feat(review-workflow): add repo-name disambiguation and complete-inventory proofs (#184)

skills/llm-project-workflow/SKILL.md

@@ -181,11 +181,21 @@ Worktree folder = branch with `/` replaced by `-`
    that the diff base is the PR base branch. If `HEAD` does not match the
    pinned head, **stop before review/merge**
    (`review_proofs.verify_pinned_head_checkout`).
-6. **Inventory proof (#173):** a blind queue review must prove listing
-   completeness before claiming "only PRs found": both configured
-   repositories checked, open-PR filters stated, pagination handled or
-   explicitly not needed, and the total open PR count per repo reported
-   (`review_proofs.assess_inventory_completeness`).
+6. **Inventory proof (#173 + repo disambiguation hardening):** a blind queue
+   review must prove listing completeness before claiming "only PRs found".
+   Use repo-name disambiguation:
+   - "Gitea-Tools" / "gitea tool" / "MCP Gitea tool" / "gitea MCP tool" /
+     "gitea-tools repo" resolve **only** to `Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools`.
+   - "mcp-control-plane" resolves only to `Scaled-Tech-Consulting/mcp-control-plane`.
+   - Ambiguous ("open PRs", no explicit repo, "MCP Gitea tooling") → inventory
+     **both** configured repos.
+   Report must state exactly which repo(s) were checked. If only one checked:
+   "Only <repo> was checked. Other configured repos were not checked. This is
+   not a complete queue inventory." Never let a single-repo zero hide PRs in
+   the other.
+   Both configured repos must be reported with state filter, pagination proof,
+   and open-PR count (`review_proofs.assess_inventory_completeness` and
+   `resolve_repos_from_user_reference`).
 7. Inspect the full diff; confirm scope matches the linked issue; flag unrelated files.
 8. Run the tests. Validation reporting must include the exact command and
    exact results: pass/fail, counts of tests passed/skipped/failed, any