Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 77 Pull Requests 10 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat(review-workflow): add repo-name disambiguation and complete-inventory proofs (#184)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
sysadmin
2026-07-05 15:30:06 -04:00
parent 340b585bfd
commit e2bccbafee
4 changed files with 163 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
skills/llm-project-workflow/templates/review-pr.md
+13
View File
@@ -5,6 +5,19 @@ Copy, fill the `<...>` fields, and paste as the task prompt.
```text
Task: review PR #<pr> for issue #<n>.
Repo name disambiguation (Gitea-Tools blind review hardening):
- "Gitea-Tools", "gitea tool", "MCP Gitea tool", "gitea MCP tool", "gitea-tools repo"
→ MUST resolve to `Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools` (never treat as mcp-control-plane).
- "mcp-control-plane", "mcp control plane" → only `Scaled-Tech-Consulting/mcp-control-plane`.
- If user says "open PRs", "the queue", "MCP Gitea tooling" without explicit repo,
or reference is ambiguous: check BOTH configured repos:
`Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools` and `Scaled-Tech-Consulting/mcp-control-plane`.
- In the final report, always state exactly which repo(s) were checked.
If only one was checked: explicitly say "Only <repo> was checked. Other
configured repos were not checked. This is not a complete queue inventory."
- A single-repo "no open PRs" result MUST NOT be reported as global "no open PRs"
if the other configured repo was not inventoried.
Rules (llm-project-workflow):
- Review in a SEPARATE detached review worktree, never the author's folder.
- You must NOT be the PR author. If the authenticated user == PR author, stop.