.assertEqual(remove_calls, [])
self.assertFalse(
any(a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree" for a in actions)
)
deletes = [
a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
]
self.assertEqual(len(deletes), 1)
self.assertFalse(deletes[0].get("success"))
self.assertEqual(deletes[0].get("blocker_kind"), "active_branch_ownership")
self.assertIn(
guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_WORKTREE_BINDING,
deletes[0].get("blocking_categories") or [],
)
def test_issue_851_idempotent_resume_when_worktree_already_absent(self):
"""#851: partial failures remain resumable and idempotent."""
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
branch = "fix/issue-851-resume"
ownership_calls = []
def fake_collect(**kwargs):
ownership_calls.append(kwargs)
return {"records": [], "inventory_error": False}
def fake_remove(project_root, branch, worktree_path=None):
return {
"success": False,
"performed": False,
"message": f"worktree not found: {worktree_path}",
}
def fake_probe(h, o, r, auth, br):
return guard.classify_branch_readback_http_status(
404, not_found_scope=guard.NOT_FOUND_SCOPE_BRANCH
)
report = {
"entries": [
{
"pr_number": 851,
"head_branch": branch,
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
"local_worktree": {
"safe_to_remove_worktree": True,
"worktree_path": "/tmp/already-gone",
},
}
],
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
}
patch(
"mcp_server.get_profile",
return_value={
"profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
"role": "reconciler",
"allowed_operations": [
"gitea.read",
"gitea.branch.delete",
],
"forbidden_operations": [],
},
).start()
patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[]).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
return_value=report,
).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees",
return_value=[],
).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.audit_reconciliation_mode.check_cleanup_execution_allowed",
return_value=(True, []),
).start()
patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None).start()
patch(
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
side_effect=fake_collect,
).start()
patch("mcp_server._probe_remote_branch", side_effect=fake_probe).start()
patch(
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree",
side_effect=fake_remove,
).start()
self.mock_api.side_effect = lambda *a, **k: {}
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
dry_run=False,
execute_confirmed=True,
remote="prgs",
)
actions = res.get("actions") or []
removes = [a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree"]
deletes = [a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"]
self.assertEqual(len(removes), 1)
self.assertFalse(removes[0].get("success"))
self.assertEqual(len(deletes), 1)
self.assertTrue(deletes[0].get("success"))
self.assertTrue(deletes[0].get("after_worktree_removal"))
self.assertTrue(ownership_calls)
if __name__ == "__main__":
-53
View File
@@ -12,59 +12,6 @@ import merged_cleanup_reconcile as mcr # noqa: E402
class TestMergedCleanupAssessment(unittest.TestCase):
def test_issue_851_plan_order_worktree_then_reassess_then_remote(self):
"""#851 dry-run plan: remove worktree, reassess ownership, then remote."""
plan = mcr.plan_cleanup_execution_order(
remote_assessment={"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
local_assessment={"safe_to_remove_worktree": True},
)
actions = [s["action"] for s in plan]
self.assertEqual(
actions,
[
"remove_local_worktree",
"reassess_branch_ownership",
"delete_remote_branch",
],
)
self.assertEqual(plan[0]["phase"], 1)
self.assertEqual(plan[-1]["phase"], 3)
self.assertIn("independently_safe", plan[0]["reason"])
self.assertIn("reassessment", plan[-1]["reason"])
def test_issue_851_plan_remote_only_when_worktree_not_safe(self):
plan = mcr.plan_cleanup_execution_order(
remote_assessment={"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
local_assessment={"safe_to_remove_worktree": False},
)
self.assertEqual([s["action"] for s in plan], ["delete_remote_branch"])
self.assertNotIn("reassess_branch_ownership", [s["action"] for s in plan])
def test_issue_851_plan_worktree_only_when_remote_not_safe(self):
plan = mcr.plan_cleanup_execution_order(
remote_assessment={"safe_to_delete_remote": False},
local_assessment={"safe_to_remove_worktree": True},
)
self.assertEqual([s["action"] for s in plan], ["remove_local_worktree"])
def test_issue_851_entry_includes_planned_execution_order(self):
entry = mcr.build_pr_cleanup_entry(
pr={
"number": 848,
"title": "Closes #844",
"body": "",
"merged_at": "2026-07-23T00:00:00Z",
"head": {"ref": "fix/issue-844-x", "sha": "a" * 40},
},
project_root="/tmp/not-a-real-root",
open_pr_heads=set(),
remote_branch_exists=True,
head_on_master=True,
delete_capability_allowed=True,
)
self.assertIn("planned_execution_order", entry)
self.assertIsInstance(entry["planned_execution_order"], list)
def test_extract_linked_issue_from_closes(self):
issue = mcr.extract_linked_issue(
"feat: cleanup (Closes #269)",
+153
View File
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ from pr_work_lease import ( # noqa: E402
assess_reviewer_mutation_blocked,
assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report,
format_conflict_fix_lease_body,
find_active_conflict_fix_lease,
parse_conflict_fix_lease_comment,
parse_reviewer_lease_comment,
)
@@ -203,5 +204,157 @@ class TestFormatLease(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(parsed["pr_number"], 376)
class TestConflictFixLeaseLifecycle(unittest.TestCase):
def test_claim_followed_by_matching_release(self):
claim_body = _conflict_fix_body(phase="claimed", worktree="branches/fix-376")
expires = (NOW + timedelta(minutes=60)).isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
release_body = "\n".join([
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
"pr: #376",
"branch: feat/fix-376",
"worktree: branches/fix-376",
"profile: prgs-author",
"phase: released",
f"head_before: {HEAD_A}",
f"head_after: {HEAD_B}",
f"expires_at: {expires}",
])
comments = [{"body": claim_body}, {"body": release_body}]
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
self.assertIsNone(lease)
def test_expired_claim_without_release(self):
past_expires = (NOW - timedelta(minutes=10)).isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
claim_body = "\n".join([
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
"pr: #376",
"phase: claimed",
f"head_before: {HEAD_A}",
f"expires_at: {past_expires}",
"profile: prgs-author",
])
comments = [{"body": claim_body}]
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
self.assertIsNone(lease)
def test_mismatched_release_different_head(self):
claim_body = _conflict_fix_body(phase="claimed", worktree="branches/fix-376")
expires = (NOW + timedelta(minutes=60)).isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
release_body = "\n".join([
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
"pr: #376",
"profile: prgs-author",
"phase: released",
f"head_before: {HEAD_B}",
f"expires_at: {expires}",
])
comments = [{"body": claim_body}, {"body": release_body}]
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
self.assertIsNotNone(lease)
self.assertEqual(lease["phase"], "claimed")
def test_mismatched_release_different_branch(self):
claim_body = "\n".join([
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
"pr: #376",
"branch: feat/branch-A",
"phase: claimed",
f"head_before: {HEAD_A}",
f"expires_at: {(NOW + timedelta(minutes=60)).isoformat().replace('+00:00', 'Z')}",
"profile: prgs-author",
])
release_body = "\n".join([
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
"pr: #376",
"branch: feat/branch-B",
"phase: released",
f"head_before: {HEAD_A}",
f"expires_at: {(NOW + timedelta(minutes=60)).isoformat().replace('+00:00', 'Z')}",
"profile: prgs-author",
])
comments = [{"body": claim_body}, {"body": release_body}]
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
self.assertIsNotNone(lease)
self.assertEqual(lease["phase"], "claimed")
def test_release_followed_by_newer_claim(self):
claim_1 = _conflict_fix_body(phase="claimed", worktree="branches/fix-376")
expires = (NOW + timedelta(minutes=60)).isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
release_1 = "\n".join([
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
"pr: #376",
"profile: prgs-author",
"phase: released",
f"head_before: {HEAD_A}",
f"head_after: {HEAD_B}",
f"expires_at: {expires}",
])
claim_2 = "\n".join([
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
"pr: #376",
"profile: prgs-author",
"phase: claimed",
f"head_before: {HEAD_B}",
f"expires_at: {expires}",
])
comments = [{"body": claim_1}, {"body": release_1}, {"body": claim_2}]
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
self.assertIsNotNone(lease)
self.assertEqual(lease["head_before"], HEAD_B)
def test_malformed_or_ambiguous_markers(self):
malformed_release = "\n".join([
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
"pr: #376",
"phase: released",
# missing head_before and profile
])
claim_body = _conflict_fix_body(phase="claimed")
comments = [{"body": claim_body}, {"body": malformed_release}]
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=376, now=NOW)
self.assertIsNotNone(lease)
def test_pr818_historical_sequence(self):
comment_14696 = "\n".join([
"<!-- mcp-conflict-fix-lease:v1 -->",
"pr: #818",
"branch: feat/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1",
"worktree: /Users/jasonwalker/Development/Gitea-Tools/branches/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1",
"profile: prgs-author",
"session_id: unknown",
"phase: claimed",
"head_before: 08061b7b8aebdd099a37d1abf5dafcf38e4fd3fb",
"expires_at: 2026-07-23T07:12:13Z",
"reviewer_active: no",
])
comment_14730 = "\n".join([
"<!-- mcp-conflict-fix-lease:v1 -->",
"pr: #818",
"branch: feat/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1",
"worktree: /Users/jasonwalker/Development/Gitea-Tools/branches/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1",
"profile: prgs-author",
"session_id: prgs-author-61241-e5129c60",
"phase: released",
"head_before: 08061b7b8aebdd099a37d1abf5dafcf38e4fd3fb",
"head_after: 64b6eb5d5402663098de5ded3b0617cc3b3df98f",
"expires_at: 2026-07-23T06:05:00Z",
"reviewer_active: no",
])
comments = [{"body": comment_14696}, {"body": comment_14730}]
check_now = datetime(2026, 7, 23, 6, 30, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
lease = find_active_conflict_fix_lease(comments, pr_number=818, now=check_now)
self.assertIsNone(lease)
reviewer_gate = assess_reviewer_mutation_blocked(
pr_number=818,
comments=comments,
reviewed_head_sha="64b6eb5d5402663098de5ded3b0617cc3b3df98f",
live_head_sha="64b6eb5d5402663098de5ded3b0617cc3b3df98f",
mutation="approve",
now=check_now,
)
self.assertTrue(reviewer_gate["mutation_allowed"])
if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main()