fix: close implements tracker gap and clarify closing keywords (#110)

docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md

@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ tied to an issue number so the work is traceable end to end:
 | Issue | `#123` (claimed with `status:in-progress`) |
 | Branch | `(fix\|feat\|docs\|chore)/issue-123-<slug>` (review: `review/pr-456-<slug>`) |
 | Worktree | `branches/fix-issue-123-<slug>` (slashes → hyphens) |
-| PR | body says `Closes #123` (closes) or `Refs #123` (related) |
+| PR | body says `Closes #123` or `Fixes #123` (closes issue); `Implements #123` or `Refs #123` (does NOT close) |
 | Cleanup | remove remote+local branch + worktree folder; drop `status:in-progress` |
 
 `scripts/worktree-start` **rejects** implementation branches that are not

mcp_server.py

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ mcp = FastMCP("gitea-tools", instructions=(
 def extract_linked_issue_numbers(text: str | None, branch_name: str | None = None) -> list[int]:
     issues = set()
     if text:
-        pattern = re.compile(r'(?i)(?:close[sd]?|fix(?:e[sd])?|resolve[sd]?|ref[s]?)\s+#(\d+)')
+        pattern = re.compile(r'(?i)(?:close[sd]?|fix(?:e[sd])?|resolve[sd]?|implement[s]?|implemented)\s+#(\d+)')
         issues.update(int(m) for m in pattern.findall(text))
     if branch_name:
         pattern = re.compile(r'(?i)issue-(\d+)')

skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md

@@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ is maintained by:
 - the branch name (contains the issue number),
 - a claim comment on the issue, e.g.
   `Claimed. Branch: fix/issue-123-short-description. Worktree: branches/fix-issue-123-short-description.`,
-- the PR body — `Closes #123` when the PR should close the issue, `Refs #123`
+- the PR body — `Closes #123` or `Fixes #123` when the PR should close the issue
-  when related but not closing,
+  (do NOT use `Implements #123` or `Refs #123` to close, as Gitea will not auto-close),
 - cleanup after merge — remove the remote branch, local branch, and the issue
   worktree folder, and drop `status:in-progress`.
 

skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/merge-pr.md

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Steps:
    - Target task role: merger identity (must NOT be the PR author)
    *If the current identity does not match the required role (or is the PR author), STOP. Relaunch/switch to the correct profile first.*
 2. Verify authenticated identity + active profile.
-3. Confirm PR #<pr>: author (not you), state open, mergeable, review approved.
+3. Confirm PR #<pr>: author (not you), state open, mergeable, review approved. Check if PR body uses `Closes #N` or `Fixes #N`; if it uses `Implements #N` or `Refs #N`, manual closing will be needed in step 29.
 4. If any gate fails → STOP and report.
 4. Merge with explicit confirmation (e.g. confirmation="MERGE PR <pr>"),
    optionally pinning the reviewed head SHA / changed-file set.

skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/review-pr.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Steps:
 4. scripts/worktree-review <pr-head-branch>          # detached, branches/review-*
    cd branches/review-<pr-head-branch-slug>
 5. Confirm the worktree is clean. Inspect the FULL diff; confirm scope matches
-   issue #<n>; flag any unrelated files, secrets, or formatting churn.
+   issue #<n>; flag any unrelated files, secrets, or formatting churn. Check that the PR body correctly uses Gitea-closing keywords (`Closes #N` or `Fixes #N`) instead of non-closing ones (`Implements #N`, `Refs #N`).
 6. Run the test suite; note results.
 7. Post the review verdict: approve only if scope is clean and checks pass;
    otherwise request changes with specifics. Never merge from this review step.

skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/start-issue.md

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ Steps:
 6. Checks: run the test suite, compile/lint changed files, git diff --check,
    and scan the diff for secrets.
 7. Commit (issue-linked message), push the branch, open a PR to master.
+   *The PR body MUST use closing keywords like `Closes #N` or `Fixes #N` to close the issue; do NOT use `Implements #N` or `Refs #N` for closing, as Gitea will not auto-close it.*
    Include an "LLM Handoff Metadata" block in the PR body (attribution only;
    never an eligibility input — docs/llm-agent-sha.md):
 

tests/test_mcp_server.py

@@ -1649,3 +1649,23 @@ class TestTrackerHygieneCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
         res = gitea_close_issue(issue_number=1)
         self.assertTrue(res["success"])
         self.assertIn("error:", res["cleanup_status"].get(1))
+
+    def test_extract_linked_issue_numbers_hygiene(self):
+        from mcp_server import extract_linked_issue_numbers
+        # Standard closing keywords
+        self.assertEqual(extract_linked_issue_numbers("Closes #123"), [123])
+        self.assertEqual(extract_linked_issue_numbers("Fixes #123"), [123])
+        self.assertEqual(extract_linked_issue_numbers("Resolves #123"), [123])
+        
+        # New implements/implemented keywords
+        self.assertEqual(extract_linked_issue_numbers("Implements #123"), [123])
+        self.assertEqual(extract_linked_issue_numbers("implemented #123"), [123])
+        self.assertEqual(extract_linked_issue_numbers("implement #123"), [123])
+        
+        # refs / ref should NOT match
+        self.assertEqual(extract_linked_issue_numbers("Refs #123"), [])
+        self.assertEqual(extract_linked_issue_numbers("ref #123"), [])
+        
+        # branch name fallback
+        self.assertEqual(extract_linked_issue_numbers("", branch_name="issue-123"), [123])
+        self.assertEqual(extract_linked_issue_numbers("", branch_name="feat/issue-123-foo"), [123])