fix: align test mocks with #399 lease gates and head SHA requirements
PR #416 introduced pr_work_lease reviewer blocks and mandatory full 40-hex expected_head_sha on mark/merge paths. Update audit, review, permission-report, terminal hard-stop, inventory, and schema tests to patch lease comment fetches, seed ready review decisions, and use consistent HEAD_SHA constants so the full suite passes again.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
import mcp_server
|
||||
|
||||
HEAD_SHA = "a" * 40
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _lock(mutations=None, correction=False):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
@@ -127,10 +129,20 @@ def _feedback(blocking, stale=False, success=True):
|
||||
"success": success,
|
||||
"has_blocking_change_requests": blocking,
|
||||
"review_feedback_stale": stale,
|
||||
"current_head_sha": "abc123",
|
||||
"current_head_sha": HEAD_SHA,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _mark(action, pr_number=6, **kwargs):
|
||||
kwargs.setdefault("expected_head_sha", HEAD_SHA)
|
||||
no_lease_block = {"block": False, "reasons": [], "mutation_allowed": True}
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]), \
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block", return_value=no_lease_block):
|
||||
return mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=pr_number, action=action, remote="prgs", **kwargs
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDuplicateRequestChangesSuppression(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(None)
|
||||
@@ -139,8 +151,7 @@ class TestDuplicateRequestChangesSuppression(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
_seed()
|
||||
with patch.object(mcp_server, "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
return_value=_feedback(blocking=True, stale=False)):
|
||||
result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=6, action="request_changes", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = _mark("request_changes")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["marked_ready"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("duplicate" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
|
||||
@@ -150,16 +161,14 @@ class TestDuplicateRequestChangesSuppression(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
_seed()
|
||||
with patch.object(mcp_server, "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
return_value=_feedback(blocking=True, stale=True)):
|
||||
result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=6, action="request_changes", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = _mark("request_changes")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["marked_ready"], result.get("reasons"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_request_changes_allowed_when_no_blocker(self):
|
||||
_seed()
|
||||
with patch.object(mcp_server, "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
return_value=_feedback(blocking=False)):
|
||||
result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=6, action="request_changes", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = _mark("request_changes")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["marked_ready"], result.get("reasons"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_request_changes_fails_closed_when_feedback_unavailable(self):
|
||||
@@ -167,8 +176,7 @@ class TestDuplicateRequestChangesSuppression(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
with patch.object(mcp_server, "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
return_value=_feedback(blocking=False,
|
||||
success=False)):
|
||||
result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=6, action="request_changes", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = _mark("request_changes")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["marked_ready"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("could not verify" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
|
||||
@@ -178,8 +186,7 @@ class TestDuplicateRequestChangesSuppression(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
_seed()
|
||||
with patch.object(mcp_server, "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
side_effect=AssertionError("must not be called")):
|
||||
result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=6, action="approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = _mark("approve")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["marked_ready"], result.get("reasons"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user