Compare commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
e43ddd3cbe |
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Incident #670: bare direct-to-master commit `2fa97c26` (retroactive audit)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Status: verified; disposition recommendation: **accept as-is, no revert** (final
|
||||||
|
disposition owned by controller per issue #670).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Summary
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Commit `2fa97c26fbda555a1a83930ca5fdcea9d8e47b50`
|
||||||
|
(`fix(mcp): load dotenv relative to project root`) landed on `prgs/master`
|
||||||
|
as a single-parent commit with no PR wrapper and no review record, bypassing
|
||||||
|
the sanctioned issue → branch → PR → review → merge workflow. It was
|
||||||
|
discovered during the PR #654 post-merge audit. PR #654 itself merged
|
||||||
|
cleanly via the Gitea API and did **not** introduce this commit.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Verification evidence (acceptance criteria 1–3)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **AC1 — present on `prgs/master`: yes.**
|
||||||
|
`git merge-base --is-ancestor 2fa97c26fbda555a1a83930ca5fdcea9d8e47b50 prgs/master` → true.
|
||||||
|
- **AC2 — no PR or review record: confirmed.**
|
||||||
|
The commit is a single-parent, non-merge commit sitting directly on
|
||||||
|
first-parent master between the #629 merge (`5ab5fe85`) and the #654
|
||||||
|
merge (`ec903b0d`). A PR landing on master produces a merge commit (or a
|
||||||
|
PR-linked head); neither exists here. The controller audit at issue-create
|
||||||
|
time also found no PR wrapper and no review record for this SHA.
|
||||||
|
- **AC3 — changed files and diff summary: confirmed.**
|
||||||
|
`gitea_auth.py | 5 +++--` (+3/−2). Single parent
|
||||||
|
`5ab5fe8583c07134d55dadf09381aecb67df246e`. The change moves
|
||||||
|
`PROJECT_ROOT` derivation above `load_dotenv()` and loads
|
||||||
|
`.env` relative to the project root instead of the process CWD.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## AC4 — why no immediate revert
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- The dotenv fix is intentional and required for correct runtime behavior:
|
||||||
|
without it, `load_dotenv()` resolves `.env` against the process working
|
||||||
|
directory, which breaks MCP server launches whose CWD is not the project
|
||||||
|
root.
|
||||||
|
- The change is small (+3/−2), self-contained in `gitea_auth.py`, and has
|
||||||
|
been running on master without incident since 2026-07-10.
|
||||||
|
- Reverting would re-introduce a real bug to remove a provenance defect —
|
||||||
|
the wrong trade. Provenance is repaired retroactively by this document,
|
||||||
|
issue #670, and the hardening landed under #671.
|
||||||
|
- If the controller later judges the change unsafe, a separate
|
||||||
|
revert/repair issue is the sanctioned path (issue #670, recommended
|
||||||
|
disposition option 4).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## AC5 — workflow-hardening linkage
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Prevention already landed: **issue #671** (closed)
|
||||||
|
*“Block direct pushes to stable branches from MCP workflow sessions”*,
|
||||||
|
implemented by commit `5933d87647656643a67a50331c4c7b06ea751dad`
|
||||||
|
(`feat(guard): block direct stable-branch pushes from MCP workflow sessions`).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Shipped guardrails include:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- `gitea_record_stable_branch_push_attempt` — classifies proposed commands
|
||||||
|
for direct stable-branch push intent (`git push <remote> master`,
|
||||||
|
refspecs, `HEAD:master`, `--force`, dry-run intent, `:master` delete),
|
||||||
|
plus root/control-checkout local commits not carried by an issue branch,
|
||||||
|
and writes a durable `stable_branch_contamination` marker.
|
||||||
|
- `gitea_audit_stable_branch_contamination` — reconciler-only audit/clear
|
||||||
|
path; a contaminated worker session cannot self-clear.
|
||||||
|
- Review/merge/close/completion mutations fail closed while a
|
||||||
|
contamination marker is active.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## AC6 — PR #654 was not the source
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- `2fa97c26` is the **first parent** of the #654 merge commit
|
||||||
|
`ec903b0d619e7a27d24aed272a890f4e5d381411`; it predates the #654 merge.
|
||||||
|
- First-parent history `5ab5fe8..ec903b0`:
|
||||||
|
`2fa97c2 fix(mcp): load dotenv relative to project root` followed by
|
||||||
|
`ec903b0 Merge pull request 'feat: lifecycle role/hazard labels ... (#603)' (#654)`.
|
||||||
|
- The #654 merger audit confirmed `ec903b0d` was a valid Gitea-API merge,
|
||||||
|
the `git push prgs master` attempt during that run was a no-op, and the
|
||||||
|
net change `2fa97c2..ec903b0` contained only the reviewed #603
|
||||||
|
lifecycle-label files.
|
||||||
|
- Conclusion: #654 merged reviewed content only; the unauthorized-path
|
||||||
|
defect is solely the earlier bare commit `2fa97c26`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Explicit non-actions (unchanged by this audit)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- No revert of `2fa97c26`.
|
||||||
|
- No force-push or history rewrite.
|
||||||
|
- No master mutation from the audit session.
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user