test(author): execute the native #953 tool functions and compensation paths (#953)

Review 632 F4. Every prior reference to `gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock`
and `gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract` under `tests/` was a string literal — a
`tool=` argument, an assertion on returned prose, or a docs substring check —
and the suite reconstructed the recovery sequence by hand from
`assess_bootstrap_lock_recovery`, `build_canonical_issue_lock`,
`build_recovery_record`, and `bind_session_lock`. A hand-written sequence
validates the decision layer but cannot see a divergence between itself and
the tool body, which is exactly how F1 and F2 — both call-site defects —
survived 61 passing cases.

The new cases drive the registered functions against a real `git init`
repository, a real durable lock file, and config-backed profiles:

* `NamespaceMutationWallOnRecovery` — the gate is reached with this task and
  `author_role_exclusive=True`; its return value aborts the tool rather than
  being computed and discarded; the author namespace succeeds and produces a
  canonical lock; a reviewer namespace is refused with `namespace_block` even
  when the claimant data would otherwise match, and emits the standard BLOCKED
  audit record; merger is refused; a mismatched claimant profile is refused by
  the exact-owner layer with the namespace wall explicitly clear; a mismatched
  head is refused; every refusal leaves the lock bytes, generation, branch,
  worktree, and an unrelated lock untouched. A subtest matrix asserts the
  role-kind wall admits `author` and refuses reviewer, merger, limited, and
  mixed.
* `InspectionToolExecutes` — the registered read-only tool reports the contract
  and the recovery preview while leaving lock bytes, mtime, HEAD, and porcelain
  status unchanged, and reports an absent lock without creating one.
* `Ac7PostCompensationGuidance` — drives the real bootstrap to its AC7 refusal
  with a forced partial lock and asserts the returned action against the state
  the rollback actually left: complete cleanup directs to a bootstrap retry and
  that retry is then executed and succeeds, leaving exactly one canonical lock
  and one branch; partial cleanup with a surviving lock, and with a surviving
  branch and worktree, each get their own executable action; a rollback that
  never completed is distinguished from both; no recommendation names a deleted
  artifact; unrelated locks are byte-identical afterwards. Two cases cover
  `release_session_lock` directly — that the rollback now really removes the
  lock, and that it refuses a lock owned by another session.
* `NativeEndToEndBootstrapToCreatePr` — bootstrap, inspect, heartbeat,
  legitimate divergence (commit and push), pre-mutation ownership re-check, and
  the unchanged #447 create-PR provenance guard, in one sequence against a real
  origin. `gitea_lock_issue` is patched to fail the test if anything reaches for
  it, so the bootstrap lock is proved to carry the whole cycle unrepaired.
* `DeadProvenanceConstantRemoved` — the removed constant stays removed and the
  sanctioned source set stays unwidened.

`_NativeToolBase` clears `role_session_router` route state per test: the sticky
reviewer-stop marker is process-global and, now that this task is registered in
`AUTHOR_TASKS`, an earlier suite leaving it set would make the first gate refuse
before the namespace gate under test is reached.

Also documents both new tools in `docs/mcp-tool-inventory.md`, so this branch
adds no drift to `test_documented_inventory_equals_registered_tools`; the
failure reason there is now identical to the pinned base's.

Suite: 61 -> 92 cases.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>

author_issue_bootstrap.py

@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ import shutil
 import subprocess
 from typing import Any, Mapping
 
+import author_lock_contract
 import author_mutation_worktree
 import control_plane_db
 import issue_lock_store
@@ -278,6 +279,36 @@ def _verify_assignment_and_lease_ids(
     return None
 
 
+def _branch_exists(canonical_repo_root: str, branch_name: str) -> bool:
+    """Whether *branch_name* still resolves in the canonical checkout (#953 F2).
+
+    Used after compensating recovery to observe what survived rather than infer
+    it from the journal. Fails closed to ``True``: an unobservable branch is
+    reported as present, so the recommendation stays conservative rather than
+    telling an author to re-bootstrap over something that may still be there.
+    """
+    if not branch_name:
+        return False
+    try:
+        res = subprocess.run(
+            [
+                "git",
+                "-C",
+                canonical_repo_root,
+                "rev-parse",
+                "--verify",
+                "--quiet",
+                f"refs/heads/{branch_name}",
+            ],
+            capture_output=True,
+            text=True,
+            check=False,
+        )
+    except Exception:
+        return True
+    return res.returncode == 0
+
+
 def run_compensating_recovery(
     journal: dict[str, Any],
     canonical_repo_root: str,
@@ -314,10 +345,21 @@ def run_compensating_recovery(
                     issue_number=issue_num,
                     session=session_id,
                     lock_dir=journal_dir,
+                    remote=journal.get("remote"),
+                    # The same defaults the lock was written under, so the
+                    # rollback targets the exact file bind_session_lock keyed.
+                    org=journal.get("org") or "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+                    repo=journal.get("repo") or "Gitea-Tools",
                 )
                 rolled_back.append(f"lock:issue-{issue_num}")
-            except Exception:
+            except Exception as exc:
-                pass
+                # #953 F2: a swallowed failure here is what made the rollback
+                # report success while leaving an unrecoverable lock behind.
+                # Record it so the post-compensation classification can see the
+                # lock survived and recommend accordingly.
+                rolled_back.append(
+                    f"lock_release_failed:issue-{issue_num}:{type(exc).__name__}"
+                )
         artifacts["lock_created"] = False
 
     worktree_created = (
@@ -1198,26 +1240,31 @@ def bootstrap_author_issue_worktree(
         save_phase_journal(journal, journal_dir=lock_dir)
 
         # Phase 6: STATE_ESTABLISHED — Issue Lock Acquisition
+        #
+        # #953: this used to hand-build a thinner record — claimant at the top
+        # level, no work_lease, no lock_provenance, no expiry — which every
+        # downstream reader then refused. It now builds through the one shared
+        # canonical contract, so the lock bootstrap writes is the same lock
+        # gitea_lock_issue writes.
         from datetime import datetime, timezone
         try:
-            lock_data = {
+            lock_data = author_lock_contract.build_canonical_issue_lock(
-                "remote": remote,
+                issue_number=issue_number,
-                "org": org or "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
+                branch_name=target_branch,
-                "repo": repo or "Gitea-Tools",
+                worktree_path=target_worktree,
-                "issue_number": issue_number,
+                remote=remote,
-                "branch": target_branch,
+                org=org or "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
-                "branch_name": target_branch,
+                repo=repo or "Gitea-Tools",
-                "worktree_path": target_worktree,
+                identity=identity,
-                "owner_session": session,
+                profile=profile,
-                "claimant": {
+                tool="gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree",
-                    "username": identity,
+                source=author_lock_contract.SOURCE_BOOTSTRAP,
-                    "profile": profile,
+                owner_session=session,
-                },
+                assignment_id=assignment_id,
-                "assignment_id": assignment_id,
+                lease_id=lease_id,
-                "lease_id": lease_id,
+                expected_base_sha=live_master_sha,
-                "expected_base_sha": live_master_sha,
+            )
-                "created_at": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
+            lock_data["created_at"] = datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat()
-            }
             journal.setdefault("pending_creations", {})["lock"] = True
             journal["artifacts_created"]["lock_created"] = True
             save_phase_journal(journal, journal_dir=lock_dir)
@@ -1235,9 +1282,65 @@ def bootstrap_author_issue_worktree(
                 "exact_next_action": "Verify lease/assignment state and retry.",
             }
 
+        # ── #953 AC7: verify the lock that was actually written ──
+        # Reporting "lock_created: true" and then directing the author to
+        # implement is what produced the unrecoverable state: by the time any
+        # reader refused the lock, the branch already carried commits and every
+        # sanctioned recovery path had become ineligible. The lock is therefore
+        # read back from disk and structurally verified *before* this function
+        # can report success, and a partial lock fails closed here — while the
+        # branch is still base-equivalent and recovery is still cheap.
+        written_lock = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(lock_res)
+        contract = author_lock_contract.assess_lock_contract(written_lock)
+        if not contract["canonical"]:
+            journal["failure_reason"] = author_lock_contract.format_contract_refusal(
+                contract
+            )
+            compensation = run_compensating_recovery(
+                journal, root, journal_dir=lock_dir
+            )
+            # AC5/AC15: the recommendation must describe the state compensation
+            # actually left, not the state that provoked it.
+            # ``run_compensating_recovery`` has by now released the lock, removed
+            # the worktree, and deleted the branch, so recommending
+            # incomplete-lock recovery for those exact artifacts would refuse
+            # twice over. Observe what survived and answer for that.
+            post_state = author_lock_contract.assess_post_compensation_state(
+                compensation,
+                lock_present=bool(lock_res) and os.path.exists(lock_res),
+                worktree_present=os.path.isdir(target_worktree),
+                branch_present=_branch_exists(root, target_branch),
+            )
+            return {
+                "success": False,
+                "reason_code": "incomplete_issue_lock_contract",
+                "message": author_lock_contract.format_contract_refusal(contract),
+                "issue_number": issue_number,
+                "branch_name": target_branch,
+                "worktree_path": target_worktree,
+                "lock_state": lock_res,
+                "lock_contract": contract,
+                "missing_fields": contract["missing_fields"],
+                "implementation_allowed": False,
+                "compensating_recovery": compensation,
+                "post_compensation_state": post_state,
+                # AC15: never strand a branch or worktree without a structured
+                # recovery recommendation — and never name an artifact the
+                # rollback has already deleted.
+                "exact_next_action": author_lock_contract.post_compensation_action(
+                    post_state,
+                    issue_number=issue_number,
+                    branch_name=target_branch,
+                    worktree_path=target_worktree,
+                    missing_fields=contract["missing_fields"],
+                ),
+                "phase_journal": journal,
+            }
+
         journal["phases"][PHASE_6_STATE_ESTABLISHED] = {
             "status": "completed",
             "lock": lock_res,
+            "lock_contract": contract["contract"],
         }
         journal["phases"][PHASE_7_TRANSITION_COMPLETED] = {
             "status": "completed",
@@ -1261,9 +1364,16 @@ def bootstrap_author_issue_worktree(
             "assignment_id": assignment_id,
             "idempotency_key": key,
             "lock_state": lock_res,
+            "lock_contract": contract,
+            # #953 AC6: the canonical ownership token for this claim. Never null
+            # on a successful bootstrap — it is the fencing token every
+            # subsequent heartbeat and renewal is checked against.
+            "task_session_id": contract["task_session_id"],
+            "implementation_allowed": True,
             "phase_journal": journal,
-            "exact_next_action": (
+            # #953 AC5: executable under the state actually returned. The lock
-                "Call gitea_whoami, then gitea_resolve_task_capability(task='work_issue') "
+            # has been read back and verified canonical, so proceeding to
-                "and proceed with author implementation in the bootstrapped worktree."
+            # implementation is genuinely the correct next step here — which is
-            ),
+            # exactly what the old unconditional wording could not promise.
+            "exact_next_action": author_lock_contract.recommended_action(contract),
         }

author_lock_contract.py

@@ -0,0 +1,623 @@
+"""One canonical author issue-lock contract shared by every writer (#953).
+
+Before this module, ``gitea_lock_issue`` and
+``gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree`` each wrote their own lock record.
+``gitea_lock_issue`` wrote the canonical shape — ``work_lease`` carrying the
+claimant plus a sanctioned ``lock_provenance`` — while bootstrap wrote a thinner
+record with the claimant at the lock top level, ``lease_id: null``, and no
+``work_lease``, ``lock_provenance``, or expiry at all.
+
+Every downstream reader was written against the canonical shape, so a lock that
+bootstrap reported as successfully created was simultaneously:
+
+* un-heartbeatable — the ownership check read the claimant only from
+  ``work_lease.claimant``;
+* un-renewable — expiry is read only from ``work_lease.expires_at``, so a
+  missing lease read as "never expires", and #760 exact-owner renewal only ever
+  assesses an *expired* lease;
+* un-re-lockable — the branch had by then advanced past its base;
+* and rejected by the #447 create-PR provenance guard.
+
+Each of those gates is individually correct. The defect was that two writers
+disagreed about what a lock *is*. This module is the single definition, and both
+writers now build through it.
+
+Nothing here weakens a guard. ``build_sanctioned_lock_provenance`` remains the
+only provenance source, provenance is never accepted from a caller, and the
+#447 guard is untouched — this module simply makes bootstrap satisfy it.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+from typing import Any, Mapping
+
+import issue_lock_provenance
+import issue_lock_store
+import lease_policy
+
+# Bootstrap writes through the same sanctioned source as gitea_lock_issue: the
+# lock it produces *is* a canonical lock, not a second dialect that readers must
+# learn. Adding a distinct source would have required widening
+# SANCTIONED_LOCK_SOURCES, which is exactly the #447 weakening this issue's
+# safety requirements forbid.
+SOURCE_BOOTSTRAP = issue_lock_provenance.SOURCE_LOCK_ISSUE
+
+# Recovery of an incomplete bootstrap lock (#953 AC8-AC11) deliberately writes
+# through SOURCE_LOCK_ISSUE too, and records its distinctness in
+# ``lock_provenance.written_by_tool`` plus the ``bootstrap_lock_recovery``
+# transition block instead. There is no distinct recovery *source* constant, for
+# the same reason bootstrap has none: minting one would require widening
+# SANCTIONED_LOCK_SOURCES, which the #447 safety requirements forbid.
+
+#: Top-level keys every canonical author issue lock must carry.
+REQUIRED_LOCK_FIELDS: tuple[str, ...] = (
+    "remote",
+    "org",
+    "repo",
+    "issue_number",
+    "branch_name",
+    "worktree_path",
+    "work_lease",
+    "lock_provenance",
+)
+
+#: Keys every canonical ``work_lease`` must carry.
+REQUIRED_WORK_LEASE_FIELDS: tuple[str, ...] = (
+    "operation_type",
+    "issue_number",
+    "branch",
+    "worktree_path",
+    "claimant",
+    "created_at",
+    "expires_at",
+    "last_heartbeat_at",
+    "task_session_id",
+    "lifecycle_version",
+)
+
+# ── Explicit expiration states (AC12) ──
+# The bug this replaces: a lock with no recorded expiry produced
+# ``is_lease_expired() -> False``, which reads as "not yet expired" and made the
+# lock permanently non-expiring *and* permanently ineligible for the renewal
+# path, which only ever assesses an expired lease. "Absent" and "in the future"
+# are different facts and are now named differently.
+EXPIRATION_RECORDED = "recorded"
+EXPIRATION_MISSING = "missing"
+EXPIRATION_UNPARSEABLE = "unparseable"
+
+#: Structural verdicts returned by :func:`assess_lock_contract`.
+CONTRACT_CANONICAL = "canonical"
+CONTRACT_INCOMPLETE = "incomplete"
+CONTRACT_LEGACY = "legacy"
+CONTRACT_ABSENT = "absent"
+
+
+def _text(value: Any) -> str:
+    return str(value or "").strip()
+
+
+def now_utc() -> datetime:
+    return datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+
+
+def format_timestamp(value: datetime) -> str:
+    """Serialize in the durable ``...Z`` form already used on disk."""
+    return (
+        value.astimezone(timezone.utc)
+        .replace(microsecond=0)
+        .isoformat()
+        .replace("+00:00", "Z")
+    )
+
+
+def lock_claimant(lock: Mapping[str, Any] | None) -> dict[str, str]:
+    """Read the claimant from either canonical or legacy placement.
+
+    ``work_lease.claimant`` is canonical and is preferred. A top-level
+    ``claimant`` is the legacy/bootstrap placement and is accepted as a
+    fallback (AC14) — three separate readers already disagreed about this
+    (``issue_lock_store``, ``issue_lock_renewal``, ``issue_lock_recovery``),
+    which is why it now lives in one place.
+
+    Reading a legacy placement is *not* a widening: every caller still compares
+    the values it returns against server-resolved identity and profile. This
+    only decides where to look, never whether ownership is proven.
+
+    Delegates to ``issue_lock_store.lock_claimant`` rather than reimplementing
+    the rule. A second copy here would be a fourth reader that could drift from
+    the other three, which is the exact failure #953 exists to end. It lives in
+    the store because ``author_lock_contract`` imports the store, so defining it
+    here would make that import circular.
+    """
+    recorded = issue_lock_store.lock_claimant(dict(lock) if isinstance(lock, Mapping) else None)
+    return {
+        "username": _text(recorded.get("username")),
+        "profile": _text(recorded.get("profile")),
+    }
+
+
+def claimant_placement(lock: Mapping[str, Any] | None) -> str:
+    """Where the claimant was found: ``work_lease``, ``top_level``, or ``absent``."""
+    if not isinstance(lock, Mapping):
+        return "absent"
+    lease = lock.get("work_lease")
+    if isinstance(lease, Mapping) and isinstance(lease.get("claimant"), Mapping):
+        return "work_lease"
+    if isinstance(lock.get("claimant"), Mapping):
+        return "top_level"
+    return "absent"
+
+
+def build_claimant(*, username: str | None, profile: str | None) -> dict[str, str]:
+    """Build the canonical claimant pair from server-resolved values."""
+    return {"username": _text(username), "profile": _text(profile)}
+
+
+def build_author_issue_work_lease(
+    *,
+    issue_number: int,
+    branch_name: str,
+    worktree_path: str,
+    claimant: Mapping[str, Any],
+    task_session_id: str | None = None,
+    created: datetime | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Build the canonical author ``work_lease``.
+
+    The single definition behind both writers. The TTL comes from the central
+    policy rather than a literal, and the window slides from the last valid
+    heartbeat (#790), so an abandoned task releases its claim within one TTL.
+    """
+    started = created or now_utc()
+    policy = lease_policy.policy_for(lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK)
+    expires = started + timedelta(minutes=policy.initial_ttl_minutes)
+    session_id = _text(task_session_id) or issue_lock_store.mint_task_session_id(
+        issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE
+    )
+    return {
+        "operation_type": issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
+        "issue_number": int(issue_number),
+        "pr_number": None,
+        "branch": branch_name,
+        "worktree_path": worktree_path,
+        "claimant": dict(claimant),
+        "created_at": format_timestamp(started),
+        "expires_at": format_timestamp(expires),
+        "last_heartbeat_at": format_timestamp(started),
+        # #790 AC-N1: the ownership key for this task, distinct from the
+        # recorded PID, which is the shared daemon and identifies no task.
+        "task_session_id": session_id,
+        # #790 AC-N8: the explicit lifecycle marker. Its absence — never a
+        # timestamp comparison — is what makes a lock legacy.
+        "lifecycle_version": lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1,
+        "heartbeat_count": 1,
+    }
+
+
+def build_canonical_issue_lock(
+    *,
+    issue_number: int,
+    branch_name: str,
+    worktree_path: str,
+    remote: str,
+    org: str,
+    repo: str,
+    identity: str | None,
+    profile: str | None,
+    tool: str,
+    source: str = issue_lock_provenance.SOURCE_LOCK_ISSUE,
+    owner_session: str | None = None,
+    assignment_id: str | None = None,
+    lease_id: str | None = None,
+    expected_base_sha: str | None = None,
+    task_session_id: str | None = None,
+    created: datetime | None = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Build a complete canonical lock record.
+
+    ``tool`` and ``source`` are server-supplied. There is deliberately no
+    parameter through which a caller could inject provenance: the #953 safety
+    requirements forbid caller-manufactured provenance, so provenance is always
+    minted here from ``build_sanctioned_lock_provenance``.
+    """
+    claimant = build_claimant(username=identity, profile=profile)
+    work_lease = build_author_issue_work_lease(
+        issue_number=issue_number,
+        branch_name=branch_name,
+        worktree_path=worktree_path,
+        claimant=claimant,
+        task_session_id=task_session_id,
+        created=created,
+    )
+    record: dict[str, Any] = {
+        "remote": remote,
+        "org": org,
+        "repo": repo,
+        "issue_number": int(issue_number),
+        "branch": branch_name,
+        "branch_name": branch_name,
+        "worktree_path": worktree_path,
+        "work_lease": work_lease,
+        "lock_provenance": issue_lock_provenance.build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
+            tool=tool,
+            source=source,
+            claimant=claimant,
+        ),
+    }
+    if owner_session is not None:
+        record["owner_session"] = owner_session
+    if assignment_id is not None:
+        record["assignment_id"] = assignment_id
+    # #953 AC6: a null lease id is recorded only when no workflow lease was
+    # allocated for this bootstrap. The task-session identifier in the
+    # work_lease is what downstream ownership checks fence on, and it is never
+    # null on a canonical lock.
+    if lease_id is not None:
+        record["lease_id"] = lease_id
+    if expected_base_sha is not None:
+        record["expected_base_sha"] = expected_base_sha
+    return record
+
+
+def expiration_state(lock: Mapping[str, Any] | None) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Classify a lock's recorded expiry explicitly (AC12).
+
+    Distinguishes "no expiry was ever recorded" from "an expiry was recorded
+    and is still in the future". Collapsing those two into a single ``False``
+    from ``is_lease_expired`` is what let a malformed lock be treated as
+    permanently live and simultaneously never renewable.
+    """
+    if not isinstance(lock, Mapping):
+        return {"state": EXPIRATION_MISSING, "expires_at": None, "expired": None}
+    lease = lock.get("work_lease")
+    raw = lease.get("expires_at") if isinstance(lease, Mapping) else None
+    text = _text(raw)
+    if not text:
+        return {"state": EXPIRATION_MISSING, "expires_at": None, "expired": None}
+    try:
+        parsed = datetime.fromisoformat(text.replace("Z", "+00:00")).astimezone(
+            timezone.utc
+        )
+    except ValueError:
+        return {"state": EXPIRATION_UNPARSEABLE, "expires_at": text, "expired": None}
+    return {
+        "state": EXPIRATION_RECORDED,
+        "expires_at": text,
+        "expired": parsed <= now_utc(),
+    }
+
+
+def missing_contract_fields(lock: Mapping[str, Any] | None) -> list[str]:
+    """Name every canonical field a lock does not carry (AC7)."""
+    if not isinstance(lock, Mapping):
+        return ["<no lock record>"]
+    missing: list[str] = []
+    for field in REQUIRED_LOCK_FIELDS:
+        value = lock.get(field)
+        if value is None or (isinstance(value, str) and not value.strip()):
+            missing.append(field)
+    lease = lock.get("work_lease")
+    if not isinstance(lease, Mapping):
+        if "work_lease" not in missing:
+            missing.append("work_lease")
+    else:
+        for field in REQUIRED_WORK_LEASE_FIELDS:
+            value = lease.get(field)
+            if value is None or (isinstance(value, str) and not value.strip()):
+                missing.append(f"work_lease.{field}")
+    provenance = lock.get("lock_provenance")
+    if isinstance(provenance, Mapping):
+        if (
+            _text(provenance.get("source"))
+            not in issue_lock_provenance.SANCTIONED_LOCK_SOURCES
+        ):
+            missing.append("lock_provenance.source (not sanctioned)")
+        if not _text(provenance.get("written_by_tool")):
+            missing.append("lock_provenance.written_by_tool")
+    claimant = lock_claimant(lock)
+    if not claimant["username"]:
+        missing.append("claimant.username")
+    if not claimant["profile"]:
+        missing.append("claimant.profile")
+    return missing
+
+
+def assess_lock_contract(lock: Mapping[str, Any] | None) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Structural, read-only verdict on a durable lock record (AC7, AC16).
+
+    Pure inspection: it reads the record it is handed and mutates nothing —
+    no lock, lease, branch, worktree, issue, or PR. Callers use it both to
+    verify a lock they just wrote and to report on one they found.
+    """
+    if not isinstance(lock, Mapping) or not lock:
+        return {
+            "contract": CONTRACT_ABSENT,
+            "canonical": False,
+            "missing_fields": ["<no lock record>"],
+            "claimant": {"username": "", "profile": ""},
+            "claimant_placement": "absent",
+            "expiration": {
+                "state": EXPIRATION_MISSING,
+                "expires_at": None,
+                "expired": None,
+            },
+            "heartbeatable": False,
+            "create_pr_eligible": False,
+            "lock_generation": None,
+            "task_session_id": None,
+            "reasons": ["no durable lock record"],
+        }
+
+    missing = missing_contract_fields(lock)
+    claimant = lock_claimant(lock)
+    placement = claimant_placement(lock)
+    expiration = expiration_state(lock)
+    provenance_check = issue_lock_provenance.assess_lock_file_for_create_pr(dict(lock))
+
+    # Canonical means: every required field present, the claimant in the
+    # canonical placement, an expiry actually recorded, and the untouched #447
+    # guard satisfied.
+    canonical = (
+        not missing
+        and placement == "work_lease"
+        and expiration["state"] == EXPIRATION_RECORDED
+        and bool(provenance_check.get("proven"))
+    )
+    if canonical:
+        contract = CONTRACT_CANONICAL
+    elif placement == "top_level" and claimant["username"] and claimant["profile"]:
+        contract = CONTRACT_LEGACY
+    else:
+        contract = CONTRACT_INCOMPLETE
+
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    if missing:
+        reasons.append("missing canonical fields: " + ", ".join(missing))
+    if placement == "top_level":
+        reasons.append(
+            "claimant recorded at the lock top level rather than in work_lease "
+            "(legacy/bootstrap placement)"
+        )
+    if expiration["state"] == EXPIRATION_MISSING:
+        reasons.append(
+            "no expiration recorded; the lock is neither expirable nor renewable "
+            "until it is upgraded"
+        )
+    elif expiration["state"] == EXPIRATION_UNPARSEABLE:
+        reasons.append(f"unparseable expires_at '{expiration['expires_at']}'")
+    if provenance_check.get("block"):
+        reasons.extend(provenance_check.get("reasons") or [])
+
+    # Heartbeat needs the claimant pair (from either placement, post-fix) plus a
+    # task-session identifier to fence on.
+    lease = lock.get("work_lease")
+    task_session_id = (
+        _text(lease.get("task_session_id")) if isinstance(lease, Mapping) else ""
+    )
+    heartbeatable = bool(
+        claimant["username"] and claimant["profile"] and task_session_id
+    )
+
+    return {
+        "contract": contract,
+        "canonical": canonical,
+        "missing_fields": missing,
+        "claimant": claimant,
+        "claimant_placement": placement,
+        "expiration": expiration,
+        "heartbeatable": heartbeatable,
+        "create_pr_eligible": bool(provenance_check.get("proven")),
+        "lock_generation": lock.get("lock_generation"),
+        "task_session_id": task_session_id or None,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+    }
+
+
+def format_contract_refusal(assessment: Mapping[str, Any]) -> str:
+    """Human-readable refusal naming exactly what the lock is missing."""
+    missing = ", ".join(assessment.get("missing_fields") or []) or "unknown fields"
+    return (
+        "Issue lock contract incomplete (#953): "
+        f"{missing}. The lock cannot be heartbeated, renewed, or accepted by "
+        "gitea_create_pr in this state (fail closed)"
+    )
+
+
+def recommended_action(assessment: Mapping[str, Any]) -> str:
+    """The one executable next step for a lock in this state (AC5, AC15)."""
+    contract = assessment.get("contract")
+    if contract == CONTRACT_CANONICAL:
+        return (
+            "Lock is canonical. Call gitea_whoami, then "
+            "gitea_resolve_task_capability(task='work_issue'), then proceed with "
+            "author implementation in the bootstrapped worktree."
+        )
+    if contract == CONTRACT_ABSENT:
+        return (
+            "No durable lock exists. Call gitea_lock_issue for this issue and "
+            "branch before writing any implementation bytes."
+        )
+    return (
+        "Do not begin implementation. Call "
+        "gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock for this exact issue, branch, "
+        "and worktree to upgrade the lock to the canonical contract, or "
+        "gitea_lock_issue while the worktree is still base-equivalent."
+    )
+
+
+# ── Post-compensation recovery guidance (#953 AC5/AC15, review 632 F2) ──
+#
+# ``recommended_action`` above answers "what can be done about a lock in this
+# shape". That is the wrong question on the bootstrap AC7 refusal path, because
+# ``run_compensating_recovery`` has already run by the time the answer is
+# reported: it releases the lock, removes the worktree when clean — which it
+# always is there, no implementation bytes having been written — and deletes the
+# created branch. Recommending incomplete-lock recovery for those artifacts
+# hands the author two refusals in a row (``no_durable_lock``, then
+# ``worktree_invalid``) for a state that a plain bootstrap retry would fix. The
+# advice must describe the state that actually *remains*.
+
+#: Compensation removed every artifact this transition created.
+CLEANUP_COMPLETE = "complete"
+#: Compensation removed some artifacts; others survive and are still actionable.
+CLEANUP_PARTIAL = "partial"
+#: Compensation itself failed or could not be observed; nothing is provable.
+CLEANUP_FAILED = "failed"
+
+
+def assess_post_compensation_state(
+    recovery: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
+    *,
+    lock_present: bool,
+    worktree_present: bool,
+    branch_present: bool,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Classify what survived compensation, from observed durable state.
+
+    Pure. The caller observes the filesystem and git; this decides. Observation
+    is authoritative over the journal's ``rolled_back`` list, which records what
+    compensation *attempted*: ``run_compensating_recovery`` swallows a failed
+    lock release and appends nothing, so an absent marker proves nothing either
+    way. The list is still carried through as corroborating evidence.
+
+    The three states are distinct facts, not degrees of the same one:
+
+    * ``CLEANUP_COMPLETE`` — compensation ran and nothing it created remains.
+    * ``CLEANUP_PARTIAL`` — compensation ran and artifacts survive, whether by
+      design (a worktree dirty at rollback time, a branch carrying commits) or
+      because a rollback step errored. Either way the surviving set was observed
+      directly, so it is known and actionable; ``failed_rollback_steps`` records
+      which cause applies.
+    * ``CLEANUP_FAILED`` — compensation never ran to completion, so nothing it
+      would have removed can be assumed removed.
+    """
+    rolled_back = list((recovery or {}).get("rolled_back") or [])
+    executed = bool((recovery or {}).get("executed"))
+    failed_steps = [entry for entry in rolled_back if "_failed" in entry]
+
+    surviving: list[str] = []
+    if lock_present:
+        surviving.append("lock")
+    if worktree_present:
+        surviving.append("worktree")
+    if branch_present:
+        surviving.append("branch")
+
+    if not executed:
+        state = CLEANUP_FAILED
+    elif surviving:
+        state = CLEANUP_PARTIAL
+    else:
+        state = CLEANUP_COMPLETE
+
+    return {
+        "cleanup_state": state,
+        "compensation_executed": executed,
+        "lock_present": bool(lock_present),
+        "worktree_present": bool(worktree_present),
+        "branch_present": bool(branch_present),
+        "surviving_artifacts": surviving,
+        "removed_artifacts": [
+            name
+            for name, present in (
+                ("lock", lock_present),
+                ("worktree", worktree_present),
+                ("branch", branch_present),
+            )
+            if not present
+        ],
+        "failed_rollback_steps": failed_steps,
+        "rolled_back": rolled_back,
+    }
+
+
+def post_compensation_action(
+    state: Mapping[str, Any],
+    *,
+    issue_number: int,
+    branch_name: str,
+    worktree_path: str,
+    missing_fields: list[str] | None = None,
+) -> str:
+    """The one executable next step for the state compensation actually left.
+
+    Every branch names only artifacts the classification says still exist, so no
+    recommendation can point at something the rollback deleted.
+    """
+    missing = ", ".join(missing_fields or []) or "the reported missing fields"
+    cleanup_state = state.get("cleanup_state")
+    lock_present = bool(state.get("lock_present"))
+    worktree_present = bool(state.get("worktree_present"))
+    branch_present = bool(state.get("branch_present"))
+
+    if not state.get("compensation_executed"):
+        # Compensation never ran, so nothing was rolled back and nothing about
+        # the remaining state was decided. The read-only surface is the only
+        # action executable under any state.
+        return (
+            "Compensating rollback did not complete, so the remaining state is "
+            f"not proven. Call gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract for issue "
+            f"#{issue_number} (read-only) to establish what survives before any "
+            "further action. Do not retry bootstrap until it is known."
+        )
+
+    prefix = ""
+    failed_steps = state.get("failed_rollback_steps") or []
+    if failed_steps:
+        prefix = (
+            "Compensating rollback reported a failed step "
+            f"({', '.join(failed_steps)}); what survives was observed directly "
+            "and the action below is scoped to exactly that. "
+        )
+
+    if cleanup_state == CLEANUP_COMPLETE:
+        return (
+            "Compensating rollback removed the malformed lock, the branch, and "
+            f"the worktree, so nothing from this attempt remains. Resolve "
+            f"{missing} and re-run gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree for "
+            f"issue #{issue_number} from the clean pre-bootstrap state. Do not "
+            "call gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock: there is no lock, "
+            "branch, or worktree left for it to act on."
+        )
+
+    if lock_present and worktree_present and branch_present:
+        return prefix + (
+            "The lock, branch, and worktree all survive. Call "
+            "gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock for issue "
+            f"#{issue_number}, branch '{branch_name}', and worktree "
+            f"'{worktree_path}', passing the worktree's current head as "
+            "expected_head, to upgrade the lock to the canonical contract."
+        )
+
+    if not lock_present and worktree_present and branch_present:
+        return prefix + (
+            "The malformed lock was released but the branch and worktree "
+            "survive. No implementation bytes were written, so the worktree is "
+            f"still base-equivalent: call gitea_lock_issue for issue "
+            f"#{issue_number} on branch '{branch_name}' from worktree "
+            f"'{worktree_path}' to acquire a canonical lock."
+        )
+
+    if lock_present and not worktree_present:
+        return prefix + (
+            f"The worktree for issue #{issue_number} is gone but the durable "
+            "lock survived, so neither gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock "
+            "(it would refuse worktree_invalid) nor gitea_lock_issue (it has no "
+            "worktree to bind) is executable. Call "
+            "gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract for issue "
+            f"#{issue_number} (read-only) to confirm the surviving lock; it "
+            "must be released by its recorded owner before bootstrap is "
+            "retried."
+        )
+
+    # Lock gone, worktree gone, some git artifact left (a branch with commits,
+    # or a branch this transition did not create).
+    return prefix + (
+        "Compensating rollback removed the lock and worktree; branch "
+        f"'{branch_name}' survives and was not deleted. Call "
+        f"gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract for issue #{issue_number} "
+        "(read-only) to confirm no durable lock remains, then re-run "
+        "gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree, which will adopt the existing "
+        "branch rather than recreating it."
+    )

bootstrap_lock_recovery.py

@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+"""Target-specific recovery for incomplete bootstrap issue locks (#953).
+
+The situation this exists for: ``gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree``
+reported success, wrote an incomplete lock, and told the author to implement.
+The author did — legitimately, following the tool's own reported next action —
+and the branch now carries real committed and pushed work. At that point every
+pre-existing recovery path is simultaneously ineligible:
+
+* heartbeat refuses, because the claimant is not where it looks;
+* ``gitea_lock_issue`` refuses, because the branch is no longer base-equivalent;
+* #760 exact-owner renewal never engages, because a lock with no recorded
+  expiry is never *expired*;
+* the #447 create-PR guard refuses, because there is no provenance.
+
+Distinct from every neighbouring path: #753 ``issue_lock_recovery`` requires a
+dead owner PID, #760 ``issue_lock_renewal`` requires an *expired* lease, and
+#442 ``issue_lock_adoption`` decides branch adoption. None of them addresses a
+lock that is structurally incomplete and therefore never expires at all.
+
+**What this will not do.** It never moves, resets, or rewinds a branch, and
+never requires base-equivalence — the committed work is the thing being
+preserved. It never pushes and never opens a pull request. It touches only the
+one lock file named by (remote, org, repo, issue). It accepts no caller-supplied
+provenance and no caller-supplied authorization flag; both are minted
+server-side. It refuses a healthy foreign-owned lock outright, and a matching
+username alone is never accepted as proof of ownership — the profile must match
+too, and the lock's recorded binding must agree with the observed branch,
+worktree, and head.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+from typing import Any, Mapping
+
+import author_lock_contract
+import issue_lock_store
+
+#: Refusal codes, so callers can branch on cause rather than parse prose.
+REFUSAL_NO_LOCK = "no_durable_lock"
+REFUSAL_ALREADY_CANONICAL = "already_canonical"
+REFUSAL_FOREIGN_CLAIMANT = "foreign_claimant"
+REFUSAL_HEALTHY_FOREIGN = "healthy_foreign_lock"
+REFUSAL_IDENTITY_UNRESOLVED = "identity_unresolved"
+REFUSAL_BINDING_MISMATCH = "binding_mismatch"
+REFUSAL_WORKTREE_INVALID = "worktree_invalid"
+REFUSAL_HEAD_MISMATCH = "head_mismatch"
+
+
+def _text(value: Any) -> str:
+    return str(value or "").strip()
+
+
+def _same_realpath(left: str | None, right: str | None) -> bool:
+    lhs, rhs = _text(left), _text(right)
+    if not lhs or not rhs:
+        return False
+    try:
+        return os.path.realpath(lhs) == os.path.realpath(rhs)
+    except OSError:
+        return lhs == rhs
+
+
+def assess_bootstrap_lock_recovery(
+    existing_lock: Mapping[str, Any] | None,
+    *,
+    issue_number: int,
+    branch_name: str,
+    worktree_path: str,
+    remote: str,
+    org: str,
+    repo: str,
+    identity: str | None,
+    profile: str | None,
+    observed_head: str | None,
+    declared_head: str | None,
+    worktree_exists: bool,
+    worktree_registered: bool,
+    current_branch: str | None,
+    now: Any = None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Decide whether this exact lock may be upgraded by this exact caller.
+
+    Pure: every input is an observation the caller already made, and nothing
+    here reads or writes the filesystem, git, or Gitea. That is what makes the
+    same decision testable in isolation and reusable by the read-only
+    inspection surface, which must not mutate anything (AC16).
+
+    Returns a dict with ``recovery_sanctioned`` plus the full evidence set. A
+    refusal never raises — it reports, so the caller can surface exactly which
+    piece of evidence was missing.
+    """
+    reasons: list[str] = []
+    refusal_code: str | None = None
+
+    contract = author_lock_contract.assess_lock_contract(existing_lock)
+
+    if not existing_lock:
+        return {
+            "recovery_sanctioned": False,
+            "refusal_code": REFUSAL_NO_LOCK,
+            "reasons": [
+                f"no durable issue lock exists for issue #{issue_number}; there is "
+                "nothing to recover (fail closed)"
+            ],
+            "contract": contract,
+            "evidence": {},
+            "expected_generation": None,
+        }
+
+    active_identity = _text(identity)
+    active_profile = _text(profile)
+    recorded = author_lock_contract.lock_claimant(existing_lock)
+    freshness = issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(dict(existing_lock), now=now)
+    generation = issue_lock_store.lock_generation(existing_lock)
+
+    evidence: dict[str, Any] = {
+        "recorded_claimant": recorded,
+        "active_identity": active_identity,
+        "active_profile": active_profile,
+        "recorded_branch": existing_lock.get("branch_name"),
+        "recorded_worktree": existing_lock.get("worktree_path"),
+        "recorded_owner_session": existing_lock.get("owner_session"),
+        "recorded_generation": generation,
+        "recorded_remote": existing_lock.get("remote"),
+        "recorded_org": existing_lock.get("org"),
+        "recorded_repo": existing_lock.get("repo"),
+        "observed_head": _text(observed_head),
+        "declared_head": _text(declared_head),
+        "current_branch": _text(current_branch),
+        "worktree_exists": bool(worktree_exists),
+        "worktree_registered": bool(worktree_registered),
+        "freshness": freshness,
+        "claimant_placement": contract.get("claimant_placement"),
+        "expiration_state": contract.get("expiration", {}).get("state"),
+    }
+
+    # ── Repository and issue identity (AC10) ──
+    if _text(existing_lock.get("remote")) != _text(remote):
+        reasons.append(
+            f"recorded remote '{existing_lock.get('remote')}' does not match '{remote}'"
+        )
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_BINDING_MISMATCH
+    if _text(existing_lock.get("org")) != _text(org):
+        reasons.append(
+            f"recorded org '{existing_lock.get('org')}' does not match '{org}'"
+        )
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_BINDING_MISMATCH
+    if _text(existing_lock.get("repo")) != _text(repo):
+        reasons.append(
+            f"recorded repo '{existing_lock.get('repo')}' does not match '{repo}'"
+        )
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_BINDING_MISMATCH
+    if existing_lock.get("issue_number") != issue_number:
+        reasons.append(
+            f"lock targets issue #{existing_lock.get('issue_number')}, not "
+            f"#{issue_number}"
+        )
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_BINDING_MISMATCH
+
+    # ── Branch and worktree binding (AC10) ──
+    if _text(existing_lock.get("branch_name")) != _text(branch_name):
+        reasons.append(
+            f"recorded branch '{existing_lock.get('branch_name')}' does not match "
+            f"'{branch_name}'"
+        )
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_BINDING_MISMATCH
+    if not _same_realpath(existing_lock.get("worktree_path"), worktree_path):
+        reasons.append(
+            f"recorded worktree '{existing_lock.get('worktree_path')}' does not "
+            f"match '{worktree_path}'"
+        )
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_BINDING_MISMATCH
+
+    # ── The worktree is real, registered, and on the branch (AC10) ──
+    # Deliberately no base-equivalence requirement and no constraint on how far
+    # the branch has advanced: the whole point is that it already carries the
+    # author's legitimate commits (AC9).
+    if not worktree_exists:
+        reasons.append(f"declared worktree '{worktree_path}' does not exist")
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_WORKTREE_INVALID
+    if not worktree_registered:
+        reasons.append(f"worktree '{worktree_path}' is not a registered git worktree")
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_WORKTREE_INVALID
+    if _text(current_branch) != _text(branch_name):
+        reasons.append(
+            f"worktree is on branch '{_text(current_branch) or 'unknown'}', not "
+            f"'{branch_name}'"
+        )
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_WORKTREE_INVALID
+
+    # ── Current head fencing (AC10) ──
+    # The caller names the commit it believes it is recovering. A mismatch means
+    # the worktree moved under the caller, so the decision is stale.
+    if not _text(observed_head):
+        reasons.append("could not observe the worktree head")
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_HEAD_MISMATCH
+    elif _text(declared_head) and _text(declared_head) != _text(observed_head):
+        reasons.append(
+            f"declared head '{_text(declared_head)}' does not match observed head "
+            f"'{_text(observed_head)}'"
+        )
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_HEAD_MISMATCH
+
+    # ── Ownership (AC10, AC11) ──
+    # A matching username alone is never sufficient: the profile must match too,
+    # and both are compared against server-resolved values the caller cannot set.
+    if not active_identity or not active_profile:
+        reasons.append(
+            "active identity and profile could not both be resolved; ownership "
+            "cannot be proven"
+        )
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_IDENTITY_UNRESOLVED
+    if not recorded["username"] or not recorded["profile"]:
+        reasons.append(
+            "durable lock does not record both a claimant username and profile"
+        )
+        refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_FOREIGN_CLAIMANT
+    elif (
+        recorded["username"] != active_identity
+        or recorded["profile"] != active_profile
+    ):
+        # AC11: a foreign-owned lock is never recoverable through this path,
+        # healthy or not. The healthy case is reported distinctly so the refusal
+        # is legible, but both refuse.
+        if freshness.get("live"):
+            reasons.append(
+                f"lock is owned by a healthy foreign claimant "
+                f"'{recorded['username']}/{recorded['profile']}'; takeover is not "
+                "a recovery path"
+            )
+            refusal_code = REFUSAL_HEALTHY_FOREIGN
+        else:
+            reasons.append(
+                f"lock claimant '{recorded['username']}/{recorded['profile']}' "
+                f"does not match active '{active_identity}/{active_profile}'"
+            )
+            refusal_code = refusal_code or REFUSAL_FOREIGN_CLAIMANT
+
+    # ── Nothing to recover ──
+    # A lock that is already canonical is left strictly alone. Rewriting it would
+    # mint a new task-session identifier and invalidate the heartbeat token the
+    # legitimate owner is already using.
+    if contract.get("canonical") and not reasons:
+        return {
+            "recovery_sanctioned": False,
+            "refusal_code": REFUSAL_ALREADY_CANONICAL,
+            "reasons": [
+                "lock already satisfies the canonical contract; no recovery is "
+                "required"
+            ],
+            "contract": contract,
+            "evidence": evidence,
+            "expected_generation": generation,
+        }
+
+    sanctioned = not reasons
+    return {
+        "recovery_sanctioned": sanctioned,
+        "refusal_code": None if sanctioned else refusal_code,
+        "reasons": reasons,
+        "contract": contract,
+        "evidence": evidence,
+        "expected_generation": generation,
+    }
+
+
+def build_recovery_record(
+    assessment: Mapping[str, Any],
+    *,
+    recovered_at: str,
+    new_task_session_id: str,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Auditable record of the ownership and generation transition (AC10).
+
+    A recovered lock must never read as an original claim, so both sides of the
+    transition are preserved: what the incomplete lock recorded, and what
+    replaced it.
+    """
+    evidence = dict(assessment.get("evidence") or {})
+    contract = dict(assessment.get("contract") or {})
+    return {
+        "recovery_kind": "incomplete_bootstrap_lock",
+        "recovered_at": recovered_at,
+        "prior_contract": contract.get("contract"),
+        "prior_missing_fields": list(contract.get("missing_fields") or []),
+        "prior_claimant_placement": evidence.get("claimant_placement"),
+        "prior_expiration_state": evidence.get("expiration_state"),
+        "prior_generation": evidence.get("recorded_generation"),
+        "prior_owner_session": evidence.get("recorded_owner_session"),
+        "prior_freshness": (evidence.get("freshness") or {}).get("status"),
+        "replacement_task_session_id": new_task_session_id,
+        "preserved_head": evidence.get("observed_head"),
+        "branch_reset": False,
+        "base_equivalence_required": False,
+    }
+
+
+def format_recovery_refusal(assessment: Mapping[str, Any]) -> str:
+    reasons = "; ".join(
+        assessment.get("reasons") or ["unknown bootstrap lock recovery refusal"]
+    )
+    code = assessment.get("refusal_code") or "refused"
+    return f"Bootstrap lock recovery refused ({code}): {reasons} (fail closed)"

control_plane_db.py

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ from typing import Any, Iterator, Sequence
 import dependency_graph
 import gitea_audit
 
-SCHEMA_VERSION = 6
+SCHEMA_VERSION = 5
 
 # Assignable work kinds only — raw monitoring incidents are never work items.
 WORK_KINDS = frozenset({"issue", "pr"})
@@ -65,33 +65,6 @@ CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS sessions (
     status TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT 'active'
 );
 
--- Fleet-level MCP server runtime registry (#949). Distinct from ``sessions``:
--- a session is one allocator *task*, while a row here is one *server process*
--- that bound native MCP transport. Each server writes its own row and no other,
--- so a caller can never supply this evidence. Creating the table is itself the
--- v5→v6 migration: additive, idempotent, and it touches no existing table.
-CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS mcp_server_runtimes (
-    runtime_id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
-    namespace TEXT NOT NULL,
-    profile TEXT,
-    role TEXT,
-    remote TEXT,
-    org TEXT,
-    repo TEXT,
-    repository_root TEXT,
-    pid INTEGER NOT NULL,
-    cohort_id TEXT,
-    cohort_source TEXT,
-    client_provenance TEXT,
-    boot_id TEXT,
-    startup_head TEXT,
-    daemon_start_head TEXT,
-    transport TEXT,
-    registered_at TEXT NOT NULL,
-    last_heartbeat_at TEXT NOT NULL,
-    status TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT 'running'
-);
-
 CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS work_items (
     work_item_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
     remote TEXT NOT NULL,
@@ -937,142 +910,6 @@ class ControlPlaneDB:
             rows = conn.execute(sql, params).fetchall()
             return [dict(r) for r in rows]
 
-    # ── MCP server runtime registry (#949) ────────────────────────────────
-
-    _RUNTIME_COLUMNS: tuple[str, ...] = (
-        "runtime_id",
-        "namespace",
-        "profile",
-        "role",
-        "remote",
-        "org",
-        "repo",
-        "repository_root",
-        "pid",
-        "cohort_id",
-        "cohort_source",
-        "client_provenance",
-        "boot_id",
-        "startup_head",
-        "daemon_start_head",
-        "transport",
-        "registered_at",
-        "last_heartbeat_at",
-        "status",
-    )
-
-    def register_mcp_server_runtime(
-        self,
-        record: dict[str, Any],
-        *,
-        retention_seconds: int | None = None,
-        now: str | None = None,
-    ) -> dict[str, Any]:
-        """Record that *this* server process is running (#949).
-
-        Only the described process ever calls this, at native transport bind.
-        Two housekeeping deletions happen here — on the startup write path, never
-        on the read path — so the registry cannot grow without bound:
-
-        * rows that recorded the **same PID**, which the calling process now
-          owns and which therefore cannot still be a live server;
-        * rows older than *retention_seconds*.
-
-        Neither can hide a live duplicate: a concurrently running server holds a
-        different PID and writes a fresher row.
-        """
-        stamp = now or _ts()
-        row = {key: record.get(key) for key in self._RUNTIME_COLUMNS}
-        row["runtime_id"] = str(record.get("runtime_id") or "").strip()
-        if not row["runtime_id"]:
-            raise ValueError("runtime_id is required (fail closed)")
-        row["namespace"] = str(record.get("namespace") or "").strip()
-        if not row["namespace"]:
-            raise ValueError("namespace is required (fail closed)")
-        if record.get("pid") is None:
-            raise ValueError("pid is required (fail closed)")
-        row["pid"] = int(record["pid"])
-        row["registered_at"] = record.get("registered_at") or stamp
-        row["last_heartbeat_at"] = record.get("last_heartbeat_at") or stamp
-        row["status"] = record.get("status") or "running"
-
-        columns = ", ".join(self._RUNTIME_COLUMNS)
-        placeholders = ", ".join("?" for _ in self._RUNTIME_COLUMNS)
-        values = [row[key] for key in self._RUNTIME_COLUMNS]
-
-        with self._tx() as conn:
-            conn.execute(
-                "DELETE FROM mcp_server_runtimes WHERE pid = ? AND runtime_id != ?",
-                (row["pid"], row["runtime_id"]),
-            )
-            if retention_seconds and retention_seconds > 0:
-                cutoff = _ts(
-                    _utc_now() - timedelta(seconds=int(retention_seconds))
-                )
-                conn.execute(
-                    "DELETE FROM mcp_server_runtimes WHERE registered_at < ?",
-                    (cutoff,),
-                )
-            conn.execute(
-                f"INSERT OR REPLACE INTO mcp_server_runtimes({columns}) "
-                f"VALUES ({placeholders})",
-                values,
-            )
-            stored = conn.execute(
-                "SELECT * FROM mcp_server_runtimes WHERE runtime_id = ?",
-                (row["runtime_id"],),
-            ).fetchone()
-            return dict(stored)
-
-    def heartbeat_mcp_server_runtime(self, runtime_id: str) -> None:
-        """Refresh a runtime row's liveness timestamp.
-
-        Never called by the inventory read path: liveness is established from
-        process evidence so that reading the fleet mutates nothing (#949 AC11).
-        """
-        with self._tx() as conn:
-            conn.execute(
-                "UPDATE mcp_server_runtimes SET last_heartbeat_at = ? "
-                "WHERE runtime_id = ?",
-                (_ts(), runtime_id),
-            )
-
-    def mark_mcp_server_runtime_stopped(self, runtime_id: str) -> None:
-        """Mark a runtime row stopped (graceful shutdown bookkeeping)."""
-        with self._tx() as conn:
-            conn.execute(
-                "UPDATE mcp_server_runtimes SET status = 'stopped', "
-                "last_heartbeat_at = ? WHERE runtime_id = ?",
-                (_ts(), runtime_id),
-            )
-
-    def list_mcp_server_runtimes(
-        self,
-        *,
-        statuses: Sequence[str] | None = None,
-        limit: int = 500,
-    ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
-        """List runtime registry rows, newest registration first (read-only).
-
-        Ordering is fully deterministic: ties on ``registered_at`` break on
-        ``runtime_id`` so two callers reading one snapshot see one order.
-        """
-        clauses: list[str] = []
-        params: list[Any] = []
-        if statuses:
-            placeholders = ", ".join("?" for _ in statuses)
-            clauses.append(f"status IN ({placeholders})")
-            params.extend(statuses)
-        where = ("WHERE " + " AND ".join(clauses)) if clauses else ""
-        params.append(max(1, int(limit)))
-        with self._tx(immediate=False) as conn:
-            rows = conn.execute(
-                f"SELECT * FROM mcp_server_runtimes {where} "
-                "ORDER BY registered_at DESC, runtime_id ASC LIMIT ?",
-                params,
-            ).fetchall()
-            return [dict(r) for r in rows]
-
     # ── work items ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
     def upsert_work_item(

docs/author-issue-lock-contract.md

@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+# The canonical author issue-lock contract (#953)
+
+Every author issue lock has exactly one shape. Both writers —
+`gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree` and `gitea_lock_issue` — build it
+through `author_lock_contract.build_canonical_issue_lock`, and every reader
+consumes that same shape.
+
+Before #953 the two writers disagreed. `gitea_lock_issue` wrote the canonical
+record; bootstrap wrote a thinner one with the claimant at the lock top level,
+`lease_id: null`, and no `work_lease`, `lock_provenance`, or expiry. Because
+every reader was written against the canonical shape, a lock that bootstrap
+reported as successfully created could not be heartbeated, renewed, re-locked,
+or accepted by `gitea_create_pr`. Each of those gates was individually correct;
+the defect was that two writers disagreed about what a lock *is*.
+
+## Required ordering
+
+**Finalize the lock before writing any implementation bytes.** This ordering is
+what keeps recovery cheap: while the worktree is still base-equivalent, a lock
+problem can be fixed by simply calling `gitea_lock_issue` again. Once the branch
+carries commits, base-equivalence is gone and the ordinary re-lock path is no
+longer available.
+
+1. `gitea_whoami` — resolve identity and profile.
+2. `gitea_resolve_task_capability(task='work_issue')`.
+3. `gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree` — creates the branch, the registered
+   worktree under `branches/`, and a **canonical** lock. It reads the lock back
+   and verifies it structurally before reporting success; a partial lock fails
+   closed here, with the missing fields named, and never reports
+   `implementation_allowed: true`.
+4. `gitea_heartbeat_issue_lock` — prove the lock is usable, using the
+   `task_session_id` bootstrap returned.
+5. Implement, commit, push.
+6. `gitea_create_pr`.
+
+If bootstrap returns `success: false` with
+`reason_code: incomplete_issue_lock_contract`, **do not implement**. Its
+`exact_next_action` names the executable recovery step. Bootstrap's reported
+next action always matches the state it actually returned.
+
+### What that refusal leaves behind
+
+The AC7 refusal runs `run_compensating_recovery` *before* it reports, so the
+advice has to describe the post-rollback state rather than the shape of the lock
+that provoked it. Recommending incomplete-lock recovery for artifacts the
+rollback already deleted would produce `no_durable_lock` and then
+`worktree_invalid` — two refusals for a state a plain retry fixes.
+
+The refusal therefore carries `compensating_recovery` and
+`post_compensation_state`, and derives `exact_next_action` from what was
+observed on disk. `cleanup_state` is one of:
+
+| `cleanup_state` | Meaning | Next action |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| `complete` | lock, branch, and worktree all removed | resolve `missing_fields` and re-run `gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree` |
+| `partial` | rollback ran; some artifacts survive, by design or because a step errored | scoped to exactly what survives — see below |
+| `failed` | rollback never completed, so nothing is proven removed | `gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract` (read-only) before anything else |
+
+Within `partial`, the surviving set decides the action:
+
+| Survives | Next action |
+| --- | --- |
+| lock + branch + worktree | `gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock` for that exact issue, branch, and worktree |
+| branch + worktree (lock released) | `gitea_lock_issue` — no implementation bytes were written, so the worktree is still base-equivalent |
+| lock only (worktree removed) | `gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract`; the surviving lock must be released by its recorded owner before bootstrap is retried |
+| branch only | `gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract`, then re-run bootstrap, which adopts the existing branch |
+
+`failed_rollback_steps` names any rollback step that errored, and the returned
+action says so rather than presenting the surviving state as intentional.
+
+> The lock half of that rollback was dead code until #953 review 632 F2:
+> `run_compensating_recovery` called `issue_lock_store.release_session_lock`,
+> which did not exist, inside a bare `except Exception: pass`. Every rollback
+> removed the branch and worktree and silently left the lock — the exact
+> uninspectable, unrecoverable state this issue exists to eliminate. The
+> function now exists, releases only a lock whose recorded `owner_session`
+> matches, and its failures are recorded rather than swallowed.
+
+## The contract
+
+A canonical lock carries every field in
+`author_lock_contract.REQUIRED_LOCK_FIELDS`:
+
+| Field | Meaning |
+| --- | --- |
+| `remote`, `org`, `repo`, `issue_number` | repository and issue identity |
+| `branch_name`, `worktree_path` | the binding this claim owns |
+| `work_lease` | the canonical lease block, below |
+| `lock_provenance` | sanctioned source, minted server-side |
+| `lock_generation` | monotonic; every write advances it |
+
+`work_lease` carries every field in
+`author_lock_contract.REQUIRED_WORK_LEASE_FIELDS`, notably:
+
+| Field | Meaning |
+| --- | --- |
+| `claimant.{username,profile}` | **canonical** claimant placement |
+| `expires_at` | sliding TTL from `lease_policy` |
+| `last_heartbeat_at`, `heartbeat_count` | liveness evidence |
+| `task_session_id` | the ownership fencing token — never null |
+| `lifecycle_version` | `heartbeat-v1`; its absence is what makes a lock legacy |
+
+### Claimant placement and legacy compatibility
+
+`work_lease.claimant` is canonical. A top-level `claimant` is the legacy
+placement written by pre-#953 bootstrap and is still **read** — through the one
+shared reader, `issue_lock_store.lock_claimant` — so an existing lock is not
+refused for "not recording a claimant" when it plainly records one.
+
+Tolerating the placement is not a widening. Every caller still compares the
+values against server-resolved identity and profile, so a legacy placement
+grants nothing the canonical placement would not. When both are present, the
+`work_lease` copy wins: after an upgrade, a stale top-level copy must never
+decide ownership.
+
+### Expiration is explicit
+
+A lock with no recorded expiry is **not** "not yet expired". `is_lease_expired`
+returns `False` for it, which used to make such a lock permanently non-expiring
+*and* permanently ineligible for #760 exact-owner renewal, which only ever
+assesses an expired lease. `author_lock_contract.expiration_state` names the
+real fact: `recorded`, `missing`, or `unparseable`. A `missing` expiry makes the
+lock eligible for the recovery path below rather than stranding it.
+
+## Recovering an existing incomplete bootstrap lock
+
+For locks already written by the old bootstrap — including those whose branches
+already carry legitimate committed and pushed work — use:
+
+```text
+gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract(issue_number, branch_name, worktree_path, remote=...)
+gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock(issue_number, branch_name, worktree_path, expected_head, remote=...)
+```
+
+`gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract` is strictly read-only: it performs no lock,
+lease, branch, worktree, issue, or pull-request mutation. Use it first to see
+which fields are missing and what the recommended action is; pass `dry_run=True`
+to the recovery tool to preview the decision without writing.
+
+`gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock` upgrades that one lock to the
+canonical contract. Before writing anything it verifies:
+
+* repository (`remote`, `org`, `repo`) and issue number
+* claimant username **and** profile against the server-resolved values — a
+  matching username alone is never accepted
+* branch, worktree path, worktree existence, and worktree registration
+* the worktree is on the recorded branch
+* the observed head equals the caller's `expected_head`
+* the existing lock's generation and provenance state
+* the absence of healthy foreign ownership
+
+What it deliberately does **not** do:
+
+* it never moves, resets, or rewinds the branch, and never requires
+  base-equivalence — preserving the committed work is the entire point;
+* it never pushes and never creates a pull request;
+* it touches only the single lock file for that exact remote/org/repo/issue;
+* it accepts no caller-supplied provenance and no caller-supplied authorization
+  flag — both are minted server-side.
+
+A recovered lock records a `bootstrap_lock_recovery` block holding both sides of
+the transition — prior contract, prior missing fields, prior generation, prior
+owning session, the replacement `task_session_id`, and the preserved head — so a
+recovered claim never reads as an original one.
+
+### Gates, in order
+
+`gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock` is an author-only durable-lock
+mutation and carries the same three gates as every comparable author operation,
+in this order:
+
+1. `role_session_router.check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop` — no author
+   fallback after a reviewer `wrong_role_stop`.
+2. `_namespace_mutation_block(task, remote=remote, author_role_exclusive=True)` —
+   the namespace wall. It refuses a reviewer-bound session and, because this
+   task's required permission is `gitea.issue.comment` (which merger,
+   controller, and reconciler profiles also hold), additionally requires the
+   active profile's derived role kind to be exactly `author`. A refusal carries
+   `namespace_block: true` and emits a `BLOCKED` audit record naming the
+   namespace and profile.
+3. `_profile_permission_block` — operation, provenance, and session-context
+   gates.
+
+Exact-owner claimant matching inside `assess_bootstrap_lock_recovery` runs
+*after* all three. It is a further layer, never a substitute for them: on its
+own it refuses one step too late and leaves the audit trail silent about the
+attempt.
+
+### Refusals
+
+| `refusal_code` | Meaning |
+| --- | --- |
+| `no_durable_lock` | nothing to recover |
+| `already_canonical` | lock is fine; rewriting would invalidate a live heartbeat token |
+| `foreign_claimant` | recorded claimant is not the active identity/profile pair |
+| `healthy_foreign_lock` | a live foreign-owned lock; takeover is not a recovery path |
+| `identity_unresolved` | identity or profile could not be resolved |
+| `binding_mismatch` | repository, issue, branch, or worktree does not match |
+| `worktree_invalid` | worktree missing, unregistered, or on another branch |
+| `head_mismatch` | the worktree moved under the caller |
+
+## The #447 create-PR provenance guard is unchanged
+
+`issue_lock_provenance.assess_lock_file_for_create_pr` still requires both a
+sanctioned `lock_provenance` and a `work_lease`, and the sanctioned source set
+was **not** widened. Bootstrap writes through
+`issue_lock_provenance.SOURCE_LOCK_ISSUE` — the lock it produces *is* a
+canonical lock, not a second dialect with its own exemption. Bootstrap now
+satisfies the guard rather than the guard being relaxed to admit bootstrap.

docs/mcp-fleet-inventory.md

@@ -1,134 +0,0 @@
-# Authoritative MCP fleet inventory (#949)
-
-`gitea_assess_fleet_inventory` is the read-only native capability that answers a
-question no other surface could: **is exactly one server running for each
-configured PRGS profile, and do they all belong to one client cohort?**
-
-## Why the existing surfaces were not enough
-
-| Surface | What it proves | Why it cannot prove the fleet |
-| --- | --- | --- |
-| `gitea_get_runtime_context` | Profile, identity, workspace binding of **the process answering the call** | Says nothing about the other four namespaces |
-| `gitea_assess_master_parity` | Startup vs current vs live revision of **that same process** | Five self-reports of one revision do not establish five processes, nor the absence of a sixth |
-| `gitea_assess_mcp_namespace_health` | Whether one named namespace can invoke one tool | Accepts `process`, `probe_result` and `registered_tools` **from the caller** — a capability whose inputs come from the party it constrains is not evidence |
-| control-plane `sessions` table | Allocator **task** sessions | A session is a unit of work, not a server process; nothing recorded that a server exists |
-
-Before this capability, satisfying a strict five-process/single-cohort gate
-required shell process inspection, cached JSON, or source reading — none of
-which are sanctioned workflow evidence.
-
-## Evidence model
-
-Two independent sources must agree before a member counts as running.
-
-**1. Control-plane runtime registry** — table `mcp_server_runtimes`.
-Each server writes exactly one row *about itself*, from the official entrypoint,
-immediately after the native MCP transport bind. Only a transport-bound process
-reaches that line, and no MCP caller can reach it at all. The row is
-authoritative for identity: namespace, profile, role, repository binding,
-cohort, startup revision, transport, and PID.
-
-**2. Server-side process observation** — a process listing performed by the
-server answering the inventory call, never by the caller. It is authoritative
-for existence and liveness, and it is the only source that can reveal a running
-server the registry does not know about.
-
-A member is `live` only when a registry row has a matching running process whose
-start time precedes the registration — so a recycled PID cannot impersonate a
-server that has since exited.
-
-### Deliberate non-inferences
-
-* **Configuration is not existence.** A configured profile with no live
-  corroborated row is `missing`, never `running` (AC8).
-* **Matching revisions are not a cohort.** `single_cohort` is derived only from
-  recorded cohort identity. Five members at one revision with an unknown cohort
-  yield `single_cohort: null` and a closed gate, never `true` (AC7).
-* **Parent-client status is not member health.** Each member is classified from
-  its own evidence.
-
-Cohort identity comes from `GITEA_MCP_CLIENT_COHORT_ID` when the client sets it,
-otherwise from the parent process that launched the server. A server whose
-parent has gone away (reparented to init) reports an unknown cohort rather than
-guessing.
-
-## Result shape
-
-Top-level verdict fields:
-
-| Field | Meaning |
-| --- | --- |
-| `inventory_complete` | All evidence was obtainable. False whenever anything below is unknown. |
-| `incomplete_reasons` | Every distinct reason completeness failed. |
-| `configured_members` | The five expected members with their instance counts and health. |
-| `running_members` | Live, corroborated instances of expected profiles. |
-| `missing_members` | Expected profiles with no live instance. |
-| `duplicate_members` | Expected profiles with more than one live instance, with every PID. |
-| `unexpected_members` | Live members outside the expected roster. Never folded into duplicates. |
-| `stale_members` | Registry rows whose process is dead, unobserved, PID-recycled, or unknown. |
-| `unregistered_processes` | Running MCP server processes with no registry row. |
-| `repository_binding_mismatches` | Live members bound to another repository, or with an incomplete binding. |
-| `role_mismatches` | Live members whose declared role or namespace contradicts the configured profile. |
-| `single_cohort` / `mixed_cohort` | `true`/`false`, or `null` when cohort evidence is unknown. |
-| `mixed_revision` / `startup_revisions` | Revision spread across live members. |
-| `exactly_one_per_profile` | No missing and no duplicate expected members. |
-| `mutation_gate_satisfied` | The full invariant held. |
-| `blocked_reason` / `blocked_reasons` | Why the gate is closed; the first is the headline. |
-| `mutations_performed` | Always `[]`. |
-
-Ordering is deterministic — every list sorts by namespace, profile, PID, then
-runtime id — so two callers reading one snapshot see identical structure.
-
-## How controller and reconciler gates consume it
-
-Classification is a **pure function of the snapshot**. The answering namespace is
-reported as `answering_namespace` metadata and never affects the verdict, so
-`gitea-controller` and `gitea-reconciler` return the same result for the same
-fleet. Neither is privileged over the other.
-
-Consume it like this:
-
-1. Call `gitea_assess_fleet_inventory` from `gitea-controller` **or**
-   `gitea-reconciler` (any namespace holding `gitea.read` may call it).
-2. If `mutation_gate_satisfied` is `true`, the exact-one-instance-per-profile,
-   single-cohort, single-revision invariant is proven; proceed.
-3. Otherwise **stop and report `blocked_reason` verbatim**. Distinguish the
-   cases — they need different operator actions:
-   * `missing_members` — the client did not launch that namespace; reconnect it.
-   * `duplicate_members` — a second client or a manual launch is running that
-     profile; the **operator** quits the extra client. This capability never
-     terminates a process.
-   * `unexpected_members` — an unconfigured PRGS server is live; investigate
-     before trusting any gate.
-   * `unregistered_processes` — a server is running code that predates this
-     capability, or failed to register; the inventory is incomplete by
-     construction and must not be reported as healthy.
-   * `mixed_cohort` / `mixed_revision` — the fleet is not one coherent unit.
-   * `single_cohort: null` — cohort evidence is missing; this is *unknown*, not
-     *healthy*.
-
-Never treat `inventory_complete: false` as a soft warning. It means the
-inventory cannot describe the whole fleet, which is exactly the state the
-mutation gate exists to refuse.
-
-## Read-only guarantees
-
-The capability performs no restart, reconnect, drain, lease mutation, issue
-mutation, repository write, or process termination, and it never manufactures
-historical restart evidence. The only signal it sends is `signal 0`, a
-liveness/permission check that delivers nothing to the target process. Registry
-writes happen exclusively on the startup path of the process being described,
-never on this read path.
-
-## Scope boundaries
-
-This capability is observation only. Related concerns live elsewhere and are
-deliberately not absorbed here:
-
-* **#950** — controller role metadata and capability-routing consistency.
-* **#951** — durable synchronization and restart receipts.
-* **#952** — stale-lease inspection, dashboard, and executor consistency.
-* **#900** — cohort lifecycle supervision (draining and reaping superseded
-  cohorts) is a *mutating* transition that would consume this evidence.
-* **#948** — the client/session/generation ownership model that this evidence
-  feeds.

docs/mcp-tool-inventory.md

@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ that gates each call, not which tools exist.
 - `gitea_assess_already_landed_reconciliation`
 - `gitea_assess_conflict_fix_classification`
 - `gitea_assess_conflict_fix_push`
-- `gitea_assess_fleet_inventory`
 - `gitea_assess_gitea_operation_path`
 - `gitea_assess_master_parity`
 - `gitea_assess_mcp_namespace_health`
@@ -104,6 +103,7 @@ that gates each call, not which tools exist.
 - `gitea_get_shell_health`
 - `gitea_heartbeat_issue_lock`
 - `gitea_heartbeat_reviewer_pr_lease`
+- `gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract`
 - `gitea_inspect_workflow_lease`
 - `gitea_issue_irrecoverable_provenance_authorization`
 - `gitea_list_dependency_edges`
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ that gates each call, not which tools exist.
 - `gitea_record_pre_review_command`
 - `gitea_record_shell_spawn_outcome`
 - `gitea_record_stable_branch_push_attempt`
+- `gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock`
 - `gitea_release_merger_pr_lease`
 - `gitea_release_reviewer_pr_lease`
 - `gitea_release_workflow_lease`

gitea_mcp_server.py

@@ -196,7 +196,6 @@ RECONCILER_WORKTREE_ENV = "GITEA_RECONCILER_WORKTREE"
 import namespace_workspace_binding as nwb  # noqa: E402
 import canonical_repository_root as crr  # noqa: E402  # #706 cross-repo canonical root
 import mcp_namespace_health  # noqa: E402
-import mcp_fleet_inventory  # noqa: E402  # #949 authoritative fleet inventory
 import stale_binding_recovery  # noqa: E402
 
 # Worktree env bindings inherited from the parent environment at daemon boot
@@ -2111,6 +2110,8 @@ import issue_lock_store  # noqa: E402
 import issue_lock_adoption  # noqa: E402
 import issue_lock_recovery  # noqa: E402
 import issue_lock_renewal  # noqa: E402
+import author_lock_contract  # noqa: E402
+import bootstrap_lock_recovery  # noqa: E402
 import dirty_orphan_worktree_recovery  # noqa: E402  # #860 dirty orphan recovery
 import dirty_same_claimant_session_rebind  # noqa: E402  # #864
 import stacked_pr_support  # noqa: E402
@@ -2659,33 +2660,17 @@ def _build_author_issue_work_lease(
     worktree_path: str,
     host: str | None,
 ) -> dict:
-    created = _work_lease_now()
+    # #953: the lease shape now lives in author_lock_contract so that bootstrap
-    # #790 Slice A: the window comes from the central policy, not a literal here.
+    # and gitea_lock_issue cannot drift apart again. The policy-derived sliding
-    # It is also now a *sliding* window — the lease lives ``initial_ttl_minutes``
+    # TTL (#790 Slice A) and the task-session ownership key (#790 AC-N1) are
-    # past its last valid heartbeat rather than a fixed four hours past its
+    # unchanged — they simply have one definition instead of two.
-    # creation, so an abandoned task stops holding the claim within one TTL.
+    return author_lock_contract.build_author_issue_work_lease(
-    policy = lease_policy.policy_for(lease_policy.TASK_CLASS_AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK)
+        issue_number=issue_number,
-    expires = created + timedelta(minutes=policy.initial_ttl_minutes)
+        branch_name=branch_name,
-    return {
+        worktree_path=worktree_path,
-        "operation_type": AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
+        claimant=_work_lease_claimant(host),
-        "issue_number": issue_number,
+        created=_work_lease_now(),
-        "pr_number": None,
+    )
-        "branch": branch_name,
-        "worktree_path": worktree_path,
-        "claimant": _work_lease_claimant(host),
-        "created_at": _work_lease_timestamp(created),
-        "expires_at": _work_lease_timestamp(expires),
-        "last_heartbeat_at": _work_lease_timestamp(created),
-        # #790 AC-N1: the ownership key for this task. Distinct from the recorded
-        # PID, which is the shared daemon and identifies no individual task.
-        "task_session_id": issue_lock_store.mint_task_session_id(
-            AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE
-        ),
-        # #790 AC-N8: the explicit lifecycle marker. Its absence — never a
-        # timestamp comparison — is what makes a lock legacy.
-        "lifecycle_version": lease_policy.LIFECYCLE_HEARTBEAT_V1,
-        "heartbeat_count": 1,
-    }
 
 
 def _active_work_lease_block(
@@ -4955,6 +4940,370 @@ def gitea_heartbeat_issue_lock(
     return outcome
 
 
+def _observe_recovery_worktree(worktree_path: str) -> dict:
+    """Observe head, branch, existence, and registration for lock recovery.
+
+    Read-only: it runs ``git`` queries and touches nothing. Kept separate from
+    the decision so the decision stays a pure function of observations (#953).
+    """
+    observation = {
+        "worktree_exists": os.path.isdir(worktree_path),
+        "worktree_registered": False,
+        "current_branch": "",
+        "observed_head": "",
+    }
+    if not observation["worktree_exists"]:
+        return observation
+    try:
+        observation["current_branch"] = subprocess.run(
+            ["git", "-C", worktree_path, "rev-parse", "--abbrev-ref", "HEAD"],
+            capture_output=True,
+            text=True,
+            check=False,
+        ).stdout.strip()
+        observation["observed_head"] = subprocess.run(
+            ["git", "-C", worktree_path, "rev-parse", "HEAD"],
+            capture_output=True,
+            text=True,
+            check=False,
+        ).stdout.strip()
+        listing = subprocess.run(
+            ["git", "-C", worktree_path, "worktree", "list", "--porcelain"],
+            capture_output=True,
+            text=True,
+            check=False,
+        ).stdout
+        real = os.path.realpath(worktree_path)
+        observation["worktree_registered"] = any(
+            os.path.realpath(line.split(" ", 1)[1].strip()) == real
+            for line in listing.splitlines()
+            if line.startswith("worktree ")
+        )
+    except Exception:  # fail closed: unobservable is not provable
+        return observation
+    return observation
+
+
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract(
+    issue_number: int,
+    branch_name: str | None = None,
+    worktree_path: str | None = None,
+    remote: str = "dadeschools",
+    host: str | None = None,
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+) -> dict:
+    """Inspect a durable author issue lock against the canonical contract (#953 AC8/AC16).
+
+    Strictly read-only. It performs no lock, lease, branch, worktree, issue, or
+    pull-request mutation of any kind — it reads the durable lock record and
+    reports. Use it to find out *why* a lock is being refused before choosing a
+    recovery path, and to confirm afterwards that recovery produced a canonical
+    lock.
+
+    Reports which canonical fields are missing, where the claimant is recorded
+    (``work_lease`` is canonical, top level is the legacy/bootstrap placement),
+    whether an expiration is actually recorded — as opposed to absent, which
+    used to masquerade as "not yet expired" — whether the lock can be
+    heartbeated, and whether it satisfies the untouched #447 create-PR
+    provenance guard.
+
+    Args:
+        issue_number: The issue whose lock to inspect.
+        branch_name: Optional; when given, the recovery eligibility preview is
+            evaluated against this branch.
+        worktree_path: Optional; when given, the recovery eligibility preview is
+            evaluated against this worktree.
+        remote: Known instance — 'dadeschools' or 'prgs'.
+        host: Override the Gitea host.
+        org: Override the owner/organization.
+        repo: Override the repository name.
+
+    Returns:
+        dict with 'success', 'lock_present', 'lock_contract' (the structural
+        verdict), 'recommended_action', and — when branch_name and
+        worktree_path are supplied — a non-mutating 'recovery_preview'.
+    """
+    blocked = _profile_permission_block(
+        "gitea.read",
+        issue_number=issue_number,
+        remote=remote,
+        host=host,
+        org=org,
+        repo=repo,
+        org_explicit=org is not None,
+        repo_explicit=repo is not None,
+    )
+    if blocked:
+        return blocked
+
+    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    existing = _load_existing_issue_lock(
+        remote=remote, org=o, repo=r, issue_number=issue_number
+    )
+    contract = author_lock_contract.assess_lock_contract(existing)
+    result = {
+        "success": True,
+        "performed": False,
+        "mutation_performed": False,
+        "read_only": True,
+        "issue_number": issue_number,
+        "lock_present": bool(existing),
+        "lock_contract": contract,
+        "lock_freshness": (
+            issue_lock_store.assess_lock_freshness(dict(existing))
+            if existing
+            else {"status": issue_lock_store.STATUS_ABSENT, "live": False}
+        ),
+        "recommended_action": author_lock_contract.recommended_action(contract),
+    }
+
+    if branch_name and worktree_path:
+        resolved = issue_lock_worktree.resolve_author_worktree_path(
+            worktree_path, _canonical_local_git_root()
+        )
+        observation = _observe_recovery_worktree(resolved)
+        claimant = _work_lease_claimant(h)
+        result["recovery_preview"] = bootstrap_lock_recovery.assess_bootstrap_lock_recovery(
+            existing,
+            issue_number=issue_number,
+            branch_name=branch_name,
+            worktree_path=resolved,
+            remote=remote,
+            org=o,
+            repo=r,
+            identity=claimant.get("username"),
+            profile=claimant.get("profile"),
+            observed_head=observation["observed_head"],
+            declared_head=None,
+            worktree_exists=observation["worktree_exists"],
+            worktree_registered=observation["worktree_registered"],
+            current_branch=observation["current_branch"],
+        )
+    return result
+
+
+@mcp.tool()
+def gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock(
+    issue_number: int,
+    branch_name: str,
+    worktree_path: str,
+    expected_head: str,
+    remote: str = "dadeschools",
+    host: str | None = None,
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+    dry_run: bool = False,
+) -> dict:
+    """Upgrade an incomplete bootstrap issue lock to the canonical contract (#953 AC8-AC11).
+
+    Explicit, target-specific recovery. It does **not** widen
+    ``gitea_lock_issue``, and it is not a takeover path.
+
+    The state it repairs: ``gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree`` reported
+    success but wrote a lock with the claimant at the top level, no
+    ``work_lease``, no ``lock_provenance``, and no expiry. The author then
+    implemented, committed, and pushed — following bootstrap's own reported next
+    action — after which heartbeat, re-lock, exact-owner renewal, and the #447
+    create-PR guard all refuse simultaneously.
+
+    Deliberate non-behaviours: the branch is never moved, reset, or rewound, and
+    base-equivalence is never required — preserving the already-committed and
+    pushed work is the entire point. Nothing is pushed and no pull request is
+    created. Only the single lock file for this exact (remote, org, repo, issue)
+    is written.
+
+    Ownership is proven, never asserted. The claimant recorded on the durable
+    lock must match **both** the server-resolved identity and the active
+    profile; a matching username alone is refused. Repository, issue, branch,
+    worktree, registration, current branch, and head are all verified before any
+    write, and the declared ``expected_head`` must equal the observed head. A
+    healthy foreign-owned lock is refused outright. Provenance and authorization
+    are minted server-side — there is no parameter through which a caller can
+    supply either.
+
+    Args:
+        issue_number: The issue whose incomplete lock is being recovered.
+        branch_name: The branch recorded on the lock; must match.
+        worktree_path: The registered worktree recorded on the lock; must match.
+        expected_head: Full SHA the caller believes the worktree is at. A
+            mismatch fails closed, so a worktree that moved underneath the
+            caller cannot be recovered against stale evidence.
+        remote: Known instance — 'dadeschools' or 'prgs'.
+        host: Override the Gitea host.
+        org: Override the owner/organization.
+        repo: Override the repository name.
+        dry_run: Report the decision and evidence, mutate nothing.
+
+    Returns:
+        dict with 'success', 'performed', the resulting canonical
+        'lock_contract' and 'work_lease', the auditable
+        'bootstrap_lock_recovery' transition record, and 'exact_next_action'; on
+        refusal 'success'/'performed' False with 'refusal_code' and 'reasons'
+        naming exactly which evidence was missing, and no write performed.
+    """
+    task = "recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock"
+    ok, block_reasons = role_session_router.check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop(
+        task
+    )
+    if not ok:
+        return _author_mutation_block(block_reasons)
+
+    # #953 F1: the namespace/session wall every author state-creating mutation
+    # carries, and which this tool — the structural neighbour of
+    # gitea_recover_dirty_orphaned_issue_worktree, writing the same durable
+    # lock — was the only one to omit. Exact-owner claimant matching inside
+    # assess_bootstrap_lock_recovery is a later layer, not a substitute: it
+    # refuses one commit too late and leaves no BLOCKED audit record of the
+    # attempt. author_role_exclusive is required here because this task is gated
+    # on gitea.issue.comment, which merger, controller, and reconciler profiles
+    # also hold.
+    blocked = _namespace_mutation_block(
+        task, remote=remote, author_role_exclusive=True
+    )
+    if blocked:
+        return blocked
+
+    blocked = _profile_permission_block(
+        task_capability_map.required_permission(task),
+        issue_number=issue_number,
+        remote=remote,
+        host=host,
+        org=org,
+        repo=repo,
+        org_explicit=org is not None,
+        repo_explicit=repo is not None,
+    )
+    if blocked:
+        return blocked
+
+    h, o, r = _resolve(remote, host, org, repo)
+    resolved_worktree = issue_lock_worktree.resolve_author_worktree_path(
+        worktree_path, _canonical_local_git_root()
+    )
+    existing = _load_existing_issue_lock(
+        remote=remote, org=o, repo=r, issue_number=issue_number
+    )
+    observation = _observe_recovery_worktree(resolved_worktree)
+
+    # The claimant pair is resolved server-side from the live session; the
+    # caller cannot influence which identity or profile recovery compares
+    # against.
+    claimant = _work_lease_claimant(h)
+    assessment = bootstrap_lock_recovery.assess_bootstrap_lock_recovery(
+        existing,
+        issue_number=issue_number,
+        branch_name=branch_name,
+        worktree_path=resolved_worktree,
+        remote=remote,
+        org=o,
+        repo=r,
+        identity=claimant.get("username"),
+        profile=claimant.get("profile"),
+        observed_head=observation["observed_head"],
+        declared_head=expected_head,
+        worktree_exists=observation["worktree_exists"],
+        worktree_registered=observation["worktree_registered"],
+        current_branch=observation["current_branch"],
+    )
+
+    if not assessment["recovery_sanctioned"]:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "performed": False,
+            "mutation_performed": False,
+            "issue_number": issue_number,
+            "refusal_code": assessment["refusal_code"],
+            "reasons": assessment["reasons"],
+            "message": bootstrap_lock_recovery.format_recovery_refusal(assessment),
+            "lock_contract": assessment["contract"],
+            "evidence": assessment["evidence"],
+        }
+
+    if dry_run:
+        return {
+            "success": True,
+            "performed": False,
+            "mutation_performed": False,
+            "dry_run": True,
+            "issue_number": issue_number,
+            "would_recover": True,
+            "lock_contract": assessment["contract"],
+            "evidence": assessment["evidence"],
+            "exact_next_action": (
+                "Re-run without dry_run=True to upgrade this lock to the "
+                "canonical contract."
+            ),
+        }
+
+    recovered = author_lock_contract.build_canonical_issue_lock(
+        issue_number=issue_number,
+        branch_name=branch_name,
+        worktree_path=resolved_worktree,
+        remote=remote,
+        org=o,
+        repo=r,
+        identity=claimant.get("username"),
+        profile=claimant.get("profile"),
+        tool="gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock",
+        source=issue_lock_provenance.SOURCE_LOCK_ISSUE,
+        owner_session=(existing or {}).get("owner_session"),
+        expected_base_sha=(existing or {}).get("expected_base_sha"),
+    )
+    # AC10: preserve both sides of the transition so a recovered lock never
+    # reads as an original claim.
+    recovered["bootstrap_lock_recovery"] = bootstrap_lock_recovery.build_recovery_record(
+        assessment,
+        recovered_at=_work_lease_timestamp(_work_lease_now()),
+        new_task_session_id=recovered["work_lease"]["task_session_id"],
+    )
+
+    try:
+        lock_path = issue_lock_store.bind_session_lock(
+            recovered,
+            expected_generation=assessment["expected_generation"],
+            recovery_sanctioned=True,
+        )
+    except Exception as exc:
+        return {
+            "success": False,
+            "performed": False,
+            "mutation_performed": False,
+            "issue_number": issue_number,
+            "refusal_code": "lock_write_failed",
+            "reasons": [str(exc)],
+            "message": f"Recovered lock could not be persisted: {exc} (fail closed)",
+        }
+
+    written = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(lock_path)
+    contract = author_lock_contract.assess_lock_contract(written)
+    return {
+        "success": True,
+        "performed": True,
+        "mutation_performed": True,
+        "issue_number": issue_number,
+        "branch_name": branch_name,
+        "worktree_path": resolved_worktree,
+        "lock_file_path": lock_path,
+        "lock_contract": contract,
+        "work_lease": (written or {}).get("work_lease"),
+        "task_session_id": contract["task_session_id"],
+        "lock_generation": (written or {}).get("lock_generation"),
+        "prior_generation": assessment["expected_generation"],
+        "bootstrap_lock_recovery": (written or {}).get("bootstrap_lock_recovery"),
+        "preserved_head": observation["observed_head"],
+        "branch_reset": False,
+        "pushed": False,
+        "pr_created": False,
+        "exact_next_action": (
+            "Lock is canonical. Heartbeat it with the returned task_session_id, "
+            "then continue the author workflow; publish and create the pull "
+            "request through the normal sanctioned calls."
+        ),
+    }
+
+
 @mcp.tool()
 def gitea_recover_dirty_orphaned_issue_worktree(
     issue_number: int,
@@ -15156,8 +15505,21 @@ def _profile_permission_block(required_operation: str, **extra_fields) -> dict |
     )
 
 
-def _namespace_mutation_block(mutation_task: str, **extra_fields) -> dict | None:
+def _namespace_mutation_block(
-    """Reviewer/author namespace alignment gate (#209)."""
+    mutation_task: str,
+    *,
+    author_role_exclusive: bool = False,
+    **extra_fields,
+) -> dict | None:
+    """Reviewer/author namespace alignment gate (#209).
+
+    ``author_role_exclusive`` additionally requires the active profile's derived
+    role kind to be exactly ``author`` (#953 F1). Off by default, so the six
+    pre-existing call sites are unchanged. Tools whose required permission is
+    ``gitea.issue.comment`` — which every configured role holds — opt in, since
+    the reviewer-namespace check alone would let a merger, controller, or
+    reconciler session through to a durable author lock write.
+    """
     required_permission = task_capability_map.required_permission(mutation_task)
     required_role = task_capability_map.required_role(mutation_task)
     # #714: evaluate active profile only — never auto-switch.
@@ -15179,6 +15541,9 @@ def _namespace_mutation_block(mutation_task: str, **extra_fields) -> dict | None
         }
     ok, reasons = role_namespace_gate.check_author_mutation_namespace(
         mutation_task, profile)
+    if ok and author_role_exclusive:
+        ok, reasons = role_namespace_gate.check_author_role_kind(
+            mutation_task, profile)
     if ok:
         return None
     blocked = {
@@ -18812,116 +19177,6 @@ def gitea_assess_master_parity(
     return out
 
 
-def _fleet_namespace_for_profile(profile_name: str | None) -> str | None:
-    """Fleet namespace for *profile_name* (#949).
-
-    ``role_namespace_gate.infer_mcp_namespace`` recognises only author and
-    reviewer and returns the profile name for everything else, so it cannot
-    name the controller, merger, or reconciler namespaces. The fleet roster
-    carries that mapping; this defers to it and keeps the existing inference as
-    the fallback for profiles outside the roster. Widening the shared helper is
-    controller role-metadata work owned by #950.
-    """
-    return mcp_fleet_inventory.namespace_for_profile(
-        profile_name,
-        default=role_namespace_gate.infer_mcp_namespace(profile_name),
-    )
-
-
-@mcp.tool()
-def gitea_assess_fleet_inventory(
-    remote: str = "dadeschools",
-    host: str | None = None,
-    org: str | None = None,
-    repo: str | None = None,
-) -> dict:
-    """Read-only: authoritative inventory of the running PRGS MCP fleet (#949).
-
-    Every other runtime surface is per-process. ``gitea_get_runtime_context``
-    and ``gitea_assess_master_parity`` describe only the server answering the
-    call; ``gitea_assess_mcp_namespace_health`` takes ``process`` and
-    ``probe_result`` from the caller and so cannot constrain it. This tool takes
-    **no evidence parameters at all**: it combines the control-plane runtime
-    registry, which each server writes about itself at native transport bind,
-    with a process observation performed by this server. A member counts as
-    running only when both agree, so configuration alone never counts as a
-    running server and a caller cannot supply the answer.
-
-    Classification is a pure function of the snapshot, so ``gitea-controller``
-    and ``gitea-reconciler`` return the same verdict for the same fleet;
-    ``answering_namespace`` is metadata and never changes it.
-
-    Fails closed. Any unreadable registry, unavailable process listing,
-    unregistered server process, unknown cohort, or unknown startup revision
-    sets ``inventory_complete`` false and ``mutation_gate_satisfied`` false with
-    a specific ``blocked_reason``. Matching Git revisions never establish a
-    single cohort — ``single_cohort`` is derived only from recorded cohort
-    identity and stays ``null`` when that is unknown.
-
-    Strictly read-only: no restart, reconnect, lease mutation, issue mutation,
-    repository write, or process termination, and duplicates are reported and
-    never terminated. The only signal sent is ``signal 0`` liveness probing,
-    which delivers nothing to the target process. ``mutations_performed`` is
-    always an empty list.
-
-    Args:
-        remote: Known instance — 'dadeschools' or 'prgs'. Declares which
-            repository binding fleet members are expected to carry.
-        host: Override the Gitea host.
-        org: Override the expected owner/organization binding.
-        repo: Override the expected repository binding.
-
-    Returns:
-        dict with 'inventory_complete', 'configured_members', 'running_members',
-        'missing_members', 'duplicate_members', 'unexpected_members',
-        'stale_members', 'unregistered_processes', 'single_cohort',
-        'mixed_cohort', 'mixed_revision', 'exactly_one_per_profile',
-        'mutation_gate_satisfied', 'blocked_reason', and per-member evidence.
-    """
-    read_block = _profile_operation_gate("gitea.read")
-    if read_block:
-        return {
-            "success": False,
-            "read_only": True,
-            "inventory_complete": False,
-            "mutation_gate_satisfied": False,
-            "blocked_reason": "the active profile may not read control-plane state",
-            "reasons": read_block,
-            "permission_report": _permission_block_report("gitea.read"),
-            "mutations_performed": [],
-        }
-
-    ctx = session_ctx.get_session_context() or {}
-    expected_binding = {
-        "remote": remote or ctx.get("remote"),
-        "org": org or ctx.get("org"),
-        "repo": repo or ctx.get("repository"),
-    }
-
-    db, db_errors = _control_plane_db_or_error()
-    runtime_rows: list[dict] = []
-    registry_error: str | None = None
-    if db is None:
-        registry_error = "; ".join(db_errors) or "control-plane DB unavailable"
-    else:
-        try:
-            runtime_rows = db.list_mcp_server_runtimes(statuses=("running",))
-        except Exception as exc:  # noqa: BLE001 - unreadable registry is unknown evidence
-            registry_error = f"runtime registry could not be read: {_redact(str(exc))}"
-
-    result = mcp_fleet_inventory.classify_fleet_inventory(
-        runtime_rows=runtime_rows,
-        process_scan=mcp_fleet_inventory.scan_mcp_server_processes(),
-        expected_binding=expected_binding,
-        registry_available=registry_error is None,
-        registry_error=registry_error,
-        answering_namespace=_fleet_namespace_for_profile(_active_profile_name(host)),
-    )
-    result["expected_repository_binding"] = expected_binding
-    result["summary"] = mcp_fleet_inventory.summarize(result)
-    return result
-
-
 # #781: documented in the canonical review workflow as a tool reviewers call
 # before workflow load, but the registration decorator had been lost, so the
 # documented inventory named something no namespace could reach.
@@ -24455,72 +24710,6 @@ def gitea_quarantine_contaminated_review(
     }
 
 
-def _register_fleet_runtime(transport: str = "stdio") -> dict | None:
-    """Record this server process in the control-plane runtime registry (#949).
-
-    Called once from the official entrypoint immediately after the native
-    transport bind, so the row can only ever describe the process writing it.
-    This is the evidence ``gitea_assess_fleet_inventory`` reads; without it the
-    fleet is unprovable, but a failure here must never prevent the server from
-    serving, so every error is swallowed after being logged to stderr.
-    """
-    try:
-        profile_name = gitea_config.selected_profile_name()
-        try:
-            profile = get_profile()
-        except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001 - identity resolution must not block boot
-            profile = {}
-        allowed = (profile or {}).get("allowed_operations") or []
-        forbidden = (profile or {}).get("forbidden_operations") or []
-        role = _role_kind(allowed, forbidden) if allowed else None
-        ctx = session_ctx.get_session_context() or {}
-        env = os.environ
-        provenance = (
-            "client_managed"
-            if (
-                (env.get("GITEA_CLIENT_MANAGED") or "").strip().lower()
-                in {"1", "true", "yes", "client_managed"}
-                or (env.get("GITEA_MCP_CLIENT_MANAGED") or "").strip().lower()
-                in {"1", "true", "yes", "client_managed"}
-                or (env.get("GITEA_SERVER_PROVENANCE") or "").strip()
-                == "client_managed"
-            )
-            else "manual_launch"
-        )
-        record = mcp_fleet_inventory.build_process_runtime_record(
-            namespace=_fleet_namespace_for_profile(profile_name),
-            profile=profile_name,
-            role=role,
-            remote=ctx.get("remote"),
-            org=ctx.get("org"),
-            repo=ctx.get("repository"),
-            repository_root=PROJECT_ROOT,
-            startup_head=_process_boot_head_sha,
-            daemon_start_head=_process_boot_head_sha,
-            transport=transport,
-            client_provenance=provenance,
-            env=env,
-        )
-        db, errors = _control_plane_db_or_error()
-        if db is None:
-            sys.stderr.write(
-                f"--- fleet runtime registration skipped: {'; '.join(errors)} ---\n"
-            )
-            return None
-        db.register_mcp_server_runtime(
-            record,
-            retention_seconds=mcp_fleet_inventory.RUNTIME_RETENTION_SECONDS,
-        )
-        sys.stderr.write(
-            f"--- fleet runtime registered: {record['runtime_id']} "
-            f"(cohort {record['cohort_id']}) ---\n"
-        )
-        return record
-    except Exception as exc:  # noqa: BLE001 - never block startup
-        sys.stderr.write(f"--- fleet runtime registration failed: {exc} ---\n")
-        return None
-
-
 # ── Entry point ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
@@ -24530,11 +24719,6 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
     # native transport; offline imports / standalone scripts fail closed.
     mcp_daemon_guard.mark_sanctioned_daemon()
     mcp_daemon_guard.bind_native_mcp_transport(transport="stdio")
-    # #949: record this process in the control-plane runtime registry. Only a
-    # transport-bound server reaches this point, so the row is authoritative
-    # evidence that this namespace is actually running — evidence no caller of
-    # gitea_assess_fleet_inventory can supply.
-    _register_fleet_runtime(transport="stdio")
     # Lock this session's launch profile into the environment so child CLI
     # processes (e.g. review_pr.py) can detect and refuse profile
     # side-channel overrides (#199).

issue_lock_store.py

@@ -299,9 +299,13 @@ def _ownership_refusals(
             f"lock worktree '{lock.get('worktree_path')}' does not match "
             f"'{worktree_path}'"
         )
-    lease = lock.get("work_lease") if isinstance(lock, dict) else None
+    # #953 AC2/AC13/AC14: read through the shared claimant reader so a lock
-    claimant = lease.get("claimant") if isinstance(lease, dict) else None
+    # written by bootstrap — which records the claimant at the top level — is
-    claimant = claimant if isinstance(claimant, dict) else {}
+    # not refused for "not recording a claimant" when it plainly records one.
+    # This is not a widening: the values are still compared against the
+    # server-resolved identity and profile immediately below, so a legacy
+    # placement grants nothing that the canonical placement would not.
+    claimant = lock_claimant(lock) if isinstance(lock, dict) else {}
     recorded_identity = str(claimant.get("username") or "").strip()
     recorded_profile = str(claimant.get("profile") or "").strip()
     if not recorded_identity or not recorded_profile:
@@ -636,6 +640,99 @@ def iter_lock_files(lock_dir: str | None = None) -> list[str]:
     return sorted(paths)
 
 
+def release_session_lock(
+    *,
+    issue_number: int,
+    session: str,
+    lock_dir: str | None = None,
+    remote: str | None = None,
+    org: str | None = None,
+    repo: str | None = None,
+) -> str:
+    """Remove exactly the durable lock *session* created for *issue_number*.
+
+    ``author_issue_bootstrap.run_compensating_recovery`` has called this name
+    since #850, but it was never defined: the call raised ``AttributeError``
+    into a bare ``except Exception: pass``, so the lock half of every
+    compensating rollback silently did nothing. The branch and worktree were
+    removed and the lock was left behind — a state no sanctioned tool can act
+    on, since recovery refuses ``worktree_invalid`` and ``gitea_lock_issue`` has
+    no worktree to bind (#953 review 632 F2).
+
+    Ownership is proven, not asserted. A record is removed only when its
+    recorded ``owner_session`` equals *session* and its issue number matches;
+    ``remote``/``org``/``repo`` narrow it further when supplied. Zero matches or
+    more than one both raise, so a caller can never delete a lock it does not
+    own and an ambiguous directory is never guessed at. The ``.json.lock`` flock
+    sidecar is deliberately left in place — it is a zero-byte mutex another
+    process may hold, and removing it under contention would be a race.
+
+    Returns the removed lock file path.
+    """
+    target_issue = int(issue_number)
+    owner = str(session or "").strip()
+    if not owner:
+        raise ValueError(
+            "release_session_lock requires the owning session id (fail closed)"
+        )
+
+    def _is_owned_durable_lock(record: dict[str, Any] | None) -> bool:
+        # A durable lock, not a bootstrap phase journal or a session pointer,
+        # both of which can share a directory and carry the same issue number
+        # and owner_session.
+        if not record or "lock_generation" not in record:
+            return False
+        if not str(record.get("branch_name") or "").strip():
+            return False
+        if not str(record.get("worktree_path") or "").strip():
+            return False
+        try:
+            if int(record.get("issue_number") or 0) != target_issue:
+                return False
+        except (TypeError, ValueError):
+            return False
+        return str(record.get("owner_session") or "").strip() == owner
+
+    # Prefer the exact keyed path when the caller knows the repository; scanning
+    # is the fallback for callers that only carry the issue number.
+    if remote and org and repo:
+        exact = lock_file_path(
+            remote=remote,
+            org=org,
+            repo=repo,
+            issue_number=target_issue,
+            lock_dir=lock_dir,
+        )
+        if not _is_owned_durable_lock(read_lock_file(exact)):
+            raise FileNotFoundError(
+                f"durable issue lock '{exact}' is absent or is not owned by "
+                f"session '{owner}' (fail closed; nothing released)"
+            )
+        os.remove(exact)
+        return exact
+
+    matches: list[str] = []
+    for path in iter_lock_files(lock_dir):
+        if _is_owned_durable_lock(read_lock_file(path)):
+            matches.append(path)
+
+    if not matches:
+        raise FileNotFoundError(
+            f"no durable issue lock for issue #{target_issue} is owned by "
+            f"session '{owner}' (fail closed; nothing released)"
+        )
+    if len(matches) > 1:
+        raise RuntimeError(
+            f"{len(matches)} durable locks for issue #{target_issue} claim "
+            f"session '{owner}'; refusing to guess which to release "
+            "(fail closed)"
+        )
+
+    path = matches[0]
+    os.remove(path)
+    return path
+
+
 def find_lock_for_branch(
     *,
     remote: str,
@@ -1112,21 +1209,43 @@ def assess_same_issue_lease_conflict(
     )
 
 
-def _lock_claimant(lock: dict[str, Any] | None) -> dict[str, str]:
+def lock_claimant(lock: dict[str, Any] | None) -> dict[str, str]:
+    """Read the claimant from either canonical or legacy placement (#953 AC13/AC14).
+
+    ``work_lease.claimant`` is the canonical placement and is preferred; a
+    top-level ``claimant`` is the legacy/bootstrap placement and is accepted as
+    a fallback. This is the single definition. Before #953 the readers
+    disagreed: this module, ``issue_lock_renewal``, and ``issue_lock_recovery``
+    tolerated both placements, while ``_ownership_refusals`` looked only in
+    ``work_lease`` — which is what made a bootstrap-written lock
+    un-heartbeatable.
+
+    Preferring ``work_lease`` over the top level is deliberate: once a legacy
+    lock is upgraded, the canonical placement is authoritative and a stale
+    top-level copy must never win.
+
+    This decides *where to look*, never whether ownership is proven — every
+    caller still compares these values against server-resolved identity and
+    profile.
+    """
     if not isinstance(lock, dict):
         return {}
-    claimant = lock.get("claimant")
+    lease = lock.get("work_lease")
+    claimant = lease.get("claimant") if isinstance(lease, dict) else None
     if not isinstance(claimant, dict):
-        lease = lock.get("work_lease")
+        claimant = lock.get("claimant")
-        claimant = lease.get("claimant") if isinstance(lease, dict) else None
     if not isinstance(claimant, dict):
         return {}
     return {
-        "username": str(claimant.get("username") or ""),
+        "username": str(claimant.get("username") or "").strip(),
-        "profile": str(claimant.get("profile") or ""),
+        "profile": str(claimant.get("profile") or "").strip(),
     }
 
 
+#: Back-compatible alias for the pre-#953 private name.
+_lock_claimant = lock_claimant
+
+
 def assess_foreign_lock_overwrite(
     existing_lock: dict[str, Any] | None,
     incoming_lock: dict[str, Any],

mcp_fleet_inventory.py

@@ -1,785 +0,0 @@
-"""Authoritative, read-only PRGS MCP fleet inventory (#949).
-
-Every pre-existing runtime surface is *per process*. ``gitea_get_runtime_context``
-and ``gitea_assess_master_parity`` describe only the server answering the call.
-``gitea_assess_mcp_namespace_health`` accepts ``process``, ``probe_result`` and
-``registered_tools`` **from the caller**, so it cannot constrain the caller. The
-control-plane ``sessions`` table records allocator *task* sessions, not server
-processes. Five independent self-reports of the same revision therefore never
-proved that exactly five processes exist, that no sixth exists, or that all five
-belong to one client cohort.
-
-Evidence model
---------------
-Two independent sources must agree before a fleet member counts as running:
-
-``control-plane runtime registry``
-    A row each server writes **about itself** at native transport bind
-    (:func:`build_process_runtime_record`). No caller can supply it. It is
-    authoritative for identity: namespace, profile, role, repository binding,
-    cohort, and the revision the process started at.
-
-``server-side process observation``
-    A process listing performed by the server answering the inventory call
-    (:func:`scan_mcp_server_processes`), never by the caller. It is
-    authoritative for existence and liveness, and it is the only source that
-    can show a process the registry does not know about.
-
-A member is ``live`` only when a registry row has a matching, still-running
-process whose start time precedes the registration (so a recycled PID cannot
-impersonate a dead server). Anything the two sources cannot jointly establish
-is reported as unknown and fails the mutation gate closed — configuration alone
-never counts as a running member, and matching Git revisions never establish a
-single cohort.
-
-This module performs no restart, reconnect, lease mutation, issue mutation, or
-process termination. The only signal it ever sends is ``signal 0`` liveness
-probing, which delivers nothing to the target process.
-"""
-
-from __future__ import annotations
-
-import os
-import secrets
-import subprocess
-from datetime import datetime, timezone
-from typing import Any, Iterable, Mapping, Sequence
-
-# ── expected fleet ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-# The configured PRGS fleet. Each entry is one expected member; the roster is
-# the definition of "expected" for missing/unexpected classification.
-EXPECTED_PRGS_FLEET: tuple[dict[str, str], ...] = (
-    {"namespace": "gitea-author", "profile": "prgs-author", "role": "author"},
-    {
-        "namespace": "gitea-controller",
-        "profile": "prgs-controller",
-        "role": "controller",
-    },
-    {"namespace": "gitea-reviewer", "profile": "prgs-reviewer", "role": "reviewer"},
-    {"namespace": "gitea-merger", "profile": "prgs-merger", "role": "merger"},
-    {
-        "namespace": "gitea-reconciler",
-        "profile": "prgs-reconciler",
-        "role": "reconciler",
-    },
-)
-
-# Cohort identity supplied by a client that manages the whole fleet.
-COHORT_ID_ENV = "GITEA_MCP_CLIENT_COHORT_ID"
-
-# Registry rows older than this are pruned at *registration* time (a startup
-# write), never on the read path. Dead rows inside the window are still reported
-# as stale evidence rather than silently dropped.
-RUNTIME_RETENTION_SECONDS = 7 * 24 * 3600
-
-# Liveness classifications for a registry row.
-LIVENESS_LIVE = "live"
-LIVENESS_DEAD = "dead"
-LIVENESS_PID_RECYCLED = "pid_recycled"
-LIVENESS_UNOBSERVED = "unobserved"
-LIVENESS_UNKNOWN = "unknown"
-
-# Per-member health classifications.
-HEALTH_RUNNING = "running"
-HEALTH_MISSING = "missing"
-HEALTH_DUPLICATE = "duplicate"
-HEALTH_UNEXPECTED = "unexpected"
-HEALTH_STALE = "stale"
-HEALTH_UNKNOWN = "unknown"
-
-EVIDENCE_AUTHORITY = "control_plane_runtime_registry+server_process_observation"
-
-_MCP_PROCESS_MARKER = "mcp_server.py"
-_LSTART_FORMAT = "%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y"
-_ISO_FORMAT = "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ"
-
-
-# ── time helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-
-def _utcnow() -> datetime:
-    return datetime.now(timezone.utc)
-
-
-def iso_now() -> str:
-    return _utcnow().strftime(_ISO_FORMAT)
-
-
-def _parse_iso(value: Any) -> datetime | None:
-    text = (str(value) if value is not None else "").strip()
-    if not text:
-        return None
-    if text.endswith("Z"):
-        text = text[:-1] + "+00:00"
-    try:
-        parsed = datetime.fromisoformat(text)
-    except ValueError:
-        return None
-    if parsed.tzinfo is None:
-        parsed = parsed.replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-    return parsed.astimezone(timezone.utc)
-
-
-def _int_or_none(value: Any) -> int | None:
-    try:
-        return int(value)
-    except (TypeError, ValueError):
-        return None
-
-
-def _clean(value: Any) -> str | None:
-    text = (str(value) if value is not None else "").strip()
-    return text or None
-
-
-# ── process-level evidence (server side only) ─────────────────────────────────
-
-
-def probe_pid_alive(pid: int | None) -> bool | None:
-    """Return whether *pid* exists. ``None`` when it cannot be determined.
-
-    Uses ``signal 0``, which performs a permission/existence check and delivers
-    nothing to the target. This module never sends a terminating signal.
-    """
-    resolved = _int_or_none(pid)
-    if resolved is None or resolved <= 0:
-        return None
-    try:
-        os.kill(resolved, 0)
-    except ProcessLookupError:
-        return False
-    except PermissionError:
-        # The process exists but belongs to another user.
-        return True
-    except OSError:
-        return None
-    return True
-
-
-def scan_mcp_server_processes(*, runner=subprocess.run) -> dict[str, Any]:
-    """Observe running Gitea MCP server processes from this server process.
-
-    This is deliberately performed by the answering server, never by the caller:
-    a caller-supplied process list is exactly the input a fleet gate must not
-    trust. When the listing cannot be obtained the result reports
-    ``available=False`` so the inventory fails closed instead of assuming that
-    no unregistered process exists.
-    """
-    try:
-        proc = runner(
-            ["ps", "-o", "pid,lstart,command", "-ax"],
-            capture_output=True,
-            text=True,
-            check=True,
-        )
-    except Exception as exc:  # noqa: BLE001 - any failure means unknown evidence
-        return {
-            "available": False,
-            "processes": [],
-            "reason": f"process listing unavailable: {exc}",
-        }
-
-    processes: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
-    for raw_line in (proc.stdout or "").splitlines()[1:]:
-        line = raw_line.strip()
-        if not line or _MCP_PROCESS_MARKER not in line:
-            continue
-        parts = line.split(None, 6)
-        if len(parts) < 7:
-            continue
-        pid = _int_or_none(parts[0])
-        if pid is None:
-            continue
-        try:
-            naive = datetime.strptime(" ".join(parts[1:6]), _LSTART_FORMAT)
-            started_at = naive.astimezone(timezone.utc)
-        except (ValueError, OSError):
-            started_at = None
-        processes.append(
-            {
-                "pid": pid,
-                "started_at": started_at.strftime(_ISO_FORMAT) if started_at else None,
-                "command": parts[6],
-            }
-        )
-
-    processes.sort(key=lambda item: item["pid"])
-    return {"available": True, "processes": processes, "reason": None}
-
-
-# ── cohort / registration record ──────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-
-def namespace_for_profile(profile: str | None, *, default: str | None = None) -> str | None:
-    """Map a configured profile to its fleet namespace.
-
-    Resolved from the expected roster rather than from name-shape heuristics.
-    ``role_namespace_gate.infer_mcp_namespace`` only recognises author and
-    reviewer, so it returns the *profile* name for controller, merger, and
-    reconciler — which would label three of the five members with a namespace
-    that does not exist. Widening that helper is controller role-metadata work
-    and belongs to #950; the roster already carries the mapping this inventory
-    needs, so it is read from there.
-
-    A profile outside the roster falls back to *default* (typically the
-    caller's existing inference), so an unexpected member is still described
-    rather than dropped.
-    """
-    cleaned = _clean(profile)
-    for entry in EXPECTED_PRGS_FLEET:
-        if entry["profile"] == cleaned:
-            return entry["namespace"]
-    return default if default is not None else cleaned
-
-
-def derive_cohort_identity(env: Mapping[str, str] | None = None) -> dict[str, Any]:
-    """Derive the client/cohort identity of this server process.
-
-    A cohort is the set of servers a single client launched together. The
-    parent process is the durable expression of that: an IDE/CLI client spawns
-    every namespace as its own child. A process whose parent has gone away
-    (reparented to init) cannot prove which cohort it belongs to, and says so
-    rather than guessing.
-
-    Revisions are deliberately not consulted here. Two servers built from the
-    same commit are not thereby one cohort (#949 AC7).
-    """
-    source_env = os.environ if env is None else env
-    explicit = _clean(source_env.get(COHORT_ID_ENV))
-    if explicit:
-        return {"cohort_id": explicit, "cohort_source": "explicit_env"}
-    try:
-        ppid = os.getppid()
-    except OSError:
-        ppid = 0
-    if ppid and ppid > 1:
-        return {"cohort_id": f"ppid:{ppid}", "cohort_source": "parent_process"}
-    return {
-        "cohort_id": None,
-        "cohort_source": "unknown",
-        "cohort_reason": (
-            "parent process is unavailable or reparented to init; this server "
-            "cannot prove which client cohort launched it"
-        ),
-    }
-
-
-def build_process_runtime_record(
-    *,
-    namespace: str,
-    profile: str | None,
-    role: str | None,
-    remote: str | None = None,
-    org: str | None = None,
-    repo: str | None = None,
-    repository_root: str | None = None,
-    pid: int | None = None,
-    startup_head: str | None = None,
-    daemon_start_head: str | None = None,
-    transport: str | None = None,
-    client_provenance: str | None = None,
-    env: Mapping[str, str] | None = None,
-    boot_id: str | None = None,
-    registered_at: str | None = None,
-) -> dict[str, Any]:
-    """Build the row a server writes about itself at native transport bind.
-
-    Every field describes the *calling* process. Nothing here is caller-supplied
-    in the MCP sense: the only code that reaches this function is the official
-    entrypoint of the process being described.
-    """
-    cohort = derive_cohort_identity(env)
-    resolved_pid = _int_or_none(pid)
-    if resolved_pid is None:
-        resolved_pid = os.getpid()
-    token = boot_id or secrets.token_hex(8)
-    return {
-        "runtime_id": f"{namespace}:{resolved_pid}:{token}",
-        "namespace": namespace,
-        "profile": _clean(profile),
-        "role": _clean(role),
-        "remote": _clean(remote),
-        "org": _clean(org),
-        "repo": _clean(repo),
-        "repository_root": _clean(repository_root),
-        "pid": resolved_pid,
-        "cohort_id": cohort["cohort_id"],
-        "cohort_source": cohort["cohort_source"],
-        "client_provenance": _clean(client_provenance) or "unknown",
-        "boot_id": token,
-        "startup_head": _clean(startup_head),
-        "daemon_start_head": _clean(daemon_start_head),
-        "transport": _clean(transport),
-        "registered_at": registered_at or iso_now(),
-        "status": "running",
-    }
-
-
-# ── classification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-
-def _expected_index(
-    expected_fleet: Sequence[Mapping[str, str]],
-) -> dict[str, dict[str, str]]:
-    index: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {}
-    for entry in expected_fleet:
-        profile = _clean(entry.get("profile"))
-        if profile:
-            index[profile] = dict(entry)
-    return index
-
-
-def _sort_key(member: Mapping[str, Any]) -> tuple:
-    return (
-        str(member.get("namespace") or ""),
-        str(member.get("profile") or ""),
-        _int_or_none(member.get("pid")) or 0,
-        str(member.get("runtime_id") or ""),
-    )
-
-
-def _normalize_row(
-    row: Mapping[str, Any],
-    *,
-    observed_by_pid: Mapping[int, Mapping[str, Any]],
-    process_scan_available: bool,
-    now: datetime,
-) -> dict[str, Any]:
-    pid = _int_or_none(row.get("pid"))
-    member: dict[str, Any] = {
-        "runtime_id": _clean(row.get("runtime_id")),
-        "namespace": _clean(row.get("namespace")),
-        "profile": _clean(row.get("profile")),
-        "role": _clean(row.get("role")),
-        "remote": _clean(row.get("remote")),
-        "org": _clean(row.get("org")),
-        "repo": _clean(row.get("repo")),
-        "repository_root": _clean(row.get("repository_root")),
-        "pid": pid,
-        "cohort_id": _clean(row.get("cohort_id")),
-        "cohort_source": _clean(row.get("cohort_source")) or "unknown",
-        "client_provenance": _clean(row.get("client_provenance")) or "unknown",
-        "boot_id": _clean(row.get("boot_id")),
-        "startup_head": _clean(row.get("startup_head")),
-        "daemon_start_head": _clean(row.get("daemon_start_head")),
-        "transport": _clean(row.get("transport")),
-        "registered_at": _clean(row.get("registered_at")),
-        "last_heartbeat_at": _clean(row.get("last_heartbeat_at")),
-        "recorded_status": _clean(row.get("status")) or "unknown",
-    }
-
-    pid_alive = probe_pid_alive(pid)
-    member["pid_alive"] = pid_alive
-
-    observed = observed_by_pid.get(pid) if pid is not None else None
-    member["process_observed"] = bool(observed) if process_scan_available else None
-
-    if not process_scan_available:
-        # Existence cannot be corroborated; never upgrade to live on the
-        # registry's word alone.
-        member["liveness"] = LIVENESS_UNKNOWN
-        member["liveness_reason"] = (
-            "process observation unavailable; registry rows cannot be corroborated"
-        )
-    elif pid_alive is False:
-        member["liveness"] = LIVENESS_DEAD
-        member["liveness_reason"] = "recorded PID is not running"
-    elif pid_alive is None:
-        member["liveness"] = LIVENESS_UNKNOWN
-        member["liveness_reason"] = "PID liveness could not be determined"
-    elif observed is None:
-        member["liveness"] = LIVENESS_UNOBSERVED
-        member["liveness_reason"] = (
-            "recorded PID is not a running Gitea MCP server process"
-        )
-    else:
-        started_at = _parse_iso(observed.get("started_at"))
-        registered_at = _parse_iso(member["registered_at"])
-        if started_at and registered_at and started_at > registered_at:
-            member["liveness"] = LIVENESS_PID_RECYCLED
-            member["liveness_reason"] = (
-                "the process now holding this PID started after the registry row "
-                "was written; the registered server is gone"
-            )
-        else:
-            member["liveness"] = LIVENESS_LIVE
-            member["liveness_reason"] = None
-
-    heartbeat = _parse_iso(member["last_heartbeat_at"])
-    member["heartbeat_age_seconds"] = (
-        int((now - heartbeat).total_seconds()) if heartbeat else None
-    )
-    return member
-
-
-def _binding_matches(
-    member: Mapping[str, Any], expected_binding: Mapping[str, Any] | None
-) -> bool | None:
-    if not expected_binding:
-        return None
-    for field in ("remote", "org", "repo"):
-        expected = _clean(expected_binding.get(field))
-        if expected is None:
-            continue
-        actual = _clean(member.get(field))
-        if actual is None:
-            return None
-        if actual != expected:
-            return False
-    return True
-
-
-def classify_fleet_inventory(
-    *,
-    runtime_rows: Iterable[Mapping[str, Any]],
-    process_scan: Mapping[str, Any] | None = None,
-    expected_fleet: Sequence[Mapping[str, str]] = EXPECTED_PRGS_FLEET,
-    expected_binding: Mapping[str, Any] | None = None,
-    registry_available: bool = True,
-    registry_error: str | None = None,
-    now: datetime | None = None,
-    answering_namespace: str | None = None,
-) -> dict[str, Any]:
-    """Classify a fleet snapshot. Pure: identical input yields identical output.
-
-    The verdict never depends on which namespace asked, so controller and
-    reconciler agree by construction; ``answering_namespace`` is reported as
-    metadata only.
-    """
-    moment = now or _utcnow()
-    scan = dict(process_scan or {"available": False, "processes": [], "reason": None})
-    scan_available = bool(scan.get("available"))
-    observed_processes = list(scan.get("processes") or [])
-    observed_by_pid: dict[int, Mapping[str, Any]] = {}
-    for proc in observed_processes:
-        observed_pid = _int_or_none(proc.get("pid"))
-        if observed_pid is not None:
-            observed_by_pid[observed_pid] = proc
-
-    expected_index = _expected_index(expected_fleet)
-
-    members = [
-        _normalize_row(
-            row,
-            observed_by_pid=observed_by_pid,
-            process_scan_available=scan_available,
-            now=moment,
-        )
-        for row in (runtime_rows or [])
-    ]
-
-    live = [m for m in members if m["liveness"] == LIVENESS_LIVE]
-    not_live = [m for m in members if m["liveness"] != LIVENESS_LIVE]
-
-    live_by_profile: dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]] = {}
-    for member in live:
-        live_by_profile.setdefault(member["profile"] or "", []).append(member)
-
-    running_members: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
-    missing_members: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
-    duplicate_members: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
-    unexpected_members: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
-    binding_mismatches: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
-    role_mismatches: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
-    configured_members: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
-
-    for entry in expected_fleet:
-        profile = _clean(entry.get("profile")) or ""
-        instances = sorted(live_by_profile.get(profile, []), key=_sort_key)
-        configured_members.append(
-            {
-                "namespace": _clean(entry.get("namespace")),
-                "profile": profile,
-                "role": _clean(entry.get("role")),
-                "instance_count": len(instances),
-                "health": (
-                    HEALTH_MISSING
-                    if not instances
-                    else HEALTH_RUNNING
-                    if len(instances) == 1
-                    else HEALTH_DUPLICATE
-                ),
-            }
-        )
-        if not instances:
-            missing_members.append(
-                {
-                    "namespace": _clean(entry.get("namespace")),
-                    "profile": profile,
-                    "role": _clean(entry.get("role")),
-                    "health": HEALTH_MISSING,
-                    "reason": (
-                        "no live registry row corroborated by a running server "
-                        "process"
-                    ),
-                }
-            )
-            continue
-        for instance in instances:
-            instance["health"] = (
-                HEALTH_RUNNING if len(instances) == 1 else HEALTH_DUPLICATE
-            )
-            instance["expected"] = True
-            running_members.append(instance)
-        if len(instances) > 1:
-            duplicate_members.append(
-                {
-                    "namespace": _clean(entry.get("namespace")),
-                    "profile": profile,
-                    "role": _clean(entry.get("role")),
-                    "health": HEALTH_DUPLICATE,
-                    "instance_count": len(instances),
-                    "pids": sorted(
-                        i["pid"] for i in instances if i["pid"] is not None
-                    ),
-                    "instances": instances,
-                    "reason": (
-                        "more than one live server is registered for this profile"
-                    ),
-                }
-            )
-
-    for member in sorted(live, key=_sort_key):
-        profile = member["profile"] or ""
-        expected_entry = expected_index.get(profile)
-        if expected_entry is not None:
-            expected_role = _clean(expected_entry.get("role"))
-            actual_role = member["role"]
-            if expected_role and actual_role and actual_role != expected_role:
-                role_mismatches.append(
-                    {
-                        "namespace": member["namespace"],
-                        "profile": profile,
-                        "pid": member["pid"],
-                        "expected_role": expected_role,
-                        "declared_role": actual_role,
-                        "reason": "declared role does not match the configured profile",
-                    }
-                )
-            expected_namespace = _clean(expected_entry.get("namespace"))
-            if (
-                expected_namespace
-                and member["namespace"]
-                and member["namespace"] != expected_namespace
-            ):
-                role_mismatches.append(
-                    {
-                        "namespace": member["namespace"],
-                        "profile": profile,
-                        "pid": member["pid"],
-                        "expected_namespace": expected_namespace,
-                        "declared_role": member["role"],
-                        "reason": (
-                            "profile is served from a namespace it is not "
-                            "configured for"
-                        ),
-                    }
-                )
-        else:
-            member["health"] = HEALTH_UNEXPECTED
-            member["expected"] = False
-            unexpected_members.append(member)
-
-        match = _binding_matches(member, expected_binding)
-        member["repository_binding_matches"] = match
-        if match is False:
-            binding_mismatches.append(
-                {
-                    "namespace": member["namespace"],
-                    "profile": profile,
-                    "pid": member["pid"],
-                    "remote": member["remote"],
-                    "org": member["org"],
-                    "repo": member["repo"],
-                    "expected": dict(expected_binding or {}),
-                    "reason": "member is bound to a different repository",
-                }
-            )
-        elif match is None and expected_binding:
-            binding_mismatches.append(
-                {
-                    "namespace": member["namespace"],
-                    "profile": profile,
-                    "pid": member["pid"],
-                    "remote": member["remote"],
-                    "org": member["org"],
-                    "repo": member["repo"],
-                    "expected": dict(expected_binding or {}),
-                    "reason": "member did not record a complete repository binding",
-                }
-            )
-
-    stale_members: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
-    for member in sorted(not_live, key=_sort_key):
-        member["health"] = (
-            HEALTH_UNKNOWN if member["liveness"] == LIVENESS_UNKNOWN else HEALTH_STALE
-        )
-        stale_members.append(member)
-
-    registered_pids = {m["pid"] for m in live if m["pid"] is not None}
-    unregistered_processes: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
-    if scan_available:
-        for proc in observed_processes:
-            observed_pid = _int_or_none(proc.get("pid"))
-            if observed_pid is None or observed_pid in registered_pids:
-                continue
-            unregistered_processes.append(
-                {"pid": observed_pid, "started_at": proc.get("started_at")}
-            )
-        unregistered_processes.sort(key=lambda item: item["pid"])
-
-    # Cohort. Derived only from recorded cohort identity — never from revisions.
-    cohort_ids = {m["cohort_id"] for m in live}
-    cohort_unknown = any(cohort_id is None for cohort_id in cohort_ids)
-    known_cohorts = sorted(c for c in cohort_ids if c is not None)
-    if not live or cohort_unknown:
-        single_cohort: bool | None = None
-        mixed_cohort: bool | None = None
-    else:
-        single_cohort = len(known_cohorts) == 1
-        mixed_cohort = len(known_cohorts) > 1
-
-    # Revision spread. Reported independently of cohort; never used to infer it.
-    heads = {m["startup_head"] for m in live}
-    head_unknown = any(head is None for head in heads)
-    known_heads = sorted(h for h in heads if h is not None)
-    mixed_revision = (len(known_heads) > 1) if known_heads else None
-
-    exactly_one_per_profile = not missing_members and not duplicate_members
-    no_unexpected_members = not unexpected_members
-
-    incomplete_reasons: list[str] = []
-    if not registry_available:
-        incomplete_reasons.append(
-            registry_error or "the control-plane runtime registry could not be read"
-        )
-    if not scan_available:
-        incomplete_reasons.append(
-            str(scan.get("reason") or "server-side process observation unavailable")
-        )
-    if unregistered_processes:
-        pids = ", ".join(str(p["pid"]) for p in unregistered_processes)
-        incomplete_reasons.append(
-            f"running Gitea MCP server process(es) with no runtime registry row "
-            f"(PIDs: {pids}); the fleet contains members this inventory cannot "
-            f"describe"
-        )
-    if live and cohort_unknown:
-        incomplete_reasons.append(
-            "one or more live members did not record a client cohort identity; "
-            "matching revisions do not establish a single cohort"
-        )
-    if live and head_unknown:
-        incomplete_reasons.append(
-            "one or more live members did not record a startup revision"
-        )
-    if any(m["liveness"] == LIVENESS_UNKNOWN for m in members):
-        incomplete_reasons.append(
-            "liveness of one or more registry rows could not be determined"
-        )
-
-    inventory_complete = not incomplete_reasons
-
-    blocked_reasons: list[str] = list(incomplete_reasons)
-    if missing_members:
-        names = ", ".join(sorted(m["profile"] for m in missing_members))
-        blocked_reasons.append(f"expected fleet member(s) not running: {names}")
-    if duplicate_members:
-        names = ", ".join(sorted(d["profile"] for d in duplicate_members))
-        blocked_reasons.append(
-            f"duplicate server(s) registered for profile(s): {names}"
-        )
-    if unexpected_members:
-        names = ", ".join(
-            sorted(
-                str(m["profile"] or m["namespace"] or "?") for m in unexpected_members
-            )
-        )
-        blocked_reasons.append(f"unexpected fleet member(s) running: {names}")
-    if mixed_cohort:
-        blocked_reasons.append(
-            "live members span more than one client cohort: "
-            + ", ".join(known_cohorts)
-        )
-    if mixed_revision:
-        blocked_reasons.append(
-            "live members started at different revisions: " + ", ".join(known_heads)
-        )
-    if binding_mismatches:
-        blocked_reasons.append(
-            "one or more live members are not bound to the expected repository"
-        )
-    if role_mismatches:
-        blocked_reasons.append(
-            "one or more live members declare a role or namespace that does not "
-            "match the configured profile"
-        )
-
-    mutation_gate_satisfied = bool(
-        inventory_complete
-        and exactly_one_per_profile
-        and no_unexpected_members
-        and single_cohort is True
-        and mixed_revision is False
-        and not binding_mismatches
-        and not role_mismatches
-    )
-    if not mutation_gate_satisfied and not blocked_reasons:
-        blocked_reasons.append(
-            "the fleet snapshot did not establish the exact-one-instance-per-"
-            "profile, single-cohort invariant"
-        )
-
-    return {
-        "success": True,
-        "read_only": True,
-        "evidence_authority": EVIDENCE_AUTHORITY,
-        "answering_namespace": _clean(answering_namespace),
-        "generated_at": moment.strftime(_ISO_FORMAT),
-        "inventory_complete": inventory_complete,
-        "incomplete_reasons": incomplete_reasons,
-        "configured_members": configured_members,
-        "running_members": sorted(running_members, key=_sort_key),
-        "missing_members": sorted(missing_members, key=_sort_key),
-        "duplicate_members": sorted(duplicate_members, key=_sort_key),
-        "unexpected_members": sorted(unexpected_members, key=_sort_key),
-        "stale_members": stale_members,
-        "unregistered_processes": unregistered_processes,
-        "repository_binding_mismatches": sorted(binding_mismatches, key=_sort_key),
-        "role_mismatches": sorted(role_mismatches, key=_sort_key),
-        "cohort_ids": known_cohorts,
-        "single_cohort": single_cohort,
-        "mixed_cohort": mixed_cohort,
-        "startup_revisions": known_heads,
-        "mixed_revision": mixed_revision,
-        "exactly_one_per_profile": exactly_one_per_profile,
-        "no_unexpected_members": no_unexpected_members,
-        "expected_member_count": len(expected_fleet),
-        "running_member_count": len(running_members),
-        "mutation_gate_satisfied": mutation_gate_satisfied,
-        "blocked_reason": blocked_reasons[0] if blocked_reasons else None,
-        "blocked_reasons": blocked_reasons,
-        "process_observation": {
-            "available": scan_available,
-            "observed_process_count": len(observed_processes),
-            "reason": scan.get("reason"),
-        },
-        "registry": {
-            "available": registry_available,
-            "row_count": len(members),
-            "error": registry_error,
-        },
-        "mutations_performed": [],
-    }
-
-
-def summarize(result: Mapping[str, Any]) -> str:
-    """One-line human summary of a classification result."""
-    if result.get("mutation_gate_satisfied"):
-        return (
-            f"fleet healthy: {result.get('running_member_count')} of "
-            f"{result.get('expected_member_count')} members running in a single "
-            f"cohort at one revision"
-        )
-    return f"fleet not provable: {result.get('blocked_reason')}"

mcp_tool_inventory.py

@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ NON_TOOL_IDENTIFIERS: frozenset[str] = frozenset(
         "gitea_auth",
         "gitea_config",
         "gitea_mcp_server",
-        "mcp_fleet_inventory",
         "mcp_server",
         "offline_mcp_helper",
         "offline_mcp_runner",

role_namespace_gate.py

@@ -74,6 +74,43 @@ def check_author_mutation_namespace(
     return True, []
 
 
+def check_author_role_kind(
+    mutation_task: str,
+    profile: dict,
+) -> tuple[bool, list[str]]:
+    """Author-exclusive wall for durable-lock mutations (#953 F1).
+
+    ``check_author_mutation_namespace`` walls off reviewer-bound sessions, which
+    is the whole gate for tasks whose required permission is itself author-only
+    (``gitea.pr.create``, ``gitea.repo.commit``). It is *not* sufficient for a
+    task gated on ``gitea.issue.comment``, which every configured role holds: a
+    merger, controller, or reconciler session would clear both the namespace
+    check and the permission gate and still reach the durable write.
+
+    Opt-in per call site and additive. It refuses any active profile whose
+    derived role kind is not exactly ``author`` for a task the router declares
+    author-required, and grants nothing to anyone — a ``mixed`` profile is
+    refused rather than admitted.
+    """
+    required_role = role_session_router.required_role_for_task(mutation_task)
+    if required_role != "author":
+        return True, []
+
+    allowed = profile.get("allowed_operations") or []
+    forbidden = profile.get("forbidden_operations") or []
+    active_role = derive_role_kind(allowed, forbidden)
+    if active_role == "author":
+        return True, []
+
+    profile_name = profile.get("profile_name") or ""
+    namespace = infer_mcp_namespace(profile_name)
+    return False, [
+        f"author mutation '{mutation_task}' blocked: active session role kind is "
+        f"'{active_role}', not 'author' ({profile_name} / {namespace}); this "
+        "operation writes a durable author issue lock and is author-exclusive",
+    ]
+
+
 def mutation_audit_context(mutation_task: str, profile: dict, *,
                            remote=None, repository=None) -> dict:
     """Structured mutation metadata for audit records (#209)."""

role_session_router.py

@@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ AUTHOR_TASKS = frozenset({
     "push_branch",
     "bootstrap_author_issue_worktree",
     "gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree",
+    # #953: recovery of an incomplete bootstrap lock is an author-only durable
+    # state mutation and belongs to the same class as bootstrap itself.
+    "recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock",
+    "gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock",
     "create_pr",
     "comment_pr",
     "address_pr_change_requests",
@@ -112,6 +116,12 @@ TASK_REQUIRED_ROLE = {
     "claim_issue": "author",
     "create_branch": "author",
     "push_branch": "author",
+    # #953: without this entry ``required_role_for_task`` returns None and
+    # ``role_namespace_gate.check_author_mutation_namespace`` short-circuits to
+    # "allowed" — the namespace wall on the recovery tool would be inert. The
+    # capability map already records the same role; both tables must agree.
+    "recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock": "author",
+    "gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock": "author",
     "create_pr": "author",
     "comment_pr": "author",
     "address_pr_change_requests": "author",

skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md

@@ -252,31 +252,6 @@ Helpers: `scripts/worktree-start`, `scripts/worktree-review`,
 - Never place raw tokens in LLM/MCP config.
 - Use `gitea_whoami` and `gitea_resolve_task_capability` before mutating.
 
-## Fleet inventory
-
-`gitea_whoami`, `gitea_get_runtime_context` and `gitea_assess_master_parity` each
-describe only the server answering the call. Five namespaces independently
-reporting the same revision never proved that five processes exist, that no sixth
-exists, or that all five belong to one client cohort.
-
-`gitea_assess_fleet_inventory` is the read-only capability that does prove it. It
-takes no evidence parameters: it combines the control-plane runtime registry,
-which each server writes about itself at native transport bind, with a process
-observation the answering server performs. Classification is a pure function of
-that snapshot, so `gitea-controller` and `gitea-reconciler` return the same
-verdict for the same fleet.
-
-Consume `mutation_gate_satisfied`. When it is false, report `blocked_reason`
-verbatim and stop — `missing_members`, `duplicate_members`, `unexpected_members`,
-`unregistered_processes`, `mixed_cohort` and `mixed_revision` are reported
-separately because each needs a different operator action. Treat
-`inventory_complete: false` and `single_cohort: null` as *unknown*, never as
-healthy. The capability never terminates a duplicate process, restarts,
-reconnects, or touches a lease.
-
-Details, field meanings, and the gate-consumption sequence:
-[`docs/mcp-fleet-inventory.md`](../../docs/mcp-fleet-inventory.md) (#949).
-
 ## Tool inventory
 
 [`docs/mcp-tool-inventory.md`](../../docs/mcp-tool-inventory.md) is the canonical

task_capability_map.py

@@ -41,6 +41,27 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
         "permission": "gitea.issue.comment",
         "role": "author",
     },
+    # #953: target-specific upgrade of an incomplete bootstrap lock (explicit
+    # operation, never a widening of lock_issue). Author-only, and the tool
+    # additionally proves exact-owner claimant match before writing.
+    "recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock": {
+        "permission": "gitea.issue.comment",
+        "role": "author",
+    },
+    "gitea_recover_incomplete_bootstrap_lock": {
+        "permission": "gitea.issue.comment",
+        "role": "author",
+    },
+    # #953: read-only lock contract inspection. Read permission only — it must
+    # never be able to mutate.
+    "inspect_issue_lock_contract": {
+        "permission": "gitea.read",
+        "role": "author",
+    },
+    "gitea_inspect_issue_lock_contract": {
+        "permission": "gitea.read",
+        "role": "author",
+    },
     # #860: dirty orphaned same-claimant worktree recovery (explicit operation).
     "recover_dirty_orphaned_issue_worktree": {
         "permission": "gitea.issue.comment",
@@ -159,19 +180,6 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
         "permission": "gitea.read",
         "role": "reconciler",
     },
-    # #949: fleet inventory is strictly read-only evidence. It is deliberately
-    # not role-exclusive — the controller and reconciler gates are its named
-    # consumers, but any namespace holding gitea.read must be able to prove the
-    # exact-five-process/single-cohort invariant before it acts, and the verdict
-    # is a pure function of the snapshot so every namespace agrees.
-    "assess_fleet_inventory": {
-        "permission": "gitea.read",
-        "role": "reconciler",
-    },
-    "gitea_assess_fleet_inventory": {
-        "permission": "gitea.read",
-        "role": "reconciler",
-    },
     # PR synchronization lifecycle: assess is read-only (any role with gitea.read);
     # update-by-merge is author-only and mutates the PR head via Gitea API.
     "assess_pr_sync_status": {

tests/test_control_plane_db.py

@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ from control_plane_db import (
     ControlPlaneError,
     InvalidWorkKindError,
     LeaseRequiredError,
-    SCHEMA_VERSION,
     WORK_KINDS,
     _ts,
     _utc_now,
@@ -38,10 +37,7 @@ class ControlPlaneDBTest(unittest.TestCase):
             rows = dict(conn.execute("SELECT key, value FROM schema_meta").fetchall())
         finally:
             conn.close()
-        # Pinned to the constant, not a literal: every additive migration bumps
+        self.assertEqual(rows["schema_version"], "5")
-        # SCHEMA_VERSION, and the invariant under test is that the meta row
-        # records the version the code actually wrote (#949 added v6).
-        self.assertEqual(rows["schema_version"], str(SCHEMA_VERSION))
         self.assertIn("DB coordinates", rows["architecture"])
         self.assertIn("bridge", rows["architecture"].lower())
 
@@ -872,7 +868,7 @@ class SessionCheckpointTest(unittest.TestCase):
             conn.close()
         self.assertIn("session_checkpoints", names)
         record = self._write()
-        self.assertEqual(record["checkpoint_schema_version"], SCHEMA_VERSION)
+        self.assertEqual(record["checkpoint_schema_version"], 5)
 
     # AC2 — checkpoints written for multi-role session fixtures.
     def test_multi_role_fixtures_each_get_a_row(self) -> None:

tests/test_control_plane_db_server_runtimes.py

@@ -1,282 +0,0 @@
-"""Control-plane MCP server runtime registry (#949).
-
-The registry is the half of the fleet evidence a caller cannot supply: each
-server writes exactly one row about itself at native transport bind. These tests
-pin the storage contract — additive migration, deterministic ordering, and
-PID-reuse/retention pruning that cannot hide a live duplicate.
-"""
-
-import os
-import tempfile
-import unittest
-from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
-from unittest import mock
-
-import control_plane_db
-import mcp_fleet_inventory as mfi
-
-
-def _stamp(delta_seconds=0):
-    moment = datetime.now(timezone.utc) + timedelta(seconds=delta_seconds)
-    return moment.replace(microsecond=0).strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
-
-
-class _DBCase(unittest.TestCase):
-    def setUp(self):
-        self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
-        self.addCleanup(self._tmp.cleanup)
-        self.db_path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "control_plane.sqlite3")
-        self.db = control_plane_db.ControlPlaneDB(db_path=self.db_path)
-
-    def record(self, namespace, profile, role, pid, **overrides):
-        base = mfi.build_process_runtime_record(
-            namespace=namespace,
-            profile=profile,
-            role=role,
-            remote="prgs",
-            org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
-            repo="Gitea-Tools",
-            repository_root="/checkout/Gitea-Tools",
-            pid=pid,
-            startup_head="82d71b77028a7abd4f8ab4a4e4d89658a187f73d",
-            transport="stdio",
-            client_provenance="client_managed",
-            env={mfi.COHORT_ID_ENV: "ppid:40990"},
-            boot_id=f"boot{pid}",
-        )
-        base.update(overrides)
-        return base
-
-
-class TestSchema(_DBCase):
-    def test_schema_version_is_bumped(self):
-        self.assertGreaterEqual(control_plane_db.SCHEMA_VERSION, 6)
-
-    def test_runtime_table_exists_on_a_fresh_database(self):
-        self.assertEqual(self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes(), [])
-
-    def test_migration_is_additive_and_idempotent(self):
-        """Re-opening an existing DB must not disturb the other tables."""
-        self.db.upsert_session(session_id="s-a", role="author", profile="prgs-author")
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(
-            self.record("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 41000)
-        )
-        reopened = control_plane_db.ControlPlaneDB(db_path=self.db_path)
-        self.assertEqual(len(reopened.list_sessions()), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(len(reopened.list_mcp_server_runtimes()), 1)
-
-
-class TestRegistration(_DBCase):
-    def test_registration_round_trips_every_field(self):
-        record = self.record("gitea-controller", "prgs-controller", "controller", 41001)
-        stored = self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(record)
-        for key in (
-            "runtime_id",
-            "namespace",
-            "profile",
-            "role",
-            "remote",
-            "org",
-            "repo",
-            "repository_root",
-            "pid",
-            "cohort_id",
-            "cohort_source",
-            "client_provenance",
-            "boot_id",
-            "startup_head",
-            "transport",
-            "status",
-        ):
-            self.assertEqual(stored[key], record[key], key)
-
-    def test_registration_requires_a_runtime_id(self):
-        record = self.record("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 41002)
-        record["runtime_id"] = ""
-        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
-            self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(record)
-
-    def test_registration_requires_a_namespace(self):
-        record = self.record("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 41003)
-        record["namespace"] = "  "
-        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
-            self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(record)
-
-    def test_registration_requires_a_pid(self):
-        record = self.record("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 41004)
-        record["pid"] = None
-        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
-            self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(record)
-
-    def test_five_members_register_independently(self):
-        for index, entry in enumerate(mfi.EXPECTED_PRGS_FLEET):
-            self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(
-                self.record(
-                    entry["namespace"], entry["profile"], entry["role"], 41100 + index
-                )
-            )
-        rows = self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes()
-        self.assertEqual(len(rows), 5)
-        self.assertEqual(
-            sorted(r["profile"] for r in rows),
-            [
-                "prgs-author",
-                "prgs-controller",
-                "prgs-merger",
-                "prgs-reconciler",
-                "prgs-reviewer",
-            ],
-        )
-
-
-class TestPruning(_DBCase):
-    def test_reusing_a_pid_replaces_the_stale_row(self):
-        first = self.record("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 41200)
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(first)
-        second = self.record("gitea-reviewer", "prgs-reviewer", "reviewer", 41200)
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(second)
-        rows = self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes()
-        self.assertEqual(len(rows), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(rows[0]["runtime_id"], second["runtime_id"])
-
-    def test_pruning_never_removes_a_live_duplicate_on_another_pid(self):
-        """The defect this must not have: hiding a second running server."""
-        first = self.record("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 41300)
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(first)
-        second = self.record("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 41301)
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(
-            second, retention_seconds=mfi.RUNTIME_RETENTION_SECONDS
-        )
-        rows = self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes()
-        self.assertEqual(len(rows), 2)
-        self.assertEqual(sorted(r["pid"] for r in rows), [41300, 41301])
-
-    def test_retention_drops_rows_older_than_the_window(self):
-        old = self.record(
-            "gitea-merger",
-            "prgs-merger",
-            "merger",
-            41400,
-            registered_at=_stamp(-(mfi.RUNTIME_RETENTION_SECONDS + 3600)),
-        )
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(old)
-        fresh = self.record("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 41401)
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(
-            fresh, retention_seconds=mfi.RUNTIME_RETENTION_SECONDS
-        )
-        rows = self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes()
-        self.assertEqual([r["pid"] for r in rows], [41401])
-
-    def test_retention_is_skipped_when_not_requested(self):
-        old = self.record(
-            "gitea-merger",
-            "prgs-merger",
-            "merger",
-            41500,
-            registered_at=_stamp(-(mfi.RUNTIME_RETENTION_SECONDS + 3600)),
-        )
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(old)
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(
-            self.record("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 41501)
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(len(self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes()), 2)
-
-
-class TestListing(_DBCase):
-    def test_listing_is_deterministically_ordered(self):
-        for index in range(5):
-            self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(
-                self.record(
-                    "gitea-author",
-                    "prgs-author",
-                    "author",
-                    41600 + index,
-                    registered_at="2026-07-28T02:00:00Z",
-                )
-            )
-        first = [r["runtime_id"] for r in self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes()]
-        second = [r["runtime_id"] for r in self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes()]
-        self.assertEqual(first, second)
-        self.assertEqual(first, sorted(first))
-
-    def test_status_filter_selects_running_rows(self):
-        running = self.record("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 41700)
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(running)
-        stopped = self.record("gitea-merger", "prgs-merger", "merger", 41701)
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(stopped)
-        self.db.mark_mcp_server_runtime_stopped(stopped["runtime_id"])
-        rows = self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes(statuses=("running",))
-        self.assertEqual([r["pid"] for r in rows], [41700])
-
-    def test_listing_without_a_filter_returns_stopped_rows_too(self):
-        stopped = self.record("gitea-merger", "prgs-merger", "merger", 41800)
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(stopped)
-        self.db.mark_mcp_server_runtime_stopped(stopped["runtime_id"])
-        rows = self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes()
-        self.assertEqual(len(rows), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(rows[0]["status"], "stopped")
-
-
-class TestHeartbeat(_DBCase):
-    def test_heartbeat_advances_only_the_timestamp(self):
-        record = self.record(
-            "gitea-author",
-            "prgs-author",
-            "author",
-            41900,
-            last_heartbeat_at="2026-07-28T02:00:00Z",
-        )
-        self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(record)
-        self.db.heartbeat_mcp_server_runtime(record["runtime_id"])
-        row = self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes()[0]
-        self.assertNotEqual(row["last_heartbeat_at"], "2026-07-28T02:00:00Z")
-        self.assertEqual(row["status"], "running")
-        self.assertEqual(row["pid"], 41900)
-
-    def test_heartbeat_for_an_unknown_runtime_is_a_no_op(self):
-        self.db.heartbeat_mcp_server_runtime("does-not-exist")
-        self.assertEqual(self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes(), [])
-
-
-class TestEndToEndSnapshot(_DBCase):
-    """Registry rows feed the classifier without reshaping."""
-
-    def test_registered_fleet_classifies_as_healthy(self):
-        pids = []
-        for index, entry in enumerate(mfi.EXPECTED_PRGS_FLEET):
-            pid = 42000 + index
-            pids.append(pid)
-            self.db.register_mcp_server_runtime(
-                self.record(
-                    entry["namespace"],
-                    entry["profile"],
-                    entry["role"],
-                    pid,
-                    registered_at="2026-07-28T02:00:00Z",
-                )
-            )
-        rows = self.db.list_mcp_server_runtimes(statuses=("running",))
-        scan = {
-            "available": True,
-            "processes": [
-                {"pid": pid, "started_at": "2026-07-28T01:00:00Z"} for pid in pids
-            ],
-            "reason": None,
-        }
-        with mock.patch.object(mfi, "probe_pid_alive", return_value=True):
-            result = mfi.classify_fleet_inventory(
-                runtime_rows=rows,
-                process_scan=scan,
-                expected_binding={
-                    "remote": "prgs",
-                    "org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
-                    "repo": "Gitea-Tools",
-                },
-            )
-        self.assertTrue(result["inventory_complete"])
-        self.assertTrue(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["running_member_count"], 5)
-
-
-if __name__ == "__main__":
-    unittest.main()

tests/test_fleet_inventory_tool.py

@@ -1,337 +0,0 @@
-"""Native exposure of the fleet inventory capability (#949).
-
-Covers the parts the pure classifier cannot: that the tool is registered and
-documented, that it is gated on ``gitea.read`` rather than a role, that it
-accepts no caller-supplied evidence, that it fails closed on an unreadable
-registry, and that the workflow documentation explains gate consumption.
-"""
-
-import inspect
-import os
-import pathlib
-import unittest
-from unittest import mock
-
-import gitea_mcp_server
-import mcp_fleet_inventory as mfi
-import task_capability_map
-
-
-REPO_ROOT = pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
-TOOL_NAME = "gitea_assess_fleet_inventory"
-
-
-class TestCapabilityMapExposure(unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC14: the invariant is provable through sanctioned native calls."""
-
-    def test_task_resolves_to_a_read_permission(self):
-        self.assertEqual(
-            task_capability_map.required_permission("assess_fleet_inventory"),
-            "gitea.read",
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(
-            task_capability_map.required_permission(TOOL_NAME), "gitea.read"
-        )
-
-    def test_task_and_tool_keys_agree(self):
-        self.assertEqual(
-            task_capability_map.TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP["assess_fleet_inventory"],
-            task_capability_map.TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP[TOOL_NAME],
-        )
-
-    def test_task_is_not_role_exclusive(self):
-        """Controller and reconciler both need it; so does any read-only gate."""
-        self.assertNotIn(
-            "assess_fleet_inventory", task_capability_map.ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS
-        )
-        self.assertNotIn(TOOL_NAME, task_capability_map.ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS)
-
-    def test_task_is_not_registered_as_an_issue_mutation(self):
-        self.assertNotIn(TOOL_NAME, task_capability_map.ISSUE_MUTATION_TOOL_TASKS)
-
-    def test_unknown_task_still_fails_closed(self):
-        with self.assertRaises(KeyError):
-            task_capability_map.required_permission("assess_fleet_inventory_typo")
-
-
-class TestToolRegistration(unittest.TestCase):
-    def test_tool_is_registered_on_the_server(self):
-        self.assertTrue(hasattr(gitea_mcp_server, TOOL_NAME))
-
-    def test_tool_accepts_no_caller_supplied_evidence(self):
-        """The defect #949 names: evidence parameters the caller controls."""
-        signature = inspect.signature(gitea_mcp_server.gitea_assess_fleet_inventory)
-        self.assertEqual(sorted(signature.parameters), ["host", "org", "remote", "repo"])
-        for forbidden in ("process", "probe_result", "registered_tools", "processes"):
-            self.assertNotIn(forbidden, signature.parameters)
-
-    def test_tool_is_documented_in_the_canonical_inventory(self):
-        doc = (REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "mcp-tool-inventory.md").read_text()
-        self.assertIn(f"`{TOOL_NAME}`", doc)
-
-    def test_docstring_states_the_read_only_guarantee(self):
-        doc = (gitea_mcp_server.gitea_assess_fleet_inventory.__doc__ or "").lower()
-        self.assertIn("read-only", doc)
-        self.assertIn("fails closed", doc)
-
-
-class TestNamespaceResolution(unittest.TestCase):
-    """Every configured profile must resolve to its real fleet namespace.
-
-    ``role_namespace_gate.infer_mcp_namespace`` recognises only author and
-    reviewer and echoes the profile name for the rest, which would label the
-    controller, merger, and reconciler members with namespaces that do not
-    exist — and then flag all three as role mismatches.
-    """
-
-    def test_every_expected_profile_maps_to_its_namespace(self):
-        for entry in mfi.EXPECTED_PRGS_FLEET:
-            self.assertEqual(
-                mfi.namespace_for_profile(entry["profile"]),
-                entry["namespace"],
-                entry["profile"],
-            )
-
-    def test_server_helper_agrees_with_the_roster(self):
-        for entry in mfi.EXPECTED_PRGS_FLEET:
-            self.assertEqual(
-                gitea_mcp_server._fleet_namespace_for_profile(entry["profile"]),
-                entry["namespace"],
-                entry["profile"],
-            )
-
-    def test_unknown_profile_falls_back_to_the_supplied_default(self):
-        self.assertEqual(
-            mfi.namespace_for_profile("prgs-shadow", default="gitea-shadow"),
-            "gitea-shadow",
-        )
-
-    def test_unknown_profile_without_a_default_returns_the_profile(self):
-        self.assertEqual(mfi.namespace_for_profile("prgs-shadow"), "prgs-shadow")
-
-    def test_registered_row_uses_the_roster_namespace(self):
-        fake_db = mock.Mock()
-        with mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server, "_control_plane_db_or_error", return_value=(fake_db, [])
-        ), mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server, "get_profile", return_value={"allowed_operations": []}
-        ), mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server.gitea_config,
-            "selected_profile_name",
-            return_value="prgs-reconciler",
-        ):
-            record = gitea_mcp_server._register_fleet_runtime(transport="stdio")
-        self.assertEqual(record["namespace"], "gitea-reconciler")
-
-
-class TestToolBehavior(unittest.TestCase):
-    """The tool wires the registry and the process scan into the classifier."""
-
-    @staticmethod
-    def _healthy_rows():
-        return [
-            {
-                "runtime_id": f"{entry['namespace']}:{43000 + index}:boot",
-                "namespace": entry["namespace"],
-                "profile": entry["profile"],
-                "role": entry["role"],
-                "remote": "prgs",
-                "org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
-                "repo": "Gitea-Tools",
-                "repository_root": "/checkout/Gitea-Tools",
-                "pid": 43000 + index,
-                "cohort_id": "ppid:40990",
-                "cohort_source": "parent_process",
-                "client_provenance": "client_managed",
-                "boot_id": "boot",
-                "startup_head": "82d71b77028a7abd4f8ab4a4e4d89658a187f73d",
-                "daemon_start_head": "82d71b77028a7abd4f8ab4a4e4d89658a187f73d",
-                "transport": "stdio",
-                "registered_at": "2026-07-28T02:00:00Z",
-                "last_heartbeat_at": "2026-07-28T02:00:00Z",
-                "status": "running",
-            }
-            for index, entry in enumerate(mfi.EXPECTED_PRGS_FLEET)
-        ]
-
-    def _call(self, rows, *, scan=None, db=None, db_errors=None):
-        fake_db = db
-        if fake_db is None and db_errors is None:
-            fake_db = mock.Mock()
-            fake_db.list_mcp_server_runtimes.return_value = rows
-        scan = scan or {
-            "available": True,
-            "processes": [
-                {"pid": r["pid"], "started_at": "2026-07-28T01:00:00Z"} for r in rows
-            ],
-            "reason": None,
-        }
-        with mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server, "_profile_operation_gate", return_value=[]
-        ), mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server,
-            "_control_plane_db_or_error",
-            return_value=(fake_db, db_errors or []),
-        ), mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server, "_active_profile_name", return_value="prgs-controller"
-        ), mock.patch.object(
-            mfi, "scan_mcp_server_processes", return_value=scan
-        ), mock.patch.object(
-            mfi, "probe_pid_alive", return_value=True
-        ):
-            return gitea_mcp_server.gitea_assess_fleet_inventory(
-                remote="prgs", org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting", repo="Gitea-Tools"
-            )
-
-    def test_healthy_fleet_satisfies_the_gate_through_the_tool(self):
-        result = self._call(self._healthy_rows())
-        self.assertTrue(result["inventory_complete"])
-        self.assertTrue(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["running_member_count"], 5)
-        self.assertEqual(result["mutations_performed"], [])
-
-    def test_tool_reports_the_expected_repository_binding(self):
-        result = self._call(self._healthy_rows())
-        self.assertEqual(
-            result["expected_repository_binding"],
-            {"remote": "prgs", "org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting", "repo": "Gitea-Tools"},
-        )
-
-    def test_tool_reads_only_running_rows(self):
-        rows = self._healthy_rows()
-        fake_db = mock.Mock()
-        fake_db.list_mcp_server_runtimes.return_value = rows
-        self._call(rows, db=fake_db)
-        fake_db.list_mcp_server_runtimes.assert_called_once_with(statuses=("running",))
-
-    def test_tool_never_writes_to_the_registry(self):
-        rows = self._healthy_rows()
-        fake_db = mock.Mock()
-        fake_db.list_mcp_server_runtimes.return_value = rows
-        self._call(rows, db=fake_db)
-        fake_db.register_mcp_server_runtime.assert_not_called()
-        fake_db.heartbeat_mcp_server_runtime.assert_not_called()
-        fake_db.mark_mcp_server_runtime_stopped.assert_not_called()
-
-    def test_unavailable_control_plane_fails_closed(self):
-        result = self._call([], db_errors=["control-plane DB substrate unavailable"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["inventory_complete"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["registry"]["available"])
-        self.assertIn("unavailable", result["blocked_reason"])
-
-    def test_registry_read_failure_fails_closed(self):
-        rows = self._healthy_rows()
-        fake_db = mock.Mock()
-        fake_db.list_mcp_server_runtimes.side_effect = RuntimeError("db locked")
-        result = self._call(rows, db=fake_db)
-        self.assertFalse(result["inventory_complete"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertIn("could not be read", result["registry"]["error"])
-
-    def test_missing_read_permission_blocks_without_touching_the_registry(self):
-        fake_db = mock.Mock()
-        with mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server,
-            "_profile_operation_gate",
-            return_value=["profile may not read"],
-        ), mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server, "_control_plane_db_or_error", return_value=(fake_db, [])
-        ):
-            result = gitea_mcp_server.gitea_assess_fleet_inventory(remote="prgs")
-        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertIn("permission_report", result)
-        self.assertEqual(result["mutations_performed"], [])
-        fake_db.list_mcp_server_runtimes.assert_not_called()
-
-    def test_answering_namespace_is_reported(self):
-        result = self._call(self._healthy_rows())
-        self.assertEqual(result["answering_namespace"], "gitea-controller")
-
-    def test_summary_is_present(self):
-        result = self._call(self._healthy_rows())
-        self.assertIn("5 of 5", result["summary"])
-
-
-class TestStartupRegistration(unittest.TestCase):
-    """The registry row is written by the process it describes."""
-
-    def test_registration_helper_exists_on_the_entrypoint_module(self):
-        self.assertTrue(hasattr(gitea_mcp_server, "_register_fleet_runtime"))
-
-    def test_registration_writes_one_row_for_this_process(self):
-        fake_db = mock.Mock()
-        with mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server, "_control_plane_db_or_error", return_value=(fake_db, [])
-        ), mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server, "get_profile", return_value={"allowed_operations": []}
-        ):
-            record = gitea_mcp_server._register_fleet_runtime(transport="stdio")
-        self.assertIsNotNone(record)
-        fake_db.register_mcp_server_runtime.assert_called_once()
-        written = fake_db.register_mcp_server_runtime.call_args.args[0]
-        self.assertEqual(written["pid"], os.getpid())
-        self.assertEqual(written["transport"], "stdio")
-
-    def test_registration_failure_never_blocks_startup(self):
-        with mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server,
-            "_control_plane_db_or_error",
-            side_effect=RuntimeError("boom"),
-        ):
-            self.assertIsNone(gitea_mcp_server._register_fleet_runtime())
-
-    def test_registration_is_skipped_when_the_control_plane_is_unavailable(self):
-        with mock.patch.object(
-            gitea_mcp_server,
-            "_control_plane_db_or_error",
-            return_value=(None, ["unavailable"]),
-        ):
-            self.assertIsNone(gitea_mcp_server._register_fleet_runtime())
-
-    def test_entrypoint_registers_after_binding_native_transport(self):
-        """Order matters: only a transport-bound process may claim a row."""
-        source = (REPO_ROOT / "gitea_mcp_server.py").read_text()
-        bind_at = source.index('bind_native_mcp_transport(transport="stdio")')
-        register_at = source.index('_register_fleet_runtime(transport="stdio")')
-        run_at = source.index('mcp.run(transport="stdio")')
-        self.assertLess(bind_at, register_at)
-        self.assertLess(register_at, run_at)
-
-
-class TestWorkflowDocumentation(unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC13: documentation explains how the gates consume the result."""
-
-    def setUp(self):
-        self.doc = (REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "mcp-fleet-inventory.md").read_text()
-        self.skill = (
-            REPO_ROOT / "skills" / "llm-project-workflow" / "SKILL.md"
-        ).read_text()
-
-    def test_dedicated_document_exists(self):
-        self.assertIn("# Authoritative MCP fleet inventory", self.doc)
-
-    def test_document_names_both_consuming_namespaces(self):
-        self.assertIn("gitea-controller", self.doc)
-        self.assertIn("gitea-reconciler", self.doc)
-
-    def test_document_explains_gate_consumption(self):
-        self.assertIn("mutation_gate_satisfied", self.doc)
-        self.assertIn("blocked_reason", self.doc)
-
-    def test_document_states_the_non_inferences(self):
-        self.assertIn("Configuration is not existence", self.doc)
-        self.assertIn("Matching revisions are not a cohort", self.doc)
-
-    def test_document_preserves_the_neighbouring_issue_boundaries(self):
-        for issue in ("#950", "#951", "#952"):
-            self.assertIn(issue, self.doc)
-
-    def test_canonical_workflow_skill_links_the_document(self):
-        self.assertIn("docs/mcp-fleet-inventory.md", self.skill)
-        self.assertIn(TOOL_NAME, self.skill)
-
-
-if __name__ == "__main__":
-    unittest.main()

tests/test_mcp_fleet_inventory.py

@@ -1,788 +0,0 @@
-"""Authoritative fleet inventory classification (#949).
-
-One test group per acceptance criterion. The classifier is pure, so every
-scenario is expressed as a snapshot: registry rows plus a process observation.
-PID liveness is the one impure input, so it is patched per test rather than
-depending on whatever happens to be running on the machine.
-"""
-
-import os
-import unittest
-from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
-from unittest import mock
-
-import mcp_fleet_inventory as mfi
-
-
-NOW = datetime(2026, 7, 28, 3, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
-HEAD_A = "82d71b77028a7abd4f8ab4a4e4d89658a187f73d"
-HEAD_B = "35ed8a2fcb11134a37c862ca6eaca26e3028902a"
-COHORT_A = "ppid:40990"
-COHORT_B = "ppid:51022"
-BINDING = {"remote": "prgs", "org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting", "repo": "Gitea-Tools"}
-
-_BASE_PID = 41000
-
-
-def row(
-    namespace,
-    profile,
-    role,
-    pid,
-    *,
-    cohort_id=COHORT_A,
-    startup_head=HEAD_A,
-    registered_at="2026-07-28T02:00:00Z",
-    **overrides,
-):
-    """One control-plane runtime registry row."""
-    record = {
-        "runtime_id": f"{namespace}:{pid}:boot{pid}",
-        "namespace": namespace,
-        "profile": profile,
-        "role": role,
-        "remote": BINDING["remote"],
-        "org": BINDING["org"],
-        "repo": BINDING["repo"],
-        "repository_root": "/checkout/Gitea-Tools",
-        "pid": pid,
-        "cohort_id": cohort_id,
-        "cohort_source": "parent_process",
-        "client_provenance": "client_managed",
-        "boot_id": f"boot{pid}",
-        "startup_head": startup_head,
-        "daemon_start_head": startup_head,
-        "transport": "stdio",
-        "registered_at": registered_at,
-        "last_heartbeat_at": registered_at,
-        "status": "running",
-    }
-    record.update(overrides)
-    return record
-
-
-def healthy_rows():
-    """One live row per expected member, all one cohort, all one revision."""
-    return [
-        row(entry["namespace"], entry["profile"], entry["role"], _BASE_PID + index)
-        for index, entry in enumerate(mfi.EXPECTED_PRGS_FLEET)
-    ]
-
-
-def scan_for(rows, *, available=True, extra_pids=(), started_at="2026-07-28T01:00:00Z"):
-    """A process observation that corroborates *rows* (plus any extra PIDs)."""
-    processes = [
-        {"pid": r["pid"], "started_at": started_at, "command": "python mcp_server.py"}
-        for r in rows
-    ]
-    processes.extend(
-        {"pid": pid, "started_at": started_at, "command": "python mcp_server.py"}
-        for pid in extra_pids
-    )
-    return {"available": available, "processes": processes, "reason": None}
-
-
-def classify(rows, scan=None, **kwargs):
-    kwargs.setdefault("expected_binding", BINDING)
-    kwargs.setdefault("now", NOW)
-    return mfi.classify_fleet_inventory(
-        runtime_rows=rows,
-        process_scan=scan if scan is not None else scan_for(rows),
-        **kwargs,
-    )
-
-
-class _AliveMixin:
-    """Treat every PID as alive unless a test declares it dead or unknown."""
-
-    def setUp(self):
-        super().setUp()
-        self.dead_pids = set()
-        self.unknown_pids = set()
-
-        def probe(pid):
-            if pid in self.unknown_pids:
-                return None
-            return pid not in self.dead_pids
-
-        patcher = mock.patch.object(mfi, "probe_pid_alive", side_effect=probe)
-        patcher.start()
-        self.addCleanup(patcher.stop)
-
-
-class TestHealthyFleet(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC1: a healthy five-server fleet reports all five members exactly once."""
-
-    def test_five_members_each_reported_once(self):
-        result = classify(healthy_rows())
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["configured_members"]), 5)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["running_members"]), 5)
-        self.assertEqual(result["running_member_count"], 5)
-        self.assertEqual(result["missing_members"], [])
-        self.assertEqual(result["duplicate_members"], [])
-        self.assertEqual(result["unexpected_members"], [])
-        self.assertTrue(result["exactly_one_per_profile"])
-        for member in result["configured_members"]:
-            self.assertEqual(member["instance_count"], 1)
-            self.assertEqual(member["health"], mfi.HEALTH_RUNNING)
-
-    def test_healthy_fleet_satisfies_the_mutation_gate(self):
-        result = classify(healthy_rows())
-        self.assertTrue(result["inventory_complete"])
-        self.assertTrue(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertIsNone(result["blocked_reason"])
-        self.assertTrue(result["single_cohort"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mixed_cohort"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mixed_revision"])
-
-    def test_every_expected_namespace_and_profile_is_present(self):
-        result = classify(healthy_rows())
-        self.assertEqual(
-            sorted(m["profile"] for m in result["configured_members"]),
-            [
-                "prgs-author",
-                "prgs-controller",
-                "prgs-merger",
-                "prgs-reconciler",
-                "prgs-reviewer",
-            ],
-        )
-
-
-class TestDuplicateMember(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC2: two processes on one profile are a duplicate and fail the gate."""
-
-    def test_duplicate_is_reported_with_every_pid(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows.append(row("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 49999))
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["duplicate_members"]), 1)
-        duplicate = result["duplicate_members"][0]
-        self.assertEqual(duplicate["profile"], "prgs-author")
-        self.assertEqual(duplicate["instance_count"], 2)
-        self.assertEqual(duplicate["pids"], [_BASE_PID, 49999])
-
-    def test_duplicate_fails_the_mutation_gate(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows.append(row("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 49999))
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertFalse(result["exactly_one_per_profile"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertIn("duplicate", result["blocked_reason"])
-
-    def test_duplicate_is_not_reported_as_missing_or_unexpected(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows.append(row("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 49999))
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(result["missing_members"], [])
-        self.assertEqual(result["unexpected_members"], [])
-
-
-class TestMissingMember(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC3: a missing expected server is identified and fails the gate."""
-
-    def test_missing_member_is_named(self):
-        rows = [r for r in healthy_rows() if r["profile"] != "prgs-merger"]
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["missing_members"]), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(result["missing_members"][0]["profile"], "prgs-merger")
-        self.assertEqual(result["missing_members"][0]["health"], mfi.HEALTH_MISSING)
-
-    def test_missing_member_fails_the_mutation_gate(self):
-        rows = [r for r in healthy_rows() if r["profile"] != "prgs-merger"]
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertFalse(result["exactly_one_per_profile"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertIn("prgs-merger", result["blocked_reason"])
-
-    def test_missing_member_still_lists_all_configured_members(self):
-        rows = [r for r in healthy_rows() if r["profile"] != "prgs-merger"]
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["configured_members"]), 5)
-        merger = [
-            m for m in result["configured_members"] if m["profile"] == "prgs-merger"
-        ][0]
-        self.assertEqual(merger["instance_count"], 0)
-        self.assertEqual(merger["health"], mfi.HEALTH_MISSING)
-
-
-class TestUnexpectedMember(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC4: an unexpected PRGS server is reported explicitly."""
-
-    def test_unexpected_member_is_its_own_category(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows.append(row("gitea-shadow", "prgs-shadow", "author", 47777))
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["unexpected_members"]), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(result["unexpected_members"][0]["profile"], "prgs-shadow")
-        self.assertEqual(
-            result["unexpected_members"][0]["health"], mfi.HEALTH_UNEXPECTED
-        )
-
-    def test_unexpected_member_is_not_collapsed_into_duplicates_or_missing(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows.append(row("gitea-shadow", "prgs-shadow", "author", 47777))
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(result["duplicate_members"], [])
-        self.assertEqual(result["missing_members"], [])
-        self.assertTrue(result["exactly_one_per_profile"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["no_unexpected_members"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-    def test_unexpected_member_blocks_with_its_own_reason(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows.append(row("gitea-shadow", "prgs-shadow", "author", 47777))
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("unexpected" in reason for reason in result["blocked_reasons"])
-        )
-
-
-class TestMixedCohort(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC5: members from different client cohorts are detected."""
-
-    def test_two_cohorts_are_detected(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["cohort_id"] = COHORT_B
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertTrue(result["mixed_cohort"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["single_cohort"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["cohort_ids"], sorted([COHORT_A, COHORT_B]))
-
-    def test_mixed_cohort_fails_the_mutation_gate(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["cohort_id"] = COHORT_B
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertTrue(any("cohort" in reason for reason in result["blocked_reasons"]))
-
-    def test_mixed_cohort_is_not_a_duplicate_or_missing_report(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["cohort_id"] = COHORT_B
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(result["duplicate_members"], [])
-        self.assertEqual(result["missing_members"], [])
-
-
-class TestMixedRevision(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC6: members running different startup revisions are detected."""
-
-    def test_two_revisions_are_detected(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["startup_head"] = HEAD_B
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertTrue(result["mixed_revision"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["startup_revisions"], sorted([HEAD_A, HEAD_B]))
-
-    def test_mixed_revision_fails_the_mutation_gate(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["startup_head"] = HEAD_B
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("revision" in reason for reason in result["blocked_reasons"])
-        )
-
-    def test_mixed_revision_does_not_by_itself_imply_mixed_cohort(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["startup_head"] = HEAD_B
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertTrue(result["single_cohort"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mixed_cohort"])
-
-
-class TestRevisionIsNotCohort(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC7: matching Git revisions alone do not establish a single cohort."""
-
-    def test_identical_revisions_with_unknown_cohort_stay_unknown(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        for r in rows:
-            r["cohort_id"] = None
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(len({r["startup_head"] for r in rows}), 1)
-        self.assertIsNone(result["single_cohort"])
-        self.assertIsNone(result["mixed_cohort"])
-
-    def test_identical_revisions_with_unknown_cohort_fail_closed(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        for r in rows:
-            r["cohort_id"] = None
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertFalse(result["inventory_complete"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("cohort" in reason for reason in result["incomplete_reasons"])
-        )
-
-    def test_one_unknown_cohort_among_known_ones_still_fails_closed(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["cohort_id"] = None
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertIsNone(result["single_cohort"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-    def test_cohort_derivation_never_consults_revisions(self):
-        """The cohort helper takes no revision input at all."""
-        identity = mfi.derive_cohort_identity({mfi.COHORT_ID_ENV: "cohort-x"})
-        self.assertEqual(identity["cohort_id"], "cohort-x")
-        self.assertEqual(identity["cohort_source"], "explicit_env")
-
-    def test_orphaned_process_reports_unknown_cohort(self):
-        with mock.patch("os.getppid", return_value=1):
-            identity = mfi.derive_cohort_identity({})
-        self.assertIsNone(identity["cohort_id"])
-        self.assertEqual(identity["cohort_source"], "unknown")
-
-    def test_parent_process_is_the_cohort_when_no_env_is_set(self):
-        with mock.patch("os.getppid", return_value=40990):
-            identity = mfi.derive_cohort_identity({})
-        self.assertEqual(identity["cohort_id"], COHORT_A)
-        self.assertEqual(identity["cohort_source"], "parent_process")
-
-
-class TestConfigurationIsNotRunning(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC8: configuration without a live worker is not a running member."""
-
-    def test_no_registry_rows_means_every_member_is_missing(self):
-        result = classify([], scan=scan_for([]))
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["missing_members"]), 5)
-        self.assertEqual(result["running_members"], [])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-    def test_dead_pid_is_stale_not_running(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        self.dead_pids = {rows[0]["pid"]}
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["running_members"]), 4)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["stale_members"]), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(result["stale_members"][0]["liveness"], mfi.LIVENESS_DEAD)
-        self.assertEqual(result["stale_members"][0]["health"], mfi.HEALTH_STALE)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["missing_members"]), 1)
-
-    def test_registry_row_without_a_matching_process_is_not_running(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        scan = scan_for(rows[1:])  # first member's process is absent
-        result = classify(rows, scan=scan)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["running_members"]), 4)
-        self.assertEqual(
-            result["stale_members"][0]["liveness"], mfi.LIVENESS_UNOBSERVED
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-    def test_recycled_pid_does_not_impersonate_a_dead_server(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        scan = scan_for(rows)
-        # The process now holding the first PID started *after* registration.
-        scan["processes"][0]["started_at"] = "2026-07-28T02:30:00Z"
-        result = classify(rows, scan=scan)
-        stale = [
-            m
-            for m in result["stale_members"]
-            if m["liveness"] == mfi.LIVENESS_PID_RECYCLED
-        ]
-        self.assertEqual(len(stale), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["running_members"]), 4)
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-
-class TestIncompleteEvidenceFailsClosed(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC9: unknown or unavailable evidence produces a fail-closed result."""
-
-    def test_unavailable_process_listing_fails_closed(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        result = classify(
-            rows,
-            scan={"available": False, "processes": [], "reason": "ps unavailable"},
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["inventory_complete"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertIn("ps unavailable", result["incomplete_reasons"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["running_members"], [])
-
-    def test_unreadable_registry_fails_closed(self):
-        result = classify(
-            [],
-            scan=scan_for([]),
-            registry_available=False,
-            registry_error="registry unreadable",
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["inventory_complete"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertIn("registry unreadable", result["incomplete_reasons"])
-
-    def test_unregistered_running_process_fails_closed(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        result = classify(rows, scan=scan_for(rows, extra_pids=[59999]))
-        self.assertEqual([p["pid"] for p in result["unregistered_processes"]], [59999])
-        self.assertFalse(result["inventory_complete"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("59999" in reason for reason in result["incomplete_reasons"])
-        )
-
-    def test_undeterminable_pid_liveness_is_unknown_not_healthy(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        self.unknown_pids = {rows[0]["pid"]}
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(result["stale_members"][0]["liveness"], mfi.LIVENESS_UNKNOWN)
-        self.assertEqual(result["stale_members"][0]["health"], mfi.HEALTH_UNKNOWN)
-        self.assertFalse(result["inventory_complete"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-    def test_unknown_startup_revision_fails_closed(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["startup_head"] = None
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertFalse(result["inventory_complete"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any("startup revision" in r for r in result["incomplete_reasons"])
-        )
-
-    def test_unknown_is_distinguished_from_healthy(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        for r in rows:
-            r["cohort_id"] = None
-        result = classify(rows)
-        # Not "unhealthy" in the sense of a named defect: nothing is missing,
-        # duplicated or unexpected. It is *unknown*, and that still fails closed.
-        self.assertEqual(result["missing_members"], [])
-        self.assertEqual(result["duplicate_members"], [])
-        self.assertEqual(result["unexpected_members"], [])
-        self.assertIsNone(result["single_cohort"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-
-class TestBindingAndRoleConsistency(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """Repository-binding and role/profile mismatches fail closed."""
-
-    def test_repository_binding_mismatch_is_reported(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["repo"] = "Some-Other-Repo"
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["repository_binding_mismatches"]), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(
-            result["repository_binding_mismatches"][0]["repo"], "Some-Other-Repo"
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-    def test_incomplete_repository_binding_is_reported(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["org"] = None
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["repository_binding_mismatches"]), 1)
-        self.assertIn("complete", result["repository_binding_mismatches"][0]["reason"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-    def test_role_mismatch_is_reported(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["role"] = "merger"  # prgs-author is configured as author
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["role_mismatches"]), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(result["role_mismatches"][0]["expected_role"], "author")
-        self.assertEqual(result["role_mismatches"][0]["declared_role"], "merger")
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-    def test_profile_served_from_the_wrong_namespace_is_reported(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["namespace"] = "gitea-reviewer"
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertTrue(
-            any(
-                m.get("expected_namespace") == "gitea-author"
-                for m in result["role_mismatches"]
-            )
-        )
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-    def test_matching_binding_produces_no_mismatch(self):
-        result = classify(healthy_rows())
-        self.assertEqual(result["repository_binding_mismatches"], [])
-        self.assertEqual(result["role_mismatches"], [])
-
-
-class TestDeterminism(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC10 / stable ordering and deterministic structured output."""
-
-    def test_identical_snapshots_produce_identical_results(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        first = classify(rows, scan=scan_for(rows))
-        second = classify(healthy_rows(), scan=scan_for(healthy_rows()))
-        self.assertEqual(first, second)
-
-    def test_row_order_does_not_change_the_result(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        shuffled = list(reversed(healthy_rows()))
-        forward = classify(rows, scan=scan_for(rows))
-        backward = classify(shuffled, scan=scan_for(shuffled))
-        self.assertEqual(forward["running_members"], backward["running_members"])
-        self.assertEqual(forward["configured_members"], backward["configured_members"])
-        self.assertEqual(
-            forward["mutation_gate_satisfied"], backward["mutation_gate_satisfied"]
-        )
-
-    def test_members_are_sorted_by_namespace_then_profile_then_pid(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows.append(row("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 40001))
-        result = classify(rows)
-        keys = [
-            (m["namespace"], m["profile"], m["pid"]) for m in result["running_members"]
-        ]
-        self.assertEqual(keys, sorted(keys))
-
-    def test_answering_namespace_does_not_change_the_verdict(self):
-        """AC10: controller and reconciler agree for one fleet snapshot."""
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        controller = classify(
-            rows, scan=scan_for(rows), answering_namespace="gitea-controller"
-        )
-        reconciler = classify(
-            healthy_rows(),
-            scan=scan_for(healthy_rows()),
-            answering_namespace="gitea-reconciler",
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(controller["answering_namespace"], "gitea-controller")
-        self.assertEqual(reconciler["answering_namespace"], "gitea-reconciler")
-        for key in sorted(set(controller) - {"answering_namespace"}):
-            self.assertEqual(controller[key], reconciler[key], f"{key} disagreed")
-
-    def test_controller_and_reconciler_agree_on_an_unhealthy_fleet(self):
-        rows = [r for r in healthy_rows() if r["profile"] != "prgs-merger"]
-        controller = classify(
-            rows, scan=scan_for(rows), answering_namespace="gitea-controller"
-        )
-        reconciler = classify(
-            rows, scan=scan_for(rows), answering_namespace="gitea-reconciler"
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(controller["blocked_reason"], reconciler["blocked_reason"])
-        self.assertEqual(
-            controller["mutation_gate_satisfied"],
-            reconciler["mutation_gate_satisfied"],
-        )
-
-
-class TestReadOnly(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC11: the capability mutates nothing."""
-
-    def test_classification_reports_no_mutations(self):
-        result = classify(healthy_rows())
-        self.assertEqual(result["mutations_performed"], [])
-        self.assertTrue(result["read_only"])
-
-    def test_classification_does_not_write_the_input_rows_back(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        snapshot = [dict(r) for r in rows]
-        classify(rows)
-        self.assertEqual(rows, snapshot)
-
-
-class TestLivenessProbe(unittest.TestCase):
-    """AC11: the real probe never sends a terminating signal.
-
-    Deliberately *not* using ``_AliveMixin`` — these tests exercise
-    ``probe_pid_alive`` itself, which the mixin replaces.
-    """
-
-    def test_only_signal_zero_is_ever_sent(self):
-        with mock.patch("os.kill") as killer:
-            mfi.probe_pid_alive(4242)
-        killer.assert_called_once_with(4242, 0)
-
-    def test_classifying_a_duplicate_never_terminates_it(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows.append(row("gitea-author", "prgs-author", "author", 49999))
-        with mock.patch("os.kill") as killer:
-            result = mfi.classify_fleet_inventory(
-                runtime_rows=rows,
-                process_scan=scan_for(rows),
-                expected_binding=BINDING,
-                now=NOW,
-            )
-        self.assertTrue(killer.call_args_list, "liveness must actually be probed")
-        for call in killer.call_args_list:
-            self.assertEqual(call.args[1], 0, "only signal 0 may ever be sent")
-        self.assertEqual(result["mutations_performed"], [])
-
-    def test_liveness_probe_tolerates_a_missing_process(self):
-        with mock.patch("os.kill", side_effect=ProcessLookupError):
-            self.assertFalse(mfi.probe_pid_alive(4242))
-
-    def test_liveness_probe_treats_permission_error_as_alive(self):
-        with mock.patch("os.kill", side_effect=PermissionError):
-            self.assertTrue(mfi.probe_pid_alive(4242))
-
-    def test_liveness_probe_returns_unknown_on_other_os_errors(self):
-        with mock.patch("os.kill", side_effect=OSError):
-            self.assertIsNone(mfi.probe_pid_alive(4242))
-
-    def test_invalid_pid_is_unknown_and_probes_nothing(self):
-        with mock.patch("os.kill") as killer:
-            self.assertIsNone(mfi.probe_pid_alive(None))
-            self.assertIsNone(mfi.probe_pid_alive(0))
-        killer.assert_not_called()
-
-
-class TestMultiClientRegression(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    """The multi-LLM duplicate-server scenario that motivated #949."""
-
-    @staticmethod
-    def _two_client_rows():
-        first = healthy_rows()
-        second = [
-            row(
-                entry["namespace"],
-                entry["profile"],
-                entry["role"],
-                50000 + index,
-                cohort_id=COHORT_B,
-            )
-            for index, entry in enumerate(mfi.EXPECTED_PRGS_FLEET)
-        ]
-        return first + second
-
-    def test_second_client_running_the_same_five_profiles_is_caught(self):
-        """Two clients, ten servers, same profiles, same revision.
-
-        Every member self-reports the same parity, which is exactly why the old
-        per-process surfaces reported success. The fleet inventory must report
-        five duplicates, two cohorts, and a closed gate.
-        """
-        rows = self._two_client_rows()
-        result = classify(rows, scan=scan_for(rows))
-
-        self.assertEqual(len(result["duplicate_members"]), 5)
-        self.assertFalse(result["exactly_one_per_profile"])
-        self.assertTrue(result["mixed_cohort"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["single_cohort"])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mixed_revision"], "both clients share a revision")
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["missing_members"], [])
-
-    def test_identical_parity_across_ten_servers_is_not_health(self):
-        rows = self._two_client_rows()
-        result = classify(rows, scan=scan_for(rows))
-        self.assertEqual(result["startup_revisions"], [HEAD_A])
-        self.assertFalse(result["mutation_gate_satisfied"])
-
-    def test_every_duplicate_pid_is_named_for_the_operator(self):
-        rows = self._two_client_rows()
-        result = classify(rows, scan=scan_for(rows))
-        for duplicate in result["duplicate_members"]:
-            self.assertEqual(len(duplicate["pids"]), 2)
-
-
-class TestProcessScan(unittest.TestCase):
-    """The process observation is server-side and fails closed."""
-
-    def test_scan_parses_mcp_server_processes(self):
-        stdout = (
-            "  PID STARTED COMMAND\n"
-            " 41000 Mon Jul 27 20:00:00 2026 python /path/mcp_server.py\n"
-            " 41001 Mon Jul 27 20:00:01 2026 python /path/other_server.py\n"
-        )
-        result = mfi.scan_mcp_server_processes(
-            runner=lambda *a, **k: mock.Mock(stdout=stdout)
-        )
-        self.assertTrue(result["available"])
-        self.assertEqual([p["pid"] for p in result["processes"]], [41000])
-
-    def test_scan_failure_reports_unavailable_rather_than_empty(self):
-        def boom(*args, **kwargs):
-            raise OSError("ps missing")
-
-        result = mfi.scan_mcp_server_processes(runner=boom)
-        self.assertFalse(result["available"])
-        self.assertEqual(result["processes"], [])
-        self.assertIn("ps missing", result["reason"])
-
-    def test_scan_results_are_sorted_by_pid(self):
-        stdout = (
-            "  PID STARTED COMMAND\n"
-            " 41005 Mon Jul 27 20:00:00 2026 python /path/mcp_server.py\n"
-            " 41001 Mon Jul 27 20:00:01 2026 python /path/mcp_server.py\n"
-        )
-        result = mfi.scan_mcp_server_processes(
-            runner=lambda *a, **k: mock.Mock(stdout=stdout)
-        )
-        self.assertEqual([p["pid"] for p in result["processes"]], [41001, 41005])
-
-
-class TestRuntimeRecord(unittest.TestCase):
-    """The row a server writes about itself."""
-
-    def test_record_describes_the_calling_process(self):
-        record = mfi.build_process_runtime_record(
-            namespace="gitea-controller",
-            profile="prgs-controller",
-            role="controller",
-            remote="prgs",
-            org=BINDING["org"],
-            repo=BINDING["repo"],
-            pid=41022,
-            startup_head=HEAD_A,
-            transport="stdio",
-            client_provenance="client_managed",
-            env={mfi.COHORT_ID_ENV: COHORT_A},
-            boot_id="deadbeefcafe0001",
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(
-            record["runtime_id"], "gitea-controller:41022:deadbeefcafe0001"
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(record["namespace"], "gitea-controller")
-        self.assertEqual(record["cohort_id"], COHORT_A)
-        self.assertEqual(record["cohort_source"], "explicit_env")
-        self.assertEqual(record["startup_head"], HEAD_A)
-        self.assertEqual(record["status"], "running")
-
-    def test_record_defaults_pid_to_the_current_process(self):
-        record = mfi.build_process_runtime_record(
-            namespace="gitea-author", profile="prgs-author", role="author"
-        )
-        self.assertEqual(record["pid"], os.getpid())
-
-    def test_each_boot_gets_a_distinct_runtime_id(self):
-        first = mfi.build_process_runtime_record(
-            namespace="gitea-author", profile="prgs-author", role="author", pid=1
-        )
-        second = mfi.build_process_runtime_record(
-            namespace="gitea-author", profile="prgs-author", role="author", pid=1
-        )
-        self.assertNotEqual(first["runtime_id"], second["runtime_id"])
-
-    def test_registered_at_uses_the_control_plane_timestamp_format(self):
-        record = mfi.build_process_runtime_record(
-            namespace="gitea-author", profile="prgs-author", role="author", pid=1
-        )
-        datetime.strptime(record["registered_at"], "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
-
-
-class TestSummary(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    def test_healthy_summary_names_the_counts(self):
-        result = classify(healthy_rows())
-        self.assertIn("5 of 5", mfi.summarize(result))
-
-    def test_blocked_summary_repeats_the_blocked_reason(self):
-        rows = [r for r in healthy_rows() if r["profile"] != "prgs-merger"]
-        result = classify(rows)
-        self.assertIn(result["blocked_reason"], mfi.summarize(result))
-
-
-class TestHeartbeatAge(_AliveMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    def test_heartbeat_age_is_reported_for_diagnosis(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        stamp = (NOW - timedelta(minutes=30)).strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
-        rows[0]["last_heartbeat_at"] = stamp
-        result = classify(rows)
-        member = [m for m in result["running_members"] if m["pid"] == rows[0]["pid"]][0]
-        self.assertEqual(member["heartbeat_age_seconds"], 1800)
-
-    def test_missing_heartbeat_is_reported_as_unknown_age(self):
-        rows = healthy_rows()
-        rows[0]["last_heartbeat_at"] = None
-        result = classify(rows)
-        member = [m for m in result["running_members"] if m["pid"] == rows[0]["pid"]][0]
-        self.assertIsNone(member["heartbeat_age_seconds"])
-
-
-if __name__ == "__main__":
-    unittest.main()