When gitea_lock_issue adopts an existing own branch, the live tool
response now carries explicit, citable adoption-proof fields so #473-style
recovery sessions can quote the lock output directly instead of inferring
adoption from separate offline checks.
- issue_lock_adoption.py: add DECISION_LABELS + decision_label()/
safe_next_action() helpers; extend build_adoption_proof() with
adoption_decision, adopted, adopted_branch, adopted_branch_head,
matcher_summary (boundary-safe reason), competing_branch_check, and
safe_next_action for all outcomes; add build_non_adoption_lock_proof()
for adoption-free NO_MATCH metadata.
- gitea_mcp_server.py: attach adoption-free adoption_check block to normal
(non-adopt) lock responses so they cannot be misread as claiming adoption.
- docs/llm-workflow-runbooks.md: document the adoption/adoption_check
response blocks and instruct recovery reports to cite them directly.
- tests: explicit-field proof for ADOPT/BLOCK_COMPETING/NO_MATCH,
substring-collision boundary safety (issue-42 vs issue-420), non-adoption
proof, and MCP-level live-response assertions.
BLOCK_COMPETING lock attempts still fail closed (raise); no raw API
fallback, branch deletion, force-push, or manual lock seeding introduced.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Replace substring issue-marker matching with a numeric word-boundary
regex so issue-42 adoption is not false-blocked by unrelated issue-420
branches. Add regression tests for the #42 vs #420 collision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Store per remote/org/repo/issue locks under GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR with
atomic writes and per-session binding. Integrate own-branch adoption for
lock recovery, update worktree-start and cleanup reconcile, and add tests
documenting the ban on manual global lock seeding.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
jcwalker3andClaude Opus 4.8
sysadminandClaude Opus 4.8