fix(capability-map): restore reviewer role on 10 review tasks (break-glass, incident #722)

EXCEPTIONAL OPERATOR-AUTHORIZED BREAK-GLASS RECOVERY - incident #722.

Commit 970e68b ("fix: adopt_merger_pr_lease requires merger role") was an
unreviewed direct push that flipped 11 task_capability_map.py entries to
role="merger" instead of the intended 1. Merger profiles forbid the review
permissions, so no configured profile could resolve review_pr / approve_pr /
request_changes_pr (matching_configured_profile was empty repository-wide)
and no fix PR could be formally reviewed. The operator resolved the catch-22
with a one-time break-glass authorization recorded on issue #722
(comment 11918); this commit is the authorized minimum and nothing more.

Changes:
- task_capability_map.py restored to blob 02826af (the preserved intended
  correction, local commit c071f8a1): the 10 regressive entries return to
  role="reviewer"; adopt_merger_pr_lease keeps role="merger"; merge_pr is
  untouched.
- tests/test_task_capability_role_invariants.py added (#723 AC1/AC2):
  profile-coverage invariant for formal review tasks, map/router agreement,
  merger-only adopt_merger_pr_lease and merge_pr, merger profiles cannot
  hold review permissions.

Validation: focused role-mapping tests 72 passed (+22 subtests); full suite
2900 passed, 6 skipped, 1 known warning, 195 subtests.

Recovery step 1 for incident #722; code-defect follow-ups tracked in #723.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EnHNSVQvJ8nCk7KZ9kL4Ym

task_capability_map.py

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
     },
     "review_pr": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
-        "role": "merger",
+        "role": "reviewer",
     },
     "merge_pr": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.merge",
@@ -90,42 +90,42 @@ TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
     # Apply path posts lease release + audit comments (gitea.pr.comment).
     "cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
-        "role": "merger",
+        "role": "reviewer",
     },
     "gitea_cleanup_obsolete_reviewer_comment_lease": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.comment",
-        "role": "merger",
+        "role": "reviewer",
     },
     "blind_pr_queue_review": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
-        "role": "merger",
+        "role": "reviewer",
     },
     "pr_queue_cleanup": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
-        "role": "merger",
+        "role": "reviewer",
     },
     "pr-queue-cleanup": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
-        "role": "merger",
+        "role": "reviewer",
     },
     "request_changes_pr": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.request_changes",
-        "role": "merger",
+        "role": "reviewer",
     },
     "approve_pr": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.approve",
-        "role": "merger",
+        "role": "reviewer",
     },
     # #594: clear durable #332 decision lock only when last terminal PR is
     # already merged/closed (moot). Apply path requires reviewer review
     # permission; assessment itself uses gitea.read inside the tool.
     "cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
-        "role": "merger",
+        "role": "reviewer",
     },
     "gitea_cleanup_stale_review_decision_lock": {
         "permission": "gitea.pr.review",
-        "role": "merger",
+        "role": "reviewer",
     },
     # #709: truthful absence-of-proof recovery (server-side auth + record + consume).
     # Dedicated mutation capability — gitea.read is insufficient (review 434 F1).

tests/test_task_capability_role_invariants.py

@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+"""Invariant tests pinning task_capability_map role assignments (#722/#723).
+
+Added with the operator-authorized break-glass repair for incident #722:
+commit 970e68b remapped ten reviewer tasks to ``role="merger"`` while every
+configured merger profile forbids the review permissions, so no configured
+profile could resolve any formal review task (``matching_configured_profile``
+was empty repository-wide). These tests fail loudly if that class of
+regression recurs:
+
+- every role-exclusive formal-review task must be satisfiable by at least one
+  canonical role profile (permission AND role together);
+- the capability map must agree with ``role_session_router`` task sets;
+- ``adopt_merger_pr_lease`` stays merger-only (the legitimate hunk of
+  970e68b, preserved by the repair);
+- merger profiles must not be able to resolve review_pr/approve_pr.
+"""
+
+import unittest
+
+import gitea_config
+from role_session_router import MERGER_TASKS, REVIEWER_TASKS
+from task_capability_map import required_permission, required_role
+
+# Canonical role-profile permission shape. Mirrors the configured
+# author/reviewer/merger/reconciler profiles (profiles.json v2 role split):
+# reviewers review/approve/request changes but never merge; mergers merge but
+# never review/approve/request changes.
+CANONICAL_ROLE_PROFILES = {
+    "author": {
+        "allowed": [
+            "gitea.read",
+            "gitea.branch.create",
+            "gitea.branch.push",
+            "gitea.repo.commit",
+            "gitea.pr.create",
+            "gitea.pr.comment",
+            "gitea.issue.create",
+            "gitea.issue.comment",
+            "gitea.issue.close",
+        ],
+        "forbidden": [
+            "gitea.pr.approve",
+            "gitea.pr.request_changes",
+            "gitea.pr.merge",
+        ],
+    },
+    "reviewer": {
+        "allowed": [
+            "gitea.read",
+            "gitea.pr.review",
+            "gitea.pr.approve",
+            "gitea.pr.request_changes",
+            "gitea.pr.comment",
+            "gitea.issue.comment",
+        ],
+        "forbidden": [
+            "gitea.branch.create",
+            "gitea.branch.push",
+            "gitea.repo.commit",
+            "gitea.pr.create",
+            "gitea.pr.merge",
+        ],
+    },
+    "merger": {
+        "allowed": [
+            "gitea.read",
+            "gitea.pr.merge",
+            "gitea.pr.comment",
+            "gitea.issue.comment",
+        ],
+        "forbidden": [
+            "gitea.branch.create",
+            "gitea.branch.push",
+            "gitea.repo.commit",
+            "gitea.pr.create",
+            "gitea.pr.approve",
+            "gitea.pr.review",
+            "gitea.pr.request_changes",
+        ],
+    },
+    "reconciler": {
+        "allowed": [
+            "gitea.read",
+            "gitea.pr.close",
+            "gitea.pr.comment",
+            "gitea.issue.comment",
+            "gitea.branch.delete",
+            "gitea.decision_lock.irrecoverable_recovery",
+        ],
+        "forbidden": [
+            "gitea.pr.approve",
+            "gitea.pr.merge",
+            "gitea.pr.review",
+            "gitea.pr.request_changes",
+            "gitea.pr.create",
+            "gitea.branch.create",
+            "gitea.branch.push",
+            "gitea.repo.commit",
+        ],
+    },
+}
+
+# Role-exclusive formal-review tasks (mirrors the resolver's role-exclusive
+# handling for review work): permission alone is not enough — the profile's
+# role kind must also match, so both dimensions are pinned here.
+FORMAL_REVIEW_TASKS = (
+    "review_pr",
+    "approve_pr",
+    "request_changes_pr",
+    "blind_pr_queue_review",
+    "pr_queue_cleanup",
+    "pr-queue-cleanup",
+)
+
+
+def _profile_satisfies(role_name, task):
+    """True when the canonical *role_name* profile can perform *task*."""
+    profile = CANONICAL_ROLE_PROFILES[role_name]
+    ok, _reason = gitea_config.check_operation(
+        required_permission(task), profile["allowed"], profile["forbidden"]
+    )
+    return ok and role_name == required_role(task)
+
+
+class TestFormalReviewProfileCoverage(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#722: some configured profile must be able to formally review."""
+
+    def test_every_formal_review_task_has_a_satisfying_role_profile(self):
+        for task in FORMAL_REVIEW_TASKS:
+            with self.subTest(task=task):
+                satisfying = [
+                    role
+                    for role in CANONICAL_ROLE_PROFILES
+                    if _profile_satisfies(role, task)
+                ]
+                self.assertTrue(
+                    satisfying,
+                    f"no canonical role profile satisfies both permission "
+                    f"{required_permission(task)!r} and role "
+                    f"{required_role(task)!r} for task {task!r} — formal "
+                    f"review would be impossible for every configured "
+                    f"profile (incident #722)",
+                )
+
+    def test_formal_review_tasks_are_reviewer_role(self):
+        for task in FORMAL_REVIEW_TASKS:
+            with self.subTest(task=task):
+                self.assertEqual(required_role(task), "reviewer")
+
+
+class TestMapRouterAgreement(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#723 AC2: the map and the role session router must not drift."""
+
+    def test_reviewer_tasks_map_to_reviewer_role(self):
+        for task in sorted(REVIEWER_TASKS):
+            with self.subTest(task=task):
+                self.assertEqual(
+                    required_role(task),
+                    "reviewer",
+                    f"router classifies {task!r} as a reviewer task but the "
+                    f"capability map assigns role {required_role(task)!r}",
+                )
+
+    def test_merger_tasks_map_to_merger_role(self):
+        for task in sorted(MERGER_TASKS):
+            with self.subTest(task=task):
+                self.assertEqual(
+                    required_role(task),
+                    "merger",
+                    f"router classifies {task!r} as a merger task but the "
+                    f"capability map assigns role {required_role(task)!r}",
+                )
+
+
+class TestMergerBoundary(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Preserve the legitimate hunk of 970e68b and the merger fence."""
+
+    def test_adopt_merger_pr_lease_requires_merger_role(self):
+        self.assertEqual(required_role("adopt_merger_pr_lease"), "merger")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            required_permission("adopt_merger_pr_lease"), "gitea.pr.comment"
+        )
+
+    def test_merge_pr_requires_merger_role(self):
+        self.assertEqual(required_role("merge_pr"), "merger")
+        self.assertEqual(required_permission("merge_pr"), "gitea.pr.merge")
+
+    def test_merger_profile_cannot_resolve_formal_review_tasks(self):
+        merger = CANONICAL_ROLE_PROFILES["merger"]
+        for task in ("review_pr", "approve_pr", "request_changes_pr"):
+            with self.subTest(task=task):
+                ok, reason = gitea_config.check_operation(
+                    required_permission(task),
+                    merger["allowed"],
+                    merger["forbidden"],
+                )
+                self.assertFalse(
+                    ok,
+                    f"merger profile must not hold {task!r} permission "
+                    f"(got reason {reason!r})",
+                )
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()